men without that art and rules or sophistical learning deduce a certain conclusion out of true Propositions which scarce any man of Reason wants we deny not the use of it and I have sometimes used it in this Treatise which also may serve without that Dialectical art As for the other part of Philosophy which is called Moral or Ethicks it is not so necessary to Christians who have the rules of the Holy Seriptures and the Gift of the Holy Spirit by which they can be much better instructed The Physical and Metaphysical part may be reduced to the arts of Medicine and the Mathematicks which have nothing to do with the essence of a Christian Minister And therefore the Apostle Paul who well understood what was good for Christian Ministers and what hurtful thus exhorted the Colossians Col. 2.8 Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit And to his beloved Disciple Timothy he writes also thus 1 Tim. 6.20 O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust avoiding profane and vain babblings and oppositions of science falsly so called § XXI The third and main part of their literature is School Divinity a monster made up betwixt some Scriptural notions of Truth and the Heathenish terms and maximes being as it were the Heathenish Philosophy Christianized or rather the literal external knowledge of Christ Heathenized it is man in his first faln natural state with his devilish wisdom pleasing himself with some notions of Truth and adorning them with his own serpentine and worldly wisdom because he thinks the simplicity of the Truth too low and mean a thing for him and so despiseth that simplicity wheresoever it is found that he may set up and exalt himself puffed up with this his monstrous birth it is the devil darkening obscuring and veiling the knowledge of God with his sensual and carnal wisdom that so he may the more securely deceive the hearts of the simple and make the Truth as it is in it self despicable and hard to be known and understood by multiplying a thousand hard and needless questions and endless contentions and debates all which whoso perfectly knoweth he is not a whit less the servant of sin than he was but ten times more in that he is exalted and proud of iniquity and so much the further from receiving understanding or learning the Truth as it is in its own naked simplicity because he is full learned rich and wise in his own conceit and so those that are most skilled in it wear out their day and spend their precious time about the infinite and innumerable questions they have feigned and invented concerning it A certain learned man called it a two-fold discipline as of the race of the centaurs partly proceeding from Divine sayings partly from Philosophical reasons A thousand of their questions they confess themselves to be no ways necessary to Salvation and yet many more of them they could never agree upon but are and still will be in endless janglings about them The Volumes that have been written about it a man in his whole age though he lived very old could scarce read and when he has read them all he has but wrought himself a great deal more vexation and trouble of Spirit than he had before These certainly are the words multiplied without knowledge by which counsel hath been darkened Job c. 38. v. 2. They make the Scripture the text of all this Mass and it 's concerning the sense of it that their voluminous debates arise But a man of a good upright heart may learn more in half an hour and be more certain of it by waiting upon God and his Spirit in the heart than by reading a thousand of their Volumes which by filling his head with many needless imaginations may well stagger his faith but never confirm it and indeed those that give themselves most to it are most capable to fall into error as appeareth by the example of Origen who by his learning was one of the first that falling into this way of interpreting the Scriptures wrote so many Volumes and in them so many errors as very much troubled the Church Also Arius led by this curiosity and humane scrutiny despising the simplicity of the Gospel fell into his error which was the cause of that horrible Heresie which so much troubled the Church methinks the simplicity plainness and brevity of the Scriptures themselves should be a sufficient reproof for such a science and the Apostles being honest plain illeterate men my be better understood by such kind of men now than with all that mass of scholastick stuff which neither Peter nor Paul nor John ever thought of § XXII But this invention of Satan wherewith he began the Apostasie hath been of dangerous consequence for thereby he at first spoiled the simplicity of Truth by keeping up the Heathenish learning which occasioned such uncertainty even among those called Fathers and such debate that there are few of them to be found who by reason of this mixture do not only frequently contradict one another but themselves also And therefore when the Apostasie grew greater he as it were buried the Truth with this vail of darkness wholly shuting out people from true knowledg and making the learned so accounted busie themselves with idle and needless questions while the weighty Truths of God were neglected and as it were went into desuetude Now though the grossest of these abuses be swept away by Protestants yet the evil root still remains and is nourished and upheld and upon the growing hand that this science is kept up and deemed necessary for a Minister for while the pure learning of the Spirit of Truth is despised and neglected and made ineffectual man 's faln earthly wisdom is upheld and so in that he labours and works with the Scriptures being out of the Life and Spirit those that wrote them were