agayne what it is too be iustifyed by fayth For these thinges being well and substantially vnderstanded I do not doubt but that the teste wyll bee a greate deale the playner PHILALETHES To be iustified by workes is by our owne deedes to deserue remission and forgeuenesse of synnes and too pourchase vnto oure selues saluation Or elles thus They are iustifyed by workes in whose life there is founde suche cleanelinesse and holynesse as maye deserue the testimonye of righteousnesse before the iudgement seat of God or that wyth the vprightenesse of theyr woorkes be able to aunswer and satysfye Goddes iustyce and iudgemente DYDIMVS I beleue that they are very thynne sowen that with the vprightnesse of theyr workes be able to aunswer and satisfy the iustice and iudgemente of God PHILALETHES They are very thyn sowen in dede For non Christ onely excepted could euer do it And therefore Christ only hath satisfied the iustyce of God all the chyldren of Adam beinge at defiaunce with their owne righteousnesse oughte to crye oute wyth Dauid and sai Enter not in to iudgemeÌt with thy seruauÌt o lord Psal 143. for in thy sight shal no maÌ liuiÌg be iustified ALBI. And what is it to be iustified by fayth PHI. They are iustifyed by faith What it is to be iustyfied by fayth that being excluded froÌ the righteousenesse of workes do by faythe take holde one the righteousenesse of Christe wherwyth when they are clothed and appareylled they appeare in the syghte of God not as synners but as ryghteouse personnes ALBION Obiecti ⣠on i. This me thinke is a verye coumfortable doctrine But yet it wyll not be alowed of all men for the most parte wyll stil maintaine that we are iustified by workes and not by faith onlye aleadginge for the probation of this their sayinge the second chapiter of Iames Iam. 2. wher he saieth on this maner was not our father Abraham iustified throughe workes when he offered Isaac his son vpon the altar And a little after ye se then how that of woorkes a man is iustified and not of faithe onlye Either ye muste saye they make the holy Apostels to disagree or ye muste graunte with Iames that of works man is iustified and not of faith onlye Aunswer PHILALETHES God wotte this is a poore helpe that they doe bringe for them selues For firste and formoste let vs marke the history that Iames doeth make meÌtion of and we shal soone perceiue how ignorauntly they behaue theÌ selues in expoundinge the wordes of the Apostell We reade in the xv chapiter of Genesis Gen. 15. that Abraham beleued the Lord and it was coumpted vnto him for righteousnesse Which texte is of Paule aleaged after this sort If Abraham were iustified by workes Rom. 4. he hath wherein to reioyce or glorye but not with God For what saith the scripture Abraham beleued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse Wherby the holye Apostle Abraham was iustyfied .xxx. yeares afore he offered his sonne Isaac doeth proue most stronglye that Abraham our father was iustified by faithe But this that Iames doeth speake of whiche is the offerynge of Isaac was done xxx yeares after that the scriptures did pronounce Abraham to be iustified or that his faith was coumpted vnto him for righteousnesse Verely fyth that .xv. yeares afore that Isaac was borne Gene. 22. Abrahams faythe was imputed vnto hym for righteousnesse it was impossible that he shoulde be iustifyed by the offering of hys sonne Isaac which was as I sayd before .xxx. years after What if we saye then that the apostle doeth only go about to shewe What faith Abraham was iustified by that the fayth whiche Abraham was iustifyed by was no idel or dead fayth but such a faith as made hym obedient vnto God as it is more playnelye set foorthe in the .ii. to the Hebrewes EV. This that ye haue brought in now is of greate strength And truly I do not see which way thei can wind theÌ selues out of the briers if the history the circumstaunces of the same be weyghed a ryghte PHI. We wil yet go to worke with them another way and shew how that ther is no repugnaunce at al in the doctrine of the Apostels For what contrariety or repugnaunce could ther be in their doctrine sith that they wer both lead by one spirit Therfore we shal marke that the holy Apostle S. Paul in his epistels to the Romains to the Galathians did dispute and reason against theÌ that did atribute iustificatioÌ to workes but. Note this diligeÌtly S Iames did wryte against them which did vtterly contempne and despise good workes And therfore Paule sheweth the causes of our iustificatioÌ Iames the effectes frutes of the same Paul declareth how we are iustifyed Iames how we are knoweÌ to be iustified Paul excludeth workes as not the cause of our iustificatioÌ Iames approueth workes as effects proceding