Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
word_n holy_a spirit_n trinity_n 2,812 5 9.9722 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27054 The true and only way of concord of all the Christian churches the desirableness of it, and the detection of false dividing terms / opened by Richard Baxter. Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691. 1680 (1680) Wing B1432; ESTC R18778 282,721 509

There are 19 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Father and the Holy Ghost nor Sanctification Consolation and Sealing to the Holy Ghost than to the Father and the Son and so that they are not hence relatively distinguishable to us and by us at all III. Of the Person of Jesus Christ 1. That Christ is but a Creature or not eternal or not of the same Divin● Essence as is the Father 2. That Christ hath no humane created soul but the Divine nature was to his body instead of a soul 3. Or that a superangelical created nature united to his Divine nature was instead of a humane soul to his body 4. That Christs body was not derived from the Virgin Mary but only passed through her as water through a Channel 5. That the Mother of Christ alone was as much the cause of his soul and body as our Fathers and Mothers both are of ours 6. That the Virgin Mary was not the Mother of him that was God and man 7. That she was the Mother and actual cause or procreator of the Godhead and of Christ as God 8. That Jesus Christ was two Persons a Divine and Humane 9. That he had not two distinguishable natures viz. the Divine and Humane 10. That he had not two distinguishable understandings wills and operations 11. That the Body of Jesus Christ was incorruptible in and by its own nature and constitution and not only by its union with the Deity and by Gods will decree and preservation 12. That he was begotten by Joseph or some other man 13. That Christs humane nature soul or body suffered no real pain nor was capable of suffering any 14. That he was not of the line of David after the flesh 15. That he had original sin guilt or vitiosity 16. That Christ is not now God and man in heaven 17. That the Glorified Body of Christ is now formally flesh and blood so called univocally as ours having the same formal constitutive essence 18. That every Priest maketh Bread and Wine by the Consecration in the Eucharist to become no longer Bread and Wine but the very Body Flesh and Blood of Christ or that God so maketh it or the Priests speaking those words And so that all the consecrated Bread and Wine since Christs days till now are made Christ's flesh and blood and yet his flesh and blood no whit increased 19. That all believers are by union part of the Natural Person of Christ 20. That the humane nature of Christ is now the Godhead or is become a proper part of the second Person in the Trinity as such And here presumptuous men must take great heed of medling too far some Scholastick Divines say It is errour to say that Christs humane nature is a Part of his person because his Person was perfect from eternity and the Divinity cannot be a Par. of any thing Others say that It is erro● to say that the Humane nature is no part of Christ 〈◊〉 seeing it is no part of the Divine Essence or nature therefore it is a part of his person Others say that it is only an Accident of Christ some think that if it were not for fear of the clamours of Ignorant Hereticaters that will call it Nestorianism it were soundest and safest to say that the word Person is equivocal And that as it is taken for the second eternal person in the Trinity the humane nature is no part of it But as it is taken Relatively for the Person of the Mediator the humane nature is a part And so that Christ hath two persons but not univocally but equivocally so called IV. Of the Holy Ghost and the Holy Scriptures 1. That the Holy Ghost is but a creature or not God of the same essence with the Father and the Son 2. That the Holy Ghost is but the Angelical nature or species and as the diabolical nature and many Devils are called singularly the Devil so the many Angels are called the Holy Spirit 3. That the Immortal part of man called his Spirit is the essence of the Holy Ghost 4. That the Holy Ghost as operative on man is not a valid witness of the truth of Christ and Christianity in the world 5. That the Holy Ghost did not impregnate the Virgin Mary or that Christ was not conceived by him 6. That Adam had not the Holy Ghost or true Holiness 7. That the Prophets spake not by the Holy Ghost Or that their prophecies are of Private interpretation that is objectively to be interpreted of such private persons and things as they immediately spake of and which were but types of Christ or grace 8. That the Holy Ghost in the Prophets was not the Spirit of the Redeemer and sent by him 9. That the miracles of Christ and his Apostles were not wrought by the Holy Ghost 10. That the Holy Ghost may set the seal of true uncontrolled miracles to a lie 11. That the Canonical Scriptures were not indited by the Holy Ghost as infallible records of the Divine will 12. That they are but for a time till a perfecter Law is made called The Law of the Spirit 13. That they are imperfect without the supplement of Roman Tradition as part of the Rule of faith and life 14. That they were but occasional writings never intended for the universal law or rule of faith and holy living 15. That there are in the true original as they came from the Apostles some errours 16. That in the present received Originals there is any errour inconsistent with true saving faith and practice 17. That we are not bound to believe the Holy Scriptures to be Gods word but by the authoritative proposal of the Church of Rome that is A general Council subject to the Pope or called or approved by him as authorized thereto by Christ or that we must believe that the Pope or Council are authorized by Christ before we are bound to believe in Christ himself 18. That the Scriptures are not intelligible in necessary things till the Church Council Pope or Fathers expound them to us 19. That the Scriptures have no such im●●ss or excellency by which they manifest themselves to be of God supposing necessary conveyance and ministerial explication 20. That we must not understand any text of Scripture but as the consent of ancient Fathers expoundeth it 21. That the Spirit now given to Po●● Councils or to individual Christians is as much the Rule of faith and life as 〈◊〉 holy Scriptures or that the Spirit is not given now to us 〈◊〉 to teach us to understand believe love and practise Gods word indited by the more emmen● inspiration of the Apostles and Prophets ●ut also to inspire us as infallibly to know more than is revealed in the Scripture and that as needful to Salvation Or that it is not so much the Spirit extraordinarily inspiring the Apostles as the Spirit as inspiring ourselves which is every mans rule of faith and life 22. That the Light which is in Heathens Infidels and all men is this
conclude no worse of the ingneous Element nor yet of sensitive or Intellectual spirits For 1. How far they are passive and partible being many we know not Most of the old Fathers especially the Greeks as Faustus Regiensis cited them in the book which Mammertus answered thought that God only was totally Immaterial or Incorporeal And it must not be denyed that every creature doth pati à Deo is passive as from God the first cause and many Philosophers think that all Passivity is a consequent or proof of answerable Materiality And many think that we have no true notion of substantia besides Relative as it doth subsist of it self and substare accidentibus but what is the same with Materia purissima 2. But supposing all this to be otherwise spirits being true substances of a more perfect nature than grosse bodies as they are more inclined to Union inter se so there is as little if not less danger that they should be losers by that Union than that a drop of water should be so For the perfection of the highest nature must needs be more the perfection of all the Parts Physical or intelligible than the perfection of the lowest And the noblest inclineth not to its own loss by desiring Union which to the lowest is no loss 38. It is called in the Text The Vnity of the spirit 1. As it is One species of Spiritual Grace which all the members are endowed with which is their Holiness or Gods Image on them which is called The Spirit in us because it is the immediate and excellent work of Gods spirit As the Sun is said to be in the room because it shineth there 2. As the Spirit is the efficient cause hereof 3. And because this One spirit in all the members inclineth them to Vnity even as the soul of every animal inclineth it to preserve the Unity of all its parts and to abhor wounding and separation as that which will be its pain and tendeth to its destruction by dissolution 39. The Holiness or spiritual qualification of souls which is called The Spirit is Holy or Divine Life Light and Love or the holy disposition of the souls three natural faculties Vital Power or Activity Vnderstanding and Will As all men have One species of humanity so all Saints have this One spirit 40. Though Quickning by holy Life and Illumination be parts of sanctification or this spirit yet the last part Love is the compleating perfective part and therefore is oft called Sanctification specially and by the word Spirit and Love is oft meant the same thing And when the spirit is said to be given to Believers the meaning is that upon and by believing the wonderful demonstrations of Gods Love in Christ the habit of holy Love is kindled in us 41. This holy Love which is gods Image for God is Love usually beginneth at things visible as being the nearest objects to man in flesh And as we see ●od here as in a glass so we first see the Glass before we see God in it And accordingly we first see the Goodness and Loveliness of Gods blessings 〈◊〉 us and of good people and of good words and actions But yet when we come up to the Love of God it is H● that is the chiefest object in whom all the Church by Love is centred so that we thenceforth Love God for himself and all his servants and word as for his sake and impress on them And our Vnion by Love would not be perfect if it United us together only among our selves and did not Unite us all in God and our Redeemer So that the Vnity of the spirit is the Love of God in Christ and of all the faithful yea and of all men so far as God appeareth in them to which Gods spirit strongly enclineth all true believers including holy Life and Light as tending to this Vnity of spiritual Love 42. Therefore Love is not distinctly named after among the particular terms of Vnity as faith and hope are because it is meant by that word There is One spirit 43. The love and Vnity of Christians as in One Church supposeth in Nature a Love to man as man and a desire of the Vnity and concord of mankind As Christianity supposeth humanity 44. But Experience and Faith assure us that this humane Love and Vnity is wofully corrupted and much lost and that though mans soul be convinced by natural light that it is good and have a general languid inclination to it yet this is so weak uneffectual as that the principles of wrath and division prevail against it and keep the world in miserable confusion 45. It is the predominancy of the corrupt selfish inclination which is the great Enemy and destroyer of Love and Vnity 46. Christianity is so far from confining all our Love to Christians that it is not the least use of it to revive and recover our Love to Men as Men so that no men have a full and healed Love to mankind and desire of universal Vnity but believers 47. The purest and strongest Love and Vnity is universal And it is not genuine Christianity if it do not incline us to Love all men as men and all professed Christians as such and all Saints as Saints according to their various degrees of amiableness 48. Love and Vnity which is not thus universal partaketh of wrath and S●hism For he that loveth but a part of men doth not love the rest and he that is Vnited but to a part whether great or small is Schismatically divided from all the rest 49. But Love to All must not be Equal to all nor our Vnity with all Equal as on the same terms or in the same degree As the Goodness of meer Humanity and the meer Profession of Christianity is less and so less amiable than is the Goodness of true sanctification so our Love and Vnity must be diversified All the members of the body must be Loved and their Unity carefully preserved But yet not Equally but the head as an head and the heart as an heart and the stomach as a stomach and all the essential parts as Essential without which it is not a humane body and all the integral parts as such but diversely according to their worth and use The eye as an eye and a tooth but as a tooth Goodness being the object of Love and Love being the life of our Vnity it varieth in degrees as Goodness varieth 50. That Love and Vnity which is sincere in kind may be mixt with lamentable wrath and Schism as all our Graces are with the contrary sin in our imperfect state Not but that all Christians have an habitual inclination to Vniversal Love and Vnity but the act may be hindred by the want of due information and by false reports and misrepresentations of our brethren which hide their amiableness and render them to such more odious than they are 51. Sincere and genuine Love and Vnity hath an Universal care of
