therefore feare not but his power and his wrath is against all them that forsake him Briefelie that thou maiest profite by this booke I craue of thee to take this paines in it bestow an hower a day in the reading thereof and in so doing after the first time thou maiest well read it ouer once euerye moneth The which course if thou shalt take I dout not but in one yeare thou shalt so benefite thy selfe as there shall be no point of waight in religion wherof thou shalt not be able to resolue thine owne conscience and also to edifie others according vnto thy calling in verye good measure But in anie case take heede that thy knowledge gotten by reading rather encrease then diminish thy care in the hearing of the word preached And thus thou mayest exspect for the blessing of the Lord vnto whom I betake thee my selfe and all his now and euer Amen GROVNDS AND PROPOSITIONS OF RELIGION propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua by certaine students of diuinitie there and determined by M. THEODOR BEZA and M. ANTHONIE FAIVS professors of diuinitie FIRST CONCERNING GOD. 1 SEing that the whole summe of all wisedome and felicitie doth consist in the true knoledge of God it is most meet that all our endeuors should be spent in seeking to attain vnto that knowledge as far as we may be capable of it 2 Not that a full a perfect knowledge of his Majestie who is far greater then the capacitie of men and Angels can reach vnto may be any waies comprehended within our vnderstanding but that wee should bend all the powers of our soules and bodies to knowe that one God who is the author and giuer both of soule and body 3 And although humaine reason bee able to affoord vs some proofs wherby we may be taught that there is a God and but onely one and whereby also his attributes may bee in some sort made knowen vnto vs. Yet notwithstanding those proofes are more sure and strong yea and altogeather the most vndoubted which for this purpose are fetched and drawen out of Gods word that is out of the sacred writings of the holie Prophets and Apostles contained in the old and new Testament 4 For howbeit that the knowledge of God which is deriued from the consideration of his workes and power hath many notable vses yet is it nothing comparable with that light which is gotten from the holy Scriptures both because this knowledge reuealed by the word doth wholie flow and proceede from God him selfe and also in asmuch as God in this his written woorde hath manifested howe and after what manner he will be knowen and worshipped of men Now whether there be a God or no we are to be so farre from making any question thereof that wee are bound most firmely with all our hearts without all wauering and doubting to beleeue that point And therfore we auouch that the rauing madnes of all Atheists who make a question whether there be a God or no ought not so much to be confuted by words and reason as it ought to bee cleane rooted out of the societie of men by the Magistrat and the stiffe maintainers of it taken from amongest men For though al men by nature as it is now corrupt be void of the true God neuerthelesse there are certaine motions and sparks of the knowledge of God imprinted in the mind of euery man which cannot altogeather be put out And as these motions doe testifie that man was borne to worshippe God So vnles a more full light bee joyned vnto them they leaue man straying and groping in the darke and are smallie or nothing behoofull vnto him Therefore as the knowledge which man hath by nature is not altogeather of no vse vnto saluation so is it verie farre from being of it selfe sufficient therunto It bereaueth them indeede of all excuse who quench that small lighr of nature though neuer so corrupt which is left in them 5 True it is indeed that he who goeth beyond al bounds can in no wise be defined and that that exceeding brightnes of God which no man can attaine vnto cannot bee comprehended by our darknes yet hee may be as it were shadowed out by this discription and so wee may say that God is hee who hath his beeing in himselfe whose nature is of himselfe inuisible without beginning without ending infinite incomprehensible indiuisible vnchangeable no bodily substance but a being most pure most simple and euery way most perfect wise mightie good iust mercifull free who hath created all things of nothing c. And therfore we do detest the multitude of Gods acknoledged among the Gentils the grosnes of the * Heretiks so called because they held God to haue a body and members like a man Anthropomorphites the furie of the Manichaeis and all such like And here it is to be obserued that those things which are attributed vnto God by the former Epithites and attributes are not to betaken as qualities inhaerent in him for we are to knowe that there is nothing in God which is not God himselfe 6 As where it is sayd that God is iust good merciful c. That is so to bee vnderstood as if hee were said to be iustice goodnes and mercy it selfe And therefore although that when we speake of God we must not conceiue of him as hauing any liknes or affinitie with the nature of man or of any creature yet such is the excellencie of the Lorde and mans weaknes that when wee speake of his Majesty we are enforced to vse borrowed speaches from creatures And herein hee is so far from disliking of vs that he himselfe descending as it were into our capacitie doth euery where thus speake of himselfe Defended by SAMVEL AVIENVS of Berne THE SECOND SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE HOLY AND VNSEARCHABLE TRINITIE 1 THat knowledge of God which we attaine vnto by his written word doth far surpas al that whatsoeuer it be whereunto the light of nature doth or can lead vs. 2 For that God is one in substance and three in persons is no where els to bee learned saue onely out of the worde The truth of which Doctrine it setteth downe most clearlie and vndoubtedly but so as it leaueth the reason thereof as a matter altogeather vnsearchable and a mysterie not to bee sought out by humain arguments but to be reuerenced and embraced by faith onely 3 These words Trinitie Essence or Substance Person and Coessentiall though they bee not in expresse syllables the word a Heb. 1.3 Person onely excepted to be found in the Canonicall Scriptures yet notwithstanding they were not without just causes brought into vse by the godly auncient Fathers neither are they to be rejected as adding any thing vnto the word but rather to bee still profitablie and wholsomelie retained in the Church 4 By the word TRINITY we vnderstand the nōber of the persons contained in the diuine essence which is one onely 5 By
indeed from all aeternitie or els because they will haue the fleshe of Christ to be taken out of the substance of the Godhead or as some do nowe affirme because all the proprieties of the Deity were poured into the humane nature when the worde was incarnate or to be briefe by what other dotage soeuer they goe about to obscure the coaeternall generation of the Sonne Defended by IOHN HENRY SCHINTYER of Tigurine THE FOVRTH SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE HOLY GHOST HITHERTO CONCERNING THE PERSONS of the Father and the Sonne it followeth now that we speake of the holie Spirit 1 VVHereas the word SPIRIT is diuersly taken in the scriptures we in this doctrine do vnderstand by the holie spirit the third person in Trinitie 2 The holie Spirit is that Essentiall and working power who is essentially subsisting in the Father and the Son from whome the whole Deity wherein also they doe subsist being communicated vnto him after an vnspekable maner though he procedeth or if we may so speake is as it were breathed yet is he not at all seperated in respect of this his proceding but is in regard of the maner of his being distinguished from the persons of the Father and the Sonne And therefore he is not without cause reckoned the third person in nomber seing in consideration of his being hee is referred vnto the Father and the sonne yet not as vnto two beginnings but as vnto one 3 The Deity thus communicated by issuing and proceeding is not multiplied in substance seing he is most simple and single Whence it is that the holie Ghost in regard of his person is and euer hath bin coessentiall and coaeternall with the Father and the sonne and in regarde of his substance is that one onely true God in himselfe Wherevpon also the name of God is sometimes personally attributed vnto him The holy Ghost is therefore to be worshipped by the one and the same faith and inuocation that the Father and Son are 4 And although the works of the Trinnitie which they cal outward or external are vnseperable yet in the effecting of them wee are to obserue a distinction not onelye of the persons but also of the personall actions 5 The proper and the peculiar action of the holie Spirit in all the workes of the Deity bee they naturall and ordinary or els extraordinary was and is to effect in his time and maner those things which the father from all aeternitie hath decreed in his owne wisdome that is in his Son and the Son hath ordered and disposed to come to passe 6 Yet is not the holy spirit any instrumental cause affording his helpe as a seruaunt vnto the Father or the Son but working together with them without any inferioritie or inaequallitie 7 But the power and working of the holy spirit is especiallie seene in the planting and gouerning of the Church In which particular respect he is called the holie spirit even because that he who is most holie doth stirr vp and nourish all the holie motions that are in the elect For he it is by whose inspiration all the holie prophets haue spoken it is he that giueth eares to heare and a hart to beleeue who appointeth Pastors and doth enable them with necessary gifts who stirreth vp the slouthfull and being the true comforter indeed doth comfort the afflicted soule By whome those that are borne againe of him do cry Abba father he also formed the fleshe of Christ in the wombe of the virgine and did most aboundantlie anoint his humane nature to conclude it is he by whose strength we stand vntill we overcome Wherefore we doe abhor and renounce the SABELLIANS who confound the persones with the substance of the Godhead the ARRIANS and the MACEDONIANS who deny the holie Ghost to bee coessentiall with the Father and the Son the GRECIANS of later time who affirme that hee doth onlie proceed from the father and those also who by the holie Ghost will haue nothing els to be ment saue certaine motions and inspirations onely together with those who deny that he is to be invocated by the one and the selfesame faith with the Father and the Sonne and to be briefe we detest all those that any waies oppugne the Deity of the holy Ghost either in his substance or person Defended by IOHN IAMES COLER of Tygurine THE FIFT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE ATTRIBVTES OF GOD IN GENERALL HITHERTO WE HAVE SPOKEN OF GOD both as far as wee are able to attaine vnto bee the light of nature also as he is laied before vs in the holy Scripturs to be three in person and one in substance now it followeth that we intreat of his attributes wherby in a sort we are taught what maner of God he is 1 ALthough there be no composition in God nor yet any accidentall qualitie seeing hee is a substance most single and euery way one yet to the end that according vnto our capacitie we might vnderstande what a God hee is he himselfe in the scriptures is accustomed to attribute vnto himselfe many things as qualities 2 By attributes in this place then we vnderstande the essentiall proprieties of the Deity which are attributed vnto him in the scriptures 3 These things are so attributed vnto him that notwithstanding they place nothing in him that is cōpoūd or diuers from his substance but look whatsoeuer they point him out to be the very same he is in his owne most simple substance 4 For both these proprieties and also their actions doe in very deede differ no whit from the substance of the Godhead but onely in some consideration we are to holde them diuers both from the diuine substance and also the on from the other 5 Now these things are attributed vnto the Deity sometimes substātiuely somtims adjectiuely as they speak that we may thereby knowe him to be a being that subsisteth indeede and that he is such a one not by participation and imperfectlie but of himselfe and that most perfectlie 6 Of attributes we make two kinds the one is of them which are so proper vnto the Deitie that they can bee in no sort communicated vnto creatures neither haue they anie other respect vnto creatures saue that by them the Deitie is distinguished from creatures of this kind are aeternity simplenes vnmeasurablenes omnipotencie 7 The other kind is of those who although simply and as far as they are in the Deitie they cannot be communicated yet creatures may be partakers of them not properly but by analogie and a kinde of agreement and that not essentially but in regarde of qualitie and but in part neither such ar wisedome goodnes and the rest of that kind Therefore OSIANDER erred grosly whoe taught that the essentiall righteousnes of God was communicated vnto vs and at this day their error is intollerable who recalling back again the blasphemie of EVTYCHES holde that al the proprieties of the Deitie were powred by personall vnion into the flesh which
