by doing whereas it is he and he alone that hath merited to us Grace and Glory and all title to Heaven Not to say that a Charter of life from such a noble Superiour as Christ by the purchase of blood and of such blood the blood of God Act. 20.28 is some better then to have eternall liveliehood and free-hold from our duty and lubrick best works which are polluted with sin and by which though we were Evangelically conscious to our selves of nothing yet should we not be therefore justified 1 Cor. 4.4 for the righteousnesse in which is Davids blessednesse before Christ and Abrahams before the Law and ours under the Gospel is in forgiving of iniquity covering of sin not imputing of sin Rom. 4.1 2 3 4 5 6 7. But in all the Scripture our sins are never said to be pardoned and not imputed to us by our own most Evangelick doing for we are justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3.24 not by the Redemption that is in us and are washen from our sins in his Blood Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 Mat. 26.28 Rev. 1.5 and sufferings not by our Evangelick doings and if such a case could stand the Martyrs sure might well be justified by their own blood and since no pardoning washâ—ng Law-satisfying vertue can be in faith works or our Evangelick deservings they can not justifie us nor keep and occupy the Chair of Christ. And the fault were the lesse if our works were onely called the way to the kingdom not the cause of raigning but they are called perfect both in their nature and conforme to the rule and also in order to the end to justifie us before God and to save us And if so all in Christ may say we have no sin contrary to Scripture Jam. 3.2 1 King 8.46 Eccles. 7.20 Prov. 20.9 Jam. 2.10 Yea though he that is guilty in one offends in all yet in the sight of God all flesh shall be justified this way Psal. 143.2 Nor can it be said that such works are perfectly conform to the Gospel because the doers beleeving in the lowest degree fulfills the condition of the Gospel But where it is said that the Gospel commands only faith in the lowest degree Then the Centurions faith the faith of the woman of Canaan and the greatest faith shall not be required in the Law For the condition of the Covenant of Grace cannot say they be required in the Covenant of Works and it is not required in the Gospel under the pain of sinning against the Covenant of Grace and of damnation for then all who have not faith in the highest degree should be damned and violate and break the Covenant of Grace contrary to the whole Gospel which saith that these who have weak faith are justified and saved and so the greatest faith shall be will-worship and a work of supererogation And because this way saith that all and every one of mankind are under the Covenant of Grace then 1. there shall be none living under the Law 2. no Law but only to beleeve in CHRIST shall lay an obligation on any Jews Christians under pain of wrath And if James be to prove that we are justified by works and yet mean that both faith and works concur as causes though faith more principally how can Paul deny that we are justified by works If Peter and John jointly work a miracle and heal the creeple man suppose the influence of John in the miracle be more yet it is not to be denyed that Peter wrought the miracle Nor doth the Scripture say that we are more principally justified by faith and lesse principally justified by works but the places alledged for salvation by works if works have a causative influence specially Matth. 25. speaks more for the preheminence of works Nor doth the Scripture insinuate any thing of the first and second Justification or of growing in Justification in having our sins not imputed to us to our very day of death and the Question must be Rom. 4. whether Abraham was justified by works done before circumcision or not Rom. 4. when as faith was not reckoned to Abraham when he was in uncircumcision and the blessednesse of righteousnesse by faith cometh both upon circumcision and uncircumcision vers 9. and he had faith and righteousnesse and was in Christ and regenerated when he was justified Though some taught Justification by the works of the ceremoniall Law yet Paul Gal. 3.10 states the Question of works agreeable to the Morall Law that are absolutely perfect and must be done by Grace And Paul might justly in the Epistles to the Romans and Galatians have excepted himself David Abraham and all the regenerate for they are justified by giving almes to the poor Mat. 25. as was Rachab by receiving and lodging the spyes The English Divines say How could the Scripture conclude from Abrahams being justified by works whence he offered his Son Isaac unlesse by works here we understand a working faith the Apostle must mean the same by works vers 21. that he meaneth by faith 23. for he cannot say vers 23. the Scripture was fulfilled in Abrahams being justified in the work of offering his son v. 21. which saith Abraham beleeved God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse Except it must be meant that the work of offering his son Isaac was counted to him for righteousnesse Now the letter of the Text expresly vers 23. saith that beleeving God was counted to Abraham for righteousnesse then the work of offering his Son must either be the beleeving declared by offering his son and faith working by that act of offering or if they be two sundry things he must then say this in effect Abraham was justified by the work of sacrificing vers 2â— causatively before God Ergo the Scripture is fulfilled vers 23. and Abraham is justified by beleeving causatively before God vers 23. which we cannot ascribe to the Apostle according to their minde who make faith and works the two collaterall and joint causes of Justification before God as if one would say Peter wrought the miracle Ergo the Scripture is fulfilled that Iohn wrought the miracle So Abraham was justified by works vers 21. Ergo Abraham was justified by faith 23. 2. The faith which Iames debarres from Justification must be the faith Iam. 2. by which Paul strongly proves Rom. 3. c. 4. we are justified without works If faith and works concurre as collaterall causes in our Justification before God as the Papists contend but the faith which James excludes from Justification is no faith at all But only 1. fair words to the hungry and naked and giving them supply for no necessity either of hunger or nakednesse and which cannot save and so is no faith and so can have no saving influence with works to justifie and save but such is the faith which James excludes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 14 v. 15. the
faith of Paul saves Rom. 4. Rom. 5. purifies the heart Acts 15.9 2. A dead faith is no saving and living faith no more then a dead corps is a living man v. 17. 3. A faith that cannot be shown to others in good works as this v. 18. is no faith for it hath no motions of life 4. A faith of the same nature with the faith of the Devils who beleeve and tremble v. 19. 5. A faith which a vain empty professour imagines to be a living faith when it is dead without works as this v. 20. can have no joint influence of life to justifie and save with good works all which saving influences contrair to this saving faith hath 2. It is to be observed that James maketh mention of two sorts of faiths ch 2. which the Adversarie confounds 1. All alongs v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20. he gives vive characters of a dead painted faith which is in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the vaine empty boaster ver 20. 2. He showes us of a lively faith of Abraham which wrought with his Works now it is a lewd error to make Abrahams faith and the faith of believing Rahab of the same nature with the faith of the vain empty Hypocrite who 's faith is nothing but fair words and with the faith of Divels So the Papists Lorinus Estius Stapleton Mavochius Bellarmine make it an Hypocriticall and dead faith and lively faith as Abrahams was a vitall receiving of Christ and a believing the Lord so as believing is counted for righteousnesse to differ not in nature and essence from the faith of the Devils whereas in the faith of sound Believers there is a Godly submitting and leading captive of the understanding to the obedience of Christ because it is the Lord that speaks and so a receiving of the Word as the Word of God 2 Cor. 10.5 1 Thes. 2.13 Math. 22.32 which is not in the faith of Divels 3. There is in it a receiving of Christ Joh. 1.11 a fiduciall resting of the heart upon God in Christ. And the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to confide to betake himself to a luâ—king place where one may be safe from a storme Psal. 2.12 Psal. 11.1 Psal. 31.2 Deut. 32.37 Psal. 118.9 Judg. 9.15 come and 〈◊〉 under my shaddow And this is contradistinguished from the Divels and Hypocrites who cannot seek their lodging nor a hiding place against wrath in the Lord. 2. It is to lean and rest the body 2 Sam. 1.6 Saul leaned upon his spear and by a Metaphore it is to cast the burden upon the Lord Isa. 50.10 Psal. 55.22 hence the word that notes a staffe 2 Sam. 22.18 Isa. 3. the Lord hath broken the stay and the staffe of bread Isa. 30.1 and this is to be done often when there is no present duty to be done nor any work required of us but only a fiduciall relying upon the Lord alone as at the Red Sea Moses and the people were to leane upon JEHOVAH only not to act which cannot be said of the faith of Divels and Hypocrites 3. It is to look with delight and confidence Isa. 17.7 as oppressed servants Psal. 123 1 2. 4. There is a word that notes to be silent not to speak not to move Josh. 10.12 1â— the Sun was silent it moved not It notes a Godly submission that the soul dar not speak against God Psal. 37.7 rest in the Lord file Jehovâ— LXX sub ditus esto Domino Psal. 62.6 whence faith teacheth us to submit and hold our peace and lay the mouth in the dust as a spirit dantoned of God Lev. 10.3 Job 1.21 Lam. 3 28. Ezek. 16 6â— which is far from Hypocrites â— To believe is to cleave to God from a root that signifies to adhere as thingâ— glewed together with pick or glew Psal. 63 â— Josh. 23.8 Deut. 11.22 so we become one Spirit with the Lord 2 Cor. 3. 