used to express the resting place of Thorns laid up to be burned 2 Sam. 23.7 Now because those dayes which it pleased God to set apart for himself were dayes in which he did require a cessation from labour to that end that they might better attend Religious dutyes these dayes were called Sabbaths and that as well before the giving of the Law upon Sinai Exod. 16.25 26 29. as after in innumerable Texts So as the word is indifferently used to signifie the weekly Sabbath as those other holy dayes which God appointed the Jews twice in Holy Writt we find the word with a little alteration doubled Exod. 16.23.35.2 we translate it a Sabbath of Rest In the Hebrew it is but the doubling of the same word or words or of a word from the same root and of the same significancy A rest of rest signifying it was not to be a bare cessation from labour but an holy religious rest So as the fourth Commandement is no more than Keep holy a day of Rest And because God had instituted but one such day in the revolution of a Week therefore by an usual figure the word doth sometimes signifie a week as Lev. 23.15.25.8 and so in the New Testament But that usage of the word in this case wâ— have nothing as yet to do with 2. A second thing which our Brethreâ— should know and observe is That thosâ— little particles a and the are English particles not found in the Hebrew but put 〈◊〉 by translation to make up the sense according to our way of speaking the Hebreâ— hath no more than Remember to keep holy dâ— of Rest or day of Sabbath and it is indifferent whether according to our Englisâ— way of speaking we put in a or the noâ— can any argument on either side be fetcheâ— from those supplyes to the Text. These things being premised we say That there are three things or four whicâ— the Fourth Commandement requireth oâ— us 1. That we should keep some solemn time 〈◊〉 a time of holy Rest unto the Lord. 2. That it should be one day of seven a seventh part of our time 3. That it should be an intire day 4. That it should be such an intire day of seven as God hath appointed But that this day should be the seventâ— day in order from the Creation we say falleth not at least primarily under the Fourth Commandment I say primarily not secondarily it doth as that was the day which God had appointed to the Jews Now we say 1. That this is not a singularity but divers divine Precepts both of those which were temporary to the Jews and of those which are of perpetual concernment have just such an interpretation allowed even by our Brethren and by all judicious Christians God commanded Deut. 12.5.11 You shall offer all your sacrifices only in the place which the Lord your God shall choose I would ask our brethren whether this Precept did not oblige them to offer their Sacrifices in the Tabernacle while that lasted and in the Temple afterwards when God had chosen that and in Ezra's Temple when that was builded You shall remember saith God to keep holy a Sabbath day one day in seven for an holy rest such a one as God shall choose for a Sabbath why must this be the seventh from the Creation only and not that only till God should choose another which done the Commandment as much obligeth to that We say in the second Commandment God requires of us observance of the Acts of Instituted Worship which with the Jews quite differed from ours Yet the command obliged both them to sacrifice anâ— us to preach hear receive the Lords Supperâ— How so The Commandment only requireâ— of us in the generall to worship God according to his will The fifth Commandment requires us to Honour the King wheâ— it was given the Jews were bound to honour Moses their chief Magistrate at thaâ— time and many years after they were bound to honour Ahaz Hezekiah and all in forceâ— of the same Precept God requires by thâ— Fourth Commandment that his People in all Ages should keep holy to him a Sabbath day He expounds himself thus One day in seven in which we shall not labour hâ— any bodily labour and such a day as 〈◊〉 should appoint You will say then how did the Jews know or how shall we know what to keep We answer the Jewâ— knew by a Law given them of the same Age with that for Sacrifices many hundreds of years before the Law given at Sinai and by a temporary Law often repeated and quite of another kind from the Fourth Commandment which day must hold still if we can neither find it expired nor repealed nor another substituted in the room of it buâ— if we can find any such sacred Record The Fourth Commandment is not destroyed but established That required a Sabbath a day one of seven such day as God had or should appoint We plead only for a new appointment of the particular day to the New Earth the New World which God made by the sending of his Son into the world in the mean while the Fourth Commandement doth neither require this nor that day otherwise than as that day was at that time by another Law by God set apart Let us hear what our Brethren object 1. Some of them have observed an emphatical note in the Hebrew as much as that Sabbath Remember to keep holy the day of that Sabbath Answ We yield it that the affix Î is indeed sometimes emphatical but hundreds of places are to be shewed where it is not so as no argument of force can be drawn from it 2. But we may grant it so it is not that day but the day of that Sabbath if the note of Emphasis had been to the word signifying day it had been far more to our Brethrens purpose But what is it to our Brethrens purpose that it is the day of that rest or that Sabbath We will grant them that it is no ordinary rest but a special emphatical rest a spiritual holy religious rest which God requireth not a meer cessation from labour but a rest of rests as God sometimes calls it an holy rest in which we musâ— not think our own thoughts 2. But say our Brethren you grant thâ— God requires by the Fourth Commandement 〈◊〉 seventh day how can it be a seventh if it 〈◊〉 a first day can the first be the seventh Answ All this runs upon the formeâ— mistake that the fourth Commandemeâ—â— requireth the seventh in order from the Creation which we have denyed it require no more than such seventh Day as God haâ— or should appoint Suppose seven pieces oâ— Silver on a Table before us either the one or other of the outermost pieces may be the seventh accordingly as we begin to count We must suppose the seven dayes of the Week so to lye before the great Lord oâ— our time surely that is the seventh whicâ— God will appoint and make
so Suppose that any one of us should seâ— to our neighbour our crop of Corn with a reservation to our selves of a seventh part according to the proportion of our Acres and we should say to them Remember I have reserved the seventh part to my self six parts I have sold you but a seventh is mine you shall not meddle with it Must this seventh upon such a demise needs be this or that Close surely no but such a seventh as either according to our bargain we shall choose or our Farmer shall set out This is the case all our time was Gods he hath freely given us six parts and reserved a seventh such a seventh as he shall appoint to himself Hath not God a liberty at his pleasure to set out a seventh to us 3. But say our Brethren it must needs be the seventh in order from the Creation for that was the day which God rested which is brought in the Commandement as an argument to urge upon us the sanctification of the Sabbath Ans 1. That our great Creators resting from his work of creation is brought as an argument to induce us to the observation of the Sabbath we freely grant but we say not as an argument for the particular day but for the same proportion of time God rested one day in seven therefore you must also so rest It is impossible we should rest that day in which God rested that day vanished and returned no more Our Brethren therefore can plead only for the seventh in the weekly Revolution and why not foâ— a seventh in Number only not in Order 2. But we may freely grant our Brethren that that argument held for the seventh iâ— order so far as it could be without any damage to our cause The Precept is onâ— thing the argument is another It doth not at all follow that because thâ— force of the Precept is perpetual thereforâ— the force of every argument should be sâ— also One argument brought hath a perpetual force Gods allowing us six dayes sâ— our own imployment what if the other haâ— a temporary force a force only for thaâ— time during which the Sabbath then instituted was to continue There is nothing more ordinary in Holy Writ than to annex arguments of an universal eternal force to Precepts that were to expire and arguments of a temporary particular vertue to Precepts that obliged for ever How often do we find this