Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	person_n	scripture_n	trinity_n	3,376	5	9.9610	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91721	The Racovian catechisme vvherein you have the substance of the confession of those churches, which in the kingdom of Poland, and great dukedome of Lithuania, and other provinces appertaining to that kingdom, do affirm, that no other save the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, is that one God of Israel, and that the man Jesus of Nazareth, who was born of the Virgin, and no other besides, or before him, is the onely begotten Sonne of God.; Racovian catechism. English. 1652.	Smalcius, Valentin, 1572-1622.; Socinus, Faustus, 1539-1604.	1652 (1652)	Wing R121; Thomason E1320_1; ESTC R200387	94,429	183

cannot be proved out of that place is evident from the place it self where Christ saith The Father is greater then all and consequently then the Son as the Son himself elswhere confesseth John 14. 28. and that he gave those sheep to Christ Q. But where doth the Scripture call him equal to God A. John 5. 18. Therefore the Iewes sought the more to slay him in that he had not only broken the Sabbath but also called God his own Father making himself equall to God And Phil. 2. 6. Who Christ Jesus being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal unto God Q. What answer you to those places A. That Christ is equall to God no way proveth a Divine Nature in him yea the contrary is hence collected For if Christ be equall to God who is God by Nature he cannot possibly be the same God But the equality of Christ with God herein consisteth that by the power which God conferred on him he did all those things and will do them which pertain to God himself as if he were very God Q. Where read we that Christ is the Son of the living God the proper and only begotten Son of God A. Of the first we read Mat. 16. 16 where Peter saith Thou art the Son of the living God And Rom. 8. 32. where the Apostle saith Who God spared not his own proper Son but delivered him for us And Iohn 3. 16. So God loved the world that he hath given his only begotten Son and a little after v. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the name of the only begotten Son of God Q. What do you answer to these places A. From all those attributes cannot be proved any Divine Nature of Christ For as to the first it is apparent that Peter confesseth the Son of Man to be the Christ the Son of the living God who it is certain had not a Divine Nature as they imagine Again the Scripture testifieth of other men that they are Sons of the living God as Paul citeth it out of Hosea Rom 9. 26. and it shall be in the place where it was said unto them you are not my people they shall be there called the Sons of the living God But as to the second and third places in them we read that the proper and only begotten Son of God was not spared but given and delivered to death for us which cannot be said of him that is God by Nature Yea from thence that Christ is the Son of God it is apparent that he is not God otherwise he will be the Son of himself Now the reason why those attributes are ascribed to Christ is this because amongst all the Sons of God he is both the chiefest and most deare to God as Isaac because he was most dear to Abraham and the heir of all things is called the only begotten Heb. 12. 17. although he had a brother Ismael And Solomon is called the only-begotten in the fight of his Mother Prov. 4. 3. although he had more brethren of the same mother 1 Chro. 3. 5. Q. Where is he called the first-born of every creature A. Colos 1. 15. Q. What say you to it A. Neither can it be hence concluded that Christ hath a Divine Nature For since Christ is the first-born of every creature it must needs be that he also is one of the creatures For such is the force of the word first-born in the Scripture that it must of necessity be one of them amongst whom it is the first born as the first-born of sheep is a sheep of asses an asse of men a man But that Christ should be the first-born of creatures in the Old creation the adversaries themselves must not admit unlesse they will become Arrians Wherfore they must confesse that the Lord Jesus Christ is one of the New Creation Whence the Divine Nature of Christ is not only not concluded but it is on the contrary firmly concluded that he hath no Divine Nature But that Christ is by the Apostle called by that name doth hence proceed namely that he both in time and dignity precedeth all other things of the New Creation Q. Where doth the Scripture affirm that he hath all things that the Father hath A. Iohn 16. 15. where Christ himself saith All things that the Father hath are mine And below ch 17. 10. All mine are thine and thine are mine Q. VVhat say you to these places A. The word all as was formerly demonstrated is commonly r●strained to the subject matter Wherefore from such places no such thing as the adversaries would have can be collected Now the subject matter Iohn 16. is that which the Holy Spirit was to declare unto the Apostles concerning the Kingdom of Christ and c. 17. it is apparent that it is spoken of the Disciples of Christ whom God had given to him whence he also calleth them his own Besides inasmuch as whatsoever Christ hath he hath it from the grant of the Father and not from himself it is hence evident that he hath no such Divine Nature as is imagined Since he that is a God by Nature hath all things from himself Q. But where is Christ called a Father of eternity A. Isa 9. 