divine authority of credit sufficient in and of themselves to be beleeved without the testimony or approbation of any man or men If the Scriptures be the Word of God then who dares deny their authority refuse what they command or do what they forbid But the Scriptures are the Word of God For First The pen-men that wrote them were called and sent of God they were assisted of God confirming their doctrine with mighty signs and wonders beyond any humane power or skill and they were inspired of God teaching and writing though themselves simple and unlearned most high and divine mysteries above the reach of any natural wit and such as the very Angels of Heaven desired to look into Secondly The doctrine or matter that is written is 1. Heavenly and divine about heavenly and divine things 2. It is most certain and true all things that were foretold most certainly came to pass and though they were written in several places ages and times by several persons of several arguments yet all the books of holy Scripture from the beginning to the end do most sweetly accord or agree together as the dictates of one and the same Spirit of truth Thirdly The effects of this heavenly doctrine are divine and wonderful as never any writings in the world did produce the like For though it be contrary to humane reason and most cross to our natural lusts and affections yet it works and wins so upon men both powerfully and sweetly that it wooes and weans men not only from the world but also from themselves It discerns the thoughts comforts the heart enlightens the mind convinceth the conscience and makes such a change in the whole man that it makes him a new man transforming and conforming him to the image of God in true holiness all most sure arguments of a divine Spirit Fourthly It hath made a thorough conquest of the whole world by the endeavors of very weak and silly men bringing mighty Nations in obedience unto Christ maugre all opposition that could be made against it a plain demonstration that it is the Word of God and not of man and it hath continued and been preserved even to admiration though a world of counsels have been taken and attempts made to destroy it Fifthly The testimony of the Church in its due place is to be esteemed as not a little moving the consent and confession of Christians in all ages but especially the sufferings of holy Martyrs in defence of the same Sixthly The testimony of the Holy Ghost to our hearts and consciences puts all out of doubt this doth not only perswade but most certainly assure us that the Scriptures are the Word of God it imprints a firm belief of it in our hearts called the sealing of the Spirit Eph. 1.13 Lastly The holy Scriptures give testimony of themselves 2 Tim. 3.16 All the Scripture is given by inspiration of God 2 Pet. 1.21 Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost And the Prophets always delivered their message with Thus saith the Lord The Mouth of the Lord hath spoken it The Scriptures then are of supream and soveraign authority above the Church and greater then the Church by so much as the authority of God is greater then the authority of men The Scriptures for the matter or substance were before the Church even that immortal seed whereof the Chuâ—ch sprang and grew and is still the ground whereon it stands the pillar whereby it is supported Ephes 2.20 The pillar and ground of the Church is the Scripture Irenaeus l. 3. cont Haer. c. 11. The authority of him that spake it is sufficient to confirm it Theodor. in Ezek. c. 34. The Scripture is to be judg in all matters of concroversie Isa 8.20 To the Law and to the Testimony Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures for they testifie of me Acts 17.11 The men of Berea searched dayly the Scriptures whether those things were so as Paul spake Secondly The Old Testament is not abrogated or grown unprofitable but together with the New is still necessary for our instruction 2 Tim. 3.16 All Scripture the Old Testament as well as the New is profitable for instruction Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures saith our Saviour i. the Old Testament for then there was no other Our Saviour spake many things out of the Old Testament to confirm the doctrine of the New therefore it is of as great authority Object But the Law and the Prophets were until John since that time the Kingdom of God is preached Luk. 16.16 Sol. They were until John and then not abrogated but swallowed up of a greater light the Old Testament is the same Gospel that is in the New the same Spirit same Christ Christ yesterday to day and the same for ever Heb. 13.8 Yesterday under the Law to day under the Gospel and the same still The Old and New Testament give mutual light and testimony one to another the one foretelling those things that the other testifies are really and truly come to pass Thirdly The Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are perfect and sufficient of themselves without