and to be incarnate being made Flesh and Incarnation signifie the same May be you will deny it 't is but what some of yours do in a thing of the like nature as that to make and to create the World signifie not the same thing If the Word which as S. John saith was God was made Flesh I think that according to all Rules of Logick out of those Premises we may conclude how God was incarnate or made Flesh and that Act we may well call Incarnation As to the other part that it is only by Deduction you cannot be ignorant how there are such Deductions as are equivalent or next to the Expression for when the chief Assertion contained in Scripture is true so must also be whatsoever is therein included and in the Explication of it drawn by a true and right Consequence Thus tho' in the Sixth Commandment to give one Poyson be not expressed yet by a true and certain Consequence 't is deduce out of these Words Thou shalt not kill so starving one to death is adjudged Murther and punished as such Tho Incest be not expressed in the Seventh yet none will deny it to be forbidden under these Words Thou shalt not commit Adultery so is Fornication and so of every other Precept wherein when a Sin is forbidden all of the same kind are so and also the Virtue contrary to the Sin is prescribed And tho there were some difference in the Nature of the thing yet hence we infer this certain Truth that tho some things be not expresly set down in Scripture yet are therein contained and thence deduced by a true and lawful Consequence Of this sort are the words Trinity and Incarnation and if the Names then also the Things for the Use of Words is to signifie Things As to what is added in Answer to the Assertion that the Son of God was made Man how the Vnitarian will say The Son of God doth not always signifie God 't is thereby implyed that sometimes it doth and that grants what we desire for thus we know that when it is simply and absolutely attributed to Christ which is never so to any Angel or Man we may conclude that then it necessarily signifies God As to what is answered to the other Text The Word was made Flesh that the Word doth not plainly signifie God I only say this how John saith the word was God I leave them in his hands and let them come off as they can As to the Third Text the Vnitarian will say what he said before That God may be manifest in the Flesh without being incarnate he may say what he pleases if he proves nothing nay not so much as go about it surely they claim a Priviledge to be believed in what they say upon their bare word but seeing they give no reason for what they say we may suppose those great Masters of Reason have none to give their Reason fails them and is succeeded by Passion I see they found out a short way to answer all Arguments against them either with not taking notice of them and thus they answer my Book or with denying every thing without giving any Reason for it This puts me in mind of a common Saying when I was in the Philosophy School Plus negabit asinus quà m probabit Philosophus The dullest Fellow in the World can deny more than the greatest Philosopher is able to prove do but always deny and at last the Philosopher will have nothing to say There is no arguing against those who deny Principles now this is a great one for Men to give Reason as for what they affirm so for what they deny this is the part of Rational Men We attack them out of Scripture and they ought in our way to answer us out of the same as their School-Arguments we answer in their way But to return to what the Unitarian saith that The Son of God doth not always signifie God I say 't is not always necessary to our purpose it should And to state the Question well these two things ought to be observed First The Question is not at all about Angels or Men but about the Person of the Lord Jesus The Second The Name God is not improperly taken This being premised I say how the words Son of God when spoken of Christ do signifie God which to prove out of many Texts I shall bring only two in S. John's Gospel and if in the whole Bible there was but one yet it would be sufficient for every word therein is Truth and if once the Holy Ghost therein declares the Son of God to signifie God 't is not in the power of Men or Devils to make it otherwise Besides that the two Texts are so plain that there is no ground left to Cavil The first place is about the Interpretation given some words spoken by our blessed Lord whereby said the Jews thou makest thy self God which our Saviour rendered by these I said I am the Son of God So that the words God Son of God signifie just the same The Question between our Lord and the Jews was not about the meaning of what he had said they were agreed about it but the Dispute was whether those words were Blasphemy which they affirmed and he denied Those words in question spoken by our Saviour are in ver 30. I and my Father are One which because they are most material to the Question I shall thereupon observe this How therein Christ expresses Two Persons Himself and the Father the word I he explains by the name Son I said I am the Son of God and as by the first words of the Verse he makes a distinction of Persons so by the last he affirms a Oneness between Him and the Father when he saith they are One. This Oneness cannot be of a Personality which already he hath distinguished what else then can it be but in Nature and consequently in the Attributes thereunto belonging With this Text is to be compared the other I am in the Father and the Father in me It is very idle and frivolous for them to think they are One only in Will and Consent for if our Saviour's meaning had been only so and no farther the Jews would never have branded it with Blasphemy nor offered to have stoned him for it they well knew how by their Law no Man could be guilty of Blasphemy for saying his Will and Consent was one with God's for they were commanded to conform their Will and Mind to the Will of God that thereby might be a perfect agreement between their God and them between his Law and their Obedience Therefore to make this in their opinion to be Blasphemy there must be something of another nature which they declare plainly enough because that thou being a Man makest thy self God So the Question came to this Whether the Lord Jesus was God Which the Jews denied as now Socinians do but our Lord affirmed as after him
