Law may meet with external Changes in its Administration either by Dispensation when positive only as the Ceremonial or an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Abatement of the Rigor in Words but the Law the same that suffers the change 3. The Law may suffer some Change in particular Precepts which are its Integral Parts A Man is the same Man still thô he lose his Thumb Collective Bodies are capable of Increase or Decrease so Jus Collectum of Derogation Surrogation or Erogation but Abrogation or Obrogation alters the Essence and until the Moral Law is Abrogate we cannot expect one specifically distinct from it But the Opposition is perspicuous thus A Law that requires your Works a Law to be obey'd by you and a Law that requires your Faith a Law fulfill'd by another for you which you ought to believe and it thus Answers the Argument we are justified by most perfect Obedience but we perform'd it not it was Christ Fourthly It is manifest from the Context and Harmony of the Apostles Discourse he had all along join'd the Laws and the Works together which he excluded from Justification First The pure Natural Law among the Gentiles Secondly The manifold Mosaical now he tells us of a Righteousness and a Law that we may and must be justified by if at all is it reasonable or possible to separate these two Ver. 21 22. But now the Righteousness of God is manifested Even the Righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ If the one be the Righteousness of Christ the Mediator surely the other is the Law of it shall we separate the Righteousness of Faith and the Law of Faith The Text would not be a good Conclusion from what precedes without this that which he had prov'd was there is no Justification by the Deeds of the Law but only by the Righteousness of God Well says he if the Case be so Where is your Boasting it is excluded He draws his Conclusion Triumphing over them How By the Law of Faith You are justifi'd by the Righteousness of God you are justifi'd in a way that excludes Boasting the Law of Faith excludes Boasting and the Righteousness of God justifies you do not then these two Coincide the one as the Work the other as the Command if it were another Law requiring a new kind of Obedience and Righteousness distinct from what he had spoken of he had drawn a Conclusion without any Premises There are two things should have been enlarged on First To prove that this Righteousness is the Righteousness of Christ as Mediator The Second Whether or not this Law of Faith referrs to the Righteousness as the Rule of it or the Faith by which it is applied Both which I must deferr to some proper Verses in the fourth Chapter only at present as to the first that 2 Pet. 1.1 may perswade any unprejudic'd Person Thorough the Rsghteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ As to the second our Confession of Faith says We are not justifi'd by Faith or that is not imputed to us it self as an Act nor any other Evangelical Obedience But this is to be treated in ver 3. Fifthly This Law is a Law we can be justifi'd by and it is before prov'd that we cannot be by any Law requiring Obedience of us Sixthly The difficulties that attend the Explication of it by Socinians Arminians aliis melioris notae who say this Law is the Law of Christ the Mediator not as made under it but as a Law-giver requiring Faith and Repentance of us as the Condition of an Interest in his Merits and Justification by them I say the difficulties that attend it render it the less credible 1. This Gospel-law or Law of Faith must be a perfect Law requiring Faith in Perfection Repentance in Perfection and so other Evangelical Obedience Mr. Bull in his Examination who is Zealous for this New Law and who as Mr. Pitcarn one of his many Adversaries says is of the greatest Acumen of the kind he not only owns it but proves it from Christs own Words Mat. 5.48 when he was Promulgating his Law Be ye perfect as my Father in Heaven is perfect 2 Pet. 3.18 Grow in Grace and in the Knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ On which he thus Acutely Comments The Commands of growth have no Bounds nor Limits until we come to the Unity of the Faith and the Knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect Man unto the Measure of the Stature of the fulness of Christ and it is a certain Truth that there is no Duty in the Gospel wherein Gods Law only requires sincere and not perfect Obedience Patience should have its perfect Work and that 's a special part of Evangelical Obedience Either the Gospel Law or Law of Faith must require Perfection of Obedience in these Duties or some other Divine Law else God would become an Indulger of Sin by Law if it be by another Law viz. the Moral that he requires perfect Obedience and by this sincere only then these two Laws differ but in Degree not in Specie or Kind because both require the same Duties or Works and so this Gospel Law would be no Distinct Law but only the Measure of sincere Obedience would receive a new use which we own it has to wit to be an Index and Mark of our Justification tho' we cannot own that use of its giving Right but to proceed a distinct Law they must hold or quit their Cause or this Foundation of it for the Text sets the Law of Faith down as an