invented expositions will be as liable to be wrested by Hereticks as the Scripture It is ridculous presumption to talk of making any Law profession or Articles that a false Heretick may not subscribe to 3. But there is another remedy against them while they conceal their heresie they are no Hereticks in the judgment of the Church Non apparere here is as non esse when they divulge it the judicatures must correct them It 's vanity to dream that the Law is faulty as long as it is but such as men can break or that any Law can be made which none can break But as they break them they are to be judged 4. And we must not rack and divide the good for fear of such letting in the bad The Churches Concord and peace is of more regard than the keeping out of some secret Heretick yea of old he was not called a Heretick that did not separate from the Church All good men agree to the word of God but all will not agree to every word of yours § 13. I conclude In humane affairs there is nothing without imperfection weakness and incommodity and to pretend the cure of these by impossibilities or mischiefs is the way of such as these Thirteen hundred years have been the true schismaticks and distracters of the Church CHAP. X. A draught or specimen of such Forms as are before mentioned for the Approved and the Tolerated Ministers § 1. TThis Chapter should have gone before the ninth But I thought to pass it by lest it seem presumptuous But the observation how ordinarily men miscarry in this work hath perswaded me to run the hazard of mens censures § 2. 1. The form to be subscribed by the Approved Ministry I A. B. do seriously as in the sight of God profess that as I have been in Baptism devoted by the sacred Covenant to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost renouncing the Devil the world and the flesh so far as they are his enemies so I do unfeignedly Believe in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and consent still to that Covenant in hope of the grace and Glory promised obliging my self to continue by the help of that grace in Faith Love and sincere obedience to the end More particularly § 3. I. I do unfeignedly Believe 1. That there is one Only God an infinite Spirit of Life understanding and will most perfectly powerful wise and good incomprehensibly Three in One and One essence in Three called persons or subsistences by the Church the Father the Word and the Spirit of whom and through whom to whom are all things he being the Creator preserver Governour and the ultimate End of all Our absolute owner our most just Ruler and our most gracious and amiable Father and benefactor 2. I believe that this God created all the world things invisible and visible And made man in his own Image forming a fit Body and breathing into it a spirit of Life understanding and will fitted and obliged to know love and serve his Creator giving him the inferior Creatures for this use making him their Owner their Governour and their End under God But specially forbidding him to eat of the Tree of knowledge on pain of death 3. The woman being tempted by Satan and the man by the woman both fell by wilful sin from their Holiness Innocency and Happiness into a state of Pravity Guilt and misery under the slavery of the Devil world and flesh under Gods vindictive Justice and the condemnation of his Law Whence sinful corrupted guilty and miserable natures are propagated to all mankind And no meer Creature is able to deliver us § 4. II. I believe that God so loved the world that he gave his only Son to be their Saviour Who being God and one with the Father took our Nature and became man being conceived by the Holy Ghost born of the Virgin Mary named Jesus the Christ who was perfectly holy without sin fulfilling all righteousness and being tempted overcame the Devil and the world and after a life of humiliation gave himself a sacrifice for our sins by suffering a cursed death on the Cross to ransome us and reconcile us unto God and was buryed and descended to Hades and conquering death the third day he rose again And having sealed the New Covenant with his blood he commanded his Apostles to preach the Gospel to all the world and promised the Holy Ghost and after forty daiesascended into heaven where he is God and man the glorified Head over all things to his Church all power being given him in heaven and earth our prevailing Intercessor with God the Father to present us our service acceptable to God and communicate Gods grace and mercies unto us to Teach us Govern protect and judge us and to save and bless and glorifie us § 5. 2. By the new Testament Covenant or Law of grace God through the aforesaid Mediation of Jesus Christ doth freely give to fallen mankind Himself to be their Reconciled God and Father his Son to be their Saviour and his holy Spirit to be their sanctifier and comforter if they will accordingly believe and accept the gift and by faithful covenant give up themselves to him in these Relations Repenting of their sins and consenting to forsake the Devil the world and the flesh so far as they are enemies to God and their salvation and sincerely to obey Christ his Laws and his Spirit to the end bearing the Cross and following him though through sufferings that they may reign with him in Glory All which God will faithfully perform § 6. III. I Believe that God the Holy Spirit proceeding from the Father and from or by the son was given to the Prophets Apostles and Evangelists to be their infallible Guide in preaching and recording the doctrine of salvation and to be the great witness of Christ and his truth by his manifold Divine operations And that he is given to quicken illuminate and sanctifie all true believers and to save them from the Devil the world and the fleshes temptations from sin and from spiritual misery And that the Holy Scriptures indited by this Spirit are to be believed loved and obeyed as the word of God § 7. 2. I believe that all who by true Consent are devoted to God in the foresaid Baptismal Covenant and so continue are one sanctified Church or Body of Christ and have Communion in the same spirit of faith and Love and have forgiveness of their sins and having one God one Christ one spirit one faith one Baptism and one Hope of Heavenly Glory are bound to keep this unity of the spirit in the bond of peace in the Doctrine worship order and conversation and mutual helps which Christ hath by himself or his Apostles commanded avoiding uncharitable contentions divisions injuries and offences And that the Baptized Covenanters and external Professors of the foresaid Covenant consent are the visible
saying That for one infallible old Gentleman at Rome we have Thousands of Hot Spirits in England that pretend to more of the Divine Perfections than ever he did For if the Holy Ghost doth personally indwell in Sectaries then they are personally possessed with all the glorious Attributes of the Godhead pag. 26. And 28. The Idolatry of the Papists will be as excusable at the great day of Accounts as the unreverent Rudeness and superstitious Sowreness of the Sectary And p. 29. The gross Usurpation and Invasion of the Priestly Office by Sectaries to erect Churches c. throws more dirt upon the Christian Religion than the grossest Errors in the Roman Church c. Answ 1. I know none so worthy of the Name of Sectaries as the Papists that damn all Christians save themselves and feign themselves onely to be all the Church 2. It 's like by these Sectaries he meaneth those that are not Re-ordained or have not uninterrupted Episcopal Ordination And if all such Reformed Churches are so much more dirty and injurious to Christianity than the grossest Errors of the Papists it 's better be of the Papal Church than of them 3. Doth pretending to the help of Gods Spirit in Praying and Preaching and Living arrogate more than pretending to Papal Infallibility in the Office of an Universal Monarch and Judge of the sense of all Gods Word The word Personal I have heard used by none but this and such Accusers But what he meaneth by it who can tell First If it refer to the Person of the Receiver how can the Holy Ghost dwell in any man and not dwell in his person Secondly If it refer to the Person of the Holy Ghost what Christian before this man did ever doubt that took the Holy Ghost to be God whether the Person as well as the Essence of the Holy Ghost be every where Doth not the Scripture say That the Holy Spirit dwelleth in Believers Rom. 8. 11. 1 Cor. 3. 16. 2 Tim. 1. 14. c. and God dwelleth in us 1 Joh. 4. 12. 15 16. And that we are an habitation of God by the Spirit Ephes 2. 22. Is Gods Word worse than Popery Or is not this to reproach God and his Word and Spirit more than the Reformed Churches do by not having Bishops who are accused by Mr. Dodwell to sin against the Holy Ghost Thirdly But if Personal should mean the mode and title of Union as if by Hypostatical Union like Christs the Holy Ghost and Believers be made one Person who are those Sectaries that hold such a thing who shew the state of the English Religion And this is one of the men that cry out against Toleration and tells us that There can be no stability of Government in England till there be a settlement in Religion No settlement of Religion but by uniting Affections No uniting Affections but by unity of Religion And so on Therefore Rulers must force all to be of one Religion Next to the thought of the Heathen and Apostate Nations case it is one of the saddest to me that Rulers and People that have too little studied such matters should lie under the temptation and horrid abuse of Clergymen that write and talk at such a rate as this man doth 1. Will he maintain That there is no Union of Religion wherever men are not of one opinion form or mode in every Circumstance Rite or Ceremony or every accident or integral of Faith Are any two men in the world then of one Religion any more than of one visage or slature c 2. If this man had Rulers that differed from him as much as he doth from the Nonconformists would he and could he presently change his judgment or would he falsly profess a change lest he should not be of one Religion with his Prince or rather must it not be he or such as he that must be the standard of that one Religion to all 3. Doth he believe That Prisons or Flames will make men of one Affection Would such usage win himself to love the judgment and way of those that he suffered by 4. Or if men of many Opinions and Affections be forced into the same Temple as a Prison doth their corporal presence make them of one Religion and Affection It is a doleful thing to hear Preachers of the Gospel cry out for Blood Flames or Prisons to make whole Kingdoms of one Religion confessing how unfit they are to do it themselves who have undertaken the Office that should do it Woe to the Princes Church and People that have not wit and grace to escape the snares of such ignorant Tyrannical Counsellors Abundance more such Pamphlets have lately endeavoured to destroy Love and Peace and infect the Land with Malice and Cruelty § XII The Roman Doctrine and Laws for exterminating and burning Hereticks is the top and perfection of this hypocritical wickedness which murdereth Gods Servants and depopulateth Countries on pretence of Charity Unity and Government And when so many Princes became guilty of serving this bloody Clergy that never knew what manner of spirit they were of it was Gods wisdom and justice to permit the same Councils of Bishops and the same Popes to decree their Deposition which decreed their Subjects extermination Lateran sub Innoc. 3. what can be more contrary to Nature to Humane Interest or to the Doctrine Example and Spirit of Christ And whose blood is safe while such blood-sucking Leeches are taken for the Rulers of the world and the Physicians of Souls § XIII All this I perceive is on occasion of Objections but superadded to what I fullier said before Part II. Chap. 8. But I still say That Toleration must have its due bounds and not extend to intolerable Doctrines Practices or Persons To proceed then Every one that will must not be Tolerated to be a publick Pastor and Preacher no not of the Truth For some insufficient men may by that manner bring a scandal or scorn on the sacred Doctrine and Worship of God and taking Gods Name profanely and in vain is worse than silence much less should men be suffered to preach or dispute down anys Point of Christian Faith or Duty § XIV In a word The Prince that will escape the dangerous Extreams of Licentiousness and oppressing Persecution must 1. Have an eye to the Holy Scripture and Apostolical Institution and to the Law of Nature together as his Rule 2. He must make the true publick Good which lieth in mens spiritual welfare his end 3. He must make the promoting of Obedience to God and his Laws the chief work of his Office and of his own Laws 4. He must abhor and avoid all carnal Interests contrary to the Interest of Christ and mens Souls 5. He must do all with Caution from a Spirit of Love and a Care to preserve mens fear of God 6. He must take heed of Partiality or hearkning to the counsel either of Atheists prophane men or of an ignorant proud and cruel
THE TRUE AND ONLY WAY OF CONCORD Of all the Christian Churches The desirableness of it and the detection of false dividing Terms Opened by RICHARD BAXTER LONDON Printed for John Hancock at the Three Bibles in Popes-head-alley over against the Royal Exchange in Cornhil 1680. Act. 15. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things Rom. 14. 17 18. The Kingdome of God is not meat and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost for he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved of men 2 Tim. 4. 1 2. I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his Kingdome Preach the word be instant in season and out of season Act. 4. 19. Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken to you more than unto God judge ye 1 Thes 2. 15 16. They please not God and are contrary to all men forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved to fill up their sin alway for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost Mr. Jones of the 〈…〉 Soveraign p. 344. Id fit quod jure fit 〈…〉 but great Lords of Nullities by the exemption of the Will and soul from and the frown of Heaven upon all bruitish injustice and force Read him also p. 23. THE PREFACE To the Honourable and Reverend Dr. George Morley late Lord Bishop of Worcester and now of Winchester and Dr. Peter Gunning Lord Bishop of Ely IT is now about eighteen years since you and many others were appointed by his Majesties commission with divers of us who desired some Reformation of the Church Discipline and worship to consider what Alterations of the Liturgy were necessary and expedient for the satisfaction of tender consciences and the restoring and continuance of peace and Vnity to the Churches under his Majesties protection and government His Majesties Gracious Declaration about Ecclesiastical Affairs had before shewed so much of his Wisdome and care to attain this Unity as we thought had almost done the cure the differences about Church Government and most of the rest being thereby as we hoped fairly ended As with the help of the Reverend Dr. Sparrow now Bishop of Norwich and Dr. Pierson now Bishop of Chester you maintained that no Alteration was necessary to these ends so I with others endeavoured to prove the contrary But since the said Declaration being dead such Alterations were made as greatly increased our Impossibility of Conforming we never treated with you for Presbyterian Government or Independent but for Vnity and peace Nor did we herein offer you any worse than Arch-bishop Vshers Form of the Primitive Episcopal Government which I had declared my judgement of before in print And I never heard of the name of Episcopal Presbyterians or Presbyterian Archbishops till of late And we thankfully accepted much less than that Form as granted in his Majesties foresaid Declaration As I doubt not but you still think that your way was best for the healing of the Church and Land so I know that I have greatly incurred both your displeasures for what I have said and done against your way One of you shewed it in a Printed Letter long ago which when I had answered I cast that aside for Peace believing that the opening of so many mistakes in matter of fact would not be easily born The other of you since told me that he would Petition authority that we might be compelled to give our Reasons as if we kept up a Schism and would not tell why I rejoiced at the motion and offered to beg leave on my knees to do it Since then your Mr. Walton in his Life of Bishop Sanderson hath called me by name to remember our debate aforesaid I know not of any two men living that I am now more obliged to give an account to of my continued dissent than unto you My judgement is not in my own power nor in yours Many are dead who were in that consultation You and I by Gods great mercy are yet alive and may review our actions before we come to the Bar of God which is like to be speedily to me and to you it cannot be far off especially to the elder of you so that I suppose that all three of us are really beyond the motives of any personal worldly interest what is this world to us who are taking our farewel of it for ever All the doubt then remaining is whether your terms or those desired by us are the true way of Love and Concord and which are the true causes of Schisms and the attendant evils I doubt not but you still think that the good which you have done doth far weigh down all the direct and accidental hurt What that Good is you know better than I Dr. Heylin in the Life of Arch-Bishop Laud tells us what some accounted then most desirable And how much more desirable it is to open the Church doors so wide as that moderate Loyal Romanists may come in as they did in Queen Elizabeths first years and to reconcile them by nearer approaches or concessions rather than to go further from them to unite with a few inconsiderable Puritans whose principles are against the Power and Wealth of the Church we have often heard from others As also that the ejection of the near two thousand non-conforming Ministers was the Churches deliverance from them that would have done more hurt within than they can do without The converted Priest Mr. Smith in his Narrative of the Popish Plot dedicated to the King nameth more reasons which I will not name which some were moved by For my part as with fear I foresaw so with grief I see so many hundred Ministers under the restraints and penalties which you know of of whom I have better thoughts than you have believing from my heart by the acquaintance which I have had with very many that notwithstanding the faulty former actions of some few of them and the unjustifiable scruples of others you cannot name that Nation under heaven out of our Kings Dominions which hath this day so many Ministers more sound in doctrine heart and life and liker to further mens salvation than those that in England have been silenced and cast out Name that countrey if you can And I believe that Christ hath given us no supernumeraries of such useful men but if all faithful Ministers Conformists and Non-conformists were employed and encouraged they would be still too few to do the work upon the ignorant ungodly and vicious which is to be done And considering how many souls a faithful Minister may hope to edifie and save I consider then how many thousands are like to be losers where such are lost and wanting It grieveth my soul to see what advantage Satan hath got in England against that Christian Love which is the