they are the Metaphorical Doctors of the World who make bold to turn almost the whole Scripture into Metaphors even to set up a Metaphorical God O Sirs first pull out the Beam out of your own eye and then ye shall see clearly to cast out the Mote out of your Brother's Anon we shall meet with some more Cavils of theirs They appear at the Bar whereto indeed they deserve to be called and Plead for themselves thus The first of the 39 Articles saith There is but One living and true God and in Vnity of this Godhead there be Three Persons of one Substance Power and Eternity the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost As to the latter part which is the main Question they pretend to come off with mincing the matter and say by some of their late Prints meaning Socinians I perceive that they for Peace-sake submit to the Phrase of the Church and expresly own Three Persons tho' they think the word Person not so proper as another word might be The weight of the words of the Article lieth so heavy upon them that under it they must either break or bend this last they chuse to do and would seem to yield not because they believe it but only for Peace-sake Peace to themselves to avoid the Penalty They think the word Person not so proper as another might be still they reserve a Back-door why do they not name the word which is in their opinion more proper than that of Person that word remains in petto in their Breast till there be a fair occasion to declare it Their speaking of Peace is well if with it they join Truth for they ought not to be asunder no Christian is to betray Truth for Peace-sake Now if a Person of the Godhead be described as it is by an incommunicable Subsistence of the Divine Essence the Socinian shall not be acquitted as he pretends It is not my work neither is this a place to shew how frivolous that Plea would prove at the Bar of the Law but I am sure in my Book I sufficiently demonstrated it to be a vain Subterfuge and against the Gospel That trimming Spirit in them which because they have not the upper hand one may easily perceive to Rule throughout in both Letters puts me in mind of the Popish Methods in such Cases as among other Instances it appears by what passed in 1561 in that great Assembly at Poissy in France which the then French King Charles IX appointed to meet and in his Presence therein to have free Conference about Religion between some of the Popish Clergy and some of the Protestant Ministers Because as yet things were not ripe for their Designs they by means of those Conferences would try whether some way might be found out to plaister things over and for the present to compose Differences in order thereunto after some discourses about the Sacraments which between the Cardinal of Lorrain and Theodorus Beza had happened in the K. of Navarr's Chamber where they met accidentally the Popish Party being not willing to venture their Cause upon Disputes first by the Doctors of Sorbon and lastly by the Cardinal of Tournon in the name of the whole Clergy desired the King and Queen-Mother to give the Protestants no Hearing who by the Mouth of Beza had already made a Speech in the Assembly and given an account of their Confession of Faith So then these Publick Conferences not doing the work they did set up Private ones first between Two and Two then between Five and Five of both Religions and among these for the Protestants Peter Martyr was one the Point was about the Lord's Supper On the Popish side the design was not to find out the Truth but only such words as each side might Interpret on his behalf To that purpose several Formules which here I need not to insert were by the Papists offered the Protestants but being ambiguous captious and such as might be understood in a double sense Beza for Conclusion said We must say all or nothing because indeed the Mystery of that Holy Sacrament must be explained The like was practised in their Council of Trent where happened great Heats between the Dominicans and Franciscans about several Points wherein they differ but to displease neither side their Canons about those Matters before they were passed they shewed to both Parties and penn'd them in such Words and Expressions as each side might favourably Interpret for his own Opinion Thus Socinians would follow the same way and admit of such words as may be taken in their Sense and ours too yet tho' we should agree about the Terms they know we do not in the Signification they for Peace sake submit to the Phrase of the Church and own Three Persons yet Interpret it not as the Church doth Again They seem desirous to wash their hands of Socinianism yet defend it as much as they are able Vpon the prudent Explication which hath been given of some obnoxious Terms they weave the Dispute and come in as Brethren yet still believe not as the Church doth nay if we will believe them we are all of a perfect Agreement but if we examine it will be found if by these pretended last Concessions of theirs we agree 't is about some Words when the difference about Things still remains And as then Papists were only to have things quiet for the present so I perceive Socinians are now content it should be so between us to see whether Times may happen to turn for them then indeed they would declare by the word Person they mean not an Incommunicable Subsistence of the Godhead but only an Attribute as Wisdom Love that Christ is God and Son of God by Favour not by Nature and by eternal Generation But all such Trimmers to speak in Job's Words are Physicians of no value and such Remedies cannot cure the Wound but it will break out again and this I call daubing with untempered Mortar 't is not enough to ease of the Pain but the cause must be removed which is the only way to cure for certain and to prevent Relapses this I bring in to shew how Socinians are not so averse from such Popish Practices as they pretend to be and if we narrowly inquire into it we shall find they are willing to join with them in the Practice of the following Maxim where they are the weakest they first pretend for Moderation and Toleration then for an Equality afterwards struggle for Superiority and at last destroy any one that to a hairs Breadth would not come up to what they would have for as Papists brag of a Spirit of Infallibility intailed upon their Church so Socinians are of opinion that the Spirit of God if they own any such thing is departed from other Christian Societies only to be among them who look upon themselves as the only true Interpreters of God's Word as Socinus doth applaud himself in his new fangled Expositions
he had said the living God according to an usual way of speaking in Scripture when the Abstract is put for the Concrete thus God is called the Lord our Righteousness that same Word that was God was made Flesh and dwelt among us to dwell denotes a Person and we Beheld his Glory not the Glory of Reason or Wisdom but the Glory as of the only begotten of the Father here is a Relation of a Son to a Father and surely a Son is a Person not a Thing and of this same John bare witness of him saying this was he of whom I spake he that cometh after me is preferred before me read on till ver 19. all along the Word is spoken as of a Person and in ver 17. he declares who that Word is by a Comparison between Persons the Law was given by Moses but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ This Jesus Christ he hath been speaking of all this while and his Design is to shew that Jesus Christ is the Word so often by him mentioned and to that effect he speaks of John's Evidence about him if the Word be a Thing and not a Person Christ was so and so Moses who was a Person and Christ after he was made Flesh is compared to him O the Perverseness of some Mens Judgment who read Scripture not to find out Truth or be guided by it but out of it to wrest some things to support their Prejudices Papists to set up the Pope's Supremacy think after much seeking to have found a Text to serve their turn he that is