6. It is a word of near adherence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to lean firmly upon any with hope of securitie 2 King 18.5 hast thou leaned upon this reed Hos. 10.13 Psal. 13.6 Psal. 31.7 Deut. 12.10 Thou shalt dwell safely confidently it places the soul under the Rock of Omnipotencie 7. It is to roll thy self upon God and is borrowed from heavy bodies Josh. 10.18 Roll great stones to the mouth of the cave Genes 29.3 Psal. 22.9 he trusted in the Lord rolling himself on the Lord. Prov. 16.3 commit thy works unto the Lord and thy thoughts shall be established Cartwright sayeth it is a Metaphore from men who being oppressed with a burden transfer it off themselves upon one who is mightier and stronger it is excellent when the heart rolles all its cares upon the Lord and disburdens it self upon him 8. There is a word that noteth to leane to stay or stablish to strengthen Isa. 48.2 2 Chron. 32.8 the people rested themselves upon the word of Ezekiah Cant. 2.5 stay me with flagons Psal. 71.6 I have leaned upon thee from the womb and it notes to draw near Ezek. 24.2 so it is to strengthen and make strong the heart that is trembling and shaking if it be not stayed upon God And shall all these excellencies of faith be in the faith of Divels and Hypocrites and therefore it is most absurd to make the faith of Abraham all one in nature with the faith of Divels and Hypocrites and to make the difference only in having Works and no Works as if there were the same heart leaning soul rolling and cleaving to the Lord by faith in Abraham and in Hypocrites and Divels who tremble 3. That Scripture Abraham believed and it was counted to him for righteousnesse Is not Gen. 22. when he did justifie himself by the work of sacrificing Isaac But it is Gen. 15.6 when the son of promise Isaac a type of Christ is promised to him at which time there was no work at all required of Abraham but only believing the promise for what should Abraham act or do to further the fulfilling of that promise for he believed that Gospel promise in the mean time with a faith lively and having with it as a concomitant a resolution to walk before God and be perfect 〈◊〉 then the Text shall say Gen. 15.6 Abraham resolved to be fruitfull in good works when he heard the promise and that resolution of good works was counted to him for righteousnesse which is most violent 4. Who so are justified causally and in the sight of God by Workes as James saith to him workes are counted as the formaâ—â— cause for so James from Scripture ver 23. Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 believed God and it was counted to him for righteoâ—â—nesse Which sayeth by that faith he was declared or by that 〈◊〉 was justified which was imputed to him for righteousnâ—â—â—e But his beleeving or his faith living and working like the â—ody quickened with the Spirit was counted to him for righteâ—â—snesse
Now except it be yeelded that James speaks of two â—aiths one dead and empty ascribed to the hypocrite ver â—â— 15 16. another lively and working ascribed to Abraham â—er 23. and except this be denied that Abraham was 〈◊〉 ver 23. not by that same faith It must follow that Aâ—â—ahams empty beleeving ver 23. was that which was countâ—â—o him for righteousnesse Gen. 15.6 but James cannot be so â—â—derstood but when he saith the Scripture Gen. 15.6 〈◊〉 â—ulfilled for his faith in beleeving the promised seed Geâ—â— he shows that Abraham was justified by faith without 〈◊〉 as Paul Rom. 4. and when he saith he was justified 〈…〉 â—orks in offering his son as Gen. 22. he saith he was 〈◊〉 â—â—â—lared just or not justified by the empty and idle faith of 〈◊〉 hypocrites but by a faith that did prove it self to be lively So that James proveth that we are not justified by a dead faith that neither hath nor can have good works As his Adversaries said and Paul proves Rom. 4. that we are not justified and saved by works that is by our own inherent perfect righteousnesse because Rom. 3. all have sinned Jew and Gentile Because Abraham then should boast as a perfect man free of sin and he needed no Redeemer the Law of works should save him and so he needed not remission of sins nor the non-imputation of iniquity But there is a mids between these and Iames saith that is to be justified by faith by a metonymie of the effect by faith made known to be lively not to the world only but to their own conscience for if Iames should mean that we are justified by works properly as counted to us for righteousnesse he could not say vers 21. Abraham was justified by works when he offered his son vers 22. he cannot infer vers 2â— thou sees that his faith wrought with his works What faith He had spoken of works vers 21. not one word of Abrahamsâ—aith â—aith yet he saith because Abraham was justifâ—â—d that is declared to be really before God to his own consciencâ— and others justified his faith did work in a lively way as reall in anâ— by his works and you see that Abrahams faith Gen. 15.6 was perfectâ—â— by works Gen. 22. when he offered his son Now it was not 〈◊〉 as touching the nature of it and the act of justifying for 〈◊〉 Rom. 4. cites Gen. 15.6 to prove that Abraham was justified by 〈◊〉 faith in beleeving the promise of the blessed seed some 25. yearâ— as others reckon 30. years before he sacrificed Isaac Gen. 22 â— that it must follow that Abraham was not justified by works noâ— his 〈◊〉 perfect in its lively operations untill he offered his son Isaac â—hen the contrair of this the Scripture tells us for by faith he 〈◊〉 his Countrey C. 12. By faith beleeving the promise he was 〈◊〉 Rom. 4. many yearâ— before Therefore these words seest thou 〈◊〉 faith must mean that his faith came out to view by his works But theâ—e be learned and godly Protestants who 〈◊〉 that James must speak of â—ustification reall and before God and 〈…〉 declared Justification before men only Answ. It s true 〈…〉 to name them But these are subordinate James speaks not 〈◊〉 a faith only declared nor of a justification onely declared to the world But of a declared Justification that is reall before God 2. That is declared to the man himself and to the world And that James speaks of a Justification before God the Text saith Because he saith ver 14. What can that faith profite Which is empty he must mean what can it profite before God to save and justifie As the word 1 Cor. 13.3 if I have not love 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it profits me nothing before God 2. Can that faith it is not well translated leaving out the particle in the new Translation can faith save him save him Then he must speak also of reall faith and so reall salvation and so of justification before God 3. The examples of the Justification of Abraham of Rahab which were reall must say something to the same purpose 2. That he speaks of reall Justification to the mans own conscience as well as to the world if clear in the Text also For James speaks to the conscience and privitie of the man who saith that he is justified and hath faith vers 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast faith thou beleeves the Devils also beleeve he would have the hypocrite to discusse his own conscience and solidely to know whether his Faith and Justification be reall or not And James wakens all visible professours in this Epistle as Iohn also doth to try his Religion whether it be true and solide or vain by Chap. 1. being a doer of the Word and not a hearer only 23 24. by visiting the fatherlesse vers 27. by loving and respecting the poor that are Godly as well as the rich Ch. 2. by trying his faith whether it be dead or lively by bridling the tongue Ch. 3. And therefore the Arminians and others do but lose their labour who say Iames doeth not speak here of Justification declared to the world because the world cannot judge infallibly whether our works by which we are declared to be justified are sincere or not For 1. we say that Iames doth speak of Justification declared to the world for he speaks of real Justification before God but as declared not to the world only but to the conscience also of the doer 2. Because the world can not infallibly judge of our Justification and works therefore they cannot judge at all It s a loose consequence For we may declare our selves to our own conscience and to others by our good works that we are before God justified Otherwise because men connot see our good works nor the principles from which they proceed whether from saving faith or not nor the ends for which they are whether for the glory of God or not men should not glorifie our heavenly Father Contrair to Matth. 5.16 nor should the Gentiles glorify God in the day of visitation As 1 Pet. 2.12 because they cannot infallibly 〈◊〉 whether they be good works or not and done in faith and for Goâ— Nor is Abraham declared to be justified because of a secret heart-â—â—tention to offer his son to God in the court of men but in the coâ—â—t of his own conscience he may yet his journeying to the place where he was to sacrifice his son his building an Altar his laying on wood his binding his son and stretching out his hand to kill him may well declare him to be a justified man to the world and to men Trelcatius the Professours of Leyden Calvine Beza Paraeus yea a Papist Cajetan hath said well to this point Not to adde that Scripture shall never admit that Abrahams and Rahabs sins were pardoned their iniquities not imputed and they delivered from condâ—mnation
