in him Or if that work doth not hinder the free grace of iustification in Protestants conceit because it is the gift of God because it doth not iustify according to them as it is an actioÌ„ proceeding froÌ„ man but as it taketh hold and applyeth vnto them the iustice of Christ Why should our preparatiue workes any way preiudicate the freedome of that fauour as long as we acknowledg theÌ„ also the meer guift of the highest and not to dispose vs to the life of grace as they are achieued by our owne forces alone or flow from the drye and barren soyle of Nature but as they are made fertile by the water of the holy Ghost as they are eleuated and inspired by his viuificall motion For if the Beggar which is Cardinall Tolets example who of his owne accord Toleâ— in c. 3. ad Rom. stretcheth out his hand to receaue the offered almes doth not hinder the francke and liberall bestowing of the money much lesse should the cooperation of our freewill which not of our selues not of our owne endeauours but moued and strengthned by God yieldeth to his motions any way withstand his liberall donation and free guift of Iustice 17. In the last wing wherein the only hope of their victory remayneth such sentences of Scripture are ranged as flatly debarre the concurrence of workes from all kind of Iustice to wit By grace you are saued through fayth and that not of your selues for it is the guift of God not of workes that no man glory We account a man to be iustifyed by fayth without the Ephes 2. v. 8. Rom. 3. v. 28. Rom. 11. v. 6. Rom. 4. v. 2. workes of the law If by grace not now of workes otherwise grace now is not grace If Abraham were iustifyed by workes he hath glory but not with God with many others to the same purpose I answere that the Apostle excludeth indeed from the grace of iustification either first or second all workes which proceed from the vigour or strength of nature on which the Pelagians so much relyed Then he excludeth the good vse and exercise of freewil done without Christ to which the Semipelagians ascribed the dowry of grace Thirdly he excludeth the moral vertues performed by the Act. 15. v. 1. Aug. l 5. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 7. in prâ—f ps 3â— ep 107. tract 50 de verb. Domini secundum Euang. Matth. Hier. l. â— com in c. 3. ad Gal. Prosper cont collat c. 22. Cent. 3. c. 4. Col. 80. ciâ—ant Orig. l. 8. in epist ad Rom. light of reason precepts of naturall Philosophy wherin the Gentils boasted and placed their happines Lastly he excludeth all works achieued by the sole notice of the Law both cerimoniall and morall in which the Iewes trusted so farre as they deemed themselues thereby only assured of Gods fauour and some of them vrged the necessity of circumcision the obseruation of their ceremonyes euen to Gentils conuerted vnto Christ of whome they auouched Vnles you be eireumcised you cannot be saued 18. Against these the Apostle so often inculcateth that neither circumcision prepuce nor any worke either of Iew or Gentill done by themselues or by the knowledge of the law without the grace of the Spirit inwardly mouing is able to saue them but he neuer excludeth the Sacraments of Baptisme or Pennance nor the works proceeding from the help of supernaturall grace to be dispositions to attaine the first true causes of increase in the second iustification whereof read S. Augustine S. Hierome and Prosper who interprete the Apostls meaning in the selfe same manner as I haue heere declared which interpretation the Century-writers haue also espyed and reproued in Origen engrossing these wordes in the Catalogue as they account them of his errours It is to be vnderstood that the workes which S. Paul reiecteth and so often reprehendeth are not the iustices which are commanded in the Law but those thinges in which they boast and glory who obserue the law according to the flesh or rites of sacrifices or obseruation of Sabaoths and new Monnes these and the like are the Concil Trid. sesl 6. Can. 1. Fulk in c. 2. Iacob sect 9. Fulk ibid. Vasq in 1. 2. disp 210. cap. 9. VVhitak l. 1. aduerf Duraeum VVhitak in his answere to M. CampiaÌ„ 8. reason â—ulke in c. 2. Iac. sect 9. Abbot in his defence c. 4. Ambr. in c. 3. 4. ad Rom. Chrys in c. 3. ad Gal. hom 7. in c. 3. ad Rom. Basil serm de humiâ—it Aug. l. 1. cont 2. ep Pelag. c. 21. l. 83. q. 76. Hesich in Leuit. l. 4. cap. 14. Hilar. cap. in Matth. August tract 49. in Ioan. workes by which he auoucheth no man may be saued Hitherto Origen quoted by the Magdeburgians To which purpose the Councell of Trent hath very diuinely decreed If any shall teach man may be iustifyed before God by his works which either by humane nature or by the doctrine of the Law are accomplished without the diuine grace of Iesus Christ let him be accursed According to this authentical exposition S. Paul and S. Iames are clearely discharged from that irreconciliable contradiction M. Fulke imagineth betweene them in our opinion for either S. Paul speaketh of the first iustification and S. Iames of the second which is not as he mistaketh another kind of iustification but the augmentation of the former or they both treate of the first and second also as Gabriel Vasquez thinketh most probable and the one excludeth workes wrought without the inward motion of grace from iustification the other acknowledgeth such workes to cooperate thereunto as proceed from grace which is no contradiction but the true and vndoubted position of our Catholike fayth 19. Although all the sentences of the Fathers which are stumbling blockes in our Reformers way be satisfyed in the same manner as these Texts of Scripture yet to ease the studious Reader from further trauaile I will particulerly set downe how the chiefest of them are to be vnderstood whome our Reformers oppose against vs concerning this point S. Ambrose S. Chrysostome S. Basil S. Augustine Hesichius and S. Hilary when they affirme vs iustifyed by fayth alone without any workes they mean without any workes eyther of our owne or of Moyses law done without grace Or they are to be interpreted of Fayth which is liuely indewed with Charity and accompanyed with other vertues So S. Augustine in his treatises vpon S. Iohn when he sayth Fayth is the soule of our soule Prosper S. Bernard and S. Augustine againe in the seauenth Chapter of his booke of predestination of Saints Prosp de voca gent. l. â— c. 8 9. Bernar ser 22 in cant Aug. de praedest Sanctor c. cap. 7. Leo serm de Epiphaâ— alibi Orig. in c. 3. ad Rom. Chrysost hom de fide lege nâ—turae Vasq in â— 2. disp 210. c. 9. are to be interpreted of fayth alone inchoatiuely S. Leo