the word essence in this doctrin is ment that which in deed is one and of al things most singular or single wherein the seuerall persons being euery one of them the whole the same essence do subsist being distinguished in their peculiar proprieties These persons are the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost 6 The Persons in the Deitie are the whole and the verie same substance of the Deitie distinguished the one from the other by their peculiar or respectiue incommunicable proprieties 7 The proprieties whereby the persons are distinguished are the diuers maner of being that they haue in the Deitie whereby the substance of the Godhead is no wise deuided assunder nor the persons of the same essence seperated but yet so distinguished as the one of them cannot possiblie bee the other 8 The diuine Essence the Deitie or Godhead God are essentiallie the one and the same 9 These persons are sayd to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or coessential not because they are only of like essence and substance as we see the particulars of the same kinde to bee but inasmuche as they are indeed the one and the selfe same simple essence of which sort nothing that is created can be And therefore the persons of the Deitie cannot without blasphemie be said to bee onelie cohaerent togeather in substance or onely of like substance 10 Amongst these persons distinguished indeed by their respectiue proprieties although there be an order yet is ther not any degree whence either any inferioritie inequalitie or confusion may arise Therefore wee conclude that there are indeed three persons in nomber yet but one Godhead and one GOD in regard of substance 11 The proprietie of the person of the father is to be vnbegotten and to beget The proprietie of the sonne is to be begotten of the father The proprietie of the holy ghost is to proceed from the father and the sonne Wherefore in conclusion we do from our hearts detest all the blasphemies that both old and new heretiks haue maintained contrary vnto this doctrine Defended by IOHN CHEROPONTIVS of Neocome THE THIRD SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING GOD THE FATHER AND GOD THE SON SEING WE HAVE DEALT CONCERNING God one in substance and three in persons it followeth nowe that we speake in order of euery one of the persons 1 THe word GOD is sometimes taken particularly for the person of the Father because that the persons of the Son and of the holy Ghost are referred vnto the father as it were vnto a certaine original of their being wheras the father receiueth his being of none but doth communicat it both with him selfe and also with the other two persons 2 God the Father was alwaies God and alwaies the Father and therfore it fell not as a property vnto him that being meerely God at the first he shoulde be afterwarde made God the Father but as he is God from all aeternitie so he is the Father from all aeternitie 3 God the Father after an vnspeakable manner of generation begat his onely Sonne by communicating his whole essence with him the which maner of begetting is shadowed out by a kind of similitude where the son is in the holy scripture named the Wisdome the Power the a Coll 1 15 Image the b Heb. 13. brightnes and the ingrauen forme of his person 4 And after this sort wee are to conceaue but not curiously to scan the similitudes of the fountaine the streame that issueth from it of the Sunne and the Sunbeames of the light that proceedeth from light of the water the vapors that arise out of it of the tree and the branches of the mind and the speach that is inwardlie conceiued of the seede and the budde and to be briefe of al such similitudes as the Fathers haue broght to manifest in some measure though not perfectly to lay open this mistery Which they accounted a matter to be reuerenced adored not curiously and prophanely to be sifted and waded into 5 And althogh this diuine maner of begetting doth neither cutte into parts nor multiplie the essence of the Deity which Deity is not a thing that onely may be conceaued in thought hauing no other being or existence as are the generall kinds and sorts of things created but is in deede a most single and a most pure infinite self-being yet doth it multiplie the persones but so as it doth in no wise seuer the one of them from the other 6 The Father therefore is an other person in number then the Son and in like sort the Son is another person then the Father And yet is the Deity neither deuided nor multiplied when the Son is said to be God of God And euen as in substance he is the one and the selfe same with the Father so is he in his person so distinguished from the Father that hee is and remaineth in him still 7 The Father and the Sonne then are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the one of thē in the other or neither of them seuered from the other by any distance of place Yet is the Son more properlie sayed to be in the father then the father in the sonne by reson of the dignitie as it were of the Fatherhood Hence also it is that the Son personally distinguished from the Father is in many places of the Scripture called God 8 Out of these things it apeareth what we are to beleeue concerning the person of the Sonne to wit that in regarde of his substance absolutely considered hee is that one onelie true God vnto whome doe agree whatsoeuer may be attributed to the diuine substance considered in it selfe but in regarde of the maner of his being that is in respect that hee is the Sonne or as far as hee is personally considered then we are to beleue that hee is not of him selfe but of the Father yet coaeternall and coessentiall with the Father 9 Wee do condemne therefore the Tritheits by whome not onely the persons which also wee graunt are nombred but euen the substaunce of the Godhead wherein also they place an inaequality multiplied In like sort we condemn the SABELLIANES who holding a contrary errour doe not soe much as nomber the persons and in stead of the royall notions whereby the persons are distinguished the one from the other do bring in only a certaine difference of their effects and names We do also condemne the ARRIANS who rob the Son of his essentiall Godhead And the EVNOMIANS who haue forged the inaequalitie of the persons Togeather with the followers of SAMOSATENVS and SERVETVS and all other fanaticall spirites who affirme the person of the Son to haue taken his beginning with his humane nature because as they hould before that time either the Worde was not the Sonne or was nothing els but a shape or a forme conceaued in Gods minde of the humane nature that should afterwarde be borne or was onely predestinate and appointed to be but not being
of true Praier is the glorie of God or some profite that we hope to receiue thereby 12 It is meet that a certaine place time be apointed if it may be conueniently done in euery church for publik praier yet is it meere superstition to thinke that praiers made in a certaine place or time are of themselues more effectuall 13 The dedications of Temples and the rites vsed in this action are the reliques partly of Paganisme and partlie of Iudaisme and therefore to be vtterly abollished 14 Priuate Praiers also are carefully to be practised in the vse whereof it is the part of euery man to consider what is expedient 15 There are foure sorts of Praiers reckoned vppe by PAVLE 1. TIM 2.1 supplications praiers intercessions and giuing of thankes vnder which foure sorts hee comprehendeth all other 16 These foure sortes may be thus discerned Supplication is when wee desire to bee deliuered from the euills that hang ouer vs Praier is when wee craue a better successe of our affaires For as by Supplication we intreat the taking away of inconueniences so by Praier we craue the supplie of those things that are good for vs Intercession is when as one of vs doth intreat for the necessitie of an other beeing of charitie mooued therevnto or when as wee complaine vnto God of injuries done vnto vs Brieflie by thanks-giuing we praise God for the benefites that we haue receiued and shew that wee are beholding vnto him for al the benefits both spirituall and corporall that we haue obtained 17 The fruits which we reape by Praier are diuers 1. Our heart is inflamed with an earnest desire to seek loue and worshippe God when as we are accustomed in all our necessities to flie vnto him as vnto an holie anchor 2. No desire cometh to our minde whereof wee are ashamed to make him a witnesse when as wee poure out our whole hart before him 3. We are framed to receiue his benefits with thanks-giuing 4. Hauing obtained that which we did craue wee are more feruentlie carried to meditate of his louing kindnes 5. Lastlie vse and experience it selfe doth confirme vnto our soules his prouidence vertue and goodnes towards vs. 18 Hence it appeareth that Inuocation which is that true worship of God is altogeather ouerthrowen in Poperie 19 First of all because the Papistes doe teach men to bring their owne merites as that Pharisie did although they are beholding vnto God for them The which doctrine doth damme vp that especiall spring of true Prayer namelie the sense of our want 20 Next that they either bring in fained promises or inuent merites that haue no promise 21 Thirdlie in that they professedlie place doubting in stead of faith as though to bee assured that GOD will heare vs were a securitie full of Presumption 22 Herevnto is to bee adjoyned that both they conceaue priuate and publicke prayer in a straunge vnknown tongue which is nothing else but a manifest mocking of God and that they pray by nomber Brieflie in that they teach which is vtterlie wicked that those prayers of theirs doe deserue remission of sinnes and other benefites 23 To be short herein they are most godlesse in that they appoint Saints departed as substitute intercessours vnder Christ not onelie rashlie and in vaine besides and contrarie to the word of God and therfore without faith but also vnprofitablie seeing that cannot bee held but they must make the Spirits of those that are dead to be the searchers of harts and attribute vnto them that which is proper vnto GOD onelie namelie that they may heare those that call vpon them euery where 24 This sinne is augmented euen by an other two-fold impietie the one in that they honor the Virgine MARIE and the signe of the Crosse by a certaine peculier inuocation the other in that they doe yeeld vnto Images both painted and grauen the verie same worship whereby they would honour Christ if he were present 25 Touching those degrees of their religious adoration by LATRIA DVLIA and HYPERDVLIA wee affirme them to be altogether vaine 26 Vaine also is that distinction of the Mediator of redemption and intercession Defended by IOHN CRVCIVS a Flemming PRINCIPLES VPON THE PRAEFACE OF THE LORDS PRAYER LXIIII. WE HAVE ABOVE IN THE LAST TENTH Principle made mention of a forme of inuocation or prayer and therefore hauing alreadie spoken of the rest of the causes thereof wee nowe come to the interpretation of the said forme out of the words of Christ Math. 6. Luke 11. which is therefore commonlie called the Lords Prayer 1 THis forme teacheth vs most compendiouslie indeed but yet most absolutelie whatsoeuer wee are to aske of God generallie as it were in certaine common places and in that method wherein it is fit that these things should be craued of God it doth furthermore enforme our minds by what affectiō we are to conceaue our Prayers and in what hope we may expect the effect of thē beeing rightlie conceaued 2 It is free for vs according vnto our sundrie griefes to expresse in other speciall formes those thinges that make for the glory of God and our saluation and to apply them vnto diuers circumstāces but it is in no wise lawful to pray anie other Prayer in regarde of the matter All the Praiers of DAVID therefore of the Prophetes and other faithfull examined according vnto these rules doe agree with this perfect forme 3 The parts hereof are three 1. The beginning or Praeface 2. The petitions themselues 3. The conclusion 1. The Preface OVR FATHER VVHICH ART IN HEAVEN 4 FATHER This word doth first of all teach vs the foundation of our faith namelie the distinction of the persons for the FATHER is one the SONNE is an other 5 These petitions are directed vnto the person of the Father that therby not onelie the distinction but also the order of the persons may be expressed the first whereof is the Father the second is the Sonne of the Father and the third is the holie Ghost of the Father and the Sonne 6 When as therefore we cal vpon the Sonne our minds staie not in him but aryse from him vnto the Father as we are led by the holie Ghost vnto the Father and the Son Otherwais as the persons vnto whom the worship of inuocation is directed are not separated so is not the said worship to be seuerallie considered but onelie distinctlie seing the same reuerence is aequallie due vnto al the 3. persons as to the one and the self-same God 7 Moreouer this most sweet name of a FATHER doth regarde vs also seeing wee doe not call vpon the Father as the Father of the Sonne onelie but euen as vppon our Father 8 Againe this word doth set down the other foundation of our trust namelie that hee who is the Father of Christ is also ours though in a diuers respect 9 For he is the Father of Christ 1. by nature onlie in respect that the Sonne is Coessentiall with the
we are by little and little to climbe higher higher vnto the full assurance of our free aeternall Praedestination in Christ which is joyned with continuall praier hearing of Gods word and perseuerance in well doing 16 Now all those whome it pleaseth the same GOD who is debter vnto no man in justice to leaue in their own corruption either altogeather not called or called but without the opening of the heart and worthelie to deliuer vp vnto Sathan and their owne concupiscence being such also as wilfully and willinglie harden themselues will hee one day according vnto his aeternall Praedestination adjudge togeather with Sathan vnto aeternall punishments laying open in their iust destruction the glorie of his great and most iust hatred against euill 17 The manifesting of this decree of Reprobation is to be left vnto God vnlesse it be apparant in any that they haue sinned against the holie Ghost as in times past it was with IVLIAN the Apostata The cause why wee are not to determine of Rebrobation from the effects of Sathan and our corruption that sinne against the holie Ghost onelie excepted as wee are to gather our Election from the working of the holie Spirite in vs is this Euen because it hath pleased our mercifull GOD to shew that some yea of the greatest sinners at their very last gasp were of the number of his elect by bestowing forgiuenes of sins vpon them by his extraordinary fauour as it fell out with the theefe that hung vpon the Crosse 18 Those therefore who holde on the waye of destruction are so to bee tolde of their dutie as leauing vnto God the secrets of his judgements we are not to dispaire of anie mans saluation For it is a true consequence indeed to say I beleeue as it appeareth by the effects therfore I am elected and appointed vnto saluation But it is no necessarie consequent to say I do not beleeue and I tread the path of destruction therefore I am a reprobate and appointed to damnation For he that beleeueth not to day may bee endued with faith to morrow But thus rather we are to make a true conclusion I do neither beleeue the Gospell nor labour to beleeue but continue in the way of destruction Wherefore except I betake mee vnto an other course I shall perish And therfore I wil enter vnto an other way which God laieth before mee And these are the cogitations which all pastors are bound by duty with great care to lay before their wandring sheepe 19 God therfore in appointing some of free-gift vnto saluation and others vnto just condemnation is neither author of sinne nor respecter of persons but thereby sheweth himself to be the true God in deed Defended by RAPHAEL EGLINE of Tigurine PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE CREATION OF ALL THINGS AND THEIR DIVISION XII WE HAVE DONE WITH GODS PROVIdence and Praedestination nowe wee are to entreat of the works of God wherby he doth as it were make him selfe visible vnto vs that is concerning the creation of all things and their distinction 1 CReatiō is the external work of God fore-known and decreed by him of his vnspeakeable goodnes from aeternitie whereby vnto the glorie of his Name he did create of nothing all things that are without him that is all things that haue a substance different from his essence 2 The alone soueraigne cause therefore of the world and all things that haue being therein is God who made all things not after the manner of men but without all labour and also without the worke help and seruice of anie other but by his word alone that is by his Sonne through the power of the holie Ghost For the workes of the Trinitie are vnseparable 3 Neither did he frame all those things of anie fore-being stuffe or matter but euen of nothing that is from that