of the Romans occasioned by the Apostles former answer For though the Apostle had granted in the beginning of the third chapter that the circumcised Jews were in some respect privileged above other Nations and that chiefly in those eminent tenders and offers that the Gospel held out amongst them which though it proved not effectual to all yet he minds to some it was effectual But yet after in verse 9. The Apostle begins to manifest his understanding that to be a Jew after the flesh and to be in the covenant of Circumcision did not free men from the guilt of damnation no more than other men that were Heathens that were not Jews after the flesh neither circumcised To this purpose he states a question What then Are we better than they No in no wise For we have before proved that both Jew and Gentile are all under sin as it is written there is none righteous no not one where the Apostle goes on to prove That the Jews after the flesh in the covenant of Circumcision were equally in a damnable and sinful condition with the poor Heathenish Infidels all equally guilty before God verse 19. and his inference is in verse 20. that therefore by the works of the Law no flesh should be justified in his sight cleerly holding forth That to be a Jew and circumcised and to be under the Law is the self-same thing and when the Apostle had concluded that being a Jew in the Covenant of Circumcision did in no way difference him from the Heathen as to life He now shews what way both Jews and Gentiles come to the Justification of life and that is freely by Gods grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood and therefore he excludes the Law of Works wholly in the matter of Justification and brings in the Law of faith shewing clearly that he hath but one way to justify both Jew and Gentile which is by Faith in Jesus Christ the true promised seed in the new covenant Upon these words the Romans seemed thus to argue chap. 4. ver 1. Is it so that a man may be a Jew and have interest in the covenant of Circumcision entailed upon the fleshly line and seed of Abraham and yet be not better than Pagans or Heathens as to the matter of life What shall we then say that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found As if they should say if a man may be a Jew of the seed of Abraham and so of the covenant of Circumcision and as to the matter of Justification and eternal life be no nearer than a profane Gentile that is not Abrahams seed nor hath any Interest in the Covenant what privilege doth Abraham find in the covenant appertaining to or intailed on the flesh Unto which the Apostle answers in the second and third verses and so along in the chap. 4. of the Romans clearly distinguishing two covenants the one of Circumcision a covenant of works the other a promise of Jesus Christ made to the faith of such as believe Therefore saith the Apostle in the 2. ver and so forward If Abraham were justified by works he hath wherof to glory but not before God plainly interpreting that the covenant that our Father Abraham had interest in as appertaining to the flesh of him and his seed after him in their generations was a covenant of works in which Abraham had nothing to glory in before God the reason is given because he was justified before God in another Covenant or promise Gen. 15.5 6 For what saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was accompted to him for righteousness And thus the Apostle goes along shewing that Justification was not to be had in the Covenant of works intailed on the flesh of Abraham But by faith in the Covenant of grace the promised seed which he proves by Davids Testimony in Psalm 32.1 2. set down in the 6 7 8 verses of this chapter Now â—hus much being said he states the question Whether this grace of Justification came upon the Circumcision only or the uncircumcision also for we say that faith was reckoned unto Abraham for righteousness Now here is the question seeing that Abraham had two covenants made with him one the Gospel of Faith and the other a Covenant in the Flesh In which of these had he his justification to eternal life The answer is plain for saith the Apostle not in circumcision he was not justified in or by the Covenant of Circumcision but in the promise of the promised seed which God is said to give a covenant for his people by faith in that seed even in uncircumcision was Abraham justified and that as I said before 24. years before the covenant of Circumcision was made with him he was justified believing in the promise of the Messiah that was to come out of his loins according to the flesh In whom all Nations of the Earth should be blessed Now God promising that the Messiah according to the flesh should come out of Abraham viz. out of his Loins or his flesh and this was then a great article of his faith that he was to believe to righteousness not only that Justification was to be had and blessedness to be had But it must be had in that seed that was to come out of Abraham according to the flesh And as a confirmation and seal of this publique righteousness confirmed in Abraham as a Father of all Nations God elects that flesh and blood to himself I mean the family of Abraham in an external Covenant to point out to all the world that as verily as God did take this nation according to the flesh to himself by this external covenant so would God be incarnate in this flesh And as the flesh of the fore-skin of the member of Generation must be cut or bruised and the blood shed by which the Jew according to the flesh was bound to keep the Law this I understand did figure out how Christ the true seed of Abraham descending out of his loins by Generation should considered as male and not female by breaking his flesh and shedding his blood fulfil and satisfy the Law So that this Covenant of Circumcision was of sealing use to Abraham to confirm this other covenant and a School-Master to lead to Christ as all other Branches of that old covenant were Therefore saith Paul in Rom. 4.11 Moreover he received the sign of Circumcision a seal of the Righteousness of faith which he had being uncircumcised that he might be the father of all those that believe Where observe the Apostle calls not circumcision a seal but a sign He received the sign of Circumcision a seal of the righteousness of faith which he had being uncircumcised There are these reasons in the Text that restrain the sealing use of Circumcision only to Abraham The sealing use of Circumcision proved to be peculiar unto
grace in Christ Jesus the Mediator without all condition of works to be fulfilled in the creature I shall make it clear That God no otherwise gives himself in the covenant of Circumcision but conditionally 1. Argument to prove Circumcision a covenant of Works which is the first argument that I shall use to prove the covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of works not a covenant of eternal life because it is conditional what God promiseth to be or to give to Abraham and his fleshly seed in their generations it was upon a condition that Abraham and his seed should keep his covenant on their parties as clearly appears Gen. 17.7 8 to verse 14. where you find the Lord engageth himself to Abrahamn and his fleshly seed to be their God and to give them the whole Land of Canaan In that sense he would be their God to possess them of that good land and all the blessings of the same upon condition that they should keep his covenant on their part both he and his generation after him And the subject matter of the covenant that they should keep is That he should be circumcised and circumcise all born in his house and bought with money But though Circumcision only be here mentioned yet all the works of the Law at that time made known to Abraham are there included as the Apostle expounds it who best understood that Scripture Rom. 2.25 For Circumcision verily profiteth if thou keep the Law but if thou be a breaker of the Law thy circumcision shall be made uncircumcision and so you have it Gal. 5.1 2 3. Stand fast saith the Apostle in the Liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free and be not intangled again with the yoke of bondage which in Acts 15. it is said Neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear but verse 2. Behold I Paul say unto you That if you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing for I testify again to every man that is circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law And so much is clearly held forth in Gal. 6.12 13. Where saith the Apostle As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh they constrain you to be circumcised only least they should suffer persecution for the Cross of Christ for neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the Law but desire you to be circumcised that they may glory in your flesh Where you may observe That for men to be circumcised themselves and not to keep the Law or otherwise to press it upon others the Apostle holds it to be absurd if withall they did not keep the Law that were thus circumcised And in the Text before quoted it is clear That Circumcision in the nature of it binds them over to keep the Law And to this purpose you find in Acts 15. There were certain Teachers that taught the Brethren That except they were circumcised they could not be saved Upon which the Apostles come together and in the 10. verse Peter saith Why tempt you God to lay a yoke upon the Disciples necks which neither our Fathers nor we are able to bear And what was this yoke but that they were to be circumcised and to keep the Law So that Circumcision was that which did comprehend under it the covenant of works or the yoke of bondage that Paul in Gal. 5.1 2 3. bids Christians stand fast in their liberty or freedom from that covenant or yoke of bondage which Jesus Christ had freed them from So that you may see that all the observation of the Law which we are set at liberty from by Christ Jesus his death was included in the Law of Circumcision So that in effect here you have the covenant Abraham as if God should say I will be a God to thee and to thy seed after thee in their generations to protect defend and deliver thee to bless thee and thy seed with the blessing of Canaan to bless thee and the fruit of thy womb in the Basket and in their store in all their outward blessings upon condition that thou and they will be circumcised and keep the Law Thus God makes a covenant upon condition So that if they fail on their part then he is left at liberty to fail on his part as that notable expression in Jer. 11.2 3 4 5. Hear the word of this Covenant and speak unto the men of Judah to the Inhabitants of Jerusalem and say thou unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel Cursed be the man that obeyeth not the words of this Covenant which I commanded unto your Fathers when I brought them from the Land of Egypt from the Iron Fornace saying Obey my voice and do according to all these things which I command you so shall ye be my people and I will be your God that I might confirm the Oath that I have sworn unto your Fathers to give them a Land which floweth with Milk and Honey as appeareth this day Whence you may clearly observe That God gives himself to be their God and the blessing of Canaan upon condition that they would keep the Law So shall ye be my people and I will be your God Now you must mind that Abraham had a new covenant of life made with him when he was 75. years old Gen. 12.4 which was 24. years before this time that he had the covenant of Circumcision and his happiness with all his spiritual seed was and is in that absolute covenant confirmed of God in Christ which stands in force still to believers in all Nations But this covenant of Circumcision was conditional and not absolute therefore no covenant of life but a covenant of works 2. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of works The second ground why the covenant of Circumcision must needs be a covenant of Works a Typical covenant is because it was a National covenant a covenant in the flesh as in Gen. 17.13 He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must needs be circumcised so my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting Covenant To be sure such is not the covenant of grace to eternal life for that was confirmed of God in Christ as you hear to all Nations In thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed Gen. 12.3 and in thy seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 as I have formerly spoken to But the Lord saith of this Covenant of Circumcision that it shall be in their flesh for an everlasting covenant It is manifest by the Apostle Paul that this is therefore a covenant of Works Rom. 4.1 2 saith he What shall we say then that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found for if Abraham was justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God These words are inserted by the Apostle Paul for the prevention of an objection that might justly be in the mind