in by which they are rightly understood and made use of And so he that is to be a Minister must learn this art or trade of merchandizing with the Scriptures and be that which the Apostle would not be to wit a trader with them 2 Cor. 2.17 That he may acquire a trick from a verse of Scripture by adding his own barren notions and conceptions to it and his uncertain conjectures and what he hath stoln out of Books for which end he must have of necessity a good many by him and may each Sabbath day as they call it or oftner make a Discourse for an hour long and this is called the preaching of the word whereas the Gift Grace and Spirit of God to teach open and instruct and to preach a word in season is neglected and so man's arts and parts and knowledg and wisdom which is from below set up and established in the Temple of God yea and above the little Seed which in effect is Antichrist working in the Ministry and so the Devil may be as good and able a Minister as the
above intimated will appear The same argument will hold as to the other branch of the position That it is not the primary adequade rule of faith and manners thus That which is not the rule of my faith in believing the Scriptures themselves is not the primary adequate rule of faith and manners But the Scripture is not nor can it be the rule of that faith by which I believe them c. Therefore c. But as to this part we shall produce divers arguments hereafter as to what is affirmed That the Spirit and not the Scriptures is the rule it is largely handled in the former proposition the sum whereof I shall subsume in one argument thus If by the Spirit we can only come to the true knowledge of God If by the Spirit we be to be led into all truth and so be taught of all things Then the Spirit and not the Scriptures is the foundation and ground of all Truth and knowledg and the primary rule of faith and manners But the first is true Therefore also the last Next the very nature of the Gospel it self declareth that the Scriptures cannot be the only and chief rule of Christians else there should be no difference betwixt the Law and the Gospel As from the nature of the New Covenant by divers Scriptures described in the former Proposition is proved But besides those which are before mentioned herein doth the Law and the Gospel differ in that the Law being outwardly written brings under condemnation but hath not life in it to save whereas the Gospel as it declares and makes manifest the evil so it being an inward powerful thing also gives power to obey and deliver from the evil Hence it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is glad tidings the Law or Letter which is without us kills but the Gospel which is the inward Spiritual Law gives life for it consists not so much in words as in vertue Wherefore such as comes to know it and be acquainted with it come to feel greater power over their iniquities than all outward Laws or Rules can give them Hence the Apostle concludes Rom. 6.14 Sin shall not have dominion over you For ye are not under the Law but under Grace This Grace then that is inward and not an outward Law is to be the Rule of Christians hereunto the Apostle commends the Elders of the Church saying Acts 20.32 And now Brethren I commend you to God and to the Word of his Grace which is able to build you up and to give you an inheritance among all those that are sanctified He doth not commend them here to outward laws or writings but to the Word of Grace which is inward even the Spiritual Law which makes free as he elsewhere affirms Rom. 8.2 The Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death This Spiritual Law is that which the Apostle declares he preached and directed people unto which was not outward as Rom. 10.8 is manifest where distinguishing it from the Law he saith The Word is nigh thee in thy heart and in thy mouth and this is the Word of Faith which we preach From what is above said I argue thus The principal Rule of Christians under the Gospel is not an outward letter nor law outwardly written and delivered but an inward Spiritual Law ingraven in the heart the Law of the Spirit of Life the Word that is nigh in the heart and in the mouth But the letter of the Scripture is outward of it self a dead things a meer declaration of good things but not the things themselves Therefore it is not nor can be the chief or principle rule of Christians § III. Thirdly That which is given to Christians for a Rule and Guide must needs be so full as it may clearly and distinctly guide and order them in all things and occurences that may fall out But in that there are many hundred of things with a regard to their circumstances particular Christians may be concerned in for which there can be no particular Rule had in the Scriptures Therefore the Scriptures cannot be a Rule to them I shall give an instance in two or three particulars for to prove this Proposition It is not to be doubted but some men are particularly called to some particular Services there being not found in which though the act be no general positive duty yet in so far as it may be required of them is a great sin to omit for as much God is zealous of his Glory and every act of Disobedience to his will manifested is enough not only to hinder one greatly from that Comfort and inward Grace which otherwise they might have but also bringeth Condemnation As for instance Some are called to the Ministry of the Word Paul saith there was a necessity upon him to preach the Gospel wo unto me if I preach not If it be necessary that there be now Ministers of the Church as well as then then there is the same necessity upon some more than upon others to occupy this place which necessity as it may be