can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
not the least sound that way teaching nothing that hath any relation to truth or antiquity In the pursuance of his ambition he makes proselytes of such as hauing their eares itching doe after their own lusts seek Masters of new notions * Scientia iuquit Apostolus Paulus inflat vbi charitas non aedificat quam sententiam frequeÌ„ter vsurpat S. Aug. As science without charity begetteth pride and pride Teachers of Nouelties so want of science without sobernes bringeth forth curiosity which maketh itching cares in order to new Masters The (c) Vincen. Lyrinen 2. p. tom 5. Bid. vit S. Patr. addresseth himselfe to Priests and Teachers in order to auoiding of Nouelties thus O Priest ô Doctor if the aiuine povver hath furnish'd thee vvith vvitt and abilities fit for exercise out out faithfully the precious stones of diuine doctrine deck and set them forth vvisely adde splendour grace and comliness but so teach vvhat thou hast learn'd that vvhile thou speak'st after a nevv method thou deliuer nothing of nevv doctrine singularity of one Doctour planteth a sect and the curiosity of many encreaseth it In the compleating of his ambition he doth not only equall but exceed the ambition * Volaterranus l. 15. Anthrop Erostratus inquit TeÌ„plum Diana Ephestae incendit nominis famae libidine of Erostratus that to perpetuate his name set on fire the Temple of Diana at Ephesus counted one of the seauen wonders of the world for the ambition of Erostratus destroyed one Temple only but the pride of a singular Teacher ruines * 2. Cor. 6. vos estis teÌ„plum Dei 1. Cor. 3. TempluÌ„ Dei estis Spiritus saÌ„ctus habitat in nobis as many temples as the Christians which by crafty dealings he seduceth and bringeth into errour euery Christian being a temple of the liuing God and the habitation of the holy Ghost and consequently as the God of Christians surpasseth in worthines Diana of the Ephesians and as a spirituall exceÌ„edeth a materiall temple so a destroyer of Christian soules goes beyond Erostratus in wickednes In like manner he exceedeth the Regicide * Ioan. Sarisburiensis polycratio Pausanias inquit cum Hermaclea percunctatus esset quò nam modò clarus euadere posset subito atqueÌ„ hic respondisset si occidisset aliquem virum clarum continuo Philippam interemit Pausanias that made his way to an euerlasting memoriall of a wicked enterprise thorow the Royall blood of Philip of Macedo which ambitiously he spilt for a singular Teacher murthereth as many * Secundum Bedam l. 3 in cap. 10. lucae quos Lucas appellat Reges matthaeus vocat iustos ipsi sunt ait ille Reges magni qui tentationuÌ„ suatum motibus non consentieÌ„do succumbere sed regendo praeesse nouernÌ„t kings as there are just men which he peruerteth and draweth from the truth Howeuer a singular Teacher will not profess openly the malice of his ambition as did Erostratus who affraid as it were to lose the renowning of his name himselfe diuulged his * Hier. l. con Heluidium cap. 8. mullo inquit prodente sacrilegium fertur ipse Erostratus in medium processisse clamitas sese incendium subiecisse sacrilegious crime for though a singular teacher is inwardly a rauenous wolfe yet outwardly for the most part he appeareth in sheep's clothing And indeed his ambition is a subtile inordinate desire of glory a secret poyson an occult plague author of crafty dealings and mother of hypocricy A singular Teacher neuer publisheth his wicked affection lest the effects therof might be therby obstructed he is like vnto a white tombe which appeares beautifull outward but within is full of filthines Howeuer that such teachers should rise euen of Christians Apostolicall prophecies giue euidence enough to beleiue so When S. Paul said 1. Cor. 11. There must be heresies euen among you he pointed at singularity of doctrine for the word heresy taken in the precise sense for a choosing and adhering vnto a peculiar opinion imports as much When the same Apostle said as is related Act. 20. I know of your own selues shall men rise speaking peruerse things to draw disciples after them he foretolde the ambition of a singular Teacher When S. Mathew said Beware of salse Prophets which come vnto you in sheeps clothing he hinted at the hypocrisy of singular Teachers which disguise their malice with a visard of outward sanctity and thereby craftily circunuent and bring into errour such as through weaknes or wauering in faith or through itching eares are giuen to nouelties (d) Vincen. Lirinen writeth of Origine that he might haue been of great authority if an exemplar life had been sufficient enough to haue made him so for he was a person of singular integrity purity learning industry c. but that gallant person saith he in regard he insolently abused the grace of God confiding in his own abilities and despising the simplicity of Christian Religion presumed that he knew more then all other men and interpreted holy Scriptures after a new mode deseru'd that the Church of God should say of him Non audies verba prophetaeillius thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet Baronius in his Ecclesiasticall History An. 449. after he had said much of Eutiches the Heretick in order to his outward sanctity aduiseth the reader to learn from him that other Hereticks so comport themselues as if they breathed forth purity of faith and sanctity of manners The same Baronius writeth in his Eccles Hist An. 428. that the Arch-Heretick Nestorius with his sordide clothing pale face and lean body wherby he was counted a person of great abstinence and mortification drew many followers after him Again An. 411. of his Eccles History he relateth that Paulinus in an Epistle to S. Austin extolleth Pelagius the Heretick for great sanctity of life who notwithstanding as Baronius attesteth was a rauenous wolfe cloth'd in a Monasticall habit a new Proteus that according to place time and persons with whom he conuersed chang'd his discourse Moreouer Wicleff the first English heretick through his sordide clothing and affected humility bewitched and infected nany with his pernicious nouelties Vnder a false shew and disguise of outward holines singular Teachers in all times of the Christian Church haue spread their pernicious Doctrins as do plainly euidence the Ecclesiasticall Annals of each age respectiuely and indeed Origines Nestorius Pelagius Eutiches to say nothing of sundry others while they wantonly presumâ—d of their own witts and insolently despised the ancient plainess and lownes of Christian religion together with the generall practice therof affected outward piety thinking therby to get authority and credence to their new notions wanting ordinary Mission to preach them The actiuity of their own witts caused wantonnes wantonnes pride and pride a preferring themselues before all other Teachers of those daies yet though the end of such teachers be euill the end for which the supream
new law namely outward Rite or sign promise of sanctifying grace and the institution of Christ The outward Rite or ligh as to the Sacrament of Penance is the sensible absolution of a Priest The promise of grace appears by the words of Christ Ioan. 20. Whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and the institution of Christ is expres'd in the precedent words of the same Chapter As my Father sent me so send I you Wherfore the ancient Fathers treating of sacramentall Penance in order to such as are baptized teach that Christ giues power vnto a Priest to remit thereby euen occult sinnes in consequence of which they appropriate to Penance the name of a Sacrament as much as to baptism Tertull. l. de praescript adversus Haeret Ambros l. de poenit c. 7. and S. Austin l. 5. hom c. 5. compareth this Sacrament ministred by a Priest to the raising yp of Lazarus by Christ and to the vntying of his cords by the Apostles Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense vnto remission of sius committed after baptism and therefore named * Hieron ad Demetr vocat Sacramentum poenitentia secundam tabulam post naufragium the second spirituall boord or plank of a souls spirituall wrack Grace giuen by baptism restoreth sanctity that Originall sin tooke away grace receiued through Penance recouereth that sanctity being lost again through actuall sin A christians life on earth is a warfare against flesh and blood against principalities against powers against worldly Gouernours the Princes of the darknesse of this world and against all spirituall wickednesses which are the assaults of the deuill And for as much as humane nature is infirm and the power of this aduersary great it is impossible for any whomsoeuer to escape vnwounded without armour of extraordinary protection In regard whereof Christ hath prouided a soueraigne remedy as an effectuall cure for all the personall wound a christian might receiue in this warfare exercised after baptism and this is the Sacrament of Penance instituted by Christ himselfe (b) Christ Mat. 18. saying to his Apostles Whatsoeuer ye shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heauen and vvhatsoeuer ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in Heauen only promised them and their successors in Priestly function authoritie and power to forgiue sinnes and inuested them in it Ioan. 20. saying vnto them Receiue the holy Ghosâ— vvhose sinnes you shall forgiue are forgiuen them Neither hath Christ left less power vnto Priest's to loose then to binde as S. Ambrose asserted against Nouatianus who taught that Priests had power to bind but not to loose 10.20 when he said to his Apostles Receiue the holy Ghost whosoeuers sius ye shall remit they are remitted and whosoeuers sins ye shall retain they are retained Although Christ alone had the * Apoc. 3. qui habet clauem Dauid c. key of Dauid which openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth Apocal. 30. as to supream excellency and power of remitting and retaining sins being enabled in vertue of his diuinity to open to and shut against sinners the kingdome of Heauen without help of a Sacrament neuertheless the same power as to participation and outward Ministery therof he communicated to his said Apostles and their successors in priestly function committing to them the Word of reconciliation 1. Cor. 5. That is to say the * Aug. accedit verbuÌ„ ad elementum fit Sacramentum ElemeÌ„tum seu materia proxima Sacramenti poenitentiae est confessio contritio word of sacramentall power implyed in the form of sacramentall absolution vêªt videlicet I absolue thee which ioyned to the elements contrition confession and actuall satisfaction makes the Sacrament of Penance these acts being the materiall parts therof And although Christ did not appoint this form in express tearmes neuertheless for as much as he instituted this Sacrament (c) Great is the dignity of a Priest saith S. Chrysostome hom 85. in Joan. For vvhose sinnes they shall remit are remitted to them and hom 5. de verbis Isa Vidi Dominum Speaking of the Sacrament of Penance writeth thus Heaven takes from the earth chief povver for the Iudge sitteth in earth our lord follovv's the seruant and vvhatsoeuer he shall judge here belovv God approu's aboue By the judge that sitteth in earth is meant a Priest whose judgment or sentence goes before and the sentence of God comes after In consequence of which seeing that a sentence meer declaratory cannot goe before but of necessity must follow it is euident that a Priest sacramentally absoluing a penitent is a judge taken in the proper sense wherefore S. Cyprian Epis 73. ad Iubaian S. Ambrose lapsis de poenit c. 1. 2. S. Austin l. 2. con Epis parmeni c. 11. and S. Chrysostome l. 3. de Sacerdot expound the particles vvhose sinnes ye shall forgiue of power and authority giuen vnto the Apostles as judges in order to remitting of sinnes after the similitude of an outward iudicatory Court or Tribunall wherin the penitent acts the accused and the witnesses too and the Priest supplies the part of the (d) The Council of Trent declares that no man can be restored by the Sacrament of Penance to that sanctity and integrity which he receiu'd by baptism without bitter tears and painfull labours judge in the room of Christ it is euidence enough to proue it As in an outward Court of iustice the judg giueth sentence and therby absolueth or condemneth the accused So Christ did thinke fit that a Priest as lawfull judg should pronounce sentence of absolution vnto remission of sins committed after baptisme for Christ in saying Whosoeuers sins ye shall remit are remitted substituted the Apostles * 1. Cor. 5. vbi dixisset Apostol is dedit nobis ministerium reconciliationis subiungit pro Christo ergo legatione fuÌ„givnur id est Sacardotes succedunt in munus seu ministerium reconciliationis eo modo quo Christus reconciliauit homines Deo ramitteÌ„do paccata corum vt constat av citato Textu Et Chryso hom 11. inâ—llam 2. Epis Pauli sic scribit quod igitur pro Christo legatioue fungimur idem est ac si dixisset Christi vice nos enim ipsius muneri successimus his speciall Legats to reconcile sinners to God neither is it of necessity required to the forme of a Sacrament that it be expresly set down in holy scripture the vniuersall tradition of the Church being testimony enough to proue it and euen Caluinists and sundry other sectaries doe vse in baptism the words I baptise thee for which they cannot alleadge any scripture-euidence Besides Caluin in his fourth book of institutions chapter 3. 5. 6. treating of imposition of hands exercised in the ordination of Church-minister's deriueth that ceremony from Church tradition and practice only and confesseth withall that it ought to be counted in lieu of a precept By the premises plainly
speaketh of sauing after death it is clear that he meaneth eternall saluation therby Thirdly that by the words The day of the lord shall declare it is vnderstood the day of each souls particular judgment is manifest likewise according to that saying Math. 24. Watch therfore for ye know not what howre the son of man will come that is to say what hower ye shall die and be iudged Again the same Apostle 2. Timoth 4. sayth that there was laid vp for him a crown of Iustice which At that day our lord would giue him a iust Iudg. Yet doubtless he obtained that reward instantly after his death as to essentiall blessedness Lastly that by the word (f) According to S Austin l. de fide operibus the fire of hell is euerlasting against the errour of Origin and the Latin Father 's in the Council's of Florence assert true fire in Purgatory and speake after the same manner of it as of Hell fire and the Current of catholick Doctours teach that the fire of Hell is true corporall fire fire true and reall fire is meant appear's by the Apostles saying That if any mans work burneth for to burne is proper to true fire and as concerning the particles * Jo. 1. vidimus gloriam eius quast gloriam vnigeniti à Patre vbi quasi non est particula diminuens aut faciens comparationem inter veram metaphoricam gloriam sed potius explicat veritatem vt notant S. Patres sic loquendo de Rege dicimus incedit quasi Rex id est vt Regem decet de vâ—ro iusto venit vt vir iustus id est vt decet virum iustum as it were they doe rather affirme then infirme the reality of fire for when S. Iohn sayeth of Christ cap. 1. we saw the glory of him as it were of the only begotten of the Father the particles as it were doe not deny Christ to be the true and naturall son of God the Father but rather affirme that vndoubted truth as all catholick writers doe obserue in their Commentaries vpon that scripture Hereby it is cleare (g) S. Cyprian Epis 52. ad Antonia writes thus T' is not the same thing to be sent to prison and there to remain till the last farthing be pay'd t' is not the same thing to receiue suddenly the reward of faith and vertue and to be clens'd and purg'd by fire after long suffering of grieuous sorrovves for sinnes committed afore that the Apostle held purgation of some soules after they were deuested of their bodies and before their translation vnto eternall life and this the catholick Church calleth Purgatory which name though it be no vsed in holy scripture no more then the words Trinity person and sundry others which are receiued and allowed of by all writers in order to a clearer explicating some misteries of christian Religion howeuer the name Purgatory taken in the sense afore mentioned layeth claime to a large series of Antiquity But seeing that scriptures and * S. Cyprian Epis tota 52. ad Anton Orig. hom 6. in Exod. cum inquit venitur si quis multa opera bona parum aliquid iniquitatis attulerit illud parum tanquaÌ„ pluÌ„bum resoluitur purgatur totum remanet aurum purum .... Hilar. in illud Psal 118. concupiuit anima mea purgatorium vocat indefessum ignem in quo grania sustinentur supplicia per quae animae à peccatis expiantur Aug. l. 2. 1. de ciuit c. 24. ait constare quod spiritus aliquorum fidelium poenas aliquas temporales post mortem patiantur primitiue Fathers doe assert the thing signifyed by the name of Purgatory vêªt videlicet purgation of some souls by suffering of temporall paines in the next life * Aug. quando de re constat de nomine non est conteÌ„ndendum no man can contend about that name without incurring a censure of manifest weakness yet in regard of two states only to which God promiseth eternall life or eternall death that is beatitude or damnation for Purgatory shall cease after the day of generall Iudgment is past both the scripture and the Fathers sometimes doe mention only after death the Paradise of the blessed and the Hell of the damned * De locis seu statibus perpetuis intelliguntur hae scripturae Eccles 11. si ceciderit lignum ad Austrum aut Aquilonem in quocunque loco inciderit sbi erit Item Mat. 25 Jte maledicti in ignem aternuÌ„ venite benedicti possidere RegnuÌ„ which be the two euerlasting states of soules but hence no man can argue an absolute negation of a third place or state in reference to temporall afflictions after death without preiudicing both scriptur's and Fathers as is sufficiently enough proued and though S. Austin Ser. 14. de verbis Domini lib. 10. de peccatorum meritis remissione cap. 20. doth expresly affirme that the catholick faith acknowledgeth two places only vat an eternall kingdome of Heauen or Hell eternall neuertheless by his other writings appeareth plainly that he held the Purgatory of some faithfull soul 's after death and in the cited writing's he denyeth only that the Catholick Church does acknowledge such a third place as Pelagius contended for who taught that children dying without baptism should be saued though they were not admitted into the kingdome of Heauen which errour S. Austin confuteth By the premises is euident that such souls only goe to Purgatory as are liable either to veniall sins or temporall satisfactions corresponding to their sins pardoned in this life as to the guilt thereof both of them importing defects that are inconsistent with the perfection of heauenly blessdeness yet these suffering souls while they endure their painfull afflictions haue something of comfort and refreshment (b) Pope Leo the tenth in his condemnation of Luther's 26. article hath defined that soul 's in Purgatory are assured of their saluation for they know that there is fauour laid vp for them they are certaine of their saluation they loue God with all their power conforming themselues in the bitterness of their afflictions to his diuine will of Iustice they haue confidence in the suffrages and sacrifices of the faithfull vpon earth in order to their deliuerance and are visited by their good Angells that cheare them vp Neither doth it hence follow that their paines are less grieuous for the intensest sorrow is not incompatible with the said refreshments as appeareth by Christ whose grief abounded and exceeded others in intensness notwithstanding the assurance of glory the comfort flowing from his God-head the conformity to the will of his diuine Father and the extream willingness to suffer his death and passion for the Redemption of the world and indeed it is a certaine truth that the anguish and tribulation which a soul endureth in Purgatory * Docent S. Aug. l de euva pro mortuis agenda c. 16. S.