of the same Paul denieth that any good workes caÌ be in theÌ that be not iustyfied Iames affirmeth that they which be iustified caÌ in no wise be wtout good woorkes But ye shall heare what S Augustine hath left vnto vs by writing touching the matter Augu. 83. questionum questi 76. Glossa ordinaria Quod Abraham per fidem sine operibus iustificatus est de operibus quâe precedebant intelligitur quia per opera quae fecit iustus non suit sed sola fide Hic de operibus agitur quae fidem sequntur Heb. 11. per quae amplius iustificabatur cum tam per fidem fuisset iustus Vnde Paulus dicit Fide obtulit Abraham Isaac quum tentaretur Haec oblatio est opus et testimonium fidei et iustitiae That is too saye That Abraham was iustifyed by faith without works it is to be vnderstaÌded of the workes that dyd goo before For he was not righteouse throughe the workes which he had done but by faythe only Here it is spokeÌ of the works that folowe the faith whereby he was more iustifyed whereas he was alreadye before made righteouse by faithe Therfore Paule sayeth The offeringe of Isaac is a testimony of the fayth righteousnesse of Abraham Abraham did offer Isaac with faith when he was tempted This offeringe is a worke and testimonye of his faythe and of hys righteousnesse These things did he write vpon Iames epistell If the offering of Isaac is a testimonie of the faith and righteousnesse of Abraham He coulde not be iustyfied by it but rather it was therby declared that he was iustifyed alreadye So that this obedience of his Rom. 4. which he shewed vnto the word of the Lord did only manifest and shew that he was when he beleued Gods promises made ryghteous before God throughe the same fayth and beleue wherwyth he was so strengthened that geuynge the glorye vnto God he perswaded him selfe fullye that he which had promised was also able to do the thynge that he
For that is one of the thinges which the enemies do stoutely denye PHILALETHES Er I do satisfye your desire I doe intende to aledge yet two or three golden sentences out of the Apostel which canne not well be omitted in thys case The firste shall ye haue in the Epistel to Titus Titu 3. where he writteth on this wyse Not by the workes of righteousnes which we had done but according to his mercye he saued vs that we beinge iustified by his grace shoulde be made heyrs accordinge too the hope of eternall lyfe The second is muche like vntoo this and is setfoorth in the second Epistell to Timothee after thys maner God hathe saued vs 2. Timo. 1. and called vs with an holye callinge not accordinge to our workes The purpose of God doth exclude al merites and deseruings froÌ the iustification of man but according to his own purpose and grace whiche was geuen vnto vs throughe Christ Iesus afore the worlde was Truely whersoeuer this purpose of God is there workes merits or deseruinges can take no place in the iustification or saluation of man Wherby it must nedes folowe as we can gather none other of the sentences nowe aleadged that by the free mercy and goodnesse of God apprehended and taken hold vpon by fayth we are deliuered from oure synnes and from euerlasting damnation and made felowe heyers with his sonne Iesu Christ whose righteousnesse he doth impute vnto vs of his eternall and euerlastinge kingdome of heauen All these thinges I say do we obtain throughe fayeth onely withoute anye merites goynge before DIDIMVS Say what ye wil the enemies do styll whisper in to the eares of the symple and ignoraunt persons that this is but a newe sounde doctrine and that none of all the auncient doctours did euer teache it PHILALETHES Ye myght haue learned that thys is playne falâe in the autority that we haue already broughte out of saint Augustine Aug. 83. questionuÌ questione ⪠76 Glossa ordinaria whose wordes are these Quod Abraham per fideÌ sine operibus iustificatus est de operibus quae praecedebant intelligitur quia per opera quae fecit iustus non fuit sed sola fide Whiche we haue alreadye englished thus That Abraham was iustified by faith without workes it is to be vnderstanded of the workes that dyd go before For he was not ryghteous throughe the workes whyche he had done before sed sola fide but by faieth onlye If it be an heresye to saye that faythe onely doeth iustifye let me see how they can excuse Saynte Augustine of heresye Vnto hym maye we ioygne father Ambrose who wrytinge vppon the epistell to the Romayns Amb. in episto ad Romanos ca. 4. speaketh on this manner Iustificari sunt gratis quia nihil operantes neque vicem reddentes sola fide iustificati sunt dono dei That is to saye They were iustyfied freelye for they worckynge nothinge nor makinge anye recompence they were iustifyed throughe faythe onelye by the gyfte of God Agayne in the