spiritual judgeth all things yet he himself is judged of no Man with them the Pope is that Spiritual Man the Socinians whose Design is not to set up one as Papists do but to pull down and destroy the great Work of Incarnation say because it serves their turn no Word or Divine Person but only the Reason of God was made Flesh Out of what I have said I think it plainly appears how the Scope of the Place and the Design of the Evangelist is to speak of a Person and not of a Thing But to prove our Interpretation let us further search into Scriptures Paul speaks to our purpose for as John saith the Word that was God was made Flesh so he declares that God was manifest in the Flesh which he calls the great Mystery of Godliness and the whole Verse tho in different Branches as preached unto the Gentiles believed on in the World received up into Glory do plainly demonstrate the Lord Jesus to be that God or Person of the Godhead manifest in the Flesh and in another Place he saith when the Fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a Woman that Person which in another place is called God in this is called the Son of God and in another God's own Son or proper Son in these several Texts mention is made of an Incarnation or of being made Flesh manifest in the Flesh made of a Woman and God sent his own Son in the Likeness of sinful Flesh and the Subject is called the Word God Son of God God's own and proper Son is there in all this any Metaphor or any Ground to say that the Word made Flesh signifieth Reason communicated to Jesus all this proves that our Interpretation is according to the Analogy of Faith and shews a sweet Harmony of several Texts of Scripture to demonstrate the adorable Mystery of the Incarnation of the Son God Thus far we proved our Interpretation of that Text of Scripture we do not perceive they are in a Condition to do the like for theirs for if they could we should hear of it they have not one Text to do it Magister dixit is no Reason with us the Vnitarian may say but that is not enough what he saith he must prove upon true Grounds and to the purpose well for want of Scripture the Author of the Letter gives a Reason of his own which is this And we all know that Divine Wisdom may be communicated to Man without the Incarnation of God Did ever any one read such a pitiful coming off in so weighty a matter as this is how sawcy with God are some Men in the World in setting out their foolish and wandering Fancies and where is a due Respect for his Holy Word hath not God made foolish the Wisdom of these Men if ever they had any doth this Interpretation hold any proportion with that high and noble Idea which the Evangelist would give us of the Person whose History he writes first of all we defy them to shew that this is the Sense of any Text concerning this Matter Secondly suppose they could yet it being against the usual Meaning they ought to shew reason why in this place it should be taken otherwise and then must such a silly Reason weigh down the Authority of so many Texts of Scripture what will become of all the glorious Attributes and Prerogative of the Lord Jesus over Angels and Men what of that Name which is above every Name God's own only begotten Son in whom he is well pleased if all comes only to this God's Reason and Wisdom were communicated to him which God in a high degree did to Solomon and to others of his eminent Servants whereby he must make them equal with his Son and he with them we all know that God if he pleases can create another World must we conclude therefore he hath not created this God if he had pleased could have delivered his People out of Egypt otherwise than by the hand of Moses must we say therefore he delivered them not by his hand Out of what God can do we must not infer that he hath not done what he hath done because God can communicate Reason to Man therefore the Word the Son of God was not made Flesh Ye great Logicians is this a good Consequence risum teneatis I could almost say if the thing in question was not of the highest importance Before I leave this Point I shall skip over to another place of the Letter for tho' he there speaks not to me but to another whose Notions I am not concerned for yet what he saith relating to the Cause I ought to take notice of the more because it belongs to that Text of John which hitherto we were upon 't is said Tke Incarnation of God is no where expressed in Scripture it can be no more than meerly a deduction from thence 'T is well you are so kind as to grant 't is in 't in some way As to the first part if you say in so many Letters according to your cavilling way we know 't for the word Incarnation is Latin and so none of the Books of Scripture being originally written in that Language we must not think to find it in 't but we say a word altogether equivalent and which signifies the same thing is in 't Doth not to be made Flesh
did use the Superlative degree instead of the Positive But these are but Quibbles of your own which argues that seeing you stick at such things you have little else to say for your selves ye leave things for Words and like drowning Men lay hold upon any thing that lieth in your way to save a sinking Cause when no serious Man but would think it below himself to stay upon such things all your Observations and Inferences are an effect of a distemper'd Imagination and not of a sound Reason whereby you deserve the name of the Ridiculer ridiculed As well as you we know Essence to be one thing and Circumstance another but that were tolerable if ye did not as ye do jest with Holy things But I think to know where the Sore lieth ye do not like the words Essential nor Essence derivative nor primitive and tho' in the Schools of Divinity and Philosophy they be used yet ye dislike them because in so many Letters not to be found in Scripture but here you might see I use it not in a Religious but Civil account I own I am at a loss to find a way how to please such nice Spirits as ye are for of one side ye would not have us to use the words Essence Trinity Person because you say they are not in the word of God yet ye both find fault with me for making use of Scripture so much as I do against you in my Book So ye Gentlemen prodigies of Learning may now see which if you do not others do how ye sin against very common Rules what then will become of the four things you learned after you put your Wits to the rack to make others pass for Nonsensical Scriblers who hardly can write three words of good Sense Thus if your witty Premises do fall how can your learned Inferences stand These miserable Shifts which every solid Man would scorn to trouble his head with do tend only to shew how in you is an earnest desire but want of power to make others who differ from you to pass for Silly and Ridiculous so take to your selves what you had prepared for others But what 's all this to the Cause but a putting it off and running away from it Having shewed how when I penned my Epistle I thank God I was in my right Senses the next thing I must do is to prove my Charge against Socinianism which he calls false and disagreeing yet I make no doubt but it will stick First I call it Blasphemous and I shall prove it out