which was not by his word alone he gaue being vnto all things that are Those Philosophers therefore doe erre who held that the world was aeternall and those also who deemed it to haue bene made and formed of moates by chance together with these who taught this visible worlde to haue bene framed by some other then by God In which error was CERINTHVS CARPOCRATES the ARCHONTIANES and others who attributed the work of the creation only vnto certain vertues and powers 4 The chiefe end of the creation is that there should be some who should enjoy the louing kindnes of God in the true tast thereof and glorifie his Majestie for euer To this end were Angels and men created A secundary end of the creation is that all other creatures shoulde together set foorth the glorie of God and serue to the vse of man 5 Now although by the order of nature from one as far as it is one there can proceed but one and that God of all other things is most single and but one yet the infinite varietie of things proceedeth from the same wisedome of God from whence their creation and gouernement doth depend For he worketh not according to the course of nature but doth whatsoeuer he will aboue all nature most freelie and voluntarilie Yet in that inaequalitie of things there appeareth greatest aequalitie yea the diuersitie of things appeere to be but one in respect that whatsoeuer hee hath created are referred vnto that generall kind of the beeing of things which is but one 6 The essentiall diuision of things is from their matter and their forme in which respect some things are visible as all simple mixt bodies either without life and breath or enjoying both Some also are inuisible as Angels the soules of men whose effectes are manifest though both their Materiall and Formall causes as also other circumstances of the time and place wherein they were created be obscure and in some sort vnknowen vnto vs. 7 Now all these things which God created could not but be good seing he himselfe is most good for they were created of him exceedinglie good and most pure without all corruption hauing nothing in them which did not declare the omnipotencie and the exceeding goodnes of the Creator In this originall integritie men and euill Angels might haue still continued if they had woulde and men might haue conuayed the same vnto their posteritie In stead whereof God for the sinne of man did curse the inferiour Creatures which he had created for mans sake 8 As concerning Euill it is not anie thing created or hauing beeing but onelie signifieth the meere absence of the good that ought to be present neither is it in the subjects as an accident but as Priuation opposite vnto good rather expelling the same then hauing beeing in it selfe 9 And although it doth marre that which otherwise is good in it selfe yet is it by accident the cause of good That the degrees of thinges created may appeare which haue their state according as they haue the greater or lesse good in them So vnto the good of all things in generall Euill seemed to bee in some
cause made known before the Presbyterie not that anie satisfaction shoulde thereby be made vnto God as though the penaltie were satisfied but to the end that the pride of the sinner being beaten downe the Church might haue a sure testimonie of his repentance those punishments wee say haue the saide Papists changed with manifest impietie into certaine formes of penalties that partlie are full of superstition and partlie altogether blasphemous which also they teache to bee such a satisfaction of the penalty in the presence of God as deserueth remission of sinnes 15 Vnto this most foule delusion they joyne an other twofolde error to wit purgatorie and indulgences wheras indulgence was nothing els at the first but some mitigation of the seueritie of the Canons whereby vpon good grounds some fauour was shewed vnto those that had offended least they should haue bin swallowed vp with over much heauines Wee detest therefore that whole fable of purgatory as being an execrable impietie and meere contrarie vnto our free reconciliation by Christ 16 The lawe is properlie the object of repentance as the promises of the Gospell are of fayth Therfore to speake properlie Faith is the mother and not a parte of repentance 17 Yet if by repentance wee will vnderstand the whole change of man vnto better we acknowledge that fayth is a principall parte thereof whereby a man is changed from beeing an vnbeleeuer to be a beleeuer 18 Nowe we rightly gather by the former things that repentance is a meere gift of God and that it is ridiculouslie said to arise from our naturall free-will seeing by nature we are seruants vnto sinne 19 And seeing that the flesh doth in some sort remaine in vs two things doe followe thence first that continuall Repentance is required of vs as long as we are in this life Secondly that Repentaunce is acceptable vnto God not by any merrite thereof but onelie by his meere free mercie 20 We condemne the Nouatians who deny repentance vnto them that are once fallen 21 And the Annabaptists who dreame that they haue attained vnto a perfect degree of righteousnes in this life 22 And that ouer great seueritie of the Cannons who did exclude the Ministers of the Church after they had once made publicke repentance from al hope of being receaued againe Defended by DANIEL DOOLEGIANVS a Low-countrey man PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE CONCEPTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLI SEING WE HAVE SVFFICIENTLY SPOken of the person and office of Christ and also of the Lawe which bringeth vs vnto Christ we thinke it meet now particularly to handle those things out of the Creed of the Apostles which Christ in the performance of his office hath done for vs beginning with his conception in the wombe of the Virgine 1 BY Conception wee vnderstande that which was made within the Virgin namely that in deed essentially she should beginne to beare in her wombe that Sonne of God which was true God and true man 2 Neither was that man formed any space of time before the person of the word was vnited vnto him but that Man began to bee at the one and the verie same moment that it was personallie assumed by the aeternall word 3 This humanity was and shal continue for euer a true and a perfect humaine nature in regard both of the bodie and soule beeing then made when as it was conceaued in the wombe of the Virgine and not before 4 That aeternall person also of the word or of the Sonn of God Coessentiall with the Father is the true person of the Sonne of God 5 In this conception which was a beginning in time of that personall vniting the one nature did not simplie assume the other but the person of the Sonne tooke vppon him the nature of man in that one particular man and did preferre it vnto the dignitie of the person of the Deitie Wherein notwithstanding doe remaine both the very natures also their proprieties wherby they are that which they are distinguished without anie confusion or separation 6 Whereas DAMASCEN then doth call the person of Christ wholie considered a compound person because hee is God and man his words are warily to be taken For the partes concurring togeather for the making of some third thing which of it selfe is not as the soule and the body in the making of a man doe of them selues exist before the third thing made of them is existent But in the person of Christ the Deitie of the worde doth not onely sustaine the consideration of the one nature but euen of the whole person attributing this vnto that man that hee doth subsist in the very Sonne of God and is not man alone of him selfe For otherwise there should be one person of the Son of God and another of the Sonne of man neither wherof could of him selfe be the Mediator 7 The parts furthermore that properlie make vpp the whole are compounded togeather But the Deity can admit no composition seeing it is most perfect and therefore in this conception it did preferre that man vnto the dignitie of the diuine person but so as nothing was added thereby vnto the worde but rather that that man did receiue this personall dignitie from the word whereby it is come to passe that as wee haue said he is exalted aboue the Angels the natures yet remaining 8 Therefore Christ was rightlie said by the Fathers to be greater then himselfe and lesser then himselfe 9 Nowe this assumed bodie was made out of the substaunce of the Virgin Marie according vnto the promises made by the Prophets in which respect he the very same who is the Sonne Coeternall and Coessentiall with the Father is trulie the Sonne of ADAM out of the stocke of ABRAHAM and DAVID Coessentiall also with his Mother 10 This conception the effect whereof was the personall vnion of the word and that man could not possiblie be wrought by the power of any Creature 11 Furthermore Christ is said in the beliefe according vnto the Scriptures to bee conceaued of the holie Ghost which is as the Angell GABRIEL doth expound the power of the most high and the third person in the Deitie 12 Yet cannot Christ bee said therefore to be the Son of the holy Ghost for in this conception the holy Ghost doth not sustaine the consideration of the Father who begate of his owne substance but of a cause forming the flesh out of a matter taken els-where 13 Yet is this Conception the worke of the whole Trinitie but distinctlie considered for the Father doth send his Son into this flesh the Sonne is conceaued in this flesh the holy Ghost dooth forme this flesh out of the substance of the Virgin 14 Although that that Virgine blessed aboue all women was yet the daughter of ADAM and therfore infected of her selfe with that vniuersall contagion of all mankind whereof also vndoubtedly she brought forth some fruits Yet notwithstanding the flesh of Christ was in no wise poluted with that contagion but as
day which went before the Sabaoth lay in the graue the whole Sabboth according to the custome of the Iewes which account a naturall day from Euening to Euening and rose againe the beginning of the next which was the first daye of the weeke 13 Concerning this Article of the descension of Christ into Hell it is manifest that there is no mention made of either in the Nicene or in any other of the ancient creeds and RVFFINVS witnesseth that it was not read in the Church of Rome 14 No man therefore ought to wonder if some question be made of the meaning thereof 15 That the Creede which is called the Apostles was written by the Apostles themselues before they departed from Ierusalem euerie one of them bringing in his seueral Article it is a meere fabulous tale as the very number of these Articles do shew 16 Yet it is cleare that they were faithfullie and truely gathered out of the preaching of the Apostles acounted euen frō the most ancient time as a square a rule of faith 17 Now their opinion is verie probable who doe take these words he descended into Hel if this Article was at the first in the common creed expressed in so many words not for any distinct Article but for a summary comprehension of the last and lowest degree of Christes humiliation which should bee pointed out by the wordes of suffering crucifiyng death and burial as this kind of speach is somtimes in the Scriptures Metaphorically vsed for the lowest estate of anguish and dejection So that He suffered was dead buried and descended into Hell should be but one Article of faith 18 But who can beleeue that the Fathers of Nicene and so many Synods that afterward followed and the very Church of Rome it self would haue rashly blotted out this Article if it had bin written in so many words in the common Creed 19 Either of the two therefore must needs bee necessarie namelie that either this kinde of speach in that sense that wee haue spoken though familiar vnto the Hebrues was not yet receiued in all Churches as being ambiguous and not necessary seeing it was sufficiently vnderstood by the former and so by a little and a little grewe out of vse or that this Article also was then inserted into the common Creed when as their opinion which hath bene of ancient time had by degrees taken place who thought that the soule of our Sauiour Christ beeing separated from his bodie went into I know not what place where the Spirits of the beleeuing Fathers should haue their aboad 20 But this opinion though it hath bin of a long time receaued by a common and an olde growen error cannot bee confirmed any wise by any testimonie of the Euangelicall Historie but is manifestlie ouerthrown thereby seeing it is very apparant by the woordes of the Euangelists that the Spirite of Christ being departed out of his bodie was there receaued into whose hands hee committed it when hee gaue vppe the Ghost that is into the place of aeternall blessednes whereof speaking vnto the Theefe he said this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise 21 Nowe that there was any place allotted vnto the Spirits of the Fathers that departed before the incarnation of Christ whence afterward the Spirite of Christ comming thither indeed shuld bring them with him into heauen it can in no wise bee confirmed by any colourable testimonie of the Scriptures Neither would the Euangelists haue omitted any such thing in the storie of the passion of Christ But this opinion seemeth to arise partlie in that manye are written to haue risen either by Christ or with Christ partly out of the PSALME 16.8 which PETER citeth Act. 2.25 and out of two other places also of 1. PET. 3. wrongfullie interpreted 22 Out of this error arise two other that are more absurd the one of those who beeing ledde by the misvnderstanding of the words of PETER thought that the soule of Christ went indeed into Hell to the ende that as in bodie hee had preached the Gospell vpon earth vnto those that were liuing so also he should preach the said Gospel in his Spirit vnto the Spirites of those that were dead as though that after death there were any place left for preaching repentance 23 The other errour is of those who dreamed that the Spirite of Christ should goe vnto the soules of the damned that hee might there also suffer in his soule the paines ordained in hell for the damned as though that the soule of Christ whilest it was in his bodie did not beare those punishmentes for our sake as both that horrible agonie which hee sustained in the Garden and also that fearefull crie My God my God c. which vpon the Crosse made Heauen and earth to tremble doe beare witnesse or as though that speache It is finished wherein our whole hope consisteth were vntrue 24 But wee omitting the whole controuersie concerning the putting in or the blotting out of this Article do simplie vnderstand by the Descension of Christ into hell those things which Christ being made a curse for vs suffered in his soule for our sake in those torments especiallie which were so greeuous as nothing could be no not imagined more horrible 25 By the word DESCENSION therefore is not ment any remoouing from a higher place to a lower because that can properlie agree neither vnto the Deitie which is euery where nor vnto the bodie which of it selfe lay dead in the Graue neither vnto the soule which beeing commended vnto the Father was straight way in Paradise after it was separated from the body 26 Now the word HELL which in the Scripture is diuersly taken signifieth neither the Graue because that explanation should bee superfluous and obscure neither yet the place of the damned as it is cleare out of the former Principles 27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hel which had an ende at his death went before the Article of his buriall but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speach euen because it was thought meet to set downe in one tenor of speach whatsoeuer did belong to the humiliation of his body Defended by HILLARIE FANTRART an English-man of Guernzy PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE RESVRRECTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLV 1 HItherto wee haue heard Christes combate with death wherein he might seeme to be ouercome by death because it so far preuailed against him as it threw his dead bodie into the graue 2 Now we are to speake of Christs victorie ouer death the beginning whereof was the preseruation of his dead bodie in the graue vncorrupted and that without the help of anie art of the Apothicarie 3 His full victorie manifested it selfe in the resurrection of his bodie seeing that life is directlye opposite vnto death 4 Now that onlie is said to rise again which lay down and therefore neither the Deitie nor the soule of Christ rose againe Yet notwithstanding the resurrection after a