Abraham First Because this righteousness of faith the Text saith he had before he was circumcised Therefore good reason it might be sealed or confirmed having it before he received the sign of Circumcision a seal of the righteousness of faith which he had being uncircumcised But his posterity after him at eight daies old cannot be said that they had this righteousness of faith to seal having it not preceding their Circumcision The second reason the text affords us is that he might be the Father of all that believe this is the main reason the Apostle insists upon He received the sign of Circumcision a seal of the righteousness of faith that he might be the Father of all that believe This reason cannot be applyable to any of Abrahams posterity besides himself for they were not the Fathers of all that believe That was proper to Abraham to be a high Father or a Father of all nations therefore as I said before God promising in Abraham that publique righteousness as a father of all Nations in the the covenant of grace adds to that covenant an external covenant to be intailed in his line and in his flesh as a confirmation of the same A third reason is this Here is the Spirit of God affirming the sealing use of Circumcision to Abraham only and not to any one of his fleshly seed and as before upon a reason special to Abraham Now where the Scripture hath not a Mouth to speak we must not have an Ear to hear But the Scripture here only affirms Circumcision to be a Seal of the righteousness of faith to Abraham and affords no such thing as to his seed A fourth reason lies in verse 13. That the promise of Abraham to be the heir of the world was not to him nor his seed through the Law that is through the covenant of Circumcision but through the righteousness of faith For if they which are of the Law be heirs then faith is made void and the promise of none effect because the Law worketh wrath therefore it is of faith that it might be by Grace to the end the promises might be sure to all the seed Not to that only which is of the Law but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham who is the father of us all as it is written I have made thee a father of many Nations before him who believed even God who quickneth the dead So that there is not in all the Scripture a place more clearly proves the covenant of Circumcision intailed on the fleshly line of Abraham to be a covenant of works than this 4. of the Romans clearing and setting the covenant of Circumcision and Faith in opposition holding forth that Abraham and all his spiritual seed had their Justification in another covenant and not in the covenant of Circumcision clearly holding forth the covenant of Circumcision to be works and not Grace which doth sufficiently prove that the covenant of Circumcision had no promise of Justification or eternal life in it But further An Appendix to the second Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of works That the covenant intailed on the flesh must needs be understood to be a Covenant of works viz. that of Circumcision appears in Philip. 3.2 3 4. and so forward where saith the Apostle Beware of Doggs beware of evil Workers beware of the Concision for we are the Circumcision that worship God in the Spirit and rejoice in Jesus Christ and put no confidence in the flesh By flesh he means the covenant entailed upon the flesh the covenant of Circumcision it is plain by his answer for he saith If any man thinketh he hath whereof to trust in the flesh I more circumcised the eighth day of the stock of Israel of the Tribe of Benjamen an Hebrew of the Hebrews as touching the Law a Pharisee concerning zeal persecuting the Church touching the righteousness of the Law blameless And this he sets by no more than dung or dross in comparison of the other Covenant or Promise of Christ righteousness and salvation by him which he received by faith and he suffered the loss of all things for the sake of him and did accompt all the whole privilege of Circumcision and the covenant of works to be but as dung that he might win Christ which if the promise of Christ and salvation and justification by him had been given in the Covenant of the flesh and line of Abraham then it had been very improper for Paul to accompt this as dung and to cast contempt upon it as that which was wholly void of Christ It would be very sinful for any man in such a case to cast such contempt upon the covenant of grace it self and the privileges thereof peculiarly relating to the same But you see Paul doth here clearly distinguish two covenants The one of saith the other of Circumcision This will further appear in Gal. 3.3 Are ye so foolish that having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect in the flesh Where he again distinguisheth two covenants the one Spiritual the other a fleshly covenant The Gallatians having at the first hearing of him begun to imbrace the Gospel or the Spirit or Spiritual word of the New Covenant and now they would join the covenant of works in the flesh with the Gospel which it is evident he means the covenant of circumcision which here they would seek to be perfected by Therefore in Gal. 4. lâ—tter end he clearly distinguisheth between two Covenants under the figure of Sarah and Hagar and two seeds holding forth the covenant of Circumcision to be the covenant of works and to be that bond-woman as it were in chap. 5.1 2 3. Chap. 6.12 13. So that if you will seriously mind these Scriptures they do most evidently prove that the covenant of Circumcision made in the flesh or fleshly line of Abraham is a covenant of works and that which the Gospel or Covenant of grace is set in opposition to and as this covenant of Circumcision is set in opposition to the covenant of eternal life as having all the works of the Law included in it So consider the new covenant speaks thus I will put my Law in your hearts and in your minds will I write them But Circumcision is a covenant not in the heart but in the flesh only as you have heard This is the second ground why the covenant of Circumcision cannot be a covenant of eternal life but a covenant of works only The third reason to prove Circumcision to be a Covenant of works an not of eternal life 3. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of Works is Because that there is no promise of eternal life in it but of temporal blessings in the Land of Canaan and that God promising himself to be a God is only in that respect as to outward Protection and Provision in the Land of Canaan and other like privileges And that is noted by the Apostle in Heb.
Papists hold that the Ordinance of baptism conveith grace by the very work done which is so generally confuted by all Protestant Authors that it is not worth the speaking of p. 25. The Covenant of life not made to the seed of believers as coming out of their loins and therefore the baptism of infants drawn thence by a false consequence ib. Two Covenants the one of Works the other of Grace or the one Old the other the New p. 29. Why though the Covenant of Grace be absolute yet the promises are held forth under a condition p. 35. Faith the gift of God p. 36. Repentance the gift of God ib. The Covenant of grace obscurely delivered to our first Parents p. 37. The New Covenant not entailed upon any fleshly line p. 38. What is meant by the blessedness promised to Abraham and to his seed page 39. Circumcision proved to be no covenant of eternal life but a typical and carnal Covenant p. 42. How the word Everlasting is taken in the Law ib. First argument to prove Circumcision a covenant of works pag. 44. Second argument to prove Circumcision a covenant of works p. 48. The sealing use of Circumcision proved to be peculiar unto Abraham p. 53. An Appendix to the second argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 55. Third argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 57. Fourth argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 60. Fifth argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 61. Sixth argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 65. Seventh argument to prove circumcision a covenant of works p. 70. To say that the covenant of grace is entailed on the flesh overthroweth the main fundamental points of our religion p. 71. The third General Head p. 84. Somewhat offered to prove that God presently upon the Fall made an outward carnal covenant entailed upon the flesh ib. Why the covenant of circumcision made to Abraham and his seed and not to others p. 88. To defend a covenant of life entailed on the flesh is virtually to deny that Christ is come in the flesh p. 93. None have right to the Covenant of grace but such aâ— are united to Christ by faith p. 94. Answers to such Scriptures as are alleged to prove the Baptism of Infants p. 101. An answer to that text Acts 2.39 p. 101. An answer to that text 1 Cor. 7.14 p. 105. An answer to that text Rom. 11.16 17. p. 110. An answer to that text 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3. p. 119. Faith made not Israelites capable of performing the Ceremonies of the Law p. 130. An answer to that Text Mat. 19.13 p. 132. An Exposition of that Text Gal. 4.21 p. 140. Why the Ordinance of Baptism is administred but once the Ordinance of the Lords Supper often p. 168. What things are essential to a particular visible Church p. 169. Vnbaptized persons not to be admitted into Church fellowship p. 172. The Commands of Christ must not be disputed p. 177. THE Doctrine of Baptism AND THE Distinction of the COVENANTS OR A Plain Christian Treatise explaining the Doctrine of Baptism and the two Covenants made with Abraham and his twofold Seed ACTS 2.37 38. Now when they heard this they were pricked in their hearts and said unto Peter and the rest of the Apostles Men and Brethren what shall we do Then Peter said unto them Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the Remission of Sins and you shall receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost THese words of my Text have a special dependence upon the words foregoing in the Chapter The occasion of the words in the Text laid open for in the beginning of the Chapter you shall find that the Apostles and the Church were all with one accord in one place when the Day of Pentecost was fully come And according to the promise that Jesus Christ commanded them to wait for and that John had foretold of That one should come after him that should baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire the which was at this time fulfilled for as the Author of the Acts here relates Suddenly there came a sound from Heaven as of a Rushing mighty wind and it filled all the House where they were sitting and there appeared unto them Cloven Tongues like as of fire and it sate upon each of them And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak with other Tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance Now this I understand to be the Baptism which John speaks of viz. that of the Holy Ghost and of fire which Christ should dispense as you may see was extraordinary and upon special occasion communicated to the Apostles they being now to give testimony of Christs Death Resurrection and Ascension The Lord in order to this work communicates to them the extraordinary Gifts of the holy Ghost and that in an extraordinary manner For here was outward signs which were cloven Tongues of fire resting on them and here was also the Holy Ghost with the extraordinary Effects of it as the inward things signified by the outward sign all which was I understand extraordinary for the fitting of these Apostles to that extraordinary work which God had to do by them First They were to be eye-witnesses of Christs Majestie in the flesh Secondly The Reasons why the Holy Ghost descended in an extraordinary manner upon the Apostles They were to be Master-Builders to lay a Foundation which all after Ministers to the end of the World were to build on they being Penmen of Scripture Thirdly They were now to overthrow all the Jewish Worship and all the Mosaical Administrations put to an end by Christs Death and to furnish them to this extraordinary work which Christ as an effect of his Session at the right hand of God pours down these gifts upon them as beforementioned this being noised abroad how they spake with other Tongues the multitude came together wondring at them and some thought they had been drunk but Peter standing up with the eleven began to lift up his voice to teach them And first The Contents of Peters Sermon to the Jews upon the descent of the Holy Ghost He proves by Scripture that these gifts of the Holy Ghost were formerly promised by the Lord and as an effect of his Ascension now given to them and he endeavours in this Sermon preached to prove First That Jesus was the Christ a man approved of God by Miracles and Signs that God did work by him amongst them Secondly He endeavours to prove by Scripture that he did suffer and dy according to the Counsel and Will of God Thirdly That he did rise again from the Dead which he from Scripture doth justifie And that in the fourth place God had exalted him by his right hand to be both Lord and Christ and he proves that by the visible gifts of the Holy Ghost which they did see and