of better Authority than that of the Polonian Knight or Bidle's or what the Reasons to the contrary of the Authors of both Letters can come to In order to 't I say there is a twofold Blasphemy one Positive when Men call or otherwise make God a Liar and to deny himself or the like and the other Negative when Men deny him to be Infinite Almighty or Eternal the first when God is made to be what he is not the second when he is deny'd to be what he is That Blasphemy is an abominable Injury directly against God's Nature Attributes or Works is so plainly and frequently set down in Scripture that I think unnecessary for me to prove it and if the same offence committed against God's Nature Attributes and Works be called Blasphemy and that committed against the Lord Jesus's Person be called Blasphemy it follows first that Jesus Christ is true God then secondly that whosoever denies Christ to be God in his Nature Attributes and Works he is a Blasphemer Now Socinianism denieth our Saviour Divine Nature and Essential Attributes of that Nature therefore Socinianism is a Blasphemous Opinion and Doctrine as much for denying Christ to be true God by Nature as by denying Divine Nature Almightiness and Eternity Now that the Sin called Blasphemy is sometimes committed against the Lord Jesus we learn it out of his own mouth upon the occasion of the Pharisees saying he did cast out Devils by Beelzebub the Prince of Devils this he called Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost the chiefest of all And when he was in the hands of the Jews the things by them done and spoken against him were by the Evangelist called Blasphemy and many other things spake they blasphemously against him Thus when the Jews spake against the things that were spoken by Paul and what were those things That Christ was the Son of God which to prove he made use of the words of Psalm 2. Thou art my Son c. in the proper Sense their speaking against this is call'd Contradicting and Blaspheming upon the same account in another place 't is said they opposed and blasphemed Thus Paul saith of himself he was before his Conversion a Blasphemer and compelled others to blaspheme that is to deny and speak ill of Christ so to say that Christ is not God of the same Nature and Power equal with the Father is as great a Blaspemy as to say he was or is a Sinner which any one that hath a religious Honour and Love for him and hopeth for Mercy at his hands when at the last day he shall appear in his Glory cannot and as much as in him lieth must not endure The next Charge against Socinianism is Atheism and Deism he doth couple them thinking to shew a Contradiction but there is none I say to worship the true God not in a true manner is Idolatry as well as to worship a false God Jeroboam for worshipping the true God in an undue manner is branded with Idolatry and provoked God as much as Ahab for worshipping Baal or a false God or else with Papists we must take away the Second Commandment In like manner I say not to know the true God in a true manner is Atheism as well as not to know him at all and the true way to know God is to know him in Christ without whom no true knowledge of God to that purpose the Apostle saith unto the Ephesians that at that time when they were without Christ they also were without God in the world That is they were Atheists and is it truly to know God in Christ only to know him there in a Creature seeing the very Heathens can tell us Praesentemque refert quae libet herba Deum and not rather as in him in whom dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily These fragments of Scripture please not Socinians for they not knowing God in Christ as his Eternal and Natural Father are thereby branded with Atheism As for Deism I take it in the Sense wherein it is taken now adays for a Deist is he who prefers Humane Reason before Faith and Revelation so you own my Charge is not a perfect Nonsense tho' in some degree you would have it still to be a Nonsense for you are pleased thus magisterially to decide Now I confess this sort of Charge is not so perfect a Nonsense as the other however I
I said the Enemy and Plague of Socinianism was gotten into the Bowels of the Church the more the Pity and therefore seeing they will not hide themselves for shame here I do humbly desire the Heads and Governours of it to take notice of Socinians boasting to be Members of the Church and care to weed them out Good Lord Men who overthrow the first Article of our Religion of one God in three Persons and the second of two Natures in one Person besides others the Athanasian Creed the the first part of the Litany with several others of the Service Book yet they have the face to call themselves Members of the Church However 't is worth the inquiring into what they ground upon their calling themselves Members of the Church we already have taken notice of one place wherein speaking of themselves in the third Person they say For Peace sake they submit to the Phrase of the Church and own three Persons so they seem not to be much concerned for the Truth to know whether what they or we say be true but they take care of their Safety being as they pretend alarm'd with fear of Fire and Faggot and to save their Bacon therefore I am apt to believe that what they say in relation to this is more out of fear of Punishment than of love for Truth however for Peace sake they are Members of the Church but to dive into the bottom of this Title of theirs of being Members of the Church two Places I am to look into the first is this As for those late English Writers sometimes called Unitarians and very injuriosly termed Socinians they seem desirous to wash their hand of it and their disputing some of the Articles of our Church hath proceeded chiefly from their Apprehension that it would be Idolatry to admit them Thus still under disguise and of a third Person they are those late English Writers who call themselves Vnitarians who seem desirous to wash their hand of Socinianism so 't is only seemingly and in appearance for else what could make them tooth and nail concern themselves so much for Socinians let it be taken notice of how these pretended Members of the Church confess that they disputed some of the Articles of it and these are none of the less fundamental which they suspected as leading into Idolatry and therefore they would not admit them See what Members of the Church these are who publickly and in Print own that some of the Articles of the Church do tend to Idolatry doth not this very thing deserve Punishment according to Law and to justifie their disputing of some of the Articles they would infinuate as if the Church or some part of it had owned they were in the right Therefore upon the prudent Explication which hath been given he doth not name by whom of some obnoxious Terms they wave the Dispute and come in as Brethren This is as good as to say that in our Articles those that are the most Fundamental are in terms justly obnoxious that is to their Cavils And to shew they had cause to take Exceptions an Interpretation hath according to their Sense been given those Articles and so upon their own Terms they are come in as Brethren if they are