shewe vnto their subjects of those whome they will haue to be in equall dignitie with them and by whome they exercise their gouernment by placing them in a most honorable seat that is at their right side or at their left by this kind of speach I say is meant that Christ hath receaued all power both in heauen and in earth as he himselfe the best interpreter of his owne words doth expresse MAT. 28.18 5 This power as far as he is God Coeternal with his father he receiued not first after the resurrection of his flesh but enjoyed it from al aeternitie common with his Father of whome he receiued his Sonne-hood from aeternitie 6 Yet because not in himselfe distinctly considered as far as he is God but as far as he personally joyned to himselfe the forme of a seruant subject vnto all our infirmities sin excepted he seemed in some sort vnto the time of his Ascention to haue cast of his owne Majestie which in the Scriptures is expressed by the word of Descending therefore he is also in the same respect said to bee exalted vnto the right hand of the Father or restored as far as it appertaineth to the manifesting thereof into the same Majestie which he had with the Father before all worlds 7 There is another consideration of his humain nature the which hauing truly and not in shewe most powerfully accomplished the office of his infirmitie became Conqueror ruler and triumpher and hath gotten a perpetuall gouernment ouer all creatures both for the preseruation of his the perfecting by degrees the worke of their saluation also for the vtter ouerthrow of his enemies this is it that is ment by his sitting at the right hand of the father 8 And euen as the hypostatical vniō is not therfore dissolued bicause the properties of the humanity ar distinctly attributed thervnto euen so his glorification being distinctly considered in the said humanity doth not infer that there shuld ether be two christs or sitting at the right hād of God 9 Yet is not the humanitye by this meanes made equall with the worde either in substaunce which is the proper error of EVTYCHES or in authority as the Vbiquitaries do now hold because that that gouernment wherby Christ as hee is man hath all things subject to himselfe as well in heauen in earth as vnder the earth is limited within the compasse of Creatures excepting him saith the Apostle who hath made all things subject vnto him that is the Father with whome as the WORD hath the one and the same essence from aeternitie so hath he the one and the same power fully in common with him in so much that the Fathers haue said trulye that Christ in respect of this gouernment also is both greater and lesser then himselfe 10 False also and blasphemous is that Vbiquitary and all present Majestie of the essentiall humanitie of Christ which they seeme to haue sharpelie gathered from this sitting at the right hand of the Father for besides that by this meanes the truth of the flesh of Christ is manifestlie abollished It is a foolish thing to reason from the power of his flesh vnto the essence thereof that is to holde that the essence of his humanitie doth reach as farre as the power thereof where as the very faith of that Centurion so much commended by our Sauiour Christ MATH 8.10 doth on the contrarie side teach vs that it is meere folly to inclose his power within the bounds of his essentiall presence 11 Now this kingdome gouernment hath Christ alreadie perfectlie obtained as hauing gotten a name aboue all names but in his mysticall body that is in the church it is but onely in some sort begun neither shall it bee perfected in the saide bodie before that last day when as all the enemies of Christs glorie and our saluation beeing aeternally ouerthrowen and cast downe God shall bee all in all that is in his Saints in whom now he is onely but some thing whether we respect them beeing a liue or dead 12 That gouernement of Christ therefore doth nowe consist in two things that is partly in the subduing both of his owne children and also of all their enemies and partlie in bringing his by little and little to perfection by the power of his Spirite and the administration of that other part of his aeternall Priesthoode that is in the strengthening of them by his intercession with the Father euen vntill that he hath together with all his elect celebrated an eternall triumph 13 This intercession of his consisteth especially in that efficacie of that oblation of his made once to his father the force whereof is this that the Father looking vppon all his elect in his Sonne by whose blood he is reconciled vnto them doth imbrace them euermore with a Fatherlie affection partly in that as all the prayers of the Saints being as yet Pilgrimes here vpon earth are conceiued in the name of Christ so hee presenting himselfe vnto his Father in heauen as the onelie Mediatour doth sanctifie those prayers and make them acceptable vnto God the Father 14 Vnto these things is to bee adjoyned that stay and defēce which we haue by Christ in that he hauing all creatures in his hand doth by what instrument and meanes he thinketh good most powerfully preserue his Church traueling as yet here vpon earth against all the furious insurrections of all whosoeuer 15 Touching this sitting at the right hand of GOD the Father although in respect of the title thereof it belonged vnto the humanitie of Christ from the verie first moment of the personall vniting thereof with the Deitie yet both in regarde that this humanitie was to be throwen down vnto the verie lowest degree for the performance of the worke of our reconciliation and also because this glorification of our head was the crowne due vnto the obedience he yeelded for vs vnto the Father even vnto the death of the crosse therefore it fell not vnto him in deede and posession before he had suffered risen againe and ascended aboue all heauens Hence it followeth that this errour also of the Vbiquitaries is intollerable namelie in that they holde that this reall sitting at the right hand of the father began at the very first moment of the Lordes incarnation offending heerein two manner of wayes First in the wrong interpretation of this article next in that they inuert the order of the articles of the beleife which ought necessarilie to be retained 16 In asmuch as the place of this sitting is expreslie said to be in heauen and not vpon earth or any where els and that Christ is not to depart from heauen before the last day and also that he is endued with a bodie though glorious yet organical contained within the parts therof Therfore that reall presence of his vpon earth is shewed to be false against all Transubstantiators and Consubstantiators euen by this sitting of his in heauen at the right
elect in particuler are common vnto all the Saints in respect of the vse which is the communion of Saints in this life 15 Yea and the vse of these graces if it may be ought to reach euen vnto them that are without as farre as the glorie of God and the edification of the Church doth permit both because often times many of the elect lie hid amongst them and also because wee must bee like our heauenly Father who maketh his Sunn to rise vpon the good and bad 16 This Communion begun here vpon earth shal then after that those thinges which belong vnto the vse of this life are abollished be perfected in that aeternall kingdom when as faith being chaunged into a full knowledge hope into the injoying of the thinges hoped for and charitie being made perfect God shall be all in all his Saints Now the Communion of Merites either amongst the Saints liuing heere togeather or betweene the Militant and the Triumphant church is both most false and also blasphemous as also the very opinion of merrites is a meere forged vntruth Defended by IOHN WTENBOGAERT a Low-country man of Vtrick PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE WORD OF GOD. LII 1 VVE haue dealt in the former principles with the Church and it hath bene said that the notes of the true Church were the Word of God and the Sacraments now wee will deale with these notes and first of all with the former of them 2 The word of God which is the first note wee cal in this place not whatsoeuer GOD hath spoken but those things onlie which the Prophetes and Apostles inspired by Gods Spirite haue in times past as taught by worde so committed to writing those things which being comprehended in the bookes of the ould and new Testament are as yet vnto this day after so manie warres slaughters ouerthrowes extant in Gods Church in which bookes God hath declared both what he will haue vs to know cōcerning him and what is to be done of vs. 3 God onelie is to bee acknowledged the authour of these bookes whence the whole Scripture is said by PAVL to bee giuen by the inspiration of God and is also called the word of God And therefore it is vnlawfull to call into question or to refuse anie thing that is contained therein as also to bring in anie thing that is not written in the same Detestable therefore was that peruersnes of the Marcionites Manichaees the Valentinians and of all such as refused either all or some of the bookes of the newe Testament 4 These writings by the singular prouidence of God haue long since beene brought by the Church into a certaine order and Cannon that they might bee discerned from counterfaite yea and all other bookes and that they should bee a rule of faith and obedience that should haue credite of it self and hence they are called Cannonicall Other bookes whosoeuer haue beene the authours of them though they contain manie wholsome profitable things are yet but accounted the writings of priuate men neither haue they their credite of themselues but as far as they agree with the former bookes and no otherwise They therefore both haue and at this day doe most greuouslie offend who take away this difference and affirme that the bookes of the APOCRYPHA are to haue no lesse credite in the establishing of Religion then the Cannonical Scripture of which number are the Tridentine conspiratours 5 This Scripture we acknowledge to be cannonicall and authentick not so much by the common consent of the Church as by the testimonie of the Spirite of God who teacheth vs that they are to be embraced as beeing most vndoubtedlie true and such as haue proceeded from Gods own mouth 6 Now these holie books do whollie containe al those thinges that are needfull for our saluation in somuch that it is altogether vnlawfull to exspect for anie supplie of this doctrine for the Scripture as PAVLE doth expreslie teach is able to make the man of God absolute Most greeuous therefore is their errour who thinke that the liuelie and the sauing knowledge of God is to be else where sought then in the written word and doe therefore thrust vnto vs their vnwritten falshoods out of the which they will haue necessarie arguments to bee drawne in the cause of faith and religion 7 The naturall and proper interpretation of this holy Scripture is to be drawne from the analogie of faith and the conference of places For that which is darcklie in one place is in an other clearelie taught that which heere is shortlie is elsewhere largelie set down and so the Woord is the rule and the interpretour of it selfe They are deceauers therefore who say that the right and authoritie of expounding the worde of God is in their power as though it were lawfull for them to interpret anie place as they think good 8 Neither are the expositions of auncient Doctors to bee receaued as vndoubted anie farther then they agree with the truth for PAVLE doth command vs that we giue eare or consent vnto none whosoeuer he be that teacheth anie other doctrine Wee cannot allow therefore of their opinion who wil haue the interpretation of the fathers as they call thē to haue credite of themselues 9 It is true indeed that some places of the Scripture remaine euen vnto this day so obscure and hard to bee interpreted as the verie best and most faithfull interpretours haue not agreed among themselues vpō their proper meaning but in these things euery man is to acknowledge his owne ignorance sluggishnes or some other fault and the Scripture is so plentifull that the one and the selfe same place can admit diuers interpretations and yet all agreable with the doctrine of faith 10 This notwithstanding is most certaine that the grounds and necessarie heades of Christian Religion are so clearely set downe by the Prophets and Apostles as the Spirite of God woorking in the Saincts they are manifestlie perceaued in the Church And therefore wee doe not agree vnto them who thinke the Scripture so obscure as it needeth to be made cleare by some other light Nowe this light they will haue without exception to bee drawne from that pretended Catholick Church that is either from the fathers from the Synods or from some long custome of time as though the Scripture had not beene vnderstood before either the Fathers or the Synodes were 11 This Word of God is to be dailie meditated vppon and all men of what estate soeuer they bee ought most diligentlie to read the same for no man is to be bereaued of that meanes whereby hee is to be instructed in the knowledge and the sure way of his saluation Wee cannot therefore but condemne the Papistes in this point also who holde it vnlawfull for laie-men as they call them to employ themselues in the reading of the Word 11 Now that the vnlearned and vnskilfull may with fruit bee conuersant in the reading heereof it is needfull that