and to their works § 31. III. And they all believe that the Holy Spirit being God and one in Essence with the Father and the Son proceeding from the Father and or by the Son is the Great Witness Agent and Advocate of Christ before at and after his coming into the world incarnate by his gifts of Prophecy Miracles and Sanctification convincing sinners and drawing them to Repent and Believe and dwelling in Believers as an operating cause of Divine Life and Light and Love thus Uniting them to God in Christ their Head and to each other in Faith and Love by which they are gathered to him as his Church or body having the forgiveness of their sins and the adoption of Sons and right to the heavenly inheritance And living in holy communion on earth their souls at death are received to happiness with Christ and their Bodies shall be raised and soul and body Glorified at the last with Jesus Christ and all the blessed in the perfect Vision Love and joyful Praise of the most Glorious Jehovah § 32. And as I. All Christians agree in this Belief so also II. They all solemnly in and by the Baptismal Covenant and their holy Eucharistical Communion and other duties Profess the Consent of their wills to these Relations to God their Creatour Redeemer and Sanctifier and to his Church or body and their thankful Acceptance of the foresaid Gifts And they profess and express their seeking-desires hereof according to the Contents of the Lords Prayer § 33. III. And as to Practice they all agree in professing and promising obedience to Christ according to the Law of Nature the Decalogue and all his Written Laws so far as they understand them and their desire to Learn them to that end § 34. All sincere Christians agree in the true and Hearty Consent to all this And these are the true saved Church of Christ called Invisible because their Hearts-consent is Invisible All other Baptized and Professing Christians with them agree in the Profession of all this And are called The Church-visible their Profession being visible And all this being truly included in Baptism which is our entrance into the Catholick or Universal Church in this before described consisteth our Catholick Communion in Christs body as spiritual or invisible and as visible § 35. II. But besides this Universal Church-Union and Communion for ORDER and Advantage to our great end God hath instituted the ORDER of Christian Assemblies or Particular Churches which are to the Vniversal Church as Cities and Corporations to a Kingdom Which are the noblest and most priviledged parts of the Kingdom but yet not essential parts but eminently Integral For it may be a Kingdom without them and would be if they were all disfranchised and laid common And if Apostles and Evangelists as Itinerant Preachers convert and baptize men they are part of the Church Universal before they are gathered into distinct societies under proper Pastors of their own The Eunuch Act. 8. was baptized into no particular Church but into the universal only and so were many others And meer Baptism as such without any additional contract doth no more If thousands were Converted in America or cast there without Pastors they were parts of the Universal Church if baptized Professing Christians And before the Apostles ordained any fixed Bishops or Pastors of particular Churches the Church Universal was in being though small § 36. But these particular Churches being a great part of Christs Institutions and necessary not only by Precept but as a means to the Well-being of the Universal and the Edification of it and the particular members It must be endeavoured and that with good hope of success that there may so much Particular Church-Vnion be obtained and maintained as shall much conduce to its great and excellent ends That is 1. So much as that in them God the Father Son and Holy Ghost may be Publickly solemnly and constantly confessed by sound doctrine holy worship and holy discipline and conversation 2. So much as that hearty Christian Love may be exercised and maintained and Christians edified in Communion of Saints 3. So much as that God shall accept them delight in them and bless them their converting edifying and comforting souls hearing their prayers and praises and owning them by his Ministry Covenants and grace and differencing them from the people that do not thus confess and worship him and promoting hereby their salvation And if this much be attained it is not to be vilified for want of more nor blotted with reproachful names but acknowledged with thankfulness and praise § 37. III. And yet there is a further degree of concord to be hoped for and endeavoured and that is the concord of these particular Churches with one another That they may all Profess 1. The same faith and necessary doctrine 2. and the same Love to God and one another 3. and the same Hope of life eternal 4. and may offer to God the same necessary and acceptable sort of worship viz. by preaching and applying his holy word recorded in the holy Scriptures preserving and reading them calling upon his holy name by Confession prayer thanksgiving and praises and holding respective communion in the use also of the Sacraments of his Covenant and exercising in some measure such holy Government and Discipline by Pastors overseeing their several flocks as he himself by his institution hath made universally necessary And all this though not in perfection nor every where with the same degree of purity and care yet so far 1. as that Gods word and ordinances be kept up in soundness in all parts and respects necessary to salvation 2. and as may tend to the edifying of the Churches by Love and concord in necessary things and their mutual help by counsel and strength by that concord 3. and the avoiding of pernicious feuds and divisions § 38. The means by which this is to be done 1. by communicatory Letters 2. by Synods 3. and by Civil Governours is after in due place to be explained Thus much of Christian Vnity and Concord may be well hoped for upon just endeavours here on earth But neither Perfection in these nor those unnecessary terms of Concord which some have long taken to be necessary § 39. And indeed so much as may be hoped for is so very hardly to be obtained that if we trusted not to Gods extraordinary Grace more than to any natural probability that appeareth to us in man we should be ready to despair that ever Christians should live long in so much peace and concord And though the great difficulty must not kill our hopes it must much quicken us to strenuous endeavours Of which more anon Satan is so great an enemy to it and every sin in man is so much against it as every disease in the body is against its ease and peace and the multitude and malignity of sins and sinners is so great and the very healers so few and faulty and unskilful
form of a particular Church lawful but what is of Divine institution some hold that only a Diocesan Church that hath many Congregations and Altars is of Divine institution and that the Parochial are not Churches but Oratories or Chapels or parts of a Church Others ho●d that only Parochial Churches of one Altar or associated for personal Communion in presence are of Divine institution some that both Diocesane and Parochial Churches are of Divine institution and some that these and Provincial National Patriarchal and the Papal are of Divine institution Thus do mens judgements vary § 3. A third sort hold that God hath instituted some Church forms besides the Universal and left men to make others And here some think that God instituted Patriarchal and left them to make the Diocesan and Parochial some hold that God instituted only the Diocesan and left them power to make the Patriarchal and the Parochial some hold that he made only the Parochial I mean single societies associated for present personal Communion and left them by voluntary associations to make the greater over them § 4. Among these opinions let us first try whether Christ hath instituted any Church form besides the universal and 2. what that is I. And 1. if Christ hath instituted a holy Christian society for ordinary holy Communion and mutual help in Gods publick worship and holy living consisting of Pastors authorized and obliged to Teach and Guide and speak for the flock in Gods publick worship and administer his Sacraments according to Christs word and of a flock obliged to hear them learn obey and follow such their conduct to the foresaid ends then Christ hath instituted a form of a particular Church and its policy But the antecedent is true as shall be proved And the consequent or major is proved à definito ad denominatum This definition containeth the Essentials of a Church No man can deny that to be a Christian Church which hath this definition § 5. Here still it is supposed that the Spirit in the Apostles who were designed to be founders and master-builders and to gather and order Churches and teach them to observe all Christs commands was Christs promised Agent as Tertullian calls him and that Christ did what the Spirit did by the Apostles in their proper work to which he was promised them as their Guide as it is aforesaid § 6. And that Christ and his Apostles instituted sacred ordinary Assemblies of Christians for holy worship and Communion is so clear in the New Testament that it were vain to prove it § 7. And 2. as notorious and past doubt it is that the end of these Assemblies was such as is here mentioned 3. And as plain that such Pastors as are here described were set over all these Congregations and authorized and obliged to the foresaid work that is under Christ the great Teacher Priest and Ruler of the Church to Teach them Gods word to intercede under Christ for them to God and from Christ to them in prayer and Sacraments c. and to Guide them by that called the Keyes of the Church discerning whom to receive by Baptism whom to reprove exhort comfort or absolve Act. 14. 23. Act. 20. 1 Tim. 3. Tit. 1. and many other places shew this § 8. And it is no less plain that the people were bound to continue in their doctrine communion and prayer and to obey them in that which they were commissioned to do Heb. 13. 7 13 24. 10. 25 26. 1 Thes 5. 12 13. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 20. and many other places so that the form of such Churches as consist of such Congregations and their Pastors is past all denyal and just doubt § 9. And as to all other Church-forms Classical Diocesan Metropolitical Provincial National Patriarchal and Papal it is these only that fall under reasonable doubt and controversie And 1. for Classical Churches I can say but this 1. That the General commands of holding Christian Love and Concord and doing all to edification require such Churches as live near together to be helpers to each other and that counsel and correspondency is necessary hereto which the Churches have still laudably exercised by Synods And if these associations for order-sake be agreed on as to stated times and numbers and bounds it is but the circumstantiating of a known duty And if any will call this a distinct Policy or Church-form I contend not against their liberty of speech while we agree de re But I judge it perillous to give the same name to such an Assembly or Association as to a Church of Christs institution lest it seduce men to think that the word is not equivocally used If the Agents of several Kingdoms met at a common Dyet I had rather not call them a superiour Kingdom were their meeting never so necessary An Assembly that is the Pars Imperans of one body Politick having Legislative power is one thing and an Assembly of Agents or Princes for meer concord and strength and help of distinct Kingdoms Schools Armies c. is another thing And I know no proof that such Councils must be ordinary or at stated Times and places but sometimes that is best and sometime not as the case standeth as even the Papists confess And when they begin to degenerate from a Council for Concord to a Majesty or highest Governing power it 's time to cross their claim and interrupt the occasions of it § 10. And if men at such Classes and Councils choose one to keep order as a moderator yea if they fix him it is but the circumstantiating of the Assemblies work But if he will claim hereupon a distinct order office and proper political Church relation so as hence to make himself the Regent part of a species of a Church yea and claim this as of God and unalterable I cannot justifie such a Church-form § 11. This holds as to the Presidents of all ranks of Synods Classical Diocesan Metropolitical Provincial National or Patriarchal To use them as Presidents of Councils for Concord is one thing and to use them as the Pars Imperans or the constitutive heads of a distinct Church species is another Arch-Bishop Vsher told me himself his judgement that Councils were but for Counsel and Concord and not for the Government of each other or any of the members and that they had no proper Governing power either over their Minor part or over any absent Bishops Though each Bishop was still the Governour of his own flock and their power over their flocks was exercised with the greater advantage by their Concord in Councils Dyets and Councils of distinct independent Bishops are not distinct forms of policy or Churches § 12. And if this hold true that the Councils themselves are not thereby Rectors of a distinct political society but for Concord of many then it will follow that a President of such a Council whether Diocesan Provincial National or more General is not as such a