opposite Law to that of Works and that they hold 1. Then if it be a perfect Law requiring perfect Obedience there is no possibility of Justification in this Life Poppius the Arminian grants the Conclusion that our Obedience must be consummate before our Assurance and others distinguish between a Compleat and Partial Justification the former is not they say until the day of Judgment But this is not all the difficulty for it 's the adding a Load to a Burden Is this Gospel to a Man that is unable to perform the least part of the Moral Law to tell him that God or the Mediator requires perfect Obedience to it for the Future and another too Or is this Gospel to say you shall perish Aeternally and have the Fire of Hell seven times heated if you obey not this Gospel It s indeed a Conditional Hell but it 's more dreadful than the Law-Hell and the Condition is more impossible because we have less Power to shun this difficulty of two perfect Laws Mr. Bull owns no other perfect Law but this Gospel-Law since Man fell but by shunning one difficulty he falls into two as great 1. Then the Moral Law is abrogated beside the falsness of the Doctrine it self for it is impossible that should cease to be our Duty to love God with all our Heart and Soul what Advantage brings Christs Death To abrogate one perfct Law and
1. It is a Righteousness from God as the Author of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it 's expressed in the third of the Philippians it is the Gift of his Grace the Contrivance of his Wisdom and the Effect of his Power It is the Gift of his Grace Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the Gift of Righteousness 2 Tim. 1.9 It is a Grace given us in Christ before the World began but is now made manifest By this Righteousness of God Death is abolished and Life and Immortality brought to light God that so loved the World as to give his Son for them gave all things with him and this none of the least of the Gifts which is as freely given as any other for we are Justified freely by his Grace It is also a Fruit of the depth of the Riches of the Knowledge of God the Angels stand amazed at the Contrivance the most Sagacious of them would have been non-plus'd if asked by what Righteousness a Sinner could be justified It 's one of those things God hath prepared that neither Eye hath seen nor Ear heard nor ever Heart considered it is also an Effect of Infinite Power what Power less could have united Divine and Humane Nature in one Person What Power less could have made a Virgin Conceive What Power less could have brought a Clean thing out of an Unclean and Caused one to be born of a Woman and partake of Humane Flesh and Blood and yet be Sinless It is a kind of Generation none can declare What Power less could have done that great Work and Service he was appointed by this Law The Angels that excell in Strength being all put together could never have performed a thousand part of it the restoring of all things to their Primitive Beauty and Order What Power less could bear the Burden of Guilt the weight of one Sin is an intolerable burden to a Soul No Man were able to stand if God should mark Iniquity but this sure Foundation Stone bore the guilt of the whole World but never did yield nor give way did neither shrink split or flinch he is a tried Stone and found to be a sure Foundation he could rise again from the Grave notwithstanding the weight of this Grave-stone of Guilt 2. It 's the Righteousness of God Subjectively because the Righteousness of that Person who is God as the Blood of the Humane Nature is called the Blood of God to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood All the Works of his Person by Reason of their Conformity to the Mediatorial Law are called Righteousness Rom. 10.3 Have not submitted themselves unto the Righteousness of God for Christ is the end of the Law So we see the Righteousness of God is the Righteousness of Christ ◠Person in whom the Law gained all its ends for he obeyed all its Precepts he suffered all its Threatnings and he purchased all its Promises too 3. It 's the Righteousness of God in Opposition to all Humane Righteousness it 's his in Opposition to our own he is Jehovah our Righteousness not Adam's or Mans Righteousness 4. It is the Righteousness which alone God can accept a Sinner for he cannot be Just and yet justifie a Guilty Person for any other Righteousness but this he is the Lamb that takes away the Sins of the World This was the Sacrifice God was well pleased with God is pleased with the Sacrifices of a broken Spirit for part of Duty being Sincere but for no part of the price This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Isa 42.21 The Lord is well pleased for his Righteousness sake Act. 13. For all that Believe by him are justified from all things By the Obedience of one many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 Secondly It is without Law 1. As to its Existence obliging us it was not directed or regulated by Ceremonial Judicial or Moral Law for tho' it may be call'd the Natural Law of a Mediator because one cannot be a Mediator without performing such Duties yet it 's distinct from any other Law Moral or Natural taken in its whole Latitude these are distinguish'd as a part from the whole 2. It was manifested without the Law now for tho' the Ceremonial did represent it that Dispensation was at an end it was now more perspicuously Taught the Moral never taught it 3. We are interested in it without Law we cannot be interested in any other Righteousness without obeying the Law Directing and Commanding it but we are interested in this by Believing Thirdly It is witness'd to by the Law and Prophets Isa 2.2 Out of Zion shall go forth the Law and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem Prucknerus thus This is the Law of Faith Rom. 3.27 The Hearing of Faith Gal. 3.2 The Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 This is the Gospel the Gospel is the Narration of all Christ has done for us with the offer of it to us and all he did was ordered by the Mediatorial Law and therefore is called a Law Hackspanus thus Jalkut on this place says All the Consolations which God is to give to Man shall arise out of Sion for it is said Out of Sion shall go forth a Law Hence the Jews did expect their Salvation as well as we and they bear Testimony that it is no new Law but a new Doctrine and the Text it self calls it the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem to wit that Word which was the Subject of the Apostolical Sermons which Rom. 1. was the Gospel Another Testimony we have from the 19th Psalm where it is said The Law of the Lord is Perfect Converting the Soul that by this is meant the Apostolical Doctrine may be seen from Rom. 10.18 where it 's cited that it was Prophesied their sound should go to the Ends of the Earth that the Gospel Light should be as Vniversal as that of Sun and Moon The Papists pretend to prove the Corruption of the Original Text because what the Hebrews calls Lines both the Version of the Seventy and the New Testament translated Sound their sound went unto all the Earth but in Sence they are agreeable For the Sun and Moon have their Course by Lines which Lines do Tipifie the Travels of the Apostles and their Followers or the spreading of a Voice by Lines in the Air Bellarm. Capell and Grot. think the Word was formerly read Kolam and by Corruption turned into Kavam but the Masora Marks it to be an once read Word whereas Kolam by their marks is read fifteen times As the Prophets bare Testimony to this Law so they do to its Righteousness Jer. 23.6.33.16 This is the Name whereby he shall be called The Lord our Righteousness Abravanel reads thus This is the Name whereby the Lord shall call him to wit the Messias our Righteousness wherein he grants the Office of the Messiah but denies his Divinity but the Accent joining Lord and
gratefull or ungratefull to our Taste according to the Disposition of our Palat. Our Will is our Spiritual Appetite and according to its Natural Disposition its Sympathy or Antipathy arises We are a Generation of Vipers there is Poyson in our Constitution and being evil we cannot speak good Mat. 7.18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit This Indisposition is granted both by Arminians and their Antagonists but the Dispute between them is Whether 't is a Sin or no. The Divine Nature in Holiness Righteousness and Knowledge is as much the Measure and the Rule of the Disposition of the Mind of Man as the Divine Law which is the Copy of that Holy Nature is the Rule and Measure of Mans Actions and therefore since Sin is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Want of Conformity to the Law there is a sinfulness in our very Natures though undoubtedly it wants much of the Sinfulness and Guilt that our actual Transgressions have the one is our Misery and our Grief the other is Matter of our Repentance and Amendment It seems to receive a Diminution in that 5th of Romans that they have not sinned after the similitude of Adam The Scripture elsewhere aggravating the Sins of Adult Persons says They have Transgressed like Men but the Original hath it like Adam This Moral Impotency is as unconquerable as Natural Antipathies Mark 10.25 It is easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for a rich Man to enter into the Kingdom of God The Text represents a Penetration of Dimensions which is beyond a Miracle to be easier than for an Unregenerate Man to mortifie his Earthly Inclinations Transubstantiation is easier to be Believed than that a Man can Convert himself when he will tho' receiving all External Helps for in this young Man here was a good Natural Disposition Jesus loved him here was a good Education All these have I observed from my Youth here was an excellent Preacher Jesus Christ himself here was a Carefull Attention for he went away grieved at the Proposal of the Choice Christ offered him Treasure in Heaven for parting with Treasure on Earth but that he could not do Lastly Because the Scripture asserts that we are made Willing by Divine Power John 6.44 No Man can come to me except the Father draw him Psal 110. Thy People shall be willing in the Day of thy Power 1 Thes 1.5 Our Gospel came not to you in Word only but also in power Secondly There is a Natural Impotency as well as a Moral 1. Because this Impotency is in our Natural Constitutions Psal 51.5 I was shapen in Iniquity and in sin did my Mother conceive me Neither the Grammar nor Sense gathered from the Context