same place these be hys wordes Sic decretum dicit a deo vt cessante lege Ibidem solam fidem gratia dei poscereâ ad salutem Whyche maye be englyshed thus He sayethe that it was so decreed of God that the lawe beynge at an ende the grace of God shoulde requyre faythe alone or faythe onelye vnto saluation Ibidem These be also his wordes Hoc ipsum munit exemplo prophetae Beatitudinem hominis di it cui deus acceptam fert iustitiam sine operibus Beatos dicit quibus hoc sanxit deus vt sine labore et aliqua obseruatione sola fide iustificentur apud deum That is to say he doeth strengthene or fense this by the example of the prophette He saith that the same man hath blessedfulnes or that blessedfulnes pertained and belongeth to that man vnto whom God imputeth righteousnesse withoute workes he calleth them blessed vnto whom God had made this decree that wythoute laboure and withoute anye obseruation they shoulde by faith onely be iustified before God And in an other place Idem in 9. ca. ciusdem epistolâe Sola fides ad salutem posita est Faythe onelye sayeth he is appoynted vnto saluation Ye maye see nowe howe many tymes this olde father doth vse this worde sola alone or only which the aduersaries or enemies doe accuse of heresye But let vs heare what the other auncient fathers do say concerning this matter these are Ieroms words vpon the Epistle to the Romains Ieronimus in 10. caput episto ad Ro. Ignorantes quod sola fide iustificat deus et se ex operibus legis quam numquaÌ custodierunt iustos esse putantes noluerunt se subijcere remissioni peccatorum ne peccatores fuisse viderentur That is to saye They not knowinge that God iustifieth by faith onely and supposing them selues to be iust by the works of the law whiche they neuer obserued they would not submit them selues vnto the remission of synnes leaste they shoulde seeme too haue bene synners EVTRAPELVS By this autoritye that ye haue aleadged oute of Ierome two thinges maye be learned Firste and foremost we learne that God doeth iustifye by fayth only which of the enemies is coumpted playn heresye whervpon we maye conclude that they be wrapped in the same moste pestiferous ignoraunce that the scribes and Pharisees were wrapped in What credit ought to be geuen vnto the enemies of the truth and what sâaÌfull ignoraunce they be wrapped in and that therfore no credit ought to be geuen vnto them nor yet to their doctrine For why thei be altogether ignoraunt in the highest and moste principall poynte of our religion causinge the people to seeke for saluation wher there is nothinge elles but desperation and shippewracke of conscyence Secondlye we see here moste euidentlye the cause whye the scribes and Pharisees Why the scribes Pharises wer vtter enemies vnto the gospell Luc. 18. were suche extreme enemies vnto the gospel which offereth vnto all them that wyll beleue in oure sauioure Iesu Christ free pardone and remission of their sinnes Forsoth they iustyfyed them selues that they were perfect and withoute synne Lest then they shuld lose any part of their estimation for thei sought their owne glorye more than the glorye of God they woulde in nowyse submitte them selues vnto the doctryne of the remyssion of sinnes nor yet receaue the generall pardone that was offered vnto them of God For then they muste needes to haue acknowledged them selues with the other to haue bene sinners But they would none of that beinge in this pointe moste like vnto oure greate Rabbis Why our great rabbis will not acknowledge their errour whiche althoughe their conscyences beare them recorde that they be in a moste pernicious errour and haue most shamefully deceiued the people yet because they wyll not mynishe one iote of their reputation that they haue hadde amonge simple and
hys second Epistell to the Corinthians sayeth 2. Cor. 9. youre zeale speakinge of almes hath prouoked very many And in the epistel to the Hebreues Let vs sayeth he Heb. 10. consider one an other to prouoke vnto loue and vnto good workes EV. If this had ben obserued and kepte amonge Christians by this time both the Turks the Iewes with al the paynims in the world would haue ben wonne to Christ But as long as we vse our selues after this same sorte we shall rather become Turks and Painims than they Christians What causeth the Turkes and paynims to abhor Christes religion Suche fylthinesse of life suche vntrue dealinge deceate fraude and periurye such ydolatrye and superstition they do see dayly to raygne amonge vs that it is no maruayle if they do abhorre altogether oure religion We go about to conquere them by force of armes but we see that through our synnes they are growen so mighty that they be able if God doeth not set his healpinge hand to ouer renne all the whole worlde