DIES DOMINICA OR THE Lords Day Ignat. Epist. ad Magnes After the Sabbath let all that love Christ celebrate the Lords Day as being consecrated to the Lords Resurrection the Queen and Princess of all dayes THE Lords-Day OR A SUCCINCT NARRATION Compiled Out of the Testimonies of H. SCRIPTURE and the Reverend Ancient FATHERS and Divided into Two Books In the former whereof is declared That the observation of the Lords Day was from the Apostles and by the Christian Church solemnized in a continual series that its Institution was Divine and what things do hinder its solemnity In the Later is shewn In what things its Sanctification doth consist In both which also Several Ecclesiastical Antiquities not unworthy to be known are explained Lately Translated out of the Latine Aug. de verb. Apost Serm. 15. The Lords Resurrection hath promised us an eternal day and consecrated for us the Lords Day which is called the Lords Day because it seemeth to belong properly to the Lord. Acta Martyrum apud Baronium an 303. n. 37 c. The Martyrs being called into judgment and ask'd of the Proconsul Whether they had done their Collect or celebrated the Lords day answered with the same words often repeated that they were Christians that they had done thes Lords Collect and celebrated the Lords Day with a congruou devotion of Religion because it could not be intermitted London Printed by E Leach and are to be sold by Nevil Symmons at the Princes Arms in St. Pauls Church-yard 1672. TO THE READER Reader IN the midst of our distractions confusions and desolations our declinings and the increase of wickedness in the land it would be no small reviving to our hopes if we could but procure a more general and conscientious observation of the Lords day I mean not a Judaizing Touch not Taste not Handle not Go but a Sabbath dayes journey Heal not on the Sabbath day Rub not the Ears of Corn to eat c. but a holy diligence all the day in learning the Will of God in reading and hearing his Word in singing and speaking out his praises in calling upon his name in the Communion of Saints in the Sacramental Commemoration of the Death and Resurrection of our Saviour till he come Nor do I mean the preferring of the Name of the Sabbath before the naming of it The Lords Day But the real separation of it for these Holy works from all works that are common and unclean not calling that unclean which God hath cleansed but avoiding all unnecessary things which are a true impediment to the duties of the day and to the edification and comfort of our Souls Could we but procure a general Conscience of this Holy day and work Oh what a blessed means would it prove to the increase of knowledge and holiness among us How could men spend one day of seven in the serious reading and hearing of Gods Word and not grow in the understanding of it How could they spend each week a day in hearing heavenly discourses and in holy prayers praises and thanksgivings and not become themselves more holy if they did this in good earnest and not with hypocritical formality Where there is a profitable publick Ministry what a furtherance would this be to its success Where there is not O what a supply would this be in Families If Parents and Masters did but spend the day in Catechising their Children and Servants and reading to them the Word of God and holy profitable Books and in praying singing of Psalms and fruitful Conferences how much would it make up the loss of a profitable Ministry where there is none But I confess for those many thousand families where none is able thus to Read or Pray the case is hard in these times when they dare not come to their neighbours families that can help them But O that the love of our souls were as strong as natural self-love is in the preservation of our lives If prohibited persons did put the case to me Whether it were lawful for them against their Rector's wills to go beg bread at their neighbours houses rather than famish or feed on grass I think their resolutions would anticipate my answer And if he have not the love of God in him who seeth his brother in need and shutteth up the bowels of compassion from him I may inferr that he neither rightly loveth God nor himself who will suffer his Soul and Family to famish and deny God his Worship and spend the Lords own Day unprofitably and think it a sufficient excuse to say I was forbidden and man must be obeyed Nor will it excuse Neighbours from helping one another who live out of the reach of publick helps as alas too many do especially in the remote parts of the Kingdome to cast the blame on negligent Ministers or to cry out It is the Prelates that famish so many souls nor to complain of the silencing of Faithful Teachers For every man hath his own part to do in building up the City of God And if you do not your own work you do but condemn your selves while you complain of others Was that your Covenant with Christ that you would serve him if others did or if none forbad you or else not If others perform not their duty will you sin for company and yet condemn them If you think they do ill why will you imitate them If well why do you blame them Do you cry out of silent or unprofitable Ministers and do you think that silence and unprofitableness in the Governour of a Family is no crime What if all the rest of the Town denied food or cloathing to the poor Would your obligation to feed and cloath them think you be the less or the greater As ever you would have your families to be under the blessing and protection of God and not exposed to the miseries of such as he forsaketh see that you dedicate them as holy Societies to God and set up his Government over them and his worship among them especially in the Holy Improvement of the Lords Dayes And I take it to be a merciful and comfortable prognostick that God hath suddenly stirred so many to write on this subject and to confute all that is said against this duty And some more are ready if not hindred shortly to come forth Among them all I take this Book to be of singular weight and worth which having declared in my own lately published on this subject it hath occasioned many to enquire after it and a worthy Knight who had this Translation by him to be willing to publish it I confess I intended no more than to provoke the Learned to take more notice of the Book as it is in the Latin Tongue For being strong in the testimonies of Antiquity and the opening of Church-customes on which as an historical evidence of fact I laid in this controversie no small stress I thought it fittest for the perusal of the Learned But seeing it
CHAP. V. The Reason of observing the Lords Day was the Resurrection of Christ on that day it is called the first day of the week by the Evangelists and Fathers and Lords day and Sunday also and why the Sabbath and Christian Sabbath whereupon the Fathers did rarely use the name of Sabbath what the word Synaxis may signifie with the ancients THe things that are observed thus far have taught us that the Lords day was alwaies solemnized in the Church of Christ from his Resurrection now let us enter both upon opening the reasons for which the Primitive Christians were induced to this and also the names by which they usually called this day First one and the same reason of this days solemnity is assigned every where in the Fathers then it 's pointed out by the self-same names of them all though far remote from one another and the testimonies observed in the former Chapter do witness both these The Fathers plainly affirm that the Lords day was sacred with the Christians by reason of the Lords Resurrection and that he had a festival ever since that time So Ignatius Justin Martyr Constant Mag. Augustine c. in the places fore-cited But we meet with the reason of this Festival no where more accurately and to the life as they say painted out than in Athanasius de Sabb. Circumcis Of which place this is the summ to which because it is large I referr the Reader There Athanasius mentions a double world to the former whereof he tells us the saving Passion of Christ at which the Sun appeared not put an end and the beginning of a new creation came after it which took its beginning in our Saviour The Church relying on this reason which all the other Fathers acknowledge hath hitherto alwaies from the Resurrection of Christ had in reverence the Lords day namely because of the Lords Resurrection now the Resurrection presupposeth Christs Nativity and Death or the Resurrection is as it were the consummation of our Redemption therefore when the Apostles office is described of Luke Acts 1. 22. they are called witnesses of the Resurrection not because they testified of the Resurrection alone but since the Resurrection without which the Faith of Christians would be vain the great Apostle being witness 1 Cor. 15. is the chief article of the Gospel when they are said to give testimony of the Resurrection iqis as much as if they bore witness of the whole Gospel Hence it was that the ancients preferred the Passovers solemnity to all other Festivals Greg. Nazianzen calls it the festival of festivals a solemnity of solemnities which saith he doth so far excell all the other not only the humane and earthly but those also of Christ himself and are celebrated for his sake as the Sun excelleth the Stars because if he had not risen again neither had his Nativity nor Baptism nor the other Mysteries of Christ been confirmed nor made us believe them Therefore Gregory Nazianzen thinks the honour of that festival is far to be preferred to the solemnities of others as his interpreter Nicetas thinks Therefore while the Fathers consess that the Lords day was consecrated in memory of the Resurrection it 's the same as if they had said in memory of our Redemption which Resurrection is the chief point of the Gospel to hear and handle which on that day the Church is sequestred from Worldly affaires Some assign other reasons but this former is omitted by none although to it other are added by others Nor is there less harmonious consent amongst the ancient Fathers of the Church in the Name of this Festival than in assigning its reason and in its appellation they follow the Evangelists agreeing amongst themselves who were the Holy Ghosts amanuenses in whom it 's called by two names First it 's called by the Evangelists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 28. Mar. 16. Luk. 24. Joh. 20. So Acts 20. 7. and 1 Cor. 16. 2. as we have observed in the second Chapter In which places una Sabbatoruni must be expounded by the Lords day saith Chrysostom Whose interpretation Hierom follows and expounds the reason thereof Ad Hebidam Quest 4. Because saith he every week is divided into the Sabbath and into the first and second and third and fourth and fifth and sixth day which the Heathens called by the names of their Idols and Elements and therefore in those Fathers opinion una Sabbatorum by Enallage of the plural number for the singular for it s seldome read in the singular number in the Old Testament which manner the Writers of the New Testament do imitate and prima Sabbatorum are all one for the name of Sabbath among the ancients denoteth not only the last day in the week but the whole week also which from finishing the creation and the day of rest is called the Sabbath for its excellent dignity as Theophylact in Luc. 18. 2. that is to say for the reverence of this day the Hebrews called the whole week the Sabbath And in this sense is the Pharisee to be understood about the Sabbath when being puffed up with extream Pride amongst other things he glories of Fasting 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quasi twice a Sabbath There by Sabbath we must of necessity understand the whole Week by an Hebraism and not the last day thereof For the Pharisees as the most learned searchers of Hebrew antiquity have often observed which thing also Epiphanius puts us in mind of instituted two Fasts every week namely on Munday and Thursday therefore the Lords day was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or una Sabbatorum as in the Evangelists and Apostles so in the Writers of the following age he that will look into their writings shall find examples enow And this for the first name of this day in the Scriptures The second is extant in Rev. 1. 10. where that which was before called of all the Evangelists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John calls it denominative with an article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Lords Day and is hitherto called by that agnomination amongst the most ancient Fathers both Greek and Latine since the Apostles age which he that will consult them shall not deny So Ignatius Epist ad Magnes Eusebius when he speaks of the Ebionites Hist l. 3. c. 21. de Dionysio Corinthiaco Hist l. 4. c. 22. Cyp. Ep. 59 c. after the name of our Saviour Constantine the Great saith it 's called Dominicum because as Austin the Lord made it This reason perhaps will be of no great weight with some since the Lord made all other dayes but he seems to have made this day after a special manner namely by his Resurrection the commemoration of which benefit succeedeth the memory of the Creation from the dead whereby he perfected our Salvation or else because it was then destinated for worshipping our Lord Jesus Christ Austin assigneth both these reasons when he saith
the Lords Resurrection hath consecrated for us the Lords day and it seems properly to belong to the Lord. It is therefore called the Lords because the Lord hath instituted its solemnity as the Lords Prayer is so called because the Lord endited it or the Lords Supper because Christ instituted it or else because it was chiefly instituted for the Lord and his worship while the Lord Christ is worshipped upon it but some others contend it is so called because that by the Lords Resurrection a way is opened to an eternal Sabbath but the former is more common and received of most Justin Martyr calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Sunday about the beginning of his second Apology and his follower Tertullian writes that he and the Church gave themselves to rejoyce on the Sunday But in this they agree with the Heathen who use this word to whom they both directed their Apologies in which it is so named and to whom the names used by the Church were unknown For they distinguished the names of the seven dayes in the week by the names of the Planets yet in the Church it was called the Lords day so Justin disputing against Trypho a Jew useth a name accommodated to the man and calleth the Lords day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tertullian also when he deals with the Christians useth the name Lords day as in his Book de Corona cap. 3. and lib. de Idol c. 14. and very seldome Sunday Hierom although spurious yet very willingly confesseth that it may be called Sunday because on it light arose to the world and the Sun of righteousness with healing in his wings A speech also which is reckoned amongst Ambrose's saith that the day which is called the Lords day in the Church by the men of the world is called Sunday where the name is set down by which it was called both by the Church and others In other Authors it is also called Sunday but Austin shews us that the Manichees rather than the Christians called it so Ye saith he to the Manichees worship the Sun on that day which they call Sunday as we call the same the Lords day because on it we reverence not the Sun but the Lords Resurrection And elsewhere he is earnest that Christians should not call dayes by Heathen names for the Church manner of speaking comes better from a Christian mouth Moreover also I am not ignorant that other of the Fathers do sometime express this day otherwise Cyprian sometimes calleth it the eighth because it is the eighth from the beginning of the Creation sometimes the first after the Sabbath So Tertullian Of Basil it is called the onely the first the eighth de Sp. Sanct. c. 27. By Hilary the eighth and first in his Prol. to the Expos of the Psalms So Aug. Epist 119. c. 13. While Chrysostom nippeth the Jews for abusing the Sabbath to idleness he sharply taxeth others also that indulged their vices on festival dayes under the name of the Sabbath The Feasts of Christians are called Sabbaths by Ruffinus the enemies saith he do deride our Sabbaths Ruffinus speaks there of the Christian not Jewish Sabbaths Athanasius says that he observed the Sabbath day not as it was prima aetate in the beginning of the world The Lords day with Origen is the Sabbath and the Christian Sabbath Where without doubt Origen speaks of the Lords day otherwise men must cease all the dayes of their life from worldly affairs which is required on the Christian Sabbath ibidem In the Council of Friuli Can. 13. the Sabbath is called Dedicatum Domini i. e. Dedicated to the Lord. But although the ancients have sometimes called the Lords day the Sabbath from its parent as it were the Jewish Sabbath as in the Scriptures the Holy Ghost calls Baptism Circumcision yet it 's certain they very rarely do note this day by the name of the Sabbath especially because they opposed the Jews that gloried in the Sabbaths solemnity whose observation they judged necessary to obtain eternal life as appears from Trypho in Justin Martyr and that contemned the Gospel And like as the Christians had nothing to do with the Jews in celebrating the Feast of the Passover because they abhorred to keep it with them at the same time as witnesseth Socrates lib. 5. cap. 22. so they abstained from names of Feasts in use with the Jews lest as St. Austin when he enquires whether a true Christian be to be called a Jew or Israelite for the ambiguity of the word which usual speech discerneth not that might seem to be uttered which is an enemy to the Christian name we ought not to confound the custome of mans speech by foolish loquacity for this reason we meet with the name of Sabbath rarely amongst the ancients This is also to be added because while the first Fathers were alive both the Sabbath and Lords day were observed of the Church although not in the same manner as we have before shewed out of the Fathers While therefore they spake of the Lords day they were forced to abstain from the word Sabbath that they might distinguish the Lords day from it and that difference they have also observed strictly in other things Like as what Collecta is with the Latines with the Greeks it is Synaxis namely a meeting of the Church as the word means And although it be derived 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence also the word Synagogue yet the first Christians which the learned Casaubon observeth for the nonce have abstained from the word Synagogue that they might discriminate the Christian meetings from the Jewish Synagogues therefore they called their assemblies Synaxes not Synagogues by Synaxin is meant the meeting of the Church it 's plain from Socrates speaking of the Alexandrians administring all things pertaining ad Synaxin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. besides the celebration of the Mysteries where he plainly distinguisheth between Synaxin and Eucharistiae administrationem So not once in Chrysostom the name of Synaxis is general which comprizeth all things that were wont to be done in the Christian assemblies and is distinguished from their oblation Hom. 18. in Act. Ap. where he teaches that in the Churches of Villages and Towns the Sacrament was wont to be celebrated only on Lords dayes but Prayers and hymns and Synaxes every day But this by the bye that it may appear to us how it was ordinary with Christians to abstain from words in use with the Jews therefore they are read seldome to have used the word Sabbath but as once Alexander Hales because the Sabbath day taken in determinately is called the day of rest or vacation to God after this manner the Lords day may be called the Sabbath day without any prejudice of the Christian name or scandal of Christians More names of this day do also occurr in other of the Fathers who only obiter ex re
