might be deluded by the Sophisms of the unbelieving Jews and their cunning Emissaries if they were not strong in Faith and their former holy resolutions they might the more easily be overcome by the sear of persecution and the love of their Temporal Peace Safety Estates Liberty Lives The reason of this dehortation was because he knew that if they did not carefully avoid the contrary which was destructive of perseverance they could not persevere To avoid this sin he adds an exhortation wherein he prescribes a means tending to continue us in the Truth saying Vet. 13. But exhort one another daily whilst it 's called to Day lest any of you be hardued through the deceitfulness of sin § 13. Though we may exhort one another in private yet this seems to have some reference to their publick Assemblies for Religious Worship For as the Psalm was composed for the publick Worship and to be sung as a preparative to the same especially that part which is concerning the hearing of God's Word So in the times of the Gospel it was used by some Christian Churches to prepare the People assembled as for other Duties so for that of hearing the Gospel Thus we find it placed in our Liturgy And upon due consideration it will appear to be an excellent place of Scripture and most fit for that end In the words we have 1. An exhortation 2. A reason In the exhortation we have 1. The duty 2. The time of performance The duty is mutual exhortation and encouragement of one another The time is daily while it 's said To Day The reason is to prevent obduâ—ation lest any of you be hardned Before I enter upon the particular explication of these words I must inform the Reader That the Apostle having recited the words of the Psalm in the application of them follows the order of the principal words and parts thereof The first was Harden not your heart this he insists upon ver 12 13 14. The second The Fathers provoked God this he takes up in ver 15 16. The third God was grieved with that Generation this you find ver 17. The fourth is The shutting of these unbelieving Ancesters out of God's Rest this you may read of ver 18 19. The fifth is Entring into rest granted and promised to God's People after the days of David This takes up the greatest part of the Chapter following The duty exhorted unto is to exhort one another so that it is an exhortation to exhortation Where we must consider 1. What it is to exhort 2. Who they be who are concerned in this duty to perform it 1. To exhort is to move stir up encourage comfort strengthen perswade The end is confirmation and continuance in Christianity The means are proposing the divine Precepts the glorious Reward promised the fearful Punishments threatned to manifest the clear and pure Truth of the Gospel and the Divine confirmations of the same with the falshood of all contrary Doctrines To these we may add their publick and private Prayers with the Sacraments 2. This Duty concerned all and every one For every Christian according as he hath power and opportunity is bound as to convert others so to edisy and confirm one another converted and mutually further and promote their Salvation And this is a special work of Christian Charity which we owe one to another is Christian Brethren and fellow-Members of the same Body Yet the greater our Abillties and the more excellent out Gifts the greater is our Obligation And Ministers of all others are most concerned in it and the end of out Christian Assemblies for Religious Worship and Discipline is to do this work But how guilty are we of neglect how careless are we of this work How justly may God charge the Blood of the Souls of our Apostate Brethren upon us Most men hinder and that many wayes and few further the Salvation of their Brethren It 's high time for us all to reform in this particular This is the Duty to exhort one another the time limited for the performance is to Day whilst it 's said to Day For so the Psalmist saith To Day if you will hear his Voyce This presupposeth a time when God will speak and we must hear God speaks by his Word and here in particular by the Gospel and the Professors and Ministers thereof By it he Commands all men to repent and believe and being once converted to persevere unto the end and by it he promiseth to such as obey a glorious Reward He is further ready to accompany this Word of the Gospel with the power of his Spirit without which man cannot perform his Duty This is that which we call Vocation so that to Day is the time of Vocation granted to any People or to single Persons And whilst God grants to any the Word and Spirit which are the means of conversion He may be said to Call and Man is bound to hear and be Obedient Some think this Day to be the whole time of every man's life whilst he is a member of the visible Church yet we find that many of the Israelites were by an Oath excluded out of God's Rest before they dyed and that Jerusalem had by her hardness of heart made her case desperate and her ruine unavoidable long before it was destroyed so likewise many a man's Day and Time of possibility and hope to be saved is spent and ended before his life determine Therefore by Day in this place is understood in a special manner the present time because no man is certain of the future Therefore they must exhort one another whilst it 's said to Day that is presently and in no wise delay or intermit the performance of this Duty The reason of this exhortation is from the end which is the preventing hardness of heart through the deceitfulness of Sin This presupposeth that sin is deceitful and implies that the deceitfulness thereof will harden the heart Sin in it self is base and filthy and an object of abhomination and except it be represented in some appearance of good every one would abhor it Satan therefore when he would tempt and perswade man to it deludes his Understanding with false colours of Pleasure or Profit or something desirable but conceals the baseness and the sad and woful consequents thereof This outward appearance of goodness makes it like a bait fastned on an hook and man being greedy of the bait swallows the hook When he finds no mischief to follow upon the Commission immediately he goes on by degrees till he acquire an habit which hardens the heart makes it sensless blots out the Characters of divine Truth and so in the end changeth the very quality of the heart Whereas man before was very pliable and ready to receive the impressions of Divine Truth now he is blinded and become stupid Divine commands promises threats exhortations admonitions cannot work upon him and then how easily will he be perswaded to fall off
drink it and receive it into our bodies yet if we neither eat the one when it 's set before us nor drink the other when put into our hands we may perish for hunger and thirst So it is spiritually with our Souls in respect of the Word preached and heard only our with outward ears and not received and receiued in our hearts by a true and lively Faith So that the cause why the Word of God being so great a Blessing and so excellent a means of Salvation doth us no good is from our selves or in our selves who either refuse it at the first or reject it after we have professed it and promised to live according to it And this refusal and rejection as they are hainous sins not onely against God's just Laws but his merciful tender of eternal life so they will prove in the end the cause of our eternal misery which shall be greater and more intolerable than those to whom the Word of God was never preached 4. Therefore it concerns us all to fear this Sin of Apostacy as we fear loss of heavenly Rest God's eternal displeasure Hell Death and eternal Punishments The Apostle by this word fear implies there is danger of falling away and if we consider there is danger and the same very great For if we look upon our weakness and the remainders of corruption the deceipt and hypocrisy of our own hearts the imperfection of our Understanding in heavenly things the inconstancy of our Wills our little experience in the wayes of God and the violence and power of temptation from the Devil and the World we may easily see that it 's a wonder if not a matter of amazement that we stand one day one hour yet when we look up towards Heaven remember our Saviour Christ reigning and victorious the power of the blessed Spirit the helps God hath given us the Promises of assistance there is great cause of hope yet this hope doth not exclude but require our diligent Care continual Watching and instant Prayers without which we cannot by which we may hope to stand Oh how should we carefully and constantly attend unto God's Word lay it up in our hearts make it the Rule of our whole life so as to obey his Commands rely upon his Promises and fear his threats and every day call to mind the Profession we have made and the Promises whereby we have engaged our selves unto our God And seeing so few do fear it 's no wonder so many fall and come short of this blessed Rest. Most men presume upon the Promise and neglect the Duty The Israellres had a Promise yet did not enter because they did not believe § 3. There follows another distinct Reason from the former and that is the great benefit that follows upon the performance of the Duty Ver. 3. For we who have believed do enter into Rest as he said As I have sworn in my Wrath c. THere is some difficulty to know the coherence of these words with the former as also of those that follow with these and amongst themselves Some say they come in upon the words immediately antecedent and give a reason why the Word not mixed with Faith did not profit nor bring the hearers into God's Rest For onely we that believe do enter that is There is no entrance but by Faith but by Faith there is Others think they propose a reason why we should fear Apostacy and be careful to persevere and that from the happy consequent and the glorious reward which follows upon perseverance in belief and that is entrance and admittance into God's Rest yet they may referr to those words of the former Chapter For some when they had heard did provoke howbeit not all that came out of Aegypt by Moses For Caleb and Joshua heard and believed and persevered for it 's said of Caleb and it 's the Testimony of God That he had another Spirit with him and followed the Lord fully Numb 14. 24. This he applyes to himself and the Hebrews to this purpose That though some did not enter because of Unbelief yet some did believe and did not provoke and so entred so likewise shall we believing do As the former might cause fear so this latter might cause hope and prove a strong motive why we should fear to fall and be very careful to persevere So that if we will sum up that which went before it 's this in brief To day if we will hear God's voice we must not harden our hearts 1. Because if we do harden them we shall be shut out of God's Rest as our rebellious and Apostate Fathers were 2. If we do not harden our hearts but believe we shall enter into God's Rest as Caleb and Joshua did It follows As he said I have sworn in my wrath if they shall enter into my Rest c. These words serve to inform us of three things 1. That the Word not believed could not profit because by Unbelief they provoked God to wrath and in his Wrath he sware they should not enter into his Rest so likewise we should fear to be guilty of Unbelief because if we prove such God in his Wrath by the like Oath will exclude us 2. That as God by this Oath did exclude none but Unbelievers and brought the Believers into Canaan so he will exclude none out of the Rest promised in the Gospel but Unbelievers and will without all fail bring us believing into our spirituall Canaan 3. That as the Oath so the Exhortation used by the Prophet David implied that as there was a Rest in the dayes of Joshua so there is another Rest besides that of the promised Land Therefore because it might be doubted what Rest either David meant or the Gospel doth promise the Apostle proceeds to prove that there is yet a Rest prepared for God's People under the Gospel and determines what Rest that is This is done by distinction for he informs us of a three-fold Rest 1. Of the Sabbath 2. Of the Land of Canaan 3. Of the eternal Rest in Heaven That it was the intention of the Apostle to manifest that there was a Rest for the People of God under the Gospel and yet that Rest was neither the first of the Sabbath nor the second of the Land of Canaan is evident by that which follows especially Ver 19 10. That it was expedient if not necessary for him to do thus is as clear because he had alledged the words of the Psalm To day if ye will hear his Voice and also said in Ver. 1. That a Promise was left us of entring into his Rest. The first is the Rest of the Sabbath in these words Although the Works were finished from the Foundation of the World And Ver. 4. For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day in this wise And God did rest the seventh day from all his Works THE particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is turned here although yet it may signify and
King of Righteousness and after that also King of Salem which is King of Peace MElech and so Melchi in Hebrew signifies King Prince or Governour and such is being one person is eminent in Power above the rest Zedeck is Righteousness in that Language This name agrees with Adonizedeck of Adon or Adoni Lord and Zedeck Righteousness as before This Name did truly agree unto this Person and he did answer to his Name He was a just King and did Order and Govern his People in Righteousness by just Judgment and according to just Laws and sought their weal and common good Such all Civil Governours should be for justice is essential to good Government and God never gave any power to any person but bound him to Righteousness nay further governing Power is no Power without wisdom and justice it may be potâ—ntia but not potestas Some Princes are more righteous then other yet this man was eminently righteous because he proved a Prince of Peace For the Fruit of Righteousness is Peace and the more wise and just the Government of any State shall be the greater the Peace and Happiness of the People But Righteousness must go before and after that Peace will follow and Kings must first be Kings of Zedeck before they can be Kings of Salem If the Kings of Sodom had been such they had not been invaded subdued and spoiled by a forraign Enemy The words seem to imply that Zedeck and Salem were two places from whence he had his Name and Title first from the one then from the other or that because he was so just first he was called the King of Righteousness and after that because by his just Government the People enjoyed so great Peace He was called King of Salem § 9. The fourth and last particular is the perpetuity of his Priest-hood For thus it 's written Ver. 3. Without Father without Mother without Descent having neither beginning of Dayes nor end of Life but made like unto the Son of God abideth continually a Priest FOR the better understanding of these words we must consider 1. That if Melchisedec was a man living in Abraham's Dayes he had both Father and Mother and Descent and beginning of Dayes and end too except he as Enoch was translated not to see Death otherwise these words properly understood and strictly taken might justly give occasion to think he was an Angel in humane shape which was the opinion of some 2. Therefore for the most part the words are understood Tropically to this purpose That as he is described Gen. 14. the first and only place of the Old Testament that speaks more largely of him Moses the Historian makes no mention of his Father or Mother or Descent or Birth or Death And he was directed thus to do by the Spirit of purpose either because he being ignorant of all these the Spirit did not reveal them unto him or if he did and he knew them yet he was ordered and moved by the Spirit to conceal them that according to that Description he might appear a more lively and perfect Type of Christ. 3. The words have special reference unto his Priest-hood and gives us a real difference between him and the Levitical Priest and makes him far more like unto the Son of God our everlasting Priest For the Levitical High-Priests had their Priest-hood by Descent and Birth and upon their Death their Successors For as born of a Father of the Tribe of Levi and the House of Aaron after he was once consecrated and as born of a Mother who was a woman married to one of that House so they derived the Priest-hood from the first Investiture after the first Institution And whosoever could not manifest his Genealogy and Descent from that Family could not minister and officiate as a Priest As they had beginning of Dayes and by their Birth and Descent derived their Priest-hood from their Predecessors so they were Mortal and had end of Dayes and so transmitted their Priest-hood to their Successors Thus did not Melchisedec who though he might have Father and Mother and Descent and so beginning and end of Dayes as a man yet as a Priest he had no Predecessor from whom by Birth he might receive his Sacerdotal Power nor Successor who derived his Priest-hood from him So Christ the Son of God derived his Priest-hood from no mortal Predecessor but immediately from his heavenly Father neither will he transmit it to any Successor but when all Enemies shall be subdued and he shall deliver up his Commission by vertue of which he doth now officiate and intercede in Heaven He shall resign the same together with his Kingdom to God who gave him both And thus perhaps Melchisedec this great Priest and lively Type of Christ did And if there be any Priest-hood according to the Law of Nature which is of perpetual continunuance then he seems to be an extraordinary Priest according to the Law For there is the Law of Nature the Law of Moses the Law of Grace and every one of these may have their ordinary Priests and their extraordinary supream Pontiffs immediately instituted of God and the extraordinary supream Pontiff according to the Law of Nature must be above Aaron who was a High-Priest according to that Law which was but for a time and to be abolished and so more fit to typifie Christ the Mediatour and Priest of the New Covenant which shall stand for ever And these things I referr and in them submit my Judgment to the wise and judicious who may take occasion to seek further whether Melchisedec's Sacerdotal Title did not continue to him in Heaven till Christ's Ascension and then was delivered up to Christ and so it continued in him for ever and in this respect he abideth a Priest continually The first three verses seem to be one Proposition and all the whole description till the last words the subject or antecedent and abiding continually the predicate yet so that there are many simple Propositions in the antecedent And it 's observable that Righteousness Peace and Blessing of Melchisedec are perpetual § 10. After the explication of this Description we must consider wherein Melchisedec and Christ agree for there must be an agreement between the Type and the Antitype They agree in Offices Acts and Continuance 1. Melchisedec was a Priest and a King so was Christ Melchisedec was a King first of Righteousness and after of Peace so is Christ for he is the most righteous and just Administratour of his universal and perpetual Spiritual Kingdom and by Righteousness procures an everlasting Peace for our eternal Righteousness is from Him and the Fruit of this Righteousnesse is the perpetuall Peace of all his Loyall and Obedient Subjects 2. Melchisedec as a Priest received Tythes of Abraham and blessed him so Christ doth bless all such as believe in him and makes them eternally happy and all our spiritual Blessings and our eternal Bliss we expect to receive by him and
to be Overseers which have a Charge of men's Souls committed unto them for Direction unto eternal Bliss and also Rulers because of their Power and Authority whereby they may in the Name of Christ command them to obey his Laws and in this respect the People are subject unto them in that manner that if they hear and receive them they receive Christ who sent them and God who sent Christ And whosoever receiveth not but despiseth them desplseth Christ and God who sent them 2. These Guides lest they should be ignorant who they were were such as had spoken the Word of God unto them The Word of God is that part of the Word of God which we call The Gospel which is concerning Christ exhibited humbled exalted and reigning at the right hand of God contained in that part of the Scripture we call The New Testament This Doctrine is the Word of God not only because it speaks of God but also because it was revealed by God and that by his own Son in the last dayes This Word they had spoken and declared both by Word and Writing and that infallibly according as by Inspiration they had received an immediate Knowledg of it and this their infallible Doctrine was the Rule of inferiour Teachers 3. These they must remember Some of these might be living some of them dead both must be remembred To remember in this place is to call to mind which presupposeth a former Act of Understanding and is a Reiteration of the same Act upon the same Object These must be remembred not only as Men but as Guides and as such as had spoken the Word of God even unto them so as that they had heard them and learned from them the Mystery of the Gospel so as to believe in Christ Yet amongst these they must principally remember the most eminent and in particular those by whom they had believed For if men begin once to forget their Teachers they will soon forget their Doctrine The second part of their Duty to which their former Remembrance was subservient is the Consideration of the end of their Conversation Their Conversation and Course of life no doubt was agreeable to their Doctrine and the Word of God they taught their Preaching and their Practice were suitable and as their Conversation was good so the End was answerable In that Faith they lived in the same they dyed and as their Life was holy so their Death was happy In these words some observe two things 1. That these were dead and some of them at least had sealed the Truth of the Gospel with their Blood and dyed Martyrs 2. That they had been constant in the Profession and Practice of that heavenly Truth which they had preached and taught to others This Constancy and blessed Issue of their Conversation they are exhorted to consider and seriously review with the Eyes of their Souls as a rare and excellent Pattern worthy their Imitation 3. And if they were so worthy Imitation it was their Duty in the third place to follow their Faith that is their Doctrine which they preached believed professed practised unto Death and which they confirmed by their Suffering This is the true End of hearing Word of God and the true Use of all good Examples which are given us and set before our Eyes for this very End that we may do as they did and as they taught us both by their Words and Works their Doctrine and Practice We must follow the Example of all good men and above others of such Guides as these were amongst these Guides the most eminent in Truth Piety and Perseverance because their Doctrine and Life did agree and contiued suitable to the End § 8. It followeth Jesus Christ the same c. These words seem to stand absolute in themselvs without any dependance upon or Connexion with the Context antecedent or consequent and this hath given occasion to many several and different Expositions Some of the Ancients consider them in themselvs and understand them of Christ as God and from them prove his God-head by his perpetual Existence because he was is and shall be for ever and by his immutability because he alwayes is the same Some understand this of Christ as Redeemer whose Power and Efficacy in redeeming and saving all such as believe in him was from the first time that he was promised unto the World's End for he saved all those who believed in him for to come and all such who believe in him already come and exhibited Both these senses are true but whether intended here or no may be a Question But most Expositors consider the words in Coherence either with that which goes before or that which follows 1. With that which goes before and that two wayes 1. That as Christ the Word not incarnate or made Flesh spake to Joshua and promised not to leave him and forsake him so if they follow the Faith of their Guides and Teachers and persevere in the same to the End Christ will be with them and not leave them nor forsake them 2. That the Faith of their Guides was Faith in Christ according to their Doctrine of the Gospel concerning Jesus Christ an eternal unchangeable and never-failing Saviour and this their Faith in Christ they must follow and then Christ will be to them the same he was to their Guides and will certainly save them In this sense the words not only signify what kind of Faith that of their Teachers was and what was the Object and Foundation of it but also contain a Reason why they should follow it For their Faith was Faith in Christ which is the only saving Faith for ever as he Himself is the same for ever The Aethiopick Version favours this sense in part for thus they translate the words Follow me in the Faith of Christ c. So that according to this Christ is Faith in Christ. But others understand by Jesus Christ the Doctrine of Jesus Christ which is the same as Christ is and that for ever and never shall be changed Therefore they must follow it and never turn from it Christ may by a Metonymy signify Faith in Christ and the Doctrine of Christ because he was the Object of their Faith and the Subject of their Doctrine This Vatablus terms an Enallage This seems to be confirmed by the Exhortation following To apply this to our selves as it is our Duty so we must have a care often to remember the Apostles and their Successours who have taught us the Word of God and considering their happy Departure out of this World with the Joy and Comfort which they found in their Saviour let us follow their Doctrine and their Faith in Christ which if we do we shall have the same End and find the same Comfort in Christ who will be the same to us which he was to them for as He so his Doctrine is unchangeable for ever and whosoever shall follow his Doctrine and believe in him shall
unto is To consider Christ the Apostle and High Priest of our Profession and to presevere in his Doctrine ver 1. 2. The Reasons by which he presseth the performance of this Duty are 1. Christ was not only faithful in his Trust as Moses was but also far greater then Moses in two respects For 1. Moses was but part in the House builded Christ was the Builder of all things and especially of the Church ver 3 4. 2. Moses was but a Servant in that House Christ was the Lord and Owner ver 5 6. 2. If they persevere in his Doctrine and the Faith they shall be his House of Glory wherein God shall for ever dwell and make them fully blessed ver 7. 3. If they that disobeyed and hardned their hearts against Mose's Doctrine fell in the Wilderness and by a peremprory Oath were shut out of God's Rest much more shall they disobeying the Gospel and falling from the Faith be shut out of God's eternal Rest in Heaven In this Reason we must consider 1. That it 's taken out of Psal. 95. the words whereof are recired ver 7 8 9 10 11. 2. That from these words applied unto them he dehorts them from Unbelief and Apostacy and exhorts them to use all means of perseverance that so he might be partakers of that eternal Rest which Christ had merited for them ver 12 13 14 15. 3. He wisheth them to take special notice of such as did and such as did not enter into God's Rest and what was the cause of the exclusion of those whom God destroyed in the Wilderness and would not suffer to enter into Canaan and that was Unbelief ver 16 17 18 19. CHAP. IV. VVHerein the Discourse upon the words of the Psalm is continued and application made by way of Exhortation And 1. The Duty exhorted unto is To be obedient and mix the word with Faith ver 1. 2. The Reasons are 1. They are partakers of the heavenly Call and the Gospel was preached unto Them as well as to their Fathers 2. They not mixing the Word with Faith but being disobedient to the heavenly Call did not enter but came short ver 2. 3. They which do believe do enter into God's Rest ver 3. And here lest they should be ignorant what Rest of God is meant and to be expected he informs them of a three-fold Rest of God 1. His Rest of Creation 2. His Rest which he promised in the Land of Canaan to their Fathers 3. His spiritual and eternal Rest promised in the Gospel It was not the first ver 3 4. For after this he speaketh of another Rest ver 5. It was not the second into which many of their Fathers because of unbelief did not enter and after this he limitteth another Time and Rest which had never been mentioned if Joshua who brought their Fathers into the Land of Canaan had brought them into This ver 6 7 8. It 's a spiritual and eternal Rest in Heaven which remaineth for the People of God and is to be enjoyed when they cease from all their works of Obedience and Sufferings as God did from his when he had finished the work of Creation ver 9 10. 4. If they do not persevere they may fall after the example of their unbelieving Ancestors and lest they should presume or be secure he lets them know that Christ by the piercing Word of the Gospel will discover their inward and most secret sins and will be a severe and impartial Judg ver 11 12 13. 5. The same great Prophet who hath called us by the Word of the Gospel is our High Priest very sensible of our infirmities and entred into Heaven the eternal Rest of God in our behalf and if we wanting strength do come boldly by him before the Throne of Grace we shall obtain help in due season when we have greatest need ver 14 15 16. CHAP. V. VVHerein after the discourse of the excellency of Christ's prophetical Office he begins to speak of his Priest-hood And 1. Delivers the Doctrine thereof from this Chapter to ver 19 of the 10th 2. Applies the same and continues the Application from the 19th verse of the 10th Chapter unto the latter end of the last The scope of the Apostle in the Doctrine is To demonstrate the excellency of Christ's Priest-hood in respect of 1. The Constitution from the beginning of this Chapter to the 8th 2. The Ministration from the beginning of the 8th to the middle of the 10th In this Chapter we have 1. A Discourse of Priest-hood 2. A Digression begun in the latter end of this Chapter and continued in the 6th 1. The Discourse is 1. Concerning a Priest in general 2. Concerning Aaron 3. Concerning Christ. 1. An High Priest in general is described 1. From his Vocation He is taken from amongst men and ordained ver 1. 2. From his Ministration He must offer Gifts and Sacrifices for sins Ibid. 3. From his Qualification He must be merciful and compassionate ver 2 3. 2. Vocation which consists in Election and Ordination is not from Man but God for no Priest-hood can be efficiently conducing to Man's spiritual good except it be instituted from Heaven as Aaron's was ver 4. 3. Therefore Christ did not usurp his Sacerdotall Power but he had his Vocation Confirmation Consecration from God 1. His Vocation he finds Psal. 2. in these words Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee by which upon his Resurrection he was made and constituted King and Priest ver 5. 2. His Confirmation he reads Psal. 110. 4. I have sworn and will not repent Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec ver 6. 3. His Consecration which tended to his fuller Constitution was finished in his Agony and Death upon the Cross by which he became the Author of eternal Life to as many as obey him ver 7 8 9. Thus far the Author's Discourse of Priest-hood which is closed up with the Repetition of the words of Confirmation 1. Because the Confirmation followed the Consecration 2. From the same the Apostle takes occasion to make the Digression which followeth And therein he reproves them of their Ignorance contracted by their negligence which was such that whereas for the time they might have been more and apt to able teach others yet were Babes had need to be taught again the first Principles and were uncaple of the Doctrine which he intended to deliver concerning the Priest-hood of Christ ver 11 12 13 14. CHAP. VI. VVHerein 1. The Digression is continued 2. The principal Subject resumed ver 20. In the Digression we have 1. His Resolution 2. An Exhortation In the Resolution 1. The Thing Resolved upon 2. The Reasons of his Resolution The thing resolved upon is expressed 1. Negatively Not to go back and lay the Foundation 2. Affirmatively To go on with his intended Discourse ver 1 2 3. The Reasons are 1. If any of them after a clear conviction and considerable
sixth seventh eight ninth and part of the tenth Chapter The test of the Epistle from the 15th verse of the tenth unto the end is chiefly exhortation to continue in the profession of that Faith in Christ their only Prophet and their only Priest and a life sutable to this profession as the only way and means whereby they may obtain eternal Salvation For no other kind of profession and life could serve them yet in all this you must understand that the divine Authour with his reasons whereby he demonstrates the excellency and sufficiency of Christ doth intermix exhortations motives reproofs and sometimes digressions yet all to good purpose so that no part or parcel is impertinent The reason why I pitched upon this Epistle is 1. Because in it we find more of Christ's propheticall and especially of his sacerdotal Office then in all the Scriptures besides 2. To clear it from the false Glosses of Crellius who seeks to elude those places which so clearly contradict their Socinian Errours especially in the Deity and Satisfaction of Christ. And this I do the rather because his Book is translated and speak Socinianism in English and goes abroad under the â—â—me of Dr. Lushington for though we find not his name in the Book printed yet he is charged with the Translation and making it publick Whether it be a meer Translation I cannot say because I have not seen Crellius § 2. To enter upon the first part which is concerning Christ's prophetical Office we must observe that the substance of the first four Chapters is reduced to two Propositions The first is That Christ is a Prophet more excellent then the former Prophets then Angels then Moses The second That therefore he must be heard The first is the Doctrine the second the use That he is far above the former Prophets and the Angels is proved in the first Chapter The Use is to hearken unto him in the second where we have a digression in the third he is proved to be more excellent then Moses The Use is an Exhortation to hearken unto him and believe him the reason is lest as the Israelites hardning their hearts were overthrown in the Wildernesse So we not believing Christ never attain our eternal Sabbatism or Rest upon this the Apostle enlargeth in the third and four Chapters His excellency above the former Prophets we may understand in the three first verses above the Angels in the rest of the Chapter So that the Propositions of this first Chapter are two First That Christ is more excellent then the Prophets Secondly Christ is more excellent then the Angels To understand the first Proposition we must note that the excellency of one above another cannot be known except they be compared and laid together Therefore the Apostle though he do not expresse it yet implyes a Comparison which is in quantity and presupposeth a former in quality That in quality is this That as the holy men of Old were excellent so is Christ they are excellent he is excellent both are excellent That in quantity is That though they were excellent yet he is more yea far more excellent The meaning whereof is that 1. They are compared as Prophets for they were Prophets and so Christ is a Prophet 2. Christ is a more excellent Prophet not only the party prophesying is more excellent but also as a Prophet or in respect of his propheticall Office and the exercise thereof § 3. God who at sundry times c. ver 1. Before we can understand that Christ is more excellent then the Prophets we must know 1. Who those Prophets were 2. Who Christ is Therefore the Apostle gives us here 1. A description of the Prophets ver 1. 2. Of Christ ver 2 3. The former Prophets are described to be men by whom God spake unto the Fathers at sundry times and in divers manners or ways This implyes that a Prophet is one by whom God speaks to men and because God spake to men by them and also by Christ therefore both they and Christ are Prophets In prophecy therefore we may consider 1. The matter 2. The form 1. The matter is the mind of God infallibly made known to Man or Angel here to Man 2. The form is the infallible declaration unto Man of this mind of God first infallibly known The mind of God is Something contrived by his Wisdom and decreed by his will concerning Man as subject to his Power and ordinable to an estate of happinesse or misery 2. This is represented unto Man apprehended by Man and both infallible so that he hath a more certain and infallible knowledg of the thing revealed The form thereof is an infallible declaration of thi mind of God known infallibly It may be declared to others by Word Writing Both and this declaration also must be infallible or else God doth not speak by them For because that God is true and necessarily true therefore his Word is necessarily true Hence the Divine authority and absolute Truth of the Scriptures because God speaks in them and by them to us and for this reason are they â—â—â—â—ed The Word of God God speaks to Men immediately mediately by men infallible and inspired falllble not inspired He spake immediately and at the first hand to the Prophets mediately by the Prophets at the second hand at the third hand by such as understand and teach the Doctrine of the Scriptures A Prophet as receiving his knowledg from God may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Roâ—h in respect of his declaration and speaking to others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And he is but God's Instrument Officer Minister if he prophesy by Word he may be said to be God's mouth if by Writing God's hand or scribe or secretary And because God is the principal Agent upon whom in this work the Prophet totally depends therefore he is said to speak by them God spake by the Prophets § 4. This explication premised doth give us to understand what the Prophets were 〈◊〉 Men by whom God spake unto the Fathers of Old at sundry times in divers 〈◊〉 1. God spake by them and this did make them fit to be Prophets and this may be sâ—id to be the general wherein they agree with Christ For God spake by him and in that respect he was a Prophet 2. In the rest they differ from him and that in four things 1. They spâ—â—e to the Fathers that is their Ancestors who lived formarly in the times of the Prophets 2. They prophesyed of Old in former days before the incarâ—ation and exâ—ibition of Christ. 3. God spake by them to the Fathers at several times â—â— as some 〈◊〉 it in many parts This implyes 1. That the Prophets by whom God spake were 〈◊〉 For the Doctrine of the Old Testament was not either spoken or written by one man but by many 2. That Doctrine was delivered by parts the whole body and systeme was not 〈◊〉 up at once but first one part then
another then a third till the whole was finished One part was declared as it was revealed by one Prophet another by another a third by a â—â—ird 3. That one part was written at one time another at another and the whole â—â— several and sundry times 4. There was a considerable time between the Prophet and the parts and a great distance between the first and the last For some of the best Chronologâ—ts â—ell us that the time from Moses to Malachi was a thousand and two hundred years 5. This 〈◊〉 â—ay referr to the matter which was various 4. As it was delivered by parts and in several times so it was revealed and declared many and several ways as it seemed good to the manifold wisdom of God â—ho 〈◊〉 many ways both to inform his Prophets and instruct his People In this they all agreed that they were moved inspired illuminated and infallibly directed by the Holy Ghost Yet this eternal Spirit did inform them by several representations made to the oâ—â—ward 〈◊〉 whilst they were waking or to the inward senses in Dreams oâ— Exâ—â—fies or more partly of immediately to the immortal Soul by illaps and powerful penâ—â—â—tion with a divine Light into the intellectual Spirit And as he did notify and make known his thoughts and 〈◊〉 lent Counsels several ways unto the Prophets so by them he declared them to â—â—â— People in any ways as by words by writing by writings read by visible Figures So that he 〈◊〉 any way did apply himself to the Fathers and used several means to cause them to understand his Will He omitted no way which was either necessary or expedient for their good From all this we may collect a Description of that part of the Scripture which we call the Oâ—â— Testament It is the Word of God which at sundry times by parts many 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 times past he spake by the Prophets to the Fathers These were not all the Prophets 〈◊〉 the beginning For Adam was a Propher so was Eâ—och and 〈◊〉 and Nâ—â—h â—â—â— Abraham but these were they by whom God spake to the Fathers and Ancestors of those 〈◊〉 and were the pen-men of the holy Scriptures of the Old Testament whereof 〈◊〉 were Priests and Kings That God by these was pleased to speak unto the Fathers 〈◊〉 a peculiar mercy and special favour to that People above all other People and was in act of â—â—â—gular care and extraordinary providence And it was a prerogative and a 〈◊〉 priviledg that they were trusted with his Oracles It 's true that the Church never was without some Prophecy and Word of God whereby he supplyed the ignorance and negligence of men and defects of humane reason and memory in divine things in 〈◊〉 known those things concerning man's eternal good which otherwise could never have been known § 5. The first Proposition is That the Prophets are excellent as hath been made evident The second follows and affirms That Christ is more excellent and that not only as a Prophet but many other ways Both are excellent because God spake by both and the Fathers as also their Children happy because God spake to both Yet Christ is more excellent because God spake by Him as by his Son and their Children more happy then the Fathers because God spake to them not by Prophets but his Son For in these last Days God hath spoken to us by his Son c. Ver. 2. In the words four things are to be considered 1. Who spake 2. To whom He spake 3. When He spake 4. By whom He spake 1. Who spake It was God the same God who spake unto the Fathers For the same God is the Authour of the whole Canon of the Scripture both of the Old and New Testament 2. To whom did He speak To us that is the Children and Posterity of the Fathers living in the time of Christ and the Apostles Such were these Hebrews and the Apostles For whom God reserved this special happiness above their Ancestors For many Prophets and Kings desired to see those things which they saw and did not see them and to bear those things which they heard and did not hear them Luke 10. 24. 3. When did God speak to the Children Even in the last days which in this respect were the best days because of clearest light and greatest mercy wherewith this time was blessed above the former days 4. By whom did he speak then unto them By his Son the Greatest and most Excellent of all the Prophets and far above them all For the Word was made Flesh and dwelt amongst them and they beheld his Glory the Glory as of the only begotten of the Father full of Grace and Truth Joh. 1. 14. § 6. The intention of the Apostle in these words is to set forth the excellency of Christ and therefore he gives us a description of Him which we must 1. Understand 2. From thence conclude his Excellency both absolutely and comparatively In the description some things affirmed of Christ agree to him as the Word not made Flesh some agree to him as the Word made Flesh or Incarnate Christ Jesus if we observe is the Son of God by whom he spake whom he hath made Heir of all things by whom he made the Worlds the brightness of his Fathers Glory c. 1. He is the Son of God and that in a Supereminent manner so as neither Men or Angels though Sons of God are therefore is He said to be his only begotten He is a Son not only in respect of his person Divine but of the humane Nature united to the Word He is a Son not only because like God or because adopted but by a divine and ineffable generation and production which far transcends the capacity of humane reason As the Word He is so near to God that He is God as Flesh and Man He is nearer then either Men or Angels 2. This Son of God is a Prophet for God spake by him as he did by the Prophets yet by him in a more perfect and excellent manner 3. God hath appointed him Heir of all things To be Heir is to be Lord to be made Heir is to receive Power to be made Heir of All is to receive an Universal and supream Power not only over Men but Angels This Power he received and it was given him upon the Resuâ—rection Therefore being risen he saith All Power in Heaven and Earth is given unto me Matth. 28. 18. This includes 1. A right 3. A possession upon a Solemn investicure In this phrase he seems to allude unto the priviledg of the first born Son who was Lord of the whole Inheritance and must Rule over his Brethren And this agrees to Christ as Man yet united to the Word 4. By him he made the Worlds This is affirmed and to be understood of Christ as the Word not incarnate and made Flesh. In the words we may observe 1. Worlds made 2. The making of them 3. By whom they were made