as an Argument affixed tâ— the Ceremonial and Judicial Laws confessed by all to oblige only the Jewes For 〈◊〉 am the Lord thy God To give but one instance Lev. 22 29 30. The Precept relates â—o a sacrifice of Thanksgiving it injoyned them to eat it all the same day to leave none of â—t till the morning for saith God I am the Lord God is all our Lord yet we are not â—ll bound to that Sacrifice or the rites relaâ—ting to it On the other side The Argument affixed to the first Commandement is I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt out of the house of bondage The command in the next words Thou shalt have no other Gods but me concerns us as well as the Jews but the argument from the deliverance from Egypt and the house of bondage literally only concern'd them So here The Precept Remember to keep holy the Sabbath Day with the direction and first argument in those words Six dayes shalt thou â—aboâ—â— and do all that thou hast to doe but â—he seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God c. concerns all But the other Argument in those words For in six dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth the Sea and all that in them is and â—ested the seventh day wherefore the Lord blessed the seventh day and hallowed it We say only concerned the proportion of time not inforcing the same day in order or if it did had but a temporary force that day being then under divine institution and there being a need of that argument to quicken the Jews to observe it for those many years it was confessedly to continue after the giving of the Law in Sinai Nor indeed was it possible for all the World or for the Jews in successive times to keep the just seventh part of time from the Creation in a strict computation those who know any thing know how this computation was interrupted in Joshuah and Hezekiahs time and what a difference there is betwixt dayes in several climates and quarters of the World making it a thing impossible either for all people and the Precept concerns all or for the Jewish people afterwards dispersed over all the world to keep the punctual seventh day in order from the Creation according to a weekly revolution I conclude therefore that there is no pretence from the fourth Commandment for any to urge that we more glorifie God by obeying his will in the observation of the last than of the first day of the week yea it will anon appear we less obey God The fourth Commandement only requiring one intire day of seven and such a one as God had or should appoint If we prove God hath appointed another the fourth Commandment stands good and we are rebellious against God if we insist on the old Sabbath and neglect what God hath more lately appointed CHAP. IV. That the Lord Jesus Christ was Lord of the Sabbath and had a power as to alter all Laws relating to the acts of Worship so this Law relating to the solemn time of Worship I Cannot but be so far charitable to our Brethren ingaged against us in this controversie as to believe they will yield us what we have hitherto contended for so far as it extends only to a liberty for the Lord of Heaven and Earth after his giving the fourth Commandement to alter it for though we cannot assert such a liberty no not to the Eternal God as to such things in the ten Commandments which contain in them a morall goodness antecedaneous to the Precept being made so by the Eternall will of God and the things being of that nature that the contrary to them must necessarily impeach the glory of God which he cannot with consistency to his holy nature recede from yet for such things whose goodness meerly depends upon the Precept certainly without derogation to the Soveraign authority of God we must acknowledge a power reserved unto God to make an alteration of them So that though we cannot suppose that God should by any Precept successive to the morall Law give his creatures liberty not to glorifie him or to blaspheme him or to have any other gods besides him yet we must acknowledge a liberty to God if he pleased to alter the law for the time of his Worship that being a thing from which no glory further ariseth to God than as his will is obeyed Now I presume it a principle agreed betwixt us and our Brethren That Jesus Christ is God over all blessed for ever the
Christs Nativity but it will pose them to prove that it was then known or so early taken notice of For those that dream of Easter-day above an hundred years after this this was in dispute when it should be kept Mr. Tilham and Mr. Brabourn both think and they do but think so that it was the seventh day but why should that be called the Lords day because he that day lay in the Grave think we God indeed in the Old Testament called it his Sabbath but was it ever so called in relation to Christ did Christ ever institute that Now why the first day of the week should be called the Lords day reason offers it self plentifully 1. In opposition to his suffering day of which he saith to his Persecutors This is your day and the power of darkness 2. It was the Day when he triumphed over Sin Death and Hell 3. It was the Day when he was with power manifested to be the Son of God Rom. 1.4 4. In all probability it was the day he instituted for the Christian Sabbath and therefore called the Lords day as the Sacrament is called the Lords Supper because he instituted it 5. Finally take all the Ancients from Ignatius who lived nearest the Apostle downward they all understood by the Lords day the first day of the week and accordingly kept it holy unto the Lord. Now let all these be laid together and I beseech our Brethren laying aside alâ— partiality prejudice and saction seriously to consider whether they will not amounâ— to as good a proof as we have for many other things that the Lord Christ hath instituted the Lords day for the Christian Sabbath though it be not in the Gospel proclaimed in so many words And in good earnest I think those of our Brethren who will not judge it sufficient if their Consciences weigh all Gospel Truths in the same ballance will be in no small danger of being warped in other and those very weighty Truths of the Gospel from a perversion in which the good Lord keep them and us all for his mercy sake CHAP. VI. That the Seventh Day is repealed I Suppose I have said enough to justifie the discharge of the Old Sabbath The â—cense which the fourth Commandment gives us to labour six dayes in the week â—vinceth us under no Obligation to keep more than one Sabbath Now if the first day of the week as we have proved be the Sabbath to be sanctified reason tells us the Jewish Sabbath is discharged Though the Scripture no where saith to us you shall not keep the Passeover nor you shall not circumcise yet we understand our selves discharged of both by the substitution of two other Gospel Sacraments It is the Lord will according to the fourth Commandment we should not be under an obligation to keep two dayes in each week and it is the Lords will as we have proved wâ— should keep the first day of the week whaâ— need we any further witness But yet it be needfull I think it is not hard tâ— evince it 1. The Jewish Sabbath as I have already proved was never primarily requireâ— in the Morall Law but only by thoâ— ceremonial or temporary Laws given to thâ— Jews which all acknowledge determine by the death of Christ and the extinction of the Jewish Polity and fell of couâ— when that fell The Ordinance for tâ—â— particular day of the week was but an Oâ—dinance given to hold untill the time Reformation but to add yet a little morâ— it hath been told our Brethren and I heartly wish they would deliberate upon it Thâ— the Apostle Rom. 14.5 blameth the â—mans that amongst them One man esteemâ— one day above another Gal. 4.10 he blamâ— them that they observed dayes and month and times and years That the Apostle â—al 2.16 cautioneth the Christians That â— man should judge them as to meat or drink â— in respect of an Holy-day or a New-moon â— the sabbath-Sabbath-day That these Texts are â— to be understood of the Lords day is â—dent 1. Because as we have proved the Apoâ—es themselves and the Christian Churches â—en observed it 2. Because the fourth Commandment â—d perpetually established 1. A Day 2. A â—venth Day to be sanctified Now the â—postles words must be interpreted so as â—t to lose us one of the ten Commandâ—ents 3. Because to interpret those Texts of all other Jewish Holy-dayes with an exâ—tion only to the weekly Sabbath seemâ— both an unreasonable interpretation too short for the terms of the Texts Vnreasonable it is an usual rule Vbi lex â— distinguit non est distinguendum we â—e no reason to distinguish where the rule â—es no distinction nor can any pretence reason