of such things indifferent as the Church had not setled by any Law and would not so settle but that it 's nothing to such as the Church either hath or will so command This opinion hath carried it in England and other Nations of the world Being once commissioned to plead this cause by his Majesty among others I then presumed to say 1. That St. Paul here writeth not only to the laity but to all the Roman Church That therefore he writeth as Christ Rev. 2. 3. to the Angels of the seven Churches to the Rulers of the Church as well as to the People 2. And therefore he forbiddeth those Rulers what he forbiddeth others and so forbiddeth them the imposing of any thing contrary to this his full determination 3. Yea himself was an Apostle and a Church-Governor of as great authority as those that he wrote to And these his words signified his own judgement and what he would do himself Yea they were as good a Law as any the Romans could make that he wrote to Therefore when an Apostle by the Spirit of God shall write thus plainly and peremptorily to Priests and people thus to tolerate and receive each other he that now expoundeth it with an except the Church otherwise decree maketh this the sence I do by all these great reasons charge and perswade you not to judge despise or reject one another unless you decree to do it or not to make such rejecting Laws unless you make them And the Holy Ghost speaketh not in the holy Scriptures at this rate § 10. Yea I prove from the arguments used by St. Paul that he extended his speech to the Clergy or Rulers as well as to the people and so forbad them making such Laws And indeed the knack of making Church-Laws without the Holy Ghost in Apostolick persons was not as then learnt and used by the Churches 1. Because St. Paul argueth from Universal reasons 2. and from Moral and necessary arguments and 3. Speaketh by the Spirit and Apostolical Authority § 11. I. His reasons touch not only some singular persons and case but the case of all Churches in all Ages He argueth from the difference between well-meaning Christians as Weak and Strong as doubting and as assured as mistaken and as in the right as in danger of being damned if they act doubtingly and of stumbling and being offended c. Now such weak mistake● Christians in such matters ever have been and ever will be and so the reason from their case and necessity will hold in all Countreys and Ages to the end § 12. II. And many great and pressing Moral reasons that all Christians are bound by are here heaped up 1. One is from Christian Love to brethren 2. Another from humane Compassion to the weak 3. Another is from Gods own example who receiveth such whom therefore we must not reject 4. Another is from Gods prerogative to judge 5. and another from his propriety in his own servants 6. Another is from our having no such judging power in such cases 7. Another is from Gods Love and mercy that will uphold such 8. Another is because what men do as to please God must not be condemned without necessity but a holy intention cherished so it be not in forbidden things 9. Another is that men must not go against Conscience in indifferent things 10. Another is from Christs dreadful judgement which is near and which we our selves must undergo and must be that final decider of many things which here will not be fully decided 11. Another is from the sin of laying stumbling-blocks and occasions of offence 12. Another is from the danger of crossing the ends of the death of Christ destroying souls for whom he dyed 13. Another is that it will make our good to be ill spoken of 14. Another is that the Kingdom of God or the Constitution of Christianity and the Church lyeth in no such matters but in righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost 15. And another that Christ is pleased in this without the other and God accepteth such 16. Another is that such are approved of men that is This righteousness peace and holy joy without agreement in such Ceremonies and by-matters beareth its own testimony for approbation to the judgement of all impartial men humanity and Christianity teach us to love and honour such 17. Another is from our common obligation to live in peace with all 18. Another is from our obligation to do all to the edifying of one another 19. Another is because Gods work else is destroyed by us 20. And our own lawful acts are turned into sin when they hurt another 21. Another from the obligation that lyeth on us to deny our own liberty in meat wine c. to avoid the hurting of another that is weak 22. Another is from the damnation of such as are driven or drawn to act doubtingly 23. Another is from the special duty and mercy of the strong that should bear the infirmities of the weak 24. Another is from the common duty of pleasing others for their good and edifying 25. Another is from the example of Christ himself that pleased not himself 26. Another is from Gods patience to us 27. Another is from our great obligation to imitate Christ 28. Another because indeed this is the true way to Love and unity that with one mind and one mouth we may glorifie God while we lay not our concord on impossible terms 29. Another is in the concluding precept because Christ receiveth us and it is to Gods Glory therefore we must thus receive each other If all these moral arguments signifie no more than this Receive and tolerate such till you make Laws against it I cannot understand the argumentations of God or holy men § 13. III. And to conclude Paul spake by the Holy Ghost and by Divine authority himself and his words recorded are part of Christs Law indited by the Spirit and no man that cometh after him or to whom he wrote had power to contradict or obliterate it All this methinks should satisfie men of the meaning of so full a decision of an easie case about things indifferent which it's strange that so many yet for nothing do oppose And that the authority of an Apostle in Sacred Scripture the peace of the Church and the souls and peace of all dissenters and doubting persons should seem so contemptible to them as not to weigh down their humour and domineering will in an unnecessary and indifferent thing But it is the nature of sin especially Pride to be unreasonable and unpeaceable and the troubler of the soul the Church the world § 14. The same Apostle in the Epistles to the Corinthians 1. c. 1. v. 10. c. importuneth them to peace and unity and sharply reprehendeth their divisions 1. c. 3. He desireth them to be perfectly conjoyned in the same mind and in the same judgement But what are the terms and means of such a
voluntarily came or were duly brought 2. And if men will stay without or keep their Children out they wrong themselves and theirs but this breaketh no unity of the Christian Church § 8. There have been also factious persons that tye the validity of Baptism to their sects such as were specially the Donatists supposing that their Prelates had the truest call and power and that all others were Sectaries or Hereticks and therefore their baptism null and void and to be iterated But though in other arrogancies some follow them to this day yet few if any in the nulling of baptism § 9. But a greater and longer stir there hath been about Creeds and professions required as Tests to excuse men from heresie But yet it is to be noted that few of them by these altered the form of baptism but there took up with the ancient Creed the Apostles and the Nicene or Constantinopolitane and required no more but only imposed the rest on Bishops Priests or other afterwards § 10. And is there now any cause of discord here 1. All Christians have been made such by baptism from the Apostles dayes till now Is there any thing in the world that ever came down to us by more certain uniform consenting tradition The very same words of baptism which Christ did institute are every where used to this day And if all ages and Countreys have still baptized persons as believers or Christians and yet be not agreed what Christianity is or what the faith is that baptism requireth it will be a strange incredible shame to them But even Hierome and Hillary that cry out of their new Creeds do tell us that in Baptism the old one was still used to which they did appeal And though the Greeks and Latines differ about their filióque and some small new clauses are found in the Creed that were not in the old Copies which are now found on Record they are not so factious or vain as to nullifie Baptism by any of those differences For the Creed is but part of the Exposition of Baptism and Baptism is true Baptism if no other Creed or words were used but it self 2. And there are few Christians yet that will refuse any of the truly ancient Creeds of which more anon § 11. 3. It is true that there are some humane ceremonies which some Churches adjoin to Baptism and by others are rejected or omitted The most of the ancient Churches used the tasting of milk and honey the wearing of a white garment and Chrisme and now some use the transient Image of the Cross as a symbol of our engagement to a Crucified Christ which others omit as taking it to be so far participant of the nature of a Sacrament of the Covenant of Grace as that it is an usurpation of Christs prerogative for any men without his institution to appoint But yet all these Churches that differ in these Ceremonies agree that the validity of Baptism dependeth not on them Whether they be used or omitted the person is nevertheless baptized § 12. Qu. But what is it that is necessary to the being and validity of baptism Answ This was partly answered before 1. It is necessary to the validity of it in foro Ecclesiae that both the baptizer and the adult baptized or the person that is authorized to Covenant for the infant do Profess to intend real Baptism and not to do it in jeast or to other ends And it is necessary to its efficacy to pardon and salvation that this profession of the Baptized be sincere and that he do it from the heart And it is necessary to free the baptizer from Gods displeasure that his intention be sincere 2. It is necessary that the words of Baptism be such as express all the Essence of it such as are those of Christ which all Christians use I Baptize thee in the name of the Father of the Son and of the Holy Ghost And that no contradictory words which nullifie these be added 3. It is necessary to the validity of it in the judgement of the Church that the adult person and the Parent or pro-parent for the Infant do seem or profess to understand all the words of Baptism so far as is essential to it For ignorantis non est consensus 4. It is necessary to the validity of it to real pardon and salvation that he not only seem to understand it but really do so 5. It is accordingly necessary that the person consent to all the essence of the Covenant that is seem and profess to do it to the Church and really do it to satisfie God and obtain pardon and life by it 6. It is not absolutely necessary to the validity that the Creed or any other profession be used by the baptized besides the words themselves I believe in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and give up my self to him in this Baptismal Covenant Because understanding and consent may be expressed by those words 7. But it is usually necessary to the bene esse or the best performance of baptism that the adult person or the Parent of Infants do in larger words profess his understanding belief and consent to baptism And it is best that these words be not too many nor too few and that they be for the most part one unchanged form Lest ignorance or heresie deprave baptism by change and variety of words 8. To this end the Churches of Christ have still used the Creed as the summary form of Profession of faith As the Lords Prayer is a summary form of our Desires and the Decalogue of our rule and profession of practice But because Assent is supposed to imply Consent to the particulars Assented to though but Generally professed therefore the Church hath more rarely omitted the Creed in the profession of Assent when yet they have accepted of a more General profession of Consent to the Covenant and promise of obedience 9. But if the adult do before-hand as a Catechumen learn the Creed Lords Prayer and Decalogue and give the Pastor a satisfactory account of his competent understanding of them then that may be supposed and only a General profession of faith consent and subjection be used at the time and in the words of baptism And so much of the constitutive causes of baptism § 13. II. Though no more than Baptism be essentially Necessary because so great a work should be well done and ignorance and errour are very common it is meet that the Church require an understanding Assent to the common Articles of the Creed and an understanding Consent to the Lords Prayer and Decalogue and in general to all that he understandeth to be Gods Word Belief and sincere Obedience And therefore that the adult person and Parent of the Infant be one that hath before been Catechized or examined herein § 14. Though I consent to Ger. Vossius and others that there is no proof at all that the twelve Apostles made the twelve Articles of the
Creed respectively every one making one as some have feigned and though I deny not what he and Bishop Vsher and many others say of the two or three Articles being not found in the most ancient Copies or Records and though I verily consent to Parker de Descensu and many others that the words of Baptism were the first Creed and that the Creed was brought in by degrees as the Exposition of the Baptismal profession and that at first it had but three Articles I believe in and give up my self to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Yet I take the Creed in the sence at least to be of necessary use to the ends now mentioned and I think we may say so much as is of greatest antiquity to be Divine and the word of God and a special part of his word more necessary to be believed than many other parts § 15. For 1. Though we receive not the pretended Traditions of Rome or any Church that shall be obtruded on us without proof or as accusing the Scripture of insufficiency yet we never denyed that the Apostles preaching was Gods Word before they wrote it and as well as their writing It being eight years after Christs Ascension as is commonly supposed before the first part of the New Testament was written by St. Matthew and near an hundred years after his incarnation that the last was written by St. John and only four or five of the twelve Apostles having left us any of their writings it were intolerable to deny that the constant preaching of them and all the rest to their death was not done by the inspiration of the same infallible spirit as their writing was and so was the Word of God § 16. 2. And it is certain that Baptism was then as common as Christians and that nothing was sooner done by the Apostles nor more constantly nor with greater concord and concent than discipling persons and baptizing them For this was the summ of their first appointed work in which Christ promised to be with them to the end § 17. 3. It is certain that the Apostles did administer Baptism as wisely and holily according to Christs will as any that ever did come after them And therefore that they did not take up with mens bare saying of three words I believe in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost without understanding what they said All following ages Cathechized or examined the adult before baptism and to this day we would take the contrary course for an abuse Therefore no doubt but the Apostles did it and appointed it § 18. 4. And this is plainly implyed in the Scripture when believers are all said to be inlightned and translated from darkness to light and to know God and Jesus Christ as being life eternal Eph. 1. 18. Act. 26. 18. Joh. 17. 3 c. and to be wise to salvation and indeed when they are said to Believe For believing supposeth understanding And when Peter saith that Baptism saveth not the washing of the filth of the flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God And when all the Christians in the world as far as we have any notice from the Apostles dayes have been baptized after Profession of faith we have no reason to doubt but that the Apostles used and appointed the requiring of it § 19. 5. In doing this it is no doubt but what they required of the Confessours from their mouths was short and plain or else those multitudes of men and women who were in a short time baptized would neither have had capacity nor time to do it But the words of the Teachers and baptizers in explaining the said articles were large and many For we find that it was their common preaching work § 20. 