4. Who made them by him 1. By Worlds some understand 1. All times 2. All things in all times Others think that he used the expression of the Rabbins who make there Worlds 1. The lowest which is the Earth Sea and all things in them The second and the middle is the Ayr and the Aethereal part with the Sphears The third is the supream the World of Angels God and Souls Yet all these are but one World and systeme of Heaven and Earth and the Word signifies all times and durations with all places and all things in all times and places 2. The making of these Worlds is the giving them their Being after that they had no Being and is the same with creating and framing as we may read in many other places 3. These Worlds were made by the Word which once made Flesh was Christ For by the Word and Wisdom of God which was the Rule and Idea of all things all things were modeled and received their forms shapes and distinct beings 4. It was God who by this Word which was his Word and was with him in the beginning and also from eternity so that it was God as he was God the same God the same essence Yet we must not understand this so as though God made the World by his Son as by an instrument or inferiour distinct Agent but Father Word and Spirit were an individual efficient sole cause of the Worlds This is the same with that of the divine Evangelist All things were made by him that is by the Word and without him was not any thing made which was made Joh. 1. 3. The Apostle Paul expresseth this more particularly and distinctly for speaking of the Son he saith That by him were all things created that are in Heaven and that are in â—arâ—â— visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominâ—ons or Principalities or Powers all things were created by him and for him Colos. 1. 16. This is so clear that I wonder with what face Crâ—llius could expound the words so as by the Worlds to understand Man and by making and creating the Worlds the reforming and restoring Mankind This seems to be more strange seeing he understands those words By Faith we understand that the Worlds were framed by the Word of God Heb. 11. 3. of the Creation of the World The cause of this his false exposition is plain enough For this being affirmed of Christ that by him God made the Worlds it did plainly evince his Existence before his conception of the Virgin Mary nay before the World which was contrary to their damnable Errour Therefore he wilfully devised this interpretation lest he should grant the etemity of the Son of God But in Chap. 11. 3. where there was no mention of Christ he could give the genuine sense § 7. Ver. 3. Who being the brightness of his Glory To be Hâ—iâ— of all things did agree to him upon the Resurrection that God made the Worlds by Him referrs unto the work of Creation but to be the brightness of his Fathers Glory and the express image of his person agrees to Him from eternity For in these words we may observe his eternal generation and production Some think the expression is taken out of the Book of Wisdom though Apocryâ—hâ—l Chap. 7. 26. where Wisdom is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the brightness oâ— effulgency of eternal Light For we find diverse expressions of those Apocryphal Books taken up and used in the New Testament For the better understanding hereof we must observe 1. That God is often called Light because this bodily and visible Light is Glorious and in several respects resembles that eternal glorious essence of God 2. That here God is said to have Light or Glory not that Glory or Light is an accident in God but because he is said to have that which he is For God is not only lightfome and glorious but Light and Glory Therefore this Glory is essential Glory or Light â— 3. The Similitude here used is taken not from accidental but substantial Light as the same is said to be a Light Purity beauty delectability in Light do teach us something of Him 4. Brightness or effulgency here must not be understood to be either an effect or an accident of this spiritual infinite and eternal Glory yet it 's something issuing from and produced by that Glory as the mental Word which is a kind of invisible brightness is the issue product or broode of the intellect which is a spiritual Light From this pâ—ice and such like the Nicene Fathers did conlude That Jesus Christ was the only begotten Son of God begotten of his Father before all Worlds God of God Light of Light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made By this we may easily understand that they believed 1. The Glory to be a substance 2. The brightnesse to be a substance not an effect or accident 3. That the glory and brightnesse were one and the same substance 4. That the brightness issued from and was a product of the Glory not meerly as from a substance but as from a substance acting and acting upon it self 5. That Christ in this respect did exist from eternity We know little of this bodily Light less of the intellectual Light of the Soul and least of all of this eternal Light Therefore we trust believe according to plain Scripture most certainly that which we cannot clearly understand From hence we may understand the reason why Jesus Christ is called the Word and it is as because the word of the Intellect reflecting upon it self to know it self is a product of it self so is the Son of God the product of the eternal Intellect beholding it self to know itself yet this is the difference that this Word of the Soul is not so perfect nor real as this Word of God And the express Image of his person If Light produce Light then the Light produced must be like unto and in some measure represent more the Light and Glory producing and the more perfect and immediate the production is the more perfect is the resemblance and expression And because this production was perfect therefore this brightness is said to be the express Image of his Father The word translated here the express Image is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Character or impression made by Sculpture or some other way and this Character if rightly made is a lively expression of the samplar as an ectypon of the prototype This brightness is said to be the Character of his Hypostasis which some turn substance some turn person This implys 1. That he is a substantial Image yet not another but the same substance 2. That there is a relation between God who is this eternal Light and this image or brightness for he is the Image of this Glory 3. Yet he is not the Image of nor hath relation unto the Essence for
understands the removing of guilt and punishment and affirms that by the oblation they are removed whereas instrict sense it did not remove them but make them removeable and so he himself saith afterward That it had then only an efficacy and power 2. He distinguisheth between the Slaughter and the offering of the Sacrifice and saith That the Slaughter was on Earth and the Offering in Heaven That Christ dyed and suffered Death on Earth is clear That he willingly suffered this Death to expiate the sin of Man in obedience to his heavenly Father none can truly deny and this willing Suffering for sin in obedience may be truly said to be an offering and an act of a Priest as properly a Priest though they will not have him to be a Priest untill he entered Heaven which is very untrue Was not the High Priest a Priest before he entred with the expiatory blood into the holy Place There were many Sacrifices offered to God the Blood whereof was not presented in the holy place yet it may be granted that if type and antitype agree so far as the Scripture makes them so to do then Christ must present himself in Heaven and he did so For by his own Blood he entered in once into the holy Place Heb. 9. 12. But whether he entered as mortal or immortal in Soul only or in Soul and Body as dead or living when he presented himself before the Throne of the great eternal Judge may be doubted That his Soul that very day he dyed was in Paradise it 's certain and that entrance was properly by Blood with his Soul separated from his Body and made the expiation For when he enters the second time forty days after his Resurrection he enters as immortal in Soul and Body to make Intercession not to make Satisfaction and expiation or to merit § 10. Sâ—te down on the right hand of the Majesty on High This was a reward for his suffering and being obedient unto Death the Death of the Cross. This agrees unto him as the Word incarnate and in respect of his Man-hood And thus to sit is to be next to God above all Men and Angels and every Creature in holiness bliss honour and especially in Power and Dominion This properly agrees to him as King This is not to participate of the divine perfections and excellency as infinite and eternal but so far as the most noble Creature was capable From all this is manifest the excellency of Christ above all Prophers both as a Prophet and in other respects For as a Prophet he knew more of God and of his mind then all the Prophets joyned in one He declared his Will more fully clearly and powerfully then he did and this both by himself and by his Apostles God gave the Spirit not in measure but in fulness unto him He is more excellent not only as a Prophet but in other respects 1. As the Son of God 2. As Heir of all things 3. As he by whom the Worlds were made 4. As he is the brightness of his Fathers Glory and the expresse Image of his Person 5. As upholding all things with the word of his Power 6. As by himself purging our Sins 7. As set down at the right hand of the Majesty on high There is not the least of these though all be very great but therein he far excels the Prophets This might be added that he spake by him 1. As by his Son so did he not by any of the Prophets 2. In the last Days after which he will speak no more to mortal Men neither will there be any need § 11. The second Proposition is That Christ is more excellent then the Angels Being made so much better then the Angels This might be a conclusion of the former words but that in them Christ is compared with the Prophets Therefore we will consider it as a distinct Proposition concerning Christ as compared with the Angels And if he be more excellent then them he must needs be more excellent then the Prophets He is more excellent then the Angels in the seven sormer Respects but the Divine Apostle seems to insist principally upon the last as will appear by that which follows The occasion of this Discourse may be this because the Jews or Hebrews might say That though Christ was more excellent then the Prophets yet he was inferiour to the Angels by whom the Law was given and who spake to the Fathers and the Prophets so that they were Prophets and God spake by them and it 's not like that Jesus of Nazareth was above them or equal with them This is the more probable because it follows If the Word spoke by Angels c. Chap. 2. 2. Which implys that some part of the Old Testament especially the Law was declared by Angels For the Law was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour Gal. 3. 19. The Revelation was signified to John by an Angel of Christ Revel 1. 1. And this Angel calls himself a Prophet For he had the Testimony of Jesus which was the Spirit of Prophecy and was one of the Brethren the Prophets Revel 19. 10 22 9. So that some part of the New Testament was delivered by Angels Now to take away this conceit of the excellency of Angels above Christ he not only affirms that Christ is equal with but above the Angels and not only affirms it but ptoves it His first argument in form is this He that hath inherited a more excellent Name then Angels is more excellent then the Angels but Christ hath inherited a more excellent Name therefore he is more excellent § 12. Let 's first consider the terms of the Major then the connexion of those termes or the Consequence The terms are Angels Name a Name by Inheritance 1. Angels are Spirits or spiritual Substances the most noble and excellent Creatures God made and because Angels are good or bad who being made good became bad by their own folly here the Apostle understands the holy loyal and obedient Angels who never sinned against God They are called Angels by reason of their Office and imployment not of their nature The Word signifies Messengers because they are God's Messengers sent by him not only to do but declare his Will Angelus is the same that Malaach Nâ—â—tius Legaâ—us and those names agree to their Prophetical Office 2. These Angels have a Name but Christ a more excellent Name By Name in this place is not signified a bare Title but the Dignity and Power of Christ and a more excellent Name as a more excellent Dignity and Power Thus the word Name is used Phil. 2. 9. Ephes. 1. 21. For Fame Glory Dignity it 's signified by Name in the Old Testament and in many other Authours and in several Languages That the Apostle understands thus for a Title not only of Dignity but Power inherent in the person whose Titlo it is may easily appear from what follows 3. This more excellent Name
Christ hath by Inheritance it 's Hereditary and he is invested with it and actually possessed of it to enjoy it for ever Yet the word in the Greek signifies sometimes only to acquire possesse enjoy and so doth Iarash in Hebrew The Connexion is clear for whosoever hath greater dignity and power then another and that justly must needs be more excellent For excellency is a proper necessary consequence of Power § 13. For to which of the Angels said he at any time Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee And again I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a Son By these words he proves that Christ hath or doth inherit a more excellent Name which is the minor 1. This is a proof by an inartificial argument or testimony which depends upon the authority of the Person testifying 2. The party testifying is God therefore the authority is Divine and without exception especially to the Hebrews who acknowledged the Old Testament to be from God and infallible 3. He produceth two places out of the Old Testament 4. He alledgeth both especially the first by way of interogation affirmative which is a more vehement Negation For to which of the Angels said he that is to none and he challengeth the Hebrews or any other to prove that God said so to any Angel The first Testimony we find Psal. 2. 7. which must first be examined The words are used by the Apostle to prove the Resurrection of Christ Act. 13. 33. and his Priestâ—â—ood Chap. 5. 5 1. By the first place Psal. 2. we understand that upon the Resurrection after the time of his Humiliation was past he was made a King and by the second Hebr. 5. 5. he was made and created a Priest 2. That both are to be understood of Christ and of Christ raised up from death 3. That upon this Resurrection Christ was constituted King and Priest universal and supream in Heaven and Earth Therefore he said after his Reâ—â—rrection and before his Ascension All Power is given unto me in Heaven and iâ— Earth Matth. 28. 18. Therefore this day is not Eternity nor are the words to be understood of his eternal Generation as some of the Ancients expounded them but it 's the day of Resurrection when he laid aside the Form of a Servant and that Work which in that Form he must accomplish was finished This place truly understood doth plainly inform us that as none of the Angels did so humble themselves as he did to do so great and glorious a Service as he performed so none of them were rewarded with the honour and power of an universal Kingdom and Priest-hood as he was He had a better Name a higher place and a greater power for the Regal power he gave him was such that the very Angels were subject unto him as to their Lord and Soveraign The second place alledged we find 2 Sam. 7. 14 16. and the words of that former History contracted a Câ—ron 22. 10. in this manner The Lord speaking of a Son who should succeed him faith He shall build an House for my Name and he shall be my Son and I will be his Father and I will establish the Throne of his Kingdom over Israel for ever To understand this passage of Scripture you must consider 1. That the words are to be understood of Solomon for David intending to build a House and Temple to God was certified by Nathaâ— from the Lord that he should not build Him an House but Solomon his Son who should sit in his Throne after him should undertake and finish that Work 2 That Solomon was but a Type of Christ and that in three things 1. In building God's House 2. In being a King And 3. In the perpetuation of his Kingdom 3. You must know that when any words are spoken of a Type as a Type they are to be understood of the Anti-type and that principally to agree more exactly to the Aâ—â—â—-type For here to build God a spiritual House and to succeed David as an everlasting King did agree fully to Christ not to Solomon 4. The words understood both of the Type and the Anti-type make but one literal sense For that I call the literal sense which is intended by the Spirit And this is the excellency of the Scripture that by the same word it signifies not onely one but several things and thaâ— as the words signify things immediately at first hand so these things signify other things-things past or present or things to come For such was the wonderful Wisdom of God that he ordered things of old so that they plainly shadowed out things to come and so did teach Mysteries not onely by words but things and many things by one word 5. Christ and his Apostles do sometimes so quote the words of the Old Testament that they onely Point at the place and refer the hearer to it where he may read more than he hears and the whole when a part onely is spoken 6. This place joyned with the former doth plainly tell us that to be a Son is to be a King universal over the Church for ever and this is the more excellent Name and hereditary Power given to Christ never given to the Angels David himself by these words understood that God therein promised the Messâ—as and his eternal Saviour who was afterwards called the Son of David and his Throne and Kingdom the Throne and Kingdom of David By Son in both places is meant 1. Not a Servant 2. Not any kind of Son but the first-born 3. Not the first-born of any but of a King 4. Not the first-born of any King but of God as universal and Supream King for his Son this Son must be Heir and Lord of all § 14 Ver. 6. And again when he bringeth in the first-begotten c. These words are taken out of Psal. 97. and are found in the Septuagint Deut. 32. 43. They are brought to prove the excellent Name of Christ above the Angels affirmed in the Minor of the Apostle's Argument Expositors differ in the manner of bringing in these words upon the former but agree in the matter The difference is two-fold 1. About the Adverbs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. The bringing of Christ into the World whether it was his Incarnation as some affirm or his coming to Judgment as others For the Adverbe 〈◊〉 turned again some make it onely a word of Connexion of these words with the former as an Addition of a third Proof of the Minor out of a third place His first was from Psal. 2. The second from 2 Sam. 7. which is added to the former in this manner And again The third is this from Psal. 97. So that the word here signifies onely an Addition of a third Proof to the two former Thus Beza Trimellius Vatablus the Tigurines Zurick Erasmus Sasbout and our English Translators understand it Others think this too harsh a Transposition and joyn it with the Verbe
Prophets not by the glorious Son of God This is the first Proposition concerning the Law given § 5. The second proposition is that this Law was transgressed and disobeyed The sin which was the cause of the punishment is expressed by two words Transgression and Disobedience By these words we must not understand any kind of sin as of ignorance or infirmity or a sin upon surprizal or in petty matters for the best of the Saints and Prophets under the Law sinned in this manner But by them is understood some more hainous sins as Idolatry Blasphemy and such like or rebellion or apostacy or an habitual and continued course of Sin joyned with contempt of the Law For these were capital and capitally punished The third Proposition concerning the Punishment you heard before The fourth is concerning the Efficacy of the Law It was stedfast A Law should be armed with power and coactive force otherwise it cannot be executed and without Execution which is said to be the life of the Law it 's but words and can neither be a sufficient ground of hope in the Promises or fear in the Comminations When the Punishments threatned are inflicted it strikes a greater Terrour In this respect the Law proved firm and stedfast when the Offenders were punished according to their Transgressions and by suffering the penalties they knew that the word spoken by Angels was not vain but valid and effectual There is a three-fold stedfastness or firmness of a Law the first is in respect of the unalterable Will of the Law-giver the second in respect of the Execution the third in respect of the Party to whom it s given who firmly and certainly believes it The first is supposed the second is meant and is a great cause of the third The Emphasis is in the first words If the word spoken by Angels that is the word spoken by Angels and not by the Son proved firm and valid and was made and manifested to be such by the punishment of the Transgressors and especially in this that every transgression with an high hand contumacy and contempt was punished and not say such Offence escaped unpunished § 6. After the Sin and Punishment of Offenders in the times of the Law and Old Testament follow the Sin and Punishment of Offenders in the times of the New Testament The Sin is the neglect of the Gospel The punishment is implyed in the words How shall we escape In the first we may consider 1. The Word or Law 2. The Transgression of it In the Law we may observe 1. The Title or Name 2. The Publication 3. The Confirmation The Title is this so great Salvation by which is meant the Gospel which is called Salvation So great Salvation As in the Law so in the Gospel which is the Law of God Redeemer by Christ exhibited we have 1. Precepts and Prohibitions determining mens Duty 2. Promises and Threats declaring Punishments and Rewards according to mens Disobedience or Obedience and as in respect of the former the Gospel is the Rule of Man's Duty so in respect of the latter it 's a Rule of God's Judgment This Gospel is called Salvation because it promiseth Salvation and being followed brings loto Salvation and is said to be the Power of God unto Salvation and therefore is called the Word of Salvation and the Gospel of Salvation So that it 's called Salvation by a 〈◊〉 1. Of the Subject for the Adjunct because the matter and subject of it is Salvation 2. Of the Effect for the Cause because it â—ath a causal vertue and power to save As it's Salvation so it 's great Salvation because it doth promise and conduce to the attaining of eternal deliverance from eternal punishments and the greatest Enemies and of eternal bliss and full happiness the Word spoken by Angels did no such thing This is the Name or Title 2. The Publication or Promulgation is two fold 1. Began by Christ 2. Continued by them who heard him The Gospel is a Law and the Law of God Redeemer in Christ yet it could bind no man except it were published And it was first published by Christ. The Law and the Doctrine of the Old Testament was spoken and published by Angels and Prophets but this by Christ the Son and Lord Jesus Christ is our Lord by Redemption whereby he acquired a Right unto us and Power over us for because he suffered death for our sins God raised him up and made him Lord and Christ and being at his right hand he hath Power to command men and Angels and is the head of the Church which acknowledgeth his power and submits unto it He began to speak and declare the Gospel both before and after his Resutrection and they who heard him were especially the Apostles by whom afterward â—â—dued with the holy Ghost he declared it first to the Jew and these Hebrews then to the Gentiles It was so spoken as it was known by him and them so fully and clearly as was never done by Prophets and Angels before This is the Publication 3. The Confirmation follows where we must observe 1. To whom 2. By whom 3. By what it was confirmed 1. To whom It was confirmed saith the Author to Us that is to himself and these Hebrews so it 's commonly understood That it was confirmed to the Hebrews there can be no doubt and also to Paul who was an Hebrew to whom the Gospel was preached as to the rest of the Jews and also confirmed to him though he did not at the first believe it Yet it will not follow from hence that Paul received his immediate and infallible Knowledge of the Gospel from the Apostles For this he received immediately by Revelation from Christ as the rest of the Apostles did though they heard Christ as many more did who yet were no Apostles In this respect none can ground an Argument upon these words to prove that Paul was not the Author of this Epistle as divers do Again the word Us is often taken largely and indefinitely not strictly and precisely so as formally to include the person speaking And in this sense because it was confirmed to the Hebrews whereof he was one he might say It was confirmed to Us especially seeing it 's he that writes unto them 2. By whom was it confirmed It was confirmed by those which heard him Now many besides the Apostles did hear Him and also confirm the Doctrine of the Gospel Yet the Apostles did it in a more eminent manner and may be principally though not solely here intended Yet Paul did not hear Christ as the other Apostles did for though Christ spake to him from Heaven yet he did not speak to him as he did to others whil'st he conversed on Earth 3. By what was this Doctrine confirmed It was confirmed by two things 1. By Miracles 2. By the Gifts of the Holy Ghost Miracles are called Signs Wonders Powerful Works They are called 1. Signs 2. Wonders 3. Powerful
they are some ways one The reason why Christ is said to sanctify is because he hath an active power to sanctify and free from Sin such as are polluted with Sin and men thus polluted are said to be sanctified when they are freed from Sin Christ doth sanctify them by his merit and the application of his merit by his Sacrifice and his Spirit making use of Word and Sacraments And man is first sanctifiable by the Death of Christ and actually sanctified upon his Faith in this Death That this is the sense is plain by these words of his By which Will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Christ once for all Chap. 10. 10. The meaning whereof is that by the Death and Sacrifice of Christ remission of Sin and freedom from the pollution was merited so that this doing of his Fathers Will in suffering Death for the sin of man was so accepted of God that it hath an eternal virtue of purging the conscience from sin and in consideration of the same God is always ready upon man's Faith actually to remit and to take away his sin These two are said to be of one Crelliâ—s is here mistaken as in the former verse For he tells us that God brings many Sons to Glory by perfecting their Captain Christ through Sufferings because by his example God doth teach us that by Suffering and by Death though grievous we may attain eternal Glory and suffering is the way unto it This he spake to delude his Reader and seduce him because he would not confess the satisfying and meriting power of Christ's Sacrifice That Christ in his Suffering Death did give us a rare example of many heavenly vertues and an encouragement by his Resurrection and Glorification is true but not intended in this place So neither may we approve of his exposition of these words as any ways genuine and agreeing with the scope of the place For he makes Christ and Believers one as Brethsen because they have God as one Father But this is wide and far from the Apostles intention That of Junius and others is the best that they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of one masse and humane Nature alluding to the offering of the first Fruits at the Passover or the two Loaves waved at Pentecost by the which all the rest of their Fruits and Bread were sanctified That he means so he expresseth plainly afterwards ver 14. which informs that to be of one is to be partaker of Flesh and Blood as they are Flesh and Blood Therefore the Socinian must be either blind or impudent yet to understand his unity the better you must know 1. That as man had sinned so he was resolved to redeem and deliver him 2. That his wisdom did not think good to redeem him immediately himself nor mediately by Angels but Man must be redeemed by Man 3. That seeing man by sin deserved and was liable to Death he determined to deliver him by the Death which another must suffer for him 4. God as God could not dy therefore God must some way become Man and by his Word assume Flesh and Blood that he might in and by that humane nature suffer Death 5. He that must be Man and suffer Death and so sanctify all the rest must be one with them and not only as having Flesh and Blood as all men are but must be the Head Captain representative of all mankind and this Christ was both by divine Institution and his own voluntary susception And this is the difference between this unity of him with all mankind and the unity of all other men amongst themselves that he is so one with them as to be their Head and general representative for Redemption and Salvation And the difference between all other men considered as men and him considered as man is not only in this that he was holy and they sinful but that he was personally united to the Word they were not for they were distinct persons in themselves § 15. That they were of one is proved in the words following and that two wayes 1. In the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it is so by testimony of Scripture 2. In the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the reason why it 's so and that taken from the end to manifest how it became God thus to do The first is proved out of the Old Testament and first from Psal. 22. 22. That the Psalm is understood of Christ is clear not only because the first words thereof were used and taken up by Christ even when he was Suffering upon the Crosse but also many things in that Psalm were clearly fulfilled in Christ to the very casting Lots upon his Seamless Coat In the words Christ calls his Apostles and Disciples and all such as should believe in his Word declared unto them his Brethren not Strangers or Aliens not Servants or Slaves And by this acknowledgment and owning them he doth signify that he sanctifying and they being sanctifyed were one For he was man and they were men he was the Son of God they the Sons of God he was amongst these as a Brother of the same Society but as the Head of the Society and the first begotten amongst many Brethren The argument is this Brethren are one and of one but Christ and those who are sanctifyed by Christ are Brethren therefore they are one and of one That they are Christ's Brethren is evident because Christ calls them so and is brought in by the infallible Scriptures giving them that Title And how great a condescension was this that the Son of God Lord of Angels should vouchsafe us this honour as to acknowledg us sinful Wretches raised out of the dust his Bretheren And though he cites other words besides these as that He in the midst of the great Congregation would sing praise unto God yet the principal words for which the 40 Psalm is quoted is the word Brethren a term given by Christ unto his Disciples The second proof is found in many places of Scripture but yet they must be taken out of some place which speaks of Christ so as these words may be evidently the words of Christ. Some yea many think they are taken out of 2 Saâ— 22. 3. or out of Psal. 18. 2. where in the Septuagint we find words to the same purpose But seeing the Apostle doth follow the words of the Septuagint when he alledgeth any place out of the Old Testament and these words are not found in either of the former places neither is that Psalm so properly understood of Christ therefore it 's not likely that the Apostle intended to cite any thing out of them Therefore feeing we find the words following concerning trusting in God and concerning him and the Children which God had given him in the Prophet Esay and in the same Chapter of that Prophet and close together too therefore we may conclude with à Lapide and Heinfiâ—s that the place here cited is Esay
8. 17 18 verses where we have in the Septuagint the very words here used and alledged of the Apostle In that part of the Chapter we have a clear prophecy of Christ fulfilled in the time of his abode on Earth and before his ascent into Heaven There is a plain prediction of Christ's Incarnation and living amongst men and of his Disciples who did believe on him as also of the unbelief of the greatest part of the Jews of their rejection of Christ and of God's rejection of them and the destruction of Jerusalem And Christ is brought in saying And I will wait upon â—â— for the Lord that hideth or turneth his Face from the House of Jacob and I will trust in him as in the Septuagint Behold I and the Children which God hath given me These words are to be understood of him as one with his Disciples and man as they were men And in that Chapter we find some passages directly agreeing with the words of Simons which he spake after that he being in the Temple had received Christ being then Incarnate and an infant into his arms So that to understand the Apostle and the Prophet too we must not so must stand upon the words in themselves severed from the rest but joyntly with the context of the Chapter speaking of Immanuel that is Christ Incarnate § 16. In ver 11 he had said That both he that sanctifieth and they that are saâ—ctified are of one and in these words he assumes but the sanctified are parâ—akers of Flesh and Blood and so concludes that he must have Flesh and Blood and therefore saith He likewise took part with them And those which he called The sanctified by him ver 11. Here he names Children according to the words of the Prophet and these were Disciples and such as believed in him And it 's to be observed 1. That to be of one is to be Flesh and Blood and so man 2. That there is a two-fold union of Christ with Mâ—nsâ— The first by his Incarnation And the second by his actual Sanctification In the first respect he is one with all mankind as they are men and the Head of the whole body of them In the second respect he is one in a special manner with his Elect. By him â—â— man and dying for man all men receive this benefit to to be savable which Angels sinning do not By him as man dying and believed upon all such as do believe are actually sanctified and in the end saved And He and the Sanctified which are the Church are one in a special manner yet because to take part with the Children and be man was not sufficient except he dyed for them that by his Death he might be beneficial unto them therefore it 's added That he took part with them that he might destroy him that had the power of Death which is the Devil Where we may observe two things 1. That the Devil hath the power of Death 2. That Christ by Death destroyed him The first is implyed The second is expressed The word Devil is to be understood collectively for the Devils but in a special manner for the Prince of Devils who is said to be a Lyar and a Murderer Joh. 8. 44. because by his lyes he deceived our first Parents inducing them to Sin whereby they were made liable to Death For by his Temptations and false Suggestions he insinuateth into man and infuseth his poyson into their Soul Man yielding unto his Temptations falls into his hands and comes under his Power so that he hath dominion over him reigns in him blinds him perverts him inclines him effectually to sin and by sin stings him to Death And because he hath so great power to draw man into sin he may be said to have the Power of Death because by this means he makes man more and more obnoxious to Death which so unavoidably by the Law follows upon Sin yet he may be said to have the power of Death as a Jaylour Hangman or Executioner may be said to have such a power and God in his just Judgment may deliver disobedient man into his hand and by him execute his punishments as some understand the place and by divine permission he may have great strength to torment and destroy man Otherwise he can have no right unto Man to judg condemn him punish as being his Lord and Judg For that belongs only unto God who if man yield unto Satan may deliver him into his hand and he may detain him as his Captive The Scripture speaks much of the power of Satan over man till God deliver him out of his hand and this power can be no power of Life but of Death and Destruction This is the first thing implyed the second is That Christ by his Death destroyed him He destroyed him he destroyed him by his Death To destroy him is not to take away his immortal Life and Being but to take away his power or strength For the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the power of an Enemy over a Captive is not a legal and regular power and authority This strength and force and also right unto man as his Captive Christ took away by his Death For by his Death he satisfied God's Justice and merited a power and right to him as having by a lutron or price payed to the supream Lord and Owner bought him So that upon this price and ransome paid and accepted man became his and the Devil had only the possession of him though Christ had the right unto him and the propriety in him Therefore Christ in his prayer doth acknowledg that his Father had given power over all Flesh that he should give eternal life to as many as he had given him Again by this Death Christ made Death removable because by it he made man's sin remissible Bacon Thorpe tells us that the Devil by putting Christ being innocent to Death lost all his power over man because he had no Commission from God to put any person innocent and free from all sin unto Death yet for this he brings no clear Scripture though this be certain that God gave all men to Christ because he dyed for them This Death aimed at a further end then the destruction of the Devil as having the power of Death Christ indeed came to destroy the works of the Devil 1 Joh. 3. 8. and though the Devil at the first as a strong man keeps peaceable possession yet Christ is that stronger man who takes away his power disarms him takes possession and all this is done to deliver man out of his hands For 1. Christ must be lower then the Angels and mortal Man that he may dy 2. He must dy that he may destroy the power of the Devil 3. He must destroy the power of the Devil that man may be delivered from the danger of Death Man cannot be delivered except the power of the Devil be destroyed this
were yet here they are called Brethren as believing in Christ and holy as sanctified by the Spirit of Christ So that this is a Fraternity in respect of Religion Christian. They became such Brethren and so holy by the heavenly Call they were partakers of the heavenly Calling For as they were not Brethren so neither were they holy by natural Generation but by supernatural and spiritual Regeneration as before To be partakers of this Call is either barely to be called or to be partakers of this Mercy together with others It 's said to be Heavenly as some understand it in respect of the efficient and the final Cause It 's from Heaven that is from God who is the principal Cause of this Work and because they are to be called to Heaven that is eternal Glory which is the end and ultimate Effect thereof In it we may consider 1. The Work of God 2. The Duty of Man 3. The Benefit following upon both The Work of God is by the Word of the Gospel and the Power of the Spirit to enlighten and sanctify man and gave him a Divine Power to believe and turn unto Him The duty of Man is to be obedient to the heavenly Call The benefit is the admission of him as obedient unto his heavenly Kingdom and receiving him as an Heir of Glory Upon this heavenly Call followeth a great change both in the disposition and condition of man called For his disposition he is made of unholy holy and therefore said to be called with an holy Calling and to be called unto Holiness For his condition he is made of miserable happy and therefore said to be called unto eternal Glory And because the distance between holiness and happiness and sinful and miserable Man is so great therefore this work of God is a work of great power and because the change is so happy therefore it 's a work of great mercy wherein God freely prevents man so that if he should not thus prevent him he would be for ever sinful and miserable Wo unto all such as are disobedient to this heavenly Call and neglect this preventing Grace for as their Sin is more hainous so their Punishment shall be more grievous The Apostle seems to put them in mind of this Calling to let them know how deeply they are engaged to God and how unworthy they should be if they should not persevere unto the end § 3. The duty exhorted unto is expressed ver 6. It 's to hold fast the confidence and rejoycing of the hope firm to the end and is repeated ver 14. It 's opposed to unbelief ver 12. Take heed Brethren lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God The duty therefore is persevetance which presupposeth that they had received the Truth of the Gospel and professed their Faith in Christ and is a continâ—ance in this Faith once received and professed to the end This Faith was from God and was wrought in them by the heavenly Call and the continuance of it depends upon God He gave it at the first he continues it to the last yet so that man must be obedient at the first and use all means with diligent care to preserve it to the last Some refuse to obey at the first others who have professed and received the Truth fall off before the end and both these are sins and they only guilty of them § 4. The reasons follow 1. From the excellency of Christ which is set forth by Comparison The parties compared are Christ and Moses both excellent but Christ far more And here it is observable 1. That the duty is the same with that which was pressed Chap. 2. 2. That the ground of that was the excellency of Christ above the Angels of this the excellency of Christ above Moses 3. The reason there was that if the disobedience unto the word of Angels was punished with Death how much more grievously shall they be punished which disobey the Gospel of Christ 4. The reason here is that if their fathers for their unbelief and disobedience to the Doctrine of Moses were eternally shut out of God's rest how much more shall they he shut out of Heaven and Christ's eternal rest if they do not continue in the Faith of Christ but fall off from their profession To understand this first reason we must consider 1. The excellency of Christ and the excellency of Moses absolutely and positively 2. The excellency of both comparatively that so we may understand the excellency of the one fâ—t above the the excellency of the other 1. Therefore they must consider the excellency of Christ Jesus which is this That he is the Apostle and High-Priest of their Profession Their profession was of the Christian Faith and Religion which they did professe The Authour Apostle and Legate sent from Heaven who first published this Faith and Doctrine was Christ the Son of God by whom God spake who was formerly proved to be more excellent then the Prophets then the Angels So that their Religion was from God nor by Prophets or Angels but by Christ the great Prophet For here to be an Apostle is to be a Prophet Yet Moses and so many others may be Prophets yet no High-Priest but Christ Jesus is not only the Prophet but the High-Priest who mediates between God and Man and officiates so as to make his Doctrine effectual and saving and expiate his Peoples Sin that they may be reconciled to their God This two-fold power was necessary as without which he could not have been a perfect Saviour These are his two Offices upon which the Apostle so much enlargeth and insisteth But 〈◊〉 may be an Officer and yet prove unfaithful and not discharge his trust yet Christ was faithful For it follows Ver. 2. Who was faithful to him that appointed him § 5. This is concerning Christ's fidelity expressed both absolutely in these words and comparatively in those which follow 1. Absolutely He was faithful to him who appointed him 2. Comparatively As Moses was faithful in all his House The former words 1. Imply his ordination 2. Expresse his fidelity to him that ordained him Where we have two Propositions 1. That God appointed Him 2. He was faithful to God In that He was appointed or made an Apostle and High-Priest of our Christian profession for so the words are to be understood it 's evident that He did not Usurp this two-fold Power and Office but received it and acquired it legally and none could invest Him with this Power but onely God and the reason is because it is so eminent and transcendent After he was once advanced he was faithful to that God who advanced and trusted him with so great a Power This fidelity was the true and full discharge of his Apostolical and Sacerdotal Office in perfectly doing all things necessary for the eternal Salvation of Man so far as it depended upon this two-fold Office As an Apostle or Prophet