by the works of offering Isaac receiving the spies fighting the Lords battels suffering persecution of Saul For Iames if he say any thing for this cause that good works are the formall cause of our righteousnesse our merits and in the very place of the satisfaction of the blood shed by Christ we shall so be formall causes not of the declaratory act of justifying for that may be thought to be the Lord our Justifiers act yet of our own Justification and so should we fight and run for the Crowne of inherent righteousnesse of works as well as for the Crown of Life And what Scripture is there for that 3. A man shall be as just and sinlesse as he may say I have no sin I am just And in order to the Covenant of Grace which forbids no sin as some for this way do teach but finall unbeleef he no more needs forgivenesse of sins and the blood of sprinkling nor pardoning grace then the Elect Angels or Adam in the state of innocency and to that Prov. 20.9 as to that Eccles. 7.20 1 Ioh. 1. Who can say I have made my heart clean I am pure from my sin The man Evangelically justified can say I have made my heart clean I am pure from my sinne 4. Noâ— needs such a man pray forgive me my sins as I forgive c. for he is justified from all Law-sins who is inherently holy and Evangelically just And so the Gospel is a new Law which does not forbid all sins that the Law forbids and the man is not under sinne though he sinne against the love of Christ. According to that if ye love me keep my Commandements Joh. 14.15 so he once ere he die beleeve For the Law say the Authors forbids not unbeleef nor any Evangelick unthankfulness against the Law of a ransome-payer which yet I judge the Law of Nature and Nations condemnes The Covenant of Grace forbids no sin but finall unbeleef and the beleever can not be guilty of that except he fall away 5. And it may justly be asked whether the beleever Evangelically justified who needs no grace of pardon of Redemption from sin in order to the Covenant of Grace needs the grace of renovation to keep him to beleeve for he needs no pardon for the weaknesse of his finall beleeving for the smallest weak faith is a fulfilling of the Covenant of Grace To these adde if James mean by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 faith alone v. 24. by which he sayes we are not justified 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no other then the dead faith ver 20. and the faith which cannot save the faith of fair words to the hungry and naked when the vain man gives him nothing necessary for his body 16. the faith without works 17. the faith that cannot be shown to men 18. such a faith as devils 19. and vain hypocrites boast of 20. then sure the conclusion is for us and agreeable to the scope of Iames v. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ye see then a man is justified before men and to himself and so really declared before God justified and saved by works as the fruits of saving faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not by faith only which is dead and without works For 1. he cannot exclude saving and lively faith For that beleeving God is counted to Abraham for righteousnesse saith Iames ver 23. for then the conclusion should contradict the premisses and he should say Abraham was justified by sound and lively beleeving Ergo we are not justified by only sound and lively beleeving 2. The Adversaries Socinians and Arminians who by this Text say we are justified by works know no Gospel-faith by which we are justified but faith including essentially new obedience the crucifying of the old man the walking in the Spirit and repentance as else where I cite Therefore when Iames saith we are not justified by faith only he must mean a naked dead assent as in the former verses We are not justified and that is it which we say Iames denies not but sayes that Abraham beleeved Gen. 15. 6. It is only beleeving but lively and not dead not a naked assent which was counted to him for righteousnesse and Gen. 15. Rom. 4. he was thereby justified and therefore Paul and Iames are well reconciled And the faith here excluded must be a dead faith not a lively faith and a true faith as the body without the soul is a true body and hath the nature of a true body though it be no living body So say they the faith that Iames excludes is a true faith when as it is evident it is no more true faith then the faith of Devils and Hypocrites 3. It is false by the Papists way and Arminians also that we are not justified by faith only which is a true and generall assent to the Word of God for they teach that in the first Justification we are justified by faith only without works as Paul proves but in the second Justification when a man of just is made more just say they he is justified by works as saith Iames c. 2. Now by this they are forced to say Iames speaks not of the first Justification but of the second but beside that the Scripture knows not two Justifications Iames must deny that the unconverted hypocrites and Rahab the harlot were justified by only faith as Paul saith and it were most incongruous to teach unconverted ones who never knew the first Justification how they were not justified in the second Justification And if James be speaking of the nature and causes of the same Justification before God only with Paul and not of the effects thereof it were false that James saith with reverence to the holy Lord that we are not justified by faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without works for Paul sayes it and proves it strongly from the Scripture and never insinuates that we are justified in a second Justification by works And sure he should not have denyed all the Jews all the Gentiles all the world Rom. 3 9 19 29 30. David a man according to Gods heart and much in communion with God when he penned the 32. Psalm and Abraham a beleever and effectually called Gen. 12. and justified when he Gen. 15.6 beleeved the promise of the seed Rom. 4. to be justified by works in their second or their Evangelick Justification Yea when James saith we are not justified 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only he must mean fidem solitariam a faith solitary which hath no works conveying it as man sees not with eyes that are solitary and plucked out of the heart and separated from hearing smelling and the senses though faith if true and properly so called as they say this is must justifie as the eye sees only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the eâ—re onely not the eye hears now this faith hath a causative influence in Justification as well as works if it be proper and true faith as they say
Frustrà fit per plura quod aequè benè potest fieri per pauciora There 's no need of reall satisfaction 2. Faith imputed doth well bear the sense of the object that faith layes hold on as our righteousnesse Rom. 3.21 Now the righteousnsse of God without the Law is manifested What righteousnesse of God ver 22. Even the righteousness of God through faith of Jesus Christ unto all Now if the righteousnesse of God is manifested without one Law to wit of works why not without another Law of faith and of inherent Gospel-righteousnesse And what need that Christ should die if the act of beleeving should be that precious righteousnesse of God and that according to the Law of faith This by the way As hope is put for the object hoped for As Rom. 8.24 Hope that is seen is not hope that is the thing possessed the salvation which we have in present possession is not hoped for Col. 1.5 For the hops sake laid up in heaven that is the thing hoped for For the grace of hope is not laid up in heaven ver 27. Christ in you the hope of glory So faith here put for the thing beleeved so saith the Martyr my love is crucified that is Christ my loved or beleeved one is crucified So by faith in his name is this man made whole It were strange to say by faith and repentance and mortification is this man made whole And it must be said if so be that faith includes repentance Now Peter denies Acts 3.12 this why marvail ye as if we by our power and holinesse had made this man to walk It s not our holinesse but Jesus Christ hath done it even God the God of Abraham c. ver 13. hath done it And yet ver 16. faith in his Name hath made him strong That is faith or beleeving in his Name that is in his Power Authority God-head hath made him strong Ergo faith is put for the thing or righteousnesse beleeved So Heb. 11. By faith the walls of Jericho fell that is by love the soul and form of faith say Papists and by repentance and new obedience which is all one with faith say Socinians the walls of Jericho fell So by faith they subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions What influence reall or physicall had faith in slaying men in refraining the hungry Lions to eat Daniel None at all But thus the mighty God beleeved in by these men subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions if it be replyed there is not alike reason of justifying faith which is dead as touching the influence and causality to justifie as there is of the faith of miracles in these points it is replyed there is every way the same reason For as Abrahams dead faith if it had been dead could no more have justified and saved him then the hypocrites dead faith can save and justifie him as James saith 2.14 15 16 c. So could not these worthies recorded Heb. 11. have casten down the walls of Jericho subdued Kingdomes stopped the mouths of Lions by faith if that faith had been as dead in its nature as the faith of the vain Gnostick and Hypocrite who saith to the brother oâ— sister naked depart in peace be thou warmed and filled and yet gives him not these things that are needfull to the body Jam. 2.15 16. And this we must say except we admit that the fancied faith of the Hypocrite can remove mountains nor is it place to dispute whether Reprobates as Judas have saving faith in working miracles it is sure their faith of miracles cannot be a Hypocriticall faith such as is Iames 2.14 15 16. 3. The Scripture differenceth between faith and love and faith and repentance As 1. we are not once said to be justified by faith but are never said to be justified by love repentance almes deeds It s easie with an active ingine to labour to prove how faith includes love And so doth hope and love include many other works and gifts of the Spirit but the Holy Ghost distinguisheth them As 2. by faith as from a saving principle Abraham sojourned in the Land by faith Noah builded an Ark Iacob blessed the sons of Ioseph Moses would not be called the Son of Pharaohs daughter yet to build an Ark is not to beleeve in God we pray in faith hear in faith yet these are not the same 3. Mar. 1.15 Repent and beleeve Act. 20.21 Testifying repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Iesus Heb. 6.1 Not laying the foundation of repentance from dead works and faith toward God 1 Tim. 1.5 Love and a good conscience and faith unfained Phil. 5. Love and faith 1 Thes. 1.3 We thank God remembring your work of faith and labour of love Heb. 6.10 Labour of love 11. The full assurance of hope 12. Faith and patience We beleeve in Christ but do we repent in Christ 4. Faith is a leaning on God Isa. 10.20 Isa. 26.3 Isa. 50.10 love is not so Faith is a coming to God by way of affiance Ioh. 5.40 Matth. 11.28 Ioh. 6.37 a receiving of Christ Ioh. 1.11 an eating of his flesh and drinking of his blood Ioh. 6.54 55 56. not any of these can be said of love of repentance of new obedience 4. If to beleeve in Christ as Lord and Law-giver be formally for effectively and practically we may with that Learned and Pious D. Prestoun say it is a consenting to Christs Dominion and Government over us to obey him though to consent at the Corronation and to swear an oath of loyaltie to a King be widely different from obeying his Laws as unbeleef is a rebellion against his Government Luk. 19.17 then well may Adam in the Covenant of Works be said to be justified and saved by faith for if to beleeve in God Redeemer be to give our selves to obey him as Lord Redeemer and if this surrendering be the obedience of works by which we are justified and saved and perfectly righteous before God upon the same reason to beleeve in God Law-giver and Creator in the Covenant of Works and for Adam to surrender himself Covenant wayes by a legall faith shall be the Law obedience of works by which Adam is justified and saved and so he is saved by Law-faith as we are by Gospel-faith And this is to be remembred that for one to give himself to Christ as his Lord to be governed and commanded and to be willing to obey him is neither formally faith though it may be conjoined with beleeving nor obedience but an intention or purpose to obey And 1. shall we then be justified by works that is by a purpose and intention to work 2. There are in us May resolutions and purposes like May blossomes that wither before Harvest as some are willing but not obedient Isa. 1.19 One saith he will go work in his fathers Vineyard it may be he purposes to work but yet he works not Mat. 21.30 nor is a practicâ—ll