Charity good workes or vertuous life agreable to his fayth Therefore Maldonate had great reason to coÌ„mend this as an excellent place against all them that hold Fayth alone to be sufficient for saluation 4. The second argument is taken out of S. Iames his Epistle which was as S. Augustine sayth specially directed against the erroneous maintainers of only Fayth and contayneth many passages cleane contrary to our aduersaryes assertion as if a man sayth he hath fayth but hath not workes shall Fayth be able to saue him Likewise Fayth also if it haue not workes is dead in it selfe And Yee see that by workes a man is iustifyed not by fayth only Whitaker replyeth that S. Iames treateth of an idle faygned fayth But this is euidently false for he treateth of the fayth of Abraham much renowned in holy Scripture of that fayth of his which was consummated by his works which togeather with works did iustify him before God which must needs be a true fayth for a counterfeit fayth had neuer beene commended by the holy Ghost nor byn sayd to be consummated by workes much lesse could it iustify before the face of God Againe what needed the Apostle labour so much to proue that a faygned and counterfeit fayth nothing auayleth to the gayning of Saluation when none of those Christians against whome he wrote euer imagined any such matter And demaunding thou beeleuest that there is one God how could he haue answered thou dost wel if with a counterfeit Fayth he had belieued which had been rather hypocrisy then well doing Another euasion therefore both he Doctour Fulke and Doctour Abbot deuise that S. Iames speaketh of Fayth outwardly professed which declareth vs iust in the face of men not of inward fayth whereby we are iustifyed before the sight of God But by the same argument this is also refuted for the beloiuing in God is inward fayth Then Abrahams fayth there mentioned was iustifying fayth in the â—ight of God that alone did not iustify him but workes consummated they perfected not another but the same Aug. l. 21. de Ciuit. Dei c. 26 l. de vnic Bapt. c. 10. Cyril l. 10. in Ioan. Chrys hom 2. in Gen. hom 2. in ep ad Philemon Hier. in c. 5. ad Gal. tom 2. in Apol. ad Pammâ— c. 2. Aug. l. 83. q. q. 76. Aug. l. de fide operi c. 14. iustification therefore they also perfected the iustification before God or fayth alone performed it which the Apostle denyeth And thus S. Augustine S. Cyrill S. Chrysostome and S. Hierome vnderstand S. Iames of true Fayth which they also teach not to be auailable to saluation without other vertues Likewise it is cleare that S. Iames taketh Fayth in the same sense S. Paul did when he taught that a man is iustifyed by fayth for which cause S. Augustine noteth that he tooke the same example of Abraham which S. Paul vsed purposely to disproue the peruersity of some who misconstruing S. Paules meaning pleaded the sufficiency of fayth alone of which see S. Augustine in his booke of Fayth and Workes where he auerreth that because this opinion of only fayth sprung vp in the dayes of the Apostles therefore S. Peter S. Iohn S. Iames and S. Iude in their Epistles directed their intent specially against the same earnestly auouching that Fayth without workes auaileth nothing By which it is manifest that S. Iames the rest spake not of the outward profession but of the inward fayth and beliefe of the hart to which S. Paul with charity attributeth iustification or els they all roued from the marke and disputed in vaine or S. Augustine the most faythfull Herald of all antiquity vtterly mistaketh the scope of their intention 5. My third argument I frame in this manner The Protestant who by fayth is iustifyed may after fall into fornication adultery and other damnable sinnes or not He will not seeke to perswade vs that he cannot fall into any sinne for that were to broach a new the Iouinian heresy which S. Austine S. Hierome haue long Aug. ep 29. de haer c. 82. Hier. l. 1. coâ—t Iou. since buryed in the lake of hell Fall then he may as experience teacheth of sundry forward Protestants Ministers also arraigned condemned for their villanies in this kind Wel theÌ„ suppose they may sinne I aske whether falling into these horrible crimes they loose their true fayth which they had before â— retaine it still To graunt that they loose it is to make all sinners not only grieuous offenders but either Atheists Heretikes or Infidells also for he that is bereft of Fayth must needes be infected with Atheisme Heresy or plaine Infidelity It is to deuide and separate them from al vnion with Christ and to cut them off with Wicliffe from being members of the Church it is to depriue them of the patronage of Christs imputed righteousnes or not imputing their sins and to make them sinne like misbeleeuers to death and damnation for Christ couereth not the sinnes of any according to them but of the faythfull only it is against the common axiomes of Fulke Whitaker and their followers who ween that true fayth once gotten can neuer be lost the print thereof according to Caluin can neuer be blotted out of the harts of Gods elect To hold that they still retaine their true fayth notwithstanding they wallow in Cahâ— l. 3. instit c. ◠§. 11. these sudds of vncleanes that their fayth alone doth iustify them is to hold that they still abyde in the state of saluation and may inioy the kingdome of heauen if they should chance to depart in that wretched case which is quite contrary to the Apostle Do not erre neither fornicatours nor seruers of Idols nor aduowterers nor the effeminate 1. Cor. 6. v. 9. 10. nor the lyers with mankind c. shall possesse the kingdome of God I know the iuggling they vse to delude this argument is that in thes sinners fayth is darkned during that tyme like the Sunne ouercast with clouds like the fire couered with the ashes like the tree in winter bereaued of her blossoms But all these exampls warre against them for the tree in winter is truly a tree enioying her vegetiue life the fire raked vp is perfect fire the Sun ouerclouded looseth not the beames of his naturall light although they be hindred from shining vnto vs. Therefore the darkened and Caluin in An â—id ad Canonem 28. sess 6. in Concil Trid â—ffirmeth Particulam aliquam vitiae fidei manore inter grauissimos lapsus couered fayth of the adulterer is true fayth perfect in the nature of fayth looseth not any motion of life or beame of grace which is due to fayth and if that alone be sufficient to iustify remayning in the adulterer it affoardeth to him the benefit of iustification and by necessary consequence also of saluation for no winter barrenes no embers or
psal 130. and others obiected by you when they affirme This is to beleeue in Christ euen to loue Christ c. And which is also the only roote and cause of your errour who partially attribute that to fayth which is the chiefest priuiledge of Charity and function of other vertues not essentially coÌ„pounded but mutually conioyned in friendship togeather The principall obiection M. Abbot and other Protestants vrge against vs is that if fayth be not compounded of an act of Loue c. it is nothing els but the bare assent of the vnderstanding that Iesus is Christ the Sonne of God But this is the fayth of the Diuells for they sayth M. Abbots professe so much O Iesus of Nazareth Abbot c. 4. sect 18. fol. 456. I know who thou art euen the holy one of God I answere there are sundry differences betweene the fayth of Christians and the fayth of the Diuells first because that if it be liuely and formed it is alwayes vnited with Charity Marc. 1. v. 24. Hope and other vertues which in the Diuels are neuer If dead and formeles as in wicked beleeuers yet in them it is a supernaturall and theologicall act in Diuells naturall and not so much as a morall vertue in them voluntary and free in Diuells forced and coacted in them it proceedeth from the pious affection of the will mouing the vnderstanding to that theologicall assent in Diuells it is wrested from them by the powerfullnes of miracles or euidence of things appearing vnto them Whereupon S. Augustine fayth That the Diuells knew Christ not by the light Aug. l. 9. de ciuit Dei c. 21. which illuminateth the pious who belieue by fayth but by other effects and most hidden signes of the diuine power And as they differ in these so they agree in some other points they Aug. tom â—0 l. 50. Hom. hom 