whose House it is is expresse Scripture that Christ doth build it is so too For thus Christ saith to Peter Upon this Rock will I build my Church Matth. 16. 18. Some restrain the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all things to the Church but that 's not probable For the better understanding of these words you must observe 1. That one of the most noble Effects and Works of God is the Church a most rare and curious piece 2. That to Frame Build and Constitute this must be a special act of that excellent and universal Builder 3. That as by the Word God created all things and built the World at the first so by this Word Incarnate dying and rising again sending down the Holy Ghost revealing the Gospel he built and founded the Church-Christian which shall stand for ever 4. That because he built this Church not meerly as God by the word not-Incarnate but Incarnate and made Flesh therefore it must necessarily follow that Christ is not part of the House nor the House it self but the Builder of the House For though he doth many things by the word not-Incarnate yet he never built the Church but by it The substance of the words is That presupposing this for a certain truth That every House hath a Builder therefore this House must have so too yet because it cannot be built by Men or Angels it must be built by God and because the materials of it are Men first sinful and guilty God must build it by Christ who is the Word made Flesh. This discourse implyes that Moses was not a Builder but a Member of this House yet an eminent Member and one advanced far above the ordinary ranck of other Members not only because a Prophet but an excellent and eminent Prophet too § 7. Thus far the excellency of Christ above Moses set forth by a Similitude taken from building The second Comparison is between Him and Moses as between Lord and Servant For it follows Ver. 5. And verily Moses was faithful in all his House as a Servant for a Testimony c. These words are part of the Minor Proposition and with the words immediately following inform us of two things The one concerning Moses the other concerning Christ 1. Concerning Moses That for his place he was a Servant 2. Concerning Christ That He was Lord of God's House They both agree in this that they had some certain place in the House of God but differ in this That the one was in a lower the other in a higher place Moses though faithful yet was but a Servant He was God's Servant in an honourable Place and in an Office of great Trust For the word Servant signifies an Officer yet because all Officers are Servants therefore by a Synechdoche they are often called Servants under their Soveraign He was a kind of Steward trusted with a general superintendency and inspection over God's House the Church of Israil In a word he was a Prophet and a Prince Yet here he is considered as a Prophet for he was to testify and declare unto the People the Laws and other things God should reveal unto him And it was an Honour to be such a Servant and a greater Honour to be faithful as he was to declare and testify all things which God revealed unto him and to do this without diminishing the least or adding any thing unto God's Word This is one proper Duty of Christ's Ministers to be witnesses of Christ and declare the whole counsel of God faithfully and how happy might the Church be if her Prophets were such As 1. Who did know what the Will and Word of God is 2. Did teach it faithfully and wisely according to their Commission Though Moses in this respect was counted worthy of Honour and deserved to be heard and obeyed by that People yet Christ was worthy in this respect of far greater Honour For it followeth Ver. 6. But Christ as a Son over his own House Here Son is opposed to Servant and his own House to the House of another which is the Master Christ is the Son Moses but the Servant Christ is in the House as his own built by him Moses was in the Church of the Jews as a Servant in the House of his Master giving directions for all things to be done therein according to the Will of God his Lord and Master Christ is not here called Lord but Son but by Son is meant the Heir which is Lord of all For as you heard before God had made Christ his Son Heir that is Lord of all Chap. 1. 2. The Church is his own House for he redeemed and purchased it by his own Blood he gave himself for it which Moses never did and his Father hath given all things into his hands and made Him Head of that Church and House which he himself hath Built Moses was never advanced to this Honour he never had any such Title This excellency of Christ both absolute and comparative we are exhorted to consider It 's represented unto us fully and clearly in the Gospel yet will be of little use to us if we consider it not so as we may the more clearly and distinctly know it and be effectually moved to honour Christ and prefert Him far above Moses For the end of consideration is a more clear and perfect knowledg of the things considered and in practicals the end of that knowledg is to move and incline out hearts This exhortation is but subordinate unto another as the duty of Consideration is but subordinate to an higher and far greater and that is Perseverance which is here thus expressed Ver. 6. Whose House We are if we hold fast the considence and rejoycing of hope firm to the end § 8. The Duty exhorted unto is final perseverance and is here described by the Apostle to be an holding fast of the considence and rejoycing of hope firm to the end This is opposed to Apostacy or a falling off before the end Perâ—everance is conceived to be no virtue distinct in it self but an adjunct of virtues and especially of Faith The virtues here are considence and rejoycing of hope The nature of it is 1. To hold these fast and firm 2. To hold them fast unto the end The subject immediate of this constancy and perseverance is confidence and hope 1. Confidence in this place presupposeth a firm and certain belief of the Truth of the Gospel concerning Christ as the only sufficient Saviour by whom alone God will give us everlasting Life 2. This confidence is a reliance and resting or reposing of our hearts upon God promising remission and eternal Life for Christ's sake alone For seeing God who is almighty in Power infinite in Wisdom unchangeable in his Purposes hath signified his willingness to save us and hath bound himself by his promise upon certain terms expressed in his promise we may be confident that what he hath promised he will perform and will in no wise fail or be
from Christ and deny the Faith he had professed Hardness of heart may be considered as a Judgment of God or as a Sin of Man here it 's to be considered as a Sin And such it may be either in respect of the first Call and so is or implies at least a refusal of Christianity and so it 's either a rejection of that Christianity which was once received and professed or at least makes way for it and thus it 's to be understood in this place For no man can fall off from the Christian Faith once received but his heart must needs be hardned and stand unmoved against all former convictions This considered either in the former or latter sense may be conceived 1. As a Not yielding unto the Reasons and Motives unto belief and profession proposed in the Gospel 2. As an obstinate resisting of these Motives and Reasons joyned with some power of the Spirit And both these may be caused either from the delusion of the understanding apprehending and 〈◊〉 to contrary Motives and Reasons which are not really such but seem to be such which may be called sinful 〈◊〉 as the words of the Text may be understood oâ— from the pure malignancy of the Will or from both Now to prevent all these mutual exhortation is an excellent mean ordained by God to that end And the neglect of this Duty is a great Cause or at least a great Advantage of sin and leaves the way open for Apostacy to come in For frequent proposals and representations of the true Reasons why we should believe and a continual â—itring up to holy Duties are effectual causes of the confirmation of our profession and so of our perseverance § 14. We must mutually exhort one another whilst it 's said to Day for to prevent Apostacy and we must prevent Apostacy because without final perseverance we cannot be partakers of Christ. For Ver. 14. We are made partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end This seems to be the same with that in ver 6. yet the expression is some what different For to hold fast our confidence and rejoycing of hope firm unto the end is the same with holding the beginning of our confidence stedfast to the end And to be Christ's House the same with being partakers of Christ. So that I need not say much of this Text only some things may be observed As 1. That Hypostasis turned confidence may in this place signifie our Christian Faith 2. That the beginning of it is the first receiving of it or the principles of Christianity 3. That as it may signify a firm standing so it 's applyed to the Soul as firmly standing and continuing in the belief and profession of the Faith without wavering or doubting and is opposed to falling For though the principles and fundamental Truths are firm and stable for ever in themselves yet they are not so firm in the hearts of many who professe them Therefore it 's our duty to seek a firm existence of them in our hearts and a firm fixing of our hearts upon them never to be removed 4. That to be partakers of Christ is to partake of and attain the great Reward of eternal Glory merited by Christ For the word Christ is here taken Metonymically for the benefits of Christ. 5. That though this may seem to be the same reason with the former yet here it seems to be brought as a reason from the penalty that will follow upon our Apostacy which is an unspeakable loss of eternal Glory the greatest benefit Christ hath purchased for us For if we shall be partakers of Christ only upon this condition of perseverance to the end then if we harden our hearts and fall off we must needs lose eternal Glory and that great Benefit which Christ merited § 15. Thus far the Apostle hath made use of those words of the Psalmist To day if ye will hear his Voice harden not your hearts Now he proceeds to the words following As in the Day of Provocation and enlargeth upon them in this manner Ver. 15. While it is said to Day if ye will hear his Voice harden not your hearts as in the day of provocation For some when they had heard provoked c. Where 1. He takes in the former words with this of Provocation 2. Though the Psalmist do not mention whether all their Fathers provoked and tempted God or no yet he observes that only some not all did provoke The connexion of these words with the former seems to be this That as their Fathers by hardning their hearts provoked God to wrath so if they hardned their hearts they will provoke God likewise and he will be offended with them The argument in form is this e must Wnot do any thing that will provoke God to anger but if we harden our hearts we shall provoke him to anger Therefore we must take heed of hardning our hearts and of Apostacy The proposition in these here presupposed is That hardning the heart will provoke The propositions here delivered in the Hypothesis are 1. That some of their Fathers did provoke 2. That all did not provoke That which all these imply and inferr is this as applyed to them That they must not harden their hearts lest they provoke Lest this discourse should not be so pertinent and effectual let us first enquire what this provodation is The Hebrew word is translated by the Septuagint to signify contention contradiction and exacerbation and so they turn it only in this place And the Apostle follows their Translation and useth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which is a word 1. Compound 2. Derivative and is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies bitter as Meâ—â—s or Drinks are biâ—â—er to the taste The signification therefore in this place is Mephorical and informs us That as some Meats and Drinks being bitter are very offensive to the taste so hardness of heart and apoâ—â—acy are very offensive unto God The words used in the Psalm may be either Proper and so translated as in Meribah and Massa or Anellâ—tive as here the Apostle understands them This provocation may be considered either at a Sin or a consequent of Sin here it seems to be a consequent of sin yet necessarily presupposing the Sin Sin every sin being contrary to God 's Law provokes him to anger and gives him just cause to execute his vindictive Justice upon the Sinuer Yet some sins are more provoking then others especially such as are committed by People in Covenant with God who act contrary to their solemn Vows and Engagements as Israel in the Wilderness did And this hardning of the heart so as to fall away is the most provoking of all For it not only deserves punishment and by vertue of the Law makes the Sinner liable to it but provoks God to pass a definitive sentence and to proceed to execution This particular consequent of sin is that which here
having a Promise not believing entred not into God's Rest and some of them believing did enter So they having a Promise if they believe not shall not enter if they believe shall enter and enjoy the benefit and Rest promised The ground of this Application is that they had a Promise and this thing promised is God's Rest For there was a Rest remaining for them as well as for their Fathers The words are A Promise being left of entring into his Rest. SOme translate and understand the words of leaving and by unbelief forsaking the Promise yet this cannot be the intention of the Apostle which is made clear by these words There remaineth therefore a Rest or Sabbatism to the People of God ver 9. where we have the same simple though not the same compound Verb. To understand this we must know that God promised Rest unto the Israelites in the Land of Canaan which should be their Inheritance Therefore some understand the word left to be taken Metaphorically as Legacies are left and bequeathed in a Testament unto Children and so this was left to them by God's Promise As they had a Promise of a Rest so these Hebrew Christians had a Promise of a far more excellent Rest as well as they But then the Question is where have we this Promise and who makes it and where is it made God makes it and he makes it in the Gospel Therefore he first proves that a Promise is left them as their Fathers had a Promise For it followeth Ver. 2. For unto Us was the Gospel preached as well on to Them VVHere we have two Propositions 1. That the Gospel was preached to the Israelites in the Wilderness 2. It was preached to these Hebrews 1. It was preached to the Israelites For as a Promise was made to Abraham that he in his Seed should inherit the Land of Canaan so this Promise was renewed unto them in the Wilderness and God was ready to perform it and give them possession Yet this Promise was made and to be performed upon certain conditions and duties to be performed by them And because this Canaan was a Type and Figure of the heavenly Inheritance and eternal Rest to be obtained by Jesus Christ therefore the Gospel might be said to be preached to them though darkly and implicitly 2. It was preached to these Hebrews yet more clearly and fully by the Apostles In this Gospel as preached to them the Promises are one principal thing and amongst the Promises that of eternal Rest is the chiefest and includes all the rest This Promise is made for and in consideration of Jesus Christ the condition is Faith in Christ meriting the same and after his Sufferings being entred into this rest This Promise of Rest upon Faith in Christ already come is the substance and matter of the Gospel and the Doctrine thereof is the Gospel in proper sense hough the Doctrine preached to the Israelites whereâ—n Rest was promised upon condition of Faith was also the Gospel and might be so called though imperfectly But what was the issue of this Promise in respect of the Israelites It was two-fold 1. In respect of them who believed not it did not profit them 2. In respect of them that believed they entred into God's rest for so the Apostle informs us But the Word preached did not profit them not mixed with Faith in them that heard it In which words may be observed 1. The Event 2. The Reason The Event It profited not the Reason They believed not the Word For though the Word be the Power of God unto Salvation in them that believe yet it 's a Word of eternal death to Unbelievers Both these the Event and the Reason are delivered in two Propositions 1. That the Word preached did not profit them 2. It was not mixed with Faith in them that heard it The latter is the former in order of Nature Both include many Propositions 1. That the Word was preached unto them 2. They did hear it for how should they hear without a Preacher Where by the way note that the Gospel of Doctrine here meant in the Original is called the Word of Hearing implying that it was so preached as that they did or might hear it as they were bound to do 3. They who heard it did not believe The Expression in the Original is that it was not mixed with Faith For that whereby the Soul receiveth the Word is Faith and that whereby it receiveth it effectually is a sincere Faith For this heavenly Doctrine is like a liquor it 's an heavenly Water and is poured upon men by preaching and is of rare and excellent vertue when it 's received and digested in the Soul by Faith For the saying in Philosophy is true in this case Actus activorum sunt in passo unito disposito For by the Soul rightly disposed and by Faith receiving this Doctrine the Doctrine is as it were incorporated into the Soul and made one with it 4. This Word not believed did not profit that is did not prove any wayes effectual either for a title to eternal rest or for the possession of it For they not performing the condition God was no wayes bound to perform his promise to them yet this was not all he was so offended with them that he pastan irrevocable sentence of exclusion upon them By all this we may understand 1. That it 's a great Mercy in God to vouchsafe us the Gospel and to have it faithfully and constantly preached unto us so that we may hear it This of it self is an excellent means of our Conversion and the mighty Power of God unto Salvation It 's like the Mannâ— and heavenly kind of Food which being eaten and received into our Souls will nourish and preserve us It 's a divine light to guid us to Heaven And â—o unto them to whom God denies it for they sit in darkness and the shadow of death without any hope of Salvation 2. In this Gospel there are precious Promises the cheifest whereof is that of entring into God's Rest The condition of it is sincere Faith and continuance therein unto the end This Rest was merited by Jesus Christ To believe sincerely and persevere therein is the Duty commanded and to be performed to enter is the great Reward Therefore we should diligently consider that it promises the greatest good that God did ever give or Man is capable of and in this respect is the best Doctrine in the World yet lest Man should presume he promiseth it upon condition of perseverance and for the merit of a Saviour If we do attain it we do not deserve it for the enjoyment of it is a free Gift of God yet though God give it freely yet he gives it to none that are guilty of Unbelief and Apostacy 3. Men may hear the Gospel preached and yet receive no benefit by it through their own fault Meat will feed if it be eaten Water will quench thirst if we
be translated otherwise as it is by the Syriack Vatablus and the Vulgar This passage hath reference to that word especially my Rest for there is a Rest of God promised in the Gospel yet truly this is not God's Rest from his work of Creation upon the seventh day That was a Rest 1. Of God 2. That Rest wherewith he rested himself 3. It was his Rest from the works of Creation 4. It was that Rest which he rested the first seventh day of the World after he had finished the Works of Heaven and Earth For this purpose the Apostle alledgeth the words of Moses Gen. 2. 1 2 3. This Rest indeed might signify the perpetual Rest of Men and Angels when they have finished their work of Obedience and God might institute the Sabbath for this end Yet though this was a Rest of God yet it was not the Rest implyed in the Psalm not that which is promised in the Gospel That it was not he makes plain Ver. 5. And in this place again If ye shall enter into my Rest. THat is there is a second Rest long after promised to Israel and it is that which he gave them in the Land of Canaan this the Psalmist intends in these words As I sware in my wrath if they shall enter into my Rest yet this is not that which is promised in the Gospel This he makes evident by the words following Ver. 6. Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein and they to whom it was first preached entred not in because of Unbelief Ver. 7. Again he limiteth a certain day saying in David To day after so long a time as it is said To day if ye will hear his Voice harden not your hearts Ver. 8. For if Jesus had given them Rest then would he not afterward have spoken of another Rest. THis part of the Chapter is more easily understood if we reduce it to Propositions which are these 1. That though there was a Rest of the Land of Canaan whereinto some must enter and did enter yet a certain day is limited and appointed by David of entring into another Rest. 2. This day was appointed long after the entrance of Israel into the Land of Canaan 3. The words whereby another day of another Rest is appointed and promised are these To day if you will hear his voice harden not your hearts 4. If Jesus or Joshua had brought Israel into that Rest which David speaks of there had been no need of speaking of and promising another Rest so long after The Apostle infers from all this that there is a Rest yet remaining for the People of God though it be neither the Rest of God from the Works of Creation nor the Rest in the Land of Canaan For the Scriptures mention but three Rests or Sabbatisms the first of Creation the second of Canaan the third of Heaven and this last is that which is meant by the Psalmist and promised in the Gospel And he further adds that this Rest had some affinity with that of Canaan and with that of God's Sabbath For Ver. 10. He that is entred into his Rest hath ceased from his own Works as God did from his VVHich words may be understood two wayes 1. Of the Title and Right to enter into this Rest or 2. Of the actual enjoyment and full possession In the former respect it 's certain that no Man can have so much as a Title or any hope of this eternal Rest till he cease from and forsake his own Works of Sin by true Repentance In the latter respect which is more probably intended no Man can actually enjoy the Rest of Heaven untill by perseverance he hath finished all his Work of Evangelical Obedience as God did not keep his Sabbath till he had fully finished all his works of Creation This is a Doctrine full of sweet and heavenly Comfort That Christ hath purchased an eternal glorious Sabbath God hath promised it in the Gospel and we who by the Sanctification of the Spirit persevere in our Christian Profession and Practice shall certainly enjoy it fully and for ever All men desire Rest yet it 's not to be found on Earth but in Heaven not in the Creature but in God Happy they which know the Excellency and Glory of this Rest and with all diligence and constancy use the means to attain it by following the Doctrine of the great Prophet Jesus Christ unto the end § 4. Here comes in the Exhortation to the great Duty in Ver. 11. Let us labour therefore to enter into that Rest lest any man fall after the same Example of Unbelief THese words may be considered 1. In their Coherence 2. In themselves 1. The Coherence is implyed in the Particle and Illative Conjunction therefore which informeth us that this Exhortation is a Conclusion inferred upon some antecedent Premisses and that Proposition of the Apostle We which have believed do enter into Rest Ver. 3. Which 1. Implies that there is a Rest for us under the Gospel 2. Affirms that they who believe do enter The former he manifests at large that there is a Rest besides that of Creation and that of the Land of Canaan remaining for the People of God The latter is plain out of the Psalm and he takes it for granted that such as hear and believe shall enter and onely such have admission Hence he inferrs That if there be an eternal glorious Rest prepared and promised to be enjoyed by Believers then it 's our Duty to labour to enter This is the Connexion The Exhortation considered in it self with the rest of the Chapter to the end doth 1. Propose the Duty 2. Urge the performance upon effectual Reasons The Duty is to labour to enter into that Rest where we have A Rest. Entring into it Labouring to enter What the Rest is you have heard before The entrance is to acquire and attain the actual possession and full enjoyment and that it may be considered 1. As a Duty of man and then it is the use of all means ordained of God for the attainment 2. As a gift and gracious Work of God admitting and receiving us unto the enjoyment yet because man should not mistake by thinking it an easie matter to enter at his will and pleasure he here implies that it 's a work of labour of difficulty of striving it 's an entring in at the strait Gate and we must labour use all our power and put our strength to the utmost For this is the greatest business which we have to do in this Life and our will must be most firmly resolved and bent upon it our understanding intended and as it were set upon the rack in all the operations thereof and our executive power exercised to the utmost degree For out wit will and power and all the faculties of the Soul and Body must be taken up continually in this work as the most necessary and excellent of all others The word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 study ye And as one well observe Studium est vehemens applicatio axim ad aliquid agendum Study is a vehement application of the mind to do something Yet that which is matter of lamentation and a sad presage of the eternal ruine of many Souls is the great neglect of this Duty for few go seriously about it The vigonr and strength both of our Souls and Bodies is imployed and wholly spent in seeking the vanities of the World § 5. The Reasons whereupon the performance of this Duty is urged are three 1. From the sad and woful Consequent 2. From the severity of the all-seeing Judge 3. From the help and assistance of our High-Priest The reason from the sad Consequent is expressed thus Lest any fall after the same example of Unbelief THis implies 1. There is danger and an evil to be feared 2. The evil is falling 3. All and every one is in this danger lest any fall 4. Lest any should sleight the danger he instanceth in the Israelites who fell by Unbelief To fall may be a Sins or a Punishment If a Sin it 's Apostacy which is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifie in this as in many other places Rebellion and Apostacy If a Punishment it 's exclusion out of God's Rest with all the miseries that accompany it so it seems here to be taken By this as by many other places we easily understand how we must conceive of Examples and what use we must make of them If they be examples of Punishments we must account them as executions of God's Laws and especially of his Comminations The use that we must make of them is to avoid those Sins for which they were inflicted and to be the more careful in this particular because by them we may easily know that God's Laws are not only words and his Threats only wind It 's not with God as it 's often with Men who will threaten more then they will or can do Thence the Saying Threatned men live long But here it 's otherwise God's Word is his Deed and his Punishments threatned against Apostates are unavoidable They are not made unadvisedly and out of rash passion but according to the eternal Rules of Wisdom and Justice And let every one know that that God that spareth neither Men nor Angels nor his own chosen and beloved People will not spare Us. Therefore as we desire to escape this fearful Punishment let us labour to enter into that Rest which God hath promised § 6. The second Reason is from the severity of the Judge For Ver. 12. The Word is quick and powerful and sharper then a two-edged Sword c. TO understand this Text we need not doubt whether by Word is meant the Scripture and Doctrine of the Gospel or Christ Jesus which is the Word of God made Flesh or the penal decrees of the Gospel For by Word of God is meant the Law of God with his judicial Sentence For God is here brought in as a most perfect Law-giver and a most severe and exact Judge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Word is often taken for a Law as the ten Laws or Commandments are in the Hebrew called ten-Ten-words Exod. 20. 1. And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dabar both in Chaldee Syriack and Arabick doth sometimes signify to Order and Govern and because Government is by Laws and Judgment therefore Word signifies both This is more evident from Chap. 2. 2. Where you read If the Word spoken by Angels was stedfast and every Transgression and Disobedience received a just recompence of Reward Where by Word is meant the Law without all doubt as you heard before wherein there were not only Precepts but Comminations according to which Judgment did proceed and was executed By Word therefore is meant the Law and Doctrine of God by Christ wherein we have not only precepts and prohibitions but promises and threats and according to these God will judge every Man to whom the Gospel shall be preached This is a defect in humane Laws that they cannot reach many Offendors and leave the conscience exempt from humane Tribunals and this is an imperfection in many Judges that they cannot attain the perfect and clear knowledg of many Causes brought before them or if they know them will not impartially punish them The Apostle removes these defects and imperfections from this Law-giver and Judge this Law and this Judgment For the Word or Law of God is quick and powerful The latter word explains the fornâ—er for those things that are living are said to be active in opposition to such things which are dead which have lost their power and to be lively and very active are many times the same and this signifies the efficacy and active power of this Law This active vigour and efficacy is illustrated by a Similitude For the Law is compared to a two-edged Sword which being used by a powerful and skilful hand doth manifest how sharp and cutting it is for it pierceth quickly into the inward parts and divideth between Soul and Spirit and the Bones and Marrow which are most nearly united and more hidden and secret in living Bodies So that in the Similitude we have two acts of a Sword or any such cutting Instrument The first is dividing things most nearly united The second discovering things most secret There cannot be any more perfect division or discovery in any dissection or anatomy then is here expressed The reddition of this Comparison seems to be made in these words And is a discerner of the thoughts and the intents of the heart For this cannot agree to a Sword or any cutting Instrument and therefore the meaning must be that as a Sword doth divide things so closely united and discover things so secretly hidden in Bodies so doth this Law in the Soul especially when it 's applyed by the Judge unto the case of sinful Man to be determined by him The most hidden things in Man as a subject of God's Judgment are the intents and thoughts of the heart and they seem to be closely and inseparably conjoyned both with the heart which is the most intimate thing in Man for cor intimum honunis and also one with another We need not curiously explain the words thoughts and intents of the heart or distinguish between them The heart is the Soul of Man endued with a faculty of understanding and willing such things as are the proper objects of it The Soul is in continual motion and action framing and moulding things with in it self Thoughts and intents are the secret acts both speculative and practical of the understanding and rational appetite The words turned thoughts and intentions may signify apprehensions conceptions judgments noetical or dianoetical consultations about mens intents concerning the ends decrees and all other acts of the Soul and may here be so understood And many of these acts and operations are most secret and concealed and in respect of them God saith The heart of man
a great High-Priest above all others as Universal and Supream Pontiffe of Heaven and Earth in comparison of whom all other Priests even the highest are but shadows This is the excellency of his Office His Relation to us is this that we have him that is He is our great High-Priest in whom we who professe our Faith in him have a special Interest so that He as a Priest doth officiate for us and his excellent Office was instituted of God for our eternal good no Unbelievers can be said to have him in this manner Of this great High-Priest it 's affirmed that He is passed into the Heavens This entrance into Heaven was shadowed by the High-Priests entrance into the inmost sacrary of the Tabernacle or Temple which was called the Holy of Holiest The reason why this which is here first affirmed of him is mentioned may well be this because by this he hath not only obtained and taken possessiâ—â— of this eternal Rest wherein we must seek to enter but by this means hath procured an entrance for us For where he is there we shall be and the Head and Members must be and abide together Therefore if we labour and strive we cannot doubt of entrance seeing he hath made a passage open for us This of it self is a great encouragement that our High-Priest is passed into the heavenly Rest not only for himself but also in our behalf even to assure us that if we follow him trust in him and labour to enter that we shall not come short yet this is not all the encouragement is yet greater For it followeth Ver. 15. For we have not an High-Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our Infirmities but was in all points tempted like as we are yet without Sin I Will not here mention the principal Exhortation expressed in the former verse but reserve it to the last For it is usual upon several Reasons delivered to repeat the exhortation In the words we may observe two things 1. Christ's merciful disposition towards us 2. The Reason of it His mercy is set down negatively in that he is not sensless of our Infirmities but is one that will be touched with the feeling of our Infirmities To be inwardly affected and moved with the miseries of others doth argue an excellent temper of spirit and is a proper act of that we call mercy and compassion and it issues from goodness and love Christ as God is infinitely merciful and mercy it self and in his Word doth signify how readily and abundantly he is inclined unto it and he would have man to know it And as Man none so merciful as He and that God might manifest what store of his mercy he had for sinful Man He became Man nay miserable and mortal Man and because experimental knowledg and sense is the most effectual therefore as Man he was willing to Suffer and be Tempted And this is the Reason why he is so sensible of our sad condition because he was tempted in all points like unto us This is that wonderful way which God by his profound Wisdom contrived to make his mercy greater and in some sort more then Infinite He would have a kind of knowledg of man's infirmities which as God and infinite he could never have That which makes us an object of compassion is our infirmity that which makes him so sensible of our condition is That he was tempted in all points like us yet alwayes without Sin Infirmity is sometimes weaknesse and so the word signifies sometime Sickness and Diseases which cause weaknesse The one is opposed to strength and the other to eucrasy and health and both are twofold either of Body or Soul and here is meant the weakness and distemper of the Soul and may be Sin or Punishment which makes our Case very miserable For sin taken either for native or acquired corruption and imperfection doth fearfully weaken the Soul because it doth not only incline to actual sin but makes us unable to resist temptation so that we are easily overcome by Satan a potent subtle malicious enemy who will not only violently but continually assault us This is the reason why our sins are so many and we so often and so halnously guilty and have continually great need of mercy and pardon which cannot be obtained without the effectual intercession of this righteous Advocate and merciful High-Priest And how merciful must he needs be that was tempted himself For he was tempted in all points like unto us but without Sin Where two things are observed 1. That his temptations were in all points like ours 2. That yet he was without Sin Temptation may be taken for Sufferings or for an inducement to Sin as directly tending to sin and having a power or causality moving us thereunto As for Christ's Sufferings they were exactly like unto Ours To that end he took a Body and Soul and continued for a while in a state of Humiliation whereby he was obnoxious unto them and did actually fall under them and felt them As for temptation to sin it 's inward outward inwardly he was not tempted outwardly he was Of us it 's truly said that every man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust and enticed But in him there was no such corruption lust or inward concupiscence yet he was outwardly vehemently assaulted by Men and Devils as much as ever any Man was and was tempted to the same kind of sins to which we being tempted to do commit This appears from the History of the temptation and passion yet though we being tempted do often sin yet he being often and violently tempted never sinned never yielded to the temptation but alwayes resisted and alwayes overcame This is a great comfort to us that he never sinned for because of this his Intercession for us is the more effectual with God and the more acceptable unto him For a guilty person pleading for guilty persons could not have made reconciliation for their sins As it is a comfort so it 's a rare example for us to follow that when we are tempted we should use all means to avoid Sin as he did § 8. But let it be granted Christ is so merciful an High-Priest and though entred into Heaven so sensible of our miseries what benefit do we receive by him This the Apostle resolves in the words following Ver. 16. Let us therefore come boldly unto the Throne of Grace that we may obtain mercy and find grace in time of need IN which words we may observe 1. That as we may so we ought to come boldly unto the Throne of Grace 2. That coming thus we may speed and attain that which we desire That which in the first Proposition is presupposed is that God sits in the Throne of Grace There is a Throne of Justice and a Throne of Grace If He look upon Man according to the Law of works he must needs sit upon the Throne of Justice as a severe Lord
themselves and the Scriptures § 5. Hitherto the description of a Priest in general and such as did officiate before the times of the Gospel the next thing is concerning their calling and acquisition of their Sacerdotal Power which is delivered in these words Ver. 4. And no man taketh this Honour unto himself but He that is called of God as was Aaron THe sum whereof is this that the Institution of an High-Priest-hood and an High-Priest is from God For the more distinct handling of the Text we must observe three things 1. That no man can make himself Priest 2. That God's Calling makes a Priest 3. Aaron for example was so made a Priest 1. The first Proposition is that no man can make himself a Priest For any man to take or receive to himself or by himself this Honour is to make himself such a Priest as is formerly described The sense is not that no man will usurp this sacerdotal power or that many will not take it upon them or many will not presume to make others Priests which God did never make such For Jeroboam made of the lowest of the People Priests Yet let Princes or People presume to make Priests let others without any consent of God or Man usurp this Power yet if God do not Institute and Call them either mediately or immediately their Priest-hood is no Priest-hood their Offering no Offerings their Service ineffectual and no wayes acceptable to God And here it 's observable that Priest-hood is called an honour because the Office is high and honourable and next to that of Kings though with many it 's contemptible 2. God's Calling makes a Priest for he not only hath power to institute this Office and invest men with this honour For as all Power is of God so is this of Priest as well as that of Prince And though God gives liberty to men for to institute some civil Offices and make Officers yet in matters of Religion it 's otherwise For he hath reserved that Power of making spiritual Officers and to appoint their Service unto himself and the successe of their Service doth meerly depend on him for without him it can have no spiritual effect upon the Souls and Consciences of men Yet God doth not Call all Officers in Religion immediately and by an extraordinary and particular designation but many are called in an ordinary way yet it 's necessary that every standing Office should be instituted either by a General or some special precept of universal Obligation for the time he will have such an Office to continue in the Church This precept determines the qualification of the person and this must be known and approved by the Church â—â— such as the Church shall trust and this approbation must be publickly declared before the party that must publickly officiate can be orderly admitted yet this rule admits of some exception in extraordinary Cases All the power that the Church in constitution of Officers can challenge is to signifie the Will of Christ concerning the particular persons to be constituted that they are rightly qualified and such as Christ requires them to be Christ therefore in this work is the principal and the Church following the rules of Christ is the instrumental cause Of vocation ordination imposition of hands and constituting of Church-Officers I shall speak more at large in my Treatise of Civil and Ecclesiastical Government 3. Aaron did not take this honour to himself but was Called of God this is an instance and a particular example of the divine Vocation of an High-Priest And though it was but a particular example yet it was agreeable to a general Rule That Aaron was an High-Priest and that he did not usurp this honour and that he was Called of God is evident out of Scripture For 1. God singles out the Tribe of Levi for religious Services 2. Out of this Tribe he singles the Family of Aaron for the Priest-hood 3. Out of this Family he separates Aaron and his Sons with their Posterity to be High-Priests 4. He caused him publickly to be set apart with his Sons and to be consecrated 5. Upon his Consecration when he first begins to minister and offer his Priest-hood is confirmed by Fire sent from Heaven to burn the Offering 6. Notwithstanding this particular institution and designation he was unjustly challenged as ingrossing the Sacerdotal Power till God by consuming the Company of Korah and causing Aaron's Rod to Blossom and bring forth ripe Almonds confirmed it again 7. Aaron's Children and Posterity acquired their power by lineal discent according to the first Institution for all his Successours derived their Power from the first Investiture of him and his Sons § 6. After the Description of an High-Priest and his divine Calling follows the Apostles discourse of the High-Priest-hood of Christ. And he 1. Asserts his Calling 2. Proves it His Calling is asserted in these words Ver. 5. So Christ also did not glorify himself but he that said c. THis doth presuppose 1. That Christ is a Priest and all things essential to a Priest we find in him according to the former Description 2. That to be a Priest is a Glory and Honour for it is a place as of Power so of Dignity and Glory Yet it 's said He did not glorify himself and take upon him the Sacerdotal Power and Dignity though he was qualified better then ever any was By this we understand the intolerable pride and presumption of many in these times which take upon them to officiate in matters of Religion though no wayes qualified or fitted for this work If ever any Man or Angel then surely Christ might have taken this Honour to himself yet he did not And this will be the eternal condemnation of all such as usurp Ecclesiastical Power without any Commission from God or Man How unlike unto Christ are all such who presume of their own merit and despise such as Christ hath called But if Christ did not glorify himself and take upon him to be a Priest how did he acquire his Sacerdotal Power It 's said That God did glorify and advance him to this place and honour This is included in these words But he that said unto him For he that said unto him the words following was God and He made him Priest And the truth is the place was so high and required such a measure of Power that none but God could constitute and invest him For it was not in the power of Man or Angel to make so great an High-Priest As before it 's said 1. That he did not make himself an High-Priest 2. That God made him so by those words found in Psal. 2. 7. he proves both that he was a Priest and that God made him such For 1. It 's clear that it is the Lord and everlasting Jehovah who spake these words 2. He spake them to Christ. 3. By them he constituted him a Priest The words of Constitution are these This Day have I
experience For to learn to obey is to obey and to learn to suffer is to suffer God by laying on him the Iniquities of us all was the Master he by bearing that heavy burden became the Schollar for by the things he suffered that is by suffering so many things and amongst the rest the Death of the Cross he did perfectly learn and experimentally understand what obedience was This Lesson no Angel did ever learn in this manner they had no such command neither did they ever obey it though they knew it By the former words we understand that he offered prayers for himself and by these that he offered himself for us and learned to have pity upon poor Sinners who in their extremities cry unto God By this obedience was signified God's severity against Sin and his tender mercy towards Sinners § 8. Thus Christ was consecrated and by this Suffering and Sacrifice of himself fitly qualified for to be a Priest and a saving Priest unto all his loyal and obedient Servants For Ver. 9. Being made perfect he became the Authour of eternal Salvation uâ—to all â—â—â—m that obey him FIrst He is made perfect Secondly He became the Authout of Savation 1. To be made perfect is to be consecrated and made fit to minister before God as a Priest For though God did design Aaron for a Priest yet he did not suffer him to minister before he was consecrated There is no legal Consecration without Blood of Sacrifices therefore Christ was consecrated by his own Blood the Blood of that Sacrifice wherein he offered his life himself It was the Wisdom of God to order it and his Will â—o decree that Christ should first Suffer and shed his Blood for the Sin of man and so sanctify him by Suffering before he should have power to save For the best and most merciful Priest that ever was must be made in the best and most convenient manner Upon this strange and wonderful Consecration he became an Authour of Salvation Where we may observe 1. An Effect eternal Salvation 2. The Authour or efficient Christ consecrated 3. The Subject to which this Salvation is communicated such as obey him 1. By Salvation is meant deliverance from Sin and all the Consequents thereof so as that the party saved is made for ever happy There be both bodily and spiritual temporal and eternal dangers whereunto man by Sin is liable and this Salvation is a deliverance from all There is deliverance as from some evils and not all so deliverance only for a time and not for ever but this Salvation is a total deliverance from all evil and that for ever Eternal peace safety felicity is the issue and consequent thereof 2. This Salvation being so noble and glorious an effect must have some Cause some Authour and Efficient and this Efficient was Christ yet Christ as perfected and consecrated For by his Blood and purest Sacrifice of himself 1. He satisfied divine Justice and merited this Salvation 2. Being upon his Resurrection constituted and made an High-Priest and King and fit to minister and officiate as a Priest and Reign as King in Heaven he ascends into that glorious Temple and Palace and is set at the right hand of God 3. Being there established he begins as King to send down the Holy Ghost reveal the Gospel and by both to work Faith in the hearts of Men and qualify them for Justification and Salvation 4. When men are once qualified and prepared so as to sue for pardon in his Name before the Throne of God he as Priest begins his Intercession and by the plea of his own Blood for them procures their pardon and eternal Salvation So that as consecrated and perfect he becomes the great efficient Cause of this Salvation by way of merit intercession and actual communication There be many other ministerial and adjuvant causes of this effect yet he is the principal so the word which signifies a Cause in general was understood by our Translators who turn it the Authour 3. If it be communicated from and by him it must be received in some subject and if in him there be an eternal saving virtue and he exercise it there must be some subject and persons in whom this saving power shall produce this effect so as that they shall be saved And though this Power be able to save all yet only they and all they who obey him shall be saved Efficient causes work most effectually in Subjects united and disposed aright And so it is in this case for though the mercies of God mericed by Christ may be so far communicable to all as that all may become savable which is a great and universal Benefit yet they are not actually communicated to all because all are not obedient For the divine Wisdom and Justice have limited them to a certain subject and to regulate the manner of communicating them And seeing the proper subject of this Salvation are such as do obey this Saviour therefore here it 's presupposed that Christ is a King and Soveraign Prince and as such gives Commands and Laws to all his Subjects and such as submit unfainedly unto his Regal Power and obey his Laws and none else may expect this Salvation His Laws require this sincere submission and obedience in renouncing all others and a total dependance upon him and him alone in repenting of our Sins and believing upon him And this sincere Faith is the fundamental vertue and potentially all obedience Therefore is it said That whosoever believeth on him shall not perish but have everlasting Life And he that believeth on the Son hath everlasting Life Joh. 3. 16. 36. § 9. Yet before he was an immediate and compleat Authour of eternal Salvation he must not only be consecrated But Ver. 10. Called of God an High-Priest after the Order of Melchisedec THese words are added and repeated not only to expound his former proof out of Psalm 110 but also to shew when and how he became so mighty and glorious a Saviour and also to bring in 1. The digression 2. The discourse that followeth 1. They are exegetical and declare the meaning of those words alledged ver 6. Thou are â—â— Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec For by this Text we are informed 1. That those words were spoken by God 2. That God by those words did make him a compleat and eternal Priest and by Oath confirmed his Priest-hood For this Text was alledged to prove that Christ did not glorify himself and usurp this Sacerdotal Office but God gave it him and so he came justly and legally by it They are 2. Added to shew when Christ became so compleat an High-Priest and to exercise his saving Power and that was not only upon his consecration but this confirmation of him at his right hand For then instantly he began to work and convert Men make Intercession for them and bring them to Salvation 3. Upon these words reiterated he takes occasion to deliver that