purpose of heart to obey either obedience or faith formally 5. If to be justified by faith in Christ as not only Jesus who saves but as Lord who commands then we are justified by love for we are to love him not as Jesus only but also as Lord 1 Cor. 16.22 Eph. 6.24 especially since all the works of the Law come under the command of love Matth. 22.3.7 Luk. 7.27 Deu. 6.5 Rom. 13.8 6. All these thy faith hath saved thee Matth. 9. Luk. 7. only beleeve must be of this truth thy good works hath saved thee only do good works And it is strange that Paul saith Eph. 2.8 By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God 9. Not of works lest any man should boast Nor could Paul make an opposition between grace and works as in Rom. 11.6 if the grace of beleeving and good works were one in the New Testament for so we should be saved by works and not by works And Paul by an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 takes that away Yea but we are saved that is justified and delivered from obligation to wrath by the works of free-grace He answers nay but neither are we saved or justified by these works of grace as by means or causes For we are first saved and justified before we can do good works for good works are the fruits of free-grace since v. 10. we are his workmanship created in Christ Iesus and so justified and saved in Christ Jesus to good works that we should walk in them Yea and Paul undenyably removeth this doubt 1 Cor. 4.4 I know nothing by my self that is by his grace I am free of such sinnes as bring condemnation and so he must abound in works of grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet thereby and notwithstanding of all my inherent holinesse by works of grace I am not justified 7. There should be no ground of gloriation and boasting more then this by the Socinian and Arminian way if we should be justified by works which come from free-will not determined by any grace either habituall or actuall which is merited by the death of Christ but do proceed from pure free-will which separateth the beleever from the non-beleever Then might we glory and boast that we are not in the debt of Christ or of his grace for that which is our formall righteousnesse before GOD and so no flesh can say they are justified by grace but that we are justified by nature the same way that Adam should have been justified without being beholden to CHRIST or to his death Asser. 3. There are not properly the same causes of the possession of Life Eternall and of the righteousnesse of Life Eternall The ransome of Christs blood is only the cause of the right For jus or right to Life Eternall is a legall and a morall thing eâ—s morale and hath a morall cause as a man hath right to such a City being the Lord and owner thereof by birth or money or conquesse or by gift or grant of a Prince or of the Citizens themselves but possession and injoying the houses and rents of the City is a Physicall thing ens Physicum and hath a Physicall cause as eating drinking lodging sleeping wearing of cloaths to defend the body from the cold So the legall right a man hath to the bread and lodging he hath in an Innes but the Physicall causes are hunger appetite bodily necessities so require and his pleasure to make use of such necessities Hence the eating drinking may be Physically good and the right jus legale very bad he may have no right to the bread when he comes to it only by spoil and rapine So the legall right jus legale to life eternall is the ransome of blood that Christ payed our Goel our friend and kinsman to make the inheritance ours but that great I may say almost Apostolick light Mr. John Calvin saith good works are as it were the inferiour causes of the possession of life So simple possession is one thing and quâ— jure aut titulo but by what Law-right he possesseth is another thing But 1. Good works are necessary necessitate praecepti by the command of God and promise 1 Thes. 4.4 1 Cor. 6.20 Eph. 2.10 Matth. 28.20 and where it is said 1 Tim. 4.8 Godlinesse is profitable to all things having the promise of the life that now is and of that which is to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the promise is opposed to the Law And that is a strong Argument Gal. 3.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of promise but God gave it to Abraham by promise Covenant-promise What is that to the Galatians and to us Gentiles Mâ—ch every way For three notable points are therein 1. The heavenly inheritance promised to the seed to Christ and his ver 16. not a pâ—or earthly Canaan as Sociniâ—ns and Papists say were promised to Abraham and his seed except they say that an earthly Canaan was promised to Christ. 2. That Covenant-promise of an heavenly inheritance made to Abraham the same is made to the believing Galatians the Gentiles and their seed else Paul saith nothing for the Doctrine of Justification by faith to the Gentiles contrair to the purpose of the Apostle 3. There is an inheritance by Covenant-promise a promise of eternall life made not to works as the price that buyes the right for sure then Christ must have dyed in vain 3. Works are not necessary simply necessitate medii for then we must exclude all Infants But the necessity of a Precept inferreth a necessity of means ordinary to all capable of a Command that they do good and sow to the Spirit that they may reap of the Spirit life everlasting Gal. 6.8 3. They are necessary for the glory of God Math. 5.16 1 Pet. 3.1 2. 1 Pet. 2.12 4. They are necessary by the law of gratitude which is common both to the Covenant of Works and of Grace as we are debters to God for being so to God-incarnate as ransoned ones for everlasting life 1 Cor. 6.20 Luke 1.75 1 Pet. 1.18 and eternall well-being But such as will have our works the formall cause of our justification they put them in the chair of Christs merite and they must be meritorious as Adams legall obedience should have been yea but not but by and of gracious estimation God so esteeming them say they True but as is proven neither was Adams obedience meritorious but by Gods estimation Yea and Calvine gives a power of meriting ex pacto to our works But our works of grace are dyed and washen in Christs blood and justified that they may justifie us But the Scripture speaks nothing of justifying of works or not imputing sin to our works Antinomians dream of a freeing of both the person and works of a justified man from Law-obligation and that is a way indeed to justifie works of murther
condition of justifying faith laying hold on him who justifies the ungodly is required of us in our Covenant There is no such condition required of Christ in his Covenant of suretyship The faith of Christ is the faith of dependency but not as a condition of the Covenant of suretyship but in another account Q. But is it not hard that Christ is in one Covenant and beleevers in another It s not hard when the Lord Christs Covenant and our Covenant cannot be separated and when Christs room in the Covenant of Redemption is to be the designed person Covenanting who undertakes for us as the surety witnesse and Angel or Messenger of the New Covenant who makes sure our Writs makes valid and strong our Charters Rights and Evidences of our Inheritance Q. How is it that the promises are made to Christ as to the seed Gal. 3.16 Ans. Our Divines Beza Piscator Deodati the English Divines in their Annotations expound the Seed Christ of Christ Mystical as the Church the body 1 Cor. 12.12 is called Christ. Judicious Pareus saith that the Apostle expounds the Seed not collectivelie of many and of all the posterity of Abraham but individuallie of one Christ from whom flowes to the beleevers not so much the corporall blessing as the spirituall that is righteousnesse and eternall life And so saith he the Apostle saith that this blessing or the inheritance is given to Abraham and believers not by the Law that is by no merit in Abraham but by the promise and by faith in Christ. Among Papists Liranus the promises are made to the seed scilicet Christo in quo impletae sunt non in alio ideo dicitur semini in singulari numero that is to Christ in whom the promises are fulfilled and in none other therefore it is said to the seed in the singular number So also Cajetan Semini autem ejus tanquam cui promissa sunt in quo adimplenda erant promissa Corn. Ã lapide If the word seed semen were taken collectively the promise could not stand for its sure all the Jews were not blessed in the seed Yea many of them saith Calvin were a curse Estius saith the word seed is a collective name and notteth many and hath not in the Hebrew the Plurall Number Augustine saith he will have all Christians following the faith of Abraham to be here noted for they are that seed to which the promise is made whereas Christ is properly he in whom the promise is to be fulfilled and in whom all are one by faith and all are reduced to the Singular Number There is no reason to expound the Seed Christ of Mysticall Christ and of his Seed 1. Because the Seed is he in whom the Nations are blessed both Jews and Gentiles v. 14. And the Seed made a curse for us v. 13. But this seed is only Christ not mysticall Christ head and members for neither are we blessed in Christ mysticall nor was Christ mysticall the Church made a curse for us Nor did the Church mysticall pay a price of satisfaction to offended justice for us v. 19. The word seed seems to have the