6. Q. VVhat say you hereunto A. That a Divine Nature cannot hence be proved inasmuch as Christ is for a certain respect called a Father of eternity as may be seen by the words a little before in the same place expressed But it is a wonder that the adversaries urge this place especially according to the English Translation where Christ is called the everlasting Father For this quite subverteth the common Doctrine of the Trinity by confounding the first and second Persons thereof But the words may wel be rendred a Father of eternity or an everlasting Father both because he is the Author of eternall life to them that obey him and liveth for ever to shelter and protect and cherish Christians who are elswhere called his seed See Isa 53. 10. Q. But where are those Elogies given to Christ namely that he is the word or Speech of God the Image of the invisible God the Character or expresse image of his person or substance that he which seeth Christ seeth the Father that in Iesus Christ dwelleth all the fulnesse of the Godhead or of Deity bodily A. Iohn 1. 1. In the beginning was the word compared with Rev. 19. 13. where Christ is called the word of God Col. 1. 15. Heb. 1. 3. Io. 14. 9. Col. 2. 9 Q. What say you to these pleases A. It cannot from thence be concluded that Christ hath a Divine Nature because he is called the Word of God yea the contrary is manifest For since he is the Word of that one God he cannot be that very one God unlesse one wil absurdly and contradictiously say he is the Word of himself Which answer may be given to every one of these testimonies But Jesus

is therefore called the Word or speech of God because he hath declared the whole will of God to us as John himself seemeth to expound it chap. 1. 18. No man hath seen God at any time the only-begotten Son who is or rather was in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him As he is in the same sense called both Life and Truth And the same may be said of his being called the Image of the invisible God But he is called the expresse Image of his person or substance hereby is meant that God hath already exhibited in him whatsoever he hath promised to us But as to the saying of Christ he that seeth me seeth the Father this is not fit to prove the Divine Nature of Christ since that reason of seeing is not appliable to the Essence of God which is invisible but to the knowledge of those things which Christ as his Fathers Embassador both said and did For proof of this see Joh. 12. 45. Neither lastly can the divine Nature of Christ be evinced from thence namely that all the fulnesse of the Godhead or of Deity dwelleth in him bodily since this word God-head may denote the divine wil see Eph. 3 19. forasmuch as the Apostle doth oppose that speech not to persons but to Philosophy legall ceremonies it is evident that it is meant of the Doctrine of Christ not of his Person But should we take the words as they sound yet could not such a divine Nature as the adversaries have imagined be thence collected For it is true and manifest that the fulnes of Deity or Godhead doth now dwell in Christ even bodily in that his very body is altogether divine as being made both of divine spiritual matter namely that of the heaven see 1 Cor. 15. 45 47 48. and being indued with divine life and divine splendour divi●e strength But concerning the word corporally of that we wil discourse somwhat afterwards Q. But where saith the Scripture that Christ had glory with the Father before the world was A. John 17. 5. Now Father glorifie me with thy self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was or as the Greek runneth with the glory which I had before the world was with thee Q. What say you to this place A. Neither can the Divine Nature of Christ be evinced from hence for that Christ might have glory with the Father before the world was and yet not be thereupon God is apparent from 3 Tim. 1. 9. where the Apostle saith of the faithfull that grace was given to them before the world began Besides it is here written that Christ doth beg this glory of the Father which sheweth neither that he was formerly in actual possession therof for then he would have been in possession of it still and consequently needed not as he doth to beg it as the reward of his work nor had a Divine Nature for then his Divine Nature would have supplied him with such glory as he wanted without being beholden to another Wherefore the sense of the place is that Christ beseeches the Father to grant unto him that glory which he had with him in his decree before the world began Q. Where saith the Scripture that the Spirit of Christ was in the Prophets A. 1 Pet. 1. 10. 11. Concerning which salvation the Prophets diligently scarched and inquired who prophesied of the grace that should happen to you searching at what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ in them did signifie Q. What say you to this A. The spirit here said to be in the Prophets is therefore called the spirit of Christ either by a prolepsis because he is now become the spirit of Christ or because he foresignified the things of Christ as Peter himselfe hinteth saying when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow which forme of speech you likewise have 1 Joh. 4. 