any other help or supply to instruct us in the means of salvation We are forbidden to add to or diminish any thing from it Deut. 12.32 Rev. 22.18 19. And if a part were so perfect that it needed no addition how much more the whole Psa 19.7 The Law of the Lord is perfect converting the soul Joh. 20.31 These things were written that beleeving we might have life everlasting and what can be desired more 2 Tim. 3.15.17 The Scriptures make us wise unto salvation they make the man of God perfect This perfection of the Scripture excludes tradition For what shall be added to that which is perfect or what supply needs to that which is sufficient of it self Tradition is either written or unwritten 2 Thes 2.15 Written Tradition is the Scripture it self Unwritten Tradition if it be agreeable to the Scripture is included in the same and so to be received as the Scripture it self if it be against or contrary to the Scripture it is to be rejected as the fruit of some lying spirit and not the Spirit of God for as much as that Spirit of truth cannot contradict the written Word whereof himself was the Author Fourthly In all necessary points of faith the Scriptures are plain and easie enough to be understood so that the simple and unlearned may and ought to read them Prov. 6.23 The Commandment is a lamp or candle and the Law is light Psa 19.7 8. The testimony of the Lord is sure and giveth wisdom unto the simple the Commandment of the Lord is pure and giveth light unto the eyes Psa 119. Thy Word is a lanthorn unto my feet and a light unto my paths And if it be a light it must needs enlighten others and cannot be hid but only to them that are lost not that the Scriptures themselves are hidden dark and obscure but
the god of this world hath blinded Their eyes c. 2 Cor. 4.3 The end of the Scriptures is the instruction of the Church Rom. 15.4 Whatsoever things were written were written for our learning and one necessary mean to attain this end is the perspicuity and plainness of the Scripture for if it were dark or doubtful how should it instruct us In vain is it called a Light if it be dark in it self and to no purpose are we sent to learn it if it be so to us The Scriptures are an instrument to beget Faith Joh. 20.31 Rom. 10.17 And the first step or degree of faith is knowledg which the Scriptures could not beget if they were dark difficult or obscure Object But S. Peter says there are many things in S. Pauls Epistles hard to be understood which unlearned men wrest to their own destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 Sol. If any thing be hard in one place either it is such as the ignorance thereof will not hazard our salvation or else it is explained and made easie in another place And by unlearned men the Apostle understand not men wanting humane learning as the liberal arts and sciences c. but men unlearned in the Scriptures themselves such as most times the learned and wise men of the world are For it is known that men otherwise unlearned simple aâ—d ignorant coming in humility the fear of God and love of truth using prayer reading comparing of Scriptures c. have attained unto a sufficient measure of saving knowledg For the Scriptures discover themselves by their own proper light one place expounding and opening the meaning of another August de Doct. Christ .l 2. c. 2.9.24 all things are seen by the light but light by it self Lastly Those books that we commonly call Apocrypha are not of divine authority because they were not written by the Prophets or men divinely inspired as the other Scriptures were that are therefore called the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 12.26 Our Saviour divides all Canonical Scripture into Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16.29 But none of those books were written by Moses or any of the Prophets nor dictated by the Spirit of God but savour of a prophane and lying spirit as containing matter and stories both vain foolish and fabulous very often contradicting themselves and also the known Word of God as in the books of Tobit and the Maccabees the Stories of Bell and the Dragon are specially to be found The Jews received none of those books in their Canon neither by any of the primitive Christians or ancient Fathers were accounted for Canonical and what account the learned Papists themselves make of them may appear by Arias Montanus who in the front of his Bible hath these words There be added in this Edition the books written in Greek which the Catholick Church following the Canon of the Hebrew reckoneth amongst the Apocrypha CHAP. II. Of the Blessed Trinity Truth THere is but one living and true God everlasting and in the unity of this Godhead there be three persons of one substance power and eternity the Father the Son and the holy Ghost Errours This one point of Christian Religion is the very basis or foundation of all the rest and if this be shaken the rest must needs totter and fall to the ground and therefore the