come in then they were out before and so no Members Thus it seems they had Correspondency in the Church with some who as they term it prudently made way for them to come in Now doth not this Confession justifie what in my Epistle I said Socinianism is gotten into the Church and consequently shew a necessity to turn it out Thus having as he thinks twisted Socinians with the Church he most judiciously draws this Inference and Ironically bids me defiance I hope Mr. Gailhard will not in anger against them impute Idolatry to our Church as by Law established Can any thing in relation to the Church be spoken more insolently in the face of the whole Nation A strange thing indeed tho' nothing may seem strange from Men whose Principles allow them to say and make themselves any thing Like the grievous Wolves which in Sheeps Clothing enter in among the Flock not to feed but to tare it to deceive the blind they come in with Esau's Hands but the Voice is Jacob's yet being known should bring a Curse upon themselves But 't will be strange indeed if such ones be once found out having under the cloak of taking Care of Souls Poisoned them be not cast out by Suspension or Deprivation according to the severity of the Penal or at least of the Ecclesiastical Laws Upon this occasion the Eyes of the whole Nation are fixed upon my Lords the Bishops The other Place which I must take into consideration is this He tells us speaking of me that to deny the Trinity and our Saviours Divinity is as much as in a Man lieth to pull our Religion up by the very roots and quite to overthrow it which saith he that the Socinians do he takes it for granted That they deny the Trinity and Christ's Deity 't is done in the face of the Sun and that these Points are the Foundation of Christian Religion no true Christian will deny and my Inference is good that pulling down the Foundation the Building doth necessarily fall Yet according to the usual way he would mince the matter thus Yet those who are injuriously called Socinians declare that they only dispute some unscriptural Terms with us but are well satisfied with the Sense put upon those Terms and Explications which a considerable majority seem to be agreed in They cannot leave off the ridiculous juggling in their change of Persons for they are those called Socinians who dispute with us that is with themselves so they act both parts put the Question and answer it be the Socinian and Church-men too but the worst is they want Sincerity that whilst they indeed are the Socinian yet would pass for the Church-men Besides they would have the Dispute to be only about Words and so of no Importance thus whether there be Three Persons in the most adorable Trinity and whether the Lord Jesus and the Holy Ghost be truly God they make it to be a Dispute only about a Word and a Trifle What a Confidence is it for such Men so publickly to vent their Impieties Thereupon they declare to be satisfied upon this ground that a considerable Majority of the Church seem to be agreed with them in their Sense so according to this a considerable Majority of the Church is become Socinian Let him that can believe this for my own part I am not so Credulous however I humbly desire of the Church especially of that lesser part which this Man owneth not to be Socinian to mind what he saith so openly and to take it into their serious Consideration I bring it to their Door and there leave it They are highly concerned to take in hand their own Cause as 't is now become I have done
contrary to their Subscriptions are departed from the Doctrine I call it the true about Predestination to fall into Arminianism so they may embrace Socinianism as you say the majority now doth and so successively and by degrees pass into any other Heresie for which you give this reason Men cannot help the altering of their Minds This truly and properly is the Religion of Libertinism and Atheism is the next step So Men may plainly see what a kind of Religion you are striving for and would bring us into To what hath been said about Convocations this I shall add that though ye seem to slight a Convocation yet let me tell you either in Quality or Number 't is no despicable Body it being the Representative of a considerable part of the Nation and 't is hoped from the Piety and Wisdom of the Parliament that in Matters of Religion upon occasion they will not despise their Advice and Address In the Disputes about Socinians and us we are agreed to be judged by the Word of God yet they dislike our making use of it against them too much as they think but this Gentleman who in the beginning of his Letter complains of my numerous Quotations of Scripture Phrases as he calls it hath taken effectual care to avoid giving me cause to complain of the like against him for in the whole Letter there is but one Quotation just at the latter end of it and 't is usher'd in with this Christian Preamble ' The ill-natur'd turn of your Title-Page and the malicious and persecuting design of your Preface convinced me that if we may believe our Saviour Christ you know neither the Father nor the Son this is what we call To beat a Man with his own Weapons his own he hitherto used to little purpose at last he resolv'd to try whether the same I made use of against him would do his Work but he is so unskilful in handling of it that 't will not serve his end but is against rather than for him He saith to me If we may believe our Saviour Christ the if may well be turned against you out of another Mans Pen it were not questionable as 't is out of yours I wish you would believe him as we do when he absolutely and without any limitation doth call himself the Son of God as some times they wrest his Words so here they would make him say that I know neither the Father nor his Son whereupon he quoteth this Text They shall put you out of the Synagogues yea the time cometh that whosoever killeth you shall think that he doth God service and these things will they do unto you because they have not known the father nor me But how well applyed let us see not at all to his purpose for there the Lord Jesus foretold his Disciples that for his sake and upon his account Persecutions should befall them I ask whether in earnest he looks upon himself and other Socinians to be Disciples of Christ May be such as Judas was who betrayed his Person as they do his Truth but true Disciples that cannot be for suppose that Sect were brought under the Rod it would not be for his Cause His Apostles as we read in several places of the Book of the Acts suffered Persecution for owning Christ to be the true Son of God the holy one the Prince of Life and not for affirming him to be a meer Man who had no Being before he was born of the Virgin Mary and denying him to be true Eternal God of the same Nature with the Father certainly if God should bring you to Punishment ye could not have the face to say it is for the same Cause as his Disciples suffered they suffered for giving him his due and ye for robbing him of it Therefore to retort your own Argument upon you I say ye know neither the Father nor the Son for the Father ye cannot know but in and by the Son The Son ye do not know for ye will not own him to be what he is namely true eternal God blessed for ever thus out of our Saviour's own Words I conclude against you as in this same Cause and upon the same account he did against the Jews who looked on him as a meer Man and would by no means own him truly to be God Son of God Ye neither know me nor my Father if ye had known me ye should have known my Father also Wherefore since ye know me not ye know not my Father neither This weight I farther lay upon you how as ye know not so ye have not the Father for ye deny the Son to be what he is indeed of the same Nature with the Father and the Apostle saith Whosoever denyeth the Son the same hath not the Father to deny the Son is not only to deny him to be but also to deny him to be what he is And now since I am upon this your Words If we may believe our Saviour Christ are a Motive for me to go on and to call things by their Name to say ye are a sort of Infidels for ye will not believe God tho' he speaks from Heaven not only once but twice and thrice in our Lord's Baptism in his Transfiguration and at another time when the Voice came from Heaven God the Father from Heaven proclaimed him to be his beloved Son in whom he is well pleased with a Command to hear him Hear ye him yet ye will not believe the Father nor hear the Son who appeals to that Testimony of the Father nor when he calls himself God's Son onely begotten who is One with the Father in Power equal with him For what things soever the Father doth these also doth the Son likewise that the Father sent him out of his Bosom that he came down from Heaven he proceeded and came down from God and so many more things to that purpose But now he speaks to you as once he did to the Jews Why do ye not understand my speech even because ye cannot hear my word yet him ye will not hear but mark what will become of it And it shall come to pass that every soul which will not hear that Prophet in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you shall be destroyed among the People Ye would rob him of that Glory and Honour which he received from God the Father which not only is recorded by the Evangelist but confirmed by an Apostle with all the necessary Circumstances what where and when We were eye-witnesses of his majesty for he received from God the Father honour and glory when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased which he affirms not by hear-say but as ear-witness for he addeth And this voice which came from heaven we heard when we were with him in the holy mount But ye will hear neither Christ nor his
Apostles tho they speak loud and plainly enough whence we may well conclude you to be none of his Sheep whereof the great Shepherd himself gives this to be the proper Character that they hear and know his voice only and not the voice of strangers and they follow him when he leads them out but ye follow him not only the Devices and Inventions of your own Heart Thus to return to you who falsly would bring in your selves as Disciples of the Lord Jesus we know that as there is a Church of Christ so there is a Synagogue of Satan and that the Devil hath his Martyrs as well as the Lord Jesus some have been so far hardened as to dye for denying there is a God therefore 't is neither the Manner nor the Place but the Cause of Death which makes the Martyr 't is neither Smithfield in London nor Campo di Fiori in Rome for as the most honest Men so the greatest Villains may happen to be executed in both neither must we believe those who falsly would call themselves Disciples of Christ and insinuate as if they suffer'd for his Cause when 't is for their Heresies and Blasphemies I remember the Apostles words how false Apostles deceitful Workers would transform themselves into the Apostles of Christ and no marvel for Satan himself is transformed into an Angel of Light Do not pretend to say ye are for Christ when ye are against him As to your mis-applying of the Text to me let me advise you to be more conversant with Scripture and therein you may learn how at another time more fitly to adapt your Comparisons and better to apply Texts and not as you would so ingeniously screw out of that how you think me an unfit Writer in behalf of the Trinity which you believe not and therefore did not so much as read over my Book and I to answer ad hominem by a rational and natural Consequence out of your own Words that you have not so much as read over my Book of the Trinity do conclude you to be a rash giddy and unfit Judge whether or not I am an unfit Writer in behalf of the Trinity Thus go you off the Stage like a Snuff I answer you in your way because you answer me not in mine AN ANSWER TO THE Second Letter HAVING done with one Antagonist I must now turn to the other Between them both they shar'd the Task to try which of the two could most wrest and mis-represent things and give a Man ill Language wherein it must be owned this last yields it not to the first for they writ after the same manner and whose steps about my Epistle he follows in his first Page and part of the next wherein he would seem to soar high in his politick Enthusiasms and then falls down right into a Nonsense which he would father upon me certainly a Man hath little to say or do that stumbles at the Threshold and falls a gathering Straws when there are solid and good things to mind and instead of examining high Matters of Divinity offered he to put off the Blow and for Diversion sake turns to be a Grammarian and pittifully falls upon cavilling at Words This like the Dog in the Fable is to snap at the Shadow and leave the Body My words are these To time things well is one of the best parts of Prudence To say it is the part of a prudent Man to act in due time and Season is there any thing contrary to Sense and Reason By the word Part is not meant any such thing as we call Essential part as the Soul is to Man or what we call Integrant part such are an Arm or a Leg to the Body but 't is an usual way of speaking to say 'T is the part of a Wise Man not to be Hasty 't is the part of a Christian to Forgive to signifie how 't is proper for and belongs to a Wise Man not to be Rash and to a Christian to Forgive I add and one of the most Essential Circumstances of our Actions the meaning is plain how Timing things well is one of the chief and most necessary Circumstances of our Actions This is no just cause for any Man thereupon to entertain such idle and extravagant Fancies as we see him to do Without being a great Philosopher one may know there are several Circumstances belonging to every Action An ordinary Rhetorician can tell the Rule quis quid ubi quibus auxiliis cur quomodo quando I take Agent Time and Place to be three Concomitants of any Action and without the three no Action so then the prudential part of an Agent in the Act and to make it succeed is to chuse a fit and proper Time to apply a Remedy take Physick or be let Blood if done in due time is to observe one of the chief and necessary Circumstances If the word Essential joyned to Circumstance doth disquiet you then by the word most Essential is improperly understood the Circumstance most necessary to be observed we use to say a thing most Essential or most Necessary most