dari non debeat nisi infirmo de cuius morte timetur ideo Patres Trident. vocant sacram vnctionem exeuntium Sacrameutū danger of death in respect of extream sickness or other inward infirmity is strengthned through holy vnction against the assaults of deuills and purged of veniall sin 's together with mortall offences vnwittingly forgotten afore and therfore named Extrem-vnction being administred only in extremity of sickness Albeit that the common enemy seeketh occasion at all times to deuour our souls yet then especially he employeth his greatest subtilities and craftiest dealings to bring vs into despaire of Gods sauing mercy when he seeth vs at the point of drawing our last breath of life Christ after his Resurrection instituted and S. Iames his Apostle promulgated this Sacrament to the catholick Church in the fist Chapter of his catholick epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priests of the Church and let them pray ouer him anointing him with * Nomine olei absolusè simpliciter positi sēper intelli gitut oleum oliuarum id est liquor ex baccis oliuarum expressus alij autam humores pingues vt nucum id genus alij nō nisi eum addito dicūtur osea oile in the name of our lord and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick and our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sinnes they shall be forgiuen him wherby he expresseth the necessary requisit's to a Sacrament of the new law First the outward sign or ceremony is signified by the words anointing with oile which declare the proper sensible matter of Extrem-vnction viz oile made of Oliues for that only challengeth the name of oile taken in the proper sense as wine of the vine the name of wine Secondly the sensible sacramentall form (b) According to S. Austin the making vp of a Sacrament is the putting together of the sacramentall word and the sacramentall element or matter Accedit saith he Verbum ad clementum fit Sacramentum And the sacramentall word trac 8. in Joan. he calleth the word of faith vttered together with vnction is expressed by the words Let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile which in as much as they be ioyned together with the matter do make the Sacrament Thirdly diuine institution is plainly declared by the particles in the name of our lord for the true meaning of these words let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile in the name of our lord is this let them pronounce ouer him the form of this Sacrament which is after the manner of a prayer and anoint him with oile (c) A Priest in dispensing the Sacraments supplies the room of Christ The Sacrament of Extrem-vnction is dispensable onely in order to the faithfull of Christ wherefore the Apostle vseth the particles if any be sick amongst you that is among you faithfull baptised for he direct's his Epistle to the faithfull onely in regard wherof t' is called the Catholick Epistle of S. Iames. in the room of Christ that is in vertue of the power and authority deriued vnto them from Christ which import's diuine institution and doubtlesse the Apostle meant that the whole entire action to wit vnction together with prayer of faith ought to be performed by a Priest as the rightfull Minister of Christ For in that sense he vsed the said particles In the name of our lord in the same Chapter speaking of the Prophets who haue spoken say's he in the name of our lord that is which were inuested with power and authority to speake in the room of our lord and indeed the holy Prophets were our lord's Minister's prophecying in vertue of his speciall inspiration and commission In the same sense the Apostle S. Paul 1. Cor. 5. vseth the particles in the name of our lord to signify that he excommunicated the incestuous Corinthian in the person of our lord Iesus-Christ saying I haue iudged him in the name of our lord Iesus-Christ to be deliuered vnto Satan for the destruction of the flesh c. Fourthly the effect of this Sacrament viz sanctifying grace these words do clearly express And our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sins they shall be forgiuen him for sins are not remitted but by the infusion of sanctifying grace wherby also the diuine institution of this Sacrament is euident enough because Christ only in the new law by his speciall institution hath cloathed outward sensible rites or ceremonies with power to produce grace and remission of sins effectually And it matters not that the Apostle addeth to vnction the particles and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick for he doth not ascribe the effect of that ceremony to the prayer as if it alone were sufficient enough to cause it for therby it would euidently follow that he mentioneth and requireth vnction in vaine and to no purpose at all besid's he maketh vse of no particle that excludeth vnction but plainly signifie's by saying let them praey ouer him the sick anointing him with oyle that he attribute's grace and remission of sins to the whole entire action as it consisteth of vnction and orall prayer proceeding from and relying on the faith if not of the Minister himself which is not necessary to the effect of the Sacrament at least of the Church whose person the minister supplyeth in the administration therof and truly in the Sacraments of the new law the verball form doth more plainly and determinatly express the sacramentall effect then doth the sacramentall matter and therfore the Apostle by adding and the prayer of faith c. will signify only that the sacramentall form of this Sacrament lies claim to the best and noblest part of causality in the production of sanctifying grace but not to all the parts therof Fiftly by these words let him bring in the (d) S. Iames in the Chapter set down vseth the name Presbyter S. Luke Act. 15. S. Peter cap. 5. and S. Iohn Epis 1.2.3 vse the name Senior but both the names carry the same meaning they signify those which by holy ordination are inuested with priestly dignity and authority vnto dispensing the mysteries of God for as S. Hierom assert's Epis 85. and Euag. in the scripture-Text's set down those are meant which are Priests as to office dignity and function Besid's the Fathers in the Council of Trent and all catholick writers vnderstand per presbyteros Ecclesiae such onely as are Priests rightly ordain'd whether they be Bishops or meer Priests and according to the scripture custome in the name Presbyteri Bishops are comprehended Priests the ministers of the Sacrament are declared and determinated namely such only as are actually promoted in vertue of holy ordination vnto Episcopall or Priestly function and truly the new Testament when speaking of Church Ministers vseth the word Presbyter or Senior meaneth therby one inuested with Priestly dignity besides the Apostle could not mean
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
A wit-sectary set forth the greatest praise of faith is first to belieue and then to know an inordinate loue to Philosophy is the mother of Heresies A Wit-belieuer is an inuader of Christian faith inordinately attending to naturall reason and scientificall demonstrations in the search of supernaturall truths which faith only is entrusted with (a) S. Austin l. de vtili cred c. 1. arguing against the Manicheans which taught that Christians ought not to assent vnto the mysteries of faith vnless they knew them afore by the light of reason saith expresly That vve doe not knovv vnto belieuing but vee belieue vnto knovving and ambitious to know before he belieues he robs faith of its greatest praise which is first to * Aug. tract 79. in Joan. haec est inquit laws fidei si quod creditur non videtur vnde illud Isa si non credideritis non intelligetis belieue and then to know or to belieue what is not known Also he is an inuader of the true belieuers * Aug. de vtilitate credendi con Manichae sidelis Christianus non rationalis appellatur name which is Christian changing it into an nouell Title of rationall and accordingly stileth himselfe the rationall belieuer Besides blown vp with a conceited actiuity of his own witt he chooseth to teach amiss rather then to teach with the current of other belieuers and inuent (b) S. Paul 1. Tim. Counsels Timothy to auoide profane nouelties and oppositions of knowledge falsely so called which men of corrupt minds and puft vp with pride promising haue erred about faith vnauthoriz'd and vnparal lel'd modells of new doctrin rather then to be counted in the ranck of * Luc. 18. dixit superbus Pharisaeus nō sum sicut caeteri homines ergo sicut caeteri daemonū infert S. Bernardus Caeteri homines In the pursuance of his ambition he rips his brain and forcibly cuts out abortiue notions which goe rather in a rownd circle of fancy by which he is biased then in a right line of reason tending to the law (c) Rom. 12. The Apostle condemnes knowledge that is not according to sobriety that is which is not conform to the generall practice of the holy Church and such saith S. Iraeneus l. 5. c 17. as forsake the preaching of the Church argue the holy Priests of vnskilfulnes not considering how far more worthly a religious Idiote is then a blasphemous and impudent sophister of sobriety and charity which is the only center of religious consistency His fancied thoughts he puts forth in bold assertions dressed vp with obscure words and dark sentences to take the ears of the ignorant or such as being desirous to be esteemed witty doe abandon their judgment to an implicit faith of his new exotick notions In sum he is a wit-sectary that fancy vnder a specious colour of reason hath deboiched making him eat too * Prouerb 25. mel multum comedendo nocet aboundantly the hony of Philosophy and thereby create her the Mistress which is but the hand maid of Theology her office being only to call vnto the Tower of wisdome and not to rule therin Philosophy is the captiue woman that S. Hierome wisely aduiseth Pammachius to diuest of her alluring and bewitching haires and make her bald assuring him that by so dressing her she shall bring forth much captiue fruit and of a Moabit become an Israelite (d) S. Hier. ad Ctesiph con Pelag. c. 1. and Tertullian de praescrip con Marcio l. 5. call Philosophers the Patriarcks of Hereticks affirming that the ancient Heresies haue sprung from such as were too much addicted to prophane Philosophy And S. Ambros l. 1. de fide cap. 5. con Aria ascribes to Philosophy the Origen of all impieties and moreouer excludes Philosophicall arguments in the resolution of faith as vnnecessary For vve giue credence saith this great Doctor to fishermen and not to Philosophers Philosophy so long only is profitable to the Church of God as she is kept in awe of diuine faith and in obedience to the schooles of Christian Catholick Doctors If it were granted that * S. Tho. do Villa-noua ser de Epiph. pag. 33. experimento saepè didicimus vt qu◠nimium cupit esse Philosophus facilè desinat esse Christianus sicut magi dum quaerunt in Hierusalem humanum consilium amisere caeleste signum sic Christiani nimium quaerentes humanas rationes in diuinis mysterijs perdunt fidei lucom fulgorem Philosophy might furnish clear demonstrations as requisits to Christian faith it would follow of necessity that faith were not faith being faith and naturall euidence are inconsistent together according to the Apostle who excludeth sight from the walk of faith 2. Cor. 5. CHAR. XIV OF A SINGVLAR DOCTOR THE CONTENTS Singular Teachers compared to Erostratus and Pausanias from the singularity of one Doctor proceed's the curiosity of many hearers one singular Master planteth a sect which the curiosity of many schollars spreads singular Teachers appeare outwardly in sheeps cloathing while they are inwardly rauenous wolfes A Singular Doctor is a wanton schollar of new notions that blown vp with vanity and arrogancy ambitiously endeauoureth to get a name aboue other Teachers contempory with him (a) S. Bernard ser 65. in Cant. writeth that the intent and aim of all hereticks is to in hance and spread their name through singularity of doctrine And S. Gregor l. 24. mor. saith that t is naturall vnto hereticks to be puft vp with vaine pride of science and to scorne and laugh at the simplicity of other belieuers Also Theodoret. in praet in Polymor obserues that some men which haue done no gallant laudable actions worthy renown endeauour by wicked entreprises to celebrate their name Aug. in psal 9 saith that those which cannot be known by well doing striue by ill doing to abide for euer in the mouth of posterity desirous of an euill name rather then to haue none at all which is the sole ground of his singularity and rather then to haue none he laboureth for an ill one turning from wholsom learning * Martianus Imperator in Concil Calcedo qui post veritatem repertam inquit Doctorum vnitate stabilitā aliquid vlterius discutit mēdacium quaerit established in the vnity of Doctors to exoctick and vnauthorised Tenents which though he craftily diuulgeth for primitiue verities and vaunteth (b) S. Chrysostome in com oper imperf super Mat. hom 45. writeth thus When thou shalt hear any man extolling and beatifying the ancient Doctours obserue his carriage tovvard those vvhich are contemporary vvith him for if he shall approue and honour those doubtles he vvould haue respected the others if be had liued in their dayes but if he contemne the moderne he vvould likevvise haue contemned the ancient Teachers if he had been contemporary vvith them to haue left modern as troubled waters for ancient doctrins as clear springs neuertheless he carries
that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the
Hebrew Greek and Latine tongue as to the publick seruice of the Church these being no strange languages inspired by miracle but the known tongues of the Christian world and the most proper and significant to expresse the diuine mysteries because of the elegancy emphasy of their words and sentences and also of their grammar rules wherby they are contained within certain bounds and limits to the clearing of vncertaintyes and intricacies vnto which other languages are subject in regard of the great similitude of cases numbers and tenses that occasion inextricable doubts for this respect all the Scriptures of the old and new Testament were written and set forth in Hebrew Greek and Latine And S. Paul himself composed his Epistles in Greek which he directed to the Romans whose vulgar toÌ„gue was latine Furthermore it is euident that the Corinthians had their publick seruice in Greek when the Apostle writ vnto them wherby manifestly appeareth that he meant not of the Church seruice which in no place of the world was celebrated but in Hebrew Greek or Latin And though S. Paul saies in the aforenamed Chapter If I pray in a strang tongue my spirit prayeth but my vnderstanding is without fruit Neuertheless he does not (n) The Apostle 1. Cor. 14. reprehendes certain Corinthians endued with the guift of tongues because they vttered prayers and Hymns in the priuat meetings of the faithfull of those dayes which neither themselues nor others there present vnderstood and puft vp with a vain opinion preferred the gift of tongues before all other miraculous gifts and this is what S. Paul condemneth in the Chapter set down meane of priuate prayers which the faithfull of all fexes euen in this age doe deuoutly vse vpon their latin Primers especially for the priuate prayers he speaketh of were psalmes hymnes sonnets reuelations inspired by miracle and vttered in a strang tongue giuen extraordinarily by miracle also howeuer without doubt the Apostles intention in the words aboue mentioned was not to forbid euen strang languages since he expresly sayes in the same Chapter Wherfore brethren couet to prophesie and forbid not languages but the true meaning of the aforesaid words is that if any one shall vse a strang tongue in praying and want the knowledg therof though his spirit heart and affection prayeth well neuertheless he is without fruit as to the vnderstanding for as much as the vnderstanding doth not penetrate the things or misteries that the words signify and this is incident euen in this age to such as pray in the latine tongue wherin they are not versed yea to such also as be knowing in the grammaticall signification of latin words especially if in praying they vse the Psalmes of Dauid because of the tropes and figures contained therin For example how many euen of the learned reciting the words of the Psalme 59 Moab the pot of my hope Into Edom I will stretch out my thooe or of the Psalm 67. If yee sleepe among the midst of the lotts the wings of a doue couered with siluer rebuke the wild heasts of the reede The congregation of bulls in the kine of the people doe comprehend the sense and meaning therof notwithstanding all this neither priuate prayers which are said and not vnderstood nor publick prayers which are heard and not vnderstood likewise ought to be contemned or counted as vnprofitable for whosoeuer sayeth or heareth prayers so if he prayeth and heareth deuoutly enjoyes the fruit and comfort of a minde * S. Damas ait oratio est mentis eleuatio in Deum Suppoint autem hac orationis definitio vel includit rerum deceÌ„tium petitionem eleuated to and fixed in God wherin lies the consistency of praying and hearing aright albeit that his vnderstanding wanteth it 's proper fruit which is to feed of the sense signified by the words and indeed it happeneâ—h often times that many good catholick men and women praying in a language vnknown to themselues doe merit and obtaine more spirituall advantages of God then others that haue the vnderstanding of what they vtter in praying especially if they pray with greater humility pietie feruour and reuerence towards the prayers for as much as they be set forth and approued as holy profitable and acceptable to the diuine Majesty by the generall practice and warrantable authority of the holy catholick Church (o) Aug. Epis 118. cap. 5. any thing that the whole Church practices and obserues through out the world to dispute thereof as though it were not to be done is most insolent madnes that cannot erre in it's ordinances Besid's there is more respect and deuotion had towards a thing that is not known by the vnderstanding nor perceiued by the senses if credence be giuen to the profitablenes therof then towards any other thing that is familiar to the vnderstanding and obuious to the senses for example all true Christians doe most religiously honour the Mistery of the Incarnation and most deuoutly reuerence the Sacraments for as much as they belieue the Incarnation to be the principall and the Sacraments the instrumentall cause of iustification vnto eternall life God does not so much looke after the * Aug. Epis 102. ad Euodium non enim quantum intelligas sed quaÌ„tum credas credendo ames quaerit Deus nam saepe fit vt qui intelligunt contemnant qui non intelligunt afficiantur accuratnes of knowledg as to the vnderstanding of the words of holy prayers Hymnes c. priuatly or publickly said as he does after the credence giuen therunto wherby a belieuer is excited to loue him for often times it happeneth that such as vnderstand doe contemne when such as are * Dixit quidam sanctus Pater Jlliterati rapiunt Coelum nos vbi cuÌ„ scientia nostra vnlearned and know litle or nothing are carryed on the wings of a feruent deuotion and zeale to the inward veile of the diuine Tabernacle that is to say to the Thron of God For this reason which is taken out of S. Augustine it may be probably coniectured that in the primitiue Church the holy Ghost did giue sundry Christians guifts to speake in strange tongues which they vnderstood not therby to shew to posterity that no man ought to condemne as vnprofitable the prayers of such as say them in an vnknown language especially they relying on the Church-authority for the profitablenes therof as also vseing attention * S. Tho. ponit tres intentiones orationis vnam ad verba qua oraÌ„s profert alteram ad sensum tertiam ad finam qui est Deus Et prima secuÌ„da aliquando nocent in quaÌ„tum impediunt deuotionem as to the end of prayer which is God only though they should not haue attention as to the words vttered in praying or as to the sense therof the two last attentions being neither the best nor necessarily required to the consistency of prayer and some times do obstruct and hinder
