and dignity ouer all Churches in all parts of the world and neither by Councell Emperor or such Donation but by old custome and the institution of Christ And the same Church as before still continueth the true Church of Christ I hope it is no offence to agree with it in this as in other questions Chapter 4. All bookes receiued for Scripture by the Roman Church are Canonicall THus hauing by the directions sentence of Protestant writers of so late memory as this present is found out that the Roman Church is the spouse of Christ his true Church and piller of truth whose communion we must embrace followe her directions rest in her judgement liuing dying therein to haue eternal life the only and chiefest happynes which we can seeke or find And that the authority of the chiefe Bishops of that holy Apostolike See hath euer bin so soueraigne chiefe commanding and supreame as these men haue taught vs in the former Chapters we might here by D. Fields censure and aduise confine our selues and vvade no further in so many intricate controuersies of religion But to giue a finall contentment to all curiosities let vs briefly enter into a particuler-like examination of all principall Articles in question And first of Scriptures vvhose authority is either only or chiefest with Protestants D. Couell writeth in these wordes a Couell def of Hook p. 31 The Church of Rome teacheth no bad opinion to affirme that the Scriptures are holy diuine in themselues but so esteemed by vs for the authority of the Church And againe That the Scriptures are true we haue it from the Church And further thus b pag. 32. 33. supr The Church hath foure singuler offices towardes the Scripture First to be of them as it were a faithfull register Secondly to discerue and judge betweene false and adulterate and that which is true and perfect The third to publish and diuulge to proclayme as a cryer the true edict of our Lord him selfe The last is to be an Interpreter and in that following the safest rule to make an vndiuided vnity of the truth vncapable of contradiction to be a most faithfull expositor of his owne meaning And concludeth thus c page 34. supr We say that we are taught to receiue the word of God from the authority of the Church we see her judgement we heare her voice in humility subscribe vnto all this Hitherto be D. Couels wordes for the major proposition of my Syllogisme But the minor or second position that the Roman Church is the true Church of Christ is allowed and proued by Protestants before Therefore this Protestant argument must be thus concluded All bookes which the Church of Rome proposeth for Scriptures the expositions which shee deliuereth c. In humility we must subscribe vnto them receiue them as the word of God from her authority D. Doue referreth the question what bookes be Canonicall Scripture to the two Doctors S. Augustine and S. Hierome His vvordes be these d Doue perswas pag. 15. Catholikes proue them to be Canonicall out of S. Augustine We that they be Apocrypha out of S. Hierome both which Doctors are of no small authority with the Church of Rome and therefore in this we differ no more from them then S. Hierome did from S. Augustine Therefore I hope for many causes Protestants will giue place vnto vs in this question It is knowne S. Augustine in calling was aboue S. Hierome In learning D. Couell telleth you e Cou. against Burg. pag. 3. he was farre the most learned Doctor that euer was or shall be in all likely-hood Thirdly your publike Conference f Conference infr to be after cited hath answered S. Hieromes authority for Catholikes Fourthly S. Augustine speaketh in the name of the whole Church for these bookes his wordes be these g August tom 10. ser 191. We receiue the old and newe Testament in that number of bookes which the authority of the holy Catholike Church hath deliuered And in the place where he deliuereth the Canon of Scriptures as Catholikes nowe doe hee giueth these rules to him that vvould knowe vvhich bee true Scriptures his vvordes bee these h Tom. 3. lib. 2. doct Christ cap. 8. In Canonicall Scriptures let him followe the authority of the most Catholike Churches among which those be which haue deserued to haue Apostolike Sees and to receiue their Epistles And so proceeding too long to be cited concludeth by all his rules that all those bookes vvhich the Roman Church nowe receiueth there remembred by S. Augustine are Canonicall But to be briefe The Protestant Surueyor of the communion booke affirmeth plainely i Suruey of the booke of common prayer pag. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. that the Protestants of England must approue for Canonicall these bookes with the Roman Church So likewise doe the 22. Preachers of London in their Petition k Petit. of 22. preachers except against homilies and except 4. against the com booke And D. Field is of the same opinion or must be for thus he vvriteth l Field lib. 4. c. 23. pa. 245. The ancient and true beleeuing Iewes before the comming of Christ especially such as liued in Greece and nations out of Iury commonly called Hellenists receiued those bookes for Canonicall Scripture And to vse his vvordes Hence it came to passe that the Iewes deliuered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Churches And speaking againe of that volume of the Hellenists he addeth m page 246. These bookes joyned in one volume were translated out of Greeke into Latin and read by them of the Latin Church in that translation And entreating of S. Augustine and the Latin Fathers especially in Africke and the third Carthaginian Councell vvhere this Canon is receiued he vvriteth thus They reckon the bookes of Scripture according as they found them in vse in the Latin Church Then D. Field hath absolutely graunted that in the Latin Church vnder vvhich England is these Scriptures vvere euer esteemed for Canonicall And being translated as he acknowledgeth out of Greeke into Latin this Gretian vvill not easily persvvade but the Greeke Church also first embraced them for he saith thus n page 245. supr The Greeke Iewes or Hellenists deliuered this Canon to the Christian Churches then first to the Greeke Church being in Greece among them and best vnderstanding those Greeke Scriptures before they vvere translated into Latin The Protestant Conference at Hampton-Court entreating of the Protestant exceptions against these Scriptures vseth these wordes o Conference pag. 60. Most of the objections made against those bookes were the old cauils of the Iewes renewed by S. Hierome in his time who was the first that gaue them the name of Apocrypha which opinion vpon Ruffinus his challendge he after a sort disclaimed the rather because a generall offence was taken at his speaches in that kinde Hitherto the censure of that publike
corruptions as may partly appeare by the Abridgement of the Ministers of Lincolne Dyocesse The Protestant Authour of the Aduertisement testifieth h Aduertisemēt an 1604 The Bible is peruerted in 848. places in the old Testament The English Protestant Bible is inferior to the Turkes Alcaron And so Christianity is denyed in England by publike authority Therefore most justly might his Majesty say in the publike conference i Conference pag. 46. That he could neuer yet see a Bible well translated into English but the worst of all he thought the Geneua to be Chapter 6. The true lawfull and juridicall exposition of Scriptures is in the Roman Church and not with Protestants THE true and vvarranted exposition of Scriptures is absolutely proued before to belong to the true Church of Christ and the Roman Church For this place D. Field vvriteth thus a Field lib. 4. c. 19. pa. 134. We confesse that neither conference of places nor consideration of the Antecedentia and Consequentia nor looking into the originals are of any force vnlesse we finde the thinges which we conceiue to be vnderstood and meant in the places interpreted to be consonant to the rule of faith And this rule of faith as he further teacheth b page 242. must be tryed either by the generall practise of the Church the renowmed of all ages or the Pastors of an Apostolike Church vvhich as the vvorld can vvitnesse no Protestant can make clayme vnto Therefore as D. Couell vvriteth c Couell def of Hooker pag. 85. Doctrines deriued exhortations deducted interpretations agreeable are not the word of God And yet these be the groundes of Protestant religion and those vvhereupon their pretended faith and justification it selfe vvith them dependeth Although D. Field thus againe condemneth it d Field p. 226 Priuate interpretation is not so proposed and vrged as if they would binde all others to receiue it Therefore he assigneth e page 228. three kindes of interpretation and judgement One of discretion common to all the other of direction in the Pastours of the Church and a third of jurisdiction proper to them that haue supreame power in the Church And this third hee only acknowledgeth in the Bishops assembled in a generall Councell which as he teacheth may interpret the Scripture and by their authority suppresse all them that gaine-say such interpretation and subject euery man that shall disobey such determinations as they consent vpon to excommunication and censures of like nature Hitherto his vvordes Nowe that there neither hath beene nor possibly can bee any generall Councell among Protestants none clayming further jurisdiction then their owne temporall Terrytories it is both apparant to all and acknovvledged f Relation of relig cap. 47. in expresse vvordes by the Protestant Relator of religion And yet besides D. Field recited before D. Sutcliffe g Sutcl subuers pa. 119. D. Morton h Morton epist dedicat 2. part Apol. lib. 4. 2. part Apol. pa. 340 cap. 18. M. Willet i Willet Antilog and the rest acknowledge ordinarily that a generall Councell hath the highest and binding judgement And although M. Willet doth say k Willet prefat Engl. Antilog pag. 71. 120. That in England the temporall Prince is Gouernour ruler chiefe ouerseer and steward of the Church to whose judgement and redresse the reformation of religion belongeth Yet he addeth l Pag. 150. 