A Discourse vpon the SABBATH DAY Wherin are handled these particulares ensuinge 1. That the Lords day is not Sabbath day by divine institution 2. An exposition of the 4. Commandement so farr forth as may give light vnto the ensueinge discourse and particularly here it is showne at what time the Sabbath day should begine and end for the satisfaction of those who are doubtfull in this point 3. That the seaventh day Sabbath is not abolished 4. That the seaventh day Sabbath is now still in force 5. The Authors exhortation and reasones that neverthelesse there be not rente from our Church as touchinge practise WRITTEN BY THEOPHILUS BRABOURNE Remember the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 The seauenth day is the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 Whatsoeuer thing I command you take heede you doe it thou shalt put nothing there to nor take ought there from Deut. 12.32 Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Galat. 3.10 Printed the 23th of Decemb. Anno Dom. 1628. To the Godly and vvell-affected Reader vvhosoeuer KNOWEING dearly beloued and Christian Reader by experience in my selfe as well as otherwise that there is a propensity holy inclination in all who are truly Gods to haue a respect vnto all Gods Commandements without exceptions or reseruations I iudged this discourse of the Sabbath day which is one branch of Gods eternall Law could not be vnwelcome to thee Caleing to minde also the parable of our Saviour how seuerly He will deale with that seruant to whom he deliuered but one single Talent for his hideing it so as no profit came on it Math. 25-24 remembring also that Christ made it an essentiall marke of Peters loue vnto him To fecd his Lambes Ioh. 21.15 And that it is giuen in charge to all to exhorte one another to admonish one another to edifie one another 1. Th. 5.11.14 I durst not for feare nor could I for loue but make knovvn my minde in this pointe To see the Church and Spouse of Christ to lye in the weekly breach of the 4th Commandement by violating and prophaning of the Lords sacred tyme and Sabbath a sine of ignorance hether to I confesse and in meane tyme superstitiously sanctifying a day the first day of the weeke for a Sabbath which God nor Christ nor any of his Apostles euer commanded or appointed how could my spirit but be stirred within mee to shew vnto hir this errour and to declare vnto hir which day is that righte and true day which God requireth of hir and the Rather since God hath put it into hir hart wilingly to giue God a day for this last and honourable Parliament blessed be God for their zeale and Godly care hath enacted a Law for the better keeping holy of the Lords day I know for my good will loue I shall reape euill vvill and hatred and for this paynes I shall vndergoe most harsh bitter censures but blessed are ye said Christ when men speak euill of you falsely for my sake They will say as some allreedy doe say t is pride and singularity that setes me on vvorke To vvhom I ansvvere in Pauls vvords 1. Cor. 4. I knovv nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified but if it be I beseech God pardone the syne but blesse this work Others and that more charitablie obiect the vnseasonablenesse of this motion because the Church of God is now vnder manifould afflictions and liable to subuersion by hir enemies where vnto I say the more neede shee shold dravv neere to hir God sticking closse to his Lawes the breach whereof he hath threatned with subversions and desolations Deut. 28. and Gods truthes may not waite attendance till men be at leisure to receiue them Others may thinke and say there are men more fit then I am for a matter of this weight c. To whom I answere by a free acknowledgement of this truth what multitudes are there in our Church euery ech one wherof farr surpasse mee for partes of nature and for learning and for outward dignities titles preferrments all which might well countenance and helpe forwards such a cause as this and were much to be desired I confesse Neither can I think but some of those haue long agone foreseene this truth either perfectly or at least a farr off as my selfe at first sawe it in my studies like as the blind man in the Gospell at first sawe men like trees but what 's the cause why they did not prosecute the matter till it came to perfection till they sawe men like men clearly was it not a slothfull feare to leese their labour and catch a shadow for a Substance as painfull Studentes must doe somtymes or for feare of the greatnesse of the labour or for feare of the losse of reputation dignities preferments liueings The Lords day is not Sabbath day by Divine institution BE pleased Christian Reader first of all to note that we now a dayes apply the name Sabbath to the Lords day Promiscuosly without difference the which is altogether without warrant of holy Scriptures since Scripture saith the seventh daye is the Sabbath Exod 20 10. And all the Euangelists call the Lords day the first day of the weeke Matth 28 1. So then there is as much difference twixt these two as is betweene the seventh and the first the last day of the weeke Saturday and the first day of the weeke Sunday Now thus to confounde two proper names of dayes is as if wee should call Sunday Saturday And I desire it rather to be noted because the ignorance of this point is of dangerous consequence amongst the commone people who when they heare the 4.th Com Remember the Sabbath day c. or those words Isa 58 and call the Sabbath a delight to consecrate it glorious to the Lord c they think presently vpon our Lords day the first day of the weeke as if those texts commanded this day Whereas they point at Sabbath day the seventh and last day of the weeke Such a mistake in a lease or bonde might procure a forfeiture of them with man beware we then least by the like wee forfeite with God in the 4th Com In the next place let vs examine the authorities textes of Scripture which vsually are alleaged for profe that the Lords day is a Sabbath by Gods apointment wherein I will shewe the invalidity insufficiencey of thos textes by waye of answere to them 1. Let vs begine with the 4th Com Remember the Sabbath day c this precept is vrged vpon the Lords day that we should Sanctify it Here to I answere by denyall that this Commandement doth vrge the Lords day the reason of my denyall is 1 because the Com enioyneth a day whose proper name is Sabbath day like as Saturday with vs is a proper name of one of our weeke dayes But the Lords day is not Sabbath day for it is the daye after
church doth better become vs all that I aime at hereby is no more but this that we alleage not the practise of our church as an infallible rule touch stone of truth but though a Paul preacht it yet with these Bareanes Act. 17.11 rather to serche the Scriptures then to rely vpon the Testimony of man Finally that our church hath kept this Lords day so longe and therfore the more strange it should be an errour I answere t is true the Lords day hath beene kept for about this 1200. yeeres as nere as I can guesse from about the yeere 364. at which tyme the Laodicean counsaile enacted a Law for the abolishing the Sabbath day and for the sole setting vp the Lords day till then both dayes were in vse saue that as hath beene showne the Lords day was sometymes omitted since then only the Lords day hath beene in request and that is about a 1200. yeeres but here it is to be noted what church it is that principally ground of our future discourse I thinke it needfull therfore in the first place to stay a while vpon the exposition of it or rather of some such things in it as may make way for our future discourse First as touching the substance of the Com note that as in a bonde you haue two essentiall things th one is the summe of mony to be paide the other is the day when it is to be paide and as in circumcision there was two things commanded the one vvas the acte of circumcision the other was the tyme and day when to be done that is on the 8th day Genes 17.12 and as in that other Sacrament the passeouer two things were commanded the one was the slaying and eating of the passeouer the other was the tyme and day when to be done that is on the 14th day of the month Exod. 12.6.8 Iust so in this 4th Com God commandeth vs expresly two things as essentiall partes of his Com the one is Holinesse and Rest the other is the tyme when these ought to be performed and that is in the Sabbath day which is the 7th day the former may be called the duties in the day the latter the dutie of the day the duties in the day ye haue in these wordes To keepe it holy Exod. 20.8 the other duty in these wordes In it thou shalt not doe any worke v. 10. the duty of the day ye haue in these wordes Remember the Sabbath day v. 8. the 7th day is the Sabbath v. 10. The vse of this point serues for confutation Is it so that God in his 4th Com straightly chargeth vs two things that is the duties in the day and the dutie of the day or thus the duties to be performed and the tyme when they be to be performed how is it then that so many say of the tyme of the 4th com oh the tyme that is but an accident but a circumstance God regards not circumstances so much it is the substance of the duties to be performed in the tyme that God lookes at c. and therfore you are but superstitiouse and vaine to stand so much vpon tyme where to I answere 1. tyme may here be considered two wayes 1. in relation to the duties of Holinesse and Rest and so I grant the tyme is an adiuncte wherein these duties were to be performed 2. in relation to the commandement it selfe considered as a thing commanded together with Holines and Rest and thus it is no adjuncte but thus it is an essentiall part of the Com the tyme being no lesse commanded then the duties of Holines and Rest I answere 2. but admite that tyme here were an accident or adjuncte to the Com and that you esteeme of adjunctes as light and triuiale matters little or nothing to be regard for their nature as in them selues in comparison of things substātiall c. I say be it the tyme here were as mynte and annyse and commine and the duties to be performed Sabbath day Remember the Sabbath day c. vvhere it is to be noted that this phrase Sabbath day was emong the Iewes a proper name for one of theire weeke dayes namly for that weeke day which is the last of the weeke as Saturday is with vs and it answeres to our Saturday in so much as if we shold translate the Hebrew words Sabbath day we shold reade it Saturday Remember Saturday to keepe it holy c. now that Sabbath day was a proper name of one of their weeke dayes is apparant to all since they counted all the other 6. dayes of the weeke by the Sabbath day thus the 7th and last day of the weeke they called Sabbath day the first day of the vveeke our Suneday they called the first of the Sabbath the second day of the weeke our Moonday they called the seconde of the Sabbath our Tewsday the thirde of the Sabbath c. so as you see no day of the weeke was called Sabbath day but this one only I confesse the word Sabbath signifieth a Rest but it also signifieth a proper name of the last day of their weeke Secondly if this be not enough to shew that God had sett aparte one certaine well knowne day afore any of the other 6. dayes for Holy duties Then marke what the Lord saith further in this Com The Seaventh day is the Sabbath c. not the third day nor the 4th day nor the first day of the weeke but the 7th day is the Sabbath where to take hence all scruples aboute the order of the day it hath pleased God for our certaine information to pointe directly and distinctly to the day which he wold haue kept as by the finger saying The Seaventh day Thouchinge which word of number Seaventh it is to be noted that it is not a Cardinall number but an Ordinall notifying which for order the propertie whereof is to denote 1. one and one only 2. it notes that indiuiduall particular one which for order is the last of that number for instance The Thirde it is not any of the three as the second nor the first but it is the last of the three so the fifthe it is not the 4th nor the second but it is the last of the 5 so the Seaventh day is the Sabbath not the 6th day nor the third day nor the first day of the weeke but the last day of the weeke the 7th is the Sabbath so againe you see the Lord hath culled out the last day of the 7. for his Sabbath and hath not lefte it indefinitly and vndetermined Furthermore left any shold thinke the 7th day may be separated from that day called the Sabbath day as is vsually thought therefore note 1. the Lord God hath ioyned them together in his Comm. The 7th day is the Sabbath see Levit 23.3 and Exod 35.2 Luk 13.14 not the 8th nor the first now what God hath ioyned let noe man put asunder 2. Note that these two The 7th day and
put to this and not too others a reason wold be sought such a one as agrees to this Com. and not to others now if I may take leaue to deliuer mine opinion I cannot finde out a better reason than this God foreseeing that after a longe time that is about 364. yeeres after Christ this his Sabbath wold be not in part violated but vtterly and altogether blotted out of remembrance in the Church for 1200 yeeres together and so this 4th Comm forgotten and not the other 9. or this 4th aboue or rather then the other 9. therfore was a Memorandum set to this and not to the other or to this aboue the other to bring men into the Remembrance and practise of it againe I said this Sabbath was blotted out in the yeere of Christ 364. that is by the Laodicean Counsaile as hereafter you shall heare c. from thence vntill this present howre it is not Remembred for we profane it buy sell market fayer and worke in it I pray God bring this to our remembrances and close home to our consciences I said also this Comm is forgotten aboue the other 9. for thers no one thing in all the other 9. commanded that is wholly and altogether forgotten as is this seauenth day and though Papistes haue forgotten foulely the second Comm yet blessed be God the Reformed Church of Protestantes remember it well but as for the seauenth day Sabbath and the Command vpon it Remember the Sabbath day this is forgotten at all hands vtterly by both Protestantes and Papistes and so much of the word Remember 4. The next pointe to be considered is the name of this sacred Time and day t is called Sabbath Remember the Sabbath c. In this name two thinges are considerable 1. that it is vsed as a proper name for the seauenth and last day of the weeke with the Iewes of this I say no more referring you to what I haue else where afore said touching the Sabbath as a proper name c. 2. That the word Sabbath signifieth Rest The first vse I will raise bence shall be from the consideration of both those ioyned togeather and may be for information sheweing that the Hebrew word Sabbath may be translated into Englishe wordes if vve doe but ioyne these two together that is the proper name and the signification of it so for Sabbath as t is a proper name of the last day of the weeke put Saturday and then hereto add that signification of the word Sabbath Rest and then thus it may be rendred Saturday-Rest Remember Saturday-Reste to keepe it holy c. the profit that wold come of this is that there vvold be no scruple in mindes of the ignorant which day of the weeke it is that God requireth in his 4th Comm to be Sanctified Further it wold reforme the confusion of such as call our first day of the vveeke or Lords day The Sabbath day thus doeing they woefully confound thinges as times and dayes iust as if vve novv a dayes shold begine to call our Sunday by the name Saturday what a confusion wold this breede of time transplaceing the proper name of the seauenth day of the weeke vnto the first day of the weeke Hence in part is that delusion of well minded ignorant people that when they reade the 4th Comm Remember the Sabbath day c. and then bethink themselues that vve call our Sunday Sabbath day surely then conclude they our Sunday or Lords day is the day that God appointed by this his 4th Comm which is a grosse errour since vve all say the Sabbath day is changed into that which we call the Lords day and if the Sabbath day be changed as is said into the Lords day why doe vve not put away the ould name and take vp only the new name like as the name of that Father of the faithfull it was of ould Abram but when God changed his name into Abraham the Lord said neighther shall thy name be called any more Abram but thy name shall be called Abraham Genesi 17.5 and so let vs no more calle it Sabbath day but Lords day But if you will retaine the proper name Sabb. still as is not vnmeete you should since it is a name that may perpetually be kept in the Church it being a particle of the Morall Law which is perpetuall why then I beseech you let euery day haue its owne proper name doe not miscall dayes by wronge names Let our Satuday be called Sabbath day for so it of all the dayes in the weeke answeres to the Iewes Sabbath day vvitnesse the Iewes when they liued in England they kept Saturday for theire Sabbath day and as they doe likewise in other partes of the World where they live at this day and witnesse the Lattines vvho to this day call Saturday Sabbath day Dies Sabbathi I doubt not but this exhortation might preuaile were it not for an inconuenience which wold be this then that if vve called Saturday Sabbath day then our people wold growe to thinke that Saturday shold be Sanctified by Gods will in his 4th Comm. for our Sabbath day and if vve call the first day of the weeke Sunday or Lords day only then the people vvold not so easily be made beleeue that the 4th Comm. bindes them to the Lords day because the Comm. binds only to the day called Sabbath day not speaking one vvord of the day called Lords day But if vve call the Lords day Sabbath day once then it goes downe the stomacke without any lett or scruple that the 4th Comm pointes directly to our first day of the weeke or Lords day and so a wrong day is kept one day being taken for another so Superstition is vsed for Religion and one day God shall say who required this at your handes who may the people say why our watch men our ministers taught vs so and called it so and told vs it ought to be so as for vs we were not learned in the tounges and Artes we must beleeue our Ministers The Priests lippes must preserue knowledge and we must aske the Law at theire mouthes but this plea cannot altogeather free the people see Ezek 33.6 nor can the Ministrie be altogether free of a shrewde taxatiō were it not hitherto done of ignorance and of a good intente in asmuch as they are guilty of this transgression partly by misenameing of dayes which causeth an errour in the people But hereto it will be said Sabbath signifies a Rest now on our Lords day we Rest and therfore we may call it a Sabbath day I answer t is true Sabbath signifieth Rest so the Lords day might be called Sabbath day but yet in no other sense then euery common Holy day wherein we worke not may be called Sabbath day that is Resteing day now if the nameing of Holy dayes Sabbath dayes shold beget an inclination in the ignorant to sanctifie them as Sabbaths were it not time to forbeare such names Furthermore
note that we may call the Lords day or first day of the weeke and other common Holy dayes Resting dayes but we must know with all that thus to call and to name them is meerly humane and of our owne deuise for God neuer named or called the Lords day nor common holy dayes Resteing dayes if therfore we will call dayes as God calleth them then must vve call only the 7th day Sabbath day or Resting day for said God Exod. 20.10 The 7th day is the Sabbath or Resting day I answere 2. Sabbath day may be vsed in reference to the 4th Com or not in any reference vnto it if it be vsed not in reference to the 4th Comm I am not against it for so may we call Christmas day when t is one a weeke day Sabbath day and so may we call dayes of publike thanksgiuing and reioycing Sabbath dayes as coronation dayes Gunpowder Treason dayes c. but if vve call any day Sabbath day religiously in relation to the 4th Comm as in that sense we call our Lords day Sabbath day then know it cannot be called Sabbath day for that this name Sabbath day in reference to 4th Com it must haue these properties 1. it must be set vpon its proper day our Saturday the which is named by God Sabbath day or Resting day 2. it must be the 7th day from the creation or last day of the vveeke 3. it must be the day which God blessed and sanctified Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 now none of these thinges agree to our Lords day 5. The next point to be treated one is the vvord Day Remember the Sabbath day now as before vve haue heard of the Sabbath day vvhich it is for order and place as vvhither the first or 2d c. or 7th or 8th day so now vve are to heare of the duration and length of that Sabbath day A day is commonly diuided into a day naturall of 24. howres or artificiall of 12. howres but I must craue leaue to departe from this distinction though a common receiued one because how euer it may haue its vse in ciuill affaires yet is it not Canonicall and Diuine and therfore not to be a rule in expounding the word Day in Scripture that I may not seeme sleightily to deny a common distinction note the reasons moueing me here too are 1. Because it is no vvhere founde in Scripture that they had any day of 24. howres a day of 12. howres I reade of I confesse but I neuer reade of a day of 24. howres it is not safe therfore by Day in 4th Com to interpret it of a day of 24. howres 2. By a day naturall of 24. howres vve vnderstand both the light and the darknesse the day and the night vvhich fale within compasse of these 24. howres novv I pray what a woefull confusion and jumbling of things together is here vvhat is this but to put light for darkenesse vvhen ye call the night or darknesse Day may you not as vvell put darknesse for light and call the day or light Nighte may vve not as vvell comprize Hell vnder the vvord Heauen as darkenes vnder the vvord Day vnles it be Ironically I thinke this is matchlesse But hereto it will be said doth not Scripture thus Genes 1.5 So the Euening and the morning vvere the first day by Euening here is meante the night and by morning the day or light and both these made vp the first day I answere the Euening doth no vvhere in Scripture betoken the night or darkenesse and that I am not singular in this see Perkins cases of conscience at end of 2d booke but by Euening vve are to vnderstand the afternoone as vve in this land doe saying Good euene to you Sir if once it be past noone that euening is takē for the afternoone and tyme of perfect light and before Sune set appeares by the phrase of euening sacrifice which was celebrated about 3. or 4. a clocke in after noone see these textes Ex. 29.38.39 Deu. 23.11 losh 8.29 Ezra 9.4.5 Iere. 6.4 Deut. 16.6 so then according to Scriptures sense by Euening I vnderstand the afternoone and by morning the forenoone and thus the Euening that is the afternoone and the Morning that is the forenoone made the first day Genes 1.5 Hauing thus giuen my reasons why I reiect a day naturall of 24. howres consisting of day and night both In next place I am to shewe vvhat I meane by Day in 4th Com By Day I vnderstand the tyme of light only namly all that space of tyme and light from day peepe or day breake in the morning vntill day be quite off the skye at night that by Day is meante the light see Gene. 1.5 God vvhoe know best to name things called the Light Day see 1. Thes 5.5.8 1. Cor. 3.13 and that the day begines euen vvhilst it is but a little light and much darke see Ioh. 20.1 and see Mark. 1.35 this last text is to be reade as Chemnitius vvell obserues thus In the morning vvhilst it vvas very much night c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so Beza reades it too of dayes I may say there are 2. kindes according to Scripture 1. a naturall day and this is from first aproche of light vpon our horizon before Sune rise vnto the last departure of light after Sune sett from off our horizon 2. is an artificiall day and this consistes of 12. howres Joh. 11.9 are there not 12. howres in the day the naturall day is variable now longer as in Sommer novv shorter as in Winter The artificiall day is constantly of the same lenght 12. howres long I conclude by Day in 4th Com I rather thinke the the naturall day to be meante then the artificiall day for it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two that is the day from day breake to last shutting in of the day so long as is any light in the skye Here a case of conscience would be discussed that is if our Sabbath be but from day breake to shutting vp of day hovv shall vve doe in depth of vvinter at vvhat tyme vve haue not 12. howres of day light novv your opinion vvas euen novv that it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two dayes rather the naturall than the artificiall but in depth of vvinter the artificiall day of 12. howres is the longer day I ansvvere 1. though for that tyme the artificiall day be longer than the naturall day yet it is so but for a little vvhile during the depth of the winter only vvhich tyme excepted all the yeere after the naturall day is the longer and so these 2. dayes compared together in all tymes vve giue God the longer day vvhen vve giue him the naturall day 2. For so much as it is not likely that God would haue vs measure him his day by two diuers metevvands that is by the day naturall at one tyme of the yeere and by the day artificiall