deuotion wheras the feruour and humility in the vnlearned doe compence euen the want of an exact and distinct vnderstanding howeuer it is very expedient that euery belieuer say our lords prayer in the tongue he knowes for it is not enough to vnderstand confusedly that the petitions therin contained are good and profitable but likewise to know them distinctly Wherfore sundry constitutions set forth by Synods of Bishops require vnderstanding of words and sense as to our lords prayer CHAR. III. OF MELCHISEDECH THE CONTENTS Melchisedech a type of Christ by diuine dispensation invested in holy Priesthood offered a proper sacrifice of thanksgiuing in bread and wine Melchisedech's sacrifice figured the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood vnder the elements of bread and wine Christs vnbloody sacrifice sulfilled the figuratiue of Melchisedech Those which deny that Christ appointed Priests as his Vicars to offer in his room daily sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine of necessity destroy his euerlasting Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech the practice of Priestly blessing MElchisedech was king of * Fuit salem vrbs terrae Chananaeae vt constat ex historia Genesis quae fuit filijs Israel à Deo promissa iam dicta Iudaea Palestina seu terra sanctae salem that it by interpretation of iustice and Peace (a) According to holy scriptures Melchisedech was a Priest priesthood taken in the proper sense for he is called the Priest of God most high Gen. 1. and Hebrae 7. and this catholick assertion the ancient Fathers haue vnanimously taught as likewise Philo Iudae l. de Abraham a Priest of God most high counted without Father and mother without kindred without beginning of daies or end of life the holy Scriptures no where making mention of his genealogic He met the great Patriarch Abraham as be returned from the slaughter of the kings brought forth bread and wine which he (b) All the ancient Fathers that florish'd in the years 100.200.300.400 namely S. Irenaeus S. Hypolitus S. Chrysostomus S. Ambrose S. Hierom S. Austin c. teach that Melchisedech offered a sacrifice of bread and wine and S. Cyprian Epis 63. ad Caecil saith expresly that Melchisedech Priest of God most high made an offering of bread and wine and in an other place he calleth the sacrifice of Melchisedech the Image of Christs sacrifice offered vnder the forms of bread and wine so that according to S. Cyprian Melchisedech said Mass figuratiuely his sacrifice being a Type or figure of the sacrifice of the Eucharist and doubtless Melchisedech brought forth bread and wine with an intent to offer a sacrifice of thanksgiuing for the great victory Abraham had won and not precisely to refresh the souldiers who needed no meat hauing refresh'd themselues afore Gen 14. Howeuer t' is probable that Melchisedech did distribute amongst the souldiers of Abraham the bread and wine which he had consecrated in representation of the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper wherin he consecrated bread and wine and after gaue them to his Apostles and indeed Clemens Alexand. l. 4. stroma Calleth the meat Melchisedech distributed sanctifyed nourishment and S. Epipha ser 55. affirmes that Melchisedech gaue to Abraham and his souldiers consecrated bread and wine offered in sacrifice to giue thanks to him whose Priest he was for the obtained victory and afterward blessed him which shews his excellency aboue Abraham who was a Priest also and consequently aboue Leui and all the Priests of the old law that came out of the loyns of Abrahā (c) S. Paul Hebrae 7. saith that without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better signifying therby that Melchisedech was a greater Priest then Abraham whom he blessed moreouer the Scripture Text teacheth that to bless after a sacred manner is proper to Priestly function in consequence of which without all contradiction a Priest is greater in dignity then any temporall Prince that wanteth authority to giue sacred benediction As Melchisedech blessed Abraham so Priests num 6. were commanded to bless the people and Christ Mark 10. blessed young children and his Disciples Luk 24. and after the same manner the Bishops and Priests of the catholick Church bless lay-people and other creatures namely Agnus Dei bead's Crosses medal's candles Ashes Palmes Belles new shippes c. all which creatures are sanctifyed by the word of God and prayer for so the Church blesseth all such things by express invocation of God alwaise vsing this preface Adiutorium nostrum in nomine Domini Our helpe is in the name of our lord and so beseecheth God to bless consecrate and sanctifie his creatures in vertue of his passion and death suffered on the Cross that so they may be deliuered from the power of Satan and become beneficiall to men and the Church concludes all benedictions Per Christum Dominum nostrum For it is the prerogatiue of the greatest Priest to blesse the lesser besid's Abraham gaue him tithe which doth euidence the others exceeding dignity yet in these excellencies Melchisedech was a type only of Christ in whom the reall verity was contained Melchisedech as king of iustice and peace by interpretation was but a shadow of Christ who was and is actually and indeed king and Authour of both for he came into the world * Zachar. 9. Ecce Rex tuus venit iustus Saluator a just and peaceable king that * 1. Cor. 1. qui factus est nobis iustitia sanctificatio redemptio justified and reconciled man to God and his Angells Melchisedech as Priest of God that offered a sacrifice of bread and wine was a figure of Christ the son of God who being anointed Priest by the holy ghost offered (d) S. Austin in psal 33. saith that Christ instituted a sacrifice of his body and blood according to the Order of Melchisedech that is vnder the forms of bread and wine And l. 6. de ciuit c. 22. speaking of Melchisedech's sacrifice therin saith he first appeared the sacrifice which Christians offer to God and therby is fulfilled the propheticall saying Thou art a Priest according to the Order of Melchisedech a sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine at his last supper Melchisedech as Priest without beginning of daies or end of life signifieth the continuance of Christ his Priesthood for euer in as much as Priests instituted by and substituted vnder Christ as his proper Vicars shall continually offer to the end of the world the vnbloody sacrifice that Christ himselfe celebrated in his last supper neither can any man in reason deny but that Christ euen then offered an vnbloody sacrifice for that were to auerre that Christ did not fullfill the figuratiue sacrifice of Melchisedech and consequently that he was no Priest according to his order or similitude since it cannot be proued that Christ at any other time did offer a
and the holy Ghost and this was done with intent to render the name of Christ more honourable but S. Cyprian denyes expresly that remission of sinnes can be procured without naming of the three diuine persons which is the opinion of S. Austin l. 1. de baptismo con donat the Holy Trinity As there is fecundiâ—y in carnall parents to beget carnall children so by diuine dispensation fecundity is giuen to elementary water in baptism to bring forth spirituall children and as no man comes into the world that is not born of carnall parents So no man enters into the kingdom of Heauen that is not born again by sacramentall washing of water vnto iustification whosoeuer will put himselfe in a capacity to obtaine celestiall enjoyments must put of the old and terrene man and put on the new and spirituall creature he must purge out the old leauen of originall sin and by christian circumcision cast of the sinfull body of the flesh Col. 2. which is inconsistent with heauenly endowments that is to say he must be buried with Christ by baptism Rom. 6. christian circumcision vnto remission of sms and newness of life consisting therin Wherefore since that all men by the law * Apostolus dicit omnes peccasse in Adamo primo nostro Parente esse conceptos in peccato of their conception or birth are liable to the guilt of sin that only baptism de facto in deed or in desire receiued can wash away it is most euident that baptism is a requisite absolutely necessary vnto saluation And so i is defined 10. 3. Except that a man be born again of water and of the holy Ghost he canot enter into the kingdom of God Where the definition extend's euen to (c) Ancient Councils namely Carthag and Mileuit conuince those of foolishness which teach that euen young children can haue full enjoyment of Heauenly blessednes without baptism and so it is defined in the Council of Trent sess 5. decret de pecta originali and this catholick assertion was counted so certain in S Austins dayes that he l. con Iulia. c. 10. and 12. writeth that Pelagius out of feare of his own damnation damned such as exclude vnbaptis'd children from eternall life Yet though the Pelagians denyed that children contracted originall sin and in consequence thereof that Baptism as to them was no requisit necessary vnto the washing away of originall guilt neuertheless they taught that children without baptism could not be made Heires of the kingdom of Heauen infants that dye in their infancy vnbaptized according to the Church-interpretation expressing the want therof to import the loss of Heauens blessedness so that it is extream blindnes to assert the reception of children into Heauen vnless baptism be applyed vnto them indeed or by some extraordinary means employed aboue the common and ordinary law of Christ who hath instituted no other ordinary remedy then * Ambro. l. 2. de Abra. cap. 11. post citata verba Domini 10. 3. it a subiungit vtique nullum excipit non infantem non aliqua praeuentum necessitate IteÌ„ Aug. Epis ad Optatum mortis inquit transmissae ab Adamo chyrographo nullus omnino antequaÌ„ per baptismum liberetur non tenetur obnoxius sacramentall washing of water for the remission of originall sin as plainly shews the scripture-Testimony set down and the constant tradition and vniuersall practice of the catholick Church since the first age for 1662. years and truly children ought not to be exempted from a diuine law generally giuen with reference to all men joynt and seperat without warrantable authority of scripture (d) According to the ancient Fathers Orig. l. 5. in c. 6. ad Rom. S. Chrysostom hom ad Theoph. S. Austin l. 1. de Baptismo con dona the baptising of young children is an Apostolicall tradition in consequence of which it is no humane inuention introduced by Pope Higinus or Pope Syrisius as some sectaries vnaduisedly write and indeed it can lay claime to the best antiquity as plainly appeares by the Testimonies set down Besides Act. 16. Paul and Silas baptised the keeper of the prison and all his House and 1. Cor. 1. the family of Stephanus was baptised and euen young children are members of a family Church-tradition or speciall reuelation wherof not one example can be produced in all antiquity that euen such as are born of faithfull and godly parents can be made of Adams children Gods children and bee cleansed and purged of originall sin without the washing of water in the word (e) S. Paul Eph. 5. saith that Christ sanctifyed his Church cleansing it by the washing of water in the vvord of life Which sacred Text S. Chrys interpreting hom 20. ad Ephes asketh in what word and answeres to the question saying in the name of the Father the son and holy Ghost and S. Austin l. 6. con donat c. 25. affirmes that God is present with the Euangelicall words without which baptism has nothing of efficacy and l. 3. de baptismo explaining his meaning vnderstand's by Euangelicall words Christs own words set down in the Euangile of S. Mat. cap. 28. In the name of the Father the son and holy Ghost Whereby t' is euident that by the word required to the administring of baptism is not meant preaching vnto or instructing of those which receiue that Sacrament as some sectaries vnaduisedly expound that scripture-Text in opposition to the baptism of children that are not capable of instruction of life that is to say through the euangelicall inuocation of the most blessed Trinity Father son and holy Ghost and though Christ by his absolute power could haue instituted other remedies then the Sacrament of baptism to purge out the leauen of originall sin yet it is euident that his will was only to apply that and none other as the ordinary cure thereof Wherfore the faith and sanctity of faithfull and holy parents is not enough to sanctify their children vnto saluation without baptism hereunto being necessarily required iustifying grace through diuine faith the collation wherof is the prerogatiue of Christs merit 's The grace that does sanctify parents souls does not sanctify their childrens souls euery soul is sanctifyed by its own inherent sanctity and not by the sanctity of an other in the formall sense Parents can only through their sanctity dispose and prepare vnto spirituall sanctity for as much as they can procure for their children christian baptism wherof they be neither the formall nor efficient causes so the holy prayers of S. Steuen did dispose vnto the marueilous grace that sanctifyed S. Paul Act. but did not effect it notwithstanding in regard of this holy preparation practised by faithfull Parents the same S. Paul nameth their children holy 10. ad Cor. that is to say * Tertull. l. de monologia vocat liberos parentum fidelium sanctitati destinatos Et Hierom. Epis 153. ad Paulinum Christianae fidei candidatos as to
A man must be made a christian through baptism before he can make a progress in christianity through confirmation A man must be made a member of Christ through baptism before he can be a soldier of Christ through confirmation A man must be endued with faith through baptism before he can be deputed to a speciall office in the exercise thereof which is to defend it against the assaults of Tyrants through confirmation A man must be invested with * Hieron diolog con Lucifer cap. 4. quemodo inquit ab Ecclesia recipiet confirmationeÌ„ qui nec dum remissionem peccatorum coÌ„secutus est Docet Arianos qui errabant contra formam baptismi non accepisse spiritum sanctuÌ„ per Sacramentum CoÌ„firmationis grace vnto remission of sins through baptism before he can receiue the holy Ghost vnto perfection through confirmation which does not confer sanctity after the manner of other Sacraments only but also doth * Omnes S. Patres qui agunt de Sacramento confirmationis doceÌ„t baptismi gratiam perfici consummari per gratiam coÌ„firmationis increase and perfect the sanctity receiued afore by baptism it being the complement or consummation thereof Whereby it is plainly euident that albeit this Sacrament is not as baptism a requisite absolutely necessary vnto obtaining eternall blessedness neuertheless it is conditionally necessary to wit as to the armour of grace and (h) According to Pope Vrban dist 5. de consecratione there is no perfect christian that hath not receiu'd the holy Ghost through the imposition of Episcopall hands and Hugo de S. Vict. l. 2. de Sacram. par 7. cap. 3. countes it dangerous to dye without being confirm'd afore which is conform to the doctrine of ancient Fathers S. Dionys Lâ—de Eccles Hierar c. 4. S. Cypr. Epis 72. ad Iubaian which assert that then a man has fulnes of sanctity and is made an adopted son of God when he receiues both the Sacraments baptism and confirmation perfection therof as also to a more ample measure of blessedness then baptisme alone doth effect so that christian catholicks especially such as liue vnder persecution ought to vse extraordinary endeauours for their admittance to this Sacrament the proper office there of being to strenghten them by grace that they may not fall from the Church of Christ * In Epis ad Fabium vti refert Eusebius l. 1. cap. 35. S. Cornelius affirmeth that Nouatus fell into Heresie for the want therof If they haue no conueniency in their own country to repaire vnto a catholick Bishop the spirituall aduantages which they may reape from the Sacrament of confirmation will compence the charges of a journey into forrain parts where catholick Bishops are to be found but this is to be vnderstood in reference to such catholicks as haue ability of body and a competency of temporall fortunes As touching the sensible rites or ceremonies employed in or about the Sacrament of confirmation the most remarkable are two only For example a Bishop in making of chrism breatheth three times in form of a cross on the mouth of the pot or flagon that containeth the said Chrism signifying thereby that euen at that time through episcopall consecration Chrism receiueth virtue from God wherby it is impowered as his instrument to confer strengthning grace to such as doe receaue the Sacrament aright and ceremonies signifying the thing that is done for the time they are employed are profitable by the confession of such * Caluinus in sua harmonia ad cap. 7. S. Marci fatetur caeremonias illas quae habent significationem eius quod tunc fit duÌ„ exercentur esse vtiles as impugne catholick ceremonies The other ceremonie is the reuerence a Bishop exhibiteth to the consecrated Chrism bowing down his head he saluteth saying Haile holy Chrism This ceremony hath nothing of Idolatry for an vnliu'd thing may challenge religious adoration in reference to an other distinct wherin excellency is contained to which religious adoration is due The ancient Iewes adored the Ark of the Testament because of the relation it had to God that is an increated excellency and all Christians doe religiously worship and adore the sacred books of the new Testament in reguard of the word of God therin comprehended And subjects of a temporall Prince do render ciuil reuerence to his chaire of state in relation to his sacred Person if a king or Emperour to which is due ciuill adoration by the law of God and nature in like manner religious worship is exhibited to holy Chrism in as much as it is the effectuall instrument of God to giue armour of grace to such as are baptised and is by speciall benediction deputed to the effecting therof CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE EVCHARISTE THE CONTENTS Christ the night before his passion made his last Testament gaue vnto his Church a legasy of his body and blood in the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form's of bread and wine for to continue the spirituall food of souls till he come to Iudgment The express words of the Testament This is my body This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood exclude each figure that is inconsistent with the litterall sense intended by the Testatour that vseth not to say one thing literally and mean an other mystically because Christ Said this is my body this Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood no man in reason ought to doubt of it Authorities of Councils testimonies of ancient Fathers and the warrantable practice of both primitiue and modern Churches euince the reall presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Euchariste in vertue of the same word that was made flesh and made all things of nothing bread is transubstantiated in to the body and wine in to the bloud of Christ who is in Heauen and in the Sacrament at once One body can agree with many places by diuine dispensation Requisit's necessary to a worthy receiuing of Christs body and bloud in the Sacrament THe Euchariste is the (a) The blood of Christ shed vnto remission of sinnes is the proper legacy of the new Testament according to Christs owne words set down 1. Cor. 11. This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood legacy of the new Testament vnto eternall life that Christ bequeathed to his Church in a Sacrament of his body and blood the night before he suffered his passion in the presence of witnesses without exception which were his Apostles The same body and blood that Christ offered in a sacrifice on the cross visibly to the redeeming of man kind vnto liberty he left in a Sacrament vnder the elements of bread and wine invisibly to the feeding of man vnto eternall life In the bestowing of this legacy Christ who is faithfull in all he promiseth fulfilled the promise he had made long afore and which is set down Io. 6. (b) Christ Ioan. 6. promising and recommending the Sacrament of his body and blood said