17. tract 10. in epist Iaâ—n agree in that both giue assent to the misteryes of our faith both are fruitles and wholy insufficient to iustify vs before God In which respect S. Iames in his Catholike Epistle and S. Augustine often compareth the fayth of Diuels with the vnprofitable fayth of vngodly Christians not thaâ— this is not true and supernaturall fayth but that without Charity and good works it no more auayleth to purchase saluation then the naturall knowledge or beliefe of Diuells 18. When M. Whitaker insisteth that Charity and VVhitak l. 8. aduers Duraeum in his aÌ„swere to 8. reason of M. Campian good Workes are inseparable companions of true fayth and that it neither is nor can be without them besides the arguments already made by which this fancy is reproued I aske how Charity is inseparable from true fayth is it a fruit which springeth from it as the apple from the tree then as the tree remayneth a true and perfect tree although it be sometym barren and voyd of fruit so fayth â—hay haue all things requisite to the essence thereof howsoeuer it be somety me depriued of Charity Is it an aceidental quality of inseparable passion which floweth from fayth as the power of laughing from the nature of man It should follow that Charity could not be in heauen separated from fayth no more then risibility can be deuided from man Is it an essentiall forme which is required to the integrity of fayth Then fayth alone doth not iustify but Charity also which is essentially conioyned and worketh with it Finally who taught you thus to enterfeite and wound your selues that fayth is the fountaine of spirituall life the roote which sprouteth from branches of Charity Hope and all good Workes and yet that all the works which proceed from the faythful be all of their owne nature damnable and deadly sinnes all stayned with the infection of mortall sinnes I would you were once constant in your absurdityes and mindfull of your leasings that we might know where to haue you and what to refute 19. Thus hauing stopped the gappe by which the wily aduersary thought to escape hauing compassed him with reasons hemmed him in with Scriptures I am Cyril l. 10. in Ioan. cap. 10. now to put him to open confusion with the testimony of Fathers S. Cyrill affirmeth The faythful by sincere fayth to be sâ—â—ps or branches inocculated in the Vine And yet he sayth a little after It is not inough to perfection that is to sanctification Chrys l. â— cont vitu monast vitae Basil in Psalter psal 110. Greg. l. 6. ep 15. August tract 10. in ep Ioan. Aug. l. defide operi c. 14. 15. l. 21. de ciuit Dei c. 16. â—n â—â—chir c. â—8 de octo dupl quaest q. 1. Augu. in praef Psal 31. Cent. 2. c. 4. Colum. â—0 61. Cent. 3. c. 4. Colum. 79. 80. Cent. 4. c. 4. Colum. 292. 293. Cent. 5. c. 4. Colum. 504. 505. 506. 507. 508. 509. 510. which by Christ is wrought in spirit to be admitted into the number of branches S. Chrysostome What profit will fayth affoard vs if our life be not sincere and pure S. Basil Fayth alone is not sufficient vntes there be added conuersation of life agreeable thereunto S. Gregory It is manifest that since the Incarnation of our Lord none euen of them can be saued who haue fayth in him and haue not the life of fayth S. Augustine Many quoth he say I belieue but fayth without workes saueth not And he vvriteth a vvhole booke of purpose besides many other inuectiues against this dangerous persvvasioÌ„ of only fayth to be sufficient to saluation he likevvise shevveth many sayings of the Apostle to be false that saying of Christ If thou vvilt enter into life keep the Commandments to haue beene in vaine vnles other thinges vvere necessary besides fayth yea besides true fayth for discoursing of the fayth of Abraham vvhich you cannot deny to be true he pronounceth that euen that Fayth of his had beene dead vvithout vvorkes and like a stocke vvithout fruit dry vvithered and barren But vvhat should I recyte particuler authorityes of this or that Father We haue on our side by voluntary confession and iudgment of our Aduersaryes the Magdeburgian Protestants the generall consent of all most ancient and illustrious vvriters vvhich liued vvithin the first fiue hundred yeares after Christ for in the second hundred they accuse by name S. Clemens Alexandrinus and Theophilus for approuing in this point the truth of our doctrine cyting their vvords and quoting the places vvherin they approue it They attach of the same fault Origen Methodius Tertullian S. Cyprian in the third Lactantius Nilus Chromatius Ephrem S. Hierome S. Gregory Nissen S. Hilary S. Gregory Nazianzen and S. Ambrose in the fourth In the fifth S. Chrysostome S. Augustine S. Cyrill S. Leo Prosper Sedulius Theodulus Saluianus Salonius Eucherius 20. Wherefore to conclude for the obiections which belong to this and the next I shall ioyntly make answere in the Controuersy of good workes if all these renowned
these three meanes is Aug. l. 2. in Iulian c. 8. imparted vnto vs. First by the lauer of regeneration in which all sinnes are remitted Then by wrastling with vices from whose guilt we are absolued Thirdly when our prayer is heard by which we say forgiue vs our trespasses Finally S. Iames Do you see that Iac. 2. v. 24. by workes a man is iustifyed and not by fayth only which as I haue declared aboue cannot be vnderstood of outward Gen. 15. v. c. Rom. 4. v. 9. but of inward iustification before the face of God of that wherin Fayth doth iustify yet not only not alone Of that wherein Abraham was iustifyed when it is sayd of him Abraham beeleued and it was reputed to him to iustice the chiefe place which D. Whitaker M. Abbot and their confederacy so often alleadge for their true iustifying and internall VVhitak l. 8. aduers Duraeum Abbot in his defence c. 4. VVhitak in his preface to the reprehens p. 4. Cent. 2. c. 4. Colum. 71. Sciendum est esse eam adulterinaÌ„ Fayth In so much as many of the Lutheran and Zuinglian Protestants either traduce that saying of the Apostle or discard the whole Epistle out of the Canon of holy Scripture by reason he disputeth heere so mightily against them For this moued Luther to account it no better then an Epistle of straw in comparison of the Epistles of Peter and Paul as Whitaker after impudent denyalls was constrayned to confesse by finding an old edition wherein Luther disgorged that blasphemous paralell that poysoned speach which his whelps the Magdeburgian Centurists licking vp after him cast forth in this manner It is to be vnderstood that that is a bastard or an adulterous Epistle Among other reasons they alleage this Because against Paul and against all Scriptures the epistle of Iames ascribeth Iustice to works and peruerteth as it were of set purpose that which Paul argueth out of Genesis that Abraham was iustifyed by only fayth without workes and auoucheth that Abraham obtayned iustice by workes Rom. 4. Gen. 15. Cent. 2. c. 4. Colum 71. Cent. 1. c. 4. Colum 54. Pomeran ad Rom c. 8 Musculus in locis coÌ„mun c. de iustific num 5. p. 271. Vitus Theod. in annot in nouum Testam p. vltim Illiricus in praf Iac. Rom. 4. And in the first Century The Epistle say they of Iames swarueth not a little from the Analogy of the Apostolicall doctrine whereas it attributeth iustification not to only Fayth but to workes and calleth the Law a Law of liberty 4. Pomeran another Lutheran of singular fame among them accuseth S. Iames of no lesse then three notorious faults heerin First of making a wicked argument Secondly