set out for the maintenance of Childrens Baptism grounded upon this Consequence opposing themselves against duty as you have heard which is That every penitent or believing person ought to be baptized Now the whole tendency of those Books being to oppose the practicâ— of the same and to hinder it I may say of them as Christ said before c For upon this ground we may conclude all those Discourses not to be of God I shall therefore leave what is said to you seriously to weigh whether or no this is not an erroneous consequence But in the next place let us come nearer to examine this consequence both in its self and the grounds from whence it is drawn The grounds of this Consequence is That the Covenant of Grace belongs to believers Children the consequence is therefore Baptism being an Ordinance of that Covenant must needs belong to believers children in which two lyes our whole business for the grounds of this consequence is brought the Covenant of Circumcision that belonging to Abraham and his seed after him in their generation Gen. 17.7 and 10. to 14. From hence it is gathered That the Covenant of Grace viz. of eternal life belongs to believers and their seed born of their body For the Covenant God made to Abraham and his off-spring viz. the Covenant of Circumcision belonging to Abraham and his seed in their Generation therefore Circumcision the sign of the Covenant belonged to them so the New Covenant now belongs to believing Gentiles and their seed Baptism being an Ordinance of that Covenant belongs also to believing Gentiles and their seed this being the onely and alone foundation ground of all those except Papists for their Rantizing or Sprinkling of Children We shall endeavour to prove this ground from whence this consequence flows to be so far from being the truth that it is an error and yea such an error that if it were maintained with all those errors that naturally must needs be defended as consequences of this opinion it would shake the foundations of the Gospel But that I may with as much clear satisfaction inform others as God had clearly convinced my own soul of the truth of this I shall propound this method to be handled First then I shall make it appear to you That there is two Covenants held forth in Scripture the one a Covenant of Grace and the other a Covenant of Works or an absolute Covenant and a Conditional Covenant Secondly I shall prove that the Covenant of Circumcision was no Covenant of eternal life but a Conditional Covenant a Covenant of Works Thirdly I shall prove that none but believers ever had or shall have right to the Covenant of Grace Fourthly I shall endeavour to answer such Scriptures especially those in the New Testament that are usually alleged for defence of a Covenant of life in the flesh To the first That there is two Covenants mentioned in Scripture is very plain The one a Covenant of eternal life the other a Covenant of works Two Covenants the one of Works the other of Grace or the one the Old the other the New in which eternal life was not conveyed or given as appears in Jeremiah 31.32 33 34. But behold the day commeth saith the Lord that I will make a new Covenant with the House of Israel and with the house of Judah not according to the Covenant that I made with their Fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the Land of Egypt which my Covenant they brake although I was to them an husband saith the Lord. But this shall be the Covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those daies saith the Lord I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people and they shall teach no more every man his neighbour and every man his brother saying know the Lord for they shall all know me from the least of them unto the greatest of them saith the Lord for I will forgive their Iniquities and remember their sins no more You have here set forth two Covenants the one Old the other New and as here we find a New and Old Covenant so there is likewise mention of two Covenants in the eighth to the Hebrews where you have upon the matter the very same words only it is clear that Jesus Christ is the Minister of the New Covenant in the 6. and 7. verses of that chap. But now hath he obtained a more excellent Ministery by how much also he is the Mediator of a better Covenant which was established upon better promises for if that first Covenant had been faultless there would no place have been sought for the second In which place we may understand two Covenants a new Covenant and an old Covenant and Jesus Christ holding himself to be the peculiar Minister of the New Covenant unto the Church then gathered all those that are in Christ being Gods Israel Abrahams seed If you be in Christ then are ye Abrahams seed and heirs according to promise Gal. 3. the latter end So that those that are Christs have this Covenant now made to them and it appears at the 3. verse that the other Covenant was a meer Covenant of works in that he saith he hath made the first old And now that which waxeth old is ready to vanish away where by old Covenant he means that typical Covenant of works which run upon the fleshly line of Abraham till Christ came out of the flesh of Abraham and so put an end to that Covenant in the flesh and this you have further proved in Heb. 9.15 16. There is again mention made of two Covenants or Testaments the first and second the first was confirmed by the blood of Goats and Calves the second by the blood of Christ Now if any please but to search these Scriptures it will appear that there is two real distinct Covenants or Testaments the one of Grace and the other of works the one conditional the other absolute Now an absolute Covenant is a Covenant without all Condition required in the Creature but what God himself performs as Jerem. 32.40 I will make an everlasting Covenant with them that I will not turn away from them to do them good but I will put my fear in their hearts that they shall not depart from me Where you see God undertakes both first that he will not leave or forsake his people but do them good and secondly undertakes that he will plant his fear in their hearts that they shall not depart from him And as in that eighth of Heb. he engaged that he will write his Law in their hearts and that he will be their God and they shall be his people and that he will teach them to know him and will pardon their iniquities and their sins he will remember no more Now here is nothing but what God hath
that not of your selves It is the gift of God Where he holds forth that though Faith be an Instrumental means of our salvation yet it is Gods free gift wrought in us Faith the gift of God therfore surely a covenant gift Paul upon this ground in Phil. 1.28 saith It is not only given us to believe but to suffer for his names sake where to believe it is given of God and so in Acts 18.27 speaking of Apollo saith that when he came he helped them much who had believed through grace as in Hebr. 12.2 where Jesus is said to be as well the Author as the finisher of our faith All which passages do shew that Faith is as well given in the new covenant as the Salvation tendred upon that condition Repentance the gift of God And so is also repentance a New covenant gift as well as remission of sins tendred upon that condition as you find in Acts 5.31 Him hath God exalted with his own right hand to be a Prince and Saviour to give Repentance to Israel and Remission of sins and in Acts 11.18 When they heard those things they held their peace and glorifyed God saying then hath God also to the Gentiles granted Repentance unto life Where observe to Gods Israel both of Jews and Gentiles God doth grant and freely give Repentance as well as salvation and remission of sins promised upon the condition of Repentance as likewise appears in the 2 Tim. 2.25 where the Ministers of God are commanded in meekness to instruct those that oppose themselves if God peradventure will at any time give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth which doth plainly prove that though Repentance and Faith be the condition that the Gospel is tendred on yet you see the Lord doth in the New covenant give faith and repentance as well as Remission of sins and eternal life And further I shall make it appear The Covenant of Grace obscurely delivered to our first parents That this covenant of grace to eternal life was first more obscurely and darkly revealed to our first parents God directing his speech to the Devil in Gen. 3.16 for the greater terror of the Devil and the greater comfort of his Elect God saith I will put enmity between thy seed and the seed of the woman it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel This speech contains in substance the covenant of grace Christ the true spiritual seed being here promised who in Scripture is held forth to be the very substance and marrow of the New covenant therefore the Lord saith in Isaiah 4â— 6 speaking of Christ I will give thee a Covenant of the people a light to the Gentiles where the very gift of Christ is called a covenant because where he is promised all heavenly and spiritual blessings in him are there given all the promises being in Christ Yea and in him Amen 2 Corin. 1.20 And all spiritual and heavenly blessings are in him Ephes 1.3 He saith he will put enmity between the seed of the Serpent and the seed of the woman which must needs have thus much in it That God would put or infuse in the seed of the woman his created gifts of holyness and purity and that precious love of God whereupon it must needs be that this new nature would be hated by the Devil as being opposite to him and also must needs hate the Devil with his evil nature as the Psalmist saith Ye that love God hate evil Christ tells us in Mat. 10.34 Think not that I come to send peace on earth I came not to send peace but a sword for I am come to set a man at variance against his Father and the Daughter against her Mother and the Daughter-in-law against the Mother-in-law and a mans foes shall be they of his own house-hold And Luke saith five in one house shall be divided three against two and two against three chap. 12.52 And what should occasion this division but that new nature which the Lord infuseth into his own seed or children which cannot comply with the seed of the Serpent So Peter saith they spake evil of us because we run not with them to the same excess of Riot 1 Pet. 4.4 So that I understand that here in this third of Genesis is the whole New covenant included The New Covenant not intailed upon any fleshly line This new covenant was never intailed upon any fleshly line or generation as the covenant of circumcision was but was still confirmed of God in Christ and to such souls only in Christ as you find in the promise to Abraham Gen. 12.3 In thee shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed Where you may observe That here is no respect of persons in the matter of these blessings to everlasting life But all Nations in Christ as well one Nation as another if in Christ have those blessings promised to them and thus much is imployed in that promise that all nations out of him are accursed But God here directs his speech to Abraham some may say it is true What 's meant by the blessedness promised to Abraham and his seed but with respect to Christ now who as touching the flesh was in his loins and this blessedness or justification of life which was confirmed in Abraham as a Father of all Nations is by the Apostle Paul called the Gospel Gal. 3.8 The Scripture foreseeing that God would justify the Heathen through Faith preached the Gospel to Abraham as it is written In thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed so this blessedness spoken of in Gen. 12.3 is expounded by Paul to be justification by faith in Christ and in Acts 3. this blessedness is there expounded to be a turning of every one of them from their iniquities Acts 3.26 And also this Gospel promise or covenant is spoken to in Gen. 15.5 where he bids Abraham look up to the Heavens and if he could number the Stars of Heaven and the Sands upon the Sea-shore so shall thy seed be and Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness This promise is quoted by the Apostle Paul as the Gospel covenant in Rom. 4.3 in opposition to the covenant of Circumcision intailed upon the flesh or fleshly line of Abraham For Circumcision was a Covenant in the flesh as the Apostle calls it which he also expounds in the 1. and 2. v. to be a Covenant of works but more of that hereafter only that which I would observe at present is that the Apostle confirms that Gospel promise in Genesis 12. and verse 3. and Genesis 15. and ver 5. to be the new covenant wherein was given through faith the Justification of Life excluding in this point the covenant of Circumcision called Works Rom. 4.1 2. and both these covenants are made with Abraham in Gen. 17. there you find the new covenant made with him to verse the 6. and from the 7.