incumbent upon particular persons the Scripture neither doth nor can declare If it be said that the qualifications of a Minister are found in the Scripture and by applying these qualifications to my self I may know whether I be fit for such a place or no. I answer The qualifications of a Bishop or Minister as they are mentioned both in the Epistle to Tim. and Tit. are such as may be found in a private Christian yea which ought in some measure to be in every true Christian so that that giveth a man no certainty every pacity to an office giveth me not a sufficient call to it Next again By what Rule shall I judg if I be so qualified how do I know that I am sober meek holy harmless Is not the Testimony of the Spirit in my Conscience that which must assure me hereof And suppose that I was quallified and called yet what Scripture Rule shall inform me whether it be my duty to preach in this or that place in France or England Holland or Germany whether I shall take up my Time in Confirming the Faithful reclaiming Hereticks or Converting Infidels as also in Writing Epistles to this or that Church The general Rules of the Scripture viz. to be diligent in my duty to do all to the Glory of God and for the good of his Church can give me no light in this thing Seeing two different things may both have a respect to that way yet may I commit a great error and offence in doing the one when I am called to the other If Paul when his Face was turned by the Lord toward Jerusalem had gone back to Achaia or Macedonia he might have supposed he could have done God more acceptable service in Preaching and Confirming the Churches than in being shut up in Prison in Judea but would God have been pleased
Saints and the Blood of Christ which cleanseth from all sin is possessed must be Sufficient But such is the LIGHT 1 Joh. 1.7 Therefore c. Moreover That which we are commanded to believe in that we may become the Children of the Light must be a Supernatural Sufficient and Saving Principle But we are commanded to believe in this Light Therefore c. The Proposition cannot be denyed The Assumption is Christ's own words John 12.36 While ye have Light believe in the Light that ye may be the Children of the Light To this they object that by Light here is understood Christ's outward Person in whom he would have them believe That they ought to have believed in Christ that is that he was the MESSIAH that was to come is not denyed but how they evince that Christ intended that here I see not nay the place it self shews the contrary by those words While ye have Light and by the verse going before Walk while ye have the Light least Darkness come upon you Which words import that when that Light in which they were to believe was removed then they should lose the capacity or season of believing Now this could not be understood of Christ's Person the Jews might have believed in him and many did savingly believe in him as all Christians do at this day when the Person to wit his bodily presence or outward man is far removed from them So that this Light in which they were commanded to believe must be that inward Spiritual Light that shines in their Hearts for a season even during the day of Man's Visitation which while it continueth to call invite and exhort Men are said to have it and may believe in it but when refuse to believe in it and reject it then it ceaseth to be light to shew them the way but leaves the sense of their unfaithfulness as a sting in their Conscience which is a terror and darkness unto them and upon them in which they cannot know where to go neither work any waies profitably in order to their Salvation and therefore to such rebellious ones the day of the Lord is said to be darkness and not light Amos 5.18 From whence it appears that tho many receive not the Light as the darkness comprehends it not nevertheless this Saving Light shines in all that it may save them Concerning which also Cyrillus Alexandrinus saith well and defends our Principle With great diligence and watchfulness saith he doth the Apostle John endeavour to anticipate and prevent the vain thoughts of men for there is here a wonderful method of sublime things and overturning of Objections he hath just now called the Son the true Light by whom he affirmed that every man coming into the world was inlightned yea that he was in the World and the world was made by him One may then object if the Word of God be the Light and if this Light inlighten the hearts of men and suggest unto men piety and the understanding of things if he was alwayes in the world and was the Creator or Builder of the world why was he so long unknown unto the world It seems rather to follow because he was unknown to the world therefore the world was not inlightened by him nor he totally Light Let any should so object he divinely infers and the world knew him not Let not the world saith he accuse the Word of God and his Eternal Light but it s own weakness For the Son inlightens but the creature rejects the Grace that 's given unto it and abuseth the sharpness of understanding granted it by which it might have naturally known God and as a prodigal hath turned its sight to the Creatures neglected to go forward and through lazyness and negligence buried the illumination and despised this Grace Which that the disciple of Paul might not do he was commanded to watch therefore it is to be imputed to their wickedness who are illuminated and not unto the Light for as albeit the sun riseth upon all yet he that is blind receiveth no benefit thereby none thence can justly accuse the brightness of the Sun but will ascribe the cause of not seeing to the blindness So I judg it is only to be understood of the Only Begotten