of concluding ridiculously Thirdly of cyting Scripture against Scripture Wolfgangus Musculus also a famous Zuinglian rebuketh S. Iames That he alleadgeth the example of Abraham nothing to the purpose c. He confoundeth the true and properly Christian Fayth which the Apostle euer preacheth with that which is common to Iewes and Christians Turkes and Diuells c. and setteth downe his sentence so different from the Apostolicall doctrine The like is affirmed by Vitus Theodorus once preacher of Norimberge and by Illyricus a great Sholler of Luther who ioyne with vs against their owne sect-mates the Caluinists and all English Protestants in these two poynts First that S. Iames cannot be expounded of fayth outwardly professed but of the inward Christian fayth Secondly that Fayth alone doth not iustify according S. Iames but workes also in the same sense as S. Paul attributeth iustification to Fayth Therfore Luther boldly confesseth a contradiction betweene them which cannot be Luth. in collo conutualib latin tom 2. de libris noui Test. Idem in c. 22. Genes reconciled Many saith he haue taken great paines in the epistle of Iames to make it accord with Paul as Philip endeauoureth in his Apology but not with good successe for they are contrary faith doth iustify faith doth not iustify c. In another place he hath these wordes Abraham was iust by fayth before he is knowen such an one by God Therfore Iames doth naughtily conclude that now at the length he is iustified after this obedience for by works as by fruits faith and iustice is known but it followeth not vt Iacobus delirat as Iames dotingly affirmeth Therfore the fruites do iustify From whence we also gather that the spirit of our English Reformers is different from the spirit of Lutherans from the spirit of Zuinglians and so one of them a lying spirit in a capitall point in receauing the epistle of S. Iames for Canonicall and conteyning the true doctrine of the Apostles which they contemnâ— as apocriphall and varying from the Apostolicall doctrine in a substantiall article of fayth 5. But these things I leaue and come backe againe to my former discourse After the example of Abraham he confirmeth it with another of Rahab saying Also Rahab the harlot was not she iustified by workes receauing the Messengers Rom. 4. putting them out another way And then he coÌ„cludeth for euen as the body without spirit is dead so also fayth without good works is dead From which words these consequences may be manifestly drawn First as the body is a true body depriued of the spirit of life so fayth may be true fayth bereft of the life of Charity although dead fruitles without vigour force or actiuity to iustify as the body is dead without Iac. c. 2. v. 25. the soule SecoÌ„dly the spirit is not any outward effect only or sign of life but the true inward forme which giueth life to the body no more are works the effects only as Whitaker Ibidem v. 26. calleth the manifestations of righteousnes but the true causes also therof They do as Hugo commenteth vpon that passage by the works the fayth was consumate perfect Faytlr declare it augment and consumate it Yea they giue it the life VVhitak in his answere to M. Camp 8. reason Huge in illum loâ—uÌ„ Iac. c. 2. v. 22. efficacy both of the first and second iustification for if we vnderstand by workes the spring or fountaine from whence liuely workes proceed whch is Charity they formally impart to Faith the first life efficacy of Iustice If other actions operations which flow from Charity they meritoriously attribute the second life of iustification which is the augmentation perfection and full accomplishment of the former S. Ambrose interpreteth them of the fountaine and first life explicating those words of the Apocalyps I know thy workes that thou hast the name that thou liuest thou art dead He hath the name that he liued that Ambr. in c. 3. Apo. is the name of a Christian but he was dead because he had not the works of fayth which is Charity c. as the body is dead without the soule so also if all good things we seem to haue they are
washed but not purifyed exorcised and breathed on but not infranchised from the power of the Diuell Say also that bloud is shed for them in remission of sinnes but they are cleansed with the remission of no sinne these be strang thinges which you teach new thinges which you teach false thinges which you teach we wonder at the strang beware of the new reproue the false If he thus canuased them for denying the VVhitaker l. 8. aduersus Duraeum and in his answere to 8. reason of M. Campain f. 22â— in English In his marginall â—ots added out of his defence purgation of infants soules who acknowledged in them nothing to be purged how would he haue ratled you who acknowledg them defiled yet not purifyed from their ordure You say I confesse their persons are accepted through the mercy of God their faults are not imputed they are outwardly couered with the veile of grace but within within lurketh the venome which infecteth the whole man within in themselues in the secret bowells of their soule they are as deeply tainted poysoned and corrupted as when they were first borne the children of wrath the sonnes of darknes and of vtter perdition 18. O Diuellish facriledge O hatefull barbarisme which Whitaker himselfe would seeme to abhorre for being charged therewith first by M. Campian after by Duraeus he answereth That channell of sinne doth remaine not within them that haue attayned true righteousnes as you slaunder vs to teach but by the power of the Holy Ghost it is dayly purged out You see he would fayne wash his handes and plead not guilty of this hideous blasphemy but examine him vpon the former interrogatoryes and you shall find him as innocent as Pilate was from the bloud of Christ Aske him or any of his followers what is purged by renouation from the soules of the righteous Is the whole staine of Originall infection cleansed forth and do the scarres the infirmityes only abide We desire no more you recant your heresy and ioyne handes with vs. Or is any part of the contagion although it be essentially a priuation and consist not of parts scoured out by infusion of grace Not so for this liquor is so pretious as it cannot endure the spot of mortall crime the bed of our soules is too narrow to lodge any part of the one with the presence of the other And the Holy Ghost too full of purity might and goodnes to create a worke so imperfect a monster so deformed as I haue partly already and shall more fully demonstrate in the next Controuersy which followeth This is more largly proued in the next coÌ„trouersy of inherent iustice Notwithstanding let vs graunt that some part is purged out heerof it must needs ensue that that which by parts is taken away may at length be wholy destroyed for euery finite thing by subtraction of finite parts must of necessity be exhausted in the end Therefore if we be often renewed by the power of the Holy Ghost we may in this life at least in long processe of tyme and dayly increase of vertue be perfectly cleansed from all spotes of sinne Which Whitaker neuerthelesse and all his complices VVhitak vbi supra Feild Abbots loc citais account impossible obstinatly persisting that as long as we dwell in this world sinne must needs dwell in vs and such of it owne nature is mortall and damnable for veniall they deny What glosse then what exposition can they make of the wordes before cyted But that the chaÌ„nell of sinne is sayd to be purged out