will allow David to be bemoaning here his Parents Transgression for that could not make up a part of his Repentance and here David doth oppose it unto that Truth that God desired in the hidden and inward Parts of Man Job 14.4 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean If the First fruit be Holy so is the Lump if the Root be Holy so are the Branches We are by Nature the Children of Wrath read Mat. 7.18 and 12.34 Since this Averseness is born with us Universal to all I think it may be call'd Natural tho' in the Will so the Moral Impotency is Natural 2. The more Moral Impotency that a Man is under the more Guilty he is But there is an Impotency in Man to good that in some part tho' not wholly doth excuse Guilt as the Infants in Nineve It is said All dye because all have sinned but none can be so Uncharitable towards Poor Infants whose Impotency is greater than the Adult's to think that therefore they are more guilty Rom. 5. 3. The Invincibleness and Unconquerableness of this Impotency being represented under such an utter Impossibility doth manifest a Defect in all the other Powers as well as the Will as impossible as for a great Camel to go thorough the Eye of a Needle it requires as great a Power as Creation and the Resurrection of one from the Dead doth Eph. 1.19 it requires the exceeding greatness of his Power the Energy of his mighty Power If all the other Faculties were fitted for their Office especially the Understanding it might and would sway the Will since the Will follows its Conduct as is prov'd before for the Gospel proposes such Objects with such a Certainty that would surely Captivate and Conquer the Will if there were no Defect in discerning it and Paul the Apostle complains of the Defect of other Powers To will is present with me but how to perform that which is good I find not Christ blames the Disciples for the Weakness of the Flesh when the Spirit was willing Suppose our Wills intire our Animal Spirits would not serve us to Obey the Law of Innocency and this Incapacity is from our sin so a Man is as Guilty by this Impotence as in Omissions of Duty thorough Drunkenness and I cannot think but a Man is Guilty of Blood that Kills his Neighbour in Drink or doth not deliver him sinking in the Water because his Drunkenness has made him uncapable the Impotence is voluntarily Contracted Gal. 5.17 The Flesh lusteth against the Spirit so that ye cannot do the things that ye would Was there no Sin in the Impotence since they were willing 4. The Understanding is a distinct Power from the Will and antecedent in Manner of working and there is an Impotency ascrib'd to it 1 Cor. 2.14 The Natural Man cannot know spiritual things The Contrivance of our Salvation which is the Effect and Glory of Divine Wisdom appear'd to the Grecian Philosophers seriously Studying the Case a ridiculous Dream of a weak Brain Act. 17.19 The Epicureans and Stoick Philosophers tho' they heard him again and again and tho' his Speech was Divine yet the Conclusion was Laughter and Mockery Resurrection of the Dead was a strange and incredible Doctrine to Pagans Heaven and Hell a Day of Judgment and Destruction of this World were Chimera's and Fancies Caecil the Philosopher thus O wonderful Foolishness and incredible Boldness they Contemn present Torments and yet fear future Pains they fear not Death but fear to dye after Death their Fear is foolish and their Hope fallacious of Comfort at the revival from Death for they are not Contented with the furious Opinion of the Dissolution of the World threatning the very Stars with Fire but they tell old Fables of a Birth after Death from the Cinders and Ashes Epictetus said the Galileans were Melancholly Persons who willingly chose Death from Hopes of good things afterward Christianity appears as foolish to Politicians the spiritual Kingdom of Christ is to them a Castle in the Air When Pilat John 18. heard that Christ's Kingdom was not in this World he thought it was not worth his Attention some imaginary Business Nor had the Vulgar
and ten Years after Christ oh the 12th Chap. 3. he cites Deuteronomy 29.1 These are the Words of the Covenant and thus expounds it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Covenant is nothing else but a Law and the Midrash on Leviticus distinguishes thus between Statutes Judgments and Laws in Chap. 26.46 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Doctrine Learning and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Statutes are Midrashoth Glosses Expositions and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judgments are Hadaenin Decisions of Cases in Law and Aben Ezra on psal 19.8 gives this Etymon of it the Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Law because it shows the Right way and Converts Souls by taking away their Doubts and Fears But since they mean by Doctrine of Faith the Gospel and the Gospel being regulated by this Mediatorial Law Law of Faith and Doctrine of Faith are the same things and it is usual in Scripture to use a Law and its Works of Righteousness promiscuously Hence without the Law and without Works are the same and so the Law of Faith and the Doctrine of Faith are the same for it 's a Doctrine of what was done in Conformity to this Law Thirdly The Opposition