Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
word_n person_n son_n trinity_n 3,993 5 9.6731 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A19748 A confession of Christian religion; Protestation against popery by way of a confession of Christian religion collected for the benefit of private friends I. D., fl. 1607.; Dunster, John, attributed name. 1609 (1609) STC 6172A; ESTC S114690 21,349 54

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

view of his own glory discontinued his wonted obedience to his Soueraigne nor only so but hauing all that he could aske or thought he should receiue from God Qui mandu canerunt vt essent quasi Dio perdiderunt quod erant facto homines immorrales August betooke himselfe to the Diuell to serue him vpon credit only of better pay Eritis sicut Dij thinking by violence to breake into heauen and to exalt his Throne by the Throne of the Almighty But foolish man by this his Apostasie and wilfull disobedience forfeited his former more blessed estate and was stript of his Masters liuery and all his excellent graces dispossessed of Paradice and sent vnto the Divell to pay him his wages for his former seruice and all his posterity by the guilt of his transgression haue their nature defiled and are abandoned of God and entitled to the Divel for his children and ofspring a wicked seede witches children and sonnes of Beliall And now ô yee sonnes of men saith God by his Prophet Micheas c. 6. v. 5. Remember what Balak king of Moab had deuised and what Balarn the Sonne of Beor answered him that you may knowe the righteousnes of the Lord for so I hope I may apply this prophesie O yee sonnes of men now at this time during our bondage vnder the divel remember what the Prince of darknes had devised against vs and how Iesus Christ the sonne of the living God hath answered him and stopt his mouth with a voice of blood and nailed his accusation to a Crosse that yee may knowe the righteousnes nor that only but the exceeding loue and rich mercy of the Lorde to mankinde for there being no way to free vs out of the power of the Devill but by satisfying the iustice of God for the former transgression God the Father in the fulnesse of time sent his beloued Son made of a woman and clothed in our flesh by the shedding of his precious bloud to redeeme out of the power of the Devill all those that by faith apply the merite of his passion vnto themselues and doe afterwarde shew their thankfulnes vnto God for so great Redemption I beleeue then that Jesus Christ the only Sonne of God coessential to the Father and the holy Ghost was incarnate of the substance of the ever-blessed Virgin Mary by the operation of the holy Spirit that as Sampson married a wife in Timnah of the daughters of the Philistins that hee might seeke an occasion against the Philistins for at that time the Philistins reigned ouer Israel Iud. 14.4 So he by espousing our flesh and by being become the seede of the woman of Abraham of Dauid and our brother might condemne Sinne in the flesh and by his power shrowded vnder this vaile ouerthrow and dispoile the strong mā of his possession then was fulfilled that of St. Augustine Christus pectatumest nos Iustitia Christ is made sinne and wee the righteousnesse of God in him So that in the person of Christ I confesse 2. natures the one Diuine the other Humane by the Diuine nature I doe not vnderstand the Divine nature simply and absolutly as it is commō to all the three persons in the Trinity for wee may not say that the whole Trinity was incarnate but I vnderstand these words Diuine nature Relatiuely of the Nature only of the Sonne of God who is the second Person in the Trinity as also by Humane Nature I do not meane ths Generall or speciall nature of man but the nature considered in the Iudiuiduum only to wit that substance of the humane nature which in the wombe of the Virgin Mary the Sonne of God did assume into the vnity of his person And these 2. Natures I confesse to bee vnited in one person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 truely and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perfectly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 indiuisibly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 distinctly in which 4. words 4. principall heresies touching the person of our Sauiour of the Arians Apolinarians Nestorians Euticheans were confuted in 4. seuerall councells Nice Constantinople Ephesus Calcedon Yet in this doctrine we must heedfully beware of 2. extreames The first that we do not thinke that the Deity assuming is changed into the Humanity assumed assumpsit quod non erat non amisit quod erat saith S. Augustine nor the manhoode assumed into the Deitie assuming but each remaineth entire in his essentiall properties yet without division of the person Salvâ proprietate vtriusque naturae suscepta est à maiestate humilitas à virtute infirmitas ab aeternitate mortalitas Leo ep ad Flau The second that yet notwithstanding we holde for good all such propositions where that is attributed vnto the subiect in concreto which is to be vnderstood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as S. Cyrill speakes in the same subiect especially if the Attribute be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and an effect