seemed indeed to haue beene done vpon some colour of reason but it had a most ill issue and wee affirme that this is it that IOHN in the Reuelation doth meane by the image of the Beast 4 For hence it came to passe the aequality of the Churches beeing taken away and the order of Priorship beeing vnder the colour of auoiding schisme transformed into superioritie that in steede of the Apostolicall and the truly diuine gouernment of the church by the Eldership the humaine order of Bishoppes was by little and little brought in and from thence presentlie sprang that horrible Antichristian tyrannie the chief head whereof nowe for these manie yeares hath beene that counterfait Romaine Bishop 5 Yet of this order as long as the Lord raised vp those who did so vse this office of Bishop invēted by man as they did maintaine and set forward Gods Church there was some vse as whereby in some sort the puritye of Christian doctrine hath bene maintained 6 It was apointed to the ouerthrow of the endeuours of Sathan and his ministers not by man but by God both before the comming of Christ and in the time of the Apostles that there should bee held certaine Assemblies of the godlie both for the preseruation and reformation of Religion and also for the appeasing of controuersies risen in the Church the which meetings are called in the storie of the Christian Church by the name of Synods and Councels 7 But when as these euils did not alwaies infect the whole bodie of the Churche but did rather spring from particuler members It was not without great cause obserued in the ancient Church that certain Prouinciall assemblies should be helde at appointed times wherin the controuersies if any had risen in the prouince wer determined according to the worde of God and the outward order of the Church so appointed as was thought expedient 8 As often as the harme grew farther there is no dout but the godly the religious Pastors of churches though dwelling in diuers Prouinces did yet conferre togeather without any ambition concerning the remedies thereof as it apeareth out of the stories of the Councels and the writings of the ancient Fathers that were before the councell of Nice the aeternal God verie mightily blessing their zeal before euer the ambition of Bishoppes seas was knowen in the Church 9 But as Christian Religion after that the Romaine Empire submitted it self vnto Christ vnder CONSTANTINE the great began greatly to florishe all outward persecution being ended So Sathan on the other side began after a marueilous sort openly to set vp the Mystery of iniquity which before hand secretly had taken some growth 10 Hervpon that authority of the Seas ouer their brethren and fellowe-Ministers was established in that first councell of Nice which otherwise was a Christian assemblie and one of the most famous since that time the which authoritie could bee afterward restrained by the force of no Canons and decrees but that it brake vnto that horrible tyrannie which wasted and at this day dooth deuour the whole Church 11 There were notwithstanding the Lorde rightlie vsing this euill vnto the preseruation of his Church in these times Councels gathered and ended vnto many good purposes by the authority of godlie Romaine Emperours against those haeresies which inuaded the vniuersall body of the Church and they are therfore called general councels because the Emperours of Rome did then gouerne the most part of the world 12 Now it is manifest that these councels were graunted by the Emperours vpon the entreatie and requeste of godlie Bishops whereas otherwise the haeretickes and factious heades would not haue yealded vnto the Ecclesiasticall censures and judgements of the godly Pastors and Elders had it not beene for the authoritie of the Emperours especiallie seeing manie Churches woulde receaue those that were cast out by their Pastors as the whole auncient storie doth testifie 13 It is also manifest that the Bishops themselues or such as was sent by them to supplie their roomes satte as the Iudges in these councels and meetings for the Episcopall degree of superioritie which was euen then a great staine vnto the Church of God was euen at that time crept thereinto 14 Yet in these meetings either the Romaine Emperour himself or some noble men sent with commission by him in his stead were present but not as beeing to judge or to giue the definitiue sentence but as beeing to moderate the behauiours of the Bishops themselues which yet sometimes they could by no meanes bring to passe as yet appeareth in that sacrilegious synod of EPHESVS otherwhiles though with great labour they did in some sort effect 15 In these Synods were heard and admitted euen lay-men as they call them that no man should be condemned before his cause were heard Now the whole controuersie concerning Christian Religion was first of al properly defined out of the written word of God Next and in the second place were brought the auncient Christian Fathers yet so as of them selues they were not beleeued but receiued so far as they agreed to the word of God To conclude the determination of the Synods being sent vnto the Christian Emperours were established by their vnviolable constitutions 16 In these Synodes were determined both the waightier controuersies risen among the Bishoppes themselues togeather with their elections and depositions and also the rules concerning the generall gouernement of the Church which the Greekes call Canons were enacted 17 Hence it appeareth what place those Councels are to haue which are called by the authoritie of the counterfeit Romaine Bishop and concluded by the suffrages and voyce of his own vassals both to the establishing of his tyranie and also to the ouerthrow of all godlines and whatsoeuer good order hath bene confirmed by the approoued ancient Canons 18 Now that the Romain Empire is seuered into parts and the gouernment of Christendome deuided into diuers kingdomes and estates If any man should demand what way we think meet for the gathering of Synods we answer after this sort 19 First in those Churches who haue Christian Magistrats care is to be had after the truth of Religion and the right gouernement of the Church be established that they haue setled ordinary meetinges according to the conuenient distribution that they haue made of their Churches to the ende that the controuersies either alreadie risen or beeing likelie to arise maye bee appeased and preuented and the progresse of the Churches of euery Prouince may be looked vnto vnto which worke the authoritye of the Christian Magistrates is also to be vsed 20 But where the Magistrates doe not professe true religion we see not to what end the appointing of Synodes either ordinarie or extraordinarie should depend vppon their authoritie In such a case then the Pastors are wisely to fore-see that the Church of God be gouerned notwithstanding all the impediments of the aduersaries 21 Now what hope there can be of a generall Counsel
sence whereof wee nowe speake yet those godlie fathers haue added nothing vnto the worde when as they vsed these tearmes for the expressing of the said rites 4 Now because the word Sacrament is by the Latine fathers referred vnto al kind of signes which are vsed to expresse holie thinges it is to bee obserued that in this discourse the same is particularlie referred vnto the signes of the grace of God in Christ and that two manner of waies for a Sacrament dooth sometimes comprehend the externall signes onelie and sometimes the things signified together with the signes and a certain holie action also 5 Sacraments taken in the former signification we define to be certaine visible signes instituted by God vnto the vse of the Church where by God doth seale in the harts of the faithfull the promise of the grace of free saluation by Christ and so dooth more and more confirme their fayth and witnes the fellowship which the Saints haue amongst themselues vnder Christ their head 6 In the latter sense we define them to be a certain holie action enjoined by God vnto the Church wherein as GOD in a kinde of agreeable proportion betweene the signes and the things signified offereth vnto the senses of our bodie by the hand of the Minister the things that appertaine vnto our saluation in Christ so dooth hee giue vnto our soules the heauenlie thinges themselues to the end that they should spirituallie by faith be more more sealed in them 7 By signes in this place we vnderstand not natural or miraculous but voluntarie signes because they are ordained by the will of God to be signes of his grace in Christ which by nature they are not neither are they signes onlie but partlie remembraunces of things past and partly seales of things present and also to come 8 But nowe wee will consider in order of the causes of the Sacramentes The efficient is GOD onelie because that as it appertaineth to him alone to promise grace so dooth it also to add the seales thereof thereunto Therefore also there are neither anie other Sacramentes to be receiued into the Church neither is the manner of the institution to be anie wise violated Whosoeuer therefore doe breake out into that boldnesse that either they dare coyne new Sacraments or add anie vnto those that were appointed by the lord or detract anie title from them they are guiltie of treason against the Majestie of the highest 9 The matter of the Sacraments are of two sorts the one externall and corporall which are perceaued by the senses of the bodie the other inward and spirituall offered vnto the minde and the soule 10 The forme of the Sacraments is the ordinaunce of God comprehended in his Word for the Sacraments are that altogeather and nothing else which GOD by the word of his Diuine institution dooth testifie that hee will haue them to bee so that the word is as it were the soule of the Sacraments in regarde that it testifieth what the diuine ordinaunce is They doe therefore abolish the Sacramentes who either altogether omit this word in the administration of them or vse the same in a strange tongue 11 The chiefe end of them in respect of vs is the saluation of the faithfull by sealing their conjunction with Christ For God not contented with the generall preaching of his promises thinketh it meet to seale and to offer them in speciall vnto euerie particular beleeuer hauing a regarde thereby to their infirmitie 12 Other ends also they haue which are of great moment as that by them we should be put in remembrance of the benefites of Christ that the Church should bee distinguished from other sects For as God will be discerned from Idols so hee will haue his people seuered by these markes from the Kingdome of the Deuill that they shuld bee bandes of the mutuall loue of the faithfull Brieflie that they should bee a profession and a testification of the onelie true Religion and of our duety towardes our God 13 Nowe the instrument to vse the Sacraments aright is Faith whence it appeareth that the faithfull onelie doe receaue them as it is meet whereas all others doe participate the outwarde signes onelie and that to their condemnation They erre therefore who hold that vnbeleuers do receaue the thing signified that is Christ together with the signes And they also doe ouer-wickedlie abuse the Sacramentes who administer them to thinges without life 14 The change of the signes in the Sacramentes is not naturall but respectiue by vertue of the commandement of GOD for the signes are chaunged not in respect of their nature but onelie in regarde of their vse namelie whereas the things which before were common are by Gods commandement become the signes of heuenlie thinges and this is the consecration of the Sacrament They erre therefore and destroy the whole nature of the Sacramentes who teach that the substance of the signes are as it were by a kinde of magicall enchantment either chaunged or abolished 15 The conjunction of the signes and the thinges signified is also respectiue in regarde of the ordinaunce of God whereby inuisible and incorporall things are in a kinde of fit proportion represented by corporall and visible elements in such sort as God doth giue both by the hand of the Minister and both are receaued in their lawful vse They erre therefore who holde that there is a reall joining together and presence of the signes the thing signified 16 Vnto this sacramental change and the conjunction of the things with the signes there is no place left but onelie in the administration of the Sacrament They are therefore to be condemned who doo attribute some holines vnto the signes and as for those who worship them them wee vtterlie detest as open Idolaters 17 The Sacramentall speaches and phrases are eyther proper or figuratiue proper as when that which appertaineth vnto the signe is attributed vnto the same that which is peculiar vnto the thing signified is distinctly applied therevnto and these do forbid vs to attribute vnto the signes anie more then is meete namelie that wee should not take them for the things signified They are no lesse impious therefore then the former who worship the signes in the verie Sacramentall vse 18 These are figuratiue speaches wherein we see the names and effects of the things signified attributed vnto the signes and contrariwise the names or the effectes of the signes applied vnto the things signified which is done to expresse that moste true and moste neere sacramental conjunction of the signes with the thinges and that wee should not attribute lesse vnto them then were meet They therefore doe attribute lesse then is meete vnto the Sacraments who will haue them onelie to be signes of remembraunce thereby excluding the true giuing receauing of the things signified Yet are they in a lesse errour who will haue them to be signes onelie of our outward profession 19 Nowe in asmuch as the
