Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
work_n	abraham_n	faith_n	impute_v	5,476	5	10.4768	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89737	The orthodox evangelist. Or A treatise wherein many great evangelical truths (not a few whereof are much opposed and eclipsed in this perillous hour of the passion of the Gospel) are briefly discussed, cleared, and confirmed: as a further help, for the begeting, and establishing of the faith which is in Jesus. As also the state of the blessed, where; of the condition of their souls from the instant of their dissolution: and of their persons after their resurrection. By John Norton, teacher of the church at Ipswich in New England.	Norton, John, 1606-1663.	1654 (1654)	Wing N1320; Thomason E734_9; ESTC R206951	276,720	371

not subjectively that is such as remain ungodly when they are justified The Text saith not he reconcileth enemies according to the sense of those words in the former place He justifieth the ungodly But If when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son mark the time of this Reconciliation was the time of the death of his Son not the time of our Conversion much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life that is If while we were enemies in respect of our nature and state we were reconciled in our head i. e. our Reconciliation was actually purchased by and acknowledged at the death of his Son how much more being reconciled in our selves by the slaying of the enmity of nature through the infusion of grace and the changing of our estate in respect of our persons and actions through faith in Christ shall we be saved by his life he that hath done the greater with greatest difficulty he will do the lesse having overcome and triumphed over all difficulty past and proceeding being without all difficulty in respect of what is to come This exposition is agreeable to the Analogie of faith strengthens the Apostles arguing from the greater to the lesser and any shorter interpretation seemeth to straighten those words We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son Thus Dr. Amos and Dr. Twisse understand this place Medulla l. 1. c. 20. Twiss de permiss l. 2 cr 4. digr 10. Sect. 4. and Calvin seemeth very well to allow thereof nor doth Piscator dissent there-from as appeareth in his citation of this Text disputing with Vorstius There is remission of sins that is actually procured before we do beleeve Cham. Nobis persuasissimum est Calv. in loc Cham. Tom. 3 lib. 12. Sect 18. Perkins in Gal. 3.16 Medulla c. 24. 27. remissa esse peccata antequam credidimus Christ is first justified that is acquit of our sins and we justified in him Perkins There is a kind of previous application of Redemption to us in Christ The sentence of our Justification was pronounced in Christ our head rising from the dead Ames Transactio inter Deum Christum fuit praevia quaedam applicatio ad nos Sententia haec fuit in Christo capite nostro à mortuis jam resurgente pronunciata There is saith Mr. Rutherford Rhetorf exc 1. c. 2. a Justification in the mind of God Eternal and a Justification in time terminated in the conscience of the beleever Obj. But if it be yeelded that the grace of Justification be before Faith it will follow that in justification by faith there is nothing really and possitively wrought in the Soul but only a manifestation of what was before Ans Not so in the justification of a sinner there is that which is real and positive both on Gods part and on the Beleevers part on Gods part 1 An actual imputing of the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ to the Beleever 2 A transient judicial act of God whereby he declareth the sinner to be justified for the righteousnesse sake of Christ received by faith terminated in the Conscience of the Beleever upon the Beleevers part there is 1. An actual relying upon the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ 2. A renouncing of our own righteousnesse Obj. But if we yeeld a being of Iustification how doth the condition of an elect person justified by faith differ from his condition yet an unbeleever in respect of his Iustification Ans God hath absolutely decreed to justifie them before they doe beleeve their persons are beloved from eternity Jesus Christ hath actually and absolutely procured their justification before faith God hath accepted this Meritorious satisfaction of Christ before faith God never imputes the sins of the world of the elect to them unto Condemnation having already imputed them unto and being satisfied for them by Christ All which notwithstanding the condition or state of the Elect before faith is the same with the condition of those who are not elected we are the children of wrath even as others Ephes 2 3. guilty of sinne before God and therefore in respect of their estate obnoxious to Condemnation even as others Though their Justification be absolutely Vide Retorf ex 1. c. 2. and actually procured before Faith yet they are not justified until they doe beleeve now and not until now is their state changed now and not until now doe the effects of Gods displeasure cease towards them by vertue of the Promise He that beleeveth shall not come into condemnation now and not before are their persons accepted in themselves and consequently their actions capable of being accepted hence Albeit the justification of the Elect is absolue ely procured before they doe beleeve yet they have no consolation nor peace of Conscience till they doe beleeve Obj. Yee see how that by works a man is justified and not by faith only Jam. 2.24 Sol. That James agreeth with Paul concerning the Doctrine of Justification is evident in that the same Scripture Gen. 15.6 cited by Paul Rom. 4.3 is cited and acknowledged to be fulfilled by James 2.23 and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham beleeved God and it was imputed unto him for righteousnesse That Proposition of Pauls We are justified by faith without works and that of James We are justified by works and not by faith only are distinct but not opposite Propositions for Iames referreth not to the manner of our Justification of which Paul speaks but to the nature of justifying faith against such as boasted of such a faith as justifying which was without works Paul disputes against the Legalist Iames both against the Legalists and Libertines Paul sheweth the manner of Justification by faith Iames the nature of justifying faith Pauls conclusion is that We are justified by faith without works Iames's conclusion is that Faith without works doth not justifie Justificamur Effectivè à Deo Approhensivé à fide Declarativè ab operibus Prideaux lect 5. de Justificatione The objection also is further satisfied by distinguishing of Justification Justification is either of our persons before God so Faith only justifies or of our faith before Men so works justifie that is they declare our faith before men to be unfeigned I will shew thee my faith by my works Jam. 2.18 By works was faith made perfect ver 22. Obj. We are justified by faith Rom. 4.9 Faith is a work therefore we are not justified without works and consequently not by faith only Ans How Faith justifieth hath been spoken before that faith doth not justifie as a work is evident Rom. 4 5. But to him that worketh not but beleeveth on him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse God makes high account of that faith which accounts of its object as the matter of our Justification God makes no account of that faith which we account of as a work in the matter of our Justification the Beleever