Son of God for he is the true Light and sendeth forth his brightness upon all but the God of this world as Paul saith hath blinded the minds of those that believe not 2 Cor. 4.4 That the Light of the Gospel shine not unto them We say then that darkness is come upon men not because they are altogether deprived of Light for Nature retaineth still the strength of understanding divinely given it but because man is dull'd by an evil habit and become worse and hath made the measure of Grace in some respect to languish When therefore the like befals to man the Psalmist justly Prays crying Open mine Eyes that I may behold the wonderful things of thy Law For the Law was given that this Light might be kindled in us the blearedness of the eyes of our minds being wiped away and the blindness being removed which detain'd us in our former ignorance By these words then the world is accused as ungrateful and unsensible not knowing its Author nor bringing forth the good fruit of the illumination that it may now seem to be said truly of all which was of old said by the Prophet of the Jews I expected that it should have brought forth grapes but it brought forth wild grapes For the good fruit of the illumination was the knowledg of the Only Begotten as a cluster hanging from a fruitful branch c. From which it appears Cyrillus believed that a saving illumination was given unto all For as to what he speaks of Nature he understands it not of the common nature of man by it self but of that nature which hath the strength of understanding Divinely given it for he understands this Universal Illumination to be of the same kind with that Grace of which Paul makes mention to Timothy saying Neglect not the Grace that is in thee Now it is not to be believed that Cyrillus was so ignorant as to judg that Grace to have been some natural gift § XXII That this Saving Light and Seed or a measure of it is given to all Christ telleth expresly in the Parable of the Sower Matth. 13. from v. 18. Mark 4. and Luke 8.11 he saith that this seed sown in those several sorts of grounds is the Word of the Kingdom which the Apostle calls the Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 Ja. 1.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the implanted ingrafted Word which is able to save the Soul the words themselves declare that it is that which is Saving in the nature of it for in the good ground it fructified abundantly Let us then observe that this Seed of the Kingdom this Saving Supernatural and Sufficient Word was really sown in the stony thorny ground and by the way-side where
and whereof he was a Minister is one and the same is not far off but nigh in the heart and in the Mouth which done he frameth as it were the objection of our adversaries in the 12 and 15 verses How shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard How shall they hear without a Preacher This he answers in the 18 verse saying But I say have they not heard Yes verily their sound went forth into all the Earth and their words unto the end of the World insinuating that this Divine Preacher hath sounded in the ears and hearts of all men for of the outward Apostles that saying was not true neither then nor many hundred years after yea for ought we know there may be yet great and spatious Nations and Kingdoms who never have heard of Christ nor his Apostles as outwardly This inward and Powerful Word of God is yet more fully described in the Epistle to the Hebrews c. 4. v. 12 13. For the Word of God is quick and sharper than a two-edged Sword piercing even to the dividing asunder of Soul and Spirit and of the joynts and marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart The vertues of this Spiritual Word are here enumerated it is quick because it searches and tries the hearts of all no man's heart is exempt from it for the Apostle gives this reason of its being so in the following verse but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do And there is not any creature that is not manifest in his sight Tho this ultimately and mediately be referr'd to God yet nearly and immediately it relates to the Word or Light which as hath been before proved is in the hearts of all else it had been improper to have brought it in here The Apostle shewes how every intent and thought of the heart is discerned by the Word of God because all things are naked before God which imports nothing else but it is in and by this Word whereby God sees and discerns mans thoughts and so must needs be in all men because the Apostle saith there is no creature that is not manifest in his sight This then is that faithful Witness and Messenger of God that bears witness for God and for his righteousness in the hearts of all men For he hath not left man without a witness Act. 14.17 and he is said to be given for a Witness to the people Isa. 55.4 And as this Word beareth witness for God so it is not placed in men only to condemn them for as he is given for a Witness so saith the Prophet He is given for a Leader and a Commander The Light is given that all through it may believe Joh. 1.7 For faith cometh by hearing and hearing by this word of God which is placed in mans heart both to be a Witness for God and to be a means to bring man to God through faith and repentance It is therefore powerful that it may divide betwixt the Soul and the Spirit It is like a two-edged Sword that it may cut off iniquity from him and separate betwixt the precious and the vile and because mans heart is cold and hard like Iron naturally therefore hath God placed this Word in him which is said to be like a Fire and like a Hammer Jer. 23.29 that like as by the heat of the Fire the iron of its own nature cold is warmed