be for limiting the sense in that â—â—oner but to reconcile the Apostles Preâ—t with the fourth Commandment which may quickly be without such a restriction according to what we have proved thâ— sense of it A Sabbath may remain though that Sabbath be abolished 2. It seems also too short The Apostle to the Galatians useth four terms Dayes Months Times Years Suppose by the years be meant thâ— yearly Feast of Atonement or the years â— Jubile by Moneths the New Moons bâ— Times their Feasts of the Passeover Pentecost c. still we want an interpretation for thâ— term Dayes which certainly must be understood of the Jewish seventh Dayes or Sabbaths returning every week 4. What Mr. Warren observes is also very considerable that all these Epistles werâ— wrote to Churches much leven'd with Judaism and under great temptations to it so that undoubtedly it was the Apostles intention by that term to declare the Christians freedom from the old Sabbath which also as it is plain from Deut. 5.15 haâ— something of a Type annexed unto it Buâ— enough hath been said to prove the olâ— Sabbath out of doors if not by repeal yeâ— by expiration as being a temporary Ordâ—nance and by the appointing of anothâ— Sabbath in the stead of it CHAP. VII To insist upon the old Sabbath is to Judaize and non-communion our selves to all Christian Churches in the World both in this and former Ages FRom what hath been said must needs follow that for us now to insist upon the old Sabbath hath a double guilt attending upon it 1. The first is Judaizing 2. The second is declining communion with all the Churches of Christ that are or ever were in the world Judaizing signifies a tenacious adhering to the Jewish Rites and Customs after that Christ hath established a New Heaven and a new Earth This was the Jews great sin It was one piece of our Lords errand into the world To change the customs which Moses delivered A Truth asserted by the first Christian Martyr and for it he was accused Acts 6.14 That this was one of those customs is plain if it were not commanded in the fourth Commandment which we have proved it was not Nor doth it hinder that it begun before Moses so did Sacrifices and Circumcision yet they were the
And it shall come to pass if you diligently hearken unto me saith the Lord to bring in no burthen through the gates of the City on the Sabbath day but hallow the Sabbath to do no work therein Then shall enter into the gates of this City Kings and Princes sitting on the Throne of David riding on Chariots and Horses they and their Princes the men of Judah and inhabitants of Hierusalem and that City shall remain for ever Here 's a Promise of outward prosperity and a stability in it And they shall come from the Cities of Judah and from the places about Hierusalem and from the land of Benjamin and from the Plain and from the Mountains and from the South bringing burnt-offerings and Sacrifices and Meat-offerings and Incense and bringing Sacrifices of praise unto the Lord our God I will continue my Worship amongst you in your own land in its former purity and glory But what if this people will not sanctifie the Lords Sabbaths it follows v. 27. But if you will not hearken unto me to hallow the Sabbath day and not to bear a burden even entring in at the gates of Hierusalem on the Sabbath day then will I kindle a fire in the gates thereof and it shall devour the Palaces of Hierusalem and it shall not be quenched I will without remedy destroy your City and deprive you of all the prosperity wherewith I have blessed you Isa 58.13 If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on my holy day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thine own wayes nor finding thine own pleasure nor speaking thy own words then shalt thou delight thy self in the Lord and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the Earth and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father Here is not only a promise of temporall good riding upon the high places of the Earth inheriting the heritage of Jacob which in generall you know was the blessing but also of a spiritual mercy Thou shalt delight thy self in the Lord Now lest any one should think these Promises are debts paid fulfilled to the Jews and concern not us let us consider yet another Text Isa 56.2 3 4 5 â— Blessed is the man that doth this and the Son of man that layeth hold on it that keepeth the Sabbath from polluting it and keepeth his hand from doing evil Neither let the Son of the stranger that hath joyned himself to the Lord speak saying The Lord hath utterly separated me from his people Neither let the Eunuch say Behold I am a dry tree For thus saith the Lord unto the Eunuchs that keep my Sabbaths and choose the things that please me and take hold of my Covenant even unto them will I give in my house and within my walls a place and a name better than that of Sons and Daughters I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off v. 5. Also the sons of the stranger that joyn themselves to the Lord to serve him and to love the name of the Lord to be his servants every one that keepeth the Sabbath from polluting it and taketh hold on my Covenant v. 6. Even them will I bring to my holy mountain and make them joyfull in my House of Prayer their burnt-offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine Altar for my House shall be called an House of Prayer for all people v. 7. That this is a promise respecting the Gospel-times is plain enough from divers things 1. It is made as a relief for Eunuchs and strangers who in regard of the partition-wall set up by the Ceremonial Law lay under many discouragements from joyning themselves to the Lord. 2. It speaks of a time to come when this Wall should be pulled down I will bring them c. 3. It speaks of a time when Gods House was to be called an House of Prayer for all People which was not till Gospel-times The things promised are great and excellent God promiseth 1. A place in his House 2. A Name better than that of Sons and Daughters even an everlasting Name that shall never be cut off 3. To bring them to his holy mountain 4. To accept their Sacrifices 5. To make them joyfull in the house of Prayer Promises then which God could not promise more Now who shall be made partakers of them Lord who shall dwell in thy Tabernacle who shall abide in thy holy Hill These things are promised To the Eunuchs that keep the Lords Sabbaths To the strangers that keep the Sabbath from polluting it All but those of the Jewish Nation come under the notion of Strangers all we that are Gentile Churches are but Churches made up of Strangers who have joyned our selves to the Lord and taken hold of his Covenant If we would be blessed with these things if we will have a place in Gods house an everlasting name that shall never be cut off if we would be brought to Gods holy Mountain if we would have God accept our services if we would be made joyfull in the house of Prayer we must keep the Sabbath from polluting it 7. Will example move us to say nothing of the example of the servants of God in the Old Testament The example of Nehemiah as a Magistrate is there a famous instance recorded Nehem. 20.32 ch 13 15 16 17 19. but let us look into the New Testament and there first take our Lords example who was a zealous observer of the Sabbath the seventh day Sabbath for the other did not begin till his resurrection Mar. 1.21 He on the Sabbath day went into the Synagogue and taught Mar. 6.2 When the Sabbath day was come be began to teach in the Synagogues Once for all Luk. 4.16 As his custom was he went into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day and stood up for to read It remains that we should be satisfied how he spent that time of the Sabbath which he did not spend in acts of more solemn publick Worship Something we find as to what he did he healed the sick Joh. 5.10 11 12 13 14 c. Joh. 9.14 Luk. 6.7 13. 12 13 14. Mar. 3.2 3 c. we find him also on the Sabbath day at a feast Luk. 14.1 2 3 c. and passing through the corn-fields Matth. 12.1 Mar. 2.23 observe but his discourses upon his healing the sick when he was at the Feast Luk. 14.1 2 3. when he passed through the Corn-fields Matth. 12.1 Mar. 2.23 you will find them constantly spiritual and heavenly and suited to the Law of the Sabbath not speaking our own words Concerning others we have no such particular account but in the general Luk. 23.56 The women rested on the Sabbath day according to the commandment they prepared spices and oyntments the night before but they rested the Sabbath day according to Gods command Through the whole history of the Acts