which follows as will appear anon Two things here I will only observe 1. That to be called is openly and solemnly with power to be declared For this inauguration and confirmation was made with great solemnity and that in the presence of all the Host and Angels of Heaven Whether God commanded any Archangel with sound of heavenly Trumpet to proclaim him and ouer these words before the Throne of Glory and the place of his special presence in the Heaven of Heavens we know not It 's certain by these words he was made an eternal Priest and thereupon all the Angels of Heaven did acknowledg him The second thing to be observed is that he was not only made a Priest but also a King for without either of these he could not be so powerful a Saviour yet he was not so made by these but other words § 10. Now follow a Digression For after that the Apostle had proved him to be a Priest and so made of God and a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec and not after that of Aaron order did require he should enlarge upon the words of the Psalmist yet because this Doctrine was mysterious and profound and they not so capable of it he takes occasion by the way to reprove their dulness stir up their attention and prepare them for this Doctrine concerning Christ's Priest-hood which he intended more fully to declare unto them This reproof is brought in artificially by a kind of Transition and in this manner Ver. 11. Of whom we have many things to say and hard to be uttered seeing â—â— are dull of hearing IN these words and those which follow We have 1. The excellency and copiousness of the matter 2. The Hebrews incapacity 3. The reason of their incapacity The subject whereof he intended to speak was the Priest-hood of Christ and seeing he was a Priest after the Order of Melchisodec he must needs speak something of him The copiousness and aburdince of matter is signified by those words Of whom we have many things to say the excellency in those and hard to be uttered their incapacity they were dull of hearing The cause of this For when for the time ye ought to be Teachers ye have need that one teach you again c. which implies their negligence Of whom Some think this Relative whom referrs to Melchisedec others to Christ as Priest But it referrs to both to Christ principally to Melchisedec in order unto Christ For many things were to be known of Melchisedec that it might be made evident how he did typify Christ and how Christ was a Priest according to that Order and not the Order of Aaron This is the subject of which he intended to speak Of this subject he had many things to say This implies 1. That he knew many things concerning this Priest and Priest-hood and the same certainly and infallibly true as revealed unto him by the divine Spirit 2. That these things he could utter and express and that clearly and perspicuously enough and he was willing yea desirous to make them known if he could have found Schollars capable of this excellent Doctrine But such they were not for many excellent things might be taught if men would be careful to learn and improve their time and parts Yet these many things were hard to be uttered This implies that they were excellent and above the capacity of Babes and Children They were not hard or obscure to him for he knew them and fully understood them neither were they such things as he learned when he was rapt up into the third Heaven unutterable in themselves but they were hard to be uttered so as they might understand them For They were dull of hearing This was their incapacity The meaning is not that they were deaf either in whole or part or that such amongst them as were learned could not read them if written or understand the language but by hearing is meant understanding There are outward ears and outward hearing of the body inward ears and inward hearing of the Soul the former they had the latter they had not so as to be capable of such things as he had to say of this Priest and Priest-hood This was no obscurity in the matter but an indisposition in the Soul to receive this Doctrine Dulness was this indisposition which in general is a defect of active Power in particular in this place of the intellective faculty as not able to perceive discern apprehend and judge of this higher Doctrine It 's opposed to that we call acâ—â—â—n the sharpness quickness and piercing power of the wit and intellect yet here this dulness is restrained to a certain object for in other things they might be apprehensive and judicious enough By reason of this defect it is that much excellent and divine Doctrine is lost or at least useless to the greatest part of the People who are no whit moved with Doctrine though excellent if above their capacity For this cause the meanest Teachers are most popular though it 's true that all wise men must have respect unto the capacity of their Hearers and condescend unto them yet men should not be alwayes Babes and Dunces in God's School But what might be the cause of this dulness The Apostle informs us Ver. 12. That when for the time ye ought to have been Teachers you have need that one teach you again the principles of the Oracles of God and are become such as have need of milk and not strong meat § 11. THis incapacity and defect of the Understanding may be either from natural imperfection as in Ideots and Naturals or such as are not much better or from want of teaching instruction and disciplination or from God's just Judgment and the delusions of Satan or from the negligence of such as are taught and do not attentively hear heed consider or from the sublimity and excellency of the matter taught or from ignorance of the language or terms or manner of expression used by such as take upon them to be Teachers or from the want of Understanding in principles upon which the knowledg of other things doth depend Dulness and so ignorance from some of these causes is blamless and will not be charged upon man in his last tryal For ignorance invincible is not counted a Sin but ignorance and dulness from neglect of the means God hath given Man to improve his knowledg for his own good is inexcusable If the things to be known be necessary and concern his everlasting Salvation or conduce to the same it 's far more hainous Such was the dulness and ignorance of these Hebrews and it 's implyed in this that they had had time and all other necessary means to improve their knowledg to that of Teachers and yet they were so ignorant that they had need to be taught again the very principles of Christianity This was a Sin and the same very grievous and a great impediment to their Salvation and increase
of heavenly comfort The Sin therefore which was the cause of this dulness and incapacity was their great neglect of the improvement of their knowledg in the Word of God And this their neglect was great For 1. They had had time and teaching enough and other means to increase their knowledg so far as to be able to teach and instruct others and yet they had wofully mispent this time and lost much knowledg which they might have attained both for their own advantage and the good of others 2. They had so wofully mispent this time that they were ignorant of the very principles of the Oracles of God and had need to be instructed in them by others had need of milk not strong meat 3. By this means they had made themselves uncapable of further instruction in the higher and more execellent points of the Gospel concerning the Priest-hood of Christ. This was the greater Sin because they not only might but also ought to have improved their time so as to be men of Age able to digest strong meat and understand and learn higher Doctrine In this Text we may observe 1. That they are principles of the Oracles of God 2. That when these are once taught and learned men ought to improve their knowledg so far as to be able to teach others that are ignorant of these principles and to be capable of higher points of Doctrine 3. That many are so negligent and careless in this particular that they forget their principles are Babes and have need of Milk still and be taught their principles again The first Proposition implies 1. That there are principles of the Oracles of God 2. These are like Milk 3. Men should be first taught these By Oracles of God we must understand the Word of God revealed in the Scripture for to direct us to Salvation For God being willing to save Man gave him a Rule to direct him to eternal happiness Man knew not the way neither could he direct himself neither could any other Man or Angel teach him Therefore God was willing by the illumination and inspiration of his blessed Spirit to make known his mind unto certain men who being infallibly directed must teach others both by word and writing and their Doctrine must be the Rule of all other Teachers and is sufficient as a Doctrine to save any Man that shall learn to know and practise it This Doctrine may well and truly be called the Word of God because by it whether inspired or spoken by word of mouth or written he doth express his mind and signifies unto Man what he must know and do to be for ever saved Yet here we must observe that by these Oracles of God is here principally meant the Doctrine of the New Testament and the Gospel Yet here it 's to be noted 1. That all Scripture is the Word of God and is immediately from God in respect of the first Revelation 2. That as it came first from God it is of unchangeable Truth and the dictates of divine Wisdom are therein contained 3. That it 's sufficient without any other addition in that kind to that end God intended it Of these Oracles there are Principles In these Oracles we are taught many things and of them there be several parts which are unequal and different one from another one part and the chiefest is that of the Principles These are 1. Such as are first in order and first to be taught and learned 2. They are the chief and fundamental Truths of the Gospel and such as upon which the rest depend or to which the rest are appertinent and which are most conducing to Salvation These being prime Truths are reduced to a few Heads in a certain method intimated in several places of the New Testament and contracted in the antient Creed's grounded upon our Saviours words Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost as I have shewed in my Theopolitica These are like the A. B. C. or letters of the Alphabet upon which all words and sentences so far depend in Grammar that except they be first learned it will be impossible to spell or read They are like the Elements in Nature of which all mixt bodies are compounded and made They are like the foundation of an House without which it can neither be built or stand And not to teach these first to those who are willing to learn is a vain undertaking and a preposterous course and a very unprofitable way and we find it to be so in the learning of all other Arts and Sciences 2. These principles are like Milk Milk is the fittest nourishment for new-born Babes and Infants and of most easie digestion so these are plain and easie and such as Children ignorant and unlearned People if wisely directed may understand and they give great light to all other Doctrines and it was the great Wisdom and Mercy of God to make them such And 3. They which do not first learn these cannot profit much some confused knowledg they may acquite but distinct clear and orderly understanding without these first learned cannot be expected For the very matter and method of those give great light to all other divine Doctrines of the Scripture 2. After the first Proposition That they are principles of the Oracles of God first to be taught and learned follows the second which is That when these principles are learned men may and ought to improve their knowledg so far as to be able to teach others and be capable of higher Doctrines This is implyed in these words when for the time yo ought to have been Teachers By Teachers are not meant Ministers and publick Teachers who are Officers and have taken upon them the charge of others Souls but such as privately are fit and able to instruct their Families and their ignorant Neighbours Neither may they presume to teach higher Points of Doctrine but the principles and such as they well understand If these would do their Duty they might help the Ministers much and edisy one another and so knowledg in necessaries might abound If any of these be of excellent parts and much improved they may be called to the Ministry Yet many are so ignorant that they are not able to teach their Children and their Servants and so are not fit as for matter of Religion to be Masters of Families 3. The last Proposition is That many of these Hâ—brews and so others were so negligent that when they might and ought to have been Teachers of others they have need to be taught again the very principles of Christianity This is a great Sin and cannot be excused and many are guilty of it for two Reasons 1. Because they do not improve their former knowledg 2. Because they forget and so lose the knowledg of the very principles which they had formerly gained and so become Babes uncapable of higher Doctrine which is for men of better improvement By this
we understand that knowledg by negligence may be diminished and lost For usually he that increaseth not decreaseth and he that goes not forward goes backward For that which is acquired by industry by industry must be kept and improved If God give a Talent it must not be hid but used to gain more and where he gives capacity helps and means he requires the use and exercise of them Suppose a man should or could retain the knowledg of the principles and yet proceed no further he must needs be guilty and unfit to be advanced to an higher Form in Christ's School He will prove a Babe a Child and render himself uncapable of higher Instruction Ver. 13 14. For every one that useth Milk is unkilful in the Word of Righteousness for he is a Babe But strong Meat belongeth to them who are of fa'll age even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil § 12. IN these words the Apostle gives a reason why he could not so well proceed to deliver the Doctrine of this great Priest-hood and it 's this By their negligence they had made themselves uncapable This he doth express in an allegorical Metaphor wherein he compares the Ignorant to Babes and the more knowing Hebrew-Christians to men of full age and the Principles of the Oracles of God to Milk and his Doctrine of Christ's Priest-hood to strong meat His intent therefore is to let them know that as strong meat is not for Babes but for such as are of full age so his Doctrine of Christ's Priest-hood is not for them which have not digested the principles but for such as by use and constant diligence have improved their knowledg Here we must observe who are Babes in knowledg and who are of full age They are Babes who are unskilful in the Word of Righteousness they are of full age who have their senses exercised to discern good and evil according to that Word Where by word is meant that Doctrine of the Scripture which was revealed from Heaven to direct Man unto eternal life especially the Gospel It 's called the Word of Righteousness 1. Because it is a righteous Doctrine that is just firm stable and of eternal certain Truth For thus the word Righteous is sometimes taken in the Hebrew therefore is it called so often the word of Truth 2. The Gospel may be called the Word of Righteousness because in it is revealed the Righteousness of God by Faith 3. It 's the perfect Rule of Righteousness To be unskilful in this Word is to be ignorant of it and not to understand it To have the senses exercised to discern Good and Evil may 1. Be understood of the long experience of such as are at full age in respect of meats which by long use and exercise of the senses of seeing smelling tasting have acquired a more perfect knowledg to discern what food is good and wholsome what unwholsome Yet it 's principally by Analogy to be understood of such as by much attention study meditation have exercised their intellective faculty to find out the true sense and meaning of the Gospel and by the same to acquire a divine discerning faculty and habit more easily to understand the truths of the same and by the same to judge what Doctrine is true and what is false and more easily to apprehend and judge of higher points if taught unto them Such as these the Hebrews should generally have been and then they had been sit Schollars for his School Where we might observe That the proper act and work of man's intellective faculty is to discern and know the differences of things to be understood But now amongst us there is risen up a Generation of People who never were well grounded in the principles of the Oracles of God who yet will take upon them to teach themselvs and others too These forsake the Ministers of the Gospel whom God hath blessed with a greater measure of divine knowledg and by long and earnest study reading prayer and other means have improved themselves to an higher degree of understanding in the holy Scriptures These separate themselves from other sober and more solid Christians and are divided into several Sects and their end will be sad and woful for being deserted by their God they will fall at last into some damnable heresy or impiety or iniquity if God in his great mercy prevent it not This is a fair warning to all such as profess themselves Christians first to ground themselves well in the principles and then use all the power and means God hath given them to improve themselves and with all humility acknowledg their imperfections not thinking of themselves more highly then they ought but to think soberly according as God hâ—â—â— deals to every man the measure of Faith Rom. 12. 3. CHAP. VI. Ver. I. Therefore leaving the Principles c. § 1. THis part of the Apostle's Letter seems to be brought in upon and joyned to the former by the Illative Particle and Conjunction Therefore which though sometimes expletive yet usually inferrs a conclusion What the conclusion inferred is we find in ver 1 3. But from what words it's inferred seems to be doubtful They may be antecedent or consequent Those antecedent are Chap. 5. 11. Of whom we have many things to say As though the Apostle should say Though many of you be dull of hearing and your incapacity through negligence be such as that you have need to be taught again the Principles of the Oracles of God yet because there be many things and excellent points of Doctrine concerning the Priest-hood of Christ which I have to deliver unto you Therefore I will not go back again to initiate you but go forward unto perfection yet the premises may be in the words consequent to this purpose That seeing there is little or no hope of the recovery of such as fall so far as to need instruction in the very principles and to be initiated again and though I thus speak to warn you yet hope better things of you Therefore I will leave the principles and proceed to perfection Yet we need not stand strictly upon the one or the other for it may be he inferrs the conclusion from both joyntly § 2. But to enter upon the Chapter In it we may observe 1. The continuance of his Digression 2. His return unto his former Subject In the former we have 1. His resolution what to do from ver 1. to the 11. 2. An exhortation to these Hebrews from the 11. to the last In his resolution are to be considered 1. The thing resolved upon 2. The reasons of his resolution The thing resolved upon is to proceed in his Discourse concerning the Priest-hood of Christ. The Reasons of this resolution are two 1. That if any fall away so far as that there shall be a necessity to return unto the principles and laying the foundation of Christianity anew there is little
from him As Abraham gave Melchisedec as blessing him so all Christians should give the tenth and a competent portion of all their Goods to maintain his Servants Messengers and Ministers who labour in the Word and Doctrine without which his Worship cannot be maintained And all those who deny to do this are Enemies to Christ and to Christian Religion and cannot be excused There is a Generation of men who under pretence of Reformation and greater Purity would have all Tythes taken away and their design is to starve the Ministry enrich themselves and friends but the issue of all this will be the destruction of the Ministry the famishing of Souls and the decay of Christianity Others would have Ministers to continue but they must pinch them and keep them poor This is a base spirit and temper and no wayes suitable to the profession of Christianity Ministers indeed should not cover Riches and the Splendor of the World for thus to do is base on their parts and no wayes becoming the faithful Servants of Christ. Yet they should be comfortably maintained and such as receive any real spiritual Blessing and Comfort by them will not grudge to minister unto them and will be far from taking from them that allowance which by just Laws is settled upon them as firmly as any man's Inheritance except in the right of Alienation Some do honour Learning and are willing to have it maintained and if there be sufficient reason for this then it will follow that the most excellent Learning of all other and the most beneficial to mankind and in the exercise thereof effectually conducing to eternal Salvation should be honoured and maintained much more Some conclude from hence and not without cause That seeing Melchisedec was a Type of Christ in all things here mentioned then Christ Blessing man must receive Tythes by his Ministers as due unto Him For if he was a Type in the rest no wit of man can according to the tenour of this Scripture deny him to be a Type in receiving Tythes And this is so much the stronger 1. In this that he insists in the following words more largely upon this particular of Tythes then any of the rest 2. Because Tythes or something as good as Tythes are plainly necessary to the maintainance of Christian Religion 3. Because Christ hath ordained a maintainance 3. He was a Type in the continuance of his Priest-hood For as he did not receive his Priest-hood by Descent from any Predecessor nor transmit it to Successors in that manner as the Levitical Priest's did So Christ had no Predecessor from whom by Birth nor Successor to whom he should derive it And as Melchisedee's Priest-hood was effectual for that excellent end for which it was ordained and because it was not so carnal and imperfect as that of Aaron's was there was no reason it should be abolished So Christ's Priest-hood being perfect and effectual to bring in an eternal glorious estate upon a perfect Righteousness there was all the reason in the World it should continue for ever and never be altered § 11. After the Description of Melchisedec which is absolute follows his excellency and greatness set forth comparatively And before I enter upon the words somethings must be premised and enquiry must be made of 1. What the order and connexion of these words with the former is 2. What the Apostle's Scope is 3. In what manner the Apostle doth proceed 4. What kind of Comparison this is 5. How the words and discourse of the Apostle is brought in 1. The order is this 1. After that the Authour had informed us out of Gen. 14. who this Melchisedec was he goes on to speak of the Order of Melchisedec So that the Subject of the former words was Melchisedec the last words of the Text Psal. 110. 4. and of these words following the Order of Melchisedec For the words of the Psalmist do imply that there was one Melchisedec a Priest 2. That there was an especial distinct Order of that Priest-hood This is the Order 2. The intention and scope of the Authour is to shew the excellency of the Priest-hood of Melchisedec And 2. From thence to conclude the excellency of Christ's Priest-hood For if Melchisedec who was but the Type then much more Christ the Anti-type of that Order must needs be excellent 3. The manner of the Apostle's proceeding is Dianoetical for he proves the excellency of this Order by illation and deduction of certain conclusions from the express words of the Text Gen. 14. This act of Reason is called discourse which discovers the truths included in the bowels of the Premises By this manner of arguing is manifested the vanity of irrational Sectaries which call for expresse Scripture in points of Controversy and reject all Consequences These implicitly deny our Dianoetical faculty given us by God and tacitly blame Christ and his Apostles for drawing conclusions from expresse places of the Word Though this discoursive power as used to clear a truth whereof we doubt and are ignorant of imply an imperfection yet as it is a deducing and inferring one truth out of another it is a perfection and may agree to Angels nay to God himself because we find him by his Spirit in his Word doing so 4. But what kind of Comparison is this It 's indeed a Comparison in quantity of imparity yet it presupposeth a Comparison in quality For it implyeth That Abraham was great and excellent and that the Levitical Priest's were such and Melchisedec also They all agree in this that they were excellent but they differ in the inequality and imparity of excellency for one was more excellent then another Abraham was above the Levitical Priest and Melchisedec above Abraham his Order was the most excellent and this is the thing which as he intends so he clearly proves The Order of his Priest-hood was such a by the acts thereof did manifest the dignity and worth thereof 5. The Authour brings in this discourse with a word of Exhortation For he begins thus Consider So that from these words unto ver 11. we have an Exhortation directed unto these Hebrews and so to us The Text therefore is Ver. 4. Now consider how great this Man was to whom even the Patriach Abraham gave the tenth of the Spoils § 12. IN these words with those that follow we have 1. The Duty in general which is Consideration 2. The Matter and Subject to be considered 1. I will not stand upon the word which seems to be a Metaphorical but the thing signified by it which is the principal Consideration therefore as intended in this place is an act of the Understanding and especially the act of Judgment yet presupposing the antecedent act of Apprehension Yet it 's not any act of Judgment whether Noetical or Dianoetical but a serious and more intense act wherein we use the utmost activity of our discerning faculty And because the Understanding of man as imperfect cannot in an instant
that respect fit to represent and be a Type of Christ as our ever-living Priest But if he was translated and continued a Priest untill the moment of his translation then the representation is more full and lively yet this we find not clearly testified any where of him Some think That the Taxis or Order of his Priest-hood was of perpetual continuance and so it was in Christ the Antitype of whom it 's said He is a Priest for ever § 16. Besides all this the Apostle hath something more to say of the excellency of Melchisedec in respect of the Levitical Priests For it followeth Ver. 9. 10. And as I may so say Levi also who receiveth Tythes paid Tythes in Abraham For he was yet in the Loynes of his Father Abraham when Melchisedec met him THis is another agrument and in form is this He who so received Tythes that he did not give any is more excellent then him that so Tythes others that he Tythed himself But Melchisedec so Tythed Abraham that he was not Tythed by any Superiour Priest and the Levitical Priest did so Tythe his Brethren that himself was Tythed Therefore Melchisedec is the more excellent Priest The minor is proved ver 10. For Levi was then in the Loyns of Abraham when Melchisedec met him and tythed him and Levi in him The sum is Melchisedec Tythed Levi and in him the Levitical Priests therefore he was more excellent And because it was not proper but tropical to say that Levi paid Tythes and that to Melchisedec in Abraham therefore he abates somewhat in his expression by adding if I may so say For by a Trope he might so say though properly he could not because neither Levi nor any Priest of Levi did then actually but only virtually exist in his cause This so is true as that it must be rightly understood otherwise it may be an occasion of errour For Christ himself according to the Flesh was then in Abraham's Loynes yet Christ 1. Was not meerly Man 2. He was not to Descend of Abraham by natural propagation 3. He was in Abraham as the Anti-type of Melchisedec and so could not pay Tythes to him 4. He was to be advanced higher then Melchisedec was and rewarded with far greater priviledges yet none of these did agree to Levi or his Sacerdotal Posterity and so as paying Tythes in Abraham he was inferiour and of an inferiour Order of Priest-hood And here I might take occasion to observe that Parents and Children may be truly accounted as one person and this not only before they be born but in many cases after that they actually exist in themselves and by reason of this unity and identity the Children may be said to do or suffer what their Parents do and suffer and on the contrary § 17. Hitherto the Apostle hath described Melchisedec and set forth his greatness and excellency and now he proceeds to manifest the greatness and excellency of Christ the Antitype and of his Priest-hood as far more excellent then that of Aaron's which is the second part of this Chapter and this is the Coherence and Connexion And as the Theme of the former Discourse was Melchisedec the last word of Psal. 110. 4 So now he goes on to handle in the first place these words of that Text Another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec For though in them we do not read the word and Adjective Another yet it 's implyed because the place doth speak of Christ as another Priest distinct not only from Aaron but from Melchisedec So that the Doctrine or Proposition which he discourseth upon is That after Aaron and the Levitical Priest there must be another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec From this proposed he inferrs several conclusions of great moment concerning the insufficiency and mutation of the Levitical Priest-hood and the efficacy and sufficiency of Christ's Priest-hood And to ground this Discourse he presupposeth that the end of all legal Priest-hood instituted by God is perfection and then begins to argue in this manner Ver. 11. If therefore Perfection were by the Levitical Priest-hood for under it the People received the Law what further need was there that another Priest should rise after the Order of Melchisedec and not be called after the Order of Aaron VVHere we must note 1. That the words are Interrogative and imply that the hypothetical or connex Axiom is Negative and the negation is more vehement and peremptory For if perfection had been by that Priest-hood and that Law there was no further need of another Priest of another Order so far different from that of Aaron's That Priest-hood would have been sufficient and there had been no reason of alteration nor any necessity of a Priest of another Order 2. These words A Priest after the Order of Melchisedec are found in this 11th ver by was of supposition and afterward repeated more fully and expresly out of the Psalm and enlarged upon 3. He gives a reason 1. Why there must be another Priest of another Order 2. Why this other Priest must be constituted in a more perfect manner then the former was And the reason of both is from the insufficiency of the Levitical Priest and the sufficiency of Christ's Priest-hood 4. He joyns both the former and the latter Priest-hoods and the several and distinct Laws according to which being made they must minister 5. From the words of the Psalmist he 1. In this verse inferrs the imperfection both of the Levitical Priest-hood and the Law And 2. In ver 12. the alteration of the Priest-hood and the Law 6. In this Text ver 11. the Apostle's argument in form is this If Perfection were by the Levitical Priest-hood under which they received the Law then there was no farther need that another Priest should rise after the Order of Melchisedec and not called after the Order of Aaron But another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec and not of Aaron must rise Therefore there is no perfection by the Levitical Priest-hood or the Law The consequence presupposing perfection to be the end of Priest-hood and that God doth nothing needless and in vain and that the bringing in of another Priest and Priest-hood is clear and undoubtful The assumption he proves from the words of the Psalm which positively affirms That there shall and must be another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec For if they be the words of God by his Spirit inspiring David the Jews acknowledging the divine authority of the Book of Psalms could not deny it For the words of the Psalmist being the words of God must needs be true yet the words of the assumption are not expresly and wholly found in the Psalm but implyed consequentially For if God constitute another Priest after the Order of Melchisedec and signifies his Will to do so then necessarily it follows that there is further need of such a Priest 7. This Syllogism is Compound and to be referred to the second Connex which
to Christ. God never intended them for that perfection which is here meant though if rightly observed and used they might make good the Promises of that former Covenant § 18. Because there was no perfection by that Priest-hood therefore there was further need of another Priest which is the second Proposition David who lived above 400 years after the first Institution of the Levitical Priest-hood and knew the imperfection thereof being inspired from Heaven and enlightned by the Spirit fore-saw that the Lord would make his Lord and Saviour sit at his right hand not onely a King but also a Priest and give him an eternal Priest-hood and did fore-tell that in times to come he would say to Christ I have sworn and will not repent Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec These words Paul by the same Spirit knew as well as any other to be meant of Christ as a Priest and that to make him such was an Act of God which did presuppose his excellent Wisdom which could neither decree nor effect any thing needless And therefore from them infers the necessity of another Priest which God would never have brought in nor have signified his Will to do so if the Levitical Priest had been sufficient and able to save sinful Man Yet there might have been another Priest endued with excellent power and priviledges that might have been sufficient to sanctify God's People and of some Order but 3. This Priest must be after the Order of Melchisedec This is the third Proposition This was very fitting and suitable to the Divine Wisdom seeing Melchizedec was so great a Priest and of such an excellent Order that from the Creation we do not read of a greater Yet why might he not be called after the Order of Aaron Could not God have raised a Priest of that Order far more excellent than Aaron Not to dispute God's power and what he could have done yet his Will was otherwise For 4. This other Priest must not be called after the Order of Aaron And this is the fourth and last proposition of the Text which informs us That though he might have his Name and so his bate Title after that Order yet this was no wayes fitting But if he should be constituted according to that Order for to be called may signify either to be named or to be constituted then there could be no difference between the Levitical Priest and Him neither could there be any hope of Perfection or Sanctification by him This Negative he infers from the words after the Order of Melchizedec For if he be after that Order and so constituted he could not be constituted after the Order of Aaron which was far inferiour to that of Melchizedec's which was far more excellent § 19. Yet because the words speak of another Priest therefore the Apostle infers two things 1. The Change of the Priest-hood 2. From that the Change of the Law For so we read Ver. 12. For the Priest-hood being changed there is made of necessity a Change of the Law VVHere the Apostle doth two things 1. Presuppose the Change of the Priest-hood 2. Proves from that Change a necessary Change of the Law The Reason why he presupposeth the former Change is because it was necessarily implyed in the words of the former Verse and a necessary Consequent of the words of the Psalm which expresly speaks of another Priest and the same after another Order therefore he might well presuppose it The Reason why he infers a necessity of the Change of the Law is because some might reply That though the Priest-hood was changed and another Priest brought in yet that other Priest might officiate according to the Law and so be a Mediator of that Covenant The Apostle's Argument in Form is this If the Priest-hood be changed the Law of necessity must be changed But the Priest-hood is changed Therefore of necessity the Law must be changed The words of the Text are not difficult therefore I will briefly handle them and 1. Reduce them to propositions 2. Declare the meaning of the word Changed 3. Examine the force of the Consequence 1. The Propositions are two 1. The Priest-hood is changed 2. There is made of necessity a Change also of the Law 2. By Change in this place is meant an abolition and taking away the Levitical Priest-hood For God never intended it to continue to the end but had fixed a time how long it should be in force and when that time once came it might be said to be abolished by exspiration Yet it seems rather to be taken away by actual Constitution of another Priest-hood the Priest-hood of Christ for when he had offered up his great Sacrifice and began to officiate and make Intercession in Heaven the other Priest-hood did cease and could not consist with this which was far better but was made useless When that which is perfect and can perfectly sanctify for ever shall come then that which was imperfect and could not sanctify was put away That it must be changed and the reason why it must be changed you heard before and this is the reason why the Apostle doth presuppose it as a thing made evident and to be granted 3. The force of the Consequence is clear enough to him that shall observe what hath formerly been said In the words of the second Proposition considered in it self we may observe 1. The Change of the Law 2. The necessity of the Change 3. This necessity of this Change after the Change of the Law 1. By Change is meant the abrogation of the Law which answers to the abolition of the Priest-hood Though the bringing in of this Law 430 years after the Promise could not make void the Promise yet the bringing in of a better Law and Covenant made null and void this Law And God as he limited a time how long it should continue so he determined to take it away by a better Covenant and would not abrogate it till that was established and published For the promulgation of the Gospel and the Instituton of Christianity did abrogate it and made it of no force And this was the great Mercy of God 1. That he would change and abrogate that which was imperfect and insufficient 2. That he would not abrogate it till he had confirmed that which was better 2. Of necessity there must be a Change of this Law This implies that the Change was not casual and contingent or arbitrary or any wayes to be provented yet this was not an absolute necessity but upon supposition of the Decree and Promise of God and the Sanctification of sinful Man and the Imperfection and Inability of the Levitical Priest-hood to effect any such thing So that it 's necessitas Consequentiae non Consequentis This word of necessity seems to make the Proposition modal though in strict sense it is not so for the truth of the Proposition doth not depend upon any absolute Connexion of the terms as
it comes to pass in a necessary Axiom which is opposed to impossible 3. This is more evident when we consider that both this Change and this necessity follows after and upon another Change For though God in his absolute power could have continued this Law and prevented this Change yet if he once change the Priest-hood the Law must be changed And so the force of the Consequence comes in to be considered which presupposeth some strict Connexion of both and a dependance of the Law upon the Priest-hood For if God did determine that the Priest-hood and Law should stand and fall together then it must necessarily follow that whilst the Priest-hood did stand the Law must stand and when the Priest-hood shall fall and be abolished then the Law of necessity must be abrogated And that this was the determination of God was made evident by the event and the execution of his Decree Again if the Priest-hood be once taken away the Law was useless because there was no Priest appointed by God remaining to officiate according to that Law as we see it is at this day And this might be the Reason why God did not only by the Death and Sacrifice of the great High-Priest after he was once exhibited on Earth and his Ministration in Heaven abolish that Levitical Priest-hood but also destroyed the Temple and the City where he had put his Name and to which he had confined that Priest-hood and never yet suffered either of them to be rebuilt And from these Reasons the force of their Consequence is strong and evident § 20. He proves further that the Priest-hood was changed because the great Priest after the Order of Melchizedec was not called after the Order of Aaron because he was not of the Tribe of Levi but of another Tribe and by Name of the Tribe of Judah Thus the Text informs us Ver. 13. For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another Tribe of which no man gave attendance at the Altar Ver. 14. For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah of which Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood THE words of the Psalmist do prove that the Levitical Priest-hood must be changed and these prove that it was already changed And the Reason whereby he proves the Change of the Priest is the Change of the Tribe which presupposeth that the Levitical Priest was confined to one certain Tribe and that was the Tribe of Levi and to one certain Family the Family of Aaron From whence it follows that if the Tribe was once changed and God institute a Priest of another Tribe the Priest-hood must be changed And this great Priest which is after the Order of Melchizedec must not be was not called after the Order of Aaron neither was he of that Family In the words he informs us 1. Who the Person was that must be the Priest intended in the Psalm 2. What his Descent is and that two wayes 1. Negatively 2. Positively and affirmatively 1. The person of whom these things are spoken was Jesus Christ. The thing spoken of him are 1. That he was a Prophet above Angels all the Prophets and above Moses himself 2. That he was a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec And though a Prophet might be of any Tribe yet a Priest must be of the Tribe of Levi. Of this great Priest he saith 1. He was of another Tribe 2. Of a Tribe of which no Man gave attendance at the Altar He was of another Tribe This implies the Negative He was not of the Tribe of Levi 1. This is general and so is that which follows For 2. He was of a Tribe where of no man served at the Altar To serve at the Altar and offer Sacrifice was the proper work of a Priest and if any of that Tribe had ever been a Priest and according to God's Institution then though Christ had been of that Tribe yet the Priest-hood had not been changed But God's constitution was otherwise for it excluded all the Tribes but one that one of Levi and so that not any person of any other Tribe could lawfully serve at the Altar This makes the Negative more clear and full and peremptory By this we understand that Christ was of another Tribe that he was not of the Tribe of Levi yet all this will not inform us of what Tribe in particular he was Therefore to give full satisfaction the Authour adds Ver. 14. For it 's evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah of which Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood THe Apostle presupposing that which cannot be denied that the Tribe of Judah is not the Tribe of Levi and that Christ being of the Tribe of Judah was made a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec seems by these things to prove that the Priest-hood is changed and that more particularly and distinctly then he had done in the former verse For it might have been argued and replyed that if he was of another Tribe then of Judah or Ephram or Benjamin or some of the rest If he was of another Tribe name it or else nothing is done And this was convenient to be done to name the Tribe in particular out of which Christ sprang and it was that of Judah In the words we have three propositions 1. That Christ sprang out of the Tribe of Judah 2. This is evident 3. That of Judah Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood The first proposition is made clear out of the Histories of the Evangelists delivering the Genealogy of Christ from Abraham and David by way of descending Matth. 1. and of Christ's descent from David by way of ascending Luke 3. It 's further evident by the Calling of Joseph his Father-in-Law and his Mother to be enroled with the Tribe of Judah in Bethlehem the City of David Luke 2. And his Name was found long after his Ascension in these Rolles kept in the Arches at Rome He saith our Lord to signify that Christ was that Lord to whom the Lord Jehovah said Sit thou at my right hand c. The second proposition This was evident This might be evident then to them not only by these Histories but by the publick Records of the Roman Cense and Enrolment and the Registers both publick and private of their pedigrees For the Jews were very careful to Register their Discents for their distinction of their Families and their Tribes and God's providence did order it so to be not only by these Genealogies to manifest who had title to the Priest-hood but principally to preserve the Tribe and Families of Judah distinct till Christ was exhibited that so it might be evident that Christ was of that Tribe and of the House of David By this God did manifest his Promise concerning Christ to Descend of David to be fulfilled in that it was evident that Christ was the Son of David and so often called by that Name The third proposition That of that Tribe
