〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or publick Assembly They injoyned silence and called for audience and attention They were sent in time of warre to aske leave to bury their dead They were sent with messages from Princes and great men They attended Princes and great men to serve them upon occasion They served also at the sacrifices They prepared beasts and receaved the guests What is there in all this which in a spirituall and ecclesiasticall sence is not competent and incumbent to ordinary Pastors and Teachers aswell as to the Apostles And if wee will have the holy Ghost to expound himself as ordinary Preachers do 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in all ages and all the world over aswell as those who first preached the Gospell Mat 24. 14. 26. 13. Mark 14. 9. 16. 15. Luke 24. 47. Phil 1. 15. 1 Tim 3 16. Rom. 2. 21. thou that preachest a man should not steal dost thou steal 4. I hope 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here doth not signifie one that preacheth a new thing 1 Cor 1. 23. It pleased God by the foolishnesse of preaching 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to save them that beleeve Will any who hopes to be saved deny that this extends to preaching in all ages Except 3. That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before cited in the second part of it pag 3. 4. sayeth that the sending which the Apostles means of is not a Ministeriall or ecclesiasticall sending for then none could be an instrument to convert another but a Minister or preacher sent Neither could a man be sure whether he have faith or no till he be sure his faith was wrought in him by a Minister lawfully called It remaines therefore saith he that the Apostle speaks of a providentiall sending by giving men gifts and working with them in their use and exercise Answ. 1 The giving of gifts and powring out the spirit of a calling is plainly distinguished from the mission or sending yea in Christ himself who had receaved the spirit not by measure but above measure yet his having the Spirit of the Lord upon him was not his Mission but is plainly distinguished from his Mission and Ordination to his office which he had from God Luke 4. 18. The Spirit of the Lord is upon me because he hath anointed me to preach the Gospell to the poor he hath sent me c. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or ability of gifts to the office is one thing the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or authority to it is another thing 2. His first reason to prove that the Apostle speaks not of a Ministeriall sending because thence it would follow that none could convert another but a Minister hee groundeth thus for ' its said none can beleeve but by hearing a preacher sent Now this falls al 's heavie upon his own Interpretation for still this will follow that no man can be converted but a Preacher sent providentially with gifts and assistance when hee shall loose the knot for himself he shall loose it for us too 3. So likewise for his other reason if the Apostles scope be as he glosseth to take away doubting from men he doeth by his Interpretation split upon the same rocke which he thinks wee have run upon for a man must still doubt whether hee hath faith or no and so whether he shall be saved or no till he be sure his faith was wrought in him by a Preacher sent providentially with working gifts now the description which hee makes of the providentiall sending involveth a man in greater doubting then before for either it agreeth to false and hereticall Teachers the Ministers of Sathan or not If he sayeth it doth agree to them and that false seducing Preachers pretending to be true sound and orthodoxe are providentially sent with gifts effectuall viz. to deceave in the secret judgement of God according to Ezek. 14. 9. 1 King 22. 23. then how he will reconâ—…ile his interpretation with Isa. 52. 7. 8. let him see to it And withall he leads a man upon this opinion that hee may have faith wrought in him and so bee saved under any Ministery true or false orthodoxe or hereticall He must also justifie the sinne so often condemned in the false prophets that they run unsent for by his principles they are sent as well as the true Prophets If he will say that his description of the providentiall sending agreeth not to false or hereticall Preachers but to the true Ministers of Christ then hee leads a man into this doubt that hee cannot bee sure that he beleeves and shall bee saved unlesse hee bee sure that the Preacher providentially sent to him is a true Minister of Christ and not a Minister of Sathan transformed into a Minister of righteousnesse 2 Cor. 11. 15. or a wolfe in sheeps cloathing Matth. 7. 15. But 4. if this providentiall sending be enough it takes away the necessity not onely of Ordination but of the peoples choosing or consenting It shall bee enough that God give a man a gift and work by them whether the Church consent or not yet as I take it he that makes this objection holds it necessary not onely that Pastors bee chosen by the Church but that gifted brethren bee allowed by the Church to prophesie else that they must not prophesie 5. His objections doth strike against that connexion and concatâ—…nation of the means of salvation which the Apostle holdeth forth and there is no more strength in that which he objecteth then as if one should argue the deaf may beleeve therefore faith may be without hearing Look how hearing is necessary in the same sence is Preaching and the sending of the Preacher necessary Neither doeth it make any thing against our sence of the Text that some may be converted by those who are not Ministers for tho Preaching of the word by those that are sent to the Ministery of preaching is the standing Ordinance and ordinary mean of conversion and faith by this Text and even those who perhaps have been first wroght upon by prayer or conference with other Christians are hearers of those who are Ministerially sâ—…nt it will bee hard to prove that any beleeve who can hear the word preached by Ministers lawfully called and sent and doe not hear it Except 4. That Erastian before cited the Composer of the Grallae expoundeth as I remember this text of an extraordinary mission or calling from God not an ordinary mission from men denying the Pastors of Churches and Ministers of the Gospel in our dayes to be sent of God and that although the Apostles might shew their Mission and Commission from Christ yet ordinary Ministers cannot do it Therefore this sending belongeth not to the ordinary Ministers Answ. 1 This text doth certainly hold forth the necessity of an ordinary and mediat Mission when the extraordinary and immediat Mission is ceased which I prove this If a preaching Ministery be a perpetuall and standing ordinance then Mission is a
Prophets If not upon those Scriptures which are applyed by some to the prophesying Brethren or gifted Church-members 8. There are but three senses of the word Prophesying which I can finde any where else in the new Testament 1. For such prophesying as is competent to all converted and gifted persons when they are filled with a spirit of illumination and speak with other tongues as the spirit gives them utterance In which sense Ioel foretold that daughters as well as sonnes hand maids as well as men-servants young and old should prophesie Acts 2. 17 18. Which was accordingly fulfilled upon the day of Penticost for Acts 1. 14. and 2. 1. 4. This Spirit of Prophesie was powred out upon all the Disciples men and women 2. For such prophesying â—…s is the preaching of ordinary Ministers although I know no Text where without any controversie the word is used for the ordinary Ministeriall preaching Yet I understand the word to bee used in this sence though by allusion onely where of before Revel 11. 3. And I will give power unto my two witnesses and they shall prophesie a thousand two hundreth and threescore dayes cloathed in sackcloath 3. For extraordinary prophesying from immediate and miraculous inspiration in which sence it is often used in the new Testament as I shall shew anone But a fourth sense viz. The prophesying of gifted Brethren not sisters out of office and that publickly and by an ordinary gift I can finde no where and if we goe either higher or lower then the ordinary Pastorall preaching women as well as men might prophesie in the Scripture language Prophetesses as well as Prophets 9. The Apostle plainly distinguisheth Prophesie both from the word of knowledge and from the word of wisdom 1 Cor. 12. 