6. where the spirit of truth and the spirit of error are so called because they speak the things belonging to truth and to error Q. Where saith the scripture that Christ came down from heaven came out from the father and came into the world A Joh. 3. 13. No man hath ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven the son of man that is or rather was in heaven And chap. 16. 28. I came out from the father and came into the world againe or rather on the contrary I leave the world and go to the father and Ioh 17. 18. As thou hast sent me into the world Q What say you to these passages A. That the divine nature of Christ cannot hence be evinced is apparent in that the words of the first testimony namely who came down from heaven may be figuratively taken as in Jam. 1. 17. Every good donation and every perfect gift is from above descending from the father of light and Rev. 21. 2. 10. I John saw the holy City the new Jerusalem descending from God out of heaven But if they ought properly to be taken which we most willingly admit it is apparent that they are not spoken of any other then the son of man who since he of necessity hath a humane person he cannot be God by nature Moreover whereas the Scripture testifieth of Christ that the father sent him into the world we read the same concerning the Apostles of Christ in the words before quoted John 17. 18. As thou hast sent me into the world so have I also sent them into the world But that saying namely that Christ came out from the Father are equivalent with his descending from heaven but his coming into the world is such a thing which the Scripture sheweth to have happened after his nativity see John 18. 37. where our Lord himself saith I was therefore born and therefore came I into the world that I should bear Record to the truth and 1 John 4. 1. It is written that many false prophets were gone out into the world So that from those forms of speech a divine nature of Christ cannot be evinced But in all these speeches is described how divine the beginning of Christs prophetick office was Q. But where is Christ called that one Lord Lord of glory King of Kings and Lord of Lords A. 1 Cor. 8. 6. To us there is one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things and we through him 1 Cor. 2. 8. For had they known they would not have crucified the Lord of glory Rev. 17. 14. They shall make war with the Lamb and the Lamb shall overcome them for he is a King of Kings and Lord of Lords and chap. 19. 16. and he hath on his vesture and thigh a name written King of Kings and Lord of Lords Q. What say you to these testimonies A. As to the first the divine nature of Christ cannot be concluded from the Apostles calling him that one Lord. For first he manifestly distinguisheth him from the father whom

believe it But it is evident that these Quotations do not demonstrate the Father Sonne and Holy Spirit to be three Persons in one Divine Essence Q. Yet from such a Conjunction of those three in divine Operations it seemeth somewhat probable that they are three Persons in one divine Essence A. By no means For as to the first place although the Father Son and Holy Spirit be conjoyned in Baptism yet doth it not therefore follow that they are Persons in one divine Essence both for that it is said in the words immediately going before that all power in heaven on earth was given to the Son which cannot possibly agree to him that is a Person in the divine Essence as also because it is no new thing for the Scripture in other things no lesse divine then Baptism to joyn with God such Persons and Things as no wayes pertain to the divine Essence Of Persons you have an example in the first book of Samuel chap. 12. 18. And all the people greatly feared the Lord and Samuel And in Moses Exod. 14. 31. where according to the Hebrew it is read And the people feared the Lord and believed in the Lord and in his servant Moses Of things you have an instance Acts 20. 32. I commend you to God and to the Word of his Grace Ephes 6. 10. Strengthen your selves in the Lord and in the power of his might Q. But they hold he must needs be God into whose name we are baptized A. They are exceedingly mistaken for we read 1 Cor. 10. 2. that the Israelites were all baptized into Moses And Act. 19. 3. that certain Disciples were baptized into the Baptisme of John Although neither Moses were God nor the Baptisme of John a Person much lesse God Q. But it seemeth one thing to be baptized into any ones name and another to be baptized into any one A. By no means For by vertue of the Hebrew Idiotisme it is oftentimes all one to do something into any ones name and into any one as is sufficiently known Neither need we go far for any instance since the matter in hand will readily furnish us for whereas we read in some places that Disciples were baptized into the name of Christ see Act. 8. 16. Act. 19. 5. we read in others that they were simply baptized into Christ Rom. 6. 3. Gal. 3. 