not God Yet doth he not affirm that the observation of the Sabbath was unknown to them but he grants that the Fathers were not justified by it which they also confess who hold fast the foresaid opinion confirmed to be true by a long series of authorities It was not therefore the purpose of the Reverend Fathers to define whether the Sabbath was simply observed of the Patriarchs or not Onely they affirm that by its observation they obtained not righteousness before God nor for that cause did they observe it as the Jews did contend in this question with whom the Fathers had to do And Tertullian is not to be expounded otherwise who attended this also that he might shew against the Jews that the Fathers were not justified by Circumcision the Sabbath or the works of the Law His words do testifie this For he sayes advers Jud. c. 2. He that contendeth that the Sabbath is yet to be observed as a medicine of salvation must teach that those who observed the Sabbath formerly are just c. and thereupon what were formerly objected do follow which in this manner being understood according to the scope of the Author without any injury to the words do make nothing against the observation of the Sabbath from the Creation especially whereas Tertullian himself as formerly we observed hath asserted that the Jews do confess that Gods resting on it did from the beginning sanctifie the seventh day The truth of which assertion Tertullian no where calls into question for if he had not taken it for true then he would not have granted it without a reproof in any wise for their sakes but would have used one or other interpretation either to avoid or clear that place out of Genesis 2. 2 3. which yet he no where does The sanctification therefore of the seventh day from the Creation for which the Jewes stood is granted by Tertullian out of whom it is fetch'd that there was the use of the Sabbath before the Mosaical Law which also Tertullian granteth must continue when that ceaseth Therefore in the second place I answer that these and the like places if any be amongst the Fathers which seem to intimate that the Sabbath was not observed before Moses are not so much to be understood of the Sabbath it self or the observation of the seventh day as of the Jewish observation thereof and its abuse to Justification before God for they contend either that for its observation eternal life befell not the Patriarchs or that it was not observed before Moses according to the Ceremonies wherewith it was afterwards celebrated of the Jews neither ought it to be observed after the coming of Christ which things are affirmed by none at all Thirdly In the foresaid testimonies the Fathers had to do with the Jews who obtruded the Jewish Sabbath on the Christians for which cause when the Fathers mention the Sabbath they speak of it somewhat dishonourably if we look at the Name and Ceremonies of the Sabbath but if we understand the thing it self i. e. the Lords day they have extolled the Sabbath with wonderful praises therefore when they plead against the Jewish Sabbath they altogether reject it but when they appoint it to be celebrated in the Christian manner they greatly honour it Fourthly The Criticks which are well exercised in the writings of the Fathers teach us that it is an usual thing with the Fathers while with all their might they decline one errour they oftentimes do either fall into another or seem in a certain sort to fall into it like Husbandmen as prettily the learned Rivet in Prolegom in Crit. saâ—r cap. 11. who labouring to straiten a crooked stick do sometimes exceed measure and bend the plant into a contrary and diverse form so they know it very often falls out with the most grave Fathers who peruse their disputations with their adversaries for while they contend with their enemies out of an earnest desire to smite them they have sometimes even struck their own companions St. Austins heat against the Manichees carried him from the explication of the Text and those things which he purposed to assert This thing Austin himself when he had finished his Treatise signified to Possidonius and others that dined with him So Possidonius relateth it in the Life of Austin chapter 15. And as the truth of this thing hath appeared in other questions so in this of the Sabbath For while Tertullian and before him Justin Martyr have declared the foresaid opinions about the Sabbath their work was with the Jews who as we said obtruded the Sabbath on the Christians as though without its observation none could obtain eternal life Which errour while the grave Fathers studied to shun they declare this opinion of the Sabbath if in the testimonies cited this was their meaning being observed all that time from the Creation until Moses in expounding of which opinion although they thought to smite the Jews yet considered they not how unwarily they wounded their own companions who to their power were diligent to defend the contrary whose opinions we have formerly recited in this Chapter Lastly None that is but meanly conversant in the writings of the Fathers can be ignorant that some more hard sayings do often occurr in them which unless they be expounded by other places in them are not easily to be admitted Chrysostom saith in his later Sermon De utilitate ex obscuritate prophetiarum in Savils Edition Before Christs coming faith in Christ was not required of the Jews which words without a candid interpretation are not to be admitted for if they be taken absolutely they agree not with the Holy Scriptures as appears from Hebr. 11. in which it is related that the Saints before the former coming of Christ did rely upon him by Faith and for their Faith are commended therefore the genuine sense of this place is to be found out of another place in his former Sermon pag. 652. where of the Jews he saith they looked for the Lamb of God to come that should take away the sins of the world of which the later place affordeth no small light to the Interpretation of the former In like manner are we to judge in examining the foresaid testimonies of the Fathers wherein the Sabbath is denied to be observed from the beginning of the world whose meaning is to be expounded from those Fathers in other places or from others that were their contemporaries If any therefore have a mind to find out Tertullians mind Adv. Jud. cap. 2. let him compare him with Tertullian adv Mercion lib. 4. cap. 12. where he shall find him acknowledging that the Sabbath was holy from the beginning We may judge the same of the other authorities which are cited whose sense is to be sought out either by other places of those authors or by other writers that were contemporaries with them The words of Irenaeus and Justin Martyr do roundly enough expound their scope as before we
Festival namely Christ whom he tells us translated the Sabbath day into the Lords and then denies that the Church of her self or by her own authority did ordain that translation for saith he we set not light by the Sabbath of our selves Therefore Athanasius being Judge it appears that the Church doth not of her self but by the authority of Christ whereby the Lords day was ordained observe its solemnity and honour it as he else where speaketh And let it move no body that while he expresseth the honour wherewith the Church honoureth it he doth not speak in that manner of its institution as of the Sabbath of which when he speaks he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as God hath commanded but when he mentions the Lords day he only saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we hnour the Lords day Nor doth he say that this honour is given of the Church to the Lords day by authority of any Divine precept Let this I say move no body as if Athanasius had acknowledged the institution of this solemnity to be received from the Churches ordination and not Christs for if this grave Prelate had so meant it he would have contradicted himself as appeareth out of the place forecited Homil de sement in which he plainly acknowledgeth not the Church but the Lord to be the author of the Lords day neither can any thing else be inferred from that later phrase which Athanasius useth When Subjects do openly profess that they with all honour do honour their own Kings and Magistrates shall not I therefore conclude that they are not obliged by Divine authority to this duty No verily but the Subjects perform this to their Princes with a most ready will because by Divine Law and authority they are bound to perform this duty So Christians honour the Lords day because the Divine institution of this Festival by Christ which Athanasius makes mention of in the same place requires this by right of them Chrysostom in the often fore-cited place acknowledges God to be the author of instituting one day in the week to be set apart for spiritual work When Eusebius gathers divers arguments to demonstrate the Divine power of Christ above all the Heroes of the Heathens amongst the rest he adds this Who saith he meaning what God of the Heathen or Heroes hath prescribed to all the inhabitants of the whole world whether they be on land or sea that meeting weekly on one day they should celebrate the Lords Festival and ordain that as they fed their bodies with food so they should refresh their Souls with divine instructions Therefore in Eusebius's judgment the solemnity of this day is ascribed to Christs institution And Leo acknowledges this solemnity to be received from the Holy Ghost and Apostles ordained by him Augustine confesses that the Lords day was consecrated by Christs Resurrection where he intimateth that the Church did not only take occasion from the Resurrection of Christ to celebrate this solemnity on that day but that the very Resurrection of Christ did administer it unto Christians and if the Resurrection of Christ hath consecrated the Lords day which he confesses as well in this place as elsewhere Serm. 15. de verbis Apostoli then Christ and no other is to be reputed for the author of its institution for his Resurrection hath consecrated that day and since that time he began to have his festival Moreover if Augustine had not believed that God was the author of this Festival by what right could he have derided Urbicus speaking after this manner as if there were one Lord of the Sabbath and another of the Lords day if he had not esteemed him for the author of the Lords day who was author of the Sabbath the contrary whereof he thought Urbicus judged Augustine would never have blamed him for that which yet the premises do testifie he did And he that shall look over that Epistle shall see that he in round words doth acknowledge that there is one Lord of the Sabbath and Lords day pag. 389. He adds It was made the Lords Day through Christ pag. 383. And while that Learned Father renders a reason why it is called the Lords day he assigns this because saith he the Lord made it And how since he is the author of all dayes yet may be said especially to make that we have before chap. 4. out of Augustin himself explained And after Augustin the Fathers in Concil Forojubensi have also explained this The Lord hath sanctified it by the glorious Resurrection of Jesus Christ What needs more It 's enough to point at briefly the Divine institution of this day and these things manifest enough do suffice in a matter smelling of Piety Therefore as Basil the Great sometime concluded his Sermon of the perpetual virginity of the blessed Virgin These reasons saith he we think are sufficient because Christian ears cannot endure the contrary so also we being content with these testimonies which although few in number are yet we trust of great authority with equal estimators of things we will add no more And though many badges of this day have thus far been observed as that Christ rose again on that day Luke 24. 6. on that oftener than once he appeared to his Disciples Joh. 20. 19 26. on that day the Apostles taught and administred the Sacraments Act. 20. 7. on that day John received a Divine Revelation Rev. 1. 10. I could also reckon up others mentioned by divers as on this day the world received its beginning on this by the Resurrection of Christ both death received its destruction and life its beginning on this the Apostles took up thetrumpet of the Gospel to preach to all nations on this lastly the Holy Ghost came down from the Lord on the Apostles More badges are also extant in Austin of the Lords Day Serm. 154. de Tempore And others relate that other Miracles were done on that day These are indeed great badges but because amongst certain some of these are reckoned for uncertain they are not proper enough in their judgment to demonstrate the truth only whereas at every perfect period of time the very Heathens do testifie that certain festival dayes were to be celebrated for some eminent benefits of God conserred upon us and when any thing eminent was ordained of God it was done in honour of this day the reason of whose observation arises not from the foresaid prerogatives but is founded in the authority of God the institutor I am more easily induced to believe with the ancients its solemnity was instituted of God Here I could out of the Fathers tell you the punishments of some that violated the solemnity of the Lords Day In Concil Parisiensi so we read Many of us by the sight of our own countrey men and many of us by the relation of others have been informed that certain men exercising on this day their
〈◊〉 in its native signification doth plainly signifie any thing belonging to sustain life and getting sustenance or any thing for the use of this life whence Clem. Alexand. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is administring necessaries for this life also in the same man it occurrs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all necessity pertaining to life But amongst Divines as Stephanus observes when it is spoken of a man then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is secular or one that is addicted to the affairs of this secular life And so it often occurrs in Chrysostom as Hom. 9. in Col. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and Hom. 3. de Lazaro c. In the same sense in Justin Martyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is opposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where he that lives in common life is distinguished from him that lives in solitariness a Monk Therefore according to the native signification of Chrysostoms words by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are denoted things that pertain to life and sustenance from the sober use whereof no Christian is debarred on the Lords day How little those things conduce to the defence of secular businesses being undertaken on that day they know who look into Chrysostom We will omit any disputation about the propriety and use of the word because it pertains to the Grammarian and ought to be left to others we will produce the rest which Chrysostom himself helpeth us to Secondly we intreat the Reader to consider that Chrys in the aforesaid place is displeased with those that after they are returned from the Church-meeting are intangled in businesses which are contrary to the exercise as he speaks which is held in the Church-assembly Surely if in Chrysostoms judgment worldly matters might safely be medled with on the Lords day he would never have reproved those that looked after them which yet his very words shew that he sharply did Thirdly he thinks it is too much yea altogether extreme indevotion to spend five or 6 days in wordly matters not to employ one in spirituals He that weighs this will easily grant that Chrysostom would never have any part of that day consecrated to affairs that smell not of piety And he that abuses the authority of this holy Father to palliate the using of labour on that day although I scruple to accuse him of too much indevotion yet I am troubled that he hath no more religious a care of the Lords festival Fourthly this he layes as a law upon his Auditors in the same place that they bestow that onely day of the whole week on which they meet to hear all of it in the meditation of those things that are delivered He that requireth that the rest of the day which remaineth after hearing the Word in the publick Church meetings should be spent about meditation conference of the things they have heard will allow no liberty after the aforesaid meetings are ended to dispatch worldly affairs by which pious meditation may be hindred If therefore Chrysost being judge no other exercises be to be medled with on the Lords day out of the Church-assembly which are contrary to the duties of piety performed in those assemblies if by his grave judgment it be thought a very irreligious thing not to spend one whole day in the exercises of piety yea if he earnestly require it from his Auditors that they consecrate that whole day to their devotion of all which he tells us his judgment in these very words then surely it was far from Chrysostoms mind to give liberty for ordinary labours on the Lords Day Lastly if his words which make mention of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be stretched to that sense because sometimes in Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a secular person Chrysost did that which Gregory the Great in an other sense did whom the custom of the Laityes seasting on the Lords day usually vexed yet thought they were not to be punished by law lest that being made against them they should become worse and therefore to avoid the danger of schisme left them to themselves so that what he approved not being constrained through the necessity of the time he permitted So here whatever Chrysostom indulged the people in he did it against his will for their sakes whose minds were not so easily called back from earthly things to whom yielding in some things he did gradually bring them on to higher exercises of piety and indulged them that which he did not approve lest any thing worse should happen he as it were unwilling willed it But as for his part he judged that a whole day should be consecrated to the exercises of Religion any part whareof as we have seen he would not have employed in worldly affairs And thus we have seen St. Chrysostom vindicating himself from some mens foolish gloss nor is there any body whose senses either stupour or phlegmatickness hath not dulled which will think otherwise Origen also takes it ill that some do but assign an hour or two of the whole day to God and come to prayer in the Church while they spend the rest of the day about the world and their belly but if Christians were at liberty when their assemblies are ended to betake themselves to their worldly occasions then this reproof of his had been unjust against which they might truly answer that the custom of the Church was to define the sanctification of the day within the terms of two or three houres Gregory the Great 's judgment is also for ceasing from earthly labour on the Lords day Indeed in the beginning of that Epistle he tells us that Antichrist will make both the Sabbath and Lords day to be kept free from all labour But lest any one should unwarily deceive himself by not well considering the phrase as if Gregory had judged that Antichrist would forbid labour on the Lords day it is to be noted that he intimates this that Antichrist will have an equal regard of the Sabbath as of the Lords day because as Gregory thinketh Antichrist would call back the observation of the Sabbath and directs the stile of the former part of his Epistle against those that forbid the working of any thing on the Sabbath day Nor can the sense of those words of his be otherwise expounded who thought that labour was to be undertaken on the Sabbath from which yet we ought to abstain on the Lords day but i◠never came into Gregory's mind to reckon rest from labour on the Lords day for an interdiction of Antichrist since Gregory himself doth plainly condemn labour undertaken on that day Augustine It is therefore called the Lords day that we abstaining on it from earthly works and worldly pleasures should onely attend on Divine worship giving honour and reverence to this day for the hope of our resurrection which we have in it Augustin or whoever was the author of that Sermon doth plainly prohibit Christians attending their labours
is now translated I hope it will also be profitable to many especially of the more judicious sort of Readers who have no more than the English tongue The Author was a man eminent in his time for great Learning Judgment Piety Humility but especially for his acquaintance with the Writings of the Antient Teachers of the Churches and the Doctrine and Practise of former ages The Lord bless this and all other Labours of his Faithful Servants for the preservation of Knowledge Holiness and Concord which Satan and his forces are so fiercely and alas so successfully assaulting throughout all the world Thy fellow Servant in the Faith Labour and Patience of Believers Richard Baxter Sept. 2. the anniversary day of Londons flames 1671. To the HOLY ORTHODOX CHURCH OF CHRIST Happily cleansed from the filth of POPERY My dear Mother GRACE and PEACE THe Church of Christ in old time appealed to the Scriptures Councils and Records of the Ancients in deciding of questions whereby the Peace of the Church was disturbed or course of the Gospel retarded and then the Antients did interpret the Scriptures not as they were by the crooked interpretations of Sectaries or Hereticks accomodated to their own dreams but according to the Analogy of Faith by the consent of other Scriptures In the Church there hath alwayes been great profit by and very much need of Councils and in conclusion if ill-employed men had rejected the Records of the Antients they were forthwith exploded by the Church To these I say did the Church go straightway as to an holy anchor when any tempest arose as may be seen in Sisinnius who perswaded Theodosius studying to put an end to the unseasonable controversies of that time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to avoid disputations with Sectaries to require of them Whether they would receive those who before the distraction of the Church were the interpreters of the Scripture and Doctors Unto whom pronouncing judgment on the questions emergent according to the Scriptures they should submit themselves I judged the same was to be done by me O Spouse of Christ and beloved Mother when this unhappy question about the Lords Day solemnity alwayes in use and esteem in the Christian Church arose that the things which the Lord hath written upon this matter in the Holy Records being first observed I might betake my self to the Councils and Records of the Antients by whose engines for no new ones do I judge to be necessary to vanquish the enemies which oppugn the solemnity of this Festival I may assault the adversaries of this ordination both with the authority of Scriptures and likewise with the consent and records of reverend Antiquity plainly attested in gathering whereof I thought it expedient to discover to Thee the purpose of my mind which take briefly thus First of all I gathered into one the judgments of the Antients upon this Subject not that I ascribe more to Antiquity than Truth for that I leave to the Papists but I am determined with St. Hierom to read the Antients try all things hold fast what is good and not recede from the faith of the Catholick Church I run not unweaponed that is deprived of spiritual knowledge revealed in Gods Word to the Antients as to the Philistian Smiths for sharpening my husbandry instruments but because I see that the Holy Ghost hath very sparingly delivered himself in the Scriptures although in them he hath recommended to us its name use and Apostolical institution about the Lords Day I therefore consult the Antients who faithfully retain what they received from the Lord by the Apostles that their pious opinion and practise being observed we may observe likewise what we are to do in this case Secondly Divers have set out sundry things upon this subject to the great profit of the Church but few have touched what was the sacred practise of the more pure Church in keeping this solemnity entirely These things gave me occasion to enquire more deeply into the question not onely to help me against my own forgetfulness but also to mitigate tediousness to others into whose hands Ecclesiastical Writers have not either fallen or being detained with the weighty offices of their charge could not peruse them It was in my design hereby to make provision for both vacancy and studies whilst I present unto their eyes a brief account of the antiquity of the Lords Day This is required of every man even nature dictating it That he profit many if it can be if not so yet a few if not so yet his neighbours if not so yet himself Thirdly I judged it not unseasonable in this deplorate state of the Church to set forth this solemnity and that for a two-fold reason because the abominable and un-christian-like violation of the Lords Day doth expose the holy Worship of God Almighty to the wicked's scorn and from hence even hence hath flown an inundation of all that misery whereby the darkened glory of the Church hath fallen Alas with what squalor and miseries is the face of the Church sometimes shining and happy now in all Nations obscured They who love it with a sincere love do see and lament it although they who are bewitched with the malignant spirit of Popery see and rejoyce at it Neither is there among us any that knoweth how long the godly are fallen by the sword the little ones are dashed together and they that are with child are cut asunder oh woe is me Quis talia fando Temperat à lacrymis Who can forbear At telling such events to shed a tear This afflicted face of Christs Church doth call us to true repentance in performing whereof the violation of the Lords Day which bringeth fuel to this fire in the Church of every Nation ought to grieve us For this Festival hath been solemnized as was fit in the exercises of piety according to the rule of Gods Word but by few which the many Fairs upon it for gainful labour in all Nations feasts drunkenness dancings and the impious profanations of it by Stage-playes do testifie These flagitious Crimes which do obscure the grace of Christianity and give farther occasion of slander to those who blaspheme the name of Christ and which the purer Church abhorred do every where rage on the Lords Dayes without punishment to the great scandal of Religion In another respect also any man sees that this argument agrees not with the secure condition of these times because in this age if ever Religion among many languisheth under a bare profession of the Gospel and its power lies down almost extinct and dead I judge the sanctification of the L. day to be a present remedy for both these maladies First it will prepare a way to extinguish that vehement flame where with the Church is every where a burning This may easily be taught by the example of Gunther amnus that most pious King of France who after he had observed not without grief