because I heare the most so sleighting this sacred tyme as but a circumstance c. and as a thing not required of it selfe and by it selfe as are the duties in this tyme Holinesse and Rest but only for an other things sake as for the Holinesse sake that is to be performed in this tyme and so as if the Holinesse be performed it skilleth not so much for the tyme. For my parte therfore I cannot see but the tyme of the 7th day is more excellent then be the duties of Holinesse and Rest in the tyme if these duties be not considered absolutly and in relation to God but respectiuly as subseruient to the tyme. Holinesse consider of it only as a dutie of first Table in this branch of praising and lauding God in an acknowledgment of his power and wisedome and goodnesse c. so reflecting Gods holy workes and attributes vpon himselfe now consider as the Heauens declare the glory of God Ps 19.1 So thinke on that 7th day as the Prophet Dauid speakes of dayes in generall v. 2. Day vnto day vttereth the same too or Day after Day as Aynsworth obserueth so then if dayes doe vtter the glory of God and shew forth his handy vvorkes reflecting vnto God and declaring the same to men then doubtlesse the 7th day Sabbath hath a kinde of secret speech vnto and praise of God by reflection vnto God and declaration vnto man the whole worke of creation done vpon the 6. dayes before shewing forth these Attributes of Gods wisedome power and goodnesse manifested in those dayes and surely this day doth more compleatly in its kinde reflect and giue God the full glory of his worke of creation then can any man vvho because he knowes things by halues can speake of them but by peeces well ther is some thing in this though I vvill not be curious nor stand vpon it 2. As for Holinesse as prayer prayses and the like I consider of it absolutly or relatiuly Absolutly without reference to any speciall tyme as a parte of Gods worship and seruice and so I graunt it may be greater then the 7th day tyme relatiuly as t is employed to the 7th day to honour it withall and thus it is not so great nor excellent I explaine my selfe by this simile a sonne hath a booke of his deceased father for his fathers sake he is so in loue with the booke as he will put vpon it siluer ot goulden claspes silkin strings double gild it other cost to the double or treble value of the book if now you demaunde whither the booke or the cost be the more excellent why sure the cost is the greater in it selfe considered and not as made seruiceable to the booke but the booke is the greater and more excellent in that for the bookes sake he begildeth it and puts on all that cost So as this Sonne gildeth and bewtifieth the booke because it was his fathers just so the Lord God blessed and sanctified the 7th day because that in it he had rested Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 The reason then mouing God to adorne and bewtify the 7th day so with Holines and Rest was because God had once rested on that day so as the 7th day was not set apart for holinesse sake but holinesse at this tyme was appointed for the 7th dayes sake Euen as Angles are ministering Spirites for our sakes and so are inferiour to men in some respects that is as they be attendants to vs yet further to this end see the 4th Comm where in the first place the Sabbath is commanded Remember the Sabbath day and as the cheif thing aimed at it is twice mentioned vvhereas Holines is but once named yea doth not the very order of the words and manner of vttering them importe the same like as if one should say to his seruant remember such a booke that you saue it and lay it vp carefully or that you gilde it and bewtifye it with the finest gould c. would not a man think by these words that all the seruants care and diligence and cost about the booke were for the booke and lesse than the booke in worth and excellency why iust in such frame of words the Lord deliured the 4th Comm Remember the Sabbath day that you sanctify it the which sanctifying the day is the adorning and the bewtifying of it I conclude if any man of better judgement think that so much is not to be attributed to the day and tyme as these my words importe yet I thinke these things considered he vvill judge there is much more in the tyme that by Gods ordinance then is commonly thought on and so as euery sleightie probable argument and curiouse distinction should not force a man to abolish this sacred Day and prophane this tyme me thinks we should sticke more closse to Gods Commandements than so God hath left vs but 10. Com and they be the rule of our life a light to our feet and lanthorne to our paths and that according whereto we shall be adiudged at that last day Mat. 25.34.35 Iam. 2.12 how should we contend for the maintenance of this truth which was once giuen vnto vs not suffering any of these 10. lightes to be extinguisht no nor any one of thē to be eclipsed in least degree nor enduring that any one linke be broken from this chain no nor so much as the least peece or percell from any of the linkes but that we mainteine them in the full weight and measure that euer they had not so much as the day or tyme once altred or changed remembring Deut. 12.32 vvhatsoeuer I command you c. thou shalt put Nothing there to nor take any thing there from and Galat. 3.10 Cursed is euery man that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the Law And so I haue done with exposition of this 4th Comm. The 7th day Sabbath is not abolished THat vvith the more culler of truth they might abolish the Sabbath day many haue taken in hand out of a sincere affection to their knowledge as I verily perswade my selfe yeelding too much confidence to antiquity and trust to the labours of our worthy forefathers in this point to make one of Gods tenne and morall Commandements namly the 4th to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall a thing at first hearing very strange that of 10. only one should so farre differ in kinde from its fellowes when all vvere equally and a like deliuered by the immediate and audible voice of God and written all a like together by the finger of God in Tables of stone vvhich no ceremony vvas Nay vvhich is worce yet that not one whole commandement is said to be ceremoniall but only one peece of that one commandement is a ceremony as if one of the linkes of this chaine vvere partly gould partly lead whereas all the rest were pure gould what were this but to suppose our God to plough in his field with an oxe and
the Sabbath day it is a proper name for an other of our weeke dayes that is for Sunday or for the first day of the weeke 2. Because the Com enioyneth the 7th day which is the last daye of the weeke but the Lords daye is the 8th daye or the first daye of the weeke by the accounte of all men And it is no lesse absurde to presse the 4th Com. which enioynes the 7th day for a Sabbath to the 8th daye or to the first daye then it had been for the Israelites out of that Com Levit 25.2.3.4 The 7th yeere shall be a Sabbath of rest vnto the Land c. to presse this Com vnto the 8th yeere or to the first yeere for the lands rest 3. Because the Com enioyneth that day which the Lord God himself rested on the which he blessed hallowed Exod 20 11. but our Lords daye is not the day God rested on nor did God in the creatione blesse sanctify hallowe our Lords daye or first daye of the weeke nay he wrought one it himselfe appointed it for a workeing daye to man when he saide 6. dayes shalt thou labour doe all thou hast to doe Exod 20 9. of which 6. dayes our Lords day is one the first But here vnto it will be replied true the 4th Com did once enioyne the 7th daye Sabbath but since the daye is altered changed by Christ his Apostles so that now the 4th Com is changed too bindes to the newe daye though not properly yet Analogically by waye of resemblance I answere the word Change betokeneth two thinges the one is an abolition or remoueing the ould the other is an assumption or takeing vp of a newe as 2. Sam. 12.20 David changed his apparell that is he put off his mourning attire and he put one other apparell now I deny that euer Christ or his Apostles did thus change the Sabbath day either by there precept or practise did the Apostles so preache one the Lords day as they ceased preaching one the Sabbath day the day before the Lords day can this be proued for this is a change properly is not the contrary manifest to wit that the Apostles did constantly preach one the Sabbath dayes see Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 if then they also preached one the Lords dayes too why this is no alteration or change though it is but an addition of a day and a settinge vp of another Sabbath daye a newe and so you may haue two Sabbathes in euery weeke if you will 2. I answere admit the Sabbath was changed into the Lords day yet may you not safely say the 4th Com was changed for so you say the 4th Comm was abolisht and a newe Comm erected the word change implying so much Nor can you saye the 4th Com being an ould Com bindes to a newe day long since erected how will this be proued specially since that it was not the manner of Scripture to establish newe thinges by od preceptes Baptisme that came in roome of Circumcision it stands not by force of the ould precept to Abraham Genes 17.10 Let euery man child among you be circumcised c. but by a newe precept Matth 28.19 goe teach all Nations baptizing them c. The Supper of the Lord come in roome of the Passeover it stands not by virtue of the ould Law Ex 12.3 c. but by a newe Law 1. Cor. 11.23 As well may we faine that the Law made by Queene Elizabeth to stint vsury at 10. in the 100. is that Law which now a dayes stintes vsury at 8. in the 100. as if Queen Elizabeths Lawes did add force to and did commande things enacted by King Charles many yeeres after as to imagine the 4th Comm enacted for the 7th day shold now binde to the 8th day which is longe since risen vp as is said I answere thirdly by deniall that the 4th Com doth binde to another daye then it mentioneth Analogically and by resemblance similitude by this deuise may we binde Christians to Baptize Children only one the 9th day and to eate the Lords Supper only vpon the 15th day of the month once a yeere and say we are bounde to thes dayes by the Lawes of Circumcision and Passeover which did properly binde to the 8th day and to the 14th day but now they binde vs Analogically to the 9th and 15th dayes 2. This deuise is matchlesse for of all the other 9. Com none doe binde to other things then thos mentioned in the Com analogically and by similitude nay in this 4th Com where we haue 3. things enioyned 1. the tyme the Sabbath 2. Holinesse 3. Rest it bindes not analogically to Holinesse or Rest but only to the day and tyme as they saye since all other partes and parcelles of the 10. Com be expounded properly why shold this one particle only the 7th day or the Sabbath day be expounded improperly and analogically Sure I am it is against the receiued rule in exposition of Scriptures to giue an improper sense where a proper may be had Yet furthermore others replye thus the 4th Com enioyneth a Sabbath day which signifies a Restinge day now our Lords day is a Sabbath day for so much as it is a restinge day and so the 4th Com enioyneth it and is firme for it I answere 1. by like reason you may thus expounde the name Iesus Heb 4 8. of Ihesus the Sauiour of the world which is meante of Iesus which is Ioshua that saued the Israelites from the Canaanites as if because Iesus signifies a Sauiour therfore whersoeuer ye finde a man that was a Sauiour you may thinke he was meante by the name Iesus though the context shewes it is meante of an other Iesus 2. True it is the word Sabbath signifieth a Reste but Synecdochically for that speciall Reste specified in the 4th Com to wite that Rest which is on the 7th day not that on the 8th daye for the 7th day is the Sabbath Exod 20 10. and this is the day that goes before the Lords day furthermore the Restinge day in the 4th Com is such a restinge day as is distinguished from all other dayes in the weeke by his proper name Sabbath day which with the Iewes was neuer taken to be the Lords day or first day of the weeke no more then Saturday with vs can be mise vnderstode to be Sunedaye wherfore to auoide this shifte it were to be wished that the Hebrew name Sabbath were translated into an English name as nere as might be though by a circumlocution rendringe day for day and call it Saturday-Reste Remember Saturday-reste to Keepe it holy c. Exod 20 8. And thus the simplest cold not mistake which is the day the Lord meante in his 4th Com Thus you see the 4th Com cannot be vnderstode to enforce the Sanctification of the Lords day 2. A second Text produced is Reu 1 10. I was rauished in the Spirit one
is theire part to proue Paul begane his Sermon in the morneinge vvhoe say Paul kept this daye a Sabbath daye by preaching in it yea moreouer they must proue that the disciples here at Troas did refraine all servile labour and the ordinary vvorkes of theire caleinge all this first day of the vveeke or Lords day from morneinge to the end of this day if they vvill prove this day kept as a Sabbath for to refraine all workes and Rest is a branch of the 4th Com and one parte of a Sabbath dayes dutie but how they can prove this oute this text passeth myn vnderstanding 5. I deny that Paul preacht now at this tyme in conscience of the 4th Com and this they must proue or else they say nothing might not Paul preach at this extraordinary tyme in conscience of that Com 2. Tim. 4.2 preache the word in season and out of season surely this text was warrant sufficient for Paul to take all occasions of preaching the word euery day or night Sabbath day or other dayes finally how will it be proued that Paul kept this Lords day here for a Sabbath day by his preaching since that preachinge it is an euery dayes worke as hath bene showne afore can it be proved that Pauls intent and purpose in preaching was to celebrate thereby that day for a Sabbath this must be proved 6 A 6th Text produced is 1. Cor. 16.2 vpon the first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside by himselfe c. here say they vvas a constant weekely collection for the poore now collections vsed to be after the word preached and Sacramentes administred all which were done one the Sabbath day as appeares in the histories of the Church ergo this first day of the weeke was a Sabbath I answere 1. indeed our oulde translatiō gaue some waye to vs to thinke this collection was weekly when it reade the text thus Euery first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside c. but our newe Translatores haue well amended it and doe reade it thus vpō the first day of the weeke c. as of a single action once to be done onely and this further appeares to be true by those words in latter ende of v. 2. that so there be no gatheringe when I come so as Paul wold haue this collection cease when he came emongst them but had it bene weekly Paul wold rather haue had it reuined a freshe at his presence whoe was a furtherer of all holy performances This collection therefore was extraordinary tyeth vs not to ordenary practise for if it did then were we bound euery Lords day in euery Congregation to gather for the poore as a Sabbath dayes dutie 2. This collection was extraordenary in that it was not for their owne poore at Corinthe but for the poore of other Churches and therfore this mony collected was to be sente vpon the first day of the weeke If any shall demande which first day of the weeke the Church vvas to lay aside their almes one because there were many first dayes of the weeke in a yeere I answere since I finde it not differenced from others in the text I therefore thinke it must be vnderstoode of the first Lords day or first first day of the vveek vvhich came next after the Corinthians receiued this Epistle like as if I say to a frend come to my house one Saturday it is to be vnderstoode of the next Saturday first cominge after my invitation of him 7 A 7th and last text produced is Ioh. 20.19.26 where Christs frequent apparitiones to his disciples vpon the Lords day is made an argument to proue it a Sabbath daye but by what authority or rule of just consequēce Christs apparitions must constitute a Sabbath day nor can I conceiue nor euer haue I heard nor doe I thinke euer shall heare I answere 2. whereas the frequency and constancy of Christs apparitions one the Lords day is so much vrged I wold faine see where Christ appeared one the Lords day euer aboue once onely and that in Ioh. 20.19 as for his seconde apparition in v. 26. eight dayes after vvhich is supposed to be the next Lords daye after his first apparition it is quite other wise for in the originall it goes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and after eight dayes c. now after 8. dayes cold not be the same daye sennight vpon the 8th daye but after the 8th day as on the 9th or 10th dayes after and so this seconde apparition was not vpon the Lords daye I grante there is a phrase Mark 8.31 that Christ after three dayes must rise againe and yet it must be vnderstood thus vpon the third he must rise againe But herein we must knowe thus to reade it is a departing from the naturall and proper sense of the words which is not sufferable saue in a case of necessity as to recōcile two textes of Scripture or the like as in this instance last propounded because other textes of Scripture say Christ rose vpon the thirde day 1. Cor. 15.4 and this text Mark. 8.31 saith after 3. dayes c. therfore to recōcile these two we vnderstand this latter text and the word after to be no more but vpon but now to apply this is there the like necessity in Ioh. 20.26 to vnderstand by after vpon is there any other text affirminge that vpon the 8th day Christ appeared to Thomas and the Disciples or is there any inconveniency or absurdity to take the words in their commō proper sense if neighther of these can be showne then the readinge which I vrge is sound and good I answere 3. if Christs apparition to his disciples cold be an argument of a Sabbath day Then of Gods word for the keeping of an other day then God apointed in his morall Law or 4th Com least I partake of that brande of a wicked man prophecied of Daniel 7.25 in changing tymes and the Law now since it is a propriety of God to change tymes and seasons Dan. 2.21 had not I need be carefull there be no new day as is the Lords day set vp for a Sabbath vnles it can be expresly infallibly demonstratiuely proued to be of Gods owne doeing least I say I be accessary to the sin of changeing Godes tymes Dan. 7.25 Thus haue I answered their textes of Scripture brought for the Lords daye to be a Sabbath and the common objections now let vs in next place examine their reasons whereby the Lords day is proued a Sabbath 1 The first reason is drawne from the frequēt and constant practise of Christ and of his Apostles celebration of the Lords day the which is authority sufficient for justification of the Lords day to be a Sabbatth I answere 1. admit Christ and his Apostles did preache on the Lords day thereby honour this day aboue any of the 6. working dayes yet how doth it appeare they did this on this day to
