the Scriptures the Church hath libertie to vse such words as may familiarly expresse the thing it selfe Moreouer we call the three Persons in God the Trinitie not because the Scripture cals them so but because the Scripture saith nothing against it Yet this word three whereof this word Trinitie is deriued is expresly set downe 1. Ioh. 5.7 There be three that beare witnes c. Whence we argue that as from one comes Vnitie so from three comes Trinitie How doth this word Essence differ from this word Person in God Essence is the nature which is not more belonging to one and lesse to another of the three Persons but common to them all yea one and the same and cannot be diuided and is all in each one of them not without them subsisting by it selfe to wit the very Deitie it selfe And therefore the essentiall properties which be in them are one in number and of one nature Now a Person is the subsisting in the diuine nature or the nature of God which hauing relation to others is distinguished by some incommunicable proprietie for indeed the Persons are onely distinguished and not seuered as three men are indeed sundred though they be but one in kind The reason is because the essence of God is infinite and impartible and therefore it is all in euery Person which are not seuered each from other but only distinguished amongst themselues But as for the essence of Angels and men it is finite and partible so that it is not all in euery singular person but part in one and part in another How manifold is the difference of Persons Twofold inward and outward The inward difference is that which is caused by the internall proprieties or the workes from within concerning which we say Opera Trinitatis ad intra sunt diuisa The workes of the Trinitie from within are diuided that is the workes which God doth within himself without any creature are not common to the three Persons but are proper to one person alone Now the proprietie of the Father is this that from eternity he was not made nor begotten but hath begotten his eternall Sonne of the same substance with himselfe a Psal 2.7 Heb. 1.3.5 Pro. 88.24 The proprietie of the Son is this that he being neither made nor created but was from all eternitie begotten of his Father without any mother b Heb. 7.3 Col. 1.15 who is of himselfe as he is God but of his Father as he is the Sonne For as light commeth from the Sunne euen so the Sonne proceedeth from the Father one distinct from the Father and therfore the second in order so farrefoorth as he is begotten c Psal 110.3 Mich. 5.2 one and the selfe same with the Father as he is God And here let vs cal to mind the saying of Nazianzene The begetting of God let it be honoured with silence it is no smal matter for thee to learne that he was begotten The proprietie of the holy Ghost is this that he was neither made nor begotten but from all eternitie proceedeth from them both inseparably d Ioh. 14.26 15.26 16.13.14 Ro. 8.9 But did the Sonne take his Deitie from the Father When we speake simply of the Sonne without the Father we auouch truly and properly that he is of himselfe and call him God because of himselfe he hath his being and all that he hath and therfore we call him one alone beginning But when we point at that relation which he hath with his Father we iustly make the Father the beginning of the Sonne and say that the Son receiued all from the Father Ioh. 3.33 For the Essence is one thing and the * Modus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 manner of subsisting another Hence it is that the schoolemen say that the Son is by himselfe not of himselfe So the essence of the Sonne is without beginning but the Father is the beginning of his Person This made Hilarie to say The gifts of the Father do not infirme but affirme the Diuinitie of the Sonne And Augustine Christ in regard of himselfe is called God and of the Father is called the Sonne Ob. The Son and holy Ghost are not without beginning therefore they are not eternall Answ This is not a beginning of time or continuance but only of order and ofspring but the Sabellians here cauill viz. Christ saith He that seeth me seeth the Father and beleeuest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me Ioh. 14.9.10 therefore the Father and the Sonne are one person Ans Indeed he that seeth the Sonne seeth the Father because the Sonne hath the same essence with the Father and being manifested in the flesh hath deliuered to vs the whole will of God Ioh. 1.18 Ob. 2. That which is one in number cannot without contradiction be said to be thâ—ee in persons but God is one in number Deut. 6.4 ergo Ans That vnitie doth signifie Gods simple essence not the maner by which that simple essence subsisteth Therefore God absolutely according to his essence is one because he is indiuisible and onely in respect of inward relation I meane the reason of subsisting is three Ob. 3. If there be one being of the Father another of the Son and another of the holy Ghost it followeth that in God there are three diuers beings and consequently three diuers persons Ans The being of the Father doth not signifie that essence by which he is absolutely God but by which he is Father that is in that he otherwise subsisteth then doth the Sonne therefore the being of the Father is one thing and the being of the Son is another and yet both of them haue the same essence Ob. 4. If there be three Persons truly distinguished and one only essence then is there a quaternitie in God Ans Not so for the essence differeth from Person onely in reason but the Persons differ each from other both in reason and in being Ob. 5. The Father begot his Sonne either existing or not existing to say either of these is absurd Ans We may well say that the Father begat his Sonne alreadie existing because the Father was neuer without the Sonne euen as the sunne was neuer without his light Againe it may be as well said that he begat him not existing in that his generation although it be eternall yet in order goeth before existence as the sunne is before his light Is this difference rationall essentiall or reall It is not essentiall as in the creatures where euery one hath his proper essence or being defined and circumscribed for the essence of the Father is not one and the essence of the sonne another and of the holy Ghost another but one and the same which the Father doth wholly communicate to the Sonne the Father and the Sonne to the holy Ghost Not onely in reason because not in notion or mind or onely in word is he called Father Sonne and holy Ghost neither
the persons as Ioh. 4.24 God is a spirit where God is taken for the whole essence of the Deitie as is also the name Iehouah Or else 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 personally when there is ioyned vnto the name of God the name of the person as God the Father God the Sonne God the holy Ghost Or when the Father is opposed to the Sonne who is very God and the second Person in the Trinitie as Rom. 7.25 I thanke God by Iesus Christ So Rom. 8.3 the Father is called God the word Father being vsed personally because the Person sending is opposed to the Person sen◠Improperly when it is attributed to Angels or men and truly either in regard of their office e Exod. 22.28 Psal 82.6 or else in respect of the reuealing of the wil of God and of their reuerence f Exod. 7.2 falsly either by error or else by vsurpation and custome as 1. Cor. 8.5 or else by worshipping them 2. Cor. 4.4 Phil. 3.19 Be there any parts or kinds of God None at all because he is a most simple essence which doth admit no composition or diuision and simply and in euery respect of vnitie one and in act most infinite Are there any causes of God Not any for he is the cause of all causes Is there any accident in God No in regard of God himselfe for whatsoeuer is in God is his essence Seeing the essence of God is most simple in what respect do power goodnesse iustice wisedome mercie differ in God Not in essence for all these attributes in essence are but one very thing indeed but in our weake capacitie and manner of knowing in regard of vs and by the effects in respect of the creatures How many sorts are there of Gods attributes Two the first whereof is incommunicable so that there appeareth not the least impression therof in any of his creatures This kind we may call Absolute such is his simplicitie and which depend vpon it his immutabilitie eternitie and immensitie The second sort is some way communicable which you may call fitly a relatiue propertie in that it hath relation to the creatures such are his power wisedome will goodnesse iustice and mercie Be there any effects of God There be infinite effects of his grace iustice power and mercie How are the Gentiles said to be without God Ephes 2.12 seeing they adored so many gods Because none of their gods was the true God But yet they acknowledged God the Creator of heauen and earth I answer out of Hilarie in his third booke of the Trinitie Not the name of God but euen God himselfe was altogether vnknowne vnto them because no man knoweth God but such as confesse the Father and the Sonne But do you not by this make both Iewes and Turks Atheists There are many kinds of Atheists First such as acknowledge no diuinitie secondly such as worship fained gods in stead of the true God thirdly such as do indeed acknowledge the true God yet not as he is but as they fancie him to be Such are the present Iewes and Turkes who denie both the Father and the Sonne as also all Antitrinitarian Hereticks who denie the Trinitie of Persons in one essence and they also who say the Sonne is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of the same essence with the Father And surely they who challenge to themselues the name of the Catholike Church may be ranked in this order who professing in name one onely God the Father the Sonne and holy Ghost and Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God and man yet set downe such grounds which being granted the true God is transformed into such an Idoll as neuer was is or shall be found and withal the humanitie of Christ must needs vanish into a ghost What vse make you of the knowledge of God Surely this that he alone may be rightly worshipped to which purpose man was created and that we being guided by this knowledge may pray for to him and acknowledge that from him we haue euery good thing What things are repugnant to the doctrine concerning God Atheisme Epicurisme the mad worshipping of Idols the Gentiles making of many gods the heresie of Maniche making two beginnings one good another euill blasphemies against God false opinions concerning God as that of the Anthropomorphites who make God like vnto a man all doubting of God c. Of the Trinitie How many Persons be there in that one Essence of God THree and those both in number and in very deed distinguished the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost which haue their subsisting in one diuine essence whereupon it comes to passe that there be not many Gods but one God and the same eternall infinit and omnipotent who is named Iehouah in the Scriptures and is said to be most simple by reason of essence and three by reason of Persons By what testimonies of Scripture do you proue the Trinitie Genes 1.1 God or Elohim created the heauen and the earth In which place the verbe being of the singular number doth signifie the most simple essence of God and the substantiue Elohim being the plurall number doth note out the three Persons Also in the creation of man God as it were taking counsell with his eternall wisdome that is the Sonne and the holy Ghost saith thus vers 26. Let vs make man after our image Where he saith Let vs make because of the number of the persons and after our image because of the vnitie of the essence Gen. 19.24 The Lord rained from the Lord brimstone and fire vpon Sodome and Gomorrha in which place the person sending the raine and the person from whome it was sent that is the Sonne is distinguished from the Father Haue you any more pregnant proofes out of the new Testament 1. In the baptisme of Christ Math. 3.16 and Ioh. 1.32 the voice of the Father is heard from heauen This is my beloued Sonne in the same place there stands the Sonne by the riuer Iordan the holy Ghost descends in the forme of a Doue and sits on Christ 2. Againe in the transfiguration there is the Sonne and the voice of God the Father is heard from heauen Mat. 17.5 and Christ is shadowed with a cloud which doth signifie the holy Ghost And further Mat. 28.19 Baptize all nations in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost he saith not in names but in the name to shew the vnitie of the three Persons 1. Ioh. 5.7 Gal. 4.6 2. Cor. 13.13 The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ and the loue of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all Seeing the Scripture doth not vse the name of the Trinitie doth the Church well to reteine the same Yea no doubt for the thing it selfe is found in the Scriptures two manner of wayes 1. According to the letter 2. According to the sense Now sith that the sense of it and the very thing it selfe is found in
comforter from the Father And vnto him is attributed a voice k Act. 13.2 and his good pleasure l Act. 15.28 and free will m 2. Cor. 10.11 and a peculiar appearing in a bodily forme n Cap. 2.3 all which be the properties of a person truly subsisting And Ioh. 5.7 There be three which beare witnesse in heauen the Father the Word and the holy Ghost and these three are one What then is the holy Ghost He is the third Person of the Trinitie eternall coessentiall to the Father and proceeding from them both ioyntly and inseperably together with the Father and the Sonne the Creator and Conseruator of all things who is sent into the hearts of the elect to sanctifie them together with the Father and the Sonne equally to be worshipped As for his sending foorth it is in operation not in essence the which being vnmeasurable in that it is true God changeth not place neither is in a place but euery where as God Ga. 4.6 Proue that the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father Ioh. 15.26 He that proceedeth from the Father and Mat. 10.20 It is not ye that speake but the spirit of your Father that speaketh in you Proue that the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Sonne Ioh. 14.26 and 15.26 he is said not onely to be sent and to be giuen of the Father but also of the Son and Ioh. 16.14 to receiue all things from Christ He shall receiue of me and declare all things vnto you Rom. 8.9 and Gal. 4.6 He is called the Spirit of the Son Moreouer Augustine saith that Christ gaue the holy Ghost by breathing him into them that he might shew that he proceedes euen from him a Joh. 20.22 Ob. 1. Christ saith that he proceedes from the Father therefore not from the Sonne Ans Christ doth not say that he proceedes onely from the Father therefore this proues nothing Ob. 2. If the holy Ghost be one he must haue but one beginning and so proceed from the Father alone Ans It followeth not seeing that breathing of the Father and the Sonne by which the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne is onely one What then be the proprieties whereby the Persons are really distinguished amongst themselues Not to be begotten or the Paternitie or fatherhood is the incommunicable proprietie of the first Person of the Trinitie whereby it comes to passe that the Father is of no other but of himselfe not made not begotten but from all eternitie begetting the Sonne Now â—o be begotten or generation or the sonneship is that whereby the Sonne doth receiue and hath in himselfe all and his whole essence from the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Proceeding flowing or comming from being likewise taken passiuely whereby the holy Ghost from all eternitie doth receiue that self same and whole essence from the Father and the Son and hath it whole in himselfe Therefore the holy Ghost is said to proceed from the Father and the Sonne not when he is sent or powred foorth vpon the house of a Zach. 12.10 Dauid but in respect of his essence which from all eternitie he receiued communicated vnto him of the Father and the Sonne Is there then a difference betweene generation and proceeding There is but I saith August know it not neither am I able nor sufficient to distinguish them because that as generation so proceeding is altogether vnspeakable Yet this difference may be yeelded that as the same Augustine saith whatsoeuer is begotten doth also proceed but not of the contrarie whatsoeuer doth proceed is also begotten These proprieties by what other names are they called They are called the workes of the Trinitie within because they be effected within the very essence without all respect to creatures after an incomprehensible manner They are also called workes diuided or distinct and incommunicable For to be a Father agreeth onely to the Father to be a Sonne onely to the Sonne Proceeding onely to the holy Ghost What call you the workes of the Diuinitie without Which in respect of the creatures are done of the whole Trinitie or which the three persons ioyntly together effect in the works of creation and redemption And they are said to be vndiuided because they be common to the three Persons whence comes this rule The workes of the Trinitie without are vndiuided Gen. 1.26 Let vs make man after our owne image And Ioh. 5.17.19 What things the Father doth the same things in like manner the Sonne doth also but yet so as there is kept the proprietie of the Persons the order of doing and the difference b 1. Cor. 15.57 Rom. 11.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So the worke of incarnation being taken actiuely is a worke of the whole Trinitie in regard of the * accomplishing of it if you consider the effect although onely the Sonne be incarnate What names are giuen to the holy Ghost in the Scriptures He is called the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Comforter that is the Aduocate c Ioh. 14.16 15.26 16.7 not of Redemption nor of Mediation or of Reconciliation betweene God and men for Christ alone in this respect is Mediator but of comfort namely teaching vs to pray comforting the afflicted teaching the truth begetting those vnutterable gronings of which Paul speaketh Rom. 8.25.26 He is called the Spirit of truth a Joh. 14.26 because he teacheth the truth effectually Also the spirit of adoption b Gal. 4.6 because he sealeth vp the adoption of the sonnes of God in our hearts Also the Spirit of sanctification or the holy Ghost c Rom. 8.15 not so much in regard of his essence as for his effects d Rom. 1.4 What be the effects of the holy Ghost 1. In generall to quicken to sustaine to rule to gouerne in speciall to giue testimonie vnto Christ e Iohn 15.26 2. To leade the elect into all truth to regenerate f Iohn 16.13 the minds of the faithfull Tit. 3.4 He hath saued vs by the washing of the new birth and by the renewing of the holy Ghost which he worketh whilest that he illuminateth our minds with the true knowledge of Christ createth in vs faith in Christ by the hearing of the Gospell and by faith bringeth forth in vs newnes of life incorporateth vs into Christ g Eph. 3.5.16 and applieth Christ and the offices and treasures of Christ vnto vs. Also to seale vp vnto vs the promises of God Ephes 1.13 He is called the Seale the earnest of our saluation and the earnest of our inheritance 2. Cor. 1.22 because by his testimonie he doth establish confirme and seale vp in our hearts the assurance of our inheritance to come What â—e the Epithets which are ascribed to the same holy Ghost in the Scriptures 1. He is called the finger of God Luke 11.20 If I by the finger of God cast out diuels by whom do your children cast them out because