8. 9. 10 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdome to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit to another prophesie now what is that gift and manifestation of the Spirit which is supposed to be given to gifted and prophesying-members must it not fall under that enumeration 1 Cor 12. 7 8 9 10 11. Is it then the interpretation oâ—… opening of Scripture that is the Teachers part the word of knowledge Is it both to interpreâ—… and apply Scripture that is the pastors part the word of wisdome Is it to prophesie that is more nor either the word of 〈◊〉 or the word of wisdome and is therefored 〈◊〉 from both 10. In that Text last cited prophesie is mentioned not only as a gift by which the Spirit worketh for the profite and edification of the Church but as a Ministery function and adâ—…inistration in the Church for veâ—…s 4. 5 6. The Apostle teacheth us that there are diversitiâ—…s 1 Of gifts 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Of administrations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. Of operations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thereafter in reference to all these three he addeth the enumeration of the particulars ver 8. 9 10. In a Prophet hterefore there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministerium as well as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is frequently used in the new Testament for the Ministery not onely of ruling Elders and Deacons Rom 12. 7. of Pastors and Teachers yea of Evangelists and Apostles Ephes 4. 12. Col 4. 17. 2 Tim 4. 5. 11. Acts 1. 17. 25. and 12. 25. and 20. 24. and 2â—… 19. Rom. 11. 13. 2 Cor 4. 1. and 5. 18. and 6. 3. and 9. 1. and else where the English translators in these places render it sometimes Ministerie sometimes Office sometimes indeed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the new Testament for any Ministring to the necessities of the poore Saints by charity and almes But no body that I know doth imagine or can imagine that this is the sense of the word 1 Cor 12. where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore I conclude that the Prophets in these primitive times had an office or Ministery in the Church 11. The word Prophesying is often used in the new Testament for that which is extraordinary and by Revelation Mat. 26. 68. Rev 1. 3. Acts 21. 9. Luke 1. 67. Revel 22. 10. 19. Revel 10. 11. Mark 7. 6. 1 Peter 1. 10. Jud 14. John Baptist is called a Prophet Luke 1. 76. and 7. 28. Matth 21. 26. and 14. 5. Christ himselfe is called a Prophet Matth. 13. 57. Luke 7. 16 and 24. 19. John 4. 19. and 9. 17. Elymas the Sorcerer is called a false Prophet Acts. 13. 6. Prophesying in the name of Christ is joyned with other miraculous gifts Mat 7. 22. Many will say to me in that day Lord have we not prophesied in thy name and in thy name have cast out devils and in thy name done many wonderfull workes Acts 19. 6. and when Paul laid his hands on them the holy Ghost came on them and they spake with tongues and prophesied In this sence is the word used when 't is said that Cajaphas prophesied John 11. 51. the same word is used for propheticall prediction 1 Tim 1. 18. according to the prophesies which went before on the Rev. 2. 22. Jezebel did call her selfe a Prophetesse 12 Prophecy as Paul speakes of it is so farre from being a common priviledge of gifted Saints out of office that it is one of the speciall and rarest gifts which the Apostles themselves had or could have 1 Cor. 13. 2. And though I have the gift of prophesie and understand all mysteries and all knowledge which stands there between the gift of tongues and the faith of miracles again 1 Cor 14. 16. Now brethren if I come unto you speaking with tongues what shall I prosite you except I shall speak unto you either by Revelation or by knowledge or by Prophesying or by Doctrine The first two Revelation and knowledge are immanent in the Apostle The other two Prophesying and Doctrine are transient from the Apostle to the Church What shall my gift of tongues profite you saith he or how shall you be edified or satisfied thereby unlesse either I utter some Revelation unto you by Prophesying or utter my knowledge unto you by Doctrine so distinguishing Prophesying from Doctrine as greater then it because Prophesying proceeds from Revelation Doctrine from knowledge in him that teacheth 13. I have yet another reason which I think will be a hard knot to our dissenting Brethren the Apostle compareth in that 14. Chap the gifts of tongues and the gifts of prophesie He commendeth both as desirable vers 1. and wisheth to them all both these gifts vers 6. but rather prophesie as comparatively the better for edifying the Church Et magis minus non variant speciem There are both good and desirable gifts of the Spirit given to profite withall 1 Cor. 12. 7 10 11. The Apostle also alloweth as many to speak with tongues in
ordinary Object 7. But that Text The Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets is applyed by many Presbyteriall writers for the upholding the authority of Classes and Synods which is not a good argument of these prophets if these Prophets were extraordinary Answ. This makes the argument nothing the weaker but so much the stronger For if Prophets who were immediatly inspired were to be subject to the examination and judgment â—…nd censure of other Prophets and if Paul and Barnabas gave an account before the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem of their doctrine so much opposed by some at Antioh Acts 15. and if Peter being accused for going in to the uncircumcised was put to make his defence to them at Jerusalem Acts 11. then à fortiori it doth much more become ordinary Pastors and Teachers to submit to the judgment of an Assembly of Pastors and Teachers And generally as in civil justice 't is a good and equall rule that a man be judged per pares so proportionably in Church censures it will hold among Church officers or Ministers that they should be judged per pares an Apostle by the Apostles a Prophet by the Prophets an Elder by the Elders Object 8. Iudas and Stlas are called Prophets Acts 15. 32. and they exhorted the Church yet they were out of office for they are distinguished from the Apostles and Elders and said to be chiefe men among the Brethren vers 22. Answ 1. This president will carry the prophesying Brethren very high for Silas is reckoned by Divines to have been an Evangelist which may be collected from his travelling through so many places with Paul for spreading the Gospell Acts 16. 17. Act 17. 4 10. 14 15. Act. 18. 5. others think hee had a Ministeriall charge at Jerusalem but the former opinion seems to be better grounded 2. The word Brethren and Brother does not ever note such as were out of office in the Church but 't is diverse times used and so I take it here of such as were neither fixed as Elders nor so eminent in the Church as Apostles but had speciâ—…l and extraordinary employments or administrations in the Church as 2 Cor 8. 18. 22 23 1 Cor 16. 12. 2 Cor 1. 1. Heb 13. 23. 1 Cor 1. 1. 1 Pet 5. 12. Ephes 6. 21. Col 4. 7. Philem 1. 20. From which places it is manifest that the Apostles fellow labourers in their extraordinary administrations are often called Brethren and among these Brethren Iudas and Silas were chiefe men either for the greatnesse of their gifts or more aboundant labours And now in the close my advise and exhortationis unto such Brethren as take upon them to preach or prophesie neither being nor intending to be ordained to the Ministery that they would yet take them to serious second thoughts of this businesse and seeing that prophesying which they take for their president hath been so clearly proved to have been extraordinary seeing also Christ hath appointed Pastors and Teachers for the ordinary work of the publicke teaching edifying the Church and perfecting the Saints Ephes 4. 11. 12. which ordinance is sufficient for that end those Brethren should do well to improve their gifts in another way by writing and by occasionall exhorting admonishing instructing reproving comforting others in that fraternall manner which is sutable to Christians out of office If they desire any other work in the Church let them desire the Pastorall office and offer themselves to tryall in order thereunto for as Greg Nazianzen saith orat 7. Christ hath appointed this order in his Church that the flocke may be one thing Pastors another thing And again 't is a great businesse to teach but it is safe and harmlesse to learn why makest thou thy selfe a Pastor when thou art one of the flock CHAP. VI. Whether any other but a Minister lawfully called and ordained may administer the Sacraments Baptisme and the Lords supper THe Socinians and the Erastian Crutch-maker before mentioned so plead against the necessity of Ordination that they held it lawfull and free to gifted persons not ordained not onely to preach but to administer the Sacraments whether they extend this to women as well as men I know not Peradventure they will borrow from the Pagans those shee priests whom Gellius out of Cicero cals Antistitas not Antistites or happilie they hold with the old Pepuzians that women may both preach and administer the Sacraments at least if they may not speak in the Church because that is forbidden 1 Cor. 14. 32. although some are so bold as to restrict that prohibition to married women whereof they think they have some colour from the context that yet they may both preach and administer the Sacraments in private places And if there be no more necessary to one that preacheth or ministereth the Sacraments but onely gifts and abilities how can they avoid to allow gifted women as well as gifted men to performe these holy things But it is justly held by the reformed Churches and ordered in the Directorie of Worship agreed upon by both Kingdoms and mentioned also in the late Confession of faith chap 27. that neither Baptisme nor the Lords Supper may be dispensed by any but by a Minister of the Word lawfullie ordained Nay say the soundest Protestant writers not upon pretence of whatsoever necessitie be it among Iews Turks Pagans or to children dying or the like The arguments I lean to are these 1. God hath appointed the Minister of the word lawfully called and ordained and no other to bee the stewards and dispensers of the mysteries of Christ 1 Cor 4. 1. Let a man so account of us as of the Ministers of Christ and Stewards of the mysteries of God Moreover it is required of Stewards that a man be found faithfull Which the Apostle doeth not onely apply to himselfe and Apollo vers 6. where by the way it may be remembred that Apollo was neither an Apostle nor Evangelist but a powerfull Minister of the Gospell and to Sosthenes as appeareth by comparing the Text new cited with 1 Cor 1. 1. but he also applyeth the same to every lawfull Bishop or ordinary Minister Tit. 1. 7. for a Bishop must be blamelesse as the steward of God and this steward is ordained vers 5. So Luke 12. 42. Who then is that faithfull and wise steward whom his Lord shall make ruler over his houshold to give them their portion of meat in due season 'T is not Christs will that any one of the houshold who is faithfull wise and discreet may take upon him the stewards office to dispense meat to the rest But there is a steward constituted and appointed for that purpose There are stewards appointed in the Church which is the house of the living God and those to continue till the coming of Christ ibid vers 43. 46. and there is nothing which more properly belongeth to the Ecclesiasticall stewards then the dispensation of the Sacraments 2. Ministers lawfully
to bee extended to every error which may be confuted by Scripture although happily such an error be too tenaciously maintained Nor yet is it to be so farre restricted as that no error shall be accounted Hereticall but that which is destructive to some fundamentall Article of the Christian faith if by a fundamentall Article you understand such a truth without the knowledge and faith whereof 't is impossible to get salvation When Peter Martyr defines Heresie he makes no mention of a fundamentall error but of an error contrarie to the Scriptures loc com class 2. cap 4. § 50. So Calvin Instit lib 4. cap 2. § 5. understands all such to be Heretiks as make a breach in the Church by false Doctrines Walaeus tom 1. pag 57. saith Hereticall Churches do either erre in the foundation or onlie in some other things built upon the foundation When Peter speaks of such Heresies as take away the very foundation Iesus Christ he thinks it too little to call them simple Heresies but he cals these damnable Heresies But if you understand by fundamentall truths all the chief and substantiall principles I do not mean onely the first Rudiments or A B C of a Catechisme which we first of all put to new beginners but I mean all such truths as are commonly put in the confessions of faith and in the more full and large Catechismes of the reformed Churches or all such truths as all and every one who live in a true Christian reformed Church are commanded and required to learn and know as they exspect in the ordinary dispensation of God to be saved in this sense I may yeeld that Heresie is alwayes contrary to some fundamentall truth 'T is one thing to dispute of the absolute soveraigne power of God and what are the truths without the beleif whereof 't is absolutly and altogether impossible that one can be saved Which question I doubt is hardly determinable by Scripture nor do I know what edification there is in the canvassing of it sure I am 't is a question much abused 'T is another thing to dispute what are these truths which in a Church where the Gospell is truely preached all and every one come to years of knowledge and discretion and having means and occasions to learne are bound to know and according to the revealed will and ordinary dispensation of God must learne as they desire or exspect to have a true fellowship with Christ in the Sacrament of the Lords supper or to bee accepted of God and saved eternally 2. We must not think that no man is a Heretick but he who is consistorially or judicially admonished and thereafter continueth pertinaciously in his error For where 't is said Tit 3. 10 A man that is an Heretick after the first and second admonition reject 'T is intimated that he is an Heretick before such admonition Positively I concieve that these six things doe concurre to make a Heresie 1. T is an error held by some Minister or member of a Church I mean either a true Church or an assembly pretending and professing to be a true Church For both Peter and Paul where they foretell that Heresies were to come 2 Pet 2. 1. 1 Cor 11. 19. they adde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among you i.e. among you Christians So Act 20. 30. also of your owne selves shall men arise speaking perverse things Therefore the Scripture gives noâ—… the name of Heretiâ—…ks to these who are altogether without the visible Church but it calleth such by the names of Heathens or unbelâ—…evers or they that are without or the like 2. T is an error volunntarlie and freely chosen both in the first invention and broaching of it which is proper to the Heresiarchs and in the maintaining of it or adhering to it whicâ—… is common to all Hereticks This I collect from the very name which the Scripture gives to it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I choose Therefore we give not the name of Hereticks to such Christians as are compelled in time of persecution to profess such or such an error which peradventure were a formal Heresie if voluntarly and without compulsion professed They ought indeed to die and to indure the greatest torments before they professe what they know to be an error but this their sin is not properly called Heresie for an Heretick doth freely and voluntarily hold that which is his error And in this respect and consideration Tertullian thinks that an Heretick is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemned of himself Tit 3. 10. because he hath of himself choosed that which doth condemne him The Apostle there hath commanded to reject an Heretick If I reject him might one say then I loose him I destroy his soule Nay saith the Apostle his perdition is of himself for he hath chosen his own wayes and his soul delighteth in his abominations This interpretation is much surer and safer then to say that a Heretick is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or self-condemned because he goes against his own light and against the principles received and acknowledged by himself Which sense is accompanied with many dangerous consequences 3. 'T is such a choosing of error as is accompanied with a rejecting of Truth A Hereticke puts light for darknesse and darknes â—…or light good foâ—… evill and evill for good he chooseth eâ—…ror as truth and refâ—…seth truth as error they that give heed to seducing â—…pirits and doctrines of Devils do also depart from the faith 1 Tim. 4. 1. resist the 〈◊〉 2 Tim 3. 8 and turne away their ears from the truth 2 Tim 4. 4. their course hath a teâ—…minus a quo al 's well as ad quem 4 'T is an error professed and maintained and which â—…y that means becomes a scandal and snare to others For although there may be Heresie aâ—…s well as other kinds of sinâ—…urking and hid in the thoughts yet that belongs to Gods judgement only not to mans The Heresies which are spoken of 1 Cor 11. â—…9 are certainly known and apparently discriminative even among men And Hereticâ—…s are scandalous persons to be avoided and rejected Rom 16. 17. Tit 3. 10. which could not be except their errors were known 5. 'T is an error contradictory to some chiefe and substantialâ—… truth grounded upon or be necessary consequence drawne from the holy Scripture There was never yet any Heretick in the Christian world who contradicted that whiâ—…h is literally and syllabically in Scripture The most damnable Hereticke will offer to subscribe to the Scripture in stead of a Confession of Faith who yet will not subscribe to all truths which necessarily follow from the words of Scripture But I call not every error Heresie which is contrary to any consequentiall truth grounded upon Scripture As the Scrâ—…pture reckons not all who sin to be workers of iniquitie so it reckons not all who erre to be Hereticks Although there is not any either sin or
ungodlynesse and unrighteousnesse are the ruling Elders a holy Hereticke is a Chimera and a prophane person beleeving a right is another But here peradventure some will think that the great objection lyes may not a prophane person have a sound or orthodox judgement in all controverted truthes May not a man understand all mysteries and all knowledge who yet hath no love nor true sanctification 1 Cor 13. 2. May not a person hold fast the profession of the true faith without wavering whose heart not withstanding is not right with God nor stedfast in his Covenant I answer first where there is but a forme of godlynesse there is but aforme of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a word no where used by the holy Ghost but in two places a forme of knowledge Rom 2. 20. and a forme of godlinesse 2 Tim. 3. 5. It is not the true and reall forme either of knowledge or godlinesse which as they have a true matter so a true forme He saith not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which had been the proper word for a true forme but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speciem scientiae speciem pietatis If wee have respect to the notation of the word 't is a formation or forming I may call it a forming without mattering so that the forme of knowledge more then which an ungodly man hath not bee hee never so learned hath not the truth substance and reality of knowledge Theophilact saith some understand it to be the image and false resemblance of knowledge so Hesychius and Suydas understand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an image of a thing Secondly there is no sinfullnesse in the will and affections without some error in the understanding all lusts which a naturall man lives in are lusts of Ignorance 1 Pet 1. 14. the sins of the people are called the errors of the people Heb 9 7 and the wicked person is the foole in the Proverbs the naturall man receives not the things of the Spirit of God and what is the reason because they are foolishnesse unto him neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned 1 Cor 2 14. the world cannot receive the spirit of Truth because it knoweth him not Ioh 14 17. The â—…opish Doctrines of free will of Justification by works of meat of implicite Faith of believing the Scriptures because the Church receiveth them what marvel that they do so whose eyes are not opened to see the Sun beame of Divine light in the Scripture it self which is Spiritually discerned Of the Sacraments conferring of Grace and the like also the Soâ—…inian tenents that a man is noâ—… bound to believe any Artiâ—…le of Faith nor any interpretation of Scripture except it agree with his reason that Pastors and Ministers of the word have not now any distinguishing sacred vocation authorizing them to be the Ambassadours of Christ to preach and minister the Sacraments more nor other Christians which is also maintained by a late Erastian writer in the Netherlands These and the like errors professed and maintained by them what are they but so many legible commentaries and manifest interpretations of those corrupt and erroneous principles which are lurking and secretly seated in the judgements and understandings of naturall and unregenerated persons al 's well learned as uulearned these Hereticks do but bring foorth to the light of the Sun what is hid within the mynds of other unregenerat persons as in so many dark dungeons The like I say of tâ—…e Arminian Doctrine of universall grace and universall atonement by Christs death And of Originall sin that it is not properly sin which doctrines are common to many Anabaptists with the Arminians the like I say also of the Antinomian doctrines that Christ hath abolished not only the curse and rigour and compulsion but the very rule it self of the morall Law so that they who are under the Covenant of Grace are not bound to walk by that rule that they ought not to repent and mourn for sin that God doth not affâ—…ict them for sin that Faith without the evidence of any marks or fruits of Sanctification doth assure the soul of its interest in Christ and what is that scientia media which the Iesuits glory of as a new Light but the very old error of naturall men which looks upon things contingent as not decreed and determined by the will of God and what is the Erastian way which oppugneth suspension from the Lords Table Excommunication and all Church government 5. What is it but a declaration or manifesto of the proud imaginations of mens corruptions which say within themselves Let us break their bands asunder and cast away their cords from us And y e take too much upon you Moses and Aaron seeing all the congregation are holy every one of them and the Lord is among them I conclude this point every naturall man hath in his heart somewhat of Popery somewhat of Socinianisme somewhat of Arminianisme somewhat of Anabaptisme somewhat of Antinomianisme somewhat of Erastianisme and I cannot buâ—… adde somewhat of Independency too so farre as it pleadeth for more liberty then Christ hath allowed and if every man hath a Pope in his belly as Luther said then every man hath an Independent in his belly for the Pope is the greatest Independent in the world and t is naturall I think to every man to desire to be judged by no man Thirdly when an unregenerat or unsanctified person holds last the profession of the Faith take heed it be not because he is not yet tempted nor put to it in that thing which is the idol of his heart let him bee brought to this either to quite the truth and the faith or to quite what is dearest to him in the world and see what he will doe in that case His fruit is but such aâ—… growes upon the stony ground but stay till the Sun of persecution arise and scorch him I have the more fully and strongly asserted the inconsistencie of Heresie and holinesse as likewise of sound beleeving and prophane living and have shewed the joynt fading or flourishing of true grace and true holynesse that this being demonstrated and laid down for a sure principle may lead us to many practicall and usefull conclusions and corrolaries which I will onely here point at First it cuts off the exception of those who cry out against the censuring suppressing and punishing of Hereticks by the Christian Magistrate as if this were a persecuting of pietie or pious persons when it is indeed a suppressing of a work of the flesh â—…for Heresie is no other Gal 5. 20. and of that which is either the cause or effect either the usher or page of someimpiety Secondly it confuteth that most pernicâ—…ous and cursed opinion that if a man live well he may be saved in any Religion or any Faith Socinus did hold that all whether Lutherans or Calvinists or Anabaptists or Arians so that they live