devil hath raised up such furious adversaries to oppugn it with strange and monstrous blasphemies as of old did Simon Magus Cerinthus Ebion Manes a Persian a man according to his name furious and mad and such like at this day the adversaries to this doctrine of the Trinity are all the enemies of Christ and his divinity as the unbeleeving Jews all Mahometans Turks Moors and such miscreants among Christians only such as have suckt their principles from the schools of those Infidels They stand marshalled all in two Regiments 1. The first is of those that deny all distinction of persons in the Godhead making the Father Son and Holy Ghost but several names only of one and the same person in regard of some distinct actions or offices This Heresie was commonly ascribed to Sabellius but Noetus a disciple of Montanus hatcht it and Simon Magus layd the egg long before at this day it is revived by one M. Erbury a late Chaplain of the Army who taught That there is but one person in the Godhead and when we read of the Father Son and Holy Ghost we must not take them for so many distinct persons but only as so many appearances of God unto men And truly if M. Erbury had been that Sorcerers own disciple he could not have devised a doctrine more like his as it is recorded by St. Augustin lib. de Haeres ad Quodvultdeum cap. 1. There be others that admit a distinction of these 3 persons but deny the equality of them That the Son and Holy Ghost are not God equal with the Father of one substance and eternity with the Father This was the Heresie of Arius whose chief undertaking was against the Son of God and his eternal generation and of Macedonius who denyed the Godhead of the holy Ghost They are both revived at this day among us that of Macedonius by one M. Biddle who not questioning the Godhead of the Son a point as he professeth wherein he is not yet so well resolved denies only the Godhead of the holy Ghost granting no more but that he is an excellent creature and chief of all the ministring spirits One M. Best not fearing that fearful judgment that befel Arius who burst asunder in the midst like Judas the traitor that his bowels gushed out hath notwithstanding revived his Heresie and in these times of general and desperate Apostacy hath found many favorors and followers Now the fountain of all these impure waters was Simon Magus an impious sorcerer and the conduit that conveyed them to our times almost was Mahomet an impudent impostour For about the year 630. or as others please 670. that vile and lewd Arabian began his cursed book called the Alcoran and therein amongst a multitude of other impure follies impious fables and lyes he raked also together coÌ„mended to his barbarous followers all those Heresies and Blasphemies against the Trinity Out of this filthy puddle Michael Servertus a Spaniard a man better read in Mahomets cursed Law then in the holy Gospel of Jesus Christ suckt his Heresie about the year 1530. for denying the eternal Son of God he was burnt at Geneva and out of his ashes arose that monster Socinus But to pass by particular persons the first Country that made defection from this truth was Transylvania a Country bordering upon the Turks from whom they received this point of their Religion for to gratifie or comply with those barbarous neighbours they abjured their Faith in the holy Trinity about the year 1593. denying the Son and holy Ghost the contagion of this pest is now spread into most places of Christendom The devil hath devised
not his power it is Gods grace that makes us his servants not our own will More testimonies might be brought but whom these few will not suffice thousands more will never satisfie Cui pauca non sufficiunt plura non proderunt Concil Arausic cap. 25. Object But if it be so God may seem unjust to require that of us in his Law that we are not able to perform Sol. Not at all for in our first Creation God gave us sufficient abilities which we lost by our own voluntary fault according to that Eccles 7. God made man upright but they have found out many inventions It is not unreasonable then or unjust with God to require his own of us again though we have prodigally lost or mispent it Object If man hath no power in himself to do good to what end then are exhortations admonitions precepts promises or any preaching Sol. They are not in vain but the means ordained of God to soften our hearts and bend our wills to his Will St Paul saith God worketh in us both the will and the deed and yet ceaseth not to exhort us unto both Our Saviour invites us often to come unto him and yet faith No man can come unto me except the Father draw him Ioh. 6.44 CHAP. VII Of Christ his Person Truth IN this miserable and forlorn plight the merciful God left us not to our selves hopeless and helpless but sent his Son to take our nature upon him that being perfect God and perfect man he might fully satisfie for our sins and redeem our souls from death and hell Errours The enemies of