27. Q. What answer give you to the second Quotation A. That although divine operations be attributed to God and to the Lord and to the Holy Spirit yet can it not be rightly inferred thence that these three are of one essence Yea the contrary may be thence clearly collected namely that they cannot be of one essence since the Lord and the Holy Spirit are openly distinguished from God whom we formerly proved to be no other then the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ But because together with God mention is here made of the Lord and of the Holy Spirit this is therefore done because the Lord is he by whom God doth work all these things with the concurrent ministery of the Holy Spirit for here he treateth only of those things that appertain unto the faithfull in whom the Holy Spirit worketh Q. What answer give you to the third A. First since it is known that in the more ancient Greek copies and in the Syriack and in the more antient Latin Versions these words are not extant as the chiefest of our Adversaries do shew nothing certain can be concluded from them Again though they were extant in the Scripture yet could it not be thence concluded that there are three Persons in one Divinity For that place speaketh of no other thing then of witnessing that Jesus is the Son of God or the Christ But that this may be attested not only by such as are divine persons but even by such as are no persons at all appeareth by the following words wherein the Apostle saith that there are three that bear witnesse on the earth the Spirit the Water and the Bloud Now when he saith that the former three are one that this is meant of their being one in testimony and agreement but not in essence is apparent by the following verse where the like expression is found and must be taken in such a sense Q. I perceive by your former discourse that there is but one Person in the divine essence and therefore I would now know how the knowledge hereof is very conducible to salvation A. You will easily perceive that if you consider how pernitious the opinion of the Adverse Party is For first that opinion may easily undermine and weaken the belief of one God whilest one while it confesseth but one God another while acknowledgeth three Persons every one whereof is that one God Secondly it obscureth the glory of that one God who is only the Father of Jesus Christ whilest it transferreth it to another who is not the Father Thirdly it may easily pervert the way of salvation whilest it taketh away the difference between the first and second cause thereof and suff●reth us not rightly to acknowledge who is the prime Author of our Salvation and how God manageth the same by Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit In sine it greatly hindreth Aliens from embracing the Christian Religion whilest it delivereth such things as are opposite to divine Truth and sound reason From all which inconveniences that opinion is free which holdeth that there is but one Person in the divine essence Of the Will of God Q. YOu have explained to me the things that pertain to the essence of God explain now those things also that concern his Will A. Those things that concern the Will of God are partly such as all men in generall are and ever have been partakers of them partly such as properly belong to those who are to obtaine eternall life Q. What are those whereof all men in generall have ever been partakers of A. They are three in number first the Creation of heaven and earth and all the things that are therein Act. 14. 15. Secondly his care and providence over all things in particular Mat. 10. 29. Lastly the remuneration of them that seek him that is yeeld themselves obedient to him Heb. 11. 6. Q. Why is it necessary to believe that God created heaven and earth A. There are two principall causes thereof The one that God would have us believe it And therefore in the Scriptures both God and his Ministers do so frequently and clearly admonish us thereof as amongst other testimonies you have it in Isaiah chap. 44. 24. I am the Lord that maketh all things that stretcheth out the heavens alone that spreadeth abroad the earth by my self And in Moses Gen. 1. 1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth And in David Psal 33. 6. By the word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth He gathereth the waters of the Sea together as

whose house is by the sea-side he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do 2 Epist of John v. 7. Many deceivers are entred into the world who confesse not Iesus coming in flesh to be Christ. This is the deceiver and the Antichrist From which places it appeareth that the relative hath not respect to the neerest antecedent but to that which is more remote Wherefore the meaning of those words of Iohn This is the true God and eternall life is thus This whereof I have last spoken is the true God namely he that hath for his Son Jesus Christ and it is also eternall life namely to know the true God and to be in him by his Son Jesus Christ With this accordeth that passage of Christ himself Iohn 7. 3. This is Life eternall that they know thee Father the only true God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Q. What say you to the fourth A. The words of Iude v. 4. run thus denying the only Master God and our Lord Jesus Christ Form which place because there is but one article prefixed in the Greek they conclude that both descriptions ought to be referred to one petson and consequently to Christ But this observation taken from the unity of the article prefixed to severall words is not perpetuall as appeareth by the inspection of these places in the Greek Mat. 16. 