a sonne and a man and yet the manhoode or to be a man is one thing the fatherhoode or to bee a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhoode and fatherhoode is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectiuely as in regard of his Sonne Of the worde essence also it is furder to be noted that God or the Deitie or diuine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is vnchaungeable neither is compounded of matter and forme Therefore we cannot say wel Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indiuisible Wherefore it is not well saide that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for euery person is the whole diuine essence one and the same Neither is it as the general to the speciall because the persons are not specials but indiuiduals Neither is it simplie as the special to the indiuiduals because the diuine essence it selfe is indiuiduall or one in number and the persons are not another or a diuerse or a separated thing from the essence but euery person is that essence Therefore it is well said God or the Diuine essence is the father is the sonne is the holy ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Againe they are one and the same essence nature diuinity wisedome c. They are of one or the same essence nature diuinitie c. Yet it cannot bee saide well they are of one God Wherefore the diuine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular maner communicated in respect of those things vnto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to manie specials a general and special to manie indiuiduals but yet so that they are affirmed of those manie plurallie not singularlie as that the father and the sonne or this father and sonne are two liuing creatures two men But wee maie not speake after this sort of God and the diuine persons as to saie the father and the sonne are two Gods two spirites two omnipotentes c. Because there is but one GOD one spirite one omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation the father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the indiuidual which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his indiuiduall but is not at al the same nor of the same kind 6 Whether these names are to be vsed in the Church THese names are to be vsed and reteined in the church Obiection But these names namely Essence person and Trinitie are not in the Scripture therefore they ought not to be vsed and reteined in the Church Answere These names which are not in the Scripture neither the words themselues nor the sense of them are not to be vsed but both the names them selues of essence and person are found in the Scripture and the thing also or the doctrine it selfe concerning them The name Essence is expressed by the name of Iehoua which is frequent in the Scripture Likewise by the name of Beeing which often also offereth it selfe in the Scripture Exod. 3.14 I am that I am Reuel 1.8 Which is and which was and which is to come The woorde Person is expressed by the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 13. which woord is there interpreted Person The ingraued forme of his person The name of Trinitie is signified 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare recorde in heauen the father the woorde and the holie ghost and these three are one And this for the names themselues Now for the thing As often as is mentioned one Iehoua so often is mentioned one essence As often as the Father the Sonne and the holie ghost is called Iehoua so often the three persons of the Diuinitie are expressed that is three subsisting three vnderstanding c. And this aunswere yeeldeth the first cause why these woordes ought to bee reteined in the Church because namelie they are extant in the holie Scripture either in woordes or in sense and meaning The Second cause is because they are fit to expound the phrase and speech of the Scripture vnto the vnlearned And furder if no woordes were to bee vsed but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation shoulde bee taken away For interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture bee expounded to the vnlearned by such words as being more vsual in other languages or matters doctrines are more easie for them to vnderstand paueth and maketh plaine away vnto them for the vnderstanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture The third cause is that the sleights and sophismes of heretiques which for the most part they goe about to cloake and couer with the woords of holie Scripture are more easily espied and taken heede of if the same things bee expounded in diuerse woordes and those especiallie short perspicuous and significant So the sectaries and followers of Seruetus do confesse that the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost are one God but not one in essence but by propagation that is that they are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in substance but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like in substance Likewise they graunt the Sonne to be true God but they deny him to bee the same in substance with his father But therefore is it that heretiques will none of the Churches phrase speech because they dislike the thing it selfe For if there were a consent an according in the thinges we shoulde easily come to an agreement about the woordes 7 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or God-head IN one diuine essence are subsisting three persons Three persons are one God and one God is three persons and those truely distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternal infinit most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall and coeternal without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without anie disparagement or inequalitie betweene them And that there are three persons each of which are that one true God creatour of all thinges is prooued first by testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the olde Testament and partly out of the newe The old Testament yeeldeth vs many testimonies Gen. 1.2 The spirite of God mooued vpon the waters Then God said let there be light Exod. 3.2 The Lorde is
it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authoritie then the expresse sentence of the Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the controuersies of the Church must bee at length determined Aun Not the Church but the holie ghost is iudge in the word and that according to the Sentence of that iudge of whom wee may bee certainlie assured that we can not be deceaued So wee acknowledge this iudge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himself speaking vnto vs in the Scripture and declaring his owne woords For he is the supreme iudge whose iudgement the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he can not bee deceaued whereas all men are subiect vnto the daunger of error in a word he being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his owne words And therefore the Scripture it selfe in al doubtes recalleth vs and bindeth vs vnto it selfe as 2. Pet. 1. We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which yee doe wel that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a dark place Iohn 5. Search the Scriptures Esay 8 To the Lawe and to the Testimonie if they speake not according to this word The Church doth not alwaies speake the words of the holie Ghost it is because there is no light in them For although the holie Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost she can not be the supreme chiefe iudge of controuersies in Religion For this iudge must be such a one whose sentence may by no means bee called in question But wee haue none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Deciding of controuersies is not taken away Neither doe we at all take away the deciding of controuersies when wee make Scripture iudge of the meaning of the scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seeke sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet doe they this against their conscience and the louers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and doe acknowledge and confesse themselues to be plentifully satisfied by it For whereas vnto men also it is graunted to bee themselues the best interpreters of their own wordes how much more ought this honor to bee yeelded vnto the holy Scripture The way how to decide doubtful places 1 The Analogy of faith Wherefore if controuersie be mooued concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to doe that here which we would doe in other writinges First of all to consider and respect the anologie of faith that is to receiue no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of faith or commaundement of the Decalog or against any plaine testimonie of Scripture 1 Cor. 3. 2 Examining of Antecedents Consequents euen as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hey stubble vpon the foundation Secondly to weigh the thinges that goe before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be faigned on it but also that that may bee set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not beeing obserued or beeing dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraued Psalm 91. So those words of the Psalme Hee shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee that they shall beare thee in their handes that thou hurte not thy foote against a stone The Diuell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they serued to maintaine ouer-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to bee vnderstood of men doing those thinges that are proper vnto their calling Thirdly 3 Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly wee ought to search euery where in the Scripture whether there bee extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may bee shewed that the same doctrine in other woordes is deliuered touching the same matter which is conteined in that place which is in controuersie For if the meaning of the clearer and vndoubted place be manifest vnto vs wee shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught as when Rom. 3. it is said We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe That in this place to be iustified by faith is not to please God for the worthines of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the woorkes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places doe teach vs which in moe and clearer woordes deliuer the same doctrine concerning the iustification of man before God as in the same chapter By the woorkes of the Law shall no flesh bee iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnes of the Law and of the Prophets The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon al that beleeue for there is no difference For all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorie of God and are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus 4 Conferring like places togither Fourthly wee must conferre places of Scripture where though the same woords bee not spoken of the same thing yet the like woordes and formes of speaking are vsed of the like thinges For if the interpretation of the like place bee certaine and there bee the same causes for the like interpretation to bee giuen in the place that is in controuersie which are in the other then of like places wee must giue one and the same iudgement The Lord willeth Mat. 5. to put out our eie to cut off our hand if it be a cause of offence vnto vs. Now whereas the Law forbiddeth vs to maime our bodie Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would haue vs that wee should rather forsake thinges most deere vnto vs then that by the lust and motion of thē wee should suffer our selues to be withdrawen from God the like forme of speech otherwhere vsed to signifie things most deer and precious doth shew as Ierem. 22. If Iechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence And Deut. 32. Hee kept him as the apple of his eie 5 The catholike Church When once according to these rules the controuersie concerning the text meaning thereof is iudged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt not without great aduisement For least by the name of the Church we be beguiled first of all no sentence or
but now they are different and diuers in vs. For Iustification now is the imputatiō of Christs righteousnes whereby we are accounted righteous before God Sanctification is the working of a conformity with god in vs which conformitie is here vnperfect but shal be perfected in the life to come where holines righteousnes shal be againe one the same euen in vs. The sūme is In the person of the mediatour three things are to be considered which all the scripture ascribeth to Christ alone First that hee is God which many places of the scripture do confirme As Ioh. 1.2.3 The word was God All thinges were made by him Act. 20.28 God purchased the Church with his bloud Rom. 1.4 Who was declared mightilie to be the Sonne of God touching the spirit of Sanctification Rom. 10.11 Whosoeuer beleeueth in him shall not be ashamed 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which bear record in heauen the father the word and the holie Ghost these three are one To these also are to bee added those places in which is attributed to Christ diuine worship inuocation hearing of our praiers workes proper to God alone In like manner those which attribute vnto Christ the name Iehoua Hierem. 23. Zach. 2. Math. 3. Likewise those in which those thinges which are spoken of Iehoua are applied to Christ as Isai 6.9 and Ioh. 12.40 c. Secondly that he is true man Hither belong those places which call Christ man the son of man as when Math. 1.1 he is called the sonne of Dauid the sonne of Abraham Luc. 1.31 The fruite of the wombe And when Romans 1.3 9.5 he is said to be made of the seede of Dauid according to the flesh As also to haue a bodie of flesh not to be an imaginarie but a true bodie 1. Iohn 4.2 Euerie spirite that confesseth that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God Hither belong also those places which attribute vnto Christ things proper vnto man as to grow to eat to drink to be ignorant of some thing to rest to be wearie to be baptised to bee circumcised to lament reioice c. Thirdly that two natures in Christ make one person Hither are referred the places which by communicating of the properties of each nature attribute those to his diuine nature which are proper to his humane nature and so contrariwise As Ioh. 1.14 The word was made flesh Heb. 2.14 He was made partaker of flesh and bloud Act. 20.28 God purchased the Church with his bloud Ioh. 8.58 Before Abraham was I am Mat. 28.20 I am with you alway vntil the end of the world Heb. 12. Hee spake vnto vs by his sonne by whom he made the world 1. Ioh. 4.3 Iesus Christ is come in the fleshe Roman 9.5 Christ is God ouer all blessed for euer Amen 6 That there is but one Mediatour There can bee but one mediatour because there is but one natural Sonne of God THere is but one mediatour 1. Tim. 2.6 The reason is because the Sonne onely is mediatour and can performe the office of the mediatour And there is but one onely naturall Sonne of God 1 Obiect The Saintes also make intercession for vs. Therefore they also are mediatours Answ There is a difference betweene the intercession of Christ and of the Saintes who liue in the world and pray for others yea for their persecutours and for vnbeleeuers For the Saints depend vpon the merit of Christ Christ offered himselfe a suertie and a satisfier he sanctifieth himselfe for vs that is presenteth himself in our steed 2 Obiect Where are manie meanes there is not one mediatour But there are manie meanes of our saluation Therefore there is not one onely mediatour Answ The Maior proposition wee denie For it is one thing to be a meanes another thing to be the mediatour of our saluation OF THE COVENAVNT IT was said The couenant is that reconciliation which Christ the mediatour hath wrought between God and man that the mediatour is a person reconciling parties which are at variance Nowe this reconciliation in the scriptures is termed the Couenaunt and Testament which is the correlatiue that is hath a mutuall respect to the mediatour Wherefore the Doctrine which treateth of the Couenaunt is linked with the place concerning the mediatour because euerie mediatour is the mediatour of some Couenaunt and a reconciler of parties who are at enmitie The chiefe questions are 1 What a Couenaunt is 2 Whether it can be made without a mediatour 3 Whether there be but one and the same Couenaunt or more 4 In what the old and new Couenaunt agree and in what they differ 1 WHAT A COVENAVNT IS A Couenaunt in generall signifieth a mutuall promise or agreement betweene the parties who are ioined in that Couenaunt whereby is made a bond or obligation for the performance of certaine thinges on both parts solemne ceremonies and tokens beeing added thereto to testifie and confirme that promise and agreement For the making therefore declaring confirming of a Couenaunt serue mutual promises and outward signes and tokens of the Couenaunt A Testament is called the last will of a Testator whereby he at his death disposeth of his thinges what he woulde haue done concerning them this is ratified by the death of the Testator In speciall the Couenaunt betweene God and men is a mutual promise and agreement made by our Mediatour confirmed by othes and solemne tokens which we call Sacraments whereby God bindeth himselfe to remit their sins vnto them that beleeue and to giue them euerlasting life for by his son our Mediator men bind themselues to receiue this so great a benefite with faith and to yeeld true obedience vnto God which is to liue according to his will that so they may declare their thankefulnes vnto god The summe is This Couenaunt is gods bond to yeelde vs his grace and fauour and of the otherside our bond to receiue this grace by faith and to yeelde new obedience Why the reconciliation between God and vs is called a couenaunt Furthermore the name of Couenaunt and Testament shew the same thing to wit our reconcilement with God or the mutuall agreement betweene God and men This reconcilement is called a Couenaunt because as it hath been said both God vnto vs we vnto god haue promised certain things to be performed of both parts adding certaine signes and pledges of this our mutuall agreement Why also it is called a Testament It is called a Testament because this reconciliation was made by the death of the Testator Christ comming between that so it might be firme and ratified It could not haue bin a Testament except Christ the Testator had died For while the Testator liueth he retaineth a right to change detract or adde any thing This reason is alleadged in the epistle to the Hebrews cap. 9.16.17 The Testament saith the Apostle is confirmed when men are dead For it is yet of no force
but not to be able to be hindered 6 More Gods would be either vnperfect or superfluous 6 It is not lawfull to imagine god to be such a one as sufficeth not for the wielding and menaging of all things neither such a one as is superfluous or idle without manifest impietie and absurditie seing there is nothing superfluous or idle in god But if there be put more gods either each of them will be too weake to rule all and so imperfect and not worthie of the title and name of diuinitie or one will suffice for the guiding of the whole world and so the rest shall bee idle superfluous and needelesse Wherefore there must needes bee but one god that hee alone may suffice for all 7 There can bee but one infinite 7 There can be but one infinite for if there were more infinites none shoulde bee present euerie where and rule all Wherefore there cannot be more but one onelie god which is infinite 8 There is but one first cause of al things God is that first cause 8 But one first cause How many are called Gods in scripture Therefore he is but one Obiect Manie are called Gods Psal 82.6 I haue said yee are gods 1. Cor. 8.5 Manie are and are called gods in heauen and in earth Exod. 7.1 Moses is called Pharaos god Likewise the gods of the heathen Therefore there is not one god onely Ans There is an ambiguity double signification of this word God which sometimes signifieth him who is by nature god and hath his being not froÌ„ anie thing but from himself and by himselfe and all other thinges are from him Such a God is but one onely Sometimes it betokeneth not the verie Diuine Eternall and immense Essence but a god either so entitled for some similitude of the Diuine properties dignitie and diuine office and function Or an imaginarie and faigned god Such Gods are manie First Iudges and Magistrates are entitled and called gods not that they haue the Diuine Essence communicated vnto them and are by nature GOD but because they beare a Diuine office and function that is because they are the Deputies and Vicegerents of GOD by whom as by his instrumentes and seruaunts hee exerciseth his power and iudgementes here on earth and therefore dooth furnish and arme them with Wisedome Fortitude Power Authoritie and Maiestie as much as is necessarie and sufficient to bridle the mindes of the multitude beeing desirous of licenciousnes and to holde and keepe them in feare and obedience hee dooth also vouchsafe them the honour of his name that the Subiectes may thereby know that they haue to deale not with men but with GOD himselfe whose Vicegerents they are whether they obeie their Magistrate or repine against him Rom. 13.2 Whosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God Secondly The Angels also are called Gods both for the excellencie of their nature and giftes power and wisedome as also for the diuine office and function which God exerciseth by them in this world in defending the godly and punishing the wicked Thirdly The Diuel is called the God of the world for his great potencie and power which hee hath ouer men and other creatures by the iust iudgement of God 2. Cor. Ephes 6. Nowe Idols are called Gods by a figuratiue spâ—â—che of imitation imitating and following therein the opinion of men who saigne a diuinitie in creatures feare them trust in them and rest on them Exod. 20.3 Thou shalt haue none other Gods before me Philip. 3.9 whose God is their bellie 4 What these words Essence Person Trinitie betoken signifie The explication of these wordes serue much for the vnderstanding of the vnconceiueable mystery of the Trinitie and therefore is it not to bee read with a running eye ESsence as it is vsed in this doctrine for substaunce is a thing subsisting by it selfe that is a thing hauing a proper beeing not sustained in another although it bee communicated to moe That is saide to be communicable or communicated which is common or may bee made common to moe That is saide to bee incommunicable which is not in moe neither can bee affirmed of moe Mans essence is communicable and common to manie men but this essence is in generall common not in particular and in number that is the nature and essence of all men is in generall one but not one in number for euerie man hath his Essence distinct from others neither are all one man but manie men But the Essence of God is communicable in particular because the selfesame Deitie in number and that whole and entire is common to the three persons is the substance of the three persons and therefore the three persons are that one God who created all thinges not three gods A person is a thing subsisting indiuiduall liuing vnderstanding incommunicable not susteined in another neither part of another Subsisting By which word is signified that it is not an accident cogitation decree vanishing sound or any created qualitie or motion Indiuiduall Not any generall but a particular one in number and therefore vndiuidable and called indiuiduall Liuing No inanimat thing which hath no life as a stone Vnderstanding A thing which hath sense onely as are brute beastes who are thinges liuing and sensible but not vnderstanding and therefore are no persons Incommunicable Not the diuine Essence which is common to three not the substaunce of mans nature or any other thing created which is communicated to the thing begotten thereof or thence deriued Not susteined in another Not the human nature of Christ because this is personallie susteined of the word that is so that it together with the word is the substaÌ„ce of one Christ except it were subsisting in the word should not at al be Neither part of another Not the soule of man which as long as it is conteined in the bodie is part of man 5 What difference betweene Essence and Person IN the Church Essence is the verie being of God Person is the manner of his being which manner of being is threefold and so maketh three Persons by the name of Essence is vnderstood that which God the eternâ—â—â—â—ther and Sonne and holy Ghost eache of them aâ—â—â—n themselues absolutely and is common to them three euen the verie eternal and one onely Deitie or the verie being of God By the name of Person is signified the manner after which that beeing or Essence of God is in eache of these three or the proper and seuerall manners of eache of their beeings That is Person is that which eache of these three are respectiuely or being compared one to the other or is that very being of god considered respectiuely to one and another and distinct by a proper and peculiar manner of beeing and subsisting from the others Wherefore in number there is one and the same Being or Essence in God that is in each of these three who are god but it is after a
he was borne of the substance of the Virgin pure from al stain or corruption and so was personally vnited with the Word Obiection Euerie sonne is either natural or adopted Christ according to his humanitie is not the naturall sonne of god hee is therefore the sonne of god by adoption Aunswere The Maior of this reason albeit it may be graunted according to ciuil constitutions yet is it false in diuinitie because it compriseth not a perfect and sufficient enumeration of the sonnes of God For there are sonnes of God by grace as the Angels Iob. 1.6 likewise Christ according to his humanity which yet are not adopted sonnes Replie Grace is adoption Christ according to his humanitie is the sonne of GOD by grace therefore hee is the sonne of GOD by adoption Answere The Maior of this reason either is particular and so nothing is inferred thereby or if it be generallie taken it is a fallacie For grace is more large in signification then is adoption and is in respect of adoption as a generall in respect of a speciall For besides the grace of adoption there is also the grace of creation in respect of God creating and conforming Angels and men vnto himselfe the grace of conception and vnion in respect of God the Father the sonne and the holy Ghost forming and fashioning after a singular maner the flesh of CHRIST in the wombe of the Virgine and vniting it vnto the sonne 3 Why Christ is called the onelie begotten and first begotten sonne of God Christ is the onely begotten sonne of God according to his Godhead onely CHrist is called the onelie begotten sonne of God according to his diuine nature Because according to this he alone onely was from euerlasting begotten of the substaunce of his father and therefore hath no brethren of this generation and nature For of no other it is saide that the father giueth him to haue life in himselfe and again that in him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie Obiect He that hath brethren is not the onelie begotten Christ hath brethren Therefore he is not the onelie begotten sonne of god Aunsw The Maior is to be distinguisted He that hath brethren to wit of the same generation and nature hee is not the onely begotten Christ hath brethren but not of the same generation and nature because not any haue been begotten from euerlasting of the substance of God the father Therefore he is the onely begotten son of God in respect of his Godhead Replie He that hath a generation or begetting vnlike to the generation of other sonnes is in respect thereof said to be the onelie begotten Christ according to his humanity hath a generation vnlike to the generation of other sonnes of God Therefore Christ is called not in respect of anie eternall but of this temporall and miraculous generation the onelie begotten Aunswere The Maior is true of such a son as hath a generation vnlike in the whole kinde that is both in nature and in the manner of the generation But Christ according to his humanitie hath a generation diuers from vs not as concerning his nature the terme or ende of his generation but onely in respect of the manner For hee is true man Why Christ according to his manhood cannot bee called the onely begotten hauing a humane nature the same altogether with ours in kinde but borne after a singular manner of the virgin by the operation of the holy Ghost Wherefore according to his humanitie hee cannot bee called the onely begotten sonne of GOD. 1. Because according to this nature hee hath brethren of the same generation and nature Heb. 2.11.14 2. Because neither the scripture neither the Church vseth anie such forme of speech 3. Because the word onelie begotten doth not designe the peculiar manner of his conception and generation but the verie nature or essence it selfe which by generating that is by begetting and by waie of birth is produced The first begotten not the first created hee is called according to both natures Christ called the first begotten according to both natures According to his godhead both in respect of time and of worthines because he before all was begotten from euerlasting of the father and is perfect God and all were made by him and by and for him are deliuered and receiue the right of sonnes According to his humanitie also he is called the first begotten in respect of his worthinesse onelie and right 1. Because he was begotten after a singular manner 2 Because he hath his subsistence in the person of the Word to the vnitie whereof the humanitie was assumed 3. Because he hath by his merite purchased the right of sonnes for others 4. Because in gifts workes maiestie authoritie he vnspeakablie excelleth all the sonnes of God euen Angels themselues and it Lord and head of thē all Vnto Christ therefore in respect of his humanitie agreeth this which of old was signified by the type of the first born For after the decease of the father the first-born took two portiōs of his fathers goods when as the rest had each but one Now the cause of that right was his office and function For hee succeeded into the roome of his father so that hee had authoritie ouer his family and the rest of his brethren and did beare rule ouer them Gen. 27. 29. 37. So Christ the sonne of GOD hath also right according to his humanitie ouer the rest of his bretheren and all the sonnes of God and he but one hath receiued moe and more excellent giftes than haue all the rest because hee is the Lord of his fathers house the rest are his ministers Nowe because wee cannot beleeue that Christ is the only begotten son of God and much lesse can beleeue in this only begotten son of God vnlesse withal we beleeue that Christ is true God euen that euerlasting Word of the same substaunce dignitie power and nature with the father it remaineth therefore that herein brieflie we deale against the heretiques who impugne it 4. WHETHER CHRIST BE THE SONNE COETERNAL WITH GOD THE FATHER OR OF CHRISTS DIVINITIE WHen the question is made whether Christ be the eternall sonne of god or Whether he be that one true and eternall god these sower thinges are demaunded The first is whether the sonne of god or the Word be a subsistent or hipostasis or person in the flesh before the flesh that is whether in christ man there be besides his soule and body a spiritual nature or substaunce which was also existing before Christ borne of the Virgin and wrought and accomplished the workes of god and is the sonne of god and is so called in scripture That he is a subsistent the church beleeueth and proueth against Samosatenus Photinus Seruetus and others The second is whether hee bee a person truely distinct from the father Wee are to holde that the Word is a person distinct from the father against Noetus and Sabellius who