this very ende and purpose to sanctifye it for a Sabbath daye and in obedience to the 4th Com let these 2. things be proued or else nothing is done I answere 2. as touching our Sauiour Christ vvhereas t is supposed he constantly kept the Lords day as a Sabbath I deny it let it be proved that euer Christ did sanctifye as a Sabbath any on Lords day Nay is not the contrary manifest that Christ trauailed a matter of 15. miles out and home vpon the very first Lords day that euer was it beinge the most eminent Lords day of any euer after because it was that very Lords day whereone he rose from the dead see Luk. 24.13.33 Christ wēt with the 2. Disciples from Ierusalem to Emmaus v. 15. which is in accounte 7. miles and an halfe counting 8. furlonges to a myle thence he returned to Ierusalem backe againe that night which is 7. myles and an halfe more now 15. myles is aboue a Sabbath dayes Iourney since a Sabbath dayes Iourney is in esteeme but about 2. myles Act. 1.12 Neighther can it be proued Christ went to Emmaus to preach and keepe Sabbath there for 1. he went from the Congregation of his Disciples which he lefte behinde at Ierusalem and we reade not of any assemblyes of Disciples that were at Emmaus now Christ beinge the pastor of his flocke and the minister or preacher to his Disciples can it be thought he vvold leaue them destitute of his helpe to sanctify the first Christian Sabbath that euer the Church sawe 2. how cold Christ keepe that day for a Sabbath since he was not in the Congregation but in the field travailing from about noone as is gatherable from circumstances of the texte and so forwards all the remainder of that after noone for he went alonge with the 2. Disciples they went not aboue a matter of 2. miles an howre as is probable by the ordenary pace of trauailers so then 15. miles spent them a matter of 7. howres Had Christ imitated God in the creation as is supposed in setting vp a Sabbath day then surely as God did rest on the 7th day and set vs his owne paterne so would Christ haue rested all this Lords day after the worke of redemption to haue bene an example to vs. what if Christ being risen from the dead cold now trauaile without paine so cold God in the Creation create without paine yet wold he leaue nothing to be created on the 7th day but rested on it for vs to imitate him and Adam in Innocency cold labor without paine yet he must rest on the Sabbath daye and what if Christ did open the Scriptures concerning himselfe v. 27 to the 2. Disciples as they went on their way together must this therefore be a proper Sabbath dayes worke as the Lord by Moses commanded Deut. 6.6.7 parentes that they shold talke to their children of the Law of God as they walked by the way c. on what day so euer and as euery Godly minister now rideing on the way vpon a Saturday towards Market or fayer will vpon occasion be talking to people that ride with him of heauenly and diuine things so much rather wold our blessed Sauiour be teaching and vpon all occasions instructing the people vpon euery day especially consideringe it was his office to teache and therfore a daily taske to preach in season and out of season vpon all occasions as we reade he did in the Gospell and as we reade Act. 1.3 Christ was seene of his Apostles for 40. dayes after his resurrection speaking to them of the things appertaining to the Kingdome of God now what did Christ preache more to these 2. Disciples on that Lords day then he preached to his Apostles euery day after it for 40. dayes together To add one thing more be it you make exceptions against Christs trauailing one the Lords day what exceptions doe you finde against the 2. Disciples of Christ with whome Christ travailed these trauailed one the Lords day Christ himselfe not disallowing but by his companying them justifyed them they vvent from the Congregation of Disciples at Ierusalem where the Sabbath was kept if any where they went to a towne not to keepe Sabbath for it was neere night ere they got thither and they but staied and supped and came backe againe member vvhat I haue formerly giuen in answere to the texts brought to proue the Lords day to be the Sabbath day as for Peters sermon Act. 2.14 it vvas not made vpon the Lords day but vpon Saturday or on the Lords Sabbath day as is proued as for Pauls sermon Act. 20.7 this was in the night not in the day now I hold the night is no parte of the day I say no parte of the Lords day as shall be proued here after in my exposition of the word Day in the 4th Com yea if they began their Sabbaths at Eueninge as is holden by many from euen to euen ye shall celebrate your Sabbath Leuit. 23.32 then Paul preacht not on the first day of the vveeke but on the second because he began his sermon at Euening after the Disciples vvere come togeather vpon the first day of the vveeke or else Paul trauailed and set saile on the Lords day if the Lords day began that euening when he began his sermon for next morneing he went to shipe Act. 20.11.13 as for that text 1. Cor. 16.2 here is no mention of any preaching at all onely it treates about a future collection c. as for the text Ioh. 20.19 here is no mention neither of any Sermon made when Christ appeared to his Disciples t is true the text saith they were assembled indeed but wherefore to heare a sermon no such thing but text saith they were assembled together for feare of the Iewes like as the Lords Prophets were in Caues in Obadiahs tyme 1. King 18.4 to shrowde themselues from danger of persecutores what other ende they had in assembleing the Scripture is silent lastly admit here vvas a sermon yet it vvas not vpon the Lords day for it vvas in the night following the Lords day now the night is not in Scripture account any parte of the day as shall be showne as for the text Reuel 1.10 vvhere it is called the Lords day by John here is not the least mention of any readeing or preaching at all nay not like there cold be any since reuelations vsually came to holy men vvhen they vvere solitary and alone not in assemblies vvhere preaching and sermons be thus I haue examined all the textes vvherein is any shewe of sermons and I finde not in any of them that euer any of the Apostles did so much as one single tyme preach any one sermon vpon the Lords day the vvhich if it be true as is most true vvhere is any the least groūd from Apostles practise of keeping the Lords day for a Sabbath they must needes proue me false in this point or else the foundation being shaken
God and for vvhose sake the Sabbath it selfe vvas made Mark 2.27 To conclude did not our blessed Sauiour in his tyme approue of fyer making on the Sabbath think you or at least of as great vvorks and so of that by like reason vvhen he vowchsafed his presence at a feast of the Iewes on the Sabbath Luk. 14.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 c vvhere were many guestes now at a feast and many guests could not but be a fyer to dresse meat or as great labour in dressing meat and tendance of the guests as is the bare kindling of a fyer 3 The 3d thing is that the Iewe might carry no burdenes on the Sabbath day Ierem. 17.21 Nehem 13.15 I answere 1. If this be a part of the rigorous precise and strict rest required only of the Jewe vvhy doe all diuines now a dayes presse this rigorousnes vpon Christians forbidding vs novv to carry burdnes on the Sabbath day if this vvas a ceremony and to ende with Christ then vve Christians may freely beare burdenes vpō backs of men or beasts or on cartes novv on our Lords day is not this goodly stuffe hereby you may haue a taste vvhat it is for vvorthy diuines to captiuate their judgments to yeeld to much confidence to the labours of our forefathers if of Note or to take points of diuinity by tradition vpon trust from others for had this learned man vsed his owne judgment in these points he had neuer ouershot himselfe so farr as to put downe such things as these so vndigested 2. In this text God forbad carrying of burdenes only as an vnnecessary seruile vvork but he forbade not carrying burdnes in case of necessity as a vvork of charity for Christ allowed the sicke man to carry his bed on the Sabbath day Ioh. 5.8.9.10 now vvhere then vvas God so rigorous and straight vnto the Jewe since he permitted them burthens bearing if and vvhen necessity so required and so we haue examined these 3. things aboue mentioned 4 A 4th Text I may add vvhich I haue often heard alleaged for the former purpose and t is vvritten Exod. 16.23 Bake that to day vvhich ye vvill bake and seeth that vvhich ye vvill seeth and all that vvhich remaineth lay it vp till the morning for you c. vvhere say they here the Iewes vvere commanded to dresse all their meate on the Friday the day before their Sabbath day and by consequence they were forbidden to dresse any on the Sabbath I answere 1. To this I oppose an other Text Exod. 12.16 vvhere the Lord forbade the Isralites to doe any work but with this exception Saue about that which euery man must eate that only may ye doe this text so playnly giuing leaue to dresse such and so much meate on the day as a man should eat vpon the day giues me to thinke no other text should forbid the same but hereto it will be said the Text Exod. 16.23 treats of the Morall Sabbath but your Text Exod. 12.16 treats of the holy dayes of the passeouer I answere t is true this text speaks of the first and of the 7th dayes of the feast of vnleauened bread only but this must also be noted that these festiuall dayes had their holy conuocations and assemblies and wherein they were forbidden to doe any work as the text shewes just as on the Sabbath dayes yea these festiuall dayes were also called Sabbath dayes and threatened with death also if they wrought on these dayes Leuit. 23.30.32 now if God as strictly bound the Iewe to rest on these festiuall Sabbaths which were annuall as on the morall Sabbath weekly then looke what libertie God gaue vpon one of these Sabbaths vve are to judge I suppose that God gaue the like libertie on the other Sabbath the cases being a like and the ceremoniall Sabbath being as strictly to be rested in from all manner of seruile works as vvas the morall Sabbath 2. I answere to the text directly This Text in my thinking is vvonderously mis-vnderstood they suppose that Moses lade the Isralites bake vpon Friday both the two Omers gathered on that day and then by these words all that remayneth lay vp c. they vnderstand all that remaineth of the 2. omers backt and vneaten so as that which remained vneaten was backed But first they erre in supposing Moses bad them bake on the day before the Sabbath both these two omers vvhich they had that day gathered where as Moses left it free to their choise to backe as the text faith vvhat they vvould more or lesse Bake that which ye vvill bake and seeth that which ye vvill seeth c. and so t is most likly they baked that day about one omer of the two they had gathered just as they did on the other 5. vvorking dayes they gathered euery day one world So then the Sabbath if it must last till heauen comes it must then last to euery particular saint and beleeuer so long as he liues on earth abides in the church militant and it must last to the church generally to this worlds end and if so then I trust the Sabbath is no ceremony temporary and abolisht long since I answere 2. Admit the Sabbath here were a type yet is not the Sabbath as men keepe it made a type of heauen but as God kept it at creation as v. 4. Now if only Gods keeping Sabbath rt creation was a type of heaueu what is this to make the Iewes keeping Sabbath any type of heauen for our question is of the Sabbath in reference to men I answere 3. Gods rest at the creation is not a type properly as hauing relation to Christ incarnate but a similitude only as shadowing out Heauen and such similitudes are not ceremonious and temporary but perpetuall and eternall for instance Heb. 4.10 He that is entred into his rest hath ceased from his workes as God did from his if then Gods rest because a similitude to be a ceremony and temporary then also is the perfection in God a temporary ceremony for t is made a similitude of our perfection Mat. 5.48 ye shall therfore be perfect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as your heauenly father is perfect see a like example Joh. 5 21. And these are the textes vvhich are vsually brought to make the Rest of the 4th Comm in parte eighther too strict and rigorous or else typicall and so ceremoniall and so the 4th Com it selfe to be partly a ceremony and all to this end the better to make way for the downe fale and vtter ruine of Gods 7th day Sabbath the vvhich by Gods Mercy they haue not yet attained but you see are frustrat of their purposes so I trust shall euer be hereafter And now I come to the tyme of the Sabbath the 7th day vvhich is the maine of all and against which they haue bent all their forces and if it fall so out they haue no better successe against this 7th day Sabbath then they haue had against the Rest
in the Sabbath all their labour vvill be lost as I trust in God it will appeare at the last what they say against the 7th day Sabbath I reduce to two heades the former shall consist of textes of Scripture and artificiall arguments the latter of testimonies and authorities of men for their Textes of Scripture whereby they would proue the 7th day Sabbath is abolisht 1. The first text shall be that of Isai 66.23 from month to month or from new Moone to new Moone and from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before me c. whence it is collected by them that the weekly 7th day Sabbath was a signe and that of the euerlasting Sabbath in Heauen and therfore the ceremoniall and temporary Hereto I answere 1. that this phrase of speech in this text is obscure and dark some to vs for vvhat shall be meante by these words from Month to Month whereof are these a signe now t is vnmeet that so plaine a text as is the 4th Com touching the Sabbath which is deliured in plaine and proper vvords should be contradicted and blotted out by an other text which is in Metaphoricale phrases of a doubtfull sense 2. if this Sabbath was a signe of heauen it is so farre from being a temporary ceremony as rather it is perpetuall Morall to last till Heauen comes as hath beene said before for the signe or shadowe is to last vntill the body a substance be comne or admit this Sabbath a signe both of the whole tyme of the Church of the New Testament on earth and also of the Church triumphant in heauen as some would why yet I hope the body of Heauen hath as much force to moralize the Sabbath as hath the body of the new Church on earth to ceremonialize and temporize it yea more by how much better but it is not worth our labour to spend more words about this text it hauing so little culler to any thing in it for their purpose 2. A 2d text to proue the Sabbath a ceremony and so abolisht is Numb 28.9.10 where it was commanded the Isralites to offer two lambes for for a sacrifice on the Sabbath day Hereto I answere 1. why should the sacrificing of two lambes on the Sabbath make the Sabbath a ceremony and abolisht any more then the sacrificing of one lambe euery day for a daily burnt offring Numb 28.4.6 make the working dayes of the weeke ceremoniall and abolisht 2. Hath not the Morall works in the Sabbath as Rest and Holinesse and remembrance of Gods Rest after creation as much and more power ouer the tyme and day wherein they were done to moralize and eternize the Sabbath as hath the sacrificing two lambes to ceremonize and temporize the Sabbath or if sacrifices could abolish the tyme of the Sabbath which was commanded why did they not also abolish the duties in the tyme as Rest and Holinesse 3. The Sabbath was a Sabbath in nature and institution before there was any sacrifices for it was in tyme of Adams innocency before the fall wherfore as the Apostle Gal. 3.17 reasoneth of the promise and of the Law that the Law could not disanulle the promise to Abraham which came 430. yeeres after the promise so say I Sacrifices cannot disanulle the Sabbath since the Sabbath was before any Sacrifices and since Sacrifices came after the Sabbath as therfore the Sabbath had a being before sacrifices and ceremonies so may it haue its being after all sacrifices and ceremonies be abolisht 3. A 3d Text is in Deuter. 5.15 where the Lord telleth the Israelites He brought them out of Egypte and therfore the Lord commanded them to keepe the Sabbath vvhence they would argue to this effect since that the Sabbath is an effect of or hath necessary dependance vpō their deliuerance out of Egypt it followeth if that deliuerance out of Egypt be but ceremoniall as a thing proper to the Iewe Then so is the Sabbath also I answere 1. The Sabbath may be said to be an effect or haue dependance of an other thing two wayes one as touching its obseruation the other as touching its institution now this deliuerance out of Egypt was not cause of the Sabbaths institution for the Sabbath was before they euer went downe into Egypt Genes 2.3 neither vvas or could the deliverance out of Egypt be the sole cause nor the cheife cause of the Sabbaths institution for Gods owne rest vpon that day Genes 2.3 was the cheife cause and next the Sabbath was made for man Mark. 2.27 that is for the ease and benifite of his body and for the good and edification of his soule in duties of holinesse But as touching the Sabbaths obseruation the deliuerance from Egypt might be a cause and was and ought to be a motiue to obedience in obseruance keeping the Sabbath day and so all blessings whatsoeuer should be motiues to obedience as Deut. 6.20.21.23.24 Deuter. 28.47.48 but vvhat if these blessings faile and God giue others in roome of them shall our obedience and obseruance faile and vanishe vvhat and if we Christians haue not that one particular blessing of deliuerance from Egypt which the Jewe had haue vve no many other blessings and deliuerance to moue vs to obedience as from that Armade in 88. from the Gunpowder plott and I know not how many more I conclude that since the deliuerance out of Egypt vvas not the cause of the Sabbaths institution but only of its after obseruation therfore though that deliuerance was ceremoniall yet was not the Sabbath ceremoniall 2. I answere if this motiue of Isralites deliuerance from Egypt because not belonging to vs Christians therfore shewes the Sabbath belongs not to vs neither Then may we by as good reason abolish not the Sabbath alone but the whole morall law also and then as vve vvill none of the Jewes Sabbath to be ours no more need vve vvill the Iewes God to be ours commanded in the first Com for the reason to induce to obedience and hauing the true God for their God was this I Law as therfore vvhen the Apostle saith Ephes 2.15 Christ abrogated the Law of Commandements vve vnderstand it only of the ceremoniall law of commandements not of the morall So vvhere here the Apostle takes away the difference of dayes I vnderstand him to abolish only ceremoniall dayes but not the Morall 7th day Sabbath I answere 3d. if all difference of all dayes be abolisht vvhy then keepe we the Lords day now for a Sabbath in a religiouse manner if you say you keep it not as a ceremony or type shaddow of Christ to come which was the reason of the Sabbaths abolition but in other respects as in remembrance of Christ alredy comne vvhy then by like reason may not the 7th day Sabbath be now kept by vs so be we lay aside that supposed typicall shaddowish respect vvhich it had of Christ to come and vve keeping it in other respects as in remembrance of
Gods Rest on the same day after the vvork of creation and as it is a day for the benefit of both our bodies for rest and our soules for holinesse Thus none of those former textes you see can proue that the 7th day Sabbath vvas euer ceremoniall or yet abolisht but yet they haue two textes more behinde vvherein they put great confidence and especially in the former of the two and if they faile in these two as I trust in God they shall then are they quite gone and for euer to hould their peace for speaking more against the Lord Gods Sabbath 6. The 6th text is that Colos 2.16.17 let no man condemne you in meate and drinke or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moone or of the Sabbath dayes vvhich are a shaddow of things to come but the body is of Christ Loe say they here you haue Sabbath dayes forbidden the very point in question they are counted a shaddaw of Christ and therfore abolisht I answere 1. as there is two Lavves a morall Lavv consisting of 10. Comm all vvritten by the finger of God vpon Tables of stone and a ceremoniall Law vvritten by Moses and deliuered to the people so are there Sabbaths morall that is such as God engraued vpon the Tables of stone vvith other 9. preceptes and there are Sabbaths ceremoniall that is such as you finde no mention of in the Decalogue but such as you finde recorded by Moses dispersed here there in the 5. bookes of Moses specially in Leuit. 23.4 c. to the end of the chapter Novv as vvhen you reade Heb. 7.12 Ephes 2.15 If the priesthode be changed then must there be a change of the lavv you vvill not here permite any man to iumble confusedly together the lavv morall and Law ceremoniall and say both these lawes are here changed but you vvill distinguish of Lawes granting them the ceremoniall Law to be meante here but not the morall so doe I in answere to this text Col. 2.16 distinguish of Sabbaths granting them here is meante only ceremoniall Sabbaths denying that here is meante the Morall Sabbath of 7th day That this distinction is good and that by Sabbaths here is meant only ceremoniall Sabbaths doe beare witnesse to me euen vvorthy diuines of their owne side as Greenham in his vvorke vpon the Sabbath day and Perkins in his cases of conscience booke 2. chapt 16. Sect. 3. and Dod vpon the 4th Comm pag. 133. and Elton vpon the Colossians 2.16 and Ames in his Thesis touching the Sabbath 2. That here is meante only ceremoniall Sabbaths is plaine by the context and that by two reasons the former in that these Sabbathes are ranked vvith other things all vvhich be ceremonies as meates and drinkes and new Moones and holy dayes so that all other things in this text vvhich the Apostle abolisheth being ceremonies it giues vs cause to thinke the Sabbaths placed and ioyned vvith them be only ceremoniall Sabbaths as M. Dod vvell obserueth vpon the 4th Com the latter reason is for that this 16th verse is as you may see by the vvord of inference Therfore a conclusion vvhose premise you haue in the 14th verse and here the Apostles discourse is on this wise If the hand wrighting of ordinances which is the Law that commanded meates drinkes and Holy dayes new Moones Sabbath dayes be put out and taken away Then let no man condemne you in meates and drinkes in Holy dayes new Moones or Sabbaths dayes But the handwrighting of ordinances is put out and taken away Therfore let no man condemne you in meates and drinkes in Holy dayes new Moones or Sabbath dayes The minor you haue v. 14. the conclusion in v. 16. Now for asmuch as it is a rule vvith Logicians that there should not be more in the conclusion then vvas in the premisses Hence it followeth that if by the vvord Sabbathes in v. 16. you vvill vnderstand the morall Sabbath of the 7th day then by handvvrighting of ordinances in v. 14. you must vnderstand at least that parte of the Morall Law vvhich is the 4th Com the vvhich commanded that Sabbath The vvhich if you doe then you rune vpon this absurdety that you make the Apostle to abolish in this text a branch of morall Law as the vvhole or at least a parte of the 4th Com and so wheras the Lord wrote vpon the Table tenne commandements Deut. 10.4 you make by this interpretation but nyne commandements or at most but nyne and an halfe or but nyne and three quarters or there abouts for tenne compleate there is not I am sure Against my distinction they say by Sabbaths in this text of necessity must morall Sabbaths be meante because vnder the name of Holy dayes is comprised all ceremoniall Sabbathes so that then the word Sabbaths must meane the morall Sabbath whereto I answere that I vvill lay you out for euery word its proper day it signifies and yet the morall Sabbath excepted 1. by nevv Moones is meante only the first day of month Numb 28.11 2. Holy day is in the originall feast day or a feaste or in parte of a feaste 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 now the Lord had commanded the Jewes a feast of 7. dayes Leuit. 23.34.39 of vvhich feast the first day and also the last day were Sabbaths now the dayes goeing betwene the first and last day these vvere the parte of a feast 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and these the Apostle aimed at by holy day and then 3d. and lastly by Sabbaths are meante those annuall Sabbaths vvhich vvere on the first and last day of the Feast of 7. dayes now least ye think this distinction and application but a conceipte see Leuit. 23.37.38 where the Lord himselfe distinguisheth twixt Feastes and Sabbathes vvhen he said These are the Feastes c. besides the Sabbathes c. Or if by Holy day or Feast you vvill vnderstand all these 7. dayes with the first and last dayes which were Sabbathes then by the vvord Sabbathes in Col. 2.16 may be vnderstood these Sabbathes Leuit. 23.24.32 which were feastes but of one single day a peece and eighther of them called Sabbathes and these vvere the Sabbathes vvhich Paul abolished so you see there is no necessity by Sabbathes to vnderstand the Morall Sabbath at all I answere 2. to the text Col. 2.16 that hereby vve ought not to vnderstand the Morall Sabbath as if that were abolisht for this vvere to set Paul against Christ the seruant against his Lord for Christ established the morall Law and euery iott and title of it to the vvorlds end Math. 5.18 now the 7th day Sabbath vvas not lesse than a iott or title of the Law and did Christ please to ratifie it to the vvorlds end and shall vve make Paul with in a fewe yeeres after to abolish it vvhat necessety is there of such large vnderstanding of the vvord Sabbathes is there any besides mens pleasures so to haue it that they might throw downe the