because it is resisted kept in and restrained from breaking forth into workes of iniquity wrought with full consent for iniquity still worketh as themselues confesse not much vnlike the wickednes of him who by sleep is hindred from voluntary mischiefe or rather like a hidden impostume or poysoned canker which cannot be cured but is stopped by Physicke from further infection And this is the abhomination of which we condemne them an abhomination not fit to be proposed to Christian eares or further refuted if necessity did not presse vs with pens of Christians THE SECOND CHAPTER IN WHICH Concupiscence is more particularly proued to be no sinne Other obiections to the contrary answered against Doctour Whitaker Doctour Feild and Maister Abbots MERVAILE not Courteous Reader that after so large a discourse and full confutatioÌ„ premised I shold notwithstanding Originall sinne in habiting as ProtestaÌ„ts hold in the regenerat is the only ground of many other their impious paradoxâ— more exactly refell this dangerous paradox of our home-bâ—ed fin irremediably lurking in the bowells of nature The reason is because I find it the generall head-spring or poysoned source from whence sundry puddles of other venemous errours are drawn For from hence our Protestants sucke that deadly baâ—â— that all the actions of man euen his deuoutest prayers best workes and desires are stayned with the aspersion of mortall crime because they passe through the stincâ—ing channell of human corruption Hence they deny the merit of our good deedes wrought by grace because there is no goodâ—es in vs pleasing to God from which they should proceed hence their impossibility of fullfilling Gods Commandments for that euery action of the iust is of it owne nature a transgression of his law hence no inherent but a vaine imputatiue righteousnes for ech one in all his facultyes pestered with this capitall vice no inward iustice no inherent grace but a meere outward imputation belongeth vnto him hence their iustification by fayth alone and apprehension of Christs promises applyed vnto them and not through the dignity of their workes enhaunced by Christ hence no difference betweene the workes of the misbeleiuing Infidel Bell in his down-fall p. 49. Abbot in his defence c. cap. â— p. 176. faithfull Christian but that they both damnably offend in whatsoeuer they do only the misdeedes of the faythfull are not imputed vnto them the faults of the Infidels are hence no freedome of will to performe any morall good no liberty in man to cooperate with God when he first moueth awaketh and calleth him out of the state of sin hence I say from this Cancker of concupiscence as from the sincke of mischiefe in our Sectaryes conceit creepeth the infection of all the fornamed heresyes which pernicious conceit that they may more plausibly maintayne they distinguish following the doctrine of our Deuines concupiscence into two sorts actuall habituall habituall is the habit the inward corrupt quality or powers of the inferiour portion to exorbitant motioÌ„s actuall in the immediat act the vntoward motion or affection it selfe both which they account not only to vndergo the name but to partake the essence and nature of sinne in so much as they hold the vnuoluntary motions of concupiscence although they preuent the vse of reasoÌ„ although they be resisted and suppressed yet to be truely sinnefull in themselues and transgressions of the law Thus they 2.
be also inherent and acceptable vnto him 12. Lastly why are the faythfull outwardly accepted only as iust not inwardly inuested with the garment of Iustice It is because God will not honour them so much whome he most dearly loueth for his Sonnes sake This cannot be It derogaterh from the riches of his infinite goodnes Or because Christ with his bitter Passion hath not made so great a purchase This were to debase the treasure of his incomparable merits Is it because God cannot endow a fraile creature with so rich a rayment But thus you blaspheme the Maiesty and power of God What then Doth it plant humility Doth it enkinkle in our harts the loue of God As though the smoak of pride the ordure of hatred the contagion of sinne abyding in our souls were apter fuell to nourish vertue then the seeds of grace the ofspring of Iustice the habits of Charity Meeknes Piety and the like Or lastly doth it tend to the greater glory of God and renowne of Christ Not so for it is far more honourable to God to haue all his seruants suited in the liuery of his beloued Sonne far more for the crowne and dignity of Christ that we be all clad in his Courtely robes all shine with the inward beames of his righteousnes then that apparelled in the raggs of our own miseryes we seeme to be cloathed with the couerture of his Iustice Is it not more stately and magnifical for a Prince to be rich welthy and valiant himselfe and without any impouerishing or diminution to his owne estate to endow his subiects with the like qualityes and store of riches receiued from him and still continued by the benefit of his fauour then he in all his pompe to be attended on by beggarly ignorant and cowardly vassals Is it not more credit for a Maister to be deeply learned to make his Schollers also florish with learning then for them deuoyd of all good literature meerly to vaunt of their Maisters skill So it is more glory to God more honour to Christ for him to abound with such an Ocean of grace or welspring of iustice as without any losse hinderance or diminution Dionys l. de diuinis nomin c. 4. S. Thom. 1. part q. â— he may deriue the riuers of true Iustice to others then if he alone should swimme in all aboundance and leaue his followers dry barraine and wholy destitute of that celestiall dew Chiefly sith it is the nature soueraigne property of goodnes according to S. Dionysius and all Deuines to diffuse and communicate it selfe to others and therefore as the bounty wisedome beauty and other Aug. l. 1. de peccat mer. c. 9. 10 Aug. in psal 98. Ipsam iustitiam ipse in nobis fecit qua illi plaâ—eamus Cyril l. 6. de Trinit Hieron l. 1. 3. aduers Pelag Basil l. 1. de Bapt. c. 2. Amb. l. 6. exam c. 8. Vener Beda in c. 11. Matth. attributes of God are made more glorious by imparting them to men in some inferiour degree why should not the Iustice of Christ become more illustrious by communicating it in some conuenient measure to the faithfull of his flocke Which according to my custome I will now corroborate with the authorityes of Fathers 13. S. Augustine They are iustifyed in Christ that belieue in him through the secret communication and inspiration of spiritualgrace whereby euery one leaneth to our Lord. Againe We are impious he the iustifyer when as he hath created in vs that iustice it selfe by which we may please him Behould we are not only sanctifyed but iustifyed also through the secret communication and inspiration of grace and that grace the iustice it selfe created in vs by which we please God S. Cyril The spirit is a heat who as soone as he hath infused charity into vs and hath with the fire of it inflamed our mindes we haue euen then obtayned Iustice. The like hath S. Hierome S. Basil S. Ambrose and Venerable Bede houldeth it to be a sinne against the Holy Ghost to deny his grace by which sins are remitted to be giuen in Baptisme Eucharist and the rest of the Sacraments I cyte not Origen because the Centurists reprehend him That he doth with open mouth declaime Cent. 3. â— 4. Column 78. Idem Column 82. Cent. 2. c. 4. Colum. 