Supream Judge by him prove most effectual In that place it 's observable that he offers only the prayers of Saints and in another place he makes Intercession only for the Apostles and such as by their word should believe in him Joh. 17. 9 20. Saints and Believers are they who come to God by him And this is our Duty 1. To come to God and him alone for remission and eternal Salvation for they are found in him and in him alone and no where else 2. We must come to him by Christ as our only Propitiatour and Intercessour who alone can and will effectually plead our cause and make it good And as this is our Duty so upon the performance of it this will be the comfort of all penitent Sinners who groan under the heavy burden of their Sins and sigh and long and pray for Salvation 1. That Christ will certainly plead for them and by his Intercession obtain their everlasting Salvation And why should poor believing Sinners quake and tremble at the Bar of God seeing Christ doth plead their Cause which is more then if all Saints and Angels and the blessed Virgin the Mother of our Saviour should pray for him And why should be fear the Tryal or upon the Tryal Damnation or eternal Death For who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's Elect It is God that justifirth Who is he that condemneth It is Christ that died yea rather that is risen again who is even at the right hand of God who also maketh Intercession for us Rom. 8. 33 34. It was expedient as he said to his Disciples That Christ should go away and that to his Father's House that as a Priest and Advocate he might be ever ready in that Court of Heaven to plead our Cause His presence and his perpetual Intercession there is far more beneficial to us then his bodily presence here on Earth it 's not only beneficial but necessary For when we have sinned what should we do if we had not him our righteous Advocate and Propitiatour with his Father we were redeemed indeed by his Death but we are saved and justified by his Life because he ever liveth to make Intercession for us and will fully and for ever save us For because he is a perpetual and effectual Intercessour therefore he is so able fully and for ever to save even all that come to God by him and this is a clear proof of his excellency above the Levitical Priest § 27. Now the Apostle seems to have finished his Discourse upon that excellent Text I have sworn and will not repent Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec Psal. 110. 4. and to conclude in these words following Ver. 26 27. For such an High-Priest became us who is holy harmless undefiled seperate from Sinners and made higher then the Heavens Who needeth not c. VVHich words may be handled 1. Absolutely in themselves 2. Considered in their connexion and reference to the former But I will begin with the coherence and connexion which is difficult to be known as appeareth by the different â—pinion of Expositors upon the place For some think it 's a Conclusion and as it is the last part and close of the Chapter it may be so called for in this sense the word is sometimes taken yet this is no proposition inferred from former premises Others conceive that the Apostle proceeds by other Arguments to prove the superexcellency of Christ and this is true for so he doth Others imagine that these words give a reason why there must be such a Priest as lives for ever to make Intercession for us for such a Priest became us and none other would serve our turn Others judge a reason to be given here why the Intercession of Christ was so powerful and that is from his excellent qualification and his pure unspotted Sacrifice And it 's very certain that his Intercession had not been so effectual without this qualification of the person and the excellency of his Sacrifice Though all these things may be true yet something is to be observed and upon serious condesiration we shall find that the Apostle hath not done with his Text in the Psalmist but hath something more to say upon it and that he doth in these words It was well observed by the Rhemists that the Apostle scanneth every word of Psalm 110. 4. And there was one word more to be further examined For we have heard 1. Of Melchizedec 2. Of another Priest after his Order to arise after the Levitical Priest 3. That he is a Priest for ever 4. That he is made by Oath a Priest immortal and living for ever Yet in all this here is no mention of the person who he is that is thus made not what his qualification was nor of the time when he was thus made and why he was so confirmed But in these words he satisfices us in all these particulars as is implyed and presupposed in that very Psalm 1. The party was David's Lord For the Lord said unto my Lord ver 1. Who was above David not only because of his union with the Word but because he was advanced to far higher dignity and invested with far greater power and was the Son of God who lives for ever 2. His qualification was excellent For he was holy harmless undesiled and separate from Sinners 3. The time when he was thus made High-Priest for ever and that by Oath was after that he had offered one Sacrifice not many for the People not for himself once not often of everlasting virtue not effectual for some petty expiation for a time and after he was risen ascended and set at the right hand of God 4. The reason why he was thus made such a Priest was not only his excellent qualification and his immortality upon his Resurrection but because he had offered up himself without spot unto God That this is the intention of the Apostle will appear by the last words of the Chapter But to enter upon the words Ver. 26. For such an High-Priest became us who is holy harmless undesiled separate from Sinners and made higher then the Heavens IT may be truly said with Junius That in these words with those in the verse following Christ is circumscribed or described 1. From his Person 2. From his Ministry For his Person he had all the perfections of a Priest for his Service he was entred the holy place of Heaven to plead his excellent Sacrifice for all his Saints For his Perfections He was holy harmless undefiled separate from Sinners These are perfections which were required in the Levitical High-Priest so far as humane frailty was capable But they agreed to Christ exactly and in a far higher degree then they did agree unto any even the best of them And though the words may signify several qualities different at lest in respect yet they make but one perfect qualification of this Priest who was holy as Man
offer the Tabernacle but in the Tabernacle did not minister it but in it And the Apostle seems to take his expression from Exod. 29. 30. where it 's said That that Son which is Priest in Aaron 's stead shall put on the holy garments seven dayes when he cometh into the Tabernacle of the Congregation to minister in the holy place or Sanctuary Where we have 1. A Minister that must minister or officiate 2. The Tabernacle of the Congregation into which he must come 3. The Sanctuary where he must officiate The very same words of Minister Sanctuary Tabernacle are used by the Septuagint in that place which the Apostle taketh up in this place And though the Body of Christ may be called a Tabernacle yet that 's nothing except it be so taken here And we find the word here turned Sanctuary signifying Heaven Heb. 9. 12. and also Ver. 24. of that Chapter makes it more plain where it 's written That Christ is not entred into the holy places made with hands which are the figures of the true but into Heaven it self to appear in the presence of God for us Where we may observe 1. That the word which there is turned holy places and Ver. 12. before the holy place is here translated Sanctuary 2. That this Sanctuary or holy places into which Christ entred was not made with hands which is the same with not pitched by Man 3. This place is said to be Heaven it self 4. That Christ doth minister there by his Intercession for us after that he had offered his great Sacrifice and by the Blood thereof entred into the heavenly Sacrary within the Veil To signify this the inner Veil of the Temple rent instantly upon the death of Christ to signify that the great High-Priest was entring Heaven with his Blood 2. The Excellency of this Tabernacle is set forth 1. By the quality 2. The Cause The Quality it 's the true Tabernacle True is not here opposed to that which is feigned or nothing at all but to the Typical Tabernacle which was a real and true sacred Building yet so far inferiour to this that comparatively it might be said to be nothing or but a shadow at the best and this is the Substance For though that was glorious and honoured with God's special presence yet earthly things are poor to heavenly though we who never saw the inward glory of Heaven may admire them The Cause is expressed assirmatively pitched by God negatively and not by Man By both which is signified the excellency of it far above any Work and Building made by the power and skil of Man For the efficient power and skil of Man is nothing to the efficiency of God whose Power is almighty and Wisdom infinite and who hath made Heaven a far more glorious place than any on Earth 3. Christ is the Minister of this Sanctuary and Tabernacle to minister and officiate in it For every High-Priest must have some Temple or sacred place wherein he must minister and serve for Priest-hood Temple and Service must go together When the Temple was destroyed by the Chaldeans the High-Priest might pray but he could not offer Sacrifice burn Incense expiate Sin by entring the Holy of Holies with blood These Services were confined by God's Institution to that House and sacred Building after once it was consecrated Neither could they perform such Services till it was re-built and dedicated again Neither have the unbelieving Jews any High-Priest that can do any such thing since the second Temple was demolished by the Romans 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Minister 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to minister and serve and these two words are often used by the Septuagint For so they turn several Hebrew words and especially 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which both signify to serve in general but many times to serve God the Supream Lord and to worship him And though the performance of this Service be the general Duty of all even of private Persons yet there are certain parts of this Service proper to the Priests and some to the High-Priest who is not a private but a publick Minister as the rest of the Priests be and mediates between God and the People and by whom the People offer their Services to God The same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the New Testament and doth signify not onely to perform the Levitical but also the Evangelical Service and from this Verbe comes Liturgy a Form or Directory for the Worship of God In this place a Minister is 1. A Priest 2. An High-Priest 3. The great High-Priest of the heavenly Sanctuary Christ Jesus And here it might be observed that a Minister is not a contemptible but an honourable Title as given not onely to the Levitical Pontiff but to the Apostles and to Christ himself The Text thus explained contains an Argument to prove the excellency of Christ above the Legal High-Priest for he indeed was a Minister and did officiate yet he did this onely in an earthly Sanctuary and Tabernacle but Christ officiates as an High-Priest in Heaven And this second Verse may be part of the former Sum and Abridgment and a Conclusion deduced from the former words For if Christ be an High-Priest in the Heavens then he must needs be the Minister of an heavenly Sanctuary yet it 's so deduced from the former that it brings in new matter and gives occasion of a new Discourse concerning Christ's Ministration for if he be a Minister of a Sanctuary he must officiate and amongst other things offer something to God Ver. 3. For every High-Priest is ordained to offer Gifts and Sacrifices wherefore it is of necessity that this Man have somewhat to offer § 3. THis Text must be examined 1. In its relation to that which goes before 2. In it self 3. In reference to what follows First It relates to Chap. 5. 1. where in the Description of an High-Priest we have the very words For 1. He must be taken from amongst men 2. Ordained for men in things pertaining to God 3. Thus he is ordained for to offer both Gifts and Sacrifices For there we have his Election Ordination and Ministration And hitherto the Apostle having spoken of his Election and Ordination now begins to treat of his Ministration in offering Gifts and Sacrifices for Sin The nearer Connexion is with the Text immediately antecedent and 1. With the word Minister for if he be a Minister he must minister and officiate by offering 2. With the word Tabernacle For if that signify the Body of Christ as Beza Junius and Dr. Goug◠with divers others do understand the place He must have his Body to offer But of this I have said something already and shall have occasion to say more hereafter The words in themselves are discursive for the Apostle argues thus Every High-Priest being ordained to offer Gifts and Sacrifices must have somewhat to offer But Christ is ordained
Gospel To be Lord in this manner is to manifest himself in the Excellency of his Wisdom Power and Mercy To know him as such is not any wayes to understand those excellent things testified of him in the Gospel but effectually to believe those Truths as revealed from Heaven and to rely upon him and him alone as our onely Saviour renouncing all Righteousness in our selves and all Confidence in all other things and counting all things loss and dung in comparison of him This is that which we call Faith in Christ whereby we are justified and saved yet this Knowledge and Faith was not without teaching For how should they believe on him of whom they have not heard and how should they hear without a Preacher And again So then Faith is by Hearing and Hearing by the Word of God that is taught and preached Rom. 10. 14 17. And the Apostles had Commission to go and teach or disciple all Nations Mat. 28. 19. and they must teach Repentance Faith in Christ and Remission of sins in his Name And when Christ ascended into Heaven he gave Gifts to men and sent Apostles Prophets Evangelists Pastors and Teachers Ephes. 4. 11. Yet this Teaching of Man was not without the Power of the Spirit teaching inwardly the same which they taught outwardly yet in a more excellent manner and with far greater efficacy The Persons who shall know God were all from the least to the greatest 1. The Jew taught but the Jew or his Proselyte the Apostles both Jew and Gentile of all Nations 2. All to whom the Gospel is preached aright know God or may know him 3. All may be restrained to all those who are taught not onely of Man but of God who writes his Laws in their hearts and gives them one heart and one way that they may fear him for ever and so puts his fear in them that they shall not depart from him Jerem. 22. 39 40. And he had promised to give his People an heart to know him that he was the Lord and they his People and he their God for they shall return unto him with their whole heart Jer. 24. 7. Where it 's observable 1. That God will so give them one heart as that they shall turn with their whole heart to the Lord. 2. So turned they shall not only know God to be the Lord but to be their God and they his People 3. That this place compared with that of the same Prophet Chap. 31. 33 34. alledged in this place doth signify that this Knowledge is such as upon which will follow Remission of Sins and this is justifying Faith § 13. Two things remain to be considered 1. How this Reason infers this Conclusion That they shall not under the Gospel every Man teach his Neighbour and every Man his Brother saying Know the Lord. 2. How these words come in upon the former whether so as to be a distinct and different Promise from the former or not For the first 1. It 's certain that in Heaven the Knowledge of the Lord shall be so perfect as that there shall be no need of any teaching of Man no nor of Prophets or Apostles therefore some of the Ancients understood the place of the perfection of Saints in the state of Glory 2. That unâ—er the Gospel there is need of Man's Teaching not onely for the first Conversion but for their further Edification till the Saints be perfect in Christ. 3. Yet there is a great difference between the teaching under the Law and that under the Gospel and that in three respects 1. Of the matter taught 2. Of the Teachers 3. Of the manner of Teaching 1. For the matter taught For the matter taught under the Law was The Lord bringing them out of Aegypt into the Land of Canaan and giving them Moral Judicial and Ceremonial Laws and blessing them in that good Land whilst in their manner and measure they observed these Laws Christ also was taught in Types and Shadows But the matter taught under the Gospel is God Redeemer by Christ exhibited glorified reigning at God's right hand and officiating in Heaven as being far more clearly and fully revealed 2. The Teachers under the Law whether Priests or Levites or Scribes or Parents or Masters or any private Persons were but Ministers of the Letter not of the Spirit But under the Gospel they were Ministers not onely of the Letter but of the Spirit and their Knowledge was far greater and clearer than that of the Teachers under the Law 3. For the manner of Teaching it was more clear more full more powerful as accompanied by the Spirit of Christ enlightning the Understanding and inclining the heart For in the Law there was no Promise of the Spirit to take away their stony heart and give them an heart of Flesh and to be put in them to cause them to walk in his Statutes As the saying of Austin is Lex jubet non juvat If the Spirit had been thus given to make the Doctrine of their Teachers effectual upon the heart of their Disciples and imprint the Knowledg of the Lord so deeply in their hearts as that they should never depart from him then the Promises of that Covenant had not been so far short of the Promises of the new Covenant But as the Law could expiate no Sin so it could not minister the Spirit It 's true that under the Law they had Faith in Christ to come and were enlightned and sanctified by the Spirit yet this they had not by vertue of the Law but the Promise by Christ to come and not by Moses And they who had it were few in number and their Knowledge of Christ was but implicit and the Power of the Spirit far less But under the Gospel they were many in number not only Jews and Proselytes but Gentiles of all Nations their Faith was far more explicit and the Power of the Spirit far greater So that the force of the Reason is That if the Teaching under the Gospel â—e so far more excellent in respect of the matter taught the Teachers and manner of Teaching which is such as that they all from the least to the greatest shall know the Lord so clearly fully and powerfully then there shall be no such Teaching as under the Law For seeing there is no distinct actual Knowledge without some kind of Disciplination and Instruction therefore where any Knowledg of the Lord is whether under the Law or the Gospel there must be some kind of Disciplination under both And here the Disciplination and Teaching of the Law and the Gospel are compared together And that of the Law was so weak and imperfect in respect of the Knowledg of the Lord which it did produce and that of the Gospel so powerful and also so perfect in respect of the Knowledge of the Lord the Effect thereof that there was great Reason that the former should cease as needless useless and imperfect For as the Apostle saith in another
so made as that it abrogated the Law of Moses and the Legal Covenant Yet because the Law was given and that Covenant made by God and not by Man and had continued in force about 1500 years many could not be satisfied in the matter of Abrogation and made scruple of rejecting and neglecting of it For that which is confirmed by Law and long Custom can hardly be made void The unbelieving Jew did reject the new Covenant and adhere to the old as instituted from Heaven and sufficient to justify and save those who observed it Some believing Jews feared to neglect it and judged Christ insufficient without it and thought Moses and Christ joyntly must bring them to Heaven and some of the Gentiles seduced by them were entangled with the same Errour So that it was observed by some as necessary by some as indifferent till the ruine of Jerusalem the destruction of the Temple and the dispersion of the miserable and captive Jews into all Nations And then when there was no face either of a Civil or Ecclesiasticall Polity in that Nation then it vanished and did not appear It was abrogated therefore by the Promulgation of the Gospel decayed by little and little after that time and in the end was totally abolished The Apostle had in the former Chapter proved the Change of the Law and the Abrogation thereof from the Change and Abolition of the Priest-hood and gives the reason why it was to be abrogated to be this because it could justify and sanctify no Man And this he made good out of Psal. 110. 4. And here he implies that it must be abrogated because it was not faultless but defective and confirms the repeal of it from the words of the Lord by Jeremiah saying I will make a new Covenant and his chief Scope is to prove that Christ hath obtained a better Ministry because he was the Mediator of a better Covenant And that Covenant was better not onely because it was established upon better Promises but in that it was new and so made that it abrogated the former and it self was to continue for ever For God never promised to make another after this new one was once confirmed by the Blood of Christ. § 17. In all this Discourse he takes it for granted and presupposeth it as certain that Christ was the Mediator of this Covenant and in this he may seem to beg and not to make good the assirmative of the Question For the Jew might reply That suppose it were granted that there must be a new Covenant so made as to take away the old as God by the Prophet doth positively affirm it yet How doth it appear that Christ and not some Levitical High-Priest shall be the Mediator of it To remove this and the like Scruples it 's to be observed 1. That no Levitical Priest could be a Mediator of any Covenant but the former made with the Fathers as is evident from the Institution of that Priest-hood and the Rules of Legal Ministration Therefore he was clearly excluded from this Mediation of this new Covenant 2. That if Jesus of Nazareth was the Messias whom God promised the Fathers expected the Prophets fore-told then it will necessarily follow that he was the great Prophet above all former Prophets above Moses above Angels and he must be the great and eternal High-Priest according to the Order of Melchizedee a Minister of the heavenly Sanctuary and a Mediator of this far better Covenant But the reason why he takes it for granted and goes not about to prove that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messias was because that was done unto his hands and made evident many wayes For the fulfilling of so many Prophecies of the Old Testament and that so fully even to particular Circumstances in him who was called Jesus of Nazareth the Angel's Testimony who certified his Mother of his Conception the Testimony of an Angel with a Multitude of the heavenly hoast at his Birth did signify this So did the words of his Father at his Baptism and Transfiguration his glorious Works his heavenly Wisdom Knowledg and Doctrine besides the Testimony of John the Baptist his prodigious and stupendious Death and Resurrection Ascension the coming down of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles the Revelation of the Gospel the rare and excellent gifts of this heavenly Spirit received by such as believed on him and the wonderful works done in his Name did sufficiently and superabundantly prove him to be the Messias § 18. From all this the intelligent Reader may easily understand the Subject Scope and Method of the Apostle in this Chapter The Subject is the Ministry of Christ constituted a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec The Scope is to manifest that Christ is a far more excellent Priest than that of Aaron's Order in respect of his Ministry The Method is to set forth his superexcellent Ministry in respect of the Tabernacle the Service and the Covenant whereof he was Minister for the more excellent the Sanctuary the Service the Covenant the more excellent the Priest The Sanctuary whereof Christ is Minister is heavenly his Service and Offering not â—arnal but supernatural and divine the Blessings promised in the Covenant whereof he is Minister and which by his Ministry he procures are spiritual and eternal and such as once obtained make sinful Man fully and for ever happy And because the Covenant is so excellent and so effectual by his Ministration it 's of eternal continuance The Application of all this to our selves is of Information Exhortation Consolation for by this Doctrine we 1. Understand how excellent and effectual Christ's Priest-hood is in respect of his Ministration in the best Sanctuary by his best Service making effectual the best Covenant that ever was made 2. It stirs us up to admire the wonderful Wisdom of God which contrived such an excellent Priest-hood and Ministry and his infinite Mercy in ordering both for our eternal Salvation For Who are we that the Son of God should be our eternal Priest offer up himself a Sacrifice to confirm his Covenant which he hath made with us and that God should appoint him to minister in the heavenly Sanctaary and by his Ministry there obtain for us the excellent Blessings which he hath merited and God hath promised That he should deal thus with us and do thus for us may be matter of amazement to the very Angels of Heaven How often should we think and seriously meditate on these things and magnify his Wisdom and be eternally thankful for his unspeakable Mercy and engage our selves to his Service for evermore 3. It 's matter of sweetest Comfort that there is so excellent an High-Priest that he is our High-Priest that after he had sacrificed himself on Earth he should minister for us in Heaven that God should make so excellent a Covenant with us promise Power to keep it and bind himself upon the keeping of it to be our God for ever and eternally
Chapter we have the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first and Covenant understood Few or none make any mention of Priest-hood The Predicate and that which is affirmed of this Covenant is That it had Ordinances of Divine Service and a worldly Sanctuary The meaning is that in the time of the Law the Levitical Priest-hood and the Tabernacle there were such Ordinances and a Sanctuary belonging to the Covenant In the words we have the Sum and Abridgment of the nine following Verses which describe unto us both the Ordinances of Service and the Sanctuary In the words therefore we have two things 1. The Ordinances 2. A Sanctuary The Ordinances of Divine Service imply That there was under the Law the Work of Service and the Ordinances of this Service And because there is Service due to Man and Service due to God and Latreia signifies both therefore the Translators for difference sake and to signify what Service is here meant do add the word Divine For Divine and Religious Service is due only unto God and is to be performed to him as Supream Lord and it cannot without injury be given to any other And when it is so given to any but the true and living God it 's called Idolatry and is against the first Commandment Some distinguish between Service and Worship and it 's true they differ much if Worship be taken for Adoration which is terminated upon the divine Excellency and Dignity and not upon his Power yet the words are used indifferently But whereas the Socinian Expositor saith that Latreia properly signifies Worship he is much deceived as will be evident if we examine the places of the Old Testament where the Septuagint turn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to serve 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and that so often This Service of God is two-fold 1. Positive 2. Moral The Moral is the principal as being spiritual and performed by a Spirit unto a spiritual and eternal Substance which is God Positive and Ceremonial is far inferiour and is here meant This Ceremonial Service which never should be performed without the Moral had Ordinances as a Rule to direct both Priest and People in the performance of it and these Ordinances were given by God and were part of the Ceremonial Law determing what religious Rites and Ceremonies must be used especially by the Priests For the Service here meant is chiefly that which was proper to the Priests for as we now serve God by the Ministers in publick so they then by their Priests The word turned Ordinances is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used above 60 times by the Septuagint to interpret the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and though it often signifies Ceremonials yet not alwayes Men ever depending upon God as upon their Supream Lord are ever bound to serve him that they may receive Protection and Happiness from him He that will not serve a God is a profane Atheist he that servs any but the true God is an Idolater he that servs the true God after his own fancies and the inventions of Man is a superstitious fool he that inventeth Rites and Ceremonies and Modes of serving God and imposeth them on others is a presumptuous Wretch For as God alone doth know what kind of Worship and Service is fittest to be performed unto him so he onely hath Power to impose it The highest degree of Service is due unto him alone and he alone hath Power to make Ordinances for it This is the Service and the Ordinances of God which must be performed in some place of his special presence Therefore there was then a worldly Sanctuary A Sanctuary is an holy place consecrated to God and sanctified by his presence There is a bodily and earthly and also a spiritual Sanctuary This was a bodily earthly Sanctuary a Type of a far better and to difference it from a fat better it 's called a worldly Sanctuary though the word may signify a beautiful decent and glorious place And in respect of outward earthly decency beauty and glory it did excel It was made not according to the fancy of Man but according to a pattern given from Heaven and every thing in it was Mystical and the greatest Glory of it was God's special presence This Sanctuary was said to be the Throne and Palace of God residing as a glorious Being in the midst of his People It may be considered mystically as shadowing a far more excellent Throne and Palace which may be Heaven the Humanity of Christ and the Souls and Bodies of sanctified Persons or it may be considered as a convenient place for God's People to assemble there for publick Worship In the former consideration it 's abolished in the latter it may continue for if all things in the Worship of God must be done decently and orderly then surely it 's decent and orderly according to the Law of Nature and the Law of God to have convenient places for Religious Assemblies and Publick and Divine Worship To think there is any holiness in these places as places is the superstitious conceipt of some to think they may not be called Churches is the superstitious fancy of others For a Church or Kirk is but a convenient place where Christians ordinarily assemble to perform Divine Service and God's presence is not tyed to the place but to God's People observing God's Ordinances in this place neither is he tyed to any special presence in such place but by vertue of his gracious Promise neither is there in these places any divine special effectual and spiritual presence there but to such as there worship him in Spirit We are not so bound to these places as though God would not accept our Service else-where or more in such a place than in another but onely in respect of conveniency and the testification of our Union with God's People in the Christian Religion § 4. After that the Subject and Heads of his following discourse were determined and named he proceeds to discourse of them more particularly 1. Of the Sanctuary 2. Of the Service and Ordinances So that we may in the following nine Verses observe a Description 1. Of the Sanctuary or Tabernacle Ver. 2 3 4 5. 2. Of the Service from Ver. 6. to the 10. 1. This Sanctuary leaving out the Court where they sacrificed is divided into two parts The first is the Holy place The second the Holiest of all The holy place divided from the Court by the first Veil or Hanging is described from the sacted things and Utensils therein which are here said to be the Candlestick the Table the Shew-Bread and this was called the Sanctuary Both the place and Utensils of the place had their mystical Representations though not so well known to us The second part divided from the Sanctuary by the second Veil and called the Holy of Holies that is the Holiest of all is set forth from the things therein As 1. The Golden Censer 2. The Ark
People as a third part 1. In making the Covenant in signifying God's Will unto the People and returning the People's Answer unto God Exod. 19. 2. 2. In confirming it by Blood as an indifferent distinct person Exod. 24. To which place the Apostle doth allude as we shall understand hereafter in the illustration This is the meaning of the first Proposition The second may be divided for explication and made two 1. Christ by means of Death expiated Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. By means of this Death the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance The first implies 1. That there were Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. That there was a Redemption of these Transgressions 3. This Redemption was by the Death of Christ. The first is clear enough for Moses Aaron David and the Saints of God from the times of Moses till the exhibition of Christ had their sins much more others not sanctified The second cannot be doubted of for if there was no Redemption of those Sins and Transgressions then they could not be saved they must suffer eternal punishments as they did temporal By Redemption here is meant Expiation and Propitiation whereby their sins were made remissible and upon certain terms and conditions performed actually to be remitted The third will be granted in general that the Expiation was by Death and Blood but that they were expiated by the Blood of Christ many of the Jews denied Yet if they had understood the Books of Moses they might have known that the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not expiate the Sin of Man a rational and immortal Creature not free from the eternal Punishment Some Legal frailties and infirmities they might expiate and avert some temporal penalties Therefore there must of necessity be some other Death and Blood that must do it And this was the Blood of Christ which all their Ilastical Sacrifices and Lustrations did typify Yet this is not so to be understood as though their Sins were not remissible and remitted till Christ dyed and offered his Sacrifice for by vertue of this Death fore-seen and fore-accepted they were in their Life-time upon their Repentance Faith in Christ to come and their fervent Prayers pardoned They did not rely upon their Legal Sacrifices nor expected Remission from them but relyed upon this Death of Christ to come according to the Promise That in him all Nations should be blessed This Proposition is not to be understood exclusively as though Christ's Death did expiate no Sin but that which was committed under the first Covenant but emphatically to singnify 1. That there was no Expiation for Transgressions under the Law 2. That if Christ's Death expiate former Transgressions under the Law much more will it expiate such as are committed under the Gospel 3. That there was no reason as some observe why they should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing without his Death and Blood neither they nor their Fathers could be saved but must suffer eternal penalties The second part of this second Proposition informs us that 1. There is an eternal Inheritance 2. There is a Promise of it 3. The called receive this Promise 4. By means of Christ's Death they receive this Promise For in the words we have an Inheritance the Heirs the Conveyance the Purchase or rather the price whereby it 's purchased The Inheritance is eternal Happiness the Heirs are the called the Conveyance is by Promise and Covenant the price of the purchase is Christ's Death and Blood 1. The Inheritance is that blessed and glorious Estate which is to be enjoyed upon the Resurrection for the full possession and enjoyment is reserved for Heaven where it 's said to be laid up and reserved It 's said to be eternal in opposition to the Land of Canaan which was the temporal Inheritance of them and their Fathers and to be enjoyed with the Blessings thereof so long as they kept the Covenant of their God and this was the Inheritance promised in the former Covenant and to this which formerly was called God's Rest the Apostle seems to allude as a Type of this which was far more excellent and glorious of eternal continuance in respect of the Inheritance it self the parties enjoying it and the enjoyment thereof 2. This eternal Inheritance was promised there was a Promise of it It was God's and the disposal of it was at his Will Man for his sin was cast out of Paradise and forfeited Heaven with the eternal Bliss thereof yet it was in his mind to give it sinful Man who deserved it not so great was his mercy and bounty and Man must know this For this end he promised it and by his Promise bound himself to give it and in it did signify his Will The Effect of this Promise was Obligation on God's part and a Right unto it on Man's part an Hope to obtain it and a Comfort upon this Hope And here it 's to be observed that our Title to eternal life depends immediately upon the Promise and is derived from it for as the Israelites had the Land of Canaan and held it by Covenant and Promise so do all the Children of God expect the heavenly Canaan and hope to have it by Promise of the new Covenant Some do ' understand by the Promise of eternal Inheritance this Inheritance promised yet there must be a Promise received before we receive the thing promised 3. After the Inheritance and the Promise and Conveyance follows the Heirs which are here said to be the called Some are not called at all these have no Promise of the Inheritance Such were the Gentiles before the Gospel was preached unto them they were Strangers from the Covenants of Promise having no Hope and without God in the World Ephes. 2. 12. Some are called and have the means of Conversion but reject the terms of the Covenant and refuse to enter into it and engage themselvs such were the unbelieving Jews and many others Some are called enter the Covenant and solemnly bind themselvs to the observation of it yet do not observe it In respect of these two last it is that Christ saith Many are called but few are chosen Matth. 22. 14. None of these are Heirs Some are called and are obedient to the heavenly Call and keep the Covenant these receive the eternal Inheritance promised and first acquire the Title and after that the Possession Some were called before the Exhibition of Christ some after the former are here principally meant though the latter with them receive the Inheritance 4. These called Ones of former times with us receive this Promise by vertue of Christ's Death expiating their sins and of his Blood purging their Conscience To understand this you must consider that none but such whose Sins are expiated and their Consciences purged can be Heirs for they must be regenerated and acted by the Spirit and adopted Sons before they can be Heirs For as the Apostle argues If Sons then Heirs
that Blood was necessary not only for confirmation of the New Covenant but also for the purification of the Called Covenanteers And therefore there could be no reason why these Hebrews of the Jews should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing it was so useful and so necessary not only for Expiation but for purging the Conscience from dead Works and confirming the New Covenant and Testament And here two things are observable 1. That if this Blood should not expiate Sin and purge the Conscience the Covenant could not be firm to the Called so as to receive the eternal Inheritance For if the Inheritance be not purchased and meâ—ted and the Called justified from sin they can have no title or right unto it and if not sanctified and cleansed from the pollution of sin they cannot be capable of it so as to enjoy it 2. This Blood was necessary for the Expiation of the sins not only of them who live after it was shed but also of those who lived under the Law For under it there was no Blood of any Sacrifice that could expiate sin as polluting the Conscience and making the Sinners liable to eternal punishments and as it could not expiate so it could not purge the Conscience though sprinkled with it § 20. The Reddition or Application followeth Ver. 23. It was therefore necessary that the paterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these but the heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices then these THe sum of these words is this That as it was necessary that earthly and carnal things and shadows should be purified by the blood of these carnal Sacrifices for the confirmation of the first Covenant so it 's necessary that spiritual and heavenly things should be purified with the blood of better Sacrifices then these for the confirmation of the New Covenant This Reddition is made by a repetition in brief of the former proposition and protasis of the Comparison So that in these few words we have the full Similitude whereof there be two parts The first Is the necessity of purging the Types and Shadows The second Is the necessity of purging the Anti-types Both agree in this 1. That they must be purged 2. They must be purged with the blood of Sacrifices 3. There is a necessity of purging both with the blood of Sacrifices Yet they differ 1. In that the one are earthly and carnal Types 2. In the purging as well in the things purged For the first are purged with earthly carnal Sacrifices suitable to their nature the second with far better Sacrifices The whole may be reduced to two Axioms or Propositions 1. It 's necessary that the paterns of heavenly things should be purified with these 2. It 's necessary that the heavenly things should be purified with better Sacrifices then these Yet there is a third implyed and that is As it 's necessary for the one to be purged with these so it is necessary the other should be purged with better The disposition of the Text seems to be Dianoâ—tical and the argumentation in form to be this If it was necessary that the paterns of things in Heaven should be purified with these then it 's necessary that the heavenly things should be purified with better Sacrifices then these But the first was necessary Therefore the second is so too From all this we understand that the Apostle inferrs the necessity of purging heavenly things from the necessity of purging earthly and further that if the purification of the Types was necessary then the purification of the Anti-types with better Sacrifices was much more necessary This is the reason why the Apostle brings in this Text by the illanve Therefore which is to be understood to follow the proposition and to go before and bring in the Reddition In the first Proposition we have 1. Things in Heaven 2. Paterns of things in Heaven 3. The purifying of the Paterns 4. The purifying of them with these 5. The necessity of purifying them with these 1. By things in Heaven are meant heavenly things as appears in the latter part of the Text and by heavenly are meant spiritual and more excellent things We read of Jerusalem above Gal. 4. 26. and of the heavenly Jerusalem Chap. 12. 22. of this Epistle And this is the Church which is first Militant and then Triumphant which is first from Heaven then in Heaven 2. The patterns of the things in Heaven are such things as were Signs Images Shadows and imperfect Representations of things in Heaven For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word in the Original signifies Signs and Images which represent though but darkly other things These are not Patterns in proper sense but things that do sub-demonstrate or obscurely signify some other things They are called Examples and Shadows Examples and Shadows of heavenly things Chap. 8. 5. where it's observable that the very word which is there turned Example is here turned Pattern And Chap. 10. 1. it 's said The Law had a Shadow of good things to come These Shadows Signs and Figures were the Tabernacle the Vessels with many other things which under the Law were purified with Blood 3. What the purifying of these was you have heard before for it was Consecration Expiation Sanctification whereby the things purified of unholy were made holy 4. These were purified with these that is with Scarlet Wool Hyssop Water Blood Ashes and the principal of these was Blood and this Blood was the Blood usually of Bullocks and Goats which was ordained by God to be the Blood of Expiation and Sanctication So outward and carnal things were purged with outward and carnal Blood and both the things the Blood and the Purification were Mystical and did signify some spiritual and more excellent things Blood Purification 5. There was a necessity why these things should be so purified Where we may consider that not onely the Purification but this purification by these was necessary The necessity did arise from God's Institution and Command that these things and shadows should be purified and purified by these things And if these things must signify persons and things guilty and polluted by Sins which God would have purified then in this respect also there was a necessity because otherwise there had been no Agreement between the Types and Anti-Types § 21. The second Proposition is That it 's necessary the heavenly things themselvs be purified by better Sacrifices than these Where we must examine 1. What these heavenly things be 2. What these better Sacrifices are 3. What it 's to be purified by these 4. How this is necessary The heavenly things themselvs are some better and more excellent things for as Heaven is far above the Earth and more glorious so heavenly things must be some better and more glorious than earthly The one are bodily and corruptible and the other spiritual incorruptible and immortal in comparison whereof the best things under the Law were but Shadows These spiritual