same signification v. 16. and v. 19. Consider then v. 19. Wherefore then serveth the Law It was added because of transgressions untill the seed come to whom the promise was made Now the seed coming is Christ coming in the flesh to take on our nature If the seed were taken for Christ mysticall the Apostle must say The Law was added because of transgression untill the seed should come that is untill Christ mysticall his Church should come in the flesh which is non-sense 3. Whether the promise be of Canaan and of life eternall thereby holden forth Or of Christ to come of Abraham in whom all flesh shall be blessed or of righteousnesse by faith not by the works of the Law Or of all these coming under the name of the inheritance the promise is made to many in number like the Stars For the Lamb and the hundreth fourty and four thousands standing with him on Mount Zion and the thousands of thousands which none can number Rev. 7.9 are many and may well be called seeds And though they be all one in Christ yet the Apostle must speak too ambiguously when he said The promise of righteousnesse and life is made to the seed that is to Christ head and members for the promise is so made to Christ especially of life pardon righteousnesse as the blessings promised are fulfilled given through for Christ as the only meritorious cause as all grant which way the promises are in no sense made to believers who cannot come in as joint satisfiers with Christ as joint meritorious procurers with Christ of the blessings promised to us 4. The promise is made to the seed coming in the flesh and assuming our nature in a personal union v. 19. as is by confession of all expounded Now this restricts the promise to God incarnate and must exclude the members 5. It runs most connaturally to the Text and comfortably to us if neither Christ Gal. 3.16 be understood as a private man the Sonne of Mary nor yet as Christ mysticall as 1 Cor. 12.12 But as Christ a publike person and Head and Lord-Mediator 1. He represents all the Elect and so the word seed is taken individually He takes all the promises and the weight of the whole Covenant of Grace and Covenant-promises off the Lords hand as the second Adam representing all the Family and House Behold I and the children that God hath given me As the weight of the Covenant of Works and of the promises thereof was upon the first Adam as he should manage these promises so should it fare ill or well with all his seed And so as Christ having the Gospel and Covenant-promises committed to him so should it be with us and this Tutor cannot miscarry and so shall it be well with the Pupils and Minors Were it no more but that Joh. 14.19 Because I live ye shall live also ye shall live by promise the free promise of life eternall it s no small vantage 2. The promises are laid down in Christ as in a publike Lord-Keeper Christ is that excellent Ark in which are the Tables of the Covenant and the Book of the Law and Covenant Deut. 31.26 1 King 8.9 and as the first subject of the promises he keepeth them Yea and Christ is the fountain and originall cause of all the promises for he merited by his blood remission righteousnesse perseverance eternall life all grace which the Lord makes ours by free promise 2. In Christ they are made and published to us so they are dear mercies to Christ they stand Christ at a dear rate they are ours freely for no price or hire 3. Hence nothing hinders but the promises as made to Christ the first Heir and Son of promise for Christ is the chief and principall thing promised and other things
eternall condemnation as Arminius disp pub 7. th 16.3 and the Scripture saith infants are guilty of this sin Eph. 2.3 Rom. 5. Psal. 51.5 Job 14.4 As also Christ must not have died for the sins of Infants if there be no sin in them they need not the ransome of Christs Blood The other bastard ground is the naturall antecedent desire and love of God to have all saved moved him say they to make this Covenant of Grace with all But this makes away free-grace and changes God as the blind Talmud which saith God hath a secret place in which he afflicts himself because he burnt the Temple and delivered the Jews to captivitie As also the Lord remembring the captivity of the Jews and their desolation he powres out two tears every day in the Sea or Ocean and for grief smites his breasts with both his hands And the Alcoran saith that God and the Angels wish well to Mahomet but cannot free him from death So made the Heathen their Jupiter to deplore the destinies which he could not amend And what is this but to say God hath passionate desires to have all Elect and Reprobat Men and Angels to obey and be eternally saved but he cannot help the matter and therefore must upon the same account be sorrowfull and mourn that he cannot get all saved which destroyes the power of grace and restrains the out-goings of free-love CHAP. XI The three-fold Covenant considered 2. The Law pressed upon Israel was not a Covenant of Works but a darker dispensation of Grace 3. The three-fold Covenant of Arminians refuted 4. Diverse considerations of the Law and the Gospel THere be who hold that there be three Covenants 1. A Covenant of Nature whereby God as Creator required perfect obedience from Adam in Paradice with promise of life and threatning of death 2. The Covenant of Grace whereby he promises life and forgivenesse in Christs Blood to believers 3. A subservient Covenant made 1. With Israel not witâ— Adam and all mankinde 2. For a time with Israel not for ever as the naturall Covenant 3. In Mount Sinai not in Paradice 4. To terrifie and keep in bondage the other from an inward principle required obedience 5. To restrain Israel from outward sins to prove the people that the fear of God might be before their eyes that they should not sin So they expound Exo. 20.20 the other Covenant was to restrain from all sin Yea and so was that on Mount Sinai to do all that are written in the Book of the Law Deut. 27.26 Deut. 28.1 2 3 4. c. to that same end to love God with all the heart and with all the soul Deut. 10.12 Deut. 5.1 2 3. Deut. 6.1 2 3. Deut. 5.29 Deut. 6.5 With all the heart with all the soul with all the might which is expounded by Christ Mat. 22.37 Luke 10.27 in as full a hight of perfection as ever was required of Adam 6. It was written to Israel in Tables of stone The naturall Covenant was written in the heart so was there a circumcised heart promised to Israel Deut. 30.6 though sparingly 7. It was say they given by the Mediator Moses as that of nature was without a Mediator Yea Moses was the Typical Mediator of the young Covenant of Grace The differences between the subservient Covenant and that of Grace 1. In the subservient God only approves righteousnesse and condemnes sin in that of Grace he pardons and renues Ans. Acts 15.11 We beleeve through the Grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved even as they under that Covenant Acts 10.43 To him gave all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins Abraham and David were justified in that sin was not imputed to them not by works Rom. 4.1 2 3 6 7 8 9 c. Gen. 15.6 Psal. 32.1.2.5 I said I will confesse my transgression and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin Isa. 4325. I euen I am he that blots out thy transgressions for my own sake and I will not remember thy sins So David was a man according to the heart of God So Asa Josiah Jehoshaphat Samuel Baruch Gedeon Daniel the Prophets under that subservient Covenant except they be under a fourth Covenant were renued justified saved by faith Heb. 11. as under a Covenant of Grace 2. The former was do and live this was believe and live Ans. Doing and living was but a shuting them up under the Law that they might flee to Christ in whom they beleeved else the fathers must be saved and justified by works contrair to Rom. 2. Rom. 4. Heb. 11. 3. In antiquity the former came in as added 430. years after the promise of grace Gal. 3.17 Ans. True but he speaks of the Covenant in Sinai according to the strict Law part which could not save and so its different But that proves not two Covenants 4. In the former is compulsion and the Spirit of bondage in this heart inclining freedom and the Spirit of Adoption Ans. Yet the differences are accidentall there was a legall awing of the hearts as if they had been Servants yet Heirs and Sons they were Gal. 4.1 2. The whole Book of the Proverbs spake to the Godly as to Adopted Sons They were beleevers Heb. 11. Rom. 4. Acts 10.43 and so Sons as touching a spirituall state John 1.11 12. In regard of Oeconomie it was somewhat more rigid and legall they were restrained as servants Yet it was the Covenant of Grace by which beleeving Jews were justified and saved Acts 15. v. 11. Acts 10.43 5. In the former man is dead in this man is humbled for sinne Answ. Legally dead except they would flee to Christ and legally condemned but there was true humiliation for sins under that Covenant As David Josiah Hezekiah and all beleevers then as now were pardoned and justified 6. In the former there are commands not strength but here there be promises and grace given Ans. The full abundance of grace and of a new heart was reserved untill now And the Law could not make perfect nor give pardon in the blood of beasts as touching that legall dispensation But both grace the Spirit pardon righteousnesse and life were received and beleeved by looking on Christ to come 7. In the former Canaan was promised in this Heaven Ans. Canaan is promised only but sacramentally and that was a poedagogicall promise for the infancie of that Church but a type which was then in that Covenant and is not now make not two Covenants one then and another now Except ye say there was then a Lamb in the Passeover which was a Type of Christ to come and there is now no such Type because the body is come and Christ the true High Priest offered himself Therefore there are two Christs one then to come another now who hath come already The Lords dispensation with Israel is often called a Covenant now