of the office of Mediatorship As God redeemed the world by his blood the God of glory was crucified and we condemne for Blasphemous that saying of Nestorius Noli gloriari Iudee non enim Deum crucifixisti sed hominē as denying the two natures in 1. Hypostasis and implying that the mā Iesus was assumed into the society only of the Divinity and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as one speaketh of the same Heresie To deliver al this more plainly Christ Iesus the second person in the Trinitie assumed our whole nature both body and soule Totus totum assumpsit me vt toti mihi salutem gratificaret quod enim inassumptibile est incurabile est Pet. Lomb. lib. 3. dist 2. into the vnitie of his person and therein performed the whole worke of our Redemption Non Mediator homo praeter Deitatem non Mediator Deus praeter humanitatem sed inter divinitatem solam humanitatem solam mediatrix est humana divinitas diuina humanitas Aug. Which worke of redemption consisteth of two partes 1. Satisfaction for sin both in culpâ poenâ 2. Intercession The one performed by him in the state of Humiliation by his 1. Incarnation 2. Passion Externall Internall 3. Crucifying 4. Death 5. Buriall 6. Descent into hell The other in his estate of Exaltation glory I beleeue that God I doe not say approued or suggested or furthered but permitted directed and J may truely say willed and ordeined the fal of Adā that thereby he might take occasiō to manifest his glory that in two respects 1 In erecting a consistorie and tribunall for his iustice 2 In exposing to the view of all mē the inexhaustible treasure of his rich mercy or that I may speake in the words of a Prophet In opening of a fountaine of mercy to the house of Dauid to the Inhabitants of Ierusalem to all the Israel of God for sinne and for vncleannesse Concerning the first I confesse that there cā no other reason be assigned of the reiection of the wicked but that
Out of these proprieties doe issue Apotelesmata and actions in which the Trinity doe likewise severally yet inseperably cōmunicate I say inseperably according to that Rule of the Schooles Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa by which wee may learne to vnderstand that other of S. August Trinitas inseperabilitèr operatur to be spoken onlie of such workes which God doth without his Essence in his Creatures These outward actions of the Trinity do belong vnto one of these three heads viz 1. Creation 2. Redemption 3. Sanctification All comprised in that hymne of St. Augustine Gloria patri qui ereauit nos Gloria filio qui redemit nos Gloria Sp. S. qui sanctificauit nos Med. 33. cap. Creation is 1. Of the world in generall 2. Of man in speciall God created the fabricke of the world of nothing Nothing but nothing had this Lord Almighty Whereof wherewith whereby to build this City bestowing but sixe daies for the making and adorning of it and ever since by his watchfull eie of providence hath and doth carefully gouerne the same Which Plato coulde teach vs who avoweth it to be one the selfe same supreame powers office to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We condēne therefore the blasphemy of the Epicures which make our God an idle and carelesse God like vnto Baal in the booke of Kings which was a sleepe and must be awaked as also the opinion of Averroes vpon how goodly pretence soever builded who hemd the providence of God with in the circle of the Moone saying as it is in Iob The clowds hide him that he cannot see and he walketh in the circle of heavē thinking it absurd ad hoc deducere Dei maiestatem vt sciat quot culices nascuntur Non vacat exiquis rabus adesse Iovi Nunquam sic cura Deorum Se premit vt vestrae morti vestraeque saluti Fata vacent saith Lucan of some vile persons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For wee concerning our God haue learned of a better Master that although he hath his dwelling on high yet he abaseth himselfe to beholde things in heauen and earth that he is a God not only of the mountaines but of the vallies likewise lending his providence to the examinatiō of things of the least consequence as feeding of Rauens lighting of sparrowes vpon the ground clothing of Lilies and numbering of haires A doctrine not fully beleeued of them who when they see the wicked to builde heapes of sinne as high as Bable and yet to escape the vengance of God whē otherwise the godly are vnder his rod and punishment do breake out into blasphemy and some out openly that which Davids foole did but say in his heart Non est Deus Morn de ver Ret. Ch. cap. 12. Pompeiumque dijs obicis Luc. 9. lib. Hence Cato woulde faine haue God to giue him a reason-why Caesar overcame Pompey and Hercules in the Poet complaines in the extremity of torment that he which had freed the world of robbers and sauage beasts and beene profitable to all men had liued in miserie and shoulde die in shame when on the contrary Euristeus a tirant did liue in the ruffe of pride was liues-like the rod of God was not vpon him Et sunt qui credere possunt esse Deos Neither did the mindes of heathen men only but of Gods Saints also totter and reele in their iudgements cōcerning providence for there was a time when Ecclesiastes complained Behold the teares of the oppressed none comforts them likewise