the more we have of Religious Duties and Ordinances the more advantage ariseth to our immortal Souls if we be not wanting to our selves But now what reall advantage any soul can have from the sanctification of the last more than of the first day of the week will pose the most serious Christian to determine Is his Soul to be advantaged by Praying Hearing Singing breaking Bread All these certainly are done on the Lords day and with this advantage in a far fuller communion of Christians than those have who keep the sixth day as to which the far larger part of Christians and Protestants yea and the severest livers of them are not satisfied The only thing which I can think of as seeming in the least to abate the edge of this consideration is That God is more glorified because a stricter Obedience is given to his revealed Will. And indeed Samuel hath taught us That the Lord hath not so great delight in Burnt-Offerings and Sacrifices as he hath in our obeying his voyce that to Obey is better than Sacrifice and to hearken than the fat of Rams Now our Brethren pretend a more strict obedience to the will of God in the sanctification of the seventh than in the sanctification of the first day I shall therefore in the next Chapter arguâ— that case with them In the mean time iâ— is worthy of our Brethrens second thoughtâ— whether under the Gospel it be usual with God to enjoyn his People Precepts of meaâ— Obedience I mean such from whence their Souls shall reap no advantage nor he any glory only in this as we shew our submission to the will of God Our gracious God hath made his yoke easie by commanding us nothing but such by performing of which we further glorifie him than by a meer Obedience and from which also we reap some reall advantage to our Bodies or Souls Such I am sure are all the other moral Precepts by a performance of them we really besides obedience to the will of God do our selves or others some good and bring God some reall glory further than by the acknowledging of him our Soveraign and yielding him a suitable homage But as to this there can be no such pretence neither Souls nor Bodies of our selves or others are more advantaged nor God more honoured by our observation of the seventh than of the first day nor is God more honoured if it doth not appear he is more obeyed It is agreed on both hands that one intire day ought to be sanctified by the solemn performance of all duties of instituted Worship both publickly and privately Reading the Word praying preaching hearing administring and receiving the holy Sacraments singing of Psalms visiting and administring to the necessities of the sick and of the poor Now I say it cannot be imagined what good our selves or others shall reap more by the performance of these duties on the seventh than on the first day Nor what honour God shall have if it doth not appear that a stricter obedience is yielded to the command of God by the sanctification of the seventh than by the sanctification of the first CHAP. III. That God hath no where required of Christians the observation of the Seventh day The fourth Commandment though it requires a Seventh day and such seventh day as is of Gods appointment yet it doth no more require the Seventh than the first day of the Week THere can be no pretence for a further Obedience to the command of God in the observation of the seventh day in ordeâ— from the Creation than in the observatioâ— of the first but from the letter of the fourth Commandment as to which it is thus far agreed betwixt us and our Brethren 1. That it is in the power of God only to make a day holy No man can lay mens Consciences under an obligation that it shall be sin for them not to labour on this or that day or not to spend such a day in publick and private dutyes of Divine Worship but by Authority from God 2. That the fourth Commandment is morall and perpetuall not ceremonial and temporary either in whole or in part 3. That the sence of it is plain and literal not mystical only 4. That as it requireth some solemn time to be set apart for the Worship of God so expressely 1. A whole Day 2. One whole Day of Seven 3. Such a Day as God hath instituted So that we are far nearer agreement with our Brethren of this perswasion than with Heylin Primrose c. and the rest of that party who will have the Commandment ceremonial either in whole or in part and so lose us one of the ten Commandments or â—hose who overstraining two or three Allegorical expressions in Origen and Epiphanius would make the sense mysticall Christ to be the Sabbath and the Precept only to require the Sanctification of the Name of Christ a modern dream justifiable by no Reason Scripture nor Authority We are agreed with our Brethren That the fourth commandment is a Precept requiring the sanctification of a seventh part of our time unto the Lord for ever and such a seventh part as we shall find his direction for But that the fourth commandement doth primarily require the sanctification of the seventh day in order from the Creation is that in which alone we differ from our Brethren Let us therefore without passion candidly consult the Precept and see what there is in it which can justifie our Brethrens zeal in this case The Precept runs thus Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy six dayes thou shalt labour and do all thy work but the Seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not do any work thou nor thy son nor thy daughter nor thy man-servant nor thy maid-servant nor thy Cattel nor thy stranger that is within thy gateâ— For in six dayes the Lord made Heaven 〈◊〉 Earth the Sea and all that in them is aâ—rested the seventh day Wherefore the Lord blâ—sed the Sabbath day and hallowed it It possibly is some disadvantage in thâ— controversie that most of our Brethren aâ— not skilled in the Hebrew language in whiâ— this Precept was Originally wrote Theâ— lay much stress upon the word Sabbatâ— and the particle the beyond what indeeâ— the letter of the Precept will bear It maâ— not therefore be amiss to let our Brethreâ— know these two things by way of promise 1. That the term Sabbath in the Hebreâ— signifieth no more than Rest and a day oâ— sabbath is no more than a day of rest Thaâ— the term Sabbath signifies no more than rest is evident to him that either attends the derivation of the word or the usage of the same word in many Scriptures Lev. 25.6 where it is applyed to the years of Jubilee Lev. 26.43 2 Chron. 36.21 Isa 30.7 It is used to signifie a rest from strife Prov. 20.3 and that rest from labour which a wounded man hath Exod. 21.19 it is
brightness of his Fathers Glory the express image of his person as the Apostle speaketh And that in pursuance of an Eternal Covenant he was in the fulness of time â—â—nt into the world not only to work out mans redemption by his Active and passive obedience to the Law But also as the first Minister of the Gospel as the head and Law-giver of the Gospel Church to reveal his Fathers will for the Worship of God in it to this purpose he tells us Matth. 11.27 That all things were delivered him by the Father Accordingly Matth. 26. he instituteth the Lords Supper and in Matth. 28.18 he instituteth the Ministry preaching the Gospel and Baptisme and Matth. 28.20 he authorizeth his Apostles to teach whatsoever he had commanded them And lest we should think that although the alteration of the Acts of Worship were within Christs commission yet the alteration of the solemn time of Worship was not he hath inspired three of the four Evangelists to tell us what he asserted that he was Lord of the Sabbath Matth. 