58. Cent. 4. c. 10. Col. â— 49. Luth. in commen S. Petri. Calu. l. 3. instit c. 1◠§. 15 Kemnitius in 1. part examinat Concil Trident. Patribus non mouemus litem Kemnitius ibid. paulâ— post of the Iustice of Iob nor S. Cyprian whome they also blame for saying The baptizing person imparteth the holy Ghost and inwardly sanctifyeth the baptized nor Clemens Alexandrinus of whom they report That in all his writings it appeareth he neuer knew the force of Originall sinne or the inherent malady thereof Likewise touching S. Hierome they approue that saying of Luther This point which in Christian doctrine is to be vndoubtely established that in Saints sinne abydeth was neuer by Hierome vnderstood And why did neither Hierome nor Clement vnderstand it but only because they teach with vs the infection of Originall sinne to be wholy extinguished by the inhabitant grace or Iustice of our soules Moreouer Caluin of S. Augustine touching this point sayth The very sentence of Augustine or at least his manner of speaking is not altogeather to be receaued And Kemnitius of many other Fathers writeth We sue not processe against the Fathers albeit they commonly take the word to iustify for the renewing therby the workes of righteousnes are wrought in vs. Againe I am not ignorant that the Fathers do often vse the word iustify in this signification namely to make inherently iust Thus you haue the sentence of S. Augustine the doctrine of S. Cyprian of Origen of S. Hierome of S. Clemens Alexandrinus and the common current of the Fathers speach running on our side by the partiall iudgment of no meane Protestants VVhitak in his answere to 8. reason of M. Campian fol. 231. Abbot in his defence c. 4. sect 5. 2. Cor. 5. v. 19. Psal 3â— v. 1. 14. Howbeit from these testimonyes of Fathers and deposition of their owne associates Whitaker and M. Abbot make their appeale once againe to the Tribunall of holy Scripture and to those places by name wherein our sinnes are sayd to be couered not imputed hidden c. As God was in Christ reconciling the world vnto himselfe not imputing to them their sinnes And blessed is the man whose iniquityes be forgiuen and whose sinnes are hidden or couered Likewise blessed is he to whome the Lord imputeth no sinne To which I haue answered in the former Controuersy now I add that three seuerall wayes a thing may be couered First we couer things to preserue them as sweet oyntments or perfumes least they loose their sent fragrant odour Secondly to hide and conceale them from our eyes by reasoÌ„ of their loathsomnes which we cannot otherwise
true Iustice consisteth Remission of sinnes sayth he it selfe is not without some merit if fayth do get or impetrate it neither is the merit of fayth none by which fayth he sayd Lord be mercifull to me a sinner and descended iustifyed by the merit of faythfull humility And in the epistle next following But if any man shall say that Fayth doth merit the grace of working well we cannot deny it nay we willingly confesse it c. They therefore that haue fayth by which they obtaine iustification through the grace of God haue arriued to the law of Iustice Likewise in another place This confession sayth he meriteth Iustification 5. The Centurists taxe Tertullian Origen S. Gregory Nissen S. Ephrem S. Hierome for fauouring heerin our doctrine Tertullian say they seemeth to hould that good workes do both goe before and follow fayth for so he auerreth of Patience And in his fourth booke against Marcion he affirmeth the chief cause of Zachaeus iustification to haue been in that he not knowing fullfilled the precept of Isay breake thy bread vnto the hungry In like manner Origen in so many places I cyte their owne wordes ascribeth to workes the preparation to saluation and cause thereof as in his Commentaryes vpon S. Matthew Such truely sayth he as do professe their fayth in Iesus and do not prepare themselues by good workes to saluation are resembled to the foolish Virgins And in his homilyes vpon Iosue The habitation or dwelling of God in vs he attributeth to our merits that is to our merits of congruity as S. Augustine taught whome I cyted before Then they reprehend and labour to refell this saying Cent. 4. c. 10. Colum. 953. Nissen l. de vita Moys Cent. 4 c. 4. Colum. â—94 Ephrem l. 2. de compunct cor cap. 8. Cent. 4. c. 10. Col. 1249. of S. Gregory Nissen The grace of the holy Ghost dwelleth not in man vnles be first mortify in himselfe the force of sinne They accuse S. Ephrem for teaching that Contrition doth merit remission of sinnes Wherupon they reiect this as one of his blemished places Who doth not admire that God by the teares of this short space forgiueth sinnes and that we gauled with the sore of a thousand woundes he at the eleuenth houre cureth vs by teares Againe When he hath healed vs he rendreth the reward of tears S. Hierome also they blame because in his commentary vpon the prayer of Ieremy Nimium tribuit contritioni he attributeth too much to contrition they blame him likewise for houlding That Cornelius receaued the holy Ghost by the works of the naturall law by which Abraham Moyses and other Saints were also iustifyed What S. Hierome there meaneth by receauing the holy Ghost and whether Cornelius were S. Basil reg 224. ex breuior Greg. hom â— in Ezech. iustifyed before the comming of S. Peter I referre my Reader to the expositours vpon that place and certaine it is that S. Basil S. Gregory do insinuate that the almes prayers and other morall good workes which Cornelius wrought were acceptable preparatiues to moue God to mercy and to communicate vnto him the grace of inherent Iustice Which preparation Prosper expresly acknowledgeth and freeth it from the heresy of the Pelagians Prosp l. de lib. arbitr ad Ruffin Beda in hunc locuÌ„ saying that they did not vnderstand that preparation of Cornelius to be made by Gods grace as we do And Venerable Bede out of S. Gregory affirmeth of the same Cornelius He knew God Creatour of all but that his omnipotent Sonne was incarnate he knew not and in that fayth he made prayers and gaue almes which pleased God and by well doing he deserued to know God perfectly to belieue the mistery of the Incarnation and to come to the Sacrament of Baptisme S. Augustine also thus Because Aug. l. â— de Bapt. c. â— whatsoeuer goodnes he had in prayer and almes the same could not profit him vnles he were by the bands of Christian society and peace incorporated to the Church he is bidden to send vnto Peter that by him he may learne Christ by him he may be baptized Wherby it appeareth that all these allowed his preparatiue workes to deserue in a manner by way of congruity the iustifying grace of the holy Sacrament of Baptisme 6. It is bootlesse to demur any longer on the recitall Rom. 4. Ioan. 20. v. 29. Matth. 8. v. 10. 15. v. 8. Luc. vltim 25. Marc. vlt. v. 14. of other sayings in a point so cleare which Protestants themselues could neuer gainesay vnles they would haue vs worke like stockes and stones or like brute and senseles creatures without freedome and election in the most noble and supernaturall act of our fayth wherein they place the summe of our spirituall life For if that be free as the Holy Ghost declareth it to be commending the fayth of Abraham and of many other that belieued rebuking the incredulity of such as belieued not which he would not haue done if it had not beene in their power to belieue or not to belieue Then it must needs presuppose a pious affection of the will to go before and bend the vnderstanding to assent vnto such hidden misteryes as he imbraceth not only because that alone can affoard it the dignity of freedome but also because the vnderstanding being not inclined by nature nor drawne by the euident sight S. Thoâ— 2. 