vnto vs into ours seeing the Apostle saith that they did eate the same spirituall meat 12 It appeareth that their outward matter and forme was diuers from the Sacraments of the new Testament by the verie signes rites and manner of administration 13 That they differed in nomber it is out of controuersie for we according vnto the institution of Christ doe acknowledge onelie two Baptisme and the holie Supper they had more as Circumcision the Paschall lamb the Sacrifices and oblations Wee doe therefore condemne the Manichaees who taught that the things signified vnder the olde law were changed together with the signes Defended by DANIEL DOOLEGIANVS a low country-man PRINCIPLES TOVCHING THE NOMBER OF THE SACRAMENTS OF THE NEVV TESTAMENT LVII WE HAVE DEALT TOVCHING SACRAments in generall and the difference of the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament wee will nowe omitting the olde which were abolished by the comming of Christ deale with the new 1 THe Sacraments of the new Testament are those which Christ hath instituted in his Church to continue vntill his second comming 2 Of this sort there are onelie two Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord by the former we are receaued into by the latter nourished and sustained in the Church Confirmation Repentance extreame vnction order and mariage which the Papists account among the Sacraments are none in deed 3 For the true definition of a Sacrament cannot agree vnto them Now that definition which they bring that a Sacrament is a visible signe of an inuisible thing reacheth a great deale toe farre and is not proper vnto this discourse 4 Therfore although the Fathers in the verie puritie of the auncient Church did vse the worde Sacrament in a verie large signification yet did they not acknowledge any more Sacraments of grace then these two so far were they from admitting the other fiue into the nomber of Sacraments 5 For these doe want in deede that forme whereby the Sacraments are that which they are that is the worde of God or the institution of Christ whose office alone it is to ordaine Sacramentes comprehended in his word 6 And none of them doe testifie the vnion that the Saints haue betweene themselues vnder Iesus Christ their head 7 We do not denie but there were some vse of them in the auncient and purer Church but we affirme it to bee a far other than that which is now in Poperie 8 The Papists make Confirmation to be the next Sacrament vnto Baptisme and they say that it is that wherby the children of Christians that are come to age after they are annointed in the fore-head with oile and haue receaued a blow or a pat of the Bishop doe forsooth receaue the holie Ghost though they make no confession at all of their Faith 9 But the Fathers made that to be Confirmation wherby those that were baptised when they were infants beeing after instructed in the Christian Religion were by laiyng on of hands and solemne prayers after they had made publick confession of their faith commended vnto God and the church 10 But it was not a Sacrament for it wanted a proper visible signe which is one necessarie part of the matter of a Sacrament 11 True Repentaunce wee admitte in the Church as beeing altogether necessarie vnto the saluation of all beleeuers that are come to age although it hath not alwaies satisfaction before the Church joyned with it 12 Now the Papists call that Repentaunce when as a man being touched with a perfect contrition for his sinns doth confesse them by making a full reckoning of them in the eares of the sacrificing masse-priest by whome after he hath receaued absolution he is enjoined to make suche a satisfaction as receauing force from the merits of Christ doth satisfie Gods justice 13 And seeing furthermore it hath no visible signe it can not be a Sacrament 14 They make extreame vnction to be a fift Sacrament whereby some person beeing at the point of death is by the sacrificing Masse-priest annointed with oile that the paines of Purgatory may be remitted vnto him 15 In the time of the Apostles when as the guiftes of miracles remained as yet those who were sick were wont to call the Elders of the Church by whome they were annointed and so did oftentimes recouer their health 16 But miracles beeing ceased vnction also hath ceased and therefore is no Sacrament for the Sacraments of the new Testament are to continue vnto the comming of Christ 17 Orders amongst the Papists are rites and Ceremonies partlye inuented by them and partlie fetched from the Fathers whereby they consecrate their Ecclesiasticall Ministers 18 It is out of controuersie that in the Church of God who is the authour of order all thinges ought to bee done in order yet cannot this order bee anie wise a Sacrament of the Church seeing it neither hath anie promise of grace annexed vnto it nor doth belong vnto all the faithfull 19 Mariage being the seauenth Sacrament of the Papists is out of question the holie ordinaunce of God appointed for the propagation and conseruation of mankinde yet do we not acknowledge it to be a Sacrament 20 First it hath no promise of saluation nor any corporall matter which might bee a signe of the grace of saluation ordained by God 21 Secondlie it is not common vnto all the elect for it is not needfull that all those who will bee accounted of the visible Church should be maried yea the Papisticall cleargie doe reject the same as a filthie and prophane thing 22 Thridlie it is not proper vnto the Church of Christ vnder the new Testament for it was preciselie instituted at the verie beginning of the world and it is common vnto all men euen the verie heathen which could not bee if it were a Sacrament Defended by DANIEL CRAMERIVS Occitanus PRINCIPLES TOVCHING BAPTISME BEING THE FIRST SACRAMENT OF THE NEVV TESTAMENT LVIII HAVING IN THE FORMER PRINCIPLES set down the nomber of the true Sacraments of the new Testament we now come to handle the first of them namelie Baptisme where we will deale with the causes and effectes thereof referring other things that belong vnto this argument vnto the next disputation 1 BAPTISME beeing a Sacrament of the newe couenant testifying that Christ is come came in the place of Circumcision which vnder the old Testament did prefigure Christ to be manifested 2 Both of them are the same in deede yet differing in signes 3 The same is to bee saide of all types both singulare and extraordinarie of which sort was the passage through the sea vnder the cloud and also legall and ordinarie of which sort were sprincklings and diuerse washings ordayned vnder the olde Testament 4 By Baptisme beeing one of the two Sacramentes of the new Testament we vnderstand in this treatise that holie and mysticall action which is proper vnto the Christian Church and ordained for those ends wherof we will speak anone 5 The matter of Baptisme are the signes the things
signified The signes are water and the sacramentall rites which are a dipping into the water and a taking out of the same againe whence washing doth follow The thing signified is the blood of Christ vnto the remission of our sinnes and that spirituall and deuine force whereby wee are regenerated which regeneration consisteth partlye in the abolishing of the olde man which decaieth by little little and partlie in the creating of the new which is to be perfected by degrees 6 The formall cause of Baptisme consisteth in the lawfull vse of the institution the especiall part whereof is the inuocation of the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holie Ghost together with the rite either of dipping into the water or of the sprinckling of the same 7 For it is not greatlie materiall whether the person that is to be baptised be whollie dipt vnder the water or whether the water bee onelie sprinkled either vppon his head or his face Vaine therefore and void is that washing where either Baptisme is not done into the name of the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost or water is not vsed 8 Those vaine questions that haue risen from that false absolute necessitie of Baptisme as whether it be lawfull to baptize with distilled water with vrin or stale or with sand where naturall water cannot be gotten wee reject as absurd and ridiculous neither thinke we that any contention ought to be made whether the water is to bee once or thrise applied 9 It is not lawfull no not for any Angell in heauen to ordaine any Sacramentall rites seeing the signification of them doeth respect the promise of grace For it is in the power of GOD alone both to promise what hee thinketh good and also to establishe his promises by what signes it pleaseth him 10 They did greatly offend therefore who not contented with the simplicitie of the Lordes institution thought that they could adorne Baptisme by adding curious rites thervnto where as of the contrarieside the Lord will haue the Sacraments of the newe couenant which are opposed vnto the olde to be therefore most few and simple to the end that wee should so much the more readilie be drawen from these corporall and sensible things to the consideration of spirituall and heauenly matters I Those innumerable added trifles therefore which haue presentlie growen into manifest superstition and wherof some were added by the Papists as chrisme spittle Tapers wee haue justlie abollished though they be of antiquitie as being will-worship II Now as touching Exorcisme if by that name be vnderstood not the solemne couenant of Christianitie but the conjuring of Sathan and Spirites wee altogeather refuse the same as being rashly and foolishly drawen from those that were possessed with Diuels to be applied vnto men that were in their right wits and to the infants of Christians III Yet did not these spots though filthie and loathsom and therefore to be carefully abollished anihilate Baptisme as long as the essentiall forme thereof remained 11 The first that the Lorde appointed to publishe this action was IOHN therefore called the Baptist but the Author hereof is properly Christ who onely hath this authority in the house of his Father 12 Nowe the outward administration of this Sacrament as also the simple preaching of the worde hee hath committed vnto Pastors lawfully called Their error therefore is very greeuous who commit this office vnto priuate men and much more greeuous who giue women leaue to intermeddle in this action in the cause of necessitie as they call it 13 ALTHOVGH they are not to be accounted to haue a lawfull calling who haue inuaded the places of true Pastors either by a common error or by long permission yet are they to be DISTINGVISHED from meere priuat mē Therefore Baptisme administred by them according to the forme appointed by Christ is to stand Yet are not they to be excused who now that the holy Ministerie is in some sort reformed doe as farre as in them lyeth confirme the false calling of these men by giuing their children to be Baptized of them 14 To the end in the mean time that all these things may bee lawfully done they are to be so performed in the Church as it may be vnderstood what is done therfore a certaine forme togeather with meet conuenient praiers is to be vsed in the vulgar tongue which may declare the originall vse and end of Baptisme Therefore also Baptisme is profaned by them who either administer the same without any exposition or depraue the administration thereof by some false worshippe or administer it in a straunge and an vnknowen tongue Although it be true Baptisme as long as that remaineth which is the chiefe thing therein namelie the signe and the right inuocation of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost for Baptisme doth neither depend vppon the faith nor yet is defiled by the sinnes of him that administreth it but is grounded onely vppon the ordinance of the Sonne of God 15 The Analogie furthermore of the signes and the things signified is manifest For the element of water vsed for the washing of the outwarde filthines doth most fitlie represent that blood which was shead for the taking away of the sinnes of the world and applied to purifie vs Briefelie that either dipping into or sprinckling of the water though it bee but done in a short space doth yet clearelie represent the first part of our regeneration that is the sealing of our inward and spirituall ingraffing into Christ his death and buriall whereby our olde man togeather with all our sinnes being by little and little brought to decay is altogeather buried Last of all in that hee who is baptized whether hee bee dipt vnder the water or sprinckled with the same doth yet rise again it laieth open as it were before our eies the remission of our sinnes and the rising againe of our new man 16 The proper end of Baptisme is that by this solemne and holy action wee might bee knowen by the testimony of men and Angels to bee in the number of the visible Church also that by meanes of this action the adoption of the elect might to their full assurance bee more more sealed by the holy Ghost in their hearts 17 The principall efficient cause heereof is the holie Ghost who in his good time doth inwardly performe that which by the word of promise accompanied with outward signes is declared vnto the mind Whence also may be gathered what are the effects of Baptisme 18 Now the instrumental cause of the efficacie of baptisme is the very same that maketh the worde alone to bee powerfull namly faith wrought by the holy Ghost throgh the hearing of the word in those that are of age I Their error therefore is intollerable who dreame that there is any diuine power either in the water or in the rites of Baptisme seeing that whole efficacie is solie the worke of the holie Ghost which can
once an onelie and a most perfect Sacrifice vnto God neither was there anie other that could can or shal be able to performe that work 13 For the Sacrifices that ought nowe to haue place among Christians are onelie of thankesgiuing that the faithfull may giue thankes vnto God for all his benefites and offering their prayers vnto him may perpetually consecrate themselues whollie a liuing and an acceptable sacrifice vnto his majestie An expiatorie or propitiatory sacrifice there is or can bee no other but that which Christ once made most perfectlie vppon the Alter of the crosse 14 Yet we do not denie but that the auncient writers did giue the name of Sacrifice vnto the Lords Supper but as in this point so in manie other thinges in a verie farre streatched signification and that partlie to the end that as they thought they might set foorth the dignitie of this high mysterie whereat the Angels doe admire and partlie that they might note out and retaine the custome vsed amongst the auncient Christians Who were wont in their holie feastes of loue to bestowe and offer guiftes and offerings of diuers thinges and euen of meat and drinke which beeing collected togeather into one were so disposed of by the Pastors of the Churches as first of all they were by praiers offered vnto God next some portion of them was taken wherby the holy Supper was administred lastlie that which was left was bestowed for the maintenance of the poore Out of which rites the Masse-mongers doe as yet retaine the names of OFFERTORI COLLECT and COMMVNION And hence it is thought that the name of the MASSE was deriued euen from the custome that the faithfull had to send those things vnto the publick assemblies of the Church which they would haue bestowed vpon holie vses 15 Now it is no lesse fabulous that the Popish Masse was celebrated by IAMES or anie other of the Apostles then it is most true that the same was coyned neither all at once nor yet by one and the selfe same man but was soldered together as now it is by manie Popes after manie yeares and after that it had bene eiked out with many patches which were added thereunto 16 Vnto the former errors there are adjoyned not a few others as that it is celebrated not by the congregation of the faithfull but by one Masse-monger alone that the Sacrament is after the holie action RESERVED as it were a preseruatiue against whatsoeuer inconuenience that the names of dead Saints are called vpon and their imaginary merits intermingled in the Masse that the one of the signs is in a kind of impudent and altogeather hellish boldnesse taken away from the lay people as they call them that the whole action is done in a strange tongue that the Masse-Priest alone is priuie vnto many things that are done therin that they vse the attire and gestures of stage-plaiers and many other things brought forth by this plant which the heauenly Father hath not planted and therefore shal one day be altogeather rooted out Therefore we detest this imaginary and blasphemous sacrifice of the Masse which is contrarie vnto Gods worde and ouerthroweth the force of Christes Passion and bringeth in almost innumerable errours and wee pray with al our hearts and soules that the Lord would graunt vnto all his Churches the pure and sound vse of his holie Supper Defended by THEOPHILVS HESPERIVS of Bearne PRINCIPLES TOVCHING CONSVBSTANTIATION LXII WEE HAVE ALREADIE DISPVTED concerning Transubstantiation