12.8 Mar. 2.28 Luk. 6.5 Texts which I wonder Mr. Titham should fancy to have any thing in them for the old Sabbath For he who reads any of the Evangelists must yield the sense to be this at first sight That he had authority to expound the Law of the Sabbath contrary to the rigid sense of the Doctors of those times so as it should allow a liberty for acts of necessity piety and mercy The words do plainly assert our Saviour an Authority to alter the Sabbath for he is Lord of it Our Brethren by their daily practice yield our Saviour a liberty to alter the Acts of Worship hence they do not offer Sacrifices as the Jews did though by the way observe our Saviour never said to us You shall no longer Sacrifice they allow of Baptisme instead of Circumcision though it be worthy of our Brethrens observation that Mr. Titham and Mr. Pooly fell to Circumcision and consequently to a denyall of Christ and under the terror of that Text If you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Our Brethren also allow the Ordinances of the Lords Supper and Preaching and certainly it is very unreasonable for our Brethren to allow their Lord and Saviour the authority to alter the Acts of Worship and to deny him a power as to the time of Worship Certainly the time is not so considerable as to the glory of God as the Acts of Worship are besides that as I said before to deny our Saviour this Authority is to deny him to be God Equall with his Father and to deny what three of the Evangelists expresly assert with an even and also The Son of Man is Lord even or also of the Sabbath day CHAP. V. That the Lord Jesus Christ in pursuance of his Commission for establishing the Gospel Church did alter the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day of the Week How this appears THis being obtained we have nothing to doe but to prove That our Lord did alter the Sabbath day In order to which proof Sheppard Thes Sab. th 24. what that holy and learned man Mr. Sheppard hath said is to be observed We are not to expect such evidence from Scripture concerning this change as fond and humorous wits sometimes plead for in this controversie Namely that Christ should come with Drum and Trumpet as it were upon Mount Zion and proclaim by word or writing in express words The Jewish Sabbath is abrogated and the first day of the week instituted in its room to be observed of all Christians to the end of the world For it is not the Lords manner to speak so in many things concerning his Kingdom but as it were occasionally or in way of history or Epistle to some particular Church or people c. The Scripture saith that Christ after his resurrection continued upon the Earth forty dayes speaking of things concerning the Kingdom of God Acts 1.3 and St. John chap. 21. tells us that all things which he said were not written for the World would not have held the books Indeed it is not expressely said that in that time he instructed them as to the change of the Sabbath as it is not said he any time spake to them about the ceasing of Circumcision Sacrifices the Paschall Lamb c. nor is it said what in particular he taught them within those forty dayes But certainly a moderate degree of charity will inforce us to believe that what we shall find in Holy Writ the Apostles and primitive Churches exemplarily practising in this thing they learned either by word of mouth or by infallible inspiration from their Lord and Master which is all one to us and we must be very uncharitable to think that those first and greatest Ministers of the Gospel the greatest Light ever set upon the Lords Hill should by word of mouth or practice teach the Primitive Christians so weighty a thing as the change of the Sabbath without any direction or authority from the Lord Jesus Christ The Apostles in what they did were followers of Christ Jesus and upon this account 1. Cor. 11.1 the Apostle calls to the Corinthians to be followers of him and Phil. 4.9 Those things which you have learned and heard and seen in me do ye It is true the Examples of the Apostles are not in all things our rules nor by us to be imitated But in those things which they did not upon some special reason and wherein we can imitate them unquestionably they are to be imitated and that in force of many Scriptures speaking to that purpose And in such things their example unquestionably amounts to a divine Institution What have we more than the example of the Apostolical Churches practice for our use of Water in Baptisme administring the Lords Supper to Women c. So that the business in question will much lye upon these two things Whether we can shew any Institution of Christ or practice of the Apostolical Churches in this case Here we will also freely grant our Brethren That the exercise of holy dutyes on a day will not argue such a day was observed as a Sabbath But if we will prove that the first day of the week was by the Apostolical Church observed as the Christian Sabbath we must prove That Day set apart for Sabbath Services more than any other day in the Week and honoured above any other day for that end To this purpose there have been three more eminent Texts in the New Testament insisted on almost by all Divines who have handled this controversie I shall not pretend to add any thing much considerable to what hath been largely and learnedly said by Dr. Young Mr. Caudry Mr. Sheppard Mr. Warren c. but I shall gather what they have said into fewer words and give it my Brethren in their own tongue and it may be more in their own dialect in a plain and familiar style for I write not
to Scholars and so am under no temptation to shew reading or Rhetorick nor am I ingaged with any particular Adversary and so not concerned to digress to answer all his impertinencies The first Text I find insisted on is Acts 20.7 where we read that the Apostle having sailed from Philippi to Troas abode there seven dayes Vpon the first day of the week saith the Text when the Disciples came together to break Bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his speech untill Midnight And there was many lights in the upper Chamber where they were gathered together 1. It is first very observable That the Holy Ghost tells us that Paul abode at Troas seven dayes one of which must needs be the Jewish Sabbath It is not unlikely that the Apostle prayed and preached amongst them more than once but here 's no notice taken of any meetings of the Christians any day or of any Religious duties performed by St. Paul any day but upon the seventh day after he came there which the Apostle tells us was the first day of the week so that there is an especial notice taken of this day by the Holy Ghost of the day before none at all in this place amongst a company of Christians Paul was there seven dayes it is not said that he rested or went into the Jewish Synagogue on th◠Sabbath probably there was none there but the sixth day of Pauls abode there i◠reckoned as an ordinary day at Troas yet that must be the Jewish Sabbath no mention of any preparation to it any solemn dutyes in it it is counted amongst the other week-dayes 2. Secondly If here had been no more notice taken of the Lords day the first day of the Week than of the day before we could have had no argument from hence but it is expressely said Vpon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread c. where many things are to be noted 1. The Name The first day of the week not one day in the week as some would have it It is the same phrase Job 20.1 Matth. 28.1 Mar. 16.2 Luk. 24. 1. Certainly the Evangelists design was not to tell us that our Lord rose one day of the week but the day next to the Jewish Sabbath which was the last day of the week If as some have contended the word should be translated One day of the week it would agree with no other use of the phrase in Holy Writ 2. It would not tell us when they met which plainly is the Holy Ghosts design Were it reasonable to translate Mar. 16.1 2. And when the Sabbath was past very early in the morning one day of the week they came c. is it not plainly the Evangelists design to tell us what time they came and therefore he saith 1. When the Sabbath was past 2. Early in the morning 3. The first day of the week It is a manner of speaking according to the Hebrews who ordinarily for want of such a plenty of words as other Languages have express the cardinall number by the Ordinall numerall So Gen. 1.5 The evening and the morning were One day so it is in the Hebrew that is the first day 2. It is not said Paul called them together or that the Church called a meeting that day but when the Disciples met together or they being gathered together for in the Greek it is the Genitive case put absolute the Text mentions it as a time when of course and according to their custom they were met together 3. It is not said when some of the Disciples were met together but the Disciples being gathered together that is the Church being met as publickly as those times would bear they came together v. 7. They were gathered together v. 8. there were many lights in the room where they were gathered v. 8. Here are words enough to conclude a Church-meeting a numerous meeting such a one as required many lights and put Eutichus to take his seat in a dangerous window 4. The Text saith they were met together to break bread A phrase indeed which doth not alwayes signifie receiving the Lords Supper but very ordinarily It is further said that Paul preached and continued his speech till midnight The end of their meeting was solemn religious dutyes in a Church-assembly and they accordingly were performed till Midnight 5. It is not said they were gathered together in the evening but upon the first day of the week though the duties were held on till midnight therefore it is but a fancy of them who think it was evening before they met If Paul did preach amongst them upon other dayes and the Lords Supper were administred any of the other