2. of the obiect nor otherwise inforced cannot possibly as S. Thomas the oracle of Deuines reasoneth giue assent to darke obscure and ineuident articles vnles it be bowed and determined by the force of the will which force and Concil Araus c. 5. Concil Tol. 4. c 55. refer c. de Iudaeis dist 45. August tract 26. in Ioan. Ambr ad Rom. 4. in illa verb. Ei autem quioperatur c. inclination the Arausican Councell tearmeth Initium fidei ipsum credulitatis affectum the beginning of Fayth and the affection it selfe or desire of belieuing And for this cause the fourth Toletan Councell sayth Mentis conuersione quisquis credendo saluatur By the conuersion of his owne mind euery one belieuing is saued S. Augustine recyting many thinges that man may do not willingly immediatly inferreth but belieue he cannot vnles he be willing S. Ambrose To belieue or not belieue is the part of the will for he cannot be forced to that which is not manifest Origen No man is depriued of the possibility of belieuing for this is placed in the arbitrement or choice of man and in the cooperation of grace S. Clemens Alexandrinus The kingdome of heauen is yours if you will c. it is yours if you shall only be willing to belieue Which wordes the Centuristes quote and with their proud and audacious pen censure as Origen ho. 2. in diuersa loca sacrae Scripturae Clement Alexan. in paren Cent. 2. c. 4. Col. 59. Iraen Col. â—8 apud Centur. erroneous As also the like of
the power of our will to moue or Suarez iâ— opus Theoâ—og l. 1. c. 10. 13. in breu resol § 26. not to moue to will or not to will nor to vse any choice election or liberty at all For as Suarez profoundly teacheth that which neither in it selfe is free nor in the cause by which it worketh is no way free The will of man according to Caluin and his Sectaries is not free in it selfe because of it selfe it can doe nothing without the motion and predetermination of God nor in the cause for it is not in the power of man either to appoint remoue chaÌ„ge or resist this determination of God immouably made from all eternity Therefore no liberty remayneth in vs bereft of all indifferency Necessarily determined to euery particular act by the ouer-ruling motion of the prime and supreme cause What wrong then hath Bellarmine done to Luther and Caluin of which M. Field hath the fore-head to challenge him What iniurious imputation hath he layed vpon them or their followers in taxing their Doctrine with the Manichean heresie which they as you see boldly professe and labour to support with sundry arguments sorted and disposed into three seuerall classes or seats 1. Cor. 12. v. 6. Isay 26 v. 12. Hierem. 1â— v. 23. 20. In the first they place those which attribute all our workes to the generall concourse and premotion of God who first moueth inclineth and principally floweth into our actions as All in all things he doth worke All our workes O Lord thou hast wrought in vs. I know O Lord that mans way is not in his owne handes nor in his power to direct his steps c. 21. I answere it is true that God worketh all things in vs and we with him he as the vniuersall we as the particuler causes yet so as the influence of his action neither altereth nor hindreth but rather sustaineth helpeth Fulke in c. 8. Io. sect 2. in cap. 9. ad Rom. sect 7. in c. 2. 2. ad Tim. sect 1. Augu. de verbo Domini ser 2. IdeÌ„in Ench. ad Lauren. cap. 30. Aug. l. de Natu. Grat. cap. 53. and perfiteth ours He concurreth to euery creature according to their owne nature and condition with thinges contingent contingently with necessary thinges necessarily with free thinges freely 22. In the second classe Doctor Fulke rangeth those authorityes of S. Augustine wherein he affirmeth Freewil to be lost by the fall of Adam to wit Man when he was created receaued great strength of Free-will but by sinning he lost it And Man abusing his Free-will lost both himselfe and it The like he vrgeth out of his booke of Nature and Grace and other places M. Whitaker also obiecteth the former sentence of S. Austine out of his Enchyridion addeth therunto the authorityes of S. Ambrose and S. Bernard to whome I shall reply in the next Chapter heere I answere to S. Augustine 23. Man lost by sinne that strength of freedome and perfection of Nature which he had at his first creation and so he lost as S. Augustin excellently discourseth both himselfe his Free-will himselfe in respect of God and the Aug. l. 1. ad Bonif. c. 1. Aug. epi. 107. ad Viclaem Aug. tom 7. de Praed Sanct. c. 2. Aug. l. de perfect Iustitiae de spiri lit de Naâ— gra c. finall end whereunto he was created his Free-will which he had in Paradise First Habendi plenam cum immortalitate iustitiam Of hauing full and perfect Iustice with immortality Secondly He lost his Free-will of louing God by the grieuousnes of his first sinne Thirdly He lost his Free-will of beginning or performing any good and pious deed Fourthly He lost his Free-will of fulfilling the Commandments of God of vanquishing all tentations of perseuering still in the state of Innocency in which he was created For Adam ourforefather endowed with the habit of originall iustice could by the liberty of Free-will ayded with the speciall cooperation of God alwayes fullfill and performe those thinges without any new excyting grace to quicken and stir him vp which we though iustifyed in this state of corruption by reason of many carnall allurements assaults of Sathan and dulnes of nature cannot atchieue without his diuine grace of excitation direction and protection Therefore S. Augustine speaking of the accomplishment of the aforesayd dutyes sayth This is not Aug. lib de bono perseue cap. 7. in the forces of Freewil as now they are it was in man bedore his fal Those freedomes then Adam lost himselfe according to that height of dignity he lost yet as he did not absolutly loose but impaire himselfe as he lost not the nature and Ioa. c. 8. v. 14. Rom. 6. v. 16. 2. Pet. c. 2 v. 19. Aug. l. de corr gra c. 13. Aug. cont 2. ep â—ela l. 3. ca. 8. Concil Arausi can 7. 22 Mileuit can 4. Ambr. in c. 6. ad Roman Ruper l. 4. com in Gen. c. 3. Aug. tract 41. in Ioan. cap. 8. noli in quit libertate abuti ad liberè peccandum sed vtâ—râ— ad non peccandum Aug. l. 1. ad Bâ—â—if c. 2. liberum arbitrum vsque adeo in peccatore non perijt vp per illud peccent maximâ— omnes qui cum delectatione peccant condition of man so neither the faculty of his will which still continuing remaineth free 1. To thinges in different with Gods general concourse 2. To things morally good with his peculiar assistance 3. To accept or refuse his motions offered 4. To worke and purchase his saluation by meanes of infused grace 24. In the third and last classe are digested such sentences as insinuate the will of man to be in the bondage and slauery of sinne as He that doth sinne is the seruant of sin And You are seruants of that to which you obey Seruants of corruption And S. Augustine I say Free-will but not made free Free from iustice but slaue of sinne To which purpose M. Fulke often repeateth this other saying of S. Augustine Free-will being made captiue auayleth nothing but to sinne 25. I answere S. Augustine in this later place writing against the Pelagians speaketh after the manner of two Venerable Councels who define and teach as he doth that the will of man of it selfe without the grace of God auayleth to nothing but sinne that is to nothing of piety oriustice to nothing appertayning to Saluation or damnation but only to Sinne. 26. To all the former instances I ioyntly reply with S. Ambrose Rupertus and the same S. Augustine that he who sinneth supposing he doth sinne is slaue to the sinne he doth commit yet hence it followeth not that he necessarily sinneth or is depriued of his naturall freedome By which as S. Augustine auerreth men sinne chiefly all who sinne with delight Secondly I say he who maketh himselfe the bond-slaue of sin is so far from being necessarily tyed to trangresse the