respectiuely or by relation as one man may both be and be called a father and a sonne But it is reall yet altogether incomprehensible because each person hath his own peculiar definition or his essentiall and incommunicable proprietie and differs from another not in essence but in the manner of subsisting What is the outward difference It is taken from the workes of God that be without as that the Father sends the Sonne the Son is sent as the Redeemer the holy Ghost is the sanctifier As in the Creed the Father is distinguished from the Son by the worke of creation the Sonne by his incarnation the holy Ghost from them both by the worke of sanctification and regeneration as where he appeared like a Doue Mat. 3. and in clouen tongues Act. 2. although all these things be effected by one and the selfe same God As we vse to say the workes of the Trinitie without are indiuisible therefore here let vs remember the saying of Gregorie Nazianzene I cannot imagine one but presently I am compassed about on euery side with the brightnesse of three neither can I distinguish three but foorthwith I am brought againe to one Further in the persons of the Deitie there is an order but there is none inequalitie there is a distinction but no diuersitie What things be contrarie to this doctrine 1. The heresie of Sabellius who taught there was only one person of the Godhead but sometimes in one respect sometimes in another one while called the Father another while called the Sonne 2. Of Samosatenus who taught that the Sonne did no more subsist in God than wisedome iustice and goodnesse 3. Of Arrius who denyed that the Sonne was begotten of the essence of the Father that he was coeternall coequall and according to his person of the same substance with the Father 4. Of Seruetus who affirmed that the word Person is no otherwise to be taken then as in Comedies the name of person is vsed for the habite and the distinction of the office 5. Of the Tritheitarites who do transforme the three persons into three distinct and seuerall essences they denie the Son of God according to his essence to be of the same substance with the Father and the Sonne to be God of himselfe 6. The blindnesse of the Iewes who do affirme an essence altogether without distinction Here must we insert certaine obiections of one Gentilis an Hereticke burnt at Geneua Ob. 1. If there be diuers Iehouahs there must be diuers essences but Gen. 19.24 the first is true for Iehouah did raine fire from Iehouah that is the Sonne from the Father therefore the Sonne is a distinct essence from the Father Ans It is an Hebrew phrase signifying that God did miraculously raine fire of himselfe from heauen Againe the word Iehouah is taken sometimes personally it is therefore a distinction in the Persons not in essence Ob. 2. There is one life of the Father and another of the Son Ioh. 5.26 therefore another essence Ans First that place is to be vnderstood of a power communicated to Christ as he was Mediator Secondly although the Son be from the Father in respect of the origination of his person yet is he of himselfe if he be absolutely considered and therefore hath the same life with the Father Ob. 3. They who haue distinct operations haue distinct essences but the actions of the Trinitie are distinct ergo Ans The proposition is true if it be vnderstood of naturall and externall actions but if of internall and personall actions it is not true for these do not take away the vnitie of essence since that the same essence in number is wholly in euery person Ob. 4. Each Person hath not one and the same power for the Father can beget the Sonne the Son cannot beget ergo they haue not the same essence Ans They haue all one naturall power but not personall as there is one nature but not one person Ob. 5. The essence of the Father is communicated to the Son by generation therefore there is one essence in the Father another in the Sonne because there is one essence begetting and another begotten Answ We must distinguish betwixt generation and communication for the person begets and is begotten but the essence neither begetteth nor is begotten but communicated Ob. 6. If the Father and Sonne haue one essence it must follow that the Father was incarnate which is absurd ergo Ans The essence of God absolutely considered was not incarnate but the second person and although the person of the Sonne include the whole essence of God yet for the proper manner of subsisting it is distinguished from the person of the Father Ob. 7. If the Father and Sonne haue one essence the Sonne should be Mediator to himselfe Ans The Sonne is properly Mediator betwixt vs and his Father not absolutely betwixt vs and the diuine essence And the office of Mediator dependeth vpon the most free ordination of God The second common Place concerning Christ What doth this word Christ signifie IT signifieth Annointed being deriued of a Greeke word that signifieth commonly to annoint as Esa 45.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord said to king Cyrus his christ that is his annointed But in way of excellencie it is ascribed to the Sauiour of the world who is called in Hebrew Messias a Ioh. 1.14 because he was annointed with the oyle of gladnesse aboue his fellowes as we reade in Psalm 45.8 And indeed he is that King that onely Priest and Prophet which was promised vnto mankind b Psal 2.6 110.4 Esa 61.1 Doth this name Christ signifie his nature or his person His person subsisting in both his natures and not this or that nature alone for it is a name concrete as the Grammarians speake and not abstract What do you call a word Concrete and what an Abstract This word Concrete in the discourse of Christ is said to be that which signifieth the nature together with the subiect and doth comprehend in his signification both the thing and the subiect wherein the thing is that is to say it doth designe the person of Christ as he is the Sonne of God because the Sonne of God doth not simply signifie the nature of God but the person of the Sonne of God so the sonne of man when it is spoken of Christ signifieth the Person and not his humanitie simply But this name Abstract is a word that signifieth the nature simply as the Diuinitie of Christ the humanitie of Christ How many things are especially necessarie to know Christ and which be they Two his person and his office What is Christ He is the onely begotten Sonne of God a Joh. 1.14 who of his meere loue towards mankind b Tit. 3.4.5 did create vnto himselfe of the seed c Heb. 2.16 of the Virgin Marie d Luk. 1.31 being sanctified by the holy Ghost e Luk. 1.35 and by creating did assume
Math. 9.36 Iohn 2.17 Ioh. 11.33.35 Mat. 26.37.38 that he ascended visibly and locally into heauen and thence that he shall come againe to iudgement l Act. 1.9.11 Why must Christ needes be true man 1. The iustice of God required it should be so that the disobedience committed in our flesh might in the same be repaired m Rom. 5.17.18.19 Hebr. 2.14 2. The reason of our adoption for it pleased the Sonne of God to take the nature of man vpon him and to become our brother and by that means to become our nearest kinsman and most neare allied vnto vs that we being made his members might be made the sons of God Gal. 3.26 and that he might haue right to redeeme and ransome vs n Ier. 32.8 Ruth 3.12.13 Hence is matter of comfort in euery kind of temptation Therfore the Apostle to the Hebrewes 2.17 4.5 saith He tooke not vpon him the nature of the Angels but the seed of Abraham and in all things became like to his brethren that he might haue compassion of his brethren 3. For the confirmation of our resurrection for in that Christ tooke on him our nature and hath raised it vp and giuen vnto it immortalitie and hath exalted it in the heauen by vertue of that communion which we haue with him shall we be raised vp at the last day and this our vile bodie shall be made conformable to the glorious bodie of Christ Phil. 3.21 1. Cor. 15.22 As in Adam all are dead so in Christ shall all be made aliue Why was neither the Father nor the holy Ghost incarnate but the Sonne 1. Because it was meet that the world should be redeemed and all things restored by him by whom all things were created or that man should be redeemed from death by him by whom he was first created and should haue bene brought vnto life eternall if he had not sinned 2. It would haue bene vnconuenient that there should be two Sonnes one in the diuine nature another in the humane nature 3. It was the eternall decree of the Father whereby he purposed to saue mankind by the Sonne a Heb. 2.10 Whether is Christ God and man diuided or ioyned together Ioyned and vnited but not diuided By what kind of vnion Not by inhabitation onely as God dwelleth in the Saints not by consent onely b Ioh. 17.21 as the faithfull are one in the Father and the Son not by mixture as when water is mingled with wine not by combination as two boords be ioyned together lastly not by composition whereby of the mixture of two things there ariseth a third but by personall vnion which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incorporation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because neither the whole Deitie nor any part of it is subiectiuely communicated to the humanitie of Christ but onely the humane nature was assumed of the Sonne of God into the same person Leu. 2.16 What is the personall vnion in Christ It is that whereby the person of the Sonne of God being a person from all eternitie existing did assume the most pure nature of man wanting all personall existing of it owne into the vnitie of his person and made it his owne the proprieties of each nature being preserued Or as Paul defines it Colos 2.9 Whereby in Christ doth dwell all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Whereof we haue a manifest resemblance in the vnion of the soule and the bodie but that it doth not fit in euery point For in man from the nature of the soule and the nature of the bodie there ariseth a third nature compounded of two which is called the nature of man But in Christ there is not made a frame of one third nature of the diuine and humane but each remaines pure and vnconfounded Neither doth that similitude of the iron red hote agree in euery point because the heate and the light in the iron being hote are but qualities not the very substance of the fire And therefore the Apostle doth well call it a great mysterie of godlinesse 1. Tim. 3.16 How is this vnion made Without all confusion without all conuersion of one nature into the other indiuisibly inseparably The difference of the natures by no meanes being taken away by the vnion but rather the proprietie of either nature being saued and ioyned together or concurring into one person and one subsisting as the Calcedon Synode speaketh in the historie of Euagrius lib. 2. cap. 4. And from that time that the Word did assume our humane nature he neuer left it no not in his death And to this purpose make those verses Sum quod eram nec eram quod sum nunc dicor vtrumque Ignoras nisime stirpe ab vtraque tenes I am that I was nor I was that I am now both am I called Thou knowest me not except thou know me subsisting of both natures By what testimonies will you proue that the diuine and humane nature in Christ did ioyne together into one and the same person Esa 7.14 9.6 Luk. 1.35 That which shall be borne of thee shall be called the Sonne of God Ioh. 1.4 And the word was made flesh not by sacramentall vnion in which respect Christ was said to be a rocke not by confusion of the natures not by commutation as water is turned into wine Ioh. 2.14 but by assuming the flesh into the vnitie of the person The voice of God speaketh thus of Iesus the sonne of Marie This is my welbeloued Sonne Mat. 3.17 He that descendeth is euen the selfe same that ascended aboue all heauens that he might fulfill all things Ephes 4.10 God sent his Sonne borne of a woman Gal. 4.4 But what meanes this that the flesh of Christ is said by Damascene and Gregorius Nyssenus to be deified Not because it is turned into the diuine nature but because it is ioyned vnto it into one person and we must vnderstand it of the bestowing of gifts vpon it whereby the humane nature of Christ doth excell all creatures yet so as they do not abolish his nature Why is it necessarie that Christ should be both God and man in one and the same person 1. To the end he might reconcile God and man or that he might make God and man one 2. That he might be a fit Mediator betweene God and men by reason of his participation and affinitie with them both a 1. Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8.6 3. That he might reconcile God vnto vs by his death which if he had bene God alone he could neuer haue suffered if onely man he could neuer haue ouercome 4. That the workes of redemption performed in the flesh of the Sonne might become a sufficient price for sinne whereby God that infinite good was offended For although certaine actions do properly proceed from the diuine nature and some are done by the humane nature yet all of them do equally receiue their price and worthinesse from the diuine nature So the
flesh of Christ hath power to quicken because it is the flesh of that person who is God the obedience of the man Christ doth iustifie because it is the obedience of that person who is God the bloud of Christ redeemes the Church because it is the bloud of God Act. 20.28 Of the Phrases What is the communication of proprieties IT is called of the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which cannot well be englished and it is not the effusion of the proprieties of one nature into the other or a mutuall confusion of proprieties but the attributing by Synecdoche a part for the whole or an affirmation one of the other whereby because in Christ the two natures and one person is * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dial. 3. one thing and another and not one person and another that which is proper to one nature in Christ is attributed not to the other nature but to the person taking the name of one of the natures whether it be the diuine or humane As Theodoret saith Those things which be common to the person are made proper to the natures by reason of the identitie of the person as Damascene saith and the affinitie of the natures one towards another and because there is but one person Orthod fid lib. 3. cap. 3. 4. Or else it is such a manner of predication whereby those things which be proper to the natures are indifferently attributed to the person of Christ which is but one and that because Christ in his two natures is both to wit perfect God and perfect man to whom therefore those things are truly and indeed attributed as well which are proper to God as those which be proper to man Therefore it is well and truly said God or else the Son of God was borne of the Virgin Marie suffered was crucified and God purchased vnto himselfe the Church with his owne bloud 1. Cor. 2.8 Act. 20.28 Not simply principally and by himselfe as he is God but by accident and in another respect or in regard of another thing because that which is proper to one nature namely to be conceiued borne crucified to die is not attributed to his diuinitie but to the person taking the name of one namely the diuine nature For this word the Sonne of God or God which is the subiect of the proposition is the Concrete and not the Abstract and signifieth not the diuine nature but the person who is God and man Therefore it is well said The Sonne of man or Christ man is eternall almightie al-present saueth raiseth the dead giueth eternall life And Ioh. 31.13 No man ascendeth into heauen but he that commeth downe from heauen both in respect of the vnion seeing that the selfe same person is both man and God for as God by reason of the vnitie doth account those things which belong to the humane nature proper to himselfe saith Cyril of the incarnation of the onely begotten cap. 26 so as he is man by reason of the vnion doth account those things which belong to the diuine nature to be proper to it selfe and also because the Sonne of man is a word Concrete which signifieth the person of Christ being but one consisting of the diuine and humane nature and therefore whole Christ is euery where present but not all that is in Christ Totus Christus non totum Christi est vbique On the contrarie it is wickedly said that the diuinitie of Christ was borne of the Virgin suffered and that the humanitie of Christ is eternall euery where present almightie for the diuinitie is a word abstract which simply signifieth the diuine nature in Christ which is most free from all manner of suffering Now the predication of diuerse natures by reason of the hypostaticall vnion is of no force but in those things which are signified as whole and perfect Supposita for as we do not vse to say the bodie is the soule or the man is the soule so neither do we say this God Christ is the bodie of Christ or the soule of Christ but onely God is man Is the communication of proprieties verball onely or reall It is a true and reall speech because the person of whom by the trope Synecdoche as well the diuine as the humane either names or proprieties or effects are indifferently and equally affirmed containeth all those things in it selfe truly and indeed which do agree to very God and very man those things which be diuine as he is God those also which be humane as the same is man but not in respect of both natures but according to the one and the other as in the same place Cyrill teacheth For then should be brought in the Eutychian heresie of the confounding of the natures or proprieties and it should cease to be a speech by Synecdoche But those titles which belong to the office of Redemption are they to be attributed to the natures seuerally a sunder or to the person To the person as Christ is a Mediator Pastor Priest according to both natures although each of them in that worke retaineth his owne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proper efficacie or operation What is the effect of that personall vnion The bestowing of gifts whereby the humane nature in the person of Christ is adorned and whereby it excelleth all other creatures in wisedome goodnesse holinesse power maiestie and glorie which the Fathers call the Deifying of the flesh the Schoolemen Habituall grace of the communion of proprieties which is mutuall one of another and the reciprocation of the names altogether distinct How manifold is the state of Christ Twofold one of humiliation whereby he willingly vndergoing the burdens reproches and punishments of our nature did humble himselfe to the death of the crosse the Diuinitie in the meane while according to Irenaeus resting or hiding it selfe that he might be crucified and die The other of exaltation whereby after his death his humane nature did lay aside all the infirmities of his humane nature but not the essentiall properties and was wonderfully exalted aboue all creatures vnto most great honor yet not in any case matched and equalled to the diuine nature of Christ a Phil. 2.7.9 What are the doctrines contrary to this The 1. heresie of Macedonius and Valentinus who affirmed that Christ brought with him a celestiall body from heauen as also of Apelles who said his bodie was ayrie his flesh starlike and that he passed from the virgin as water from a pipe 2. Of the Manichees who fained vnto him an imaginarie bodie 3. Of Apollinaris who denied that Christ did assume a reasonanable soule but that his Diuinitie was vnto him in stead of his mind 4. Of Eunomius who affirmed Christ to be a meere man and that he was called the sonne of God by adoption and of Ebion who said that Christ was borne by humane generation 5. Of Nestorius who taught that as there be two natures in Christ so there are two persons and that
seuered from the end of that signe or from the vertue and truth of it which he cals spirit as Rom. 2.27 But they that by the letter vnderstand the literall sense and by the name of the Spirit the allegoricall speake to no purpose But when it is attributed to the Creator himselfe how many waies is the word Spirit taken Two manner of wayes one way essentially otherwise personally And essentially either in common of the whole Trinitie Ioh. 4.24 God is a spirit or else specially for the diuine nature of Christ or for the power and efficacie of the truth in the humanitie assumed f Mat. 12.28 Ro. 1.4 Of his Sonne made of the seed of Dauid according to the flesh declared to be the Sonne of God according to the spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the dead 1. Pet. 3.18 Put to death according to the flesh but quickened in the spirit in the which also he preached vnto the spirits that are in prison So Heb. 9.14 Christ by the eternall spirit offered vp himselfe without spot to God and 1. Tim. 3.16 he was iustified in the spirit But when is this word Spirit vsed personally When it is taken for the third person in deitie who together with the Father and the Sonne is the same in essence and deitie as Mat. 28.19 Go baptize all nations in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Spirit But why is the third Person called the Spirit Because he is that essentiall vertue and working being of the same substance together with the Father and the Sonne proceeding equally and as it were breathed from them both or else by a Metonymie of the effect or else because he breatheth where he listeth g Ioh. 3.8 or else because he stirreth vp spirituall motions in the hearts of the beleeuers and doth purifie their hearts and quicken them which also is shewed by this epithet Holy not sanctified but sanctifying or the sanctifier in way of excellencie as the Father is called the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer of his especiall operation in vs which is called Sanctification h 1. Pet. 1.2 Proue now that the holy Ghost is God I proue it 1. By the Phrases of Scripture 2. By the attributing of those properties belonging to God vnto him 3. By the workes or effects which agree to God alone 4. By that worship and honor which is performed vnto him by the faithfull 5. By that punishment which is inflicted vpon such as sinne against the holy Ghost Shew me those sentences of Scripture whereby you can proue that the holy Ghost is God Those words which the Prophets do affirme were spoken by the God of hoasts the Apostles do ascribe to the holy Ghost As that we reade Esa 6.9 Iehouah said vnto the Prophet Go and say to this people Heare and vnderstand not c the Apostle Act. 28.25 attributeth to the holy Ghost Againe Act. 5.3 Peter saith thus to Ananias How is it that he hath filled thine heart that thou shouldest lye vnto the holy Ghost and presently after Thou hast not lyed vnto men but vnto God But the Spirit is in plaine words called God and the temple is assigned vnto him which belongs to God alone c 1. Cor. 3.16.17 6.19 20 2. Cor. 6.16 and he is called Lord and God d 1. Cor. 12.4.5 Shew some testimonies wherein the proprieties which agree to God alone are attributed to the holy Ghost Gen. 1.2 It is said that the Spirit of God moued vpon the waters presently in the beginning of the creation therefore he is eternall a Heb. 9.14 He is said to be present euery where and of infinite greatnesse Psal 139.7 O Lord whither shall I flie from thy spirit Wisd 1.7 The spirit of the Lord filleth the world Whereupon Basill in his book intreating of the holy Ghost against those which denie him frameth this demonstration Euery creature hath a substance circumscribed The holy Ghost hath not a substance circumscribed Therefore he is not a creature and ergo he is a God He is said to be omniscient knowing all things Ioh. 15.13 That spirit shall leade you into all truth 1. Cor. 2.10 The spirit searcheth all things yea euen the deepe things of God And he is called Almightie b Esa 14.13 Proue the diuinitie of the holy Ghost by his workes The works which are onely proper to God alone are ascribed to him as the worke of creation conseruation viuification Iob 33.4 The Spirit of Iehouah hath created me and the Spirit of the Almighty hath quickened me Psal 33.6 By the word of the Lord were the heauens made and all the power of them by the spirit of his mouth He is said in like manner to dwell in the hearts of the faithfull as in a temple c Rom. 8.9 1. Cor. 3.6 Regeneration iustification sanctification d Ioh 3 6.8 1. Cor. 6.11 1. Cor. 3.16 truth grace and whatsoeuer good thing can be imagined 1. Cor. 12.4.5.11 One and the same Spirit diuideth all things How do you proue that he is God by that worship and honor which is giuen vnto him 1. Because faith and inuocation is attributed vnto him for we are baptized into the holy Ghost as well as into the Father and into the Sonne e Mat. 28.19 and as we call vpon the name of the Father and the Sonne euen so also on the holy Ghost 2. We confesse in the Creed that we beleeue in the holy Ghost 3. Because euen the Angels themselues called Seraphims do adore the holy Ghost f Esa 6 3 and the Apostles call vpon him g Act. 13.2.3 2. Cor. 13.13 Reu. 1.4 How do you proue by the punishment which is inflicted vpon them that sinne against the holy Ghost that he is God Because blasphemie against him is not remitted h Mat. 12.31 for Christ saith Mark 3.29 He that shall sinne or speake blasphemie against the holy Ghost shall neuer be forgiuen neither in this world nor in the world to come Now proue that the Spirit of God is a person subsisting in God really distinguished from the Father and the Sonne 1. Out of the Creed for whereas we say in the beginning I beleeue in God and presently adde 1. the Father 2. the Sonne 3. the holy Ghost as we confesse the holy Ghost to be God so also do we acknowledge the same to be the third person in the deitie not by degree but by order 2. In the baptisme of Iesus Christ the Fathers voice is heard from heauen Christ stands by who was baptized of Iohn Baptist and the holy Ghost descended in the forme of a Doue who sitteth vpon Christ i Mat. 3.16.17 But euen Christ himselfe Ioh. 14.16 distinguisheth the holy Ghost from himselfe and the Father when he saith Another comforter shall he giue vnto you he saith another in person not another thing in essence and 15.26 I will send you the Spirit euen the