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
impossible outward extension in order to place being an accidentall propriety only of a body cloathed with quantity as naturall Philosophy teacheth and consequently the want thereof destroieth not the nature or essence of a body as naturall Philosophy teacheth also Besides though the light of the sun be a corporeall quality neuertheless it is well nigh in infinite places at once likewise the words of a preacher are corporall things which in the same moment of time possesse the eares of all such as are attentiue to his sermon and one man walking in a Chamber where be placed sundry looking-glasses his Image appeareth in each of them at the same time in consequence of which doubtless God in the virtue of his word can put supernaturally one singular Man in many places since his figure which is some thing doth naturally occupate many looking-glasses at once Out of the premises plainly followeth that the Sacrament of the Eucharist hath a singular prerogatiue beyond all the other Sacraments of the new law in as much as it is not an effectuall instrument only to confer diuine grace which is a soueraign Antidote against the poyson of sin but it containes and giues also the Author of grace wherfore it comprehends within it self both the sweetness of inherent sanctity and the giuer therof which is all sweet being the fountaine of sweetness and sweetnes it self whereunto the faire spowse in the Canticles inuiteth saying Tast yee and see how sweet our lord is Howeuer as Manna which was a figure of this Sacrament as to Christs body did seem bitter and loathsome to the ill minded and pleasant only to the good Israelites In like manner Christs body to Christians that receiue it vnworthily is the bitterness of death vnto death and to others that eat it aright the sweetness of life vnto life so fier that purgeth gold consumes wood soe the suns light that recreat's the sound offend's the vnsound eyes so the sweet sauour of an oyntâ—â—ent that refreshes doues kill 's beetles Christians by eating Christs naturall body worthily are not vnited to him only * Eph. 5. quia membra sumus de corpore eius de car ne â—â—us de ossibus cius through faith and charity mystically but really and are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones Eph. 5. To eate worthily vnto a naturall vnion with Christ a christian ought * 1. Cor. probet autem seipsum homo sic de pane illo edat vnde dc Sacramento corporis sanguinis Christi canit Ecclesia mors est malis vita bonis to examine himselfe afore and purge out the leauen of vice Christ hath * Nulla conventio Christi ad diabolum nulla conventio charitatis ad peccatum mortale no concord with sin nor consequently vnion with a soul that sin hath dominion ouer Christs body will not be * Luc. 23. in sindone muÌ„da in sepulchro in quo nondum quisquaÌ„ positus sit wrapped but in a pure linnen cloath that is to say in a clean heart nor will be laid in a Tombe that is not hewen out of a rock wherin neuer any laid afore As there is no agreement betwixt Christ and Belial no communion betwixt sanctity and iniquity no society betwixt light and darkness so there is noe vnion betwixt Christs body and a Christian that serue's Belial delight 's in iniquity and walkes in darkness wherfore let no Christian thinke to tye a knot of vnion with Christ if he shall put his body where allready is * L. 6. super cap. 9. Lucae ait nemo accipit cibum Christi nisâ— fuerit ante sanatus Et Aug. trac 26. in Joan. sic praecipit Innocentiam ad altare portate established Belial that is to say the deuill through mortall sin and truly Christians that * 1. Cor. 11. qui manducat bibit indignè reuâ— erit sanguinis corporis Domini vnworthily receaue the body of Christ as much as lyeth in them doe betray him to the deuill putting him in a place the deuill command's in and consequently become guilty of Christ's body and blood in as high a measure (k) According to S. Chrysostom hom de non contemnenda Ecclesia hom 8 ad popul Antioch those which receiue the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ vnworthily doe an iniury to Christs proper person like the Iewes and Gentils that crucified him as Iudas that betrayed him to the Iewes As the children of Israel were forâ—idden Exod. 12. to cate the paschall lambe which was a figure of Christs Sacramentall body too * Exod. 12. non comedetis ex eo crudum quid nec coctum sed tantum assum igne raw or boiled butrosted only so Christians be prohibited to eat Christs body raw that is before the fire of charity hath prepared them for it or boiled namely in luxury and voluptuousness but rosted only viz. at the fire of a contrite heart inflamed with the memory of Christ * Ecce agnus Dei inquit Apostolus qui tollit peccata muÌ„di the lambe of God that was rosted in the hot furnace of affliction for the taking away the sins of the world CHAR. IX OF COMMVNION IN BOTH KIND'S THE CONTENTS Christ instituted the holy Euchariste vnder the elements of both bread and wine Christ by his institution did not oblige the Church to dispense the Euchariste vnder both kinds Christ left it in the Churches power to giue the Euchariste to lay-people vnder one or both kinds accordingly as she should think fit in order to tymes places and persons those which receiue the Euchariste vnder one sole kind haue nothing less nor such as receiue vnder both kinds haue nothing more of Christ nor of the Sacramentall grace if there be parity in the receiuers as to worthiness obiections answered Communion in both kinds is the receiuing of Christs reall body and blood vnder the two Sacramentall shapes or element's of bread and wine afrer Christ's own institution Mat. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. Howeuer from thence it followeth not that communion vnder both kindes is necessary to the whole Church ioynt and separate vnto saluation for matrimony and the orders of Bishops and Priests doe challenge diuine institution neuertheless none of them be necessary to each member of Gods Church A Priest celebrating as he ought to consecrate the body and blood of Christ vnder distinct elements through distinct form's of words for as much as he then representes Christ's person supplyeth his room and offereth an vnbloody sacrifice on the Altar that is an express remembrance of Christ's bloody sacrifice offered on the cross wherein his blood was seperated from his body in consummation of the generall redemption so he ought likewise to communicate in the distinct consecrated elements but communion in order to lay-people which are no Priest's Christ hath left free (a) According to S. Austin Epis 108. Christ left power vnto
signification doe constitute the body only vnder the forms of bread and the words which consecrate Christ's blood according to their proper signification doe put the blood only vnder the form's of wine neuerth eless in vertue of naturall concomitancy that is to say of the naturall connection which is between all the naturall part 's of Christ now inuested with immortality it is manifest by necessary consequence that wheresoeuer Christ's body and blood is there is all Christ vndeuided and so it is alike in the mystery of the blessed Trinity that includes three Persons really distinct though the word Father according to it's proper signification be appropriated to the first Person only notwithstanding whersoeuer the first diuine Person is who only layeth claim to the name Father taken in the proper sense there also is the second Person the son and the third Person the holy Ghost in vertue of the naturall connection that one Person has with an other Hence it is plainly euident that the Euchariste distributed vnder one kinde only ought not to be counted a lame Sacrament since one sole species contain's as much of Christ as both together to wit all Christ entirely Neither is a greater measure of grace conferred Ex opere operato that is by the Sacraments working precisely when it is taken in one sole or in both kind's the spirituall effect thereof which is supernaturall grace vnto refreshing and feeding of the soul being equally diuided to all such as receiue the Sacrament with the same worthines whether vnder one only or both kind's and all such are * 1. Cor. 10. multi vnum corpus sumus qui de vno pane participamus one bread and one body in as much as all are partakers of one bread 1. Cor. 10. which is an other effect of the Sacrament Also he that shall eate of this bread worthily which is conuerted into the body of Christ shall liue for euer 10. 6. And as * 2. Cor. 8. qui multum non abundauit qui modicum noÌ„ minorauit Et Exod. 16. filij Israel colligerunt Manna alius plus alius minus nec qui plus collegerat habuit amplius nec qui minus parauerat r. perit minus an Israëlite that gathered much Manna had nothing ouer and an Israëlite that gathered little had not the less so a Christian that receiueth the Sacrament vnder both kind's hath no more of Christ or of sacramentall grace then he that receiueth vnder one kinde only if there * Gratia sucramentalis confertur iuxta dispositiones supernaturales eorune qui recipiunt Sacramenta be parity as to the disposition of the receiuers notwithstanding all these premises it cannot be said in proper speech that he that eateth Christ's body doth drinke his blood or that he that drinketh Christ blood vnder the forme of wine doth cate his blood albeit that whosoeuer receiueth his body receiueth his blood withall and whosoeuer receiueth his blood receiueth his body withall for the reason of difference in order to the proper form of speech doth not proceed from the absence of the one and the sole presence of the other but from a different manner exercised in the conueyance of the consecrated elements * Innocentius III. ait quod quamuis dum bibitur sanguis Christi simul accipiatur eius corpus quod tamen tune non dicitur propriè â—â—aÌ„ducari vnder both of which be contained as well the body as the blood of Christ from the mouth into the stomach no man eating and thinking alike Secondly lay-communion vnder one kinde only is continued because of other modern sectaries that lay claim to a diuine precept to proue a necessary vsage of both kinds which is a manifest weakness for * Jems 6. hic est panis de coâ—le descendens sâ— quit 〈◊〉 ipso manducauevit non morictur Et v. 52. 〈…〉 si quit manducâ—â—erit c hoc pane viuet in aterâ—â—â— Rursiam qui maÌ„ducâ—t â—â—am 〈◊〉 viâ—â—t in aeternum many scripture-testion onies doe declare communion in one kinde to be enough for one obtaining eternall life and not any one doth exprosse an obsolute command to oblige the Church vnto lay-communion vnder both kinds For of all the three Euangelist's which set down the Institution of the Eucharist only S. Luk cap. as mentioneth an absolute precept given by Christ viêªt videlicet Doe this in 〈◊〉 of me but from this scripture no man ought to argue an obligation euen for consecration in both kinds and consequently much less for lay-communion vnder both kinds because the precept doth immediatly follow the consecration of the bread asone and was enjoyned afore Christ did institute the chalice and though Christ Mat. 6. after he had consecrated the chalice said drink yee all of it yet that was a precept giuen to the Apostles only which were present for S. Mark chap. 14. says And they All drank of it that is all the Apostles then sitting at the last supper Furthermore Christ by giuing the afore said precept Doe this in remember ance of mee wherby is commanded the execution of all the actions ioynt and separate that Christ then did cannot be meant vniuersally in order to all the faithfull ioynt and separate the said actions being inconsistent with meer lay-people who are not invested with power to offer proper sacrifice consecrate Christs body and ordaine Priests for the distributing the Euchariste to others which were the actions that Christ exercised and proper only to the Episcopall and Priestly function * Trident. sess 22. cap. 1. can 1. ait per verba hoc facite Christum ordinasse Apostolos Sacerdâ—tes that Christ instituted at his last supper Amongst the Apostles S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. only relateth the Institution of this Sacrament and according to his Testimonie the absolute precept Doe this in remember ance of me is giuen also before Christ consecrated the chalice and albeit that S. Paul mentioneth a conditionall precept that felloweth the institution of the said chalice to wit This doe as oft as ye drinke it in remember ance of me neuertheless as no man ought to argue according to the rules of true Logick from a condititionall proposition an vniuersall absolute so no man ought to infer from a conditionall an absolute precept vniuersally obliging the whole Church ioynt and separate and consequently there cannot be produced out of the three Euangelists and S. Paul which set down the words Christ vsed in the institution of this SacrameÌ„t any warraÌ„table ground to proue a diuine precept obliging all belieuers vniuersally to coÌ„municate vnder both kind's and although S. Iohn the EuaÌ„gelist chap. 6. doth shew an express warrant from Christ coÌ„manding as it were communion vnder both kinds in order to the whole Church joynt and separate The warrant runs thus Except ye eate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye haue no life in you howeuer modern sectaries and Caluinist's especially cannot in
knowledg of his own infirmity left of his great pride detested the wickedness that he had committed in the holy Temple of Ierusalem and prayed also vnto God neuerthelesse found no mercy vnto iustification of life because his repentance proceeded from naturall * S. Thomas â—it actum poenitentiae quem exercuit Antiochus fuisse ex motiue purè natutali motiues precisely For he did not cast away from him the thoughts of sins in regard they were offences to God but in respect they were punishments to himselfe In like manner Esau found no place to penance though he sought with teares Heb. 12. because he did not weepe for his sins wherby he had offended God but for the loss of his father Isaacks blessing that by a diuine ordinance was annexed to his Birth right which he had sold afore for one portion of meate Besid's his heart was full of enuy and malice againsT his brother Iacob whose death he had threatned Gen. 27. A sinner that will finde place to penance and blessing to inheritance ought to behold his wayes * Vide vias tuas in conâ—alle scito quid feceriâ— Jerem. 2. in the valley of humility and know what he hath done call to his rememberance the dayes of his life that are passed thinke * Heb. 10. borrendum est incidere in manus Domini viuentis how terrible it is to fall into the hands of the liuing God consider how * Jerem. 2. scito vide quia malum est â—marum reliquisse Doâ—â—inuÌ„ Deum â—num euill a thing and bitter it is to forsake his Creatour and thereby in vertue of an humble and contrite heart to cast away from him the serpent in his bosome the poyson in his stomack the thiefe in his house that is deadly sin which keeps away from him wrongfully the place to penance and the blessing to the inheritance of Heauen CHAR. XIJ. OF CONFESSION THE CONTENTS T' is not enough that a sinner confess his sinnes to God with his heart vnless he tell them to a Priest with his mouth also that is the Minister of Christ to whom the word of reconciliation is committed Joa 20. As secret auricular so intire perfect confession and likewise the seale or obligation to keepe secret what in secret is sacramentally confessed lie claim to a diuine precept according to the practice of some primitiue Churches publick confession of publick sinnes were enioyn'd as satisfactory penances vnto humbling publick sinners the church of God haith laid aside publick confessions for iust reasons those hazard their foul's which defer sacramentall confession of their sinnes till grieuous sicknes seize on them Confession is an outward act of penance wherby a penitent sinner humbly accuseth himself of himself telling his own sins in the eare of a Priest in uested with power of iurisdiction to the end be may obtain full remission thereof in vertue of his absolution Christ when he instituted the Sacrament of penance Ioan. 20. wherein he conferred on his Apostles and their successors in priestly function authority to absolute from sins committed after baptism enioyned also sacramentall confession for by the words set down Io. 20. plainly appear's that Christ euen then instituted an inward tribunall in order to remission of sinnes and constituted Priest's the spirituall Iudges therin wherfore as in an outward Court of Iustice a person arraigned cannot be absolued or punished by a temporall Iudge legally vnless * Prouerb 12. qui iudicâ—t quod noâ—â—t iudex est iustitiae he hath the hearing of his cause so a Priest to whom the keys of authority are giuen as to the opening or shutting the gates of Heauen cannot open to or shut against a sinner iuridically whose sins he hath no knowledg of (a) The Council of Trent fess 14. c. 6. 7. as likewise others more ancient namely Lateran sub Innocent 3. Constant c. haue defined the necessity of sacramentall confession as to mortall sinnes committed after baptism And indeed veniall sinnes importe no such necessity because the Sacrament of penance hath nothing of power to retaine them and consequently confession is of diuine right and an essentiall part of the Sacrament of penance neither matters it that Christ pardoned the sinnes of S. Mary Magdalen and others of whome he exacted no confession for he that searcheth the heart knoweth exactly the state and condition of the spirit albeit nothing be outwardy expressed Howeuer now the Sacrament of penance being instituted after the similitude of an outward Court of Iustice wherein the penitent supplieth the part of the person accused and the Priest of the Iudg in the room of Christ sacramentall confession is of absolute necessity for the remission of mortall sinnes committed after baptism (b) According to S. Austin l. 65. hom 49. c. 3. if to confess our sinnes to God priuately were sufficient vnto the remission of them without cause it is said whatsoeuer yee shall loose in Earth shall be loosed in Heauen c. and in vain the keyes are giuen to the Church of God and thereby as this great Doctour obserues we should frustrate the holy Euangell we should frustrate Christ's own words promising to our selues what he denyeth And according to S. Basil in regulis breuioribus interrog 288. there is a necessity of confession our sinnes to those which are dispensers of the misteries of God it is not enough that a sinner confesse his sins to God with his heart vnless he shall tell them also with his mouth vnto a Priest who is the Minister of Christ to whom is committed * S. Basil in Regulis breuioribus interrog 228. necessario inquit ijs peccata aperire debent quibus credita est dispensatio mysteriorum Dei qua habetur 1. Cor. 4. dispensation of the mysteries of God together with the word of reconciliation A penitent that out of the tribunall of Priests seek absolution from his sins deceiues himself for it is not said in vaine Whatsoeuer yee shall loose vpon earth shall be loosed in Heauen nor the keys of authority in order to the forgiuing of sin's are giuen in vaine to the Church of God which would proue a necessary consequence if the antecedent were granted For the Sacrament of penance which Christ instituted for the pardoning of sins would not be vsefull aâ—ot if sin's might be pardoned without it In the primitiue times two kind's of confession were in practice the one publick the other secret in reference to two kind's of offences the one openly the other in secret committed and the primitiue Bishops in their seuerall Dioceses respectiuely deputed certain speciall Priests for hearing the confessions of such (c) According to Orig. in hom 2. in psal 37. S. Cyprian l. de lapsis and Tertull l. de poenit c. 9. Confession of publick sinnes was publick in the primitiue Church and publick penitent's had a place in the Church a part from the rest of the faithfull whose sinnes