dayes Yet the Holy Ghost's taking no notice of those performances but only of what was done in this day is no mean argument that this was the day which he would have us take notice of as the solemn time for Christians Gospel-worship in imitation of the Apostolical president I am not ignorant what pains some have taken to avoid the dint of this Text. Mr. Brabourn and Mr. Titham both tell us the Meeting was but occasional and extraordinary for which there had been some colour if the Text had said That Paul called them together or that they were called together but it saith they being met together speaking of it plainly as an ordinary customary day when they were wont to meet But saith Mr. Titham As soon as they were met lights were seen in the upper Chamber so that he sayes t is not probable they met till towards evening But the Scripture saith no such thing it saith they were met on the first day of the week and Paul continued his speech till midnight when he began it it saith not but the term continued implieth he began long before Mr. Brabourn thinks it probable they did not begin to meet till toward evening because that was the time for the Lords Supper according to our Saviours example Mar. 14 17. and the example of the Primitive Church 1 Cor. 11.21 That our Saviour first celebrated the Lords Supper in the Evening was plainly upon a special reason that being the instituted time for the Passeover in the close of which he designed the institution of the Supper but that either we are still obliged to that hour or that the Apostles kept them to that hour is very hard to prove The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used 1 Cor. 11.21 will not do it It is translated Feast Mat. 23.6 Mar. 12.39 Luk. 20.46 and indifferently signifies Breakfast Dinner or Supper as might be shewed from many Authors Mr. Titham sayes the Lords Supper was not administred till the next day for Paul continued his speech till midnight and after this he restored Eutychus and v. 11. when he was come up again and had broken bread and eaten and talkt a long while even till break of day he departed But
it is said v. 7. Vpon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread So as plainly their designed meeting to break bread was upon the first day ot the week I clearly think the second breaking of bread v. 11. was not any religious duty but a bodily refreshment Paul took before his journey the phrase is so used besides the manner of the phrase methinks in this place plainly enough signifieth it When he had broken bread and eaten and talkt with them When all the Religious duties of the day were over and Paul had refreshed himself with some Victuals and discoursed with his friends he took his journey The sense of the Text is plainly this Paul religiously with them kept the first day of the Week preaching administring the Lords Supper and he being to leave them preached something longer than usually Eutichus falls asleep falls from the window where he was and was taken up dead Paul the duties being done recovers him to life again refresheth himself with Victuals and discourseth with them till break of the day and then departeth Lastly Mr. Titham is mistaken to say St. Pauls once preaching at Troas is so stood upon as canonizing a Sabbath That which is insisted upon is this That Paul staying at Troas seven dayes no mention is made of the Christians there meeting together any other day but on the first day of the week upon which it is evident that they met and met on purpose for the most solemn Gospel-services and brake not up from them till midnight yea and the Holy Ghost mentions their meeting that day as an usual customary thing Mr. Brabourn puts us to too hard a task to prove that they abstained from their servile labour We hope our Brethren will not think that they were at their servile labour whiles Paul was preaching or while they were me◠together to partake of the Lords Supper And it is not very charitable for us to think if they had not kept this day as the Christian Sabbath that so near a solemn service which requireth preparation they should be distracting themselves with secular labour Besides that this will fall as heavy upon our brethren What one Text have our Brethren to prove that Paul or any Christians abstained from all servile labour on the seventh day which was the Jewish Sabbath or that they kept it It is indeed said Acts 13.14 15. That Paul coming to Antioch went into the Synagogue and sate down and after the reading of the Law and the Prophets upon the desire of the Rulers of the Synagogue Paul preacht a notable Gospel-sermon to them to convince them of their errors V. 42. The Gentiles desired that those words might be preached to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we translate it the next Sabbath and I must ingenuously confess that if that translation were necessary it would have more colour for an argument on our Brethrens side than any place I know in Scripture will afford them that the Christians when the Jews were gone should pitch upon the next Sabbath above other dayes to hear Paul again But as there is no necessity to translate it so so neither is that translation of the particle I think to be justified by any like usage of it We translate it Between generally See Matth. 18.15 Between thee and him alone Matth. 23 35. Luk. 11.51 Between the Temple and the Altar Luk. 16.26 There is a gulf between me and thee Joh. 4.26 In the mean while that is in the time between Acts 12.6 Peter was sleeping between two Souldiers Acts 15.9 betwixt us and them Rom. 2.15 Their thoughts in the mean while or between themselves as it is in the Margent So as to this very Text. The Margent tells you it may be read In the week between or in the Sabbath between If our Brethren will allow the latter which is justifiable there was a Sabbath between that and the next Jewish Sabbath which must be the Christian Sabbath but if they take it in the former sense the Gentiles did not desire Paul to preach the next sevent◠day those words but in the week between so the words are And the Margent of ou◠Bibles tell us the Translators saw thus it might be read nor could any thing lead them to this translation but v. 44. where it is said that the next Sabbath day came almost the whole City together to hear the word of the Lord which they might do yet that not the day which the Gentiles before mentioned desired to hear the same things again Acts 16. Paul comes to Derbe and Lystra quarters very full of Jewes for the Text saith for that very reason Paul circumcised Timothy though his Father was a Greek v. 3. Thence they go to Philippi there v. 13. It is said that on the Sabbath day they went out of the City by the River side where Prayer was wont to be made It is not indeed said it was by the Jews but Lydia is called one that worshipped God who but Jewes in Macedonia should worship God at that time I cannot tell for we never read before that the Gospel was preached in those parts Whereas Mr. Brabourn objects so it is said Cornelius Acts 10 2. was one who feared God with all his house it is true but he lived in Caesarea a place not so far from Hierusalem where the Apostles had so abundantly preacht the Gospel as Philippi in Macedonia was and therefore far more likely to be a Gentile Proselyte than Lydia was but at once to answer this objection of the Apostles going into the Jewish Synagogues and preaching on their Sabbath day either there or elsewhere where they were met 1. It is most evident that the Lord indulged the Christians a time to be satisfied that those things in this Rule of Worship given to the Jews which were ceremonial and temporary had an end during which time it was lawfull for them to observe them Though they all died with Christ yet the Lord allowed them having his own ancient Institution a time for honourable Burial Hence Acts 16. Paul circumcised Timothy as well as kept the Sabbath day and in the first Councel the Apostles injoyn'd the Gentiles to abstain from blood and things strangled and Rom. 14.6 gives a liberty to the Christian to observe the Jewish dayes This liberty did not last long for the Apostle tells the Galatians Acts 15.2 That if they were circumcised Christ should profit them nothing And in this very point of dayes Gal. 4.13 he tells them that he was afraid of them because they observed dayes and months and years It is manifest this Epistle to the Galathians was one of his last it was written from Rome where as he tells us he was then in bonds and as judicious Interpreters think not above two year before his death which was about 65 years after our Saviour That to the Romans was wrote long before so was his circumcising Timothy Acts 16.