might manifest his iustice and mercie 2. The primitiue or outward cause mouing vnto it the calamitie of mankinde and the tyranny of the Diuell ouer mankinde 3. The antecedent or inward cause mouing here vnto was the vnspeakeable loue of God the father towards his creature as it is said Ioh. 3.16 So God loued the world that hee gaue his onely begotten sonne c. 4. A fellow cause working voluntarily and with election and obeying the father was the sonne of God himselfe who as Paule saith Phil. 2.7 Made himselfe base taking on him the forme of a seruant became obedient to the father euen vnto the death of the crosse For hee deliuered himselfe into the hands of his enemies voluntarily and readily according to the prophecie Esai 53.7 He was offered because he would and Heb. 10.4 out of the Psalm 40.7.8.9 Because it was impossible by the bloud of Buls and Goats to take away sins therefore Christ entring namely into the world said Sacrifice and oblation thou wouldest not haue burnt sacrifices for sins thou wast not pleased with then I said Lord I come in the beginning of the book it is written of me that I may doe thy will O my Lord. Sathan also is a chiefe cause of Christs death because with an ancient hatred he persecuted the seed of the woman and when hee could do no more hee bit his heele as it was foretold Gen. 3.15 All men are causes of Christs death and to them it must be imputed because of the guilt and the sinne wherein euery one is entangled The helping or instrumentall causes of Christs death were Iudas and the high Priests who counted to Iudas the 30. siluer pieces a Mat. 26.15 Annas also Caiphas Pilate and the people which cryed Away with him away with him b Ioh 18.15 And the Roman souldiers who were his executioners which instruments notwithstanding God so vsed as he finished by them a worke most holy to wit the redemption of mankind but the cursed instruments for none but the most vile and wicked could endure to betray condemne and murder an innocent he did punish with most iust punishments seing they sinned not by constraint but of their owne accord and most of them against their owne conscience What is the subiect oft this passion The Lord himselfe the verie sonne of God being made man But whether was the passion a suffering of his whole person or of one of his natures onely The passion was of the person because that person which suffered was God and man but he suffered not in his diuine nature for it cannot be that an immutable thing should suffer an immortall thing die but in mans nature which hee tooke vpon him and which was subiect to suffering Therefore Paule in respect of the person saith Act. 20.28 That God purchased to himselfe the Church by his bloud And in respect of the humane nature 1. Pet. 4.1 the Apostle affirmeth that Christ suffered in the flesh And in the Epistle to the Hebrewes 2.14 the author saith That the sonne of God was made partaker of flesh and bloud that by death hee might destroy him who had the power of death Therefore although the passion and death of Christ be properly of the flesh according to nature yet according to the person it belongeth to the word because it is one and the same person both of the flesh and the word What was the formall cause The suffering both of the bodie soule both which sufferings are described by the Euangelists in certaine degrees and parts What was the suffering of his soule The inward torment of the soule which Christ felt especially after the administration of the Supper and that ariseth by certaine degrees 1. For first in the garden hee feeling the anger of God kindled against our sins out of his great trouble of minde cryeth Mat. 26.38 My soule is verie heauie euen vnto the death and Father if it be possible remoue from mee this cup by which cup according to the Hebrew phrase he vnderstandeth the anger of God and the punishment for our sinnes yet notwithstanding he addeth a condition Not as I will but as thou vvilt Mark 14.26 Whereby he signifieth not an opposition but a diuersitie of wils which is not of it selfe faultie especially where the wil of mā is subiected to Gods will so a man is ought to be sorie at his friends death yet doth he willingly yeeld to the purpose of God 2. This torment was so increased that hee sweateth drops of bloud through the grieuousnesse thereof Luk. 22.44 At last vpon the Crosse as though he were oppressed by these griefes and forsaken of god he cryeth out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Ma. 27.46 not as though God were separated frō the humane nature but because it is as Bernard saith a kinde of forsaking when there is no performance or exhibiting of power in so great necessitie neither any shewing of Maiestie which complaint was the complaint of one not despairing or distrusting for he calleth God his God but of one wrestling with a most grieuous temptation Caluin calleth this sanctam desperationē an holy desperation For this cause Dauid prophecying of Christ Ps 18.5.6 saith thus The sorrowes of the graue haue cōpassed me about that is I haue suffered horrible griefes such if as these griefes should haue bene indured by an angel yea al the Angels they would haue bin brought to nothing altogether oppressed of thē And He. 5.7 it is thus said of him Who in the daies of his flesh did offer vp praiers supplycations with strōg crying tears vnto him that was able to saue him frō death and was also heard in that which he feared or was deliuered from his feare that is from that terrour astonishmēt which possessed him when he thought vpon the most seuere iudgement and anger of God But what was the cause of such torments in Christs soule Not one but many 1. The thinking vpon the tyranny of sinne death and Sathan which made hauock of mankind 2. The meditation of that horrible infamous and cursed punishment a Gal. 3.13 which he foresawe he should suffer in his most holie bodie as also those contumelies which should be cast vpon him 3. His thinking vpon the ingratitude of the greatest part of the world 4 Especially the sense of Gods horrible wrath which hee sustained for our sins for which he tooke vpon him to make satisfaction Whereupon Iohn 1.29 Hee is called the Lamb of God which taketh away or which beareth the sins of the world What was the suffering of the bodie His outward suffering which befell to him besides those griefes which in his soule hee sustained which may bee diuided according to the subiectes or places in which he was diuersly afflicted as the garden Caiphas his house or the Cōuocation of the Priests the Pretorie or towne Hall the place without the citie where theeues were punished
place Of Christs Resurrection VVhat is meant by rising againe THat properly riseth againe saith Hierom which before fell by dying and therfore neither the diuinitie nor soule of Christ properly but the same bodie which fell by death rose again NotwithstaÌ„ding the Resurrection of Christ belongeth also to his soule but in some respect onely that is so farr forth as by the resurrection it was restored to the owne body What therefore is the resurrection of Christ It is the first degree of his exaltation whereby he according to his humane nature by the power of God putting off infirmity mortality his soule returning into his bodie reuiuing came the third day out of the Sepulcre as conquerour tryumphed gloriously ouer death hell that he might quicken all that beleeue in him and that the dead being raised againe in the last day he as a king of the Church might giue to all the elect a ioyfull victorie and immortall life casting the wicked away into perpetuall torments By what power did Christ rise againe Not by any power begged from others or any power of a nature created but by the proper power of his Godhead Iohn 10.18 No man taketh my life from mee but I lay it downe of my selfe I haue power to lay it downe and I haue power to take it againe For which cause his true Doctrine is shewed by his resurrection Rom. 1.4 in these words And declared mightily to be the sonne of God touching the spirit of sanctification by his rising from the dead Yet because the workes of the trinitie ad extrà without are vndiuided therefore this rising againe being taken actiuely is attributed both to Christ himselfe to the father and the holy Ghost Ephes 1.20 according to his mightie power VVhich he vvrought in Christ vvhen hee raised him from the dead and set him at his right hand in heauenly places Also Coloss 2.12 and Rom. 8.11 If the spirit of him that hath raised Iesus from the dead dwell in you he that hath raised Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his spirit vvhich quickneth dvvelleth in you For that power wherby Christ was raised againe is essentially common to the three persons Did the humanity of Christ vvorke together vvith the Godhead in his resurrection According to the Diuine nature Christ himselfe wrought his resurrection a 2. Cor. 13 14. he suffered through the infirmitie of the flesh and liueth by the povver of God But properly hee rose againe according to the humane nature which obeyed the Godhead raising it vp and moued it selfe as the will and power of the Godhead directed it Wherupon came this common effect or worke of both natures Death was swallowed vp in victorie 1. Cor. 15.54 the Resurrection is attributed to the whole Christ b Rom. 1 4. but actiuely according to the spirit of sanctification passiuely according to the flesh From whence is the confirmation and certaine knowledge of Christs resurrection to be taken From the adiuncts or testimonies both those which went before which concurred at the time of it and which came after VVhat are the testimonies going before Partly prophecies partly figures or types by which the resurrection of Christ was aforehand signifyed Prophecies are euident and plaine affirmations concerning the resurrection of Christ which was to come As among others these 1. Out of Moses Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shall bruâ—e the head of the Serpent that is Christ shall ouercome sinne death and Sathan which he could not do otherwise then by rising againe 2. And Psal 16.8 where Dauid in the person of Christ saith Thou wilt not leaue my soule in the graue nor suffer thine holy one to see corruption 3. Out of the Prophets Esai 53.10 VVhen he shall make his soule an offering for sinne he shall see his seede and shall prolong his daies and the will of the Lord shall prosper in his hand therefore hee shall rise againe And Daniel 9.24 saith that Christ shall bee slaine and yet hee ascribeth to him a perpetual kingdome in which iniquitie shall be taken away euerlasting righteousnesse brought in place Therefore he foresaw that Christ should be raised againe Which prophecies are proued true by the euenr What figures of the resurrection were there 1. Adam who was cast into a sleepe againe raised vp out of whose side whilest he slept was Eua made Gen. 2.21.22 was a type of Christ who died was raised again out of whose side being opened issued forth both water bloud by which the Church was bred and purged 2. Isaac who was laid on a pile of wood and was deliuered by an Angel a Gen. 21.9.11 was a type of our Redeemer who died so for vs in regard of his humanitie in his sacrifice for vs that notwithstanding in regard of his Diuinity he remained immortall 3. Ioseph who was cast into prison afterward brought out againe and aduanced to great honours b Gen· 39.20 41.41 did resemble Christ rising again from death who receiued the rule of heauen and earth 4. As Samson when he was shut vp the city gates being locked did notwithstand securely go forth breaking the lock and carying away the gates c Iudg. 16.3 so the Lord opening the Sepulcre which was sealed vp was deliuered from death 5. Ionas being cast quick out of the fishes belly d Mat. 12.5 40 resembled Christ who came out of the graue aliue To conclude Dauid hauing scaped so oft out of persecution and being aduanced to the kingdom did shadow forth the death resurrection of the Lord. And what is the vse of all this which hath beene said That our faith may therby be confirmed for the certainety of our faith as Augustine saith consisteth in this that all things which haue bin foretold of Christ haue fallen out vpon Iesus the son of Marie Therefore he is the true Messiah and Sauiour of the world What are the adiuncts of Christs resurrection which coÌ„curred with it The time At what time did Christ die and was raised aaaine At that very time when the Patriarch Iacob foretold that he should come whilest Moses his forme of gouernment yet lasted stood but bended to ruine Gen. 49 10. The Scepter shall not be taken from Iuda and the lawgiuer from betweene his feete vntill Silo come And Daniell doth expresse the verie yeare of his passioÌ„ Whence may be perceiued the certainty of gods promises and our faith concerning the promises not yet fulfilled is confirmed and the error of the Iewes who holde the messiah is not yet come is confuted At what time of the yeare did he rise againe In the Springe time that the time it selfe might admonish put vs in minde of the power of Christes death and resurrection as Lactantius hath elegantly expressed it in these verses Ecce renascentis testatur gratia mundi Omnia cum domino dona redisse suo Namque renascenti
Bethania a village of Iudea that from that place Christ ascended But in the Acts cap. 1.12 he said that they returned from Mount Oliuet vvhich is neere vnto Ierusalem whence it is manifest that Christ ascended from some part of that mountaine not farre from the towne of Bethania into heauen Why did he choose to himselfe this place That like as he had giuen proofe of mans weaknesse and of his exceeding great loue towards vs in Mount Oliuet in that hee sweat bloud in his conflict with death Luke 22.39 44. so departing from the same place into heauen hee might giue certaine triall and proofe of his Godhead a Iohn 6.62 and so the same place might serue for Christs glorie which had giuen the beginning to his ignominie and passion 2 That the mountaines might put vs in minde of heauen 3 That from hence we might learne that those who goe into heauen out of Bethania which is expounded the house of affliction doe finde entrance by Christ vnto the ioyes of heauen and admittance into the kingdome of heauen through many tribulations VVhat vvas the manner of his ascension 1 Departing from his Disciples like a good guest he lifting vp his hands to heauen in solemne manner blesseth them and biddeth them farewell that is commendeth them to Gods protection thereby to testifie he was that blessed seed in vvhich all nature are blessed b Gen 22 18 that full saluation is obtained for vs and that we are freed from all curse and reconciled to the father that he hath blessed all that beleeue in him and that his blessing shall remaine sure for euer seeing to him is giuen all power in heauen and in earth Math. 28.18 2 Whilest the Disciples looked on he was taken vp on high Therefore he vanished not out of sight or in himselfe became inuisible but whilest his Disciples beheld he went visibly from the earth where he was formerly taken vp vnto heauen where he was not before 3 The ministerie of a cloud was vsed which cloud râ—ceiued him at his going away caried him as in a wagon caried him at length out of their sight that therby he might testifie that he was that person of whom it is spoken Psal 104.3 He maketh the cloud or clouds his chariot as also that by this meanes he might as with a veile put betwixt him and them stay his disciples from further curiositie and searching after him Whither did he ascend Into heauen And least the word Heauen should be doubtfull and vncertaine or should be onely vnderstood of Heauenly conuersation such as may be euen in the earth or onely of the heauenly glorie he attained Luke saith He was taken vp on high and Marke that he was receiued vp into heauen Act. 3.21 it is there said That the heauen must containe him In which manner also Nazianzen doth expouÌ„d it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to be conteined of heauen vntill the time of restoring And Oecumenius Scholiastes he calleth the heauens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the receptacle or harbour of him that was sent namely Christ to wit the place of eternall blessednes which is without this corruptible world and so aboue or without all heauens But Paule Ephes 4.10 saith That he ascended aboue all heauens It is true For the Scripture maketh mention of three heauens i. The ayre 2. the celestiall orbs 3. the seates of the blessed into which Christ was receiued Therefore he is rightly said to asend aboue all heauens because he remained not below or within the worldly heauens but was caried aboue the aire or ayrie region and the celestiall orbs neither did he stay in those visible heauens but entered into the highest heauen which is aboue all these moueable and worldly heauens which being beautified by the light and glorie of God is subiect to no change but is inuisible to vs which as yet liue vpon the earth And this is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that hight of which it is said Psal 68.19 Thou hast ascended vp on high By what names is that heauen called 1 The heauen of heauens and the highest habitation of heauen a 1. King 8 27· 39 Also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the highest places b Maâ— 21.9 Also the third heauen c 2. Cor 12.2 in respect of the aire which is the first heauen next to vs d Math 6.26 and in respect of the celestiall spheres 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paradise or the Garden of pleasure e Luk. 23.43 2 Cor. 12 4. Apoc 2.7 because it was figured and shadowed vnto vs by the earthly Paradise planted in Eden f Gen. 2.8 and it is now prepared for vs in stead of that earthly Paradise 3 The house of God the habitation seat and dwelling of the blessed g Iohn 14.23 because there the father openly and immediately manifesteth himselfe and his glorie and goodnesse and also communicateth them to the blessed 4 The Schoolemen call it Coelum Empyreum or the fierie heauen not because it burneth with fire but because it shineth with a light like fire But if Christ be ascended aboue all worldly heauens therfore his body is no longer in place because as Aristotle proueth in his first booke De coelo aboue all the heauens there is no place Although euery place be not of the same nature and such as Aristotle in his Physicks describeth yet notwithstanding wheresoeuer any bodie is there of necssitie is a space in which that body is contained according to that knowen saying of Augustine Tolle spatia locorum corporibus nusquam erunt c. Take away from bodies the space of places and they shall be no where and because they shall be no where they shall not be at all This space therefore is called in the Scriptures a place Iohn 14.2 I go to prepare a place for you But further we oppose the authoritie of Iesus Christ to Aristotles authoritie Doth not the ascension of Christ imply a contrarietie to that his saying Mat. 28.20 I will be with you vntill the consummation of the world It is not contrarie for Augustine saith He is both gone and is here also he will returne and he hath not forsaken vs Tract 50 in Iohan. for he hath caried his bodie into heauen but his Maiestie he hath not taken away from the world Therfore Christs saying is to be vnderstood in respect of his Diuinitie which is present in all places and at all times and cannot be contained in any certaine space of place seeing it containeth al things but especially it is meant coÌ„cerning his perpetual actiue power preseÌ„ce in the Church which worketh in the minds of them that beleeue not of the presence of his humanity which is finite and included in place In respect of which his humanitie he saith Iohn 12 8. The poore are alwaies with you but me you shall not haue alwaies And Mat. 24.23 he foretelleth that Antichrists should say Lo