Christ are of two sorts 1. The enemies of his person 2. The enemies of his office Of the first sort were Simon Magus Cerinthus Marcion Samosatenus Arius Nestorius and such Monsters whereof some denyed his Divinity others his Humanity Some the purity of his conception others the truth of it some confounded the two Natures denying their distinction others denying their union divided the person of one making two some said he took tne body but not the soul of man others that he took an aetherial or spiritual not a true body and such like They are seconded at this day by the unbeleeving Jews Turks and all Mahometans Antitrinitarians New-Arians Anabaptists Familists Socinians particularly by Mr Paul Best and others who deny the Divinity of Christ affirming That he was but a meer man some fear not to say He was a sinful man some That he was God but not from everlasting the Son of God but not before his incarnation God by merit office or excellency of gifts not by nature and generation The Anabaptists say he brought his flesh with him from heaven and took it not of the Virgin The Familists turn the Incarnation of Christ into an Allegory holding That every one of their family is Christ and the taking in of their belief is the Incarnation Having discourse once with one of them he would not say Christ came or was come but is now come in the flesh Christ is now come in my flesh said he and now I speak Christ speaks to you So also Mr Erbury By flesh saith he is not meant the humane nut are but the coming of Christ is the manifestation of the Godhead in the flesh of Saints Antidote Against these hellish Blasphemies we oppose these heavenly Truths First That our Lord Jesus Christ is very God Isai 9.6 Vnto us a child is born c the Mighty God Rom. 9.5 of whom Christ came who is God over all blessed for ever 1 Tim. 3.16 God manifest in the flesh Rom. 1.4 Declared mightily to be the Son of God c. Secondly Christ is very man and had a true body taking flesh of the Virgin Mary therefore often called the son of man And 1 Tim. 2.5 The man Christ Jesus Isa 7.14 A Virgin shall conceive and bear a Son Mat. 1.20 She was found with child by the Holy Ghost Gal. 4.4 He was made of a woman 1 John 1.1 The Word of Life which we have heard which we have seen with our eyes and our hands have handled He had a true body then his humanity was obvious enough to all the senses If Christ be not God why do you adore him It is plain Idolatry to worship Christ if he be not God Cyril Alexand Cont. Eunom The second Nicene Councel Charged Nestorius with Idolatry because he affirmed Christ was a meer man yet adored him S. Paul condemns serving the creature Rom. 1.25 and yet professeth himself Servant of Jesus Christ Rom. 1.1 Therefore Christ is no meer creature or man Ambros lib. 1. de fide ad Gratian August c. 7. Arrians then Socinians Mr. Best and the rest that deny Christ to be God and yet grant that he ought to be adored what do they differ from Turks and Pagans that worship the creature Rom. 1.22.25 Professing themselves to be wise they become fools and change the Truth of God into a lye This then is Argument enough against the Arrians Socinians c. to prove the diety of Christ because according to their own divinity he ought to be served worshipped and adored The Heathen that knew God and yet glorified him not as God Rom. 1.21 And the Arrians Socinians c. that glorifie Christ as God and yet acknowledg him not for God are a like vain in their imagination and their foolish heart is darkned CHAP. VIII Of Christ his Office Truth THe Office of Christ being God and man is to mediate between God and man and reconcile them together again God who is angry for sin and man who is guilty of sin This Office is three-fold For 1. as a Prophet he doth instruct his Church 2. As a Priest he makes satisfaction and intercession for it 3. As a King he gathers and governs it Adversaries are those that affirm 1. Errours That Christ is Mediator only in respect of his divine nature So Osiander 2. That he is Mediator in respect of his humane nature only So Stancarus And of this opinion are the Papists who most wickedly set up other Mediators also besides Christ even Saints and Angels whom they pray unto to intercede for them But the Papists are enemies to every part of his Office 1. To his Kingly Office in that they make the Pope head of the Church 2. To his Priestly Office in that they set up other Mediatours and Intercessours besides Christ and other satisfaction for sin besides that which he hath made 3. To his Prophetical Office in subjecting his holy Word to the Authority of the Church Judgment of the Pope a sinful man and equalizing traditions and humane inventions with the same Against these Errours we teach Antidote and are taught 1. That there is but one God and one Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus 1 Tim. 2.5 He maketh intercession for us Rom. 8.34 Heb. 7.25 The Saints do not hear us or know our wants Isai 63.16