PHILA This that ye saye is most true And vntyll a true reformation be hadde and better amendmente of lyfe be seene in vs thei wil neuer embrace Christ nor his Gospell But to our purpose this is the fift vse of good workes that by them Christ is releaued in his poore and nedy members yea the coÌmon societi and felowship of men is mayntained For haue we not al nede one of an other Therfore they be not menne but vayne shadowes of men Vain shadowes of men which through oute all their life time are found to be ydell so that they seme to be borne for nothinge elles but for to consume the frutes of the earth ALBION I woulde gladly learne Whether our good works be acceptable vnto God or not whether these oure good workes do please God or not and why they be acceptable vnto him syth that the profyt of them doeth redounde vnto vs altogether PHILA That our good workes do please God it is euydente and playn by the wordes of the Apostell where he sayeth Colosse That ye might walke worthy of the Lord and please him in all thinges The causes why our good works do please God beinge frutefull in all good workes They therefore that be frutefull in all kynde of good workes doe please God in all thinges The causes are manifest enough It is so in dede that the dyuine maiesty of God hathe no neede neyther of oure good wordes nor yet of oure good workes yet those thynges that are well done of vs do please him Fyrste because they be the frutes of fayth He that aloweth the fayeth of his people shoulde not hee also alowe the fruytes of their fayth As he doeth reproue all workes that be done without fayth so doeth he alowe all maner of works that do procede of a sincere fayeth and true beliefe Secondly our good workes do please hym because they bee done and wrought by hys spirite Phi. 2. For as the holy Apostell doeth testifye he worketh in vs both the will and the dede accordinge to hys good wyl And therfore saint Augustine saieth ryghte well Augu. that God doeth croune in vs hys owne workes We canne not denye but that the works that we do by the spiryt of god are bi reason of our imperfection vnperfectely good yet for as muche as they come of hym it canne not be but that they must please hym as beynge the righte author of them Thyrdely that whiche the Godlye do they do it for Gods sake beynge desirous to gratifye him in all thinges Wyll not he thinke ye accept this their good wyll and desyre or mynde that they haue to please him We do not here speake of those Note that neyther of a pure fayeth nor by the sprytte of God but of mere superstition and of a generall custome do woorke manye thinges thynkinge thereby to please God whereas they do hyghly displease him This saying of Christ is not vnknowen They worshippe me in vayne teachinge the doctrynes and preceptes of men Math. 15. Herein bothe the Iewes and false Christyans doe mooste shamefullye erre Fourthelye God oure heauenlye father doethe accordynge to his ryghteousnesse loue al works that be good righteouse and iuste as on the contrary side he doeth not onely detest and abhorre the vngodlynesse and vnrighteousenesse of a wicked hart but also all the frutes of vngodlynesse and of vnrighteousesse vnder what tytelles so euer they be aduaunced and set foorthe Thou doest hate Psal 5. saieth Dauid all that worke iniquitye thou shalt destroy them all that speake leasinge And in the Actes of the Apostelles thus doeth Peter saye Act. 10. Emonge all nations whosoeuer doeth feare God is acceptable vnto him Fyftely because that God is most true yea rather the truthe it selfe our good dedes do therefore please him be cause that they proceade of true godlynesse and of an vnfaygned sayth which aboue all thinges God is wonte to regarde and accepte For as all hipocrites are detestable bothe before God and before men so contrarywise God loueth truthe not onely in those thinges that are well done of the faithfull but also in them that do truely and without al dissimulation confesse and acknowledge theyr synnes EVTRA. Truely syth that it is so manifest How earnestly the causes aboue rehersed oughte to moue vs to do good workes that the good works of the faythfull do please God we oughte with all oure whole endeuour to geue our selues vnto good workes for as muche as they be not onely many and sondrye wayes profitable vnto the whole misticall bodye of Christ which is his church but are also for the causes aboue rehersed most pleasaunt and acceptable vnto the lyuinge Lord oure heauenlye father For that man hath but small Godlynesse in him selfe whom these two causes can not moue to do wel Agayn he that gapeth onely in doynge of good workes after a recompence or rewarde or reckeneth for a merite whatsoeuer he doeth thinkinge that God is therefore bound