the throne of iudgement chaseth away all euill with his eies And of the gouernment of the Messiah Isa 16.5 In mercie shall the throne be prepared and he shall sit vpon it in stedfastnesse in the tabernacle of Dauid And in this sense sitting doth signifie a Royall or Iudiciall dignitie and authoritie But what doth it it signifie ioyntly Mat. 20◠2 or together to sit or to stand at the right hand of any man 1 In humane affaires by the figure Metonymia it signifieth to obtaine the next place of honor dignity to any man as Psa 45 9 Vpon thy right hand the Queene standeth in a vesture of gold siluer 2 To be a fellow and companion or copartner of the rule and Empyre 3 To giue helpe and aid as Psal 142.4 I looked on my right hand and beheld whether any stood by me that is to say to helpe me Metaphorically it is attributed to God to the Church to Christ himselfe As for God he is said to stand at the right hand of men when he doth helpe and succour them and protecteth them against their enemies and dangers as Psal 16.8 I haue set the Lord alwaies in my sight for he is at my right hand that I may not he moued-So is God the father in this sence said to stand at the right hand of Christ that is to say that he is in degree of honour and dignitie next vnto himselfe· Psal 45.10 The Queene 1. The Church doth stand at thy right hand namely at the right hand of Christ that is it standeth in the next degree of dignitie 3 Christ is said to b Mark 16.19 sit c Act. 7.55 stand and d Rom. 8.34 be at the right hand of God the father Is Christ said to sit at the right hand of the father properly or Metaphorically Not properly for it no way agreeth with his Deitie and although it may in the proper signification be attributed and applied vnto his other nature which is bodily yet it must not be imagined that that glorious body in heauen doth either continually sit or is moued or standeth although it be indeed limited and locall and as for the right hand of God much lesse is that to be taken properly seeing God is without a bodie as is alreadie said Seeing then Christ sitteth at the right hand of the father doth it therupon follow that the father sitteth on the leaft hand No indeed for the father is not limited and in euerlasting happines all is the right hand because there is there no miserie VVhat is therefore meant by this kind of speach In his exposition of the Creed Augustine taketh it for resting with the father in that euerlasting blessednes for this was conueniēt for Christ saith he after so many labours sustained after the crosse and after death to rest blessed in heauen not indeed idle for hee gouernes the Church and makes intercession for vs but yet without labour The same Augustine also calleth the right hand of the father that eternall and vnspeakable felicity Against the Sermon as Arius c 12. whereunto the sonne of man is attained hauing receiued immortalitie euen of the flesh 2 Damascen saith that Christ hath togither with his father equal glory of the diuinity which he had before all beginnings And in this sence the transitiue preposition to doth note only a personal distinction Lib. 4. cap. 2 and order of beginning but not any degree of nature or dignity for there is no such matter in the persons of the deity 3 But we say also that it is meant thereby that Christ hath obtained all power in heauen and in earth as he himselfe who is his owne best interpreter expoundeth it Mat. 28.18 by a phrase borrowed from a King or a Prince which hath a sonne and that an onely begotten sonne or a first begotten sonne whom at length he appointeth to be his heire and successor maketh to sit at his right hand that he may reigne with him may exercise the right of dominion ouer all things which appertaine vnto the kingdom of the cceed Chap. 4. Whereupon Saint Augustine saith thus By the right hand vnderstand the power which that man that was taken from God did receiue that he might come to be a Iudge who before came to be iudged For the father iudgeth no man but hath giuen all iudgement to the sonne that all men might honour the sonne as they honour the father Ioh. 5 22 What is then the sitting of Christ at the right hand of the father It is his exceeding glorious estate or the great high degree of Christs exaltation wherein he is placed by his father the truth of both natures still reserued in which estate Christ doth not only rest from labour and enioy vnspeakable glory and vnmatchable felicity but especially he is placed not only the head of the church but the king and gouernour of heauen and earth that togither with his father he may gouerne all things both in heauen and in earth all things created being subiect vnto him Whence doe you confirme this Exposition Out of the Psal 110.1 Sit saith the father to Christ on my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footstoole which Paul 1. Cor. 15.25 expounding saith He must raigne till he haue put all his enemies vnder his feet Therefore to sit is to raigne And Eph. 1.21 after the Apostle had said that Christ sitteth at the right hand of God in heauenly places he addeth for expositions sake that he is exalted aboue all principalities and powers and that all things are made subiect vnder his feet and that he is appointed head of the Church VVhat is the cause efficient The father by whose will and ordinance he sitteth at the right hand of the father Psal 110.1 Sit at my right hand And Ephe. 1.20 And God hath set him at his right hand in the heauenly places This sitting then is it of the whole person or onely of one of the natures namely of the humane Words phrases are to be taken according to the matter about which they are vsed For to sit at the right hand of the father doth declare two things For sometime it sheweth the great equalilitie of the diuine glorie maiestie power and honour sometime it signifieth the qualitie that is the high perfection and felicity of the flesh of Christ now that it is exalted vnto the right hand of God which the schoolemen call Habituall grace In the later signification therefore sitting is to be applied vnto the humane nature wherein the humane nature in Christ is more blessed then the rest of the creatures hath royal iudicial power ouer all creatures a Iohn 5.27 but in the former which is the chiefe and principal of the whole person because as the whole person was broght low so the whole also was exalted in the Resurrection ascending into heauen and sitting at the right hand of the father
in the word and sacraments or faith is the organ instrumēt or meane whereby man being a sinner apprehendeth and applyeth to himselfe Christ wholy with all his benefits and is vnited vnto Christ and liueth in him The Apostle Heb. 11.1 describing faith saith thus Faith is the substance of things which are hoped for the euidence of things that are not seen And Paul Ro. 4.20.21 painting out faith as in a map bringeth in the example of Abraham the father of the faithfull and saith Hee doubted not of the promise of God through vnbeleef but was strengthened in the faith gaue glory to god being fully assured that hee which had promised was also able to doe it Is that discription of faith Heb. 11.1 differing from the rest No forasmuch as therein there is exact mention made both of the forme of faith which is declared in the words Substance and Euidence also of the obiects namely things hoped for and things not seene For by the word Substance hee meaneth not a person as in the article of the Trinitie a Heb. 1.3 but the ground and as it were the prop whereupon a godly minde must stay and relie it selfe to signifie that faith is a certain sure safe possession of those things which are promised vnto vs by God As Psal 39.8 My Hypostasis or substance that is to say My hope is euen in thee And Heb. 3.14 We are made partakers of Christ if we keepe sure vnto the end 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the beginning wherewith wee are vpholden or vnderpropped Some translate the word Hypostasis existence or subsistēce because faith in some respect causeth things to haue a beeing as if they were which in trueth are not that is to say it setteth things before vs as if they were present which onely are in expectation Budaeus translateth it Strength or Courage In which signification it is vsed 2. Corinth 9.4 Least wee should bee ashamed 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. In this constant boasting Cha. 11.17 By a word deriued from the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to sustaine to except not to giue placc to violence Hereupon it is that a souldier is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is bolde and hardie and turneth not his backe to his enemie but goeth to meete him and resists him and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 boldnes whereby a man standeth stoutly to it and without stirring his foote receiueth his aduersarie that inuadeth him And surely this notable signification doth well agree with faith For in the act of beleeuing wee haue neede of strength and patience we must resist the flesh we must conquer reason we must withstand our owne conscience sinne the wrath of God and all other things whereby the consent of faith is hindered and oppugned Wee had neede to be armed with such a strong shield that wee may receiue and quench all the fyrie darts of the diuell Ephe. 6.16 and ouercome the world 1. Iohn 5.4 As for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is translated Euidence it is not a refutation or a reproofe but an argument demonstration that is an assurance wherby the minde being conuinced by diuine testimonies doth most stedfastly embrace the diuine promises But by the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are hoped for and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are not seene is vnderstood the Gospel those things which are offered in the Gospel namely fellowship with Christ forgiuenesse of sins iustification Resurrection and life eternall For these are the things we hope for and which doe not appeare and of themselues are not conformable vnto our reason and so are they the misteries of saluation in themselues and in their owne nature inuisible But those things which we see with our minde and in hope we do behold them in the word of God and doe accompt them as if they were done accomplished and present before vs. How many sorts of Faith are there Not many sorts but only one faith Ephe. 4.5 One Lord one Faith one Baptisme Now faith is one not in respect of the subiects for after that sort there are as many faiths that is to say giftes of faith as there are beleeuers but faith is and alwaies hath been one in Specie that is in respect of the thing beleeued and of the obiect whereupon it rests And this is the only obiect of faith namely the grace and mercie purposed and ordained for all beleeuers in Christ from the beginning of the world What is the efficient cause of Faith God himsefe working freely and giuing faith to whome hee will euen of his owne free good will Iohn 6.29 This is the worke of God that yee beleeue in him whom he hath sent Act. 16.14 God opened the heart of Lydia so that shee attended vnto the things which Paule spake Rom. 12.3 God hath dealt to euerie man the measure of faith Phil. 1.29 It is freely giuen vnto you for Christs cause not onely to beleeue in him but also to suffer for his sake The causes together with God the father are the son and the holy Ghost for as it is said in another place The workes of the Trinitie without are diuided Luk. 24.32 Christ opened the minde of his disciples that they might vnderstand the Scriptures And Heb. 12.2 Looking vnto Iesus the author and finisher of our faith 2. Cor. 4 13. We haue the spirit of faith that is to say we haue faith by the inspiration and gift of the same holy spirit The workmen together with God are the ministers of the worde 1. Cor. 3.5 Who is Apollo and vvho is Paule but the Ministers by vvhome that is by vvhose preaching ye beleeued The instrumentall cause of faith is the hearing of the word of God by the which word the holy Ghost vttereth his power Ro. 10.17 Faith is by hearing hearing by the word of God Esa 57.19 And Act. 10.44 VVhile Peter spake these vvords the holy Ghost fell on alll them which heard the vvord Furthermore another instrumentall cause is the beholding and vse of the Sacraments And to this end God ordained a ministerie in his Church yet so as no force is to be attributed either to the Ministers that speake or vnto the words themselues or to the Sacraments forasmuch as they haue no other effect but only to represent vnto our minds those things for the declaring whereof they are applyed by the ordinance of God but the force and power of them a Mark 16 20 1 Cor 12 6 commeth onely from God and there is but one and the same installer of man into life eternall who was the Creator of him vnto this life temporall 1. Cor. 3.7 Neither hee that planteth is any thing neither he that watereth but God vvhich giueth the increase And Cha. 15.19 I haue laboured more then they all yet not I but the grace of God which is with mee or which vvas present vvith mee And so the voice of
termes of faith and hope are taken one for the other b 1. Pet. 1.5 Rom. 8.24 And as Luther saith faith beholdeth the word of the matter hope looketh vnto the matter of the word Moreouer faith receiueth Charitie giueth and bestoweth Charitie is begotten of faith and not on the contrarie faith maketh vs the sonnes of God c Gal. 3.26 charitie trieth vs d 1. Ioh. 4.7 Iohn 13.35 whether we be the sonnes of God The obiect of faith is Christ offered in the Gospell with all his benefits the obiect of Charitie is God and our neighbour a Mat. 22 37 39 Furthermore faith endureth in this world and shall passe into a perfect knowledge in the other world but Charitie shall flourish most of all in the world to come 1. Cor. 13 13. The chiefe of those three vertues is Loue In respect of the vse namely toward our neighbour whereas the other two go no farther then the person of the beleeuer and hoper VVhat are the contraries of faith 1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Infidelitie the vnbeleefe of all infidels who say in their heart There is no God Psal 14.1 2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that difficultie to beleeue of the Christians which heare the word and doe not beleeue it and which conceiue a faith of God not according to the Scriptures but according to the imaginations of their owne hearts 3 Security of the flesh and contempt of Gods Iustice wherby sinnes are punished 4 The Iewes confidence in the flesh b Phil. 3.3 5 Presumption and confidence of our owne strength workes merits righteousnesse and worthines such as was in the pharisies Luke 18.11.12 6 Confidence and trust in the helpe of man c Esa 30.2 7 That Academicall distrust and doubting of God of the certaintie of Gods word of the grace of God or the forgiuenesse of sinnes that so that selling of workes of supererogation and suffrages for the dead may the more easily be retained 8 Desperation 9 The errrour of the Papists which say that faith is not onely of those things that are reuealed in the Scripture but likewise also of those that are deliuered by hand without writing Also that there is a beginning or bringing cause of all other vertues for the which we are iustified That there is a habite formed by Charitie vnto righteousnesse Moreouer that faith and doubting are not opposites and that wee can no otherwise determine of the fauour of God towards vs then by morall coniecture Besides what the Church beleeues that is the Catholicke truth That faith may remaine in the wicked and that therefore it doth not iustifie then which nothing can be said more slaunderous against sauing faith of which Christ saith Hee that beleeueth in him shall not perish but shall haue eternall life Iohn 6.40 Furthermore that faith is occupied onely in generall propositions as Hee that keepeth the commaundements shall enter into life And Hee that beleeueth and shall bee baptised shall be saued But not in these Particulars I shall enter into life I shall be saued or My sinnes are forgiuen mee For it were a vaine confidence for hope to applie those generall sentences vnto particulars and seueralles which yet may bee deceiued whereas Paule saith directly contrarie Rom. 5.5 Hope maketh not ashamed Lastly they account it impudencie or presumption to hope any thing without desert 10 The madnesse of certaine fanaticke persons who doe seuer the internall word as they call it from the ministration of the outward word And finally the madnesse of the Anabaptistes who dreame of the perfection of faith ⧠The thirtieth common place Of Repentance where of Regeneration From whence is Repentance deriued THE Latine word poenitentia is deriued from poena punishment because there is a kinde of punishment in those things which are shamefull or loathsome vnto vs. And therefore if we looke vnto the propertie of the Latine word it rather agreeth with contrition or sorrowes which are in our soules through the acknowledgement of our sinnes then it doth with conuersion vnto God In Hebrew it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Teshuba conuersion or reuersion turning backe according to that Ier. 4.1 If thou wilt returne vnto me returne saith the Lord. By a metaphore borrowed from them that haue strayed out of their way and after long wandering doe returne vnto their first high way In Greeke it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly afterwit of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth after the deed done to be wise to change our mind and purpose for the better to returne vnto a sound mind and so to grieue for the error by past as to amend it Whereupon some will haue it deriued from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 madnesse and folly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 afterwards as if it should be the correcting and amending of madnes and folly for alwaies with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is ioyned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 soundnesse of mind And the matter it selfe well agreeth with both these interpretations the summe whereof is this That forsaking our selues we should turne vnto God and laying aside the foolishnesse of sinning we should put on a new minde and become wiser By another Greeke word it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Latine poenitentia of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after a thing done to be sorie grieued for which the Latines properly say poenitere So 2. Cor. 7.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signfyeth to take griefe for any thing that is done Although I made you sorie by a letter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I doe not repent though I did repent And Rom. 11.29 The giftes of God are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. Such as can neuer displease him seeing once they did please him Also it is taken in ill part as it is written of Iudas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 grieuing not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 repenting 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he brought againe Math. 27.3 signifying sorrow and griefe wherewithall hee was swallowed vp For euerie man doth not repent that is sorrowfull and grieued but oftentimes falleth into a worse case then hee was before whereas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the holy Scriptures is alwaies taken in good part and signifieth sauing amendment Notwithstanding the Latine interpreter hath translated both the Greeke words by the word Poenitentia How many waies is the terme of Repentance vsed Foure waies 1 Synecdochially 2 Generally for the whole turning and conuersion of man to God 3 Specially for Regeneration 4 For the outward profession of Repentance VVhat is repentance taken Synecdochically It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sting of sinne or the prick of conscience and it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a displeasing which the Greeke Diuines call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because it wounds the soule commonly we call it Contrition And they make it double or of two sorts Legall by the preaching of the Law whereby the sinner being wounded with the searing