portransibit gladius she endured grieuous afflictions and painefull sorrows S. Iohn Baptist who exceeded in sanctity all others of his sex by Christ's owne testimony did practice extream penance and the calamities that holy Iob suffered were greater then his sin 's required as himself witnesseth in the sixt Chapter of his book saying Oh that my sins were weighed wherby I haue desernad wrath and my miseries together in the ballance as the sand of the sea this would appeare heauier in like manner it may be turly said of the passions endured by other blessed Saint's wherfore since the supream prouidence doth reward euery good work beyond what it deserueth vndoubtedly he hath assigned reward 's suitable thereto that is both in order to merit and satisfaction according to that of S. Luke cap. 21. There shall not an hair of your heads perish Wherby Christ promiseth a recompence to each good work how litle soeuer it be But if the works of blessed Saint's as meritorious only and not as satisfactory should receiue reward many baires of their head 's would perish that is many of their good works as they are satisfactory should not be recompenced which is contrary to Christ's promise Sithence the coÌ„dition of satisfaction is such that it is applyable by him that satisfyes for others distinct from himselfe as appears by S. Paul that wished to be Anathema for his bretheren and by Moses that beseeched God to blot him out of the book of life for the conseruation of the Israëlites it is conformable to reason and diuine iustice which hath a reward for euery good work that the aboundant and exceeding satisfactions of blessed Saints that remaine vprecompenced be laid vp in the Treasury of the Church vnto the remission of temporall paine due to sin which is the reward that good works as satisfaction specially challenge and vndoubtedly * 2. Cor. 12. Ego autem libentissimè impendam super impendam ego ipse pro aniâ—â—bus vestris Et S. Timoth. 2. omnia sustineo propter electos the saints themselues now departed in as much as they were inuested with the grace of charity when they did exercise their voluntary satisfactions and endured their violent passions had at least a virtuall intention to assist and profit therby the rest of the faithfull the law of charity requiring that * Vnum inquit Paulus corpus in Christo sumus Et Gal. 6. alter alterius onera portate all members of the holy catholick Church concurre mutually to the perfecting of the whole body one bearing anothers burthen and one satisfying for an other applying a meer price for temporall paine due to sinne * In Bulla Pij 5. damnatur propositio Michaelis Baij diceÌ„tis per passiones sanctorum coÌ„municatas Jndulgentijs non propriè redimi debita which is the consistency of Communio Sanctorum that christians profess in the Nicene Creed and the Apostle practiced saying Now reioyce I in my suffering's for you and fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christs in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Neither hence ought any man to infer the saint's to be our Redeemers because their satisfactions for others in order to remission of temporall punishment's if Christ's satisfactions were to be laid aside would signifie nothing being founded therin (g) Though the blood of Christ be sufficient enough to olenst a soul from both the guilt and the pain of sin neuertheless it does not procure that deliuerance vnless it be applyed by the Churches Sacraments or by acts of faith and contrition and indeed euen sectaries assert a necessity of saith and contrition vnto remission of sinnes In consequence wherof wheras Christ is said Hebra 10. with one oblation to haue consummated foreuer them that are sanctifyed it is meant as to sufficiency being that one oblation without the application thereof doth not sanctify indeed and effectually and he alone is properly our Redeemer in and by whose proper merit 's through the effusion of his blood was purchased our redemption vnto forgiueness of sinnes Collos 1. And that was Christ only One mediator of God and man and as no man ought to be said his own Redeemer according to the form of proper speech for as much as through good works of painfull satisfaction he payeth a ransome for temporall punishment's corresponding to his sins or for as much as he exerciseth an act of perfect contrition whereby his sin 's are remitted so the blessed saint's ought not to be called the Redeemers of such as receiue remission of temporall paines due to sinn's through the application of their satisfactions Neither hereby are Christ's satisfaction 's preiudiced For as the prayer that one belieuer on earth maketh for another doth nothing at all diminish the dignity of Christ's dayly praying for vs at the right hand of his diuine Father * Rom. 8. quotidie interpellat pro nobis Rom. S. since the efficacy of it is founded in the merit 's of his death and passion so the satisfactions of the blessed saint's applyed for the remission of paine due to sin doe dot lessen the infinite valour of Christ's satisfactions being they receiue from them all their worthiness and efficacy And doubtless Christ's own will was to haue it so to the end that his faithfull on earth might exercise reciprocall works of charity towards one an other and exhibit honour to such as he had translated to his kingdom of eternall blessedness being the honour done to a seruant doth redound to his lord and Master Power to dispence this spirituall Treasure of Indulgences or pardons is committed to the Catholick Church as appeareth euidently by Christ's own word's Mat. 16. saying And I will giue vnto thee the key 's of the kingdome of Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt binde vpon earth shall be bound also in Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt * Quoad verba Christi quodcuÌ„que solueris nomine solutionis non intelligitur sola absolutio iudiciaria sed etiam omnis dispeÌ„satio imo omnis fauor gratia ex vi illius potestatis facta proinde Indulgentia concessa pro extensa ad defunctum à summo Pontifice eius enim solius est dare Indulgentias per defunctis infallibiliter prodest defuncto per modum suffragij id est pro modum auxilij adiutorij Ecclesiastici eidem defuncto applicata si caetera sint paria puta si Jndulgentia fiat ex rationabili causa sique defunctus existat in gratia c. his suppositis Indulgentia applicata defuncto alicui semper est valida rata apud Deum luxta tamen Caâ—etanum Henricum Indulgentia non babes infallibilem effectuâ— respectu animae defuncti sed liberum est Deo eam acceptare vel non acceptare loose an earth shall be loosed also in Heauen wherby Christ promiseth to S. Peter and his successors in Church-gouernment authority and power for the remouing of all
what the vniuersall Church practiseth constant and vniuersall practice that agreeth with so warrantable and euident testimonies as are set down Howeuer he produces but weake and incoÌ„sequent proof's for the establishing of his nouell doctrine for example from these words Maccab. For if he had not hoped that they which were slaine would rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for the dead he doth infer that the soul 's in Purgatory are not freed of their sufferings till the generall Resurrection and this inference he proueth only saying For if soul 's were released out of their pains through the prayers of the liuing before the Resurrection it would be extreame profit able to pray for the dead though no Resurrection should follow But where is the connection between the Scripture-Text and Mr. Whites inference shall it follow that good soul's must be imprisoned till the generall Resurrection because the noble and godly Iudas according to the profession of his Religion did belieue in the immortality of soul's and the Resurrection of their bodyes and indeed the true meaning of this scripture afore alledged according to all Orthodox writers is this viêªt videlicet if Iudas Maccabaeus had belieued soul 's to be mortall and to die with their bodyes which consequently should neuer rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for them and therfore religiously thinking of the Resurrection and fearing that the souls of his souldiers that were slaine in battell might be punished in the next life in respect of some sinnes they had committed vpon earth he commanded that prayers and sacrifice should be offered for their deliuerance from sin that is to say from temporall punishment due to their sinnes whence doubtlesse no wise and indicious man can infer the imprisonment of soul 's in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection which would neuer haue happened if souls had been mortall and died together with their bodies After the same manner he abuseth the new Testament Let the new iustrument saith he keepe time and harmony with the old let S. Paul be heard preaching to the same effect 1. Cor. 15. what shall they doe which are (n) by baptism for he dead the Apostle may mean water of tribulation and persecution wherewith primitiue Christians seem'd as it were baptised again may vnderstand voluntary afflictions for example praying fasting giuing of Almes c. which the liuing offer to God for the comfort and benefit of the dead moreouer the Apostle may mean the baptising of such as defer'd their baptism till the hower of death which Custome was vsuall in the primitiue Church and the Apostles sense is then if souls be mortall and in consequence therof no resurrection of the dead those which are baptised dying that is at the hower of their death reapo nothing of aduantage by their baptism baptised for the dead if the dead doe not rise at all From this holy text he inferreth that no benefit is obtained by baptism for the dead before the Resurrection not by so doing can soul 's till then be released But in earnest this is a pitifull deduction like vnto this God is in Heauen therfore Mr. Thomas White is at Roterdam for indeed there is nothing of connection between the antecedent and consequence and Mr. Whit's inference for it does not follow that soul's obtain nothing of profit before the Resurrection because S. Paul saith What shall they doe which are baptised for the dead meaning thereby to what purpose shall Christians pray fast giue Almes or suffer tribulation for Christ's sake if the dead rise not again Besides if Mr. Whit's inference were warrantable and vnquestionable the Apostle himself is not as yet in a capacity to obtaine that eminent benefit of being deliuered before the Resurrection For in the same Chapter he addeth to the word 's set down Why are we Apostles in icopardy euery hower if the dead rise not at all what aduantageth it me to haue prayed fasted endnred great persecution if the dead be not raised vp let us eat and drink for to morrow wee shall die that is if there be no Resurrection after death why doe wee giue our selues to any thing el's saue to eating and drinking Wherfore S. Paul himself according to Mr. White is but in the way to his blessed crowne for if his soul were already translated into Heauen his sufferings would haue aduantaged euen though no Resurrection should follow But it seemeth a strange thing that Mr. White should presume to gather from the words set downe that good souls shall not be released of the paines which they sufferin Purgatory before the generall Resurrection the said words not carrying the least sound that way for they neither speake of pain 's in order to the next life nor of releasing souls out of Purgatory and indeed the Apostles sole intent in the Chapter alledged is to proue the Resurrection of the dead and to that purpose brings sundry argument's The first whereof is that Christ our head is raised vp and therfore we his members shall rise again in regard of the fast connection that is between the head and the members thereof And what Mr. White alledgeth for the imprisonment of souls to the day of Iudgment is a secondary argument which S. Paul vseth only as a confirmation of his first argument to demonstrate the Resurrection of bodyes signifying therby that he himselfe together with the rest of the Apostles and primitiue Christians of those day 's had suffered in vain afflictions and tribulations if sou'ls had been mortall and consequently neuer to rise again for t' is clear by the very forme of the Apostles speech that he supposed the false opinion that teacheth souls to be mortall whence of necessity would follow that there should be no Resurrection at all and truly if the Apostle had not made that supposall he would haue concluded nothing for supposing souls to be immortall good works of this life would haue much aduantaged him for the obtaining of Heauenly blessedness though no Resurrection at all had followed And the same supposall is made by the holy writer of the Macchabies signisying therby if the dead were not to rise again it would follow that soul 's were mortall in consequence of which all prayers offered for them would be in vain where is obseruable that the Iewish sectaryes to wit Sadducies held that the soul 's were mortall and consequently denied the Resurrection of Bodies other Iewes which belieued aright professed immortality together with the Resurrection there being in each soul an innate desire to resume the body wherof it was the true form once and as to reason it is most consonant that God who createth nothing in vain will not frustrate that desire hence it was that the ancient Iew 's spoak of the immortality of souls and the Resurrection of bodyes alike and our Sauiour Christ Math. 22. to proue to the Sadducies the Resurrection of bodies infer's it from the
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis
causeth her to commit adultery and whosoeuer shall mary her that is diuorced doth commit adultery and it matters not that Christ insertes that exception except for fornication for it hath reference only to the first part of the sentence viz. Whosoeuer shall put away his wife Christ signifying therby that it is lawfull for an husband (m) S. Austin con Adamant cap. 3. and Theophilac expounding that Chapter of S. Matthew teach that whosoeuer putteth his wife away otherwise if afterwards she comit adultery he is the cause of it and doubtless Christ in the Chapter set down speak's of a Husband that shall put his wife away as to dwelling and bedding with him which kinde of diuorce according to the Council of Trent sess 24. can 8 may be done lawfully when a iust cause interuem's for example fornication eminent danger of some great euill whether spirituall or temporall or enormious crime c. and indeed Christ in that Chapter speaks not at all of dissoluing the bond of marriage for that kind of putting away is a deuorce giuing power toeach of both to marry again without waiting till the one or the other chance to dye to depart from an adulteres wife or for a wife to depart from an husband that is an adulterer which is it is lawfull for an innocent husband not to bed or liue together with a wife that committes adultery and doubtless Christ intent was not to inuolue the said exception in the latter part of the sentence for so Christ's meaning should be this viz whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced except for fornication committed adultery and consequently should signify thereby fornication to be a sufficient lawfull ground to dissolue the very bond of marriage vnto giuing leaue to a wife put away for adultery to marry again which sense carryeth an extream absurdity for so the condition of an adulteress wife were better then that of an innocent wife the adulteress being made free in regard of her adultery to take a new husband in consequence of which if that were the true sense of Christ's words euery married woman that is weary of her husband might easily commit adultery to get liberty to marry an other if adultery could dissolue the bond of marriage Besides S. Mark cap. 1. and S. Luke cap. 16. relating this forementioned passage and the sentence Christ pronounced Math. 5. dâ—e clearly and absolutly assert putting no exception at all that whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced committeth adultery wherfore though after consummation of marriage a wife may lawfully depart from her husband that committeth adultery and a husband may lawfully depart from his wife that committeth dultery as to bedding and liuing together neuerthelesse neither of them is at liberty to mary again as long as both doe liue As to administring the Sacrament of christian marriage albeit that the Councill of Trent requireth the presence of the parish Priest vnto the celebration therof in all