the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Now Christ dying as a publck Person for the sins of the Elect and rising again as a publick Person for the justification of the Elect. It was more to raise Christ from the dead then it hath or vvill be to raise all the Elect from sin or then it will be to raise all the dead at the last day Hence in the working of faith in the soul God is not only said to move the soul but to dravv it None can come to me Except the Father which hath sent me draw him John 6.44 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dravving is an Act wherein the Agent putteth forth his might for us To believe is said to be the Work of God John 6.29 Emphatically so called not only because of its special acceptableness unto God but also because he is the Efficient of it and that with a preëminent efficacy of the Authour shining forth in this Work compared with his other works God is able to graffe them in again Rom. 11.23 in the ingenerating of faith in Christ and uniting of the soul unto Christ are manifested both the inability of man and the ability of God Here appears the Elects malice unto Christ and Christs love unto the Elect the evil of the spirit of corrupt nature and the good of the Spirit of grace Sarah her conceiving of Isaac whose birth was a figure of regeneration Gal. 4. was a great Work a Miracle Mary her conception of Christ by the Power i. e. by the Command and Blessing of the Holy Ghost was also a great Work a Miracle but for Christ to be formed in the soul by believing is a greater-Work Christ himself the Object of Faith is the greatest of Gods Works the Creation of Faith in Christ that is to make a sinner a believer may be reckoned amongst those that are next thereunto 3. Concerning the Greatness and Largeness of the Obedience of Faith consider that as in unbelief and its consequences there is unspeakable disobedience So faith besides vvhat is formally contained in its proper nature hath an influence unto all new obedience Amongst other notable Services implyed in Faith it necessarily presupposeth these great duties First The right discerning of its Object an Act of such high contentment unto Christ as that he professeth himself to be ravished therewith Cant. 4.9 Secondly The Denial of our selves in matter of our righteousness Philip. 3.8 9. Yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the Excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith Thirdly Denial of our own wills As the Camel passeth through the Needles eye so is the Will unravel'd littled nothing'd by being brought to faith in Christ Jesus Mat. 19.24 Fourthly The Denial of our own glory John 5.44 How can ye believe which receive honour one of another and seek not the honour that cometh from God only The Obedience of the Law vvas perfect and glorying giving glory unto man Rom. 4.2 For if Abraham were justified by works he hath whereby to glory but not before God The Obedience of the Gospel is perfect and humble giving glory unto Christ that is unto God in and by Christ Rom. 4.20 Abraham was strong in Faith giving glory to God Fides pro varia dispositione ipsi ad Objecta varia vir utes omnes habitus omnes bo●os ia se continet tanquam proprietates in forma virtualitèr ab ipsa perdentes in actu secundo Ames de traduct peccat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Covenant of Grace makes man as holy as the Covenant of Works and more lowly And as Faith in it self necessarily presupposeth these high and supernatural Services so as was intimated a little before hath it also in relation to the exercise of all other graces an influence into universal obedience By Faith we are united to Christ Ephes 3.17 By Faith we are justified Rom. 5.1 By it we perform all duties of both Tables Gal. 2.20 By it we persevere 1 Pet. 1.5 And lastly By it we are saved Ephes 2.8 To shew the Eminence of the Obedience of Faith The Truth that is to be believed is called the Truth John 8.44 At least as some take the place the Witness That God gave of his Son 1 John 5.10 the Command 1 John 3.23 And to believe is called the the Work John 6.29 No marvel therefore if it be said 'T is easier to keep the whole Law then to believe Seeing by faith we receive Christ himself and from him legal obedience imputatively and assisting power in our ovvn persons practically to fulfil all new obedience Evangelically Because also there is more power required to make Adam a believer then either to have created or continued him in the state of innocency wherein had he persevered he had fully answered the Law The Grace of Creation confirming grace being superadded sufficed to that the Grace of Redemption is requisite to this Gods pleasure vvas enough without any cost for that but this besides the good pleasure of the Lord cost God his Son and Christ his Blood in that the Soul vvas a meer nothing and so could do nothing for it self yet being but a meer nothing it made no resistance but here besides the helplesness of a meer nothing there is also the enmity of a most corrupt thing The Believer obeyeth both Law and Gospel we obey the Law legally in our Surety the Gospel perfectly in our ovvn persons with the perfection of parts or sincerely in this life with the perfection of degrees in the life to come Believers obey the Law legally in their Surety Legi satisfecimus in Christo justificamur praedita eâ justitia quam lex à nobis postulat Piscat in Rom. 8.4 because in him vve obey the Precept Do this Levit. 18.5 and satisfied the curse Thou shalt dye Gen. 2.17 The believer hath satisfied the Law in Christ through faith in vvhom vve are endued vvith that righteousness which the Law requireth Rom. 8.4 and 10.4 Believers obey the Gospel perfectly vvith the perfection of parts The Gospel is the Law in Christ the Rule of Righteousness is the same both in the Lavv and in the Gospel though the manner and end of obeying are changed the manner of obedience under the Lavv was by the Grace of Creation the manner of obedience under the Gospel is by the Grace of Redemption i. e. by the Grace of Jesus Christ A great end of obeying under the Law vvas That vve might obtain life as due unto us for perfect obedience thereunto in a way of justice The great end of obeying under the Gospel is thankfulnese

in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. c●p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for