personal succession to be an absolute sure marke of the church by the church they vnderstaÌ„d the pastors only and they cal it heresie to referre the name of the church to the number of the faithfull contrary to the saing of Christ super hanc petram i. vpon my selfe will I build my church contrary to the article of our creede which commaunds vs to beleeue the catholike church 5 which make the word of God subiect to the church and not the church subiect to the word of God 6 which make the doctrine and precepts of men the foundation vpon the which the church is built 7. which place the vnity of the church not in faith not in spirit but in the vse and similitude of such ceremonies and which teach that multitude visibility perpetuity antiquity and such like for the marke of the true church 3 The Romane clergie or that rabblement of Monks and Priests which depraue the naturall sence and meaning of the scripture and doe in very deede deny the office of Christ while they doe attribute to the worke of their owne or other that the most proper and peculier vnto Christ and their sectes whereof some are named after one teacher some after another whose rule they haue made choise of to follow and to liue thereafter 4 The assembly of all infidels which doe persecute and reiect the doctrine of the prophets and Apostles and Christ himselfe 5 The error of those men that are of opinion that euery one shal be saued in his owne religion when without that one alone catholicke church their is no saluation 6 Of the Academicks which haue brought into the church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incomprehensibility 7 Of the Platonicks which make the church to be altogether inuisible and on the contrary of them that thinke the church is and hath alwaies bin visible on earth 8 Of donatists Anabaptists and schismaticks which because of the wicked make a departure from the true church in which the true gospell is preached and the sacraments rightly administred which asmuch as in them lyeth deuide the vnity of Christs body breake the band of peace that is Charity wherewith Christ knits the church to himselfe these proudly contemne the church and indanger there owne saluation for he cannot haue any communion with Christ which will not haue communion with the church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 schisme not such whereat a wicked vnity is deuided like as the vnitie of the Iewes who hearing of Christ raised adissention among themselues whereby their vnity brake and was deuided a Iohn â— 16 10.9 neither such by which good Men seperate themselues from wicked men but factions whereby the society of the faithfull is deuided into contrary partes and studies as when the Corinthians were deuided into partes b 1 Cor. 10 11.12 3 3 either when they did disagre one from the other not onely in opinion and will but in the verie communitie of holy things and in rites and customes so that one anothers community and fellowship they auoided as damnable an heresie declares properly some certaine faction and sect about doctrine e Act. 5.37 and so heretickes are called which in such sort depart from the true and sound doctrine that contemning the judgement of God and the iudgement of the Church continue in their opinions and violate the concord and agreement of the Church 10 The contempt of Ecclesiasticall assemblies namely of them which seeme vnto themselues to knowe all things or which keepe themselues busied at home or which misliking the meanenesse of the preachers person or finding some other occasion of absence neglect Sermons or which for feare of the crosse or for the fauour of great men or of their friends contemne and set light by them Also the abuse of those men which either through some foolish deuotion or accustomed ostentation or to beguile the tediousnes of time frequent holy assemblyes either seldome or at them trifle the time away or let their minde raunge abroad or else after they haue heard a word or two depart out or in a word they heare indeed Sermos but yet liue wickedly The two and fortieth common Place Of the Ministerie VVhence comes this word Ministerie OF the Lattin word Ministre to minister or ferue The greeke name for Ministery is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying dust wheÌ„ce is this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to serue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or seruant who labours til he be as of a dusty sweat a Math. 20 26.27 hence is it that in the new Testament this word is takeÌ„ for any person labouring b Rom. 16 11. painfully earnestly in any seruice c Rom. 13.4 for the common-wealth family or Church d Mat. 22 15 And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is all one with this word Ministerie signifiing both the office of e Act. 6.4 2 Cor. 6 3 Ephe. 4.12 â—eaching and also the performance of any Ecclesiasticall function There are diuersities of Ministeries but the same Lord. 1. Cor. 16. Not vnlike to this is the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Liturgia comming of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to doe minister or doe ones duety so it is vsed Acts. 13 2. f 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whilest they ministred that is as Chrisostome expounds it preached not sacrificed except as the words Liturgia and sacrifice are vsed for the publick functions of the Church As Phil. 2 17. Though I be offered vp vpon the sacrifice and seruice of your faith And for this cause the Fathers called the Lords Supper a Liturgy and Sacrifice whence came that execrable errour of such as will haue the sonne of God daily in the Church to bee offered and sacrificed Hence also was it that publick officers both g Rom. 15.16 ministers and Magistrates were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministers and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 DeacoÌ„s Rom. 13.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yea Heb. 1.7 Angells are called Ministers and ministring spirits Hence also was the publick seruice of the Church called a Leiturgie as Luk. 1.23 Yea and the verie execution of that seruice was so called as if a man should haue giuen that name to the Leuiticall sacrifices Heb. 10.11 euery high Priest standeth daily to Minister So that this action of his were it of preaching 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or performing holy mysteries might be called a Liturgie Furthermore this name of Liturgie Oblation and sacrifice began to bee giuen Metaphorically to Almes h Rom. 15.27 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Gentiles ought to Minister carnall things to the Saints at Ierusalem By the like reason all Christians may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministers as Paul called Epaphroditus Phil. 2.25 To conclude in the Ecclesiasticall storie certain formes of seruice at the Church were called Liturgies as
the Liturgy of Basill Chrysostom c. Againe each professor of Christ hath the name of Deacon or minister giuen vnto him Ioh. 12.26 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If any man wil be my Minister let him follow me But more specially this word Diaconia doth signifie prouision for the poore and that collection it selfe is so called k 2. Cor. 9. Diaconissa and properly 1 Ro. 12.7 men Deacons were such as were ouerseers for the poore and women Deacons in the Ecclesiasticall Historie who looked to the poore being sick or who were as the publick hostes to entertaine Christian strangers a Rom. 16.1 1 Tim. 5.9 10. But Christ he is called the minister of Circumcision Rom. 15.8 Not of circumcision it selfe or of the Lawe which he by his comming did abrogate or rather fulfill but of the Circumcised Iewes amongst whome he onely liued so long as he vpon earth liued b mat 15 24. Hee is called the Apostle of our profession that is of the Gospell c Heb. 3. â— as he who immediatly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was himselfe sent froÌ„ the Father Now in this place wee take the word Ministerie as it generally signifieth for an Ecclesiasticall function VVhy doe you call this Function a Ministery Because it is not a chiefdome Dominion Magistracie or imperious office but rather 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 care and Diaconia seruice yea a painfull seruice and ministerie Neyther are the Ministers of the Church as Ministers such rulers or Lords as may chalenge to themselues dominion ouer eyther the Cleargy or mans conscience or the members of the Church or vnto ought to haue power to make lawes and translate kingdomes but they are the seruants and ministers of that one Prince and Lord of Lords Christ Iesus For after this sorte to domineere Christ expressly forbiddeth his Disciples both by word and example Rom 1.1 Phil. 1.1 Iac. 1.1 2. Pet. 1.1 Iude. 1. by word Luke 22.25.26 The kings of the Gentiles rule ouer them it shall not be so with you and by example verse 27 and Iohn 13.4 and. 13. yea and Peter himselfe exhorteth all Pastors to be not as Lords c. but as ensamples to the flock of Christ This made Bernard writing to Eugenius the Pope to say Dominion was plainely forbidden the Apostles be not thou therfore bold to Challenge to thy selfe either ruling Apostleship or being Apostolicke rule Thou art quite forbidden both If thou wilt needs haue both together in the end thou shalt loose both What is Ministerie It is an Ecclesiasticall function vpon earth assigned to preach the worde to administer the Sacraments to practise Christian Discipline and things which are called Ecclesiasticall What is a Minister of the Church He is a person lawfully called to teach Gods word administer the Sacraments Church gouernment and things ecclesiasticall according as they are prescribed in the word of God How many sorts of Church Ministers are there in the scriptures Two some of the olde Testament others of the new and againe the Ministers of the Church of the Old Testament were some perpetuall and as it were ordinary as Patriarchs Leuites Priests Scribes others Temporarie and as I may say extraordinary as the Prophets were As for the Pharisees and Saduces they were rather names of Sectes then publicke functions as appeareth Act. 23.9 What were the Patriarckes The heades of Families or heads of Fathers in their kinreds a Exo. 6.13 2. Chro. 8.10 Act 7.9 or they were men of the Olde Testament before and after the Deluge till Moses vnto whom God reuealed himselfe by Angels Visions in the night apparition by day and by dreames b Gen. 8 16 6.13.14 12.7.20.13.28 12.46 2 Num 12.6 And that by a voyce perceptible to man and framed to the speach vsuall amongst men And by these onely in liuely tradition hee taught their families religion they being in the families as Prophets and Priests Thus Adam whilest hee expâ—unded to his wife and children the promise of that seed of the woman taught them a twofold seruice of God and offered Sacrifices vnto God c Gen. 4.4 And Henoch the seauenth from Adam is thus said to haue prophecied d Gen. 5.22 Gen 14 â— And so Noah is called a Preacher of Repentance e 1 Pet. 3.19 4.6 2. Pet. 2.5 Righteousnes the Gospell and of Christ because all those hundred and twentie yeeres before the floud be ceased not by words and works to admonish that wicked world how great a measure of Gods wrath did hang ouer their head After this the chiefe in each family are said to haue been teachers and Priests So in the land of Canaan at Salem which was after called Ierusalem Melchisedeck who as some thinke was Sem a Priest of the most high God and who was also King of Salem f Gen. 14.18 Heb. 7.1 so Abraham performed the office of a Doctor and a Priest g Gen. 13.18 17.23.20.17 22.10 13 and by faith is said to haue offered sacrifice h Heb. 11.7 Gen. â—3 20 35.7 49.2 After Abraham Isaacke after Isaacke Iacob who himselfe as a prophet instructed his people at diuers places erected diuers Altars and offered sacrifices i At the length when it was now time not to teach onely priuate families but many people in the true knowledge of God Moses being stirred vp by God a Exod. 3.2 did establish a seruice and Church among the people and to this purpose he ordained Priests and Leuites to whom from God he prescribed certain Lawes according to which God would haue the people of Israel gouerned not onely by liuely voyce as before but by writing and at Gods commaundement he deliuered the word of God For before Moses we read not of any Scripture giuen by inspiration from God What were priests They were men immediatly called out of Aarons posteritie for they onely were Priests and were called the sonnes of Aaron and annointed with oyle and consecrated in the sight of the people b Exod. 41 29. Leuit. 8 2 that they might teach others the doctrine mediatly receiued from GOD offer sacrifices blesse the people and might make intercession for themselues and the people c Leuit. 9 7 16.6 Num. 17.6.24 2. Chron. 1.4 Mat. 2.4 and these were superiours who ministred to the people in the Tabernacle among whom some were called High Priests d 1. Chron. 1. these were the heads of their families For the which cause they were called Princes of the sanctuarie and deuided into twentie foure ordes or classes e Hebr. 5.6 all which were figures of Christ but yet was there euer some one aboue the rest he was the eldest of Aarons sonnes and posteritie who was called the high Priest and was especially in his function a figure of Christ the head of his Church f Heb. 6 5 he alone might goe into the Sanctuarie g Hebr. 9.11 Leuit. 16.2 and he alone might appeare
or to be vsed and obserued in writing those lawes and humane traditions 1 That they be not repugnant to the analogy of faith or that they lead vs not from Christ or be superstitious of which sort for the most part the popish rites are neither must our consciences be intangled as though those lawes of order and decency be for that cause onely brought in as if they were parts of diuine worship 2 That they be not preferred before the heauenly doctrine which the Apostles receiuing from God haue deliuered neiâ—â—â—â— must those lawes be eternall or immutable but as necessitie shall require mutable 3 That those things which are vnprofitable ridiculous foolish parasitical and operatiue should not be appointed for a graue honest and profitable order such as those which the Papacie doth commaund of Auricular confession the difference of meates daies and apparell vowed peregrination and the like 4 That the Church be not burdened with the multitude of those precepts as is done in poperie and the true and pure worship of God be oppressed as it was once done of the Pharisies b Mat. 23.4 and so the commaundements of God be made void in respect of men c Mat 15.3 Mar. 7.13 Act. 15.10 That they doe not degenerate into superstition or impietie that there be no merit ascribed to them or worship or necessitie that is they may not be accounted necessarie to saluation or a part of Gods worship and that of themselues by the work done as they speake which if it come to passe let them presently be reformed or altogether abolished by the example of Ezechias which brake in peeces the brasen Serpent d 2. Reg. 18 4 and lastly we must beware least through a pretence of indifferencie they offer poyson and hide a deadly hooke vnder a hony bayte VVho can ratifie or abolish those lawes In particuler Churches the Pastors by the sage iudgement of the Consistory and the authority of the Christian magistrate his consent being thereunto adioyned lastly the flocke being certified therof approouing the same who verily ought not rashly to forsake the opinion of their Pastors and superintendents being confirmed by the word of God sound reasons but in prouinciall Churches it is the office of the Synods being lawfully called in the Lord to constitute such kind of lawes VVhat is a lawfull Synode It is an assembly or meeting and councill either of certain places that is named A prouinciall Synod or else of the whole Church and so it is called Oecumenicall or vniuersall represented by certaine choise persons of her selfe for a certaine time as Pastors and gouernours being remoued as well from all popular gouernment as from smal gouernment and especially from Antichristian â—yrannie that they may expell the wolues and compose all controuersies which are raised in the Church out of the word of God prouided that it be alwaies their rule that they may maintaine pure doctrine and appoint such an outward cutaxie and goood order as seemeth most expedient for the whole Church a Act 15.2.6 c And of such Synods there is great profit 1. Because that which is sought of many is with greater facility obtained 2 Because errors heretiks patrons of errors are more easily repressed and condemned by common consent and iudgement of many By whom are Synods to be called and appoynted By the chiefe Magistrate if hee bee faithfull or at least if he tolerate the Christian faith who also eyther by himselfe or by others whom he hath made choyse of ought to be president of the Synode For it is the office of the Magistrate as the nurce of the Church to preserue the peace and quiet thereof but so that he doth submit himselfe to the word explaned by the mouth of the minister but if hee bee an infidel then it is the office of the Pastors to haue regard as much as in them lyeth that the Church of Christ be no whit damnified and mutually to stirre vp each other that by a common consent they may meete in the name of the Church without any prerogatiue of places to choose those who are knowne to excell in doctrine integritie of life and other gifts of the holy Ghost the Laitie being not excluded as it is manifest out of the Acts. Chap. 15.2 22.23.25 but especially that as Chrst did sit b Luk. 2.46 in the midst of the doctors so now he must be present and beare rule in the councel of the doctors Are all things which Synods decree to be accounted alwaies for true and vndoubted They are not as it is apparant by the second Nicene Councell which did determine against the word of God for the worshipping of Idols and the second Councell holden at Ephesus where the heresie of Eutiches preuailed and the Aphrican Councels where Cyprian was where it was established that those which were baptized by hereticks should be rebaptized for the Church on earth may erre yea being gathered together as it is euident out of Esay 56.10 Ier. 6.13 a Exod. 22.25 1 Reg. 22.6 22 Mar 12.29 Ioh. 11.2 47 2 Thess 2.4.11 the reason is because the Church on earth is not composed of the blessed Angesl but of men whose propertie it is to erre and to be deceiued for that which is said Psal 89.6 that the truth of God is in the congregation of his saints it is to be vnderstood either of the holy Angels liuing in heauen or els of the church where the pure preaching of the gospel souÌ„deth Is there any authoritie of the Synods There is but that which doth depend on the word of God namely which is of Christs promise Mat. 18 2â— where two or three so more be gathered together in my name there am I in the the midst of them neither is it to be doubted but that much more some vniuersall company he doth gouern by his spirit b Act. 15 2â— Cor. 5.4 Therfore the iudgments of Synods are not to be despised especially of those where Christ doth sit in the middest but withall obserue by what condition Christ is in the middest of a councell if it be gathered together in his name and the scripture bee in the most eminent place for then the definition of the councils concerning that opinion which is controuersed after lawfull examination and iust inquiry hath his waighâ— which notwithstanding it selfe must be tried by the touchstone of the scripture according to that try all things keepe that which is good 1. Thess 5.21 Doth not the Apostle commaÌ„d vs to obey rulers gouernors He. 13.17 Yes verily but both with an implicite condition if they be true rulers let not the word of God the volume of the law depart froÌ„ their mouths c Ios 1.7.8 if they sit in Moses chaire that is they teach the doctrine of Moses incorruptly d Mat. 23.2 in those things which are peculier to their ministery as in the word of God lawfull