vnto him hathe but a mercenaries hart DYDIMVS Whether our good workes shall be rewarded or not And shal our good workes be neuer a whytte rewarded PHILA I wyll not saye so For althoughe the liuing God be debtoure vnto no man yet of his goodnesse he doeth promysse and geue a reward vnto the good workes of the faythfull And therefore we haue these sayings in the scriptures Math. 5.10 Reioyce and be glad for youre rewarde is great in heauen agayne he that geueth to one of these my lytle ones a cup of coulde water in my name Verely I say vnto you he shall not lose his reward Heb. 6. And in the Epistel to the Hebrewes God sayeth he is not vnrighteouse that he should forgette our laboure Nowe we must not thinke that this reward is promised vnto our good workes because of the dignitye and worthinesse of them for are not these
a kingedome of lyes folio 4. They that are iustified by workes are able or must be be able to aunswere fullye to the iustice of God folio 5. The offeringe of Isaac is a testymonye of the fayth and righteousnesse of Abraham fol. 8. This word to iustify is otherwise taken of Paul then of Iames. fo 9. To attribute iustificatioÌ vnto any merites goyng before is a derogation of the grace of God fo 12. The enemies of the truth are to be likened to the Arians fol. 15. The purpose of God doeth exclude all merites and deseruinges from the iustification of man fo 17 The fathers were to be blamed that do affyrme fayth onely to iustify if that doctrine wer not true fo 24 The history of Cornelius fo 30 The frutes of iustification fo 31 The firste frute of iustifycation folio eodem The 2. frute of iustification fo 32. The certaynety of Gods promise folio 33. The .4 frute of iustificatioÌ fo eodeÌ The .5 frute of iustificatioÌ fo eodeÌ The common doctrin of preachers touching good works fol. 35. The deuil did peruerte the ende of our creation which Christ restored agayne fo eodem The works of the papistes fo 36 They that are enemies of the papistes good workes are enemies of synne and of most detestable abhomination fo 37. Terrible and dreadefull histories folio 38. The order that god had appointed touchinge the Arke fo 39. The historye of Saul fol. 40 The vntrue reporte of the papists folio 43. They the worke for feare are lewde seruauntes fol. 44. The causes whye our good works do please God fo 47. The causes why we canne by our good workes merit no part of our saluation fo 51. The imperfection of our workes folio 57. The inestimable glorye of lyfe euerlastynge doeth cutte awaye all merites fo 59. To attribute any parte of the heauenly felicitye and glorye vnto the merits of men it is to be iniurious vnto the glory of the grace of God folio 62. The exposition of Daniels words folio 63. The diuersity that now is among Aungels shal ceasse at the generall resurrection of the righteous fo 67 To the parable of the talents fo eodeÌ To the place of the .2 to the Cor. fo eo To the place of the .22 of Luc fo 99 The epilogus or coÌclusion fo eod Three sortes of people althoughe thei do good works do not deserue the praise of wel doinge fo 73 The perfecte obedience of Christe is imputed vnto vs. foli 73. V. Vzah smitten of the Lord fo 39. Vayn shadowes of men fo 47 W. Why ther is a diuersity in the punishementes of the reprobate and non in the rewarde of the elect and chosen foli 65 Who thei be that can sing the new songe foli 70. Why the true electe are called virgines foli eodem What it is to folowe the lambe whether soeuer he goeth fo eodem Who the be that storme at the doctryne of predestination foli 2. We ought not for the feare of men to hyde the truth fol. 3 What scope or marke we oughte to shote at in settinge foorth the doctrine of iustification of fayth fo 3. What it is to be iustified by workes fo eodeÌ What it is to be iustified by fayth folio 6. What fayeth Abraham was iustified by fo 7 What be the meanes whereby we are iustified or deliuered frome the state of dampnation fol. 11. What Paul vnderstandeth by the workes of the law fo 14. What they must do that wyll enioye the righteousnesse of Christe folio 15. What credyt ought to be geuen to the enemis of the truthe and what shamful ignoraunce thei be wrapped in fo 19. Whye the scrybes and Pharisees were vtter ennemies vnto the gospell fol. eodem Whye our greate rabbies wil not acknowledge theyr errour fo 20 We ar not deliuered froÌ our sins to this end that we should walow in them agayne fo 23. Why the Athenians woulde here Pauls doctrine fo 29. Why the spirit of Christ is geuen vnto them that be iustified fo 34. Whereof the enemies of the truth be ashamed fo eodem Why man was created fo 35. Why we be regenerate in Christ folio 36. Who they be that are offended at the doctrine of iustification of faith folio 