meetings in those dayes when they could But the Church being wonderfully increased and daily corroborated in the Faith by the frequent preaching of the Apostles it appeareth by the History of the Apostles travels recorded by St. Luke that the Christians where-ever they lived were wont to meet upon set dayes to handle Religion to prove its truth divers examples are ready in the Acts of the Apostles and their Epistles in which the celebrating of their meetings is usually denoted by these phrases meeting together to hear the word of God Acts 13. 44. coming together to break bread Acts 20. 7. to come together 1 Cor. 11. 20. ministring to the Lord. Acts 13. 2 c. they are said sometimes to meet in the Temple Act. 2. 46. Sometimes other Christians than the Apostles were at the Jews Synagogues because there the Apostles preached Christ to the Jews and therefore other Christians also resorted thither that they might hear the Apostles teaching Act. 5. 12. That the first Christians were sometimes present at the Jews Synagogues on the Sabbath day is granted the Holy Writ being witness hereof Acts 13. 14. also Acts 17. 2. it 's said the Apostle as his manner was went in unto them and three Sabbath dayes reasoned with them out of the Scriptures c. but not to solemnize the Sabbaths after the Jewish manner from whose observation the Christians and that by authority committed to the Apostles from the Lord were far enough off especially when Paul himself could most severely reprove the Colossians and Galatians because some amongst them stood for the Sabbath and other feasts of the Jews but because they then had obtained a good occasion of communing with the Jews being met together that their readings of the Law and Prophets being finished in the Synagogues they might preach the Gospel with more fruit in such a concourse of men which upon other dayes they could not so easily obtain and for no other end as from the alledged testimonies is evident Which things let the Reader seriously weigh with himself For at what time or in what place soever they could speak with the Jews they set upon them and preached the Gospel to them Therefore both on the Sabbaths and other dayes as well in the Synagogues as when they were met other where the Apostles were not wanting amongst the Iews in the office of preaching When they had tarried certain dayes amongst the Macedonians because no fit occasion for preaching the Gospel was offered as the circumstances of that place teach which the Apostles every where greedily sought after they preached Christ on the Sabbath dayes out of the City by a River side to the women which resorted to publick Prayers according to their custome St. Paul hastened to keep the Feast of Pentecost at Ierusalem only because he might have many of the Iews living dispersedly in divers places of the world there gathered together with whom he might treat about Christ and so the preaching of the Gospel by them returning home might be made famous through the world So thinketh Chrysost who sayes What means that haste of his he speaks of Pauls hasting to the Feast it was not for the Feast but for the Multitude Afterwards he sayes He made haste to preach the word It 's granted therefore that the Apostles and other Christians in those first times were present at the Synagogues of the Iews yet although they met with them on the Sabbaths they are not read in the Scripture to meet on the Sabbath dayes apart from the Iews and by themselves Neither do we read that this was done of them with an intention to solemnize the Sabbath or have a worship common to the Iews which was not lawful to be done St. Paul sometimes disputed in Areopagus Act. 17. 19. and the Schools of the Heathen Act. 19. 9. In which the Schoolmasters were wont to explain the names genealogies fables and histories of their gods to observe their Feasts and instruct their Catechetae in their rites Yet no man will thence conclude as Mr. Eaton well observes that because he was present in their Schools he did observe the Heathens feasts and worship their gods In like manner the Apostles must not be said to have observed the Jewish Sabbath although they had divers disputations thereon as the concourse of the Iews gave them occasion Moreover if the Christians had observed the Sabbath then Justin Martyr had satisfied with little ado Trypho the Jew that counselled him to observe the Sabbath For it had been enough for Martyr to have answered the Iew that the Christian Church did observe the Sabbath Yet this he grants not but that blessed Martyr plainly denies that the Jewish Sabbath ought to be observed by the Christians The same do other Fathers against the Iews as we shall see afterwards Lastly we read not that the Apostles were alwayes at their Synagogues For it 's said Act. 19. 9. when the Iews hearts were hardned at Pauls Doctrine first Paul himself departed from them neither is he ever after read to enter into their Synagogues Besides he segregated from them the Disciples that embraced the sounder Doctrine lest as it 's in the Proverb the sick cattel should infect the sound Therefore as long as they conceived any hope of converting the Iews they neither declined their company nor Synagogues But when they observed that they rose up against the sound Doctrine of the Gospel with an obdurate heart they forthwith forsook them neither are they read in Scripture ever after to enter into their Synagogues any more CHAP. II. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. are briefly considered AFterwards when the Christians had no dealing with the Iews we read that they met by themselves in the Apostles age and that on the Lords day to exercise the offices of Piety and Divine Worship But for the period of time in which at first they held these conventions by themselves apart from the Iews there 's nothing occurrs in Scripture and divers dispute about it Passing by whose dispute it plainly appears in the Holy Scripture that the Lords day while yet the Apostles were alive was destined for the publick meeting of the Church There are three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. in which there is plain mention of that dayes celebrity on whose most grave authorites the religious observation of the Lords day by the common suffrage almost of all Divines doth chiefly rest Yet all Interpreters agree not amongst themselves in their Expositions of them and no wonder since to all it is not given presently to hit upon the sense of what is delivered in the Scriptures but to some that
elude if they could the genuine interpretation received every where of the Church But whoever shall weigh with himself the blessed Apostles purpose who did studiously provide that his ordinances should not be a burden to the Churches of Christ which in those dayes for most what consisted of men of an inferiour condition will not easily admit that the Apostle did so ordain that collections should be made daily neither is it like that he should ordain that these should be gathered on every Sabbath properly so called since when the Apostle was present at Corinth the Christians could not meet in one place much less after his departure from them was it safe for them to frequent the Jewes Synagogues on the Sabbath day Let that place Act. 18. 17. be consulted Lastly neither must we believe that the Christian Corinthians did hold their publick meetings on the Sabbath day amongst themselves since they were held on the Lords dayes in every place neither is there extant any testimony in the whole Volume of the Scriptures by which it can be shown that the Christians kept Sabbath-day meetings among themselves or apart from the Jews Therefore the received Exposition of the Apostles words is to be retained namely that the Apostle did ordain in the Church of Corinth yet when they met for Religion weekly as the Lords dayes returned almes should be collected for the poors use and they seem privately to have laid aside what their condition permitted to bestow for the comfort and relief of the poor and that which was thus laid aside they kept with themselves till the first day in the week at what time they deposited it with the Rulers of the Church for the poors use He that shall more considerately weigh the Apostles phrase may well enough see this was his meaning for he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. i. against the first day in every week or when the first of every week comes so as is said amongst the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. Water ready for washing ones hands In like manner the Almes which were privately laid aside of every one were deposited on the first day of the week for the help of the needy and then when the Church met are said to be gathered because their collection was made of those who privately had laid them aside on the Lords day or or first day of the week Le◠admonished his hearers because on the Lords day there should be a Collection toprepare themselves for a voluntary devotion and that every one according to his ability might have fellowship in that most sacred oblation from which testimony one may easily gather that the Christians laid aside by themselves their Collections against the Lords day which then they deposited with the Rulers of the Church to be bestow'd Although Chrysostom thinks that the people reserved their almes laid aside on the Lords day till the Apostle himself came to whom they should be brought in but the former exposition doth more agree with the custom of the Church The third place is Rev. 1. 10. where there is had express mention of the Lords day out of which almost all Writers fetch the custome of the Lords day solemnity from the very Apostles time For the Lords day as we see is expounded by as well ancient as late Interpreters of Scripture to be the first day in the week and some new expositions of that phrase which cannot stand with the signification of the Lords day in the Evangelists themselves and some famous Writers next the Apostles age are solidly resuted by divers and therefore omitting them we set it down for a certain that in the Apostles age that I may use Ribera's words on Rev. 1. the solemnity of the Sabbath was changed into the Lords Day being consecrated by the Resurrection of our Lord. For it 's not once that it appears from Scripture that the Apostolical Church kept solemn the Lords Day by celebrating the Supper preaching the Word and collecting of Alms in which the true manner of solemnizing it doth consist Yea the history of the Apostles travels lets us know that the Christians of that time held not their ordinary meetings but upon the Lords day He that shall teach the contrary confiding in Scripture authority I will freely hear although after the Apostles death the succeeding Church in some places as afterwards we shall see kept their meeting on the Sabbath dayes In the mean time we find that the Lords day in the Apostles age the sacred records attesting the same was solemnly observed Which thing was first to be proved by us CHAP. III. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The ancients observed the Sabbath not as an holy day The differences between the observation of the Sabbath and Lords Day How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Not bowing the knees on the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords Day NOne who will diligently look into the gravest writers of the following ages shall be ignorant that after the Apostles were dead the Church did in all Nations celebrate the Lords Day which that it may more plainly be known to all we must know as I said in the first Chapter when the Apostles were translated to Heaven the number of dayes on which ordinarily the Church-meetings were had received an increase For while the Apostles were alive the Christians ordinarily held their meetings on the Lords dayes only but afterwards the ordinary time for performing the exercises of publick worship was not only weekly but anniversary that came every week this but once every year But here we will not speak of the extraordinary and anniversary festivals that were used by the succeeding Church but of the ordinary time returning every week destined for Religious exercises Where in the first place it will be for the Readers profit to consider that although the use of the Lords day spread abroad through the world in the Church of God yet in some places the Church had weekly her publick meetings on other dayes besides the Lords Socrates acknowledges the Sabbath and Lords Day for feasts returning every week on which meetings were wont to be kept Hist 6. c. 8. And elsewhere when he treats of the sundry rites of Churches l. 5. c. 22. he tells us that the Presbyters and Bishops of Cappadocia Cesaria and Cyprus did interpret the Scriptures on the Sabbath and Lords Day When Sozomen noteth the time of calling the Church together he sayes some met on the Sabbath and the day after the Sabbath Epiphanius in Panario contr Heresi lib. 3. T. 2. acknowledgeth that the Church met upon the Wednesday instead of the Sabbath and Lords Day When St. Austin shews what Christians must do when they see the customes of Churches to vary he confesses that
de Idol cap. 14. saith the Sabbaths are extraneous to Christians and that Holy dayes were sometime time beloved of God The Nazaraei observing the Sabbath are branded for Heresie by Epiphanius l. 1. num 30. and likewise the Ebionites If it had been the Christians duty to observe Sabbaths why had the Catholicks imputed its observation as a fault to the Hereticks which yet they have done more than once as sure as sure can be But Christians have celebrated their Lords day every where without brand of heresie or any other crime and therefore since the festivity of the Sabbath was not every where in use with the Christian Church nor doth any where occurr any Apostolical ordination for continuing it in the Church we do by good right affirm that Christians are not obliged to its celebration which to affirm of the Lords day that was observed in the Apostles age and ever after is an heirrous thing 2. When meetings were held on Sabbath dayes they met not weekly on all Sabbaths as they came about for on one Sabbath publick Conventions were to be omitted if we may believe the foresaid Constitutions so it 's ordained Constit Ap. lib. 5. cap. 19. and what that is they explain the Sabbath in the great week Constit Ap. c. 24. lib. 7. The Sabbath of the Lords burial on which it's fit we should fast but not celebrate a festival So also August to Casulanus Ep. 86. but for the omitting Church-assemblies on the Lords day as often as it came about and were safe for the Church for the Persecution of the Tyrants we read nothing was ever ordained of the ancients There is a sanction in the same Constitutions that the Lords day should be celebrated without intermission Lib. 7. cap. 31. 3. In populous Cities where without dammage to their Estates they could be present at reading of Scripture and their interpretation meetings were more frequently kept Therefore the Council of Laodicea decrees that the Gospels should be read on the Sabbath Can. 16. Ambrose treated of Prayer the same day de Sacram. lib. 4. c. 6. But all the exercises of piety were not every where performed in those assemblies that yet were not omitted on the Lords day Augustine saith in another place On the Lords day only the Communion of the Lords Body and Blood is used Socrates doth not record that they of Alexandria and Rome did celebrate those mysteries on the Sabbath While Chrysostom requireth it of the rich Lords of Villages that they build Churches in them Hom. 18. in Act. he distinguisheth those congregations that were on other days from those that were held upon the Lords day Upon those Congregations Prayers and hymns were had in these an oblation was made on every Lords day and for that cause the Lords day is in Chrysostom called dies panis i. the day of bread Athanasius purgeth himself of a calumny imputed to him for breaking the cup because it was not the time of administring the holy mysteries for it is not saith he the Lords day Whence it is evident that the Lords Supper was administred on the Lords dayes otherwise the argument wherewith Athanasius purgeth himself were of no weight Although therefore they met upon the Sabbath day yet did they not every where observe it equally to the Lords day on which they celebrated all the mysteries of Religion 4. The people were free to be present or absent from Sabbath-day meetings as they saw good that is they were not obliged by any necessity of law to meet on that day for the Sabbatarii contending for a necessary observation of the seventh day were of the whole Christian Church condemned of heresie in this behalf as I have briefly shewn before I confess Origen reproves his hearers which came seldom to hear the Word of God that scarce did come to the Church on Feast dayes Gregory Nyssen in that Oration which he made against those that would scarce endure reproofs nips the people that met not on the Sabbath With what eyes saith he lookest thou on the Lords Day that despisest the Sabbath Dost thou not know that these dayes are Sisters that if thou reproach the one thou offendest the other But he speaks of those who had oftener liberty to meet for hearing the Word which they regarded not to embrace out of a certain supine negligence or being puffed up with pride despised the Church-meetings on Sabbath-dayes Whether it was the sluggishness or arrogance of these men it was deservedly blameable whenas they might divers dayes meet at Church without dammage of their worldly affairs which yet to do they were not easily moved although the duties of their calling would bear it In the old Testament some hours in a week were consecrated to Gods Worship Numb 28. 3. but yet all the day long the whole people of Israel should not attend on the holy duties of piety this was only enjoyned to them that could commodiously do it So in the Churches planted by the Apostles they met on other dayes as often as they could besides the Lords dayes but on the Lords dayes appointed for this end they were bound to be present at the publick assemblies and their absence for a certain time from these on the Lords day was to be reprehended by the sentence of the first Concil Eliberitan Can. 21. And yet where are any Canons established for punishing their absence from Sabbathday-meetings Although the Fathers do often reprove those that come seldome on the Sabbath and other dayes to hear the Word 5. Although on the Sabbath dayes they might meet to hear the holy Oracles of God yet when that dayes meetings were ended they might not be idle but an Anathema is denounced to them that work not on that day Conc. Laodic Can. 29. Ignatius in an Epistle to the Magnesians exhorts them to spend the Sabbath in labours without rest and therefore the Sabbath had not its vacation from labours So Athan. de semente Ambros Ep. 72. which we never read was ordained of the Lords day on which it's a sin to give our selves to labour And let these things suffice for the Lords dayes prerogatives above the Sabbath by which we find that the Sabbath day was not kept holy of the Church i. e. the ancients did not separate it from common use and labour nor consecrate it wholly to God in an holy rest that on it the acts of Divine Worship and those things that pertain to a spiritual life should only be exercised neither were the conventions on that day to be compared with those held on the Lords day which things surely once to define had been much to our profit For the Institution of other dayes to hold meetings on it 's not needful to take much pains since we have nothing writ of it in the Word of God as of the Lords day and many things which were not instituted of the Apostles but first arose in