verse to the 14. the covenant of Circumcision in the flesh the new covenant is expressed in the third verse where he saith As for me my covenant shall be with thee and thou shalt be a Father of many nations or of a multitude of nations and thy name shall be no more called Abram but Abraham for a Father of a multitude of nations have I made thee this is by the Apostle Paul in Rom. 4.17 18. held out to be the Covenant of life which he doth clearly hold distinct and different from the covenant of Circumcision in that place denying that Abraham or his spiritual seed had their justification in the covenant of Circumcision but bringing in this that Abraham should be a Father of many nations and so shall thy seed be as that in which Abraham and his spiritual seed whether of Jews or Gentiles were and should be justified And this promise or covenant is made with Abraham in Gen. 18.18 In thee shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed So long as Christ was according to the flesh in Abrahams loyns the promise runs thus In thee meaning that through Christ which then was in him should all nations of the earth be blessed But assoon as Isaac was come out of Abrahams loins as in Gen. 22.18 then saith he In thy seed shall all the nations of the Earth be blessed whereby seed most strictly is to be understood Christ as the Apostle Paul intimates in Gal. 3.16 where he expounds this word seed to be not seeds as of many but seed as of one which is Christ So this blessedness in the seed Christ is here expounded to be Gods confirming his Covenant in Christ and note that this blessedness which David holds out to be the Covenant confirmed of God in Christ it was not entailed upon the flesh of Abraham and his fleshly seed but made in Abraham as a Father of all the spiritual seed in all nations and confirmed in the seed Christ to all nations Here the Jews after the flesh have no more interest than any other nation except it be by faith for faith only unites to this seed and gives an in-being in the same This blessedness is expounded by David in Psalm 32. last ver To ly in remission of sins and purgation of the heart from guile and expounded by the Apostle in Acts 3. last ver To be a turning every one from his iniquities for so there Peter expounds this blessedness confirmed in Abraham and his seed And though Christ did fulfill this covenant to the Elect of the Jews yet the rest were hardned and were never in this sense blest either in the point of Justification or purgation from sin because they were never in Christ the true seed by faith nor never were thereby the spiritual seed of Abraham walking in the steps of his faith as all his spiritual seed did Rom. 4.12 and Gal. 3.29 If you be in Christ then are you Abrahams seed and heirs according to the promise Thus I have given you from clear light of Scripture that there were two covenants a covenant of Grace and a covenant of Works the covenant of Grace belonging to Abraham and his spiritual seed in Christ and all along from Adam to all the spiritual seed of the Woman that were born of promise as the Apostle describes the spiritual seed in Rom. 9.8 for he saith such are accounted the seed that are so born of promise And so at this day all nations both Jews and Gentiles that are born again they are the seed and children that only have an Interest in the promise of salvation And so much for this first head Circumcision proved to be no covenant of eternal Life but a typical and carnal covenant Now I come in the next place to prove that the covenant of Circumcision is no covenant of eternal life but a typical covenant yea a covenant of works which is also called by the Lord a Covenant in the flesh Gen. 17.13 and therefore to be sure no covenant of eternal life But for the better clearing of the truth of this I shall first expound some words in the covenant How the word Eve lasting is taken in the Law and that is the word Everlasting Covenant that word seems to some to hold it forth a covenant of life because it is said to be everlasting wheras the word everlasting used in this Covenant is to be understood only for the Ever of the Law for the time of the Jewish State as alwaies the word is to be understood when applyed to the Jews in their generation As for example In the 16. of Leviticus it is said the Priest should make an attonement for the holy Sanctuary an attonement for the Tabernacle of the Congregation and for the Altar and he shall make an attonement for the Priests and for all the people of the Congregation and this shall be an everlasting Statute to you to make an attonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year which everlasting here must needs be understood but till Christ came and so in Numb 25.13 He shall have it and his seed after him even the Covenant of an Everlasting Priesthood because he was zealous for his God and made an attonement for the Children of Israel speaking here only of a Ceremonial Priesthood typing out Jesus Christ the substance that was to put an end to it And so this covenant of Circumcision is to be understood as everlasting as Canaan and the possession thereof which was until Christs comming who was the substance thereof this being a Maxim That wheresoever the word Everlasting or Ever hath this joined with it to you or to your seed in their generations that then it is to be understood only for the Ever of the Law and the time and period of that Ministration till Christ come and no longer Exod. 40.15 Thou shalt annoint them as thou didst annoint their Fathers that they may minister unto me in the Priests office for their annointing shall surely be an everlasting Priesthood throughout their generations And so you have it in Exod. 30.20 21. Moses saying When they go into the Tabernacle of the Congregation they shall wash with water that they dy not and when they come near the altar to minister to burn offerings made by fire unto the Lord so they shall wash their hands and their feet that they dy not and it shall be a Statute for ever to them even to him and to his seed throughout their generations The next word that I would speak to is I will be to thee a God and to thy seed after thee which to some seems to hold forth a covenant of grace in that he gives himself as a God in this covenant To which I answer That God either gives and makes himself over in a covenant of works which is upon a condition of works done in the creature or else he gives himself in an absolute covenant of
8.6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent Ministery by how much also he is a Mediator of a better covenant which was established upon better promises Herein he clearly doth shew that the covenant waxing old and vanishing away was grounded upon worse promises which must needs be understood temporal promises as in Jerem. 11.2 3 4 5. Hear ye the words of this Covenant and speak unto the men of Judah and Inhabitants of Jerusalem and say unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel Cursed be the man that obeyeth not the words of this Covenant which I commanded your Fathers in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt from the Iron Furnace saying Obey my voice and do them according to all which I command you So shall ye be my people and I will be your God that I may perform the Oath that I have sworn unto your Fathers to give them a Land flowing with milk and honey as it is this day then answered I and said So be it O Lord. Where you have this Covenant of Gods being his peoples God and giving them Canaan annexed to the works of the Law as being all one covenant Observe the words in the Text So shall ye be my people and I will be your God that I may perform the Covenant which I have sworn to your Fathers to give them a Land flowing with Milk and Honey You shall see that the promises of Canaan and the blessings thereof are annexed to the Law of works Deut. 30.15 See I have set before thee life and good and death and evil In that I command thee this day to love the Lord thy God to walk in his waies and to keep his commandments and Statutes and his Judgements that thou mayst live and multiply and the Lord thy God shall bless thee in the Land whither thou goest to possess it And so in the last verse where he presseth the people to obey his voice that they might dwell in the Land that the Lord sware unto their Fathers to Abraham Isaac and Jacob to give them And so in Deut. 7.12 13. Wherefore it shall come to pass that if you hearken to those Judgements to keep and do them that then the Lord shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy that he sware to thy Fathers and he will love thee and bless thee and multiply thee he will also bless thee in the fruit of thy womb and the fruit of thy Land thy Corn and thy Wine and thine Oyl the increase of thy Kine and the flock of thy Sheep in the Land which he sware unto thy Fathers to give thee So that you see the covenant of God giving himself a God to the National people of the Jews in relation to the blessing of Canaan was still upon obedience to the works of the Law that this covenant which God elected to himself the body of Israel in and by which he seperated them to himself from all the Nations of the Earth it is clear was a covenant of works wherein the people were bound to outward observance and worship and service to God Upon this Condition would God be their God and give them Canaan For there is a vast difference in Gods making over himself to be a God to a People in a conditional covenant of Works out of Christ and in an absolute covenant established of God in Christ For in such a covenant he was never the God of the whole family of Abraham or Church of Israel the elect obtained that the rest were hardned as in Rom. 11.17 4. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of Works The fourth ground is this That a man by laying out a little money might have brought a Person into this Covenant and interessed him thereby into all the Privileges of the same which if this were a covenant of life wherein the Spirit and Spiritual gifts of the Lord had been given a man might say as Peter did say to Symon Magus Thy money perish with thee But for that reason most certain it is That this covenant of Circumcision is no spiritual covenant which will appear from the words of the Covenant in Gen. 17.12 13. And he that is eight daies old shall be circumcised among you every man child in your Generations he that is born in the house or bought with money of any stranger which is not of thy seed He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must needs be circumcised and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant Where observe That all bought with money must be circumcised so that if an Israelite should buy a black Moor or the most savage Heathen in the World he was bound to see him circumcised and being circumcised he was now in that covenant The truth is Circumcision was one of those carnal Ordinances that the Author to the Hebrews in Heb. 9.9 doth speak of that was appointed till the time of Reformation Now the person which the Lord would have circumcised must be of the family of Abraham and that is all the qualifications required For God doth not require a person so and so spiritually qualified as he doth now under the Gospel the Lord gives in general a Law and Commandment unto Abraham That all his Family must be circumcised and that he must see it performed It is not in the institution enjoined that the person that doth circumcise must be a believer neither is it enjoined that the person upon whom it is done must have Disciple-ship or the work of grace but this only He must be one of the Family of Abraham either born in his house or bought with his money and so the slave bought with money was as truly interessed into the covenant of God and the right of eating the Passeover as one born in the house of the seed of Abraham A fifth ground is this 5. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of Works That men out of this Covenant might be saved and such as were really interessed in it might be damned As for Example Lot dwelling in the City of Sodom and all the Godly that day in the whole world excepting Abraham and his house or family were no way interessed in the Covenant of Circumcision yet were saved And Israel who for the multitude of them were as the Sand on the Sea-shore and interessed in this Covenant yet but a Remnant of them were saved as Isai 10.23 Lot is commended to be a just and righteous man and yet this covenant was never made to him nor his seed and posterity the Ammonites and Moabites which were as truly the seed and children of a believer as the seed of Abraham were So you find Job in the Land of Vz in the Book of Job and his four friends and besides those of Jobs friends one of his friends doth intimate several other antient and godly persons in those times as Job 8.8 10. Joh 15.10 For