36. Whiche be the true good workes that God doth require of vs. fo 41 Whye the good workes of mercye are set most chieflye foorth vnto vs folio eodem Whiche be the good workes that god hath prepared for vs to walke in foli 42. Whye all they that doe those good workes that God hath commaunded in his word do not deserue the prayse of well doing fo eodem Why fayth is likened to a sparke folio 45. Wherin our iustification doth consyste foli 5. What causeth Turkes and Paynimes to abhorre Christs religion folio 46. Whether our good workes be acceptable vnto God or not fo 47. Whether our good works shal be rewarded or not fo 49. We are all debters vnto god fo 51 Woorkes of supererogation are blasphemous and iniurious to the merits of Christ and therfore they oughte rather to be called workes of derogation fol. 55. Whereupon they grounde them selues that do appoynte diuersities or degrees of glorye in the lyfe to come foli 59. Here endeth the Table ¶ IMPRYNTED at London by Ihon Cysdale and are to be solde at his shoppe in the vpper ende of Lombard strete in Allhallowes churchyard nere vnto grace churche 1561.
hadde promysed thoughe it semed neuer so straunge nor so muche against the common course of nature And therefore the Apostle concludethe ryghte well that it was imputed vnto him for ryghteousnesse EVTRAPELVS As far as I do remember I haue hearde you tell that otherwhyles to be iustifyed is to be declared righteous and iuste As when the prophette Dauid sayeth Psal 51. That thou mayest be iustified in thy wordes ouercome when thou art-iudged that is to saye that thou mayest be declared iuste and thy goodnesse and trueth appeare in performing thy promises when man eyther of curiosite or of arrogaÌcie wold iudge thy workes PHILA This is wel remeÌbred And therefore this shall we note by the waye This worde to iustifye is other wise takeÌ of Paule then of Iames. that this worde to iustifie is not taken of Paul in that signification that saincte Iames doeth take it in For of Paul it is taken for to deliuer from syn and for to impute righteousnesse but Iames doeth take it for to declare one iuste and righteous Agayne Paul speaketh of a liuely faythe whiche can no more be wtout good workes Fayth is not taken of the Apostels in one signyfication than the Sunne can be without light or fyer with out heate But Iames speaketh of an idell and deadde faythe whiche maye be in the reprobate yea in the diuell hym self as the Apostell writteth in thesame place Moreouer whether ought one texte too geue place to many or manye too geue place to one One text must geue place to manye DYDI. It standeth with reason that one texte shoulde rather geue place too manye than that manye should geue place to one PHILALE For this one text of Iames that semeth to attribute iustifycation vntoo workes how manye notable textes and sentences shal ye fynde in the other Canonicall scriptures that teach the contrarye ALBION And we do all pray you brother Philalethes that ye will aleadge the chiefest and most principall of theÌ For as touching that place which thei do aleadge bring out of the second chapiter of Iames ye haue well satisfied my mind I thanke god therfore PHI. That wil I gladli do yea I wil be sides this ioigne vnto the autorities of the scriptures word of God the sayinges of the aunciaunt fathers of the primitiue churche that so the enemies of the trueth whiche doe moste lyengly blowe abrode that we haue no suche stuffe maye at length seing our greate rychesse vtterly be shamed and confouÌded DIDIMVS Forsothe in so doinge ye shal do vs all a greate pleasure PHILALETHES I might here bring many notable sentences out of the olde and new Testament wherein the excellencye of faith is highly setfoorth but I wil at this present omitte or leaue theÌ and aledge only those places that do most chiefly perteyne to iustification Act. 13. Firste in the Actes of the Apostles we haue these wordes written in the sermoÌ that Paul made vnto the Iewes that were at Antiochia a cytte of Pisidia Be it knoweÌ vnto you therfore brethern that through this maÌ is preached vnto you the forgeuenesse of synnes And that from all thinges froÌ whiche ye coulde not be iustified by the law of Moses by hym eueri one that beleueth is iustified These wordes are so playne that they nede no exposition at al. For all men onelesse they will be wilfully blynde styll maye easely see that he taketh awaye altogether iustification from the lawe of Moses Iustification is taken awaye all together from the lawe of Moses atributed vnto faith and doeth attribute it vntoo fayth in our sauiour Iesu Christe But in the Epistel to the RomaiÌs the holy apostell maketh the matter more playne where he sayeth They haue all synned and are destituted or