1. Luke 19. 45. Act. 15 41. 1 Thes 1. 8. Heb. 9. 19. Eph. 2. 20. Eph. 3. 5. Wherefore we must have our chiefe recourse to the nature of the thing it self Q. What say you to the fifth A. The fifth testimony is that of Paul Tit. 2. 13. Looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Iesus Christ In which words that the Epithete of great God is referred unto Christ the adversaries endeavour to evince with two reasons the first is taken from the unity of the articles prefixed in the Greek the other from our expectance not of the Father but of the Son The first of which reasons was solved a little before To the second I answer that Paul in the Greek doth not say the glorious appearing of the great God but the appearing of the glory of the great God Now it is certain that Christ shall come to judge the world not only in his own glory but also in the glory of his Father Luke 9. 26. Mat. 16. 27. Again what inconvenience is it to say that when Christ cometh to judge the world God doth come since Christ in judging the world sustaineth the person of God from whom he hath received his authority of executing judgement Q. What say you to the sixth A. The sixth testimony is this Rev. 4. 8. Holy holy holy is the Lord God Almighty who was and is and is to come This passage is therefore by the adversaries referred to Christ because they suppose that none is to come but Christ for he is to come to judge the quick and dead But we must know that that word which is here rendred to come may as well be rendred to be as Iohn 16. 13. Where Christ saith of the Holy Spirit whom he promised to the Apostles that he should tell them things to come that is to be And Act. 18. 21. We read of a feast to come that is to be Again who perceiveth not that when it hath been first said who was and is and it is immediately added and is to come that to come is all one with to be that the speech may in every part be understood of existence and not in the two first clauses of existence in the last of coming Neither is there any one that may not easily observe that the eternity of God is here described which comprehendeth the time past present and future But that which detecteth this grosse mistake is Rev. 1. 4 5. where we read Grace and peace be to you from him that was and is and is to come and from the seven Spirits that are before his Throne and from Jesus Christ the faithfull and true witnesse From which testimony it appeareth that Jesus Christ is quite another then He that is and was and is to come Q. What say you to the seventh A. The seventh runneth thus Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the Holy Spirit hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own bloud Act. 20. 28. Whereunto I answer that the name God is not here referred to Christ but to God the Father who is from the beginning of the speech perpetually understood by the name of God and whose bloud the Apostle calleth that bloud which Christ did shed in such a way of speaking and for such 〈◊〉 cause as the Prophet saith That he which toucheth the people of God toucheth the apple of Gods Eye For the exceeding great conjunction that is between God the Father and Christ although they be different in Essence causeth the bloud of Christ to be called the bloud of God the Father especially if it be considered as shed for us For Christ is the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world Whence the bloud shed to that purpose is called the bloud of God himself and that deservedly Neither is it to be passed by that in the Syriack Edition it is not read God but Christ Q. What say you to the eighth A. The eighth runs thus Hereby perceive we the love of God because he laid down his life for us 1 John 3. 16. First therefore you must know that in no Greek edition save the Complutensian nor in the Syriack Translation is the word God read But though this word were read in all copies should therefore the word He be referred to God At no hand Not only for the forementioned reason in answer to the third testimony namely that relatives are not alwaies referred to the persons next going before but also because John referreth the word He sundry times in this Epistle to him that was a great while before named as in the 29. verse of the foregoing chapter where he saith If ye know that he is just know that he that doth justice is generated of him Where by him as both the thing it self and the following words shew is meant the Father although in the words next going before mention had been made of Christ only Q. You have given me satisfaction as to the names of Christ I would now therefore have you explain those quotations that have respect to the works of Christ which the Adversaries imagine are ascribed to him by the Scripture A. They are such wherein they imagine the Scripture attributeth unto Christ that he created the heaven and the earth that he conserveth all created things that he brought the people of Israel out of Egypt that he was with them in the wildernesse conducting them and doing good to them that his glory was seen by Isaiah that he was incarnate Q.