Consubstantiation being the neerest error vnto it is now to be handled 1 COnsubstantiation consisteth in this that the bodie and blood of the Lord is said to bee corporally naturally and really present in vnder and with the bread and the wine 2 It hath this common with Transubstantiation that in both of them the wordes of the institution are in a preposterous sort stiflie maintained without any regard vnto the meaning Although that in verie deed the wordes are chaunged in both by the fained interpretations whereby they are expounded whence manie absurdities doe follow 3 First in that both of them doe take away the force nature of a Sacrament which consisteth in this that two thinges should bee in them namely earthly elementarie and signifiyng then heauenly inuisible and signified both which are seuerallie considered not as they are something absolutely and simply existing of their own nature but as there is a mutuall comparison and referrence between them whereby the signes do represent the things signified are represented 4 Next Transubstantiation maketh that the thing is not that which it is and that it is that which it is not but Consubstantiation maketh that two things indeed are become one 5 Thirdly this doctrine doth include contrarieties for it affirmeth that the same body is receiued both naturally and supernaturallie whereas the truth doth teach that the signes are naturally and the things signified supernaturallie participated 6 For the receiuing of the mouth and also the helpe of the other senses are heere required by the institution of Christ to the ende that that which is naturall and corporall may performe his owne office the operation also of the mind and faith is especiallie to be present that what is spirituall may be receiued by spirituall instruments 7 Yet wee confesse that the bodie and blood of Christ is offered bodilie that is corporallie in the holie Supper But after the same manner that PAVLE saith that all the God-head doth dwell in him corporally that is trulie and fullie the Lord performing without all doubt that which hee promised 8 And although the bodie of Christ be of it selfe a naturall substaunce and contained within the dimensions or limites thereof yet is it not materially but spiritually eaten of vs. For the fleshe would haue profited vs nothing but the Spirite and life yet we may say in some sense that the bread and the wine are the bodie and the blood and that the bodie and the blood are fed-vpon namely in a Sacramentall manner 9 This Doctrine also is directly contrary vnto that end of the institution whereby Christ commaunded vs to celebrate his memorie For if hee bee present his memorie cannot be called vnto our remembraunce except wee will speak very vnproperlie seeing things past and not present are called into memorie 10 Againe it doth abolish the nature of Christs bodie For if the same be thus receued by euery one in particuler it must needs be both present in infinit places at once and also be infinite of it selfe The which point is contrary vnto the Articles of our beliefe whereby we beleeue that hee was true man that hee was borne suffered dead risen againe ascended vp into heauen 11 Furthermore if the receiuing of Christ were corporall the ancient Church vnder the law had not bene partaker of his bodie because the same was not as yet borne which point is contrarie vnto the Apostle who saith that the Fathers did receiue the same spirituall meate and the same
spirituall drinke 12 Further if Christ were corporally present he should be eaten without respect both of the badde and the good which is impossible For to eat the flesh of Christ is to beleeue in Christ to be joyned with Christ and to be drawen from death vnto life which can by no meanes agree vnto the wicked 13 For they as AVGVSTINE saith do onely receiue the bread of the Lorde but not the bread which is the Lorde which bread is also vnto them not a sign of Christs bodie but meerely bread euen as the Sacrifice of the wicked are by the Prophet HOSEAH not called sacrifice but only flesh Yet doth GOD justlie punish in them the contempt of his grace offered 14 Againe seeing the question in this point is onelie touching the soule and the feeding thereof to offer a corporall thing therevnto is to bee ignorant of the nature of things and to mingle heauenly and earthly things togeather seing that eating of Christs bodie with the mouth if it could be possiblie done could not reach vnto the soule but onely vnto the bodie And as the blood of Christ doth not wash them that are corporallie dipped thereunto the which thing might haue come to passe vnto the very Iews that tormented him But those who apprehend the force and efficacie thereof by true faith for they eat his bodie and drinke his blood who spiritually yet not by imagination but truly as hath bin said apprehend him as he is giuen vnto vs of the Father 15 Last of all Consubstantiation cannot be established by the woordes of the institution For Christ did not say Heere is my bodie that is in vnder or with the bread but this is that is this bread is my bodie And it were absurd to say that Christ who reached the bread vnto his Disciples was corporally in vnder and with that bread 16 Now the similitude of Iron beeing red hotte of an infant lying in his swathes of wine contained in the vessel are so grosse that they need no confutation for these conjunctions are natural wherby new qualities are aplied vnto bodies substances are joined vnto substances wheras al things in the Supper ar supernatural depēding vpon the institution of Christ Yea and that supernatural conjunction whereby the Deitie of Christ is personally vnited vnto his humanitie can haue no place in this argument nor yet that miraculous conjunction whereby GOD taking vpon him certain visible formes did manifest himself vnto some It followeth then that this compulation is Sacramentall whereby the signes and the things signified wholie remaining the Sacraments are that truly which they are said to be 17 The rest of the proppes of Transubstantiation being of the same strength with the former wee reject as making no account of them togeather with Consubstantiation it selfe adjoyning the saying of IRENAEVS that they who will not know the truth are forced to allowe of many falshoods Defended by MOSES RICOTERIVS a Gascoigne PRINCIPLES TOVCHING THE INVOCATION OF GODS NAME LXIII WEE HAVE DONE WITH THE WORDE and the Sacraments being the two markes of the Church wherevnto seeing Praier or the inuocation of Gods name is inseparablie ioyned it is conuenient that in this place we deale therewith 1 THe inuocation of God is an ardent affection bent towards God whereby we do both craue and exspect of God onely for Christ his sake spirituall and corporall blessings according vnto his commaundement and promises and also doe giue thanks vnto him for blessings receiued 2 The same is necessarie vnto all Christians that are come to yeares First because it is that especiall worshippe of God which the couenaunt of grace doth require of vs Next because this is the meanes whereby God will haue his elect to obtaine and keepe the grace of the holy Spirit and all the rest of his benefites Brieflie it is a testimony of Gods couenant in our hearts For whosoeuer doe call vppon the name of God they are indued with the Spirite of the adoption of Children and receiued into the couenant of God 3 True inuocation ariseth first from the true feeling of our wants the knowledge of the sufficiency of God and vpon the promise of being hard which is apprehended by faith 4 Inuocation is due onely vnto GOD the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost both because hee alone is the onelie Authour of all good things and also because that to bee able to heare-and heale all that call vpon him in all places belongeth vnto none saue onely vnto the omnipotent God 5 Now whereas no man is worthie to present himselfe in the presence of God the heauenlie Father to the ende that he might driue away from vs all shamefastnes feare hath giuen vs the onely Mediator in whome alone he doth looke vpon vs as beeing reconciled and heareth our prayers Now the holy Ghost is he who giueth vs the true contrition of the heart and true faith in him vpon whome we call and doth inwardlie teach vs what wee ought to pray so that we doe call vpon the Father in the name of the Son by the holy Ghost 6 Neither of the three persons of the Deity therfore is to be omitted in true praier though they bee not alwaies distinctlie named but wee may sometimes call vpon God simplie and sometimes direct our praiers vnto the father sometimes vnto the Sonne and sometimes vnto the holie Ghost 7 By the intercession of Christ with the father is ment not any praiers proceeding in some maner of gesture from him now in heauen on our behalfe but the price of that redemption of his wherevpon when the Father looketh hee heareth his and also this namely that when wee call vppon the Father in his name hee in some sort doth offer our praiers according vnto the tender care whereby he is euen now vnspeakablie affected towards his members yet after his owne manner which is altogeather vnsearchable vnto vs. 8 Seeing Christ doth make intercession for vs and with vs in such sort as we haue spoken we holde that the praiers of the faithfull are alwaies acceptable vnto God thogh he doth neither alwais giue vnto vs that which we rightly ask nor at the time wherein we aske 9 And seing our praiers are to be framed according vnto the rule of Gods word we may simply without exception aske those thinges which God hath simplie and without exception promised vnto vs as the increase of faith the strength of the Spirite against temptations remission of sinnes and such like All other things not specially expressed as the deliuery from this or that danger and such like are to be desired with exception namely as farre as it bee expedient for Gods glory according as and also when hee thinketh meet who onely knoweth what is expedient to be granted vnto vs. 10 The father hath deliuered vnto vs by his deare son a most perfect generall forme of praier yet are we not tied vnto the very words thereof 11 The chiefe end
Father 2. In respect that his humanity being conceaued by the holy Ghost dooth by personall vnion subsist in that aeternall Sonne of God 10 But he is our Father in respect of Adoption that is in regarde that he doth vouchsafe vs being spirituallie engraffed into Christ by Faith to be called children as those whome being elected in him he justifieth will one day glorifie 11 Therefore this worde teacheth vs againe that beliefe in the Father through the Sonne must go before our Prayers the which if it bee not present prayers are not only not acceptable but euen sins in the presence of God 12 Wee are also by this meanes taught that if we will be heard we are bound to come in the presence of God not onlie wihout anie consideration of our merites which can be none at all but contrariwise that we conceaue our prayers trusting in his onelie free Adoption and mercie in Christ Iesus 13 Lastly this word FATHER doth require that we pray vnto God with a true sense of our sinnes past and a firme purpose to amend our liues otherwise our prayers are in vaine For the impudencie were not tollerable to call him Father whome wee are not sorie that wee haue offended and whome euer after wee meant not to feare and reuerence OVR 14 This doth put vs in mind of 2. things both being of great moment in true Praier 1. of our Adoption wherof wee haue spoken whereby it commeth to passe that he who hath that onelie Sonne by nature coaeternall with himself doth account vs his sonnes adopted in him without whome there is no saluation nor anie true confidence in calling vpon God 2. That true loue is to bee joined with faith that as the Father who is but one is yet in his Sonne the common Father of all the faithfull so we shuld think that they cannot be acknowledged for sonnes who are not in loue with their brethren otherwise they should bee accounted to bee in the bodie who seuer themselues from the members thereof which cannot be 15 This conjunction consisteth partlie in the agrement of doctrine and religion partlie in the affections And therefore before we can trulie call vpon God we must be members of the Catholicke Church and haue a regarde to maintaine peace and concord one with another in such sort as all vnkindnes and hatred being laid aside we must pray from our hearts euen for our enemies 16 But this conjunction cānot be perfect while we liue heere For all of vs know but in part and often not in the same part now in respect of mutuall liuing together there is none but in some thinges hee sheweth himselfe to be a man But as the imperfection of faith doth not hinder the effect thereof the same is to be said of our mutuall agreement both in Religion and also in affections so that wee be displeased with our selues for those our imperfections and be more and more desirous of a growth in our obedience 17 Seeing this communion of faith doeth not onelie comprehend the elect that are alreadie indued with faith and striue togeather with vs in this life against sinne But euen those that are to beleeue and lying as yet vncalled knowne onelie vnto God our prayers also doe belong vnto them 18 But as for those whose Spirits are already gathered with Christ and whose bodies are a sleepe in the graue our Praiers for them should bee altogether vaine and vnprofitable as also for those whose soules are already condemned An addition That custome therefore though auncient of reckoning vp the names of the Apostles and certaine martyrs in common prayers though it may bee thereby excused in that such prayers were meere thanks-giuings doth neuertheles want a ground and therefore is to bee abolished as the verie issue of it hath proued for it is certaine that from hence did arise by little and little both inuocation of the dead who were assuredlie beleeued to bee in heauen and also prayer for the departed vnto whome superstitious men did according vnto their owne fancie appoint Purgatorie fire WHICH ART IN HEAVEN 19 It is needfull that vnto the assurance of Gods fatherlie goodwill towards vs we adjoine his power Majestie both to let vs know that he is not onlie willing but also able to bestow vpon vs whatsoeuer wee craue of him by true faith and also that the consideration of his majestie may retaine vs in that reuerence which is due therevnto 20 We holde that God as a most simple beeing being in regard of his infinite essence in euerie thing in all things at once but not in or of their substance is without and beyond all things whollie in himself preseruing and gouerning all his creatures not mixed with any thing contrarie vnto the rauing dotage of the Manichaees 21 He is then said to be IN HEAVEN that thereby his supreame excellencie power dominion aboue al things may be declared whereas by the name of Heauen we vnderstand the highest place of this visible worlde which is conspicuous vnto vs in regard of the vnspeakeable most certaine motion thereof wherewith the Lord hath moste excellentlie garnished the same Wherein as the Prophet DAVID saith God hath engrauen testimonies of his vnchangeable truth 22 The same God is said to be aboue al those heauens the Scripture also declaring that the place of aeternal happines is appointed euen aboue all the coelestiall spheres whereunto Christ beeing entred doth receaue the soules of his children according vnto that saying This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise and that of the Apostle I desire to be dissolued and to bee with Christ Whence also we beleeue that he will come and where he will entertain all his when they haue receaued their bodies againe being made incorruptible and will cause them to liue there with him aeternallie 23 Nowe as that glorie which wee hope for is at this day incomprehensible vnto vs so wee are not curiouslie that is without Gods woorde to make enquirie of these blessed mansions but deuoutlie to reuerence that which the Scripture teacheth vs to hope to beleeue touching them vntill the time that indeed we shall see heare and receaue those thinges which eie hath not seene eare hath not heard nor euer entred into the heart of man Defended by IAMES HABEERVTERVS of Bearne PRINCIPLES TOVCHING THE PETITIONS OF THE LORDS PRAYER IN GENERALL AND PARTICVLARLIE OF THE FIRST OF THEM LXV HAVING HANDLED THE PRAEFACE which was the first part of the Lords Prayer the second is now to bee opened which containeth the petitions or the substance of the Prayer it selfe 1 CHRIST framed these petitions according vnto the present nature and state of man vz. in respect that we are in the want of all thinges and sinners in this worlde which whollie lieth in wickednesse as it is said IOHN 15.19 and not vnto the first condition wherin ADAM was created pure and vpright before his fall 2 For there had bene no