you are debters to keep the whole Law perfectly as the only way to life and by no other Covenant can you be justified and saved now Abraham was not circumcised that way circumcision did bind Abraham to keep the Law as a Ceremonie and Seal of the Covenant of Grace commanded of God But the Law as a Covenant of Works doth command no Ceremonie no Sacrifice no Type of Christ Mediator at all It s true that first Covenant had Moses for its mediator but as he was a Type of Christ so Christ yesterday and the day was the reall Mediator but vailed The New Covenant hath better promises Heb. 8.6 Heb. 7.22 it s a better Covenant Heb. 7.22 hath a better reall not a Typicall suretie a better Priest who offered himself through the eternall Spirit Heb. 9.14 a better Sacrifice because of the plainenesse Iohn 16.29 2 Cor. 3.18 because the reall promises are made out to us because of a larger measure of Grace 2 Cor. 3.1 2 3 4. And the first Covenant is faultie Heb. 8.7 not because there was no Salvation by it the contrare is Heb. 11. but that is comparatively spoken because the blood of beasts therein could not take away sins Heb. 10.1 2 3 4. because forgivenesse of sins is promised darkly in the first Covenant but plainly in the other because Grace is promised sparingly in the former but here abundantly the Law being written in the heart John 7.39 Esa. 54.13 And it is true Gal. 4.22 23 24 c. they seeme to be made contrare Covenants But Paul speaks Gal. 3. of the Law as relative to that people and so it pressed them to Christ and keeps them as young Heires under nonage 2. He speaks of the Law absolutely as contradistinguished from the Gospel Gal. 4.21 so it is a Covenant of Works begetting children to bondage 2. Who come short of righteousnesse and the inheritance and shall not be saved 3. Who are casten out of the Kingdome of Grace 4. Who persecute the Godly the Sons of promise so is the Law as it was in Adams dayes and is now to all the Reprobate so the Godly are not under the Law and the Covenant of Works The Covenant urged upon Believers is to prove them when they stand afar off and tremble Exod. 20.20 Fear not saith Moses God is come to prove you not to damne you and therefore Calvine solidely observeth that Paul 2 Cor. 3. speaks with lesse respect of the Law then the Prophets do for their cause who out of a vain affectation of the Law-Ceremonies gave too much to the Law and darkned the Gospel and sayeth the one was 1. Literall 2. Written in stone 3. A Sermon of death and wrath 4. To be done away and lesse glorious whereas the Gospel is Spirituall 2. Written on the heart 3. The Ministrie of life 4. And glorious and praises put upon the Law agree not to it of its own nature but as it was used by the Lord to prove them Exod. 29.20 and chase them to Christ. The Arminians also especially Episopius make three Covenants 1. One with Abraham in which he requires sincere worship and putting away strange gods Beside 2. Faith and Universall obedience and promised Canaan to his seed and Spirituall blessings darkly 2. One in Mount Sinai in these three Laws Morall Ceremoniall and Judiciall with a promise of Temporall good things but to no sinners promise of life Eternall 3. A Covenant of Grace with a promise of pardon and life to all that believe and repent to all mankind but he denyes 1. All infused habits contrare to Isa. 44.1 2 3. Isa. 59.20 21. Zach 12.10 Joh. 4.14 Joh. 7.37 John 16.7 8. 1 John 3.9 he sayeth that 2. all commands are easie by Grace 3. That the promise of earthly things in their abundance is abolished in that we are called to patient suffering 4. That there is no threatning in this Covenant but that of Hell fire But the Covenant made with Abraham is that of Grace made with all the Seed Deut. 30.6 Deut. 7.5 6 7 12. Lev. 26.40 41. and made with all Believers who are Abrahams children Gal. 3.13 14 18 19. Rom. 4.1 2 3 4. Luke 19.9 yea with the whole race of man without exception 2. The second Covenant which promiseth only blessings is made rather with beasts that well fed then with men contrare to Psal. 73.25 Isa. 57.1.2 3. Psal. 37.37 and it must build some Chalmer in hell where the fathers were before Christ a dreame unknown to Scripture The third Covenant makes the Covenant of Grace a Covenant of Works and holds out life and pardon upon condition that free-will repent and believe and stand on its own feet for there is neither faith nor a new heart nor repentance promised contrare to Deut. 30.6 Ezek. 11.19 20. Ezek. 36.26 27. Isa. 59.19 20 21. Isa. 44.1 2 3 4 5. Zech. 12.10 CHAP. XII 1. All are to try under what Covenant they are 2. Threatnings under the New Testament are more spirituall 3. Desertions under both are compared 4. Considerable differences of such as are under the Covenant of Works and such as are under the Covenant of Grace 5. Of legall terrors 6. Of convictions compelled free legall c. Quest. 1. WHether should not all try under what Covenant they are Answ. Self-searching is a reflect act upon the state and such acts are more spirituall then direct acts and therefore it should be the work of all to try under what reign they are whether of the first or second Adam And whereâ—s Angels cover their faces and their feet with wings Isa. 6. before God and are full of eyes as without so also within Râ—v 4.8 We may hence learn such come nearest to the nature of these pure and heavenly Spirits who have eyes within to see what they are and their blacknesse of face and feet when they compare themselves either with the Holy God or his Holy Law 2. The Carnall man is a beast Psal 49.20 and beasts have no reflect acts upon their own beastly state 3. The more of a spirituall life is in any the more stirring in communing with their own heart the Law makes the more of life that is in the worme when tramped on the more stirring it makes deadnesse and stupiditie in not being versed and well read and skilled in our selves and our own heart argues little of the Spirit and estrangement to a spirituall Covenant nor can any lay hold on the Covenant of Grace in a night dream Quest. Whether are there rarer threatnings of Temporall evils under the New Covenant then under the Old Answ. It cannot be denyed except the threatnings of the Sword Famine Pestilence on Jerusalem and the desolation upon the Jews Math. 23. Math. 24. but in place of all the diseases of Egypt Levit. 26. and the long Roll of dreadfull judgements and curses temporall Deut. 28. denounced against the transgressours of the former
10.5 and so it is most false that none are in Covenant under the New Testament but only Believers For Judas Demas Simon Magus and all the externally called for they cannot be baptized but as in Covenant with God Math. 22.10 are by their profession in Covenant externally as the Jews profession sayeth they accepted of and consented unto the Covenant of Grace for 1 Cor. 10.7 Be not ye Idolaters as some of them commit not fornication tempt not Christ murmur not as some of them v. 8.9 thâ—se and the like say we are the same way in Covenant as they were and our Visible Church now and the Visible Church then are of the same constitution Q. And may we not say that the same Covenant of Grace we are under is the same in nature and substance with that Covenant made with Abraham Ans. The same Christ was their Mediator as ours Heb. 13.8 their Rock and our Rock Christ. 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3 4 5 6. Ioh. 8.56 2. We are justified as Abraham and David Rom 4.1 2 3 4 5. Gen. 15.6 Ps. 32.1 2. 3. They were saved by Grace the Gentiles as well as they Acts 15.11 by faith Acts 10.43 Heb. 11.1 2 3 4.13 c. 4. There is no more reason to say it was a civill Covenant made with Abraham because it distinguished Abrahams seed from other Nations and an earthly Covenant because Canaan was promised to them not to us then to say there be two Covenants of Works one made to Adam with a promise of an earthly Paradice and another Covenant of Works to the Jews with an earthly Canaan And a third to these who in the Gospel time are under a Covenant of Works Yea upon the same account the Covenant of Grace made Psal. 89. 2 Sam. 7. with David having a Throne promised to him should be yet another Covenant different from the other two And since a Covenant here is a way of obtaining salvation upon condition of obedience John Baptist should be under another Covenant of Grace then the Apostles For to their faith is promised the working of miracles Mark 16.16 17 18. But John wrought no miracles and many thousands of beleevers work no miracles and they must be under a third Covenant For though Canaan was promised to Abrahams seed there is no reason to call it an earthly Covenant or another different covenant for to all beleevers the blessings of their land are promised Ezek 36.25 26 30 31. Jer. 31.31 compared with 38 39 40 41 42 43. Mat. 6.33 Luke 12.31 1 Tim. 4.8 Heb. 13.5 6. 5. What if we say the Covenant made with Abraham Exod. 3. proves by our Saviours reasoning Maâ— 22.31 32 33. that Infants shall not rise again and be in Angel-state and saved otherwise if Infants and all beleevers in the Saduces time be not under the same Covenant with Abraham no Infants shall have a Covenant-Resurrection nor a Covenant-Salvation Or then there is some other salvation for Infants that are saved to wit some Pagan heaven without the Covenant and without Christ and if Infants be Pagans without the Covenant either none of them are saved and chosen to life Contrair to Christ Mat. 18.2 3 4. Mark 10.13 14 15 16. and the Anabaptists grant Or there is a salvation 1 without a Covenant and so without the New and Old Testament 2. Without the Name of Jesus and the Blood of the Covenant Contrair to Acts 4.12 1 Joh. 1.8 Rev. 1.5 3. they shall be saved without the Visible Church the way that Pagans are saved Q 3. Are they not saved all of them Is not this enough But because the Kingdom of Christ is spirituall the Element of water can do them no good except they beleeve Ans. If his Kingdom be not spirituall because his wisedom hath appointed externall signes then no promise which is but good words shall be made to Children contrair to Acts 2.39 for they can do them no good untill they beleeve 2. Then should there be no Preaching of the Gospel to all Nations as Mat. 28.20 for impossible it is that all Nations can be profited by the Gospel 3. The doubt suppones that it is legall servilitie and Jewish to be under the Gospel Preached and the dispensation of signes and seals even to the aged such as are Baptism the Supper rebukes censures 4. To be a visible member and visibly in Covenant and to be baptized except all be sound beleevers must be Jewish Now certain it is a new Testament Ordinance that Ministers Preach and baptize all nations though the greatest part beleeve not Q. 4. If faith sanctifie as faith then an unbeleeving whore might be sanctified by a beleeving fornicator For faith will do its formall work in every subject Answ. Paul never meant that faith doth sanctifie in every subject but in subjecto capaci Faith sanctifieth not incest and sin they are not