beginning of the woorlde who knewe GOD aright Therefore in Iesus the Sonne of Marie is another nature besides his fleshe which is the Sonne of GOD and subsisted from the beginning of the woorlde reueiling GOD vnto men not onely to those of the godly who liued since hee tooke fleshe but to those also who liued before it Againe Iohn 3.13.17.19.31 Iohn 16.28 c. Hee is called the sonne who came from heauen who beeing in earth is in heauen who came into the woorlde not as other men from the earth but from aboue out of heauen from the Father So that then hee was before he came into the woorlde But the fleshe of CHRIST is not of heauen neither came it from heauen Therefore there must needes bee another nature in him in respect whereof hee is the onely begotten Sonne of GOD euen before he tooke fleshe of the Virgine Againe He that was manifested in the flesh is GOD 1. Timot. 3. and therefore another nature from the flesh For God is one thing who is manifested and the flesh another thing wherein hee is manifested The Sonne of God is hee that was manifested in the fleshe 1. Iohn 3.5 For this purpose appeared the Sonne of GOD that hee might take away our sinnes and that hee might loose the woorkes of the Diuell Therefore the Son is God and another nature from the flesh that is the man Iesus is the sonne of God in respect not only of his humanity but also of his diuinity which besides and before the fleshe existed in him and by the assumption of the flesh was made as it were visible and conspicuous Wherefore it followeth also and that necessarily that that was a subsistent and a person For that which is by nature a sonne is also a person But Christes diuinitie or nature which was also before his flesh is the Sonne of God by nature Therefore it is a subsistent and a person in the flesh taken or assumpted and before it To the fourth classe belong those places of Scripture The Word is a person before Iesus borne of the Virgin and he is the sonne which affirme Christ man to be the word incarnate The Argument is this The word is a person which both existed before Iesus was borne and now dwelleth personally in the fleshe taken of the Virgine But that word is the Sonne Therefore the sonne is a person The Maior is proued because those thinges are attributed vnto the Word Ioh. 1.1 Ioh. 1 5. Reu. 19. which only agreeth to a thing subsistent liuing intelligent woorking that is to a person For the Woord was before al creatures with the father God by him were al things made hee was autor of al life and light in men hee was in the world from the beginning and not knowen he hath his own country and nation he came vnto it in his name men beleeue he giueth power to be the sons of god to others by his own autority power he doth assume take flesh is therein manifested seen handled conuerseth and dwelleth amongst men The Minor is proued Because the Word is called the onelie begotten Sonne of GOD Iohn 1.14.18.34 Reuelat 2.18 c. And because the same properties are attributed to the Woorde and the Sonne For the Sonne is in the bosome of the Father reueiling GOD vnto men By him the woorlde was created In him is life hee was sent and came from Heauen into the woorlde Hee tooke the seede of Abraham Likewise the life which is the woorde was with the Father before the incarnation and manifestation of Christ Therefore god was euen then the father of the Word and the Word the sonne of god But seeing the newe Arrians doe maruailouslie depraue by their newe and craftie deuised Sophismes this notable place of Iohn concerning the Woorde subsisting before the fleshe borne of the virgine and creating and preseruing all thinges that thereby they might robbe and despoile the Sonne of GOD of his true and eternal deity it seemed good here to adioine those things which Zacharias Vrsinus some yeares since noted drue out as to be opposed against these corruptions and forgeries briefely indeede and barely after the manner of Logicians yet such as are learned and sound whereby also the like corruptions and wrestings of places of holy Scripture may easily be obserued discerned and refuted IOHN purposing to write the Gospell of Christ in the first entrance proposeth the summe of that Doctrine which he purposed to deliuer and confirme out of the storie and Sermons of Christ And seeing the knowledge of Christ consisteth in his person and office The argument of Iohns gospel hee describeth both and sheweth that Christ is the eternall Sonne and Woorde of God the Father who taking fleshe was made man that he might be made a sacrifice for our sinnes and might make vs through faith in him the Sonnes of God and heires of eternall life This Woorde then whom afterwards he calleth the onely begotten Sonne of the Father he saith nowe to haue beene in the beginning which sheweth his eternity These woords of the holie Euangelist they corrupt and depraue who raise againe Samosatenus blasphemies from the pit of hell expounding this beginning of the beginning of the gospels preaching doone by Christ In the beginning was But contrarie S. Iohn and the Church euen from the Apostles and their scholers time doe vnderstand that beginning of the world wherein all things to haue beene first created by GOD Moses in the first Chapter of Genesis recounteth For Iohn saith that the Worlde was made by him and further that euen then in that beginning hee was God and that the true God creator which is onelie one and was in the beginning of the worlde Replie 1. Beginning dooth not signifie eternitie Therefore wee depraue it who so expound it Aunswere Wee doe not so expound it but that euen then in the beginning of the worlde was the Word and therefore was before the creation of the world and whatsoeuer was before this was from euerlasting And so is the scripture wont to speake Eph. 1.4.1 Pet. 1.20 Pro. 8 22 23. c. where wee may see a large place concerning wisedome whose eternitie is there signified in this that it is saide to haue beene before the creation of the worlde Replie 2. Beginning often signifieth the beginning of the gospels preaching Yee were with me from the beginning I said not to you from the beginning Aunswere This sheweth that somtimes it so signifieth but not alwaies And we are stil to conster it of that beginning which the text sheweth As also in other places Reuel 1.8 I am α ω the beginning and the end the first and the last The woorde The corruptors say The man Iesus Christ is called the Woorde because hee speaketh and teacheth the will of the father Wee say that hee is called indeede the Woorde for this cause because hee declareth God his wil but yet in respect
attributed vnto Christ can not bee wrested to any other meaning If therefore wee fence and gard our selues with such testimonies the aduersaries of this Doctrine cannot consist or stand but will they nill they they shall bee forced to confesse that Christ was before hee tooke fleshe And if hee were before hee tooke fleshe hee was either the Creator or a creature But he was no creature both because he created all thinges and because also hee is called creator Wherefore seeing the true GOD hath beene from euerlasting his Godhead also which is true God must needes be subsisting from euerlasting The Minor is likewise confirmed by the former Argument 1. The nature which tooke flesh is GOD and the Sonne of GOD. For neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost tooke flesh Therefore the Sonne otherwise the Sonne of God is not by nature GOD. 2. The humane nature in Christ is not the naturall sonne of GOD. Therefore the Diuine nature must bee that sonne 3. The Diuine nature in Christ is the Worde 4. Jt is Wisedome 5. According to it Christ is Mediatour 6. The Deitie of Christ is the Angel and messenger of the Lord sent of olde vnto the Church Therefore the Deitie of Christ is the sonne of God THE SECOND CONCLVSION The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holie Ghost THat the Worde or sonne of GOD is diuers and distinct from the Father and the Holie Ghost not in office onelie but also in subsistence and Person is prooued by foure Arguments No one person can be both Father and sonne in respect of him selfe 1 None is the same person with him whose sonne hee is or with him who proceedeth or floweth from him Otherwise the same thing in one respect shoulde bee relatiue and correlatiue But the Word is the sonne of the Father and from the Word the Holy Ghost proceedeth and is giuen therefore the Word is neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost 2 Christ himselfe expresselie calleth himselfe another from the Father and the Holie Ghost Iohn 5.32 Christ another from his Father There is another that beareth witnesse of mee namely the Father in the same Chapter vers 37. And John 7.16 My Doctrine is not mine but his that sent me Iohn 14.16 J wil pray the Father and hee shall giue you another comforter 3 The scripture dooth plainelie affirme that the Father Three persons expressed in scripture the sonne and the holie Ghost are three 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare witnesse in heauen the Father the Word and the Spirite and these three are one Gen. 1.26 Let vs make man in our image Iob. 10.30 I and my father are one hee dooth not say am but are Iohn 14.26 The comforter which is the Holie Ghost whom the Father will send in my name hee shall teach you all thinges Ioh. 15.26 When the comforter shall come whom I will send vnto you from the father euen the spirite of truth which proceedeth of the Father hee shall testifie of mee Matthew 28.19 Teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father the sonne and the Holie Ghost 4 The attributes or properties of the Persons namely The properties of the persons are distinct and diuers sending reueiling and their offices are diuers The Argument is this Whose properties are distinct they are in them-selues distinct But the properties of the Father the sonne and the Holie Ghost are distinct therefore the sonne is neither the father nor the Holie Ghost The Minor is prooued because the sonne onely and not the father or the Holie Ghost was begotten of the Father conceiued by the Holie Ghost made flesh sent into flesh manifested in the flesh made Mediatour baptized did suffer and died The Father of himselfe woorketh by the Sonne The Sonne not of him-selfe but of the Father by the Holy Ghost the Holy Ghost of the father and of the sonne Matthew 11.27 No man knoweth the sonne but the father neither knoweth anie man the father but the sonne These words cannot be expounded after this sort No man knoweth me but I and no man knoweth me but I. Iohn 10.15 As the father knoweth me so knowe I the Father The sense of these words cannot be this As I knowe mee so I knowe mee The sonne of GOD therefore Christ is another from the father and the holy Ghost THE THIRD CONCLVSION The Word is equall with the Father THat the Word or the sonne of God Christ is no made god or inferiour to the father but by nature true eternal God and equall vnto the father in Godhead and in all essential perfections of the Godhead is confirmed first by testimonies of scripture 1. Iohn 5.20 We are in him that is true that is in his sonne Iesus Christ This same is verie God and eternall life Iohn 16.15 All thinges that the father hath are mine Colos 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnes of the god-head bodilie Iohn 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so hath he also giuen vnto the sonne to haue life in himselfe Phil. 2.6 Who being in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equall with god Iohn 5.19 Whatsoeuer thinges the Father doth the same thinges doth the sonne also that all men shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father But the father is to bee honoured as God Therefore Christ is God equall in honour with the father Christ hath the whole Godhead entirely cōmunicated 2 He that hath the whole Essence of the godhead is necessarilie equall with the father But the sonne of god hath the whole Essence of the godhead communicated vnto him For this because it is infinite is indiuisible Therefore the whole must needes be communicated vnto whomsoeuer it is communicated Therefore the Word or the sonne of god is equall in all thinges with the eternall father in the god-head The minor is prooued Generation or begetting is a communicating of the Essence the Word was generated or begotten of the Essence of the eternall father because he is his sonne proper naturall and onelie begotten Therefore the whole Deitie was communicated vnto the Word 3 The Scripture giueth the same proprieties and perfections of Diuine nature vnto the Sonne which it dooth vnto the Father Hee hath the same properties of the godhead as namelie eternitie omnipotencie immensitie omniscience the searching of the hearts and reines 4 The same woorkes are attributed to the father Hee worketh the same diuine workes and to the sonne as that he is creatour preseruer gouernour of all thinges that he susteineth all thinges by his powerfull woorde Heb. 1.3 that hee is the authour and woorker of miracles Lastly that hee is the giuer of the holie ghost and that he saueth his Church that is hee ordaineth and maintaineth his ministerie and by it through the vertue of the holie ghost is effectuall and forcible in moouing the heartes of men These diuine woorkes
or moe substaunces of the same nature and essence So two men are vnited in naturall properties and perfections because they haue the same in kinde or the like and therefore are of the same humane nature The Aire in the Chimney which getteth the perfections or qualities of the fier as beeing nowe become a flame and the fier of the burning coales which fiereth and inflameth the Aire next vnto it are two substaunces of the same properties and fierie nature and therefore are saide to bee vnited in nature and essentiall properties that is they are two fiers in number but in kinde and nature they are one Likewise the three diuine persons are vnited in essential properties that is haue the same essentiall properties which is nothing else but that they are one essence one and the same God 2 WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN PERSON THOSE things are said to bee vnited in person which are one person that is which although they differ in naturall properties yet exist in one and the same indiuiduall subsistence or haue altogether the same subsistence So the soule and bodie of man are vnited and concurre vnto one person because they beeing vnited doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not susteined in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not vnited in person or personall properties because they haue these not the same but distinct By this which hath beene saide it is manifest That the Vnion in nature and naturall perfections is an equalitie of properties and nature but the personall Vnion is when two vnlike natures are coupled so that each reteineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet haue both one and the same subsistence wholie or it is the ioining of two natures different in properties to constitute the substaunce of one indiuiduall or person that is such a connexion and knitting of them together as that they are one indiuiduall subsisting by it selfe or the substaunce of one indiuiduall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Woorde is not essentiall made in the nature or anie essentiall propertie of the God-head is shewed by these reasons First Of the God-head and the fleshe assumpted there ariseth not anie third Essence but eache is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especiallie the Diuine as beeing in it selfe a person and simplie voide of all change commeth into the composition or compounding as wee properlie take this Word of the other Secondly Jf the Vnion of the fleshe with the Word were essentiall it would follow that the humanitie once assumpted and taken was equalled with the Godhead in essentiall properties and so by a consequent to bee made of the same nature essence with the Word So Vigilius in his fourth booke sheweth that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will haue the essential properties of the Godhead to be reallie communicated and common with the fleshe so that the fleshe shoulde truely and reallie bee and bee called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoeuer else the God-head is they indeede howsoeuer in woordes they mightily stand against it holde this Vnion to bee made in essentiall properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Schwenckfield they confounde both natures and take away the difference betweene the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternitie For albeit they say that they in that their confusion or as themselues call it with their Master Schwenkfield Deifiyng and Maiesticall exaltation of the fleshe doe retaine the substance of the fleshe yet two substaunces hauing reallie the same and like perfections are two Subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoeuer other indiuiduals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinitie For there is one and the same Essence in number of the diuine persons and the same essential properties Wherefore that which is vnited and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needes be also vnited and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Vnion of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper vnto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that vnion their properties whole and vnconfounded For the Word did not by vniting humane nature vnto it make the same the Godhead or GOD and omnipotent immense and infinite but it tooke the manhood which reteineth still the properties belonging vnto it and so did ioine and knitte it vnto it selfe as to bee one person with it and the substaunce of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kinde neither any Homogeneal part thereof shoulde yet exist in the same subsistence with it or shoulde subsist in it selfe where-with it is vnited For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kinde The same is the subsistence both of the sprig engraffed and of the tree susteining the sprig that is they are one and the same indiuiduall tree yet haue they and so doe retaine natures in properties most diuers The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the sonne Obiection The humane nature is vnited with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is diuorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onelie of the sonne is vnited with the humane nature therefore not the diuine nature it selfe of the Word Aunswere In both these Arguments is a fallacie from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sounde in faith either knowe not or are not willing to distinguish betweene these two Phrases of speech To bee vnited in nature and to be vnited too or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne vnto the schoolemen For to bee vnited in nature is to bee equalled that is to bee made one essence or nature with another To bee vnited too or with a nature is to bee coupled and ioined therewith to one subsistence or personalitie Wherefore the fleshe is vnited to or with the the Woorde not in nature or in Essentiall propertie that is it is not made with the Woorde one essence neither made equall vnto it in omnipotency wisedome and nature for so shoulde the whole Trinitie bee incarnate Yet is it vnited to the omnipotencie wisedome nature and essence of God not simplie but of god the Worde Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be vnited to the person of the sonne or to the Worde in person which person is the verie diuine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoeuer else is proper to the Godhead But albeit
the flesh taken or assumpted is truely vnited both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any seuerall thing or reallie differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well saide that the flesh is vnited to the Word in person only and Likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate but the sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this vnion is the person onely of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the Godhead For the person onely is proper vnto the Word the essence of the Godhead is common to him and the same with the Father and the Holy Ghost This is plainely taught by the 6. Toletan Councel Cap. 1. in these wordes The son onely tooke the humanitie in singularity of person not in vnitie of diuine nature that is in that which is proper vnto the son not which is common to the Trinitie And Rusticus in his dialog against the Acephalists Not god the Word by the diuine nature but the diuine nature by the persō of god the Word is said to be vnited to the flesh And a little after Wherefore both God the Woorde and his nature is incarnate hee by him selfe in that he is himselfe his nature not so but by the person God the Word then as touching himselfe is vnited to the flesh for he is made one person and one subsistence with the flesh but as touching his nature hee is conioyned rather than vnited because there remaine still two natures Wherefore either foule shamefull is the follie or notorious the malice and slaunder of certaine smatterers that of this verie orthodoxall and sound position not of the schoolmen onely but of Councels also and auncient Fathers The flesh is vnited to the Word in person onely or according to subsistence and this onely maketh the proper difference of personall vnion they inffer that by this meanes the diuine nature of the Woorde is drawen away from the personall vnion But let them againe and againe looke vnto it least by that their reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the Godhead which are the verie diuine essence common to the sonne with the Father and the holy Ghost which communication they will haue to bee the personall vnion which they define by it they ouerthrowe as well the eternall Godhead of Christ man as also the manhood it selfe and withall plainlie incarnate the whole Trinitie That then one and the same Christ is and is called truly and reallie the verie eternall God immense omnipotent creatour and true naturall man finite weake subiect to passions and sufferinges and a creature the onely cause is the vnitie of person subsisting in two natures perfect whole and reallie distinct diuine and humane For euerie indiuiduall and person is denominated or named of the natures or formes and their properties and operations cōcurring or subsisting in it Wherefore seeing in the same indiuiduall person of the Word doe truely subsist and belong to the substance of one Christ these two most diuers natures vnto one and the same Christ of which soeuer nature he be called do agree are affirmed of him all the attributes and properties both diuine and humane but after a diuerse manner For the attributes which agree to Christ in respect of the personall vnion are of two sorts some are attributes or properties of the natures others of his office The naturall attributes are those which are proper to ech nature whether the same bee essentiall belonging to the essence of the thing or which necessarily followe accompanie it without which the nature can not consist or accidentall which may bee away and wanting without the destruction of the nature The essentiall properties and perfections of the Godhead are to be eternall vncreate immense euerie where present not to be circumscribed in place omnipotent omniscient and the like which are the verie essence of the Godhead as also to create to giue the Holy Ghost to regenerate The essentiall attributes of the humanity are to haue a soule vnderstanding immortall and a body compounded of elements consisting of skinne bloud flesh bones veines and sinowes hauing a certaine and definite greatenesse figure proportion and collocation or localnes of partes and therefore to be circumscried in one place to be solid visible palpable and such like These Christ reteineth for euer because without these nothing can bee a humane nature The accidental properties of the humanitie are those infirmities which ensued vpon sinne which infirmities Christ together with the humane nature it selfe assumed and tooke without sinne For he tooke the forme of a seruant which by his resurrection and ascension hee laide down againe The attributes of his office are called those which agree not to one nature onely but to both together that is it agreeth to the whole person according to both natures as being the compound of both A rule to be obserued as touching the attributes or properties of both natures in Christ BOTH natures and their properties are truely and reallie affirmed of the person and of themselues interchangeably in concrete termes or voices yet so that the proper predicate which is proper vnto one nature is attributed to the person not according to both natures but according to that onely to which it is proper The reason is for that one and the same person subsisting in two natures hath and reteineth for euer reallie the properties of both natures and also because one and the same person is signified by the concrete voices of both natures As therefore one the same man is liuing and corporeal according to diuerse natures and the corporeal is liuing by the soule onely and contrarilie the liuing is corporeall by the bodie onely For both soul and bodie are of the substance and essence of the same man So likewise one the same Christ is God eternal immense omnipotent according to the God-head onely is man the Virgines sonne created finite infirme and did suffer according to his humanity onely So likewise God is man borne of a Virgine annointed with the holy Ghost and suffered according to the flesh And man is God eternal creatour omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost not according to the humane nature but according to the diuine For the sense and meaning of these speaches is The person which is God creatour of thinges omnipotent by reason of the God-head the selfe-same person is man a creature infirme by reason of the flesh subsisting in it But notwithstanding one nature and the properties thereof whether they bee vttered in abstract or in concrete voices cannot be affirmed of the other nature or forme truly and really The reason is Because the vnion is not made in the nature that is two natures are not made one nature and because in neither nature the properties of the other doe reallie exist neither can exist
were it that after so many threats warnings from heauen from earth from God from men from their foes abroad and their frinds at home they should not yet once not once descend into a dutifull consideration of this their heauy trespasse and so with a speedy industrie and assiduitie reenter and recouer those their forsaken charges which a long while haue languished and worne awaie for want of pasture and ly now the deer lambs of Christ Iesus stretched on the ground for faintnes fetching their groanes deepe and their pantes thicke as readie to giue ouer and to yeelde vp the Ghost O Lord are not thine eies vpon the truth Ierem. 5.3 thou hast striken these men but they haue not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they haue refused to receiue correctiō they haue made their faces harder thā a stone haue refused to return Not the losses and vnsupportable calamities of Christs people not the miserable apostasie grieuous falling awaie woe to vs therefore of multitudes of the ignorant and vnlettered men from the Apostolicke faith and the Church of Christ not the certaine daungers and hazards of their owne persons Wiues Children and Kinsfolkes with all which rods of his fatherly chastisement God hath latelie in his iustice tempered with surpassing mercy visited them can awake or rouze them out of that dead and deadlie slumber wherby they haue as much as in them lieth betraied to the powers and forces of Satan Gods sacred enheritance and laid open the precious flock of Christ to the mouthes and teeth of Woolues But would God the burden of this sin rested onelie on the neckes of these rechlesse persons whose extreme barbaritie yet in letting through their profane absence their harmlesse sheepe to drop awaie by famine of the word hath raised a louder cried and clamour against them in the eares of God than any we are able to make by our most iust cōplaint in the eares of men Another swarme of Caterpillers there are the very trash and rifraffe of our nation who deeming it a more easie life to say seruice in the church than do seruice in the house and to stand at the altar of God than to followe the plough of their Master haue like men of idle dissolute quality only moued thereto in a lazie speculation laide their wicked sacrilegious hands on the Lords Arke vnreuerently entred with shooes and all into his Temple taken his vndefiled Testimonies in their defiled mouthes disgraced defaced and diffamed the glorie maiesty of diuine rites and mysteries through their beggarly entring into base demeaning thēselues in so high an office Gape not these men trow you for new miracles to rain out of heauen As if Christ must needs for their sakes lay the foundation of his Church again cal again from the net the receit of custom and other trades of this world such as hee would dispatch abroad for this holy Message that so these artisans might be inuested with Apostleships Doctorships and the rooms of Prophets as ready men after a nights sleepe or an hours trance to turn the book of God menage the keies of Heauen But my frind be not deceiued awake out of sleep dream no more Zach. 13. ◅ Thou art no Prophet thou art an husbandman taught to be an heardman from thy youth vp Get away therefore with speed from the Lords house if thou be a cleauer to thy wedge and ax if a hind to thy Masters plough but meddle not with Gods affaires least he break out vpon thee and destroy thee But in vain spend I words to brasse and Iron who though the Lord hath held in his hand for a long time the ful viol of his wrath and is now wearie with holding it any longer and about to poure it out vpon them for this their horrible transgression yet staggar they not a whit at it but run on like hūgry cōpanions with an eie only to the flesh pots and so sel both themselues their people for a morsel of bread a messe of pottage to the diuel Shal I not visit for these things saith the Lord Ierem. 9. ◅ Or shal not my soule be auenged on such a nation as this Yes doubtlesse hee who is able to muster the cloudes and winds and to fight with heauenly powers against vs shal and wil if wee leaue not off to make such hauok of his children be auenged on vs he shal raise vp the standard and make the trumpet blow nether shal suffer the sight of the one to passe our eies nor the soūd of the other to forsake our ears vntil destruction come vpon destruction death vpon death plague vpon famine and sword vpon both to the vtter ouerthrow both of our selues Country perpetually Nay rather O God if there bee any place for mercy and why should wee doubt of mercy with thee the God of mercy looke not vpon this drosse and filth wherewith thy holy house hath bin polluted but sweep them out but looke O Lorde with thy tender eie of compassion vppon thy silly people for what haue they done and stirre them vp daiely for Pastors and Prophetes wise and skilfull men whose lips may keepe knowledge and whose hands may break vnto them the bread of life Now that this may haue a more mature happy successe I am humbly to beseech and solicite if so this my simple work come vnto their hands the Reuerend Fathers of this Land to whom I acknowledge al duty submission in the Lord whom with al reuerence I solicit in this the Lords cause that if their authority be not able to stretch so far as to the throwing out of these dum deafe and blind watch-men out of Gods tabernacle into which they haue been shuffled against manie of their Honors wils by those accursed Simoniacal Patrons who haue sodred simoned the wals of their houses with the verie bloud of soules yet it may please their wisedoms to constraine and compell these wheresoeuer they shal find them in any of their Dioceses to the reading and diligent studying of those books which their owne country-men moued with mere pittie towardes them and their flocks haue painfully deliuered vnto them in a tongue familiar and common to them all And if it shal seeme so good and expedient to their Honours to adioine these my labours vnto the paines and trauels of many the seruants of God who haue with great praise endeuored in the like matter on the like respects heretofore I make no doubt but that out of this short yet ful Summe of Christian Religion God adding his blessing thereunto they may in short time receiue such furniture and instruction as they shal saue both themselues and others who both else are in case to perish euerlastingly But if their feete wil walke on in the way of blindnes and themselues refuse to come out of the darknes of ignorance into the bright light of Gods knowledge
creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in paradice yea the woord is that immortall seede of which the Church was borne The Scripture is first in nature as the cause The Church therefore could not bee except the woord were first deliuered Now when wee name the holy Scripture wee meane not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are conteined in them which they shal neuer be able to prooue to be of lesse antiquitie then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2. Answere The Maior is false A yonger workmā may be more skilful than an elder yet the summe of the Law Gospell was the same for euer To conclude neither is that which they assume alwaies true That the autority of the ancienter witnes is greater thā of th◠yōger For such may be the conditiō quality of the yonger witnes that he may deserue greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnes of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnes of him neither yet is the autoritie therefore greater no not of all the other witnesses then of Christ alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee haue is the woord of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnes of it selfe the same but with that kinde of witnes that is more certaine and sure than all the othes of Angels and men There is alleadged also to this purpose a place 1. The pillar of truth to Timot Obiection 4 3. Where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But since the Scripture doth teach otherwhere and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest inough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a foundamentall or vpholding piller but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carrie the truth left with her and committed vnto her in the open face of all mankinde Acts. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Tit. 1. euen as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the name of God before the gentiles and kinges neither yet did Paul get credit vnto the Gospell but the Gospell vnto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars Galat. 2. not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the gospell and as it were the chieftaines and maisters of doctrine For a man is not bound to beleeue those that teach on their bare woord but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alleage a sentence of Austin out of Obiection 5 his booke entituled against the Epistle of the foundation A place of Augustine 1 Answere An example maketh no rule chap. 5. I saith Augustine would not beleeue the Gospell except the authoritie of the catholicke Church did mooue mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austin or some others did giue credence vnto the Gospell onely for the Churches autoritie yet might there not bee fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine 2 Aunswere He speaketh of himselfe as yet not cōuerted or not sufficientlie confirmed which these mē wold haue they do easily perceaue who weigh both the whole course of this place the phrase of speech which is vsual vnto Austen For Austen going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of al proof of their doctrine first he opposeth one who as yet beleeueth not the gospel and denieth that such a one is able any way to be conuicted by the Manichaeans for he were to be conuicted either by argumentes drawen out of the doctrine it selfe of which the Manichaeans haue none or by the consent of the catholike Church from which themselues were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not haue had beleeued the Gospel except the authoritie of the catholik Church had moued him thereunto Austen therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as hee was then when hee writ these things against the Manichaeans but of himselfe before hee was yet conuerted or not sufficiently confirmed And that hee speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow do manifestly declare whom then I beleeued when they said Beleeue the Gospel why should I not beleeue them when they say Beleeue not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was mooued especially by the authority of the Church he meaneth it of that time at which he obeied the Churches voice that is departed from the Manichaeans vnto the true Church But after that once he was conuerted and had perceaued the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authoritie of the Church but on a far other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnes for vs whereas in the selfesame book Therefore he did beleeue the Church especially before he was able to perceiue it cap. 14. he saith on this wise Thou hast purposed nothing els but to commend that thy selfe beleeuest and to laugh at that which I beleeue And when as I of the other side shal commend that which myselfe beleeue laugh at that which thou beleeuest what dost thou thinke we must determine or do but euen to shake handes with them who bid vs to know certaine things and afterward will vs to beleeue things that are vncertain and let vs follow them who bid vs first to beleeue that which as yet we are not able to perceaue that being more enhabled by faith it self we may discerne to vnderstand that which we do beleeue not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthning and illightning our mind Wherefore they do manifest iniury vnto Austen who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when hee was not yet conuerted or was but weake vnto that time when he affirmeth far otherwise not of himselfe onely but of al the godly For so reuerent a regard ought we to haue of the worde of God and such also is the force and efficacy of the holie spirit in confirming the harts of beleeuers that we beleeue God yea without any creatures Testimony euen as Elias forsooke not god 1. Reg. 19. The application of the answere no not when he thought that himselfe only was left aliue of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austen or whosoeuer els being not as yet conuerted vnto religiō nor as yet hauing experiēce of the certainty of it in his hart That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent 2 Because thereis a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example 1 The
vnto the end among which none is so little that deserueth not euerlasting death and all of them are so euill and grieuous that they cannot bee expiated or doone away no not by the eternall punishment of any creature The third is That he may restore by his forcible operation power the Image of God in vs. The fourth is That he should make knowen vnto vs the secret wil of God concerning the receiuing of mankind againe into fauor For of this except he were God himselfe should bee ignorant so should not be able to reueale it vnto others Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at anie time the onlie begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father hee hath declared him The fift is That he might giue the holie ghost by whome hee might bestowe on vs mantaine and perfect in vs the benefits purchased by his death to wit remission of sinnes righteousnesse new obedience and life euerlasting For it is not sufficient for our Mediatour to make intercession for vs to be made a sacrifice to open and manifest the decree of God but it is necessarie also that he promise in our behalfe that wee shall embrace the decree concerning our redemption by our mediator and cease at length to offend God through our sinnes which is the other part of the couenant made betweene God and vs and is performed by vs that the couenant may remaine firme and ratified But this by-reason of our corruption could bee promised of no man in our behalfe except hee haue the power also of giuing the holie ghost by whom he might woorke in vs to assent and to be more and more conformed to the Lawe of God But to giue the holy ghost and by him to woorke forcibly in the harts of men faith conuersion and saluation belongeth to god alone whose also is the spirit Ioh. 15.26 Whom I wil send you from the father Obiection The partie offended cannot bee Mediatour Christ as he is God is the partie offended Therefore as hee is God hee cannot bee Mediatour Aunswere The Maior proposition is true if the partie offended be such a one in whom there are not more persons But a most cleare Testimony whereby are taught in few words those three to wit That the Mediatour is both true man and perfectly iust and true God is extant Act. 20.28 when it is said God hath purchased the Church with his blood For he is true man who sheddeth his owne blood He is perfectly iust who sheddeth it for the redemption of others He is true God to whom both the name and properties of true god are giuen which is to be a redeemer both by his merit and also by his efficacy and power and that of the church that is of the elect and chosen 5 Who is and may be that Mediatour OF the person who should be that Mediatour mention hath beene made by the way in the former question but the handling of it dooth chiefly appertaine vnto this The Mediatour was to bee God yet not the father nor the Holy Ghost That Mediatour who must be both very god and very man is not neither can be any other than the naturall sonne of god who also is the sonne of Mary that is Iesus Christ 1. Our Mediatour must be true god But god the father could not be Mediatour because he worketh not by himselfe or immediatly but mediately by the Sonne and the holy Ghost though yet he dooth all things of himselfe neither is hee the messenger or is sent but he sendeth the Mediatour Neither yet could god the holy ghost be Mediator because he was to be sent of the Mediator into the harts of the elect Therefore necessarily the sonne was to be our Mediatour 2. That which a man imparteth to others he must needes haue himselfe first But it belongeth vnto the Mediatour to conferre and bestowe grace and the name of the children of God vpon vs that is to woork that through him we might be adopted of God to bee his sonnes now this the holy Ghost doth not giue for hee is not the Sonne neither had the father it because hee was to adopt vs by his Sonne to bee his Sonnes Therefore the Mediatour himselfe was to haue the right and name of a Sonne and that not by grace onelie but by nature that is hee was to bee a Sonne by nature that hee might make vs the Sonnes of adoption Iohn 8.36 If the Sonne shall make you free yee shall bee free indeede Iohn 1.12 As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to bee the Sonnes of GOD. Ephes 1.5 Who hath predestinate vs to bee adopted thorough Iesus Christ vnto himself vers 6. With his grace he hath made vs accepted in his beloued 3. The Sonne alone is that person by which the father openeth his will concerning our redemption giueth his holie spirit maketh vs new creatures Therefore is the sonne called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the price ransome of our redemption and the scripture ioineth the first creation with the second sheweth that we are again to be created by him by whom we were created of God 2 Cor. 5.17 Gal. 6.15 Eph 2.10 Ioh. 13. But this was proper vnto the Mediatour to be a messenger truceman betweene God vs to remake or regenerat vs by his spirit Therefore the sonne must be this Mediatour 4. It belongeth to the Mediatour to send the holy Ghost But the son sendeth the holy Ghost Therefore the sonne is Mediatour The father also indeede sendeth the holy Ghost but mediately by the Sonne the Sonne immediatly 5. It belongeth to the Mediatour to suffer die for vs. But the son is he who taking our flesh vpō him hath suffred in it died Therefore he is the Mediator 6. That the son is the Mediatour is proued by conference of reuelations prophecies in the old testament by the fulfilling of the same in the new 7. The same is proued by the works miracles which Christ wrought Ioh. 5.36 The works that I do beare witnes of me that the father sent me Ioh. 1.38 Beleeue my works 8. This is also apparant by the office of the son His office is to declare the counsail of his father whence he is called the word Ioh. 1.18 The onely begotten son which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him Hee hath also opened vnto vs the true knowledge of god his secret wil concerning our redemption 9 By testimonies of Scriptures both others this of the Apostle 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made of god vnto vs wisedome righteousnes or iustice sanctification redemption Here are put the * That is wisedome is put for the maker of vs wise Iustice for our Iustifier sanctification for our sanctifier redemption for our redeemer abstracts for their concrets Iustification and Sanctification in vs before the fall were one the same thing as in the holie Angels
or internal external common to al three internal appropriated vnto the person Here is to be obserued that the workes of the persons are of two sortes namely Their woorkes inwarde and their woorkes outward The inward or internal workes of the persons are those which the persons haue and exercise one towardes another By these actions or properties are the diuine persons distinguished and described For the father is the first person which hath not his essence and beeing from any other neither begotten nor proceeding but being of himself he begot from euerlasting the sonne from him proceeded the holy Ghost The sonne is the second person of the Godhead begotten from euerlasting of the father This generating or begetting of the Son is the participating of the whole diuine essence wherby the son receiueth from the father the same essence wholely and entirely which the father hath and reteineth For the diuine essence being infinit and indiuisible there cannot some part thereof bee seuered and imparted to another as it commeth to passe in creatures but it must needs bee wholy imparted vnto him vnto whomsoeuer it is imparted The holy ghost is the third person of the deity proceeding from euerlasting from the father and the sonne But begetting proceeding differ For to be begotten or to be born is for another man or another person to bee produced out of the substance of him that begetteth by waie of birth as the sonne is borne of the father Proceeding is a communication of the diuine essence whereby the third person onely of the Godhead receiueth from the father and the sonne as the spirite from him whose spirit it is the same whole essence which the father and the son haue retaine As therefore he that begetteth is one person hee another that is begotten In like maner the holy ghost also is another person from the father the son from whom he from euerlasting ineffably is produced or hath his being by proceeding or issuing yet for al this there is but one and the same diuine essence of these three persons albeit the father as the foūtaine of the deity hath his beeing from no other but from himself the son begotten of the father the holy ghost proceeding from the father and the Sonne 2 The outwarde or external woorkes of the persons are those which are done towards the creatures and on them by them through the wil and power or efficacie of the father the son the holy ghost but yet that order stil of the persons beeing kept as that the father is the fountaine of the operations of the son the holy Ghost doth al things not of any other but of himselfe The Sonne and the holy Ghost doe not work of themselues but by themselues that is the Son worketh the fathers wil going befo e the holy Ghost woorketh the will going before both of the Father the Son Obiect Whose works are diuerse their essence also is diuerse The external works of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are diuerse Therefore their essence also is diuerse Answere vnto the Maior we make by inuerting it thus Nay rather because the persons are infinit there must needes bee but one essence of all Because the inward operation is the communication of the essence and therefore the diuersity of externall woorks doth not import diuersitie of essence THE FIRST PART OF THE CREEDE OF GOD THE FATHER CREATOR I BELEEVE in God the father Almighty Creatour of heauen and earth To beleeue in God is to beleeue 1. That there is a God and hee such a one as hee hath manifested himselfe in his woord and woorkes 2. That he is such a one to me and that whatsoeuer he hath manifested of his nature hee will apply and refer to my safety Obiect In the Creed the father only is said to bee God The word God in the creede is ment essentially to all three persons not personallie to one Therefore the son the holy ghost are not god Ans We deny the antecedent Because the name of god in the creed is put essentially cōpriseth al 3. persons that is it is put for God the father the Son the holy Ghost These 3. therefore The Father the Son the holy Ghost are one subiect by appositiō of the word God as if it should bee saide I beleeue in one God who is the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost The rest which commeth betweene each of these in the Creede appertaine to the description of each person and this is easily proued First these words I beleeue and the particle in are referred after the same maner and sense to al three persons For it is as well said I beleeue in the Son and I beleeue in the holy ghost as I beleue in the father But we may beleue but in one god Wherefore as we beleeue in the father in that he is God so beleeue wee also in the Sonne and the holy ghost because they are God When then it is said I beleeue in the sonne I beleeue in the holy ghost in both places is necessarily vnderstoode the woord God Furthermore if of these woordes of the first article it followe that the father onely is God then of the same words by the like reason it should followe that the Father onlie is omnipotent and creatour of heauen and earth which the whole Scripture crieth to bee most false But of especiall consideration is this name of God but only once mentioned in the Creede thereby to signifie that the true God is but only one One thing to beleeue God an other thing to beleue in God Wee are moreouer to obserue in this place that it is one thing to beleeue God another thing to beleeue in god For that sheweth a faith of knowledge or historicall this declareth true faith or confidence To beleeue god if wee speake properly is to beleeue there is a GOD and hee such a one according to whatsoeuer is ascribed vnto him as he hath manifested himselfe in his woorde To beleeue in god is to be perswaded that whatsoeuer God is is said to be he is al that and referreth it all to my safety for his sonnes sake that is to resolue that he is such a one towards me What is to beleeue in the father and why God is called a father To beleeue in the Father is to beleeue 1 That hee is the Father of our Lorde Iesus Christ 2 That he is also my father for Christs sake that is that he beareth a fatherly good will towards me as hauing adopted vs by Christ in Christ to be his sonnes God is called a Father First In respect of christ his onlie begotten naturall Sonne Secondly In respect of all creatures as he is Creator preseruer of them all Thirdly In respect of the elect whom beeing adopted in his beloued Sonne he regenerateth Wherefore GOD is our Father in respect both of our
in vs euen nowe a conformitie with God which shall bee perfected in the life to come And lastly when Christ himselfe is said to be God and to haue a diuine bodie There is not thereby signified a mutation of the diuine nature into the humane or of the humane into the diuine but an vnseparable conioyning of two natures reteining their properties distinct into one person and a glorifiyng of the humane nature which indeede agreeth to a nature ruler and gouernes of all things but yet notwithstanding made created What wee are to learne by the immensitie and incomprehensibilitie of God Incōprehensible or immense 1. He wil haue vs to know that he cannot be cōprehended in the cogitation of any creature so that what things he ascribeth to himself in his word how great soeuer they be thought of vs yet are they alwaies far greater For the power of vnderstanding which reacheth but to finite things cannot cōceiue the forme or perfect patterne of an infinit nature 2. The Deitie cannot be cōprehended or circumscribed in place or space or any limits that is the essence of God is immense or vnmeasurable neither to be extended nor diuided nor multiplied Therefore it is al euery where one the same The 1. reasō hereof is Because an infinit power cannot be cōtained in an essence or nature which is finit limited Reasons to shew that the power and essence of God is euerie where whole one and the same 2. Because the power of god is alwaies euery where therefore his substance also For that cānot be without this yea it is the diuine essence it selfe And that the power or vertue of the diuinity which hath been spread perpetually in infinit maner both before after the creation of the world cannot be any where either in no substāce at al or in any substāce but only in the very substāce it self of god the Philosophers also who cōceiued god to be infinit haue cōfessed Neither yet is it to be thought that the substance of the diuinity is so extended that one part thereof is one where or so multiplied that an other part is another where but that it being infinit is euery where and seeing it cannot bee diuided into partes as beeing immense and most perfect to bee all euerie where and seeing it is but one that it is euerie where the same so that none can pierce into or cōprehend it but it pierceth into cōprehendeth all things Iere. 23. Doe not I fill the heauen the earth saith the Lord 3 Not onely the power but the essence also of the Diuinitie to be infinite doth euen hereby most certainlie appeare Because there is one the same and whole substance of the three persons For the eternall father as he is alwaies so at that time when Christ liued on earth was hee in heauen And the woorde or coeternall Son of the Father was in his bodie on earth yet because there is but one the same essence of the father the sonne both the father was with the Son on earth and the son with the father in heauen as himselfe saith Ioh. 16. The father is with me Ioh. 3. The sonne of man which is in heauen and Iohn 14. I am in the father and the father is in me So the holy ghost was truely present in the likenesse of a Doue and a flame at the Baptism of Christ at Pentecost now dwelleth in vs as in his Temple And yet is alwaies with the father and the Sonne in heauen as the father and the Sonne are with him in all the Saintes which are dispersed through out heauen and earth And hence appeareth the third difference betweene an infinite nature and a finit nature or the third reason which is onely opened in the worde of God whereby the diuine essence is incomprehensible to witte by communication whereas the whole is in such sort common to the three persons of the Diuinity as not only it is in them as in the creatures but also is their very substance yet neuerthelesse remaineth in number one and the same Nowe that it is proper to the Deity alone Infinitie or immensitie proper to God not imparted to anie creature nor imparted or communicated to any creature to bee infinite or immense or to bee euerie where at the same time or to be the same in diuerse places is apparant by these reasons First Because it is impossible that any creature should be or be made equal to the creator as it hath beene often said Lord who is like vnto thee 2. Because god himselfe by this mark distinguisheth and discerneth himselfe from the creatures for in saieng that he is he who filleth heauen earth he signifieth that there is no other such besides him 3. Because christ sheweth his diuinity by this argument in that whē he was in body on earth yet hee affirmeth himselfe to bee in heauen Iohn 3.13 The fourth reason is that the godly Doctors of the auncient Church defended the Diuinitie of the holy Ghost by this selfesame argument as Dydimus in his Treatise of the holy Ghost lib. 1. cap. 1. The holy Ghost himselfe if he were one of the creatures shoulde haue at leastwise a substaunce limited as all thinges which were made For although inuisible creatures are not limited and circumscribed by place yet are they limited by the propertie of their substaunce But the Holie GHOST beeing in manie hath not a limited and finite substance God most perfect in himselfe God is moreouer most perfect in himselfe 1. Because hee onely hath al things which maie be desired vnto perfect felicity and glory so that no way any thing may bee added vnto him to make him more glorious or happy And all the creatures haue but only some parts and degrees of blessinges distributed vnto them conuenient for their nature and place which the Creator assigneth and giueth to euery one 2. Because hee receiueth no part of this most absolute felicitie from anie other but hath al thinges in himselfe and of himselfe and is alone sufficient to himselfe for all thinges and therefore needeth no mans labour or aide or presence but was alike blessed from euerlasting before any creature was as hee is now after the creation of the woorlde But contrariwise al the creatures stand so in neede of the goodnesse and presence of God that without it they cannot onely not any way bee well and in good state but not so much as bee at al the space of one moment 3. Because hee is not for himselfe onely but for the creating also preseruing guiding and furnishing of all and euerie creature so sufficient that he alone doth giue to al of them all good thinges necessarie and meete for them aswell eternall and heauenly as terrene and temporall neither yet for all that dooth the least iot depart either from his power or from his happinesse Now all the creatures not onely cannot at
exercised Ioseph and taken vengeaunce on his brethren that shoulde then haue beene the best It foloweth therefore that God will no other thing after hee hath once decreed what hee will haue done but that he was able from euerlasting to haue decreed some other thing For whatsoeuer he would that from euerlasting hee woulde most freely 4 Obiection Moreouer some places of scripture seeme to intimate that the will of God may bee sometimes hindered by his creatures As Ezech 33.11 I desire not the death of the wicked Math. 23. How often would I haue gathered thee and thou wouldst not Ans These and the like places onely shew with what God is delighted to what he inuiteth calleth al but not what by his mercie spirit he hath purposed to work in euery one Wherefore this doctrine of the libertie and free will of God let vs diligently maintaine that both the glorie of god may bee vindicated from stoicall blasphemies and in vs faith hope inuocating on god and sedulitie and earnestnes in performing our duety may be established if acknowledging god most freely to gouerne all hir creatures we be neither secure in prosperitie nor in aduersitie doe cast away hope and good indeuours Lastly in the description of gods nature is put The anger of God against sinne that he is angrie and wrath with offences and sinnes Which horrible anger and wrath of god whereby hee detesteth and punisheth all sinnes although al the wicked at length too late perceiue haue experience of when they rush into eternall dispaire yet such his displeasure and indignation as god will haue to be knowen they cannot so much as conceiue who are without the Church seeing they neither iudge all those euils to be sinnes which god in his lawe threatneth hee will punish with euerlasting tormentes neither knowe the death and punishment of the sonne of god than which god could not shewe a greater token and Argument of his anger against sin The elect and chosen alone are throughly moued by a right and sauing knowledge thereof gathered out of gods punishments and threatninges to conuersion and the feare of god But the greatnes of it no man can fully conceiue according as it is saide Psal 90. Who knoweth the power of thy wrath How the conceiuing of the whole nature of God he that is instructed by the spirit goeth beyond him whom nature informeth Out of the description therefore of God before deliuered wee may vnderstand how the true God is discerned from false Gods Likewise what the knowledge of God reueiled in his word differeth from that which the heathen haue beeing deriued from the light of nature The difference consisteth first In the attributes or properties of God now expounded Secondly In the persons Thirdly In the workes of these two is to be spoken afterwardes These thinges are fullie and rightly vnderstood in the Church onely Because they are made knowen by reuelation from GOD onely wherefore they who are not of the Church doe not knowe and worship of the true GOD but an idole in steede of the true GOD. For they erre First in the attributes or properties of GOD who either knowe not and professe all or doe not rightly and fully expounde them as they are declared in the worde or else corrupt them The Heathen therefore know not the omnipotencie wisedome goodnes iustice truth mercie bountifulnesse of GOD shewed in the sauing and restoring of men by the sending of the Sonne and the holie Ghost They knowe not the death and punishment of the Sonne of GOD therefore they knowe not the grieuousnesse of GODS anger against sinne euen that hee will punish all sinne yea the least with eternall punishment Wherefore also they know not the iustice of GOD punishing all sinne with eternal pains in the wicked or with that which is equiualent to eternall in his Sonne They knowe not the Wisedome Mercie Truth of god freeing vs sinners from death and receiuing vs without breach of his iustice into fauour Iustifiyng vs sanctifiyng and glorifiyng vs in his Sonne by the holie ghost according to his promises Neither further doe they ascribe vnto god fullie and wholy his Omnipotencie Wisedome goodnesse which shineth in the creation of thinges and in the continuall preseruing of the same For of manie things they haue either none or but a darke knowledge many things they subtract and withdrawe from the prouidence and gouernement of god and attribute it to their owne wisedome industrie vertue and strengh or ascribe it to fortune and chaunce The like we are to conceiue of other attributes of god in which they are alike blinde Secondly The Church acknowledgeth three persons of one and the same Diuine Essence that is that the true god is an Essence so in number one eternall and infinite that notwithstanding it is the same and whole substaunce of the three persons to wit the eternall Father and his Coëternall Sonne and the Coëternall holy ghost But the Heathen and Pagans and other sectes doe not acknowledge three persons but as the Essence so also the person of the Godhead they professe to bee onely one Thirdly They which are not of the Church are altogether ignorant of the works of the Churches saluation namely the reconciliation of men with god iustification sanctification and full deliuerie from all sinne and miserie by the Sonne and the holie ghost Neither doe they wholy acknowlege or professe the woorkes of Creation For they doe not thinke all thinges to haue beene created of nothing by the woorde of god onely they denie all generally and each in particular euen the least to bee administred power-fullie by the Omnipotencie of God but ascribe very manie to Chaunce Fortune and humane Wisedome Wherefore seeing out of the woorkes of god as his proper affectes are made knowen both the properties or nature of the true god as also the Trinitie of persons in one godhead and therefore god and eache of the persons take their names from them and seeing those woorkes are both all and chieflie extant in the Church and are by the Church rightly and sufficiently vnderstoode hereof is necessarily concluded that hee alone who is made knowen in the woorde and the Church is the true and naturall god and that hee is to bee knowen and discerned from Idols by the woorde onely and by his benefites and reuelations exhibited to the Church as the sending of the holy ghost the redemption of mankinde regeneration sanctification and glorification concerning the which Pagans and many other sects know nothing at all 3 Whence it may appeare that there is but one god Whence first sprang the multitude of Gods ALbeit god in the beginning did as certainely declare vnto mankinde that he is but one onely as what he is yet the world by the guile and deceit of the Diuel going about to spoile god of his honour and to beare and vaunt himselfe for god and to destroy mankinde for the hatred hee beareth vnto