6. It is most probable by the reason of the thing and the history Act. 2. and elsewhere that at the first no form of words was required and used besides the form in baptism but that the people being instructed in the sense of those words thereupon professed understanding belief and consent And no more is essentially necessary But that after a Creed in terms was the common form which was used by Professors in order to baptism 1. Because so many thousands being baptized the matter being short and meerly Divine they could not be supposed to be left to much variety of expression Divine great necessary things must be spoken with so much caution as may avoid errour heresie corruption and abuse And if every ignorant man and woman were left to use only words of their own devising to express the Christian faith it would be of confounding and dishonourable consequence 2. And the great care that then was used that all Christians might be of one faith and speak the same things and that the heresies then arising might be suppressed doth imply that this necessary means was then used by those that commanded that all be done to edification and unity and in order 3. And many expositors think that this Creed is it that Paul meant by the depositum and form of wholsome words to Timothy 4. But the fullest proof is universal historical tradition and consent of the Christian Churches who have ever used Catechizing and the Creed as the profession of faith in order to baptism and this as from the Apostles without the least notice of any other original of it There is some difference in words between that recited by Irenaeus and two recited by Tertullian and that which we now use and some little difference between that of Marcellus in Epiphanius and that of Aquileia in Ruffinus and ours now used And the forming of the Nicene Creed in other words doth shew that the Churches took not themselves to be so tyed to the same words of the former Creed as not to alter any part of them And it is supposed that before the Nicene Creed the Greek Church had a Creed that had as much of the words of the Nicene as of that called the Apostles And no doubt it was the wisdom of the Apostles and the Churches not to lay too much on particular words and make them seem essential to baptism or more necessary than they were And to this day if any in other words exprest the same thing he may be baptized But ad melius esse and for concord and safety the Churches that still agreed in words of the same sence and mostly the same words as to all that explained the essentials of Christianity found it more and more needful to agree in every word and leave men no room for dangerous diversity though over and above they may explain their minds From whence it was that so great contentions have risen about some single word as the Nicene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latines Filióque lest the Creed should be altered at the will of man and the Christian faith seem to be an uncertain mutable thing § 21. By all this it is evident that the Church must make
persecute them and never repent of it because they err How many Lutherans slander Calvinists and they the Lutherans and Papists and Protestants oft make each others matters seem otherwise than they are Yea so do Conformists and Nonconformists Anabaptists and Padobaptists and most that disagree and yet repent not thinking that to be true that is not and so that they do well § 10. Therefore two things must concur in the sin that deserveth an Excommunication from Catholick Communion 1. That it be such as some call a Mortal sin that is Not a sin of meer infirmity and ignorance which may consist with sincere Love to God and holiness and subjection to the Government of Christ but a sin which in an impenitent person proveth the absence of such Subjection and Love And the mark of this is That it be a sin which is so much in the power of the Will that no one can keep it that is sincerely willing to leave it and which must be known to be sin by all that are truly willing to know it A sin that men may know if they are willing and had rather keep than leave 2. And that it be unrepented of and such as due information and perswasion with patience do not bring the sinner to repent of A heinous mortal wilful sin unrepented of § 11. By this it appeareth who is to be sentenced cut off from the Catholick Church and who not None but those that first really depart because the sentence must be true and just And this departure is either direct by Apostasie renouncing God the Father the Son or the Holy Ghost or some essential part of Godliness or Christianity 2. Or indirectly when men deny not any of these in words but in works do that which is evidently inconsistent with them and may be so discerned by any willing mind § 12. And hence it appeareth 1. that the number of these is greater than the Pastors that cast off true discipline do acknowledge That is All those that are guilty of living in such sins as the common light of nature detecteth to every willing mind such as are fornication adultery drunkenness perjury malignity persecution slanderous preaching or speech hating others especially for good c. and are obstinate in refusing to repent and amend And alas how great a number live in our Churches never excommunicated nor publickly admonished who lye in such sins and will not repent The Papists Priests themselves conform by unjust oaths and professing to assent and consent to many Decrees and Canons of Councils which are false and sinful and by many other sinful practices Their very persecution of men better than themselves on false pretences of heresie and schism is a crime that many were they truly willing might soon know Drunkenness whoredom lying perjury prophane swearing cursing and slandering covetous and proud oppressing and many such like yea even professed Saduceism and infidelity and deriding serious Godliness are all too common in the world Yet few of all these are ever excommunicated § 13. 2. Yet hence also it is plain that the commonest sort of Excommunications for these thousand years at least have been but the acts of carnal tyrannical usurpation like a plague or publick war or fire to the Churches Viz. I. Anathematizing men for a dark ambiguous word or phrase though inept and though in the obvious sence by undiscerned consequence it might be inconsistent with the essentials of Religion is tyrannical and unjust § 14. 1. When the words only are bad and the man doth not so mean them this is no heresie in the man If that word which signifieth God or Heaven should in another language or by mis-information be used to signifie Satan or Hell and so have opprobrious epithers annexed this were no blasphemy or errour in the man For he used the words as significations of his mind And they are not Natural but arbitrary signs Else all unskilful speakers would be hereticks Yea all men would be damned For there are few words but are ambiguous or of many sens● and are good in one sence and bad in another § 15. 2. And as Amesius hath well noted there is so harmonious a connexion between all the Moral parts of Religion that if you deny any one by consequence it will overthrow the rest and every errour though not in History topography Genealogy Chronology c. yet in morality wrongeth yea subverteth the foundation § 16. 3. And not only Davenant Morton Hall but all peace-making Divines are agreed that unseen consequences are not to be taken for a mans judgement rather than the contrary truths which he professedly owneth § 17. For instances I will over-pass the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not resolve the Controversie whether Eusebius Caesariensis proved by D. Petavius and others to have been indeed an Arian after all his great labours in his History his Praeparatio Demonstratio Evangelica ought to have been cut off from the Catholick Church or whether Constantine justly chid Alexander as well as Arius for their contention Nor whether Hilary justly blamed the making of New Creeds beginning with the Nicene Nor whether Justin and all the rest of the Ancient Fathers whose words Petavius citeth as speaking as the Arians should have been Excommunicated Doubtless the denyal of Christs Godhead is the denyal of his Essence But there be subtile School-men that think the word substance is spoken of God but equivocally or metaphorically yea some and no small men or number say the same of Ens it self which yet the Scotists contradict them in And many choose rather to call God A Pure Act than a substance And these men think that they that know not what substance meaneth as spoken of God should not excommunicate men for denying Christ to be of the 〈◊〉 substance unless they better understood the subject And they think that Damascene that subtilly calleth God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must needs be as guilty as they that denyed Christ to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and that where there is no substance there is no same substance And therefore thinking that some men mean the same word heretically and some well they wish that the word had never been put into a Creed which must be the test of all Church-members Though the word be true § 18. But there are abundance of other heresies that I may safely instance in as Philastrius * yea and Epiphanius have described them I am ashamed to mention some ridiculous heresies in Philastrius as calling the stars by the names of living Creatures and other better And divers in Epiphanius are not much worse But I will speak only of three or four that have made the greatest divisions in the Church § 19. I. Cyprian with his African Councils with Firmilian judging for the re-baptization of those baptized by hereticks was judged a heresie which their Countreymen the Donatists followed Yet Augustine saith that Cyprian was no heretick for it And
of the Countreys and the Judges of all Christians even in secular affairs And when one Sophronius or few others opened the case rightly to them they either understood it not or bawl'd it down and set up a cry Away with the Hereticks The Eutychians following Cyril spake u●ntly and said Christ had two natures before the union and but one after because united and union maketh one of two But it is apparent as Derodon hath proved that Cyril and so his ignorant followers did not think that Christs humane nature did exist before the union and so that ever they were divided but that in order of nature the existence is intelligible before the union and so that they were but one as being undivided not denying them to be still distinguishable and so to be what Nestorius and the Orthodox meant by two as being distinct but not divided § 25. And Derodon hath also proved that Cyril and so the Eutychians when they called them One did mean One person mistaking the sense of the word Nature and meaning by Nature the same that the Orthodox meant by Person And so the opening of two words would have ended all their Controversie and proved that they meant the same thing and knew it not that is 1. distinguishing between One undivided and One undistinguished 2. Opening what they meant by Nature and Person But alas this was no work for those famous General Councils but to cry out Anathema to Nestorius Anathema to Eutyches Anathema to Dioscorus Holy Leo Holy Cyril c. these were their arguments And Dioscorus as bad as his adversaries or worse excommunicated Leo the Bishop of Rome and went the Anathematizing way And so much of Religion was placed in cursing one another that there were scarce any Bisops in the world that were not cursed by one another § 26. VI. And the difference between the Greeks and Latines about the words hypostases Personae had almost come to the same extremity When Hierome himself that liked ●ot three hypostases was accused of heresie and was fain to fly to his baptismal Creed for refuge and to prove that he was a believer because he was baptized But one wiser than the rest had the unusual good success as to convince them that by the two words it was the same thing that they meant and did not know it § 27. VII The next calamitous Anathematizing fell out about the owning or disowning of the Council of Chalcedon because of the foresaid Nestorian and Eutychian quarrels And so doleful was the case that it became the test of the Orthodox in one Countrey to Curse or Anathematize that Council and in another to Curse all that did not receive it Especially when one Emperour was for one side and the next for another the Cursing varyed accordingly for the most part § 28. But that which added grievously to the Calamity was that the same Bishops that under one Emperour cursed the Council under the next cursed those that owned it not and thus most scandalously anathematized themselves even one party this year and another the next I say nothing but what Binius and Baronius and such others say § 29. VIII The next sad Anathematizing was about the Monothelites They that said that Christ had but One Will and One Operation were cursed as Monothelite hereticks and they that said He had two were cursed by the Monothelites And these were no narrow petty Sects but Emperours and great General Councils were for them Binius saith that the Council of Constantinople called Quin sextum that made the Trull Canons were Monothelites and yet that they were the same Bishops that had constituted the fifth Council so that those also were Monothelites And in the reign of Philippicus he saith a Council of the Monothelites was so great that there were besides the rest Innumerable Bishops out of the East And these and their adversaries kept on the cursing trade of Religion one side cursing under one Emperour and the contrary under the next § 30. And O doleful case even these also seem fully to me to contend about nothing but bare words and really agreed and did not know it partly following the stream for worldly interest and partly having not skill enough to explicate ambiguous words and state the Controversie Who knoweth not that ever read any Metaphysicks how many senses the word One or Vnity hath and how the same thing in several respects may be said to be One or Two And was this discussed in any of these Councils Which where and when 1. Two things may concur to one effect where say the subtilest Philosophers materially they are two causes but formally and properly but one All set together make but one cause being ejusdem generis and are but many parts of that one cause though many things And so some called Christs Wills One as being but One cause in these School-mens sense of the same effect For the Deity operateth only per essentiam and hath no effect in God himself 2. And as Voluntas and operatio signifie the Internal principle of the effect no one can doubt but Christ had two for the Divine essential Will and the humane faculty or Act were not the same principle or thing But Objectively they are One that is The Divine Nature or principle and the humane do will the same thing and contradict not one another 3. And the Controversie is the same as the former with the Eutychians Christ hath but One Will as opposite to Divisions One as not divided but Two as intellectually distinguishable Two as denominated à principiis from two natures one as 1. from One person and 2. as undivided and 3. as terminated on One object I doubt not but had this been thus opened to them all the sober men would have said we are all agreed in it And yet this wordy difference maketh the name of an Anathematized heresie to this day § 31. IX The next cursing difference arose about ● question whether Christs body on earth was corruptible or no O the unhappy spirit of self conceited anathematizing Prelates The affirmers were called corrupticolae and reproached as blasphemers of the Christ and the worshippers of that which was corruptible The denyers were called Phantasiasticks and made hereticks the affirmers getting the last prevailing vote And alas the Emperour Justinian out of his great zeal for the honour of Christ proved one of the hereticks and is so branded to this day yea and persecuted the corrupticolas as hereticks Where will hereticating cursing and persecuting stop or end And yet one word of just distinction had ended all this had it been duly used and received Christs Body was potentially and as to the natural quality of flesh lyable to or capable of corruption But not actually corrupted and not corruptible in respect to Gods decree that it should not actually corrupt And yet even holy Hilary Pictav held not only this errour but somewhat more His words are so bad