and by the strength of the Hammer is softned and framed according to the mind of the worker so the cold and hard Heart of Man is by the vertue and powerfulness of this Word of God near and in the Heart as it resists not warmed and softned and received a Heavenly and Coelestial Impression and Image The most part of the Fathers have spoken at large touching this Word Seed and Light and saving Voice calling all unto Salvation and able to save Clemens Alexandrinus saith lib. 2. Stromat The Divine Word hath oried calling all knowing well those that will not obey And yet because it is in our power either to obey or not to obey that none may have a preâ—â—xt of ignorance it hath made a righteous call and requireth but that which is according to the ability and strength of every one The self same in his warning to the Gentiles For as saith he that Heavenly Ambassador of the Lord the Grace of God that brings Salvation hath appeared unto all c. This is the new Song coming and manifestation of the Word which now shews it self in us which was in the beginning and was first of all And again Hear therefore ye that are a far off hear ye who are near the word is hid from none the Light is common to all and shineth to all There is no darkness in the World let us hasten to Salvation to the New birth that we being many may be gathered into the One alone love Ibid. he saith that there is infused unto all but principally into those that are trained up in Doctrine a certain Divine Influence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And again he speaks concerning the innate Witness worthy of belief which of it self doth plainly chuse that which is most honest And again he saith that it is not impossible to come unto the Truth and lay hold of it seeing it is most near to us in our own houses as the most wise Moses declareth living in three parts of us viz. in our hands in our mouth and in our heart this saith he is a most true badg of the Truth which is also fulfilled in three things namely in Councel in Action in Speaking And again he saith also unto the unbelieving Nations Receive Christ receive Light receive Sight to the and thou maist rightly know both God and man The Word that hath inlightned us is more pleasant than Gold and the stone of great value And again he saith let us receive the Light that we may receive God let us receive the Light that we may be the Schollars of the Lord. And again he saith to those Infidel Nations The Heavenly Spirit helpeth thee resist and flee Pleasure Again lib. Strom. 5. he saith God forbid that man be not a partaker of Divine Aquaintance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who in Genesis is said to be a partaker of Inspiration And Paed. lib. 1 cap. 3. there is saith he some lovely and some desirable thing in man which is called the in breathing of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same man lib. 10. Strom. directeth men unto the Light and Water in themselves who have the Eye of the Soul darkned or dimmed through evil up bringing and learning let them enter in unto their own domestick light or unto the Light which is in their own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto the Truth which manifests accurately and clearly these things that have been written Justin Martyr in his first Apology saith that the Word which
was and is is in all even that very same Word which through the Prophets foretold things to come The writer of the calling of the Gentiles saith lib. 1. cap. 2 We believe according to the same viz. Scripture and most religiously confess that God was never wanting in care to the generality of men who although he did lead by particular lessons a People gathered to himself unto Godliness yet he withdrew from no Nation of Men the Gifts of his own Goodness that they might be convinced that they had received the words of the Prophets and legal commands in services and testimonies of the first Principles Cap. 7. he saith that he believes that the help of Grace hath been wholly withdrawn from no man Lib. cap. 1. Because albeit Salvation is far from sinners yet there is nothing void of the Presence and Vertue of his Salvation Cap. 2. But seeing none of that People over whom was set both the Doctrins were justified but through Grace by the Spirit of Faith who can question but that they who of whatsoever Nation in whatsoever times could please God were ordered by the Spirit of the Grace of God which albeit in fore-time it was more sparing and hid yet denyed it self to no Ages being in vertue one in quantity different in counsel unchangeable in operation multifarious § XXIV The third Propositions which ought to be proved is that it is by this Light Seed or Grace that God works the Salvation of all men and many come to partake of the benefit of Christs Death and Salvation purchased by him By the inward and effectual operations of which as many Heathens have come to be partakers of the Promises who were not of the Seed of Abraham after the Flesh so may some now to whom God hath rendred the knowledg of the History impossible come to be saved by Christ. Having already proved that Christ hath died for all that there is a day of Visitation given to all during which Salvation is possible to them and that God hath actually given a measure of Saving Grace and Light unto all preached the Gospel to and in them and placed the Word of Faith in their Hearts the matter of this Proposition may seem to be proved Yet shall I little for the farther satisfaction of all who desire to know the Truth and hold it as it is in Jesus prove this from two or three olear Scripture Testimonies and remove the most common as well as the more strong objections usually