voyde of the glorie of God But they are iustified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus Rom. 3. whoÌ God hath setfoorthe too be a pourchasser of mercy through fayth in his bloude Let these wordes be diligentely considered and weyghed and then I do not doubt but that they that be of an indifferente iudgemente wyl sone agree vnto our doctrine First the Apostle sayeth that they haue all synned and that they are depriued of the glorye of God By whiche wordes he doth most liuelye put before oure eyes the myserable estate that whole mankind was in Secondly he doth effectuouslye shewe how and by what meanes we are deliuered from it I meane What be the meanes wherby we are iustified or deliuered from the ãâã of dampnation frome that dampnable estate that we are in by our owne nature and fyrst byrthe when he sayeth But they are iustifyed frelye by his grace Nowe if we be iustified frely by the grace of God wher are our works merits or deseruings become For if any workes deseruinges or merits do go before oure iustification how can it be sayed that we are iustifyed freelye by the grace of God oure heauenlye father EVTRAPELVS In deede it might rather be saied that we are iustified in respecte of oure owne workes and merites And so the sayinge of the Apostell coulde not stande where he sayth in an other place By grace ye are saued thorowe fayth Epho 2. and that not of youre selues it is the gyft of God not of workes leaste anye man shoulde boaste him selfe Whereunto the sayinge of a moste aunciente wryter semeth wel to agree His wordes are these Ambrosius de vocatione gentium li. 1. capi 5. Sicut nulla sunt tam detestanda facinora quae possunt gratiae arcere donum ita nulla possunt tam proeclara opera existere quibus hoc quod gratis tribuitur perretributionis iudicium debeatur Vilesceret enim redemptio sanguinis Christi ac miserecordia del humanorum operum praerogatiuae succumberet si iustificatio quae fât pergratiam praecedentibus meritis deberetur vt non munus largientis sed merces esset operantis That is to saye As there be no synnes so detestable that can kepe of the gyft of grace so there can be no workes so excellente that vnto them by the iudgement of retribution or recompence the same shuld be due which is freely geuen and graunted For the redemption of the bloud of Christe shoulde waxe vyle and the mercye of God be fayne to geue place to the prerogatiue of mens works if iustificatioÌ which is don or wrought by grace were due vnto the merits that go before so that it shoulde not be the free gyfte of the gyuer but the rewarde or hyre of the worker What other thinge I besech you doeth this holy father meane but that we are without any merites goynge before iustified frely by the mere goodnesse and grace of God To attribute iustification vnto any merites going before is a derogation of the grace of God through faith in the bloud of his sonne Iesu Christ Yea he doeth playnely affirme that it is a derogation of
ignoraunte pesonnes they haue lyeffer too continue and remaine in their erroure and to be stomblynge blockes styll vnto the people than ones too reuoke theyr erroure and to geue the glorye vnto God DYDIMVS And suppose ye that thys is the cause of their obstinacye PHILALETHES It appeareth that is so elles wold they reuoke or recant their erroure and as oure brother Eutrapelus sayd geue the glorye vnto God But we wyll leaue them vntoo theyr iudge who at length wyll by his righteous iudgemente God send him betymes send a Iehu who shal make hauok of them all and so proceade to the reste of oure matter Hylarius in the .ix. Canon vpon Mathewe Hilarius canone nono in Math. and vpon these words Remittuntur tibi peccata tua Thy synnes are forgeuen the writeth on this maner Mouet scribas remissum ab honine peccatum Hominem enim tantum in Chiristo Iesu contuebantur et remissum ab eo quod lex laxare non poâerat Fides enim sola iustificat That is to wytte It moueth the scribes that synne was forgeuen by man For they did only behold man in Christ Iesu and that to be forgeuen of him whiche the lawe could not release For fayth onely doeth iustifye This texte is verye playne For first and foremost he sayeth that the scribes wer moued because that Christ forgaue synne whome they iudged to be a nude and bare man but speciallye that he toke vppon him to forgeue and pardon that which the law could neyther releasse nor forgeue For these were theyr wordes Whye doeth this man speake suche blasphemyes Who can forgeue syns but God onelye And finallye he doeth knyt vppe the matter with these words Fides enim sola iustificat If it be an hereây to ãâã that faith only âuââify ãâã the ãâ¦ã Mat. 2 For faith only doth iustify If we for saying that fayth only doth iustifye do