be saved then he hath nothing to glory of but the riches of Gods mercy and he that is damned hath nothing to complain of but the merit of his own sin Object Some call this a licentious doctrine and say it ought not to be publisht because it overthrows all endeavours unto holiness and makes men loose in their lives or drives them to despair Sol. The preaching of Gods grace for the comfort of the godly must not be silenced because the ungodly turn it into wantoness But this doctrine may comfort and confirm many it can stumble none none can presume neither need any to despair that will but consider that God hath ordained the means as well as the end Some are ordained unto life eternal but without holiness we shall never see God Heb. 12.14 This cannot make us slothful or careless but more diligent and studious of good works that by such evidences we may make our calling and election sure sure unto our own consciences which before was sure enough in Gods eternal Counsel Some be ordained to destruction but yet none shall be damned but for sin this cannot make any careless but more careful to fly sin and be studious of good works which are not the cause but yet the way to salvation which God hath prepared for us to walk in Ephes 2.10 And so long as God affords the means of salvation offering Christ dayly unto us in his Word and Sacraments no man that waits upon the means hath any cause to despair But doest thou find the signs of election in thy self praise God for them Doest thou not find them in another pray to God for him Doest thou find them in thy self be thankful Doest thou not find them in another yet be charitable and hope still that God who cals at all hours may have an hour yet for thy neighbor as he had for thee Shun all curiosity and let these be the uses you make of this doctrine CHAP. XII Of Vocation Truth AND whom he did predestinate them he also called not only outwardly by the preaching of his holy Word but inwardly also and effectually by the operation of his holy Spirit powerfully working with the Word and winning their hearts to cleave uâ—to him inseparably to salvation Errours This is the second link of that golden chain of salvation that divers Adversaries both of former and latter times have laboured to break asunder They are of three sorts 1. Those that condemn the outward Ministry of the Word as vain and unprofitable So the Anabaptists Gaspar Swenckfeldius and his followers who affirm That men are called and faith is given not by means of the Word but by illumination and immediate working of the Spirit and being wholly intent upon Speculations and Revelations they imagine that God doth reveal his Will unto them in dreams and visions By this device many lewd impostours have risen and abused the world with their lies as Mahomet and Muncer did and in the primitive times Simon Magus Cerinthus Montanus with their harlots who under the name of visions and dreams did broach and vent their own monstrous dotages The grossest Errours that are now in Popery as Purgatory c. were first founded and confirmed by visions and dreams and by the same means the Father of lyes and spirit of Errour hath prevailed so far in the Church as we see at this day such strange and monstrous ways men presently fall into when once they depart from the light of Gods known Word 2. A second sort there be that do not indeed condemn the outward Ministry of the Word but yet esteem very meanly of preaching and expounding the same thinking and affirming That bare reading the Scriptures to the people is sufficient for edifying them unto salvation and that much or frequent preaching is not only not necessary but hurtful This opinion was if it be not still very currant with many both Ministers and other people and was mightily confirmed in their minds not by the connivence only but also ill example and practise of the Bishops themselves who as if preaching were no part of their office or derogatory to their high dignity did most of them most shamefully cast it quite off though indeed it would have been their greatest glory and therefore now God hath justly covered them with shame for it and poured contempt upon them 3. The last and worst sort are those enemies of grace and patrons of freewil the Pelagians Papists Arminians c. who to maintain the pride of nature deny the power of grace and to make good their former doctrine of freewil have brought these seconds into the field Viz. 1. That the grace of Vocation is nothing else but a moral swasion or probable inclination of the will which the outward preaching of the Word mâ—y effect denying the powerful operation of the Spirit inwardly working upon the same 2. That sufficient grace to beleeve and be converted is offered and given to all in the Gospeâ— preached and that with a serious intention in God to save all but the Reason why one receiveth grace another receiveth it not one believeth and is converted another is not is only in mans freewil in whose power