and heavenly things principally intended are the Consciences and immortal Souls of men which being purged make up the Body of the Church which is Militant first on Earth and after that to be Triumphant in Heaven 2. The better Sacrifice above the former is the Sacrifice of Christ and the pure unsported Blood of him who offered himself by the eternal Spirit to God The purifying vertue of this Sacrifice was in this that Christ the Son of God innocent holy righteous as Surety and Hostage of Man-king appointed to be so by God did deny himself took up the Cross shed his Blood for to expiate the Sin of Man and was obedient unto death the death of the Cross For him so excellent to suffer death so willingly for so glorious an end and that at the Command of God was the highest and purest degree of Obedience that ever was performed unto God and was highly accepted and did fully satisfy divine Justice so far as was required In the offering of this Sacrifice he gave himself wholly to his heavenly Father and became as it were a whole Burnt-Offering being wholly consumed with the Zeal of his Father's Glory and the Love of Man-kind And here it is to be noted upon the By That though in the Text we read Sacrifices in the plural number yet this one Sacrifice of Christ is onely meant Estius thinks it's an Enallage of number the Plural for the Singular for the Sacrifice whereby heavenly things are purified is but only one once offered Yet it may be called Sacrifices because it had more vertue than all other purifying Sacrifices and also because it was one of those expiating Sacrifices which were offered unto God yet more excellent than all the rest It 's like that expression of Jâ—phtah's Butial for it 's said he was buried in the Cities of Gâ—lead that is one of the Cities of that Country which was Mizpeh as some think Judg. 12. 7. 3. For the heavenly things and the Consciences of men to be purified is to be freed from Sin that is from the Guilt and Dominion of Sin which is to be justified and sanctified as these words are usually taken This Purification is vertual or actual for when the Blood of Christ was shed offered and accepted for the Sins of men then they may be said to be purified virtually as upon the death of Christ we are said to be reconciled because made reconcilable And when by Faith this Blood is sprinkled upon our Consciences and pardon obtained by Christ's Intercession for peniâ—ent and believing Sinners then they are said to be actually purified and when they are wholly freed from all the Guilt and Power of Sin then they are perfectly purified 4. This Purification by this Sacrifice was necessary for supposing God's Will and Decree concerning the eternal Happiness of sinful Man in Communion with his God it was necessary Man should be purified for otherwise he could have no fellowship with God so as to derive eternal Happiness from him For as God is Light and just and holy so they must be Light just and holy who shall see and enjoy him And because no Sacrifice but this of Christ could thus qualify him therefore it was necessary both that he should be purified and purified with this Sacrifice § 22. Thus far you have heard of the necessity of the death of Christ for the Confirmation of the Covenant illustrated by Similitudes taken from the Law of Nature and the Ceremonial Law of Moses Therefore the Jews except they were very ignorant could have no cause to be offended with this death upon the Cross seeing it was so necessary to the purchasing of the eternal Inheritance and the purging of mens Consciences that they might be capable of the Possession and have a Title unto it for the ground of the Promise from whence the Title is immediately derived is this Sacrifice without which the Promise was never made neither if it had been made could it without this have been valid But let 's consider what follows for he saith Ver. 24. For Christ is not entred into the Holy places made with hands which are Figures of the true but into Heaven it self now to appear before God for us THese words considered absolutely in themselvs seem to be plain and easily understood but the coherence is doubtful Some and amongst the rest Esâ—ius takes little notice of it as not much material Many others finding the causal Conjunction For do agree that in these words the Apostle gives a Reason of something that went before but they differ much in the particular Explication of the Reason Dr. Gouge conceivs that the Apostle's intention is to prove that the Sacrifice of Christ is more excellent than the Sacrifices of the Law and this is true but yet imperfect Beza thinks that the Author in this Text begins another and a new Collation or Comparison to prove the excellency of this Offering and this cannot be denyed Dr. Lushington who is said to be the Translator of Crellius tells us that here is proved That the Heavenly places are purified by better Sacrifices and that because Christ entred not into the earthly Sanctuary but into Heaven it self This doth presuppose that Heaven it self is purified by the Blood of Christ and that Christ entred thereinto for that end But this is difficult to understand and supposeth that which few will grant him A Lapide differs from all these and saith that the Apostle gives in this Text a Reason why he called the Church heavenly or heavenly things and that is because Christ entred into Heaven to unlock the Gates and open the Doors thereof that the faithful might enter thereinto This is not so clear and satisfactory though it hath something of Truth To find out the Connexion we must observe 1. That the Conjunction for or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes expletive and redundant 2. Sometimes the same that but or moreover is 3. That though it be called by the Grammarians a Causal yet it doth not alwayes imply a Cause but it 's used to bring in any other Reason or Argument and therefore might be called a rational Conjunction Yet Whittington in his Grammar saith that a Causal Conjunction signifies the Cause or Order of that which goeâ— before where he implies that it doth not alwayes joyn the Cause and the Effect 4. Let it be taken for a Conjunction which joyns these words to the former so as to contain a Reason we must consider what was formerly â—ffiâ—med and how it 's here proved To this end let us remember that the Subject of the former discourse was Purification or Expiation of things by Blood of Sacrifices and these things are earthly and carnal or spiritual and heavenly Of these latter he affirmed that it was necessary they should be purified with better Sacrifices The manner how he proves this is this He presupposing that these heavenly things must be purified proves 1. That they were purified by
But the Law had but the Shadow not the very Image Therefore it could not perfect the commers To understand this with that which follows more fully we must observe That the Question is Whether the Law by the Service and Sacrifices prescribed in it could perfect or sanctify any man that did use or observe them The Apostle denies this and proves the Negative and by this Argument because it had but the Shadow not the Substance of good things to come The Propositions in the Text are two 1. The Law had a Shadow of good things to come and not the very Image of the things 2. The Law could never with those Sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the commers thereunto perfect In the first we have 1. A Shadow of things to come 2. The very Image of the things 3. The Law which is affirmed to have the Shadow not the very Image of good things to come 1. The good things to come are some great and excellent Blessings which issued from the great Love of God to sinful Man and tended to his everlasting Salvation and Happiness and they were to come upon the Exhibition of Christ and the Revelation of the Gospel These were Christ the Work of Redemption and the benefits of Redemption Of this Phrase I have formerly spoken Chap. 9. 11. where we â—ead Christ was said to be come an High-Priest of good things to come The Shadow of these good things is the same which was called a Type or Figure that is an imperfect and dark Representation Christ was represented of old not onely by words in the Promises but by things yet in such a manner as that the People of former times had no clear and distinct Knowledg of these things as under the Gospel now we have It was a Mercy of God to give them a Shadow and by the same remind them often of their Saviour that they might the more desire him long for him and expect his coming 2. The very Image of the things themselvs according to some is a more lively Representation of them and these think the Expression to be taken from Limmers which first make a rude Draught after that finish and perfect it so as that the Picture is a more full distinct and lively Representation of the thing to be represented This they make the difference between a Shadow and the Image and this is thus far true as that they under the Law had but a rude imperfect and dark Representation of these good things which the Gospel doth reveal and represent to us far more clearly Their Light might be like that of the Moon and Stars ouâ—'s like that of the Sun already risen Yet others do observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 An Image is two-fold 1. The Pattern or Samplar 2. That which is conformed to the Pattern and in this place the Image may be the Pattern and Samplar it self of which the Ceremonies of the Law were imperfect Figurations The word in the Syriack signifying Ipse and turned by the Syriack Translator Ipsa Substantia seems to favour this sense So that the very Image of the things is both the lively Representation of them and the things themselvs represented 3. The Law had the one not the other Where by the Law understand the Ceremonial Law of Moses yet so as it was joyned with the other Laws This Law had a Shadow that is did prescribe certain Shadows and imperfect Representations that is Ceremonies or Ceremonial things and the People under the Law were bound to observe them and did enjoy these Shadows for to lead them to Christ and in this they were more happy than other People though not so happy as we under the Gospel And the Reason hereof was that God neither gave them the things themselves nor the clear Representation of them both which were reserved to the time of Christ's Exhibition § 2. In the second Proposition we have two things 1. Sacrifices offered year by year continually 2. Their Impotency to perfect the commers thereunto 1. By Sacrifices are meant Ilastical and propitiatory Sacrifices such as God commanded under the Law to be offered for Sin and the chief of them principally intended were those Anniversary Offerings of Expiation therefore it is said they were offered year by year And though there was an Intermission of the space of a Year between every single and individual Sacrifice yet they are said to be offered continually For as Year succeeded after Year from the time of Moses unto the Suffering of Christ so there was a continued Succession of these Offerings 2. These Sacrifices as Causes had their Effects and such as God intended for they did legally expiate and shadow out and continually remind the People of the necessity of Expiation to be made by a better Sacrifice for ever Yet they could not perfect that is consecrate and sanctify and free eternally from the eternal Punishment due to sin The parties who might expect Justification and Sanctification from them were such as came unto them and did worship God by them that is the parties for whom they were offered and did humble and afflict themselvs at the yearly solemnity of Expiation who are said to be Worshippers in the next Verse and such as did the Service Chap. 9. 9. And this was the impotency imperfection and insufficiency of them The Reason of this impotency is given in the former words for they were but Shadows and how can Shadows have any such causal Power as the Substance hath This Effect was reserved for that substantial and most noble Sacrifice of Christ himself offered by the eternal Spirit without spot unto God Therefore the Jews did exceedingly wrong themselves and prejudice their own Souls when they rested in these and looked not for their Saviour And we Christians are no better when we rely upon the outward Service of God and the Signs of the Sacraments and not upon Jesus Christ the Pith and Marrow of all who can benefit no Man but such as with a penitent heart rely upon him and him alone This impotency is fully expressed by a peremptory Negation for they could in no wise perfect This Effect was too noble and far and very far above the Power and Activity of Shadows This is the Apostle's first Reason to prove the insufficiency of the Sacrifices oâ— the Law § 3. The second Reason follows Ver. 2. For then they would not have ceased to be offered because that the Worshippers once purged should have had no more Conscience of Sins THis is a new Argument taken from the continuance of them which had been needless if they could have purged away Sin so that the Worshippers thereof should have had no more Conscience of it So that here we have 1. The continuance of them 2. The Reason of the continuance implyed For the Apostle argues from the non-cessation and the re-iteration of them and thence infers their Imperfection But there is some difficulty in the
Assumption to sone former Proposition 2. There was in these yearly Scrifices a Remembrance of Sin for when this great Sacrifice was to be offered God dâ— command That Aaron the High-Priest should lay both his hands upon the Head of the Scape-Goat and confess over him all the Iniquities of the Children of Israel and all thir Transgressions in all their Sins Levit. 16. 21. Where we learn what Remembrance of Sin is it 's the Confession of Sins Now Confession presupposeth Remembrance and is â—n outward Expression and Declaration of the sins remembred To confess sins is to aknowledg the Confessors guilty notwithstanding Sacrifices had been offered and Expiaâ—on made and from hence it follows that those Sacrifices had no vertue to take away sin Some vertue they had and some Legal Expiation was made yet the Offering was â— sooner made but the expiating vertue vanished and their new sins must have a new Câ—nfession and a new Sacrifice which had been needless if the former Sacrifices had been sufficient And whereas it may be said that although many Sacrifices severally could 〈◊〉 yet all joyntly might purge the Worshippers The Answer is they could not â—o not any nor all had Power to purge the Conscience that must be purged by some bette Sacrifice whereof they were but Types and Shadows This is the third Argument § 5. The fourth we find Ver. 4. For it is not pssible that he Blood of Bulls and Goats should take awâ—y Sins THE force of the Reasons in this That seeing the Effect is to take away sin it must have a Cause sufficent to produce it but the Blood of Bulls and Goats which was the princiâ—l thing in the Legal Annual Sacrifices was no such Cause it had no such vertue the Effet was so far above it that there was no possibility that such a Cause should reach it For â—ery Cause doth work according to it's Power as it is greater or less but if there 〈◊〉 power at all in respect of any particular Effect in respect of that it can do nothingâ— all The Blood of Buls and Goats might be a sign of that Blood that could take away sin but take it away or any wayes actively concur to the taking away thereof it could â—o In the words we have 1. An Effect 2. The Impotency of Legal Sacrifices in respect of this Effect 1. The Effect is taking away of sin Where by Sins we must understand sins as past yet remaining in their Guilt For though the sins be past and not in being yet the Effect abides for the party that hath sinned is liable to Punishment and must suffer it if it be not prevented Therefore to take away Sin is to make it remissible and that by some Sacrifice and Satisfaction This is to make the Guilt removable which yet is not actually removed but by the Sentence of the Judg passed upon the Sinner rightly disposed and qualified by Faith in a right Sacrifice And here you must observe that the Guilt is an Obligation not only to some temporal but also to spiritual Punishment because sin is from the Soul an immortal substance and against a Law of God which binds the Conscience and immortal Soul and promiseth Rewards and threatneth Punishments not only temporal but spiritual and eternal And the taking away sins in this place is a freeing of the party from this Obligation 2. Such an Effect so great and glorious and so beneficial to sinful Man must have some excellent and powerful Cause such the Blood of Buls and Goats cannot be Where we must know that the things sacrificed on the great day of Expiation were Buls or Bullocks and Goats and with the Blood of these shed and taken and sprinkled in the Holy place within the second Veil the Legal Expiation was made As the Beasts so the Blood was morally neither bad nor good but indifferent And though offering and sprinkling of this Blood was a rational Act in the High-Priest yet it could give no moral spiritual or supernatural Power to the Blood Neither could the Priest have had any warrant to have made this use of this Blood if God hadnot commanded him and that to signify some better and far more excellent Blood Therefore if we look upon the Blood and consider what it was we cannot rationally inagine any Power in it either placare or piacere either to satisfy divine Justice or to merit any Acceptation for that end from the supream Judg Therefore well might the Apstle say That it was not possible for the Blood of Buls and Goats to take away Sins and thence conclude that the Legal Sacrifices could not perfect or purge the Worshippers § 6. Hitherto the Apostle hath proved the insuiclency and impotency of the chiefest Legal Sacrifices for to take away sins and this heâ—ath done by Artificial Arguments taken from the Nature of the Sacrifices themselvs ad the Reiteration of them and now he goes further to manifest that they could not perect any and that by an inartificial Argument and a Testimony The Testimony is â—ivine and of infallible Authority and such in the Judgment of these Hebrews so that thâ— could not deny it The End of it is to prove that they could not purge or perfect th Worshippers because God never intended to do any such thing by them He argueso this purpose That if God intended to expiate Sin and perfect sinful Man by anothe and a more excellent Sacrifice even the Sacrifice of Christ and by that alone then they ould not expiate and take away Sin and so purge the Worshippers But he intended to â— this great Work by another more excellent which was the Sacrifice of Christ and thaalone Therefore they could not do that great Work of Expiation This was so strong a Proof that it did evince that though the Legal Sacrifices might have had some expiatig Power yet they could never expiate Sin because that Effect was and that by God's ntention reserved for another and a better Cause And this may be said to be a fifth argument â—istinct from all the former Seeing this is an inartificial Argument we must consider the Nature of the Testimony it self and the matter or thing testified The Testmony as yo heard before is divine for it 's taken out of the Old Testament and out of that part whih is called The Book of Psalms and out of one of those Psalms which by the Title is said o be David's The Pen-men of the whole were Prophets and inspired from Heaven ad amongst the rest David of whom it 's said The Spirit of the Lord spake by me and his Vord was in my Tongue 2 Sam. 23. 2. And not only he but all the men of God spake assey were moved by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. As they spake so they wrote thefore their Writings are called The Scriptures by way of Eminency and The Holy Scripres and the words written therein are all the words of God who spake in them
Will and great Command of God which can never be found in the Moral Law That Christ should suffer and offer himself to expiate the Sin of Man This Law is said to be in his heart and he delighted to do it For if he had not done it willingly it never had been accepted or effectual These words are left out in the Apostles allegation not only because he would have them understood but also because the Text of the Psalmist without them was sufficient for his purpose Though it 's very true that in the New Testament several times a few words of the Text cited out of the Old are expressed and the Reader referred to the Book where they are written at large 2. He came to do his Will that is to dye for the Sin of Man and to do this Will and offer himself a Sacrifice for the Expiation of our Sins was the end of his coming For as that was the great Command of his Father so it was the great Work he had to do Not long before his Death he said Now my Soul is troubled and what shall I say Father save me from this hour but for this cause came I unto this hour Joh. 12. 27. And in his Agony he prayes That the bitter Cup of his Passion if it were possible might passe from him yet concludes Thy will not mine be done Where it 's implyed That it was his Father's Will he should suffer and offer himself and he was resolved to do it and to deny his own Will and submit unto his heavenly Father And again The Cup which my Father hath giveâ— me shall I not drink it Joh. 18. 11. He could have prayed to his Father and have obtained twelve Legions of Angels a Power sufficient to have rescued him from all his Enemies yet would not do it For saith he How then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled that thus it must be Matth. 26. 54. Where we must observe 1. That the Father had by the Prophets of Old signified That it was his Will that Christ should suffer 2. That he câ—me into the World to fulfil this Will and to present himself before his Father when the time came and said Lo I come 3. This was written in the Volume of God's Book This Book is the Book of the Old Testament and it 's called a Volume because it was not bound up as now Books are but rouled up into a Scroul or Volume as the Hebrew word doth signify and as some say The Jews do fold up the Book they read in their Synagogues Therefore is it said That when the Book of the Prophet Esay was delivered to Christ he unfolded it and when he had read a part of it he folded it up again as the word in the Original signifieth Luke 4. 17 20. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is turned by Aquila 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by Hierom Pagnine Pratensis Tremelius and Junius Volumen by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and by the Vulgar Caput and so in this place Tremelius and Beza translate it Schindler thinks the Septuagint took Megittah for Gilgoleth which signifies the Scul or the Head But this is not likely We need not much trouble our selves about the Word For as Genebrard observes the meaning is That it was written of him in the whole body of the Scriptures and the sum of them for the sum of Moses and the Prophets is Christ. And it 's certain That Christ was the principal Subject of all their Writings which Christ read and perfectly knew his Fathers Will revealed in them that men might believe in him and expect Salvation from him This Will so perfectly known to Christ was in his heart which he delighted to do and was resolved upon it Thus must we deny our own natural Desires to suffer loss of life and cruel pains to do the Will of God if we will be Christ's Disciples and receive benefit by him § 8. Thus far the words of the Psalmist the Apostle's Application followeth which will be the more perspicuous if we consider the Subject of his discourse and the scope whereat he aims His Subject is the sanctification and perfection of such aâ— Worship God by Sacrifices and Offerings and his scope is this to prove that the Legal Sacrifices and Offerings could not expiate Sin and perfect the Worshippers because that effect was reserved for an higher Cause and for a more excellent Sacrifice Thus much premised the Apostle having recited the words of the Psalm observes three things in them 1. The rejection of the Legal Offerings and that in these two words Thou wouldst not and thou hadst no pleasure therein 2. The acceptation of the Sacrifice of Christ the Offering whereof was the doing God's Will 3. The reason why he rejected and took away the former was that he might establish the latter And seeing these were the words of God spoken by the Prophet David and that in time of the Law and that they plainly signify the Will of God in the matter of Sacrifices therefore the argument was strong and evincing and did clearly prove that the Legal Offerings could not take away sin but Christ's could § 9. That Christ's Offering could do this he affirms saying Ver. 10. By which Will we are sanctified by the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ once for all HEre the Apostle returns again unto the Sacrifice of Christ and proves it far more excellent then those of the Law and that especially in two things 1. In that it could sanctify which they could not 2. It did sanctify being but one and once offered whereas they were many and often offered This excellency virtue and efficacy is set forth two wayes 1. Absolutely ver 10. 2. Comparatively ver 11 12 13 14. In these words where we have the virtue of this Sacrifice asserted absolutely we have two things 1. An Effect our Sanctification 2. The Cause the Will of God through the once offering of the Body of Christ. Where 1. We must not understand by Sanctification only a communication of inherent Righteousness in renuing the Image of God in us but also Justification and a freedom from all Sin and all the consequents thereof so that we shall never Sin or be guilty of Sin any more This is a rare and noble Effect and such as upon the same we shall be fully and for ever blessed 2. The Cause of this is God's Will through Christ's Body once offered And here by Will is meant the Will and Command of God signifyed to Christ that he should offer his Body once with his promise to accept it Yet this Will may be considered 1. As a Law or Command given and signified to Christ. 2. As performed by Christ in which latter sense it is here taken principally For it 's not this Will or Command but this Will done that doth sanctify If God had given this Command and Christ had never
the Apostle in this latter part of this Chapter is obvious For 1. He layes the ground of his Exhortation 2. Exhorts to several Duties 3. Urgeth the performance of these Duties by several Arguments to the end of the Chapter The ground is laid in these three Verses by Repetition or rather Recapitulation of something formerly delivered either explicitly or implicitly and in this ground we have severall particulars which may seem to be Motives to excite unto the performance of the several Duties exhorted unto and especially of the first In these words of the ground we have three things 1. A new and living way unto the Holiest made and consecrated by the Body and Blood of Christ. 2. A Liberty to enter by this way into the Holiest 3. An High-Priest set over the House of God And all these are expressed in Metaphorical terms alluding to the Legal dispensation wherein the High-Priest had a way to pass through the Veil with Blood into the Holiest to expiate the People's Sins and obtain Mercy for them That we may understand the words both in themselvs and in their several respects both to that which goes before and that which follows I will 1. Explain them 2. Enquire how they are a Recapitulation of the Doctrine antecedent 3. Examine how they are a ground of the Exhortation following For the way which is the first thing in the Text according to the Order of the matter though not of the words 1. It 's new and living these are the qualities of it 2. It 's consecrated or dedicated 3. It 's consecrated through the Veil This is the Sum of the 20th Verse the second part of the Text the Subject whereof is a Way which is nothing but a certain space through which we pass from one place to another and if that space be not passable it 's not properly or actually a Way The word in this place is Metaphorical for there is no distance of space through which we pass by bodily motion to our God Yet there may be a spiritual distance between him and us and such as that he may be inaccessible unto us and we cannot come near him so as to receive spiritual Comfort from him except a spiritual way be made So that a way in this place is something whereby we come near unto our God as to a gracious Father 1. This way is said to be new the word in the Original is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is turned usually new and so we find it used by the Septuagint Eccles. 1. 9. There is nothing new under the Sun and Deut. 32. 17. New Gods newly come up In this sense they use the Adverb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yet the word in this place may signify a known and manifest way So the Vulgar Latine turns it Viam notam And this may seem to be more probable by these words The Holy Ghost this signifying that the way into the Holiest of all was not yet made manifest whilest the first Tabernacle was yet standing Chap. 9. 8. Yet put both new and manifest together you have the full sense it was a Way newly made manifest From this quality we may observe that though from the first Promise of Christ there was alwayes a way for true Believers to come to God yet it was not so manifest as it was after Christ's Death Ascension and Revelation of the Gospel 1. This way as it is newly opened and made manifest so it 's said to be a living Way which some according to the Syriack Translator understand to be a way of Life which leads to Life And it 's so called in respect of the Terminus ad quem that Life wherein it ends And though it 's true that this way doth lead unto and ends in Life yet ◠way of Life may be nothing but a living Way as a man of same or name is a famous man an Expression usual in many Languages when the latter Substantive signifies the Adjunct as the former doth the Subject For this is a certain Rule not only in the Latine but in the Greek and Hebrew That Substantivum Adjuncti regit Genitivum Subjecti Substantivum Subjecti Genitivum Adjuncti Some therefore think it 's called a living that is a constant permanent and perpetual Way So the word which signifies living is used by the Septuagint and turned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aternus Job 19. 25. He is eternal who shall dissolve me for so they translate the place And a living Fountain or Spring is such as continually springs This way may be thus called in opposition to the Typical way into the Holiest of all which was a dead way to all but the High-Priest none but he might enter into it not he himself but once a Year and then not without Blood and that 's a dead way through which no man passeth That way was but of short continuance for after Christ was once entred with his own Blood into Heaven it ceased and is now ceased for ever Again it 's a living Way in opposition not only unto this which led into the Sacrary and the most holy place but unto that into Paradise For this is a living safe way and one may pass through it and live both the other were dangerous and mortal That in the Tabernacle and Temple was so it was mortal to any but the High-Priest and to him too at all times but once in the Year and then too if he presumed to enter without Blood The other passage into Paradise was obstructed with a flaming Sword and no man could have access to the Tree of Life but must be slain and burnt to Ashes So that this is a way of Life permanent and safe 2. This way is consecrated or dedicated new made or newly made The word we had in the former Chapter it signifies to initiate to dedicate to consecrate and this is to give a kind of moral Being and Complement to a thing so as to make it differ from what it was and applicable to another and a better end and use For an House dedicated is fit to be used for habitation the Temple once dedicated fit for God's Service a Priest consecrated fit to minister and officiate in the Temple This way may be said to be initiated and consecrated when it was once made passable for sinful Man so that he might pass freely and safely to his God made accessible And this is an Act of God's Will separating and appointing it for that end and thereby giving Man access unto him 3. This way consecrated was through the Veil Where the Apostle informs us what is meant by the Veil that is the Flesh of Christ. Whereby we understand that the inner Veil did signify the Flesh of Christ. The High-Priest could not enter into the inner Sacrary to approach the Mercy-Seat which was the Throne of God but through the Veil divided or lift up or drawn aside Therefore when Christ dyed and his Soul was separated from
compass God's Altar was to draw nigh to God and to worship him to wash his hands in innocency was to cleanse his Heart and Body from sin before he did approach unto that God who requires holiness in all them that draw nigh unto him for they must be holy as he is holy This seems to be the reason why in our Liturgy the Confession of Sin was premised and began the Worship of God § 20. The second duty exhorted unto follows in these words Ver. 23. Let us hold fast the profession of our Faith without wavering for he is faithful that promised THe first Exhortation is to the exercise of Divine and religious Worship upon which both our perseverance and eternal happiness depend and if the parties drawing nigh be prepared and the Worship duly performed there will be greater hope of Salvation In these words we are exhorted to perseverance in the profession of our Christian Faith and Hope which is necessary to the attainment and actuall enjoyment of the great Reward In the words two things are observable 1. The Duty Perseverance 2. The reason why the Duty should be performed This is the principal Duty and both the former and the two latter are means and helps which will enable us to perform it In the Duty we may take notice 1. Of Faith 2. Of the Confession of Faith 3. The holding of this Confession without wavering 1. We must have Faith that divine and fundamental vertue in our hearts Most Copies make no mention of Faith but of Hope and so do most of the Translations so that we may wonder what Copy our Translatours followed Yet this doth not vary the sense For where there is Hope there must be Faith and where there is true Faith there is certainly Hope for Faith is the ground of Hope and Hope depends upon Faith and these two are inseparable Besides Faith as a confidence hath great affinity with Hope and though they may be distinguished so as that confidence may look at the party promising and Hope at the thing promised yet both are taken often for the same I need not here inform you of the Nature of Hope for that I have done already Chap. 3. ver 6. 6. 11. Both Faith and Hope with Charity are by the School-men called Theological vertues 2. If there be Hope there must be a Confession of it Hope is inward and invisible as Faith is and must be manifested to others by our Confession This Confession may be made by Works or Words When our Works are holy and just and agreeable to our Faith we thereby signify that we believe in Christ and expect eternal Glory by him When in Words we signify to men that we believe that God raised up Jesus Christ from the dead and testify our Hope of the Resurrection unto everlasting Life then we confess both our Faith and Hope This Confession is solemnly made in Baptism and also in the Eucharist and by our Communion with God's People in our publick Assemblies This Confession is necessary without it such as are at Age are not capable of Baptism neither can they without it be justly admitted to the Lord's Supper To deny Christ before men as Peter did is contrary to this Confession and a grievous Sin For with the Heart Man believeth unto Righteousness and with the Mouth Confession is made unto Salvation Rom. 10. 10. So that as without Faith there is no Righteousness so without Confession there is no Salvation 3. A man may confess his Hope for a time yet as his mind may alter so his Confession may waver therefore the Duty is to hold fast this Confession without wavering The more sincere Faith and Hope shall be and the more deeply they shall be rooted in the heart the more likely they are to persevere yet perseverance doth chiefly depend upon God's support and assistance For if temptation be violent and he desert us but for a little time we shall be in danger to waver if not to fall yet this divine assistance cannot be expected but in the diligent use of the means therefore saith the Apostle Let us hold fast And this will be the more easy in time of Peace when we shall meet with no Opposition But when the subtle Arguments of Seducers shall begin to delude the Understanding and the fear of cruel Persecution of bloody Enemies on the one hand and the desire of temporal Life Peace Happiness on the other hand shall work upon the Will then it will be a difficult thing to hold fast and not be shaken § 21. The Reason to perswade stir up and encourage is God's Promise and Fidelity For 1. We have a Promise 2. It 's God's Promise 3. God promising is faithful 1. We have a Promise We are secure when one that is able hath passed his word and by Promise bound himself unto us then we make sure thus far of the thing promised The thing which we desire and which is promised unto us is not onely the Reward of eternal Glory which is the Object of our Hope but power and ability with assistance to do all things necessary for the attainment thereof for in the Gospel not only the Reward but Power to perform our Duty are promised Therefore Paul prayes that the Ephesians may be enlightned that they may more fully know not only the excellency of the Reward of Glory but also the exceeding greatness of that Power which must not only strengthen but support and assist them in the seeking of the full possession and enjoyment Eph. 1. 16 17 18 19. 2. This Promise is not the Promise of any Man or Angel but of God this is more than if all the best men and all the holy Angels had bound themselvs unto us and given us all security which possibly they could The Reason hereof is that his Power is absolute and almighty and nothing can resist or hinder it if once it begin to work The Power of Men and Angels is great yet nothing unto this Besides God's Mercy is like his Power and as he is able so he is willing to do what he hath promised and he hath signified his Will and Purpose through Faith by his Power to preserve us unto Salvation 3. Yet one may be able and for a time willing and yet upon several Reasons and Motives change his mind for the Mind and Will of Man or Angel is not absolutely immutable and so though perhaps they will not yet it 's possible they may fail us But God will not God cannot for God who hath promised is faithful For as he cannot forget or be hindred by any contrary Power so he cannot change his Will If he say the word it must be done if he pass his Promise he will perform This faithfulness presupposeth his Power and his Promise and it 's the immutability of his Will for as he is unchangeable in his Being so he is in his Promise For the strength in Israel will not lye nor repent
we may persevere and do conceive these means to be three 1. Confidence 2. Patience 3. Faith But upon due consideration it will appear that he urgeth Perseverance by a new Argument taken from the Reward And as formerly he dehorted from Apostacy from the Punishment which would prove to be very grievous and unavoidable so here he exhorts to Perseverance from the Reward which was very great and most certain And whilest he proceeds to this Motive from the Recompence he by the way puts them in mind of their former constancy in Suffering to encourage them to go on and by the same makes way for the pressing further of the Duty from the Reward So that the former Reason from Remembrance of Suffering past is but a branch of this great Motive Before I enter upon the words I must inform you of some things in general as 1. That Confidence Patience Faith are but one and the same thing which is Perseverance 2. That the Motive is from the Reward 3. That he urgeth the Performance of the Duty both from the excellency and certainty of the Reward For first He affirmeth it to be great Secondly To be certain unto Perseverance and certainly and speedily to be received 4. He proves it to be certain 5. Applies the Proof unto themselvs This is the Sum and Scope of the Close of this Chapter from the 35 Ver. unto the End These things premised we may consider in the words of these two Verses these two things 1. The Duty 2. The Reward The Duty is Perseverance which is expressed by two words 1. Confidence 2. Patience And the words imply an Exhortation to continuance in and of both The words implying this Exhortation are these Cast not away your Confidence and You have need of Patience For that which must not be cast away and whereof they have need must be kept and kept unto the end and to keep these to the end is Perseverance The Reward is said 1. To be great 2. Certainly to be received when they had done the Will of God And it 's to be considered 1. As a Recompence 2. As promised The Argumentation of the Apostle reduced to Form is this That Duty by which we have great Recompence of Reward and by which after we have done the Will of God we receive the Promise ought to be performed But by Confidence and Patience continued we have great Recompence of Reward and after we have done the Will of God we receive the Promise Therefore we ought to continue in both In the 35th Verse we have 1. Confidence 2. The continuing of this Confidence 3. The great Recompence of Reward 4. The having of this great Recompence 1. By Confidence if we consider the word in the Original it seems to signify their Boldness in Profession of the Christian Faith For they were not ashamed to confess Christ before men no not before their persecuting Enemies in the midst of Reproaches and Afflictions Yet this profession without was grounded upon and issued from Faith in Christ and hope of eternal life within and these two were as the matter so the Soul and Life of the profession And to profess Christ and their Faith and Hope in him in the midst of persecution did argue their undaunted boldness and divine fortitude and courage 2. The continuance of this confidence is signified here negatively They must not cast it away The expression some think is taken from those cowardly Souldiers which in a Battel cast away their Shield and Armour and either begin to cry for Quarter or to run away and turn their backs upon an Enemy This is suitable to his former Metaphor whereby he had expressed their Courage and Constancy For they had endured a great Fight and here exhorts them to endure still which they could not do if they did cast away their Confidence which was like a Shield These are military terms and signify that we are spiritual Souldiers who will not fear to fight till we have attained a final Victory which without continued and final confidence we can never do To cast this divine Shield from us is an act of fear and cowardize and argues a weakness of our Faith and Hope Therefore the Duty is to be strong in Faith and in the power of God and not to shrink or give back for any thing man can do unto us for it 's but little and if God be for us who can be against us 3. If they do not cast away but hold fast their confidence there is a great recompence of Reward Recompence of reward is one word in the Greek and is turned by some Remuneration So that we have 1. A Reward 2. A rendring or returning of the Reward The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Hire or Wages given in recompence of some Work and Service The Work or Service being done the Reward is due whether it be given or not given and rendred For to be due is one thing to be rendred another yet if it be due it 's injustice not to render it In strict Justice the Service and the Hire are equal yet there is no necessity of this equality in respect of the excess for one may out of his own goodness give more then is deserved and this is not injustice but liberality Any blessing especially that great one of eternal Glory given by God upon the performance of some Duty by Man may be called Wages Hire or Reward by a Metaphor Yet no Man can deserve or merit any thing at God's hands but yet the Reward may be due by vertue of the Covenant The word doth signifie 1. That there is a Reward 2. That it 's due to such as persevere 3. That it shall be rendred Yet a Reward may sometimes be taken Synechdochically for punishment and the recompence thereof an actual punishment for Sin Thus as you may read it 's taken Chap. 2. 2. A reward may be poor or rich less or greater but here it 's said to be great so great indeed it is that no tongue of man can express the greatness or excellency of it For here the Apostle speaks of the final Reward which is unspeakable according to the promise of God to Abraham I am thine exceeding great Reward Gen. 15. 1. 4. This continuance hath this great Reward Which informs us that it will be not only due but certainly conferred upon and rendred to the person persevering for by divine ordination Perseverance and the Reward are inseparably joyned together so that the one shall infallibly follow upon the other § 37. Ver. 36. Agrees with the former in substance though it differ in expressions and as the former doth inform us 1. Of the Duty 2. Of the Reward The Duty is implyed in these words Ye have need of patience The reward in those which follow That after ye have done the Will of God ye may receive the promise The former is the means the latter is the end For explication's sake take notice 1.