places and Countries wherin their ordinance is promulgated yet he is no Minister of the Sacrament that is (n) According to the Council of Florence the efficient cause of marriage is the mutuall consent of the parties that marry expres'd in words of the present Tense For example the man faith I Thomas take thee Anna for my vvedded vvife and again I Anne take thee Thomas for my vvedded Husband no efficient cause of it since in order to such as marry together he applyeth neither matter nor form in the administration thereof these consisting in a reciprocall deliuering vp and a reciprocall accepting of bodies by mutuall codescention expressed in words of the present sense which is the true efficient cause of marriage in consequence of which those that contract are the proper ministers of the Sacrament they yeelding their bodyes to each other with an vnanimous consent reciprocally in so much that it is not absolutly (o) According to the holy congregations of Cardinals that expounded that first Chapter of the 24. session in the Councill of Trent which requires to the validity of marriage the presence of the parish Priest it is not necessary that the parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words his presence and his knowledge of the transaction is sufficient though he should forbid and dissent from it necessary that a Parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words at all his presence together with his notice of what is done there being sufficient enough and though he should dissent from the doing of it the validity of the Sacrament would receiue no preiudice therby for Christ instituting marriage a Sacrament changed nothing of the ciuill contract which necessarily it includeth but only eleuated the said contract in as much as it is performed by persons baptised vnto the dignity of a Sacrament Wherfore seeing that in all other ciuill contracts the parties that doe contract are the efficient causes therof it plainly follows that a Christian man and a christian woman marrying together are efficient causes or ministers of the Sacrament of marriage Neither is the validity of the Sacrament preiudiced though both parties while they administer stand liable to mortall sin for the vnworthiness of the minister doth not destroy the essence of a Sacrament Baptism administred by a Pagan that applyeth the true matter and form with an intention conform to Christ's intention is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense howeuer no man can participate the fruits of any Sacrament that ieceiues it vnworthily CHAR. XVIIJ OF EXTREM-VNCTION THE CONTENTS Holy vnction which Christ instituted after his resurrection and S. James the Apostle promulgated ought to be ministred to the faithfull in extremity of sicknes onely and thence is called Extrom-vnction The Sacrament of holy vnction is made and perfected in as much as a Priest anointeth the sick in the room of Christ with oyle of Oliue blessed and consecrated by a Bishop and prayeth ouer him The guirt of healing by anoynting or laying on of hands practiced in the primitiue Church was not the holy vnction that S. Iames prescribeth in his catholick Epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priest's of the church and let them pray ouer him anointing him vvith oyle in the name of our lord Priest's in the administring of sacramentall vnction anointe the Organs of the siue senses vsing the form of words prescribed by the Roman Church which doubtless is the best EXtrem-vnction is a (a) According to the Councils of Floren in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. Extrem-vnction is a Sacrament of the new law and the greek Church euen after their fall into deadly shism fell not from the definition of the Councils set down as to Extrem-vnction for their Patriarch Ieremy reckoneth it amongst the Sacraments of the new law proper Sacrament of the new law wherby a christian belieuer constituted in eminent * Habetur in Concilio Floren quod SacrameutuÌ„ sacrae vnctionis
habetis Aaron Hurvobiscum si quid natum fuerit quaestionis referetis ad eos Aaron and Hur Iudges for the deciding all differences which might arise in the congregation during his absence Exod. 24 wherefore Christ infallibly hath ordained and appointed spirituall Gouernors of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church for the deciding all controuersies of faith and religion and for the preseruing of it in holiness to the world's end this doctrine is plainly euidenced by sundry most cleare prophesies vttered by Christ himselfe viz. Math. 16. the gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against it Math. 18. if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and a publican and Ioa. 16. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth Whereby clearly appear's that the very office of supream Iudge in order to deciding matters concerning faith and religion is proper to the Church and truly the Church and no other thing distinct from it can rightfully challenge the full essentiall proprietys or conditions here vnto required For example * In supremo iudice cōtrouersiarū requiri veritatem infallibilem in definiendo non tantum catholici sed illorū aduersarij fatentur v. g. vvhittakerus contro 10 de scrip quas 5. can 8. in 3. suo argumento alij quādo de hac re agunt Vnd. Ang. l. 1. de moribus Ecclesiae catholicae ait illam esse magistram totius sapientiae christianorum magistram castissimam not to be liable to errour at all in defining controuersies of faith and religion is one essentiall propertie in fallible verity being of necessitie ioyned to the authority of a supream Iudg that declareth sentence of iudgment in matters relating to faith which is inconsistent with errour and falshood God by a speciall and supernaturall prouidence hath constituted this Iudg in his place and appointed him as his immediate Ambassadour to propound to all christians the verity of faith least they be carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the craftiness of Satan which office or employment he could not execute if he were fallible in the execution thereof neither should christians acquiess in his proposalls and definitiue sentences vnless they knew or supposed him infallible that is not liable to errour matters of faith depending of diuine reuelation which is not seen An other necessary propriety required in the supream Iudg is authority to exact obedience vnto his ordinances which essentiall propriety Christ declared when speaking of the scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moyses chaire Math. 23. he said all therfore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe where the particles whatsoeuer they bid you obserue importe power and authority to propound vnto the Iews what they were to belieue and the particles that obserue and doe import an obligation to admit and receiue their ordinances and indeed euery common-wealth hath a supream Iudg or magistrate that propoundeth laws and ordinances vnto subiects and commandeth their compliance thereunto A third necessary propriety or condition required in this supream Iudg is to be visible and a cleare speaker Moyses visible and liuing said of himselfe as supream Iudg of the faithfull in those times Exod. 18. When they haue a matter of controuersy they come vnto mee and I iudg between one and another and declare the ordinances of God and the laws also this necessary condition appeareth by the command giuen to the people of Israel Deut. 17. thou shalt come vnto the Priests of the Leuites and to the Iudg that shall be in those daies and aske and they shall shew thee the sentence of iudgment besides Christs own words Math. 23. whatsoeuer they bid you obserue doe sufficiently manifest that the head Priests which sate in Moyses seate were visible liuing Iudges and indeed there is no ciuill nation that hath not a visible liuing and speaking law that is to say a supream Iudg or magistrate visible liuing and speaking for an vnliud and mute Iudg namely a meer written law cannot Iudg between one and another pronounce sentence of iudgment to the punishing of peruerse offenders or to declare ordinances to the suppressing of controuersies That the proprieties of this supream Iudg thus explaned be proper to the (b) By the Church is meant the high tribunall of faithfull Priests wherof the Chief visible head is the Bishop of Rome seated in the Chair of S. Peter and as he is the Chief and supream head so he is supream Iudge in consequence of which whosoeuer is affraid to be circumuented by the hardness of a question he ought to recur to him Church of Christ taken in the proper sense for a congregation of belieuing Christians including the supream visible Pastour it is plainly demonstrable for example that this Church is not liable at all to errour which is the first propriety appeares by Christs testimony alledged before Math. 16. the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it which importeth an absolute infallibility in defining propounding and teaching matters of faith for if the power of Satan that consisteth in crafty dealings to draw men into errour could ouercome the Church by making it teach any one false doctrine it would follow euidently that the gates of hell might preuaile against it in consequence of which Christ should not be faithfull in his promises Besids Christ saying Ioan. 19. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth meant that the Church should teach nothing of errour to the worlds end and indeed that promise was made to the Apostles and their successours in the ministery and Gouernmēt of the Church because Christ before Ioa. 14. had said expresly that the spirit of truth should abide with them for euer wherfore * Aug. l. de mor. Ecclesia catholica ait si quis metuit falli difficult ate alicuius quaestionis ad Ecclesiā esse recurrendū Jtem ait Christū habere Ecclesiā loco Synagogae Et Tom. 6. con Epis Manichaeorū Non crederem inquit Euangelio nisi Ecclesiae catholicae authoritas me cōmoueret whosoeuer is affraid least he may be deceiued through the difficulty of a hard question he ought to recur to the Church established in the room of the Synagogue for as the Pharisies and Scribes teaching in the Chaire of Moyses could not deuiate from the truth so neither can the pastours of our Christian Church sitting in the Chaire of S. Peter Secondly that the Church is inuested with power and authority to exacte from the faithfull obedience to her ordinances which is the second propriety of this supream Iudg Christ Math. 18. plainly declareth saying if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as a heathen man and a publican that is let him be excommunicated as appeareth by Christs words immediatly following * Verba illa Christi quaecunque alligaueritis super terram intelligenda sunt de censuris ecclesiasticis id etiam fatetur Cal. l. 4. insti Whatsoeuer
re shall hind vppon earth shall be bound in Heauen which is meant of ecclesiasticall Censures the greatest of which is excommunication Again Act. 15. when the new christians referred their controuersie concerning circumcision and other ceremonies of the law of Moyses to the Apostles at Ierusalem sentence of iudgment was declared by one accord thus It seemed good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burthen vpon you then these necessary things c. Wherby it is cleare that the Apostles then the representatiue Church were inuested with authority to make ordinances (c) It appeares plainly by the sacred text Act. Jt seems good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burden vpon you then these that the Apostles had authority to commande and exact obedience to their ordinances For the particles it seems good to vs to lay no more burden Shew euidently that they were superiours inuested with authority to commande and exact obedience from the people who were bound to obey them But here is obseruable that as to the matter in debate mentioned in the Chapter set down viz. whether the conuerted Gentils were obliged to obserue the law of Moyses S. Peter in that Council cald to determine it was supream Iudge for t' is written that after much dispute Peter rose vp and as head of all spoke first and decided the controuersy in fauour of the said conuerted Gentils deliuering them from the bondage of the old law and all the multitude saith S. Hierom Tom. 2. Epis 89. Augus cap. 2. kept silence and into Peters sentence or definition the Apostles S. Iames and all the Priests past with one accorde and euer since the Popes of Rome as S. Peters lawfull successors haue had precedence and the deciding suffrage in all Councils which are of credit and authoritie in the Church of God and to oblige the faithfull in the obseruation of them for the words It seemed good to vs to lay no more burden vpon you doe signify the authority of superiours to commande inferiours and the obligation of inferiours to obey their superiours Thirdly that the Church is liuing visible and speaking which is the third propriety of this Iudg is clearly expressed Act. 20. take heed to your selues and the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of god which he hath purchased with his own blood and Again Math. 5. (d) According to S. Aug. trac in 1. epis Ioan. those are blind which cannot fee so great a mountaine and shut their eyes against the clear light put on a candlestick which is the Church of God the Church is stiled a Citty that is set on a mountaine which cannot be bid but no man can conceiue how Bishops can gouerne a Church which they see not or how a Citty set on a high mountaine can lie hid Besids all the Church offices ioynt and seperate do declare it visible liuing ad speaking neither matters it that the Church is known by faith which is of things not seen for the Apostles when they conuersed with Christ vpon earth they both saw and belieued him to be Christ As the Apostles saw Christ to be aman and belieued him to be God soe wee doe see the Church to be a congregation of men outwardly professing the faith of Christ and doe belieue that it is directed by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost and as it cannot be euinced that a man is inuisible because an inuisible soul gouerneth him soe neither can it be euinced that the Church is inuisible because the supernaturall gifts of the holy Ghost namly faith hope and charitie wherby the Church is gouerned and men made children therof be inuisible From the premises is euidently deducible (e) S. Austin li. 10. de doct christ disputing against such as pretended to the knowledge of holy scriptures by speciall reuelations dissuades euery man from so proud and dangerous a tentation as to presume that he is taught of God and not of men and this caueat he vrgeth by many examples that the priuate spirit which is to say the particular reuealing spirit wherby as many sectaries conceiue euery priuate belieuer is enabled to interpret scriptures and iudge all matters concerning faith and religion hath no good claime to the office of this suprem Iudge beeing neither seen nor heard to speak clearly nor known certainly to be infallible in what it reuealeth to each particular belieuer in priuat for it may prudently be doubted whether it be a good spirit or not since false ministers can transforme themselues into Apostles of Christ and Satan himselfe into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11. in consequence of which no wise and iudicious man can rely his eternity on such a priuat reuealing spirit Again God according to his ordinary way doth not immediatly himselfe reueale verities of faith to euery one in particular or iudge himselfe between party and party from the begining of the creation down to these times his prouidence hath ordained men to declare his ordinances vnto men appointed men to teach men and constituted men suprem Iudges of men for the determining of all hard matters in debate concerning faith and religion In the law of nature Abraham was made Teacher of men I know speaking of Abraham that he will command his son and family after him that they keepe the way of our lord Gen. 18. In the written law Moyses was constituted to teach the people of God the diuine ordinances and to shew vnto them the way wherein they were to walke and the worke they were to doe Exod. 18. and Deut. 17. the Priests of the Leuits were deputed supreme Iudges of controuersies which might rise about religion also Malac. 2. it is written the Priests lips shall preserue knowledg and they shall seek the law from his mouth In our new law of grace the Apostles were sent into diuers parts of the world to preach christian religion Mar. vltime Act. 8. God appointed Saint Philip to teach the Eunuch of Ethiopia Act. 9. Christ sent Saul to be instructed of Ananias and Act. 10. Cornelius the Centurion was admonished by an Angel to repaire vnto Saint Peter that he might learn of him matters of câ—ristian faith wherfore Saint Paul says Rom. 10. Faith is by heating and hearing by the word of God and how shall they heare without a preacher because ordinarily God teacheth men by men the verities of faith and Gal. 1. the same Apostle doubted not to prefer the doctrine he preached before the doctrine of an Angel from Heauen that should preach otherwise and truly if it were lawfull for euery man to follow and adhere to his own priuate spirit there would rise almost as many contrary religions as there are men liuing vpon the earth and consequently in room of that peace that Christ hath promised to the Church nothing but disorder and confusion would happen wherfore both in the old and new law this