diuers manner in god As when we speake of god the father that being is of it selfe not from another The sonne is the father The Sonne is the same being or Essence but from the Father The holie ghost likewise is the selfe same diuine being which the father is and the sonne but from the father and the sonne So the wisedome power iustice goodnes bountifulnes mercie c. of these three are the verie diuine being or essence which is in number one and the same in these three But to be of himselfe or from another likewise to be from one or from two that is to haue that one Essence of himselfe or to haue it communicated from an other either from one or from two is the manners of being which are three to wit The eternal father and the sonne and the spirite of them both And this is it that Iustine Martyr saith There is one existence or essence of the three which is from none but of it selfe because it is but one but the manners of the existence are three Wherefore as concerning existence Being or essence it selfe the three persons are of themselues as concerning the maner of existing or beeing the father is none but of himselfe The sonne of the father the holie Ghost from both The sonne begotten the holy Ghost proceeding The summe of the difference between the Essence and person is the essence is absolute and communicable the person respectiue and incommunicable This may bee made more manifest by exemplifiyng in a man It is one thing to bee a man an other thing to bee a Father or a Sonne and yet one and the same is both a man and a Father but hee is a man absolutely or in himselfe or according to his owne nature he is a father to another or in respect of another namely of his sonne Semblablie it is one thing to be God another thing to be the father or son or holy ghost and yet one and the same is both God and father god in respect of himselfe or his own nature father in respect of the sonne Again the essence of a man who begetteth another is communicated to him who is begot but the person or indiuidual is not communicated For the begetter bringeth forth not himselfe but another distinct from himselfe the same essence notwithstanding being communicated vnto him And no relatiue is his correlatiue or any part thereof Therefore the sonne is not the father nor the father the sonne although both bee true man So in like sort the eternall Father hath by eternall generating communicated to the Sonne his Essence but not his Person that is hee begot not the Father but the Sonne neither is the Father the Sonne or the Sonne the Father albeit each is true God God and man communicate both their Essence to another but their maner of communicating is most different and is much to be obserued Now although this be like in God and man that both doe communicate to an other not his Person but his Essence yet is there an exceeding dissimilitude in the maner whereby the diuine Essence being infinite and the humane being created and finite is communicated to another Which dissimilitude is diligently to be obserued For first in men in the father the Sonne the Essence is as distinct as the Persons themselues The father and the Sonne are not onely two persons but also two men distinct in essences So that the father is not that man which is the sonne But in God the persons are so distinct that yet the essence remaineth common one and the same and therefore there are not three Gods but the Sonne is the same God in number which is the Father and the Sonne Secondlie In persons created hee that begetteth and generateth doth not communicate his whole essence to him that is begotten For then hee should cease to be a man but only a part which being alotted and seuered out of the essence of him that begetteth is conueied or deriued into him that is begotten and is made the essence of another indiuiduall or person distinct from the essence of the indiuiduall who begetteth But in vncreated persons he that begetteth or inspireth communicateth his whole essence to him that is begotten or proceedeth or is inspired yet so that he who communicateth doth reteine the same and that whole The reason of both differences is that the essence of man as also of other creatures is finite and diuisible the essence of God infinite and indiuisible and therefore the Deity may beeing the same and whole or entire bee together both communicated and reteined Wherefore the eternall Father and Sonne and holy Ghost are that one true GOD and yet the Father is not the Sonne or the holy Ghost neither is the holy Ghost the Sonne that is they are one God not three Gods but three persons subsisting in one God By the name of Trinity are vnderstoode the three maners of beeing in God that is three not essences but persons of the same diuine Essence Now Trinity and triplicitie as also Trinal and triple differ That is said to be Triple which is compounded of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of beeing God therefore is not Triple because there are not mo essences but Trinall because he beeing one according to his essence is three according to his persons This difference of essence and person is to be obserued and held 1 Least the vnitie of the true God be distracted 2 Least the distinction of the persons be taken awaie 3. Least another thing be vnderstoode by the name of person than the truth of gods woorde declareth For person in this place doth not signifie only a relation or office as the Latines are wont to speak Principis personam tueri to defend the person of the Prince as of olde Sabellius falsely taught muchlesse doth it signifie the countenance or visible shape as in these daies Seruetus sported and trifled with the word person representing the forme or gesture of another such as is the person of a stage plaier but it signifieth a thing subsistent truely distinct frō others vnto whom it hath a relation respect by an incommunicable property that is it signifieth that which begetteth or which is begotten or which proceedeth not the office or dignity or degree of him that begetteth or is begotten or proceedeth Furthermore the persons are not anie thing separated from the essence but each of them are the verie selfesame whole essence of the Diuinitie But the difference is in this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substaunce than the essence may be vnderstoode in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substaunce is a father and a man or
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
daie Eph. 5.27 That he might make it vnto himselfe a glorious Church not hauing spot or wrincle or anie such thing 4 Whom he saueth HE saueth all and onelie the elect and beleeuers Hee saueth the elect and beleeuers onely which haue beene are or shall bee euen from the beeginning to the ende of the woorlde and that both by his merite and by his efficacie For in them onely which embrace the benefite of Redemption with a true faith hath GOD his ende euen his worship and glorie Therefore vnto them onely it doth befall Iohn 3.16 GOD so loued the woorld that hee hath giuen his onelie begotten Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life Iohn 17.20 I pray not for these alone but for them also which shall beleeue in mee through their woorde that they all maie bee one c. Iohn 6.51 I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen if anie man eate of this bread hee shal liue for euer Ephesians 1.4.12 Hee hath chosen vs in CHRIST that wee shoulde bee holie and without blame before him in loue and that wee shoulde bee vnto the praise of his glorie I BELEEVE IN CHRIST THe name of Iesus doth rather summarily than expressely note the office of the Mediator What is signified by the name of Christ and is as it were a proper name designing rather a certaine person But the woorde Messias or Christ or Annointed is properly an epitheton of the office which being adioyned to the former doth more significantly declare the proper and certaine office of the Mediatour For it expresseth metonymicallie the three parts thereof namely to bee a Prophet a Priest and a King For these three were wont to be annointed and so to be designed to these functions Obiection But it may bee that CHRIST was annointed but to one of these functions onelie Aunswere He is called in the Scripture a Prophet a King and a Priest And further CHRIST was signified by annointed persons whereof those three sortes were in the olde Testament And hence it commeth to passe that these two names JESVS CHRIST are often ioined For it is not inough to beleeue that there is a Sauiour and that hee is exhibited but wee must further also certainly bee perswaded that this IESVS borne of the Virgine Marie is that Sauiour and CHRIST promised in the olde Testament Furtherermore concerning the office of the Mediatour as it is designed by this name CHRIST which signifieth Annointed fower thinges especiallie offer themselues to bee considered 1 What the vnction or annointing of Christ is or in what sense he is called Annointed 2 What is Christs propheticall function 3 What his Priesthood 4 What his Kingdome 1 WHAT CHRISTS VNCTION OR ANNOINTING IS What was betokened by annointing in the old Testament ANnointing in the old testament was a ceremonie whereby according to gods ordinance Prophets Priests and Kings were annointed either with some speciall or with common oile that it might stand for a testimonie to those who were rightlie annointed that they were called of god to the administring of one of these functions and that they should be furnished from god with giftes necessarie for the performing of that whereunto they were called For Annointing signified 1. The calling and ordaining of anie to the office eyther of a Prophet or of a Priest or of a King 2. It signified the promise and bestowing of giftes necessarie thereto For to whome GOD committed anie office and whome hee caused to bee annointed to these also hee subministered the giftes of the holie GHOST necessarie for the discharging of it as knowledge wisedome strength foâ—titude industrie authority and such other 3. It signified the fragrantnesse or sweete sauour of the labours employed in that vocation that is it was a testimonie that the labours were gratefull and acceptable to GOD and that hee woulde prosper such labours as the Annointed shoulde with a true faith and cheerefullie vndergoe in exequuting the function committed vnto them of GOD. 2. Corinth 2.15 We are vnto GOD the sweete fauor of Christ in them that are saued 1. Corinth 15.58 Your labour is not vaine in the Lord. Further the outwarde annointing did as a signe represent the inwarde that is the giftes of the holy GHOST as the thinges signified by reason of a correspondent Analogie and proportion For as oile maketh the drie partes beeing annointed therewith liuely agill and able and fitte to doe their duetie and besides to send foorth a sweete fauour So the holie Ghost furnishing them with necessarie giftes which are ordained to a function giueth them strength and power whereby they being of themselues vnfit to doe any good are made fit and able to woorke and accomplish thinges gratefull vnto God that is the holie Ghost causeth them to dispatch readilie and with dexteritie the partes of that dutie which is enioined them and to doe thinges acceptable to GOD and auaileable for the preseruation of the Church Nowe the annointing of Iesus Christ is First the ordaining of the sonne of God to the office of the chiefe Prophet Priest and King of the Church Secondlie The especiall communicating of the giftes of the holie Ghost necessarie for this office Thirdlie Gods approbation and prospering of this office Isaie 53.10 The LORDE woulde breake him and make him subiect to infirmities when hee shalt make his soule an offering for sinne hee shal see his seede and shall prolong his daies and the will of the Lord shal prosper in his hand He shal see of the â—auell of his soule and shal be satisfied by his knowledge shal my righteous seruant iustifie many for he shaâ— beare their iniquities Therefore wil I giue him a portion with the great and hee shal diuide the spoile Iesus then the sonne of God and Mary is called Messias or Christ or annointed First because he was appointed of his father from euerlasting the Mediatour that is the chiefe Prophet Priest King of the Church This is confirmed by this reason He that is to be a Prophet a Priest and a King and is called annointed hee is in respect of those three called annointed But the Mediator which was called Messias or annointed was to be the chiefe Prophet Priest and King of the Church Therefore he is in respect of those three called annointed or Christ Again the same is shewed by many places of Scripture Ioh. 7.28 I came not of my selfe c. Iohn 6.38 I came downe from heauen not to doe mine owne will but his wil which hath sent me Heb. 5.5 Christ tooke not vnto himselfe this honour to bee made the High-Priest but hee that saide vnto him Thou art my sonne this day begate I thee Psalm 110.4 The Lorde swore thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedeck Hebr. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to daie the same is also for euer Reuel 13.8 The Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world 1. Corinth 130. CHRIST is
in the word annointing For in the Maior it is taken either for the whole annointing or for that part which is an ordeining to an office but in the Minor it is taken for the other part onely which is the participation of the giftes of the holie Ghost Nowe then according to which nature christ is not annointed that is neither seuerally by a designement to an office neither by both a designement to an office a receiuing of the giftes of the holie Ghost according to that nature he is not Mediatour Christ according to his Godheade is not annointed both with a designement to an office and a receiuing of giftes yet is hee according to his Godheade annointed by an ordaining or designement to an office Therefore hee is Mediatour also according to his Godhead Christ therefore is Mediatour that is the Prophet Priest Christ Mediatour according to both natures and King of the church in respect of both natures For vnto the office of a Mediatour doe mo actions concur whereof some he executeth by his Godhead some by his flesh yet so that they are don performed together the properties of both natures being as it were coÌ„municated Wherefore that we er not here nor coÌ„ceiue amisse these two rules ar to be obserued The first the properties of the one nature in the mediator are attributed to the other in the concrete that is to the person yet still in respect of that nature whose properties they are This is called the communicating of the properties it is a certaine kind of Synecdoche The second The names of the mediatorship are attributed to the whole person in respect of both natures yet reseruing still the properties of each nature and the differences of actions For to the perfourming of the Mediatourship the properties of faculties and operations both of the diuine and of the humane nature are required 2 WHAT IS CHRISTS PROPHETICALL FVNCTION The signification of the name Prophet THE worde Prophet commeth from the Grecke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to publish abroade things either present or to come A Prophet in general is a person called of god who publisheth and expoundeth vnto men the will of God concerning things either present or to come which without some reuelation from God remain vnknowne to vs as being such to the knowledge wherof men were not able by themselues to come A Prophet is either a minister or the head and chiefe of the Prophets which is Christ Of Ministerial Prophets some are of the old some of the new Testament Of the new Testament some are specially so called some only in generall What the Prophets of the old Testament were The Prophets of the olde Testament were persons immediatlie called and instructed of God himselfe either by instinct or by dreams or by diuine visions or by speeches had by God with them that they should declare to men to whom they were sent the true doctrine concerning God and his worship and cleanse and cleare it from errors and corruption that they should recount illustrate the promise of the Messias to come and his kingdome and benefits of remission of sinnes and eternal life by and for him to bee giuen to all beleeuers that they should foretell future euents good and bad and rewards and punishments that they should guide administer and order many counsels and offices politicke or ciuil hauing diuine and certaine testimonies to warrant them that they could not erre in such Doctrine precepts and counsels as they propounded in the name of God Those testimonies were especially these 1 The continuall consent of the Prophets in Israell of Moses and the Patriarcks both one with another and with those first diuine reuelations which were giuen at the creation in Paradise 2 Miracles certainly comming from God 3 The euents of things exaâ—tly aunswering to the sacred oracles and predictions of the Prophetes 4. The Testimony of the holy Ghost thoroughlie perswading and conuincing mens minds concerning the truth of Propheticall doâ—trine Such Prophets were Adam Seth Noa Abraham Isaac Iacob Ioseph and other and afterwards Moses they who succeeded him among the people of Israel A Prophet of the new testament specially so called What a Prophet of the new Testament is both in generall and in special is a person who by diuine instinct and through speciall reuelation of the holie ghost doth certainly foresee and foreshewe thinges to come As were the Apostles Agabus Acts. 11.28 cap. 21.11 and the Disciples telling Paul through the spirite that hee shoulde not goe vp to Ierusalem Acts. 21.4 c. A Prophet of the newe Testament in general is called anie whosoeuer hath the gift of vnderstanding expounding and applying the Prophecies and writinges of the Prophets who are properly so called to the present vse of the church So is this word vsed 1. Cor. 14.3.4.5.29 This function gift of prophecying that is of expounding applying the Scriptures of the Prophetes and Apostles to the vse of the Church is at al times necessary That other of foretelling things to come not so and therfore is it but temporary and for a time The great and chiefe Prophet which is Christ Christ a Prophet from the beginning of the church to all eternitie is a person immediatelie ordained of god euen from the beginning and cradel of the Church in paradise to al eternity sent of the father to declare the wil of god towards mankind to institute and appoint a ministerie to teach by the woorde and Sacramentes the holy ghost working together with him and lastlie in the fleshe to preach the gospel and to make knowen that hee is the Sonne consubstantiall and of the same substaunce with the father and author of the Euangelique doctrine kindling it in the harts of men and not only preaching it as a Minister And therefore Christ is called the WORDE not onely in respect of the father of whome in cogitation beholding himselfe and considering the image of himselfe not vanishing but subsisting consubstantial coequal coeternall to the father himselfe hee was begotten but also in respect of vs because hee is that person which spake to the fathers and brought foorth the liuing and quickening woorde or Gospell out of the bosome of the Father What Christ according to his propheticall fuâ—ction was to doe Wherefore the propheticall function of Christ is 1 To open declare vnto men God his secret will of sauing beleeuers by and for him shewed vnto him immediatly from God himselfe 2 To refine and purifie the Lawe and woorshippe of God from corruptions Mat. 5.67 he interpreteth the Lawe Ioh. 1.18 The sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Iohn 8.26 The things that I haue heard of the Father those speake I to the woorld 3 To open the promises of the gospell concerning himselfe to bee borne to suffer and to die concerning remission of sinnes our reconciliation vnto God
and to make intercession for themselues and others Wherefore though all the Leuitical priestes were a type of Christ yet the most notable type was the High-Priest for that he in mo thinges represented Christ our very true celestial perpetual high-Priest Obiection But it was the Prophets office to teach The difference between the Priestes and prophetes in the old Testament Therefore the Priestes differed nothing from the Prophetes Answere Both of them both the Prophets and the Priestes did teach the people and it might so fal out also that the same was both a Priest and a Prophet as it is reade of Ieremie But this was not perpetual but accidentarie Because 1. the Priestes were ordained out of one certaine tribe namelie the Leuiticall but God raised vp Prophetes out of anie tribe 2. There is a great difference found betwixt them as touching their function of teaching For the Prophets were called extraordinarilie and and immediately by God himselfe and so receiued from him the doctrine which they were to declare vnto men 3. They were so guided by the special motion of the holie ghost that they coulde not er in that doctrine which they vttered vnto men in the name of god But the Priestes as Priests 1. were ordinarie ministers of the oulde Church 2. were appointed by men 3. were tied to the doctrine of Moses and the Prophetes which they learned not from GOD immediatelie but mediatelie by men 4. They might erre in doctrine and counsels and did erre often when they departed from the rule of the Prophetes Wherefore as touching their function of teaching the Prophetes differed from the Priestes of the oulde Testament after the same sort as in the new Testament the Apostles from other ministers and teachers of the Church The signified and true and onelie High-Priest Christ the true and prefigured high priest Christs Intercession is the Sonne of GOD immediatelie ordained by GOD the Father himselfe and annointed by the holie GHOST to reueile vnto vs the secret will of GOD his counsell towardes vs by assuming humane nature to offer himselfe a Sacrifice propitiatorie for the sinnes of all man-kinde to obtaine for vs by his intercession vnto the Father remission of sinnes and eternall life and lastlie to applie effectuallie his Sacrifice vnto vs both by imputing it and also by illightening and moouing the elect by his woorde and spirit to receiue it with a true faith hauing this testimonie that he is certainly heard of his heauenly father for all those for whom he maketh intercession and withall hauing power to collect and gather his Church Wherefore there are foure principall parts of Christes Priesthoode First To teach men both outwardly by his voice and the voice of his ministers and inwardly by the efficacy of his spirite Secondly To offer himselfe a sacrifice and ransome full-sufficient and acceptable vnto GOD for the sinnes of the woorlde Christs Intercession Thirdly To make continuallie intercession for vs vnto the father For this intercession is proper vnto the Sonne First not onelie beecause himselfe liuing on earth in the time of his flesh was made a suppliant and a Sacrifice for vs vnto his Father Secondly but also because he earnestly and desirously wil according to both natures that the Father for his sacrifice once accomplished on the Crosse remit vnto vs our sins and restore vnto vs righteousnesse and life Thirdly that the Father looking vpon the sacrifice and wil of his onely beloued Sonne receiueth all beleeuers into his grace and fauour Wherefore the Sonne in respect both of his merite will to saue vs of his fathers continual beholding looking thereon hath from euerlasting made intercession and also doth nowe and for euer in heauen appearing before his Father make intercession for all the elect chosen To praie for the people is a thing common to all priestes but to make intercession both in heauen and earth vnto the Father for vs that our sinnes may bee pardoned vs is onlie belonging to this high and onelie Priest Fourthly to apply his sacrifice vnto all those for whom hee praieth Christs applying of his merit vnto vs. And hee applieth it First when hee procureth by praier the Father to impute it vnto vs that is to receiue vs for it into fauour and for it to loue vs Secondly when himselfe also for the same his sacrifice sake dooth receiue vs into fauor Iohn 17.19 Father for their sakes sanctifie I my selfe Thirdly hee endueth vs with true faith whereby wee also may apply his satisfaction vnto our selues that is maie bee assured and thinke that it is our righteousnesse whereby wee may stande in the presence of the Lorde Heereby also it is cleare in what other Priestes differ from Christ 1 These teâ—ch onlie by their outward voice â—n difference â—eâ—â—een Christ and â—ther Priests and not by the inwarde woorking also of the holie Ghost 2. They doe not make continual intercession neither do they alwaies obtaine what they aske 3. These applie their benefits vnto no man 4. They offer not them-selues a Sacrifice for the sinnes of others For all these thinges can bee and are perfourmed by CHRIST alone WHAT IS CHRISTES KINGDOME A King is a person ordained by God A King in generall to gouerne in a people and beare rule alone according to honest Lawes and to haue power to reward the good and punish the bad to defend his subieâ—tes against their enimies hauing no superiour gouernuor aboue him The King of Kings CHRIST Christ a King is a person immediatelie ordeined of GOD to gather and rule by his woorde and spirite his church purchased by his blood and to defend her beeing subiect vnto him and seruing him against all her enimies both corporall and spirituall and to rewarde her with eternall rewards but to cast her enimies into euerlasting paines and torments Wherefore CHRISTES royall office is First Christs Kingdome to rule by his woorde and spirite his Church gathered out of all nations from the beginning of the woorlde For that it may go â—ell with vs vnder this King it is not enough if hee outwardly teach vs what hee wâ—uld haue vs his subiectes to perfourme vnlesse also by his spirit he moue our heartes and cause vs to bee obedient to his commaundements Secondly To defend and preserue this his Church in this life against al both inward and outward domesticall and forraine foes which also he dooth perfourme while not onlie by his power-ful hand hee is euer present with vs but furnisheth vs also with those weapons wherewith our selues also may constantlie and happilie enter the combat against our most mighty foes and vtterly vanquish and discomfit them This sacred haâ—nesse and war-like furniture is described Ephese 6.13 Thirdly To make his church partaker of the blessings of his kingdome and to adorne her raised vp from dead with euerlasting glorie blisse Fourthly To ouercome rule his enimies by his