are reckoned up jointly with others which are not mentioned by Name After the Catalogue of these Worthies is finished the Argument taken from their Example is applied In all this Discourse you must observe 1. That the end of the Apostle is to shew the Excellency of that Faith and Perseverance which was spoken of in the former Chapter 2. That the Argument or Suasive here used for to confirm them in the Faith is taken from Example of many of the most eminent Saints and Servants of God recorded in the Old Testament and of such as lived before the Exhibition of Christ. 3. That the force of the Argument is not only in this that they believed and persevered in the Faith but chiefly from this that all their rarest and most heroick Acts and Sufferings whereby they attained so many and great Blessings did issue from their Faith without which they could have done little or nothing § 2. But to enter upon the Chapter and the Text it self we read Ver. 1. Now Faith is the Substance of things hoped for and the Evidence of things not seen THis is said to be a Description of Divine Faith a perfect Definition it cannot be That Faith is such a vertue as here is described may easily be known from the former ter whence it may be and is deduced And the Apostle thought good to premise these words for the better understanding and application of the following Examples In the words which speak of Faith we have two Propositions 1. Faith is the Substance of things hoped for 2. Faith is the Evidence of things not seen In both these we may note 1. The Object 2. The Act of Faith In the first Proposition things hoped for are in the Object and the Act is signified by the word Hypostasis here turned Substance The whole Verse may be understood either of Faith in general whether Moral or Divine yet here it 's principally meant of that Divine Faith whereby we obtain Salvation To define what Faith in general is belongs to Logick which is the Rule of Man's Understanding whereof Faith is an Act and that Act which we call Assent and so it differs from Dissent and Doubting Yet Assent may be imperfect and mixt with some degrees of Doubt and this is ordinarily called Opinion and it may be perfect and certain and that without Doubt Yet this Assent may be firm and given unto a false Proposition conceived to be true or to a Proposition true in it self either as clear in it's own Light or upon demonstration and evident Proof or at second hand and represented unto us by some extrinsecal Lights as by the Testimony of another of whose certain Knowledg and Integrity we make no doubt This Testimony is humane or divine The ground of this Faith and Assent here intended is the Testimony of God And here two things are required 1. That the thing testified be credible 2. That we have certain Knowledg that the thing to be believed be testified by God The Tradition of the Church being but an humane Testimony cannot fully satisfy us herein but we must have other artificial Arguments to prove that which the Church saith is the word of God indeed And so far only as we know the things to be believed to be testified by God so far only can we believe with a divine and an infallible Faith So that the Testimony of God known certainly to us to be his Testimony is the ground of this Faith here intended One Object of this Faith is things hoped for Things hoped for in this Text are 1. Things and Rewards promised by God as to come and not yet received 2. The principal of these is eternal life and that great and glorious Reward mentioned in the former Chapter and to be received upon final Perseverance in Faith Of these things or of their futurition we can by Nature and the Light of Reason have no intuitive or demonstrative Knowledg The Truths concerning them and their fruition are revealed from Heaven and as so revealed they are fit and proper Objects of our Faith which is here said to be the Hypostasis of these things This word is interpreted several wayes for some will have it to signify the Substance Ground Foundation of things hoped for Others a certain persuasion and expectation of them Others the Subsistance or Existence of this great Reward to come This variety of Opinions concerning the signification of the word in this place makes the Proposition doubtful unto many The Syriack Translator turns the words in this manner Faith is the Certainty or certain Persuasion of these things which are in hope as though they did actually exist or were in effect to them that do believe This Certainty or certain Persuasion is an act of the Soul of Man divinely enlightned whereby it doth as firmly believe that such as persevere in Faith shall as certainly receive the great Reward as though they did actually enjoy it This is that we call a firm Assent grounded upon the Word and Promise of God for this Word and Promise is the Hypostasis Ground Foundation Basis of this Assent in respect of things hoped for upon which the Soul is firmly fixed and this Assent is the Principle of all other heavenly vertues and in particular and more immediately of our Hope So that by this Assent these things hoped for though in themselvs yet to come have a kind of mental ideal intellectual Existence as present by Faith unto him that hath Faith and this is a mighty motive to perseverance And here is to be noted 1. That though things future as hoped for are here only mentioned as the object of Faith yet it 's not the adequate object for Faith extends further and moves in a larger Sphear 2. That this Faith is not only a certain assent perswasion and belief of the Truths and Revelations of God concerning these things but also a certain expectation of the things promised and a firm confidence and reliance upon God promising concerning the performance of the promise Yet neither this expectation nor this confidence can be Faith strictly taken though it 's certain that in respect of things hoped for as such it 's often taken in this large sense The firm assent is indeed alwayes presupposed as the ground of both § 3. The second Proposition which is That Faith is the evidence of things not sin Where 1. The Object is things unseen 2. The Act is evidence of those things 1. The Object is something not seen Things unseen are not only such things as are invisible and such as cannot be received by the eye but also such as are not perceivable by any of our senses Neither are things insensible meant but such as are above the reach of reason Most of our knowledg is acquired by our senses especially of hearing and seeing according to that Maxim Nihil est in intellect is quod non prius fuer at in sensu Though this be true only
of things sensible for no sensible thing can be received into the under standing but by virtue of our outward and inward senses yet we have an intuitive knowledg of many things as of the inward intellectual and moral acts of the Soul without any act or operation of the senses So that things unseen are such as are neither perceivables by the sense nor reason so as to have either an intuitive or demonstrative knowledg of them These are such as are conveyed to the Soul by divine Revelation without which man could not have known them and such propositions as the connexion of the terms depend upon the Will of God 2. Faith is the evidence of these things unseen because we having a certain knowledg of God's veracity and his testimony and revelation of these things are as certainly perswaded of the truth of them and give as firm assent unto them as if they were seen and intuitively and demonstratively known unto us Yet here you must consider 1. That though the things and proposition be above reason yet this perswasion or firm assent and this certain knowledg of the divine Revelation are acts of reason and in the Book of Reason are they written 2. That this object is of greater latitude then the former For things hoped for which are to come are not seen and not only they but many things past and present 3. That the things not seen in this place are not all things not seen but such as God hath revealed to be the matter and object of our Divine Faith 4. That though substance and evidence may differ yet both are a firm assent but Hypostasis in respect of the things hoped for may include a firm confidence and a certain expectation for in respect of that object that assent is more practical then this evidence which respects things unseen So that here wants but little of a perfect definition 5. The Faith here defined is divine Faith in general not that which is called justifying as justifying for that is but a particular branch of this general looking at a particular object which is Christ's Sacrifice and his Intercession Lushington's Exposition of these words as it 's singular so it 's gross and not worthy taking notice of § 4. This foundation being laid the Apostle proceeds not only to prove it to be true by many instances but also that this Faith thus described is excellent and that by divers Acts and Effects thereof And that it 's excellent it appears for Ver. 2. For by it the Elders obtained a good Report THE meaning of this in brief is That by-Faith the Elders became famous and men of renown so far as to be commended by God himself But for the more particular and distinct understanding hereof I will devide the whole into two propositions 1. The Elders obtained a good Report 2. They obtained this good Report by Faith Both these joyntly taken prove the excellency of Faith For that vertue whereby the Elders became so famous and were so highly honoured both by God and Men must needs be rare and excellent But let 's handle them severally 1. The Elders obtained a good Report In the Original were Witnessed Where we may observe 1. The Elders 2. The Testimony concerning these Elders These Elders were the Saints of God in former times called so in respect of these Hebrews their Posterity and those who succeeded them in the times of the Gospel Yet principally we must understand such as are mentioned afterwards and such as were upon record in Scripture as Abel Eâ—och Noah Abraham and the rest The testimony concerning these Elders is expressed in the general They were witnessed Now a Testimony concerning a person is good or bad and this concerning them is good and thus the word in Greek and Latine is often taken by a Synechdoche and here it s taken for the good Testimony which God gave of them for their rare and excellent virtuous acts which were such as that they were not only famous amongst the Saints of their times but also commended by God And many of them and their works he caused to be Chronicled and written in his own Book of the Sacred Scripture so that their names are upon divine Record And this was a rare priviledg and granted unto few eminent persons so that their Fame and Glory is of perpetual continuance and their names shall never be blotted out or their virtues ever buried in the grave of Oblivion 2. They became thus famous by their Faith without which their remembrance could not have been so precious and honourable to succeeding Generations That which is matter of praise and honour is some virtue shining forth in some excellent deeds Their excellent deeds are many and recorded in the Scripture and recited in this Chapter Yet all these rare Gifts and Acts issued from one Fountain and one particular Faith without which they could not have done so glorious things so worthy of praise and honour For as the Apostle shews afterward By Faith Abel offered so excellent a Sacrifice Enoch pleased God Noah prepared the Ark and so of the rest From all which he intimates 1. That without Faith they could not have performed what they did perform 2. That it was the Foundation of all their other virtues and all their vertuous acts 3. By Faith is understood that Faith which was formerly described 4. This Verse is an abridgment of the whole Chapter and of the Old Testament and signifies the harmony and agreement thereof with the New 5. By those words the Apostle doth tacitely exhort them to Faith and Perseverance therein because as the Elders so they should obtain a good Report § 5. The Apostle in the former words made mention of Elders in general and because he intended to descend unto particulars and to inform us who they were and some of them lived near the time of the Creation of the World he thought good to premise an act of Faith about an object necessarily presupposed before the particular instances For seeing he was to begin his enumeration with some of the Elders who lived near the beginning he must say something of the beginning of the World which could not be known by sense or reason but by Faith For Ver. 3. Through Faith we understand that the Worlds were framed by the Word of God so that the things that are seen were not made of things that did appear THis act of Faith in respect of this object is not proper to any particular Elder or ancient Worthy but a common act of all and therefore prefixed before the Examples and Instances following and proves in part That Faith is the evidence of things not seen which are hoped for These words inform us Of an Object Act. 1. The Object is the Creation of the World 2. The Act is the understanding of this by Faith which usually is reduced under the first article of our Creed The Proposions are these 1. The things that are seen were
special act of that Faith which was from former dayes habitual in his Soul and often exercised and exerted in the course of his whole Life This is an excellent argument to perswade to perseverance in Faith because by it we may condemn the World be saved from the deluge of God's wrath and be made Heirs of Righteousness that is justified before the Tribunal of God And whosoever being warned of the eternal penalties threatned by God doth not repent shall be condemned Therefore seeing we are all warned of God let us be moved by fear and by faith to prepare the Ark of Repentance that we may be saved from the Streams and Flood of eternal Fire and Brimstone And here we must note that Faith Repentance and Fear are opposed to Unbelief Impenitency and security in Sin and Condemnation to Justification for to be Heir of Righteousness is to be justified not by Works but by Faith The destruction by the Flood was but part of that punishment which the wicked impenitent World did suffer and deliverance from the Flood was but part of the great Reward and that eternal Salvation which is obtained by Faith in Christ. All this is plainly signified by that Doctrine of St. Peter 1 Pet. 3. 21 22. Where we have Salvation and the Causes of it as water of Baptism the answer of a good Conscience which is Faith and Repentance and the Resurrection of Christ. To close up this Example let us prepare this Ark and enter into it beâ—mes lest we perish with the wicked World § 11. The former patterns of Faith were such as lived before the Flood the following are such as lived after the Flood and first they who lived before the Law These are Abraham Isanc Jacob Joseph and Moses The first is Abraham whose Faith was so eminent that he was called the Father of Believers and therefore the Apostle enlargeth his Discourse concerning his Faith and instanceth in four rare and excellent Works and Effects of the same As 1. His obedience to the heavenly Call 2. His seeking as a Pilgrim on Earth an heavenly Country 3. His receiving of Isaac 4. His offering of Isaac The first we thus read Ver. 8. By Faith Abram when he was called to go out to a place which he should after receive for an Inheritance obeyed and he went out not knowing whether he went IN the Text we may observe 1. God's Call 2. His obedience to this Call In his Call or Vocation we have 1. A Precept 2. A Promise In his Obedience likewise two things are to be noted 1. His Faith as the principle of his Obedience 2. The parts of his Obedience which are two 1. His departure out of his own Country 2. His going towards Canaan To begin with his Vocation which is briefly expressed in this place but more largely Gen. 12. For the Apostle doth contract the words of Moses into one Proposition concerning his Calling and into another concerning his Obedience So that the Text may be reduced to these two Divine Axioms 1. Abraham was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an Inheritance 2. Abraham being called by Faith obeyed and went out not knowing whither he went In the first of these we have a Command expressed and a Promise implyed The party calling him was God therefore it 's said to be an heavenly Calling The party called was Abraham who thought of no such thing The condition of this Worthy wherein God found him was a condition of Sin and Misery for he lived in an Idolatrous place and very likely it is he was an Idolater himself This seems to be implyed by those words Your Fathers dwelt on the other side of the Flood in old time even Terah the Father of Abraham and the Father of Nachor and they served other Gods Josh. 24. 2. Upon which Masuis observes that these words were added to signify God's free mercy towards them in that he not only adopted them freely when they neither deserved nor desired any such thing but when they were Enemies This Vocation therefore must need at in act of free mècy whereby he chuseth and singles man out of the World and draws him near unto himself for his eternal Happiness It 's a gracious translating of Man out of Darkness into his marvellous Light and out of the Kingdom of Satan into the Kingdom of Jesus Christ. And if we would seriously consider our Unworthiness and the glorious I state we are called unto we might easily understand that as the giving of his only begotten Son so this Vocation is a Work of stupendious Mercy The means which God did use in calling Abraham and so in calling us is 1. A Precept 2. A Promise The Precept informs Man of his Duty and binds him to Obedience the Promise informs of God's Will and the great Reward and so encourageth us and as Man by the Precept is bound to obey so by the Promise God is bound to Reward The Precept to Abraham was Get thee out of thy Country and from thy Kindred and from thy Father's House unto a Land that I will shew thee Gen. 12. 1. This signifies that God requires of Man that he should forsake the World and all things therein even Life it self though never so near and dear unto us and because our Sins are most inconsistent with his Commands we must forsake them Therefore Abraham was commanded to renounce Idols and false Gods we must also in forsaking these resign up our selves wholly to the Will of our heavenly Father and resolve to obey him alone and follow his directions we must leave the World and love our God and fix our thoughts and affections on Heaven This is the Precept He must go out into a place The Promise is here implyed that he should have a full Compensation and instead of the Country he left he should have another and the same more excellent for an Inheritance This Promise is far more largely expressed Gen. 12. 2 3. for there the Promise consists of several Branches and the last and principal was this that in him all the Families of the Earth should be blessed For this was a Promise of Christ and of eternal Life in him for so afterward it 's explained of his Seed that is Christ in whom the Believers of all Nations are made for ever happy Yet you must know that neither Abraham nor any other Person can so understand believe and obey this Command and rely upon this Promise as to come to God except he enlighten and inspire Man by his Spirit and make him able to perform this Duty Thus Abraham was called His Obedience followeth for by Faith he obeyed and went out not knowing whither he went 1. He obeyed 2. He went out not knowing whither he went 3. He obeyed and did thus by Faith 1. Obedience presupposeth a Superiour who hath power to command one subject to that commanding Power a Command given and made known unto the party subject
were Canaanites so that they were but Heirs in Reversion This seemed good to divine Wisdom 1. Because the Sins of that People were not tipe 2. Abraham's Posterity was not yet sufficiently numerous to take Possession of that Land and to husband it Abraham with Isaac and Jacob though Heirs of this Land did but sojourn in it as in a strange Country dwelling in Tabernacles This is the second Proposition wherein we have 1. The Place or Country 2. Their Pilgrimage in it 1. The Place or Country was a certain Land It was not their native Soil but it was to them a strange Country it was the Land of Promise that is that Land which God had promised them and whereof by vertue of this Promise they were Heirs and it was an excellent Land far too good for that wicked People which did inhabit and possess it It 's said to be a pleasant Land a Land flowing with Milk and Honey 2. Their Pilgrimage in this Land is signified 1. In this that the place was to them a strange Country in opposition to their native Soil which was ur of the Chaldees beyond the River Euphrates out of which God had called Abraham 2. In that they had no fixed habitation in that strange place but dwelt in Tabernacles or Yents which were removable 3. In that they did but sojourn in this Land though they were Heirs of it So that they were not Cives either natural or naturalized and incorporated into any State neither were they Incolae because they had no fixed habitation in Canaan They were only Peregrini Pilgrims and as such they could have no Priviledges as other free Persons had Neither did they purchase any hereditary Estates except a burying place not did they build any House Town or City They had indeed some Confederates and abode in some places longer than in others Stephen tells us that God gave Abraham no Inheritance in that Land no not so much as to ser his foot on Act. 7. 5. This was so ordered by divine special Providence to teach them that though they were in the World yet they were not of the World and that they should remember that as they were born from Heaven so their native and hereditary Country was Heaven For when we once return unto our God we renounce the World and account our selvs but Strangers in it But of this more hereafter The next thing is their Faith for by Faith they thus sojourned and were content to be Pilgrims in a strange Land In this Peregrination of theirs we have an Act of their Faith whereby they understood and did affuredly believe that they had no abiding City on Earth and that they were of no Association in this World For they believed the Word of God which informed them that as there was no rest so there was no content in this World It was but a strange place where they must stay a little while pass thorow it to a better Country and that all Inhabitants thereof not born from Heaven were Strangers to them with whom they must have no spiritual Society This by Faith they did believe and out of this Belief did wean their hearts from this World as from a place of vanity misery and discomfort There was another Act of Faith whereby they did rely upon God's Promise and the Effect of this was a patient waiting for the Possession of the inheritance § 13. The second thing in the Text is their expectation of a better Country The words inform us 1. Of a City 2. Of their expectation of it by Faith 1. The City is described from the stability and the Builder thereof A City is sometimes taken for a place of habitation consisting in the vicinity of many Houses For multitude and vicinity of Buildings do commonly make a City in this sense Sometimes it 's taken for a Political Society and Community which if it be reduced under one Supream governing Power is called a Common-wealth Sometimes it 's taken for the condition and estate of these Societies In this place the word City must be taken spiritually for such a kind of Habitation Society and Estate for all these may be here meant as is not found in this World for it signifies the Habitation of Heaven the Society of Saints and Angels and the perfect peace and eternal happiness of this Society in that place Therefore is it said 1. To have Foundations which is the stability thereof and to signify the Excellency thereof 2. It 's said that God is the Builder and Maker of it 1. It hath Foundations for nothing can be firm which is not firmly fixed upon an immoveable Ground To signify the firmness and eternal stability of this City it 's said to have Foundations that is a most firm and immovable Foundation This doth difference it from Tabernacles and Tents and also from all other Buildings Habitations Societies States Kingdoms and their Prosperity For they are infirm movable obnoxious to change decay and ruine Experience doth sufficiently prove this by the ruine of so many Castles Palaces Cities Societies States and Kingdoms which have flourished in great Splendor Power and Strength yet now lye in the Dust and do not appear This City is no such thing but the place of abode the persons and their felicity endure for ever 2. The Builder and Maker is God All other Cities Societies and their Condition is from men but in this Man hath no hand at all for God is Artifex Opifex he contrived it he made it according to the Model contrived by himself These words are added to inform us 1. That it was so far above the Art and Power of Man that only God could make it He was not only the principal but the sole Efficient of it 2. That it was most excellent and far above all other Cities of the World for firmness duration beauty and felicity for the peace pleasures and felicity of it are full and everlasting 2. The next thing is Abraham's expectation of this City by Faith This looking for or expectation includes many things as 1. He had a Title to it by vertue of Gods Promise and his Qualification and this was not a meer Title but something more For theâ—e was a time limited in the grant of the full enjoyment and he had received the first-fruits of Glory 2. He desired and longed after the enjoyment of this City far more than for any thing in this World 3. These desires were very effectual and working upon his Soul and stirred him to seek this City and constantly to use all means appointed by God for to attain it and the whole course of his life was a continued Motion and an Approach towards this eternal Rest and glorious Estate 4. The actual Possession of this blessed Estate was deferred yet he with Patience did wait for it and made no doubt but to 〈◊〉 that which he so much desired And here it 's to be observed 1. That no man can
World in this respect they were Pilgrims and Strangers politically Besides by the Light of Faith they knew this Earth to be no place of perpetual abode but only made and appointed by God as an habitation for a little time through which we must only pass and out of which after a little stay remove into a more certain continuing mansion From all this we understand that on Earth they were Pilgrims and Strangers every way For many are either natural or naturalized Subjects of some earthly Common-wealth and yet knowing by Faith that this is not their resting place and continually expecting a removal are spiritually considered as Strangers and Pilgrims and are such indeed That these Worthies were such on Earth is evident and as they were such so they openly and plainly professed it and that by their words For Jacob calls the dayes of his Life the dayes of the years of his Pilgrimage Gen. 47. 9. So David confesseth before God in this manner We are Strangers before thee and Sojourners as were all our Fathers and he gives the Reason to be this Our dayes on Earth are as a Shadow and there is none abiding 1 Chron. 29. 15. They did profess this not only by their Words but their Works and the whole Course of their lives For they were men above the World who clearly apprehending the Vanity Uncertainty and Misery thereof did judg it far below them as base and unworthy the seeking They knew the End of their Creation and Regeneration was far more noble And this should be the mind of all the Saints of God Therefore Peter exhorts the Christians to whom he wrote as Pilgrims and Strangers to abstain from fleshly Lusts 1 Pet. 2. 11. For We must not love the World nor the things that are in the World 1 Joh. 2. 15. This is the thing they did express 2. The thing which by this Confession they did plainly imply is That they sought a Country There is no man in the World but if he follow the Light of Reason much more if he be guided by the Light of Grace but will seek a place and an estate of Rest wherein he may finally quiet his mind The Land of Canaan was called God's Rest because therein he gave Rest unto Israel But this was but a temporal and earthly Rest as the place of any Man's settled Inheritance may be It was a Type of an eternal Rest as their Sabbath was the Type of an eternal Sabbath Such a Country such a Rest these Saints did seek No man seeks that which he hath and enjoyeth therefore this word sought implies that they were not possessed of this Country they were as yet only Seekers Yet Seekers they were and aimed at some better thing which they did most of all desire And they were resolved to seek till they should find and never rest till they attained their final Rest. Such Seekers we should all be and continue to be such untill we reach our heavenly Mansion He that takes up his Rest in the World or any earthly thing and seeks no further is of a base Spirit and unworthy of an Immortal Soul § 16. If they sought a Country it must be earthly or heavenly Earthly it was not therefore heavenly it must be This we learn from Ver. 15. And truly if they had been mindful of that Country from whence they came out they might have had opportunity to have returned Ver. 16. But now they desire a better Country that is an heavenly Wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God for He hath prepared for them a City IN these words we find two more Propositions concerning the Duty 1. They sought not an Earthly 2. They desired a Heavenly Country The first we may easily understand to be the Substance of Ver. 15. The second is the express words of the 16. 1. That they sought not an earthly Country is implyed two wayes 1. In that they sought not that out of which they came 2. By Opposition for they sought an heavenly If they had sought any earthly Country in the World surely they would have sought their own native Soil And this is very likely For what place doth take or affect us more than that of our Birth Inheritance Kindred This Affection is naturally ingrafted in the heart of Man Yet if it be said Perhaps they had no opportunity to return He answers They had and yet never did return for they were not so mindful of it nor so affected with it This informs us that as they voluntarily left their own Country at the first so they continued their Absence and so their Pilgrimage voluntarily and they were constantly obedient to the heavenly Call From hence we learn that our Obedience must be willing or else it 's no Obedience They were and we must be content to be Pilgrims for a while in this World To return was God's Prohibition implied in God's Command to come out of it and both the leaving of it and the continuance in a strange Country out of a willing heart as it was acceptable to God so it was part of their Self-denial We must follow their Example God calls us out of the World as he did Israel out of Aegypt and Judah out of Babylon we must not only come out and that willingly but we must willingly resolve never to return again We must not with Lot's Wife look back at Sodom after that God hath delivered us out of it lest God be offended with us and severely punish us for if we return again to the World our latter end will be worse than the beginning 2. They desired an heavenly Country Here you must observe 1. That this Country is the same which in Ver. 10. was called a City and here it 's said to be heavenly which before was said to have Foundations and that which here is affirmed to be prepared by God is there affirmed to be built and made by God So that a City that hath Foundations which is made and built by God and an heavenly Country prepared by God are the same 2. Strangers Pilgrims and Sojourners are taken for the same though by Writers of Politicks they may be distinguished 3. That which before they looked for here they are said to seek and desire for they desired hoped for and sought a stable firm heavenly City and Country built made prepared by God To do thus was their Obedience and Performance of that Duty which God required at their hands This Country or City is said to be Heavenly not only to distinguish it from all earthly Countries Cities Societies Common-wealths but also to signify the Original of it as being from Heaven and also the Excellency of it for as high as Heaven is above the Earth so excellent is this Country and City above the most pleasant Countries and most glorious Cities in the World By this also we understand that it is spiritual and invisible safe and of eternal continuance Besides Heaven is the place
of our eternal Mansions and Rest where our glorious Inheritance is to be fully and for ever enjoyed And Heaven is sit for those who were born from Heaven Therefore our Hope is said to be laid up in Heaven our Inheritance to be reserved in Heaven and our many Mansions to be prepared in Heaven This heavenly Country they desire out of their Belief of the Excellency thereof and desired so much as they counted all earthly Countries base and contemptible in Comparison of the same and whosoever doth not desire it in this manner and measure as they did shall never enter into that glorious place of eternall Bliss Some think the Patriarchs and the Saints after them under the Law neither had any better Promise not higher thoughts than of temporal Felicity but the contrary is evident from this place According to the Covenant made at Sinai with Israel as a Civil Society and a Church under Ceremonies they could expect no more but according to the Promise of Christ in whom all Nations should be blessed they looked higher and as they did believe in Christ so in him they looked for the Resurrection unto everlasting Glory Thus far we have heard of the Duty which they performed now follows the Reward or Consequent of this Performance and the manner how God was affected toward them And this Affection appears in two things 1. He was not ashamed to be called their God 2. He prepared for them a City In the first we may note 1. That God was their God 2. That he was not ashamed to be called their God 1. God was their God God may be said to be a God 1. To all men as he is their Creator Preserver and Governor 2. To be such by Covenant so far as he promiseth to protect them and bless them upon condition that they take him to be their God 3. To be such in a special peculiar and eminent manner as he hath bound himself to be the Author of eternal Salvation by Christ to all such as sincerely repent believe and upon their Belief seek an heavenly Country Thus to be a God to any is to justify sanctify adopt raise up at the last day and make them for ever happy He was called their God that is He was their God for in the Hebrew sometimes to be called is to be yet that is not all for to call himself their God was not only to be their God but to signify that he was so and that not only by Words but really by Actions It was God himself who first promised to be their God and when they were dead said unto Moses I am the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob And again The Lord God of your Fathers the God of Abraham the God of Isaac the God of Jacob this is my Name for ever this is my Memorial to all Generations Exod. 3. 6 15. So that the Apostle might truly say that He was not ashamed to be called their God neither did he think it any Derogation from his eternal Excellency to own them To own base and unworthy Persons is a Disgrace to any man of Reputation and to own impenitent Sinners would be a Dishonour to God Therefore to Workers of Iniquity Christ will say at the last Day Depart from me I know you not Therefore we must take special notice of the Persons whom God did own and of their Qualification They were Persons of a sincere Faith and an heavenly Conversation and such we must be or else there will be no Hope that God will own us God will not be ashamed of any man because he is poor mean miserable blind deformed or of no account in the World but he will be ashamed of any Person though never so great that is not ashamed of Sin If we seek not an heavenly Country and manifest our selvs to be Pilgrims and Strangers in this World though we be never so rich wise potent famous he will not own us because his Justice and Holiness will not suffer him to own our Sins Let us therefore seriously consider what a Comfort it is to have God to be our God and what an Honour it will be for Christ to confess and acknowledg us before his Father and all his Holy Angels All this you may learn from the Illative Particle Wherefore For because they desired a better that is an heavenly Country and that by Faith therefore God was not ashamed to be their God Not that their Faith and Desire of an heavenly Country was any meritorious Cause of this Honour Priviledg and near Relation to God but that they qualified the Persons so that without any violation of his Justice or any diminution of his Majesty he might according to his gracious Promise thus acknowledg them 2. For he had prepared for them a City These words may seem to give a Reason why they sought a heavenly Country And why Because God had prepared it for them Or they may prove that God was their God in that eminent manner from this Preparation of a City for them Or they may manifest That God was not ashamed to be called their God and he did manifest this in that he had prepared a City for them Here we have 1. A City 2. The Preparation of it 3. The Preparation of it for them 1. This City is that which hath Foundations that better and heavenly Country spoken of before and it signifies not only a Place but an Estate The Place is excellent and the Estate glorious and both everlasting 2. God prepared For he loved them so much as he decreed to give Christ for them that by his precious Blood he might purchase and acquire a Title unto it He promised to send him into the World for that end and sent him He makes a Covenant with them and binds himself upon condition of Faith in his only begotten to give them this City He works Faith in their hearts gives them a Title and by sanctifying them prepares them for the possession and enjoyment As for the estate it was ready in his Power from everlasting and as for the place it was finished and furnished from the Creation It was God who inwardly moved by his own goodness and most free Love hath done all this for God hath prepared and made it ready before they be ready for the Possesssion 3. He prepared this City for them not as deserving it but as through the Power of his Grace desiring seeking looking for it for it was never prepared for Unbelievers and such as loving the World do not prize it or long for it For though this Preparation be a Work of his free and abundant Mercy yet it 's tempered and limited by his Justice which will not suffer him to give such holy things to Dogs nor cast such Pearls before Swine and by this Preparation of this City for them and not for others not rightly qualified he signifies his Love to heavenly vertues and his
dear Affection to them who are enriched with them So that sinful Men may hope for this City yet upon condition that they will be Pilgrims and Strangers in this World and desire above all other things this better and heavenly Country For to clear this Doctrine more fully we must observe That the World morally and spiritually considered is divided into two Societies the one is of the Devil the other of God This distinction the learned Father took notice of when he wrote his excellent Treatise De Civitate Dei For all men either seek their Rest and Happiness on Earth or an eternal Peace in Heaven and by Nature till God transplant us we are not only in but of this earthly Society and in the Kingdom of Darkness and under the Power and Dominion of Satan and whilest we are in this Kingdom of Satan we are Strangers to the Common-wealth and City of God But when God out of his unspeakable Mercy hath called us made us meet to be partakers of the Inheritance of the Saints in Light and delivered us from the Power of Darkness and hath translated us into the Kingdom of his dear Son Colos. 1. 12. 13. Then we are no more Strangers and Forreigners but Fellow-Citizens with the Saints and of the Houshold of God Ephes. 2. 19. Being once naturalized and made Burgesses of Heaven we have our Conversation in Heaven and carry our selves as Children of a Celestial extraction and the Progeny of the eternal King This Doctrine doth not only inform us of our Duty but ministreth unspeakable Comfort if we do perform it For if our Goods and earthly Estates be sequestred plundred oâ— any wayes taken from us we have a better Estate in Heaven If we be disgraced and reproached in this World yet we shall be Kings and Priests and for ever honoured in Heaven If we be banished and persecuted from place to place so that we can find no Rest and Safety but are wearied out with Removals yet we have a place of Rest and Safety and eternal Abode in Heaven and of this no man can dispossess and diffeisin us If our Sufferings be grievous many and continue long yet we have a City where is no Suffering Pain Persecution Poverty Sorrow where God will wipe away all Tears In this City are eternal Riches Pleasures Honours Peace Safety and full Joy there is nothing wanting which the heart of Man can desire This is that City which as it is the expectation so it 's the universal Comfort of the Sons of God And though the time of our Pilgrimage seem long and tedious yet it will shortly expire and then begins our everlasting Rest for God hath prepared a City for us § 17. The Apostle proceeds in proposing Abraham unto us as a Pattern of Imitation and instanceth in a fourth Work or Effect of his Faith for thus we read Ver. 17. By Faith Abraham when he was tryed offered up Isaac and he that had received the Promises offered his only begotten Son Ver. 18. Of whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called Ver. 19. Accounting that God was able to raise him up even from the dead from whence also he received him in a Figure IN these words we may observe 1. Abraham's Obedience 2. His Faith whereby he performed this Obedience In this Obedience we have A Description of the Party obeying Act of Obedience 1. The Party obedient who was Abraham is described in reference to this Act of Obedience 1. As tempted 2. As having received the Promises 3. As one to whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called 1. He was tempted or tried The party tempting or trying him was God not that God tempts any Man to Sin but that he would try and manifest unto Abraham himself his Faith and Love to God that so he might be a rare Example in both to all future Generations who should be informed of it The means whereby he tryed him was by giving him this singular and extraordinary Command of sacrificing his Son Isaac This Command we read of in the Books of Moses and this it is Take now thy Son thine only Son Isaac whom thou lovest and go thou to the Land of Moriah and offer him there upon one of the Mountains which I will tell thee of Gen. 22. 2. The End of this Command was to try whether Abraham loved God or his Son Isaac more The Effect of it was an Obligation of Abraâ—â— to perform this Service and to offer his Son Neither in this was God's preceptive Will contrary to his decretive Will for the decretive Will binds God absolutely to do that which he hath decreed and is indispensable but the preceptive Will bound only Abraham to do this yet so that God reserved a Power to dispense with him and to hinder the Performance And this was fulfilled instantly upon the signifying of his Will unto Abraham who instantly upon the Knowledg thereof was bound whether he did or did it not There was no decretive Will of God or Intention that Isaac should be slain and offered This Command was just and no wayes contrary to that other Command of God Thou shalt not kill for though it 's true that it is unjust and contrary to that Law for any Man to take away the life of a party innocent not guilty of any Capital Crime which is the thing there forbidden yet it is just and God may justly command Man to take away the Life of such an innocent Person And the reason hereof is not only this that that Law did not bind God but only Man but because he is the Supream Lord and hath absolute Power of Life and Death which no Creature hath or can have Again he could restore Life taken away which Abraham could not do nay it was above all created Power So that the Reason whereby God in this Command is freed from all Injustice is taken à Potestate Potentia Dei for his Power was absolute and supream and his strength was Almighty 2. Abraham had received the Promises of the Land of Canaan of a numerous Posterity sufficient to inhabit it of Christ in whom all Nations should be blessed 3. He was fully assured by God that in Isaac who was the Son of Promise all these Promises should be fulfilled For God had excluded Ismael and that peremptorily and had several times expresly signified that in Isaac and his Posterity and in none else these Promises should be accomplished Neither need we here trouble our selves about the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it may be turned to whom that is to Abraham or of whom that is of Isaac it was said c. This was the Description of the Party obeying The Act of Obedience was this that he offered up Isaac he offered up his only begotten Son that Son of whom it was said In Isaac shall thy Seed be called The Sacrifice commanded as commanded was bloody and required the Death and
no Son to be a Son So he was called is that he was chosen and adopted which kind of Filiation is accounted good in Law by the Consent of Nations Yet there is another thing which may be signified by this word called that is he was not only so called by her but so accounted called honoured by others God had made her an Instrument not only of his Preservation but his excellent Education Honour and high Advancement 3. Yet he refused to be called her Son It 's not meant that he was base and unthankful as not acknowledging her tender Compassion towards him when he was ready to perish or her singular Love to him and special care of him manifested in his Education and Advancement No doubt he did account her as his best friend under Heaven and his greatest Benefactrix under God and he did give her all Respect and Honour due unto her as his Mother His own natural Mother might have been willing but was no wayes able to do so much for him This Refusal therefore was no unworthy Incivility Disrespect or base Ingratitude but a free and noble Act of his divine and sanctified Soul whereby he being illuminated from Heaven did see the baseness uncertainty and danger of that great Estate of Honour Wealth Power and rare Contents of the World and did judge the Enjoyment of it if not inconsistent with yet prejudicial to his spiritual and eternal Happiness And upon this account he was willing to part with them for a better end and a great good Whilest we are seeking the eternal Bliss of Heavens Kingdom we must be willing to part with and forsake all things even the most delicious and glorious though we affect them much In this Case we must not only forsake Sin but such things which at other times upon other occasions we may justly love and lawfully enjoy Isaac must be sacrificed if God command it and Christ himself for a time must lay aside his Glory if it be the Will of God that he should sacrifice himself upon the Cross Whosoever loves not Jesus Christ above all more than his Life more than himself he cannot be Christ's Disciple nor expect Salvation and eternal Life by him This was not the Spirit of the World for most men will rather refuse to be called the Sons of God that they might be the Sons of Pharoah's Daughter and advanced in Princes Courts than refuse to be called Pharoah's Sons that they might be the Disciples of Christ and Sons of God Man devoid of Grace and heavenly Wisdom is strongly bent and strongly inclined to the Glory Honour Wealth and Delights of this World they seem so glorious and taste so sweet that they much take the Soul they promise some rare Content and perfect Happiness Therefore men seek and pursue them eagerly hoping and expecting much from them and if they once are possessed of them and enjoy them Oh! How unwilling are they to part with them They prefer them before Heaven and the eternal felicity thereof The young man who so much desired to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven and yet refused to receive it upon our blessed Saviour's terms is an Example universally to be remembred and considered for it plainly tells us that to part them and the heart of Man once strongly affected with them is impossible to any created Power and only possible to the Almighty Power of God Hence it doth appear how highly elevated and how excellently qualified the Soul of Moses was who could so fully and freely refuse to be called the Son of Pharoah's Daughter This perhaps was not done without some great Conflict the issue whereof was a clear and glorious Victory 4. This mighty turn and change was made in Moses when he came to years of Age. The distinct and particular Year of his Age when he made this Refusal is not mentioned As for Instruction or Example for any such heavenly vertue it was not likely he should find any such thing in the Court of an Heathen Prince It might be that he might have some concealed Converse with his Parents or his Brethren in whom that Heavenly aspiring Spirit which was in Abraham Isaac Jacob might remain These might inform him of some divine and saving Truths and of that Seed in whom all Nations should be blessed yet in the midst of so many Temptations these could work little upon him Therefore it is to be presumed that as Abraham so he was Partaker of the heavenly Call and this did enable him to make this noble Resolution Howsoever it was with him yet we are born and bred up in the Church upon whom the Light of the Gospel doth continuallp shine and at the door of whose hearts Christ stands continually knocking should learn this Lesson betimes We having so many helps and means of Conversion should consecrate our tender years and much more the slower and time of our riper dayes unto God But wo unto us because we will not know the day of Visitation and the things which belong unto eternal Peace we are worse than the Ox that knows his Owner and the Ass which knows his Master's Crib than the Turtle the Swallow and the Crane which know their times and yet we do not know our God we do not know our Saviour § 24. This was his Self-Denial after which the Apostle informs us of his bearing the Cross Where we must consider 1. His Choice 2. The Ground of it 1. His Choice was rare and wonderful for he chose the Cross Two things indeed were proposed unto him 1. The Suffering of Affliction with God's People 2. The Enjoyment of the pleasures of Sin for a season The one was sweet and in present Possession the other bitter Yet if we consider the Society and Company with whom he must suffer they were the People of God but the other were cursed profane Wretches So that if he look at the Company the Choice was easily made yet if he compare Afflictions and present Sufferings with present pleasures and the Enjoyment of them it would prove very difficult to forsake the sweet and pitch upon the bitter And here we must observe 1. That Self-Denial and bearing the Cross do go together 2. That to refuse to be called the Son of Pharoah's Daughter and to for sake the Enjoyment of the pleasures of Sin and the Riches of Aegypt were the same and he that refuseth the one must forsake the other The matter will be more plain if we reduce this Text to Propositions in this manner 1. God's People suffered Afflictions 2. He was willing to suffer with them 3. He was willing rather to suffer with them than to enjoy the pleasures of Sin for a season 1. By People of God in this place may be understood the Israelites who at that time were the only Nation in Covenant with God and were his People in a special manner and then under grievous Afflictions by reason of the Cruelty of the Aegyptian King Yet this