it is to receive and obey or refuse and resist the offers and operations of grace 3. That grace when it is gotten may be utterly lost again faith quite cut off and the like The outward voyce or preaching of the Word is not of force or efficacy sufficient to beget faith in a man Antidote and turn him unto God without the inward working teaching and calling of the Holy Ghost But yet for all that since the word hath been committed to writing the written Word and preaching thereof is the only outward and ordinary means ordained of God to beget faith in us and bring us to the knowledg and obedience of Jesus Christ Rom. 10.17 Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God Acts 10.44 The Holy Ghost fell upon them that heard the Word And this was the Scripture or written Word Luke 4.16 Our Saviour himself took the book of Esaias and preacht the Scripture Acts 8.35 Philip preacht the Scripture to the Eunuch Acts 17.2 Paul reasoned out of the Scriptures It is evident that all Churches both Jewish and Christian used always to preach and hear the Scriptures for their edification Nehem. 8.9 Acts 15.26 13.15 It is given Timothy as a commendation that he knew the Scripture 2 Tim. 3.15 And it is called the Word of Grace Rom. 10.8 The Word of Faith Act. 20.32 because it is a means to convey both unto us In times past indeed God was pleased to make his Will known unto his Servants the Prophets and by them to the people divers ways and after divers manners as by Dreams Visions Oracles Vrim and Thummim But in these last days he hath spoken unto us by his Son Heb. 1.1 who coming from the bosom of his Father hath revealed all
therefore it â—s not a thing indifferent because it is an ordinance of Christ nor yet absolutely necessary to salvation as hath been said before Baptism is called the lavacre of regeneration Tit. 3.5 and Joh. 3.5 it is said Except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God not that any part of our Regeneration is ascribed to water but only by water the office of the Holy Ghost is declared as also by fire Mat. 3.11 which some mistaking did brand their children with a hot iron Though the outward washing of water then be not the very washing away of sin yet it is so called the sign borrowing the name of the thing signified for the more forcible perswasion of our hearts and stronger confirmation of our Faith that our eyes are not fed with bare signs but presented with the thing it self and that our sins are as certainly done away by the blood of Christ as our bodies are cleansed by the washing of water To let pass those ridiculous toies of salt spittle and other stuff used by the Papists the main difference at this day among us is concerning circumstance of time The Pelagians and Anabaptists deny Infant-baptism and both upon the same ground With this Errour of the Anabaptists many godly people are entangled that are free enough from the rest of that pestilent Sect. Their Reasons are 1. Because there is neither precept nor example for it 2. Infants do not beleeve but it is sayed Acts 8.37 If thou beleevest thou mayst be baptized Answ It is answered To the first That there is both precept and example for Infant-baptism the precept is Mat. 28.19 the examples are Acts 16.15 33. 1 Cor. 1.16 where Infants are included as part of the nations and housholds and although there be no express command for baptizing Infants yet seeing also there is no express exception they must be baptized or else those general precepts and examples including all both Infants as well as men are not followed and observed And if it be sufficient Reason against Infant-baptism that there is no express precept or example for it then let the Anabaptists themselves for shame leave off that shameful stripping and dipping their proselytes or else shew me where they have any express command or example for it Object Secondly They that do not beleeve must not be baptized but Infants do not beleeve Ergo. Whosoever doth not labor shall not eat 2 Thes 3.10 But Infants cannot labour Ergo. Answ Both these Arguments are somewhat alike and neither good because that is drawn to Infants which belongs only to men of years And indeed this latter is the better of the two because it hath an express text for confirmation which the other hath not But to remove that rub of the Anabaptists out of the way concerning the Faith of Infants We say 1. That they have reasonable souls faculties of understanding and will which are the seat of Faith and the weakness of the Organs cannot hinder the power of the Holy Ghost to work Faith in them if he please 2. Without Faith there is no salvation if Infants then have not Faith the Anabaptists must shew some other way of salvation besides Faith in Christ or else conclude that all Infants dying are damned but yet I hope they will not pass this cruel sentence upon them unless they provide a Limbus or place of ease for them as the Papists do 3. Circumcision is the seal of the Righteousness