sacred tyme of the Lords Sabbath Beware ye be not found fighters against God and to side it vvith that branded vvicked one in Dan. 7.25 vvho thought he might change tymes and the law It is not to be passed by vvithout obseruation that the Apostle condemnes Sabbathes but indefinitly he said not all Sabbaths generally but Sabbaths indefinitly as of some Sabbathes only but say now that an indefinite axion may be conserued eighther generally or particularly aâ— the matter and circumstances of the place requireth why shew me now vvhat occasion this context giueth you to vnderstand here Sabbathes of all Sabbathes morall and ceremoniall or of any but ceremoniall or if you haue grownds so to doe from some other text I pray shew the text or if from som reasons I pray shew the reasons and let them be necessarily sounde and demonstratiuly true for there is great cause it should be so since by force thereof you vvill confront one of Gods expresse commandements you had need looke you goe on sure grownde vvhen you attempt to altar any branch of those commandements vvhich God himselfe tooke care to wright in Tables of stone for my part I trust it shall euer be my care to death to maintaine the inviolable and eternall Law of God those is commandements and euery iett and title of them so as not to departe with any of them nor suffer a title to be snatcht from me by any light distinctions or humane vnnecessary enlargement of the sense of words I trust God vvill euer giue me to make conscience of that Commandement Deut. 12.32 vvhatsoeuer I command you take heede you doe it Thou shalt put nothing there to nor take ought there from if I must not take any thing from the Law of God then resolue I not to consent to or yeelde that the Lords Sabbath should be rente from Gods Law vpon euery or any light coniecture and probable argument I answere 3d. if by Sabbathes here must be meante all Sabbathes as well the Morall as the Ceremoniall Sabbathes then by like reason may I gather an abolition not only of the ceremoniall Law but also of the morall Law for Ephes 2.15 t is said Christ hath abrogated the law of commandements and Heb. 7.12 of necessety there must be a change of the Law now vvhy may not I by the word Law vnderstand both morall and Ceremoniall Law as vvell as you by the vvord Sabbathes to vnderstande the Morall and ceremoniall Sabbathes see therfore vvhat absurdetyes would follow if it were lawfull thus to extende vvords but happily some thinke it no absurdety to say that Christ by his death abolisht both Lawes the ceremoniall and the morall but if such thoughtes and sayings be not blasphemouse against the Law of God I know not vvhat are if such collections be not of most perniciouse dangerouse consequence in Gods Church I cannot tell what be did not the same Christ whom they vvould make to abolish the morall Law renounce this facte and also contrariwise establish this morall Law Mat. 5.17.18 saying I came not to destroy the Law c. and then vntill heauen and earth perish one iotte or title of this Law shall not passe but they vvill say it vvas reestablished againe after by the in the 4th Comm and then you giue liberty for men to exercise themselues in seruile labours at home in their families and a part a brode in the fields in ploughing dikeing carteing and the like now these exercises doe vtterly abolish Holines I doe not say Holines absolutly for a man may be holy in a calling but I say it abolisheth a Sabbaths Holinesse vvhich is to be exercised in holy performances without labour and a whole day and in holy assemblies but how can they be in the congregation in the assemblie togeather who be euery man at his owne house seuerally or in the field scatteredly at their labours the same whereof is that take away Sabbaths and you take away Rest which is signified by the vvord Sabbath againe take away Rest and you necessarily take away Holinesse that other dutie also And againe if you by this text of Col. 2.16 doe abolish the very duties of the Sabbath Rest and Holines as you doe haue you not made faire worke think you by abolishing that which you call the morality of the Sabbath euer Rest and Holinesse 7. The 7th and last text they produce for the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath is that in Exo. 31.13 where the Sabbath are said to be a signe that the Lord did sanctifie his people now they say all signes be abrogated and therfore the Sabbath day I answere 1. The Lord God doth not say expresly in this text you shall not hereafter as namly after the death of Christ keepe the Sabbath day any more because I haue made it a signe now no but thus much is collected by humane reason because God made the Sabbath a signe now I can but vvonder how mortall man dareth by bare force of his blind feeble reason thus to confront his God God said in his 4th Comm which he wrote aboue all Scripture by his owne finger Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt not work Now the quite contrary to God men now a dayes blushe not by bare force of reason to anowche Namly that the Sabbath day is abolished and therfore not to be remembred any more nor to refraine seruile work in it yea they contradict their Sauiour too who said of the Morall Law one iott or title of it should not passe to the vvorlds end Mat. 5.18 but they say yis that one iott to vvit the 7th day Sabbath may passe c. now choose you vvhither it be safer to leaue the vveight of your soules vpon Gods and Christes expresse wordes or vpon mens force of reason by way of collections and consequentes we haue formerly showne how blinde a thing mans reason is in matter of religion and especially in the duties of the first Table vvhich conserueth God and that therfore Diuines in other are signes and yet in vse still I answere 5. by distinguishing of signes and that two wayes first there be signes of things present as is the Sabbath Exod. 31.13 it is a signe c. that I the Lord doe sanctify you here the signe the thing signified are together in tyme and there be signes of things to come and such vvas the signe of circumcision Genes 17.11 vvhich aimed at Christ to come now though I grant that signes of things to come be abrogate yet I deny that signes of things present be abrogate such are the Sabbaths mentioned Exod. 31.13 a difference must be put twixt the signes of things present and future since that vvhen a signe and thing signified futurly doe mete together in tyme then the signe vanisheth as vvhen circumcision and Christs death came together then the signe circumcision vanished but t is other vvise vvith
a signe and the thing signified vvhich euer vvere together as vvas the Sabbath keeping and Gods sanctifying them for if presence of a signe and thing signified then together had caused an abolition of the signe vvhy then the Sabbath day because a signe of Gods present sanctifications had beene abolisht euen then vvhen Moses vvrote these vvordes Exod. 31.13 if presence of the thing signified could not then abolish the Sabbath why should it now since God is euer the same to them that keepe his Sabbaths then or now he sanctified them then he sanctifieth vs now there is no reason therfore that such as are signes of things present as is the Sabbath Exod. 31.13 should be abolisht My 2d distinction of signes is that there be signes of things future as hath bene showne Genes 17.11 and signes of things past as the Sabbath is made a signe of the creation and of Gods Rest at the begining of the world vvhich is a thing past Exo. 31.16.17 keep the Sabbath c. it is a signe betwene me and the children of Israel for or that in 6. dayes the Lord made heauen c. in the 7th day he rested The word for is and may be translated that as Deuter. 29.6 now though signes of things future vanish when the thing signed comes in place yet is there no cause why vve should thinke a signe should vanish as the Sabbath day whose thing signified is long since past as Gods Rest at the creation why may not the Sabbath day signify and commemorate Gods Rest and Sabbath day at the creation euen to the vvorlds end as vvell as in Moses his tyme and vvhy should vve thinke the coming of Christ in the flesh should haue more force to abolish the Sabbath day if it had beene a signe of Christ to come then the work of creation vvhich is eternally to be remembred hath force to perpetuate and eternalize the Sabbath since that the Sabbath was a signe of its remembrance I confesse I heare them produce one Text to proue that all signes be abolisht and that is written in Colos 2.16.17 vvhere the Apostle seemes to giue a reason vvhy meates and drinkes and Holy dayes Sabbath dayes are abolisht namly because they were shaddowes of things to come vvhence they collect that all shaddowes be abolisht and all signes be shadowes ergo all signes be abolisht Here vnto I answere 1. t is true that it is commonly taken that these things being shadowes vvere therfore abolisht but vvhither this be a necessary or but a contingent truth I vvill not novv question 2. Whereas they suppose all signes to be shadowes this is false for the word shadowe being but thrice as I take it vsed in the New Testament as in this Text Col. 2.17 and Heb. 8.5 and Heb. 10.1 vvith reference to Christ it euer signifieth a shadow of things to come now a signe is vsed to signifie and signe out some tyme a thing past as Rom. 4.11 some tyme a thing present as Exod. 31.13 some tyme a thing future as Genes 17.8.11 now all signes then be not shadowes since some signifie things past some typifie things present 2. Shadowes still hane reference to Christ Col. 2.17 vvhich are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ so a shadow aimes at Christ but a signe often hath reference to God to Jehouah as in Exod. 31.13 Isa 38.7 Thus as a shadow and a signe differ in vvordes so you see they differ in vse and application therfore they be not both one as they vvould But when they see this profe thus vvill not hould then they fetch about the bushe an other vvay laboring to make the vvord signe in Exod. 31.13 to be a signe of a thing future and that of Christ too and then they thinke this done the word signe in this text and the vvord shadow in Col. 2.17 vvill be both one and so their propose become good againe To this end they add these vvords By and through Christ to the Text Exod. 31.13 and vnderstand the text as if thus reade The Sabbath is a signe c. that I the Lord doe sanctifie you by and through Christ and the reason of this addition they say is because God doth all that he doth to his Church by and through Christ as in Eph. 1.3 Blessed be God vvho hath blessed vs vvith all spirituall blessings in Christ Hereto I answere 1. admit that God did sanctify by and through Christ how vvill it followe and be soundly proued that because God and Christ doe sanctify man together that therfore also vvhat God made to be a signe of his vvork of sanctification the same also must necessarily be a signe of Christs work of sanctification proue I say that it vvas Gods pleasure to make the Sabbath here a signe of Christ as vvell as a signe of himselfe for though it vvas a signe by Christ yet vvas it a signe of Christ we must know signes are not applied to God or Christ naturally but voluntarily euen according as it pleased the Author of those signes to appointe them to one or more persons to himselfe or to other I answere 2. if Christs coworking vvith God causeth that vvhich is a signe of Christ Then it followes too that the Ministers of the Gospell coeworking vvith God and Christ in the worke of sanctification that therfore if the Sabbath be a signe that God sanctifieth his people the Sabbath must be a signe also that vve of the Ministry doe sanctify Gods people and such an vse of the Sabbath vvas neuer heard of before I answere 3. if they vvill conioyne any of the persones in the Trinity vvith the vvork of God the Father in sanctifying vs it vvere most proper to ioyne the Holy Ghost and so Piscator vpon Ezek. 20.12.20 applieth it and say God sanctifyeth vs by the Holy Ghost rather than by Christ since sanctification is more properly attributed to the Holy Ghost than to Christ for the Father createth the Sonne redemeth the Holy Ghost sanctifieth But I will not stand vpon this I come to the Text Eph. 1.3 God hath blessed vs with all spirituall blessings in Christ if you vnderstand these vvordes so as if vvhatsoeuer blessing the Church enioyeth Christ doth equally equally and a like with the Father dispense effectuall and bestowe it on the church you misvnderstand them doth not Piscator vpon this text that the word all must haue a limitation Justification is an acte solely of God the Father not of God the Redeemer absoluing and acquiting a penitent beleeuing sinner likewise Election is an acte of God the Father not of Christ the Re-Redeemer Also the donation of the elect vnto Christ Joh. 6.37 is of like nature can it be said here God the Father gaue the elect vnto Christ in Christ by Christ or through Christ vvhereby you see Christ is so farre from effecting equally and a like all vvorkes vvith the Father that some vvorkes he hath no
hand or stroke in and yet if they vvill haue this text to make for them they must proue by it that not only Christ doth effect all vvorkes the vvhich his Father effecteth but also that Christ doth them euery way equally and a like as God the Father doth them for else how vvill it follow by like reason that the Sabbath being a signe of Gods sanctification it must also be a signe of Christs sanctification too vnlesse it be from this grownd that God his sanctification and Christ his sanctification be both performed equally and a like in all respectes but since the former cannot be proued the latter can much lesse be proued But there vnto it may be said though the generall cannot be proued yet the particular in question may Heb. 10.10 wher t is said we be sanctified by the offring vp of Iesus Christ c. so that Christ doth sanctify as well as God the Father Herevnto I answere whither sanctification here importeth any more then a washing vs from the guiltinesse of our sines or not I will not dispute but let it goe for granted that by sanctification here is meant that inherent new quality of Holines yet it will not follow that because Christ sanctifyeth vs as well as God the Father sanctifyeth vs therfore vvhatsoeuer is made a signe of God the Fathers sanctifying vs is necessarily must be a signe of Christ his sanctifying vs to so as if God made the Sabbath a signe of his sanctification he must also make the Sabbath a signe of Christs sanctification how by force of our feeble reason we dare put such a necessity vpon God I cannot see nay rather the cōtrary appeares to mee that for so much as Gods sanctifying vs and Christs sanctifying vs be farre vnlike each other therfore they should not by force of reason obtaine a like preuiledges and relations to this purpose see how they differ 1. God sanctifyeth by virtue of his Godhead and Diuinity Christ sanctifyeth by the offering of his body Heb. 10.10 now great is the difference twixt the Deity and the Humanity 2. God the Father sanctifyeth vs of himselfe by himselfe originally but Christ his death and sufferings or Christ his body offred vp sanctifyeth not of and by it selfe but of from and by God and by his blessing vpon it so you see there is not so strong reason that Christ should haue the Sabbath made a signe of his worke as there is that God should haue it made a signe of his and so much of his answere wherein you see they put me to much nedlesse busines by shewing themselues too to busy with humane reason for as by bare force of reason without any precept they vvill erect and vphould new Sabbathes as the Lords day so by meere force of their reason they vvill make new signes or else will make those signes to appertaine to such persons as to Christ newly the which Gods word is deeply silent in I can but wonder that discreete men who woll know the defects in our reason dare there withall wade into the deepes of God thus farre yea I vvonder the more when I consider the ende thereof which is to defeate God of his chosen sacred tyme for his worship and to thwarte a morall precept I answere 5. admite that God doth all by Christ and so euer did and also admit the Sabbath vvas a signe of Christs sanctification no lesse then of Gods yet though I may truely and soundly distinguish of Christs workes and sanctification some are euer present with the signe some are future whose signe goeth long before the thing signified of Christs present sanctification was the Sabbath a present signe Exod. 3.13 keepe ye my Sabbath for it is a signe c. That I the Lord doe sanctify you where the signe and the thing signified are together of Christs future sanctification you haue the Sacraments of the ould Testament circumcision and the Passeouer and also as they would those meates drinkes and Holy dayes and Sabbath dayes vvhich are a shaddow or signe of things to come Col. 2.16.17 vvhere the signes and things signifyed are farre distāt in tyme tone long before thother Note farther Christ may be said to sanctify virtually or really as I may say virtually and as thus he is the lambe slaine from the begining of the world the virtue of whose death did saue the Patriarkes so the virtue of Christs incarnate may be said euer to sanctifye as in dayes of Moses Exod. 31.13 and thus although I grante Christ did sanctify with God Exod. 31.13 and that perhaps also the Sabbath was a signe that Christ did then sanctify the people yet this signe being present with the thing signifyed could not be abolisht by the presence of the body or thing signifyed for if it could then had the Sabbath beene abolisht euen in Moses dayes when he wrote thos wordes Exod. 31.13 since the Sabbath vvhich was the signe and sanctification which was the the thing signifyed were then both together present 2. Christ may be said to sanctify really and that is whilst he was God man Incarnate thus he is considered of only as to come afterwards as Col. 2.27 which are a shadow of things to come that is of Christ to come then and here I deny not but signes of things to come may be abrogate but yet here I deny that the Sabbath Exod. 31.13 was made any signe of any thing to come afterwards So then vntill they proue the Sabbath Exod. 31.13 was accounted and called by God a signe to come of Christs sanctification they cannot proue it abolisht The Text saith not The Sabbath shall be a signe c. that I the Lord will hereafter sanctifie thee but it saith The Sabbath is a signe c. that I the Lord doe sanctifie thee now we must not confound tymes the present tense with the future tense and so ouerthrow Grammar I answer 6. and lastly I haue cause to reiect that which is their summe and scope out of this text Exod. 31.13 namly to proue this conclusion and assertion That the Sabbath day is not abolisht it being brought in direct opposition to Gods commandement Exod. 35.2 The 7th day shall be vnto you the Holy Sabbath c. God said the 7th day shall be your Sabbath and they say The 7th day shall not be your Sabbath now I reiect this because these two are not of equall authorities tone is an expresse plaine infallible word of God tother is but a collection by man liable to error in his collections now if Paul so sleited mens contrary judgments of him I passe not to be judged of mans judgment 1. Cor. 4.3 may not I sleite mens contrary judgements of Gods Law saying I passe not what censure and collections men bringe against Gods Law shall mans collections conclusions beare equall authority with an expresse Commandement of a God or countermaunde it Neuer with me I trust to God Finally to giue