deserue to be called heretikes how shall I beseche you S. Augustine Ambrose Ierome and Hylarius be excused which do vse the same phrase and maner of speakinge that we do vse and mayntayne the same doctrine that we do maintayn Shall they not with vs be called Solifidians ALBION Nowe of a truthe I doe vnderstande and perceaue that I haue bene shamefullye beguyled by these bragginge marchauntes of the clergye PHILA Ye wyll saye so by that tyme that ye haue hearde all I haue alreadye aleadged .iiii. of the most aunciente of tha latine writers nowe wyll I ioygne vntoo them .iiii. of the greeke doctours I wyll not cumber the reader with so many as I coulde nowe bringe in for I suppose these fewe to be sufficiente for to satisfye anye resonable mannes mynde First we wyll brynge in Origenes in tertium caput epistole ad Romanos olde father Orygene who vppon the epistell to the Romaynes writeth on this manner Apostolus hisce verbis Arbitramur igitur fide iustificati hominem absque operibus legis dicit sufficere solius fidei âustificationem ita vt credens quis tantummodo iustificetur etiam si nihil operis ab eo fueâit expletum Quod si exemplum requiramus quis siâe operibus sola fide iustificatus sit sufficere arbitror illum latronem qui cum Christo crucifixus clamauit ei de cruce Domine Iesu memento mei cum veneris in regnum tuum nec aliud quicquam describitur boni operis eius in euangelijs sed pro hac sola fide ait ei Iesus Amen dico tibi Hodie mecum eris in paradiso Per fidem ergo iustificatus est hic latro absque operibus legis Quia super hoc dominus non requisiuit quid prius operatus esset nec expectauit quid operis cum credidisset expleret sed sola confessione iustificatum comitem sibi paradisum ingressurus assumpsit That is to saye Rom. 3. Paul by these wordes We suppose therefore that manne is iustified by faythe with out the workes of the lawe affyrmethe that the iustifycation of faythe alone or of fayeth onelye is sufficyente so that anye manne beleauinge onelye canne be iustifyed althoughe no manner of worke hath bene fulfylled or done by hym And if we requyre an example who was iustified by faythe onelye without workes Luc. 23 I suppose that the same theefe doeth suffice who when he was crucifyed wyth Christ did crye vnto hym from the crosse Lord Iesu remember me when thou comest in to thy kingedome Neyther anye good other worke of hys is described or sette foorthe vnto vs in the gospelles But for thys fayeth onely Iesus sayed vnto him Verely I saye vnto the this day thou shalt be with me in paradyse This thefe then was iustified by fayth without the workes of the lawe For the Lord did not vpon this requyre what he had wrought before neither did he looke what worke he should do after he did beleue but beynge redye to enter in to paradise he toke him for his waitinge man beinge iustifyed by that confession onely Besides this he doeth aleadge the example of the synnefull woman and of the Publican Luc. 7.18 that be mentioned of in the Gospell of Luke whome he doeth also affirme too haue bene iustified by fayth onely withoute any respecte of workes merites or deseruinges DYDIMVS I am affrayed lest some hearinge this doctryne so Obiecti ⣠on 3 largelye set foorthe doe waxe remisse negligente and slacke in doinge of good workes sythe that fayth alone doth suffyse to iustification yea I feare also leaste they geue them selues to lyue lycentiouslye and to folow the lustes and the concupiscences of the fleshe PHILALETHES Aunswer Origene doeth him selfe make aunswer to the same obiection sayinge If any man doeth liue wickedly after iustification We are not deliuered froÌ oure syns to this end that we shuld walowe in them agayne withoute doubte he hath despised the grace of iustificaon Neyther doeth any receaue remission or forgeuenesse of sinnes to this ende that he should thinke that licence to synne agayn is geuen vnto him For a pardone not of the synnes to come but of the synnes passed is geuen or graunted in iustification But of thys we wyll speake more amply hereafter when we shall haue occasyon too talke of those good workes that do springe and proceade of the true iustifyinge faith ALBION Let vs therefore hear what the other greecke doctours do saye PHI. With a good wyll Athanassius vpon the thirde to the Galathians writeth briefli thus Athanasius Nunc pla âe demoâstrat fidem ipsam vel solam iustificandi virtutem habere Now sayeth he doth he playnly shewe that the same faiâhe yea beinge alone hath power to iustifye Wherunto Chrisostome agreeth sayinge Chrisostomus in epistolam ad Rom. Homeli 7. Hic virtuteÌ dei ostendit quod non solum saluauit sed et iustificauit nullis ad hoc vsus operibus sed fidem tantum exigens That is to say he sheweth the vertue and power of God