1. Instit. c. 17. §. 11 cap. 18. lit 2. cap. 4. lib. 3. c. 23. God to hate vndeseruedly the workes of his handes who link his diuine Maiesty I dread to report it in the same lease with sinners who giue him the sterne to direct and commaund their naughty proiects whiles they as Oar-men row at his pleasure who faigne him to pursue and intend their sinfull ruine in giuing them ouer to a reprobate sense And thou O bound lesse piety O immeasureable bounty to whose vnstayned breast no thought of sinne or cogitation ascendeth thou who neuer permittest any euill but to turne it vnto good neuer omittest any good which may be strayned out of euill strayne I beseech thee out of the euill weeds of my deere Countrimen the good of their conuersion turne their stubborne harts bend their froward wills to loue imbrace thee the center of ioy and seate of true repose that they may at length beleeue and confesse with vs how farr thy mercifull hart and sacred will hath euer bin from working their obduration or contriuing their blindnes who with long patience expectest with great lenity sustainest with sweet callinge often inuitest with many teares and groanes of thy beloued sonne earnestly intreatest both them and all rebellious sinners to returne vnto thee THE XXX CONTROVERSY IN WHICH The Merit of Good VVorkes is supported Against Doctour Abbot and Doctour Fulke CHAP. I. GREAT is the slaunder and intollerable the reproach with which our opponents as in many other so likewise Abot in his defence c. 4 5. Fulk and al other Protestants in this controuersy are wont to vprayd vs. viz. That we pull downe the merites of Christ to vp our owne debase his honour to glory in the dignity of our owne desertes that we make our owne workes of themselues worthy of reward gratefull of themselues and pleasing to God Whereas we neuer affoard them any such priuiledge as they are deriued from our veines of earth but as they take heaâ— and are conueyed from the springes of heauen For we hold three things necessary to eleuate and aduance them to the excellency of merit all flowing from the celestiall and deified streames of our Redeemers bloud The first is that no worke of man can truly merit or deserue reward vnles being wrought with ayde from aboue it also proceed from inherent grace from the spirit of adoption inhabitant in our soules The second is that God adioyne the seale of his promise and oblige himselfe to remunerate the worke For although it be not dignified by the vertue of his promise or benigne acceptatioÌ„ as some conceaue but by the prerogatiue of Grace from whence it springeth yet his promise is requisite that he be engaged to recompense our labours who cannot be otherwise indebted to his creatures The third is that all meritorious deedes be freely and sincerely done freely from the necessity or violence of compulsion sincerely from the nakednes of sinister intention These things presupposed we constaÌ„tly mainteyne with the thrice holy and Oecumenical Councell Concil Trident. Sess 6. c. 16. of Trent against M. Fulke D. Abbot and all the Sectaries of our time a true worthines dignity in all such actions as shal be accompanied graced and enobled with the three forementioned conditions not that these conditions enhaunce them to the perfect value Arithmatical equality with the promised reward which in rigour of iustice one shilling for example hath with another or the corne sold in the market hath with the common taxed price thereof but that they infuse virtuall equality and due proportion thereunto as the seed sowed in the ground hath vertuall proportion to the statelines of the tree and accidental qualities are sufficient and equiualent dispositions to the introduction of a substantiall forme Such equiualent proportion or dignity of merit the holy Scriptures Fathers acknowledge in our workes achieued by the helpe and inspiration of the holy Ghost as Apoc. 3. v. 4. Sap. 3. v. 5. ad Coloss 1. v. 12. 2. ad Thess 1. v. 11. appeareth first by these places of holy Writ where our good deedes and patient sufferinges are expressely sayd to be worthy of God worthily to deserue the fruition of his sight as They shall walke with me in whites because they are worthy God hath tempted them and found them worthy of himselfe Giuing thankes to God and the Father who hath made vs worthy vnto the part of the lot of the Saintes in the light We pray alwayes Fulk in ca. 1. 2. ad Thess sect 1. Fulk in Ep. 2. ad Thess c. 1. sect 1. Iâ— c. 1. ad Coloss sect 3. Abbot in his defence c. 5. sect 7. 8. 14. for you that our God make you worthy of his vocation so in the auncient Protestant translatioÌ„ it is That our God would make you worthy which errour escaped them as Fulke acknowledgeth saying I confesse it is an imperfection in our translations Therfore it is since corrected in the renewed Bible by his Maiesty to bolster the euasion by which M. Fulke D. Abbot and their fellowes seeke to delude the former textes Their euasion is That we be counted worthy through Gods free acceptation by grace imputation of Christs iustice Not of the merit of our constancy 2. But neyther will the wordes beare that violent raking nor God endure so great a wrong that he should account those worthy call them worthy who haue no worthines in them Then S. Paul there writeth of the Thessalonians who were counted worthy by true beliefe and imputation of Christes worthines long before Therefore it had beene lost labour for him alwayes to pray for that which they had obtayned and could not by Protestants Sophismes euer loose or be further perfected and enriched therewith It was the increase of inherent Godlines and holy conuersation for which he offered his prayers that profiting heerein from day to day they might be made Ad Heb. 1â— v. 16. Primas in eâ—m locum worthy of the creation and society of Saintes to which they were called as many other Textes euideÌ„tly perswade which ascribe vnto our workes the dignity it selfe and worthines of merit S. Paul to the Hebrewes Beneficence and communication do not forget For with such hostes God is promerited So Primasius scholler to S. Augustine By such sacrifices ChrysostoÌ„ Oecumen Theophil Erasm in eum locuÌ„ and giftes of almes Deus promeretur adipisci God is promerited or vouchsafed to be gayned The greeke hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God is well pleased The Syriake scaphar pulchrescit that is God waxeth faire he becometh more amiable louing and fauourable vnto them S. Chrysostome Oecumenius Theophilact and Erasmus read God is pacified reconciled by meanes of these workes which could not be vnles they had some thing in them that procured his fauour In Genesis also where our Translation hath in latin and English I am inferiour Gen. 32.