Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
word_n commandment_n day_n sabbath_n 8,039 5 10.2884 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33395 A Clear proof of the certainty and usefulness of the Protestant rule of faith Scripture, after the help of ministerial guides, finally interpreted by each men's private sense / published with allowance. 1688 (1688) Wing C4620; ESTC R35645 8,105 14

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

said Jo. 6. Unless you eat the Flesh of the Son of Man you have no life in you the Jews who said how can this man give us his Flesh to eat and his Disciples who walked no more with him understood that he spake of his natural Body which they should corporally eat therefore Christ did really mean they should corporally feed on his natural Flesh This Popish Conclusion is in the same Form. Q. 5. Is the Mystery of the Incarnation of Christ clearly exprest in Scripture Or can it be clearly made out by Scripture that those words John 1. The Word was made Flesh own'd by all Christians to be true are to be understood in such sense that Both Natures were in One Person so that what is said of the Man Christ Jesus be truly said of the Son of God for example that the B. Virgin was Mother of God and not as the Nestorians understood them to wit that Christ was indeed a true man made of the Seed of David and that the Eternal Word true God was indeed in him but not by a strict Personal Union Ans Not one word from Scripture What indeed all the Nestorians supposed he proves but as to the Unity of One Person uniting these two Natures not one word This man any one may see is of those who take the Nestorians to be a part of the Catholic Church and no one will grudge their Congregation the Title of such a part of the Cath. Church that is a Member sever'd from the One Body of Christ Q. 6. The first branch of this Question is What Scripture hath absolv'd us from obeying one of the Commandments which imposes the keeping of Saturday holy The second What Text of Scripture exacts of us the keeping holy as the Lord's day the Sunday Ans To the first part not one word of Scripture and for excuse he tells us That here was no need of an express abrogation because Sunday being set apart for the public and solemn Worship of God the sabboth-Sabboth-day as well as the Holydays and New-moons of the Jews being a shadow must surrender to the Sunday Here is as little Reason as Scripture for the Sabboth did appertain to the Law of Nature and was not a shadow only of a thing to come but a memory of the past and never-to-be-forgotten benefit of the Creation Gen. 2.3 from the work whereof God rested on that day and blessed the seventh day Here 't is pity at what a loss the Answerer is to find the Chapter and Verse wherein the abrogation of Circumcision is clearly exprest 'T is a charitable condescendency to instruct him let him look then in Gal. 5.2 where behold Paul tells you that if you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing For the second part he produces a Text Rev. 1.10 I was in spirit on the Lord's day then he flourishes to teach us ignorant people that 't is usual in Scripture after that Times Places Things and Persons were set apart for the service of God by Divine Institution to have his Name as a mark of propriety given to them But in the name of sense and reason what means all this There is a Lord's day no doubt St. John was in spirit that day 't is certain But the question is What day of the week was it or was it only some peculiar day of the year as Easter-day or Good-friday Hath he Scripture for this Not one word I find forty Texts that call the day of general Judgment or that of each man's death the Lord's day but not one that mentions Sunday under that name I find Act. 2.46 how they that believed were daily continuing with one accord in the Temple or breaking Bread from house to house but not a word of a day appointed for stated Assemblies Scripture failing our Adversary he seeks supplies from Reason but the misfortune is that the first and chiefest he offers at stands against him The Moral Sabboth says he in the Patriarchal Church and the Ceremonial in the Jewish Church were on the days following the Creation and Deliverance from the Slavery of Aegypt True but what follows Therefore 't is not to be kept by Christians on the day in which Christ rested afte● he had accomplish'd our Redemption on the Cross by a solemn Consummatum est and his precious Death Not on Saturday Raillery aside what can be I will not say more dull but spoken more directly in spight of sense and reason Q. 7. Am I bound to believe the sense given to a doubtful Text because my Guides tell me I must do so Ans No plainly No And he hath two Texts for it the first 2 Cor. 1.24 Not for that we have dominion over your Faith but are helpers says St. Paul and Mat. 23.8 Call no man Master on earth for one is your Master Here not only the Walls of the City of God are broken down but the very Foundations of Prophets and Apostles are digg'd up is it all St. Paul could do all you allow him to give some light some helps when his Proselytes had any doubt about the sense of Scripture Were they not oblig'd to believe the Sense and Interpretation He gave to the Text Then that Faith is vain which was founded on the Apostles Preaching and all Christianity stands on a wrong bottom Now our Answerer takes his turn to ask Questions He tells us that for the first he has a pinching one 'T is this If I must know the Church by some Marks or Notes then I must find those Marks first and where must I seek them This is pinching indeed Suppose in a Gazette I should find some marks of a man that is sought for were it not a severe objection against the man who gave them and a pinching Question I must find these Marks before I find the man and where shall I find them I conceive such pinching would force a smile and this Answer Why Friend the Marks and the Man are found at once for they are to be seen in his face At the same time as one takes a view of the Catholic Church he sees therein a continual Succession of Bishops and Teachers from the Apostles he discovers her in all parts of the World and finds her thus Catholic he sees in her an undivided Faith Union under one Pastor in the use of the same Sacraments and finds her One he observes her Rule is Let nothing be alter'd of what was receiv'd from the Apostles by a constant Universal Tradition in the Churches which they founded and is convinced she is Apostolical he finds God favours her with the Gift of Miracles promised Matt. 10. and Joh. 14. that she hath fulfilled the Prophesies concerning the Conversion of Nations converted to Christianity by her Children only and he concludes this is she 'T is also observable at what a distance these men are from the true Church who conceive it so hard to find her out All holy Fathers ever judged it a most easie thing to each person insomuch that the holy Doctor St. Augustin thus delivers his sense of it CC. 2. in Psal 30. I tell you with truth Brethren the Prophets have spoken more obscurely of Christ than of the Church I believe because they saw in spirit that men would make Sects against the Church but would not be so much divided about Christ But 't is natural for a Criminal to question the Power of his Judge and these men know it hath ever been the sense of all Christians which St. Augustin exprest in the following words There is no Salvation out of the Church who doubts of it De Vnit Eccl. l. 4. c. 18. therefore whatever you have from the Church Scripture Creed Sacraments c. help you not to Salvation out of the Church whether you believe contrary to the Truth or being divided from the Vnity gather not with Christ whence St. Paul says to Heretics Those who do such things shall not possess the Kingdom of Heaven Gal. 5. His other Quaere's have no difficulty and withal so little of sense that I shall not offer to force my Readers attention on them All well-meaning Protestants finding that Scripture interpreted the Protestant-way is so far from being an easie and clear Rule of Faith that a Protestant in the Answer to an Address made to the Ministers of the Church of England approved by a Chaplain to the highest Ecclesiastical Authority under the King cannot as much as teach by it the first Principles of Christian Religion will seek a better method of using that Divine Rule and not be hereafter so easily imposed upon by those Guides who give them but their own private fancies under the Veil and Name of the Word of God. I was I confess surpriz'd to find Guil. Needham c. approving this Answer but God and Truth are of our side Et inimici nostri sunt Judices the weakness of our Opposers Arguments bear a proof to it Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam FINIS