new God 2. If all things be now become new vvhy then did S. Iohn say that he vvrote not a new commandement to the elect Lady but that vvhich they had from the begining 2. Ioh. 5. to conclude the Text 2. Corin. 5.17 is ignorantly vvrested to a sense it neuer meante fot the Apostle treates not of new lawes and ordinances but of new obedience and of regeneration that a man in Christ is not an ould man but a new man in conversation therfore saith the Apostle if any be in Christ he is a new creature c. 4. A 4th reason is to this effect That vvhich is changed is abolished but the 7th day Sabbath is changed vvherfore the 4th day Sabbath is abolished That the 7th day Sabbath is changed they proue by the standing still of the Sunne in Jos huahs tyme Iosh 10.13 vvhere t is said the Sunne abode in the midst of Heauen and vvent not downe of a vvhole day whence they gather that here tyme vvas changed and if tyme vvas changed then so vvas the 7th day changed which vvas a parte of tyme. I answere 1. A man may judge of the soundnesse of this argument by a like absurdety that vvill by as good reason be thence concluded for if the standing still of the Sunne in Ioshuahs tyme could make that tyme vvas changed and the Sabbath day then the same standing still of the Sunne then did make that tyme vvas changed and the Sabbath day too euen then at that present in Ioshuas tyme when the Sunne stood still and if then changed so then abolished and so there was no Sabbath in Gods church neuer after Ioshuas dayes yea if tymes formerly appointed in the Law vvere now changed by standing still of the Sunne how did the Iewes euer after to know vvhich was the 14th day of the month for the Passeouer and the 50th day for Pentecoste I answere 2. that it doth not followe that the Sunne standing still tyme is changed but admit it were and that the tyme being changed the 7th day Sabbath is changed as a parte of tyme yet is it not changed in such respect as God commanded it and as I vrge it Note therfore a day may be considered as a certaine duration and space of tyme consisting of so many howres or and that more properlie for the Light as Genes 1.5 God called the Light Day Now be it the 7th day Sabbath vvas changed considered as a parte of tyme yet was it not changed by the standing still of the Sunne as a Light for though standing still of the Sunne made that day a longer day as in Summer you haue a longer day then in Winter yet not an other day there was no change of light or day for all the standing still of the Sunne made one day a longer day yet did it not make the 3d day or the 7th day and light to be the 4th day or the 8th day light nor did it transplace the 7th day or light so out of its order as that no man could euer after know vvhich vvas the 6th vvhich was the 7th or which vvas the 8th day or light that the Sunne made to the world Now this is the day which God commandeth in 4th Comm and vvhich I vrge here namly the tyme of Light as for a day in respect of so many howres God in vvisedome hath said nothing of that least his 4th Comm should not be generall and extend to all nations vvho euery one haue their day light but no certain number of howres such a day is euer and in all countries variable some vvhere consisting of more some vvhere of fewer howres 5. A 5th reason may fetch its ground from my answere to the reason last aboue vvhere by Day I vnderstood only the tyme of Light and not a certaine space and duration of howres vvhence they may and commonly doe reason against the Iewes Sabbath by an absurdety thus if all nations be bounde to the Jewes Sabbath day vvhich you say is all the tyme of light then in some partes of the vvorld vvhere is halfe a yeere light together there they must keep half a yeere Sabbath then also more inconvenience for that they are to haue a Sabbath but once in the space of 3. yeeres and an halfe that is euery 7th halfe yeere now in so long space for people to vvant Gods ordinance of preaching many a soule may perish for vvant of Gods Word in the meane tyme. I answere 1. to this latter inconvenience what though they had no Sabbath for 3. yeeres and an halfe together no soule needes perish for lacke of Gods Word preacht for they may haue sermons in meane space as many as they please since ther is a Comm To preach the vvord in season and out of season at all tymes and occasions I answere 2. to the former absurdety of keeping a Sabbath halfe a yeere together I maruaile vvhy it should be thought more absurde for those nations to keepe one in 3. yeeres and an halfe half a yeere for a Sabbath then it vvas for the Iewes once in 7. yeeres by Gods expresse commandement to keepe an vvhole yeere for a Sabbath Leuit. 25.4 I answer 3. suppose it vvere absurd for those nations to keepe halfe a yeere for a Sabbath and the Church of God did judge it so that present necessity did call for a more frequent Sabbath as once in 7. twenty fowre howres in such a case of necessity it being foud there is a true necessity vpon sound judgement and vpon vveightie consultation and deliberation then I doubt not but God vvould dispense and we haue some examples to countenance the matter as Circumcision though commanded yet omitted during the tyme of Isralites trauailing through the vvildernesse Iosh 5.5 and the Passeouer commanded to be eaten on the 14th day of the first Month yet in case of necessity a man being on a farre iourney he might eate it on the 14th day of the second Month Numb 9.1.3.10.11 thus in cases of vrgent necessity God hath dispensed and I doubt not but in like cases God vvould doe the like againe But vvhat 's this to vs in our countries vvhere vve haue intercourse of day and night much vvhat as had the Iewes say it vvere absurd or impossible to thes countries so as the 4th Com cannot properly be extended to those so but they must haue a dispensation touching the vvord day to take it in an improper sense would this free vs from obedience to the 4th Com in its proper sense vvho haue no neede at all to departe from it or to seeke for any dispensation vvhat though Dauid in his hunger and necessity did eate the shewbreade Mat. 12.3 vvas it therfore lawfull for all Israelites vpon that to eate the shewbreade who vvere not in like need or hunger and vvhat though the 5th Com of honour thy Father doth not binde a King whose parents be dead doth it not therfore binde a subiect vvhose Father is
still liuing and so vvhat if 4th Comm did not binde that country vvhere they haue not night a day so successiuely and commodiously in short tyme following eache other to a day light doth it not therfore binde vs vvho haue not the like case And thus you haue seene their artificiall reasons against the tyme and day of the Sabbath answered now it remaineth that vve answere to their inartificiall reasons and testimonies the vvhich are fetched from the Primitiue Churchs 1. The first Testimony and Authority they produce against the 7th day Sabbath is that of Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesianes saith he Let not vs keepe Sabbath in a Jewish sorte reioycing in idlenesse for who so doth not work let not him eate as saith the Scripture vvhere Ignatius vvould haue them not Sabbatize but work rather on that day I answere let the vvords be well weighed and they make nothing at all against the Sabbath to this end note a little before he had dehorted the Magnesians that they would not suffer themselues to be seduced or deceiued with other doctrines nor with fables nor vvith genealogies nor vvith Jewish smoke thus in generall next he descends to particulares first he inueighes against the Iudiciall Law and Circumcision c. and this done next he bringes in the vvords citod aboue Let not vs keepe Sabbath c. now it is to be noted vnto vvhich of those generalles aboue said from which Ignatius dehorted the Magnesians these words haue relation for my part I must thinke they haue reference to those words fables and Iewish smoke as if he had ioyned them thus Suffer not your selues to be seduced with fables nor Iewish smoke or vanity but cleaue vnto Christ and let not vs keepe Sabbath as doe the Iewes c. thus he counted their Sabbatizing such as it was there no cleaning to Christ but a vaine Iudiciall vanity now that this relation must stand thus I proue 1. Because he spake of other doctrines and of fables now its fitest to referre Circumcision to Doctrines because it vvas a Drctrine once and to referre those things he dehortes from on the Sabbath as idlenesse and daunceinges to the words fables and Iewish smoke 2. Because he dehorted them from obseruance of the Iudaicall Law now those fables Iewish vanities of idlenesse and daunceinges on the Sabbath were neuer any ceremoniall Law and therfore cannot be referred to that forespoken of the Law Now if Ignatius in this passage did not dehorte from any thing vvritten in the Law touching the Sabbath but from other fables and traditions of their owne then Ignatius did not disswade from keeping the Sabbath as it is commanded in the Law of 4th Com but from keeping of it according to their fabulouse and vaine manner let these two things therfore be noted 1. that Ignatius did dehorte from things neuer commanded the Iewes in the Morall Law 2. That the things he did disswade from they vvere fabulouse and vaine things as from eating meates dressed the day before and from drinking lukewarme drinkes what he meanes by lukewarme drinkes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I cannot imagine I neuer reade of any such drinkes forbiden in the Law and from reioycing in dauncinges and vnciuill howtings or clapping of hands in the Sabbath day and other like he disswades from vvhich things are meerely Iewish fables and neuer found in Gods Law vvherfore I conclude that Ignatius did not forbidd an holy keeping of the Sabbath day such as stood with the Law of God but he only forbad that carnall and superstitious keeping of it fore mentioned such as vvas neuer commanded by any law That this is so yet more plainly appeares in that 1. in this very place and text He doth exhorte the Magnesians to keepe the Sabbath Spiritually in meditation of Gods Law and in admiration of the workes of God 2. In that Iguatius doth not disswade from keeping the Sabbath simply but after a sorte and in some manner He saith not Let not vs keep Sabbath but thus Let not vs keepe Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after a Iewish sorte and fashion as reioycing in idlenesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so you see it is a carnall sensuall rest from labours that this good man inuaigheth against Only one thing in his disswasion vvould be cleered vvhich is that he addeth these words Who so doth not labour let not him eate c. these vvords are not to be taken simply as if he would they should work in their ordenary callings on the Sabbath day for so we make him contrary to himselfe who exhorted them to keep the Sabbath day Spiritually by meditation of Gods Law and Gods vvorkes now to work and to rest from vvorke which the word Sabbatizing signifieth are contraries besides how can a man so meditate on Gods Law and the vvorks of God as in a Sabbath one should whilst the boby is in vnquiet labour yea in many callings mens workes are such as they cannot at all both doe their works and also meditate Gods Law as in the trades of grocers and other retailing shopkeepers who sell by little parcelles and are euer in bargayning so scriueners who are euer wrighting and the like trades which occupie the minde specially if they kept market on Sabbath day as we doe how could their mindes in the market be occupied about Gods Lawes and it is to be noted Ignatius did not oppose Spirituall Sabbatizing or Resting to Sabbatizing or Resting simply but thus he opposed Spirituall Sabbatizing to Judiciall Sabbatizing fabulously 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vvherfore to salue all seming contradiction a fit sense may be giuē of the words taking them to be comparatiuely spoken as that they should rather work on the Sabbath in an honest calling then so fabulously carnally and irreligiously to spend the Sabbath in daunceing and vnciuile showting and the like and here it seemes to me he alludeth to the like manner of speech in Isa 1.13 I cannot suffer saith the Lord your new Moones nor Sabbathes my soule hateth your appointed Feastes c. now here God did not simply forbid Sabbaths but that irreligiouse prophane judiciall keeping of Sabbaths Thus you see Ignatius his vvordes makes nothing against the Sabbath being vvell considered of but rather nesse of the abolishing of this Sabbath because these had their hands in it then I should haue done if I neuer had heard that they had any hand in it Thus you see neither their textes alleaged out of Scripture nor yet their reasons nor their testimonies can proue the Rest in the Lords Sabbath day to be partly ceremoniall nor yet the tyme and 7th day to be abrogated So then in the last place I addresse my selfe to giue some possitiue reasons to shew that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force euen to this day and so consequently must be to the worlds end The 7th day Sabbath is still in force IN the first place I would free the Sabbath day from
now there vvas also Sabbaths vvhich were signes of the creation vveekly Sabbaths euery 7th day now these vvhich were Sabbaths and signes of things past as was the creation these be no where abolished great is the difference twixt Sabbathes as signes of things to come and Sabbathes as signes of things past 3. It is of as great necessity if not of greater that vve now should haue all or any such speciall helpes and meanes to keepe in remembrance the vvorlds creation as had those Israelites in Moses tyme for vve are a people as forgetfull of Gods workes of wonder as were they yea and we be in greater danger of forgetting the vvorlds creation then those Israelites by how much vve liue longer after the creation then they did ould done things weare out of memory For proofe of the Minor to vvit that the Sabbath was an helpe to keep memory of the creation 1. All men grant it when they thus argue that the Lords day was instituded for the memory of the resurrection as was the Sabbath day for memory of the creation 2. I proue it from Exod. 31.16.17 where 2. thinges be to be marked 1. that the Sabbath is called a signe 2. whereof it is a signe and what is the thing signifyed For the latter the thing signifyed by the Sabbath considered as a signe is the creation of the vvorld in 6. dayes and Gods rest vpon the 7th day since euery signe must signifie some thing and this Text mentioneth nothing but the creation and againe where God giueth a signe he vseth to shew vvhereof it is a signe and here he mentioneth nothing but the creation therfore the creation is the thing signified and this truth may yet farther be showne by the very Text v. 17. for in 6. dayes c. vvhere note that the Hebrew vvord translated for may also be translated that as those skilfull in the tounge know well and finde sondry examples in Scripture yea the vvord for must be translated that to make good sense so then reade the Text thus that in 6. dayes c. and you haue good sense also you see it plaine that the Sabbath was a signe that in 6. dayes God created and rested and the creation vvas the thing signified by the signe The other thing to be considered in the text is that the Sabbath is called a signe and hence I thus argue If signes be helpes and meanes to bringe to minde or keep in memory the things where of they be signes then doth the Sabbath day helpe vs to minde and keep in memory the vvorlds creation but signes be helpes meanes to bringe to minde and to keep in memory the things whereof they be signes therfore the Sabbath day doth helpe vs to minde and to keepe in memory the worlds creation the consequence is good it proceeding from the genus to the species the Sabbath day being one kinde of signes and what belongeth to all signes appertaineth to euery or any signe I proue the Minor by an induction of particulares the raine-bowe in the cloudes Genes 4. it is called a signe or a token v. 13. and the Lord said He vvould looke vpon the bowe that he might remember the couenant which vvas the thing signifyed by the bovv v. 16. The Passeouer vvas a signe or token Exod. 12.13 vvhich when the Angell of the Lord saw then he remembred the couenant and spared them Circumcision Genes 17.11 it vvas a signe and token to put them in minde of Gods couenant made vvith Abraham c. and see Exod. 31.13 a text pregnant to the same purpose The Sacrament of the Lords Supper it is a signe and this signe is to be vsed in remembrance of the thing signified vvhich is Christ 1. Cor. 12.24 neither can any example be showne to the contrary for it is the very nature of a signe to bring to minde the thing signified I conclude as the Lords Supper is a signe of the work of redemption So the Sabbath is a signe of the work of creation 10. My 10th Argument is because the Sabbath day putteth vs in minde vvho it is that is our Sanctifier namely the Lord our God This argument is taken out of Exod. 31.13 and it may be thus framed That thing vvhich in the tyme of Moses vvas vsed as an helpe and meanes to put the children of Israel in minde vvho it vvas that sanctified them that meanes and helpe ought now and for euer to be in the Church to shew vs vvho is our Sanctifyer But the 7th day Sabbath was vsed in the tyme of Moses as an helpe and meanes to minde the children of Israel vvho it was that sanctifyed them Therfore the 7th day Sabbath ought now and for euer to be vsed in the Church as a meane helpe to shew vs vvho is our Sanctifyer For proofe of the Maior 1. vvhat reason can be rendered or instance giuen to the contrary to shew that our churchs and people should not now haue the same meanes and helpes to put vs in minde shew vnto vs vvho is the authour of our sanctification the which the children of Israel and Church of the Jewes had 2. No helpe or meanes once appointed of God to minde the Israelites vvho did sanctify them vvas ener yet abolished and if neuer abolished then must they remaine True it is Sabbathes ceremoniall and annuall which were signes of Christ and of justification such were abolished in Col. 2.16.17 but Sabbathes Morall and weekly vvhich vvere signes of God the Father and of sanctification such were neuer yet abolished besides the Sabbathes abolished in Col. 2.16 were such as were signes of things to come afterwards as of Christ but the Sabbathes Morall in Exod. 31.13 were signes of things present as of God presently sanctifying as you may see in the Textes 3. Wee now in these tymes haue as much neede of that help to put vs in minde of God our Sanctifyer as they had in former tymes for instance let a Christian pray feruently giue almes bountifully hate syne vnfainedly doe the duties of his calling conscionably preach powerfully and in a word liue holily and blamelesly in this euill vvorld vvhereby he out strippeth the men of this world and is as a light set vpon an hill is not this man in greate danger to be puffed vp vvith pride as vvere those Israelites Deut. 8.17 arrogating to themselues the glory of their aboundance forgetting God the author and is not this man in danger to vse his giftes as if he had not receiued them and to glorie in them as his owne 1. Cor. 4.7 surely vpon a serch we can not but confesse vvee Christians are as subiect to spirituall pride and as backward sluggish to giue vnto God the glory of his mercifull work of sanctifying vs as euer were the Israel of God now vvhat helpe could be better to foreward vs in this Diuine vvork of hallowing Gods name then to haue once in euery 7. dayes that 7th day