43. supr Neither he nor their Church hath any priuiledge from errour But plainely protesteth m Willet prefa to the reader in Antilo They must take out a newe lesson and learne to reforme their erroneous conceits And more then this is generally taught and confessed among them of which hereafter For this time and place I will only make exemplification of D. Doue his graunt and confession vvhich followeth in these vvordes n D. Doue perswas pag. 31. When the Masse was first put downe King Henry had his English Lyturgie and that was judged absolute without exception but when King Edward came to the Crowne that was condemned and an other in the place which Peter Martir and Bucer did approue as very consonant to Gods word When Queene Elizabeth beganne her raigne the former was judged to be full of imperfections and a newe was deuised and allowed by the consent of the Clergie but about the middle of her raigne we grewe weary of that booke and great meanes haue beene wrought to abandon that and establish an other which although it was not obtayned yet we doe at the least at euery change of Prince change our booke of common prayers we be so wanton that we knowe not what we would haue Hitherto his wordes and he freely confesseth errours in all these states and changes Yet this flitting from errour to errour finding no center hath beene so grieuous euen to some Protestants that the Suruey of the booke of common prayer vseth these wordes o Suruey of the commun booke pag. 159. 160. The late Archbishop of Canterbury as is credibly reported tooke such a griefe when the communion booke should haue beene altered discouered by these or like wordes good Lord when shall we knowe what to trust vnto that he presently fell into his palsey was carryed from the Court and dyed shortly after But let any man enter into a serious consideration of Protestant doctrine in this point that vnder paine of damnation vve are bound to finde and followe the truth That generall Councels as before may subject euery man disobeying their determinations to excommunication and censures of like nature the most terrible and fearefull punishment of this world And Protestants in England so seuerely punish all Catholikes for not consenting to their religion which themselues thus loade with errours and all judgements Ecclesiasticall euen generall Councels p Articul 21. anno 1562. may erre and haue erred euen in thinges pertayning vnto God as is defined in their Articles and is commonly taught and beleeued with them to excuse their errours This consideration is able to putmen not regardlesse of saluation into more then a quaking palsey Chapter 7. Traditions are of equall authority with Scripture yet proue Catholike religion THE dignity and authority of vnwritten and Apostolicall Traditions being lawfully proued was euer esteemed such that M. Wotton affirmeth a Wotton def of Perkins pag. 405. Out of all question we are bound to keepe them And telleth b page 436. That M. Perkins was of the same opinion c Field p. 134 D. Field speaketh of such Traditions in these vvordes There is no reason but these should be equall with the Scriptures For it is not the writing that giueth these thinges their authority but the worth and credit of him that deliuereth them though by word and liuely voice only He addeth also d Field p. 240 that the perpetuall Virginity of our Lady was a Tradition and only receiued by such authority and so doe other Protestants And both they
and D. Field e Field supr acknowledge Heluidius was condemned of heresie and justly for denyall thereof which could not be except to denie the doctrine of true Traditions were to denie the word of God in their judgements Nowe let vs see vvhat Traditions we shall haue approued by Protestants The same Authour maketh this discourse and diuision following f Field lib. ◠cap. 19. First we receiue the number and names of the Authours of bookes diuine and Canonicall as deliuered by Tradition This Tradition we admit the number authours and integrity of the partes of these bookes we receiue as deliuered by Tradition The second kinde of Tradition which we admit is that summary comprehension of the chiefe heades of Christian doctrine contayned in the Creede of the Apostles which was deliuered to the Church as a rule of faith The third is that forme of Christian doctrine and explication of the seuerall partes thereof which the first Christians receiuing of the same Apostles that deliuered to them the Scriptures commended to posterities This may rightly be tearmed a Tradition for that we neede a playne and distinct explication of many thinges which are some-what obscurely contayned in the Scriptures g Field p. 239 The fourth kinde of Tradition is the continued practise of such thinges as neither are contayned in the Scripture expressely nor the example of such practise expressely there deliuered though the groundes reasons and causes of the necessity of such practise he there contayned h p. 239 supr The fift kinde of Traditions comprehendeth such obseruations as in particuler are not commanded in Scripture nor the necessity of them from thence concluded c. Lastly comming to Traditions touching conuersation and manners he preuenteth confuteth the vsuall objections of Protestants about this doctrine in these wordes i Field pag. 241. 