capable to be separated to a holy use If fire as fire burn then might all the water in the Ocean be dryed up with the least sparkle of fire If prayer as prayer obtain all things shall it obtain that the sacrificing of your son to God shall be accepted of him as holy and lawfull worship Mr. Baxter saith excellently upon this subject A thing must be first lawfull before it be sanctified God sanctifieth not sin in or to any See the Argument 1 Cor. 7. learnedly and solidely vindicated by him so as the dispute is at an end now Q. 5. What holiness is it that is called federal or Covenant holiness which is in Infants Ans. It is not so much personall holinesse though it may so be called because the person is a Church member separated from the world to God as holinesse of the seed Society Family or Nation which is derived from father to son as if the father be a free man of such a City that priviledge is so personall as it is by the Law hereditarie freedome derived from father to son if the father have jus ad media salutis right to the means of salvation so hath the son Hence this was first domestical God made the CovenaÌ„t with Abraham and his family I will be thy God and the God of thy seed Gen. 17. it was extended to him not as a father only but as to the head of the family the children of Servants born in Abrahams family were to be circumcised and to be instructed as having right to the means of salvation Gen. 17.12 He that is eight dayes old shall be circumcised among you every man-child in your Generations so it is Generation-holinesse he that is born in the house or bought with money of any stranger that is not of thy seed So God showes clearly that in Abraham he chosed the Nation and the house Gen. 18.19 I know Abraham that he will command his children that is too narrow a Church Visible and his houshold after him that they shall keep the way of the Lord. 2. Afterward
and every one and such persons by head name birth c. Yet it is not the justifying of me or John or Paul for I nor no man can know that Christs satisfaction stands for you or me by name and person while first I or you beleeve because it is the hid Decree of God 3. Nor is this legall imputation beleevable nor is it revealed as â—t is terminated to single persons to me or to you untill by faith we apprehend it 5· But the imputation of application is that in which our justification standeth And the faith by which as by an instrument we are justified presupposeth three unions and maketh a fourth union It presupposeth an union 1. Naturall 2. Legall 3. Federall 1. Naturall that Christ and we are not only both mankind for CHRIST and Pharaoh Judas the traitour and all the sons of perdition are one specie naturâ true men but one in brotherhood He assuming the nature of man with a speciall eye to Abraham Heb. 2.16 that is to the elect and beleevers for with them he is bone of their bone and is not ashamed to call them brethren Heb. 2.11 12. Ps. 22.22 2. It presuppones a Legall union between Christ and them that God made the debter and the Surety one in Law and the summe one in so far as he laid our debts on Christ Isa. 53.6 â— Cor. 5.21 3. It presuppones an union Federall God making Christ our Surety and he was willing to be our Surery and to assume not only our nature in a personall union but also our state condition and made our cause his cause our sins his sins not to defend them nor to say Amen to them as if we might commit them again but to suffer the punishment due to them And our faith makes a fourth union betwixt Christ and us whether naturall as between head and members the branches and the Vine Tree or mysticall as that of the spouse and beloved wife or artificiall or mixed between the impe and the tree Or 4. Legall between the Surety and the Debter the Advocate and the Client or rather an union above all is hard to determine for these are but all comparisons and this Christ prayes for Joh. 17.23 I in them and thou in me that they may be made perfect in one 6. Now to the Question as the Law condemns not a man but him who is first a sinner and an heir of wrath by nature in the first Adam for the Law is essentially just So God justifies not a man but the man who by order of nature is first by faith in CHRIST Rom. 5.18 Therefore 〈◊〉 by the offence of one judgement came upon all men unto condemnaâ—â—â—n even so by the righteousnesse of one the free gift came upon aâ—l men in Christ as the other were in the first Adam unto the justification of life and so we must say that all ere they be justified and before God impute faith to them that is Christs believed righteousnesse to be theirs must have faith and so believe and so be one with Christ. And this imputed righteousnesse is ours because we believe and not untill we first believe and the other imputation goes before faith So the faith of Gods speciall mercy is two wayes so called 1. As it leaneth upon and apprehendeth God in Christ for the obtaining of mercy and remission of sins and imputed righteousnesse So faith goes before justification and we believe that our sins may be pardoned and that our sins may not be imputed and that we may be justified and freed from condemnation so by the act of believing righteousnesse is imputed to us And thus justification and remission i. e. relaxing of our persons from a state of eternall condemnation as is meant Rom. 8.1 are not the object of faith but the effect and fruit of faith 2. The faith of speciall mercy to me is considered as it apprehendeth and believeth or rather feelingly knoweth speciall mercy imputation of Christs righteousnesse now given to me and as Christ hath payed a ransome for me and satisfied justice for me and so imputed righteousnesse and justification are the object of faith Or rather the object of the sense of faith which is most carefully to be observed To answer Bellarmines unsolide Argument we either believe remission of sins past or to come c. But remission is liberation from punishment eternall or temporall but justificatâ—on is freedome from the fundamentall guilt-deserving punishment and remission is a consequent thereof Q. Whether or not is Justification taken one and the same way in the Old and New Testament Ans. The Apostle is clear Rom. 4. where he proves both Jews and Gentiles are justified as Abraham and David But 2. Justification by Grace hath not in iisdem apicibus in the same points the same adversaries 1. Moses and the Prophets contend most with Ceremoniall hypocrits who sought righteousnesse much in Ceremonies Washings Sacrifices New Moons and also their own inherent godlinesse Deut. 5. Deut. 7. Deut. 10. Deut. 11. Isai. 1.10 11 12 c. Mic. 6.6 7 8. Psal. 50.7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. Ps. 4.2 3 4 5. 1 Sam. 15.22 23. Isa. 66.1 2 3 4 5. Jer. 7.1 2 3 21 22 23. 2. Paul had other Adversaries Rom. ch 3. ch 4. ch 5. ch 9. ch 10. especially Antinomians who drew the Doctrine of free Justification by Grace to licencious loosnesse then we may sinne if so and so we be justified said they then is the Law of none effect Rom. 6.1 But his chief Adversaries on the other extream were men that stood much for Justification by the works of the Morall Law And Paul Rom. 3. proves that all Jews Gentiles David Abraham could be justified neither by works of Nature nor of Grace and casts down the Jews righteousnesse by Law-doing Rom. 9. Rom. 10. 3. There were a third Classe of Adversaries to free Justification Galatians seduced and false Apostles who contended for Justificatication by Circumcision and the necessity of keeping the Ceremonial Law if they would be saved Act. 15.1 2 3 4 c. Gal. 2. Gal. 3. Gal. 4. Gal. 5. ch 6. Who mixed the Gospel and Moses his Law and Paul proves Gal. 3. that we are not justified by the works of the Morall Law for that Law Deut. 26.27 involves all that omit the least duty of the Law Gal. 3.10 11 12 13. under a curse and Christ was made a curse for us And Paul proves in the generall we are justified by neither the works of the Morall nor of the Ceremoniall Law 4. James had to do with another gang of loose livers the Gnosticks who contended for justification by a bare nominall faith without love or good works And James proves that we are justified before men and to our selves by faith working by love and not by a dead faith 5. John contends much for reall and speaking marks of justification and conversion against dead Professours void of
transgressions Isa. 53. For the transgressions of us all Elect and Reprobate as they say exponing that all Isa. 53.6 of all and every one of mankind were upon him 2. We deny not but there be considerable differences between Christs dying and the punishment of the Elect which they were to suffer As 1. Ours should have been eternall because we could never out satisfie But the sufferings of Christ because of the dignity of his person God-Man were perfectly satisfactory in a short time 2. He could not suffer the same pain in number that we should have suffered for one and the same accident cannot be in different subjects nor is the surety to pay the very same summe numero that the debter borrowed 3. The Lord could not but have punished the Elect with hating aversion of mind they being intrinsecally and inherently sinners He punished Christ who was not inherently but only by imputation the sinner with no hatred at all but with anger and desire of shewing and exercising revenging justice but still loving him dearly as his only Son But upon this account Christ must stand in our room and because of the five-fold onenesse and Law-identity and samenesse For 1. Though physically the surety and the debter be two different men yet in Law they are one and the same person and one and the same legall party and the same object of justice Whoso pursues in Law the surety does also pursue the debter 2. The debt and summe is one not two debts nor two ransoms nor two punishments nor two lives to losse but one 3. It is one and the same solution and satisfaction there can not in Law-justice come another reckoning dying and payment making after the surety hath payed 4. There is one and the same acceptation upon the creditor his part if he accept of satisfaction in the payment made by the surety he cannot but legally accept of the debter and cannot pursue him in Law but must look upon him as no debter To justifie him is another thing It being a forinsecall transient declaration of his righteousnesse who beleeves I speak here of an acception of satisfaction to hurt justice revenging sin not of an acceptation of obedience 5. It s one and the same legall