whole day must be reserved as Chrysostom before to spiritual work As afterwards the Fathers in Conc. Turonensi do speak being sequestred from servile work to persevere in praising God and giving of thanks No otherwise then as anciently among the Romans the daily sacrifices were continued from the beginning of the day to the middle of the following night But I will not weary the Reader by rehearsing apart the testimonies of the several Fathers in a matter so clear whose writings he that will but lightly look into shall grant that a whole day according to their opinion must be assigned to perform religious exercises upon which will better appear from those rules that occurr in their writings for the sanctification of this day three whereof I will not refuse to reckon First they exhort the Church to regard on that day the things that pertain to their souls salvation where Hierom accommodates as he shews in the following words what the Prophet speaks of the Sabbath to those whom Christ hath made free And if any have a mind to see what it is to regard the things that pertain to the souls salvation the fourth Canon Conc. Tarraconensis will inform him namely that men on the Lords day only perform to God the appointed solemnities and what should be done on them we have formerly heard ex Turonensi Concil namely that they should abstain from servile work and persevere to the evening in giving of thanks But lest any one should grant that those exercises of Piety are to be done on that day whenas yet he might deny that the whole day were to be spent in them therefore the Fathers add Secondly That excepting those things that pertain to the fouls salvation nothing else at all must be done on that day So Hierom Austin Conc. Tarracon in the fore-cited places with whom agree also the Fathers in the Council of Friuli who ordain that on the Lords day the vacation must be to no other purpose but for Prayer and other offices of piety And in the Council of Paris it is ordained that it 's convenient for those that are redeemed by the grace of Christ to abstain on that day whereon the Author of Life rose again and gave them hope of a Resurrection from these things that are fore-mentioned i. e. from this worlds pleasures and their own and rural works as there they speak and be filled onely with spiritual joyes and busily vacant with all their heart in restless praises The same particle of restriction is added in Conc. Triburiensi Can. 35. where they ordain that it 's the peoples part on the Lords dayes only to labour in the holy service of God And afterwards they add that they must only attend on God on the Lords dayes Greg. Mag. shews also they were wholly to be employed in prayers on the Lords dayes Thirdly they do not only think that this 〈…〉 must be religiously kept and wholly â—â—ployed in the worship of God on it but â—hey farther do define the term of time which they must spend in the work thereof namely a whole day So Chrysost Hom. 10. in Gen. and Hom. 5. in Math. Let your eyes and hands be spread out to God all that whole day This is to persevere in performing its services until the evening Concil Turon 3. cap. 40. Or as in Conc. Trull cap. 90. From the evenings ingress to the Altar on the Sabbath till the following evening on the Lords day Now if in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established the premises do evidently enough shew that the sanctification of all the day is required since that not only the Fathers do determinate that we must cease from our worldly matters and attend on God but moreover that nothing must be done but a work of Piety on all that day that is from the beginning to the end thereof Neither do I think good to confirm the truth in this matter by reasons over and besides these testimonies that are not to be contemned although they be not to seek wherewith to stop the mouths of dissenters if they be angry and the entire sanctification of the whole day may be vindicated against the too earnest seekers of a profane liberty First As if the day be commanded to be held holy by common sense it follows that a day not some hours is to be sanctified So Aug. Serm. 251. de Temp. Secondly Moreover if there were any term of that dayes holiness before the day it self were determined then such a term would appear either from the Scriptures or from some of the Fathers piously interpreting them but what no where is extant he that can shew it Erit Mihi Magnus Apollo The Ancients who thought good to fast on the Sabbath sometimes continued their fasts to the ninth hour which being past they were not afraid to relaxe their fast and refresh their strength with meat Socrat. Hist l. 5. c. 22. And sometimes till the Cock-crow of the Lords day growing light as in the Sabbath of the great week as Epiphanius teaches in Panario When therefore they judged that they must simply fast on the Sabbath then they added nothing of the termes of the fast before the Sabbath it self ended but because some judged that they must not abstain on all Sabbaths for a whole day from meats therefore they signified how long their fast was to last We may say the same of the Lords day's duration if the Church must not keep holy day by a Religious solemnity from worldly affairs for a whole day then the term without whose knowledge the Church-would be ignorant how long the day were to be sanctified and the minds of men would stick pendulous of this solemnity would some way be known to us from the Scriptures nor would the Holy Ghost have passed it by untouched and formerly we have observed from their writings that the Fathers would determine nothing to be done on this whole day that is from the Sun-rising to the setting but what relates to Piety who being excited with an holy zeal have exploded the half sanctification of the Lords Day Thirdly If the glory of the Jewish Sabbath be translated to the Lords day which is not denied of the Fathers I do not see why we should not interpret this day in the same manner as it was prescribed about the Sabbath to the worshippers of God in old time for to the Jews and that by Divine authoritie it was given in command that they being sequestred from all worldly business through the whole Sabbath should attend Divine Worship alone With what face therefore and upon what authoritie relying can Christians bestow their Lords day or any part thereof in worldly affairs setting aside the worship of God let them look to 't that have a care of their salvation This reason hath the most pious Leo approved with his judgement and authority for
have heard by them both which do only contend for this that they may teach that the ancient Fathers were not justified by the Sabbath and Circumcision and add no more CHAP. IX That one day in a week is under the Gospel also to be sanctified The Morality of the fourth Command which is perpetual requireth this Christ hath not abolished the Law How the Sabbath may be said to be a sign between God and the Church THus far of the first Epocha in which we have found that from the beginning of the world one day in the weekly compass was to be set apart for the solemn performing of the worship of God and for the second from Moses to Christs resurrection none doubteth therefore I 'le add nothing of it and will come to the third Epocha of which is the greatest controversie namely Whether under the Gospel in the compass of a week one day be to be sanctified Some men of great name do deny this and some do strongly affirm it which later opinion being grounded upon so many testimonies and reasons of the ancients and the continual practise of the Christian Church I freely embrace for this is neither a new nor an unheard of assertion but by several Divines of a well exercised judgment is sufficiently manifested to all pious souls and prone to the fear of God in demonstrating whereof they have recourse to the morality of the fourth Command in the Decalogue whose moral part is perpetual for it is one of the ten words of God engraven by his own hand in Tables of Stone Exod. 35. 28. Deut. 4. 13. out of which number if the Sabbath should be expunged there would only nine remain Now the Moral part of the Decalogue which remaineth also in the new Law Bonavent l. 3. q. 37. p. 781. as Alexander Hales once wittily is said to be so two manner of wayes one way which is of the very essence of the Decalogue according to the primary intention and so vacation to a time indeterminately is moral in the Decalogue another way it 's said to be moral in the Decalogue which is to determine the Decalogue and according to this vacation on the Lords day is moral in the Decalogue in the time of grace as the seventh day in the time of the Law and that is moral by discipline i. e. by Divine institution and therefore even by the sole instinct of nature it must needs be granted that man at some time must attend upon God yea nature it self dictates that sufficient dayes be set apart to perform his worship And who is to determine those dayes but him whose the day and night are Psal 74. 15. So Alexander Hales The observance of a day indeterminately that at some time we should attend on God is moral in nature and immutable but the observance of a determinate time is moral by discipline by the adding of Divine institution Afterwards he saith when that time ought to be is not for man to determine but God because it is his part to define the certain time for worship whose it is to prescribe the worship it self it pertaineth not to inferiours whose part it is to perform offices to others to determine of a fit time to perform them in Superiours to whom they are to be exhibited do prescribe others when ex officio they ought to attend these Nor can it be otherwise because if the way of setting apart the time for worshipping God in should not depend upon Divine institution the mind of man would hang pendulous in this business neither would it appear to us what dayes would be sufficient since if we look at Gods benefits conferred upon us it would not be sufficient to consecrate the whole course of our life to this work and if we look at our covetousness and sloth how many of us would suffer the very least part of our time saith the famous Mr. D. G. to be cut off either from our labour or rest A certain time is therefore to be defined of God at least for their sakes who attend more upon this world than God as Hierom and left the conscience of men should stick in doubt or God be defrauded of his due worship very reason it self seemeth to require that a certain day should be assigned by the most Blessed and Almighty God especially when as Scotus saith man is bound to no act pro tempore indeterminato to which he is not bound pro aliquo signato because if then worship be not to be exhibited to God by like reason not now and by the same reason of every other time Besides he that will not think much to compare the reason of the present age with the times of Adam the Patriarchs and the Jews he shall see it equal and just to set apart in every seven dayes one whole one for the worship of God For why should the Lord indulge a further liberty to the men of our age in his service than he granted them especially when God since he hath repealed his Gospel is more propitious to us than to them Farther if we weigh the nature of our present men we shall find for certain that no less time is required to the instructing of them than of the ancients And to conclude relaxation from labour is no less necessary in this age to servants and those that live under other mens government than to men in former ages He that without prejudice weigheth these things cannot deny that one day in seven is as well to be set apart for the publick worship of God by Christians as men of the former age I will add nothing of the nature of the Decalogue never abrogated by the blessed coming of Christ Faith in Christ makes not void the Law the matter of which all men acknowledge to be written in mens hearts from the Creation the great Apostle being witness although we acknowledge with the same Apostle Gal. 4. and Col. 2. that the ceremonial and typical observation thereof being fulfilled by Christs coming in the flesh be now ceased This doth also Irenaeus witness adv haeres l. 4. c. 31. who affirmeth that God spoke the words of the Decalogue immediately by himself and thereupon they remain permanent and fixed with us admitting of extension and augmentation but no dissolution by the coming of Christ in the flesh So St. Austin in Psalm 32. Fulfill the Law saith he which the Lord thy God came not to dissolve but to fulfill And certainly no body that throughly weighs with himself the morality of that precept will doubt that the solemnity of the Lords day grew up by vertue of the fourth Command in the Decalogue For it is granted of all that the substance of the Command included in these words Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day i. e. the day of rest not as the seventh day is moral and to be continued for ever But if the Lords day festivity be not bottomed upon the
no be bound by the Fourth Command in the Decalogue to sanctifie one day weekly Amongst equal estimates of things saith the foresaid Learned Divine it cannot but be without controversie that it is as well for Christians as Jews having finished their labours on the six dayes to sanctifie the seventh that with the Jews they acknowledge that they worship the most blessed and Almighty God the Maker of Heaven and Earth But although in this both Jew and Christian do agree that when they have spent six dayes in their labours on the seventh they should rest yet they differ amongst themselves in the determination or designation of the day destined to this holy rest For the Christians keep holy that day which to the Jews was the first in the week and call it the Lords day that they might prove themselves the servants of God who in the dawning of that day subdued the Devil that spiritual Pharaoh and redeemed his people from a spiritual servitude by raising up Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead who hath regenerated the Christian Church not unto a sublunary Canaan but unto a lively hope of an immortal inheritance preserved for us in the Heavens And that I may dispatch in a word The Christian by sanctifying the Lords day doth prosess that he is a Christian that is as St. Peter interprets it believes in hinâ— that raised up Christ from the dead Hence it easily appears that both Jews and Christians though the same day be not solemnized amongst them both were led by the same reason to sanctifie the seventh day which to the Jews might call to mind their liberty restored from Egypt and servitude of a worldly Pharaoh and to Christians from a spiritual Egypt and Pharaoh But lest any one should object unto me Christians might profess this by sanctifying the last day in the week I add moreover they could not do so by right for if the Christians should keep holy day after the manner of the Jews then they would declare that their spiritual Redemption was not yet perfected but yet did look for it especially whenas the Redemption of Israel out of Egypt by the Ministry of Moses was a type and pledge of our future and spiritual liberty by Christ and the inheritance of the earthly Canaan which those that were freed from Egyptian bondage did seek after prefigured a celestial inheritance which the redeemed by the holy Blood of Christ did look for Since therefore the shadow vanished when the body was present we must not believe in God foretelling future things by types and shadows but in him that hath most faithfully accomplished the truth according to the prophecies foretold by him So Austin against Faustus the Manichee It is not saith he a diverse doctrine but a different time it was one thing for these things that they must be foretold by figurative prophecies and another thing that they must now be fulfilled by the truth made manifest and accomplished As by an apt similitude Mr. D. G. illustrateth it There is saith he in all Nations the same law of all the Stars and the same motion although a great variety may arise from the difference of the Horizon whereupon it may be our day when it 's night with our Antipodes so the law of Nature is the same with us and the Jews yet in some things it admitteth of some mutation from the difference of the Horizon as I may say whilst they inhabited the old world and we the new that is the Sun of Righteousness on the seventh day came to their Meridian by Creation to ours on the eighth day by Christs Resurrection whence that which was a festival to them to us is none Although the Sabbath be translated to the Lords day yet for that reason its being a sign between God and his people is not taken away but translated to another day Neither is the thing changed that was signified by that sign but only the manner and circumstance of time and clearness of signification I will hasten therefore to demonstrate the cessation of celebrating the Sabbath after the Jewish manner and substitution of the Lords Day into its place both out of Scriptures and Fathers The holy writings of the Apostles do testifie that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath as well as other festivals in use amongst them is removed from off the Christians shoulders So St. Paul Col. 2. 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the new moon or of the Sabbath dayes In that Chapter while the Apostle mentions various corruptions of the Sacred Religion which he teacheth will be profitable for the Church diligently to shun he reckons up three sorts of them the first whereof by false teachers was drawn from Philosophy the second from humane traditions the third from the rudiments of the world Now by the rudiments of the world he means the pedagogy of Moses out of which ver 16. he brings forth two corruptions to wit of the choice of meats prohibited by the Law and sanctifying of Festivals observed under the same Amongst the Jews there were divers Feasts some of great name and authorty celebrated yearly namely of the Passover Pentecost and Tabernacles and then besides these they celebrated their New Moons every Month and their Sabbath every week the Apostle affirms that all these Festivals which after a manner were the shadow of Christ to come and Christ their truth and body that is they did portend what afterwards were truly exhibited of Christ had their end when Christ was once come for when the body is come the shadow vanisheth Even as in the Emperours absence his image hath authority but when he is present hath not so these things also before the coming of the Lord in their time were to be observed but when he is come do want authority And therefore they that contend for observing the Sabbath after the Jewish manner do deny that Christ is come witness the blessed Apostle for gaping at the shadow they embrace not the body There was a time when they were to be trained up by the shadow but he that follows the shadow when the body is present is deceived Therefore from that place of the Apostle we must believe that the Jewish Sabbath of which he speaks under the number of a Multitude Sabbaths because it was celebrated every week and seldome do we meet with it in the singular number as before was observed is ceased by the coming of Christ or that Christ is not yet come The same Apostle sharply taxeth the Galatians for observing of days that having rejected the wholsom Doctrine of the Gospel they returned to the same beggarly Elements that is legal observations Gal. 4. 10. Ye observe saith he dayes and months and times and yeares Where according to Tertullian contra Marcion lib. 1. c. 20. Chrysostom Theodoret Primasius c. in Gal. 4. by dayes the Apostle understandeth
Church when the image is removed Ruffinus contendeth for observing the Sabbath though not carnally or in Jewish delights To these let be added a place in Constit Apost lib. 7. cap. 37. which tells us that the Lords day supplies the room of the Sabbath All these things argue that the pious Fathers did not under the Gospel explode that precept in the Decalogue about the Sabbath and therefore sometimes under the name of the Sabbath which to them the Lords day is signified as we have seen chap. 3. For they yield that Christ fulfilled and not destroyed the Law by his coming and that Christians are to rejoyce on the Sabbaths festival and that the solemnity of this festival is grounded on the Command in the Decologue and seem only to stand for this that now it should not be in that manner celebrated of Christians that the Sabbath was amongst the Jews They celebrated the Sabbath on the seventh day and flinging off the weighty care of godliness gave themselves up to idleness and delights of this world but the Fathers taught that Christians ought not so to keep the Sabbath who should keep the first day of the week holy not carnally but spiritually For they judged it far better under the light of purer Christianity as after shall appear to labour on the Sabbath than to attend on the alluring pleasures of the world But though they abhorred the Jewish manner of observing the Sabbath yet they alwayes ordained one day of the seven as Chrysostom speaks to be bestowed in the worship and service of the common Lord of us all And therefore passing by the abrogating of observing the Sabbath in the Jewish manner being confirmed by testimonies both of Scriptures and Fathers Thirdly it remains to be considered what may be brought from the same fountains to assert the authority of observing the Lords day For it is most sure that the Apostle although he call back in the foresaid places the Church from observing the festival of the Sabbath in the Jewish manner doth not forbid Christians all observing of every day otherwise the Apostle himself had given an offence to the Church in keeping the Lords day with a Church which it appears he did Act. 20. which to think of him the candour of a Christian mind will not admit Therefore we doubt not but by the Apostle's sentence whom we believe did not ordain it by that ordinary power which yet continueth in the Church a certain day is to be employed about spiritual labour otherwise the Church had not met at a stated time in the dayes of the Apostles And whereas a certain day is appointed whereon weekly Divine worship is to be attended only that neither diminisheth nor abolisheth Christian liberty it only directeth Christians that their minds fluctuate not in observing it which is not to destroy Christian liberty but rightly to instruct Christians in the use thereof the better that they miss it not in performing service to their God Now for the weekly conventions of the Christian Church no day was deputed of the Apostles but the Lords day the first mention whereof in their writings we meet with is Rev. 1. 10. where John saith that he was in the spirit on the Lords day And although that be the first time that it 's mentioned in the Scriptures under that appellation yet might it before John writ the Revelation be known in the Church by that name No Evangelist before St. John called Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. the Word yet the same author being witness In the beginning was the word Joh. 1. 1. So that day doubtless was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day before not as by some new institution which lately was established in the Church but as a thing well known to the Church otherwise he would not so have named that day without farther explication but that he knew for certain it was named in the Church by that agnomination Which shews that the Lords day was celebrated in the Church before that John was in the Spirit Neither could the Lords day be so solemn throughout all Churches in John's time but that all the Apostles before him had dispersed abroad this Doctrine Secondly it appears from Scripture also that this day was by Apostolical ordination destined to the collecting of almes 1 Cor. 16. 2. Where he gives order that upon the first day of the week every one should lay by him in store the Collection for the Saints of which he had spoken in the former verse The primary intention indeed of that place is to give order about the collections made for relieving the necessity of the poor but since he orders that they may be made on the Lords day there is no doubt but he changes them to celebrate the day it self For whenas he requires the end why should he not also prescribe the means directly conducing to that end without doubt the effect which was on that day to be performed presupposeth the day it self and in commanding the end the command of the means is alwayes included without which we obtain not the end To Chrysostom that searches out the causes of this Apostolical ordination that time seems very commodious to exercise mercy on First because the mind being free from labours it is more easily perswaded to commiâ—eration And secondly because the communicating of celestial holy things being had on that day will strongly provoke men to the duties of mercy Tertullian and Justin Martyr do testifie that almes were collected on that day doubtless by authority of the aforesaid Apostolical ordination which they had laid by them in store till this day as we have seen in the second chapter These collections were by the Christian people observed of their own accord as pledges of piety as Tertullian which Iustin Martyr affirms in his second Apology were on the Sunday deposited with the President out of which provision was made for pupils widows and those who were in want through sickness or any other cause Thirdly it also appears by the Scripture that on that day assemblies were held for hearing the Word and administring the Eucharist which are chiefly to be counted amongst the sacred offices of holy dayes St. Paul as in the second Chapter although he abode seven dayes at Troas we read not that the Disciples met to break bread but on the first day of the week Whence it is collected conveniently that even then the Church had on that day solemn conventions to perform the sacred exercises of Religion on in the preaching of the Word and administration of the Sacraments neither did this custome grow out of use with the succeeding Church as after when we shall treat of sanctifying the Lords day we will shew but the devout preaching of Gods Word being happily begun on that day by the Apostles Acts 2. 1. was ever after continued at the same time to the honour of God and