brought against it Out Theam then hath two parts First That those that have the Gospel and Christ outwardly preached unto them are not saved but by the working of the Grace and Light in their Hearts Secondly That by the working and operations of this many have been and some may be saved to whom the Gospel hath never been outwardly Preached and who are utterly ignorant of the outward History of Christ. As to the first though it be granted by most yet because it 's more in words than deeds the more full discussing of which will fall in in the next Proposition concerning Justification I shall prove it in few words And first from the words of Christ to Nicodemus Joh. 3.3 Verily verily I say unto thee except a Man be born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God Now this Birth cometh not by the outward preaching of the Gospel or knowledg of Christ or historical Faith in him seeing many have that and firmly believe it who are never thus renewed The Apostle Paul also goes so far while he commends the necessity and excellency of this New Creation as in a certain respect to lay aside the outward knowledg of Christ or the knowledg of him after the Flesh in these words 2 Cor. 5.16 17. Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the Flesh yea though we have known Christ after the Flesh yet now henceforth know we him no more Therefore if any man be in Christ he is a New Creature old things are passed away behold all things are become new Whence it manifestly appears that he makes the knowledg of Christ after the Flesh but as it were the Rudiments which young Children learn which after they are become better Schollars are of less use to them because they have and possess the very substance of those first Precepts in their minds As all comparisons halt in some part so shall I not affirm this to hold in every respect yet so far will this hold that as those things that go no farther than the Rudiments are never to be accounted learned and as they grow beyond these things so they have less use of them even so such as go no farther than the outward knowledg of Christ shall never inherit the Kingdom of Heaven But such as come to know this New Birth to be in Christ indeed to be a New Creature to have old things past away and all things become new may safely say with the Apostle Though we have known Christ after the Flesh yet now henceforth know we him no more Now this New Creature proceeds from the work of this Light and Grace in the Heart It is that Word which we spake of that is sharp and piercing that implanted Word able to save the Soul by which this Birth is begotten and therefore Christ hath purchased unto us this Holy Seed that thereby this Birth might be brought forth in us which is therefore also called the manifestation of the Spirit given to every one to profit withal for it is written that by One Spirit we are all Baptized into One Body And the Apostle Peter also ascribeth this Birth to the Seed and Word of God which we have so much declared of saying 1 Pet. 1.23 Being born again not of corruptible Seed but of uncorruptible by the Word of God which liveth and abideth for ever Though then this Seed be small in its appearance so that Christ compares it to a grain of Mustard-seed which is the least of all Seeds Matt. 13.31 32. and that it be hid in the Earthly part of man's heart yet therein is Life and Salvation towards the Sons of men wrapt up which comes to be revealed as they give way to it And in this Seed in the hearts of all men is the Kingdom of God as in capacity to be produced or rather exhibited according as it receives depth is nourished and not choaked Hence Christ saith that the Kingdom of God was in the very Pharisees Luke 17.20 21. who did oppose and resist him and were justly accounted as Serpents and a Generation of Vipers Now the Kingdom of God could be no other ways in them than in a Seed even as the Thirty-fold and the Hundred-fold is wrapt up in a small Seed lying in a barren ground which springs not forth because it wants nourishment and as the whole Body of a great Tree is wrapt up potentially in the Seed of the Tree and so is brought forth in due season and as the
and eschewed Evil Who taught Job this how knew Job Adam's fall And from what Scripture learned he that excellent knowledg he had and that Faith by which he knew his Redeemer lived For many make him as old as Moses was not this by an inward Grace in the heart was it not that inward Grace that taught Job to eschew evil and to fear God and was it not by the workings thereof that he became a just and upright man how doth he reprove the wickedness of men chap. 2.4 and after he hath numbred up their wickedness doth he not condemn them verse 13. for rebelling against this Light for not knowing the way thereof nor abiding in the paths thereof It appears then Job believed that men had a Light and that because they rebelled against it therefore they knew not its waies and abode not in its paths even as the Pharisees who had the Scriptures are said to err not knowing the Scriptures And also Job's Friends though in some things wrong yet who taught them all those excellent sayings and knowledg which they had Did not God give it them in order to save them or was it meerly to condemn them Who taught Elihu that the Inspiration of the Almighty giveth Vnderstanding that the Spirit of God made him and the Breath of the Almighty gave him Life And did not the Lord accept a Sacrifice for them And who dare say that they are damned But further the Apostle puts this controversie out of doubt for if we may believe his plain assertions he tells us Rom. 2. that the Heathens did the things contained in the Law From whence I thus argue In every nation he that feareth God and worketh Righteousnss is accepted Arg. But many of the Heathens feared God and wrought Righteousness Therefore they were accepted The minor is proved from the example of Cornelius But I shall further prove it thus He that doth the things contained in the Law feareth God and worketh Righteousness But the Heathens did the things contained in the Law Therefore they feared God and wrought Righteousness Can there be any thing more clear For if to do the things contained in the Law be not to fear God and work Righteousness then what can be said to do so seeing the Apostle calls the Law Spiritual Holy Just and Good But this appears manifestly by another medium taken out of the same Chapter verse 13. So that nothing can be more clear The words are The doers of the Law shall be Justified From which I thus argue without adding any word of my own The doers of the Law shall be justified But the Gentiles do the things contained in the Law All that know but a conclusion do easily see what follows from these express words of the Apostle And indeed he through that whole chapter labours as if he were contending now with our Adversaries to confirm this Doctrine verse 9 10 11. Tribulation and anguish upon every Soul of man that doth evil to the Jew first and also to the Gentile For there is no respect of Persons with God Where the Apostle clearly homologats the sentence of Peter before mentioned and shews that Jew and Gentile or as he himself explains in the following verses both they that have an outward Law and they that have none when they do good shall be justified And to put us out of all doubt in the very following verses he tells that the doers of the Law are justified and that the Gentiles did the Law So that except we think he spake not what he intended we may safely conclude that such Gentiles were justified and did partake of that Honour Glory and Peace which comes upon every one that doth good Even the Gentiles that are without the Law when they work good seeing with God there is no respect of Persons so as we see that it is not the having the outward knowledg that doth save without the inward so neither doth the want of it to such to whom God hath made it impossible who have the inward bring condemnation And many that have wanted the outward have had a knowledg of this inwardly by virtue of that inward Grace and Light given to every man working in them by which they forsook iniquity and became Just and Holy as is above proved who though they knew not the History of Adam's fall yet were sensible in themselves of the loss that came by it feeling their incâ—inations to sin and the body of sin in them and though they knew not the coming of Christ yet were sensible of that inward Power and Salvation which came by him even before as well as since his appearance in the flesh For I question whether these men can prove that all the Patriarchs and Fathers before Moses had a distinct knowledg either of the one or the other or that they knew the History of the Tree of Knowledg of Good and Evil and of Adam's eating the forbidden Fruit far less that Christ should be born of a Virgin should be Crucified and treated in the manner he was For it is justly to be believed that what Moses wrote of Adam and of the first times was not by Tradition but by Revelation yea we see that not only after the writing of Moses but even of David and all the Prophets who Prophecied so much of Christ how little the Jews that were expecting and wishing for the Messiah could thereby discern him when he came that they Crucified him as a Blasphemer not as a Messiah by mistaking the Prophecies concerning him for Peter saith expresly Acts 3.17 to the Jews that both they and their Rulers did it through Ignorance And Paul saith 1 Cor. 2.8 That had they known it they would not have Crucified the Lord of Glory Yea Mary her self to whom the Angel had spoken and who had laid up all the miraculous things accompanying his Birth in her Heart she did not understand how when he disputed with the Doctors in the Temple that he was about his Fathers business And the Apostles that had believed him conversed daily with him and saw his Miracles could not understand neither believe those things which related to his Death Sufferings and Resurrection but were in a certain respect stumbled at them § XXVII So we see how that it is the inward work and not the outward History and Scripture that gives the true knowledg and by this inward Light many of the Heathen Philosophers where sensible of the loss received by Adam though they knew not the outward History Hence Plato asserted that man's Soul was faln into a dark cave where it only conversed with shadows Pythagoras saith Man wandereth in this world as a stranger banished from the presence of God And Plotinus compareth Man's Soul faln from God to a Cinder or dead Coal out of which the Fire is extinguished Some of them said that the wings of the Soul were clipped or faln off so that they could not flee unto God All which and