office Now what is necessary to the well being And indeed though the Essential Unity of the Church lye not upon this yet the Peace and Concord of it doth and that so much as that no other means without this will attain it And the want of what is necessary ad bene esse in the Ministry and Bishops is it that hath caused the common calamities § 35. And I. Nothing is more wanting hereto than better qualifications in the persons 1. That there be a strong wit and good acquired gifts of knowledge and a strong and lively faith from Divine illumination and good acquaintance with the Oracles of God A Pastor or Teacher should not only know the essentials of Christianity which every Christian knoweth but also the Integrals and many Accidents And both essentials and integrals should be known by him by a more clear distinct and orderly understanding not only above the vulgus s●delium common Christians but above the better sort of the flock And some store of natural and common knowledge called Learning is needful hereunto But especially more illumination faith and holy wisdom and skilfulness in matter senc● and method of the word of God § 36. Where Gods Word is not by the Teacher clearly understood and firmly believed and he is not well acquainted with the work of his office it is not any formalities of Ordination consent or Titles that use to make up these defects as to the success To say what God can do is little to this business He can make an Ass to preach to Balaam He can work by fools and ignorant men and hereticks But Scripture and all the common experience of ages assureth us that it is not his ordinary way and that he rarely blesseth such with great success but worketh according to the qualifications of the Instrument and the Receivers And let a mans ti●les and ordination be what they will weak men will do weakly and ignorant men will do ignorantly and erring men will do erroneously and the Gospel will be wronged the people will be hurt or losers and enemies will deride and scorn § 37. When Aristotle saith that Wise men are by Nature to Rule and fools and ignorant persons to be ruled he meant not I suppose that this gave wise men formal Power but that this was the materiae dispositio receptiva as Gold and Silver are to be the Kings Coyn but are not so quâ talia so only wise Christians are receptive matter of Ministerial power and the wiser the better And when one appeareth to be of eminent wisdom above all the rest caeteris paribus the ordainers and people are directed and bound by God to choose that man And what scruples soever rise about his Ordination usually God worketh by excellent worthy men and as light cannot be hid so holy wisdom will be known and valued § 38. 2. But LOVE or HOLINESS is necessary ad bene esse as well as wisdom Heat causeth heat And we have need of sacred Heat as well as of Light Love kindleth love A Pastor should excel the Flock in Love to God to Christ to Holiness to Gods word and work and to all the peoples souls and should speak all from the Zeal of Love As the Nurses milk should have the warmth of Nature Cold heartless preachers usually reach not the heart and have but cold● and small success Here also God worketh usually according to the means And how can he be taken for a sound Believer of so great over-whelming things as we have to speak of that speaketh only of them sleepily and coldly § 39. 3. And as wisdom and zealous Love so executive Activity but especially Taking utterance is necessary to the well-being of the sacred-office and the success Though it be not the tricks of vain humane art and affectation which must do our work yet is it a free and moving utterance of holy wisdom faith and Love And words are not all Holy example of living in blamelesness justice humility self-denyal meekness and patience must be our work And diligence in doing all the good we can What examples are there this day among us of one or two holy humble meek and patient and unwearied labourers even in a silenced suffering and low condition men of no extraordinary parts but with ordinary parts of extraordinary labour and patience that whole Countreys have cause to bless God for I will venture to name three such 1. Mr. John Eliots in New England that hath translated all the Bible into that most barbarous language preached to the Indians about forty years and gathered divers Churches among them And verily I would the Jesuites had never done worse work than what they did with several Fryars in Congo China Japan c. which is their greatest honour 2. Mr. John Dury I hear yet living who hath these fifty years or near been employed in reconciling the Lutheran and Calvinist Protestants not without success as Helmstadt Breme Hassia and other places know Though much more might have been expected if the wars of Princes and the obstinacy of contentious Divines had not hindred 3. Our Mr. Thomas Gouge an ejected silenced Minister who hath set up about fourscore Schools in Wales for thousands of Scholars given away many thousand books to them relieved many poor honest ejected Ministers got the Bible the Practice of Piety the Whole Duty of Man printed in Welsh and visiteth the Counties there though aged once a year Gods work must be done as our trade and business and not on the by as taking up the place and time which mens fleshly and worldly interest and work can spare Had the Church such men enow as I have described and as some have been such as Cyprian Nazianzene Basil Chrysostom Atticus Proclus Hierom Augustine Ambrose Martin Salvian c. and such as Melancthon Bucholtzer Bucer Phagius Musculus Martyr Calvin Beza Vrsine Olevian Paraeus Camero Placeus Molineus Dallaeus Blondel Chamier Sadeel Le Blank c. and such as we have had many in England Jewel Grindal Field Reignolds Vsher Morton Hall Davenant Chillingworth Hildersham Dod Ball Bradshaw Gataker c. and such as yet through Gods great mercy we have many I say had the world enow such as these the light would scatter the dismal darkness and they would carry on Christs interest in the Churches against the opposition of Usurpers hereticks and contenders For even a few such have broke through armies of Philistines to fetch men the sacred waters of life And it is not scruples and quarrels about their ordinations or such like as would frustrate their endeavours § 40. II. It is greatly needful to the well-being of the Ministry and the success that Doctrine be kept sound And therefore 1. That the Christian simplicity be retained and many subtile and curious decisions be not made necessary A few great necessary certain truths are easilier preserved than multitudes of uncertain controverted niceties 2. It is needful that such as are ordained
Ministers be tryed men of sound understanding in that which they must teach and do and therefore that both the ordainers and the hearers try them This account of their understanding is better than the imposing of humane forms upon them for subscription Not but that Teachers should know more than the flock that is than the essentials nor that I presume to condemn all the Churches that impose their Confessions to be subscribed in their own and not in Scripture-words while they keep only to necessary certain things But I shall afterward prove that this way though tolerable is not best but unnecessary and dangerous 1. the Scripture affording us apt words enow to form our Confessions in which are past Controversie 2. and there being no probability of bounding mens Impositions of this kind when once they set upon this way 3. and most Confessions of that nature now extant having some needless words which other Churches or good Christians do dissent from 4. And the ancient Creeds understood which the ordainers must try and the old Catechistical Verities being sufficient to this use 5. And there being means of restraining men from preaching and vending heresies which are more safe and congruous 3. I add therefore that a certain Confession containing the certainest and needfullest Integrals of Religion should or may well be drawn up as a Law forbidding all upon meet penalties to preach or speak against them without any subscribing promising or professing 4. And upon proof of the violating of such a Law and preaching against such articles it is sufficient that both the Church and the Christian Magistrate in their several ways may judge them and by just penalties correct them of which more after in due place For it is very hard so to form long Confessions beyond the old Creeds Lords Prayer Decalogue and the General belief of Scripture and this not in Scripture-terms which shall not have some words which sound and honest Ministers cannot assent to without lying which they will not do But to silence many words which yet we conceive true and forbear speaking against some things which yet he cannot profess assent to there are very few sober men but will do And an errour never spoken or written hurts not others nor is to be judged being not known Non apparere here is as non esse And if it be vended the person may be judged as well as if he had sworn subscribed or promised And they that will tell us yet what evil may befall secret whispering errours without out such oaths subscriptions or promises do by this over-doing dangerously undo and lest man should be man and the Church imperfect on pretence of avoiding a possible unavoidable hurt they will set up knaves that will say any thing shut out honest men and necessitate divisions confusions and persecutions where they can never stop on this side banishing or killing or continued imprisoning multitudes of faithful men and never the more attain their ends Sound doctrine may be kept up as far as is to be hoped by the aforesaid means § 41. III. It is greatly needful to the well-being of Ministry and Church that Gods publick worship and Sacraments be kept pure Not that any thing done by man will be void of imperfection but that it be such as is acceptable to God honourable to Religion and profitable and suitable to the flock and to good men To which end 1. Christian simplicity here also is necessary That it be not corrupted or clogged with things uncertain needless curious nor yet much defective not confused disorderly much less erroneous superstitious ludicrous undecent false or prophane 2. It is needful that men to be ordained be tryed and known to be such as can speak to God and men without such unsufferable mis-performance 3. And that they be responsible to the Church and Magistrate for what they say and do Of Liturgies I am to speak in the third Part Only here 4. I add that fit words and spiritual life are the body and soul of worship and one must not be pleaded against another nor any by Formality mortifie holy worship and turn it into a Carkass or a lifeless image Nor yet on pretence of spirituality condemned the frequent use of the same words commonly called Forms whether prepared by the speaker who best knoweth what he needeth or agreed on by the Churches in fit cases and measures for greater Concord § 42. IV. It is needful to the well-being of the Ministry and Churches that all Pastors in their places be not only allowed to use Christs true Discipline but that it be expected and really done in every Church and that this Discipline be neither cast aside nor corrupted and turned into malignant war against the good nor into tyranny and usurpation § 43. What this Discipline is is opened before It is described by Christ in Matth. 18. If thy brother trespass against thee tell him his fault between thee and him If he hear thee thou hast won thy brother If he hear thee not take with thee two or three If he hear not them tell the Church If he hear not the Church let him be to thee as a Heathen or a publican Serious convincing admonition must be used with due patience to bring a sinner to repentance And more publick admonition after private And the person sentenced unfit for Christian Communion when refusing all he sheweth himself utterly impenitent And he must be reconciled absolved and received when he giveth the Church just proof of his true repentance § 44. 1. It is a great corruption of this Discipline when it is exercised by Lay-Chancellors or other Lay-men to whom the Keyes of the Church-Government were never committed by Christ § 45. 2. It is a great corruption when it is done only by an officer of another species than Christ ever instituted § 46. 3. It is an usurpation and corruption when it is done by the Pastor of some other Church and not by the proper Pastor of the Church where the sinner liveth Such is Papal Usurpation when the Bishop of Rome will be judge in London § 47. 4. Especially when such a pretender liveth far from the place where persons and actions are not half known and that only by great charge and travel When the Pastor and people of the present Church may easily know all and it belongeth to them who are executively either to communicate with him or avoid him which distant strangers have no opportunity or occasion to do further than by declared consent § 48. 5. It is a heinous corruption of it to Excommunicate men in a prophane worldly manner without wise serious patient endeavours to apply Gods word to the sinners case and conscience to bring him to true repentance and amendment § 49. 6. And it is yet more heinous abuse to excommunicate the faithful for a fearful avoiding sin in some imposed Oath Covenant Profession promise subscription or unnecessary Ceremony or Form and especially withal