prinat spirit is condemned for example in the old law Numb 12. God was angry with Mary Moyses Sister and Aaron because they had detracted from Moyses she saying hath our lord spoken only by Moyses hath be not spoken also by vs and Ierem. 23. Heare not the words * S. Hieron ait falsos illos prophetas referre baereticos qui sequuntur spirituÌ„ suuÌ„ quia nequaquam inquit diuino instinctu sed proprio corde vaticinantur of the Prophets that prophesie vnto you and deceiue you they speak the visions of their own hearts and not out of the mouth of our lord and Ezech. 13. God saith thus woe vnto the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit yet say the lord saith it albeit I haue not spoken likewise in the new law this priuat spirit is condemned for in the primary age of the Church (f) Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 12. attests that Cherintus besides his other prophane nouelties fained subtil delusions as reuealed vnto him by the ministery of Angels and according to the same Eusebius l. 5. cap. 15. Montanus and Maximilla were carried away with delusions of the like nature for among the reasons why they were cut of from the Church of God one was because they pretended vnto speciall reuelations and the Church declared that it was a thing contrary to the custom and practice down from the Apostles till those times that any particular person should presume to haue a priuat spirit reuealing vnto him matters pertaning to christian faith Cherintus was counted an Heretick for pretending vnto priuat reuelations in the spreading of sundry absurd doctrines and in as much as he asserted that Iesus-Christ was not come in the flesh Saint Ioan. Apostle Epis 1. cap. 4. writeth to the faithfull against him thus Dearly beloued belieue not euery spirit but trie the spirits whether they are of God for many false prophets are gon out into this world hereby you shall know the spirit of God euery spirit which confesseth that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is of God and euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Yet althought the Apostle vsed that analogie in order to this true article of faith Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh as a certain signe to shew the falshood of Cherintus assertion neuertheless he did not mean to establish it for a generall rule to distinguish euery good from euery ill spirit or euery true from euery false doctrine for the Pelagians and sundry ancient sectaries are counted Hereticks both by Lutherans and Caluinists albeit they acknowleged the mistery of the Incarnation But the generall rule for the trying of spirits Saint Iohn clearly expresseth a very little after in his same Epistle saying Wee Apostles are of God he that knoweth God heareth vs he that is not of god heareth vs not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of errour In regard his first particular rule was not sufficient enough to discerne between euery true and false doctrine that is to say between all true and false Teachers therfore he addeth this generall rule viz. To heare or not to heare vs Apostles Gouernours of the Church alluding to Christs own words set down I uc 10. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Saint Iohn spoke in the person of all the Apostles and their successors in Church Gouerment with whom is deposited christian doctrine receiued from the mouth of Christ and truly it is very probable that no one of the other Apostles was aliue when Saint Iohn writ his Epistle yet what Christ promised Mat. 28. behold I am with you alwayes untill the end of the world remained then in him and euen now in the Prelats of the Church that succeed the Apostles in the administration therof wherby it is cleare that the office of supream Iudge of coÌ„trouersies in debate concerning faith and religion is proper to ecclesiasticall authoritie only howeuer in as much as no man can come vnto Christ except the Father which hath sent him draw him Ioa. 6. inward grace of the holy Ghost is necessarily required to belieue in and loue God aright vnto the obseruation of his ordinances and law of which is meant the prophesies Ierem. 31. I will put my law saith our lord in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Isa 50. and all thy children shall be taught of our lord to witt by inward grace which excludeth not outward Teachers for faith is by heareing and hearing importeth outward Teachers Moyses and the Prophets of those daies taught the people in as much as they declared vnto them outwardly the lawes of God affording nothing of inward help to the seeking of them but Christ truly God cloathed with human flesh taught by himselfe in our new law both outwardly preaching the doctrine of faith and inwardly instilling into the hearts of his people inward grace for the embracing of it and afterward before his ascention into heauen appointed outward visible Teachers and promised withall his own inward inuisible concurrence with them to the end of the world Wherfore doubtless the alledged scripturs will show only the maiority of Christ compared to Moyses and the Prophets in order to teaching matters of faith and religion together (g) According to holy scripture Io. 1. the law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ The old law pointed at sin onely and made it known but the new law furnishes grace to fulfill it and purge out of our souls the leauen of sin with the plenteous measure of grace especially annexed to the new law in respect wherof it is stiled the law of grace neither is this necessity of outward Teachers excluded by the saying of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 2. he that is spirituall discerneth all things and he himselfe is iudged of noe man Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 2. ye need not that any man teach you but as his vnction teacheth you all things and it is true and is notlying and Saint Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 5. he that belieueth in the son of God hath the testimony of God in himselfe for as to the first text Saint Paul spoke of the spirituall man only that is to say of such beliuers as were perfect and knowing of christian doctrine and therby apt to discern false opinions and conceiue the high mysteries of faith declared by word of mouth or writing which is not to exclude outward Teachers and that this is the true meaning appeareth by the Apostle himselfe because he says in the very same Chapter set down We speak wisdom among them that are perfect and we speake wisdom in a mystery wherby he seâ—teth the spirituall maÌ„ against the naturall man that is versed only in the wisdom of the world or in the knowledge of naturall things and in the third Chapter of the same Epistle
he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
carefully heauenly Angels endeauour to bring mortalls vnto eternall blessedness being they reioyce in the repentance of a sinner Wherefore Orig. hom 1. in Ezech. prayeth his Angel to receiue him conuerted from his former errour reioyce at the conuersion of a sinner Luc. 15. Besids according to the common vsage of the primatiue Church one beleeuing christian bargained with an other that he who went first to Heauen should pray for him that abided on earth Let vs saith S. Cyprian Epis 57. pray mutually one for an other and whether of vs two shall through the diuine mercy be first called for let his loue continue and his prayers not cease for his brethren and sisters in the world In like manner S. Hierome spoke to Heliodorus Epis 1. cap. 2. saying that when he is once in Heauen he will pray for him that exhorted and encouraged him to embrace a monasticall state of life Moreouer in the law of nature Abraham made intercession to an Angel for his sons Ioseph Ephraim and Manasse Gen. 48. the Angel which hath deliuered me from all euill bless these children And albeit it cannot be proued that in any time during the old Testament the people of God prayed directly to the holy Patriarkes and Prophets after their decease in regard then the Saints departed were not translated into Heauen and inuested with whiâ—e cloathes of glory their habitation being vnder the earth as in a prison 1. Petri 2. neuertheless they made intercession to God humbly asking of him mercy and grace through the merits of the said Patriarches and Prophets * Psal 131. memeÌ„to Domini Dauid omnis mansuetudinis eius propter Dauid seruum tuuÌ„ non auertas faciem Christi tui Salomon asked of God meet helpe in regard of his Father Dauids great merits * Exod. recordare Domine Abraham Isaac Jacob scruoruÌ„ tuum and Moyses in respect of the good workes of Abraham Isack and Israel the faithfull seruants of God Likewise the ancient Iews made intercession to God through the prayers of their progenitors departed And the holy Prophet Ieremy (k) Baruch cap. 3. prayeth thus O lord omnipotent God of Jsra Heare the prayer of the dead of Israel and though some sectaries count Baruch as apocryphall neuertheless the ancient Fathers and Councills haue ranked that book with diuine scripture both vnder the name of Ieremy Baruchs vncle and vnder the inscription of Baruch which is more proper Again the Councill of Laodicea in the last canon mentioneth Baruchs lamentations and Ieremyes Epistles Moreouer the Councils of Florence and Trent haue defined this catholick truth after his death praid much for the people of Israel 2. Mach. 75. Neither doth the Prophet Isaias preiudice this catholike truth saying cap. 63. Abraham knew vs not and Israel was ignorant of vs for he meant only that Abraham and Iacob did not acknowledge the Iews of those days for their children because of their greiuous sinns and iniquities as the ancient Fathers interpret that scripture Nor Ecclesiastes when hee saith the dead know noe more and haue reward noe more For his meaning is not to take all vnderstanding and knowledge from soules remoued out of their bodyes but to inculcate vnto vs that it is impossible after our departure out of this world to merit a reward the time of this life being a necessarie requisite there to according to Christs own testimony Io. 9. the night cometh when noe man can worke But now the ingagement mentioned in the character of Purgatory calleth for an answere vnto the Digbean White that hath studied diuinity 40. yeares who as to the contents of this character mainly resisteth the constant (l) Mr. White in the third account of the midle state of souls boldly asserts that though to pray for the blessed be against the common practice of the Church neuertheless he is not of so vveake a stomack as not to digest that morsell so that he maks not only the Church liable to errour as to manners and doctrines vniuersally receiued approued and practiced which is a manifest heresy but himselfe the Churches Reformer and vniuersall practice of the Catholick Church agreeing with so large and euident testimony of scriptures Councills and Fathers as are set down for example in the third accompt of his midle state of souls to proue that the ancient practice of the Church was to pray for the dead euen after their souls were beatified He alledged the 2. Epis and 1. cap. to Timothie where the Apostle thus prays for Onesiphorus Our lord grant him Onesiphorus to find mercy from our lord in that day by which words this knowing Master that hath studyed 40. years to build a Theology on Digbean peripateticks will of necessity proue that S. Paul prayed that Onefiphorus might find mercy after he was beatified Shall I deny saith he the Apostle prayed that Onesiphorus might find mercy euen after his soule was beatified the Text on all sides confessed for bids me what then will our aduersaries say this was not to pray for the blessed common sense permit's them not S. Paul did it But doubtless no knowing man in Theology or ecclesiasticall historie that is vnpartiall dare say for his credits sake that Mr. White doth clearly proue against the whole practice of the Church that the faithfull on earth must pray for the blessed because the Apostle prayed for Onesiphorus saying Our lord grant vnto him that he may find mercy of our lord in illo die in that day for Onesiphorus was not dead when S. Paul prayed that he might find mercy of our lord in illo die In consequence of which Mr. Whites inference from the words alledged carries no weight with it at all being grounded vpon a very false supposall Howeuer the good prayer of the Apostle was not in vain for according to the martyrologes both Latine and Greek Onesiphorus was honored afterward with a crown of martyrdom in Hellespont in consequence wherof doubtless he found mercy of our lord in that day that is in the day of particular iudgment after his death for it is the constant Tenet of the Catholick Church * Apoc. 14. Beati mortui qui in Domino moriuntur à modo iam dicit spiritus vt requiescant à laboribus suis Hic sacer textus osteÌ„dit beatos morientes id est martyres aliosque fideles decedentes perfectè iustos sine omni macula reatu poenae id est obligatione ad poenam noÌ„ expectaturos vniuersale iudicium vt accipiaÌ„t beatitudinem ita explicat S. Aug. l. 20. de ciuit cap. 9. that martyrs by their death suffered for the confessing of Christs faith be perfectly purged of sin both in order to the guilt and paines therof and immediatly possess their glorious crowns which is the beatificall vision as S. Austin lib. de peccatorum meritis expresly teacheth saying he that prayeth for a martyr doth an iniury to a martyr The same doctrine the Councill of Trent ses
5. asserteth touching children that die immediatly after baptism notwithstanding they will receiue aduantages in order to their bodies in the day of generall resurrection But as to Onesiphorus Mr. White perhaps will answer that the Apostle supposeth him dead because in the same Chapter t is said Our lord giue mercy to the house of Onesiphorus Yet that form of speech doth not make him dead for the Apostle sayeth Rom. 10. salute them which are of Aristobulus his house and Mr. White cannot make it appeare by any orthodox writer that then Aristobulus was dead again the same Apostle 1. Cor. 10. writeth thus now brethren I beseech you ye know the house of Stephanus and Fortunatus be you obedient vnto such and yet it is certaine that Stephanus and Fortunatus were liuing at that time for the Apostle saith in the same Chapter I am glad of the coming or presence of Stephanus and Fortunatus Howeuer the Latine and Greek Martyrologes ought to carrie more weight with wise and iudicious men then Mr. Whites meer asserting the contrary But let his supposall be admitted gratis what doth he infer thence Mary that the soul of Onesiphorus bath not already found that mercy the Apōstle prayed our lord might grant vnto him because the Apostle praid that Onesiphorus might find it in illo die in that day In earnest a manifest weake inference in regard it relies on a false supposall as the former did viz. that of necessity by illo die thay day is meant the day of generall iudgment neither doth Mr. White produce any proofe besids his own bare assertion to shew that to be the Apostles meaning nor indeed can he produce any for both the words that day as likwise euen the words the day of our lord doe commonly signifie in scripture and namly 1. Cor. 5. 2. Cor. 1. Philip. 1. 1. Thes 2. as doe * Doctores Rhemenses in Annot a. super cap. 3. Epis 1. ad Cor. obserue Catholicke writers either the particular or generall iudgment And doubtless the mentioned Text of the Apostle is truly very fied in respect of particular judgment where vnto euery man is liable immediatly after his death because euery one shall be iudged in the generall iudgment according to the account he giues after his death at the particular tribunall of diuine Iustice and not only the fauour that a soul findeth in the generall iudgment but also the fauour that it finds at the particular iudgment is called in the scripture mercy both the one and the other being shown vpon the score of good works which proceed from the mercyfull grace of God through the merits of our lord Iesus-Christ Hereby plainly appeareth the vnquietness of Mr. Whits hawty spirite for as much as through a sacrilegious ambition he endeauours to wrest the Apostles words to ouerthrow the common practice of the whole Church of God Moreouer in persuance of his vnquiet ambition he passeth from this scripture-text vnto Church Lyturgies bearing himselfe confident to euidence thereby that the vnanimous consent of antiquitie witnes plainly on his side Let S. Iames be our first witness saith he in his lyturgy of the Hierosolymitan Church be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Thou grant them there to rest in the region of the liuing in thy kingdom in the delights of paradise And to assure the reader that the Hierosolymitan Church which by origine is the Cheif in as much as she begun from the iust Abell could not exclude any he produceth S. Cyrills testimony for which he citeth his first catechesis next faith S. Cyril for the holy Fathers and Bishops departed and of all vniuersally who are dead from amongst vs. The second witness S. Basils Mass or lyturgy Bee mindfull also of all who haue slept in hope of resurrection vnto life euerlasting The third witnes S. Chrys Mass or lyturgy For the memory and remission of their sins who were the founders of this habitation worthy of eternall memory and all who haue slept in thy communion in the hope of resurrection and life eternall our orthodox Fathers and brethren The fourth witness S. Marks Mass or lyturgy Giue rest our lord our God to the souls of our Fathers and brethren who haue slept in the faith of Christ mindfull of our Ancestours from the begining of the world Fathers Patriarks Prophets Apostles Martyrs Confessors Bishops Saints and iust men all the souls of Those who departed in the faith of Christ and moreouer of those whose memory this day we celebrate and our holy Father Marke the Euangelist to the souls of all these giue rest our supream lord and God in thy holy Tabernacle c. and he concludes saith Mr. White to their souls grant rest and admit them to the kingdom of Heauen The fift witnes S. Greg. the great his lyturgy Remember also o lord thy seruants who haue gone before vs with the sign of faith and now rest in the sleep of peace To them our lord and all that rest in Christ wee beseech the grant a place of ease and light and peace From the witnesses set down Mr. White argueth thus So many Patriarchall Churches continually in their publick lyturgyes beseech God in generall tearmes to giue saluation to all the faithfull departed assigning them a place of ease light and peace and where none is excepted all are included and in our case eminent Saints particularly named we cannot therefore doubt but that prayer was anciently offered for the blessed that is to say we cannot doubt but that the ancient Churches offered prayers for such as departed in the faith of Christ that they might find mercy saluation place of ease light and peace euen after their souls were beatified these aduantages according to Mr. White being the motiues on which ancient Churches grounded their prayers suffrages and sacrifices which they offered for such as were already blessed that they might find mercy place of ease light and peace which implies manifest weakness for he contradicts himselfe since blessedness is a clear sight of God importing of necessity saluation mercy place of ease light and peace Wherfore it seems a strang thing that vpon such premises he should conclude with soe much confidence as if the point were euidently clear that the anciēt lyturgyes acknowleged prayers for the blessed as to procuring them mercy saluation place of ease light and peace besides it s not as to reason consonant that the said lyturgyes should require the prayers and sacrifices of the faithfull on earth for the aduantages of the blessed in Heauen since these (m) As to the Churches lyturgyes it is obseruable 1. That in Saint Iames lyturgy these words are set down Let vs celebrate the memory of the most holy immaculate most glorious Mother of God and euer Virgin Mary and of all the Saints that through their prayers vve may obtaine