to the purpose most Important and most Material to signifie the same thing or near upon 't I take the Essence whether Physically or Metaphysically to be the same with the Nature of the thing And do you not think that Circumstances have their Nature and that there is the Nature of an Accident as of a Substance and that to the end one may Act well there is that which is Necessary and most Necessary God forbid when we speak of Gods Nature or even of matters of Philosophy we should make no difference between Essence and Circumstance but in Discourse 't is usual as you know too well to make use of such improper and figurative Expressions Doth not our Grammar tell us that Nouns Adjectives are compared and that there are three degrees of Comparison have ye so far forgotten it Thus the word Essential is an Adjective whereof the Superlative we call most Essential and we may say Essential more and most Essential Surely ye judicious and acute Sophisters if ever you learned Logick were taught that there is a Predicament called Proprium and that there is a Proprium not only primô but also quartô modô Quod convenit soli semper omni which in Grammar words we may call most proper in the Superlative degree And ye Gentlemen for so I must call you tho' I would have call'd you by your Names if ye had subscrib'd your Letters ye Gentlemen Socinians who are so much for Tropes and Figures might know how 't is usual by an Hyperbole to represent things with exaggeration as whiter than Snow blacker than Pitch and if such manners of speaking with exaggeration be admitted in a common Discourse much more may this improper one now in question So sometimes a thing which we like well we call best of all thus if instead of saying Essential I said most Essential I
three Attributes We cannot say the Son of God to be a Property or Attribute we cannot say an Attribute of Divine Nature was made Flesh we cannot say three Properties appeared in our Saviours Baptism or that we are baptised in the Name of three Properties Therefore ye may see we are not so far agreed as you said if you will have us to be agreed you must come to us for we declare we cannot go to you that 's the easiest and surest way of the two for we are tyed by a Revelation and may go no farther than it doth allow us but your Human Reason is a Latitudinarian which can stretch a great way we may not we cannot go beyond the bounds which God in his Word hath prescribed us but ye are Free-willers and at liberty to day your Reason may teach you one thing to morrow another for as you say your selves a Doctrine which at one time may be convenient may be otherwise when Circumstances of Times shall alter but with us no Circumstances can alter our Heavenly Doctrine Out of this you may see how all this while I have not been fighting against the Man in the Moon or as you very civilly express it making a Rod for a foolish Back of my own or to speak home a Fagot to roast my own Ribs But upon a surer ground I may say he hath been in a Dream or in a hot violent Fit for he hath been striking on all sides and spared none that lay in his way as for me I am the Man and therefore in the Fit having forgotten the Cause he hath at me almost in every Page and in one place he admires at my extravagant Zeal who would have the Socinians burnt for their complyance with the Church of England If so then indeed there were cause to admire but there is true ground of admiration that he thinks it so but really nothing is to be admired at either in or from him for he calls me a Papist a Calvinist and a Zealous one a Socinian nay a Real one He saith he is no Socinian but I am when he writes for and I against them this is a Hocus Pocus 't is and 't is not surely there is cause to suspect something is out of order within that brains of his or an extraordinary brazen-fac'dness however let him as he can secure all this from Contradiction Et erit mihi magnus Apollo When I think upon such Men as pretend to alter the Nature of things I am put in mind of what a famous Popish Author saith That the Pope can make that to be Sin which is no Sin and that not to be Sin which is Sin so do these Men who would seem to be much against Popery yet follow several of their Maxims and would make that to be a Nonsense which is good Sense and that to be no Contradiction which is and so on the contrary If these Men themselves be not Mysteries as one calls me their dark Sentences are all this while the Cause is safe enough But Calvin not so how roughly doth he handle him on all occasions if he were alive he would not be good to give to Dogs tho' neither he nor a dosen more such one 's would be worthy to carry his Books I confess 't is to me and ought to be a wonder to others to find how mad some Men in the World are against that faithful Servant of God once in his Life and Conversation and now in his Works and Labours an Eminent Instrument in his Hand as for Instruction so at first in the Work of Reformation This is a Fit of Rage which several Years since out of Envy some in Parts much inferiour to him began to be possessed of and by Men of the same Kidney hath been propagated to this very day whereof the Authors of the Two Letters are real Instances for to speak in Paul's words they are exceeding mad against him and as they are against his Memory and Person now far out of their reach so they are broken loose and so hot and fiery against the Doctrines he taught that all the Water of the Leman Lake could hardly cool them what they call Calvinism they adorn with these Epithets Proud sowr and fiery Qualifications Calvinistical Impatience and many such more whereof this Orthodox is one The Heresie of the Tritheists is not worse than uncharitable and ill natur'd Calvinism Therein I shall conclude with this In truth I think Heylin was over modest to esteem a Presbyterian that is a Calvinist worse than a Papist Here is your Protestants and as if this had not been enough his own venom he throws out in the same place for my part I esteem a Christian from whatsoever Sect denominated not excepting the Socinians more honourable than a Persecuting Calvinist Tho' the word Persecuting had been left out it had been all one to that Christian Righteous Soul of his But as for Socinus he was a most excellent Man very sound in the Faith and who if we will believe this Man hath by his Works laid a great Obligation upon the World and he subscribes to what one of the Gang said of him That none since the Apostles hath deserved better of the Christian Religion so that a Man may more avail himself by reading his Works than by perusing all the Fathers together with the Writings of more modern Authors This People either never read or care not for what Paul saith Let your Moderation be known unto all men for they observe it neither for Socinus nor against Calvin but having elsewhere had an occasion in few few words to do this faithful Servant of Christ some Justice I shall leave off speaking of his Person to take some brief notice of his Works That which most nettles his Enemies are the Doctrines about Grace and Providence mentioned in the Two Letters which they call Calvinism But if they would not so proudly despise all Antiquity but peruse some of Augustin's Works who lived 1200 Years before Calvin they might find he was a Calvinist so were Hilarius Prosper Fulgentius and others who so long before he was born could as well as he did afterwards find those same Doctrines in the Word of God and accordingly the beginning progress and end of our Salvation and from first to last we attribute to God's free Grace which in that matter we can never yield too much nor too little to any thing of our own we do not like the Pharisee boast in our Prayers that we Fast twice a Week give Tithes and are not Extortioners Unjust and make no Comparison with our Neighbours as being better Men than they but we say God be merciful to us miserable Sinners for we are commanded to trust in the Lord with all our hearts and forbidden to lean unto our own understanding which is as good as to say depend not upon your own Reason therefore in any