Habacuck Thou art a God of pure eies and canst not see evil thou cāst not behold wickednes wherefore dost thou looke vpō the transgressours and holdest thy tongue when the wicked deuours the man that is more righteous then he But to stop the mouths of heathen men and the better to settle the strugling thoughts of all Christians I will say no more thē that which Ecclesiastes Habaouch vpon better advise of Gods alwaies righteous iudgements and after the tēpest of their thoughts was alaid haue avowed before me to wit that howsoeuer God doth seeme not to see or to winke at the wicked yet indeed if we suspend our hasty iudgmēt a while and waite his patience til he hath whet his glittering sword and his hand shall take holde on iudgment we shal find that of Moses to be true That hee rewardeth to their face them that hate him to bring them to destruction for so speaketh Ecclesiastes If in a Country thou seest the oppression of the poore and the defrauding of iudgement and iustice bee not astonied at the matter for hee that is higher then the highest regardeth and there bee higher then they Habacuck likwise ô Lord Thou hast ordained them for iudgement O God thou hast established them for correction if not in this world yet vndoubtedly in the worlde to come For J remember that the Apostle giueth it for a note that because the Thessaloniās were afflicted with persequutions by wicked men that this was an argumēt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Thess 1.5 That there is a iudgement to come in which it should goe well with them and as ill with their enemies Recepisti bona in vitâ tuâ Lazarus similitèr mala Luc. 16. Abstulit hunc tandem Rufini poena tumultum Absoluitque Deos iam non ad culmina rerum Iniustos creuisse queror tolluntur in altum Vt lapsu grauiore ruant Claud. l. 1. in Rufin This God hauing created all things in the stage of the world by a word onely of his mouth being come in the 6. day to create man as being a worke of more excellency and therefore more difficulty doth as it were call a councell and advise with the other persons of the Trinity Venite faciamus hominem nor simply so but a more excellent creature thē the rest In similitudinem nostram 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naz. Not only let vs make man but let vs invest him with liberties and priuiledges aboue other creatures make him a None-such in the world to rule over fishes of the sea birds of the aire beasts that walke vpon the plane of the earth So then man was created of the dust of the earth and God breathed into him the soule of life Diuinae particulam aura Hor. and had infusde from aboue such supernaturall graces that hee was indeed the mirror of Gods creatures and minion of the world like vnto God vpon whō the alone God had conferred in abundant measure all his speciall ornaments for hee had no darknesse in his vnderstanding nor perversnesse in his will nor Rebellion in his affections no sicknes nor crasines in his whole body nor never should haue had if neuer mispending this rich dowry of God hee did neuer runne bakerupt beyonde the bounds of Gods commandements But this man thus highly exalted in the loue of God Peacock-like taking a
of Christ in the Gospell Etiam pater quia sic placuit tibi Non dicit qua ratione sic patri placuit sed tantū gratias agit patri quod sic illi placuit Chrys Or to speake to the capacity of the ignorant but the alone absolute will of God ordeining and as I may so speake adiudging to distruction the wicked before they were presented vpon the stage of the world or had done either good or euil For hath the Potter power of a lump of clay to make a vessell to dishonour and shall not the Almighty Iehouah by his vnlimited and transcendent power ordaine vessells of wrath for the euill day and for destruction Seeing he is the Lord in the parable of Matthew who said An non licet mihi quod volo facere in meis Yet againe I confesse that God condemneth not into hel any man but for sinnes and trespases for I hold this to bee a true position in Diuinity that sinne is not the cause of reiection yet may be and indeed is the meritorious and impulsiue cause of damnatiō wherfore whosoeuer thou art that settest thy face against heauen and openest thy mouth in blasphemies against God lay thy hand vpon thy mouth and looke backe vnto the fall of Adam Looke vnto the Rocke whence yee are hewen and to the hole of the pit whence yee are digged Is 51.1 v. and consider what thou broughtest with thee from thy natiuity and from thy Fathers house Doe not censure God in thy blasphemous thoughts as if vpon lust only and not of deserued iustice he did award sentence of condemnation against thee and I could also wish that many men would be more sparing to scan this doctrine and chose rather to admire and magnifie then strictly to examine by the Canon of our reason the secret and hidden will of God saying with St Paul O the deepnesse both of the wisdome and knowledge of God how vnsearchable are his iudgements and his waies past finding out And with St Augustine Disputare vis mecum mîrare mecum exclama ô altitudo Ambo consentiamus in pauore ne in errore pereamus Concerning the second I beleeue that al mē being infected from Adams sinne not only with imputatiue guilt as Pighius would haue it but