manie waies men are called sonnes 2 How Christ is and is called the sonne of God 3 Why his onelie begotten and first begotten 4 Whether the sonne be coeternal with god the father 1 HOW MANIE WAIES MEN ARE CALLED SONNES EVery sonne is a sonne either by nature or by grace A natural sonne A son by nature or a naturall and proper son is hee who is partaker of his fathers nature and essence or who hath the essence or nature of him whose sonne he is communicated vnto him and that either wholie as Christ in respect of his Godhead for vnto him the father by begetting him communicated his essence whole and the same or in part as men vnto whom is communicated some little seuered portion of their fathers essence Wherfore a naturall sonne beginneth at one and the same time both to be and to be a sonne A son by grace is he who hath the right and name of a sonne A sonne by grace not by nature that is not that he was procreated out of his substance whose sonne he is called but onelie by a free gift of his and by fauour So is he said the son of God by grace who not by nature but by Gods gift is called his sonne Nowe the sonnes of god by grace are of three sorts some by grace of creation The sonnes of God by grace of creation some by grace of adoption some by grace of vnion The sonnes of God by grace of creation are Angels and our first Parents before their fall For that God shoulde create them and conforme them vnto himselfe that is make them righteous and blessed and that now also he maintaineth those blessinges in them it is his benefite and gift proceeding of his grace And therefore God created them that hee might account them for his sonnes and they againe acknowledge and magnifie him as their bountiful and benigne father And although they were not borne of the substance of God yet neither were these at any time not his sonnes but at one and the same time beganne both to bee and to bee the sonnes of GOD. A sonne by grace of adoption or an adopted sonne is he Sonnes by grace or adoption who not by birth but onelie by the law and will of the adopter receiueth the right and name of a sonne so that hee is in the same place with him as if he had been borne of him whereas before hee had beene no sonne Wherefore an adopted sonne beginneth not at the same time to be to be a son but he sometime was when yet he was not a sonne After this sort that is by adoption are our first Parents after their fall so also are all the regenerat the sonnes of god For these by nature are the childrē of wrath but are adopted to be the sonnes of god are made Christs brethren not by any merite of their owne Our fraternitie and brotherhood with Christ but freely by for Christ Eph. 2. Furdermore our fraternitie brotherhood with Christ consisteth in these fower thinges 1. In the likenes and similitude of our humane nature For hee is true man procreated of the bloude of Adam the common father of vs all 2. In the fatherlie loue and bountifulnes of god towards vs who for Christs sake embraceth vs as his sonnes heapeth vpon vs his benefites 3 In our conformitie correspondence with Christ which is wrought by the holy Ghost whom hee bestoweth on vs. 4. In the consummation and accomplishment of his benefites that is in perfect eternal righteousnes blessednes and glorie In respect of the three latter we are the sonnes of God by adoption The sonne of God by grace of conception or vnion is Christ alone The sonne of God by grace of vnion in respect of his humane nature which by the special working of the holy ghost being conceiued formed and sanctified in the Virgins wombe was personally vnited vnto the word A TYPE OR FIGVRE OF THE SONNES OF GOD. Euerie Sonne of God is ether By nature and proper as is the WOORD onelie who hath by birth his fathers nature and substance communicated vnto him whole and the same By Grace either of Creation as Angels and Adam before his fall Conception and vnion as Christ according to his humanitie Adoption as Adam after his fall and all the regenerate 2 HOW CHRIST IS THE SONNE OF GOD. CHrist is the sonne of God according to both natures Christ is the sonne of God by nature according to his Godhead but in diuers respects According to his Godhead hee is the sonne by nature and his natural or proper and onely begotten sonne because according to this nature he alone was from euerlasting begotten of the substance of his father after a manner altogether ineffable beeing of the same nature and essence with him Ioh. 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the sonne to haue life in himselfe The eternall father therefore hath communicated vnto his sonne the life whereby both himselfe by himselfe necessarily is and maketh all other things to be which life is that one eternal Deitie creatresse and defendresse of all thinges Christ is the sonne of God by grace of vnion according to his manhood According to his humanitie hee is not the naturall and proper sonne of god because his humanitie as touching it selfe is not the person and it issued from the substance of his mother not from the substaunce of GOD But he is the sonne of god by grace not of adoption because he was at no time not his sonne as that hee shoulde bee made of no sonne or of the sonne of wrath the sonne of God but by grace of conception by the holie ghost and of vnion with the word For his humanitie was from the very wombe sanctified and vnited to the Godhead of the Word which Godhead is the sonne by nature That Christ according to his flesh was a sonne by grace not by merit of his humane nature And that a masse of fleshe in so maruelous manner by the power of the holy Ghost shoulde bee seuered out of the fleshe of the Virgin and that thereof beeing sanctified shoulde bee formed a true humane bodie that is quickened with a humane soule the same to be vnited to the verie sonne of god into one person subsistence was not the merite of his humane nature as which had not as yet any being is in it selfe but a creature but the speciall free gift or benefite of God as Paul in plaine woordes declareth Colos 1.19 It pleased saith hee the Father that in him should all fulnesse dwell And Phil. 2.9 God hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name Christ therefore as touching his humane nature was as the Sonne of GOD by grace euen presently from that very moment when hee beganne to bee borne man and that therefore because by the vertue of the holy Ghost
would haue the same to be the person of the father and the son the holy ghost which in respect of diuers functions actions is now called the Father nowe the Son now the holy ghost And therefore were they called Patripassians also against Seruetus who coâ—foundeth the sonne and the holie ghost The third is whether he bee equal vnto the father The fourth is whether he be consubstantiall that is of one and the same substance and essence with the father Those two namelie equal and consubstantiall are trulie and iustly maintained against Arius Eunomius Macedonius c. and the Tritheits of our time who make either the father alone to be eternall and the sonne to haue beene created of the father before other things or make the sonne also coeternall with the father but inferior vnto the father Wherfore by these mens opinion the father and the sonne are two essences and two spirits by a consequent two gods according to Arius neither eternall nor coequall according to the Tritheites coeternal indeede but vnequall A double way of gathering Testimonies of scripture Moreouer there is a double maner of gathering arguments out of the scriptures whereby the diuinitie of the sonne and the holy Ghost as also other things questioned in diuinitie are confirmed One is when the testimonies of scripture are gathered according to the order of the bookes of the Bible The other when as certain orders or sorts of arguments or proofes are set vnto which the Testimonies of scripture thereto belonging are referred Both waies are good and both verie often necessarie for a Diuine when hee priuately considereth examineth or discusseth controuersies and disputes of Diuinitie and searcheth what is true in them The first way is more laborious and repeating of the same things the latter is more short and compendious and more fit and appliable both for teaching and also that the groundes of the pointes and opinions of Christian religion may the more easily bee conceaued of the minde and more firmely sticke and abide in the memorie for whatsoeuer neede or vse thereof to come THE FIRST CONCLVSION The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the Virgin and before the flesh THE orders or sortes of Argumentes which confirme this Conclusion are eight in number To the first belong those testimonies which expresly teache and distinguish two natures in Christ as that the humane nature was taken by the diuine nature The argument is framed thus He that assumed the flesh is other from the flesh and a subsistent euen before the flesh The word tooke flesh Again That which commeth into the flesh is other from the flesh into which it commeth but the sonne of God or the Word is euen the verie same who assumed and tooke the fleshe and came in it Iohn 1.14 Heb. 2.14.16.1 Iohn 4.2 Therefore the sonne of necessitie is another nature from the flesh taken and a subsistent euen before the flesh borne of the Virgin For that which is the sonne and putteth on and carrieth flesh it must needes be that the same is a person and was subsisting before the flesh was taken Hither also beelong all those testimonies which oppose in Christ his diuine nature to his humane nature or flesh and distinguish that from this as Rom. 1.3 His sonne made of the seede of Dauid according to the flesh Rom. 9.5 Of the fathers concerning the flesh Christ came Therefore there is another thing in Christ besides his fleshe according to which he is not of the fathers nor of the seede of Dauid Phil. 2.6 Who being in the forme of God tooke on him the forme of a seruaunt Wherefore the forme of God in Christ is one thing namely his diuinitie most perfect and the forme of a seruaunt another thing euen his humanitie weake base and seruile Mat. 22.44 Christ is called the sonne and Lord of Dauid Therefore there be diuers natures in him Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Wherefore there is one thing in Christ which is destroyed euen his bodie and another thing likewise which raiseth vp his destroyed bodie which is the Word who Ioh. 1. is called the onelie begotten sonne 1 Obiection The Word in Iohn dooth not signifie anie person which was subsisting before the fleshe borne of the Virgin but onelie that visible Preacher or teacher Iesus who was made flesh That Iohn meaneth by the Word a person subsisting before the flesh that is was a man weak miserable and abiect Ans This is a notorious manifest impudent corrupting of this place For it is easie for any man to shewe out of the very narration of Iohn that the Word signifieth an hypostasis or person which was existing before Iesus borne of the Virgin For the Word 1. was in the beginning that is was now before existing when thinges were created 2. And that Word was God 3. By whom all thinges were made 4. Who is the author of all life and light Therefore he is a person existing before all thinges 5. Which lighteth euerie man that commeth into the world that is all if not with spirituall yet with naturall light therefore he is their illuminatour who were before the flesh which was born of the Virgin 6. Who being in the world and not knowen 7. Yet came vnto his owne 8. being made flesh that is The word was made flesh by taking flesh not by any conuersion into flesh assuming and taking humane nature of the Virgin Mary For that these woordes the Word was made flesh haue this meaning namely that he who now from the beginning was in the woorlde was made fleshe that is man which before hee was not not by any chaunging or mutation of himselfe but by assuming and taking humane nature other places of Scripture doe demonstrate Heb. 2.14.16 Hee was partaker of the flesh he tooke the seede of Abraham 1. Tim. 3.16 God was manifested in the flesh The Woord therefore assumed and tooke flesh but was not conuerted into flesh that is the diuine nature was distinct from the flesh taken and assumpted Moreouer that Christ man was such a teacher The word was a Teacher from the beginning of the world who not onely in the time of his fleshe but also before that was borne euen from the beginning of the world preached the will of his father vnto men and quickened them both this very narration of Iohn and other very many places doe plainly shew He was the life and the true light which lighteth euerie man Iohn 1. No man hath seene God at anie time the onelie begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Iohn 6.51 I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen and giueth life vnto the woorld 1. Pet. 3.19 Christ went by the spirite in the daies of Noe and preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient
in mind Moreouer hee is expressely called the proper sonne of God Therefore he is the natural sonne of God who hath the nature and essence of his father and that the same with his father because the Deity is but one in number creatresse of al things also he hath the same whole entire because it is indiâ—isible Wherfore the man christ is the same eternal god with the Father Châ—ist iâ— the pâ—oâ—er sonne of God by nature not by grace by reason of the Deity which he hath simply al one the same with the father for there are not two eternals he is also the natural coeternal Son of the father because he is another from the father as touching his person Reply 1 Christ is called the proper Son of God because he was made by God as also the church is called the proper people of god Aunswere This is a corruption of a place of Paul For Paul Rom. 8.3 and 32. opposeth the proper Sonne of God to vs and also to the Angels For both the Angels and wee are made the Sonnes of God in respect either of our creation adoption and regeneration by the holy Ghost or also in respect of both as the regenerate Therefore wee beeing compared with Christ are not the proper Sonnes of God For so he could not be called the proper and onely begotten Sonne Wherefore hee is and is called the proper Sonne of God in that hee alone was begotten of the substaunce of God the Father Reply 2. The word saith Seruetus was indeede alwaies in god but it was not the sonne but in respect of the filiation or Sonne-hoode which was to come in the wombe of the Virgine or in respect of man to bee borne of the Virgine that is The Word in it selfe was not anie inuisible hypostasis and substance which being begotten of the substance of the Father and distinct from him was truly subsisting before the flesh borne of the Virgine but was a certaine relucencie or reflexed shining in God that is that visible image or shape which appeared vnto the fathers in the olde Testament afterwards passed into the flesh or into that visible man Iesus who alone is the sonne in respect of whom also The Woord or that visible shape which alone hee will haue to be the person is called the sonne Answere 1. By this is denied that Christ is the proper Sonne of God Because his humanity issued not from the substance of god 2. The woord is such a sonne as vnto whom the father gaue to haue life in himselfe as hee himselfe hath it in himselfe who when thinges were created was euen then god by whom all things were made who was the life the light of men c. The woord therefore was and that before Iesus borne of the Virgin a liuing intelligent working hypostasis or substance 3. There should haue beene no hypostatical or personal difference betweene the Father and the Sonne because the Woorde according to Seruetus doctrine had not his proper hypostasis whereby hee should differ from the Father 2 Obiectâ—on Hee who is not named in the Scripture before the taking of flesh the sonne of god was not the sonne of god before the flesh was borne But Christ is not called in the Scripture the sonne of god before his natiuity of the Virgine Wherefore hee was not the sonne of god before To this our answere is double First we denie the Maior For wee knowe that Gods reuelation and manifesting in the newe Testament is clearer than in the olde And therefore albeit it were true which these woulde That the sonne of God is not called the Sonne but after the assumption of the fleshe yet notwithstanding seeing in many places it is shewed most clearely that the Sonne who tooke fleshe was before he tooke flesh as The woorde who is the onely begotten of the Father was in the beginning By the Sonne all things were made My Father worketh hitherto and I woorke it may not bee saide that therefore the Sonne was not before hee tooke fleshe because hee was not called before by this name And Secondly the Minor is not true Christ named in the scripture the sonne of God before he tooke flesh For how euer the olde Testament bee more obscure and darke than the newe yet is he called by Salomon the coeternall wisedome of God begotten of God Likewise it was foretolde that the Messias should bee God and the sonne of God and after an other maner than other sonnes Isay 7. His name shal be called Immanuell Isay 9.6 He shall cal his name wonderfull counselour The mightie God The euerlasting father Iermie 23.6 This is the name whereby they shall call him The LORDE our righteousnesse Psalm 27. The Lorde hath saide vnto mee Thou art my Sonne this daie haue I begotten thee Againe Kisse the Sonne 2. Sam. 7. I will bee his Father and hee shall bee my Sonne Wherefore long before was hee signified both to bee and to bee the Sonne of GOD who afterwardes was to bee man 3 Obiection If the diuine nature of Christ was without his humane nature the Sonne of god Christ but one sonne though coÌ„sisting of two natures there shall bee made thereby three sonnes namelie his Diuinitie his humanitie and whole Christ consisting of both natures Wherefore there was not anie Sonne before Iesus was borne To this wee aunswere that the Antecedent is most false For seeing the Woorde did take ioine and vnite personallie vnto himselfe not another person or Son of God but another nature this assumption or taking maketh not moe persons or sons but it is one the same person or one Sonne hauing in him two natures 4 Obiection If the god-head of oulde without the fleshe was the Sonne and nowe two natures are one Sonne there shall bee neuerthelesse two Sonnes one incorporeall the other corporeal Wherefore there was not any sonne before the flesh Answer Neither is this Antecedent true For one and the selfe same Sonne is of olde incorporeal of one only nature and only God but now corporeal of two natures and existing both God and man 5 Obiection The humanity by it selfe is not the Sonne Therefore neither the Diuinity by it selfe is the Sonne Aunswere This reason doth not followe because there is great dissimilitude of the natures which are compared The Woorde existed and was a person and the Sonne before the fleshe was taken and assumpted But the humanitie was neither before the assumption neither beeing assumpted did it make the person by it selfe And therefore the humanity seuerally is not the Son but is in the Son or is the other nature of the Sonne but the Word both separate and knitted to the flesh is the same Sonne as touching it selfe it is the Sonne of GOD by nature but as touching the assumpted nature or humanitie the naturall Sonne of of man and the Sonne of GOD by grace of personall vnion To the second classe of argumeÌ„ts also
attributed vnto the sonne differ so from the diuine properties which are attributed vnto him as the effectes from their causes so that then his properties woorke them 5 The equalitie of honour and woorshippe Hee hath equal honour giuen him dependeth of the equalitie of Essence properties and woorkes Isai 42.8 I will not giue my glorie to anie other But the Scripture giueth equall honour and woorshippe to the Father and the Sonne therefore they are truelie equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed first by Testimonies Psalm 97. Heb. 16. Let all the Angels of god woorshippe him Iohn 5.23 That all shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father Reue. 5.13 c. Secondly Hee is called God absolutelie and simplie as is the Father Psalm 45.7 and Hebrews 1.8 Acts. 20.28 1. Timothy 3.16 Thirdly the Epithets or titles of Diuine honour which are euerie where in the scriptures attributed vnto the sonne As God blessed for euer The great god and Sauiour The Lord himselfe from heauen The Lord of glorie The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Power and eternall kingdome Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bride-groome husband head of the Church god of the temple which are all the elect Trust and Beliefe in him Inuocation for hee is woorshipped of the Church as GOD and Bride groome of the Church at all times and in all places Thankesgiuing for his Diuine benefites Furthermore albeit the name of GOD especially beeing put absolutely and without restraint dooth euidently prooue the sonnes equalitie with the Father as it hath beene saide yet seeing that signifieth moe thinges and is also applied to others who are not by nature God wee are diligently to collect and haue in a readines those Testimonies in which thinges proper to the true God only are attributed to the sonne which agree to none else who are called Gods and whereby God himselfe discerneth himselfe and will haue him selfe discerned from other creatures and forged Gods For vnto whom the essential properties of any nature or essēce doe truely and reallie agree vnto him the essence it selfe must needes bee giuen The sonne hath all thinges from the Father not by grace but by nature 1. Obiection He that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The sonne hath all thinges of the Father Therefore hee is inferiour vnto the Father Aunswere The Maior holdeth and is true of such a one as hath any thing by the grace and fauour of the giuer for hee might not haue it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath al those thinges by his owne nature which hee himselfe hath of whom hee receiueth them For seeing he can not not haue them it can not be that he should bee inferiour or should haue lesse than hee of whom hee receiueth them But the sonne hath all thinges of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessitie that is in such sort as that the Father can not but communicate vnto him all thinges which him selfe hath belonging to his diuine nature and maiestie Therefore hee is equall vnto the Father in all thinges The sonne doth all thinges with the consent of the Father in like manner as the Father doth 1. Obiection Hee that doth whatsoeuer he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour vnto him The sonne will and doth all thinges by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equal vnto the Father in vertue dignitie and essence Aunswere The sonne doth all thinges his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that hee will or doth nothing which the Father also will not and doth and whatsoeuer the Father will and doth the same also the sonne will and dooth likewise that is with equall aucthoritie and power Wherefore the societie order of the diuine operations doth not take away but doth most of al settle establish the equalitie of the Father and the sonne as also of the holy Ghost THE FOVRTH CONCLVSION The word is con-substantial with the Father THE woordes con-substantiall and like-substantiall differ For * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like-substantiall signifieth mo persons and like essences as three men are like-substantial For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial signifieth one essence mo persons In the god-head is not like-substantial because there are not three gods but con-substantial because there are three persons of one and the same diuine essence For there is but one Iehoua that is one diuine essence which is the same is wholy in euery of the three persons therefore euery of thē are that one God besides which essence whatsoeuer is it is a creature not God The Latine church turneth the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial taking substance for essence It is therefore the same that coessentiall that is of one and the same essence Furthermore these three thinges beeing declared and set downe namely that the Sonne is subsisting or a person that he is distinct frō the Father that he is equall with the Father the fourth is easilie gotten and obtained against the newe Arrians to wit that he is con-substantial with the Father which is also in like manner to be vnderstood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deede affirme when they frame and faine three essences and spirits The Arguments which shew The Father the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1. Iehoua is but one essence The English translations reteine not the worde it selfe IEHOVA but vse the Lord in steed thereof which is the signification of IEHOVA and therfore in effectuall one or one god Deut. 6.4 But the eternal Father and the Sonne coeternal with the father are that Iehoua Therfore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proued first by those places of Scripture which cal the sonne Iehoua Ier. 23.6 This is the name whereby they shal cal him Iehoua or the Lord our righteousnes Isai 25.6 The expected God and Sauiour is called Iehoua But Messias is the expected god Sauior Therefore Messias is that Iehoua whereof the Prophet speaketh Za. 2.8 The deliuerer of the Church sent from Iehoua which is the Messias onely is called Iehoua Mal. 3.1 He is called Jehoua whose fore-runner was Iohn Baptist. But Iohn Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Sonne of God Christ Hee therefore is called Iehoua Hither belong al the places in which are giuen to the Angell or messenger of Iehoua both the name of Iehoua the diuine properties and honours But that Angell was the Sonne of
passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
of the flesh subsist in two perfect natures diuine and humane suffering no commixtion confusion or mutation that is The person of the Mediatour is saide to bee constituted of two natures diuine and humane as it were of partes because those two are necessarilie required and doe concurre to the absoluing and accomplishing of the woorke of our redemption In this sense therefore both by auncient and latter Diuines and also by Schoolemen are vsed well and without daunger these Phrases and speeches Christs person is compounded The two nature are as it were the partes of Christ The person of Christ is consisteth is constituted is made of or in the two natures of God and man the two natures concurre come together into one person and subsistence they make one hypostasis or subsistence Both natures belong and concur to the substance of one Christ Both are of the substance of Christ the humanitie with the Worde or contrarie the diuine person or subsistence with the humane nature doth constitute or make the substance of one Christ Of the worde and the flesh assumpted as of substantial parts doth one Christ consist By these and the like phrases of speech vsed of this mysterie singular and surpassing all capacitie of mans wit the Orthodoxal that is men of a right and sound iudgement in pointes of faith will signifie and some way expresse this onely that the two natures are so vnited and linked in that one person of Christ as that they exist wholy in the same person or subsistence which is perfect and whole proper vnto the word from euerlasting by nature and is whole made in time the person of the humanitie also now assumpted and destitute of the proper personalitie thereof and this it is made by grace of vnion so that the diuine subsistence or person of the Word being in it selfe most simple and most perfect doth notwithstanding subsist truely and indiuiduallie in the two natures Wherefore seeing the thing it self is cleare agreed vpon among them who are of right iudgement and sound in faith wee are not odiously to iar about words especially since that concerning these supernatural thinges no wordes of humane speech can be found which way at all suffice for the expressing of them But as it is not well said the person took the person or the nature took the person So these speeches are true agreeable to faith The person tooke the nature Likewise the Nature tooke the Nature For the diuine Nature is not here considered absolutely or essentially but in the person of the word or personallie 2 Obiection That which subsisteth not by it self is more vnperfect than that which subsisteth by it selfe Christes Humanitie doth not subsist by it selfe and ours doth subsist by it selfe therefore Christs humanitie is more vnperfect than ours Aunswere First if that which subsisteth by it selfe be opposed to an accident which existeth by being in another this part of the Minor Proposition is false that Christs humanity doth not subsist by it selfe because that also is a substance But in this disputation Subsisting by it selfe is opposed to that which is indeede substance but yet dependeth of another and consisteth in another So we say that mankinde and the vniuersall or generall kindes of all thinges doe not subsist in themselues but in their singulars as the common nature of all men consisteth not by it selfe but in particular men Wherefore for further aunswere wee say that the Maior proposition beeing simplie and generallie taken is false For the soule of man beeing loosed from the bodie dooth subsist by it selfe the same while it remaineth in the bodie consisteth not by it selfe but vnited with the bodie Neither yet is it therefore to bee thought more vnperfect when this rather dooth most make to the perfection thereof For it is created of GOD to this purpose that it shoulde together with the bodie constistute and absolue the Essence of man and shoulde bee a part thereof So the soule and bodie of CHRIST were created to that ende as to bee the proper soule and bodie of the sonne of GOD and to depende personallie of him That therefore CHRISTS humanitie hath his subsistence not in a created person proper vnto it by nature but in the eternall hypostasis and person of the Worde it is so farre from bringing any imperfection thereunto for the subsistence or manner of subsisting doth not change the nature or essence of a thing that rather the greatest ornament glorie and eminencie commeth thereby vnto it and this is the chiefe and principall difference whereby it differeth and is discerned from all men and also from the blessed Angels 3 Obiection A dead and an euerliuing thing are not the same subsistent or person Christ was dead and yet euer-liuing Therefore hee is not one person Aunswere The Maior is either particular or beeing taken generallie it is false For one and the same subsistent truely and indiuidually subsisting in diuers natures euen as Christ is may bee saide dead and euerliuing as one and the same man is both mortall and immortall in respect of diuers natures whereof he is made and doth consist 3 What manner of Vnion this is of the two natures in Christ and how made THE Vnion of the flesh with the Worde was not made in the Essence or nature or in any essentiall property but in the person of the Word That this may be the better vnderstood we must obserue 1 What is to bee vnited in nature or into nature 2 What likewise to be vnited in person or into or vnto one person or according to subsistence 1. WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN NATVRE FIRST Those thinges are saide to bee vnited in nature or Essence which as essentiall partes are coupled to the ful perfection or constitution of one nature or essence or kinde that is which make a perfect and whole essence or kinde and are one essence or substaunce So the soule and bodie are vnited to constitute or make the kinde or essence or nature of man that is are some one and perfect man Whatsoeuer thinges then are essentiall partes of a perfect thing they are saide to bee vnited in nature and vnto or into one nature Secondly those things also are saide to bee vnited in nature or essence which are one in nature essence or kinde or which are one essence or of one essence and nature or haue one common-essence or vnitie of nature or are ioined and agree in one essence So two men are saide to bee vnited in nature that is are one in kinde or of the same humane nature The three persons of the God-head are vnited in essence that is are one in Essence or are of one and the same diuine essence in number or haue the same Godhead in common So likewise To bee vnited in properties or perfections naturall or essentiall is to gette or haue the same or like equall properties essentiall Which is indeede nothing else than to bee made and bee one nature