to Hierusalem and find the eleven and others gathered together We in a time of persecution oft go as far to hear a sermon and yet do not break the sabbath 2. But they say the text saith Christs second appearing was after eight dayes Joh. 20.26 But so it is said that after three dayes the Son of Man must rise again Mar. 8.31 Yet we know he rose on the third day The Grecians had that liberty in their laâ—guage of expressing themselves as to expresâ— a thing as done when once began Afteâ— eight dayes is no more than after the eight day was begun as after three dayes was nâ— more than after the third day was began Our Saviour being now ascended intâ— Heaven we find the disciples returninâ— from mount Olivet to Hierusalem Act. 1 â—â— and read little of them but of their continuing in prayers and supplication and choosing an Apostle till the day of Pentecost What was done in the day of Pentecost we find Act. 2. Then the Holy Ghost descended and before that we read of thaâ— descending of the Holy Ghost the Evangelists observed They were all with one 〈◊〉 in one place A phrase fully expressing 〈◊〉 Christian Church-meeting I am not Ignorant what a stir Mr. Tilham keeps 〈◊〉 prove this was upon the Jewish sabbath We say with I think better evidence it was upon the Lords day 1. It was Gods express law that the Jews should rest on the seventh day both 〈◊〉 earing and in harvest Exod. 34.21 22. 2. The law for the feast of Pentecost yoâ— shall find Levit. 23.10 11 12 15 16. â—hen you be come into the land which I shall â—â—e you and shall reap the harvest thereof then 〈◊〉 shall bring a sheaf of the first fruits of â—â—r harvest unto the Priest and he shall wave 〈◊〉 together with the offering of a lamb withâ—â— blemish on the morrow after the sabbath 〈◊〉 shall wave it And you shall count unto 〈◊〉 from the morrow after the sabbath from 〈◊〉 day you brought the sheafe seven sabbaths â—ill be compleat even until the morrow after â—he seventh sabbath you shall number 50 dayes Deut. 16.9 Seven weeks shalt thou number â—nto thee begin to number the seven weeks him such time as thou beginnest to put sickle â—â—to thy corn I must first take notice of a base cheat Mr. Tilham puts upon his reader Tilham 7 day sabbath p. 82. â—â—lling them that Moses from God appointed Israel to bring on the â—â—orrow after their passover sabbath â—sheaf of their first fruits c. Good reader look into all the texts that mention it and see if God sayes a word of their Passover Sabbath but v. 11. The morrow after the sabbath Which was undoubtedly the weekly sabbath Besides their passover sabbath was tied to a day It is not to be imagined their corn should alwayes be riâ— just that day to wit the 14 day of â— first moneth Now they were not to couâ— till they had put their sickle into their corâ— Deut. 16.9 1. I observe first it was impossible thâ— Pentecost should ever fall upon the Jewish sabath for on the sabbath day they were â— God 's law to rest Exod. 34.21 22. even earing and harvest So the soonest they couâ— begin to put their sickle into their coâ— must be the first day of the week 2. They were then to expect till thâ— next sabbath and from the morrow afteâ— to count which makes it necessary thâ—â— the feast of Pentecost should alwayes fall 〈◊〉 the first day of the week 3. Here was a Church-meeting of Christians met in one place on the first day of the weeâ— 4. Christ who when on the Earth 〈◊〉 we heard did honour those meetings wiâ—â— his own company here he sends the comforter gives them on this day the promise of thâ— Father It is true Mr. Ainsworth and some other think the passover sabbath was meant bâ— let any one consider with reason how it wâ—â— possible unless the corn in Palestina was alwayes ripe before the fifteenth day of the month Abib so as they had reaped some of it for till that there was no beginning to count for Pentecost but Mr. Ainsworth is far from fathering this as Mr. Tilham doth on Moses it was only a notion taken up by that holy man from some Rabbins But enough of this whoso will read this argument from our Saviours Apparitions and the descending of the Holy Ghost improved to the height may have it admirably done by Mr. Warren late Minister of the Gospel in Colchester in his excellent Book called The Jewish Sabbath antiquated and the Lords day instituted from p. 169 to 187. where so much is indeed said upon this whole Subject as I think very little is to be added to it But there is yet behind one Text more insisted on almost by all Divines in this case it is that Rev. 1.10 I was in the Spirit on the Lords day and heard behind me a great voice as of a Trumpet saying c. V. 11. and I turned to see the voice that spake with me and being turned I saw seven golden Candlesticks and in the midst of the seven Candlesticks one like unto the Son of man c. who is described further v. 13 14 15 16. where he is said to have the Stars in hiâ— right hand and out of his mouth went forâ— a two-edged sword Christ himself opens the Vision v. 20. The seven starrs are the Angels of the seven Churches and the seven Candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven Churches St. John at this time was by the Roman Emperour banished into the Isle of Pathmos for the Gospel sake Here he seeth a Vision Two things as to the present Controversie are considerable in it 1. What he saw 2. When he saw it 1. What he saw He saw the Lord Jesus Christ in the middest of his Gospel Churches walking before him in the purity of Gospel Administrations and reaching forth godly Ministers to them and furnishing them with his Word which is as a sharp two-edged sword This plainly was the Vision interpreted by the Lord himself Revel 1.20 2. When saw he this On the Lords day he was in the Spirit on the Lords day then he heard this voice then he saw this Vision 3. I am aware that this Text hath so disturbed the leaders in this Controversie opposite to us that they have exercised their wits to find out a Lords day not the first day of the week Mr. Brabourn Mr. Tilham and one of more learning and worth than both of them think it might be the day of Judgement which indeed is called the day of the Lord Phil. 1.16 but never the Lords day Again the Apostle speaks of a known day and of a day in being then but neither of these is true of the day of Judgement not yet come nor to be known when it shall come Matth. 24.36 Of that day and hour knoweth no man Others think it might be the day of
it should be in the performance of his more direct and solemn worship 2. As to the effect or fruit of worship that is the impression of it which it leaves or the soul for I shall here speak nothing as to our pleasing God by the acts of homage which we perform which is the effect of i◠in reference to God We are commanded to desire the sincere milk of the word that we may grow thereby and certainly there is no serious Christian that goes out to hear a Sermon but doth propound to himself the increase of the knowledge of God the increase of faith in God the increase of the fear o◠God the increase of love to God and other graces None goes to a Sacrament but propounds to himself for his end the meeting of God in the Ordinance and receiving som◠blessing from him either as to spiritual life comfort or strength Now I appeal to th◠reason of Christians whether in order 〈◊〉 this end they had not need spend all the Sabbath time after the performance of their solemn acts of worship meditating of what they have heard in the word what they have seen and heard and done in a Sacrament you know the parable of the sower The thorns which our Saviour expounds the cares of the world choaked the word The fowls of the air pickt up the seed which fell by the way side worldly thoughts worldly discourses worldly business immediately after hearing immediately after a Sacrament are like thorns choaking the word or Birds of the air picking up the seed So as if we had no other argument than this yet it were in this case not inconsiderable But Fifthly methinks it should something prevail with us to consider how much stress God laies upon it How many times doth he inculcate the precept with how many additional precepts doth he hedge it how severely doth he punish the violators how often is it mentioned as the very head of Religion yea as the whole of it I say first how often doth God inculcate it Exod. 16.23 which text argueth it given before the law promulged in Sinai Exod. 20. Exod. 31.14 Lev. 23.3 Deut. 5.14 Lev. 19.3 and in abundance of other texts With how many additional precepts did God hedge it which though some of them but temporary yet argued Gods eye on the observation of his Sabbath such as those for not stirring out of doors to gather Manna Not kindling the artificers fire How sharply did God himself order the punishment of that poor wretch that gathered sticks on that day in pursuance of which the writers of the Jewish antiquities tell us Sabbath-breakers were wont to be stoned to death as Idolaters Blasphemers false Prophets c. incestuous Persons Sodomites Buggerers burners of their children in sacrifice to Molech Witches cursers of Parents and such as were rebelious against Parents We read of none else stoned to death For I count inticers to idolatry accessaries to these under their principals The righteous God appointed the same punishment to the Sabbath-breaker as to the vilest and worst of men which letteth us see what magnitude this sin of the violation of the Sabbath hath in the Lords eye And if we look considerately we shall find that the sanctification of the Sabbath is by God looked upon as a duty of the first and highest sort It is made one of his moral and perpetual precepts it is ushered in with a word of