such bloody work as hath been made by Bishops Councils and Emperors for the suppressing of dissenters What hath been done at Alexandria Antioch Constantinople Jerusalem Rome I have elsewhere shewed The late publisher of his travels in Egypt Vaneslup a Roman they say a Jesuite tells us that Egypt is deprived of her ancient sort of inhabitants destroyed for following Dioscorus and that Justinian killed no less than two hundred thousand of them I believe not his number But if this be true the tyrannical hereticaters are the Pikes in the pond and a far more bloody and devouring sort of men than most of those that they destroy as intolerable 3. But it is not yet divers Religions that is the subject in dispute every different opinion or practice or diversity in some small point in Religion is not a divers Religion He knoweth not what Religion is that thinketh that there are as many different Religions as there are controversies among religious persons In a word Bear a little or you must bear more § 8. Obj. 8. But the tolerated will seduce the ignorant and poison Souls And therefore are no more to be tolerated than murderers souls being more precious than bodies Answ 1. Who have poisoned the Church and souls with more errors and more palpable than the Papists who are most against Toleration 2. The meerly Tolerated being discountenanced by Authority have less advantage to deceive men than the Approved if as erroneous 3. We plead for restraining men from poisoning souls by dangerous doctrines and not for tolerating that But every dissenter or mistaking person is not such a poisoner of souls 4. The Tolerated speaking in publick are more responsible and more easily convicted of their fault than those that do it secretly where there are no witnesses And this your violence cannot hinder 5. As their errors will be openly known so you have advantage openly to confute them and to keep the people right § 9. Obj. 9. But dissenting teachers will unsay what the Approved Teachers say and hinder their work and steal the hearts of the people from them and make their calling bur densome to them Answ 1. They are to be restrained from preaching against any great sure necessary doctrine or practice 2. Christ never sent out his Ministers with a supposition that none should contradict them but with that light and strength which which was to overcome contradiction Do you so debase and disgrace your selves and your religion as to think or say that it cannot prosper if any be but suffered to speak against you 3. Doth the work of Christ afford you no more comfort than shall leave you thus burdened if any will but gainsay you How unlike Christs Ministers or Christians do you speak 4. Have not you that have sound doctrine Gods promise the Rulers countenance maintenance and honour much more to support you than they that are supposed to have none of these 5. If you tolerate not their open preaching their secret endeavours and your seeming cruelty together will alienate more from you and make you not only neglected but abhorred § 10. Obj. 10. The number of the erroneous will increase by a toleration Answ And the number of the ungodly that will say swear or do any thing for worldly respects will increase by your mistaken way of suppressing them 2. It is better that tolerated honest Christians erring in tolerable cases do increase than that they be banished or destroyed and a worldly Ministry thereby lift up abhorred by the religious and heading the malignant and prophane against all serious piety 3. Violence and Tyranny against good men for tolerable error hath already increased that same error more than wiser means would have done and hath introduced worse 4. We have found where I lived in Worcestershire and the neighbouring Counties Warwickshire Staffordshire and Shropshire in the late times of liberty in Religion that an unanimous humble able diligent Ministry frequently and lovingly consulting and all agreeing did more effectually suppress heresie error and schism than violence ever did or would have done The next Parish to me had a grave learned sober Anabaptist B. of D. that had great advantages and yet almost all our flocks were kept from the infection In my own Charge a great Parish of many thousand souls where I was above 14. years we had no one separate assembly nor one sectary that I remember save two or three apostate Infidels or Socinians and two or three Papists A faithful agreeing Ministry with the advantage of a good cause we found sufficient to shame all the Sectaries and frustrate most of their endeavours and to keep the people unanimous and right § 11. Obj. 11. If every one that will may set up for a preacher and gather a congregation or if the ignorant people shall all choose their own Teachers we shall have ignorance error and confusion Answ 1. I told you that every one that will may not turn preacher The Tolerated are to pass their proper tryal as well as the Approved before they receive their Toleration 2. The Churches commonly chose their own Bishops or Pastors for near a thousand years after Christ or had a Negative consenting voice at least And many Canons did confirm it yea and decrees of the Popes themselves yea when the Popes and Emperours in Germany the Henries c. strove about the investing power it was yet granted that the people should have their electing or free conrsenting power continued And no man can be really their Pastor till they consent And your contrary course will make worse work 3. Our way is of all other the safest Two or three locks keep the Churches treasure safest We say none shall be approved but by three parties consent nor Tolerated but by two or three The Ordainers are to consent to him as a Minister and the people as their Minister and the Magistrate as a Tolerated Minister or if any unordained be tolerated which I determine not at least the People and the Ruler must consent and that upon a just testimonial of his ability Piety and fitness for such toleration 4. And yet we speak this but of Pastors not denying but Teachers and Catechizers may be imposed on children infidels and others that are not in Communion with any particular Church § 12. Obj. 12. You would have the Church Articles at least for the Tolerated in Scripture phrase And what 's the phrase without the right sence How easily may Hereticks creep in under such phrases as several men put several sences on Answ 1. Is there not Truth enough in all the Bible in intelligible words necessary to salvation and Church Communion Is the Scripture as insufficient as the Papists make it without their supplemental Traditions or Decrees And had not the Holy Ghost skill to speak even things necessary in tolerable intelligible phrase who are they that are wiser to reform it 2. Almost all words are ambiguous and may be diversly understood your own
no not as it is a Conditional Covenant 3. That all except the elect or most or many at least are still under that first Covenant of Innocency made with Adam as prescribing to them and requiring of them sinless innocency or perfection as the only condition of their salvation As if God still said to sinners I will save you if you are not sinners 4. That the Covenant of Grace was made only to and with Christ and no other 5. That there was and is an eternal Covenant of Redemption made between God the Father and the Son which is neither Gods Essence a Divine Person or Decree but a proper Covenant 6. That God gave no grace pardon or salvation by Covenant till Christs incarnation 7. That the same faith objectively considered was necessary to salvation under the first edition of the Covenant of grace as under the last viz. to believe that Jesus the son of Mary is or must be the Messiah and that he must die for sin and rise again and intercede in heaven and return to raise us and judge the world 8. That Christs Disciples were not in a state of justification till they believed all this 9. That all men shall not be judged as they believed and kept or brake the condition of the Covenant in that edition which they were under but all according to the tenor of the last edition 10. That no faith in God as gracious and merciful to sinners and as pardoning sin was necessary before Christs incarnation 11. That God before did pardon sin without any respect to the future sacrifice and merit of Christ as mans Redeemer 12. That no souls were glorified or received to heaven and happiness till Christ's resurrection but reserved in some Limbus till then X. Of the Covenant made with Abraham and Moses Law and the Israelites 1. That Abraham was the first true Believer or the first to whom a promise or Covenant of Grace was made 2. That the Covenant of Grace was made to no other people in the world but the Israelites were Gods whole visible Church on earth and did not only add to them a Covenant of peculiarity 3. That this promise to Abraham and his seed in whom all Nations of the Earth should be blessed extended no way to the believing Gentiles 4. That all Heathens children that were circumcised were certainly saved if they died before actual sin 5. That Moses Law bound men to no spiritual duty nor promised any future reward or happiness after this life 6. That Moses Law was given by an evil God or evil Angel 7. That Moses Law was the same as the Law or Covenant of perfect innocency first made for Adam 8. That all the world was bound to keep Moses Law as such even the judicial and ritual parts of it 9. That under that Law God gave no grace to obey him 10. That the converted Jews are still bound to keep Moses Law 11. Yea and all converted Gentiles now 12. That we are bound to form our Church government according to the Mosaical or Jewish XI Of Redemption by Christ incarnate and the Gospel or last edition of the Covenant of Grace 1. That Christ brought no more Grace than was as ordinarily given before his incarnation 2. That he was habitually or actually a sinner guilty of original or actual sin 3. That Christ was properly reputed a sinner by God or a proper sinner by imputation in that he took our sin to be his own or God took him to be guilty of the fault of all our sin and not only one that undertook to bear the punishment deserved 4. That Christ was as guilty of our sin as we were of Adams 5. That Christ was habitually or actually holy and fulfilled all righteousness in the Legal person of every elect person or of every true believer so that the Law therefore judgeth them to have been what Christ was or done what Christ did therein they doing it in him 6. That Christ was not a satisfying sacrifice for sin 7. That Christs satisfaction and merit were not sufficient for their proper use and effect without our satisfaction and merit to make up their defect 8. That Christ was not the Saviour of the world or that God did not so love the world as to give his only son that who ever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life Or that God hath made no such promise or grant to all to whom the Gospel cometh that if they repent and believe in Christ they shall be pardoned and saved or that this conditional universal pardon was no fruit of Christs death 9. That none but the elect have any mercy purchased by the death of Christ nor are bound to be thankful to him for any such 10. That Christ suffered the same pains of hell hatred of God and torment of Conscience which all the elect should else have suffered 11. That Christs Righteousness and sacrifice are not the true meritorious cause of our righteousness pardon justification and salvation 12. That Christ must be oft really sacrificed 13. That Christ at his last supper did make the bread and wine become his real body then living and that it was broken and his blood shed by himself really before he was crucified by the Jews 14. That Christ felt no real pain as St. Hilary Pic●av ill said 15. That Christ died not but another in his shape 16. That Christ took not his body into Heaven 17. That all power is not given to Christ nor are Kings and Magistrates his Ministers nor hold their power by him 18. That Christ is no Law-giver and made no Law 19. That he is not our sufficient intercessor with God by whom we may have access and acceptance 20. That Christ sendeth not forth his spirit to be his agent and witness to the end of the world in sanctifying his elect XII Of Faith Repentance and sanctification 1. That Faith repentance holiness and obedience are not necessary in us to our salvation because Christ was righteous for us and repented and believed in our stead 2. That believers are under no Law of God 3. That he may be pardoned and saved who forbeareth only the outward Acts of sin through meer fear and is absolved by a Priest though he love sin better than holiness and had rather keep it than leave it 4. That loving others and doing them good and no harm is all the Love of God and Holiness that is necessary to salvation 5. That Faith and Repentance are of nature or by meer natural power and free-will and not the gift of grace through Christ 6. That God giveth grace equally to all till good improvers make a difference 7. That men may be holy in the restored Image of God without the grace of the Holy Ghost 8. That men need not the Spirit of God to help them to pray or preach 9. That the sins of sanctified persons are not judged by God to be theirs and that he seeth them
not and hateth them not nor punisheth them with any correcting punishment 10. That they that have the spirit need not study for matter method words or affection 11. That they are perfect or their duties perfect who have the spirit because all the spirits works are perfect 12. That the day of grace may be so past with some as that sincere faith and repentance and a changed will that loveth holiness and consenteth to the Covenant of grace may be rejected of God and unavailable to salvation XIII Of Justification and pardon 1. That God forgiveth the deserved punishment of no sin but requireth it of the sinner himself and Remission is only the destroying of sinful dispositions and preventing future sin and not forgiving the punishment of what is past or will be 2. That Christ's sacrifice and righteousness is not the meritorious cause of our pardon Justification adoption and Salvation 3. That Christ is not the Lord our righteousness or made of God to us wisdom righteousness sanctification and redemption nor we made the Righteousness of God in him or that it is not the Righteousness of God by faith in Jesus Christ which justifieth us 4. That Christ suffered for his own sin being either actually a sinner or our sins made properly his own sin in the guilt of culpability and not only of punishment before he suffered for them And so that he was by real imputation or Divine reputation the greatest Atheist infidel malignant murderer adulterer c. in the world these sins being in their forms or culpable guilt translated from all the elect on him 5. That all the elect were justified from eternity or before they were born or while they were no true believers by that justification which the Scripture meaneth when it saith we are justified by faith 6. That the elect are justified by the Law of innocency made to Adam or the Law of works made to and by Moses to the Jews because they were Legally in Christ fulfilling them and did perfectly fulfill them in him 7. That the sense of the Law of innocency was Thou or Christ for thee shall be innocent and obey perfectly to the end or die 8. That the Gospel Covenant or Donation is not Gods justifying instrument gift or Law 9. That God reputeth us to have been perfectly innocent from our birth to our death or at least since our believing because we were so Legally in Christ and yet reputeth us such sinners as need a Saviour and Christ suffered for our sins though we were so innocent 10. That the elect have no need of pardon at all because they are perfectly obedient by imputation 11. That at least we need no pardon of any sin committed since we believed save only of temporal correction 12. That pardon and justification actually remit all sin at once that is yet to come and is yet no sin as well as that which is past and present 13. That pardon and justification are perfect as soon as we believe 14. That therefore no true penalty no not corrective is inflicted or remaineth after our first faith 15. Therefore to such none of their wants of grace or Communion with God nor permitted sin nor suffering nor death are any true punishments for sin for the demonstration of paternal justice 16. That therefore no believer must pray for the pardon of sin it being perfected already nor seek for it of Christ by faith 17. That therefore there is no further condition or means to be used by us for pardon of new sins or for fuller pardon 18. Therefore there is no other or perfecter justification at the last judgement 19. That faith is not imputed to us for Righteousness 20. That against the false accusations that we were impenitent infidels ungodly hypocrites we need no personal Repentance faith piety or sincerity to justifie us as the righteousness contrary to this accusation but only the imputed righteousness performed personally by Christ himself 21. That we shall not be judged according to our works nor in any respect justified before God by our works nor is St. James so to be understood nor Christ that saith By thy words thou shalt be justified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Mat. 12. 