of works a poor creature truly interessed in that covenant might break it forfeit his interest and be cast out and rejected out of that covenant from amongst his people as is clearly confirmed in Isaiah 50.1 Thus saith the Lord where is the Bill of your Mothers Divorcement which I have put away or to which of my Creditors have I sold you behold for your iniquities have you sold your selves and for your transgressions is your Mother put away Now beloved a divorce argues a breach and forfeiting the covenant which the body of all Israel was in and we know all along the National covenant was that of Circumcision and they that know in the least measure the nature of the covenant of Grace cannot but know it to be such a covenant out of which a soul cannot be divorced from the Lord. But some may say There are many that are visibly in a covenant of Grace now under the Gospel and yet may be cast out from Gods people yet it followeth not but that it is a covenant of Grace and so then they might be visibly in a covenant of Grace and yet be rejected Answ Persons may now profess to be in Christ and so in a covenant of Grace by an outward profession but this being barely a profession and not in truth in them that profess the same they profess they were in that which in truth they never were For under the Gospel we have no infallible rule to know who is in the covenant of Grace and who not because we have only the confession of themselves who may deceive themselves and us But we have an infallible Rule to judge That Abraham Isaac and Jacob and the seed forward in their Loins or their generations were in this covenant of Circumcision and therefore it is a great mistake for any to evade what hath been said upon such a groundless objection Now consider That it is that great and faithful God that saith and professeth Abrabam his seed and family after him from Jacob forward were in this covenant with him But now it is only poor unfaithful Man hypocritical dissembling proud man that saith he is in the Covenant of life when it proves not so or when it visibly proves the contrary for Saints have a Rule to disown such But this is a most certain truth that God did never put a soul away and make a divorce between himself and any one Soul in a covenant of life and it is as certain that the whole Church of Israel were in reality and truth in the covenant of Circumcision as appears in Gen. 17.10 11. where Abraham and those born in his house are to be circumcised And so Psalm 105.9 10.11 which covenant he made with Abraham and his oath with Isaac and confirmed the same to Jacob by a Law and to Israel for an everlasting covenant saying Vnto thee have I given the Land of Canaan the Lot of your inheritance Now it would plentifully appear if further proof needed That God his own self testifyeth his making and entering into covenant with Abraham Isaac and Jacob and their seed forward therefore let no man please himself with such a poor groundless objection That the family of Israel were only visibly or in the judgement of Charity in the covenant of Circumcision as Hypocrites are now in the Covenant of Grace For there is nothing more clear than this that Israel were in truth and reality in the covenant of Circumcision expressed by the Mouth of God himself and nothing more certain that Israel were never all of them so much visibly in the covenant of grace For if it were necessary I could multiply places of Scripture to prove the most part of Israel visibly unbelievers living in those manifest fruits of the flesh as Drunkenness Swearing Lying Whoring Stealing Covetousness and palpable Ignorance without faith and knowledge shedding of blood All these notorious sins were constantly in the greatest part of the Church of Israel that they neighed as fed Horses after their Neighbours wives and were given to oppression and horrid Idolatrie All these sins being such manifest fruits of the flesh that such as live in them the Apostle saith cannot enter into the Kingdom of Christ and of God but are visibly the children of the Devil Therefore to say the whole body of Israel were visibly godly and so visibly in the covenant of Grace that is a most gross mistake they were really in the outward National covenant of Circumcision but not the generality so much as visibly in the Gospel covenant of life For it could not be denyed but that those Jews in the 8. chapter of John verse 30. and so forward were Abrahams children interessed in the covenant of works yet Christ is far from concluding their right to the covenant of Sonship the heavenly adoption but rather in that respect concludeth They are of their Father the Devil whose works they did they being Lyars as he was from the beginning and enemies to Christ as the Devil was therefore he excludes them from being the children of God so that the main mass of blindness and darkness lying upon mens minds is this they mix and confound the two covenants made to Abraham the one a spiritual heavenly covenant made to him as a Father of the faithful and to those only who walk in the steps of faithful Abraham and the temporal covenant of Circumcision to the seed according to the flesh frō Jacob forward and those joining themselves to that family So then in a word the covenant of Circumcision must needs be a covenant of works and not of eternal life because it might be broken which the covenant of eternal life cannot be 7. Argument to prove Circumcision a Covenant of works The seventh ground to prove the covenant of Circumcision not to be a covenant of Grace is That if we maintain the covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of Grace to eternal life therein we overthrow many fundamental points of Religion which is a strong ground to prove it is not of Grace but an outward typical covenant For it is impossible that such understanding of Scripture which crosseth plain fundamental points of religion can be true Now for to give you some example for this First you must needs confess that the covenant of Circumcision was made to Abraham and his seed after him in their generations Gen. 17.7 from Isaac and Jacob forward So that being born in the house or Family of Israel or being bought with the money of one of the Israelites interessed a person in that covenant he coming forth of that line was born heir to that covenant and the privileges of the same Now consider To say that the covenant of Grace is entailed on the flesh overthroweth the main fundamental points of our Religion That the chief and precious privileges of the covenant of grace are adoption or Son-ship Justification and the inward work of sanctification all which privileges
infatuated and had no ears to hear his plain word They of this opinion do defend the contrary to what purpose should any man seek the conversion of any of Believers children whether formerly of the nation of the Jews or now the nations of the believing Gentiles seeing they are born heirs of a covenant of eternal life and so are in as good a state without conversion and believing and being born again as any other soul by believing and by new birth can be brought into This doctrine tends to justify the Rebellious Jews against John Baptist and against Christ the Sadduces and Pharisees came to Johns Baptism Matthew 3. Saith John O ye Generation of Vipers who hath forwarned you to fly from the wrath to come bring for 〈◊〉 fruits meet for repentance and think not to say within your selves we have Abraham to our Father John you see would have this people to be converted to intitle them to this covenant of Grace and so to baptism which is an Ordinance of the same covenant and not so much as think so erroneously as if being children to Abraham according to the flesh should intitle them to the same therefore saith he think not within your selves we have Abraham to our Father and we are his children according to the flesh and therefore we need not a work of conversion or true Repentance to intitle us to the privileges of the covenant such as was baptism And also in John 8.31 and forwards saith Christ unto some Jews unto whom he spake If you abide in my words then are you my Disciples indeed and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free and then you shall be free indeed They answered him We be Abrahams children and never were in bondage to any How sayest thou then We shall be made free Where you may observe these wicked obstinate Jews were of the same opinion that they were in a state of happiness good enough by generation by being Abrahams seed according to the flesh Jesus answereth Who so committeth sin is the servant of sin and the Servant abideth not in the house for ever We find Christ afterwards tells these Sons of Abraham that they were so far from being the adopted sons of God in a covenant of life that they were of their Father the Devil and these same persons Christ speaks to in verse the 24. telling them Except they believed Christ was he they should dy in their sins Christ was far from this opinion as to think that covenant of Circumcision to be a covenant of life but he doth throughly reprehend them for this groundless confidence which error was the main obstacle that hindered the Jews from faith and repentance because they thought it intituled them to happiness enough to be of the stock of Abraham and to be born heirs of the covenant of Circumcision This very rotten opinion was to them one of the Devils sleights to lull them asleep in a carnal and unconverted condition they thought that needed not which thought of theirs had been true enough provided all the children of Abraham had by generation interest in the covenant of life which other men could have no interest in without regeneration But Christ you see presseth a necessity of conversion to these children of Abraham that at the present were as fully interessed in the covenant of Circumcision as Abraham himself even to Nicodemus which was a Ruler of the Jews Christ presseth a necessity thereof to him and also labours by a parable in Luke 16. to convince those sottish Jews that one might be the seed of Abraham according to the flesh and yet be irrecoverably damned and therefore he brings in the rich man in Hell speaking thus Father Abraham I pray thee send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water to cool my tongue And Abraham is brought in owning him to be his Son speaking thus My Son remember that thou in thy life time receivedst thy good things Where you may observe That the man in Hell irrecoverably damned owns Abraham to be his Father and Abraham also doth acknowledge him to be his Son My Son saith Abraham where you clearly see man may be a Son of Abraham and yet damned thou hadst thy good things in this life but Lazarus his evil things Ezekiel 18.9 10. where a just man is presupposed to beget a son that is a Robber and a Shedder of blood and that goes out in all manner of wickedness and that in Israel Wherein observe Abraham owns no other privilege belonged to the rich man by virtue of being the Son of Abraham but what was in this life or in this world Hell was his best portion in the world to come which if he had been born heir to the covenant of life how then could Abrahams affirmation have been true Beloved Let all ingenuous Spirits that are not willing to walk blind-fold consider how contrary to the whole tenor of the Gospel this opinion is and how destructive to this fundamental principle of the Gospel the necessity of Christ of Regeneration and destroys all sense of the necessity of conversion and helps to harden men to destruction as it did the blind Jews who as it appears were fully blinded in the receipt of that opinion that being Abrahams seed according to the flesh interessed them in happiness and eternal life Fourthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of the new covenant and the nature of it and the manner of Gods making of it with the soul for to make a new covenant with the soul is to write the Law of God in a mans heart and in his mind and to infuse saving knowledge and faith by which God unites the soul to himself and so pardons all his sins and without any condition considered in the creature binds over himself to be their God freely in Christ and binds over himself to own them to be his people And only thus and no otherwise is God said to make his new covenant with a poor soul Whereas this dream would seem to bear you in hand that a whole nation may be in a new covenant and have it made with them and yet have none of all this work wrought in their hearts Fifthly This opinion destroys the doctrine of Justification by faith in Christ only seeing that it doth hold out another way than by faith to come to Justification which is by carnal birth of beleeving parents for if a soul be admitted into a Covenant of life I hope you are not ignorant that Justification is a great privilege in the new covenant and really the portion of all that are in that covenant Sixthly This opinion destroys the Doctrine and foundation of all Gospel Churches where it is held which will appear by two things First It destroys the matter of the Church you know that this is a fundamental truth that the matter of the Church ought now under the Gospel to be Saints by calling 1 Cor. 1.2 Spiritual
another and this Law was by Moses delivered in Leviticus 11. spoken of to Peter in Acts 10. Call not thou unclean what God hath made clean and likewise the eating blood is forbidden Gen. 9.4 or flesh with the life thereof the same Moses gave Leviticus 17.10 11. where blood is forbidden upon the same ground and reason We find Gen. 6.5 that God hints at a sin of the old world for which he brought the flood which was that the Sons of God married the daughters of men seeing they were fair which must needs be understood there was a Law prohibiting Seths posterity to marry with Cains This Law was also given by Moses in Deut. 7.2 3. We must of necessity understand these Laws were from God to Adam and so to his Sons and so in substance the same was given to Abraham with some additions and the same by Moses committed to writing with further additions but this is the result that I would come to God having promised the seed of the woman to come out of that flesh did institute an external covenant of worship that the Lord did carry all along upon the flesh or line out of which the Messiah should come and in which flesh the Word would be incarnate I understand upon the first promise of Christ to Adam and Eve God then made this made this Ceremonial covenant of Worship with Adams family therefore both his Sons were trained up as Worshippers and this must needs be because Cain was never in a covenant of Grace nor we have no ground to judge that he had ever any appearance of true grace in him but God having no intent to bring his promised seed out of Cain or Abel and also resolved there should be a world as well as a Church he suffers Cain to murther Abel upon which he rejects Cain with all his posterity as a Fugitive and a Vagabond from what did he reject him but from this Church Covenant of Ceremonial obedience and worship but when Seth was born God as it appears to me did renew a fresh Election upon him and his seed according to the flesh and the whole Race of Seth were Gods Church God hereby teaching that the Messiah must come out of that Family according to the flesh and not out of Cains or his posterity nor any other And when God had destroyed the world by the Flood then there was only Noahs Family consisting of eight persons being all of them in this Church covenant of worship for a time till God pitched a fresh election upon Sem by the mouth of Noah his Father Gen. 9.26 where Ham and Japhet with their posterities are past by though as truly the seed of believing Noah as Sem was And this Ceremonial covenant of Works goes on upon Sem till the time of Abraham the world growing then numerous God would have his Church in a more narrow compass and more especially take unto him that particular family out of which Christ should come which was Abraham So that by the way observe The main ground upon which God elects Abrahams family into the outward Covenant with himself and not Lots nor any of the rest of the Godly families then living in the world It was not because Abraham was any more a believer or his family the family of a believer for if so then Lot and his family and all the godly mens families then in the world had been necessarily taken into the covenant of Circumcision because they and their families had been believers as well as Abrahams for this is a sure Rule if God give a promise or a command to any person considered in such a capacity as a Believer then whosoever is a Believer that command and promise belongs unto them I might by manifold instances clear this as when God saith to Joshua I will not leave thee nor forsake thee This being not made to him under any other consideration but as a Believer The Apostle is bold to say this promise is made to the whole Church of the Hebrews Heb. 13.5 they being all believers as Joshua was but this covenant of Circumcision now so termed was made with Abraham his seed and family Why the covenant of circumcision made to Abraham and his seed and not to others and not upon this ground because he was a believer but because that Christ must come out of his flesh and line therefore to confirm and ratify this to Abraham that Christ should so come and to point out to all the world where they must look for and expect the Christ God doth as much as say in Abrahams loyns you must expect him and no where else For as Christ saith to the woman of Samaria The Jews know what they worship for salvation is of the Jews therefore to be sure the Covenant of worship runs in that line But now Abraham had eight Sons the one by Sarah Gen. 21.2 the other by Hagar Gen. 16. and six sons by his wife Keturah Gen. 25.1 26. to which he gave gifts and sent away to the East Countrey from his son Isaac and this Covenant of Works did belong onely to Isaac and his seed For when God had in Genesis 11.17 7. promised that he would be the God of Abraham and his seed in their generations and give them Canaan in the conclusion of this covenant he begins to speak to Abraham of a Son he should have by Sarah and that she should be the Mother of Nations as in Hebrews 11. Abraham being affected with his Son Ishmael which he then enjoied saith O that Ishmael might live in thy sight as if Abraham should say Lord I understand that thou hast made a Church Covenant with me and my seed after me taking my seed in their Generations into external Covenant with thee O as if he should say that Ishmael might be the seed upon which this Covenant might run where God tells Abraham that he had heard his prayer that he would bless Ishmael with manifold outward blessings otherwise but saith he my covenant shall be with Isaac meaning here that outward covenant of Circumcision where you have Ishmael and the six Sons of Keturah with all their posterity past by in this fresh Election of Isaac and his seed which were only elected in this covenant Therefore the bond child and the six Sons of Keturah though as truly believers children as Isaac was yet they are all dismissed this covenant and privileges of the same The six Sons by Keturah as you have heard before Abraham gave them gifts and sent them into the East Countrey And when Isaac had two Sons in Rebeccus womb God again made a fresh election of Jacob and his seed in their Generations passing by Esau and his seed for saith God There are two Nations in thee and two peoples So he chose Jacob considered as a Nation and past by Esau considered as another Nation for it is plain from those words there are two Nations and two peoples that the Election
unclean but now are they holy As if Paul should say the reason why I would have the believing husband to abide with the unbelieving wife is this because the unbeliever now since the partition-wall is down between Jew and Gentile may justifiably be a wife to a believing Husband there being now no Law in the New Testament against such marriages especially considering their marriage was transacted when they were both Idolatrous Heathen Now it being taken for granted their marriage was lawful in these words The unbelieving wife is sanctified to the believing Husband and that it be understood that the unbelieving husband is by the Law of Marriage sanctified to or set apart or separated to or made holy to the believing wife the Law of marriage having separated him from all other women in the world to be to her and her only else were your children unclean Mark saith the Apostle Else were your children unclean but now are they holy that is if the Law of God did not set the unbeliever apart to the believer and so justify their fellowship in the marriage bed then would the children begotten in that fellowship be unclean and base born but now they are holy that is now they are begotten in holy wedlock according to the holy law of marriage not as those children were in Ezraes time which were unclean So that from the unbelievers lawful and sanctified abode with the believer doth the Apostle conclude the children to bâ— clean or holy And thus all children of Heathen are in the same sense holy that are begotten in holy wedlock for as the fellowship of man and woman in the bed being not according to the Law is called fornication uncleanness and unholiness so the fellowship of any two persons even of Heathen being according to that Law of marriage it is then clean or holy and so the children begotten in that fellowship are said to be clean or holy begotten But there was none doubted of the holiness of the Heathen they never having any law to prohibit their marriage together but now the Jews having an express Law against marying with any other nation it was legally unclean or unholy to match with any such or to bed with any such that were not Jews or Proselytes Now that Law you must mind was part of the partition-wall between Jew and Gentile which is abolished since Christs full exhibition so then take the sense of the text thus That first the Apostle bids the Believers continue with the unbelievers or Idolaters Secondly adding this reason because their fellowship is holy Thirdly From an absurdity which would else follow and that is Else were your children unclean but now are they holy An answer to that text Rom. 11.16 17. In the next place let us speak to that in the 11. of the Romans 16 17. made use of by some to prove a covenant of eternal life in the flesh the words