appointed of God to be a signe and remembrancer vnto vs that Jehouah the Holy God is that fountaine and authour of our sanctification and holinesse Well then since vve Christians haue as much need of helpes and meanes to minde vs of the authour of our sanctification as those Israelites had and God hath giuen vs no other helpes or meanes in the roome of those he gaue to the Israelites then it followeth that we now and the 7th day doe both notify but one tyme which is the last day of the weeke so them conioyned by God and also permiseously vsed Exo. 20.10 Leuit. 23.3 Exod. 31.15 there you haue them conioyned by way of apposition Gen. 2.3 Exod 20.11 Exod. 16.29 Luk. 13.14 here you haue them permiscously vsed the one for the other so as the name Sabbath and the tyme the 7th day cannot be separated 2 Whereas they deny me the accident of tyme the 7th day see it expressely commanded in so many words Exod. 16.29 Exod. 20.10 Exod. 23.12 Exod. 31.15 Exod. 35.2 and so you see not only the Sabbath is in force now but also the tyme and 7th day The other commone answere is that the 4th Com and so the Sabbath day are now in force indeed as touching the Morality of them but not as touching their speciall application vnto the Iewish state Here vnto I say it is but a fained thing to thinke that eighther the 4th Com or the Sabbath day were so commanded and appointed of God to the Iewe as if made peculiar and proper to their state and not common to all nations To this end perpende we the particulars of the 4th Comm to see if ought there be that might giue vs occasion to thinke it vvas applied to the Iewish nation exclusiuely or if all Nationes might not equally participate vvith them in this Commandement as vvell as in the other 9. Commandements In the Com ye haue these things enioyned 1. Remember the Sabbath 2. to rest in it 3. to keep it holy 4. a daye 5. the 7th day or last of 7.6 because God resteth on that day What is here now that is peculiar to the Iewe so as other nations cannot obserue the same Cannot we in England as well as they in Ierusalē 1. Remember the Sabbath 2. rest in it 3. keep it holy 4. a whole day 5. the 7th day and last of 7 6. in imitation of God because he rested on this day could no nation beside the Iewe obserue thes 6. things Perhaps it vvill be said The Sabbath and so the Comm was applied to the Iewish state because of that reason mouing them to obedience of it which is annexed to the Com Deut. 5.15 namely Gods bringing them out of Egypt Here vnto I say This motiue and reason may be said to be applied indeed to the Iewish state exclusiuely as not belonging to other nations and if they meane no more but thus that the 4th Com and so the Sabbath are not now in force as touching this speciall application only to the Iewish state because the Lord brought them out of Egypt that this reason should not now be properly pressed vpon vs Christians I am not against it nor doth it at all helpe them who goeth about to proue the Sabbath is in force now to vs with relation to that reason of Gods bringing Israel out of Egypt or to moue Christianes to obedience by that reason The 4th Com stands on two partes The one is Law commanding or forbidding some thing to be done this part only I vrge The other part is reason or motiue to enforce to obedience of the Law now this I vrge not nor neede I for it is no Law properly for it nor forbides nor commandes any thing Be it that the Law as touching the motiues be applied specially to the Iewish state yet the Law as touching all things commanded or forbidden in it is vniuersall to all nations Thus hauing proued the 7th day Sabbath is still in force to this day in next place I will shew you how this Sabbath hath beene practised and in vse in the Christian Church both in the dayes of the Apostles after Christ his resurrection and after also in the more primitiue churches for the practise of the Apostles I doe the rather produce it because the contrary side I see leane much vpō their practise labouring much though all in vaine as hath beene showne to proue the practise of the Apostles vpon the Lords day vvherfore since Apostles practise is vvith them of so great strength if I shall proue now that the Apostles practised the 7th day Sabbath I trust they will forth with yeeld that the 7th day Sabbath is now in force make no further question of the matter For this purpose looke Act. 13.14.15.16 Act. 13.42.44 Act. 16.13 here ye see 3. seuerall Sabbaths and in two seuerall places the Apostles preached vpon the Sabbath day and see Act. 17.2 Paul as his manner was vvēt in vnto them and three Sabbath dayes disputed with them by the Scriptures Here you see in an other place and Church three Sabbaths more kept by Paul and those that trauailed with him nor was this any extraordenary thing for the Text saith it vvas an vsuall thing for Paul so to doe Paul as his manner vvas c. and see Act. 18.4 here Paul in an other place and Church namely in the Church of Corinthe v. 1. disputed in the Synagogue euery Sabbath day so here was a constant practise Sabbath by Sabbath Euery Sabbath day saith the Text and thus I trust I haue more soundly proued that the Apostles kept the Sabbath day and that constantly and the same in soundery Churches then they haue proued that the Apostles kept the Lords day The keeping the Sabbath day was an Apostolicall practise but so was not the Lords day Let the indifferent reader judge now and let him choose to practise that day of the twaine vvhich he seeth most soundly and plainly proued before his eyes practised by the Apostles Against this be sondry answeres brought as 1. True Paul preached on the Sabbath day amongst the Sabbath day but they vndertooke indeed but neuer did nor euer will be able to proue the Apostles did constantly keep the Lords day so in this point of Apostles practise I haue the better of them since they can not proue Apostles constantly kept the Lords day amongst nor Iewes nor Gentiles no nor Iewes and Gentiles mixt Secondly I produce an other Text against theire answere shewing the Apostles preached amongst the Gentiles in which Text is not the least grownd for any such exception as to say there was a mixture of Iewes and Gentiles see Act. 16.12.13 here Paul and Timothie preached on the Sabbath day and note 1. that there was no thing constrayning them to preach rather on this then on any other day vnles it were the 4th Comm they had beene there as the Text saith certaine dayes and of all thes dayes the Sabbath
day vvas chosen what can be thought should incline them to this choise but the 4th Comm 2. Note here is not any reason to thinke here were any Iewes because vve reade not of any Synagues the Iewes had here the people assembled in the open fields besides a riuer to pray as the Text speaketh and therfore not with the Iewes in their Synagogues as they were wonte to doe where the Jewes had Synagogues As for Lydia it will not follow shee was a Iewesse because the Text saith shee was a vvorshipper of God for so was Cornelius Act. 10.2 but yet no Iewe no nor any proselyte for he vvas vncircumcised then Act. 11.3 finally I say suppose here was a mixture of Iewes and Gentiles and also in that other place Act 13.42.44 yet ther is no cause of scruple or doubt that the Apostles would vse any ceremonies as they suppose the Sabbath to be amongst those Iewes that vvere mingled with the Gentiles no more then they would amongst the Gentiles alone for saith the Text Act. 21.21 Paul taught those Jewes that were mixed among the Gentiles to forsake Ceremonies c. and you see it his practise Gal. 2.11 he would not endure no not a Peter to Iudaize it amongst the Gentiles and can we thinke himselfe would doe vvhat he reproued in an other besides it was against reason for so he should builde vp things as ceremonies which he labored to destroy Gal. 5.1.2 I say build vp for Paul counted Judaising amongst Gentiles a constraining of those Gentiles vnto Judaizme Gal. 2.14 for all this I deny not but Paul did Iudaize but it was only in such places of assemblie where vvere none but Iewes only as at Ierusalem and the like places Act. 21.17.20.26 but in assemblies mixed of Iewes and Gentiles there he would not Iudaize lest he should constraine the Gentiles to Iudaizme as hath beene said An other and seconde answer vsually brought against this practise of the Apostles is that Paul did keepe Sabbath here vvith the Iewes to beare with their weakenesse for a tyme and as he did Iudaize it by circumcision of Timothie Here vnto I say 1. it appeareth he did not keepe Sabbath only for the Iewes sake for then vvould he not haue kept the Sabbath with the Gentiles as he did 2. vvas it a weakenesse in the Iewes to yeeld obedience to a morall precepts to the 4th Com 3. The things vvherin properly Paul was said to Iudaize were Ceremoniall things standing in force by the Ceremoniall Law as Circumcision and the Rest but things standing in force by the Morall Law as doth the Sabbath day performance of these is no Iudaizing but Moralizing if I may so speake A 3d answere is that the Apostles must take such dayes as they found in vse in the Church then or else they cold not preach and divulge the Gospell and the Iewes then would assemble on no dayes but the Sabbath Here vnto I say the Apostles cold make knowne the Gospell though they had neuer frequented the Iewes vsuall assemblies for the Apostles taught and preached Christ in priuate housen from house to house Act. 5.42 and when Paul forsooke preaching in the Synagogue he taught else where as in the Schoole of one Tyrannus and there frequented him both Iewes and Grecians Act. 19.9.10 yea Paul cold assemble the Iewes them selues vpon occasion the very chiefe of them refused not to assemble at his calle Act. 28.17.20 wherefore necessity compelled him not to keepe the Sabbath vvith them To make a more full answere to those common obiections vvhich they bring against the practise of the Apostles in keeping the Sabbath day one of vvhich maine obiections is that fore spoken of to this effecte true the Apostles practised the 7th day Sabbath but it was amongst the Iewes not amongst the Gentiles where vnto I say vvhat and if it vvere only amongst the Ievves are therefore the Apostles practises and actions vnvvareantable and vnimitable because they vvere done amongst the Iewes are all their actions amongst Jewes but of an indifferent nature if such obiections be lawfull if a preacher confirmes his doctrines in the pulp it by the practise of the Apostles then is it lawfull for any thus to cauill against it oh but that it vvas done among Jewes for instance suppose this the doctrine Ministers must preach constantly on the Sabbath day novv after it is proued c. then he confirmes it by the constant practise of the Apostles Act. 13.14.44 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 is it tollerable for an auditor to cauill thus oh this it dience and reference vnto some of those Commandements The last obiection is that t is true indeed the Apostles kept the Sabbath but it was but for a tyme till the Iewes vvere better instructed the vvhich if they had refused to keepe the Iewes vvould neuer haue heard them preach of Christ c. Here vnto I answere this obiection presupposeth now as granted two false suppositions the one that the Apostles vvould not if they cold haue auoided it haue kept this Sabbath the other that the Iewes vvere needlesly religiouse making conscience of this Sabbath now vvhen they neded not for the former for any thus to imagine or say is growndlesse for vvhere hath any of the Apostles declared themselues any enemies to the Morall Sabbath that it should be thought they had rather not to haue kept the Sabbath then to haue kept it for the latter t is true of Circumcision it might be said the Iewes vvere needlessely religious and carefull of it because vve finde the Apostle inueighing against it Galat. 5.2 but how can vve say so of the Iewes as touching the Sabbath day since vve no where finde the Apostles inueighing against it or reprehending the Iewes for keeping it as they did for Circumcision The maine errour in these obiections is that they take it for granted vvhich is not granted that is supposing the Sabbath day in the 10. Commandements to be a Ceremony as vvell as Circumcision and that so it vvas abolisht by Christ vvhereof there is no grownd in Scripture as else vvhere I haue largely shewed nay farther for any to say the Sabbath is a ceremony or that any vvord or letter of the Law or 10. Commandements is Ceremoniall is no better then blasphemy against Gods Law and Truth to speake euill of the way of God Thus you see I haue proued the practise of the Apostles vvas constantly to keep the Sabbath day and the keeping of the Sabbath day vvas an Apostolicall practise the vvhich proofe I haue made to this end that you might see vve haue better grounds for the Apostles keeping the Sabbath day then for their keeping the Lords day nay there is good ground for the Sabbath day but no ground at all for the Lords day Further more as by the way you may see it hath beene showne the Apostles kept the Sabbath day 1. constantly not once or twice or thrice and no no more 2.
In sondry places in diuerse churches not at one place or two but at more 3. that vvhere they abode diuerse dayes they chose the Sabbath day not the Lords day to teache and to preache in as Act. 16.12.13 Act. 13.42.44 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 4. They kept Sabbath with both Jewes and Gentiles together sometyme with you see the duties of a Sabbath meditation in Gods Law vvith ioy and delight and admiration of the workes of God There be I confesse that would haue all this vnderstood of the Lords day but Ignatius speakes both of the Sabbath also of the Lords day distinctly in the same Text for the very next words are thus And after the Sabbath let the Lords day be celebrated c. Athanasius in his Homilie de semente saith thus We assemble together in the Sabbath day not as if vve were sicke of Iudaizme but therefore we meete on the Sabbath that we may vvorship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath vvhere ye see Athanasius not only auowching that they of this tyme kept the Sabbath but also he defendeth theire keeping of it from superstition or Iudaizme but our tymes are now of a contrary minde thinking and saying if we should keepe the Sabbath day we should play the Iewes and be infected with Judaizme Socrates in his History chap 8. booke 6th saith Assemblies were vvonte to be in the Churches euery weeke vpon the Sabbath vpon the Lords day Zanchie ypon the 4th Com Thes 1. saith out of Sozomen That thos of Constantinople almost all others haue Ecclesiasticall assemblies to heare Gods Word on the Sabbath day and on the Lords day Doctour Prideaux on the Sabbath saith The Churches after Christ kept both the Sabbath the Lords day for diuerse yeeres with holy assemblies and this thing is so manifest saith he as it needeth no proofe c. In a word is it not plaine the Sabbath was in vse in the Church vntill the yeere of Christ 364. at vvhat tyme the Laodicean counsaile enacted a Law against it and for the Lords day Hosp de Orig. Fest cap. 9. pag. 27. but how vniustifiable this their acte was may appeare in that they enacted a Law against Gods Law and were guilty of that brande in Dan. 7.25 of vnlawfull changing of Tymes and the Law yea how full of suspition this their facte was may appeare in this that Church of Laodicea it was the worst of all the 7. churches that S. Iohn wrote vnto in his Reuelations yea and in that this change was not made till the yeere 364. t is of small accounte since the elder the church grewe the more corrupt it grewe for 364. yeeres after Christ crept into the church superstition and so dayly thence forwards popery by degrees But how soeuer it is plaine that the Sabbath day was in vse in the church at that tyme in which they enacted a Lavv against it or else they made a Law against nothing Here it shall not be amisse to adde the testimony of two or three of our owne Diuines auowching the morality of the 7th day Sabbath I could produce many but two or three for all strengthen my selfe and vvronge not them 3. Doctour Prideaux vpon the Sabbath lately comne forth pag. 140. saith Where did Christ abrogate the Sabbath vvhere is there any mention of setting the Lords day in the roome of it well Christ ascendeth he left his Apostles preachers and did not they vvithout any scruple obserue the Sabbath of the Iewes wich the Iewes did not they institute most freely assemblies in the Sabbath day did not the succeding churches the like c And now let me propounded vnto your choise these two dayes The Sabbath day on Saturday or the Lords day on Suneday and keepe whither of the twaine you shall in conscience finde the more safe If you keepe the Lords day but prophane the Sabbath day you vvalke in great danger and perill to say the last of transgressing one of Gods eternall inviolable Laws the 4th Com but on the other side if you keep the Sabbath day though you prophane the Lords day you are out of all guneshot and danger for so you transgresse no Law at all since Christ nor his Apostles did euer leaue any Law for it 1. To conclude let me take away two or three obiections and so an end Say some what a doe is here about a day is God so strict for a day so be he hath the duties it matters not so much for the tyme To whom I answere and make not you as much a doe too as you can for the Lords day the 8th day else why may not Mooneday or Tewsday or some other day be kept in memory of Christs Resurrection as well as Sunday the first day of the vveeke and doe not our diuines of best ranke lay it downe as their judgement that the Church the whole Church cannot now alter the Lords day to any other it seemes then in your owne judgement that tyme and day how light a circumstance soeuer you make it when you dispute about the 7th day in the 4th Com yet it is a matter of vveight and moment when you argue for the Lords day for vvhich yet you haue no Com 2. Thinke you it a light matter the which God hath beene pleased to stampe his Commandement vpon Exod. 35.2 The 7th day shall be vnto you the Holy Sabbath c. Will you sleight Gods Commandements admite the tyme and 7th day be as thing little profitable to God as was the fruite of the tree of knowledge of good euill in Paradise dareth any man hazard with God as Adam did The lesse the thing is vvith the more ease vve may shew our obedience and the greater our sine if disobedient 3. We dare not forfighte a bonde with man vpon such shiftes saying whē t is paiable on 7th day of Ianuary oh my neighbour regardeth not so much the day so I carry him the full some though it be the day after t is due nor durst those faithfull Israelites so sleight Gods tymes as to circumcise on the 9th day to call Passeouer on the 15th day vvhen God hath commanded CIrcumcision on the 8th day and the Passeouer on the 14th day 2. Saith an other this vvere to bringe into the Church Iudaizme againe and that strict rigorous obseruation of the Sabbath vvhich they vsed Here to I answere Athanasius afore cited said They kept the Sabbath day in their tymes and yet he saith they were not infected with Judaizme Further Iudaizme is when obedience is yeelded to a Law Ceremoniall but he that keepes the Sabbath day doth it in obedience to a Law Morall And as touching the rigorous strictenesse of the Iewish Rest or Sabbath it is not better than an euill reporte brought vp vpon the Lords Sabbath to loathe men of it vvhat and if men erroniously thinke the Iewes vvere more strictly tyed then indeed they vvere that is their errour and what and
the Lords day c. Hence it is thus argued this day is called the Lords day as the last Supper of Christ is called the Lords Supper now as Christ did substitute the last Supper in roome of the Passeouer so he substituted the Lords day in roome of the Sabbath I answere 1. it doth not followe it must be called the Lords day in the same sense as Christs Supper is called the Lords Supper for it may be called the Lords day 1. in reference to God the Creator meaninge there by the Lords Sabbath of the 7th day since thes Sabbathes were caled the Lords dayes as the lords Holy day Isa 58 13. now if the Sabbath be the Lords holy day then is it the Lords day 2. In reference to God the Redeemer it might be called the Lords day as the day is wherein Christ will come to Indgment Luk 17 24 30. that is a day wherein Christ will shewe himselfe Maruailouse to the world so did Christ in the day of his Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascention in euery of thes he did a remarkable worke and euery of thes might be called the Lords day and which of them Iohn had respect vnto Scripture is altogether silent and therfore can we not builde vpon infallible growndes herein and we must not set vp Sabbathes tyeinge mens consciences vpon probabilities and contingencies furthermore who wold argue from Luk 17 24. that because the day of Iudgment is called Christs day Therfore that day must then be kept for a Sabbath day but admit S. Iohn meant the day of Christs Resurrection that is a day wherein he would declare himselfe mightely to be the Sonne of God by the resurrection from the dead Rom 1 4. What is this to a Sabbath which men must celebrate how doth it appeare Christ rose one this day and called it the Lords day with this intendement that men shold for euer after keepe it a Sabbath shewe me an institution of a Sabbath day by Christs riseing one this day or by S. Iohns calling it the Lords day finally say it were a Sabbath day how will it appeare in the Canon of Holy Scripture that the Lords day was in the Apostles dayes a weekly day kept euery 7th day as now it is or rather an annuall day as Easter day is for properly Easter day is the Lords day I answere further there is not like reason of thes two the Lords day and the Lords Supper for a day and a Supper differ much so as a day may be called the Lords in one sense and a Supper may be called the Lords in an other sense I answere secondly it will not follow that there must be the same reason and likenesse betweene the Lords day and the Sabbath which was betwene the Lords Supper and the Passeouer for the Passeouer was a branche of the Ceremoniall Law and a Ceremony and a type of Christ and therfore to be abolisht at Christs comeing But the Sabbath was a branch of the Morall Law and a Morall neither euer was it made a death to life now that God Sanctified the first day of the weeke for Christ to rise on I deny not nor doe I refuse to reioyce there on and be thankfull to God for so greate a worke euen euery day in the weeke and yeere or more solemnely once in a yeere as at Easter or ofter if the Church see it expedient But that this Text doth prophecy of this day for euer to be kept for our sole Sabbath in a Rest all day long and in holy duties euery 7th day this I denye since this Text saith not this day was Sanctified for men but it was Sanctified for Christ yea we may reioyce and be glad in it annually as the Iewes were in theire annuall dayes of purim Ester 9.26.27 and yet not keepe it in a stricte Rest all day long as on a Sabbath I answer secondly by day in the Psalme is not necessarily vnderstod a shorte ordinary day of 12. or 24. howres but rather a long space of tyme as all the tyme after Dauid came to the Crowne and so it may be applied to type out the whole tyme of Christ vpon the earth ruleing as King in the Kingdom of his Church thus Abraham sawe Christs day Ioh. 8.56 thus t is called the day of Saluation 2. Cor. 6.2 If then by day here be meante the day of grace or the tyme of Christs abode one the earth then heer is no footing for a Sabbath day of 12. or 24. howres long 4. A 4th Text they produce is Act. 2.1.14 where Peter preached one Pentecost which is one our white Sunday and administred the Sacramentes of Baptisme and the Lords Supper after he had converted 3000. soules wherfore this must nedes be a Sabbath day because in it were performed the workes of a Sabbath c. Here to I answere 1. That Peters actions are no diuine institutions vnlesse backt by some precept now nor Christ nor his Apostles gaue any precept for performance of thes duties one this day 2. Peters sermone was extraordenary for it was vpon the extraordenary comeing downe of the Holy Ghost then and to remoue away the false slander of drunkenesse v. 13. and it was occasioned by the greate concourse of people extraordenarily met and assembled not to heare a sermone but to heare the Apostles myraculously speake straunge tounges v. 6. now extraordenary things binde not to ordenary practise 3. Preaching and administration of Sacraments be not proper duties of a Sabbath but commone to any day of the weeke Christ administred Lords Supper one a Thursday night the night before he was Crucified Phillip baptized the Eunuch one a trauileing day Act. 8.38.39 and for preaching it was an euery dayes worke if occation serued preach the word in season and our of season 2. Timoth. 4.2 Christ preached to the Samaritane Ioh. 4. on a working day for his Disciples were gone in to the citty to buye meate v. 8. He preached one the Mountaine Mat. 5.1 and out of a shippe at an other tyme Luk. 5.1.2.3 which dayes were no Sabbaths for on the Sabbaths Christ and the people mett in theire Synagogues Luk. 4.14 Paul preacht daily in the Temple and from house to house Act. 5.42 and daily in the schoole of Tyrannus Act. 19.9 Now vnles thes duties of preaching and administration of the Sacraments were so proper to the Sabbath as they were vsed vpon no day else how can thes duties be markes of a Sabbath no no nothing but a Commandement will establish a Sabbath day doe not we preache reade Scriptures praye administer the Sacrament and performe as many Sabbath duties on Christmas day when it falls on a weeke day as we doe on any Sabbath day and yet vvho vvill therfore gather vve keepe that Christmas day for a Sabbath 4. Note Walaeus vpon the 4th Com pag. 161. saith it is called in to question of some whither this day of Pentecost then fell vpon the Lords day