no weight and in very deed is foolish since not the diligence of husbandry but the virtue of the Sun when it seems good to the bestower of fruits doth afford the abundance of fruits because I say such a law is come forth as vilisies the Lords worship and is a decree differing from those that by the Holy Ghost have gotten the victory against all their adversaries we ordain also which seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted of him that all persons cease from labour that day whereon our innocency was restored he speaks of the Lords day and let neither husbandmen nor any others go about any unlawful work on that day For if they who observed but a certain shadow and figure did so greatly reverence the Sabbath day that they wholly abstained from all labour how is it not reasonable for those who honour the light of grace and the truth it self to reverence that day which is of God enriched with honour and on which deliverance from shameful destruction was wrought for us Thus Leo Novel 54. Leon. And so according to that common Proverb The later day is scholar to the former what by too much facility which suited not with the Lords solemnity was formerly granted by them that followed who saw the inconvenience of the former liberty was afterwards amended In divers Councils also it was ordained that no rural labours should be exercised on that day as about the year 413. in one and the same year all servile and rural labours and markets are forbidden Concil Aceratensi 14. Can. 16. in Turonensi Can. 40. in Moguntino Can. 37. in Rhemensi Can. 35. in Conc. Aurelianensi 3. where they think fit to determine of rural work that is concerning husbandry or the vineyard or pruning or reaping winnowing or cutting hedge that coming to the Church they moght more easily attend upon prayer Can. 27. Also in Conc. Narbonensi cap. 4. it 's ordained that they should not yoke oxen In Concil Antisiodorensi Can. 16. It is not lawful to yoke oxen on the Lords day or to exercise other labours Also in Concil Calibonensi Can. 18. We define that none at all presume to work any rural labours on the Lords day that is to plow to reap make sale or any thing that pertains to husbandry But although these things do very abundantly shew that on the Lords dayes we are not to employ our work for gainful labour since as well they were to be punished by the supreme authority of the Prince as by the censure of the Church who did the contrary yet there are some who having no respect either to the worship of God or to the promoting mens salvation do affirm that Christians may on the Lords day safely attend any labours when the duties of the publick service are ended to establish which opinion they first wrest the authority of Hierom and them of the third Council of Orleans Hierom. in Epitaphio Paulae ad Eustochium tells us that the women returning from the Church on the Lords day with Paula were busie about their task and either made clothes for themselves or others In the Council of Orleans they determine that on the Lords day that to be lawful which was lawful before to be done only rural labours excepted Hence some gather that men are to cease from their labours no loâ—â—â—r on the Lords dayes than while collectam faciunt as Hierom there speaks But first let the Reader well weigh whether Hierom in that place may seem to speak of womens labour which they bestowed about their works on other than the Lords dayes and whether revertentes ab Ecclesia in him be the same as if he had said when they are not present at Church they are busie at work Nor doth this sense of Hierom's words want reason especially because Hierom sayes they went only to the Church on the Lords day And in another place Hierom contends that on the Sabbath he speaks to those whom Christ had made free not the Jews men should only do those things which pertain to the salvation of the soul Now if those women had on that day plied their labours they would have done somewhat that had not pertained to the souls salvation which by Hierom's judgment they should not have done And of others Hierom speaks who on the Lords dayes did only attend on Prayer and reading Epist. ad Eustochium de custodia virginit But Hierom sayes not this as if on the Lords day to attend the duties of piety had been only appropriated to the Coenobitae of whom he speaks and other Christians on that day had employed their work oâ—â—â—daily labours from which the Coenobitae ceased No by no means But the Holy Father doth distinguish the works undertaken by the Coenobitae on the Lords day from others which they undertook on the other dayes of the week on which they fell about stated works as he speaks and those being ended they attended on Prayer and reading also which thing they also did every day when they had ended their labours but on the Lords day they were intent on nothing else but the duties of piety Secondly If it should be granted that those women did attend their ordinary works on the Lords day it was proper to them onely and then what we must think of that fact appears out of St. Cyprian who while he affirms that the Aquarians did bottom on no author or will of Christ insinuateth this Doctrine to us namely that the custome of some men is not to be followed unless first we enquire whom they followed whose grave authority we may very fitly accommodate to the aforesaid women We are to consider not only what those women did but upon what authority they did it If they attended on the Lords day their daily works and labours they were invited thereunto neither by the authorities of Christ nor his holy Apostles nor the lawful practise of the Church which restrained Christians from those works And I believe no body of a sound mind will impose as a law on other mens shoulders a certain singular custome confirmed by no law or authority but contrary to the general practice of the whole Church especially when Hierom himself and other grave Fathers do conclude that nothing but the works of piety or of some emergent necessity is to be done on that day as formerly from their writings hath been observed We do with St. Austin commend a custom which is known to usurp nothing against the Catholick faith Thirdly Charles the Great in his Constitutions ordains that on the Lords day women sow not their clothes Now we prefer justly the religious ordinance of a pious Emperour depending upon various authorities of Ecclesiastical Canons to a custome of women confirmed by no antiquity Lastly I 'le only add this What if those silly women believed it to be a work of charity by the
as though God could not be offended with the delight of man which without any prejudice to Gods fear and honour to enjoy in fit time and place is no sin lest any one here should think so I will over and above add something that may make more for illustrating the genuine sense of the aforesaid prohibitions And in the first place this is worth our knowing that sights playes and conflicts were amongst the ancients under the same kind and in Tertullian there are reckoned four kinds of sights namely 1. Circi insania i. the folly of the Cirque 2. Theatri impudiciti◠i. the wantonness of the Theatre 3. Arenae atrocitas the cruelty of the Sand. 4. Xysti vanitas i. the vanity of the Xyst or wrastling-gallery In the Cirque four horses run striving one with another In the Theatres were acted Stage-playes and immodest Interludes were recited In the Sand were setting together wild Beasts and Fencers Lastly in the Wrastling galleries there were the praeludia of these Games while the Wrastlers were exercised in their Schools and the swiftness of the runners was tryed Whence the same Tertullian calls the founders and orderers of these sights Quadrigiarios Scenicos Xysticos Arenarios Whatever we meet with to be observed about them by the searchers of antiquity it is to be referred to these kinds of sights And all these are disallowed by the ancients especially by Tertullian and Cyprian in their books which they have set out purposely de spectaculis In which their Idolatrous original because at first amongst other superstitious rites they were instituted under the name of Religion and divers obscene provocations of lust flowing from them are recited and condemned But when the Emperours had embraced the Christian Faith it seems all other acts but the sights in the Cirque and Theatre were ceased and hence it was that the grave Fathers being haters of Games when they write against sights do not so much make mention of others as of these two and against them from which they judge that all Christians should withdraw they direct a sharp stile enough neither by their good will would they have any members of the Church at any time much less on the Lords day to be present at them This the books above cited de spectaculis do without me saying any thing abundantly testifie The holy and general Synod in Trulle forbids those Jesters as they are called and the sights of them and then the seeing of huntings and those dances that are acted in the Scene Neither is the time named by them on which they are prohibited but they say that the Synod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 forbiddeth altogether and what is forbidden altogether is to be done at no time For as Zonaras expounds the Canon the Faithful are to lead their life by the prescript of Evangelical discipline and not remissly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. as becometh Saints All those things therefore by which the mind cannot be released by a necessary remission and whereupon immoderate laughters are provoked are by the decree of this Canon forbidden Now if in their judgment we must not at any time see the actions of Jesters or Scenical dancings much less must we on the Lords day which is expresly ordained by the Africanes in the Council of Carthage St. Chrysostom Cyril Ephrem Syrus Greg. Naz. and divers other Fathers have taught the same The sacred Emperours Leo Anthemius and others have decreed the same whose testimonies are formerly recited in this Chapter But although the truth of this be largely demonstrated yet so far is the vigour of Ecclesiastical discipline enervated and by the languishing whereof we are thrown down into so bad a condition that now not only an excuse but authority is given to vice Whereupon the same falls out in our age which did sometime in Cyprians there are not wanting fawning assertors and indulgent patrons of vices who give authority to vice These do as we said batter with a double Ram the aforesaid truth confirmed by so many illustrious testimonies of the ancients And they contend that worldly shows were forbidden of the Fathers only for two causes either because they were obscene in themselves and of their own nature and therefore never lawful or else because they were held at such a time as the publick meetings of the Church were celebrated according to them honest and sober dances as they speak notwithstanding the aforesaid Canons and Statutes especially after the Church-meetings are ended may safely be used How wise doth disputing arrogance think it self especially when it fears losing any thing of worldy joyes saith Tertullian This subtil wit if any where appears in this weak refuge Shall they who decree as Leo and Anthemius that dayes dedicated to the most High Majesty be occupied in no pleasures be believed that they would assign any place to them and although these pleasures afterwards in the same law be called obscene yet by virtue of what consequence can it be inferred that therefore some pleasures there are not obscene which are not prohibited by that decree This new and unheard of distinction of forbidden pleasures is to be left to the authors of it which was unknown to Leo and Anthemius when they decreed that the holiness of the day was to be violated by no pleasures and which Octavius in Minuc Felice confesses the Church was ignorant of while he answers Caecilius blaming the Christians for abstaining from sights and pomps which Caecilius then a heathen called honest pleasures Octavius confesses that Christians abstained from them Octavius a Christian takes those for evil pleasures which Caecilius a Heathen called honest This is to all men an argument that the Christians whose cause Octavius pleads against Caecilius did repute the pleasures of sights and pomps as evil and that for good cause since as the Greeks have a Proverb An ape is an ape although clad in purple by the pleasures of sights with what painting soever they be whited the Lords day is not to be violated Any may see that the pleasures of pomps or showes in the fore-mentioned decree of the Emperours are called obscene from the effect For they that follow them do usually fall into obscene manners And the word Obscenity is added by the Emperours not for the distinction but detestation of pleasures as when the Apostle 1 Pet. 4. 3. calls Idolatry abominable or if any one else should call Drunkenness detestable will any wise man thence conclude that there is a certain lawful use of Images or that some Drunkenness is not to be detested Nothing less St. Chrysostom wished that games and dances might altogether be left off of which he never speaks without highly detesting them in his mind and boldly condemns the very art of dancing which he that exerciseth if he be asked why omitting other arts he is employed in this he could not deny it to be dishonest and
writings about the time of later Lammas Moreover if on other dayes on which the Church was permitted to attend on worldly labours they took pains in so often interpreting of Scripture who will be so far a stranger to right reason as that he should believe that they would not bestow so much labour for this business on the Lords dayes on which they abstaining from all others were only intent on Divine worship much rather and better â—â—ould they say in my judgment if on other dayes they Treated twice out of Scripture they would if occasion served much oftener give themselves to this labour on the Lords day As sometimes Sisinnius being asked why he would wash himself twice every day in the publick bath being a Bishop he answered because I cannot wash thrice So the ancient Bishops of the Church were seriously intent twice on the Lords dayes on the explication of Scripture And if they could get any just occasion to do more than this they would not avoid the labour of doing it the third or fourth time as may be seen by that Sermon in Austin when he whoever he was that was the author of that Sermon had twice performed the office of explaining Scripture when a new occasion was offered which was an extraordinary one on the same day he did the same the third time For thus he begins Wonder not dear brethren if I to day this third time by Gods assistance preach unto you Serm. 33. ad fratres in eremo We have formerly seen some of Basils both morning and evening Sermons we read also that he preach'd twice before noon In the beginning of his Hom. in Psalm 114. he excuseth himself that he came somewhat late to some that had waited on him from midnight and gives the reason because before he came to them he had preached in another Church yet those Vigils were onely continued from mid-night to mid-day And thus these things shew that the Fathers did oftener than once treat out of the Scripture on one and the same day CHAP. IX Both in Old and New Testament in celebrating the Sabbaths solemnity after reading of the Scriptures followed the interpretation of them It 's considered whether before the Babylonish captivity the interpretating of the Law was in use among the Jews on their Sabbath dayes THere are some who being not content with the aforesaid testimonies do further demand an example to be shewn either in the Old or New Testament of any Pastour labouring in preaching of the Word who bestowed his labour in this work twice on the Sabbath dayes I cannot enough wonder at these mens wit who will not be removed from the opinion they have espoused and rather would pluck out their their own eyes than see what will they nill they they are enforced to see But come on iâ— there be any satisfying of these mens expectation and let us consider what light may be setch'd from the fountains of Scripture to answer this question From both Testaments it is evident that in the publick assemblies of the Church after reading of Scripture there followed the interpretation of the same This we have shewn in Chap. 3. So Neh. 8. 5 6 7 8. they did not onely read plainly the Law of God in the publick assembly but they also expounded the sense of it and therefore the naked reading of Scripture was not thought sufficient by the Levites to give the people understanding otherwise they would have abstained from expounding them from day to noon So in the Jews assemblies which are mentioned in the New Testament alwayes after reading of Scripture followed their explication see Luk. 4. 20. Act. 13. 15. The sacred books being read they that excelled in Doctrine did afterwards interpret them So Acts 15. 21. we read that Moses had in every Town those that preached him being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath day the sense of which Scripture we have declared out of Philo Judaeus And these things shew that the Scriptures were both read and by interpretation illustrated in the Jewish Church But some there are that they may elude this answer who contend that this manner of interpreting Scripture on Sabbath dayes was not in use under the former Temple that is before the Babylonish captivity because in the writings of Moses in which is extant the institution of the Sabbath before they were returned out of Babylon into the Land of Canaan we meet with no mention thereof neither as they think is there any command extant by virtue whereof the Priests are obliged to interpret the Law on Sabbath dayes successively returning which opinion is entertained by some with applause Now if it be true which they say then the whole manner of the Jews keeping holy the Sabbath consisted in meer idleness or a cessation from labours by Gods command which yet none will easily admit since not onely in the old Sabbath God enjoyned the rest to the people of the Jews but also required holiness in those that ceased from their labours otherwise he had not determined the day on which we are to rest to be sanctified which yet he did Observe saith Moses the Sabbath day to sanctifie it as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee The rest commanded by God on the Sabbath day was not a part properly called but an help to its sanctification as we have taught out of the Fathers Book 1. chap. 11. The Sabbath saith Chrysostome is given not for idleness but that men being withdrawn from the care of temporal things they might spend the rest of it in spiritual matters Yea he saith in the same place that the Jews were to attend the hearing of Divine Sermons So also Origen confesses that the Reader or Doctor of the Law did not cease on Sabbath dayes from his work and yet did not break the Sabbath Now what was the work of the Reader or Doctor of the Law on which they did attend but to instruct the people in the understanding thereof Athanasius also saith The Sabbath signifieth or intimateth not idleness but the knowledge of the author The Sabbath was given for knowledge and not for idleness because knowledge is more necessary than idleness He blamed those who were idle on the Sabbath because they had not that which was proper for the Sabbath that is to say knowledge of the truth The Sabbath therefore according to St. Athanasius was given men that they ceasing from worldly businesses might freely apply their minds to the means by which they might attain some knowledge of God And what those means are we have shewn from Chrysostom and Origen St. Austin thought that the Jews women might better spin wool and their men dig the ground as formerly we have observed out of him than that they ceasing from labour should spend their time in playes according to whom something else was required to the sanctification of the Sabbath than meer rest namely the sanctifying of the
other interpreting of the law used under the former Temple besides that which the Prophets being extraordinarily called undertook Which opinion being once admitted it will not be easie to avoid the aforesaid incommodities as to any one it will appear by a more narrow search into them Unto whose conjecture we will with their good-leave oppose the authorities both of Jews and Christians in that particular being bottomed upon the Holy Scripture Flavius Josephus whom according to Cunaeus we are to believe next to the Pen-men of Holy Writ pleading the Cause of the Jews against Appion in his Apology which in the famous Cunaeus opinion is learned to a miracle in express words affirms that Moses would have us hear the Law not once or twice or oftner but he commands all men leaving their other works to meet together to hear the Law and perfectly to learn it c. Thus he And if this Ordinance of a weekly meeting to hear and learn the Law was in force in Moses age then was it long before the Babylonish Captivity While Philo Judaeus contends that the Playes and ridiculous spectacles of Fools and Dancers ought to be put away he saith that it was the manner to study Philosophy on Sabbath dayes the Prince going before and teaching what was needful to be done or spoken the rest giving ear Whereupon he also affirms that they now should play the Philosophers upon Sabbath dayes more patrio in their country manner and he acknowledgeth that Oratories in Cities were for Schools of Virtue More credit therefore is deservedly to be given to the Jewes relating their countrey customes than to other mens conjectures of them Among the Christians divers very learned men treating of the Hebrews Common-wealth have taught the same Amongst whom Carolus Sigonius de Rep. Hebraeorum l. 5. c. 10. and Cornelius Bertramus p. 96. The famous Cunaeus to whom the Christian Church is much beholden for his labours in explaining the antiquities of the Hebrews saith that the right observation of Sabbaths consisted in the holiness of all their words and deeds and in Divine worship and Prayers All which doth plainly evidence that they used to read the Law and interpret it to the peoples capacity on the Sabbath dayes otherwise neither their words nor deeds had been noted for holiness or how else could the minds of the Jews have been furnished piously to conceive Prayers on Sabbath dayes without the explaining of the Scripture Yea the Learned Cunaeus confesses that the Levites in the Synagogues did deliver to the people in the Towns of Judaea the chief knowledge of all Laws both of Humane and Divine things and when could the Levites do this with greater profit than on the Sabbath dayes In a word although we deny that at that time the Talmudical interpretation of Scripture was grown in use which we confess the ancient Church of the Jews knew nothing of yet we cannot affirm this of the vocal interpretation of the Scriptures by the Levites But to return to our purpose We find that under the Old Testament the Scriptures were read and opened in the Jews assemblie even the Holy Ghost being witness although some doubt of the period of time at which their interpretation on Sabbath dayes began As for the Churches in the New Testament planted by the Apostles they could not so long as their Peace was disturbed with a storm of Persecutions meet together without very great difficulty for which cause as we said Chap. 1. they had their meetings sometime on the night and sometimes on the day neither again was it safe for them to hold a meeting all the day For which cause Tertullian judges that it was best for Christians if the Lords dayes solemnities could not be celebrated on the day time for persecutions whereof he speaks then ought they to keep them on the night if not with every one of them yet at least with three These things teach us that the Church was not permitted in that age with safety and as often as they list to meet together on the day time to perform the exercises of piety He therefore that requires of us some one example for expounding Scripture twice while the fire of Persecution raged with which that age abounded I desire him to tell me whether the Christians did during that Persecution twice every Lords day keep their meetings For if it were safe for them to meet why may they not as well be believed to meâ—t for interpreting of Scripture and Prayer to God since these duties are joyned by the Apostle 1 Cor. 14. and observed by Cyprian as he faithfully expounded the Scriptures Especially when it was the custom of the Church so often as Scripture was read to interpret the same This we have largely enough shewn out of Justin Origen Tertullian Ambrose Augustine and other Fathers of great authority chap. 4. Since therefore in the Jewish Apostolical and other Churches succeeding the Apostles there followed after the reading of the Scriptures an exposition of them it seems necessarily to follow that if they had liberty to meet on Lords dayes then they used to treat twice out of Scripture of which there is frequent mention in their assemblies And it 's certainly evident from the continual practiâ—â— of the Church that from the very Apostles times prayers and reading were reckoned both together which were celebrated both morning and evening No man therefore can judge it unreasonable to say that there followed an interpretation of those things which were read because reading was used to instruct the people But how could the people be instructed in the Scripture read without an interpretation The Eunucâ— answered Acts 8. 31. that he could not understand what he read except some one should guide him Yea they were wont to Treat out of the Reading or Lesson as was formerly said The calamitous condition also of those times wherein so many cruel persecutions were stirred up required the same Daily exhortations were very needful to the Christians for to bear the Cross of the Gospel patiently Neither must we think that these skilful Pastours who were set over the Church by the Apostles and Apostolical men did not endeavour as often as they could to instruct the People committed to them in the matters of Faith St. Cyprian Ep. 40. professes that he was sore troubled when he could not go to and exhort every one as the Lords and his Gospel Ministry required while he was in his banishment If it were a grief to this vigilant Bishop that because being hindred by his exile he could not provoke all who were commended to his inspection and care by his holy Exhortations to piety and patience certainly when he was with his people if he took care that by a Reader the bare reading of the Gospel was recited to them although he stirred not them up by his Exhortations to practise what they had heard read he would never in very deed have thought