are these For if the first fruits are holy then the Lump is also holy and if the Root be holy so are the Branches and if some of the Branches are broken off and thou being a wild Olive-tree art grafted in among them and with them partakest of the Root and fatness of the Olive c. The usual exposition is That this root is Abraham and these first-fruits are Abraham Isaac and Jacob and these Branches are to be understood the body of Israel that came of their Loins as the root and the branches And so the Jews through unbelief with their generation were broken off and so also the Gentiles with their Generation and seed are brought in This last Clause which mainly serves for their purpose they bring in by head and shoulders that the Gentile and his seed is brought in What is there in that text which will countenance that clause if it be truly examined But let us consider this Text and see what it will afford to prove a covenant of eternal life to life to run in the flesh of believing Gentiles for that is it the Text must prove without the which in vain it is alleged And for the better examining of the same we will take for granted that by root is meant Abraham and by First-fruits is meant Abraham Isaac and Jacob which are spoken of If so then you must of necessity distinguish Abraham as the Apostle doth as begetting and working Abraham and as believing and faithful Abraham and so thus you must understand Abraham in a two-fold Covenant as hath been before cleared Wherein he was in a double sense holy as he was in that absolute covenant of grace so considered he was spiritually holy and considered as in the covenant of works that conditional covenant made with him he was legally holy Now all the Nation of the Jews being separated by God from all other Nations in and by the same Covenant are in this sense holy as Abraham was and as he was holy in a Covenant of life with a spiritual holiness so only those of the spiritual and believing seed as his branches in that sense can be said to be holy And the like may be said of these Patriarchs who as the first fruits consider them in the spiritual covenant so they as the first fruits may be said to be spiritually holy So by the Lump you must understand that seed in that covenant to be only spiritually holy as the first fruits were But if you consider them in the covenant of works the external National covenant as the first fruit in that covenant were legally holy so were the whole lump that is the whole Nation of the Jews thus holy till that covenant was abolished and put an end to and then this covenant intailed on the flesh of Abraham being put an end to or abolished it must needs be that the branches must be broken off viz. such as only by nature or birth had an Interest to that covenant or joining only to the family And the distinctions of the Covenants and seeds being here observed it will inlighten the soul to understand this place We find this distinction carryed on in the beginning of the chapter viz. two covenants and two seeds and both in the Church of Israel such as some would call the covenanting seed There were two seeds amongst the external covenanting seed there was the covenant of works and the covenant of grace as for example The Apostle speaks of the whole body of Israel then of a select number out of Israel which God foreknew and therefore brings in the case of Elias 1 Kings 19. where God had in Israel 7000. selected from the rest of the same body of Israel in the outward covenant with him And also in the Apostles time he saith That there were a select number according to the election of grace which God had chose out of Israel Then saith he If by grace then not by works if by works then not by grace Where you hear the Apostle clearly distinguisheth two seeds in Israel
as two covenants the one a conditional covenant of works the other of grace an absolute covenant as in the 4 5 6 7. verses of that 11. of the Romans and so the main drift here of the Apostle is to hold forth that though God did now cast off from being his Church the carnal seed that were only in the covenant of works this covenant standing no longer in force but growing old and vanishing away as in Heb. 8.13 in which covenant he chose this nation to himself yet nevertheless the Apostle doth affirm that God had a remnant that were elect that should be called of that natural seed of Israel even to the end though for the present the greatest part were hardened in unbelief So that when he saith the branches were broken off we are not to understand that such of them as related to Abraham as a Father or Root of Believers in a Covenant of grace were broken off For then we should hold falling away from and out of a Covenant of life which would be a gross error but the branches were broke off from the Root considered in that national covenant of Circumcision which was a Covenant of works that carnal people might really be in as you heard before This National Covenant now ceasing as I have shewed and being put an end to by Christ he becomming the substance of the same covenant and that being the partition wall at that time between Jews and Gentiles But the Apostle now affirms in Gal. 5.6 and 6.16 That Circumcision availeth not any thing nor Vncircumcision but a New Creature and Faith that worketh by Love therefore all of the Jews that believed not ceased to be members of Gods Church Because now Abraham is no way considered as a Father and a Root in the Gospel Church but as faithful and believing Abraham in a Covenant of eternal life therefore unbelief now cuts off the nation of the Jews Why had not unbelief cut them off many hundred years before The answer is plain for so long as the typical covenant of works stood in force Israel by being of that family or that generation whether they had faith or no or any appearance of grace or no were interessed in that covenant and in the privileges thereof But now when Christ was fully exhibited in the flesh and that covenant ceasing and the covenant of life now only remaining it becomes so that only those branches and that lump of believers the spiritual lump only remain in the Church whether Jews or Gentiles So that if you will seriously mind the scope and drift of the Apostle you shall see that the Lump and the Branches here intended must needs be holy because the First-fruits and Root are holy which is meant those of Gods spiritual elect of the Jews that he would call to the end of the world which since is confirmed in the 28. verse For saith the Apostle As concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sakes meaning the Gentiles but as touching the election they are beloved for the Fathers sake Not as if God hated these rejected Jews for the sakes of these Gentiles properly or loved a certain number of the Jews for their fathers sake properly But thus for the Gospels sake they became enemies that is the Gospel promise or Covenant having as you have heard before respect to all Nations Gen. 12.3 Gen. 22.18 with Gal. 3.8 Now this Gospel Covenant being not capable to be divulged to all Nations so long as this external electing love to the Nation of the Jews was kept on foot in that Covenant of Circumcision being a partition-wall therefore this bond of favour and frendship being broken in this external covenant they came to be enemies because of the accomplishment of the promises of the Gospel to the Gentiles that those beloved elected of the Jews and ten Tribes even are beloved for their Fathers sake meaning for the promise sake made to their fathers concerning their calling which must needs be accomplished Isaiah 65.23 for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off-spring with them meaning all such elected off-spring as this 11 of the Romans speaks of the calling For saith the Text As touching the election they were beloved for the Fathers sake so that for the promise sake made to their Fathers they shall in time be actually elected with an eternal electing love But to mind this Scripture further it makes exceedingly against any fleshly covenant running in the fleshly line of the Gentiles because that these words in verse the 20. to the 24. do declare that the Gentiles came to be Abrahams spiritual seed and so a branch of that stock only by faith in Christ that fat Olive For if you are Christs then are ye Abrahams seed and heirs according to promise Gal. 3. last And as it is said the Gentiles are graffed into this stock or root of Abraham contrary to nature it must needs cut off such a conclusion as That all believing Gentiles seed shall come by nature into this Stock It being not only against the whole scope and drift of this place but against the express words which saith the Gentiles are graffed in contrary to nature and stand by faith and further that unbelief broke off the Jews Now this would be a strange riddle in my judgement first to conclude that the whole nation of the Jews were in a Covenant of eternal life and yet never had faith no not so much as visibly for the greatest part of them Secondly That they were broken off from a Covenant of eternal life and why because of unbelief And yet nevertheless believing Gentiles their unbelieving seed in the midst of his unbelief is grafted in This in substance is what is drawn from this text for proving a covenant in the flesh But let any impartially judge how much a shame it would be to wrest Scripture so contrary to the Scope and meaning For this chapter shews that there were two seeds two covenants one of Grace or the Gospel the other of works and that men could not obtain aright to this Gospel Covenant but by vertue of election and that meerly of grace the other covenant of works and the fleshly seed in this Covenant were broke off that is from any privilege comming from Abraham according to the flesh that fleshly covenant being put an end to by Christs being come in the flesh All unbelieving Jews upon that ground cease to be Gods Church much more unbelieving Gentiles for if unbelief broke off the Jew be sure it will as effectually keep out the Gentile as it is clear it doth because they stand by faith only and are graffed in contrary to nature and it is said the Jew if he abide not in unbelief shall be graffed in again From all which it is plain that there is no other way now under the Gospel to come into or stand in the house or Church of God but by faith neither for Iew nor