Sathan is not in respect of bodily affliction as some doe expound it seing Ecclesiasticall censures doe not appertaine to the bodie as ciuill doe but properly vnto the soule but amongst the Iewes there was casting out from the Synagogue a Ioh. 9.22 and to be cut off from the people b Gen. 17.14 Leuit. 7.2 and to be reputed for an heathen and Publican that is for profane and altogether irreligious c Mat. 18.17 but to bee excommunicated amongst Christians is to lose the right of a Christian citie vntill he repent and to bee made a vassall of Sathan who ruleth out of the Church Who are to be cited to this censure Not altogether aliants such as this day the Iewes and Turkes are neither Schismaticks hereticks and such as haue made a secesssion altogether from the Christian Church or such as neuer did associate theÌ„selues to the true Church but those especially which yet are as conuersant in the bosome of the Church and haue not yet manifestly gone to them of a separation the Apostle testifying if any being named a brother that is which doth professe himselfe a member of the Church be an Adulterer a couetous person or an Idolater or slanderer or drunkard or an extortioner with such an one eate not nor haue any commerce with him for what haue I to do to iudge of them without doe not you iudge those that are within take away therefore the euill one from amongst you 1. Cor. 5.11.8 Who is the Author of the Ecclesiasticall censure God himselfe for alwaies from the beginning of the world this discipline was vsed in the Church of God wherby the Church in generall was not onely discerned from men which were manifestly profane as in times past before the flood the sonnes of God that is the godly which were deriued from the posteritie of Seth from the sonnes of men that is from the wicked of Caines familie d Gen. 4.26 6 4 but those which did misdemeane themselues were cast out of the bosome of the Church in which sense the ancient fathers thought Caine to bee cast out from the presence of the Lorde And those which were of mature yeares being vncircumcised if they did neglect circumcision or being by their parents neglected was approued of them were cut off by the commaundement of God from his people that is from the societie of the Saints g Gen. 17.14 and by the law of God diuerse rites concerning pollution as of the leaprosie and other seuerings purgings and expiations a Leuit. 5 1.2 13.2.40 14.2 Numb 5 2 6 19. were appointed to the consistorian Synagogue Lastly Christ himselfe hath expresly appointed this order being as we haue learned deriued vnto vs from the Church of Israell b Mat. 18.18 and Paul himselfe at Corinth and else where hath commanded the same to be kept c 1 Cor. 5.1 2.3.4.5 c. 1. Tim. 1.20 and 2. Thes 3.14 saith d 1. Cor. 1.2.18 if any harken not to our speech by Epistle marke him e 1. Tim. 4.14 to wit with the note of excommunication Who ought to haue the power of excommunication The Bishop and the Gouernours of the Church which the Pastor ought to denounce as it is apparant 1. Cor. 5.4 saith Paul being assembled with my spirit for the whole Church ought to haue notice of the same otherwise how can she auoid the familiar society of the partie excommunicated for it is manifest wheÌ„ Christ did dispute of this thing f Mat. 18.17 that he ment the consistorie or the Ecclesiasticall Senate applying his speach to the custome of his times And the power of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction was in their power which were called the chiefe rulers of the Synagogue g Mar. 5.22 who did also manage the affaires of particular Churches Examples heereof we haue Ioh. 9.22 h 12.42 16.2 and Paul 2. Cor. 16. saith that it is sufficient that such a man was rebuked not in priuate not publick before the whole Church but of many namely being done in the consistorie Whence it is manifest that all the excommunications of that Antichrist of Rome and all his Hierarchie are in trueth none at all How farre forth may a lawfull conuocation vse this spirituall sword Not at their owne arbitrement or priuate authority but. 1. By a precedent lawfull knowledg 2. Vpon iust causes 3. By the prescript of Gods word 4. In the feare of the Lord. 5. In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that is Gods name being called on as it beseemeth them who do not regard theit owne worke but the Lords businesse according to his worde and with the power of the Lord a 1 Cor. 5.4 6 with the spirit of meeknesse and with especiall clemencie and charity b Gal 6.9 for that which is vnlawfully and wickedly acted on earth cannot be ratified in heauen Vpon whome ought it to be exercised Vpon blaspheemers enemies of Gods glory his trueth obstinate sinners hereticks and seducers worshippers of Idols Schismaticks or Sectaries periured or faithlesse and on open malefactors as rebels to the admonitions of their superiours murtherers whoremongers vsurers railers drunkards extortioners inordinate liuers and such as are condemned in their owne conscience and after their conscience hath beene conuinced do perseuere in their obstinacie vnbridled vncorrigible despising all Christiâ—â— admonition but present not absent c Mat. 18.17 1 Cor. 5.11 2 Thess 3 1â— Tit. 3 11. From what things is the excommunicate person excluded Not only from the participation of the Sacraments for this is only a suspention but from the whole bodie and benefite of the Church and from the ordinarie conuersation speech cohabitation society of life with other meÌ„bers of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for wee must haue no voluntarie familiar for our minde sake coÌ„mixtion coÌ„sociation or fellowship with any excommunicate person e Rom 16.17 2. Thes 3.14 couple not or consociate not your selues to him 1. Cor. 5.11 But he must be as an Ethnick and publican to vs as Christ doth aduertise vs. Mat. 18.17 neither must we eat with him neither receiue him into our house neither salute him 1. Cor. 5.11 d 2. Ioh. 5.10 but we must fly from him and yet so as our children wife subiects in respect of the magistrate be not exempted from due reuetence least there be a confusion of all neither must they for the offence of the maister of the familie bee accounted as excommunic te prouided that they do not by their conuersation with him giue any assent to his crime As for others they must auoide an excommunicate person Notwithstanding he is not to be depriued of the benefit of the f 1 Cor. 14.2 word by which meanes the offender may bee reclaimed 2. Thess 3 14 if any doe not yeeld obedience to our speech haue no fellowship with him yet saith the Apostle Admonish him as
b 1 Cor. 11 27.29 As for example Abraham and his household c Gen. 17 23 Absalon Achitophel the people d Sam. 15.12 Iudas e Luk. 22.21 Simon Magus f Act. 8.13 But they belong to theÌ„ only for whoÌ„ they are appointed and such as be conteined in the couenant of God according to his words But not to them that be without which doe not professe the name of Christ and to such too as bee liuing and present but not to the deade and such as bee absent Wherein doe the word and Sacraments agree In the Efficient cause for the same person is the Authour of the promise of grace and of the Sacraments to wit the sonne of God the head King Doctor and Priest of the Church and in the instrumentall causes for the selfe same ministers of the word be also the disposers of the Sacraments g Mat. 28.1 1 Cor. 4.19 2 In the matter intelligible or the principall subiect for the same thing is promised in the word and the lawfull vse of the Sacraments the same Christ with his benefits of saluation Therfore as the Gospell testifieth those which turne to God are washed and sanctified by the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God 1. Cor. 6.11 And that they are begotten by the Gospell and borne anewe by the worde of the liuing God 1. Corinth 4.15 h 1 Pet 1.23 1 Rom. 6.3 Tit 3.5 And that Iesus Christ is that breade of life Iohn 6.35 So the sacramentes doe testifie that those which are baptised into Iesus Christ are baptised into his death k Ioh. 3.33 36 Râ—â— â—4 23 Heâ— 11 6 Habac 2 4 and are saued by the washing of the new birth 1. And the bread which wee breake is the communion of the body of Christ 1. Cor. 10.16 3 In the forme manner and Instrument wherby we receiue the thing to saluation for the word and sacraments profit none but those which haue or shall haue faith k Ioh. 3.33 36 4 In the end common to them both For both the word and the sacraments are meanes whereby the sonne of God dooth teach and gather the Church vnto himselfe and doth in this life communicate himselfe and all his benefits to them that shall be saued yet so as he is able without eyther of them to worke in the hearts of the godly so often and when it pleaseth him 5 In the effects For as the word of life is to the godly the sauour of life vnto life to the vngodly the sauour of death vnto death 2. Cor. 2.16 So the Sacraments in themselues are to saluation to them that beleeue but vnto the vnbeleeuers they turne into iudgment and condemnation a 1. Cor. 11.29 Euen as a sweet oyntment is healthfull to the doue but it is present death to the flye And as the seed of the word preached so the vse of the sacrament doth not presently bring forth his fruit but in that time which is appointed of God 6 Lastly as the holy Ghost doth begin and strengthen faith by the word so also by the sacraments he doth stirre vp and confirme the same Out of all which followeth that there is such a coniunction and agreement of the outward and inward word as there is of the earthly signes and heauenly things Wherein do the word and Sacraments differ 1 In nature Because the word of the Gospell doth in expresse words declare to wit that we by faith are made partakers of Christ Iesus and of all his merits the sacraments doe represent them by signes or that doctrine which the word doth deliuer cleare and more manifest the Sacraments doe propound the same in a mysterie and not so expresly 2 In the instruments The word is deliuered with the mouth receiued with the eares but the rites of the sacraments are administred with the hands and they are subiect to the eyes and the other senses and doe lead vs as it were vnto the thing present as though wee should nowe in some sort touch Christ himselfe with our handes see him with our eyes perceiue him with our taste and feele him with our whole heart 3 In the subiect to whom The promises of the word are generally and in common pronounced to all alike as well to the vnbeleeuers as to the beleeuers For the word must be preached euen to the vnbeleeuers But the sacrameÌ„ts are to be communicated seuerally to them which be probably known to be members of the Church and they doe apply and restraine the promises in a speciall manner to euerie one that doth rightly vse these rites that as certainely as thou doest vse the visible Ceremonie according to Christ his institution So certainely thou mayest and oughtest to conclude that Christ also and all his benefits do belong vnto thee 4 In the measure of signifying for the word doth especially teach but the speciall office of the Sacraments is to seale and further the word doth signifie and apply spirituall things but the Sacraments doe rather and more especially represent and applie 5 In order for whereas the Sacraments are the appendices of the word which doe confirme faith it is meet that in such as bee of yeares the preaching of the word should goe before to begin and to increase faith together with a manifest profession of faith before they be rightly administred to any 6 The word is auailable euen without the sacraments as may be seene in Cornelius a Act. 10.2 3.4.44.45 But sacraments without the word are of no force For a seale without a Charter is nothing worth 7 The preaching of the word and that effectuall is required in those that be of yeares that they may bee saued For Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God Rom. 10.17 Except it please GOD extraordinarily to worke in their hearts But the Sacraments are not altogether expresly nor absolutely so necessarie that without exception whosoeuer inioyes them not should therefore despaire of the certaine hope of saluation For that saying of Bernard is most true Not the want but the contempt of the Sacraments is damnable 8 Lastly the word considered by it selfe alone if it bee compared with the sacrament considered by it selfe alone is better and more excellent then it Although if the sacrament bee added to it it doth yet become more excellent and powerfull and more effectuall for the confirmation of faith Therefore we may not ascribe the greater honour to the sacraments then to the preaching of the gospell that is to say we may not attribute more to the seales then to the written Testament of Iesus Christ What ought they to doe who are depriued of libertie to come to the holy assemblies of the Church wherein the ordinarie dispensation of the word and sacraments is performed They ought to inquire for them but if they cannot find them they must then exercise themselues in daily meditation at home both because the kingdom
word of God 3. The multitude and pompe of humane rites hath ouerthrowen the ceremonies ordeined by God 4. In those ceremonies spirituall efficacie and operation not bare signification is vsed without the word of God as may appeare by the consecrations of oyntments salt wax c. 5. They haue degenerated into superstition and abuse 6. They are falsly supposed and held to perteine to the integritie and trueth of Baptisme VVhat is the word in Baptisme The word of the Gospell the summe whereof Christs institution conteineth beeing conioyned with the promise of eternall life being in these words Baptize yee in the name of the Father the sonne and the holie Ghost whosoeuer beleeueth is baptized shall be saued Mat. 28.19 And the pronunciation of this forme plainely and clearely in our natiue speach that all may vnderstand it I Baptize thee in the name or into the name of the father and of the sonne and of the Holie Ghost which words in the Schooles are called the forme of baptisme But wee had rather call them the forme of words therefore Dydimus saith that Baptisme is vnperfect if any of th◠three persons bee omitted For whereas in the Act. cap. 2.38 wee read that the Apostles baptized in the name or into the name of the Lord of Christ it is either spoken by Synecdoche as Ambrose thinketh and is of the same sence with the aforesaid forme because the father is in Christ the holy Ghost also whosoeuer beleeueth in the Son beleeueth likewise in the father in the holy Ghost a Io. 12.44 14.9.10.12 or in the name of Christ that is through the name commaundement of Christ that is as he had appointed and ordained as name is often taken for commaundement or the terme to which that is the end and scope and effect of baptisme is signified but not the forme of Baptizing so that the meaning is that he had baptized them into the name and profession or euen into the death of Christ and to haue incorporated them into Christ by baptisme and to haue consecrated and sealed them Christians vnto him as their Mediator but with the accustomed forme of baptisme What is it to be baptized in the name of the father the Son and the holy Ghost By this phrase is signified that by calling on the fathet the sonne and the holy Ghost he who is baptized his sins being forgiuen is receiued into the fauour of that God which is the Father sonne and holy Ghost and is adopted sealed ingrafted installed receiued and consecrated into the sheepefold familie inheritance power worship league fauour religion faith and communion of the father the sonne and the holy Ghost that is the true God in nature and essence one but in propertie of persons three which is the Author of saluation that wee might liue after his pleasure Therefore he saith not In the names but in the name least from hence occasion might be giuen of making three Gods In which sence this phrase is to bee taken as it is plaine by the words of Paul 1. Cor. 1.13 where he denyeth that he baptised any in his owne name So then by Baptisme wee are consecrated to GOD the Father because in him our Adoption and regeneration which followeth after it is established by the Holy Ghost VVhat is the internall matter of Baptisme The thing signified which is both the bloude and spirit of Iesus Christ which are correspondent to the water and also the Ingrafting and incorporating into Christ by the holy Ghost and consequently the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ the remission or washing away of sins the Regeneration or spirituall second birth the renewing and sanctification of that man which is baptized The putting on of Christ as it were of a garment wirh which wee are couered a Gal. 3.8 Ephe. 5.26 Tit. 3.5 Likewise the fruite fellowship and participation of the death buriall resurrection of Christ b Rom. 6.4.5 Col. 2.1.3 Lastly our Adoption and entrance into the Church of God as it were an admittance into the societie of the Saints which thing signified may be also called the essentiall part and internall forme of Baptisme What is then the forme of Baptisme Of outward Baptisme that holy externall symbolical action which the Minister of the word of God vseth which consisteth first in the reciting declaring of the institution of the diuine promises anexed to baptisme or in signifying the lawful wholsome vse of baptisme Secondly in the confession of that faith into the which baptisme leadeth or in Catechisticall questions answers or in stipulation by which those that were to be baptized in times past did testify their Inward baptisme being then to be cōfirmed with the outward as Act. 8.31 c 1 Pet 3.21 But first especially in the sprinkling of water in the name of the Father the sonne and the Holy Ghost And last of all in prayers blessings giuing of thanks in a language knowne vnto the people that the congregation may be able to say Amen 1. Co. 14.16 for all these things are commaunded by Scripture and example as Preach the Gospell hee that beleeueth c. Mat. 24.19 Act. 22.16 and Bee thou baptized and wash away thy sinnes by calling on of the name of Iesus Now the Scripture hath not prescribed a set forme in certain words concerning those admonitions and prayers touching the institution and Doctrine of baptisme which the word of God deliuereth but hath left that free as circumstances may require for the better edifying of the Church so that the foundation be kept But the forme of inward baptisme is that inward action which is proper vnto Iesus Christ himselfe working by the Holy Ghost VVhat Analogie and agreement is there of the Signe with the thing signified in Baptisme Verie great for euen as the water doth wash the body and the filth thereof so the bloud of Christ by his merit doth wash away our sins and spirituall spots for his spirit doth sanctifie vs d Rom. 3 25 Tit. 3 5 1 Iohn 1 7. And like as euery generation cōsisteth of moyst watery matter Wherevpon some Philosophers as Thales haue said that water was the beginning of all things so our regeneration is by the holy Ghost in Baptisme who is often signified by the name of water for euen as water prepareth the earth to bring forth fruit and quencheth thirst So the holy Ghost that same which sate vpon the waters a Gen. 1.2 maketh vs fit for good workes and quencheth in vs the thirsting after terrene things and hereof good workes are called the fruites of the spirit b Gal. 5.22 and Christ saith who so thirsteth let him come to mee and drinke for hee that drinketh shall neuer thirst but this hee spake of the spirit which they that beleeue should receiue c Esa 51.1 Secondly the sprinkling with water doth plainly note the sprinkling of the bloud of Christ