between the two Members in this Text doth Confirm it for Law of Faith cannot be here understood a Law requiring Evangelical Faith as a specifical distinct Duty from the Works the other Law did require For first Faith it self is a Work 2 Thes 1.11 The Work of Faith with Power 1 Thes 1.3 Remembring your Work of Faith and in John To Work the Work of God is to Believe For thus there would be no Distinction betwixt the Law of Works and Law of Faith for the Moral Law required Faith in God and the Ceremonial Law required Faith in him that was Typified by their Sacrifices But to come nigher to this Opposition as it is explained by the Socinians and Arminians it must either lie in the Object or in the Precept or Duty but in none of them As to the Object God and Christ there is no Essential difference there for either it must be between the Persons and then there must be three Faiths specifically distinct Or it must be between the Office and Nature and we cannot say there is any greater Distinction there between God and Mediator than between God and Creator God and Preserver or Governor or Sanctifier all which are Incitements and Motives of our Faith or Love or as Mr. Durham calls it Objectum Considerationis or as Cloppenburgh Objectum Formale sub qua but not Ratio formalis quae vel propter quam and such distinct Formalities make no distinct Worship or Faith We see the Lords bringing the People out of Egypt is set down as an Incitement to their Observation of the Moral Law I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt it is far from making a new Law distinct from the Moral so Gods becoming our Redeemer and delivering us out of the Regions of Darkness and Prisons of Bondage is the strongest Motive that ever was and this Sinning against such a Motive which is a Sin against the Gospel is the greatest Sin and as there is no specifically distinct Object in the first Table so there is none in the second to render our Evangelical Obedience to it distinct from our Moral For the Sympathizing with our Neighbour under Adversity as it s said Bear you one anothers Burdens and so fulfill the Law of Christ it is no farther remote from Loving our Brother being only Charity denominated from his Condition than not stealing of his goods from him killing of him bearing false Witness against him or those other Precepts are but it 's called the Law of Christ because that kind of Love was the Spring of all his Obedience to the Mediatorial Law the principal part of his Work was to bear our Burden but the Socinians are in a greater difficulty here than others who deny the Deity of Christ and yet do Religiously Worship him Their Work should be how to find out a new Table not how to find out a new Law to place a kind of Obedience in that is neither proper to God nor Man nor are they altogether free of this Task who thô they own the Mediator to be God yet as such talk of a specifical distinct Law of Duties to him from what we owe to God as to Repentance the Ability to perform it and the Acceptance of it being interrupted and imperfect Duty flows from the Gospel yet there is a Necessity that the Law it is regulated by be the same Law that was broken It was Mans Duty to Love God to fear him to have Faith in him and to obey him he has now by Sin omitted these Duties what is else the Essence of his Repentance but the repeating and renewing of it again that he that broke the Law now keep it If he observe not the Law he did violate it is no Repentance Repentance and Primitive Obedience differ no more than the Image of God that Man was created in and Regeneration which is a renewing of him to the same likeness of Knowledge Righteousness and Holiness as the Divine Nature is the rule of this Image both in one and the other else it were no Image so that Holy and perfect Law of God founded on what is his due from what he has been and is to the Creature called the Moral Law is the same Rule to our Actions distinct Formalities in Objects make distinct Sciences and Arts and may occasion distinct Precepts or Acts for it is an imperfect Law if it reach not to every Condition of the Subject Hence Suarez says The Law of Nature before and after the fall differ only as the Acts of the same Law in Time of Peace and War The Law says one thing to a Married Man and another to an Unmarried it has distinct Statutes to every Condition but the Law is one A Law meets with many changes and yet remains the same as a Man doth and is yet the same Man in Essence 1. In Use it may serve for directing the Obedient convincing and condemning the Guilty and be the same Law still So the Moral Law was that we were to be justified or condemn'd by in the Primitive State that use of it ceases when the Soveraign Prince Pardons then the Dignity of the Intercessor or his own Bowels of Mercy is his Measure So God now proceeds with us according to what our Mediator has done for us that is the Law of Faith not according to what we have done It is strange to say Faith in a Mediator will justifie and not Faith in God or that Faith in God belongs not to the Moral Law or that it s now having a Pardon for its Object and before a Reward brings it under another Law the Angels have many a new Duty and new Object of Faith but their Law remains the same 2. The