of Faith Rom. 4.11 And yet it was administred to Infants Infants therefore ought to be baptized and as good reason there is to baptise as there was to circumcise them 4. We have many presidents of children that were regenerate and sanctified as of Jeremiah John Baptist c. who were filled with the Holy Ghost from the womb and if children have the Holy Ghost then they may be baptized Act. 10.47 Can any man forbid water that these should be baptized who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we 5. Our Saviour himself testifieth in express words That Infants beleeve in him Mat. 18.6 And that babes and sucklings confess him and bear witness unto his name Mat. 21.16 And did grace them with many favours own them for the children of God taking them in his arms laying his hands upon them and blessing them saying That to them belongs the Kingdom of God Who then shall be so bold or impious to refuse and reject those that our Saviour himself received and embraced so lovingly giving such gracious testimoneis of them with whom God entered into Covenant as well as with their parents Gen. 17.7 And unto whom the promises of God were made as well as unto them Acts 2.39 But say the Anabaptists how shal we know that children believe And saith one If I had a certificate from God that a child believes I would not stick at his Baptisme Let them tell us what infallible certificate they have for men of riper years And whether they do not plunge more hypocrites and unbelievers in their flouds then we sprinkle at our fonts is a question to be made But the Anabaptists contradict themselves crossing one Argument with another overthrowing their own grounds and destroying the foundation that themselves have layd As for their stripping it is against common honesty and modesty and that dipping is not necessary to be used is clear by their own Argument because they have no where one express word of command or warrant for it And also the blood of Christ is called the blood of sprinkling Heb. 12.24 And as it was typified under the Law by divers sprinklings so it is exprest under the Gospel by sprinkling as well as dipping CHAP. XXVI Of the Lords Supper Truth THE Lords Supper is the Sacrament of Preservation in the Church wherein by the signs of bread and wine are signified sealed and exhibited to every faithful receiver the body and blood of Christ for his spiritual nourishment and continual growth in him unto life everlasting Adversaries of old were many that did either despise and refuse this holy Sacrament or abuse or prophane it either mingling adding or altering and changeing the Elements and substituting others in their places But to let them pass at this day the principal Errours Errours are these three Antidote The first is of Transubstantiation and that holdeth that after the words of Consecration and by vertue of the same there is a conversion or turning of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ so that the very true and natural body of Christ is corporally present and carnally eaten in the Sacrament the substance of bread and wine being vanisht away nothing remaining thereof but only the outward accidents to serve the senses The first occasion of this heresie seems to be given by the Capernaites John 6.52 but was confirmed under this title by the Councel of Lateran called against Berengarius in
the yeare 1215 and this is now the opinion of the Papists followed with many Blasphemies Idolatries and ridiculous Mummeries The second is of Consubstantiation invented by some who to shun the absurdities of the former opinion fell into worse affirming That the substance of bread and wine and of the body and blood of Christ are joyntly or both together bodily present and eaten in the Sacrament the body of Christ being in with and under the bread The first Author of this opinion and the time when it began is uncertainly reported and although it were long before Luther yet it was taken up in haste by him about the year 1525. is still maintained by his followers and gave occasion to continue that bowing and cringing that was lately used to the Communion Table The third is of bare figure and only signification affirming That in the Sacrament there is nothing but bread and wine bare signs and no other presence of Christs body but only in figure and signification so that the faithful receive nothing but naked and bare signs The foundation of this Errour was layd about four hundred years after Christ by some Hereticks that came as short of this mystery as the Capernaites went too far making no account of this Sacrament saying that it did neither good nor hurt This Errour was set on foot again by Carolostadius a rash-brained man about the year 1524. and is now followed by the Anabaptists Antidote The doctrin of our Church Art 28. is the same that the Apostle delivers 1 Cor. 10.16 To all the three Adversaries together we say If there be nothing in the Sacrament but bare signs why doth our