may manifest the hypocrites 11 Now there are diuers and almost infinite sortes of temptations for some of them are raised within vs onelie by our owne concupiscence which afterward are augmented by Sathan others are administred vnto our concupiscence by the wonderfull delusions of Sathan Againe wee are sometimes prouoked vnto wickednes from the right hand that is by flatteries and the false resemblaunce of right and profite otherwhiles from the left that is by threats and terrors 12 And from all these doe wee desire that our God would deliuer vs by enabling vs with his strength that so dwelling vnder his protection and defence we may firmlie stand against all the assaults of Sathan 13 So the worde DELIVER doeth admonish vs of our weakenesse and ignorance For if wee were able by our owne strength to withstand temptations wee shoulde not stand in need to craue strength and aide else where This our deliuerance from sinne then is not in our selues neither doth it depend vpon our selues but onelie vppon the strength grace and mercie of God Heere are confuted both the meere Pelagians who dreame that Sathan and our corruption may be ouercome by our owne strength and also the half Pelagians the Papists who imagine a concurring togeather of nature and of grace and those also who teach that the grace of regeneration once begun is sufficient for vs to gaine the victorie 14 For wee are borne the seruants of sinne and the grace of regeneration beeing begun standeth in neede of the support of new graces to confirm the same to make it effectuall 15 Yet are not wee therefore turned into stockes that in gaining the victorie ouer Sathan we should bee vsed as dead instruments onelie seeing both to will and to do is giuen vnto vs. 16 It is not greatlie materiall whether by the worde EVILL in this place wee vnderstand the Diuell or sinne dwelling in vs. 17 To conclude we desire in this petition that we be not ouerwhelmed by anie temptation but contrariwise that leaning vpon the power of God working within vs sinne and Sathan beeing ouercome we may all our daies liue in true holinesse Defended by MATHEVV ROBERTVS of Lorraine PRINCIPLES VPON THE CONCLVSION OF THE LORDS PRAYER LXXI 1 HAuing hytherto expounded the Petitions of the Lords Praier it nowe remaineth that wee open the shutting vp of them contained in these wordes FOR THINE IS THE KINGDOME THE POVVER AND THE GLORIE FOR EVER 2 There are two thinges especiallie contained in this conclusion first the confirmation of our faith that is of the assurance which we haue that we shall be heard of God who both will and can giue vs what we aske 3 Next is set downe the end whereunto wee ought to referre all the things that we craue in this Prayer namlie to his praise and glorie 4 And this is the most sure foundation of our praiers when as we know that they are to be directed vnto GOD vnto whome all power glorie and dominion dooth appertaine 5 For if our praiers were to bee commended vnto the Lord in our owne worthinesse which is none at all there is no mortall man that durst without singular temeritie so much as open his lips much lesse present his praiers before his majestie 6 But now though we be most miserable and bare of all thinges yet can we not be destitute of sufficient trust confidence in praier seeing our Fathers kingdome power and glorie cannot be taken away from him 7 By the word KINGDOME is meant the right and authoritie to beare rule this confession then dooth attribute vnto God the most soueraigne and free rule ouer all creatures whereby he gouerneth euerie where and ouer all 8 The POVVER which is mēcioned in the second place doth point out the abilitie and power to execute this gouernment which power is so soueraigne and so mightie that nothing is able to resist the same So that God is able to giue vs all things seeing hee hath this power in his hand which is also ioyned with exceeding mercie and bountifulnesse 9 Thirdlie and lastlie by the word GLORIE is declared the praise and honour of God whereunto wee are to referre all our thoughts and deedes as to their last and final end 10 The word AMEN signifieth as much as that which we aske is sure and certainlie ratified neither is it adioyned as a portion of the praier but to the end that it may both declare the sinceare desire and affection whereby we wish to be heard in Praier and also may testifie the staiednes of our faith 11 Seeing to giue thankes then we ought to consider these three things which this short sentence of Christ doth containe First that we remember those peculiar benefits which we haue receaued at Gods hand as DAVID beeing deliuered from the danger of warre saith Thou hast deliuered mee Lord from death and from the enemie c. 12 Next that we ascribe whatsoeuer we haue obtained to haue proceeded from the meere liberalitie of God and not to anie worthinesse or merites of our owne 13 Brieflie that thereby wee may be more and more confirmed in faith and may be raised vp to the hope of receauing other yea and greater benefites from his majesty For our God is not wearie in dooing vs good 14 Vnder this forme which is euerie way most perfect we holde that there is contained whatsoeuer we ought to seek at Gods hand so that it is to be accounted for the rule of all our praiers Wherefore it is not well done of the Latine Churches in that they haue omitted this clause and end of the Lords Praier though sometimes they vse the same elswhere Defended by MATHEVV SCARRO of Geneus PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE SACRED MINISTERIE OF THE CHVRCH VVHERE THE DOCTRINE OF the Law the Gospel are compared together LXXII 1 VVEE haue done with the true markes of the true Church that is with the truth of Gods word Sacraments and Praier nowe because that all thinges are to bee orderlie done in the Church it is meet that we set down how these things ought to bee administred 2 We hold that as the truth of al the sinceare doctrine that doeth appertaine vnto aeternall life so also the true manner of the gouernment of the Church was giuen from aboue by the holie Ghost both vnto the Fathers before the Lawe and to MOSES in the wildernesse and also vnto the Apostles And to be short that this truth touching doctrine and gouernment was most faithfullie most fullie set downe both by MOSES and also by the Apostles 3 And although from the beginning vnto the end of the world there was is and shall bee but one doctrine of saluation yet was there not alwaies one the same forme of the dispensation thereof 4 For it pleased GOD at sundrie times and in diuers maners to make the said doctrine known vnto the world according vnto the which dispensation it was also needefull to frame the forme of the ministerie thereof
his own flock which he ouerseeth as the rest of them doe theirs amongst whome hee which seemeth to bee most meete to moderate the whole number of the brethren is chosen to be ouer them not in regarde of anie degree or preheminence but onelie for orders sake Mans wisdome as wee haue spoken in the Principles last going before brought this order which was onlie an order of place amongst them which were aequall into superiority and preheminence which preheminence notwithstāding was tied within the boūds of certain lawes least it should grow into plaine tyrannie 7 But this humain Bishoprick in the Romish coūterfeit Church not onlie vntying but breaking a sunder casting cleane away all these bonds grew into manifold tyrannie 8 Now howe far this false and counterfeit Bishopricke differeth both from that which was ordained by God and also frō the other of mans inuentiō which by steps was cōuaied into the Church these things following do shewe I In that some are promoted vnto this dignitie by a fained kinde of election with the chapters of Cannons as they call them haue wholie wrested vnto themselues Others treading and despising all Cannons and order doe come by the same through most shamefull and abhominable briberie II In that as the soldiers in times past deuided the garments of Christ beeing crucified so doe these false Bishops with their chapters openly without all shame deuide the goods of the poore amongst themselues III In that contrary vnto the manifest so often repeated prohibition of Christ hauing cast from them the dispensation of Gods mysteries they haue so farre intangled themselues with Ciuill gouernment affairs that some of them haue vsurped all kind of temporal gouernment fraudulentlie obtaining the same either by deceiuing Common-wealthes and Cities or by seducing as the Pharises did vnder colour of Religion the vnwarie and vncircumspect heirs to bequeath vnto them their possessions which neither the one could giue nor the other lawfully receiue Other of them doe beare rule ouer Princes and euen ouer Kings themselues IIII And what should hinder them to do this who stick not to beare rule ouer the verie soules and consciences of men and to abrogate the very expresse law of God as often as they thinke good V To bee short in that if it pleaseth them for fashions sake to performe any thing that seemeth to haue any affinitie with the office of a Bishoppe that must consist not in the dispensation of Gods word but partly in their disguised and masking Bishoplie apparell and crossing with the signe of the Crosse partlie in the defending of their superstitious and cursed Idolatrie as in anointing in vsing that ridiculous ceremonie of confirmation as they call it in the consecration of Temples and Altars in the wicked ordination of their sacrifices Brieflie it consisteth in the godlesse rites of their Idolatrous worship VI. And this forsooth is that true and vndoubted Apostolicall succession whereby the true Catholick Church may be discerned in deede from the false Touching Elders 9 By the ordinaunce of God which was carefullie obserued in the Church as long as the same was rightlie gouerned there were chosen others also called according to the custome of the Hebrues by the common name of ELDERS whome PAVLE doth also call Gouernours who being men of approued godlines were joined vnto the nomber of Bishops Pastors or Elders for these three are all one by whose common direction and authoritie sinners were admonished or brought vnder the Ecclesiasticall censures and by whome the meere Ecclesiasticall causes which had risen were decided and the ciuill contentions also as it is likelie before there were anie Christian Magistrate were according to the Apostolicall doctrine brotherlie friendlie taken vp without anie debating of the matter as it is vsuall in ciuill courts 10 This then was the Christian Presbyterie or Eldershippe But in the Romish false-Church they came in the place of the Elders that ought to haue attended vpon the worde whose especiall and principall calling is not to declare that Sacrifice of Christ nor as PAVLE commaundeth to teach to rebuke improue and exhort the people out of the Scriptures of God but whollie to ouerthrow the verie foundation of Christianitie by that horrible and blasphemous Sacrifice wherby they beare the world in hand that they in verie deede do offer Christ himself vnto his Father for the quicke and the deade to mocke God and men by their singings which are either ridiculous or patched together out of Gods word miserablie torne in peeces or els full of horrible impietie being also sung in mockery of the Church in a strange and for the most part a barbarous tongue to burne incense vnto Idols to administer Baptism which they pollute a thousand waies in a strāge tongue also that for money to change the holy Supper of the Lord into most detestable Idolatrie Brieflie not to feede the poore people but to flea them and pill them most vnnaturallie by exacting a continuall tribute both of the liuing and of the dead This I say is the charge this is the calling both of their Curates and of the rest whome they call beneficed men and also of their maisterlesse hounds who liuing by their dailie wages doe as hungrie Dogs smell out the kitchin of these fat mastiffes and hire out themselues to supply their roomes 11 Now as to the other Elders whome we said to bee especiallie called Gouerners they haue vtterlie abolished euen their names and haue placed in their steed the Officiall as they call him being the Bishops Vice-gerent the Promoter as they call him and brieflie the Procurators of that which they name their Ecclesiasticall Court wherein Ciuill causes for the most part are handled that with greater brablement and sturre than in any ciuill court beside and wherein the cause of matrimonie is decided not by Gods law but according vnto their rottē Canons briefly where all the lawes of God men are most impudentlie put to sale And therfore there is no holie Eldership or Presbyterie and no Elder in the false Romish Church saue only in name Concerning Deacons 12 It is cleare and out of controuersie vnto all those that are conuersant in the reading of the word and in the storie of the purer Church that the Deacons by the ordinaunce of the Apostles had the charge of the Church-goods wherein they were also subject vnto the ouersight of the Pastors But in the false Romish Church wherein they haue adjoined subdeacons vnto their Deacons what is it I pray you to be a Deacon Forsooth to be discerned from the Priest saying Masse by a coat without sleeues to stand answering the Priest at his right or at his left hande if the Masse be to be chanted or sung otherwise Deacons haue nothing to doe there when hee secretlie muttereth some things to himself to chaunt the Epistle as they call it and to reade a peece of the Gospell to reach the Cup or Chalice vnto