by naturall corruption also as St Paul avoucheth haue iust cause inhering and residing in thē at their birth for which they should bee reiected of God left weltering in their filthy blood to the contempt of their person yea to be sent into hell to haue their originall impiety expiated with brimstone but that God for the glory riches of his mercy being loath to wreak his fury in the general perditiō of al mākind not of foreseene either workes or faith but of his good pleasure and only meere mercy hath called some out of the cursed estate of all mankinde on whō to bestow fauour the kingdome of his loue ordaining them in his secret counsell to be Citizens with the Angels of the heauenly Ierusalem and heires of blisse and coheires with Christ And doth call them at due time some at the third hower and some at the eleventh if not outwardly all by his word yet inwardly all by the hidden vertue and efficatious power of his holy spirit out of the power of darknes to be of the houshold of God in the bosome of the Church there to be consecrated by Baptisme nourished at the Lords table instructed by the word governed by his spirit even then he bestoweth vpon them his Beloved and with him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he giveth remission both of sinnes and punishment and all the benefits and merits not of his passion only but of his incarnation also and hath giuē vs the hand of faith to reach and apply them vnto our selues yea to owne possesse them as truely as if ours not by imputation only but originally and by inhaesion so that before God all the company of the faithfull are accounted as only one Numerical body with Christ Sicut corpus vnum et membra habet multa sic Christus 1. Cor. 11.12 where by Christus is ment Ecclesia Christi the Church of Christ head and body the vine and branches for the spirit of God by his sanctifying power by little and little doth worke away the old mā of our corruption doth put on vs a new creature making vs really partakers of the substaunce of the flesh yea of the whole person of Christ his proper ornaments and graces as righteousnes and sanctification The which great blessing of our every way vndeserued redemption whē I seriouslie revolue with my selfe I cannot but breake forth into praise in the words of Zachary Blessed be the Lord God of Israell because he hath visited redeemed his people c. And to vse those words of admiratiō otherwise applied I cōfesse in the book of Numbers According vnto this time it shall bee said of Iacob and Israel what hath God wrought Man having receiued these rich favours of God in his creation and redemption hath nothing charged vpon him for his tribute but only to shew a good faithfulnes to adorne his christian profession and to be carefull to shew forth good workes Wherefore I confesse vnto the glory of God that every one of Gods children which hath his sinnes washed away in the bloud of the Lamb Extra causam Iustificationis nemo potest b●na opera ●atis magnifice commendare Luth. hath it not left vnto him as Arbitrary but hath a necessity laid vpō him to do good works and that in these respects following 1. In respect of God it being his will commandement that they should be done by such our obedience to testifie our thankfulnes for his great mercies of Creation and Redemption 2 In respect of our selues that wee by these fruits of Sanctification as by certaine markes in the Kings high way for they be viae regni Ber. may knowe whether wee bee in the way of saluation or no and be led backward to a certainty of our Iustification and effectuall Vocation and Election so finding our names written in the booke of life may be perswaded Certitudine fidei cui non potest subesse falsum of our future glorification 3 In respect of others 1. Ne quis de nobis conqueri possit Philip. cap. 2. 2 That other men seeing our good workes may be allured to glorifie our Father which is in heauen to say as the Gentiles to the Iewes in the prophesie of Zachary Ambulabimus vobiscum for we haue heard that God is with you This truth being alwaies resolued on that our best workes are not perfect in their owne esteeme value if examined according to the precise rule of the Decalogue lex spiritualis est ego autem homo carnalis and in the district iudgement of God and therefore away with merit and let vs say with S. Augustine Vae laudabili etiāvitae hominum si
Euince against the Pelagians that children were tainted with originall sinne and therefore Extra feruorem disputationis cum Pelagianis hee did somwhat remit of that seuerity and we shal find in his booke de Bapt. contra Donatistas lib. 4. Cap. 22. that he is charitable to those that go out of this world vnwashed in Baptisme Si fortè ad celebrandum mysterium Baptismi in angustijs temporū succurri nō potest They are his own words and I am not the only man of all the world that thus vnderstood S. Augustine for S. Bernard in his 77. Epist whose iudgmēt of the same point what it was you haue before addeth Ab his ergo duabus columnis S. August is one S. Ambros the other crede mihi difficilè avellor cum his inquam me aut errare aut sapere fateor I confesse originall sinne to be weakned and bridled by Baptisme yea takē awaie quoad reatū imputationem but not quoad actum totali abolitione as the Papists would