242. That the Apostles deliuered many thinges of this nature to the Churches some by way of precept some by way of counsaile and aduise only some to particuler Churches and some to all some to continue but for a time and some to continue for euer we make no doubt And exemplifying that the Lordes day or Sonday is of this kinde he addeth k Field supr pag. 242. And sundry other thinges there are which doubtlesse the Apostles deliuered by Tradition but they are confounded with Ecclesiasticall Traditions as Waldensis aptly noteth that we might the more reuerence the constitutions of the Church and are dispensable by the guides of the Church Hitherto be the wordes of D. Field Then to make ashort reflexion vpon this his doctrine By his first rule of Traditions he must needes graunt vnto vs which I haue proued before at large that althose bookes which the Roman church approueth for Scripture together with the speciall doctrines of prayer for the dead to Angels c. are Traditions For not only D. Field and his rules doe so assure vs but D. Couell l Couell against Burges pag. 87. from the primatiue Church hath told vs that all which we receiue were the treasure of the holy Ghost and diuine instrument which the Apostles deliuered to the Churches Secondly we must of necessity resort to the Roman Church to knowe and learne the forme of Christian doctrine and explication of the seuerall parts thereof and the obscurities of Scriptures For he saith that the Apostles deliuered this as a Tradition to posterities And no posterity of Protestants can be of this posterity because both their priorities posterities denie Traditions Thirdly D. Field must needes seeke for or allowe of many Traditions which he remembreth not and in all equall judgement as many Articles of Catholike religion as we claime by Tradition for in his fourth fift and sixt member of Traditions he euer speaketh m Field pag. 241. 242. of them in the plurall number as thinges obseruations of this sort sundry other and the like And yet he only recounteth baptisme of Infants in the fourth n page 239. The obseruation of Lent in the fift o page 239. and Sonday or the Lordes day in the last If he will say they are confounded with Ecclesiasticall Traditions as he did that men might more reuerence the constitutions of the Church Let them at the last recant their contempt and dislike against them And this the rather because the rules vvhich he assigneth to knowe true Traditions being p Field p. 242 the authority and custome of the Church consent of Fathers or testimony of an Apostlike Church neither doe nor possibly can tell of any Traditions to aduantage Protestants which denie all Traditions So that of necessity both the Traditions and rules to knowe them doe and must belong to the Church Apostolike of Rome being in this question a rule of it selfe as he hath declared Then by the doctrine of D. Field and the Protestants before and nowe to be cited Catholikes may lawfully say with the ancient Fathers with D. Couell q Cou. against Burges pag. 139. 124. 125 and other Protestants That the signe of the Crosse is an Apostolicall constitution and Tradition With D. Couel r pa. 122. sup againe and the ancient Fathers from them that the mixture of water with wine in the Eucharist is an Apostolical Tradition With the Pastors of the Apostolike Churches three hundred Fathers and consent and custome of the Church D. Fields rules for true Traditions in the second Nicen Councell ſ Conc. Nic. 2. That reuerence of Images is an Apostolicall Tradition With S. Chrisostome S. Augustine and S. Epiphanius by D. Fields rules and M. Middletons t Middleton Papistomast pag. 137. 138 47. 45. graunt That sacrifice and prayer for the dead was an Apostolicall Tradition With the ancient Fathers so receiuing from those vvhich vvent before them by graunt also of M. Middleton u pa. 134. sup That vowes of chastity and single life in Priestes is to be obserued by Tradition With the ancient Fathers that Reliques to be reuerenced is a Tradition when M. Willet x Willet Antilog pag. 13. telleth vs that Vigilantius was condemned of heresie for denying it With his Majesty y Conference pag. 13. and the conference with the consent of Fathers Apostolike Churches c. That the particuler and personal absolution from sinne after confession is Apostolicall and a very Godly ordinance With the Protestant z Conference supr pag. 18. Bishop of Winchester antiquity so consenting That baptisme to be ministred by priuate persons in time of necessity is an holy Tradition With his Majesty and the said conference a Conference pag. 35. 36. that Bishops he diuinae ordinationis With the same Protestant conference b Conference pag. 10. 11. and antiquity not only that Confirmation is an Apostolicall Tradition But because it is so joyned by them with Baptisme and hath both a visible signe and grace by the Communion booke c Cōm booke tit Confirmation reuiued that it