remark◠Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day The observation of it in the Precept is more particularly directed Thou shalt do no manner of work thou nor thy Son nor thy Daughter nor thy man-servant nor thy maid-servant nor the Cattle within thy Gates It is joyned with the most natural necessary and momentous duties Lev. 19.3 Fear every man his Father and keep my Sabbaths It is mentioned in Scripture as the head of all Religion and therefore chosen out by God to express all Religion by and where the violation of all Religion is taxed it is ordinarily taxed under this notion of not keeping or profaning the Lords Sabbath Ezek. 20.13 16 21 24. ch 23.38 and supposing the Promises made to the strict observation of the Sabbath to be Synechdochicall and to be understood of such as keep close to and are strict in all pieces of instituted Worship yet Gods choosing of this part of Worship to express the whole by it is sufficient to let us know how much God ever laid upon the strict observation of the Sabbath as much as if God had told us that without it we do nothing in Religion It is worth the observing how cross men are to God in this thing tything mine and annis and cummin and making light of this far more weighty thing We read indeed under the Jewish Poedagogy of musick and singing and garments used in the worldly Sanctuary as the Apostle calls it but we no where read of any Promises made to these more external rites and little observances of bowing c. we see many men zealous for these things but oh how careless in this great thing not only violating the Precept but of so debaucht consciences as to teach men so to do which saith our Saviour is to make men least in the Kingdom of God Math. 5. But certainly Christians we should look as God doth and lay the stress of our practice where he layes it The Precept of the fourth Commandment is one thing the Argument is another who so saith the Precept or any thing in that is ceremonial leaves us but nine Commandments contrary to the faith of all the people of God from the very beginning of the world and they who will argue the Precept temporary because the argument had but a temporary obligation make a fair way to blot out the first Commandment because the Argument in the letter of it only concerned the Jews who were the only people God brought out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage I say in the letter of it I know we are also by Christ brought out of a spiritual Egypt out of a spiritual bondage and if we can thus blot out the first Commandment and the fourth and the Papists blot out the second which they do and interpret the third only to prohibit false swearing as some others have done we have fairly quitted the first Table and have nothing to get quit of but the second and we leave the whole world as a generation of Belial without any yoke at all 6. After this it may not be amiss for us to consider the Promises made to those that keep the Lords Sabbaths and the threatnings against the violaters of them The first I shall instance in shall be that Jerem. 17. from the 20. to the 24. v. their not observing the Sabbath according to the Command is made their great crime from the 24. v. is a Promise made to the better observation of it v. 27. a threatning denounced in case of neglect
urge them or at least only concerned the Jews in that time not afterward The fire forbidden to be kindled must necessarily be understood 1. Either in reference to the making the Tabernacle of which he there speaks or 2. more largely of any trade-fire kindled for men to work with to get a livelihood not such as is kindled for dressing of meat refreshing us in cold weather or when we are sick 1. It is not probable there was no fire in the Jews houses that made the feast at which our Saviour was Luk. 14. besides we find works paralell to this justified in Scripture Though going out of their doors on the Sabbath must be understood to gather manna Exod. 16.29 or upon other ends than in order to actions of piety neâ—ssity or preservation and mercy for that â—â—stance Numh. 15.32 33. The Scripture so shortly relates that story of the mans being put to death for gathering sticks on the Sabbath day as to the cause of it that it is hard to give a satisfactory answer Stoning to death was a punishment used in the highest cases as that of blasphemy c. with which our reason would not judge such a violation of the Sabbath as gathering sticks was to be put in the ballance but in the Judgement there could be no error for it was given by the Judge of the whole Earth who cannot err in appointing punishments to sins That he gathered sticks on the Sabbath and this was the matter of his guilt is plain but whether it was after some special command of Moses to the contrary which the scripture saith not or to assert a profane liberty and his not regarding the commandment of God when he had no need to it Or whether it was in order to kindle some fire for labour contrary to the precept Exod. 35.3 Or what other circumstance fell in to aggravate the action to such a degree of guilt we cannot tell Suppose it was to kindle a necessary fire yet we are sure it might have been done before the Sabbath so as it was an unnecessary labour as to any necessity but what a former neglect had created something was doubtless in it more than we have in the story It is certain Moses brings this example next after the Law against presumptuous sinners Num. 15.30 31 32. Nor do we read afterwards of any such examples of sevâ—rity But enough is said to shew how the Sabbath should be kept as a rest from labour 2. But this is not all it is called an holy rest the rest of the holy Sabbath and the commandment expresly saith Remember to keep it holy Now an holy rest certainly stands distinguished from a rest meerly natural when our bodies cease from action and worldly labour 2. A rest that is profane By which I understand not only a sinful rest unlawful on any day but a rest from recreations and pastimes lawful enough on other dayes We read not in the old Law of any toleration for sports on the Sabbath we read on the contrary that it was to be an holy rest kept holy c. To which sports cannot contribute It seems unreasonable to think that labour should be forbidden in order to our more serious and solemn service of God and yet sports should be allowed which every way as much distract and unfit the Soul for acts of solemn worship But the prophets are best interpreters of the Law Now the prophet Isaiah Isa 58.13 expounding this Law saith If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on my holy-day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thine own wayes nor finding thy own pleasure nor speaking thy own words Then shalt thou delight thy self in the Lord and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the Earth and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it There is a precept v. 13. and a promise annexed to the due observance of that precept v. 14. The precept is directive for the sanctification of the Sabbath which is called the Sabbath the Lords holy day The end of the Sabbath for which God instituted it and which every one ought in the observation of it to aim at and shalt honour him the honouring and glorifying of God that is the end Then you have the manner directed how you should honour God in it 1. By a reverent esteem of it calling it Honourable 2. By a free and chearful entertaining it calling it a delight 3. By an abstaining from our own pleasure our own words our own wayes and turning our foot from it Our own pleasure word wayes certainly signify such pleasure such words such wayes as we meerly serve and gratifie our selves by and bring no immediate honour and glory to God Now whether this be not as exclusive of all recreations sports pastimes c. as of all laborious actions other than those before excepted by warrant from the word of God I leave to every conscientious and sober Christian to consider with himself and judge I shall only further add that what Divines truly say of all other moral precepts must be true of this That where an action is in any precept forbidden all words and thoughts relating to it are also forbidden and this is also hinted by the prophet in special in those words not speaking thy own words I am not ignorant that many of our brethren in the other reformed Churches are not of our minds in this point of the Sabbath But 1. It is therefore to be observed that they do not think the Sabbath moral we do and â—rge it as commanded us in the fourth Commandment 2. And secondly upon inquiry we may possibly find that both amongst their Ministers and People those who are most strict in their lives lament the looseness of others of their Brethren in this thing and order their personal demeanours and their Families after another rate However we are to live by rule and not by example I have thus as shortly as I could opened your duty and shewed you how the Sabbath is to be kept as a rest as an holy rest unto the Lord. Let me now plead with my brethren that knowing our Masters will we may do it I will urge a few arguments in the case 1. It is a piece of Religion by which the people of God have formerly more honoured God in these Nations than in most if not than in any other places Professors strict observation of the Sabbath in England hath even from the beginning of the Reformation been their Crown and their Glory Oh let not this Crown in our dayes fall from our heads God hath alwayes had in this Nation a strict Sabbath-observing people in the worst of times There have been of late greater light greater means more preaching more Profession than in former times oh let there not be a less strict Sabbath-keeping