not men knowing that whatsoever good thing every one shall do that he shall receive from the Lord whether he be bond or free Ephes 6. 5 6 7 8. And 1 Pet. 2. 18. Let servants be subject to their masters with all fear not onely to the good and gentle but also the froward And Tit. 2. 9 10. That they please their masters in all things not answering again not purloyning but shewing all good fidelity And 1 Tim. 6. 1 2. As many as are servants under the yoke let them account their masters worthy of all honour lest the name of God and his doctrine be evill spoken of And those that have believing masters let them not despise them because they be brethren but serve them so much the more because they are faithfull and beloved partakers of the benefit Q. What is the office of Masters towards Servants A. That they give to Servants that which is just and equall and forbear threats knowing that they themselves also have a Master in the Heavens and there is with him no acceptation of persons ' Ephes 6. 9. Col. 4. 1. Q. What is the sixth precept A. Thou shalt do no murder Q. What hath the Lord Jesus added hereunto A. That we be not rashly angry with our brother and offend him with rough speeches proceeding from a desire of revenge which the Lord Jesus expresseth by the word Racha that is a vain person a fool Mat. 5. 22. hereunto belongeth those words of Paul Ephes 4. 31. Let all bitternesse and chasing and anger and clamour and evill speaking be put away from you with all malice Q. What is it to say to another Racha or fool A. It is all one as if you should say he were a man good for nothing or without reason Q. But if it happen that we offend our Brother what ought to be done A. He is very carefully to be reconciled for unlesse we be at peace with our Brother our Religion is vain and there is danger lest we fall under the judgement of God Q. It is then altogether unlawfull to be angry A. It is indeed unlawfull to be angry and that you should endeavour to satiate your desires of revenge but if any one be angry at the apparent sinfulnesse of a thing and yet doth not meditate or studdy any revenge not persevere in his anger it is not forbidden to be angry in such a matter Q. What else hath the Lord Jesus added to this precept A. He hath prohibited all kind of revenge not onely private but that which is by the Magistrate so that if any one hurt either our body goods or good name we should be ready rather to receive another injury then to revenge our selves which the Lord Jesus taught in these words But I say unto you resist not evill but if any one smite thee c. Mat. 5. 39 40 41. Q. Are not those words of our Lord to be taken simply as they sound A. No for we read of our Saviour himself that when he had a blow given him with the palme of the hand he did not only forbare to turn the other cheek but also opposed those words to the smiter If I have spoken ill hare witnesse of that evill if well why doest thou smite me John 18. 23. we read the same of the Apostle Paul Acts 23. 3. Q. May we not then go to Law before the Magistrate and prosecute injuries A. Yes so you be free from the desire of revenge for our Saviour forbiddeth this onely But it is revenge when a man endeavours to requite him that hath been injurious towards him with like for like as it was tollerated in the Law of Moses to requite eye for eye tooth for tooth hand for hand foot for foot burning for burning stripes for stripes Q. What is the seventh precept A. Thou shalt not commit adultery Q. What hath the Lord Jesus added thereunto A. first that we do not onely avoid the act of Adultery but forbear to look upon a woman so as to lust after her intimating that he which lusteth after her in his heart hath already committed adultery with her besides he addeth that he which putteth away his wife unlesse it be in case of Adultery and marryeth another doth commit adultery and he also that marrieth her that is put away doth also commit adultery Lastly he forbiddeth all fornication and uncleannesse and filthy speech and sacrallity and jests Mat. 5. 28. chap. 19. 9. 1 Cor. 9. 10. 13. 18. Heb. 13. 4. 1 Thes 4. 3 4. Ephes 5. 3 4. Q. What pertaineth to the same precept A. That a Beleever do not marry with an Unbeleever lest by such a Marriage the Beleevers heart be seduced for which cause we see that under the Law such Marriages were forbidden by God himself See 1 Cor. 7. 