mercy Whereby it is euident that the Apostle did not conceiue that our prayers might benefit the Saints vnto the obtaining of mercy or an encrease of glory but that wee might be saued and glorified through their prayers 2. S. Basil in his lyturgy prayeth thus O lord let none of vs receiue the holy body and blood of thy Christ vnto iudgment or condemnation but vnto finding of mercy and grace in the society of all the Saints vvhich haue been pleasing in thy sight Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs Confessors .... specially the holy Immaculate Virgin blessed lady Mother of God through vvhose intercession visit vs o God After the same manner S. Chrys prayeth in his lyturgy but Mr. White conceals these parts of the lyturgyes as all moderne sectaries haue done afore altering the lyturgyes as he doth to proue that souls departed are not translated into Heauen before the generall resurrection Nicolaus Cabasalas a Greek Author who about 300. yeares agoe set forth an exposition of the Greek lyturgy affirms cap. 33. that to offer sacrifice for the Saints is to giue God thanks for them For the Saints saith he the Church offereth this rationall vvorship and honour as a thanks giuing to God and especially for the blessed Mother of God vvho exceeds all others in sanctity from whence he infers that a Preist prays not for the Saints but prayeth them that he may be assisted by them in his prayers And cap. 49. saith expresly that if a Preist should properly pray in the Mass for the Saints it would follow that he should pray for the blessed Virgin who is aboue all intercession and more holy by many degrees then the Apostles themselues Besids in the whole Chapter 49. he impugnes those who taught that a Preist prayeth in the Mass for Saints and shews clearly that the Latin praeposition pro. in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in English for is not alwaies a token of intercession but sometymes of thanksgiuing which he proues euidently enough from the words of the lyturgy Again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometymes signifies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in the room of an other so that to offer sacrifice for the Saints may signifie to giue thanks to God in the name or room of the Saints in order to the many graces and benefits which his diuine goodness hath confer'd vpon them And though this Author was a schismatick neuertheless he deliuered plainly the sense of the Greek Church and his authority is warrantable being put with the ancient Fathers lyturgies giue clear euidence of prayers and intercessions made to the blessed Saints for the releife of all the faithfull both liueing and dead that stand charged with any guilt or defiled with any vncleanes Again to shew the extreame wantonnes of Mr. Whites witt in order to singularitie t is certaine that down from the first age of the Church to these times he cannot produce one amongst all the ancient and moderne orthodox writers that interprets the said Masses or liturgyes in his sense to wit of prayers and sacrifices offered for the aduantage of the blessed these hauing noe need in regard they are satiated with the plenty of the house of God satisfyed with the fountaine of life conforted with the son of light and inebriated with euerlasting pleasurs Psal 35. wherby t is euidently manifest that although blessed Saints be commemorated in the lyturgyes of the Church and the August sacrifice of Christs precious body and blood is said to be offered for them Neuertheless it is neuer said or meant that such commemorations and offerings were done to benefit them and indeed to offer the Churches sacrifices for the ancient Fathers Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs according to the approued interpretation of all orthodox writers is thereby to celebrate their memory vnto honoring and reuerencing them and to beseech God that through their prayers and intercessions he will heare our prayers and supplications We all saith S. Cyrill Hierosoll catechesi 5. mystigogica where he explaines the words of the Greeke lyturgy beseech thee and offer vnto thee this sacrifice in commemoration euen of those who are dead from amongst vs. First of the Patriarcks Apostles Martyrs that God through their intercessions may receiue our prayers After the same manner speaks S. Austin in his 17. Sermon vpon the words of the Apostle 'T is saith he the practice and custome of the Church which the faithfull know that when martyrs are commemorated at the Altar of God we pray not for them but for the rest commemorated which are dead from amongst vs wee doe pray because it is an iniurie to pray for a Martyr to whose prayers we ought to be recommended Hereby is further euidenced that albeit the lyturgyes especially some of those which Mr. White alledges on his side seem to direct the suffrages of the Church wherof the sacrifice of the Altar is Cheife euen to the helping of such as be departed in the faith of Christ rest in peace and are counted for eminent Saints already Howeuer that seeming apparence ought to be ascribed to the intricacy of the lyturgyes wherin words and sentences are obscurly set down and the meaning of the Church thereby is to be vnderstood in order only to such faithfull departed as haue need of helpe Wherfore S. Tho. supp q. 71. art 8. teacheth that the blessed Saints in regard they haue full enioyment of all things in as much as they are satisfied with the fatnes of the house of God haue noe need of the Churches suffrages and S. Cyrill Cateches afore mentioned where he explicats the words of the Greek lyturgy writeth thus We pray to God for the common peace of the Church for the tranquility of the whole world for kings for souldiers for the sick for the afflicted in sum for all which haue need of help Which shows euidently enough that the ancient Churches neuer offered their suffrages for the helping of the blessed Saints that suffer nothing of want But lord God what crafty dealings Mr. White vseth to bring the stream of Church lyturgyes to run on his side some words he cuts of others cites amiss and especially omits what concernes the B. Mother of God as likwise the ad dresses the Church maks to the Saints of God for helpe through their supplications and intercessions besides to proue more particularly that S. Iames lyturgy of the Hierosolomitan Church allows of prayer for the benefit of the dead vniuersally in as much as it saith be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Mr. White addeth these words But let vs consider more particularly the point of praying for the blessed the Hierosolymitan Church is by origine the Chief the begining from the iust Abell cannot certainely be supposed to exclude any and S. Cyril the Heire of S. lames in his first Catechesis will assure vs she
did not adding next Cyrillus for the holy Fathers and Bishops departed and of all vniuersally which are dead from amongst vs. Where is obseruable Mr. Whites crafty dealing for in the fift catechesis of S. Cyril the words set down by him appeare not that catechesis containing only an explication of faith in order to its definition which is substance of things hoped for and a conuiction of things vnseen Howeuer the said words cited by him are extant in the first mystigogicall catechesis of S. Cyril who before he coms at those words set down by Mr. White to proue that the Hierosolymitan Church prayed for the blessed writeth thus when we offer this sacrifice afterward we make commemoration of those also who are dead afore first of the Patriarkes Prophetes Apostles Martyres that God by their prayers and intercessions may receiue our prayers But Mr. White leaueth out these words which sheweth his crafty and subtill dealing Again the words of S. Cyril that * Uerba subsequētia hac sunt maximū est animarum iuuamen pro quibus offertur obsecratio sancti illius tremendi quod in altari positum est sacrificii quod exemplo demonstrare volumus scio enim multos dicere quid iuuat animam in peccatis ex hoc mundo decedentem etiamsi in hoc sacrificio mentio fiat illius Ansi rex aliquis eos à quibus offensus est in exilium pepulerit postea vero illorum propinqui coronam aliquam conficientes pro his qui in supplicio sunt exulibus eidem regi offerrent nonne condonationem aliquam suppliciorum dederit ad eūdem medū nos pro defunctis precationes adhibemus follow the words set down by Mr. White doe preiudice his doctrine of the midle state of soules and therefore on purpose he omits those likwise The same crafty dealing he employes about S. Marks lyturgy that is of Alexandria for there he omits mentioning the precedent of which the subsequent words depend and ioynes words together which haue nothing of connexion For example the words Of our Fathers and bretheren who haue slept in the saith of Christ down to the words and moreouer of those whose memory this day we celebrate and our holy Father Marke who taught vs the way of saluation doe not containe a prayer for the Saints because the Euangelist saith expresly grant vnto them rest mindfull of the Saints that is mindfull of them through the intercession of the Saints but truly the subsequent words to wit To thesoules of all those giue rest haue no relation to the precedent commemoration Neither doe the particles of all those giue rest comprehend the Saints commemorated afore in regard that both afore and after those words is recited the angelicall salutation Aue Maria and after this is expressed in the lyturgy that the Deacon readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the holy tables containing a Catalogue of all the faithfull departed afterward saith the lyturgy the Priest decently bows his body and prayeth vttering the words set downe viz To the souls of all those giue rest our supream lord that is to the souls of all those which be contained in the said Catalogue the names whereof the Deacon had read and whereas S. Marke concluds saying To their soules I say grant rest and admit them to the kingdom of Heauen that conclusion is only a repetition of the precedent prayer To the soules of all these giue rest our supream lord and God and consequently did not relate vnto the blessed Saints that had no need of such a prayer but to those named in the Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that receiued help After the like manner Mr. White dealeth in citing the Roman or S. Gregorie the greats lyturgy which is thus Remember alsoe O lord thy seruants N.N. that is such as I name or intend to pray for who haue gone before vs with the signe of faith and now rest in the sleep of peace After which words the Preist according to the rubricke there set down ioynes his hands together and prayes during a little while for the said N.N. which he nameth or intendeth to pray for * Innocentius Alexaner Sūmi Pontifices item Gabriel Albertus disertè docēt post verba illa dormiunt in somno pacis debere fieri memoriam specialē non vniuersalem vt perperam dicit Albius defunctorum parētum corū quibus missam specialster applicare voluerit sacerdos his potius credendum est quā Albio and afterward only it followeth To them O lord and all the rest in Christ we beseech thee grant a place of ease and light and peace whereby t is manifest that Mr. White weakly if not craftily goes about to proue from those words that S. Gregorie prayed for all who were baptized and departed in the communion of the Church And indeed soe it should follow that he prayed for the most blessed Virgin that is aboue intercession exceeding all the Angels in sanctity But t is great pity that the extream wantoness of Mr. Whits witt should so carry him away and soe harden his mouth and fortifie his stomack as to disgest a morsell of doctrine that by his own confession contradicts the generall practice of the whole Church Furthermore to cleare more amply all these and other obiections which sectaries commonly draw from vncertainties and intricacies of Church lyturgyes to preiudice Catholick verities there is nothing of absurdity or inconueniency if we answere them that the holy church represents therin the departure of Saints out of the world that is the exact time when their souls were remouing out of their bodyes for example in the Mass for the dead when t' is celebrated for such as died some hundred yeares afore the Church in that prayer of the offertory Our lord Iesus Christ deliuer the souls of all the faithfull departed from the paines of hell from the deep lake from the lions mouth let not bell swallow them vp represēts those souls vnto Christ as if euen then they were departing and considers them as if euen then they were in the agonie of death and therby noe lye is committed for a Priest celebrating the Mass of the fourth sunday in Aduent does truly say without lying Drop down yee Heauens from aboue and let the clouds raine the iust Send downe the lambe the ruler of the earth Because the Church therby only represents the humble supplications of the ancient Patriarks and Prophets for the accelerating of Christs preordained coming into the world as if they were present in that moment of time when those holy Fathers soe prayed And truly that glorious Emperour Charles the first by the aduice of his Ghostly Father commanded that his funerall should be celebrated and the office and the Mass likewise of the dead sung for him as if he had been dead indeed when he was aliue The premisses euidence enough the true sense and meaning of the Churches lyturgyes against all
hereticall interpretations Howeuer an answer shall of Mr. Whits proofes To wit nor is it saith he infrequent among the pious when they name a Saint or Martyr to adde whose glory God increase Hereby Mr. white either means essentiall or accidentall glory if he vnderstand an increase of essentiall glory in order to the intensnes therof he teacheth an heresy for the Church of God ascribes such an increase of blessednes * Concil Flor. in dee vnionis desinit animas beatorū videre clarè Deum sicut◠est sed alian◠alia perfectius pro diuersitate meritorum Et definitum est sess 6. can 32. iustificatum bonis operibus augmētum gratiae mereri ita profit entur veteres Patres Et ratio distributiua iustitiae exigit vt plus merenti maior reddatur morces to the Saints own merits and not to the prayers of their friends according to that saying of the Apostle 2. Cor. 9. He that soweth sparingly reapes alsoe sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reap also liberally and indeed it is the proprietie of distributiue iustice to better the reward in order to such as deserue better and God compenseth the merits of his faithfull according to destributiue iustice but if Mr. White vnderstand an increase of accidentall glory either in order to speciall reuelations of mysteries whereof the Saints were ignorant afore or in order to a greater measure of honour and reuerence from the faithfull aliue that makes nothing to his purpose and in that sense may be meant that saying (n) According to the Roman Catholick Church a Priest preparing himselfe to say Mass prayeth thus I vill say Muss and offer in saecrifice the body and blood of our lord Iesus Christ to the prayse of God and the vvhole triumphant Court Now if by praying soe he prayeth for the blessed he prayeth for God also being he promiseth therby to offer sacrifice to the praise of both in cosequence of which S. Paul likwise 1. Tim. 1. prayed for God when he said vnto the king of vvorlds immortall inuisible sole God be bonour and glory for euer and euer amen But were it not an extream madness to think that S. Paul by praying so conceiued that he might bring vnto God an encrease of glorie Howeuer Mr. White will needs haue the words of the prayers set down in the Roman lyturgie after the offertorie Receiue vvhat vve offer to the honour of thy Saints c. to proue it lawfull to pray for Saints that thereby they may find mercy and encrease of glory But S. Thomas 3. p. q. 71. art 8. in resp ad 1. obiec saith that when we celebrate the feasts of Saints their glory is not augmented by that solemnity but we receiue greate benefit thereby and euen so saith he when we giue praise to God we and not God receiue benefit thereby from the premises clearly appeares how vnaduisedly Mr. White in the 3. account of the midle state of souls alleageth S. Greg. to proue that the blessed receiue encrease of glory through the prayers of the faithfull liuing Sed mira sunt qua docet Albius noua sunt mira stupemus noua cauemus Aug. l. 3. con Iulia. Whose glory God encrease and after that sense Christians pray Glory be to the Father to the son and to the holy Ghost Amen CHAR. XXIJ. OF FOVNDAMENTALL AND NOT foundamentall Articles of faith T' Is a moderne distinction that was ingeniously contriu'd by (a) Marke Anthony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatto became an Apostate fled out of Italy into England in the Reign of king Iames of happy memory and taught that a Christian might be saued in any sect professing the foundamentall Articles of Christian faith as for example said he euery one may attaine vnto saluation either by adhering to S. Thomas doctrine or the doctrine of Scotus Marke Anthony de Dominis Arsh-Bishop of Spalatto and brought into the Protestant Church in order to the said Churches claim vnto as to foundamentall and disclaim from the Roman Church as to not foundamentall Articles of faith that is as to errours in order to such Articles of faith as may be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation though sufficiently propounded in regard whereof they beare the name of not foundamentall * Protestātes communiter constituunt hocdiscrimen inter fundamentales non fundamentales quod scilicet damnabile sit ab illis dissentire cū sufficienter proponūtur non item dissentire à nō fundamentalibus dum sufficienter proponūtur vt vniuersalitatem amplitudinē suae Ecclesiae estendant as disinct frō foundamētals which cā not be reiected without incurring both loss of faith and saluation in consequence wherof Protestans of theses dayes commonly represent the Roman Church as a naturall body that is partly sound and partly vnsound infected with sundry soares and vlcers which is to say that although the Roman Church hath continued alwaies sound at heart hauing neuer deuiated from the true doctrin of Christ as to foundamentall requisits vnto saluation neuertheless she still retaines sundry errours in order to not foundamentall requisits which they pretend to haue purged away and therby make their Church to be the same with the Roman Church as to the sound part therof Marke Antony de Dominis saw a necessity of inuesting the Protestant Church with visible existence least it might appeare to haue perished afore and with perpetuall succession of Pastors and Teachers these being of necessary vse in the gouernment therof for as much as they be essentially required to the professing of faith preaching the diuine word instructing the illiterat and administring the Sacraments which functions could neuer haue been performed if the Church of God wherof these be necessary markes had been inuisible and therby destitute of Pastors for the work of the ministery wherfore to fit vnto the Protestant Church visible existence and a series of Pastors and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from the Apostls he aduiced such as carried on the Protestant Reformation not to quitte all claim to the Roman Church without which visible existence and perpetuall succession of their Church had been impossible since no one society of Christian belieuers appeared vpon earth when the Protestant Reformation begun that was seperated from the Church of Rome Again he saw that by asserting the Romā Church to haue in all times reserued necessary requisits vnto saluation that is foundamentall Articles of faith it might seem as to reason consonant that the Protestants departure from it had been without cause and thereby they as to reason might be counted guilty * Secundum Aug. l. 1. con Epis Parm. cap. 4. schisma omnia scelera supergreditur of deadly schism for going out from and breaking vnity and communion with a Church wherin if they had continued they might haue attained vnto saluation therfore to escape this rock he aduiced again that Protestants should represent the Roman Church
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt