XX. Act. 28. that the Holy Ghost had made them overseers to feed that is to rule and govern the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood. And if they knew this why were they not so honest as to interpret the later by the former for there is no difference between S. Paul's words and the counterfeit S. Ambrose's S. Paul saith the Elders of Ephesus were appointed to rule the Church of God for that 's the office of a Shepherd that feeds the Flock the other saith Damasus was the ruler of God's Church If the Vniversal Church be thereby meant and not his part of it only why should it not be so expounded in the words of S. Paul and then Damasus his title to this office is crackt for there were Rulers then set over the Church Vniversal by the Holy Ghost before he or his Church of Rome perhaps was in being But if S. Paul's words must have a more limited meaning then with what conscience do they give their S. Ambrose's words an unlimited and not restrain them as they must do S. Paul's to the particular See committed to his Government And it was not easie for them to be ignorant that S. Paul in these words to Timothy speaks of the Church of Ephesus and not of Rome and was so far from having any thought of S. Peter whom these Annotators make the Ruler at that time of this House of God that it is evident Timothy was the person who presided in it and was the chief Pillar and Ground of Truth here spoken of as I doubt not I have proved in the insuing Discourse Wherein I have also shewn that other succeeding Bishops in other Churches had the same title nay many persons in the Church that were no Bishops who were far from thinking themselves or being thought by others infallible as these Annotators imagine they must needs be who are the Pillar and establishment of the Truth That 's an inference from these words for which they had no more warrant than they had to intitle S. Ambrose to those Commentaries The Author of which also did so little dream of the Infallibility of the Church when he glossed upon these words that he doth not so much as make the Church the Ground or establishment of the Truth But saith in plain terms Firmamentum as the Vulgar Latine translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hujus veritatis signa sunt prodigia the establishment of this Truth left in the Church are signs and wonders which the Apostles that is wrought to bring Men to the firm belief of that truth which they preached Which doth not rely therefore upon the credit of the Church but upon the credit of the Apostles and of those Divine Works whereby God bare Witness to them which are recorded in the Holy Scriptures From whence alone we ought to derive our knowledge of the Truth the Apostle here speaks of as is most clearly resolved by S. Cyril of Hierusalem in these memorable words (l) Catech. IV. Sect. de Spirito Saycto Concerning the Divine and Holy Mysteries of the Faith we ought not to deliver any thing though never so small without the Divine Scriptures c. neither shouldst thou believe me barely saying these things to thee unless thou receivest the demonstration of the things published out of the Divine Scriptures For this is the safety or security of our Faith which depends not upon words that we invent but upon the demonstration of the Divine Scriptures In which we hear our Lord Christ himself speaking to us who is more to be believed than the Church For the Church as S. Paul speaks is subject unto Christ they are the words of S. Augustine (m) Tom. VII Coura Crisconium Gram. l. 2. c. 21. and therefore the Church ought not to set her self above Christ so as to think that they who are condemned by him may be baptized but they that are condemned by the Church may not be baptized when he always judges truly but Ecclesiastical Judges being Men are oft-times deceived From them therefore who are fallible we appeal to Him who is infallible and hath delivered his sentence in the Holy Scriptures or from a Church particular we appeal to the Church Catholique nay from the New Church of Rome to the Old. For we are not as they would make the World believe affrighted with the Name of the Church whose judgment we truly honour as will appear in this Treatise while they dishonour it by confining the Church to themselves and then exalting it above the Scriptures of Truth and making its mere Name serve to dazzle the eyes of their own People and to keep them in profound ignorance teaching them (n) 〈…〉 in XII Luke 11. to oppose the Name of a Catholique Man and the Catholique Church as a sufficient answer to all that we most reasonably object against them Thus in their own conceit it is a kind of Gorgon's head which they fansie will immediately stupify us when it is opposed to us but blessed be God we are still in our Wits and understand very well that this is no better than his old Artifice who invented this cheat as S. Cyprian (o) L. de Vnitate Ecclesie speaks of deceiving unwary Souls by the very Title of the Christian Name For just so they now abuse the Name of Church and the name of Catholique and by good words and fine speeches as S. Paul writes XVI Rom. 18. deceive the hearts of the simple Whom I have endeavoured in this small Treatise to undeceive and direct in the way of that TRVTH of which every Church ought to be the Pillar and Ground If any one be not but in stead of the certain constant universally received Christian Truth set up uncertain nay false lately invented and particular conceits of its own it is not to be relied on but rejected though it hath been formerly a Church of never so great Authority Such the Church of Rome once was but now ceases so to be having by taking upon her too much lost that regard which otherwise it might have had in the Christian World. It is not the same Church it was in the Apostles times no nor in the days of Gregory the Great as hath been unanswerably demonstrated by Bp. Morton heretofore (p) Catholique Appeal L. 1. cap. 2. and lately by the Author of the Vindication of the Answer of some late Papers to which there will never be an ingenuous Reply Great and many alterations have been made therein to the manifest prejudice of the Christian Faith of which that Church should have been as well as others a Pillar and Establishment but hath notoriously failed in her duty by inventing another Faith which undermines and endangers that Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Of this I have given so full and so clear an account in these Papers that I fear not to expose them to the examination of them that are of
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any thing that was different or contrary to it Both these they acknowledge to be prohibited in those words No man shall bring in another Faith than that at Nice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is contrary or opposite or different or diverse or strange from the true Faith. Where it is remarkable a different another Faith is acknowledged to be forbidden as well as a contrary Nay they acknowledge that none but a General Council could make so much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another explication of the Articles of that Creed though not different from it In the Creed of the Apostles that is there are some things contained implicitely as Thomas Aquinas you heard speaks and being virtually there either in the Letter or the sence may be drawn from thence by evident consequence such as the Deity of Christ his two Natures the Catholique Church which was included in those words I believe the holy Church as this Article is exprest in the old Roman Creed and the like and yet such an explication these Fathers confessed could by no Man no assembly of Men less than an Oecumenical Council be lawfully made and imposed upon the Church For which they quote Aquinas whom †Ib. p. 163. they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that there never was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an explication of the Creed but in an Oecumenical Council and he speaks of any Creed whatsoever which was common in the Church And therefore in conclusion they absolutely deny that the Latine Church had added any thing to the Creed For the Nicene and the Constantinopolitan Creed are both one So that the one being read the other is understood For though they differ in words they agree in sense and in truth And the like they affirm of all other Creeds and thereby answer the objection that they had added a word to the Creed about the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Father and the Son which is true they confessed with respect to the words but not with respect to the sense For still the Creed remains 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * Ib. p. 170. one and the same though it differ in the words And therefore it follows it was not properly an addition but one and the same thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the exposition of the very self same thing All which I have set down thus largely to show that thus far therefore all things continued as they had done from the beginning that is notwithstanding the new Opinions there were in the Church there was no new Creed made no new Article added to the Creed nothing but what had been so at the first made necessary to Salvation Which is the last thing I observe that till the conclusion of the Council of Trent that is till a little more than an hundred years ago there were no other Creeds but those which we confess and believe in this Church which are the Apostles Creed expounded not inlarged by any new Articles But then indeed Pope Pius IV. in pursuance of the Councils Order framed another Confession of Faith consisting of no less than XII new Articles added to the old never heard of in any Creed throughout the whole Church till this time And it must be called and esteemed a New Faith and it makes that to be a New Church which falsly calls it self the Ancient Catholique Apostolique Church of Christ For it is none of these neither Ancient nor Catholique nor Apostolique but New Roman Tridentine Church derived I mean from the Roman Bishops at Trent It will be fit I think to set down this New Creed that the Reader may compare it with those I have shown were hitherto the intire Faith of the Catholique Church It may be found in several of our Writers but I wish it were in every bodies hand and therefore take the pains to transcribe it for the benefit of those into whose hands this Book shall come Pope PIVS his Creed IN. Believe and profess with a firm Faith all and every thing contained in the Symbol of Faith which the holy Roman Church uses viz. I believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth c. to the end of that we call the Nicene Creed After which immediately follow the New Articles in these words The Apostolical and Ecclesiastical Traditions and the rest of the Observations and Constitutions of the same Church I most firmly admit and embrace I also admit or receive the Holy Scripture according to that sense which the holy Mother Church to whom it belongs to judge of the true sense hath held and doth hold nor will I ever understand and interpret it otherwise than according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers I profess also that there are truly and properly Seven Sacraments of the New Law instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord and necessary to the Salvation of mankind though not all of them necessary to every Man viz. Baptism Confirmation the Eucharist Pennance Extreme Vnction Orders and Matrimony and that they confer grace and that of these Baptism Confirmation and Orders cannot be repeated without Sacriledge I likewise receive and admit all the received and approved Rites of the Catholique Church in the solemn Administration of all the above-said Sacraments All and every thing which was defined and declared about Original sin and Justification by the most holy Council of Trent I embrace and receive I profess likewise that in the Mass is offered to God a true proper and propitiatory Sacrifice for the quick and dead and that in the most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist there is truly really and substantially the Body and Blood together with the Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ and that there is a conversion made of the whole substance of Bread into his Body and of the whole substance of Wine into his Blood which conversion the Catholique Church calls TRANSUBSTANTIATION I confess also that under either kind or species only whole and intire Christ and the true Sacrament is received I constanly hold there is a Purgatory and that the Souls there detained are helpt by the suffrages of the faithful As also that the Saints who Reign together with Christ are to be worshipped and invocated and that they offer Prayers to God for us and that their Reliques are to be venerated I most firmly assert that the Images of Christ and the Mother of God the always-Virgin as also of other Saints are to be had and retained and due honour and veneration to be bestowed on them I affirm also that the power of Indulgences was left by Christ in his Church and that their use is most wholesom to Christian People I acknowledge the holy Catholique and Apostolique Roman Church to be the Mother and Mistress of all Churches and I promise and swear true Obedience to the Bishop of Rome Successor of S. Peter the Prince of Apostles and Vicar of Jesus Christ All the rest also
discourses in that very Book against Manichaeus (q) Cap. XIV contra Epist quam vocant Fundamenti his Letter from whence the fore-named saying I had not believed the Gospel unless the Churches Authority had moved me to it is wont at every turn to be objected to us by those of the Romish perswasion Thou dost nothing but praise what thou believest and deride what I believe Now since I can be even with thee and do the very same praise what I believe and deride what thou believest what is to be done but that we leave and relinquish those who invite us to know things certain and afterwards require us to believe things uncertain let those of the Roman Church mark this and that we follow them who invite us first to believe that which we cannot yet see into that being made stronger in the Faith it self we may come to understand what we believe NOT MEN NOW BUT GOD HIMSELF INWARDLY ESTABLISHING AND ILLUMINATING OUR MIND It is impossible to read this passage and not see that this Father thought our Faith is not ultimately resolved into the Testimony of the Church but by that being invited to believe the Holy Scriptures we are established upon the serious reading of them in the Christian Faith and Knowledge of the Truth by God himself Upon whose Word in the Holy Scripture and not upon Men we bottom our Faith. Upon the Testimony and Authority of God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and the Testimony of divine Men inspired by them who by Miracles and Signs and mighty Deeds and a prophetical Spirit proved themselves to be sent of God and have left his Mind and Will upon Record in the Scriptures of Truth Which the Church indeed in all parts of the World hath kept and preserved and faithfully transmitted down to us and now propounds to our Faith but it is not merely what the Church saith that makes us believe but what God himself saith in the Holy Scriptures concerning his Son Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ saith concerning his rising from the Dead and sending the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles Which being fulfilled evidently proved him to be the Son of God the Saviour of the World and them to be his Apostles and Ministers who declared to Men the true way of Salvation So the Church directs and guides us to the Scriptures of Truth but they resolve and assure our Faith being the very Word of God. The authority of God's Church is the first motive which leads us to esteem the Scriptures but being led thither we find in the matter of them that which gives us full satisfaction by bestowing our pains in reading or hearing and considering the Mysteries contained therein The Church holds out this light to us but it is by this light that we see what is the mind and will of God. To this the Church points us and bids us attend to it for this it disposes and prepares us it leads us by the hand to this as the only sure foundation of our Faith because herein we find God himself speaking to us and moreover by the Ministery of the Church we are assisted in understanding the sence of the Holy Scriptures but they contain in themselves that Divine Authority and Truth whereby we come to a certain Faith. The Church tells us such and such things are true and we find them to be so by examining the Scriptures Which the Beraeans searched daily whether those things were so which the Apostles preached and therefore many of them believed not merely because the Apostles told them they ought so to do but because they found what they said in the Holy Scriptures XVII Act. 11 12. And so far as any Church speaks according to the truth contained therein it is to be believed and followed But if it bring no Divine word for its warrant if it propound other Doctrines which are not there it hath no authority to make such Doctrines the matter of our Faith much less to set up its own authority above the Scriptures as they do who say The Scriptures receive their authority from the Church Which is the Doctrine of no less Men than Baronius and Bellarmine to name no more The former of (r) Ad Annum 53 〈◊〉 X XI which argues that because we receive these Holy Books to be writings of the Apostles and Evangelists and not forged under their Names upon the testimony of the Church therefore all the writings of the New Testament received their authority from the Churches tradition which is fundamentum Scripturarum as he ventures to say the foundation of the Scriptures The other (s) L. 2. de Sacrament C. 25. Tertium is no less positive that if we take away the authority of the present Church and the present Council we call in doubt the whole Christian Faith. For the firmness of all ancient Councils and of all Doctrines depends upon the authority of the present Church This is very presumptuous talk for by the Church they mean themselves and then by the testimony of the Church that is their own testimony they mean such a Divine witness as assures us by its own authority without any other proof Which are the great points of difference between us in this matter For we assert first that the office of leading Men to the Holy Scriptures and so to Faith belongs to every Church as much as to them and secondly that no Church can bring People to Faith by its own testimony and authority but by the Doctrine of the Holy Scriptures nor is any Church whatsoever to be heard in matters of Divine Truth further than it can prove its Doctrines by the authority of God's Word and teaches things agreeable thereunto II. Which leads to the Second thing briefly to shew what power and authority the Church cannot pretend unto in matters of Faith. 1. And first it appears by what hath been said that it hath not a Soveraign Absolute Prophetical authority independent upon the Rule of the Holy Scriptures so that we must take whatsoever it saith for true without consulting them This is the ambitious pretence of the great Doctors of the Roman Church who give the Church meaning thereby the present Roman Church an authority over all things not depending on the Scriptures but upon which the Scriptures themselves depend So that without the authority of this Church all truth is doubtful Which is a manifest principle of Infidelity making all Religion stand to the courtesie of a company of Men who in such matters are the least to be trusted of all other Christians that we are acquainted withall 2. The Church hath no authority to propound any Doctrine as necessary to Salvation which is not delivered in the Holy Scriptures but depends solely on the authority of its own Tradition This is another of their ambitious attempts who having arrogated to themselves alone the whole power of the Church make that power so unlimited that it can supply the
he that can say but a little doth take away or make it less Which is such a plain declaration that the Creed contains the whole Apostolical Tradition or Faith for they are the same in his Language and the only Catholique Doctrine that if we were at this day to contrive words on purpose for the asserting this Truth we could not invent any more full or express than these Which show us that this Faith is sufficient not only for the ignorant the Catechumens and beginners in Religion but for the most improved in Christian knowledge for those that instructed and ruled the Church who had no Authority to preach or impose any other belief This is a thing that runs through his whole Book for he repeats it again in fewer words in the latter end of the next Chapter that the true Church hath but that one and the same Faith before mentioned throughout the whole World. Which in the 19th Chapter he calls the Rule of Truth by which all error was discovered for holding this rule though they speak very various and many things we easily evince that they have deviated from the Truth And again in the third Book (g) L. III. Chap. 3. he hath recourse to the same Rule of Truth unto which whosoever will hearken may see what is the tradition of the Apostles manifested in the whole World in every Church Where he saith they were able to tell what Bishops were settled by the Apostles and their Successors untill his time who neither taught nor thought of any thing like to the dotages of the Hereticks of those days And because it would have been too long to reckon up all the Churches he instances in the Church of Rome to which all had occasion to go upon some business or other because it was the Imperial City by whose Bishop he saith that Tradition and that Preaching or Doctrine of Truth which was from the Apostles in the Church is come to us and is a most full proof that one and the same life giving faith which was from the Apostles in the Church is conferred to this time and delivered in Truth The very same which Polycarp wrote to the Philippians mark these words which they of the present Roman Church are wont to conceal that they may make the World believe Irenaeus thought the Tradition of the Apostles that is the Christian Faith was to be sought only in their Church and which was in the Church of Ephesus founded by Paul and having John continuing in it till the time of Trajan which Church is a true witness of the Tradition of the Apostles And that there may be no mistake about this Tradition L. III. Cap. 4. he repeats it again in the next Chapter and informs us in very remarkable words it was nothing else but the Doctrine contained in the Creed Since these things are so plain we ought not to seek further among others for truth which we may easily find in the Church For the Apostles left most fully in it as in a rich Repository all things that belong to truth So that every one who will may take from thence the Water of Life c. out of the Holy Scriptures he means as appears by what follows And suppose the Apostles had not left us the Scriptures shall we not follow the Order of the Tradition or Rule of Faith which they delivered to those unto whom they committed the Churches To which Ordination many barbarous Nations who believe on Christ assent having the Doctrine of Salvation without Paper and Ink written by the Spirit in their Heart and diligently preserving the ANCIENT TRADITION believing in one God the maker of Heaven and Earth and of all things which are therein by Christ Jesus the Son of God Who out of his most eminent love to his Creature vouchsafed to be born of the Virgin uniting Man to God by himself and suffering under Pontius Pilate and rising again and being illustriously received in glory shall come again the Saviour of those that are saved and the Judge of those that are judged Sending into eternal fire the misshapers of Truth and the contemners of his Father and of his coming Those that have believed this Faith without Letters we in our Language call barbarous but as to their opinion and custom and conversation they please God because of their Faith by which they are most wise living in all Righteousness Chastity and Wisdom Vnto whom if any one should speak in their Language those things which Hereticks have invented they would presently stop their ears and run away not induring to hear the blasphemy Thus by that OLD TRADITION of the Apostles viz. the Creed they do not so much as admit into their thoughts the portentous talk of those Hereticks in his days These things I have thought fit to set down the more largely because they are an evident demonstration what the OLD TRADITION of the Apostles is which is nothing else but that summary of Christian Truth contained in the Creed unto which they would suffer no other Tradition to be added but contented themselves with this as fully sufficient and by this judged of all other things that pretended to come from the Apostles and were every where so well instructed in this that in those Churches which as yet had not received the Apostolical Writings the Holy Scriptures of the N. T. they had this Doctrine as the contents of those Scriptures and were thought most wise being wise enough to salvation in this faith alone without any other But because this is such a very important Truth I shall take a little more pains to set down the sense of the Church in all Ages concerning it that the Reader may be satisfied there is no other Truth but this alone which is absolutely necessary to his Salvation Which they sometime comprehend in fewer words but never add any one article beyond those in the Creed If we had the Letters of Ignatius intire and sincere we should be able to tell what he took for Truth immediately after the Apostles were dead And thus much is evident from them as they now are that they or he who contrived the Epistle to the Philippians under his name for it is not thought to be his took this to be the Doctrine of that Second Age when after the mention of the Doctrine of the Trinity and that the Son of God was truly made Man truly born and truly crucified dead and rose again not seemingly not in appearance only but in Truth they make him conclude 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that believes these things as they are and were really done is a blessed Man. Which is an undoubted testimony they took this Creed to be sufficient to salvation which Ignatius in an unquestioned Epistle of his to the Church of Smyrna calls the unmoveable Faith wherein he blessed God they were perfected or knit together mentioning no other Articles but those before named Polycarp also in the same
or Laick anathematized Justinian himself also in his Epistle to the Bishops at Constantinople (l) In Collatione I. quintae Syn. takes special notice how the Fathers in the Council at Chalcedon anathematized those who had delivered or do deliver any other Creed but that which was expounded by the 318 Holy Fathers and explained by the 150 Fathers that is the Apostles Creed expounded by the two first General Councils at Nice and Constantinople For we * Tom. V. Labb Edit p. 422. would have you know saith he that those things which were expounded and defined by the four holy Councils of Nice Constantinople Ephesus the first and Chalcedon concerning ONE AND THE SAME FAITH we keep and defend and follow them and all that are consonant to them And whatsoever is not consonant to this or may be found by any person written against those things which were defined concerning ONE AND THE SAME FAITH in those four Councils or in one of them that we execrate as altogether abhorrent from Christian piety And this Emperor was no mean Divine though Baronius is pleased to slander him as illiterate and presumptuous for medling in matters of Faith for Pope Agatho himself and the whole sixth General Council who approved of Agatho's Letter (m) Cont. VI. Act. 4. put him in the rank of the most excellent Fathers and Ecclesiastick Writers For to prove out of the Fathers two Natures in Christ he tells Constantine Pogonatus that S. Cyril S. Chrysostome and a great many other Bishops whom he names taught this praeomnibus c. and above all these that zealous defender of the true and Apostolick Faith Justinian the Emperor of pious memory whose integrity of Faith did as much exalt the Christian Commonwealth as by the sincerity thereof it was pleasing to God c. which is enough to make the defenders of the present Roman Church blush at the insincerity of their great Annalist who makes this Emperor to have been a perfect block not past his A. B. C. (n) Ad At. 528. n. 2.551 n. 2. and many other places whom one of their own Popes who lived in the next age to him and is Sainted by them makes equal to say no more unto S. Chrysostome and the greatest Bishops that had been in the Church I might add the praises which Pope Gregory the great gives of him in many places but I shall rather observe how he in the later end of this Age concurrs with him and with the forenamed Councils in this opinion that no other Faith but this was to be admitted For giving an account of his Faith (o) L. I. Epist 24. as the manner was upon his advancement to the Papacy and speaking of the four first General Councils in so high a Style that he professed to receive and reverence them as the four Books of the Holy Gospel he gives this reason for it because on these as one a square stone the structure of the Holy Faith ariseth and the rule of every ones life and action consists So that whosever doth not hold this solid ground although he appear a Stone yet he lies out of the building After which words he also professes his veneration of the fifth Council and approves of all that they ordained This custom in the Roman Church particularly of giving an account of their Faith to their Brethren when they were newly advanced to the Priesthood is mentioned by Pope Gelasius (p) Epist 2. ad Laurentium Epise and seems to have been begun upon occasion of the great factions which were raised against the Council of Chalcedon Whereupon Childerick King of France as soon as Pelagius was advanced to the See of Rome upon the death of Vigilius whose sentence had been condemned as heretical in the 5th Council desired to know if he held the definition of the Council of Chalcedon which contained the Nicene Constantinopolian and Ephesine Faith unto which he answered in a Letter which is in the body of the Canon Law (q) Decret pars 2. Causa XXV q. 1. c. X. that he received the definitions of the 4. General Councils concerning the Catholique Faith and then having rehearsed the Creed I believe in one Lord Father and Son and Holy Ghost viz. the Father Almighty c. he thus concludes This therefore is my Faith and the hope which is in me by the gift of the mercy of God of which S. Peter commands us to be ready to answer to every one who asks a reason or an account of us From which it appears sufficiently that they had no other account to give of their Faith in those days than that which we now give in our Church who believe all that they did then and believe as they did that nothing more is necessary to be believed But it will be usefull if I give a brief account also of the sence of the following Ages in this matter And in the VII Age Pope Agatho before mentioned sent a Synodical Epistle from himself and 125 Bishops assembled at Rome to the 6th General Council held also at Constantinople in which there is a confession of their Faith which they say they were taught by the Apostolical and Evangelical Tradition which consists of no more Articles than are in the foregoing Creeds It is inserted into the Acts of that General Council (r) Sess IV. Sextae Syn. wherein those Creeds were again recited and confirmed in the same words and under the same penalties as in the Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon with a severe prohibition of so much as a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a new manner of speech or invention of a word to the subversion of what was then determined Which was done more largely in the Council immediately following called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being a kind of supplement to the former sitting in the same place where it was decreed in the very first Canon that the Faith delivered by the Ministers of the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the divinely chosen Apostles who were eye witnesses to him should be preserved 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without any innovation immutably and inviolably And then they ratify distinctly the Decrees of the Nicene Council and the other five following General Councils which they name in order with the occasion of them and conclude with these words We neither intend to add any thing at all to what was formerly defined nor to take away any thing nor can we by any means do it In these two Councils Pope Honorius was condemned as an Heretick which I mention only for this reason that the ground of his condemnation was because he had consented to the defiling of the undefiled Rule of Apostolical Tradition viz. the Creed They are the words of Pope Leo the second who receiving the Acts of the sixth Synod which were transmitted to him anathematized Honorius because he had not adorned that Apostolical Church with the Doctrine of Apostolical Tradition In the next Age