39. Exod. 34. 16. Dent. 7. 3 4. Q. What if it happen that one of the unbeleeving married parties become a Beleever must the other unbeleeving party be thereupon deserted A. By no means if the unbeleeving party be content to dwell with the beleeving but if the unbeleeving party be not content the beleever is at liberty in such a case 1 Cor. 7. 10 11 12 13. Q. What is the eight precept A. Thou shalt not steal Q. What is forbidden in this precept A. All manner of interversion in those things that concern the commodity of our neighbour which commeth to passe when we either take away those things which he hath or doe not when we are able lend our assistance to him standing in heed Q. In what manner doe we take away from our neighbour that which is his A. Either by force or fraudulent interversion how it is effected by force is evident to every man but there are sundry ways of fraudulent Interversion for you may easily find them in buying or selling or exchanging or hiring or letting or lending or other actions as we have an old prohibition of God touching sale Lev. 19. 35 39. Deut. 25. 14 15. Thou shalt not have in this house an Epha and an Epha but thou shalt have a just waight and a just Epha Q. Is not Usury to be referred hither A. Yes Q. What is Usury A. It is the extorting of Commodities and benefit from money lent with the oppression of another which appeareth from the signification of the word wherewith Usury is expressed in the Old Covenant which is all one with biteing Exod. 22. 25. Levit. 25. 36 37. Deut 23. 19 20. whence it is apparent that to receive Commodities from money lent without biteing or detriment of another is neither biteing nor Usury whence it commeth to passe that under the Gospell the receiving of such benefit is no where forbidden unlesse it be there where Covetousnesse or extortion is forbidden although all those things that are contrary to the Spirit and Doctrine of Jesus Christ are in sundry places expresly set down Q. What hath the Lord Jesus added to that precept A. That we should

be taught what order is in the same Doctrine prescribed to that Church A. That order consisteth in the duties of those persons whereof the Church consisteth and the diligent and accurate care that all the persons perform their severall duties Q. What are the persons whereof the Church consisteth A. Of them some govern others obey Q. Who rule A. Apostles Prophets Evangelists Doctors Pastors Bishops Elders and Deacons Q. What is their duly or office whom you call Apostles A. To go out into all the world and preach the Gospell of Christ for which things sake they were both chosen first by Christ and by him sent forth from whence they had the denomination of Apostles whom Christ also endued with his holy Spirit sent in a visible manner and armed with great powers Mat. 28. 19. Mark 16. 5. Act. 2. 4. Q. What is the office of Prophets A. To foretell things to come and expound the things that are hard to be understood in the Christian Religion 1 Cor. 14. Q. What is the office of Evangelists A. To be assistant to the Apostles in preaching the Gospell and to disperse it through divers regions and plant it of which sort were Philrp Timotheus and others Act. 21. 8. 2 Tim. 4. 5. Q. What are the offices of Doctors Pastors Bishops and Elders A. To go before others in speaking to keep order in the Church of God and pour out prayers for the people of God 1 Tim. 5. 17. Acts 6. 4. Q. What is the office of Deacons A. To be serviceable to the necessities of the Church especially of the Poor therein Act. 6. 2 3. Q. Are all those persons which you said are to govern others and whose offices have you described at this day found in the Church of God A. As to the Apostles and Prophets it is certain that they have no more place in the Church of Christ For the cause for which they were chosen and sent forth by the Lord is now ceased which was that God by them would have the doctrine of his Son declared and confirmed to the world And therefore they were called the foundations of the Church of Christ by Paul Ephes 2. 