haue it for it stil remaineth in vs as long as wee walke sub onere carnis and is indeed a sinne howsoeuer in Christ not imputed vnto the person in whō it is or if you wil so haue it I will giue you my iudgemēt of Concupiscence remaining after Baptisme in Saint Augustines words Remittitur in Baptismate non finitur And againe Sed sufficit inquis quod in Baptismate accepi remissionem omnium peccatorum Nunquid quia deleta est iniquitas finita est infirmitas Adhuc carnem fragilem portas adhuc corpus quod corrumpitur aggrauat animam adhuc vtique dicis donec sanentur languores mei Dimitte nobis debita nostra Baptisme is onlie to be dispensed by a minister not by a laie man much lesse by a woman yet I am perswaded that if a lay man or woman haue de facto baptised obseruing the forme of words the Baptisme is not to be repeated Nescio an quis piè dixerit esse repetendum Aug S. Augustine was not himselfe vncertaine what to thinke but doubtfull whether any well minded man in the whole world could thinke otherwise and I rest in the iudgement of a learned father amongst vs whose words they are piè fit si minister tingat solus at fit etiam si tingat alius and againe malè factum est si laicus D. Abbots loc de Bapt. peius si faemina rem sacrosanctam hanc attigerit sed factum est quod factum est infectum esse non potest We should indeed keep our selues within the limits of our vocations each sexe apart therefore when women Baptize which I take to bee not a permission by lawe but a presumption against law they are to be censured as vsurpers of an others calling who by vnsanctified hands execute that wherevnto the lawes of God and his Church haue deputed others But yet farre be it from me herevpon it being but a personall default to disanull and annihilate the Action and to make Baptisme no Baptisme to the preiudice of the Receiuer for delictum cum capite semper ambulat factum alterius alteri nocere nō debet 2 The other Sacrament is the Eucharist in which the true body and bloude of Christ is given vs vnder the visible forme of bread wine to bee receiued by the mouth of faith of everie beleeuer And I am perswaded that as truely as the bread and wine is receiued by my hand and conveied into my stomacke so assuredly the body and bloode of Christ Iesus is receiued by the hand of faith and conveied vnto my soule and conscience this certainety is assured vnto me by those Emphaticall formes of speeches peculiar in the sacraments by which the bread is tearmed the true body and wine the blood of Christ so then the body of Christ is present in the sacrament verè non imaginariè how be it non corporali praesentiâ sed spirituali according to that of S. Augustine Quid paras ventrem dentes crede manducasti Away then with the wheaten Idoll the Masse and Popish Transubstantiation for that there can be no such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Transubstantiation I protest vpon these reasons 1 It crosseth the institution of Christ he bideth vs to receaue his supper In mei recordationē now we know that Recordatio is Rei absentis non praesentis 2 Christians would then be Anthropophagi and the Lords table should bee like the house of Polyphemus in the Poet Et trepidi tremerent subdentibus artus 3 This implies a blasphemy for then Christ being chewed and eaten in ventrem cederet and therefore according to the doctrine of the Gospell in latrinam abijceretur 4 Then the wicked should eate his flesh and so haue eternall life 5 We see the Accidents of bread wine to remaine and therfore the propper substances of bread wine must remaine except we woulde haue an Accident to subsist without his proper substance which is absurd in reason And I do accoūt that glosse which the master of the sentences doth set vpon this matter verie rediculous to wit that therefore the breade and wine being indeed vanished away their accidēts must remaine to cover the flesh and bloude of Christ 1 Vt fides scilicet haberet meritum Auerr●es in 12. metaph Quoniam christiani manducant Deum quem adorant fi● anima mea cum philosophis quia fides nō habet meritū vbi humana ratio praebet experimētū 2 Ne abborreat animus si carnem ipsam oculi vsurparent 3 Ne ab incredulis Religioni Christianae insultetur as if they did eate mans flesh I protest likewise against the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and consubstantiation of the Lutherans who doe faine a Coexistence of the body of Christ in sub or cum pane and I could wish that they would vse more moderation against their Opposits I conclude my iudgement of both sacramēts with this doctrine that neither sacrament hath vim causatiuam gratiae as the Papists speake that I may explicate my selfe to the capacity of the simple that there is not in the corporal elemēts of the Sacraments any supernaturall Grace inherent and essentiall but that the Sacraments are instruments meanes by the which the holy Ghost is effectually powerfull to offer exhibit apply the merit of Christs passion to every beleeuer That which pessimè pertinacissimè Eutyches as I read of him I hope I may truely and from a sober and Christian resolution averre In hac fide genitus sum vsque hodie vixi in ea opto mori Etiam sic sentio sic credo I. D. His qui contradicit aut omnino à Christi nomine alienus est aut est Haereticus FINIS