For the natures doe not communicate each to other their essentiall properties as neither doe these impart their essence that is one nature doth not receiue the properties of both natures Wherefore these kindes of speaches are false The Godhead is the manhoode or man was conceiued borne did suffer was dead and againe these The Man-hoode is the God-head or God is eternal immense vncircumscribed in place omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost dooth regenerate For al these are no more true and to be admitted than those A soule is a bodie or corporeal mortal visible and a body is a soul or a spirit inuisible immortal 1 Obiection The whole person of Christ is really omnipotent euerie where eternal c. The humanitie and the God-head are the whole person of Christ. Therefore both are reallie omnipotent euerie where eternal c. Aunswere This argument the Vbiquetaries who most of all ground vpon it and often vse it haue borowed from Schwenkefieldeans who commonly in their bookes reason thus Whole Christ is the natural onelie begotten Sonne of God is the true and the same GOD of the same infinite power and maiestie with the eternall Father conceiued borne of the Virgine suffered was dead rose againe ascended into heauen sendeth the Holie Ghost But both natures belong to the whole person of Christ Therefore Christ according to his humanitie also is the natural Sonne of god begotten of the substance of the Father from euerlasting and con-substantiall with the Father and the same GOD with the Father who is Creatour of all If then the Vbiquetaries collection bee lawfull and sound this doubtlesse of the Swenkefieldeans is lawfull also and sound but if the Swenkefieldeans collection bee corrupt and smelling of Eutyches heresie then that of the Vbiquetaries cannot bee at all good and sound But indeede both collections are Eutychian and Sophisticall they are Eutychian because two natures which are made equall in properties essentiall or which get and haue the same or equall essential properties are indeede made one nature and substance or are two substaunces of one nature Both opinions take cleane away the nature of the humanitie transform it into the God-head but the latter dooth further make two persons in Christ of the same nature It is also Sophisticall because whether the person of Christ be considered in it selfe as it was a person being but one and perfect that before the incarnation subsisting in one nature onely or whether it bee considered as it is incarnate and now subsisting in two natures yet stil the transition and passing from the person to the natures is faultie and Sophistical For neither is it necessary that what is truly in and attributed vnto a person the same also should bee reallie in al things concurring in that person and bee affirmed of all The reason is because the parts or natures though vnited in the same person yet retain their properties operations vnconfounded Wherefore that which is proper vnto the godhead cannot agree vnto the person in respect of the flesh also but only in respect of the godhead Whole man vnderstandeth discourseth and hath motion of wil ye◠he doth not this by his finger or body but by his mind only whole man is mortal and doth go eat and drink yet none but a mad man or an epicure will therefore say that the soule also is mortal or doth goe eat and drink So not halfe but the whole person of Christ was before Abraham and from euerlasting did create and dooth preserue all thinges and tooke flesh But the fleshe neither was from euerlasting neither did create nor dooth preserue all thinges nor tooke flesh but was created and being assumpted and taken is susteined of the Word and in it So whole christ was wounded dead yet not his Godhead nor his soul This is wel learnedly declared explicated by Damascene lib. 3. ca. 7. in these words Whole christ is perfect GOD but not THE WHOLE of Christ that is not both natures are God For he is not god only but also man And WHOLE christ is perfect mā but not THE WHOLE of christ is man For he is not man only but god too For THE WHOLE signifieth the nature WHOLE the person Wherefore if the Vbiquetaries wil at al haue the illation enforcing of their conclusiō on these premisses to be necessary The Maior propositiō must be expoūded after this sort The person is god creator omnipotent eueriwhere whole that is as concerning all that which it is or in which it dooth subsist or which doth belong vnto it But the Maior taken in this sense is false most absurd as was shewed a litle before For the true sense thereof is this The person is euery where whole that is without diuision or sundering of natures or subsisting vndiuidably in two natures But the humanity is not that whole subsisting in two natures Not euery thing then that agreeth really to the person agreeth also really to the flesh And albeit the person doth subsist in the humanitie the God-head mutually vnited one to the other yet as it hath beene said it is not hereof enforced that because the person is euery where therefore the humanity should be in proper substance present euery where For this is proper to the godhead neither is it really communicated to any creature or is in any Reply The diuinity is one present in al pleces but especially with the church The diuinity is but halfe christ Therefore only halfe christ is present with the church Answere 1. ther is an ambiguity doubtfulnes in the words halfe christ For if by halfe christ they vnderstād one nature which is vnited to the other in the same person the whole reasō may be granted namely that not both but one nature onely of christ though vnited to th' other that is his godhead is present with vs al things in his proper substance in al places at al times But they by halfe christ vnderstand craftily sophistically the one nature separated from the other as if the godhead were made to be with vs bare naked not incarnat But in this sense the Minor is false the Vbiquetaries own inuētiō For the same Word by reasō of the immēsnes infinitie of his essēce is whole euerywhere without his manhood yet so that he withall is abideth whole in his manhood personally vnited thereūto Wherefore the Word nether is nor worketh any where not vnited to the flesh albeit the flesh because it hath not an infinit essence but reteineth it circūscribed in place is not made to be present substātially in al those places in which the word incarnat or the word mā is 2. There is an ambiguity also double significatiō in the word present For the presēce wherby christ is presēt with his church is not of one kind Wherefore if the Maior be vnderstood of the presence of his substance in al places of his being amongest
vs al other thinges it is true For the substance or essence of the God-head onely not of the manhood to is immense exceeding all measure alwaies existing and beeing the same and whole in all thinges But it is false if it be vnderstood of the presence of his vertue or efficacie For according to this not onely whole Christ but also the whole of Christ is present with his Church only that is not onely his diuinitie but his humanity also but so as the difference notwithstanding is kept of both natures operations The humanitie therefore of Christ is present with all the elect in whatsoeuer places they be dispersed through the whole worlde not by any presence substantiall of the flesh in the bread and within their bodies but 1 By the efficacie and perpetuall valewe of his merite For God the Father dooth euen nowe behold the Sacrifice of his Sonne once accomplished on the Crosse and receiueth vs for that as a sufficient ransome and merit into his fauor 1. Joh. 1.7 The bloud of Jesus Christ his Sonne purgeth vs from all sinne that is both by his merite the efficacie or vertue of his merit 2 By the efficacie also of his humane will because Christ according to his humanity also earnestly both would wil that we be of god receiued into fauor quickned glorified through that his one only Sacrifice Psal 110.4 Heb. 5.6 Thou art a Priest for euer and also whatsoeuer he will yea with his humane will that hee powerfully effecteth and worketh not by the power of his fleshe but of his God-head or spirite omnipotent whome not the flesh but the God-head of Christ onely sendeth into the heartes of the elect and chosen Joh. 6.63 It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Rom. 8.11 God shall quicken your mortall bodies by his spirite dwelling in you 3 Hee is present with vs by coniunction and vnion Because all those that are to bee saued must needes be engraffed and knit together euen into christs humane nature that being engraffed into his humane masse they may bee quickned as branches liue fastned to the vine members coupled and ioyned to the head which ioyning yet of vs with the fleshe of Christ is not made by any naturall connexion of Christ and our fleshe or by any existence of Christs fleshe within our substance or of ours within his but by faith and the holy ghost in Christ our head dwelling in vs his meÌ„bers Ephes 3.17 That Christ may dwell in your harts by faith Rom 8.9 If any man hath not the spirit of Christ the same is not his Ephes 5.30 We are members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bones and they twaine shal be one flesh This is a great secret so forth 2 Obiection Whatsoeuer is to be worshipped and adored is omniscient omnipotent and euerie where present that is hath the essential properties of the Godhead reallie communicated with it Christs flesh is to be adored or is adorable because whole Christ is adored Therefore Christs flesh is reallie omniscient omnipotent and present eueriewhere Aunswere This verie same reason is among the principal argumentes whereby the Schwenfieldeans endeuour to frame after Eutyches manner a Maiestie and Deifying of the flesh of Christ But both these the Vbiquetaries are deceiued deceiue by the ambiguitie and diuers taking of the worde adored That is omnipotent omniscient which is adored that is which is adored in respect of it selfe or for it selfe The humane nature is adored not for it selfe or according to the proper nature of it selfe for that were idolatrous but it is adored for the Godhead vnited therewith personally Wherefore of the adoration of whole Christ is but ill inferred the omnipotence also of his flesh For the reason doth not follow from the honour of the person to the properties of the natures Replie That which is adored by reason of another is also really omnipotent omniscient by reason of another Christes fleshe is adored by reason of the God-heade in whose person his flesh subsisteth Therefore Christs flesh is also really ommniscient omnipotent by reason of the God-head Answere The Maior is false as is this That which is made base and humiliated by reason of another thing is also by reason of another thing obnoxious subiect to alteration For the Woorde was made base or humiliated by reason of the flesh and in the fleshe neither yet the Worde it selfe or the God-head felt any change or alteration but is humiliated and so saide to be after another maner because the Woorde doth not shew his Godhead in the flesh which we tooke in the forme of a seruant So then albeit the adoration of Christ God and man doth presuppose in him omnipotencie omnisciencie presence euerie where and the searching of hearts and â—eines yet is it not of necessity that the humane nature also which by reason of the God-head vnited to it in the same person is adored should be really omnipotent omniscient euerie-where For the adoration of christ is the honor worship which agreeth is yeelded one the same to whole christmaÌ„ god keeping notwithstaÌ„ding the differences in natures of the properties operations whereon Christs office honor doth depend For to adore worship christ is by the agnising knowledge of his person office to craue of him with a tru trust coÌ„fidence that those blessings which he hath promerited promised he wil as our mediator performe giue to vs according to the proper wil operation of each nature This adoratioÌ„ coÌ„sisteth of diuerse parts compriseth both natures keepeth their properties operations though vnited yet stil distinct craueth that whole Christ in performing his promised benefits wil worke those things by his God-head which are proper to his God-head by his flesh those things which are proper to his flesh For his benefits are no otherwise to bee craued asked of him than as himselfe wil doth performe theÌ„ to vs he performeth theÌ„ stil keeping the difference of both natures Wherfore they who craue of christ the Mediator the benefits promised in the Word do necessarily acknowledge him omniscieÌ„t the searcher of hearts omnipoteÌ„t present euery where of himself beholding hearing our necessities coÌ„plaints This agnising this honor is proper to God and agreeth is yeelded to Christ man in respect of his God-head only not of his humanity For in one act or view vnchaÌ„geable to behold know vnderstand from euerlasting of himselfe al thinges past preseÌ„t to come but chiefly the needs wants necessities desires of his whole church again to send the holy ghost into the harts of al the elect chosen who haue bin eueÌ„ since the beginning of the world by this spirit to teach theÌ„ with in to iustifie regenerate coÌ„fort theÌ„ to giue to theÌ„ eternal life these I say are not
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
flesh câ—nsubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to bee according to the fleshe consubstantial with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantial with vs For according to this he is consubstantial with God So of the other side he is not according to the flesh coessentiall with god but according to this he is consubstantiall with vs. And as wee pronounce these to bee distinct diuerse one from the other not to bring in a diuision of one vndiuided person but to note the distinction and vnconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as vnited which make to the manner of the vndiuided vnion or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word the flesh how then seeing the Word is euery where is not the flesh also found euery where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heauen and now because it is in heauen it is not verily in the earth and in so much it is not as that as touching it wee looke for Christ to come from heauen whom as touching the Word we beleeue to bee in the earth with vs. Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is coÌ„teined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the Word where as one nature doth not receiue any contrarie or diuers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diuerse and far vnlike to be circumscribed in place and to be euerie where and seeing the Word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is euerie where as touching the nature of his Godhead but is not euerie-where as touching the nature of his manhood is created and hath no beginning is subiect to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby hee is god the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one son of God and the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his Godhead was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his godhead circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not conteined in any place by the nature of his Godhead is lower also than the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equal with the father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and neuer died by the nature of his Godhead This is the Catholique faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto holde and mainetaine Now haue wee in few wordes expounded those articles of the Apostolique creede which intreate of the person of Christ and haue withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessarie for vs to knowe both of the diuinitie of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seede of Dauid vnited personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy ghost and begotten in maruelous nanner of the Virgines substance And it was requisite not to suffer that any sinne should passe or bee deriued into his substance 1. Because hee was to satisfie for sinne 2. Because it was not conuenient or meet that the Woorde the sonne of God should take a nature defiled with sinne To beleeue then in the son of God conceiued by the holy ghost is to beleeue 1. That he was made man after a marueilous manner and that hee was made one Christ of a diuine and an humane nature 2. That hee being so holily conceiued and borne doth purchase for vs the right and power to bee the sonnes of God Because this person is sufficient able to recouer for vs our lost righteousnes and to bestowe it on vs. For hee is vnited with the Worde that is hee is true and naturall God and man such as the Mediatour ought to bee Hee will also performe this because he was borne to this end euen to sanctifie vs. Of al these euerie one of vs may certainlie collect and conclude That this Christ is our Mediatour And the reason of this collection and consequence is Because by this that he is the only begotten Sonne of God it is manifest that Christ is true God consubstantial coeternal and equall with the Father By his holy conception and natiuitie it is also manifest that hee is true man and that perfectly iust and vnited with the God-heade or Woord and such a one was it requisite our Mediatour should be OF CHRISTES HVMILIATION THE course of order requireth that now consequentlie we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of al of his humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christes office whereunto belong these Articles Hee suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried descended into hel After we haue expounded these we wil come vnto the rest of the Articles which speake of his glorification which is the other part of Christs office HE SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE I Beleeue in Christ which suffered that is I beleeue 1. That Christ froÌ„ the verie moment of his conception susteined calamities mesâ—ries of al sorts for my sake 2. That at that his last time he suffered all the most bitter tormentes both of bodie and soule for my sake 3. That he felt the horrible and dreadfull wrath of God thereby to make recompence for mine and others sinnes and to appease his ire and wrath against mankind These two are different To beleeue that christ suffered and to beleeue in Christ which suffered For that is to haue onely an historical faith of Christes passion neither to repose anie confidence in him but this is to beleeue not onlie that Christ suffered but also to repose and place our trust and confidence in Christs suffering and Passion OF CHRISTES PASSION THE Passion of Christ onelie doth followe next his conception and natiuitie 1. Because in his Passion consisteth our saluation 2. Because his whole life was a Passion suffering and calamitie Yet notwithstanding many things maie and ought to be obserued out of the storie of the whole race of his life on earth For that 1. doth shew This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concur and are fulfilled all the Prophecies 2. That storie is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which hee perfourmed vnto his Father The chiefe questions of Christes Passion are these 1 What Christ suffered 2 Whether he suffered according to both natures 3 What was the impellent cause of Christes Passion 4 What the final cause or end thereof 1 WHAT CHRIST SVFFERED BY the name of Passion is vnderstoode the whole humiliation or the obedience of his whole humiliation all the miseries
shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Reu. 22.17 The spirit the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receiue the Lorde For the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that iudgement THE THIRD PART OF THE CREED Of the holy Ghost the sanctifier IN this last part of the Apostolike confession are cōteined six articles whereof the first speaketh of the person of the holie Ghost the next of the Church which is gathered confirmed and preserued by the holy Ghost the foure articles following are of the benefites bestowed by the Holy Ghost on the Church and first of the communion of Saints Secondly of remission of sinnes Thirdly of the resurrection of the flesh Lastly of euerlasting life The chiefe Questions of the holy Ghost or holy spirite 1 What the name spirit signifieth 2 Who and what the Holie Ghost or spirite is 3 What is the holy Ghosts office 4 Of whom the holy Ghost is giuen and wherefore 5 To whom he is giuen 6 How he is giuen and receiued 7 How he is reteined and kept 8 Whether he maie be lost and how 9 Wherefore he is necessarie 10 How we may know that he dwelleth in vs. 1 * It is here to be noted that this Questiō serueth more properlie for the latine which vseth this name Spiritus only when as we in English vse as much or more rather the word Ghost than Spirit when wee speake of the third Person WHAT THE NAME SPIRIT SIGNIFIETH THE name spirite is taken sometimes for the cause sometimes for the effect When it is taken for the cause it signifieth a nature incorporeall and liuing of a spirituall essence wielding moouing and stirring some thing So first God essentiallie and personallie is a spirit that is incorporeal without any bodilie dimensions or quantitie inuisible Secondly The Angels also whether good or bad are in this sense spirites Thirdly after the same manner the soules of men are called spirits Gen. 2.7 Hee breathed in his face breath of life that is he sent in a spirit or soule into him When the woorde spirit is taken for an effect it signifieth 1. The aire moued 2. The mouing it selfe and motion of the aire 3. The wind and moouing vapours 4. Spirituall effects or motions good or bad So is it said The spirit of fear And contrary The spirit of Princes that is courage likewise The spirit of fornication 5. New spirit signifieth the giftes of the holy spirit In this doctrine which we haue in hand Spirit signifieth the cause stirring and moouing namely the third person of the God-head which is forcible in the mindes and wils of men And this third person of the God-heade is called a spirit 1. Because he is a spiritual essence or substaunce incorporeall and inuisible 2. Because he is inspired of the Father and the son that is because is the immediate stirrer and moouer of diuine works The Father and the Sonne mooue but by this spirit 3. Because himselfe inspireth and immediatly worketh motions in the harts of the Elect whence he is called Luk. 1.35 The power of the most high 4. Because hee is God equall and the same with the Father and the Son And god is a spirite This third person of the God-head is called Holie 1. Because he in himselfe by himselfe and of his owne nature is Holie 1. Because he is the hallower or sanctifier that is he immediatly halloweth or sanctifieth and maketh holie others The father and the sonne sanctifie by him and therefore mediatelie 2 Who and what the holy ghost is THE holie ghost is the third person of the true and onelie god-head proceeding from the Father and the Sonne and coeternall coequal and consubstantial with the Father and the Son and is sent from both into the harts of the Elect to sanctifie them vnto eternal life Here are we to say the same thinges of the Godhead of the holy Ghost which haue bin spoken before of the Godhead of the son For this definition is also to be prooued and confirmed by the proofes of the same foure partes 1 That the holy Ghost is a person 2 That he is the third person or that he is other distinct from the father and the Sonne 3 That he is true God with the Father and the Sonne or that he is equall to the Father and the Sonne 4 That he is of the same God-head with the Father the Sonne or that he is consubstantiall vnto both FIrst therefore that the holy ghost is a person is prooued 1 By his apparitions Because he hath appeared visible Luk. 3.22 The holy ghost came downe in a bodilie shape like a Doue Act. 2.3 And there appeared vnto them clouen toungs like fire and it that is the fire or the holie ghost sate vpon each of them Seeing then the holy Ghost descended in bodilie shape vpon Christ and sate vpon the Apostles it followeth that he is subsisting For no qualitie or created motion of minds or hearts is able to doe in like manner For an accident doth not only not take vpō it any shape but standeth in neede of some thing else in which it selfe should consist and bee Neither is the aire the place or subiect of holinesse godlinesse loue of God and other spiritual motions but the mindes of men 2. He is proued to be a person because he is called god 1. Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the temple of god and that the spirite of god dwelleth in you Acts 5.3 Why hath satan filled thine hart that thou shouldest lie vnto the holie Ghost And in the next verse he saith Thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto god See also Isai 40.7.13 Actes 28.25 Ephes 4.4.30 Howesoeuer then the aduersaries of this doctrine gtaunt the holy Ghost to be God yet this cannot bee but he must be a subsistent or person seing God is a being but our godlinesse goodnesse Godly motions and other diuine affections cannot be called God 3. He is a person because he is the author of our Baptisme and we are baptized in his name that is by his commaundement and wil. But wee are not baptized by the commaundement and wil of a deade thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptized in the name of the graces or giftes of God 4. Because the properties of a person are attributed vnto him as that hee teacheth that he distributeth giftes euen as he wil that he comforteth confirmeth ruleth raigneth likewise that hee sendeth Apostles that hee speaketh in the Apostles Luke 12.12 The holie Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what yee ought to saie So also he declareth the thinges to come Ioh. 16.13 The spirite of truth wil shewe you the thinges to come Hee giueth prophecies he commaundeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastlie he appointeth teachers in the church All these are thinges proper vnto a person existing intelligent endued with a wil working
and liuing 5. Because hee is plainlie distinguished from the giftes and graces of God 1. Corinth 12.11 All these things worketh the selfesame spirite distributing to euery man seuerallie as he wil And againe 1. Corint 12.4 There are diuersities of giftes but the same spirit Wherefore the giftes differ much from the spirite it selfe Obiection The gift of God is not a person The holie Ghost is called the gift of God Actes 2.38 Therefore he is not a person Aunswere The Maior is false For the sonne beeing giuen is the gift of God and yet is a person The holie Ghost is called the gift of god because hee is sent from the Father and the sonne John 15.26 J will send the comforter vnto you from the Father Or we maie aunswere Hee is called a gift in respect that hee was sent and dwelleth in the hearts of the saintes to whom hee is giuen and is such a gift as woorketh by his vertue and power the rest of the giftes and graces Now that to proceede signifieth to exist or be from both I prooue Because Paul calleth him the spirite of god which is of god and in god Of god Because the spirit floweth from the Father and the Sonne In God therefore he is somewhat of God himselfe Other spirites are not in God that is in the substaunce of God And what is in God that is the very essence of God Secondly That the holy ghost is other that is distinct from the Father and the Sonne wee prooue against those who say hee is the subsistent of the Father Which wee prooue 1. From his verie appellation in that hee is called the spirite For none is his owne spirite As none is his owne Father and none his owne Sonne Therefore hee is other from both Obiection That which is common to al the persons ought not to be distinguished and seuered The name spirite is common to all three persons Therefore it ought not to bee distinguished Aunswere This whole reason wee graunt If it bee vnderstoode of the essence of the persons and not of their order of beeing and woorcking For as hee that breatheth and the breath it selfe differ so hee that enspireth and the spirite are different Hee that proceedeth is one and hee another from whom hee proceedeth The thirde person of the godheade is one and the first or second another But the Holy ghost is saide to bee the thirde person of the Godhead and this not in that respect as if there were in God any first or last in time but in respect of the order or manner of beeing Because the Holy Ghost hath his essence from the Father and the Son from both which hee proceeded from euerlasting as also hee is the spirite of both In like manner the Son is called the second person because he is of the Father The Father the first person because he is of none 2. The holie ghost is in expresse woordes called another Iohn 14.16 J will praie the Father and he shal giue you another comforter 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare record in heauen the Father the Word and the Holie Ghost and these three are one 3. He is sent of the Father and the Son Therefore he is another from both For none is sent of himselfe One maie come of his owne wil or of himselfe But none can be sent of himselfe John 15.26 I will send him vnto you from the Father Iohn 14.26 The Father sendeth him in my name 4. The holie Ghost hath distinct attributes or properties personal from them The holy Ghost onely proceeded from the Father and the Sonne He alone appeared in the shape of a Doue in the likenesse of fire not the Father or the son Christ also is said to haue beene conceiued not by the Father or the Sonne but by the holie Ghost that is by the immediate vertue and efficacie of the holy Ghost Wherefore he is another from the Father and the Sonne which is diligently to be obserued For the aduersaries heereof being conuicted of the person of the holy Ghost grant that he is a subsistent but of the Father Obiection The vertue and power of the Father is the Father himselfe the holie ghost is called the vertue and power of the Father therefore the holie ghost is the Father himselfe Aunswere This reason is Sophistical because vertue is not taken for the same in the Maior for which it is taken in the Minor For in the Maior it is taken for the power of the Father in the Minor for the person by whome the Father sheweth forth his power Thirdly That the holie Ghost is equall with the Father and the Sonne these argumentes doe proue 1. The essence of the Father and the Sonne is communicated vnto him because hee proceedeth from both and is the spirite of both But there is nothing in God which is not his essence Seeing then that is indiuisible it must needes be whole and the same communicated vnto him which is in the Father and the Sonne As the spirite of man which is in man is of the essence of man so the spirit of God which is in God is of the essence of God By this it appeareth What is the proceeding of the holy ghost namely the communicating of the diuine essence whereby the third person of the god-heade alone receiueth the same and whole or entire essence from the Father and the Sonne as from him whose spirite hee is And that the holy ghost proceedeth from the Sonne also is proued by certaine reasons First Because hee is called the Sonnes spirite Roman 8.9 If anie man hath not the spirite of Christ the same is not his Galat. 4.6 He hath sent forth the spirite of his Sonne into your heartes The spirite of his Sonne that is not giuen vnto the Sonne of the Father but existing and proceeding as of the Fathers so of the Sonnes substaunce seeing the Sonne is equall and consubstantiall with the Father Secondly because the Sonne together with the Father giueth him Iohn 15.26 And Iohn 20.22 Receiue the holie ghost Thirdly Because the holy ghost receiueth the wisedome of the sonne which hee reueileth vnto vs. Iohn 16.14 Hee shal receiue of mine and shall shew it vnto you But seeing the holy Ghost is true God consubstantiall with the Father and the Sonne he cannot receiue any thing but of him of whose substance he is Wherfore he proceedeth of the substance of the Son because he receiueth that of him which is the sonnes 2 The holy ghostes equalitie with the Father and the Son is proued by those diuine attributes properties which are attributed and communicated vnto the holy ghost as eternitie because hee created heauen and earth and because God was neuer without his spirit Likewise omnipotency and omnisciencie that is the knowing of al things 1. Corin. 2.10 The spirite searcheth al thinges yea the deepe thinges of god Likewise immensitie or vnmeasurablenesse as who dwelleth whole entirely in al the Elect.