22. That men are justified by the works of the Law of Moses or of innocency or some other works which must be joyned to the righteousness of Christ to make it sufficient to its proper part or office and are not only subordinate thereto 23. That we are justified by faith only in our Consciences as knowing that we are otherwise justified before God 24. That we are justified only by inherent righteousness and that pardon of sin and acceptance for Christs merits and mediation is none of our justification at all 25. That a man unjustified must believe that he is justified that thereby he may be justified taking justification in the same sense 26. That God doth not make men just before he sentenceth them just 27. That Christ justifieth only by his Priestly Office and not by his judicial sentence 28. That we are justified by no act of faith but only by the act of resting on or also accepting Christs imputed justifying righteousness 29. That being perfectly justified by the first act of faith we are never after justified as to continuation by any act after that first instant 30. That to expect justification by believing in God the Father or the Holy Ghost and in Christ as Christ in his person and whole office of a saviour and not only by the foresaid single act is to seek justification by works reprehended by Paul or unlawfully 31. That faith or repentance are not by Gods gift or promise made any conditions necessary to be done by us through his grace that we may have right to Christ or pardon or justification 32. That our believing in Christ is of equal impossibility to us as our personal perfect innocency 33. That to believe Heaven and that God will glorifie us for the sake of Christ and as a Rewarder of them that diligently seek him is no act of that faith which justifieth as a Condition of justification or salvation 34. That it is all mens duty to believe that they are elect 35. That justifying faith is only a full assurance that we are elect 36. That true faith is inconsistent with doubting or imperfection 37. That it is unlawful to trust to any thing in us or done by us as a means or condition of pardon or salvation though but subordinate to Christ 38. That no meer death-bed faith or repentance is accepted to salvation or pardon because good works are part of the condition 39. That there is no degree of pardon given by God to any but the elect that are saved 40. That all praise that is ascribed to any thing in our selves or done by us or to any subordinate act of man as a means to our salvation or final justification is a dishonour to God and our Saviour and
and unskilful Mountebanks have long tryed in vain CHAP. III. More of the same subject Twenty things necessary in all that will deliver the Church from Schism Sect. I. BEcause this dividing Spirit goeth not easily out I shall repeat and summe up the common Duties of all men that will herein successefully serve the Church for it is not every man that is fit for so excellent a work though every man be bound to it in his place The sad Experience of the World assureth us that hitherto few skilful and effectual Physicians have been found Sect. II. In short all men that will promote the Churches concord whether Magistrates Pastors or People must observe all these following things as the necessary means which if they be wanting yea but one of them the Churches will be so far disquieted and diseased 1. The foresaid simple Terms of Union must be understood and received and false and ensnaring terms must be avoided 2. Magistrates must preferre Christs interest before their own and see that their own lyeth in preferring his and must value conscionable upright men though dissenters in tolerable cases and not encourage their unconscionable enemies And must keep peace among the Clergy and among all 3. Men must be taught to place their Religion in worshipping God in Spirit and Truth and to study the power and practice of Godliness Sobriety Justice and Charity more than Opinions self-exalting or Will-worship and to love their Neighbours as themselves and do as they would be done by 4. Men must learn of Christ to see the amiableness of Sincerity and Holiness under many differences and weaknesses and so love what is amiable and bear with what is tolerable and pardon what is pardonable in all and to receive the weak even in the Faith but not to doubtfull Disputations and to speak more of the Good that is in upright men than of the Evil yea never speak evil of any man till they be certain of the truth nor then till they be well satisfied that it is like to do more good than harm 5. Men must labour to know themselves and be acquianted with their own fallibility and defectibility mutability and insufficiency and to remember how much they have to be pardoned and tolerated and so to cast the first stone at themselves to fly from Pride and know how unmeet they are to be the Rule of all mens Judgments and Practices or to seem so wise as that none shall be tolerated that differ from them nor speak publickly to God but in the words which they prescribe 6. Men must not be too strange to one another nor keep too distant for neerness and acquaintance reconcileth and distance cherisheth false reports and suspicions and men take liberty to hear think and speak ill of strangers behind their backs which familiarity would cure 7. None but Volunteers must be taken for true Christians nor admitted to holy Communion to receive the Seals of Pardon and Life 8. To use more a friendly discoursing way for convincing Dissenters than disgracefull passionate militant disputations Though dangerous seducers must be confuted by necessary disputation 9. To abhorre Envy and Emulation the Off-spring of Selfishness and Pride and not to grudge at other mens esteem that are preferred before us especially that Preachers and Pastors envy not the preference of other Teachers nor murmur at their liberty honour or success but rejoyce with Paul Phil. 1. that Christ is preached though it be by Contentious men that do it in Envy and Strife to adde affliction to the afflicted 10. To dread Persecution and unjust violence to men of Conscience and not to force them to sin and damnation by bearing down Conscience in unnecessary things 11. To be well furnished with holy Reason and Love and for Ministers to be confined to the use of these from all use of Violence by the Sword and kept to their proper work and Government by the Word and Church-keyes 12. To rebuke and frown away malignant and Religious Calumniators Whisperers Censurers and Backbiters 13. To teach the People wherein the uniting Substance of Religion doth consist and what a sin it is to be censorious and separate causelesly from others and represent their different Opinions Modes and Circumstances of Worship unjustly odious to stirre up other mens hatred and separating distastes and how great a sin and danger Schism or Division is 14. To avoid all needless novelties and singularities and to keep to Vincent Lerinensis's Measure of holding to that which hath ever been received as necessary by the whole Church and was the primitive Faith and Religion 15. To avoid contending about meer ambiguous words and ever to agree of the sence of all the terms before you enter on further disputation and to suspect such ambiguity in all debates 16. As Magistrates must be just and impartial so people must be taught to obey them under Christ in all lawfull things belonging to their Office and that as a part of their Obedience to God 17. Peace-makers must be men of Piety and blameless Lives that may honour their works and not by scandal harden adversaries nor lay Stumbling-blocks before the weak and such as study to do good to all 18. They must submit to men of the lowest and weakest ranks and not despise them and the strong must bear the Infirmities of the weak restoring the fallen with the spirit of meekness remembring that they also may be tempted 19. They must not expect such a degree of Concord on Earth as is not to be expected lest for want of it they be tempted to murmur at God doubt of Religion and make the breach wider by unjust severities against the weak 20. When any are accused of Heresie or Scandal they must be ready with patience to give satisfaction to others to the Churches to Rulers to Equals or Inferiors Referring them to their Profession of Faith and answering what is charged on them and willingly amending what they are convinced is amiss But all this and much more I have formerly written in a Book called The Cure of Church-divisions CHAP. IV. Popery or the Papacie will never unite the Church Sect. I. I Come now to prove the insufficiency and ineptness of the terms of Union which many men have devised and obtruded on the Churches Repeating that few things more divide than false Means of uniting while these engage men to set against all that cannot yield to them And I shall begin with the terms of the Papal party as being the chief Pretenders Sect. II. The Papists think that the way of Union and avoiding Schism is for one Man the Pope of Rome to be taken for the Universal Vicar of Christ on Earth even the governing Head under Christ of all the Christians on Earth yea and of all the World in order to make them Christians and that the Church on Earth is one such politick Body of which Christ is the invisible Head of influence and the Pope is the visible Head
of Belief in things not evidently of God Sect. V. What I say of Divine Faith I say of Points of Religious Practice For though all things believed be not to be done yet all things to be done as commanded by God must first be believed to be commanded by him And to believe and do is somewhat more than only to believe Sect. VI. But it 's one thing to say This is Gods Command and another to say This is our Command The first none will agree to that see not evidence to believe it The second is 1. Either according to Gods Command to drive Men to obey it 2. Or beside his Command 3. Or against his Command 1. Those Laws of Men which are according to Gods Laws those only will obey who discern them so to be on that account Therefore it must be in evident Cases or they will be no measure of Concord as such 2. Those that are but besides Gods Laws Men should obey so far as they can find that the Commanders have power from God to make them And how few such will be matter of Universal Concord 3. Those that are against Gods Laws no good Christians will knowingly consent to Sect. VII And I have before truly told them what great diversity of capacities and understandings there be in the world so that even in common matters that are still before our eyes at least in many or most few persons long agree In matters of Fact at any distance or matters of Prudence Husband and Wife Parents and Children Master and Servants daily differ Mens faces scarce differ more than their understandings It is only in few plain easie things that all Men are agreed And are ever all Christians like to agree in many humane dark opinions Or will it be taken for certain to all Men because it is so to some of clearer understandings or because a self-confident Imposer vevehemently asserteth it They know not themselves they know no Man that presume to unite the Church this way Sect. VIII Therefore the Popish numerous Decrees de Fide are but so many Engines of Schism made on the pretence of declaring Points of Faith If they were Articles of Faith before they may be mani●est to be so in the Divine Revelation that is the Holy Scriptures But for the Council to tell a Man This or That is in the Bible but we cannot shew you it there nor can you find it if you search but you must take our words as infallible This is not a center that the Christian world will ever unite in And if it be an Article of Faith either the Church held it before the Council declared it or not If they did then it was known without a Councils Declaration And what need a Council to declare that which all the Church did hold before and was in possession of But if not then either it was an Article of Faith before or not If it was then the Church before held not that Faith and so was Heretical Corrupt or wanted Faith and so by their own reckoning who will not endure the distinction of essentials from the rest was no Church If not then the Council declared that to be an Article of Faith which was none It must be such before it can be truly declared such else a false Declaration that it was such did now make it such But if they had openly professed That by Declaring it an Article they meant the Making one they must prove 1. That they are Prophets and have new Revelations even of Faith 2. And that the Scriptures were not sufficient measures of the Churches Faith to the end of the world 3. And that the Churches Faith is alterable and crescent and the old Church had not the same Faith which the present Church hath And will the Christian world any more agree in such absurdities than in a Quakers of Familists professing that he speaketh by Inspiration If the Members of the Council before they came thither were no wiser nor honester than other Men nor their words more credible how shall we know that when they are there they are become inspired and their words are Gods own words But if it be said That they neither make new Articles of Faith nor declare what is in Scripture by Exposition but declare the Verbal Tradition of the Apostles I ask 1. If so big a Book as the Bible contain not so much as all the Churches Creed 2. Where hath this Traditional Faith been kept till now If by all the Church then it was held possessed and known before that Declaration If but by part of the Church then it was but part of the Church that had the true Faith and one part was of one Religion and another part of another And which part was it that kept this Tradition And how come we to know that they were righter than the rest that had it not If it was Rome only then they had a Faith different from the rest of the Churches And how shall we know that they are not as true and sound as Rome But how hath this Tradition been carried on and kept right Was it by Writing or by Word If by Writings why are they not cited seen and tryed Other men can read as well as Popes and Councils If unwritten was it by publick Preaching or private Talk If the former then it was commonly known and declared before the Council declared it If by private Talk how shall we be sure 1. That they were honest men that would keep private the Publick Faith especially being Preachers that by office were to publish it 2. And that it hath been well remembred and carried on without alteration And were it preached or whispered mans memory is so frail and words so uncertain that for the Church or a piece of the Church to carry down from the Apostles from Fathers to Children so many Articles more than are in all the Bible and so hard and mysterious and by many now controverted and this not by writing and to be sure that no mistake hath been made by oblivion or misexpression this is a thing that the Church will never unite in the belief of And was it in a set form of unchangeable words that all these Articles or Expositions were carried down till now or not If yea we should have had that Form deliver'd us as we have other Forms the Creed Lords Prayer c. If not how shall we know that the Fathers and Children had the same understanding of the matter and changed not the Faith by change of words And it 's like that all the Churches since the Apostles delivered not these Articles down in the same words when in several Countries and Ages they spake not the same language And it is a wonder that they would never write their Faith for their Children to learn when the Jews Deut. 6. and 11. were commanded to teach their Children by writing the Law upon the very Posts of their Houses and their