for the remission of sinnes Ioh. 7 37 and imputation of righteousnesse but the staying vnder the water though but a while setteth as it were before our eyes the death buriall and mortification of our natural corruption the old Adam by the vertue of the death and buriall of Christ which is the first part of our regeneration d Rom 6.3 4 And the being taken out the reuiuing of the newe man and newnesse of life yea and proportionally our resurrection to come e Ibid. vers 4.5.13 VVhat change or coniunction is there of the signe and the thing signified in Baptisme Not any naturall for the outward signe is only the Ministers corporall action but the thing signified is spirituall and Gods worke namely to be washed with Christes bloud and regenerated with his spirit which is not to bee sprinkled with Christs bloud corporally either visibly or inuisibly but to bee receiued into Gods fauour by reason of his bloud shead that is by reason of Christs whole obedience and being grafted into his body to bee quickned by him through the working of the holy Ghost as it is said expresly of Christ Hee shall baptize you with the Holie Ghost and with fire f Mat. 3.11 Iohn 3.33 Notwithstanding for the fitnesse reference and trueth of the signe and thing signified and also for the promise made to those that vse them rightly there is a Sacramentall and Relatiue copulation by reason whereof the name and properties both of the signe and thing signified are changed Hereof Baptisme is called the Lauer of Regeneration and the water the bloud and spirit of Christ. Tit. 3.5 that is not onely the shadowe but a most certaine Testimonie that the baptized truely beleeuing are cleansed with the bloud of Christ regenerated by the holy Ghost Is the same man alwaies at one instant Baptized with water and the Holy Ghost No. 1. Because the promise of the spirit annexed to baptisme is not absolute but conditionall requiring faith and obedience 2. Because that God dealeth not in Baptisme by naturall reason as when a medicine being taken worketh with thee whether thou sleepest or wakest and fire warmeth whether thou thinkest of it or no. But as God is a most free agent sometimes the Baptisme of water is without the baptisme of the spirit as the Example of Simon Magus teacheth who although hee had an Historicall faith yet hee was not regenerated and the a Act. 8 12 baptisme of the spirit sometime goeth before sometime accompanieth and sometimes followeth the baptisme of water for both men and women when they beleeued by Philips preaching the things belonging vnto the kingdome of God and of Christ as also the Eunuch Cornelius and his friends were baptized by the Holy Ghost before they were baptized with water as appeareth by their faith and conuersion b Act. 8.13 but in infants to whom the kingdome of Heauen belongeth if wee respect Gods ordinance both Baptisme and Iustification and Regeneration do concurre out of the nature of that Couenant I will bee thy GOD and the God of thy seed Gen. 17.7 but the effect hereof is truely declared afterward in his time For the seede of the word and Sacraments lyeth as it were in the Earth couered and hid as long as the Lord seeth good to deferre grace Is Christ present after one manner both in baptisme and in the Supper He is alike present in the lawfull vse but yet the manner of his presence may be after a sort discerned for in baptisme hee is present as at the new birth In the Supper for the confirmation and nourishment of him that is newe borne But vnderstand this presence in respect of him that taketh it for nothing hath the reason of a Sacrament out of the vse instituted What is the manner of receiuing Baptisme The manner of receiuing the outward signes is naturall but of the things signified spirituall for the things themselues are effectually communicated vnto vs in respect of God that giueth the holy Ghost by the meanes of the lawfull administration of Baptisme But faith is that only gift of God whereby wee apply the substance of the Sacrament peculiarly vnto our selues Touching infantes they haue a singular priuiledge in respect of God Who are to be Baptized All men lyuing who are receiued or esteemed to be receiued into the Couenant of God without difference of sexe or nation a Act 10 47 and 11.17 and those who are of yeares which come vnto the Church and shewe their assent to the doctrine of the Gospell professe their faith in Christ and shewe forth the confession of their sinnes or repentance Mat. 3.6 and 28.19 Baptizing them that is to say those which haue giuen their names to the Gospel and haue professed themselues Disciples And Act. 2.41 They which receiued his word were baptised And Christ said first He that beleeueth afterward And is baptized Mar 16 16. So Simon Magus was admitted the Eunuch and others b Act. 8.13 37. 10 46.47 Or else the Infants of the faithfull c Gen. 17.7 Luk 18.16 and those which are begotten of Baptized parents but not of Infidels which are not in the Church and not the Children of the Baptized because their seed is contained in the couenant but not these other Act. 2.39 To you is the promise made and to your children Neither is it materiall whether the Infant bee borne of vnequall matrimonie that is whether one parent or both be faithfull and Christian for the Apostle calleth such children holie d 1 Cor 7.14 that is pure and separated for the Lord according to the forme of the Couenant Neither doth this hinder because al that are borne of faithful parents are not elected for we are not to enquire into the secret iudgements of God but probably we may duely coniecture that all which are borne of Christians are elected Are persons of yeares and infants to bee admitted vnto baptisme all after one sort No but they which are of yeares are not to be baptized before they be instructed in the faith of Christ as in the word which entereth the ignorant in Christ that is in the Rudimentes of Religion in the principles of Christianisme which is called Catechisme e Heb 6 1 Secondly when they are to be baptized they ought to confesse their faith before the Church of Christ Mat. 3.6 They were Baptized by Iohn in Iordan confessing their sins that is such as did testifie that they did earnestly embrace the Doctrine of free remission of their sinnes Such a confession was required in the antient Church of them which were able to be enstructed differing farre from that Popish shrift consisting in a proditorious enumeration of each euen secret sinnes Wherupon the Apostle 1. Pet. 3.21 calleth baptisme the answering of a good conscience hauing respect to the Interrogations of Catechists to which those which were to be instructed in the principall heades of Faith and of
of God which especially shined to the church in the time of Christ when as the Gentiles imbraced the preaching of the gospel concerning which Heb 13 15. 6. 56. 66 Let vs by Christ himselfe offer to God the sacrifice of praise 13 And whereas Daniell 12.11 saith that in the last times Antichrist raging a docilie sacrifice shal be offered that is to be meant either of the daily legall sacrifice which was interrupted in the time of Antiochus and afterwarde quite taken away in the destruction of Ierusalem as Chrisostome will haue it in the oration against the Iewes or metaphoricallie of the worship of God prescribed out of his worde to be taken away Antichrist possessing the worlde as Hierom will haue it vpon Daniel Chap. 12. 14 But although Melchisedech was a figure of Christ yet not in regarde of outward sacrifice whereof there is no mention made Gen. 14.18.19.20 neither in all that comparison of Christ with Melchisidech which the Apostle doth vnfold most accurately Heb. 7. But 1. because Melchisedech was a King and also a priest 2 Because the same Melchisedech as a Priest blessed AbrahaÌ„ that is he prayed for the grace and fauour of God to him saying blessed art thou Abraham of God most high 3 Because he is set forth vnto vs in the scripture without genealogy as though he were eternal 4 It is gathered that he was more excellent then Abraham his posterity by that that Abraham offered tithes vnto him Notwithstanding that we may graunt which is not spoken that Melchesedech before he entertained Abraham with a banquet returning with his seruants from the conquest tooke parte of the bread and of the wine and sacrificed that is oblation being made gaue thanks to God for the victorie and for the wholesome vse of bodily foode and for all other benifites which was the custome of the holy fathers and which also went forward from them to the Gentiles as Atheneus doth praise Homer because he describeth the Grecian Princes neuer to sit downe at the table or to depart without Sacrifice and praiers it doth not therefore follow that that thanksgiuing was a Sacrifice applyed for Abraham and his companie that it might merit for them remission of sins So in the Lords Supper there is made a most holy Sacrifice that is the bodie and bloud of the Lord being tasted wee giue thanks for spirituall nourishment and for so great victorie whereby Christ hath ouercome sinne and death for vs and hath made his conquest common vnto vs but this thanksgiuing doth not deserue for our selues or others remission of sins It doth much lesse follow that Christ in the Supper offered himselfe to God in the forme of bread and wine but onely in an argument Allegoricall it followeth that the bread and wine offered of Abraham were types of Christ who offereth himselfe to vs in the Supper to be receiued by a true faith In which sense the Fathers doe apply the type of Melchisedech to the Supper of the Lord. Which thing Lombard doth inough declare Melchisedech shewed the rite of this Sacrament b 4. Sentence distinct 8 when as he offered bread and wine to Abraham Lastly wheras the ancient fathers doe euerie where call the Eucharist a sacrifice they do it 1. For the blessing of the signes 2. Because in this mystery there is a commemoration of that onely sacrifice which was made for vs vpon the crosse and a certaine representation of it vnder the image of the Sacrament 3. Because it is an Eucharisticall sacrifice by reason of the solemne profession of faith praiers and especially of a peculiar giuing of thanks 4. Because in it we consecrate our selues wholy vnto God Ro. 12.2 5. Because in old time it was a custome that when the holy Supper was celebrated the faithfull did offer almes wherewith they might helpe the needie brethren which also is a kind of spirituall Sacrifice a Heb. 13.16 Distinct 2 Lombard saith Christ died once vpon the crosse and there Sacrificed in himselfe but he is daily offered in the Sacrament because in the Sacrament there is a remembrance of that which was done once b 4. senten And Distinct 13. It is called a Sacrifice as it were a holie thing done because by a mysticall prayer it is consecrated for vs in remembrance of the Lords passion Because in the celebration of Mysteries there hath beene alwaies a threefold oblatiâ—n obserued in the Christian Church one meere spirituall whereby euery one doth present himselfe before God with a contrite heart and endued with faith another visible euery one bringing something least he should appeare before God emptie Ex. 23.15 The third both of the bodie and of the bloud of the Lord himselfe whether are both the latter iustly taken away by our Churches Yea rather neither of both if they be rightly vnderstood is taken away but rather renued For although now almes are bestowed not as in times past whereby both the common feasts which they did call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loue feasts were furnished and also the ministers and the poore were helped and which serued for other necessarie vses of the Church which were wont to be laid either vpon a table or a cupbord made for that purpose which in the Canons which they call the Apostles Canons Canon 3. is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or an Altar and by solemne prayer vnto God consecrated to holy vses the bread wine first of al being set apart which they did blesse seuerally to the vse of the Sacrament yet notwithstanding the loue feast being now taken away according to the Precept of Paul If any man be hungry let him eate at home not in the Church 1. Cor. 11.34 and so by little and little things being so ordained in the Christian Church that wee neede not labour to seke goods wherewith Ecclesiasticall persons are nourished but rather wee must bee carefull that the wealth wherewith they do abound be bestowed in good vses It was not needefull to retaine in our Churches these kinds of offerings prescribed by no lawe in the word of God but it is better to take heede by what means both iust stipeÌ„ds may be paid to the ministers of the word and also that the poore of euery place may be prouided for and also that an eye may be had to setting vp of schools and to nourishing of poore schollers to maintaine the buildings of Churches neither yet is the collection of priuate almes therefore to be neglected Therefore the offering of the vnbloudie sacrifyce doth remaine among vs sound whether you regard the blessing it selfe of the signes that is the rehearsing and explication of the Lords institution ioyned with prayers wherby after a sort the passion it selfe of the sonne as Cyprian speaketh is offered to God the Father and the whole Church shewing the death of Christ after a sort doth sacrifice and vowe it selfe to God whether by name of a sacrifice you
senses all which truely together cannot bee deceiued vnlesse they bee withholden as in the two Disciples which did thinke the Lord to be some stranger and in Marie Magdalene which supposed that he had beene the gardiner Luk. 24.16 Ioh. 20.15 Whether vnlesse the bodie of Christ be determined to be euery where by this is it separated and pulled asunder from the Diuine nature which is eueriewhere and to which it selfe is personally vnited or hath the body of the Lord obtained that by the vnion that it should be wheresoeuer the word is In no wise because of those things which are equally vnited so as one doth not stretch further then another one cannot be in any place where the other is not but if the one doe stretch further then wheresoeuer the lesse is there also is the greater but not contrariwise as wee may see in a precious stone and in a ring Because therefore the diuinitie of Christ doth exceede the humanitie wheresoeuer the humanity is there is the diuinitie with it not on the contrarie Neither is the personall vnion a making euen of the humane nature with the Diuine or an effusion of the properties of the Diuine nature into the humane that the humane nature may haue the same properties which the diuine hath but it is such an vnion wherby the humane nature doth subsist in the person of the word so as it may be as it were a part therof neither may it subsist by it selfe or without the word But it doth not follow Epist 57. ad Dard. saith Augustine that that which is in God is euery where as God is Moreouer seing that the deitie is euery where whole not by parts not as in a place it cannot be that the humane nature which it assumed can be said to be separated any where from it although it be contained onely in it owne place so as the inuiolable truth thereof doth beare But also the bodie of the sunne and the light thereof haue betweene themselues a naturall and extreme coniunction yet notwithstaÌ„ding to what places soeuer the light doth extend it self the body doth not come to them really So also the eye the sight are verie neerly ioyned together between themselues yet the sight goeth to many things to which the eye doth not extend it selfe Finally rightly said those ancient fathers in the general council of Chalcedon that the difference of natures in Christ is not taken away for the vnion but rather that the propertie is kept of both natures concurring into one person or one hypostasis But whether did that which Christ said Ioh. 3.13 No man ascendeth vp to heauen but the sonne of man which is in heauen make the humane nature of Christ while it was in earth to haue beene also at the same time in heauen No for the Sonne of man in this place signifieth the whole person of Christ which also is the Sonne of God but the humane nature doth signifie onely one part of that person which was assumed in time of the virgin Therefore that which is spoken of this person which is not man onely but also God is amisse said to be spoken of the humane nature also For by this it should be gathered that the humane nature was before Abraham before it was conceiued in the wombe of the virgine But it is certaine that the sonne of God when hee did speake in earth was in heauen in the same manner wherein hee descended from heauen For Christ doth speake of one and the same subiect that is of the sonne of man that he descended from heauen concerning whom he said that he is in heauen But the son of maÌ„ is said to haue desceÌ„ded not because his flesh fell downe from heauen but because the diuine nature is from heauen and tooke vnto it humane flesh Therefore the sonne of man when hee was vpon earth is so said to haue beene in heauen not because the humane nature but because the diuine nature of this sonne which alwaies filleth heauen and earth was in heauen namely by the Trope Synecdoche wherby both the whole is plainely vnderstood Booke 6. cap. and a part is named of the whole saith Cassian It is not vniust to subiect the nature of Christs glorious body which is called spirituall to the lawes of common nature In no wise because the glorie abolished not the trueth of the bodie nor changed it into a spirit but altogether made it subiect to the spirit a Luk. 24.36 Acts. 1.9 10 11. 7.55 56 Aug. Whether doe the Orthodoxall Fathers when they write that the bread which the Lord did reach to the Disciples not changed in forme but in nature by the almightie power of his word was made flesh Cyprian Serm. de caena domini In prologe Psal 33 That Christ bare himselfe in his hands Augustine That the bodie of the Lord doth enter into our mouth That the tongue is made bloudie with the bloud of Christ and that Christ himselfe is seene touched broken and that teeth are fastned to his flesh whither doe they I say b Chrysost Hom. 83. vpon Math. 45. vpoÌ„ Iohn hom 24 vpoÌ„ 1. Cor. speake properly and without trope No seeing that the senses themselues and experience do witnesse the contrarie and these things cannot bee spoken properly without great and Capernaiticall blasphemy Therefore those speaches of the fathers are figuratiue whereby the name and effects of bodie and bloud are giuen to bread and wine and in like manner those things which are done in the signes are attributed to the bodie and bloud of Christ but yet although somewhat hardly and by an hyperbole to commend the worthinesse of the mysterie they doe shewe in these most expresse figuratiue and Metonimicall phrases how certaine and effectuall the mystery is of our communion with Christ or our spirituall eating of Christ namely of such sort that we may bee flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is that being truely made one with him wee may enioy all his goods b Ephe. 5.30 In epist vpon Ioh tractat 1 serm de Crâ—mate Epist 102 ad Euodium Otherwise saith Augustin We cannot with the hand handle Christ fitting in heaueÌ„ but we can touch Christ by faith And Tract vpon Io. 50. The bodie of Christ ascended into heauen some body may aske How shal I hold him being absent How shal I send my hands into heauen that I may hold him sitting there Send thy faith thou hast hold on him And vpon Ps 73. he writeth that he did beare himself in his owne hands after a sort namely because he did beare in his own hands the SacrameÌ„t of his bodie And Cyprian saith that Sacraments haue the names of those things which they doe signifie And the same Augustin Neither let it moue thee saith he that somtime the thing which doth signifie doth take the name of that thing which it signifieth for so the rock is called
spiritually fed with my bodie giuen for you and my bloud shed for you and are nourished by it to life eternall Why had the Lord rather vse this phrase This is my bodie and this is my bloud then to say this signifieth my bodie and my bloud Because the word of signifying worthily seemed vnto him somewhat light and he would more expresly declare that those signes are not propounded that they may bee considered as they are in themselues but that it behoueth the receiuers so to behold and spiritually to apprehend with the eyes of a faithfull minde those things only in those signes which are represented by them as if that breade and that wine were not the signes of those things but those things themselues which they doe signifie Whether if the bodie of Christ bee denyed to bee in the bread of the Supper therefore Christ himselfe is said to bee altogether absent from his Supper No yet so that whole Christ is present but not the whole for Christ man is truely present 1. By the grace and operation of his spirit Where two or three are gathered together in his name Mat. 18.20 2. And by his power and maiestie a Math. 28.20 Heb. 7.26 3. That he which being absent in bodie and made higher then the Heauens yet may be whole most present by his vertue wherby he doth spiritually communicate both himselfe and all his great things to vs truely by faith 4. And by the promise of the Gospell he doth lift vp the hearts of the faithfull to himselfe euen into heauen that there they may behold namely in the celestiall sanctuarie the sacrifice offered vpon the crosse so may feed vpon it by faith Finally Christ doth truely and fully without all doubt accompish that which he promised Is the bodie of the Lord truely and Substantially present in the Supper It is present not truely by conuersion of the whole substance that is both of the matter and forme of the bread and wine into the bodie and bloud of the Lord either by impanation or assumption of the bread or locall inclusion not as an infant in the cradle for neither is it present in outward signes by in existence or indistance nor in regard of the place where the bread is neither also is it present in the bodies of men or is put into the mouth for if you respect the place the bodie of Christ is in heauen circumscribed But in the minds of the faithfull and in regard of the faith of a man lawfully vsing the holy Supper of the Lord. For that is the strength of faith that it may ioyne together most streightly things neuer so much distant asunder Therefore a true and liuely presence of the bodie of Christ in the Supper and communion of him with the beleeuers in the ministerie of the Sacraments is not reiected but onely that manner of presence which is fained at the bread is denyed Are these propositions contradictorie Christ is corporally in heauen and Christ with his body and bloud is in the Supper Not a whit because this latter is nor rightly vnâ—erstood of the presence at the place of bread but of the communion with man which is sealed and exhibited by the rite of the Supper Is not the Supper of Christ made voide if the very flesh of Christ be determined to be so farre essentially absent from this action as the heauens are from the earth In no wise because the bodie it selfe and bloud of Christ are set forth in these mysteries not simply and so farre forth as they are things subsisting in themselues but to be coÌ„sidered intellectually and are offered to the minde not to the bodie to faith not to the senses to be taken also in the mind by faith alone For truely like as those things which are heard are to be perceiued by the hearing those things which are seene by the sight so also those things which are vnderstoode by the vnderstanding so those things which are beleeued by faith neither are these things alike present to their obiects But the perceiuing of faith is a great deale more certain then all comprehension of the senses or of reason how faith can make a thing present Paule declareth Gal. 3.1 where hee saith that Christ was described in their sight and among them crucified Are earthly and celestiall gifts present after the same manner of presence Not after the same because there is no other presence of Christ in the seale of grace then in the word or promise of grace But the presence of Christ Iesus in the word adde also in baptisme yea in the whole ministerie is only spirituall not corporall or locall For as there is not made an inclusion of Christ in the voice of the minister outwardly sounding so neither in the Sacramental symbols or signes For Paul saith that Wee whiles we are strangers in the bodie are absent from the Lord and doe walke by faith and not by sight 2. Cor. 5.6.7 Neither that wee know Christ henceforth after the flesh but after the spirit vers 16. Also that Christ is aboue Col. 3.1 That Christ shall descend from heauen in the day of iudgement 1. Thess 4.16 And truely that he shall come not daily and euery moment and otherwise then he ascended that is to say inuisibly and vncircumscriptiuely but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in that manner not otherwise wherein he was seene to ascend into heauen a Act. 1.11 Wherfore the presence of Christ also in the Supper is spirituall which you may call celestiall Diuine supernaturall but not corporall or natural Which therefore is the thing signified of the Lords Supper Christ himselfe offering himselfe with all his benefits spiritually to bee apprehended in our mindes by faith for in the Lords supper wee are made partakers not onely of the operation or of the benefits and gifts of Christ but of the substance of the liuing bodie of Christ What is vnderstood by naming of bodie and bloud in the Attribute of these propositions This is my bodie and This is my bloud Not a signe thereof which some fathers call a Sacramentall bodie that is to say Sacramentally vnderstood euen as when they say that the bodie of the Lord is seene touched brused with the teeth doth fall vpon the earth is created made consumed Also not the mystical body which is the Church a Eh. 5.32 Eph. 23 For so the faithfull should seeme to cate either the signes alone or the Church although we doe not deny this that the mysticall bodie is shadowed and moreouer established by the signes of bread anâ— wine b 1 Cor. 10 16 but Synecdochically the whole humanitie of Christ both altogether and in respect of parts the true and naturall bodie of Christ deliuered for vs crucified and buried The true bloud shed for vs and his true soule yea also the whole person of Christ For truely his humanitie without the Deitie of the word