Saviour say of the elements This is my body and this is my blood And S. Paul The bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ If his body and blood be not there at all And if his body and blood be there corporally and carnally present even whole Christ why then doth our Saviour say Do this in remembrance of me And St. Paul Ye shew forth the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 10. And St. Peter That the heavens shall receive him to the end of the world Acts 3.21 Refusing then and denying both Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation as more then our Saviour intended in these words This is my body c. And also bare signification as a great deal less we admit and acknowledg Transmutation or a change and that great and marvellous in the use of the Elements not in substance but in vertue power and operation The sanctified signs are in substance creatures in signification mysteries in operation the things themselves whose names they bear the change is in their operation and use and therefore also in their names For Christ hath honoured the Symboles with the names or appellation of his body and blood not changeing their nature but adding grace unto nature Theodoret in Dial. In the Sacrament then there must needs be more then bare signs or naked Elements for how should earthly bread be an Instrument of heavenly grace and life to quicken and strengthen the soul but by some great and marvellous change which change is not in the substance of the creatures but in their vertue power and operation and such vertue power and operation could not be unless the very body and blood of Christ were truly present truly given and truly received in the Sacrament And yet the body and blood of Christ is not present given or received corporally and carnally the bread and wine being turned into the body and blood of Christ as the Papists affirm For 1. It is contrary to the Scripture 1 Cor. 11.28 Where after consecration they are called bread and wine 2. It overthrows the nature of a Sacrament for where is no Element there can be no Sacrament 3. It is contrary to nature it self that an accident should be without its subject 4. Experience dayly shews that the Elements by continuance corrupt by eating nourish the body go down into the belly c. which cannot be said of accidents or of the body and blood of Christ 5. A carnal eating is unavailable to salvation by the Papists own confession unless it be done by Faith but receiving by Faith without carnal eating is available Concil Trident. Sess 13. c. 8. et Cat. Rom. Why then is it contended for Lastly It is contrary to their own Canon taken out of St. Augustine Can. Vt Quid. Object But Christ himself said This is my body the night before he dyed no time to utter dark Parables but plain words Sol. He took the cup also and said This is my blood Mark 14.23.24 If you understand it litterally then the cup and not the wine must be turned into blood but if here be a plain figure their subtilest Doctours cannot tell how to avoyd it then why not a time to speak in figures Why not This is my body a figure too But when our Saviour says This is my body he doth not intend to shew what the bread is but what his body is not that the bread is turned into his flesh but that his body is food for our souls even as bread is for our bodies It shews not any conversion of one substance into another but only the relation that is between them He which before called his body bread John 6. doth now call the bread his body that by this chaâ—ge of names we might understand and beleeve the change that is made by grace and not so much heed the things we see as mind the the things we see not Theod. Dialog 1. Why dost thou prepare thy teeth and thy belly This is no meat for the belly but for the mind beleeve and thou hast eaten Augustine in Joan. Tract 25. ad cap. 6. 2. Consubstantiation is farther from the truth then Transubstantiation neither so possible nor probable It is not so likely or agreeable to our Saviours words who says This is my body and not my body is in with or under the bread And yet they are both gross Errours and the occasions of gross Idolatry They are both far from our blessed Saviours meaning when he spake the words This is my body from the Apostles sense 1 Cor. 11. From the Judgment of the Ancient Fathers who call the elements signs figures types c. of the body and blood of Christ and particularly St. Augustine says the words this is my body are to be understood in a figurative not a litteral sense l. 3. de Doct. Christ And besides they are impossible in nature But setting aside that barren opinion of bare sign and figure the question between us and the rest is not about the substance of the thing for we confess That the very body and blood of Christ is given and received all the question is about the manner they say it is corporally and carnally we grant indeed it is really if by really you understand truly and indeed but yet that it