Teachers perswaded the Gallatians to be a Covenant of life and that they could not be saved without it which covenant the Apostle Paul called the flesh in Gal. 3.3 meaning that Covenant which God had established in their flesh for an everlasting Covenant as he so calls it Gen. 17.13 This shall be my Covenant in your flesh saith the Lord for an everlasting Covenant Therefore saith Paul in Rom. 4.1 What shall we say that Abraham our Father as appertaining to the flesh hath found if Abraham were justified by works Mark his Exposition of that Covenant appertaining to the flesh to be a Covenant of works which in â—â—e 10. verse he clears to be Circumcision in opposition to that Gospel promise which Abraham had before he was circumcised and so he doth all along in that Chapter Herein the 3. of Gal. he doth set the Covenant of grace and that of works in opposition the one he calls the Spirit the other flesh which he most evidently explains in Chap. 5.1 2 3. where saith he Stand fast in that liberty which Christ hath made you free and be not intangled again with the yoake of bondage Here observe again that he calls it as Peter doth Acts 15.10 a yoke of bondage which is evident that they were set at freedom and liberty from as that which was abolished and they freed from as a yoak which neither they nor their Fathers were able to hear as appears in Gal. 5.1 2 3. Behold I Paul say to you if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Nay in v. 3. For I testify to every one that is circumcised that he is a Debtor to do the whole Law and in ver 4. He sets it in opposition to the covenant of grace and this is explained more in Gallatians chap. 6.12 13. verses Now all this considered you may clearly see the Covenant of Circumcision made to Abraham and his seed in their Generation that he would give them Canaan with the blessings thereof and in that sense be their God to protect preserve and externally to privilege them with the means of grace and tenders of the Gospel and the external blessings of Canaan upon condition they would be circumcised and keep the Law All these things are typical this deliverance out of Egypt typing out the deliverance out of Hell That temporal Israel after the flesh that were redeemed out of Egypt typed out the spiritual Israel that were redeemed out of the spiritual bondage and as before hath been said Moses then a temporal Redeemer Mediator or Saviour typed out Christ the spiritual Mediator and Saviour therefore in the 1 Cor. 10.6 The Apostle tells us these were our figures or types So this being premised we have the sense of the Text here plain that as the spiritual disciple or Israelite when he believes and confesseth his faith thereby shewing his interest in Jesus Christ is baptized into Christ Jesus the Mediator of that Covenant which he is in by faith So the temporal Israel by birth or being bought with money or cohabitation in that family of Israel comming to have a right to the Covenant of Circumcision whereof Moses was the Mediator they were likewise baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea that being as real a confirmation to them of the temporal deliverance from Egypt into Canaan by the hand of Moses as our baptism is a confirmation to the spiritual Israel of their spiritual deliverance by Jesus their Mediator from death and condemnation to eternal life And whereas the Apostle calls that meat spiritual meat and that drink spiritual drink he here speaks figuratively as before affirmed Not that the Manna eaten by the whole Nation of Israel was in it self spiritual but it was a figure of the spiritual bread therefore Christ saith to the Jews in John 6.32 33. Verily verily I say unto you Moses gave you not that bread from heaven but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven Observe that word Giveth not did give but giveth for the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven and giveth life to the world And therefore saith he My Father giveth you the true bread from heaven that is the substance of that shadow and so that rock was Christ meaning a figure or type of Christ What is all this Beloved to the proving of a Covenant of life running in the flesh either then or now to the Gentiles under the Gospel seeing it is clear that all these Ordinances as the Apostle calls them Heb. 9. Carnal Ordinances did type out or figure out spiritual and substantial things For their sacrifices for sin typed out Christ but they were not Christ and their typical remissions which they had by their sacrifice That remission I say which the whole body of Israel had by offering up their sin-offering can be understood to be no other but typical A man might be under that typical Remission and yet ne under the wrath of God and be damned and a poor Gentile at the utmost part of the Earth believing as Rahab did in Canaan as truly justified though he had none of this typical remission and none of these before mentioned figures so that we conclude the whole Nation of the Jews had not a covenant of eternal life in the flesh made unto them though they had a temporal typical covenant as I have all along called it that is consisting of such Laws and privileges that had not Christ in them but did point at him to come therefore they are called in Heb. 9. Patterns of Heavenly things but not the very things themselves They are called by the Apostle Beggarly Elements or Rudiments of the World or a School-master to lead to Christ The Jews literal obedience to the Law typing out the obedience to faith Deut. 30.12 13 14. with Rom. 10. from v. 6. to the 10. ver Now beloved the literal obedience in it self performed by the carnal Jew though it figured out the substantial obedience viz. faith in Christ and though the Rest in Canaan typed out the spiritual Rest in Christ yet I hope no man will be so absurd but he will confess that this litteral obedience it was not the spiritual obedience and that this rest in Canaan it was but a shadow of that rest in Christ not the very rest it self But some may say so of baptism and the Supper that these are the signs of inward and spiritual things but it doth not follow that these are the spiritual things Beloved Observe warily for here lies the ground of this great mistake the want of distinguishing between these figures that type out Christ to come and these Sacramental signs that do confirm and ratifie his being already come Those typical signs and figures then which typed out Christ to come did properly belong to that typicall seed the body of Israel that typed out the spiritual seed to come But now these signs I say these Sacramentall signs that are instituted
and Hagar the covenant of Works both these women continued in Abrahams house together for a time the first child he begat by the strength of nature without faith in a promise of a bond-woman The other he begat by faith in a promise without strength of nature of a free-woman and the free-woman continued in Abrahams house with the bond-woman and her son without any Scruple till Isaac was born and also weaned And when the son of the bond-woman persecuted Isaac the free-woman testifyes against the bond-woman and her son and will have them no longer to abide in the house with her son Abraham likewise had first the free-woman and the last the bond-woman The free-woman was sometime barren in Abrahams house but the bond-woman was fruitfull Now the mystery that the Apostle hints to be held forth in this History is clear from which he speaks in this 4. of the Gallatians which must be this That God in like manner first made a covenant of Grace even as Abraham first had a free-woman which covenant in a great measure was barren bringing forth no seed or else totally barren as Sarah was in respect of that substantial seed Christ Jesus which Isaac typed forth as soon as God had made this covenant he in the same house or Church hath also a Hagar that is a Covenant of works in which God hath abundance of seed becoming his by strength of nature without faith in a promise and the Covenant of grace as Sarah in a sense becomes barren All which time the covenant of grace and covenant of works both agree very well to be in Gods house together but at the last as the free-woman brought forth Isaac so the covenant of Grace brings forth Christ Jesus without strength of nature by faith in a promise as in Matth. 1.21 Luke 1.35 and when this substantial seed is come then the covenant of grace and works remain in Gods Church together but afterwards when Christ the true Isaac was as it were weaned that is come to maturity so as to appear that he was now in the office of the Ministery the Scribes and Pharisees with the high Priests all the sons of Hagar the old covenant persecuted Christ and those in him Whereupon the free-woman or rather the free Covenant of grace doth testify that a covenant of Works with her seed shall no longger remain with her in the Church of God But now the free covenant and her sons that is the Covenant of grace only and her children born by faith in a promise onely must for a time forward remain in the house of God So that now rejoice thou barren that barest not the Covenant of grace becomes fruitfull having seed in all nations therefore the Apostle saith the Jerusalem which is above which is free is the Mother of us all and those us or we that were members of the primitive Church were born from above by faith in a promise Therefore it is plain from hence that there were no carnal babes in that Church But when Christ the true seed of the Covenant was persecuted by the Jews which were the children of the covenant of Works the Gospel doth plentifully testifie the abolishing the Covenant of Works and the casting forth of those bond-children out of Gods Church Acts 13.45 46. But when the Jews saw the multitude they were filled with envy and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul contradicting and blaspheming Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold and said It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you but seeing ye put it far from you and judge your selves unworthy of everlasting life lo we turn to the Gentiles for so hath the Lord commanded us And as appears in the 11. chap. of the Romans and as that 4. chap. of Gall. in express words saith in the 25. verse this Hagar is meant Mount Sinai in Arabia and answereth to Jerusalem that now is and is in bondage with her children this being so clear that the bond-woman and her son that is to say the covenant af works and all those related to Abraham only in a covenant of works are cast out of the house of God How opposite then is their opinion to the truth that still would have a fleshly generation to be in the house of God with their children But seeing the natural branches that truly were descended of the Line of faithfull Abraham might not have that honor How much less the unbelieving seed of the Gentiles that are wild by nature Thus you see in brief this objection answered and that there is no ground for childrens baptism but an imagination through thick darkness upon the minds of people they setting up this idol in their hearts God hath answered them accordingly as the Prophet speaks in Ezekiel 14.2 3 4 5. verses And the word of the Lord came unto me saying Son of man these men have set up their idols in their heart and put their stumbling block of their iniquity before their face should I be inquired of at all by them therefore speak unto them thus saith the Lord Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his Idols in his heart and putteth the stumbling block of his iniquity before his face and commeth to the Prophet I the Lord will answer him that commeth according to the Multitude of his Idols that I may take the house of Israel in their own heart because they are all estranged from me through their Idols Where you see that when souls set up an idol in their heart God doth answer them according to their idol as he hath in this case suffering blind blindnes and uncertainty of judgment to befall them For such as defend childrens baptism and the ablest I have met with do grant they have no command or example in the New Testament for their practice but ground the same on a consequence which you have heard evidently proved is drawn from an error For to affirm or maintain that the covenant of eternal life is made with believers carnal seed is a dangerous error and therefore the consequence must needs be as false and rotten as that error from whence it is drawn then judge you what a pitiful consequence that must be Take the whole result thus Childrens baptism hath no ground from the word of God either Command or Example for it but a consequence as before so that it is meerly a tradition of men setting up in the place and room of the Commands of God to wit baptizing of Believers This groundless tradition which makes void the commandment of God even as the wicked Jews did in Mark 7.7 Howbeit in vain saith the Lord they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men and in verse 9. He said unto them Full well you reject or frustrate the commandments of God that you may keep your own Traditions and in verse 13. Make the word of God of none effect through your traditions which