it Can hee not deceive the soule syllogistically by false reasonings as well as positively by false suggestions I answer no doubt he can and often doth yet the mistaking of marks may be rectified in the Children of God Wisdome is justified of her children but the rejecting and slighting of all markes cannot bee rectified but is a certain and unavoidable snare to the soule If marks of grace become snares to the Reprobate that proves nothing against the use of markes The word of God is a snare and a gin to the Reprobate that they may goe and fall backward and bee broken and snared and taken yet the word is in it self the power of God to salvation So the way of markes is a sure and safe way in it selfe and to every well informed conscience When any conscience through errour or presumption mistakes the marke that is the fault of the person not of the way of markes and the personall errour may be helped by personall light and Information if the partie wil receave it Whereas to make no tryall by markes and to trust an inward testimony under the notion of the holy Ghosts testimony when it is without the least evidence of any true gracious marke this way of its own nature and intrinsecally or in it self is a deluding and insnaring of the conscience But it may be asked and 't is a question worthie to bee looked into though I must confesse I have not read it nor heard it handled before how doth this assurance by marks agree with or differ from assurance by the testimony of the holy Ghost May the soule have assurance either way or must there be a concurrence of both for I suppose they are not one and the same thing to make up the assurance For answere whereunto I shall first of all distinguish a twofold certainty even in reference to the minde of man or in his conscience for I speak not heare de â—…ertitudine entis but mentis the one may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when the conscience is in tuto may be secure needeth not feare and be troubled The Graecians have used the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when they were speaking of giving security and assurance by safe conducts or by pledges or by sureties or the like The other is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a full perswasion when the soule doth not onely stirre a right and safe course and needeth not feare danger but saile before the winde and with all it's sailes full So there is answerably a double uncertainty the one may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when a man is in himselfe perplexed and difficulted and not without cause having no grounds of assurance when a man doth doubt and hesitate concerning a conclusion because hee hath no reasons or arguments to prove it when a man is in a wildernesse where he can have no way or shut up where hee can have no safe escaping The other is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is a doubting that ariseth not from want of arguments or from the inextricable difficultie of the grounds but from a disease of the minde which makes it suspend or retaine it's assent even when it hath sufficient grounds upon which it may be assured Now 't is the evidence of signes or markes of grace which giveth that first kinde of certainty and removeth that first kinde of uncertainty But 't is the testimony of the Spirit of the Lord which giveth the second kinde of certainty and removeth the second kinde of uncertainty Take a simile two or three for illustration The Scripture is known to bee indeed the word of God by the beames of divine auctority which it hath in it selfe and by certaine distinguishing Characters which doe infallibly prove it to be the word of God such as the heavenlynesse of the matter the Majesty of the style the irresistible power over the conscience the generall scope to a base man and to exalt God nothing driven at but Gods glory and mans salvation The extraordinary holinesse of the Penmen of the holy Ghost without any respect to particular interests of their owne or of others of their nearest relations which is manifest by their writings the supernaturall mysteries revealed therein which could never have entered inthe reason of men the marvailous consent of all parts and passages though written by diverse and severall Penmen even where there is some appearance of difference the fulfilling of prophesies the miracles wrought by Christ by the Prophets and Apostles the conservation of the Scripture against the malice of Sathan and fury of persecuters These and the like are characters and markes which evidence the Scriptures to be the word of God yet all these cannot beget in the soule a full perswasion of faith that the Scriptures are the word this perswasion is from the holy Ghost in our hearts And it hath been the common resolution of soâ—…nd Protestant writers though now called in question by the Scepticks of this age that these arguments and infallible characters in the Scripture it selfe which most certainly prove it to be the word of God cannot produce a certainty of perswasion in our hearts but this is done by the Spirit of God within us according to these Scriptures 1 Cor 2. 10 11 14 15. 1 Thes 1. 5. 1 Iohn 2. 27. and 5. 6 7 8 10. Ioh 6. 45. In like manner a Scholler or a young disputant may argue and dispute be it in Philosophie or Divinity upon very right and sure principles yet perdventure not without great feare and doubting in his own thoughts till he be put out of that feare by the approbation and testimony of his learned Master who presideth in the dispute The evidence of good markes while it is opened unto us may make our hearts to burne within us as those Disciples said which were going to Emmaus but yet our eyes are held as it was with them that wee doe not know Christ in us or talking with us untill our eyes be opened by the Spirit No doubt they had much light breaking in upon their understandings while Christ expounded unto them the Scriptures by the way and this light was with life and heat in their hearts But after they knew Christ in breaking of bread then and not till then came the fulnesse of perswasion and then they could say The Lord is risen indeed Luke 24. 15 16 30 31 32 34. Our inward evidence of graces or use of signes may bring the Children to the birth I mean in point of assurance but 't is the evidence of the Spirit of God which giveth strength to come forth Without this evidence of the Spirit of God the soule doth but grope after a full assurance as it were in the dark but when the holy Ghost commeth to do the office of a Comforter then there is light and liberty Our assurance of justification adoption grace and salvation is virtually in a syllogisticall way Whoever beleeves on
love and if I cannot have any solid or safe comfort from this that I love the Brethren how much lesse can this comfort me that others judge me to be a lover of the brethren And how do I know them to be the brethren who judge so of me For by their rule no man can say such a one is a brother so that they do but tye themselves with their own knots and must therefore either quite their sense of the Text and take ours or else hold that this text hath no comfort at all in it which yet is most full of comfort and sweet as the honey and the honey combe But secondly will you see these men falling yet more foully in the ditch they have digged for others While they object so much against a believers examining or assuring his conscience by fruits of sanctification sincerity of heart hatred of sin respect to all the commandements love to the Brethren while they tell us that none of these can be sure evidences to the soule and while they pretend to shew other soule satisfying evidences which can resolve quiet comfort and assure the conscience they do but more and more lead the soule into a labyrinth and make the spirits of men to wander from mountain to hill and to forget their resting place I might here take notice of the six remedies against doubting which one of them offereth as an antidote and preservative against all objections whatsoever yet all the six put together cannot resolve nor clear the conscience in the point of a personall or particular interest in Christ I heare much will the perplexed soule say of the nature of faith of free justification of the things sealed in Baptisme c. But oh I cannot see that I have any interest for my part in these things Not to insist upon these six remedies which are indeed most insufficient as to this point my present work shall be to speak unto those personall and particular evidences of an interest in Christ which are held foorth by their chief writers Do but observe their way and you shall see that either they fall in at last into our way of gracious marks and qualifications or otherwise leave the Conscience much more perplexed and unsatisfied then they found it They tell us of two evidences a revealing evidence and a receiving evidence that by the spirits testimony this by faith The revealing evidence of interest in the priviledges of Christ which will put an end to all objections is the voice of the Spirit of God to a mans own spirit This is the great evidence indeed and the evidence which at last doth determine the question and put an end to all objections Well But doth the Spirit of God give testimony to the soule any otherwise then according to the word of God No saith the same writer by no means for it is most certainly true saith he that every voice in man speaking peace being contrary to the word of grace that voice is not the voice of the spirit of the Lord it is the voice of the spirit of delusion Immediatly he moves this doubt But how shall I know that this voice though it be according to the word of grace is indeed the voice of the spirit of the Lord and be satisfied that it is so He might have moved this doubt which is greater how shall I know that this voice or this testimony doth indeed speak according to the word or whether it speak contrary to the word so be the voice of the spirit of delusion Peradventure he had found it difficult and even impossible to answer this doubt without making use of and having recourse unto the way of signes or marks such as the word holds foorth And this agreeth to that twofold joint witnessing Rom 8. 16. the spirit of God is not simply 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a witnesse but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 qui simul testimonium dicit he bears witness not only to but with our spirit that is with our conscience So that if the witnesse of our Conscience be blank and can testifie nothing of sincerity hatred of sin love to the Brethren or the like then the spirit of God witnesseth no peace nor comfort to that soul and the voice which speaketh peace to a person who hath no gracious mark or qualification in him doth not speak according to the word but contrary to the word and is therefore a spirit of Delusion I shall not contend about the precedence or order between these two Testimonies in the soul so that we hold them together and do not separat them in our assuring or comforting of our hearts before God And here I must take notice of another Passage where he whose principles I now examine saith I do not determine peremptorily that a man cannot by way of evidence receive any comfort from his sanctification which he thus cleareth The spirit of the Lord must first reveal the gracious minde of the Lord to our spirits and give to us Faith to receive that Testimony of the Spirit and to sit down as satisfied with his Testimony before ever any work of Sanctification can possibly give any evidence But when the Testimony of the Spirit of the Lord is received by Faith and the soule sits down satisfied with that Testimony of the Lord then also all the gifts of Gods Spirit do bear witnesse together with the Spirit of the Lord and the Faith of a Believer Surely such a Testimony or voice in the soul as the soul sits down satisfied with before ever any work of sanctification can possibly give any evidence is not an evidence according to the word but contrary to the word and therefore not the revealing evidence of the spirit of God so that in this I must needs dissent from him for he casts the soule upon a most dangerous precipice neither is the danger helped but rather increased by that posteriour evidence or after comfort of sanctification which he speaks of for the soule being before set down satisfied with the Testimony of the spirit of the Lord and Faith receiving that Testimony so he supposeth it cannot now examin whether its sanctification be sound or not sound whether its graces be common or speciall seeming or real It implyes a contradiction if I say that I am assured by the evidence of the spirit of God and by the evidence of Faith that I am in Christ and in Covenant with God and that notwithstanding I sit down satisfied with this assurance yet I am not sure of the soundnesse of my Sanctification Therefore to put the soule upon a looking after the evidence of graces and the comfort of sanctification when the soule is before hand fully assured and satisfied against all objections and doubtings is not onely to lay no weight at all upon these marks of Sanctification in the point of resolving or clearing the Conscience but it is much worse then so it is a confirming
which speaks in the soule by the voice of the Lord which speaks in the Scripture If it agree not then we have not losed but have made a right discovery and found out a depth of Sathan and so gained by the tryall If it do agree so likewise we are gainers being confirmed in the assurance not upon the Testimony of another but upon the surest and best known Testimony of the holy Ghost himself Thirdly if these things be not admitted and if the Antinomian argument which now I speak to stand good then it shall be easie for any deluded person to repell the most searching convictions which can be offered to him from Scripture for he shal still think with himself though unhumbled and unregenerat it is the voice of the spirit of the Lord which speaks peace to my soule and this voice I know is according to the word because I am assured by the same spirit that it is indeed according to the Word and other evidence I will not look after because I am to receive the Testimony of the Spirit upon his own credit and not upon the credit of some other thing The voice of the spirit which speaks in my soul is that beyond which there must be no inquiry I ask now how shall the Antinomians convince such a one from Scriptur Nay how can they choose but according to their principles confirme him in his delusory imaginary assurance Fourthly the very same Antinomian Author who speaks of the Testimony of the spirit of God in the soul as that beyond which there must be no inquirie and which puts an end to all objections even he himself doth by and by tell us of aliquid ultra and puts the soul upon a further inquiry which as I said before shal either resolve into our way of assurance by marks or otherwise leave the soul overclouded more in the dark then at the beginning And so I come to his secōd evidence which he cals the receiving evidēce Though the spirit of the Lord saith he doe reveal the minde of the Lord to men yet they are not fully resolved concerning this mind of the Lord to their own spirits till by Faith they do receive it Now till men do receive this Testimony and believe it they are never resolved but when men do receive it and believe it that it is a true Testimony then they sit down satisfied Again Faith is an evidence as it doth take possession of that which the spirit of the Lord reveals and manifests and gives to a person The spirit indeed makes the title good but faith maks good the entry and possession and so clears the title to us though good in it self before Is there a voice behind thee or within thee saying particularly to thee in thy self thy sins are forgiven thee Doest thou see this voice agree with the word of Grace If thou doest receive the Testimony of the Spirit according to that word If thou doest indeed receive it here is thy evidence Thereafter he moves this objection But you will say if there be not fruits of faith following that faith is a dead faith and therefore there must be something to evidence with it For answer whereunto first he rejects this as a great indignity to Faith If faith be not able of it self to give Testimony or must not be credited when it doth give Testimony except something will come and testifie for it to give credit unto it Next he answereth thus that which hath the whole essence of faith is not a dead but a living faith Now the whole essence of faith is nothing else but the Eccho of the heart answering the foregoing voice of the spirit and word of Grace thy sins are forgiven thee saith the spirit and word of Grace my sins are forgiven me saith Faith If therefore the Eccho to the voice of Spirit and word of Grace be the essence nay be the whole essence of believing this is certain where there is receiving or beleiving there cannot be a dead faith Now behold him at a losse all resolves into this issue no assurance by the Testimony of the spirit and word of grace unlesse this testimony be received by faith no entry and possession no clearing of the title to the soule no resolution or satisfaction to the conscience till it beleive But then while the soule examines it self whether it have a true lively faith or only a dead faith he dare not admit the tryall of faith by the fruits of it as if it were an indignity to the tree to be knowen by the fruit or to the fire to be knowen by the heat Faith purifieth the h◅art saith the Scripture Faith workes by love Faith shewes it self by works This Antinomian durst not adventure upon this tryall by the Scripture markes of faith yea to avoid this he runnes into a great and dangerous errour that the whole essence of faith is nothing else but the Eccho of the heart answering the voice of the spirit and saying my sinnes are forgiven me as if there were no faith where there is no assurance of the forgivenesse of sinnes and as if faith were quite lost as often and as long as the soule cannot say with assurance my sinnes are forgiven me Again may there not bee a false Eccho in the heart may not a temporary beleever who receaves the word of grace with joy say within himself my sinnes are forgiven me Where is the clearing of the conscience now Is it in that last word where there is receaving or beleeving there cannot be a dead faith But how shall I know that there is indeed a receving and beleving The essence of faith is the receaving of Christ in the word of grace and a ◅esting upon him for righteousnesse and life Now another Antinomian tells us that to receave Christ and his benefites truely doth necessarily include in it these foure particular points 1 To know our lost state by the least sinne our misery without Christ and what need we have of him 2. To see the excellency and worth of Christ and his benefites 3. A taking and having of Christ and his benefites to ones owne self in particular 4. To be filled with great joy and thankfull zeal If these things be so then I am sure many doe imagine they have receaved Christ and his benefites by faith who have not truely and really receaved him so that the soul searching it self in this point whether have I any more then a dead faith or a counterfeit faith dare not acquiesce nor sit down satisfied with that resolution where there is receaving or beleeving there cannot be a dead faith For the soule must still enquire whether is my receaving or beleeving true reall sound lively and such as cannot agree to a dead faith The same Author whom I last cited where he putteth a difference between a counterfeit faith and a true faith he saith that the counterfeit faith neither reneweth nor
profession as being matters of the highest treason against him and the most provoking sinnes in a Church as being also the more deceitfull and secreet poyson honeyed over with plausible pretences and therefore the more needing a discovery If there were no such scandalous and prophane livers in these Churches Then note that Christ will have a great controversie against a Church which hath false Doctrinâ—…s and pernitious Sects in it although there were never a scandalous person more in it There is therefore cause to fast and pray for which Christ makes a matter of controversie against his Churches If we have prayed away Popery Prelacy the old superstitious ceremonies the Malignant Armies c. O let us cry mightily for this also see if wee can pray away Heresies and pernitious Doctrines Sects and Schismes 7. We must turne away from and avoid the fellowship of false Teachers and the spreaders of dangerous Doctrines not only that we may bee stedfast in the truth but that our hearts may be established with grace for there are such reasons given in Scripture for avoiding the company of that kinde of men as highly concerne piety avoid them because they serve not Christ but their owne bellies Rom. 16. 17 18. from such turne away because they are men of corrupt minds supposing gaine to be godlinesse and their disputings breed envy strife railings evil surmisings 1 Tim 6. 4 5. receave them not into your houses who bring not the Doctrine of Christ because such have not God 2 epist. of Iohn vers 9. 10 11. 8. Let no man think that opinions are free more then practises or that a man runnes no hazard of his salvation by erroneous and hereticall opinions Error of judgement as well as wickednesse of practise may bring death and destruction upon the soul Iam 5. 19. 20. 2 Pet 2. 1. and 3. 16. Gal. 2. 21. Hereticks as well as murderers and drunkards are there excluded from the kingdome of heaven 9. If thou wouldest keep thy head from erring bee sure to keep thy heart from erring Psal 95. 10. It is a people that do erre in their heart and they have not known my wayes as thou desirest not to be a backslider in the profession of the true faith be not a backslider in heart Prov. 14. 14. If thou wouldest be preserved from erroneous opinions pray for the mortification of thy corruptions Gal. 5. 20. with 24. 10. If thou wouldest be firme and stable in the truth thou must not onely have grace in the heart but bee established in grace Heb 13. 9. Bee not carryed about with diverse and strange Doctrines for it is a good thing that the heart hee saith not have grace but be established 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in grace hee that is not established in the present truth i. e. in the truth of the times proves himself or otherwise makes himself to bee unstable in grace If 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if he that is no prophane one be yet an unstable one what doth it profite It is plainly intimated to us 1 Pet 5. 8. 9. that such as are not sted fast in the faith doe not resist Sathan but are devoured by him and 2 Pet. 1. 12. The Apostle thinks it not enough that Christians be established in the present truth if they bee not also growing in grace and making sure their calling and election and adding one grace to another wherefore saith he I will not be negligent to put you alwayes in remembrance of these things â—…to wit which belong to the establishing of the heart in grace though yee know them and bee established in the present truth Now that the heart may be established in grace and so also in the truth let us endeavour to walk alwayes as under the eye of God Psal 16. 8. Heb 11. 27. to improve the promises and rest upon Christ for stability of heart 1 Cor 1. 8. for he is our wisdome and sanctification as well as righteousnesse and redemption ibid. vers 30. Let us intertaine the Spirit of grace and not grieve him nor quench him for by the Spirit of the Lord are we upholden stablished strengthened Psal 51. 11 12. Eph. 3. 16 11. When it comes to a time of try all and to the sifting of the whole house of Israel as corne is sifted in a sive Amos 9. 9. they onely are made manifest to be approved in whom there is both sanctification of the Spirit and beliefe of the truth both true piety and sound judgement if either of these be found wanting bee sure the other is wanting too what ever shew there may be to the contrary There is a Text 1 Cor 11. 19. worthy to bee much and often thought upon in these dayes For there must be Heresies or Sects among you that they which are approved may be made manifest among you of which Text moreanone Now then for as much as the Church is sometimes tried by Heresies sometimes by persecutions sometimes by both sometimes by other tentations and for our part we know not what further tryalls we must endure before this work be at an end or before we go off the stage As we desire to hold out in a time of tryall let us hold fast truth and holinesse together and cast away from us whatsoever maketh us to offend whether it be the right eye of an erroneous opinion or the right hand of a sinfull will or the right foot of a carnall affection CHAP. XIII Whether conscionable Christians and such as love the power aud practice of piety can without defiling their conscience or without a destructive wounding of the power of godlinesse embrace and hold the principles of these who call themselves the godly party Or whether they ought not rather to avoid those who doe now Pharisaically and Donatistically appropriat to them selves the name of the godly party as being indeed such who under pretence of Zeal for the power of godlinesse hold diverse ungodly principles LEt no man here stumble in the threshold or bee scandalized at the case I put I intend nothing either against piety or truely pious persons but to vindicat both from those principles of impiety which some maintaine and adhere unto under colour of piety The Arrians Ebionites and Socinians in Poland have pretended to bee the godly party there in so much that Faustus Socinus wrote a book entituled thus That the men of the kingdome of Poland and the great Dutchy of Lithuania commonly called Evangelicks who were studious of solid piety ought altogether to adjoyne themselves to the Assembly of those who in the same places are falsely and undescrvedly called Arrians and Ebionites There is as little truth in that pretence which diverse Sectaries now make to the way of godlinesse observe but these principles of theirs 1. That none ought to be punished for Preaching Printing or maintaining any error in Faith or Religion except it be contrary to the very light of nature Hence
it will follow that none is to be punished for Preaching or publishing these errors That the Scripture is not the word of God That Jesus Christ was an impostor or deceaver for the light of nature will never serve to confute these or such like errors concerning the Scriptures the truths concerning them being wholly supernaturall Mr. I Goodwin in his Hagiomastix sect 58. holds that he who will hold that there is no Christ is not so pernicious nor punishable as that man who lives as if there were no Christ and one of his reasons is this because saith he the sinnes mentioned adultery theft c. are clearly and at first sight against the light and law of nature but the denyall of the being of such a person as Christ who is both God and man is not contrary to any law or principle in nature I desire that the reader may here observe the words of Mr. Burroughes in the Epistle dedicatorie of his Sermon preached before the house of Peers Novemb 26. 1645. For connivence at blasphemies or damnable Heresies God forbid any should open his mouth these who are guilty herein against the light of nature should be taken off from the face of the earth and such as aâ—…e guilty against supernaturall light are to be refrained and kept from the society of men that they infect not others The latter part of that which he saith I accept and I would to God that so much were put in execution But why no other Hereticks or blasphemers should be taken off from the face of the earth but those onely who are guilty against the light of nature I finde no reason brought for it and I doe not understand how it comes to passe that any who look so much forward to new lights should herein fall so farre backwark as to the light of nature or that those who decline the light of nature in matter of Church government subordination appeals and the like should nothwithstanding in matters of faith which are much more sublime appeal to the light of nature There is need of some Oedipus here 2. That in controversies or questions of Religion we must not argue from the old Testament but from the new Hence are these exclamations against old Testament Spirits c. which might indeed beseem the Manichees who denyed and acknowledged not the old Testament But to bee heard in a reformed Church among those who acknowledge the old Testament to be the word of God as well as the new 't is most strange Our orthodox protestant writers condemne as well the Anabaptists who reject and sâ—…orne at arguments brought against them from the old Testament as the Manichees who did repudiat the old Testament as having proceeded from an evill God See P Martyr in 1 Cor. 10. 12. Aret proble theol loc 56. By this principle they shall not hold it contrary to the will of God under the new Testament that a man marry his fathers brothers wife this not being forbidden in the new Testament but in the old Some indeed of this time have maintained that it is not unlawfull to us to marry within these degrees which are forbidden Lev 18. See Mr. Edwards in the third part of Gangraena pag 3. These hold 't is onely forbidden to commit fornication with such as are within these degrees not being married as if 〈◊〉 were not unlawfull to commit fornication with any be they never so farre without these degrees By the same principle which rejecteth old Testament proofs they must deny the duty of children under the new Testament to marry with their parents consent and this is one of the foule errors of some Sectaries now adayes that though consent of parents unto childrens marriage was commanded under the law to them that lived then yet because that was but a ceremonie 't is now lawfull to marry without their consent because we live under the Gospell See that same third part of Gangraena pag 14. By the same principle they must deny that an oath be it never so just and necessary may be imposed by authority Or that the Magistrat ought to put to death a blasphemer an incestuous person an adulterer a Witch or the like the Scripturall warrants which make these crimes capitall being in the old not in the new Testament Saith not the Apostle 2 Tim 3. 16. all Scripture and consequently the lawfull examples and laâ—…dable presidents of the old Testament is given by in spiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction in righteousnesse Rom. 15. 4. Whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning Is not our justification by faith proved by the example of Abrahams justification by faith Rom 4. Doth not Christ himself defend his Disciples there plucking the ears of corne upon the Sabbath day by the example of Davids eating the shew bread and by the example of the Priests killing of sacrifices upon the Sabbath day Matth 12. Yea those that most cry out against proofs from examples of the old Testament are as ready as others to borrow proofs from thence when they think to serve their turne thereby which Aretius probl theol loc 56. instanceth in the Anabaptists who would not admit proofs from examples of the old Testament yet many of them justified the Bowrs bloudy warre by the example of the Israelits rising against Pharaoh 3. That if Sectaries and Heretickes make a breach of peace disturbe the State or doe evill against the Common-wealth in civil things then the Magistrate may punish and suppresse them But Sectaries and Heretickes who are otherwise peaceable in the State and subject to the Lawes and lawfull power of the civil Magistrate ought to be tollerated and forborne This is their Kodesh hakkodashim their holy of holies indeed their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 See the compassionat Samaritan pag 10 Iohn the Baptist pag 57 The bloudy Tenent Chap 52. M. S to A. S. pag 53. 54. The ancient bounds Chap 1. See now how farre this principle will reach A man may deny and cry down the word of God Sacraments Ordinances all the Fundamentals of faith all Religious Worship One may have leave to plead no Church no Minister no Ordinances yea to blaspheme Jesus Christ and God himself and yet to escape the hand of the Magistrate as being no troubler of the State This I gather from Mr. Williams himself in his bloudy Tenent Chap. 6. where hee distinguisheth between the spirituall and the civill peace and cleares in the instance of Ephesus Nâ—…w suppose saith he that God remove the candlestick from Ephesus yea though the whole worship of the city of Ephesus should be altered Yet if men be true and honestly ingenuous to city Covenants Combinations and principles all this might be without the least impeachment or infringment of the peace of the city of Ephesus So that by their principles if the city of London were turning peaceably to Mahumetanisme or Paganisme the Parliament ought