Guide it must be first subordinate to Revelation which is the prescribed Rule and from which it ought not to recede no more than a Judge from the Law as Paul told Ananias or else he is in danger of falling into Precipices that 's the Light it must follow and as the Soul is guided by Reason so must Reason be by Revelation neither can Reason and outward Revelation do the Work without inward Revelation whereby Reason is supernaturally endowed and this is Faith a Gift of God this is the ground of our Blessed Saviour's giving his Father thanks for revealing the Mysteries of Faith and Salvation unto Babes that is those who as yet in his Sense were not capable of Reason and plainly tells Peter that if he knew and confessed him to be the Son of the living God Flesh and Blood or his natural Reason had not revealed it unto him but his Father which is in Heaven When the Lord Jesus was upon leaving this World he promised his Disciples a Guide what their own Reason no such thing but the Holy Ghost the Spirit of Truth who should teach them all things and bring to remembrance whatsoever he had said unto them and he was to abide with them for ever this Spirit of God is the right Guide whom true Protestants own to lead and guide us in the way of Salvation and this he doth not according to human Fancies or private Inspirations but according to the Rule of the Word for saith our Saviour he shall receive of mine that is my Word and shall shew it unto you for he shall not speak of himself he teaches and applies the Word and his working is by the Apostle called the Spirit of a sound Mind which God hath given us so that a sound Mind an Orthodoxy in the Faith is an Effect of God's Gift not of our Reason or of any thing else in us wherefore David saith give me Vnderstanding according to thy Word But these things Socinians have been told over and over and in the Preface and latter end of my Book I think I said enough to satisfie unbyassed Persons so have others too this is the sure and infallible Guide which God hath given us and not any human Authority different from or contrary to it the Pope we cannot own for he is a Party and sets up for himself nor the antient Writers if they deviate from the Rule but 't is a good Argument for the things wherein they follow it Men must not be so selfish and wilful as to despise others who may have the Spirit of God as well as themselves and being Witnesses of those Times are able to inform us how things stood in their time and cannot be partial for this wherein we live The Author of the first Letter hath a touch upon the matter and that 's all 't is about the interpretation of what S. John saith the Word was made Flesh I confess there is a great difference in the interpretation we say according to the natural Signification the Word or Son of God took upon him our human Nature they say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate the Word signifies Reason rather than Word and they infer that the Reason or Wisdom of God was communicated unto Jesus Christ this is a very much forced Interpretation and fetch'd afar off for all along the Word is spoken of as a Subject and they would make a shift to turn it into the Predicate Now what shall we do of these two Opinions to find out the true one for if every Person or Party be allowed such a Latitude as to interpret things after their own Fancy there will be no end of false Glosses and wrong Interpretations how doth the Goldsmith do to know true Gold or Silver from that which is false he brings it to the Touch-stone so must we in this case between them and us is a Difference the Party must not be the Judge 't is not just they should be Judges in their own cause nor we in ours then we must agree about a Judge such as is impartial and infallible and none but God is such now God doth not immediatly speak from Heaven for he doth it in his Word that is his Will and ought to be our Law and Rule in matters of Faith I will believe no Man's Assertion except out of Scripture he proves it to me the like he may justly expect from me but in case of that Text of Scripture he and I give different Interpretations what 's to be done we ought still to keep in the same Court and wait for a Decision from the same Judge then I must prove my Interpretation by some other place of Scripture or else he must not believe me nor I him except he doth the like and if Men will but lay aside Prejudices and be acted by a real and sincere desire to find out the Truth God will not leave them but therein afford such Helps as shall answer their Good for all Scripture is given by Inspiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction for Instruction in Righteousness that the Man of God may be perfect Now let us come to our Point and reduce the Rule to a Practice the Question is Whether by the Word is meant a Person as we say or a Quality as they would have it there is a great Difference between Persons and Things now to find out the Truth this Text must be compared with others we need not to go far for in the first Verse of the Chapter we read thrice the same Name in the beginning was the Word was signifieth existed had a Being which relateth to a Person and not to a Thing the same Word was with God and was God what a Quality with God and a Thing God doth the Evangelist begin his Gospel in so high a strain only to tell us how Reason was in the beginning how Reason was with God and Reason was God or in plain Words that God was Reasonable which is a Truth known to every one so no need to tell it but he would acquaint the Readers with things before unknown to them besides doth this hold any proportion with the Nature and Excellency of the Gospel and great Tidings of Salvation this indeed is to exalt Reason and because they make a God of their Reason therefore for Name 's sake Reason must be deified then according to their Principle this Reason must be an efficient Cause of all for all things were made by him and without him was not any thing made that was made to create and make things is the Property and Act of a Person and not of a Thing in him as in a Person and not as in a Thing was Life and the same Apostle calls him the Word of Life that Life which was manifested and that Eternal Life which was with the Father first and then was manifested unto us as if