for it doth not being receiued into vs quicken vs by working in vs new corporal qualities like as a medicine dooth but the bodie of christ nourisheth and quickeneth vs after a maner diuers from that natural nourishing and accordingly as this manner of nourishing and quickening requireth so receiue we christs bodie The maner whereby christs bodie and bloud nourisheth vs is 1. The respect of his merite For for vs christs bodie is giuen and his bloud shed for vs and for the bodie and bloud of christ wee haue eternal life giuen vnto vs. After this manner then the bodie and bloud of christ quickeneth vs as it is a merit deseruing for vs this blessing 2. His bodie and bloude quickeneth or nourisheth vs when wee receiue that merite of christs bodie and bloud that is when we beleeue with a true faith that for it wee shall haue eternall life This faith resteth and hangeth on christ hanging on the Crosse not corporallie dwelling in vs. 3. It nourisheth vs when the same spirite vniteth vs by faith vnto christ and worketh the like in vs which it doth in christ For except wee be graffed into christ wee doe not please God For hee will on that condition receiue vs and pardon vs our sinnes So that by faith through the working of the holy Ghost we bee ioined with christ and engraffed into him Seeing then this is the maner whereby the bodie and bloude of christ quicken and nourish vs there is no need of any descending of the bodie and bloud of christ into our bodies 4 Obiection The eating of bread is done by the mouth But the eating of the bodie is the eating of bread Therefore the eating of the bodie is done by the mouth and is corporall when it is saide Take and eate Aunswere This eating whereof mention is made heere is perfourmed by the mouth not simplie but as concerning the signe But it is not doone by the mouth but is spirituall as concerning the thing signified spirituall Reply This is my bodie that is the inuisible bodie which J haue in my handes Aunswere But the bodie is the thing signified and spirituall other-wise there will bee no proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified It followeth therefore that hee saieth The bread is my bodie So that the bread is that whereof the bodie is affirmed For in this speech the thing signified is affirmed of the signe 5 Obiection The Wordes are not to bee changed Christ vsed the woord Js Therefore there may not be put in place thereof the word Signifieth Aunswere The woords are not to bee changed into another sense than God wil haue But otherwise they are often to be changed As when it is said Pluck out thine eie For woords are to bee vnderstoode according to the nature of thinges Moreouer they themselues who accuse vs of change doe more make this chaunge and mutation than we Reply The bodie of christ was broken and crucified for vs not the signe of the bodie Therefore the bread is the substantiall bodie of christ Answ I grant for the bread signifieth that very bodie which was borne of Marie crucified Question Why then are the things signified attributed to the signes Two causes why the thinge signified are attributed to the signes and the signes called by their names if neither consubstantiation nor transubstantiation bee thereby signified Aunswere There are two causes alleadged heereof A similitude or likenesse and a certainty 1. The similitude or proportion of signes and the thing signified is first As the bread and wine nourish our body so the body and bloud of christ nourish vs vnto euerlasting life Secondly As the bread and wine are receiued by the mouth so the body and bloud are receiued by faith Thirdly As the bread is eaten being broken so the bodie of christ is receiued being sacrif ced and broken Fourthly As in corporall foode is required an appetite vnto it so also in this spiritual foode is required faith Fiftly As of many cornes is made one loafe so are we being many made one bodie Wherefore by reason of this similitude of the signe and the thing signified the thing signified is attributed vnto the signes 2. The certainty of the signes in the cause likewise why that is affâ—rmed of the signes which is proper vnto the thing signified For the sâ—gnes testifie that christes sacrifice is accomplished and for our behoofe and commodity because it is certainly and truly applied vnto vs. Here last of al is to be obserued that the eating of christs body dooth comprise and comprehend 1. Faith 2. That by faith we are made partakers of christ that is we are vnited vnto Christ and our communion is wrought by faith and the holy Ghost is the bond of this our vnion and coniunction with Christ 3. That wee are made partakers of Christs benefites iustification and remission of sinnes And this ensueth of that vnion of Christ with vs. 4. Jt comprehendeth also the benefite of our regeneration whereby we are made like and conformed vnto christ because the same spirit dwelling in vs and in christ worketh also the same things in vs. This eating is easily collected as out of many other places so also out of this saieng of christ I am the liuing bread which commeth downe from heauen if any man eate of this bread hee shall liue for euer And the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I wil giue for the life of the world 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords supper and the popish Masse THIS question is necessary by reason of errours which haue câ—ept into the church It is otherwise demanded Why the Masse is to be abolished â—ut here this questioÌ„ is also conteined and comprehended because these differences and contrarieties of the Lordes supper and the Masse are the causes why the Masse is to bee abolished First let vs speake a few woordes of the name of the Masse or Missa The word Missa seemeth to haue his name from an ancient custome of Ecclesiastical rites actions The originall of the woord Missa which we call the Masse in the end whereof leaue was giuen of departure to the Catechumenes the possessed with spirites and the excommunicated persons and so the woord Missa seemeth to be vsed as it were a mission or sending awaie because it was the last part of diuine seruice Others wil haue it to be so called from a dimission or from the manner of dimissing them because they were demised with these words â—te Missa est that is go you may depart or as others interprete it goe now is the collection or alms which they will haue to be called Missa of the sending it in as we may so speak or throwing or casting it in for the poore Some wil therefore haue it deriued from the Hebrue Masah that is tributes which was wont to be paied of euery one The word is found Deut. 16.10 Missach nidbath iâ—decha A free
Christes kingdome Now to pronounce a man to bee a Publicane and an aliene from Christes kingdome belongeth vnto the Ecclesiastical magistrate not vnto the ciuil because a Publican and an Heathen may be a member of the cittie but not of the church of Christ 2. Christ addeth Verily verily J saie vnto you whatsoeuer yee bind on earth shal be bound in heauen Heere Christ meeteth with an obiection For the excommuned person may obiect what doth this touch me Although the church account me for an infidel for an Heathen and Publicane I wil notwithstanding in the meane season eate and drink Christ answereth therefore That this iudgement shall not be frustrate or of no effect for I may selfe wil be the executour of it Before in the 16 Chapter he said I will giue thee the keies of the kingdome of heauen but there hee speaketh of the common and general authority of the ministerie here he speaketh namely and particularly of the ministers authority in this cause To bind and loose therefore is not belonging vnto the Magistrate but vnto the church 5 The wicked maie bee accounted for Heathens and Publicanes without anie excommunication Therefore a Publicane and an excommunicate are not alone Aunswere I denie the Antecedent because to account one out of the communion of the church to excommunicat are all one Reply But they maie account one that is think of one in their mind to be such a person Aunswere If hee heare not the church thou art to knowe not what the church thinketh of him in minde but what they publikely determine of him whether thou maiest account him for an Heathen and Publicane And furthermore Paul elsewhere forbiddeth vs to eate or drinke with a wicked person Therefore it is not a knowledge only in the mind Against the Examples PAVL willeth that the incestuous person be cast out of the Catholick church 1. Corinth 5.13 that is hee will haue him pronounced to be no member of the Church Therefore this eiection or casting out is not to think only but to pronounce also excommunicate The aduersaries vrge the contrary to this on this wise 6 The Apostle expoundeth himself 2. Corinth 2.6 Jt is sufficient vnto the same man that he was rebuked of many Therefore those words Account him for a Heathen a Publicane and put him awaie from among you signifie only a rebuking Answere This reason deceiueth by a fallacy of consequent because a generall rule is not builded vpon one example For because heere was neede of rebuking onely seeing the partie repented It doth not thereof follow that alwaies the same onely is required Reply What they did that Paul commanded But they did onlie reprehend and rebuke Therefore Paul commaunded them onelie to reprehend him when he commanded them to put him awaie from among them Ans Paul commaunded that but not that only because he cōmanded also that they should reiect him if he repēted not But if he repēted it should be sufficient to reprehend rebuke him Wherefore it doth not follow They onely reprehend him Therefore Paul commaunded them onely to reprehend him This is a true aunswere vnto the former reply but there is another also cleare and manifest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the Greeke woorde which the Apostle here vseth signifieth not onelie reprehension and rebuking but also that excommunication which is by words onelie And in this sense not onelie it maie but also must bee taken because hee saieth So that now contrariwise yee ought rather to forgiue him Therefore he was now excommunicated and not as yet receiued but to be receiued Neither was he onely reprehended and rebuked but also cast out eiected And whē also he saith Of many hereby is cōfirmed that by the name of the church whereof Christ speaketh Matth. 18. is not vnderstoode the common multitude but the chief gouerners of the church Againe For this cause did I write saith the Apostle that J might know the proofe of you whether you would bee obedient in all things He praiseth them therefore because they obeied Wherefore before repentance he forbiddeth That they companie not together with the excommunicated person And further also hee saith I praie you that you would confirme your loue towardes him The Greeke woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we interpret to confirme signifieth by publique sentence to speake a thing So is it taken Gal. 3.15 a mans couenant when it is confirmed that is ratified by publique autoritie The Apostles meaning therefore here is that they should declare their loue towardes man by publique testimonie Therefore to forgiue was to receiue the excommunicated erson into fauour and that doth hee often repete Now there was also some space betweene the writing of the former and the latter Epistle to the Corinthians Therefore hee stoode in the meane time excommuned In the former Epistle Paul saith that hee heareth that some wicked persons were amongest the flock Them he willeth to bee excōmuned And it is likely that the Corinthians obeyed this his commandement in excommuning them and so wrote to Paul that they had obeyed him therein because in his 2. Epistle Cap. 2. he commendeth them and willeth them to receiue againe the incestuous person vppon repentance 7 Whome Paul had willed to bee noted by a letter him hee willeth the Thessalonians to account of as of a brother and therefore will not haue him to be excommunicated This consequence or sequele is proued thus Contraries can-not stand together But to excommunicate one and to account him for a brother are contraries therefore if he bee to bee accounted for a brother hee is not to bee excommunicated That these are contraries is also thus proued To Excommunicate is not to account one for a brother but not to account one for a brother and to account one for a brother are contraries Therefore also to excommunicate one and to account him for a brother are contraries and so can not stand together except not to account and to account for a brother shoulde bee all one Aunswere There is an ambiguitie and diuerse vnderstanding of these woords to account for a brother Wherefore the contrarietie is not here of force For all men are brethren both Christians and Turks But christians neuerthelesse although they account Turks for their brethren and neighbours and desire their saluation yet doe they not account them for christian bretheren If then they are to account Turks for their brethren then much more must they account them and seeke their saluation who were before time brethren that is christians 8 What Paul did that are not we to folow Paul did excommunicate Hymenaeus and Alexander without the churches consent 1. Timot. 1.20 Therefore wee must excommunicate no man Answere The Maior proposition is false if it be generally vnderstoode Reply The Maior is thus proued What Paul did by his Apostolique autoritie that are not we to follow But hee did this by his Apostolique autoritie Now this Minor is
places of scripture Matth. 20.25 Yee knowe that the Lordes of the Gentiles haue domination ouer them and they that are great exercise authoritie ouer them But it shall not bee so among you but whosoeuer will bee great among you let him be your seruaunt 1. Pet. 5.3 Not as if ye were Lordes ouer Gods heritage but that yee maie be ensamples to the flocke Colos 2.16 Let no man condemne you in meate and drinke or in respect of an Holie-daie or of the newe Moone or of the Sabboth daies Gal. 5.1 Stand fast in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made vs free Neither are the causes obscure or harde to come by for which God made this difference namely that there might bee an euident difference betweene the ciuill Magistrate vnto whom it belongeth to beare rule ouer his subiects and to constrain by corporall force such as obeie not and the Ministers of the Church vnto whom no such rule and power is graunted but vnto them is committed the charge and office of teaching and instructing men concerning the will of GOD. Againe because by the breach of Ecclesiasticall lawes if it bee done without giuing of offence the first table of the Decalogue for which they are to serue is not broken but by the breach of ciuil lawes albeit no offence be giuen thereby the second table is broken in as much as either some thing is taken frō the common wealth or some occasion is giuē of iniurying it Neither is this replie of force That vnto the greater and worthier office greater obedience is due And therefore the constitutions of the Ministers of the Church are no lesse necessarilie to bee kept than the lawes of the ciuil Magistrate For vnto the worthier greater obedience is due in those thinges which are properly belonging vnto his office Now the proper office of the ciuil Magistrate is to make lawes which are for the commaundement it selfe to bee obserued but the proper office of the ministerie of the Church is to sound foorth Gods commaundements And the proper office of the Church is to ordaine Ceremoniall decrees which must bee kept not for the commaundement of man but for auoiding of offences 4 Humane ordinances which are repugnant vnto the ordinances of God These God forbiddeth vs to obey whether the ciuil Magistrate commaunde them or the Church or the Ministers of the Church Acts. 5.29 We ought rather to obey God than Men. Matth. 15.3 Why transgresse yee the commaundement of god by your tradition Hauing now considered these foure kindes of ordinances deliuered by men it is easie to make aunswere vnto that first obiection God commaundeth vs to obey the commandementes of men He doth so first Such as bee good that is not repugnant vnto his woorde Secondly such as hee himselfe hath commaunded by men that worship maie be giuen him Thirdly Ciuil ordinances which depend on the authoritie of men not obeiing them for diuine worshippe but for conscience sake Fourthly Ecclesiasticall or Ceremonial ordinances obeying them but not respecting therein anie diuine worshippe or conscience neither of which they import but onelie the auoiding of offence 2 Obie What things the church commandeth by the instinct of the holie ghost those are diuine ordinances belonging to the worship of god But the church decreeth good and profitable constitutions being guided by the guiding of the holie ghost Therefore good constitutiōs decreed by the church appertaine to the worship of god Aunswere The general indeede of those commandements which the church prescribeth by the instinct of the holie Ghost appertaineth to the worship of God This general compriseth the diuine Lawes of God of not breaking charity and of auoiding offence of keeping order and comelinesse in the church And in respect of this general the constitutions which the church decreeth by the instinct and motion of the holy Ghost are also diuine or the constitutions of God as namely they are a part of these diuine Lawes the care and keeping whereof is commended vnto vs by god himselfe in his word But those good constitutions of the church are humane or the constitutions of men as they doe in speciall designe that which was in generall by these diuine Lawes signified rather than expounded Wherefore those ordinances are no worship of god which the church aduiseth decreeth receiueth or commaundeth for the countenaunce of mutual charity among vs and for the preseruation of order and comelinesse or for the auoiding of offences albeit in the choosing and constituting of these shee be directed by the instinct of the holy ghost For the holy ghost declareth both vnto the church both what is profitable for the auoiding of offences and also that those things which are commaunded for the auoiding of offences are neither the worship of god nor necessary to be obserued but in case of auoiding offence and therefore that the church reteineth her libertie of deliberating of them or of chaunging of them or of omitting them if there be no feare of offence This doth Saint Paul manifestly declare when as 1. Corinth 7. counselling them to single life which haue the gift of continency yet hee addeth further But I speak this by permission not by commandement Again This J speake for your owne commoditie not to tangle you in a snare but that yee followe that which is honest and that ye cleaue fast vnto the Lord without separation Here he affirmeth both both that hee wisheth them that are continent to leade a single life that so they may the more fitlie serue god and that also hee leaueth it free vnto them to marry and hee speaketh both by the instinct of the holie ghost 3 Obiection God is worshipped by those thinges which are done to Gods glory The things that the Church doth decree are don to Gods glorie Therefore these also are the worship of God Aunswere Those thinges that are done to the glory of god by themselues that is which are commaunded by god to this end as that by these workes wee should declare our obedience towardes him they are the worshippe of god but not those thinges which serue for the glorie of god but by an accident that is which serue sometimes for the perfourming of those thinges which are commanded by god vpon some accidental respectes and causes which if they do not concur god yet may be honored both of those that do thē and of those that doe them not so that they be done or left vndoone of faith which is assured and resolueth that the person is not reconciled vnto god and that the action or omitting of the action doth agree with the word of god 4 Obiection The examples of those who haue worshipped God without his direct commandement confirme that it is permitted to men to worship God with that worship which themselues ordaine Auns The example of Samuel sacrificing in Ramoth cannot at al establish Wil-worship For as touching the sacrifices they were the worship of god because they were commaunded by god and as
is obedience according to al Lawes that appertaine vnto al in respect of euery ones vocation and calling That this is here commaunded is manifest because the superiours must require this of their inferiors and incite them by their example to obey and inferiours are commaunded to obey al iust ordinaunces and commandements Neither doth it hinder that the honour of the ministerie also doth comprehend the whole obedience of the Lawe For there it is exacted as obedience vnto the voice of god himselfe here as obedience towards men that bear rule ouer vs. 2 The second common vertue to both is the particular distributiue iustice which keepeth a proportion in distributing of offices and rewardes or which is a vertue giuing to euery one his owne Now euery mans owne is such an office or honour or reward as is conuenient and fit for him or belongeth vnto him Roman 13.7 Giue to all men their dutie tribute to whom ye owe tribute custome to whom custom fear to whom fear honour to whom ye owe honour 3 Sedulitie or diligence or fidelitie which is a vertue in a man well knowing and vnderstanding those parts which belong properly vnto his owne duty and office examining them and doing according to Gods commaundement those things that belong vnto him constantly continually studiouslie willingly and cheerfully likewise conteining himselfe with this endeuour of wel doing within the bonds of his owne duty and calling letting passe thinges that appertaine not to his vocation and such as are vnnecessary and al to this end principally as thereby to serue god and his neighbour and to doe those thinges which are pleasing to God and profitable vnto men 1. Thess 4.11 Studie to bee quiet and to meddle with your own busines Roman 12.8 He that ruleth let him do it with diligence Eph. 6.6 Serue as the seruants of Christ doing the wil of God from the heart Eccle. 9.10 Al that thine hand shal find to doe doe it with al thy power But it is to be obserued that this vertue is not onely to vnderstand what are the parts of a mans duty but also to examine search if yet there be ought remaining which hee knoweth not to belong vnto his duty For hee that knoweth not must seeke and search otherwise hee shal neuerthelesse render an account of neglecting his duety because his ignoraunce was purposed and voluntary 4 Grauitie which is a vertu that obserueth that which becommeth a mans person and sheweth a constancy and squarenesse in words deedes gestures that thereby wee may maintaine our good estimation or authority that our calling be not reproched For because God wil haue superiors to be honored he wil also that they themselues maintaine their owne honour Now true glory which is an approbation yeelded vs both of our owne conscience and of the conscience of others iudging aright seing it is a vertue necessary both for the glorie of God and for the safety and well-fare of men is without question to be desired so that these ends be withal respected Prou. 22.1 A good name is to be chosen aboue great riches Eccles 7.3 A good name is better than a good ointment Eccles 41.12 Haue regard to thy name for that shal continue with thee aboue a thousand treasures of gold Gal. 6.4 Let euerie man proue his owne work and then shall hee haue reioicing in himselfe onelie and not in another Tit. 2.7 Aboue all thinges shew thy selfe an example of good woorks with vncorrupt doctrine with grauity integritie 5 Modestie is a vertue which hath neere affinity with grauity whereby a man knowing his owne imbecillity and considering his place and office wherein hee is placed by God keepeth a meane and conueniency of person in opinions and in speech of himselfe and in actions and in behauiour to this end that we giue no more to our selues than becommeth vs that we shew no more glitter or gorgiousnesse in our apparel in our behauiour in our talke and life than is needefull that wee set not our selues before others or oppresse others but behaue our selues according to our ability and capacity with an acknowledgement of Gods giftes in others and of our owne defectes Now as it was said modestie hath an affinitie with grauity For if grauitie be not ioined with modesty it degenerateth into ambition and swelling Humilitie and Modestie differ in their ende and Modesty is toward men acknowledging their owne vices and the giftes that are in others Humility is towards God Galat. 6.3 Jf anie seeme to himselfe that hee is somewhat when hee is nothing he deceiueth himselfe in his imagination 6 Loue or tender affection toward our kindred and neere of bloude as towardes our Parentes children and other kinsfolkes For when God willeth vs to honor our Parents he wil also that we loue them and that as our Parents and when he wil haue them to bee Parentes hee will haue also their children to bee loued of them and that not onely as straungers but as their children For seeing God ordaineth the bonds of coniunction betweene men he also alloweth the degrees of loue and duties 1. Timot. 5.8 If there be anie that prouideth not for his owne and namelie for them of his houshold he denieth the faith and is worse than an infidel 7 Thankefulnes which is a vertue consisting of truth iustice acknowledging from whom what and howe great benefites we haue receiued and hauing a desire or willingnesse to perfourme and returne for them mutuall labour or mutual duties such as are honest and possible Prou. 17.13 Hee that rewardeth euil for good euil shal not depart from his house 8 Aequitie which is a vertu mitigating vpō good cause the rigour of strict iustice in punishing taxing others offences patiently bearing with some such errors defects as do not enormously harme the publike safety of the priuate welfare of our neighbours and couering and correcting such vices of others or endeuouring to heale cure them For this by reason of mens manifolde infirmity is so necessary both in superiours towards inferiours in inferiours towards superiours that without it ciuil society cannot consist 1. Pet. 2.18 Be subiect to your Masters with all feare not onely to the good and curteous but also to the froward Hither appertaineth the example of the Sonnes of Noah Gen. 9. Likewise the commandement of the moderation and gentlenesse of Parentes towardes their children in exercising correction and discipline Ephes 6 4. Fathers prouoke not your children to wrath but bring them vp in instruction and information of the Lord. Col. 3.21 Prouoke not your children to anger least they bee discouraged And cap 4.1 Ye Masters doe vnto your seruauntes that which is iust and equal knowing that ye also haue a Master in heauen The vices contrary to these common vertues of this fift commaundement 1 VNTO the general iustice are opposed 1. All neglectes of such duty as iust Lawes require of euerie one either of superiours or of inferiours 2.