effect Christ justified in the Spirit and risen again 1 Tim 3.16 and we in him as in the merâ—torious cause are legally justified Hence he who suffered the same satisfactory punishment for the same sinnes committed by us which in Law we ought to have suffered eternally 2. He suffered and died for us in our stead and place especially when the Creditor counts these sufferings as if we had suffered So Paul 2 Cor. 5.14 If one be dead for all then were all dead And the Messiah was cut off and died not for himself Dan. 9.26 He did no violence neither was guile found in his mouth Isa. 53.9 Joh. 8.46 Heb. 7.26 But he was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes we are healed Isa. 53.5 1 Pet. 2.23 24 25. He was delivered for our offences The Lord laid on him the iniquity of us all He was cut out of the land of the living for the transgression of my people was he plagued Isa. 53.8 He bare on his body our sins on the tree 3. He who being made under the Law payed that Law-debt of satisfaction which the Elect in their persons should have payed and thereby freed them from the Law-debt of satisfaction He sustained the person of the Elect in his suffering But Christ being made under the Law payed that Law-debt of satisfaction which the Elect in their persons should have payed The proposition is out of doubt none denies the Minor but that we should have died eternally in our persons if Christ had not died for us 4. He who of purpose took on him our nature the nature and seed of Abraham and the legall condition of a surety to suffer for us he stood in our person and room in suffering for us But Christ took on him our nature which is common to beleeving Jews and to such also who are casten off of God Rom. 9.3 4. but not as common to them but as the seed of Abraham Heb. 2.16 And 5. Gal. 3.10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse for it is written cursed is every one who continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the Law to do them 13. Christ hath redeemed us from the Law being made a curse for us not to reconcile all and every one to himself or to obtain a potentiall and far off power of salvation But ver 14. That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Iesus Christ that we might receive the promise of the spirit through faith Not that we might beleeve or not beleeve if we would that is not the blessing of Abraham Act. 11.18 Act. 15.8 9. Act. 5.31 Ph. 1.29 and for his great love he died for us the just for the unjust to bring us to God 6. And it is thus confirmed Christ in dying is not looked on as a man Nor 2. simply as a single man dying Nor 3. as a publick Martyr or witnesse that all or none at all if they so will may get good of him but by speciall paction if he shall lay down his life and work his work and suffer for our sins that which we should have suffered he shall receive his wages and see his seed 7. As also none who dies as a surety or pays as a surety but he bears the person of such as he pays for who ever gives a ransome for another by way of payment and whosoever as a Priest offers a sacrifice for another he represents the person offended for whom he offers so does the Advocate act the person of the Client the intercessour his person for whom he interceeds 8. The phrase to die for another as a ransoner signifies to die in the stead and person of another Demosthenes orat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in liew of Ktesiphon For Archias for Marcellus he pleads it is in Law as if Archias as if Marcellus or as if the parties for which Cicero and Demostenes do plead were in persons pleading themselves It s true Isocrates hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for in bonum for the favour and good of any And for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 notes also to do or die for the good and profit of others Col. 1.24 I rejoice in my sufferings for you that I may fill up the remnant of the sufferings of Christ for his body But if it cannot be denied but for Christ to die for his body is somewhat more then for Paul or any Martyr to die for the body then sure Christs dying for his Church as the more doth include the lesse notes Christs dying for the good of his Church
hec adimitur quicquam derogari putamus fidei Christiana N. 12. Justificari â— Paulo dicimur cum obliterata justitiae nostrae memoria justi reputamur eo si expectasset Jacobus praepostere ciâ—asset Illud ex Mose Credidit Abraham Deo Si absurdum est effectum sua causa priorâ—m esse aut falso testatur Moses eo loco imputatum fuisse Abrahae fidem in justitiam aut ex ea quam in Isaac offerendo praestitit obedientia justitiam non fuit 〈◊〉 nondum concepto Ismaele qui jam adoleverat antequam nasceretur Isaac fide sua 〈◊〉 fuit Abraham We are not Evangelically justified by Works Professores Leyden in Synosi Pur. Theolo Dis. de Justific in Censâ—â—a Confessio Remonstrant c. 10. pag. 145. Apud Paulum nomen Justificationis sumitur prâ— ipso justificandi actu qui solius DEI est tanquam causae efficientis principalis fidei tanquam causae instrumentalis Apud Jacobum pro fidei professione fides sumitur Câ—jetanus in Jacob. c. 2 v. 23. Adverâ—e prudens Lector quod Jacobus non sentit fidem absque operibus mortuam esse quoniam constat nos justificari per fidem absque operibus ut pareâ— in infantibus c. sed sentit fidem siâ—e operibus hoc est â—enuentem operari esse mortuam impleta est Scriptura quoad executionem maximi operis ad quod paratâ— erat fides Abrahae uterque vâ—rum dicit Paulus quidem quod non factis ceremonialibus aut judicialibus secundum se sed fidei gratia justificamur Jacobus autem quod non fide sterili sed fideâ— foecunda operibus justificamur What a faith James Chap. 2. speaks of David Pareus Com in Jacobum c. 2. Absurde enim diceret fidem v. 21 cooperatam fuisse operibus nisi opera senechdochice suâ—cret per metonymam effecti pro ipsa fide operibus conspicua 1. Juberet videre quod non erat quod non dixerat Quia fidei nullam mentionem fecerat potius diceret vides opera fuisse cooperata c. 2. Absurde etiam diceret ver 22. Credidit Abraham Deo Scripturam opere impletionis filii implâ—â—â—m fuisse Scriptura enim de fide Justificatione Abrahami impleri non poterat nisi per fidem justificaâ—tem cujus in historia oblationis nulla habetur mentio imo sibi contradicâ—ret ver 20. â—x operibus ver 22. ex fide Abrahamum justificatum asserens 3. Absurde etiam ex Scriptura Crediâ—â— Abraham Deo inferret ver 24. videtis ex operibus justificari hominem Potius 〈◊〉 contrarium inferendum erat Videtis ex fide justificari hominem â—on ex fide c 〈◊〉 Jaco Arminius disput priva 8. â—h 7. Justificatio apud Jacobum pro 〈…〉 declaratione Justificationis quae fide fii operibus sed alia ratione quam â—a qua fides 〈◊〉 justitiam à DEO propositam apprehendit quae cêrte fide operibus non apprehenditur sed apprehensa declaratur fides non accipitur eo modo quo apud Paulum pro assensu nempe fiduciali sed pro fidei confessione professione quomodo fides sumpta se habet ut operâ— nempe ut 〈◊〉 bonis operibus junâ—â—a declaret manifesteâ— hominem justificatum sic justificat c. Catech. Ruccov c 9. de Propheâ— munere l. C. pag. 193. * James can hardly be understood to speak of the Popish second Justification by works What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only Jam. 2. noteth Cateche Raccov c. 9. pag. 194. Socinus tract de justific p. 58. Meminisse debemus fidem hanc qua scilicet justificamur esse obedientiaÌ„ Socin de Chris. Servat p. 3. c. 2. In Christum â—redere nihil aliud est quam ad ipsius Christi normam praescriptum obedientem praebere Cateche Raccovien de prophetico I. C. munere c. 9. pag. 193 Ergo tu obedientiam sub fide comprehendis Sic est Jac. 2. ut fidem Abrahae ex operibus consummaâ—am p. 194. they expone that Vt penitentiam agamus non secundum carnem ambulemus nullâ—â— peccati habitum contrahamus omnium vero virtutum Christianarum habitus comparemus Remonstr Armini Confess c. 10. th 2. Vtique necesse est fidei praescriptum non alio modo hic quatenus justificat consideretur quam quâ—tenus proprietate sua naturali obedientiam fidei includit Hac ratione considerata fides totam hominis conversionem Euangelio praescriptam suo ambitu continet Remon Apologia fol. 113 114. Edward Poppius August Porta fol. 28. Faiâ—h is puâ— for the objâ—ct of faith The Scripâ—ure and sound reason distinguish between faith and new obedience To give our selves to Jâ—sus Câ—rist to be ruled commanded by him as Lord and King is not formally to beleeve in him See the Learned Commenter D. Trochrigge on Eph. â— 8 9. Right or jus to life eternall possession of or the way to life eternal are much different Christs blood is the right of merite to life eternall good works the way and meanes by which we come to the possession thereof Calvinus Instr. l. 3. c. 15. n. 21. Respo ad 1. Arg. Istis nihil obstat quo minus opera Dominus tanquam causas inferiores amplectatur Sed unde id Nempe quos suâ— misericordia aeternae vitae haereditati destinavit eos ordinaria sua dispensatione per bona opera inducit in ejus possessionem Quod in ordine dispensationis praecedit posterioris causam nominat The necessity of good works The Scripâ—ure speaks of justifying of persons not of works How wee are redeemed from our vaine conversation Objections against the distinction of right to life possession of life removed The title or right is accidental to the nature of possessioÌ„ * PossessioÌ„ of life and due right to life ar both from Christ but diverse wayes How the promise is made to godlinesse Christ suffers not for some sins of reprobates and not for others CHRIST cannot buy all from their vaine conversation conditionally for the condition caÌ„not be shown in Scriptur For whom Christ died for their unbelief finall vain conversation he died also Prâ—sper Carmi. de ingrat c. 13. Ergo hominis valida arbitrio divina voluntas aut etiam invalida est c. Ioan. Davenantius Episc Salisburien Disâ—sert de morte Christi Impres 1650. c. 1. pa. 6. Hoc enim est illud uleus doctrine Pelagianae quoâ— Faustus Rhegiensis hisce verborum integâ—â—mentis conatur ocâ—ultare volentes Deâ—us redâ—â—i◠〈…〉 Christs death is not a remedie applicable by the Gospel-Covenant to all and every one of mankinde so they actually beleeve This is false that God hath decreed that Christ in the preached Gospel and salvation may be offered to all and every one old young of all and every nation in all generations upon condition of actuall beleeving That there be two intentions in God in dying for all without exceptioÌ„ hath no warrand in