instituted that they may be hiding places of things signified but that they may bee effectual signes seales and memorials as the Scripture speaketh Aliud existentia aliud significantia saith Augustine that is being one thing and signifying another thing But meerely significatiue or relatiue that is wholy placed in this that according to Gods ordinance declared in the Sacramentall word these things in a mutuall respect reciprocall relation betweene themselues are one certaine thing for as Beda saith vppon Lu 22 Panis ad corpus Christi mysticè vinum ad sanguinem refertur that is Tho bread is referred to the body of Christ mystically the wine to the bloud and are offered to be considered and also to bee taken spiritually by faith the signes of them which doe lawfully administer the Supper but the things are giuen of the Father and Christ the son the holy Ghost working together with them Seing that Aristotle booke 5. chap. 6. of the Metaphysicks doth teach that there are fower kinds of them which are one In number figure generall Analogie which of these waies is the bread the bodie of Christ Neither in number nor figure nor generall kinde but in analogie or proportion and similitude for they are said to be one in proportion whatsoeuer are compared together betweene themselues as one thing to another according to proportion he saith What things soeuer are as one thing to another are said one in respect Therfore the bread and body of Christ or the bread of life are one thing in proportion because both of them doe giue sustenance that is nourishment and increase to a man but that to the bodie but this to the faithfull soule So the wine of the Lord and the bloud of the Lord are one in proportion because they quench thirst and doe refresh but that the bodie this the faithfull soule Whether can that supernaturall coniunction whereby the Deitie of Christ is personally conioyned with the humanity or that miraculous whereby God hauing taken some visible shapes disclosed himselfe to some men as when God is said to haue appeared to Moses in a flame of fire in a bush a Exod. 3 2 or when the holy Ghost descended vpon Christ in the shape of a Doue Mat. 3.16 or when it was giuen to the Disciples by the breathing of Christ and with firie tongues Iohn 20.22 Act. 2.3 take place here No because the the personall vnion and the Sacramentall vnion doe differ in the whole kinde and because the condition of that bread should be better then of all the faithfull men to whom the bodie of Christ is vnited not personally but only mystically Moreouer the body of Christ is one thing which cannot bee in many places God or the holy Spirit another thing which is euery where And besides we may not argue from that which is done against order by miracle to that which is ordinary in the Church of God of which sort is the Supper of the Lord according to his owne precept Doe this Finally neither that Doue which Iohn Baptist saw descending from heauen vpon Christ nor that breath wherewith he breathed vpon his Disciples nor the fierie tongues which sate vpon each of the Disciples were God or the holy Ghost essentially or had the holy Spirit in them but were signes of that spirit both in Christ and also in the Disciples Is it true in all things that those things which are ioyned by Gods ordinance in a peculiar manner are affirmed one of another as This man is God the Doue is the Holy Ghost No otherwise we might say truely in a man The soule is the bodie and in Christ The Humanitie is the Diuinitie and in a fired sword the sword is the fire or the fire is the sword which yet no man doth grant But it is true chiefly in the propositions concerning the person of Christ when as for the same substantial word they put in concrete words as wel this man as this God But the personall vnion is not placed in the Sacrament wherefore it cannot bee that that should be alike true This man is God that This bread is the body of Christ Moreouer in symbolicall and Sacramentall speaches as we read that the holy Ghost was seene of Iohn descending like a Doue because the Doue was the signe of the Holy Ghost and so we grant that the bread is the bodie of Christ But concerning a vessell of wine we say truely but yet figuratiuely This is wine seing that there are two substances their ioyned and as it were the thing contained in the thing containing as also of an Angell appearing in mans shape it might bee saide This is an Angell but as a thing in a place which that it cannot be said of the body of Christ in the bread hath beene alreadie proued at large Why therefore are the Sacramentall signes called Exhibitiue Because the Lord doth so truely exhibit and giue himselfe being the bread celestiall â—ucer comment vpon the Ephes and that of eternall life to those which are his like as he gaue truly to his Disciples the holy Ghost by the signe of the breath of his mouth or as by the touching of the hand hee gaue vnto many health of bodie and minde as sight by clay made of spittell as by circumcision of the flesh the circumcision of the heart and as by baptisme Regeneration For they which with a true faith doe communicate with the signes corporally doe receiue true confirmation and increase of the communion of the bodie and bloud of the Lord spiritually But Irenaeus saith that the Eucharist doth consist of two things of an Earthly and a Heauenly Rightly yet we must not thinke that it is compounded or whole altogether substantiall or some subsisting thing made of whole parts as a man of bodie and of soule and the bodie of an head and a trunke but it is a holy action or a diuine ordinance wherein at one time but not in one place diuers things are distinctly propounded and deliuered no otherwise then as a pledge being deliuered or the earnest of any thing the thing it selfe was wont to be deliuered also together To what purpose commaunded the Lord to make his Supper Not for an vnbloudy oblation of his body to God the Father for the sinnes of the quick and dead or for a Scenical representation of the death of Christ but for a commemoration of his death for he saith Doe this in remembrance of me that is to say to bee celebrated in the assembly of the faithfull to that end a Luke 22 19. to which purpose also serueth the words of Paule verse 26. declaring what that is In remembrance of me For as often as ye shall eate of this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lords death vntill he come Verse 25. That is 1 Cor. 11.24 call to minde and speake of the whole obedience of Christ and all his benefits with a thankfull mind
vpon the Sacrament doth cease For the Sacraments are religious and continuall actions to which signes are added not that the minde should stay it selfe in them but that they might moue them to whom they are giuen to thinke vpon and doe another thing 2 Is is manifest also out of the word of God that it was plainely forbidden of the Lord that any of the Paschall Lamble being the expresse type of our Eucharist and of Manna should be kept till the next day vndoubtedly that the least entrance to superstition might be shut vp 3 And this worshipping of bread Dan. chap. 11.38 Doth attribute to Antichrist when he saith He shall honour the God Mauzzim as if he should say Missarie that is to say crustie or breaden In Gold and siluer and precious things 4 Neyther said Christ lift vp offer lay vp carie about worship but take eate drinke in remembrance of me What is the second end That the Lord may visibly represent his inuisible giftes neere to all the senses to the sight to the hearing to the taste to the feeling that the whole man being mooued in bodie and soule may celebrate this most pleasant and holy thing with greater ioy Which is the third end That it may be an effectuall token symbole pledge testification and confirmation of our communion coniunction and incorporation with Christ the head and by him as it were by a Mediator with the Father and the holy Ghost a 1 Ioh. 1.3 Of which end the Apostle saith the cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ and the bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ 1. Cor. 10.16 that is to say Metonymically like as the Gospell is called the power of God to saluation Rom. 1.16 That is an effectuall instrument of God which ende the promise of the Lord doth also note Iohn 6.56 Hee that eateth my flesh dwelleth in mee and I in him Of how many sorts is the coniunction of our nature with Christ 1 Threefold the first is of natures that is of our nature by Incarnation but yet in the particular and truly of the seede alone of Abraham and a ioyning together of the diuine nature in the person of the sonne into one person b Ioh. 1.14 Heb. 2.14 16 which is called Hypostaticall and according to this we say that the sonne of God is of our flesh and of our bones because hee tooke flesh of our kinde 2 There is a ioyning together of our persons but yet being absent and on pilgrimage from the Lord and of the person of Christ God and man yea of both natures both of the Diuine and of the humane nature of Christ into one mysticall bodie which in regard of the extreams See Zanch. his Spiritual mariage betwixt Christ his church his comment vpon Eph. 5. de communione cum Christo is called Substantiall Essential but in regard of the bond or manner whereby the extreames are vnited meerely spirituall and mysticall that is to say secret Whereupon dependeth the participation of the operation and of the graces of Christ that is of remission of sinnes of regeneration and of life eternall Concerning which 1. Cor. 1.9 God is faithfull by whom ye are called vnto the fellowship of his sonne Iesus Christ our Lord. And according to this wee are said to be of his flesh and of his bones not in respect that we are men but in regard that wee are Christians and ingrafted into Christ and by this Christ is the Spouse of one Church that is of all the Elect a Eph. 5.30 3 And there is a coniunction of our persons but present with the Lord and of the person of Christ into one glorious bodie and that is called glorious Of which coniunctions the third dependeth vpon the second and the second vpon the first What doth the word Felowship signifie in the saying of Paule b 1 Cor 1.9 that is which coniunction of those three doth it signifie Not the concord or coniunction of consent and will onely but the habitation and dwelling c 2 Cor. 6 6. and consociation or participation of our persons with Christs person Although 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is participation doth seeme to be referred properly to the signes and to the seuerall persons eating the same bread but yet broken and distributed seuerally by parts as the same Apostle noteth 1. Cor. 10 17. as Chrysostome interprets it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Because we all are partakers of one bread But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Felowship is to be referred to whole Christ to be applied to themselues by faith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is participation may be an exception of the part but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is fellowship a fruition and possession of the whole And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is participation may be said of the signes taken by parts but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is felowship of the thing signified that is to say whole Christ Verily how straight this is it is euident Ex nomine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is by the name of vnitie or coniunction which Christ vnfolding saith I desire of thee O father that they which thou hast giuen me may be one as thou O Father art in mee and I in thee euen that they also may be one in vs. Iohn 17.21 Else where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifye both fellowship in prayers and in breaking of bread and also almes or contribution or collation or abilitie d act 2 42 Rom. 15.26 2 Cor 8 4 Heb. 13.16 and also consent in doctrine Gal. 2.9 What is it to communicate with Christ It is not onely to professe Christ or onely to communicate with his incarnation whereby he was made a certaine one thing in speciall with all mankind although this incarnation be the foundation of this Vnion whereof wee intreat neyther onely in affection in loue in consent and concord to bee vnited to Christ nor to communicate only with the merits of Christ But it is to haue Christ dwelling and liuing in vs and vs to dwell and liue in Christ a Ioh. 6.55 and that in verie deed as Chrysostome speaketh and naturally as Cyrill saith that is in the verie communication also of the humane nature of Christ to be vnited and ioyned with Christ to cleaue to him and Christ to bee made ours and wee in like manner to bee made Christs and moreouer to bee nourished with Christ or to be ioyned to him to be ingrafted into him so that more more growing vp into his mystical bodie in one spirit we be members of his bodie b 1 Cor. 6.15 of his flesh and of his bones And that we may all meete together in the vnitie of faith and knowledge of the Sonne of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the
by faith and ouerthrew their enemies But wee must remember this withall that a wise man must first trie all meanes before he goe to warre And the magistrate must beware that he be not therein led by his owne lusts or by any wicked or corrupt affection but as Augustine saith Let him euen pitie the common nature in that man in whom he punisheth his proper and particular offence And lastly the warre must be iust As for that speach Math. 26.52 He that smiteth with the sword shall perish by the sword It is to be vnderstood of him to whom the sword is not deliuered by the Lord that is to say hee that without any superiour authoritie commanding or granting the same vnto him doth vsurpe the sword to smite another man And to Peter being a shepheard of soules and a preacher of the Gospell it was said Put vp thy sword into his sheath as in like manner that 2. Tim. 2.4 is spoken to ministers No man that warreth entangleth himselfe with the affaires of this life Onely they may with their exhortations and prayers be helpefull vnto them that fight iust battels as Iosh 6.8 commaundement is giuen that the Priests should blowe the Trumpets in the time of warre Lastly that speach of the Prophet Micah prophecying of the kingdome of Christ Micah 4.4 They shall breake their swords into mattockes and their speares into sithes nation shall not lift vp a sword against natiō nor learne to fight is meant of the Christiās and thereby is shewed what their behauiour and endeuour shall be and ought to be among the Gentiles namely that they shall seeke loue and peace and concord which all they doe that embrace Chrst Iesus the Prince of peace with a true faith but outwardly to defend themselues against wicked men is not forbidden How many sorts of warre be there Two Spirituall and Carnall Spirituall is that kinde of warre or combat which the spirit hath against the flesh the diuell and the world a Gal. 5.17 In which warre faith in Christ Iesus the word of God a care zeal of iustice such like vertues are weapōs necessary for vs but they are spirituall weapons b Eph. 6.13 2 Cor. 10 4 1 Thess 5.8 The carnall warre is that which is fought with carnal weapons And the battell is the verie fight conflict of disagreeing persons among themselues this later the Graecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fight the former is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 warre What is politicall or carnall warre It is a lawfull defence or a lawfull recouery of those things which are wrongfully taken away or a iust and due punishment which is inflicted by a mans owne magistrate by force and by corporall weapons Which are iust warres 1 Those which without the manifest danger of the whole common wealth and of the common safetie cannot bee pretermitted 2 Those which are commaunded by the chiefe magistrate to whom the care of the commonwealth is committed or else by him that hath the gouernment thereof vnder him and in this case the priuate person must follow that commission that he hath receiued of his superiour magistrate for this action of warre is the principall part of the higher power 3 The warre must be vndertaken vpon a cause iust and necessarie and agreeable to the word of God 4 The warre must first be denounced to the enemie and the matters for which they warre must first be rehearsed that is to say there must be no warlike action vsed nor hostilitie performed vntill first the Heralds that is the publike messengers of armes and of warre haue denounced the same vnto the enemie and offered conditions of peace a Deut. 20 10 Gen. 11.12 5 They must be made with a right intention not in desire to hurt or in crueltie but labouring for peace and to bridle the wicked and relieue the good For as Augustine saith Men doe not seeke peace to the intent to make warre Libro 5. de verbis dōini but they make warre to the intent to seeke peace Which are iust and necessarie causes of warre The remote causes are peace in time to come and the amendement of our enemies against whom wee fight and by whom wee haue beene vniustly iniured and prouoked a Math. 5 9 23 The propinque or immediate causes are the requiring againe of the thing that is vniustly taken from vs and not restored or of the iniurie or contumely but chiefely the repulse punishment and reuenge of the offence that is committed against vs b Gen. 19.15 20.1 2 Sam. 10.6 7 And lastly the necessarie defence of those that are in league with vs or beeing in our armie are in some extreame daunger Is it lawfull to defend true Religion with weapons It is lawfull so to doe against those that are of other countries that haue no authoritie ouer vs yea and against any part of the Commonwealth which goeth about to ouerthrow the true Religion being once receiued by the publike consent of all estates of the land c Ios 22.10 11.12 2 K. 23.15 In this regard it was lawfull for Constantine to defend the Christians against Licinius his fellow in office For so God commaundeth in the law Deut. 13.14 to slay the inhabitants of that Citie within our dominions with the edge of the sword which shall worship other Gods and continue obstinately in their wickednesse and much more iust then and more necessarie is it to resist them that would force vpon vs strange Gods and wicked superstitions and take away the wholesome doctrine of the word of God or infect it with the brainsicke conceits of mens traditions And this the law of nature approueth which teacheth vs that wee owe all we haue to God and by which the Athenians in times past being enlightened did publikly bind their Citizens by an oth that they should fight for their Gods and for their Temples and holy rites both with themselues and with others But the Lord hath not commaunded his seruants to inuade other countries or to make warre for idolatrie but commaundeth his people to ouerthrow the Altars within their owne lands and territories a Deut 7.1 5 Neyther hath Christ commaunded vs for the propagation of religion to make warre vpon forraine countries which are not subiect vnto vs but to teach them and to preach the gospell vnto them and where the gospell is not receiued to flie and giue place Math. 10.23 Are those iust actions that doe accompanie and are incident to warre namely spoyles ambushes besiegings slaughter taking away their furniture and such other Calamities which are vsually done to the enemie in time of warre They are iust actions if the cause of the warre at first were iust Epist 105 ad Bonif. if that were vniust they are also vniust But yet Saint Augustine telleth vs that It is not sufficient that the warre be iust vnlesse it be also iustly performed Which that it may be