find this to be so § 9. Because the Faith and Doctrine of Jesus Christ taught by the Apostles is as Christ himself the same yesterday to day and for ever therefore the Apostle dehorteth them thus Ver. 9. Be not carried about with divers and strange Doctrines for it is a good thing that the heart be established with Grace and not with meats which have not profited them which have been occupied therein THese words are a Dehortation and in it we may consider 1. The Sin dehorted from 2. The reason why they should take heed of it 1. The Sin is to be carried about with divers and strange Doctrines Doctrines divers and strange are all such as are different from the Gospel which is a Doctrine of perpetual and immutable truth and alwayes uniform the same Therefore the word divers may signify such as are different from it and different amongst themselves as all false and heretical Doctrines are though the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies new or absurd and such all errors in Religion are They are new because invented and vented after the Truth was revealed and absurd because all such are irrational and many of them very gross They are also strange as having not the same Original with the Truth which was revealed from Heaven and of another stamp and quality By these some think he means Judaism and Philosophy and the Errors and Superstitions of the Morinthians and Cerinthians who attempted to make up one Body of Religion by joyning Judaism and Christianism together yet not only these but all other Heresies whatsoever are here intended They must not be carried away or about with these this is the Duty The Metaphor seems to be taken from Wethercocks or Ships which turn every way as the Wind carries them to be so carried about implies that they turn from the truth of the Gospel believe these false Doctrines and so are deceived as the word in the Original may signify and it signifies the inconstancy of such as receive them as not being firm and fixed in the saving Truth For if we once turn away from that we fall first into one Error then into another and are first of one Sect after that of another and can settle no where We have had sad experience of this in our times wherein many forsaking their Orthodox Teachers and the antient and apostolical Doctrine turned Anabaptists Seekers Quakers and men above the Ordinances of Scripture Sacraments Sabbaths Such we must not be not so erroneous heretical unstable This Text agrees with many others as Rom. 16. 17. Ephes. 4. 14. Colos. 2. 8 16. and many more noted by Curcellaâ—s Great is our frailty in this particular because of the imperfection of our Understanding the corruption of our Hearts the subtilty of the Devil and Seducers therefore let us he well informed in the Truth endeavour to live according to the Truth certainly known pray for the Spirit of Truth to guide us For it is not wit or learning without the Grace of God can preserve us from these Doctrines which carry us away from Christ and cause us to wander in by-wayes that lead our Souls into Destruction 2. The reason is 1. Because the Doctrine of the Gospel can save us 2. These strange Doctrines cannot promote our Salvation it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For 1. It 's good the heart be established with Grace not with Meats By Grace may understand the Truth and the Truth of the Gospel so it 's taken Tit. 2. 11. And it 's called Grace because it 's the Word or Doctrine of Grace Act. 20. 24 32. which manifests the Grace of God in Christ and the Knowledg and Love of it is a Grace and Mercy of God To have the heart established therewith is to understand it believe it be affected with it so as to adhere unto it and make it our care in seeking eternal Life And then the heart is thus established with it when the Spirit of God writes it in our hearts so that we know it more clearly and are effectually moved to follow and practise it It must be deeply imprinted in our hearts and our hearts must be firmly fixt in it And this is good and profitable for Sanctification and Salvation but meats are not so By Meats is understood the Doctrine of Meats and by Doctrine of Meats may be meant Doctrine of Ceremonies such we find in the Books of Moses yet all abolished by the Gospel The Jews were perswaded that they were sanctified by the observation of Mosaical Ceremonies and the Traditions of their Elders This also was the perswasion of all Superstitious Wretches whether Heathens or Hereticks For Meats may here signify not only false Doctrines and Ceremonial Observations of the Jews but also all other various strange and different Opinions and Superstitions of all others whose hearts were not stablished by Grace And though men's hearts be never so pertinaciously fixed in them yet they could not advance their Salvation For it followeth which have not profited such as were occupied or as the Greek word signifies walked therein To walk in them is to profess and in their practise constantly to observe them Not to profit them is not to sanctify justify them or make them acceptable to God For that is truly profitable in this kind which makes a man more holy brings him nearer unto God and renders him more capable of eternal Life The sum is they must take heed of all false Doctrines and adhere to the truth of the Gospel And the reason is 1. Because establishment in the truth of the Gospel is good and certainly conduceth to eternal Life 2. The belief profession practice of any other Doctrine is not so cannot further our happiness § 10. There is another reason why they must not return to Judaism or any other Doctrine different from the Gospel For Ver. 10. We have an Altar whereof they have no right to eat which serve the Tabernacle IN these words we have 1. A benefit or priviledg 2. A right unto it granted unto Christians denied unto Jews and others The Propositions are two 1. We have an Altar 1 2. They who serve the Tabernacle have no right to eat of it 1. Altar here is the Priest or Sacrifice offered upon and sanctified by the Altar The Sacrifice is that of Christ's Body slain and offered by the eternal Spirit without spot unto God To have this is to have a right unto it so as to eat and be partakers of it The expression and phrase is Legal and Levitical For in the Law there were certain Sacrifices whereof part was given and offered to God part was given to the Priests to eat thereof part was allowed to the People which brought the Sacrifice and they might eat thereof before the Lord in the Tabernacle or the Temple The same Custom many of the Gentiles had To this the Apostle doth allude and doth imply that the Body of Christ was slain and offered unto
is a Sacrifice of Praise and Thanks-giving 2. This Praise is the fruit of our Lips and so is Thanks-giving 3. This Sacrifice of Praise must be offered unto God with Thanks-giving to his Name 4. This Sacrifice must be offered by Christ. 5. It must be offered continually 1. There is a Sacrifice of Praise for there is Praise and this Praise is a Sacrifice Praise as it 's a Duty to be performed to God 1. Hath for Object some divine Vertues and Perfections and the same manifested unto us by his Word or Works or both and also apprehended by us 2. It is an Acknowledgment of these Perfections as proper unto God as most glorious and excellent in respect of them 3. Some outward Expression of this Acknowledgment as by word of Mouth or some other way 2. This Praise is a Sacrifice because to be offered to God of which hereafter 2. This Praise is the fruit of our Lips because by our words which issue from the heart we express our inward thoughts and high Apprehensions of the same Therefore our Tongue in Hebrew is said to be our Glory and the Reason given by some is not only this that by our Speech and Language we excel irrational Creatures but because it was given us to praise and glorify God And as our Understanding is given us to think of God and to know him so our Speech was given us to speak of God and declare his wondrous Works and his excellent Perfections manifested therein In this respect Praise is said to be a speaking well of the person or thing to be praised This Expression is made either in private or publick and the publick is the principal It is made either in our Prayers in our singing of Psalms Hymns and spiritual Songs wherein the Voice is louder sweeter and melodious which is called Vocal Musick sometimes joyned with that which is called Instrumental The Reason why in Assemblies we use this Vocal Praise is to inform others and stirr them up to praise God joyntly with us Thanks-giving also is the Fruit of our Lips wherein we use our Voice as in Praise and sometimes Praise and Thanks-giving are the same therefore the word here used signifies Confession which presupposing our inward Acknowledgment is an outward Declaration of the same Yet Thanks-giving strictly taken is different from Praise for the object of it is the works of God as beneficial to us and manifesting his mercy love and kindness and the act of it is an acknowledgment of his love mercy and kindness and an expression of the same And this is also a Fruit of our Lips as well as Praise and is signified outwardly for the same Reasons for which the inward Acknowledgment of Praise is expressed This Phrase Fruit of our Lips is taken out of the Prophets as Isa. 57. 19. but especially Hosea 14. 2. where the word Calves is turned by the Septuagint Fruit. 3. This Sacrifice of Praise and Thanks-giving must be offered to God and to his Name A Sacrifice is sometimes taken largely for an Oblation or Offering and in this sense a Sacrifice is an Offering of something to God as Supream Lord. Praise therefore and so Thanksgiving being something offered to God as Supream may be said to be a Sacrifice which is proper to a Deity Praise is due to Him as Supream in some Perfections Thanks as to the Supream Benefactor and Fountain of all Goodness Blessings Mercies These are due to him as he is Supream and we are bound to offer these by vertue of the first Commandment which requireth Love Fear Praise Thanks-giving Honour and other Duties to be performed to Him alone as Supream in the highest degree The Reason why the Authour mentions Sacrifice may be this Because all Religions require Sacrifices to be offered to a God whether true or imaginary and God required in the Law several kinds of Sacrifices both Ilastical and Eucharistical to be offered unto him and these Hebrews might say What is the Law of Moses so abrogated that all Sacrifices and Offerings to God are taken away Hath Christian Religion no such thing Is it singular in this particular To this the Apostle answers that indeed all Sacrifices of Bullocks Goats Lambs Rams which were carnal are taken away yet there are more excellent Sacrifices which are moral and spiritual of which praise and thanksgiving are not the least to be offered unto God as Supreme Lord. For you are an holy Priest-hood to offer up spiritual Sacrifices c. 1 Pet. 2. 5. Where it 's expresly signified 1. That there must be Sacrifices in the Christian Religion and Worship Yet 2. These Sacrifices must not be carnal but spiritual And under the Law God required the Sacrifice of Thanksgiving more then the Blood of Bulls and Goats Psal. 50. 14. and the Knowledg of God and mercy more then those Legal Sacrifices of Beasts Hos. 6. 6. and the Sacrifices of a broken Spirit of a broken and contrite heart Psal. 51. 17. This Sacrifice of praise was and is most solemnly to be offered in the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ for that inestimable blessing of Redemption by that great Sacrifice offered upon the Cross. Therefore that Sacrament was called the Eucharist or Thanksgiving and a Commemoration of Christ's Death And this might be the reason why the Antients so often called it a Sacrifice to signify that neither the Heathens nor Jews had any reason to upbraid them with the want or neglect of Sacrifice It must be offered unto God and God alone as Supreme and to his Name where by Name may be signified either his Majesty and Supremacy and it is the same with offering unto God or it may signify his Glory and then the meaning is that it must be offered to him to manifest his Glory and to ascribe all Glory Honour excellency and Perfection unto him 4. This Sacrifice must be offered by Christ. By Christ that is by Faith in Christ 1. As having propitiated God by his Blood and made his Throne accessible For by him we have access by Faith into this Grace wherein we stand Rom. 5. 2. Through him we have access by one Spirit to the Father Eph. 2. 18. And in him we have boldness and access with confidence by Faith of him Col. 3. 12. For how should sinful guilty man dare to approach into his presence of an holy and just Lord if satisfaction be not made first unto Divine Justice offended by Sin 2. By Faith in him as having merited God's favour and acceptance of our Services for without this Merit we are unworthy to enter into his presence and our best Services considered in themselves without his merit are not acceptable 3. By him as our Mediatour and Intercessour for he is our Advocate with the Father 1 Joh. 2. 1. As no man under the Law could offer his Sacrifice unto God but by the Priest so under the Gospel no man can offer his Prayers Praises Alms or any other
to submit our selves The parties who must perform this Duty are Christian People as having Rules over them they are the Flock under their Shepheards Subjects under their Governours The parties to whom the Duty must be performed are such as have the Rule over them who before were called Guides which taught unto them the Word of God and here such as watch over their Souls All this implies that they are Superiors Governours Officers and to distinguish them from Civil Magistrates they are said to be trusted with men's Souls not their Bodies and Estates these are Officers in the Church whether extraordinary or ordinary of what order ranck or quality soever if instituted by Christ yet ordinary are here chiefly meant These are called Ministers of the Gospel Elders Pastors Teachers Their work chiefly is in Word Prayer administration of the Sacraments These most be fitly qualified for knowledg life utterance and approved by such as being sufficient to judg of them are appointed by the Church for that work They should be such as against whom no exception can justy be taken And this is said to be their Vocation upon which usually follows Ordination by Imposition of hands a certain form of words and prayer These are acts of the Church designing and engaging fit persons but their power is from Christ All this is to be understood of ordinary Pastors These are the persons to whom the Duty is to be performed The duty is Obedience and Subjection Obedience presupposeth Commands and subjection Power The Commands must be done the Power must be acknowledged The Power is spiritual and from God for they are made Overseers of the Church by the Holy Ghost Act. 20. 28. And it 's so great that Christ plainly affirms That whosoever heareth and receiveth them heareth and receiveth Christ and God who sent Christ and he that despiseth them despiseth Christ and God who sent him Matth. 10. 40. Luke 10. 16. And this is true not only of the Apostles but of their Successors Yet this presupposeth that they do all things in their place according to their Commission from Christ and in his Name exercising their Power according to his Command 2. The Reasons are taken 1. From their Work 2. From their Account 1. Their work is to watch over their Souls and here we must take notice 1. That the subject of their work are mens Souls and the Soul is the principal and more noble part of man and here it 's to be considered as immortal and capable of an eternal estate of felicity or misery And here they are considered as in great danger of eternal punishment and the work of the Minister must be to prevent it so far as he can This is done by watching which is a Metaphor taken from a Shepheard or a Scout or Sentinel And whatsoever the one should do for his Sheep and the other for his Country to save and preserve them this he must do for the Salvation of mens Soul For mens Souls are as Sheep without a Shepheard wandring in the wayes of Sin in danger of Satan Hell and Death dâ—stâ—â—ute of all necessary saving Blessings and all power either to direct or protect themselves And this Watching includes many works as instruction of the Ignorant reproof of the Guilty threatening the Stubborn strengthening the Weak comforting the Sorrowful directing all giving good example to all encouraging all praying for all To Watch is to do the whole work of the Ministry for Doctrine and Worship in the right dispensation of the Word and Sacraments Some understand by these Guides and Rulers all other Officers and Governours of the Church for Discipline but these may be other besides Ministers which are here principally intended Seeing these watch and that over their Souls and for their eternal Salvation to prevent their damnation they should be considered as most necessary of all other men and should be esteemed highly in love for their works sake People do little consider how great a blessing from God and happiness to Man good and faithful Ministers are but if they once find the power of their Doctrine and the comfort of the Spirit they prize them as Messengers and Angels sent from Heaven out of great mercy for their eternal good Yet the best are most hated of the Devil despised by Men reviled persecuted and sometimes martyred Yet we must not think this any strange thing seeing they called Christ Beelzebub and counted the Apostles the filth of the World and the off-scouring of all things But the insufficiency and infidelity of vicious lazy ambitious covetous Wretches though it may give some occasion of contempt cannot excuse the wickedness of the World in this particular 2. As Watching over mens Souls is the first reason so the second is taken from their Account which may be good or bad in respect of the Ministers or the People committed to their Charge where it 's to be observed that it may be good in respect of the Minister who hath been faithful and yet bad in respect of the People who have been disobedient Yet here the account is chiefly considered with reference to the People And it is two-fold 1. Good and made with joy which is profitable 2. Bad and made with grief which is unprofitable to the People This implies that Ministers as they receive power from Christ so they receive Mandates with Instructions and are deeply charged and wo unto Paul if he preach not the Gospel For such will be guilty not only of their own sins but of the Blood and Damnation of the Peoples Souls this is an heavy Charge This implies they are Stewards and the Flock is not their own but Christ's who trusted them in their hands and will call them to account and as they prove faithful or unfaithful so he will deal with them and punish or reward them more then other men and surely if we did remember this Account or loved Christ we would feed his Flock which cost him so dear even his own Life and Blood And the People should consider the expence of Christ's Blood the charge the study the pains the prayers of their faithful Ministers and this consideration should work much upon them and perswade them to obedience and submission because the performance of the Duty will end in the Ministers joy and their profit For as it is a great grief to their Guides to see the People impenitent and all their labour lost in respect of them so it is a matter of great joy to see them converted and brought into an estate of Salvation so that they can say These Souls I have gained and saved from Hell and can present them blameless as washed in the Blood of Christ before the Judgment-seat of God And as it is a joy to their Pastors so it is a profit and great advantage unto them for their joy shall end in the Peoples Salvation who will bless the Day that ever they hearkened to them and in receiving them received
it self both will and deed are from him because he makes us of unwilling willing and causeth us actually to do that which we do 2. That we cannot obtain any mercy of God but by Christ nor do any Good pleasing to God but by him For without me saith Christ ye can do nothing This Petition is reducible to that in the Lord's Prayer Thy will be done on Earth as it is done in Heaven The Doxology followeth To whom be Glory for ever and ever This presupposeth 1. God's glorious and excellent perfections for he is glorious for ever in himself 2. The manifestation of these glorious and excellent perfections 3. The acknowledgment of this glory manifested in his works unto him so as to ascribe praise honour thanks unto him as due 4. The ascribing of it to him as due for ever and ever This may be understood by that of the Apocalyptist Thou art worthy O Lord to receive Glory Honour and Power for thou hast created all things and for thy Will and pleasure they are and were created Rev. 4. 11. Where we may observe 1. That God did manifest his excellency and perfections by his glorious works 2. That in this respect Glory Honour and Power was due unto him and deserved by him for he was worthy to receive it both from Men and Angels 3. This they acknowledg and by their acknowledgment return and give them unto him And here this Glory may be understood as given unto him for that great and blessed Work of raising Christ and making him the great Shepheard of the Sheep for their eternal Salvation As when we depart out of the presence of Kings and great Ones we bow and bless them so when we have made our Prayers and presented our Petitions to the great Soveraigh of Heaven and Earth we do not abruptly and rudely turn our backs and so depart but in all humility bless and glorify his Name and acknowledg him worthy of eternal praise This is one of the Ceremonies used in the Court of Heaven The Petition presented is sealed up with Amen which is to be understood as added not only to the Petition but the Doxology it 's the conclusion of the whole and seems to request that God would subscribe his Fiat to our Petitions and so seal up and confirm our Prayer We find it used in the Old Testament to signify our consent with others in what they had said or pray'd and so it 's implyed it should be used under the Gospel 1 Cor. 14. 16. It 's a word of Faith and Hope as Prayer is an Act of both and though our Prayer be long yet it 's an Abridgment and contains the substance of all and repeats and in one word prayes the whole prayer over again § 19. The third part of the Close is a kind of Exhortation or entreaty Ver. 22. And I beseech you Brethren suffer the Word of Exhortation for I have written a Letter unto you in few words IN these words we have two Propositions 1. Paul had written unto them in a few words 2. He beseecheth or entreates them to suffer the Word of Exhortation which he had written in a few words unto them 1. That which he had written and sent unto them in writing was this Epistle and it 's the largest Epistle of all the Epistles general of James Peter John and Jude and of Paul's except two that to the Romans and the first to the Corinthians Yet he terms it brief and if we consider the hortatory part it is but brief though the whole be somewhat large If we consider the matter and subject it required a very large Discourse yet he comprised much matter concerning the Offices of Christ both prophetical and facerdotal in a few words For we find that he omits many things not only because of their incapacity but because he had confined himself to such things as were most pertinent necessary and of greatest concernment And by this his practice he seems to condemn all such as unnecessarily enlarge their Discourses upon a certain distinct subject by impertinent needless and sometimes empty and unprofitable Digressions as many of copious Inventions and yet of no solid Judgment use to do 2. Because his Discourse was brief and contracted and not likely either to oppress their Memory or confound their Judgment he beseecheth them as Brethren for that 's his loving Compellation to suffer it He calls it a word of Exhortation By a Word is meant an orderly solid and Methodical Discourse and by a Word of Exhortation may be understood a Discourse of Comfort as the Vulgar Syriack Arabick turn the word or of Reproof Instruction Admonition For the word may imply if not directly signify all for Sermons and whole Discourses had the Name of Exhortation though we find in them many other things Howsoever the Apostle meant by the word the whole Epistle which in respect of the last part from Chap. 10. 19. is chiefly hortative and consolatory They must suffer this so our Translators and some others turn the word which gave occasion to some to tell us that Paul was more offensive to the Hebrews than any other of the Apostles because they were so much taken with the Law and Ceremonies to which they had been so long accustomed and therefore he both conceals his Name and desires them to bear with this Discourse and not to be offended with it But whether this was so or no it 's certain that the word here used signifies not only to suffer and tolerate but to receive hear and obey and so certainly it must be taken here For if they did not thus receive his Doctrine and Exhortation with Attention and Obedience the Epistle had been in vain and unprofitable unto them And whereas he might have commanded them as Inferiours and subject to his Apostolical Power yet in his Wisdom he thought good to entreat them as Brethren And this might the rather perswade them because his Discourse was brief and contained much profitable and necessary matter in a few words This implies 1. That it is our Duty to receive the Word of God readily and with all Attention and with Thankfulness of heart because it 's so great a Blessing 2. Yet such is our Corruption and depraved disposition that a short Discourse though full of heavenly matter is tedious to us and we are soon weary of it But profane and wicked Persons will not endure it § 20. The fourth thing is Information concerning Timothy Ver. 23. Know ye that our Brother Timothy it set at liberty with whom if he come shortly I will see you THis was Intelligence and good News the Subject of it was Timothy and himself Of Timothy he delivers 1. That he was set at Liberty 2. Gives some hope that he would come shortly Of himself he promiseth upon condition of Timothy's speedy coming to them that he would 1. Come with him 2. See them so that there was some hope that they might see both him
and Timothy together and enjoy their blessed Society 1. Timothy was set at Libetry Who this Timothy was both by Birth Education Office and Employment we we may easily understand from the Acts of the Apostles Paul's Epistles and especially from two written and directed to him in particular He was a Jew by his Mother a Christian by Paul's Conversion of him a Minister of the Gospel an Evangelist and an Assistant unto Paul in the Work of the Ministry and though he was but young yet he was eminent and famous in the Churches planted by Paul a Person of Integrity and Fidelity This Timothy was set at Liberty which implies that he was bound imprisoned or some wayes restrained of his Liberty but where and how is not expressed in Scripture Yet now he was set at Liberty God had delivered him out of the hands of his Enemies and they must know it as a matter of Joy and Comfort It was a sad thing that such a Man as Timothy so faithful so serviceable to Paul and the Church of God should be restrained and he knew that to hear and have certain Intelligence and from him that he was released must needs comfort and rejoice their hearts So also we when we hear of the Liberty and Peace of the Church and especially of pious and eminent Ministers should be glad and should render Thanks unto our God for so great a Mercy 2. Yet there was a further degree of Comfort for he gives them hope that as Timothy was ser at Liberty so he would come unto them shortly and would see them and give them a Visit in his own Person And not only Timothy but he himself would come with him and see them together with him that they might mutually comfort and rejoice one another and this Meeting and Society would be sweer To hear of their Liberty was good News but to be certified of their speedy coming together to see them was better God's Servants cannot alwayes converse together on Earth that Happiness is reserved for Heaven yet their hearts do rise and much rejoyce when they can see and enjoy one anther though but for a time § 21. The fifth part of the Close of this Letter is spent in Salutations Ver. 24. Salute all them that have the Rule even you and all the Saints They of Italy salute you THE Saulutations are 1. Of Paul 2. Of them of Italy For Paul and they of Italy were the Persons saluting and their Guides and the rest of the Saints were the Persons saluted True and hearty Salutations are an Expression of our Love and good Affection towards the Persons saluted and they are either of Persons present or absent When we salute Persons present we express our Affection by words of Peace Health Happiness and by Embracements or Kisses or both according to the Custom of the Time and Places But when Friends are absent we signify our good desires by Writing or words of Messengers and so embrace one another at a Distance There are some who are not capable of Salutation to whom we must not say God speed 2 Joh. 10. Some are capable but not of a Christian Salutation because not capable of spiritual Grace and Peace in Christ Yet these Salutations are Christian 1. From Paul a Christian to the Hebrews Christians 2. From the Saints and Christians of Italy to the Saints and believing Hebrews Paul is the first in sending Salutations the Persons by him saluted are 1. Their Guides or Ministers put in the first place because of their Office and Eminency 2. The People which by Profession of Faith in Christ their Baptism and Society with the Church were Saints The Persons saluting in the second place and that by Paul were they of Italy that is their Brethren Saints and Believers in Italy and of the Church of Churches in Italy the Persons saluted are the same saluted before To salute anciently amongst the Jews and Israelites was to wish Peace under the Gospel Grace and Peace The Syriack turns these words Desire ye the Peace of your Guides c. but he is singular These Salutations though good in themselvs are much abused and made words of Course and Custom or turned into Complements devoid of reall and hearty Love § 22. The last part of the Conclusion is a Benediction in these few words Ver. 25. Grace be with you all Amen THis is so a Salutation as that it is a Benediction pronounced with Apostolical Power and was effectual upon all such as are capable This is a Benediction proper to Paul and usually if not alwayes written with his own hand which then was well known in many Churches though the Epistle it self might be written by some other whom he used for his Scribe It is so proper unto him that we find it used by none other of the Apostles neither James nor John nor Peter nor Jude Only John doth conclude and shut up the Revelation with it but that was not written with Paul's own hand And by this in those times this Epistle might certainly be known to be his We use to salute one another at our first Meeting and also at our Parting which latter is called a Valediction So Paul in all his Epistles excepting this begins with Grace and Peace and that 's his Salutation and he ends this as all the rest with Grace and this is his Valediction and Benediction This Benediction we find sometimes briefer sometimes larger and the largest of all closeth up the second Epistle to the Corinthians and we must know that the briefest contains all the matter of the largest though not expresly The usual Blessing both of old and of latter times is The Lord be with you For if the Lord be not against us but for us and with us we must needs be so far happy yet the Lord may be with us and in Mercy many wayes but to be with us in the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ is the highest and happiest degree of God's presence tending to our eternal Bliss Therefore the Apostle's Blessing is The Lord be with you all greater Blessing than this there cannot be By Lord is meant Jesus Christ our God-Redeemer whom the Father out of greatest Love sent to save us in whom and by whom we receive all spiritual Blessings which are signified by Grace which presupposeth here the Love of the Father the Redemption by Christ and the Communion of the Spirit the Effects of all which in us is Remission Reconciliation Adoption Sanctification heavenly Joy and Comfort For this Grace is sufficient to make us in time though by degrees fully and for ever happy And by Grace here is meant the continuance encrease and perfection of Grace This Grace he desired prayed for and pronounced upon them all as Believers for none but such are capable of it Amen is added to Petitions Doxologies Confessions and Benedictions as here it is to confirm his Benediction and to seal it up unto them The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ be blessed for ever FINIS * Though the principal subject be the prophetical and sacerdotal office yet there is mention made several times of his Regal excellency b I take prophecy in a large sense * 1 Pet. 4. 22. * Beza upon the place Ver. 6 7 8 9 c. Ver. â— * He signifies 1. That the Hebrews had no reason to be offended with the death and humiliatiof Christ. 2. That this humiliation was no hinderance of but a means unto his exaltation and it was so ordered by the wisdom of God for the unspeakable benefit of man who â—ould â—ot he saved but by this being lower then the Angels * There is no need to distinguish between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 between videre â—â—d cernere †It may be a word which suited with the metaphor of a Cup wherein is contained some bitter poâ—ion which torments him who tasts of it Therefore Christ compares his sufferings to such a Cup ' when he saith Let this Cup passe from me Ver. 13. Ver. 14. * Therefore the Sacraments in publick Assemblies were called Exhortations * Many think that Priesthood is of Institution * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * The Aethiopick and Arabick have not the word Imposed Some Copies read not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Voluntas est ambulatoria * For we find the word Megillah taken for a Roll. Ezra 6. 2. Ezek. 2. 9 3 1 2 3. †The Psalmist seems chiefly to intend the Books of Moses which were written before his time * Yet in this the Apostle may allude to the purifications under the Law By Ceremonial understand Typical * 1 Cor. 15. 18. * Conscience may be taken for the Heart and the intention of the Heart
Works because they 1. Signify God's Approbation of the Doctrine 2. Cause men to wonder 3. Are done by a divine and supernatural Power The same words are used 2. Cor. 12. 12. In Signs Wonders mighty Deeds They are said to be divers because they are not onely many of one kind but of several and different kinds as dispossessing of Devils raising the Dead and miraculously healing all kind of Diseases and as they are Works of extraordinary Power and Wisdom so they are of Mercy 2. By Gifts or Distributions of the Holy Ghost according to his own Will So that there were Gifts of the Holy Ghost Distributions of them These according to his Will Gifts of the Holy Ghost were extraordinary Qualities and Powers given such as heard the Apostles Doctrine and believed it as power to heal to speak in strange Languages to prophesy to do Miracles They are said to be Gifts and Effects of the Holy Ghost because they had them not by Nature or Industry or Instruction by Man but from the Power of God-Redeemer and the Spirit of Christ. They are called in the Original distributions or divisions because they were 1. Communicated to divers Persons 2. Were many of different kinds 3. Were given in several degrees They were distributed according to his own Will 1. Freely 2. To whom he will 3. What Gifts he will 4. In what measure he will For there are diversities of Gifts 1. Cor. 12. 4. But all these worketh that one and the self-same Spirit dividing to every man severally as he will Ver. 11. The Effect of these Miracles and Gifts was the confirmation of the Doctrine of the Apostles which they did confirm by Word and Deed For 1. They did most certainly affirm and assert this Doctrine as having heard it immediately of Christ and as having received the immediate Knowledge there of from him 2. They did these Signs Wonders and mighty Deeds and upon the Imposition of their hands Believers received the extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost yet they neither did these Miracles nor gave these Gifts by their own power or holiness But the Works were done and the Graces given by them as Instruments in the Name of Christ as risen and glorified and from God So that the Power of God the merit of Christ their Ministration did all concur to the production of these glorious Effects God was the principal Cause therefore is it said that by these God did bear them witness and attest their Doctrine to be true and from him so that this confirmation was a giving credibility to the Doctrine of the Gospel so far as it was new and delivered the positive truths concerning Jesus of Nazareth dying for our sins rising again sitting at the right hand of God and the dependence of Justification before the Tribunal of God and eternal Glory upon Faith in him making Intercession in Heaven For there was no need thus to confirm the Ceremonials of Moses and the Covenant of God with Israel before Mount Sinai to the Jew For these things he made no doubt of nor was this confirmation needful for to perswade the Gentile of the Equity and Justice of the Morals of the Scripture for the natural light of Reason did approve them These Miracles and Gifts were Proofs very strong and powerful for they were no jugling Impostures or Delusions but real demonstrations of the divine Will and clear to the senses § 7. The Transgression is a neglect of this divine Doctrine thus declared thus confirmed This neglect implies a contempt and is a disobedience to that Law of God-Redeemer by Christ exhibited in not believing and repenting or a positive deâ—ial of this excellent truth in such as never professed it or in Apostates who once received it The punishment is eternal death which can no ways be avoided by the Offenders neglecting this Salvation The force of the Argument is the last and chief thing to be considered To understand this we must observe the Form of the Apostles Argument which is this That sin which makes us liable to grievous and unavoidable punishment must with earnest heed be avoided But to let slip or recede from and neglect the Doctrine of the Gospel is such a Sin Therefore with all earnest heed to be avoided The Apostle in this Argument presupposeth 1. That sin makes liable to Punishment â—ainous sins to grievous punishments some sins to unavoidable punishments For the punishment of some sins are avoidable and the sins whereby we are made obnoxious though committed yet may be remitted Some are not by the tenor of God's Laws remissible 2. That we are made liable to punishment by the divine comminations 3. That the end of Comminations in God's Laws is by representing the penalty as certainly due upon Transgression to restrain us from Transgression and Disobedience For though the Love of God and Righteousness and hatred of Iniquity are the principal Motives to Obedience and Restraints from sin yet the hope of Rewards and fear of Punishments may have great force because we love our selves desire our own peace and happiness and abhor such things as tend to our misery and ruine These things taken for granted make the Proposition good But the doubt might be of the Assumption That neglect of the Doctrine of the Gospel will make us liable to such a grievous unavoidable punishment This he therefore proves thus If Disobedience unto the Law mucâ— more will the Disobedience to the Gospel make us liable to such a Punishment But Disobedience to the Law made the Offenders liable to such a Punishment This the Hebrew and Jew would grant for they knew it but the Proposition onely could be controverted by them Therefore he confirms it from this presupposed in general That greater sins make us obnoxious to greater Punishment but disobedience to the Gospel is the greater Sin And this he proves fully and that from many particulars For this end he proves the Doctrine of the Gospel more excellent than that of the Law more powerfully binding men to receive it and retain it And if it be so then to sin against it is more hainous than to sin against the Law That it is as excellent there could be no doubt for it hath all the excellencies of the Law But that it was more excellent he manifests by four things 1. It was the Doctrine of so great Salvation for such the Law was not It by it self without the Promise could not save eternally and suppose it could yet it was not so full so clear so powerfull and effectually conducing to eternal life 2. It was first spoken by the Lord Christ who is so far above the Angels by whom the Law was given 3. It was confirmed by Miracles far more in number and more glorious 4. Upon the hearing and receiving the Gospel the Believers received many different and extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit which the Hearers of the Law did not For the Apostle saith to the Galathians He therefore that
Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood These words are added to signify that no man of that Tribe had right to officiate as a Priest For before he had said that no man of that Tribe did serve at the Altar but this was but matter of Fact for though none of Judah did serve at the Altar de facto yet some might de jure as having a right to officiate But these prove as none did serve so none could jure justly and lawfully do it For it they could they might prove their title out of the Books of Moses Yet this cannot be done because Moses never wrote of any such thing there is not in all his Books the lest tittle of the right of any of Judah to officiate as a Priest And the rule of the first Constitution of the legal Priest-hood is to be found there and no where else These words imply that a negative argument from the Scripture in matters of Religion is valid For that which is not to be found in the Scriptures truly understood either expresly delivered or by consequence to be deduced cannot be of divine authority so as to bind men to believe it or do it But those arguments which prove a Negative not only from the silence but also from exclusive terms are the strongest And in this particular cause we find Moses not only silent and saying nothing of the Tribe of Judah concerning the Priest-hood but also speaking so positively of the Levitical Priest as that he so confirms him to the Tribe of Levi and the House of Aaron that he peremptorily and clearly excludes all other persons of all other Tribes from that Office And here we may take notice of the wisdom of God which contrived this business so that he made Augustus though he thought of no such thing an Instrument of this evidence For though the Cense and Enrolment was general of all Countries within the Roman Empire whereof Judea was one yet by this he brought Mary to Bethlehem when she was ready to be delivered of Christ that so he might be born there according to the prophesy of Micah and that it might be evident that he was of the linage of David and so of the Tribe of Judah § 21. Hitherto the Apostle hath manifested that the Priest-hood was changed because the Tribe was changed and another Priest was risen of another Tribe But not content with this he proceeds to make this far more evident For so it followeth Ver. 15 16. And it is yet far more evident for that after the Similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another Priest Who is made not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the power of an endless life HEre the Apostle seems to insist upon two words in the Text of the Psalm 1. After the Order or Similitude of Melchisedec 2. A Priest for ever after that Order By both which he is thought to prove the change of the Priest-hood and the Law by the Introduction of a Priest of another Order and a Priest for ever The former proof was evident and sufficient yet this seems to make the change more evident and not only more but far more evident And so the words may be taken as by our Translatours they are turned That this must be understood we may consider 1. What that thing or proposition is which is made far more evident 2. How it is far more evidenced The thing evidenced is the change and abolition of the Levitical Priest-hood and the Law A thing is made evident when it is so clearly represented to the Understanding that if it be rightly disposed it must needs assent unto the truth of it once received as it is represented This evidence may be either immediate from Connexion of the terms distinctly understood or mediately from a third Argument This evidence of this change abolition abrogation is mediate And that argument whereby it 's made so evident is 1. That there must be and then was risen a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec 2. His Priest-hood must be personall and perpetual In the words we may observe two propositions The 1. That another Priest ariseth after the Similitude of Melchisedec The 2. This Priest is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandment but after the power of an endless life In this Proposition you must 1. Remember what hath been said formerly concerning the explication 2. You must note that Order mentioned before and Similitude here are the same and to be a Priest after the Similitude is the same with being a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec so that if Christ be of the same Order then he must be like unto Melchisedec By Order is meant a distinct and different kind of Priest-hood and though Christ's Priest-hood be like both to Aarons and Melchisedec's yet it was far more like unto Melchisedec which was far more exellent then that of Aarons This Order might be the better known if we knew the Law and Covenant whereof he was a Priest which was not only the Law of Nature according to which he did minister and serve the most high God as Creatour and Judge of this World but of the Law of Grace according to which he worshipped God as Redeemer by Christ promised to Abraham Seth Enoch Noah Shem and the rest of the Patriarchs before him who believed in Christ to come yet not as to descend from Abraham Whereas it 's said That another Priest ariseth you must know that his rising is his constitution manifestation and beginning of his Officiation And the rising of him was the fall of the Levitical Priest and the abolition of that Priest-hood The force of this proposition considered as a reason is in this That this other Priest is not only of another Tribe and in particular of Judah but after another Order For it might have been said That though Christ was a Priest of the Tribe of Judah yet he might be after the Order of Aaron and so he might be essentially the same kind of Priest though accidentally he might differ from the rest of the Levitical Priests as they were of that Tribe To take away all colour of any such conceit this is added That he was after the Similitude of Melchisedec and not of Aaron This doth prove the change far more strongly and therefore the evidence is far greater The second proposition to evidence the difference yet to be far greater informs us according to what Law he was made a Priest and this is done 1. Negatively not after the Law of a carnal Commandment 2. Affirmatively after the power of an endless life In the Negative we have 1. A Commandment 2. A carnal Commandment 3. The Law of a carnal Commandment 1. By Commandment we may understand the whole System of the Ceremonies and Mosaical Rites prescribed from God by Moses to that People For whatsoever else it may signify or include here yet these are principally if not solily meant 2. This Commandment or body