that he had shewed himself a faithful Bishop Whereupon it deservedly seems an absurd thing to Mr. S. A. a man of ripe judgment to think that the primitive Bishops faithfully fulfilling their Ministry were content with a naked reading of the Scriptures without any explaining of them to the People which if the Bishop had not performed although he might live innocently and without scandal yet that conversation without preaching would do hurt by silence although he might do good by Example as Hierom shews Ep. ad Oceanum Therefore the diligent Overseers of Churches would never intermit this unless they were hindred by some urgent necessity and therefore amongst them after reading of Scriptures there followed an explication of them as often as the Church met CHAP. X. The Church used Prayers on the Lords Day Conventicles for Churches Prayers only to God the Praeses began them he prepares the people to poure them out Sursum corda at prayer the voice of all who were present was one they prayed as the Holy Ghost suggested to them How this custome was changed For what the Church prayed Prayer in a known tongue The posture of the body in prayer The word Amen THus far of the Ministry of the Word whereby was made a solemn observation of the Lords Day the second Office performed by the Church on that day followeth this consists in Prayer and the Scripture witnesseth that the Church prayed in their Assemblies together to God St. Paul commands that supplications prayers intercessions and giving of thanks be made in Churches 1 Tim. 2. 1. The Apostles and Christians are said to continue with one accord in prayer and supplication Act. 1. 14. We read that the Church gathered at Hierusalem did continue in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and in breaking of bread and prayers Act. 2. 42. Prayers also are every where reckoned by the Fathers amongst the offices of Piety celebrated on that day When the people were congregated to perform the Lords dayes solemnities the Scriptures were not onely read but also Petitions were sent away viz. to God Tertullian de anima c. 9. also Apol. c. 39 he saith that the Church assembled into a company that we praying may by our prayers as it were beset God about with a company made up that is that the Prayers of all being gathered together we may as it were in a certain spiritual host go unto God with one humble assault and make him propitious to us and others as the renowned Zanchius expounds it When the writings of the Prophets and Apostles were read in the Church-assembly and the same explained by the Praeses all rose up and poured out their Prayers to God in Justins age When Julian studied to accommodate the Greeks manners to the Orders of the Church among other things he ordained that after the manner of the Church there should be certain Prayers for certain houres and dayes Arnobius affirms that the Christians used Prayers in their Conventicles lib. 4. contr Gent. In which place Arnobius calls the places w ch were assigned to the publick assemblies of Christians for interpreting of Gods Word prayer to God and administring the H. Eucharist Conventicula As Lactantius while he makes mention of a certain mans cruelty in Phrygia who burnt all the people together with the Conventicle Where he speaks of the place where the Church performed the exercises of Religion in their assemblies Arnobius also elsewhere mentions these Prayers lib. 1. where he saith that the Christians with joynt Prayers worshipped Christ and begged of him things just honest and such as he may well hear Cyril acknowledges that Christians ought on Feast-dayes to frequent the Temples of God and among other duties of Religion to insist upon prayers lib. 8. in Joh. c. 5. All these things shew that Prayers were used by the Church in their publick assemblies But Christians when they were assembled were not intent onely upon Prayers as Zonaras would have it in Can. 16. Conc. Laodic For in the fore-going Chapter we have observed out of Church-records that in the publick assembly of the Church the Scriptures were both read and interpreted by the Bishops and those that were delegated to this office in the Churches In rehearsing of these Prayers eight things come especially to be spoken of which are not unworthy our knowledge In the first place the primitive Christians made all their Prayers to God because they knew they could not obtain what they prayed for of any one else therefore in Prayers they had respect to God as being one who alone could answer their petitions And it is a point of great folly to ask of those who are no Gods as if they were Gods Clem. Alexandr Strom. l. 7. The Christians therefore at that time worshipped God alone and the Martyrs they honoured as the Disciples and followers of the Lord. Eus Hist. l. 4. c. 14. neither had the Idolatrous worship of Saints crept then into the Church which our Learned Divines for all the anger of the Papists have copiously enough taught and therefore I will add no more of that Secondly Prayers made in the Church-assembly were begun by him who was set over the rest which he put up as well as he could saith Justin Martyr for which reason Proterius Bishop of Alexandria is called by Niceph. Hist l. 15. c. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mediator of God and Men althhough Augustine affirms that none of the good and faithful Christians could bear Parmenianus that made a Bishop the Mediatour between God and the people And Greg. Naz. reckons this as a praise to Bishops that they undertake the care and government of souls and do the part of Mediatours between God and men Apol. pro â—uga Which yet I think is onely to be affirmed of those who with Moses stand in the gap to turn away the wrath of God lest he destroy the People Psal 105. 23. The Emperours themselves do confess in their Epistle to the Asian Diocess that by Bishops Prayers wars are ended invasions of Angels kept off and hurtful spirits repelled All these things are ascribed to them not that they procured them but because they seriously pleaded with God in Prayers that he would avert these evils from the Churches committed to their care to whose Prayers God in his infinite Mercy gave an answer So thinketh Chrysostom who tells us that it is the part of a Bishop as an Ambassadour to intercede for a whole City yea for the whole world and deprecate God that he may be propitious to men And when the Praepositus prepared to pray with the people before he begun he prepared the people with a previous speech For Ambrose thought it necessary that the preparation of the mind go before Prayer lest he that prayes to God seem to tempt him which men led even by the onely instinct of nature know as we may see in the Pythagoreans not
those that were absent of what they heard in publick after they were departed from the publick assembly So Chrysostom Hom. 10. in Gen. And he sharply taxes those that did not thus Hom. 32. in Joh. whom when they are gone home he affirms they set upon no work beseeming a Christian Whilst they do not search out the sense of the Scriptures which they heard in the assembly And at length requires them that when they are gone home they endeavour the doing of what they are commanded c. Hom. 3. in Joh. Bafil was of the same mind who seriously wished that what they had heard at both morning and evening assembly all that might be the table talk to the hearers that is when they sat down to table they should talk of what they heard St. Austin counsels his hearers to conferr with those that were absent of what they heard and so their memory would be as his voice Praef. in Psal 50. And in the end of the interpretation of that Psalm he saith As it belongeth to us to speak in the Church to you so it belongeth to you to speak of it in your houses Thirdly Because the Lords Day is not onely ordained for a pious celebration of the memory of Christs Resurrection but also Basil the Great being witness is an image of the world to come although it be no type of the rest and happiness in the life to come yet as after he explaines it that in this daily commotion we neglect not to provide viands for a removal into that life that never will have end Basil de Spiritu Sancto cap. 27. Such viands shall he provide that on that day while he hath leisure from external things shall seriously think with himself that this is not his Countrey but he an Exile and at length he must remove hence into Heaven the Countrey of all the faithful Augustine or whoever it was else affirms in the Book De decem chordis cap. 3. that a Christian is commanded to observe the Sabbath spiritually in hope of the future rest which the Lord promiseth And elsewhere The Lords Day being consecrated by the Resurrection of Christ doth not onely prefigure the eternal rest of the Spirit but body also Aug. de Civitate Dei lib. 22. cap. 30. Christians therefore are on this day principally to think of this eternal rest taking an occasion from the rest of the Lords Day although as I said it be not properly instituted to signifie this rest as a type of that thing What Ignatius Epist ad Magnes delivers of the manner of observing the Sabbath may fitly be applied to the celebration of the Lords Day He would have every one to keep a Sabbath in a spiritual manner in meditating of the Law not in refreshing and releasing of the body and admiring the works of God which especially do agree to the solemnity of a Christian Sabbath on which Christians are to bend their care hither to recollect themselves and feed their souls with the pious thoughts of that eternal rest of which the Lords Dayes rest is an image according to Basil in the world to come by what means they can Therefore when the publick meeting was ended there followed also a pious meditation which very well agreeth to the sanctification of the Lords Day when the minds of men by hearing of the Word publick Prayers and other publick Offices of Religion performed on that day are inflamed with exceeding love to desire heavenly things And that the Ancients were of that mind the testimonies cited Book 1. Chap. 5. without me saying ought do bear witness For the Fathers as we have seen do acknowledge that the Lords Day was dedicated to Divine Worship and judged that nought was to be done on that day by Christians whether in their assemblies or after they were dismissed from them but what tended to the salvation of the soul This Origen alone for all will manifest Hom. 23. in Num. who while he shews in what things the observation of the Christian Sabbath consisteth bids in among other things to think of heavenly things to be careful about the future hope to have before our eyes the Judgment to come and not to look at present and visible things but at invisible and future These things do shew that pious meditation is of necessity to be had on the Lords Day by help whereof the minds of Christians may be carried up from earthly to heavenly things to the end that their conversation may be in heaven from whence they look for the Saviour Phil. 3. 20. even while they live on earth Chrysostom is earnest with his hearers Hom. 15. in Gen. that they would remember what was spoken in the Auditory and that they would weigh all things with themselves that what they had heard might settle in their thoughts Nor doth he ask this onely of them but doth also earnestly request it of God that not onely while they were present in the Auditory they would remember what he had said but that they would weigh them at home by themselves and in the market and wheresoever they did abide Hom. 5. ad Pop. Now if a Religious meditation on the Lords Day of what we have heard be a way to the eternal observation of a Sabbath in the Heavens for Christians for whom there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remaineth a Sabbatism Heb. 4. 9. if they are to have before their eyes the future hope and the tremendous judgment on that day and to exhilerate their minds with the thoughts of a future life if they are to hearken to what is said with an attentive mind not onely while they are present in the Auditory but after their their departure thence where-ever they abide they be to call to mind what they have heard Lastly if those vigilant Fathers were earnest with God that their Auditors minds might be perswaded to do this all which are manifest by the cited testimonies then not without cause have we affirmed that when the publick assemblies are ended Meditation upon what we have heard is of necessity required of Christians Fourthly we read that Gifts which afterwards they called Collects were given on the Lords Day for the use of the poor So St. Paul gave order 1 Cor. 16. 2. That upon the first day of the week every one of you lay by you in store as God hath prospered him c. The Apostle did very fitly make choice of a day of a sacred assembly for gathering Almes on That the minds of Christians might by hearing the Word publick Prayers and holy Lessons had on that Day be the better inflamed to bestâ—â— them upon the poors use Add also the consent of the antient Church Justin Martyr Ap. 2. saith that when the Church was met on the Sunday there was a larger contribution as their ability would bear and what they so gathered they committed to him that was the Praepositus to be bestowed for the use of all that were
other Heathens which I think needless to rehearse here because if any will not believe my relation the aforesaid testimonies of the Poets in Clemens may make the incredulous to believe Euseb de praepar Erang saith that God having finished his works allowed us a day for rest from our labours This he confirms by the authorities of divers Poets And the learned Rivet in dissertat de Sabbato cap. 5. proves that these testimonies are to be understood of the seventh day of every week While Suetonius describes the moderation of Tiberius exhibited even towards his inferiours he tells us amongst other things that Diogenes a certain Grammarian being wont to dispute on the Sabbath dayes at Rhodes would not admit Tiberius to hear him out of his order but by his servant put him off till the seventh day Whence it appears that the seventh day was known to Diogenes although the learned Casaubon on that place of Suetonius thinketh that the observation of weeks which holds at this day used among the Greeks was not commonly received before the times of Tiberius Yet the learned Rivet loc citato proves by divers testimonies that it was in use amongst the Latines so to distinguish their dayes Lampridius in Alexand. Severo tells us that when he was in the City he went up to the Capitol on the seventh day and frequented the Temples We meet with more testimonies to this purpose in the learned Amesius of pious memory in Medul Theolog. lib. 2. cap. 15. sect 10. And now I will conclude with the testimony of Josephus against Appion l. 2. That there is no nation either of Greeks or Barbarians or any where else amongst whom the custome of the seventh day which the Jews used to keep holy was not grown common With whom as we have seen agreeth Clemens Alexandrinus That the custome therefore of celebrating the seventh day was common amongst the Heathens can be doubted by none whether as I said from the instinct of nature or by the ordination of God which came by tradition to the posterity of Adam However if we may credit the fore-mentioned Authors it is certain that the Festival of this solemnity was known to the whole world although most know not the cause of this solemnity which Philo de vita Mosis lib. 3. observes and Theophilus Antiochenus in the fore-cited place Theophilus saith that all men call the seventh day the Sabbath but most know not the cause of its appellation Now that cause which most knew not was Gods resting on it when he had finished in six dayes that stupendious work of Creation which was obliterated amongst the Heathens by a long tract of time although they observed the day as appeareth by the mentioned testimonies This Irenaeus teacheth more at large in the end of the thirtieth chapter of his fourth book whither I send the Reader In the last place I will satisfie the second Question viz If the Gentiles were obliged to observe the Sabbath and the custom of observing it was grown common amongst them why are they never in Scripture reproved of God for profaning the Sabbath who can deny that the Gentiles as well as the Jews were obliged by the instinct of nature to worship God their great Creatour Besides divers of the Heathen had got the knowledge of God the Creation and Sabbath as Clemens Alexandrinus Eusebius c. have plainly taught us Furthermore let him tell us who can why they as well as other men should not be obliged to observe the Sabbath by the Divine Law for we know that a determined time to perform a certain worship is no less necessary to them than others But many reasons there were for which God might reprove the Heathen and yet move no controversie against them about the Sabbath either because its institution was grown obsolete amongst many of the Gentiles though not all or because they had violated the whole worship of God for which cause he reprehends them yet he reproves them not for the Sabbath by name as being the time of worship because the Sabbath was onely ordained for performing the true worship of the true God now the Gentiles worshipped not God but Idols therefore God accuseth them of Idolatry and not for neglecting the Sabbath and in vain would they have had regard of the Sabbath while on the Sabbath they worshipped Idols and not God the author of the Sabbath I might also add here that it 's not manifest that all the sins committed by the Heathens were reprehended in Scripture particularly But the famous Rivet doth answer this objection more at large in whose learned answers they that do not abhorr the truth cannot but acquiesce And thus much for the reasons against the opinion of the Sabbath being observed from the beginning of the world Now to the authorities by which others busie themselves to infringe this opinion these are in number three The first whereof is that of Irenaeus who lib. 4. cap. 30. tells us that Abraham believed God without Circumcision and without the Sabbath The second is of Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew in whom it 's read that Abel and Enoch were just without the observation of the Sabbath and after them Abraham and his posterity untill Moses pleased God And after he adds Before Moses there was no need of celebrating the Sabbath In the third place Tertullian is produced in whom they read that neither Adam nor his off-spring Abel or Noah or Enoch did keep the Sabbath These are the chief places which are brought against the contrary opinion to which before I answer I might say that the Judgments of other Fathers that affirm it might be opposed to the authorities of them that deny it But lest by so saying I should seem to set together the grave Fathers amongst themselves I answer first He that equally weigheth the foresaid testimonies shall easily observe that the Fathers intention in the foresaid places was this that they might teach that men were not justified by observing of the Jewish Sabbath This at the first blush will appear to him that views the places Irenaeus he speaks of the multitude of them that were just before Abraham the Patriarchs and Moses and were justified without these namely without Circumcision and the Sabbath It was therefore Irenaeus his purpose to prove that the Sabbath or Circumcision were not the perfecting of righteousness neither doth Irenaeus simply speak of the observation of the Sabbath but of its observation in order to justification which thing his words do declare And Justin Martyr had the same meaning who disputed against Trypho the Jew propounding to himself means by which mercy might befall him from God as Trypho speaks amongst which he reckons the Sabbath and Circumcision that he might have some hope of salvation Whilst the blessed Martyr opposeth himself to this mans purpose he affirmeth that all the foresaid Fathers who kept the Sabbath pleased
the Sabbaths of the Jews and by the names of Months New moons by years the computing of years according to the Jews The false Apostles did urge the Sabbath New moons and the other Feast dayes of the Jews because they were legal observations but the Apostle having pious bowels rolling within him doth seasonably admonish the Galatians that they should not yield to them in this business and so his labour in promulging the Gospel be in vain And to any that considers the circumstances of the Text it is a thing without controversie that the Apostle properly doth reprehend the Galatians because that after they had acknowledged and received the Doctrine of the Gospel in a Jewish manner to whom not only the day for the worship but also the celebration in its rest was of it self religious they had observed Feast dayes as if such a kind of observation were so necessary to the worship of God that by its neglect their salvation was in hazard Neither are the words of the Apostle so to be taken as if he only reprehended the Galatians for observing dayes on this ground that they might make a guess of the success of their actions as the Heathens did as St. Austin would have it Epist ad Januarium although in another place he interprets this place doubtfully Austin in Epist ad Cal. expounds it first of the Heathens custom and then of the Jews Also the Commentaries in Gal. attributed to Ambrose do interpret the place of the Apostle in the same manner but because the observation of dayes which was rejected of the Apostle was done according to those weak and beggarly elements Gal. 4. 9. i. e. as we said legal observations which the Galatians did seriously sue for being so taught of the false Apostles The sense of the Apostles words cannot be expounded according to the foresaid Fathers These sacred testimonies of the blessed Apostle do shew that the Jewish Sabbath was abrogated by Christs coming Nor do I dissent from the gravest Lights in the Churh in teaching the cessation thereof for with an-unanimous consent they do teach that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath is not to be imposed on Christians So Athanas Hom. de semente Homil. de Sab. Circumcis Cyprian would have the eighth day to be to the Christians what the Sabbath was which as he saith is as it were the Image of the Lords day August Ep. 118. c. 12. Ambros in Eph. 2. Chrysost in Cal. 1. Tertullian calls the Sabbath temporal which in time should cease Chrysostom confesses the same Hom. 12. ad Pop. Aug. l. 6. c. 4. contr Faust Manich. de Gen. ad literam lib. 4. c. 13. Hither also are to be referred other fore-cited testimonies of the Fathers which yield a testimony evident enough for the cessation of the Jewish Sabbath Now since these holy Fathers do assert that the precept of the Sabbath is not to be observed of Christians whether do they simply contend for abrogating the observation of the weekly Sabbath or only that it must not be kept on that manner and on the seventh day as the Sabbath was commanded the Jews Which is very worthy our consideration and the later seems to be intimated by the following examples Whereas the name is put upon the seventh day and the observation thereof ordained yet we saith Hilary do rejoyce on the eighth which is also the first the festival of the Sabbath being finished Therefore Hilary affirmeth not a simple abrogation but change of the Sabbath whose name we often meet with and the observation prescribed because he confesseth that Christians did observe the festival of the Sabbath though on the Sabbath day i. e. the seventh day from the Creation it was not done Tertullian while he disputeth that the Patriarchs did not acknowledge the use of the Jewish Sabbath yet he granteth the Sabbath which he calls eternal that is it was before the Law and must last when it ceaseth for no where doth Tertullian deny the sanctification of the seventh day from the Creation which the Jewes do assert St. Austin contr Faust Manich. whilst he teacheth that the Sabbath and Circumcision were figures saith it is no diverse doctrine namely ours from that of the Jews about the observation of the Sabbath but a different time it was one thing for these things that they must be foretold by figurative prophecies and another thing that they now must be fulfilled by the truth made manifest and accomplished Where Augustine confesseth that both the Jews and Christians observation of the Sabbath is grounded upon the same foundations of Doctrine though the same consideration of time be had amongst both Yea in another place he acknowledgeth that the command of the Sabbaths observation was more enjoyned to us than the Jews The 251 Sermon in August de tempore saith also that the glory of the Sabbath is transferred upon the Lords day that is the positive determination of the seventh day is changed which yet he affirmeth not is abolished For where there is only a mutation of a thing there is not an utter destruction of it Therefore according to the author of that Sermon the Law of the Sabbath is not vanished and made void so that by it we are not obliged to observe any Sabbath Origen grants that every holy and just man ought to observe the Sabbath's festival and he shews how this must be done neither doth he yet speak of that spiritual Sabbath of which we meet with frequent mention in the Fathers but of the Christian Sabbath which now is succeeded into place of the former Sabbath which he shews by the works that are to be done on that day Leaving therefore saith he the Judaical observations of the Sabbath let us see how the Christian ought to observe the Sabbath On the Sabbath day he speaks of the Lords day under that name he ought not to work any of all the worlds actions If therefore thou ceasest from all thy secular works and doest no worldly thing but attendest on spiritual works goest to the Church hearest godly Lectures and Treatises lookest not after present and visible things but at invisible and things future this is the observation of the Christian Sabbath This shews that Origen speaks of the Sabbath as it is to be observed of Christians and not of the spiritual Sabbath or else Christians all their dayes ought not to be troubled with their secular labours which Origen never thought on Athanasius saith that he observed the Sabbath day not as they in the first age Now what else meaneth the observation of the Sabbath in Athanasius but keeping it holy day by vertue of the command in the Decalogue about the Sabbath The image of the Lords day according to Cyprian went before in the Sabbath Whereby he infinuateth that the Lords day is to us what the Sabbath was to the Jews whose place it now supplieth in the
they in City were obliged to be present at Church-assemblies Which things being considered I see not to what purpose any should conclude out of the Elib Council that they which live in the Countrey are not to attend on the Lords Festival although in the Canon there be express mention of those who live in Cities because the Bishops and Presbyters to whom it belonged to go before the other members of the Church in celebrating the Lords day did dwell in the Cities and in that age there was not every where a supply of them afforded for the Villages therefore the Fathers of that Synod by name did express these who were supplied with them that laboured in the Word And a long time after the Eliberitan Council was gathered divers Villages were not furnished with Churches witness Chrysostom Hom. 18. in Act. Besides when it 's plain that the unlearned and unbelievers were admitted into the Church-assembly in the Apostles dayes 1 Cor. 14. 23. why should not the Countrey men after the Apostles death be bound to be present at the assemblies of the Church as if they who had bestowed their pains in tilling the earth had forthwith forsworn their barbarity And because they who live in the Countrey are as well Members of Christ as Citizens why should not Christ impart his communion as well to these as those in the exercises of Religion on the Lords dayes It is expresly commanded in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles that on the Lords day servants attend in the Church to hear the Doctrine of Religion And Sozomen tells us that amongst the Arabians and Cyprians he found ordained Bishops in Villages If at that time Bishops were set over some Villages then certes they who inhabited them were instructed by the Bishops in the Doctrine of Christ on all especially the Lords dayes as the custome of the Church was Eusebius also confesseth that men and women old men and children bond and free noble and ignoble learned and unlearned did almost daily assemble together in every place where-ever the men lived to receive the discipline of Christ from the rising of the Sun to the setting thereof If all men of whatever condition or quality were daily intent upon the Doctrine of Christ then they that lived in the Countrey did not refuse it on the Lords day Yea the same Author as formerly we have seen affirmeth that Christ hath prescribed all the inhabitants of the world whether at land or sea to celebrate the Lords day Eusebius therefore acknowledges not that it 's only for Noble men and others of great name to be present at Church-assemblies from which servants and those of inferiour condition should be excluded but saith that the Lord himself hath otherwise commanded Also in Theodoret that pious Emperour Theodosius witnesseth that the doors into the holy Temple are open for servants and beggars and therefore in this age they were present with other Christians in the Church-assembly and were not excluded from the same But let us return to examine that indulgence granted by the Emperour Constantine to Countrey men for working their labours on the Lords day Where first we may make a question with the learned Divine Mr. S. A. Whether any such was ever granted of him for the countrey mens sakes or no since Eusebius who was Constantius's contemporary and who well enough knew all things that the Emperour did speaking of the Law he made about observing the Lords day makes no mention of this indulgence Euseb de vita Constantin l. 4. c. 18. but only relates how the Emperour commanded that all should rest from their works In the same manner Sozomen recites the same law although lib. 1. c. 18. and in both there be a deep silence about excepting country labours Which things being considered it may justly be doubted whether ever such an indulgence were granted by that Emperour of blessed memory But come on and granting this indulgence for the authority of the Book relating it let us seek out the reason and sense thereof This was the true reason of that liberty if there was any granted Because Constantine subjected all the subjects of the Roman Empire whether they had embraced the Christian faith or had not yet tasted it to the law of observing the Lords day witness Eusebius Which though it could be known by no other argument might be judged of by this that he calls not that day in the Church manner as Baronius The Lords day but by the Heathen manner Sunday Thence I say may it be gathered that the same Law was not prescribed by him to Christians only but Heathens also for whose sake he uses an appellation peculiar to them Since therefore the Gentiles also were to rest from their labours by virtue of the Law made by â—…stantine therefore he granted them a liberty to look after their countrey labours Whereas he knew that those who were not turned Christians could not easily be brought in to be bound by the Christians lawes he yielded something for these mens sakes and Constantine was sufficiently hated by them for neglecting their idolatry and therefore by little and little he studied to draw them to the true worship of God as Eusebius ubi supra Moreover the liberty of medling with countrey labours on the Lords day was granted to countrey men only in case of necessity which thing the very words of the indulgence do declare lest through occasion of a moment the profit yielded by the heavenly providence perish by the occasion of one moment the profit of fruits might perish therefore in gathering in the fruits sometimes a regard of a moment may be had no labours are therefore permitted but to undergo which they were induced by a certain necessity lest the fruits should perish in which case also we have observed worldly labour is permitted That exception therefore of Constantine cannot be brought to patronize labour used upon no necessity because he indulged this liberty for the sake of the Heathen only whom he with all lenity studied as far as he could to perswade them to embrace the Christian faith and in case of necessity which being afterwards continued a while Leo declares void by a new law set forth to the contrary and calls that indulgence a decree differing from the Apostles But because Leo doth very aptly answer the reason of this indulgence assigned by Constantine I will set down his very words for the Readers sake Because saith he it is apparent that another law doth contradict that law which commands all to reverence the day of the Lords Resurrection by a cessation from labours which determines that all generally are not prohibited working others have a liberty to work for it saith Let all Judges c. as above in the Law of Constantine the cause of which profaning that day is grounded on no reason for although the preservation of fruits may be pretended yet that is of
Hierosolymitan saith he esteems of Apostles after one sort and of other Treaters after another And Ep. ad August he calls those Treaters that did interpret the Holy Scriptures Aug. Ep. 11. In explicating this Section about Treatises upon Scriptures first we will consider whose office it was to interpret them Secondly the manner which they used in explaining of them In the third place something shall be added about the time at which the ancients did attend these In the first place we will speak of the Treaters themselves Those to whom the administration of the Word was committed by God in the Scriptures they were by a name familiar enough to the Fathers called Clerici the Clergy or in Clerum ascripti admitted into the Clergy either because Matthias was chosen by lot who was the first that we read of that was ordained by the Apostles so Augu. in Psal 67. or because they are the Lords lot 〈…〉 should possess him for their lot and inheritance with the children of Levi for ever So Austin in Prolog in Psal if that Preface be Austins Hierom gives almost the same reason who fatih they are the Lords lot and because the Lord himself is the lot that is the portion of the Clergy The Apostle comprehends all to whom any publick charge in the Church of the Philippians was committed under Bishops and Deacons Philip. 1. 1. Where under the name of Bishops he understandeth all that especially executed the office of teaching and under the name of Deacons he intimates others that ministred The name of Bishop is a general appellation signifying all those that labour in the Word of God and attend upon the cure of souls Whence the office of an Apostle is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bishoprick Act. 1. 20. and by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are elegantly described men that administer the Word according to the Scriptures For it signifies both indulgently to attend as shepherds their flocks as Jacob Gen. 32. 38 39 40. that they may drive away wild beasts from the sheep and to watch like watch-men Ezek. 3. 17. I have made thee a watch-man to the house of Israel namely that thine adversaries come not near thee who threaten thee destruction So Heb. 13. 17. the teachers of the Gospel are said to watch for the souls of the Church The Holy Scripture calls these watchmen who watch the actions of all men and with an aim of religious curiosity spie out how every one liveth with his houshold in his house how with the Citizens in a City Where the duties of Bishops or Watchmen is excellently set out Ambrose interprets Bishops super inspectores overseers lib. de dignitate sacerdotali cap. 6. Hierom contends that they are most truly called Superintendentes because they are to look diligently over or superintend every one in their flock and Ep. ad Evagrium he renders the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by superintendentes These words therefore do not signifie any perfunctory inspection which only is undertaken for knowledge sake but a diligent and accurate watchfulness that ought to be Bishops that they might make provision of necessary means to feed their flocks and instruct them to live piously As Alipius was whom Austin Ep. 35. acknowledges to be a Pastor carefully governing the Lords pasture sheep Under the title of Bishop both Bishops and Presbyters are comprehended And though there be some that distinguish not a Presbyter from a Bishop yet I do with Austin who expounds the words Oratio Precatio Postulatio choose to understand that by these words which all or almost all the Church doth often use Ep. 59. Therefore since according to the custom of the Church or according to the words of honour which the Church useth the office of a Bishop is greater than that of a Presbyter the highest Ministry in the Church is now signified under the title of Bishop The Bishops work was especially to interpret the Holy Scriptures when the Church was gathered together and therefore I think their power was of the Ancients signified in the name Cathedra because chiefly it consisted in teaching Optatus saith the first gift of the Church was Cathedra whereby is signified that the Churches power is instructive and for this cause Aug. confesses that Christs Chair or cathedram succeeded Moses chair i. e. the Apostles of Christ succeeded the Interpreters of Moses and the Prophets The Bishops duty therefore is to instruct the people commended to their care and Hierom thinks this ability to be so necessary for them that it can profit a Bishop nothing at all to have the testimony of his virtues in his own mind except he be able to instruct the people committed to him And Hilary acknowledges that by the necessary virtue of his office he is bound to serve the Church in preaching the Gospel And therefore Athanasius excited Dracontius to take upon him a Bishoprick to which he was elected with this reason because the people by whom he was made Bishop did expect that he would bring them meat out of the Doctrine of Scripture Neither did the greatest Bishops decline that charge but rather for a Bishop to abstain from preaching seemed to Gregory the Great a foul shame and wicked act and he saith that he is dead that walks without the sound of preaching ibid. Since therefore the principal duty of Bishops is terminated in Doctrine to which by necessity of office they are obliged and without which although they otherwise live a pious life they are not to be adorned with the title of Bishops their first and principal charge was to interpret the Word of God the onely subject for all doctrine of Ministers in the Church Luk. 24. 27. when the Church was assembled for hearing the same that the most vigilant Bishops of old did this with great praise and for the great fruit of the Church their most learned Treatises which are extant among their works do testifie But to explain the Holy Scripture in the Churches publick assembly did not only lie upon Bishops but upon Presbyters also and that ex officio So 1 Pet. 5. 2. Therefore the second chair in the Church was assigned them by the Fathers So Clem. Alexand. Strom. l. 6. Origen saith that some Deacons in his age did seek after the first chairs of them who are called Presbyters If the chair was assigned to them then it was their duty to instruct the people in the doctrine of the Gospel if it had not been their duty to feed the Church with the food of the Word and Sacraments why should St. Paul charge them to take heed unto themselves and to all the flock over the which the Holy Ghost had made them overseers to feed the Church of God Augustine being yet a Presbyter while Valerius was alive edified the Church with the Word and Sacraments It was the custome at Alexandria
observe Socr. l. 7. c. 22. Nor do I remember that I have read any where in the ancients that any man was interdicted who being not deprived of the faculty of preaching by the Church or was not subject to its censure that he should not so often as conveniently he could instruct the people committed to him in the knowledge of the Scriptures Cyprian asked the Presbyters in his absence that they would seriously execute both their own and his part in the instructing the Church of Christ Ep. 5. and he commends the Presbyters that did corroborate every one with their daily exhortations Ep. 40. The Roman Clergy exhorted the Clergy of Carthage to constancy in executing their office and to encourage the Christians to persevere in the confession of Faith and detestation of idolatry by arguments drawn out of the Holy Scriptures Cypr. Ep. 3. But neither Cyprian nor the Romans did prohibit the Presbyters of Carthage from the diligent function of this office but provoked them forward to perform it upon every occasion that was offered This St. Chrysostom teacheth elegantly and pithily Homil. 15. in 2 Tim. while he exciteth all the Doctors of the Church whom he contends ought so to be called because they teach to labour in the Word and Doctrine and stingeth some that say that there is no need of the Word and Doctrine because in his judgment it tendeth no little to the edification of the Church if those that are over the Church excell in the grace of teaching without which many things in the Church-discipline will perish He doth not therefore greatly reprove those that applied themselves to Doctrine but shews they are to be greatly honoured CHAP. VIII On the Lords Dayes they were wont to Treat twice out of the Holy Scriptures THat the ancients when a fit occasion was offered did treat out of the Scripture every day their own records do teach us but as I said in the former Chapter they especially buckled themselves to this work on the Lords day For it beâ—oveth those that are set over Churches on all dayes but especially Lords dayes to teach all the Clergy and people the oracles of piety and the right Religion And as they took pains to explain the Scripture every day so they judged that all times of the day were fit for a spiritual discourse Chrys Hom. 10. in Gen. Yea though night grâ—w on himself being judge it prejudiced not spiritual Doctrine And hence it was that we read that the ancients explained the Scriptures not only in the morning but evening for at both times the Church assembled as is shewn in the first Chapter This their very words will tell us It appears from the beginning of Basils second Hom. that one of those Sermons was had in the morning and the other after noon for he saith We took time in a few words from the first dawning of the day c. Hexaem Hom. 2. and he kept the second Hom. about the evening While on it he interpreted the evening Hom. of the first day he saith These our discourses of that evening being now occupied from this evening do here put an end to our Oration Hexaem Hom. secun circa finem And he saith in the beginning of his third Hom. that one part of these Homilies brought morning aliment and the other evening joy to his hearers In the end of his seventh Hom. he admonishes his hearers to give thanks and to talk among themselves of those things which both early and in the evening his Oration yesterday had offered them In the conclusion of the eighth Hom he puts an end to the morning feast lest the exuberant satiety of speech make his auditors more dull to receive his evening banquets In the beginning of the following Hom. had upon the same day he saith that his Oration had set a banquet before his auditors in the morning and that Oration was had about the evening for he concludes it in this manner Behold the Evening time commands us silence the Sun being now set a pretty while since here therefore we think it meet that this our Oration should bring us to our bed or rest All these to testifie that Basil the Great held a double Treatise out of the Scriptures the same day For he makes mention both of his evening and morning labour undertaken in performing that office by him Neither did Great Chrysostom give place to Basil although he was called Magnus in the diligent treating out of Scripture who saith What we have said to day is very like to that which we yet have determined to speak to day Hom. oportet haereses esse That place doth shew evidently enough that Chrysostom preach'd twice on one and the same day and if the Church were but to meet once a day to hear the word of God with what face could Chrysostom have reproved those his auditors that refused to come after their carnal table to a spiritual banquet which thing we find him to have done not once So Hom. 10. in Gen. Hom. 9. ad Populum Contrariwise he commends those that obeyed this admonition because when they had dined they met in the Church Hom. 10. ad populum In the beginning of 67 Oration T. 6. of the Greek Edition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. he saith that he being wearied with the labours of the morning Sermon reserved the rest namely till afternoon and was wonderfully refreshed with the presence of Flavianus This testifies that he preached twice that day otherwise Bishop Flavianus had not been present to hear him in the afternoon He that shall look into the beginning of the second Sermon of Austins in Ps 88. will grant that Austin did the same For he commands his auditors to bend their mind to the rest of the Psalm of which he had been speaking in the morning Being content with these authorities of the Fathers although we meet with much more in them we will add no more And he that shall weigh these in an equal ballance will with a little adoe find that these grave Authors did endure the labour of Treating twice a day out of the Scriptures Now if any one whose palate nauâ—â—ating the old path that leadeth straight to the eternal salvation of the soul and seeking a new one the premises do not please shall object to me that from the aforesaid testimonies it is not evident that the Fathers did undergo those labours in interpreting and treating out of the Scripture twice on the Lords day which I should have proved Surely he that shall say so will not work me much trouble nor will he enervate my opinion of the Fathers labours declared in this sense unless he shall first demonstrate that the Church did on all dayes besides the Lords keep evening assemblies on which they had these Sermons and that they laboured to sanctifie other dayes more than the Lords Dayes which thing I suppose he will demonstrate from their grave