creation or at the first day of the worlds redemption t is groundlesse to set any other beginning now Sunday is the common reputed day for the first day of the vvorlds creation and the 7th from it is Saturday the Lords Sabbath day but if you refuse this beginning and vvill fetche a first from the redemption then good Friday vvhereon Christ suffred must be the first day of your 7 and then Thursday will be your 7th day and so your Sabbath day or else Sunday vvhereon Christ rose must be your first day and then Saturday the Jewes Sabbath day vvill be your 7th day and new Sabbath day now behold though you seeme to stande to a 7th day for your Sabbath yet you cannot any approued vvay make the Lords day a 7th day vnles you take Mooneday for your first day of the weeke which no approued Authores doe and vvhich computation is not Diuine in ould or new Testaments but is merely humane and deuised and by like reason if you groundlesly begine at Mooneday may not vve begine at Tewsday or Wensday or Thursday c. and so skippe ouer as many dayes as vve please so as no man shall knovv vvhere or vvhen to begine nor vvhat day shall be his 7th day for a Sabbath if we may skipe ouer as many dayes as we please before vve take one for our first day may vve not skipp ouer as vvell 7. dayes as one day and if vve may skipp ouer 7. dayes why not 700. or 7000 dayes and so many vveekes yea yeeres may be vvithout any Sabbath 6 A 6th last reason they fetcht from practise of the primitiue Churches for the Historyes of the Church say they relate that they kept the Lords day for a Sabbath constantly I answere 1. I finde the contrary and that alleadged too by M. Perkins vpon the 4th Com vvhoe thus speakes The Sabbath meaning it the Lords day was neglected of those Churches vvhich succeded the Apostles vntill afterwards it vvas established by Christian Emperoures this he proues to be so by alleaging his author for it Leo and Anton. Edict of holy dayes now if Mr. Perkins vvhoe vvas so well seene in history of our churches vvould affirme this and that too whē he pleaded vvhat he could for our nevv Sabbath then surely in his judgement it vvas a cleere case that the primitiue churches kept not our Lords day euer or constantly 2. Ignatius vvhere he exhorted to keepe the Lords day there he exhorted to keepe the Sabbath day too now it is not likly both these dayes vvere kept for Sabbathes but that one only and that was the Sabbath day as is gatherable in that Ignatius calles the Lords day the Queene and Princesse of all dayes vvhere he left out a higher place for the Sabbath day as the Kings Prince of all dayes it is likly therfore that our Lords day was kept as we keepe an holy day with vs vvhen those Christian Emperoures did establishe by Lawes our Lords day to be solemnized at which tymes it flourished most yet euen then they kept it not as a Sabbath day but as vve keepe an Holy day for Constantin the Emperour most religiouse patrone of our Lords day as is vvell knowne in his Edicte for the celebrating of the Lords day yet therein gaue liberty for men to doe vvorkes of Husbandry on the Lords day now ploughing and sowing and reaping and the like worke of husbandry be quite against the very letter of the 4th Comm and against and contrary to that rest from all seruile vvorkes in earing in haruest and at other tymes enioyned in the Law for Sabbath day duties can we thinke Constantin directed by his reuerēd Clergy would can giuen such liberty had they counted the Lords day for the Sabbath day and to stand by the 4th Comm finally if vve should imitate the primitiue churches as touching dayes vve should weekely keepe holy Friday vvhereon Christ suffered as vvell as Sunday whereon Christ rose for Constantin did by one and the same Law commande his whole Empire to sanctifye the Friday and the Sunday the day before the Iewes Sabbath the day after it see Euseb de vita Constant lib. 4. cap. 18. and see Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 8. the Lords day because of Christs resurrection the Friday because of Christs passion as saith the text and here againe it appeareth the primitiue church kept not the Lords day for their Sabbath no more then they kept Friday for their Sabbath but both of them as we keepe holy dayes Hauing answered all their reasons that I can finde or heare of in next place let me passe my censure of reasons in generall How feeble a thing our best and refined reason is euery man may knovv that vseth reason S. Paul shall speake for vs vve know but in parte we see through a glasse darkely 1. Cor. 12.9.12 saith he 2. let all our lerned Diuines speake vvhoe not only in publique prayers to God confesse our blindnesse of minde but moreouer in their Sermons they dare not deliuer a doctrine collected by reason out of their text vnles they can soundly proue the same by some plaine text or other as you see their constant and laudable practise is and this they doe least they should deliuer for doctrines mens preceptes vvhereby you see what an holy ielousy they haue of their reason that though in their priuate studies they haue collected a doctrine by helpes both of nature and artes with great diligence yet dare they not trust to their reason vntill they finde God in his word to backe them 3. let Logicianes speake vvhoe are the masters in reason doe not they in their bookes of Logicke shew how many and sondry wayes reason is subiect to be corrupted by fallacies and Sophisticall arguments all which testimonies of the dimenesse and weakenesse of our reason teacheth vs thus much that as it is too great boldnesse vvith God and ouergreate confidence in our reason by bare force of it to dispute against any thing which God hath set vp as the 7th day Sabbath So it is a matter of no lesse dispraise and presumption by only force of reason consequence to innouate and set vp a new Sabbath and yet for all this doe I not exclude the vse of reason about the Holy Scriptures so be it be but to finde out vvhat God saith in his vvord I only exclude the vse of reason as by collections to add any thing to Gods vvord wherfore I reiect all reasons and consequences touching in nouation and bringing in a new Sabbath vnlesse as diuines backe their doctrines in sermons by plaine textes so these doe backe euery collection and consequence by a cleere text of Scripture or at least if I may be bould to grante so much that euery collection and consequence be such as is necessarily and demonstratiuely true so as it apparantly cannot but be true Hence is that laudable vsage of our church which though it
assembly wherein they did no seruile labour v. 6.7 and this was a Sabbath day to wit a ceremoniall Sabbath day now the Iewes killing their passeouer on good friday as the 14th day then Saturday must be the 15th day and so an holy convocation and Sabbath by the Leuiticall Law and so here is an other Sabbath fell on and with the weekly Sabbath now to come to the point the parascue or preparation spoken of Mark 15.42 hath respect of these two Sabbathes only to this latter that is to the Ceremoniall Sabbath which was on the first day of vnleauened bread or on the 15th day of the month and it hath not respect vnto the Morall Sabbath now the reasons mouing me to say so are 1. because this parascue or preparation is not any vvhere applied to the Morall Sabbath but only it stands in reference to the ceremoniall and therfore we reade the Euangelist Ioh. 19.14 calling it the preparation of the passeouer not the preparation to the Sabbath as they would 2. we reade of a preparation euer on the day before the 15th day of the month the Sabbath on the first day of vnleauened bread but of none before the vveekly Sabbath see Luk. 22.8.9 and ye know there must be a preparation of the passeouer before it be eaten for it must be killed and rosted first Exod. 12.6.8 and a place where it must be eaten in must be prepared too Luk. 22.11 and to winde vp all in a word the parascue or preparation whereof Scripture speakes so oft is nothing else but the preparation and making ready of the passeouer to be eaten the which labour fell as now vpon the day before the Sabbath vnderstand whither Sabbath you will Mark. 15.42 so then this preparation ouer night being proper to the Ceremoniall Sabbath of the passeouer it belonged not to the weekly Sabbath so the weekly Sabbath began not ouer night ere the more for this Text Mark 15.42 Finally the cleering of this text Mark 15.42 by the way may be vsefull to shew their opinion is growndlesse vvho vrge a preparation to the Sabbath on Saturday afternoone or on Saturday euen pressing vs then to refraine our weekly labours and to spend that portion of tyme in holy exercises for my part I know no other preparation to the Sabbath to be performed more on Saturday after noone than in the forenoone or then on Friday or Thursday before that is I know none but this that we should remember it afore hand and so to be more and more mindfull of it as it drawes nerer and nerer vnto vs lest vvhen t is come we profane it You haue heard the first vse shewing vvhen the Sabbath doth not begine as namly not ouer night c. The 2d vse shall be to shew by vvay of instruction vvhen the Sabbath doth begine The Sabbath is to begin in the morning vvhen the day begines as breake of day this flowes naturally from the Comm for if God commanded vs to keepe holy the Day then must we begine vvith the day then vvhen the day begines to begin it afore the day as at midnight or the like is growndlesse and is more then God euer required so to delay the beginning an howre 2. or 3. after day breake is to robbe God of a part of his day by sanctifying to the Lord not a day but a peece of a day 6 The 6th and last point in the Comm as touching tyme and day is to enquire 1. vvhat day God sanctified but this nedeth no labour since t is apparant God sanctified the 7th day and last day of the vveeke that day vvhich followed his 6. dayes vvorke 2. vve are to enquire after the reason mouing God to sanctify this day of the vveeke before any other and this is plainly laid downe in the last clause of the 4th Comm and againe in Genes 2.3 So God plessed the 7th day and sanctified it Because that in it he had rested from all his vvork vvhere you see God renders the speciall reason mouing him to blesse and to sanctify the Sabbath day and it vvas Because that on that day himselfe had rested Use 1. may be to shew vs that God in his 4th Comm enioyneth not a day at randome but a particular day such a day as hath this reason of Gods Rest belonging to it now this belonged only to the 7th day of the vveeke not to the 8th day nor to the first day of the vveeke our Lords day for God the creatour rested not vpon our Lords day vvhen he had finished the vvorke of creatiō but vpon our Saturday the 7th day which goeth next before the Lords day Use 2. may be to shevv vs that the 4th Com can not be vrged or applied to the first day of the vveeke our Lords day because that reason of Gods Rest vpon the 7th day vvhich moued him to sanctify it neither doth nor can belong to the Lords day now since that reason of Gods Rest vvhich is a parte of the 4th Com can not belong to our Lords day no more can the whole Com belonge vnto it Use 3. and me thinks the reason of Gods Institution should say some thing for the morality and perpetuity of the Sabbath for as sine moued God to bringe death into the vvorld at the first vpon Adam Rom. 5.12 so the same continuing moues God still to continue death in the world vpon Adams posterity So Gods Rest vpon the 7th day mouing him at first to sanctify it the same reason remayning to vvorlds end should moue God to continue the sanctification of the 7th day for euer the ground of which consequence is taken from that axiome That God is immutable and vnchangable euer the same so as if things be the same towards him he againe is the same towards them Hence it is vve thus argue did God so to Abraham to David to Pharaoh c. if thou be to God as they were so God vvill be to thee as he vvas to them now as God is euer the same so is Gods rest on the 7th day And so we haue spake of the duty of the day and of the tyme next we should come to speake of the duties in the day and in the tyme the duties in the day are 2. Holines and Rest Remember to keepe the Sabbath day Holy and in it thou shalt not doe any worke but as touching exposition of these two Holines and Rest I purpose to desiste for asmuch as vve differ not in these sauing about the latter that it is houlden partly morall partly ceremoniall but of that by and by Hauing spoken of the duty of the day and mentioned the duties in the day here a question would be scanned touching both these comparatiuly to know whither is the more excellent that which God did first and principally aime at the duty of the day or the duties in the day a question at first sight I confesse it seemes friuolouse the rather I moue it
an asse yoked together to sowe it vvith seedes of diuers kindes vvhich kinde of vnequall mixtures God vvould not abide amongst his people how much lesse vvould him selfe vse it as if God had vvrote moralls ceremonialls both vpō the same Table of stone and twisted in one Commandement some thing perpetuall other some thing temporary for they make the tyme in the 4th Com a ceremony and Holines a Morall yea the one indiuiduall Rest is partly a morall and in other parte of it a ceremony oh monstrous vvhat a hotch potche haue vve heere vvhat a mingle mangle what a confusion iumbling of things so farre distant together as vvhen moralls and ceremonialls are supposed to be here mingled together the one to last but for a tyme the other to last for euer the one belonging only to the nation of the Jewe the other belonging to all nations and both of these thoug mingled in one single word in the vvord Rest was the like euer heard of can the like instance be showne in all the 10. Commandements and yet againe contrary wise vvhat a rending and violent tearing in sunder such things in the Com vvhich God hath ioyned together as to sunder the Sabbath from the 7th day vvhen God saith expresly The 7th day is the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 and so inviolably linked them together thus they imagine Moyses to iumble things vnskilfully together and then come they and rend and slash them asunder againe if this be lawfull then vvhich of the 10. Comm may not suffer violence laying out such parcells of them as disconceit vs and letting stand still vvhat fansy vs and is not this vvith that vvicked man To change tymes and the Law Dan. 7.25 To come yet nerer they endeauer to shevv the 4th Com is partly ceremoniall and that in two things the one is as touching the Rest the other is as touching the particular tyme of 7th day now least they should seeme to hould only the 7th day vvhich is the question to be ceremoniall there is great labour vsed to finde out some thing else in this Com ceremonious too so the 7th day should not stand nakedly alone for a ceremony and to this purpose euery text that may seeme to sauour of any exrraordenary strictnes about the Jewish Rest that and those textes are not expounded vvith a graine of salt or dramme of qualification but stretcht vpon the tainterhoockes to the vtmost of these two things we vvill begin with the Rest and see how they make it in parte ceremonious A vvorthy and late wrighter whose name I spare for honours sake makes this rest ceremoniall in three things the vvhich he termes that rigourous and precise rest prescribed to the Jewes these three things we will examine one after an other and hauing dispached these vve vvill also examine some other like textes and if vpon their examination it be founde that God neuer required any such strict rigorousenesse of rest of the Iewes as is supposed then is it but a forgery to say the strictnes of the Iewish rest vvas a ceremony for how can it be a ceremony which is not 1. The first is that the Iewe might not on the Sabbath goe forth or take a iourney any whither for any busines of his owne Exod. 16.29 this saith he was temporary and doth not concerne these tymes of the New Testament Heretoo I answere This text forbiddeth only vnnecessary iournying on the Sabbath to prouide that thing vvhich God giueth him enough of the day before for because God had giuen them Manna on the 6th day enough for two dayes therfore God forbad them to trauaile for it forth the doores on the 7th day so here God forbade only needlesse and idle iournyes on the Sabbath and vvhat rigorouse precise strictnes then vvas here imposed vpon the Jewe is this such a hard intollerable burthen as besemes only the showlders of a Iewe and not of a Christian that a man should not trauaile vainly and to no purpose on the Lords Sabbath 2. The Text is excedingly wronged to say it forbad a man to take a iourney for any busines of his owne for it forbad him not to trauaile a fewe miles for himselfe in a case of necessity since it only forbad him to trauaile in a case friuolouse idle 3. If this text and law perteined only to the Iewe and left vs at libertie then may we on our Lords day and Sabbath now take such friuolous iournyes vvhich yet all sound diuines condemne 2. The 2d thing vvherein stood the rigour of the Iewish rest as saith he is that they might not kindle a fyer on the Sabbath day Exod. 35.3 Hereto I answere this text is set vpon the tainters and stretched farther than need is why should the same men qualify some textes about the rest of the Sabbath with due limitations and yet extende other some text about the same rest beyond all limitation for instance Exod. 20.10 In it thou shalt not doe any work which though it according to the letter forbiddeth generally any kind of worke whatsoeuer yet they doe well expounde it to be vnderstood only of seruile works forbidden not of works of charity and necessity But in this Text Exod. 35.3 ye shall kindle no fyer this canst needes be vnderstood litterally and generally as if the Iewe might in no case kindle any fyer without exception I pray what differeth the Law Exod. 20.10 Thou shalt not doe any worke from the Law here Exod. 35.3 Thou shalt kindle no fyer is not that the generall and this this the speciall is a limitation to be added to the genus and none to the species wherfore by the same authority that they limite the words in 4th Comm thou shalt not doe any work that is not any common vnnecessary seruile work by the same authority may I limite this Com Exod. 35.3 Thou shalt kindle no fyer that is thou shalt kindle no fyer to doe vnnecessary seruile works vvithall such as is of common brewars and bakers to got their lyuing by as on the 6. dayes and such as was for the building of the Tabernacle Exod. 35.3.4.5 c. vvhereof there was no such necessary hast as that they should kindle fyers to work about it on the Sabbath But thinke you that God who allowed the Iewe to labour in case of necessity on the Sabbath day to leade a beast to the vvater to pluck and ruble eares of corne to help a beast out the ditche vvas so rigorous to him in an other thing of like vse as not permit him to kindle a fyer to warme his body in the depth of winter vvhen t is freezing could or to dresse a bite of warme meat for his dynner on the Sabbath vvhereby he may be cheered vp the cheerefully to attend vpon God in his ordinances in the after parte of the Sabbath was God thinke you so carefull for oxen or vvas it not rather spoken for men vvho are made after the image of
