Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	greek_a	latin_a	translation_n	3,103	5	9.6519	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A58886	Dr. Sherlock's preservative considered the first part, and its defence, proved to contain principles which destroy all right use of reason, fathers, councils, undermine divine faith, and abuse moral honesty : in the second part, forty malicious calumnies and forged untruths laid open, besides several fanatical principals which destroy all church discipline, and oppose Christs divine authority : in two letters of Lewis Sabran of the Society of Jesus.	Sabran, Lewis, 1652-1732.	1688 (1688)	Wing S217; ESTC R16398	73,086	90

Forgery says the Minister the Title of this Sermon in the INDEX and I will not turn over five Tomes To ease him of the labor I tell him 't is the 14th Sermon pag. 144. in the Fifth Tome of the Paris Edition of 1661. What Answer is returned me None but No matter says this Preface-maker It was called a Forgery by the Minister it must be still a Forgery Boldly said is it proved Not The Proof from S. Gregory Nazianzen ' s Jamhicks is a Forgery one single word by either of the Ministers but as a Ministers Oath lately made any Loyal Man a Traitor so this Minister's bare saying it is must make any of the Fathers Works a Forgery In my First Letter to you Sir The Council of Chalcedon was clipt and abus'd the Councils of Laodicea Gangrae and Carthage misrepresented I have cleared evidently these three Calumnies The Case of the Council of Carthage is whether these words in all the Greek Originals ' O 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and all the Latin Translations Martyr oret pro nobis ought to be translated That the Martyr pray for us or as the Minister rendred it The Martyr will intercede to you for us This Second I said and say still was a Forgery and whoever can but Construe Greek and Latin will I am sure say that I translated right and that the Minister was guilty of Forgery I proved the Sense I gave to a Canon of the Council of Laodicea to be the true one from Theodoret That of the Council of Gangrae from the very Synodical Epistle of that Council That of Carthage was so evident that the Minister having nothing to offer against it thought fit only to say without attempting the least Proof All this is nothing to the purpose yet the Preface-maker will have them all Forgeries Had not this Minister great reason to conclude in his Preface He was amaz'd at such a Mass of Forgeries in so little room These Gentlemen forget the Axiom Probationes habere debent Lib. qui accu s●r●● de ●den● qui accusare volunt They must have Proofs at hand that will accuse I have I conceive fully made out in my Vindication that Protestant Ministers do accuse our Writers of Forgery but prove it not and therefore stand guilty of the basest sort of Calumny which hath as much of Silliness as of Dishonesty Now I would make out the other Truth I asserted to wit that we prove upon them the most impudent Forgeries we accuse them of and this by an Instance the most weighty in Dr. Comber's Case because that no one ever pretended more to Ingenuity Sincerity and Charity and I boldly assert it No one was ever guilty of so many and so outragious and malicious Forgeries But because this Postscript swells already much beyond its due Bounds to convince also Dr. Sherlock that we do not generally forbid the reading of Heretical Books but only to such as want Abilities or Application to search into and find out their gross Forgeries I will publish a Book written by a Lay-Gentleman to whom I had recommended the Reading of the Advice to Roman-Catholics by which it will appear how modestly I spoke when I said that Dr. Comber's Forgeries and Falsifications could be produced by Dozens for the Reader will find them exposed by Scores and such as will allow of no Colour but the Blushes of the hardest Forehead Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam A Third Letter of F. Lewis Sabran of the Society of JESUS to Mr. Needham Licenser of the Second Part of Dr. Sherlock's Preservative against Popery Giving an account of the Misrepresentations and Calumnies that make up the whole Book SIR WHILST my Second Letter to you is yet under the Press I meet with a Second Part to the Preservative Licensed by you to come abroad and because I apprehend by a charitable Judgment that you approve not all that you License but which of the two may be the lesser Fault refer your self to the Author's Ingenuity and Accurateness I venture once more to give you an account of the scandalous Vntruths and unconscionable Forgeries in plain Matters of Fact unto which you have unwarily put your Hand If Reason was much abused by the First Part of the Preservative Religion is slandered at a far higher rate by the Second in which the Catholic Faith appears so disfigured that had I not consulted the Title I had never discovered against what Church Dr. Sherlock directs his outragious Invectives I laid open the Errors of the First in a single Sheet a full Answer to the thredbare and weak Objections he hath made a Collection of in the Second would not take up half a Sheet if yet they could challenge at all to be considered but he hath packt them up in so many slie and equally false Insinuations which claim for him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Title of The Misrepresenter and backt them with such a train of most shameless Calumnies that the bare exposing of them which is their plain Confutation will I fear take up two or three Sheets I will follow the order of his four Sections and first summing up in each his Misrepresentations and Calumnies I will give them no other Answer than by a fair and full account of our Faith the ugly Mask he hath disfigured her by will be no prejudice to her when her Face appears Ten Misrepresentations and Calumnies contrived by Dr. Sherlock in his First Paragraph Concerning Idolatry 1. SAcrifice is the only Act of Worship which the Church of Preserv fol. 3. Rome appropriates to the Supreme God she doth not pay to him alone that degree of Worship which the tempting Devil demanded of Christ whereas our Saviour denying to give him this inferior degree of Worship thereby teaches that no degree of Worship must be given to any Being but the Supreme God. 2. The Papists by their worshipping Saints Angels and the Virgin Mary put them in the Throne of God. 3. They offer not their Prayers only in the Name of Christ Fol. 4. that in him they may find acceptance 4. They make not their Applications to One God by One Mediator 5. They Fol. 9. bow to or towards their Images as the Objects of their Worship and in that are Idolaters So were not the Jews on account of the Cherubins which by God's Ordinance covered the Mercy-seat for tho' the People in pursuance of David's Advice did bow down to and worship God's Footstool and tho' this relate to the Ark yet how doth David's Exhortation to worship the Ark which is God's Footstool prove that all their Worship must be directed to the Cherubins which are his Throne Suppose the Jews were to direct their Worship towards the Mercy seat which was covered with the Cherubins where God had promised to be present how are the Cherubins concerned in this Worship which was paid only to God as peculiarly present at that Place which is no more than