20. Wherefore after that the Gospell of Christ had according to the counsell of God been abundantly discovered to the world and confirmed there is no more place left in the Church for such persons as should any further discover and confirm the same Q. Why call you the Apostles and Prophets the foundation of the Church when Christ himself is the foundation thereof 1 Cor. 3. 11. A. The Apostles and Prophets are called the foundation of the Church in one sense and Christ is in another the foundation thereof The one only in reference to other men who belong to the same Church of Christ and wholly ground themselves on the doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets And then Christ is considered as something greater that is as the chief Corner-stone of that foundation see the forecited place Ephes 2. 20. The other not onely in reference to the rest of the Church but also the very Apostles themselves who are built upon Christ as well as other Believers Q. What say you concerning Evangelists A. That they ceased together with the Apostles For they did then with the Apostles preach a New doctrine which now accounted most Old Q. What think you of the other persons A. In as much as their Ministries doe even now continue the persons themselves must also needs continue as being constituted for the ministries sake Q. How are they constituted for the Ministry A. As we have it set down in the doctrine of the Apostles Q. How is that A. Concerning the offices of Doctors Pastors Bishops and Presbyters or Elders the Apostle Paul at large discovereth 1 Tim. 3. 2 3. c. A Bishop must be unblameable c. and Tit. 1. 6 7. c. A Bishop must be unreproveable c. Q. Have not those who teach in the Church and keep order therein need to be sent in some speciall manner A. By no means for they doe not now bring a new doctrine and such as was unheard of before but that of the Apostles received of old by all men exhorting men to lead their lives according to it Whence the Apostle expresly describing all things which belong to the constituting of such persons make no mention of any mission or sending Neverthelesse when such persons according to the prescript of the Apostolick Doctrine are constituted and are endued with those two properties namely innocency of life and aptnesse to teach they ought thereupon to have just authority amongst all Q. What say you to those words of the Apostle Rom. 10. 15. How shall they preach unlesse they be sent A. The Apostle doth not here speak of any preaching whatsoever but of the preaching of a new Doctrine and such as hath not formerly been heard of which sort was the preaching of the Apostles and their assistants who therefore had need of a mission or sending But in as much as at this day there is no such preaching there is also no need of such a mission Q. How ought Deacons to be ordained A. As the Apostles directed 1 Tim. 3. 8 9. Let the Deacons in like manner be grave c. Q. You have handled what pertained to those that govern now handle also that which pertaineth to those that are governed A. It is their duty to be obedient unto those that govern in all those things which they prescribe according to the Word of God Concerning which we read in the Epistle to the Hebrewes chap. 13. 17. Next that they communicate to them that teach in all good things Gal. 6. 6. yea that they allow them double honour or maintenance 1 Tim. 5. 17. Finally that an accusation against them be not admitted under two or three Witnesses 1 Tim. 5. 19. CHAP. III. Concerning the Discipline of the Church of Christ Q. YOu have shewn the Offices of the persons which constitute the Church of Christ now likewise shew the way how these Offices may be duly performed A. That way partly concerneth all partly those that govern Q How doth it concern all A. In that manner as it is written Heh 3. 12 13. Take heed brethren lest there shall be found in any of you an evill heart of unbelief c. and Heb. 12. 15. Taking care lest any man shall fall from the Grace of God and Paul saith 1 Thes 5. 11. Admonish one another and build up one another See also ver 14. of the same Chapter Q. How must ●hey be dealt withall who are despiseds of this order A. Two wayes for they are either privately to be corrected or publickly Q. 〈◊〉 to be privat●ly corrected A. As Christ hath taught Mat. 18. 15 16 c. If thy brother offend against thee c. Q. Why to be so corrected A. Because as it appeareth from this place they privately offend against us and therefore the same is to be