beleeuing yeelding to those that teach or shew better things that vpon certaine reason framing his will ready to assent vnto true or probable reasons to leaue those thinges which before he held embraced The same are the extremes of Docilitie which are of constaÌ„cie wherunto also this Docilitie is necessarie For Constancie without Docilitie degenerateth into Pertinacie and Docilitie without Constancie degenerateth into Leuitie Now al these vertues which haue beene numbered agree and are linked verie well one with another For Trueth must bee tempered with Fairenesse of minde and Simplicitie perceiued and knowen by Docilitie preserued and maintained by Constancie And so these former vertues are required to the being of truth Now the three vertues following are required to the profitable beeing of the trueth in the world 6 Taciturnitie or silentnesse which is a vertue withholding in silence thinges secret vnnecessarie to bee spoken where when as far as is needful auoiding ouer-much babling talkatiuenes Or it is such a maner of professing the truth whereby secret thinges whether true or false are kept close speeches vnnecessarie vnprofitable are auoided especially vntimely pernicious speeches such as giue offence The extremes hereof in the defect are Pratling foolish prating and treacherie Pratling is not to be able to keepe close any thing Foolish Prating or futilitie follie of speech is to speake vnseasonably immoderatelie foolishly In the excesse Haughtinesse Peeuishnesse dissembling of the trueth where are necessarie or probable causes Peeuishnesse or morositie is an ouer-much silentnesse burying of the truth where gods glorie the safety of our neighbour or our owne or others cause or the loue of our friendes requireth vs to speake Silentnesse without affability becommeth Morositie or peeuishnesse and Affabilitie without Silentnesse becommeth pratling and foolish prating babling out thinges hurtfull vnnecessarie vaine or secret 7 Affability or readines of speaking which is a vertu gladly with signification of good wil hearing answering speaking where need is vpon a necessarie probable cause or it is a vertue easilie entertaining the mutual talkes of others giuing signification of the good wil in conferences speech gestures Or Gentlenes facility affabilitie consist in giuing care making answere vnto others with some signification of good wil. The same are the extremes of Affabilitie which are of Taciturnitie or Silentnesse likewise leuitie Assentation or affectated labored affabilitie 8 Vrbanitie or pleasantnesse which is a vertue of speaking the trueth with a certain grace elegancie to teach comfort exhilarate nip or touch or it is a certain sauce of trueth speech to wit the trueth figuratiuely vttered either to mooue or delight others without bitternesses keeping the circumstances of place time persons The Extremes are 1 Scurrilitie and Dicacitie Scurrilitie is obscene homly iesting especially in serious matters Scurra that is a scurrulous person is so called from the Greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth dung because he speaketh filthinesse dung Dicacitie or scoffing is a vice of iâ—sting bitterly of deriding bourding and exagitating others but especially such as are miserable 2 Stoliditie or Foolishnesse Sottishnesse or vnsauorinesse Foolishinesse is an vntimely affectation of vrbanitie Sottishnesse is an absurd vnsauorie affectation of vrbanitie Now Vrbanitie is an especial gift of the wit but may notwithstanding bee gotten by experience in matters 3 Backbyting which spreadeth false slaunders of others constereth doubtfull speeches in the worse part with a desire of reuenge an endeuor to hurt or to raise enuie THE TENTH COMMANDEMENT THOV shalt not couet thy neighbours house nor his wife nor his seruant nor his maid nor his Oxe nor his Asse not any thing that is his The scope and ende of this commandement is a rightnesse and inward obedience of all our Affections towardes God and our neighbour which must also be obserued in the other coÌ„mandements Neither yet is this commandement superfluous because it is added to the former commandments to be a declaration of them that vniuersall because this is spoken of the whole in generall and furder it is also added to be as a rule leuill according to which wee must take and measure the inwarde obedience of all the other commaundements For in this commaundement is commanded originall iustice or righteousnesse towardes God our neighbour which is the true knowledge of God in our mind a power inclination desire in our will heart in all our parts to obay God his knowen will and to performe vnto our neighbour for gods sake al duties required to regard maintaine his safety welfare Vnto orinall iustice originall sinne or concupiscence is repugnaunt which is an inordinate appetite or a corrupt inclination pronenesse in the minde will heart contrarie to God and desiring those thinges that God forbiddeth in his Law which ensued vpon the fall of our first parents and was from theÌ„ deriued to all their posteritie so deprauing and corrupting their whole nature that all by reason of this corruption are become obnoxious to the euerlasting wrath of God neither are able to doe ought that is pleasing to God except pardon be graunted for the sonne of God the Mediator and our nature be renued by the holy Ghost Of originall iustice towardes our neighbour there are two extremes 1. In the defect Original sinne towardes our neighbour which is a desire and wishing of those thinges which hurt our neighbour 2. In the excesse Jnordinate loue of our neighbour when for his sake we neglect God We are heere to obserue that not onelie corrupt inclinations are sinnes but also the thinking of euil is sinne to wit as the thinking of euill ioined with a desire of doing it Now that concupiscence is euil and sinne albeit it be borne with vs there is no doubt For we are not to iudge according to nature but according to the lawe whether a thing bee sinne or no be it or be it not borne with vs. The Pelagians denied concupiscence to be sin But Paul saith the contrarie Roman 7.7 J had not knowen concupiscence or lust except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Their obiections are these 1 Obiect Natural things are not sins Concupiscence is a natural thing Therefore it is no sin Ans There is a fallacy of the accident in the Minor For concupiscence was not before the fal but ensued after the fal Againe this word Naturall hath a diuers construction For in the Maior it signifieth a good thing created of God in nature to wit mans appetite before the fall which was not contrarie to the Lawe In the Minor it signifieth a thing which wee haue not of nature but which we purchased vnto vs after the fall Replie An affection or appetite euen in nature now corrupted to desire good things and eschue hurtfull things is not sin But such is
selfesame particle betokeneth a certaintie or confirmation of our faith whereby we trust that we shal be heard Wherefore Amen signifieth 1. So be it and sure and certaine be that which wee desire and let God condiscend and aunswere vnto our request 2. So God being not vnmindful of his promise truly and certainly heare vs. FINIS ¶ A TABLE OF THE COMMON PLACES AND PRINCIPALL QVESTIONS HANDLED IN THIS SVMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION THE PREAMBLE A THREEFOLD order or three parts of the study of Diuinity 2 Of a Catechism or Catechising doctrine What a Catechisme is 2 In the Primitiue Church two sorts of Catechumeny 3 Catechising as the Doctrine of Baptisme of laying on of hands euer hath beene vsed in the Church and the reasons why still it ought 3. 4 Of the holy Scriptures Two opinions of religion but one alone true 5 What the holy Scripture teacheth or how Christian religion is diuided 6. 7 True religion ought to bee discerned from others and why 8 The difference of the true Doctrine of the Scriptures from others 10 The difference of true Doctrine from Philosophy 11 Certain notes whereby the tru church is distinguished from others 12 Whence it may appeare that this religion was once deliuered from god which is contained in the Scriptures 12 The authority of the Scriptures dooth not depend of the Church with reasons for proofe aunsweres to the contrarie obiections 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 Reasons for proofe of the certaintie truth of the holy Scriptures 20. 21 The difference betweene the prophecies of the heathen and them contained in the holy Scriptures 23 The spirit of Christ a sufficient witnesse of his Doctrine 27 No doctrin besides the holy Scripture is to be receiued into the church and the reasons why with answers to the contrary obiections 28. 29. 30 The obseruing of the Lords day left arbitrary to the Church 36 How controuersies doubtfull places are to be decided 46 Of the true comfort of the Godly The way to attaine to this comfort and the parts thereof 53 Why the knowledge of our misery deliuery and thankfulnesse is necessary to this comfort 55. 56. 57 THE FIRST PART OF THE MISERY OF MAN HOWE a man commeth to the knowledge of his misery 60 Of Sinne. Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to be in vs. 63 What sinne is 65 How many kinds of sin there are 67 Of Orginall sinne Whether there be Original sinne 6◠What Originall sinne is 68 Whether the souls of the children bee deriued from the souls of the Parents 71 What Actuall sinne is 78 Raigning sinne 78 Sinne not raigning or veniall 79 Sinne against the conscience not against the conscience 86 Sinne pardonable vnpardonable 87 Sin of itselfe sin by an accident 94 The workes of the regenerate vnregenerate differ seuen maner of waies 98 What are the causes of Sinne. 99 What are the effects of sinne 115 Of the creation of man What man was created of God 124 For what man was created 125 Of the image of God in man What the image of God in man is 128 How far foorth the image of God was lost how far it remaineth 130 How it is repaired in vs. 131 How the image of God is in Christ and how in vs. 132 Of the first sinne What that first sinne of Adam Eue was 134 What were the causes of the first sinne 135 What are the effects of the first sin 135 Why GOD permitted the first sin 136 Of free-will The causes of diuers controuersies risen about free-will 138 Of the word Liberty 140 What is the Liberty of will 141 What is like or common and what is different in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and men 144 Whether there be any liberty in vs what it is 157 There are foure degrees of freewill 159 Of euils of punishment Of the euils of punishment 192. Howe many kinds of afflictions there be 194 What be the causes of them 198 What are the comforts that are to be opposed against them 200 THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERY WHAT mans deliuery is 226 Whether any deliuery might bee wrought after the fall 227 Whether deliuerie bee necessarie and certaine 231 What manner of deliuerie this is 231 By what meanes mans deliuery may be wrought 233 Of the Mediatour What a Mediatour is 238 For what cause a Mediatour is necessarie 239 What is the office of a Mediator 241 What maner of Mediatour ours ought to be 243 Who is may be that Mediator 250 That there is but one Mediatour 252 Of the couenant What a couenaunt is 253 Howe a couenaunt may bee made betweene God and men 255 whether there be but one couenāt 255 In what the old and new couenaunt agree and in what they differ 256 Of the Gospel What the Gospel is 159 Whether the Gospel hath bin alwaies knowen 261 Howe the Gospell differeth from the Law 264 What are the proper effectes of the Gospel 267 Whence the trueth certainty of the Gospel may appeare 267 Of faith The necessitie of the true doctrine of faith 268 What faith is in general 270 What are the kinds of faith 272 How those kindes differ 275 How faith hope differ agree 278 What are the causes of faith 276 What are the effects of faith 280 Vnto whom faith is giuen 281 Conclusions comprising the summe of faith 285 Of the Creede or Symbole of the Apostles VVhat a Symbole is 287 What are the parts of the Apostolick Symbole 288 The first part of the Creede of God the Father Creatour The sense and meaning of the words I beleeue in God the father Almighty Creatour 291 Of God VVhether there be a God 294 VVho and what God is 301 An explication of the description of God deliuered by the church 305 VVhence it may appeare that there is but one God 336 VVhat these woordes Essence Person Trinity betoken and signifie 340 VVhat difference betweene Essence and Person 341 VVhether these names are to bee vsed in the church 345 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or Godhead 347 How the three persons of the godhead are distinguished 349 VVherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the church 351 Of Creation VVhether the woorld were created of God 355 How God made the world 362 For what cause god created the world 367 Of Angels VVhat good Angels are 369 Of euil spirits or Angels 375 Of Gods prouidence Errors concerning Gods prouidence 379 Whether there bee any prouidence of God 380 VVhat the prouidence of God is 385 A confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of God moouing and gouerning all and euery particular whether good or bad great or smal most iustly 405 VVhy the knowledge of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessarie 426 The second part of the Creed of God the redeemer VVhat is signified by the word Iesus 430
anie condition annexed For they are simply profitable vnto vs and god himselfe hath prescribed the manner and way which we are to folow in them so that in desiring them we cannot erre For what things god hath simply promised vs the same vve ought simply to desire vvhat things he hath specially and absolutely promised vs the same must vve in like manner absolutely aske and desire So must vve simplie desire the holy ghost because god hath simply and expressely promised that hee vvill giue the holy ghost to euerie one that desireth him 2 That wee maie learn to be content with those things which we haue receiued of the Lord and submit alwaies our will to his pleasure and purpose So god also for this cause hath commanded vs in generall to desire corporall bessings that such a desiring of those blessings may be an exercise of our faith and of the subiection and submitting of our vvill to the vvill of god 3 Why Christ comprised corporal blessings vnder the name of Bread VNder the name of bread by a Synecdoche which is an vsual figure of speech vnto the Hebrues Christ comprised al corporal blessings and such as are necessarie for this life as are al foode victuals raiment health ciuil peace This is apparaunt by the end and scope of the petition For wee desire Bread for our necessity But many other things are necessarie for vs. Therefore we desire them also vnder the name of Bread And this Hebrewe Synecdoche is found often in the sacred Bible as Gen. 3.19 Jn the sweat of thy face shalt thou eate bread Psal 41.9 Hee which did eate of my bread hath lifted vp the heele against me Furdermore christ did not only comprise things necessarie themselues vnder the name of Bread but also the profitable vse of them And therefore comprehēded he all these things vnder the name of Bread 1 To bridle and raine our desires that so we should aske onely thinges necessarie for vs to susteine our life and to serue God and our neighbour both in our common and proper vocation and calling 2 That bread might bee profitable vnto our saluation that is that those corporall blessinges might tend to our saluation or that the vse of those corporall blessinges might bee good and sauing vnto vs. For bread without this good and sauing vse is a stone Nowe Bread is made good and sauing vnto vs 1 Jf wee receiue it with faith and with that minde and after that manner and to that end which GOD requireth to wit if we sticke not in the creatures but pierce with our minde vnto God him-selfe the Creator of all things and the fountaine of al benefits or gifts 2. Jf we desire that he wil giue to the Bread obtained receiued from him a force vertu of nourishing and susteining our bodies Hereby now is it plainly clear what we desire when wee desire breade namely 1. Not great riches but onelie thinges necessarie 2. That they maie bee bread vnto vs that is that they maie bee good and sauing vnto vs thorough Gods benediction and blessing wherewith if they bee not accompanied the Breade shall not bee Bread 4 Wherefore Christ calleth it our Bread CHRIST willeth vs to desire our Bread not mine thine or another mans Bread 1 That we should desire those things which god giueth vs. For the Bread is made ours which is giuen vs of God necessarie for the sustainance of our life Therefore giue vs our bread signifieth Giue vs Bread O God assigned vnto vs by thee which thou wilt haue to be ours God as an Householder doth distribute to euerie one his portiō which we desire for our selues of him 2 That we should desire things necessarie gotten of vs by lawful labor in a kind and trade of life pleasing to God and honest and profitable to the common societie that is which we may receiue through ordinarie meanes and by lawfull waies the hand of god from heauen reaching thē out vnto vs. 2. Thes 3.10 He that will not woorke let him not eate 3 That we may vse them with a good conscience 5 Wherefore Christ calleth it Daylie Bread CHRIST calleth the Bread which wee must desire of god Dailie 1 Because hee will haue vs dailie to desire as much as maie for euerie daie suffice vs. 2 Because hee will bridle our raging and endlesse lusts and desires Mat. 6.32 Your Father knoweth what ye haue neede of Psal 37.16 A small thing vnto the iust man is better than great riches to the wicked and mighty Psal 34.9 Nothing wanteth to them that fear the Lord that is no profitable and necessarie thing Therefore Giue vs daily Bread that is giue vs Bread sufficient giue vs so much of things necessarie for our life as shall be needefull for euerie of vs in his vocation and calling to serue god and our neighbour 6 Why Christ addeth This day CHRIST addeth This daie 1 To meet with our distrustfulnesse and couetousnesse and to reclaime vs from both these vices 2 That we should depend on him onlie as yesterday so this daie and to morrow that namely we looke for the necessaries of this life at the hands of god that we know them to bee giuen vs of god not to be gotten by our owne hands or labours or diligence that also we know that they beeing receiued profit not our bodie except gods blessing dooth accompany them 3 That the exercise of faith and praier maie alwaies be continued in vs. For as long as it is said This day so long wil he haue praier to bee continued that so wee may yeelde due obedience to that Commaundement Praie alwaies 7 Whether it be lawfull to desire riches THIS question together with the next ensuing ariseth out of the former questions For when wee are willed to desire onely dailie Bread and that this daie it seemeth at the first sight that it is not lawful either to desire riches or to put vp any thing for the morrow But it is verilie lawfull to desire riches if taking away all ambiguity and doubtfulnesse of the worde wee vnderstand by the name of riches things necessary for the susteināce of life As the Epicure defined riches To bee a pouertie agreeable to the Law of nature This definition is good And if we so take the name of riches riches are doubtles to be desired of god in asmuch as we ought to desire such things as are necessary for nature and our place and function whereunto god hath called vs. The reason hereof is because these necessarie things or riches are dailie Bread which we ought to desire They are also otherwise defined To bee an aboundance and plentie ouer and aboue thinges necessarie So Crassus surnamed the Rich said that no man was rich but he who was able to maintaine an armie with his reuenues If wee take riches in this sense riches are not at all to be desired of God because Salomon in the person of al the godly saith
Prouerb 30.8 Giue me not pouerty nor riches by which wordes the spirite of god also by Salomon teacheth vs to pray against riches that is aboundance aboue things necessarie Hither belongeth also that of Paul 1. Tim 6.9 They that will be rich fall into tentations and snares and into manie foolish and noysome lustes which drowne men in perdition and destruction for which cause riches are called Thornes by Christ But contrariwise Godlinesse is great gaine if a man be content with that he hath But notwithstanding if god hath giuen vs any thing beside those things which are necessarie for vs let vs doe our diligence to vse them well And to this end first we must take heede that we repose not our confidence in them Secondly Wee must consider that wee are Gods stewards who hath committed these riches vnto vs to employ and bestowe well and that by this means he hath laide a burden vpon vs and therefore shall wee one day render an account to god of our stewardship and administration 8 Whether it be lawfull to put vp anie thing for heereafter IT is doubtles lawfull for to put vp some thing for time to come according to this cōmandement of Christ Gather vp the broken meat which remaineth that nothing be lost Hither belōg all such precepts and commandements as speake of parsimony and frugalitie And here further wee are to obserue these three things 1 That those things which are stored vp bee lawfullie gotten purchased by lawful honest labor industry 2 That we repose no confidence in them 3 That they may be emploied on lawfull and necessarie vses both of our owne and others as to the maintenance either of our life or of our family or of our friendes Likewise to the preseruation of the Church to aide the common wealth when neede shall require and to bestow somewhat on the poore and our needy brethren Hereof saith Paul Ephes 4.28 Let him that stole steale no more but let him rather labour and worke with his hands the thing which is good that he may haue to giue vnto him which needeth Now shal aunswere easily be made to such obiections as may be opposed against this petition 1 Obiection That which we desire is not ours Bread is ours Wherefore we neede not to desire bread Aunswere There is a diuerse signification in the woorde ours For in the Maior proposition it signifieth a thing which we haue in our own power but after a farre other manner is Bread ours as hath bin before declared 2 Obiection Christ willeth vs to desire Daily Bread Therfore it is not lawful to put vp any thing against the Morrow but we are to care only for the present day Againe he willeth vs not to desire Bread against the morrow but to desire Bread for This daie therefore they doe ill who gather any thing for future vses Aunswere This is a fallacie putting that for a cause which is no cause Christ willeth vs to desire daily bread This day and therefore wee must also desire thinges necessarie of him for our life for euerie day this day to morrow and so long as wee liue but hee meaneth not hereby as if hee would not haue vs labour for the morrow or not to put vp any thing for the morrow or to cast away those blessings which he hath already giuen vs sufficing for the morrowe Christ indeed otherwhere commandeth That wee care not for the morrow but so he forbiddeth vs to thinke of the morrowe with distrustfulnesse but not with praiers labours Wherefore the Lord will not that wee put vp nothing for hereafter but first that we be content with things present all distrust couetousnesse vnlawfull getting disobedience being set apart and banished 2 That we place not our trust in things necessarie giuen vs of God but knowe and certainlie perswade our selues that those benefits which haue beene and are giuen come vnto vs from the hande of God and that they are not otherwise good and profitable vnto vs except his blessing come to them 3 That wee consider our selues alwaies to stand in neede of Gods blessing And wee must withall beware that wee prescribe not to god what he is to giue vs. THE FIFT PETITION AND forgiue vs our debts as we forgiue our debtors This petition is a notable confession of the church wherein she acknowledgeth and bewaileth her sins it is withal a consolation that the Church shall receiue remission of sinnes according to Christs promise Now Christ in this petition will 1 That we acknowledge our sinne 2 That we thirst after remission of our sinnes because it is granted to them onlie that desire it and who do not tread vnder foot the bloud of the Son of god 3. That our faith bee exercised because this petition confirmeth our faith and again this petition floweth from faith For faith is the cause of praier and praier is the cause of faith as concerning the encreasing of faith The special Questions 1 What Christ here calleth debts 2 What is remission of sinnes 3 Why we are to desire remission of sinnes 4 How sinnes are remitted vnto vs. 1 WHAT CHRIST HERE CALLETH DEBTS CHrist calleth al our sins debtes both originall actuall and those both of fact and omission And they are called debts because they make vs debters to god either of obedience or punishment which we are to pay For when we sin we doe not giue nor perfourme vnto god what we owe vnto him as long as we giue not this vnto him so long we remaine debters 2 What is remission of sinnes THE creditor is said to Remit the debter when he neither requireth the debt of him nor punisheth him Remission of sinnes is That god wil not impute any sinne vnto vs but doth receiue vs into fauour pronounceth vs iust and righteous and accounteth vs for his sons of his meere and free mercy for Christs satisfaction performed by him for vs imputed vnto vs apprehended of vs by faith And that therefore hee wil not punish vs for our sin but endoweth vs with iustice and euerlasting life because the remission of sinne taketh away the punishment thereof For sin and punishment are correlatiues put sin and you put punishment take away sinne and punishment is also taken away Obiection When we desire that god will remit vs our sins we desire that god wil inuert the order of his iustice Answer The consequence of this reason is false For we desire remission of sinnes for the satisfaction of Christ for which they are remitted vnto vs and therefore our sins are not remitted vs with any breach of gods iustice because they are remitted vs with recompence made for them Reply If they be remitted with recompence made for them Then god dooth not remit vs our sinnes freely Answere They are remitted with recompence therefore not freely in respect of Christ but they are remitted freely in respect of vs because hee receiueth not satisfaction of vs