rest or the consecration of the rest to the publick exercise of Gods Worship which in what things can it better be observed than in reading of Gods Law and explaining the sense of its words prayers and other exercises of piety On the Sabbath saith Theodoret we are commanded to rest but it 's not any kind of rest since the Holy Ghost hath multiplied our work and what that work of the Spirit is that is multiplied on the Sabbath he afterwards expounds when he saith he hath commanded us to labour in Prayers and Psalms These things shew that something more than rest was required of the people on the Sabbath day Secondly if the Bible had not been publickly read and its sense expounded on Sabbath-dayes then none besides the Priests and Levites and some others that offered Sacrifices to the Priests had been bound to be present on Sabbath dayes in the place destined by God to sacrifice in for what need was there that they should onely be present with them that sacrificed But the contrary appears from the very Text Lev. 23. 3. where the solemnity of the Sabbath is shown God appoints that there shall be an holy convocation Now if a Convocation were by God required on the Sabbath dayes then it concerned the people as well as the Priests to be present at the common assembly which being finished that solemn benediction was pronounced by the Priest to the people assembled Num. 6. 23. Thirdly if there had been no reading of the Law and explaining thereof in use among the Jews under the former Temple then the Priests had been bound to nothing else but to serve for offering sacrifices But the Scripture testifies that the Levites were to teach Israel the Judgments and Law of God as well as to put incense upon the altar Deut. 33. 10. where two offices are assigned to the Levites In the first place that they teach the people in the Law and judgments of God and secondly that they put incense upon the altar But if they had not instructed the people in the Law then they had bestowed their chief care upon the less principal the other which was the principal duty being neglected And unless the people had been instructed in the meaning of the Law they had wholly been ignorant of the use for which the Sacrifices were ordained of God But Aaron and his sons were separated from others by God to teach the children of Israel the statutes of God Lev. 10. 11. Which they faithfully performed both privately as often as any consulted them upon any emergent question Deut. 17. 9 10. and publickly for they instructed all Israel in the Word of God 2 Chron. 35. 3. And that charge did ex officio lie upon the Levites as well before as after the captivity to be indued with the knowledge of all things that the Law might be sought for at their mouth M.al. 2. 7. But when could they with greater fruit draw out the knowledge of Gods Law to the peoples edification than in the publick assembly of the Church being gathered together on S. Dayes since on other dayes on which they were to attend their labours they could not do this Christ when he began his Ministry once did frequently teach in the Temple Why did the people wait for Zacharias when he was offering Sacrifice if it were not an usual thing for them to hear some short Sermon and benediction from him before they went out Christ sate in the Temple in the midst of the Doctors hearing and asking them questions which shews that it was the custome of a Doctor to teach the multitude in the Temple If therefore the Law of God was not on the Sabbath dayes expounded for the peoples use and no other exercises of piety but sacrifices were required of the people in what thing was the Sabbath ennobled above other dayes for sacrifices were offered on other besides the Sabbath dayes yea two Lambs were day by day offered for a continual burnt-offering Numb 28. Therefore the Sabbath was not made remarkable by the only worship of Sacrifices above other dayes on which they attended sacrifices but besides the sacrifices were superadded the interpreting of the Law and a serious and pious exercising themselves therein and other duties of piety upon which account the Sabbath day was reckoned more holy than other dayes of the week and the ninety second Psalm was for this end written that the people might sing it in the Church on the Sabbath day whereon a holy Convocation was held Fourthly the question propounded by the husband of the Shunamitess doth evince the same 2 Kin. 4. 23. He asks his wife why she would go to the Prophet that day since it was neither new moon nor Sabbath which were the ordinary dayes to consult God upon and to hear his word according to the famous Junius Lyra saith also the same on that place He spoke this saith he because men went more frequently on those dayes to the Prophets to hear Gods word because the Prophets were not to attend Sacrifices therefore they that went to the Prophets did it that they might be instructed in the Law and will of God by them but when could this be better done than on the Sabbath The famous Cunaeus upon the authority of Rabbi Aben Ezra affirms that Oracles were consulted on Sabbath dayes De Rep. Hebraeorum l. 2. c. 24. Fifthly if reading of Scriptures and a clear interpreting of them had not been prescribed of God then Christ and after him his Apostles who were faithfully diligent in expounding the Law on Sabbath dayes are to be taxed for Will-worship because they offered God a worship on the Sabbath which he had not commanded them Lastly that the use of Synagogues was among the Jews before the Babylonish captivity may be collected from Moses Lev. 26. 31. where the Hebrews by Sanctuaries do understand Synagogues in which the people met weekly on Sabbath dayes of whose ruine and vastation the Church expostulateth with God Psal 74. 7 8. the inscription of which Psalm shews that that Psalm was penned when David governed the Kingdome for the Inscription is for Asaph It was therefore either penned by Asaph who writ some of the Psalms as well as David 2 Chron. 29. 30. or was commended to his care who together with his sons is recited among those who sung holy songs 1 Chr. 25. 2. If therefore while Asaph survived then were Synagogues long in use before the captivity But for what end were they instituted in which sacrifices which it was lawful to offer no where else but at Hierusalem when the Temple was built were not offered but in them was the people instructed in the Law of God by the Levites who were dispersed up and down Israel and by others who were delegated of God to that charge and office Which things being considered let others judge what to say of their uncertain conjecture who contend that there was no
lose my labour with the Reader that 's well exercised in these things and after Homer write an Iliad as the Proverb goes CHAP. XIV Who was to be present at all the offices of the Liturgy and who not The Catechumeni Audientes Competentes Poenitentes and their sundry degrees namely some Lugentes others Audientes others Substrati others Consistentes others Eucharistiae participantes At what offices these were to be present and what not HAving recited the offices which were performed in the Churches publick assemblies it will be a thing worth the labour to advertise the Reader that all the members of the Church were not all at once to be present alwayes at all these offices which we will now shew from a more narrow observation of the persons of which the Church consisted the observation of which thing because it is not obvious to all mens eyes we think it not altogether good to pass by in silence The whole Christian people in the Church were anciently distinguished into thrâ—â— degrees For there were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Catechumens Faithful and Penitents and to men as they were constituted in all those degrees there were certain offices of the Liturgy appropriated to which they being admitted were excluded from the rest while in the mean time the faithful were present at all the rest The Catechumeni were they who first desired to become Christians whom Origen calls them that lately were admitted but had not obtained the Symbol of lustration They are called Catechumeni because while they were in this Class they were by the voice instructed of others in the principles of the Christian Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. no believing without catechising saith Clemens Alexand. Even those that were to be brought to the Faith were first to be instructed in the Doctrine of the Catechism 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. Catechizing leads to the faith Now the points wherein the Catechumeni were instructed are extant in Const Ap. lib. 7 c. 40. They were instructed namely in the tremendous mystery of the Holy Trinity in the stupendous work of Creation and Gods providâ—â—â—e and especially that about mankind and â—â— the general judgment to come c. all which are compendiously recited by Augustine lib. de Fide Operibus cap. 6. where he exhorteth the Catechumeni to hear how they ought to become and live as the Faithful Afterwards that they hear what Faith is and what the life of a Christian ought to be Those that were to be baptized therefore were to be instructed in these before they desired Baptisme They that taught the persons of this order in the principles of the Christian Faith were called by St. Hierom the Masters of Catechising among whom were numbred Origen Euseb Hist l 6. c. 8. Hierom in Catal Eccles script in Origine Also Pantaenus Eus l. 5. c. 10. Hierom confesses that he had Greg. Nazianz. and Didymus for his Catechists in the Holy Scripture Now if any desire to know to what offices of the publick Liturgy the Catechumeni were admitted this cannot be observed with a distinction of them of which mention is made amongst the ancients in divers places Of the Catechumeni some were called Audientes and some Competentes Those had their name from hearing the Word because they were newly admitted only as tiroes or candidates of the Christian Faith and therefore they were reckoned inter auditorum tyrocinia as Tertnllian speaks while being not admitted into the auditory they stood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. without the compass of the Temple as Dionys Areop de Hierarch libro c. 3. that is as Zonaras interprets it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. without the Temple in the Porch where the Consistentes according to the custome of the Church onely heard the tune of the Psalms and reading of Scripture in the Church for none whether he were Gentile or Jew or Heretick was excluded from hearing of the Word or the Bishops Sermon to the people for instructing them Zonar in Can. 19. Laodic Neither were they admitted to the holy things which afterwards followed in the Church-assembly So Dyonys Areop Eccles Hierarch lib. p. 94. 96. Behold saith Augustine after Sermon missa fit Catechumenis i. e. the Catechumeni were dismissed and the Faithful remained The Audientes then were to come at no holy office but the reading of the Scriptures which being ended before the Church went to prayer or administring the Eucharist they were dismissed And because they had liberty granted to be present at reading the Scripture in the publick assembly of the Church therefore the Readers were called their Doctors or Teachers So Optatus in Cyprian is called Doctor Audientium because that after he was an ordained Reader he was to read the Scripture in the Church-assemblies The Catechumeni who were Competentes being well instructed in the Christian saith sued for Baptisme and were sometimes distinguished from the Catechumeni in Ambrose lib. 5. ep 33. Having dismissed saith he the Catechumeni that is those whom they call Audientes to some I gave the Symbole in the Fonts Because as I said they being well instructed in the Christian faith as firm therein they sued for Baptism Aug. Serm. de tempore 116. When the Audientes were admitted a Prayer was rehearsed by a Deacon to the Catechumi Competentes who were fallen on their knees Conc. Neocaes Can. 5. and then when that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. let the Catechumeni go out was pronounced they went forth the Faithful preparing themselves to the Holy Eucharist as Zonar in Can. Conc. Neocaesar The words of an excellent Oration uttered to the Competentes together with a perspicuous explication of them by St. Chrysostom are extant in Chrysostom Hom. 2. in 2 ad Cor. where the Deacon admonisheth all to pray for the Catechumeni while he saith Let us stand honestly let us pray earnestly that the most merciful and compassionate God would hear their Prayers would open the eares of their hearts that they may hear what the eye hath not seen nor ear heard nor hath entred into the heart of man and that he would instill into them the word of truth that he would sow his fear in them and confirm his faith in their minds that he would reveal to them the Gospel of righteousness that he would give them a divine mind chaste thoughts a life joyned with truth continually to think of his things to relish his things to meditate of his things to delight themselves in his Law day and night Let us moreover pray for them more intensly that he would deliver them from all evil and dishonest matter from every sin of the Devil and all snares of the adversary that he would vouchsafe them in due time the laver of regeneration and remission of sins that he would bless their comings in and going out all their life their houses and habitations Let us pray that
great industry And for this cause Prosper De vita contempt lib. 2. cap. 2. contends it is that Bishops are called Watchmen Because they watch the actions of all men and with an aim of religious curiosity spie out how every one liveth with his houshold in his house how with his Citizens in the City what good men they approve they confirm by honouring them whom they observe to be vicious they amend by reproving them St. Prosper judged it to be the Bishops duty whom the Lord hath appointed to be the Watchmen of his Church not onely to attend preaching of the Word in the Church assembly but also when that was ended and the people dismissed diligently to observe the manners and conversation of the people that they might promote godliness if by any means they could while they excited those whom they saw to walk according to what they heard in publick to a farther progress in godliness and sharply admonished those that turned not what they heard into works Which office if ever we believe they did faithfully perform on the Lords Day which we may see in St. Chrysostome who when he observed any not to be attentive enough to his publick Treatises promised that he would when he had finished his Treating by interrogatories make tryal whether they retained what they had heard Homil. 4. in Hebr. Yea he tells them that when the assembly was dismissed he would discourse some time with his Auditors about what they had heard in the conclusion of Hom. 6. ad Pop. Antioch And elsewhere he declares the reason of his diligence Hom. 9. ad Pop. For saith he if it be no reproach for a Physician to ask his patient how it is with him neither is it amiss in us to be still inquiring about our Hearers salvation for we being thus advertised what to do and what to leave undone shall apply remedies according to congruous discipline And this diligence he calls a sollicitude not of curiosity but provision where by an argument from the less to the greater he illustrates the necessity of the aforesaid industry For if a Physician who attends the cure of a frail body doth diligently enquire of the state of his patients health after he hath administred his medicines why doth it not much more lye upon Bishops to whom the inspection of souls is committed ex officio to observe whether their people lead their life according to what they have heard after that they have prescribed unto them wholsome admonitions and exhortations whereby on every emergent occasion they may prescribe necessary remedies Chrysostom himself confesses that he undertook private labours in teaching some of his Hearers while he inculcated some things to them who entred communication with him privately Thus he speaks of himself Hom. prim de Lazaro It grieved St. Cyprian to the heart while he was in exile that he could not have liberty to go to every one that was committed to his care and to exhort them cording to the Ministry of the Lord and of his Gospel He commends the Presbyters and Deacons that supplied his place for strengthening all by their daily exhortations Ep. 40. If therefore Cyprian set upon all that were commended to his care with his exhortations and commended others that did the like he thought that something more after the Church-meetings were ended in which he could not go to them severally was to be done by him Possidonius in the Life of Austin chapter 12. mentions his private labours that he frequently undertook in instructing and exhorting the Catholick people All these vigilant Fathers did not onely propound the Word in Church meetings but also shewed us by their own example that it is privately to be inculcated upon the minds of the Hearers and their own testimonies teach us that this was done by them daily Secondly he that shall consult the Fathers touching the observation of the Lords Day will observe that they did frequently stir up their hearers to a religious meditation and discoursing of what they had heard in the publick assembly Chrysostom more than once doth labour what he can to perswade his hearers that after they are returned home from the Church friends among themselves parents with their children masters with their servants meditate and strive how they may do what they are taught Homil. 5. ad Pap. Antioch which he elegantly explains by divers similitudes Even as saith he many that depart out of a meadow do take a Rose or Violet or some such flower and carrying it about a while in their fingers do depart and others returning home out of an Orchard do carry the boughs of trees that bear fruit others again bring to their kinsfolks fragments of the table from sumptuous suppers so also thou when thou depart'st carry back an admonition to thy children wife and all thy kindred For this admonition is of more use than a meadow an orchard and a table These roses never wither this fruit never falls off these dishes never are marred Afterwards Think what a thing it is setting aside all other things both publick and private to be alwayes discoursing of Gods Laws at table and in the market and in other Conventicles c. Homil. 6. ad Populum Where by an induction of divers similitudes he declares what Christians are to do after they be returned home from the publick assembly namely that they conferr at home of what they heard in the Church In the beginning also of the second Homil. on John he requires of his hearers that they talk not only with one another publickly but at home of what they had heard and when he reproves those that went out of the Church who did not well remember what they had heard he prescribes this remedy for that malady namely that when they are return'd home they read the Holy Scriptures and call their wife and children together to confer of those things that were spoken It 's an excellent place which the Reader shall find lib. 5. chap. 12. We wish saith Origen that you would study what you have heard not onely hear the Word of God in the Church but in your houses be exercised and meditate in the Law of the Lord day and night for Christ is there and every where present to them that seek him From the fore-mentioned testimonies it appears that the Fathers treated seriously with their people to conferr among themselves of what they had heard Now if any one think that they meant conferring of what they had heard on other dayes than the Lords Dayes I doubt not but he is deceived that perswades himself of this For if they require of their Hearers to conferâ— of the Word heard on other dayes which he will not deny they did that looks into their writings do they therefore judge that the Word of God which was handled on the Lords Day must be forgotten Nothing less especially when elsewhere they counsel their hearers to conferr with