Tables of stone to notify its perpetuity they hauing no plaine and direct Text of Scripture necessarily abolishing it it can be nothing then but their bare vvilles and pleasures to haue it abolisht and this grownded vpon the custome of the church because shee hath abolisht it now a long tyme. They haue not thus done vvith it though for they haue also certain reasons argumēts more vvhich vve novv come to my minde against the tyme and day where by they would proue the Sabbath day abolisht The first is taken from Christ himselfe Say some men vvhy Christ himselfe abolished the Sabbath day and that euen in his owne tyme whilst he vvas vpon the earth for He gaue leaue to vvork vpon the Sabbath as to leade beastes to water to toile about lifting a beast out of a ditche yea himselfe made clay on the Sabbath to open the eyes of the blinde man in so much as the Pharises taxed him for a breaker of the Sabbath and for a godlesse man for it saying This man is not of God because he keepeth not the Sabbath day Ioh. 9.16.14 Hereto I answer 1. what matters it what those superstitious Pharises censured of Christ vvho were the blind leaders of the blinde and of enuy could not endure Christ should doe any thing but they would carpe and cauill at it if possiblie they could though here they would not endure Christ so much as to cure a blinde man on the Sabbath yet it appeareth it was but enuy but superstition in them for Christ approued his owne facte of healing on the Sabbath day by a common practise among the Jewes themselues at that day of the like saying what man among you if his sheepe fall on the Sabbath into a pitt doth not take it and lift it out Mat. 12.10.11 yea it appeareth the Pharises and Doctoures of the Law euen vnder the Law allowed other men though not Christ nor his Disciples to doe works of charity and necessity on the Sabbath as to lift a sheep out of the ditch and for the Priest to kill the Sacrifices on the Sabbath Matt. 12.5.11 I answere 2. let not vs attend to the Scribes and Pharises censures but hearken we to Christ the true expounder obseruer of the Law now he allowed workes of mercy and workes of necessity to be done on the Sabbath day as those instances afore mentioned doe proue but for any to suppose Christ meante hereby to abolish the Sabbath is a simple conceipte for Christ saith of the Morall Law vvhereof the Sabbath day is a branch He came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it Mat. 5.17 But suppose the Sabbath had beene a branch of the ceremoniall Law why yet t is absurde to think that Christ would abrogate any thing of it so long as he liued for the ceremoniall Law was equally in force with the Morall Law vntill Christs death So then these things did not argue any abolition of the Sabbath day then but rather giues vs to vnderstand how we Christians are to keepe the Lords Sabbath to the worlds end not in any superstitious strictnes as if vve might not on that day doe works of mercy and necessity but the contrary for if Christ allowed it to the Jewes euen before his death whilst no man doubtes but all Lawes morall ceremoniall were in force why should vve thinke but that he allowed as much libertie to Christians to the vvorlds end 2. A 2d reason is fetcht from that phrase Mat. 12.8 The Sonne of man is Lord of the Sabbath day whence it is thought that since Christ is called the Lord of the Sabbath that therefore Christ may change the Sabbath day secondly that Christ as Lord of the day did abolish the day I answere first to the former Say I should graunt that Christ the Lord of the Sabbath may or might change the Sabbath what 's that to our question vve dispute not of what Christ may or might doe but what Christ did doe I answere to the latter that neither the context nor yet the phrase of Christ being Lord of the Sabbath will afforde any such matter see the absurdety of such collections from a like phrase Rom. 14.9 Christ died and rose againe that he might be Lord both of the deade and of the liuing can any hence collect that because Christ is called Lord of the liuing that therfore Christ might or did abolish or destroy the liuing 2. to suppose Christ here did abolish the Sabbath day as a ceremony is altogether growndlesse for both at this tyme when Christ spake these vvordes all ceremonies vvere in full force and also so they remained euer after vntill the day of his death and passion for not vntill then was the handwriting of ordinances taken out of the vvay Col. 2.14 nor vntill his death did Christ euer abolish any ordinance formerly in vse in the Iewish church To conclude no more can be gathered out of this text Mat 12.8 but the right vse of the Sabbath Christ freeing it from the superstitions of the Pharises who held that no worke might be done in no case vpon the Sabbath day but Christ shewed that in a case of necessity his Disciples might plucke and rubb a fewe eares of corne to satisfie present hunger Christ did beare them out in it allowing a dispensation in such a ease for as he vvas Lord of all the commandements as touching his Godhead so of the Sabbath day also and therfore he might dispense vvith that law and that day or rather he might therfore be betrusted to haue giuen the true sense and exposition of the commandement and to haue showne them the right vse of a Sabbath day as if he had thus said since I am Lord of the Sabbath doe not you Pharisies think that I vvill giue way no not to my Disciples to doe any vnlawfull facte on this day nor suffer them to prophane this sacred tyme for it is myne I am Lord of it if therfore their plucking eares of corne had bene blame worthy you should haue found me so farre from defending them as I vvould haue bene the first that would haue rebuked them for it but herein I see they haue done no more then I doe allowe them to doe the Lord of a corne field vvill allow his seruants to make a footpath through his corne in case of a necessity 3. A 3d reason is because all things are become new now in the Kingdome of Christ 2. Cor. 5.17 and therfore the ould Sabbath is abolished say they Where vnto I answere 1. if all things be become new now in Christs Kingdome I pray shew me then vvhere you haue a new commandement for the 8th day or first day of the weeke or for the Lords day in steade of the ould 4th commandement for the 7th day or Sabbath day and where the Israelites vvere commanded in the first comm to serue the true God only shew me vvhere now we are commanded to serue any
a prejudicate opinion arising in mindes of men from calling it the Iewes Sabbath day Touching which name were it vsed in a good or in an indifference sense I should say nothing but since I finde it so termed in a reprochfull sense to rescue it herefro I vvould faine know a reason why the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th Com should rather be called the Iewes Sabbath day then the Lord our God whom wee are commanded to worship in the first Com should be called the Iewes Lord God I can see no reason but that the one may be so called as well as the other Nor any reason but if we may call the Iewes God our God so vve may call the Iewish Sabbath day our Sabbath day and if vve doe not call it our Sabbath day because we keepe it not the faute is only in our selues wherfore to auoide all difference about the name let it not be called the Jewes Sabbath day nor the Christians Sabbath day as proper to eighther but let vs call it the Lords Sabbath day as common to Jewes and to Christians both and as appertaining vnto all nations vnto whome soeuer the 10. Comm doe appertaine This name you shall finde justify able by Moses in Exod. 20.10 where he calles it the Lord Gods Sabbath when he said The 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God 1. My first argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because the 8th day Sabbath or Lords day is not in force and thus it may be framed If our now Sabbath called the Lords day which is eighther on the 8th or on the first day of the week be not in force Then must the 7th day which is the day next foregoeing the Lords day be now in force But our now Sabbath called the Lords day which is on the 8th or first day of the vveeke is not in force Therfore the 7th day vvhich is next foregoeing the Lords day is now in force More briefly thus If the 8th day be not in force Then the 7th day is in force But the 8th day is not in force Ergo the 7th day is in force I proue the consequence to be good because eighther the 7th or the 8th day must be Sabbath the one of them for of all the seuen dayes in the weeke there is no scruple or question betwene them and me saue only about these two dayes so as one of these two dayes must be Sabbath by both our consents especially since we all hould it morall that one day in euery 7. must be a Sabbath which to deny were great impiety I proue the Minor that is That the 8th day or Lords day is not in force and this I proue because ther is neither precept nor practise neither of Christ nor of any of his Apostles in Scripture to put the Lords day in force and this taske I haue particularly and largely made good in the first parte of my Booke where I haue shown by way of answere That the Lords day is not a Sabbath day by Diuiue Institution 2. My 2d argument is because the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished and it may thus be framed That which is not abolished that is now in force But the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished Therfore the 7th day Sabbath is now in force I need not proue the Maior since t is plaine to euery eye for the Minor this I haue proued particularly and largly in the 3d parte of my booke where by way of answere I haue shewed That the 7th day Sabbath is not abolished 3. My 3d argument is because the 7th day Sabbath was neuer changed and it may thus be framed That which was neuer altred nor changed by Christ or by his Apostles That is still in force to this day But the 7th day Sabbath vvas neuer altred nor changed by Christ or by his Apostles Therfore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force to this day The Maior is cleere of it selfe since things once instituted by God in the ould Testament if euer they vvere altred it must be by Christ or his Apostles in the New Testament For the Minor note that the vvord change intimates two things th one is the abolishing of the ould thother is the bringing in of a new as Dauid 2. Sam. 12.20 he changed his apparell that is he left or laid of his mourning apparell and he put on other apparell now thus did neither Christ nor his Apostles change the Sabbath by abolishing it and by setting vp a new if they did change it it was by precept for by practise but not by precept for they as they did not blot For the truth of the Maior 1. the vvrighting of this Law in Tables of stone by God vvhat could it intimate vnto posterity if not this for one namly that those Lawes should be perpetuall else they might haue beene vvrote on paper or parchement or the like vanishing things 2. what reason can be rendered why God should put such an apparant difference twixt the 10. Com and the ceremoniall Law as that he would vvright the one vvith his owne finger but the other he vvould not but set Moses to vvright it the one he deliuered by his audible voice vnto the people the other was deliuered solely by the voice of Moses vvhat may be judged to be the reason hereof but that God did more esteeme of the one then the other and so vvould haue it more durable 3. This Maior is the common receiued truth at the hand of all Diuines witnes Doctour Ames in his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. Haec enim regula est certissima inter optimos omnes Theologos recepta praecepta moralia a ceremonialibus in eorum traditione sic fuisse discriminata ut omnia sola moralia publice fuerint coram toto populo Israelis ex monte Sinai ipsius Dei Voce proclamata postea etiam proprio Dei quasi digito scripta rescripta idque in tabulis lapideis ad perpetuam immutabilem ipsorum durationem indicandam For this saith he is a most certaine rule and receiued by all best Diuines that the Morall Commandements vvere thus differenced in their deliuery from the ceremonials that all and only the Morals vvere proclaimed publikly before all the people of Israel from Mounte Sinay by the Voice of God himselfe after also were wrighten and againe written as it were by the singer of God and that in Tables of stone to declare their perpetuall and immutable continuance As for the Minor this you haue it in the 4th Comm and deliuered as a commandement in preceptiue and commanding termes Remember the Sabbath day c. In it thou shalt not doe any work c. now if you aske vvhich day we must remember the Lord in the same Com telleth vs it is the 7th day But the seauenth day is the Sabbath c. So the 7th Sabbath vvas commanded and so it most plaine Exod. 35.2 5. My 5th
the hearte why may not the prophane man cauill against the Sabbath day because t is said In it thou shalt doe no worke what not any manner of worke vvhat not feede our children nor cut our owne meate this Commandement is Iewish Againe Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe vvho is able thus to doe vvherfore this Commandement pertained only to the seruitude of the Jewish nation saith the vncharitable person and againe Thou shalt not couet thy neighbours vvife nor any thing that is his that is thou shalt not haue the least desire to the least thing of the neighbours Oh saith the lawlesse Protestant these things are partly Morall partly Ceremoniall this same liuing so accuratly and so strictly pertained to the Iewes t is to vs a yoke nor we nor our fathers could beare c. if I say an exception be once made from this generall truth for you for the 7th day vvhy may not euery of these come in also with his exception too Yet farther since this is that generall truth vvhich all Ministers both in pulpit and in their bookes doe vphould vvhatsoeuer they say or vvright that it must be so and so because God had commanded it in the Morall Law vvhich particular flowes from this generall that whatsoeuer God hath commanded in his Morall Law 〈◊〉 now in force since I say they pay out such coyne to others why should they not be willing to be paid in the same coyne by others vvhy therfore should I be put to proue this principle and fundamentall truth vvhich in other cases themselues make no scruple of If so be that this be not sufficient that vvhatsoeuer is commanded in Gods Law the 10. Comm is now in force to bind vs our very principles shall become disputable and doubtfull If they shall answere by any distinction wher by they empaire the full force and virtue of any branch of this Law of God they offend against a plaine texte Deut. 12.32 whatsoeuer I command you you shall take nothing therefro yea they falsify Christs words and predication Mat. 5.18 vvho confirmed the Law and euery iote title in it to abide in such force as it was in when he preached that sermons in Mat. 5.18 thence forwards vnto the vvorlds end yea they side it vvith these Priestes Zepha 3.4 who wrested the Law or vvho did violence to the Law of Scripture vve haue but two parts left vs the one is the Law Morall the other is the Gospell now whosoeuer shall enfring or deny any iote or title of eighther of these portions of holy writt he is no freend to God 2. Neuerthelesse some thing may be said to proue that whatsoeuer God hath commanded in the 10. Commandements the same is now in force as 1. because all the 10. Commandements were all and euery one equally and a like deliuered by the same God by the same voice at the fame tyme and wrote vpon the same tables of stone therfore one should bind aswell as thother and one should last as long as any other they should haue the same duration in common reason 2. Our Sauiour Christ himselfe ratified the Morall Law and euery iote and title of it vnto the vvorlds end Matt. 5 17.18 which is to the full as much as can be desired I should proue 3. If some thing commanded in the Morall Law doth not binde now then are there not 10. Commandements for there is but 9. Commandements and an halfe or but 9. Commandements and three quarters or there abouts but sure I am tenne fully there is not for there wants the tyme of 7th day commanded in the 4th Comm if you except it now Moses telde Iewes and consequently vs that God wrote in the Tables tenne Commandements Deuter. 10.4 if therfore we haue not tenne commandements compleat then haue we Christians not the Law of God as it was deliuered at first intirely but defectiuely and maimedely and some peeces only of it 4. If that reasoning of S. Iames Iam. 2.10.11 be sound and good vvhere by he proueth that whosoeuer breaketh but one Law is guilty of all the other precepts by this reason because he that commanded one Law he commanded the other Lawes also Then so may I reason and proue whosoeuer shall violate the 7th day is guilty of all the other precepts by this reason because he that commanded vs to beepe the Sabbath day proue it from a like phrase in Scripture as in Genes 14.21.23 said Abraham to the King of Sodome I will not take so much as a threed or shoolatchet of thee c. and as in Matth. 5.26 said our Sauiour Christ thou shalt not come out thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing both vvhich phrases intimate thus much that if the debtor should not come out of prison till he had paid euery farching thē should he not come out till he had paid euery penny euery shilling and euery pownd if Abraham would not take a threed or shoolatchet of the King then would he not take of him raiment cattell siluer or gould thus you see it the manner of Scripture by mentioning and denying of the very least to intimate ther by a deniall of all any the whole and euery part and parcell of that thing wher to that least belonged a like phrase you haue Mat. 10.30 yea and the haires of your head are numbred c. if the haires vvere numbred may we reason then were the hands eyes eares the teeth and the fingers numbred also just so is my atguing aboue if euery title of the Law be in force then so also are thes letters words in force to wit the 7th day is the Sabbath so you see the consequence proued good and sound I proue the Minor to wit that euery title of the Law is in force to the worlds end by Mat. 5.18 where our Sauiour prophecied of the duratiō of the Law of euery iote and title of it to last to the worlds end saying Amen or verily Isay vnto you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 donec vntill Heauen Earth passe one iote or one title of the Law shall not passe c. vvhere you see Christ did ratifie this prophecy by a vehement assueueration prefixed to it Amen or verily said he c. Farther note vvhat learned Chemnitius saith vpon this Text by way of exposition saith he Iote is a letter of the Hebrew Alphabet and a letter of the least value of all the rest in the Alphabet and title saith he is as a pricke to a letter or as a comma to a sentence so you see Christ did stablish for euer the very least things of moment in the law and thus is the minor made good Neuerthelesse against this Text many answeres are brought as 1. that by Law here is not only meant the Law Morall but also the Law ceremoniall Here vnto I say 1. that it is a growndlesse answere it hath no foundation in the Text or context for since all the Lawes
if the Scribes and Pharises vvere superstitious in keeping the 4th Com and forbad vvorkes of charity to be done on the Sabbath vvere they not erroniouse too in expounding and obseruing other of the Commandements But sure I am our Sauiour Christ the true expounder of the Law he gaue leaue euen to the Iewes in his tyme before any Ceremonies were abolisht to doe vvorks of charity and works of necessity euen vpon the Sabbath day as to rubbe eares of corne to carry a bedd to lift a beast out of a ditch and the like yea doe not vve hold our selues now thus strictly tyed vpon the Lords day as not to doe any vvorks thereon saue works of necessity and charity I finde not that a beleeuing Iewe vvas any thing more strictly tyed then so For my parte I see no difference twixt the doctrine of our Church of Engeland touching keeping the Lords day for strictnesse and the doctrine of Moses and of Christ touching the keeping of the Sabbath day nor can I see how a beleeuing Iewe vvas more strictly tyed then a beleeuing Christian is in right account 3. Saith a 3d. Should vve embrace the Sabbath day then should vve be accused of nouelty and the neighbour Churches of Papists vvould vpbraide vs Here too I answere vvhat if man accuseth where God commendeth it vvas new doctrine that Paul brought to Berea but it vvas theire commendations that they receiued the word vvith all readinesse and serched the Scriptures daily to see vvhither those things vvere so or not it vvas not the newenesse of the Gospell nor the singularity of Paul the teacher that cold daunte them and for Papistes it is not the first tyme that they haue vpbraided vs for nouelty if they thinke it a matter of reproche to confesse vve know but in parte and that the best Church and purest may be more pure and growe nerer to God in knowledge and reformation daily let them scoffe on what Dauid vvill regard a Michal or Isaack an Ishmael what and if vve offend the Church of Papistes if vve may gaine the Church of the Iewes doe vve not vvright of speake of and pray for and hope for conversion of the Iewes and can there be a better vvay for their entrance into our Church then by remouing a way this great stumbling blocke that is our prophanation of the Lords Sabbath day said not the Iewes of Christ this man is not of God because he keept not the Sabbath day Ioh. 9.16 can the Jewes say any better of vs at this day who are not causelesly taxed as vvas Christ why these Christians may they say vvere their religion good they vvold neuer liue in so manifest a breache of the 4th Commandement vveekly as they doe prophaning the Lords Sabbathes 4. Saith a 4th This vvere to bringe an imputation vpon our Church that haue not seene this of 1600. yeeres c. I answere for 300. or 400. yeeres after Christ this Sabbath vvas kept and that by the purest Churches of the primitine tymes so the ouer sight vvas not aboue a matter of 1200 yeeres Againe at these tyme when the Lords Sabbath vvas abolisht by the Laodicean counsaile in the yeere 364. euen then the churches began to decline strangly and then began superstition popery to creep into the Church and by little little it ouerspreade the Christian world vntill about Luthers tyme all vvhich tyme our Church vvas couered in the Romish Church as corne in the chaffe and vve vvere as captiues in a forraine nation vvhere we vvere kept from knowledge of the Lawes of our Lawfull and rightfull soueraigne the Lord our God now vvhat imputation is it to our Church that the Romish Church did ouersee this and blott out the 4th Com as they had done the 2d Com Since Luthers tyme indeed by the mercy of God the chaffe hath beene fanned away yet haue we not had a setteled constant shine of the Sune of the Gospell but twixt tymes it hath beene elouded as in the raigne of Quene Mary c. and for this short breating tyme since Quene Elizabeth of blessed memory hath not our Church had worke enough to hould the ground which our forefathers wone for vs haue vve not beene in a continued warfare battailing vvith Romish doctrine both by penne and by preaching euen vntill now of late yeeres during vvhich conflict our church hath had scarce leisure to bethinke hir selfe of any further purification but now since God hath in some sorte giuen vs rest from our enemies labour vve to growe in grace both in knowledge and in obedience labour vve to perfect Holinesse daily more and more let vs rather imitate the more pure primitiue churchs from vvhom the Church of Roome is fled in practise of the Sabbath day then the corrupted Romish church from whom vve suckte this euill milke Neither is it to be thought a thing vnpossible for a Church of God ignorantly to lye in the breache of one branch of Gods Law for a season for did not the Church of God in Iosiah his tyme as much vvhen the booke of the Law of God it selfe had beene lost for I know not how long tyme 2. King 22. now to vvhom vvas this great sine of carelesnes in loosing the booke of Gods Law to be imputed vvas it not vnto the Idolatrous tymes and church vvhich vvent last before the Raigne of Iosiah so who is mostly to be blamed for our ignorance in this but the idolatry and superstition irreligion of former tymes which began at the Counsaill held at Laodicea Anno 364. for they first puft out this light There are two sortes of people to vvhom this discourse doth pertaine the Laitie and the Clergye as for the Laity God he knoweth they can doe no more then they can doe though of vviling minds that all should goe vvell and that God might haue this owne tymes and t is not a farr thing gaine to them whither they giue God the Saturday or the Sunday but since they want the Artes tounges those instruments of knowledge in this points they must be guided by their Ministers The Priests lippes must preserue knowledge and they must aske the Law of their mouths I say the lesser care of this matter pertaines to the people I doe not say no care for their is a spurre for them in Ezek. 33.6 and a president in those Noble men of Berea for serching the Scriptures and let them in Gods feare both priuately pray to God to direct their Ministers vvith Spirituall illumination and also let them often call vpon them to see to their Ministry shewing them the price of their soules is in their hands and if Ministers neglect the soules of people pay for it As for these of the Ministry these doe knowe this matter mostly conserueth them to knovv vvhither Saturday or Sunday or Sabbath day by Gods appointement And hereof it is that our Sauiour Christ hauing ratified the Law and euery iote and