many more such expressions that might be gathered out of their writings shew they were not without a sense of this loss Also they had a knowledg and discovery of Jesus Christ inwardly as a remedy in them to deliver them from that evil seed and the evil inclinations of their own hearts though not under that particular denomination Some called him a Holy Spirit as Seneca Epist. 41. who said There is a Holy Spirit in us that treateth us as we treat him Cicero calleth an inuate Light in his Book de Rublica cited by Lactantius 6. Instit. where he calls this Right Reason given unto all constant and eternal calling unto duty by commanding and deterring from deceit by forbidding Adding that it cannot be abrogated neither can any be free'd from it neither by Senat nor People that it is one Eternal and the same alwayes to all Nations so that there is not one at Rome and another at Athens who so obey it not must flee from himself and in this is greatly tormented although he should escape all other punishment Plotinus also calls him Light saying that as the Sun cannot be known but by its own Light so God cannot be known but with his own Light and as the Eye cannot see the Sun but by receiving its Image so Man cannot know God but by receiving his Image and that it behoved Man to come to purity of Heart before he could know God calling him also Wisdom a name frequently given him in Scripture See Prov. 1.20 to the end and Prov. 8 9.34 Where Wisdom is said to cry intreat and invite all to come unto her and learn of her And what is this Wisdom but Christ Hence such as came among the Heathen to forsake Evil and cleave to Righteousness were called Philosophers that is lovers of Wisdom They knew this Wisdom was nigh unto them and that the best knowledg of God and Divine Mysteries was by the Inspiration of the Wisdom of God Phocylides affirmed that the Word of the Wisdom of God was best His words in the Greek are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And much more of this kind might be instanced by which it appears they knew Christ and by his working in them were brought from unrighteousness to righteousness and to love that Power by which they felt themselves redeemed so that as saith the Apostle they shew the work of the Law written in their Hearts and did the things contained in the Law and therefore as all doers of the Law are were no doubt justified and saved thus by the Power of Christ in them And as this was the Judgment of the Apostle so was it of the primitive Christians Hence Justyn Martyr stuck not to call Socrates a Christian saying that all such as lived according to the Divine Word in them which was in all men were Christians such as Socrates and Heraclitus and others among the Greeks c. That such as live with the Word are Christians without fear or anxiety Clemens Alexandrinus saith Apol. 2. Strom. lib. 1. That this Wisdom or Philosophy was necessary to the Gentiles and was their School-master to lead them unto Christ by which of old the Greeks were justified Nor do I think saith Augustin in his Book of the City of God lib. 18. cap. 47 that the Jews dare affirm that none belonged unto God but the Israelites Upon which place Lodovicus Vives saith that thus the Gentiles not having a Law were a Law unto themselves and the Light of so living in the Gift of God and proceeds from the Son of whom it is written that he inlighteneth every man that cometh into the World Augustin also testifies in his Confessions lib. 7. cap. 9. That he had read in the writings of the Platonists though not in the very same words yet that which by many and multiplied reasons did perswade that in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God this was in the beginning with God by which all things were made and without which nothing was made that was made In him was Life and the Life was the Light of Men and the Light shined in the Darkness and the Darkness did not comprehend it And albeit the Soul gives testimony concerning the Light yet it is not the Light but the Word of God for GOD is the true LIGHT which inlighteneth every man that cometh into the World and so repeats to the 14 verse of the 1 chapter of John adding these things have I there read Yea there is a Book translated out of the Arabick which gives an account of one Hai Ebn Yokdan who without converse of man living in an Island alone attained to such a profound knowledg of God as to have immediate converse with him and to affirm that the best and most certain knowledg of God is not that which is attained by premisses premised and conclusions deduced but that which is enjoyed by conjunction of the mind of man with the Supream Intellect after the mind is purified from its corruptions and is separated from all bodily Images and is gathered into a profound stilness § XXVIII Seeing then it is by this inward Gift Grace and Light that both these that have the Gospel preached unto them come to have Jesus brought forth in them and to have the saving and sanctified use of all outward helps and advantages and also by this same Light that all may come to be saved and that God calls invites and strives with all in a day and saveth many to whom he hath not seen meet to conveigh this outward knowledg therefore we having the experience of the inward and powerful work of this Light in our Hearts even Jesus revealed in us cannot cease to proclaim the day of the Lord that it is arisen in it crying out the woman of Samaria Come and see One that hath told me all that ever I have done Is not this the Christ That others may come and feel the same in themselves and may know that that little small thing that reproves them in their Hearts however they have despised it and neglected it is nothing less than the Gospel preached in them Christ the Wisdom and Power of God being in and by that Seed seeking to save their Souls Of this Light therefore Austin speaks in his Confessions lib. 11. cap. 9. In this beginning O God! thou madest the Heaven and the Earth in thy Word in thy Son in thy Vertue in thy Wisdom wonderfully saying and wonderfully doing who shall comprehend it who shall declare it What is that which skineth in unto me and smites my Heart without hurt at which I both tremble and am inflamed I tremble in so far as I am unlike unto it and I am inflamed in so far as I am like unto it It is Wisdom which shineth in unto me and dispelleth my cloud which had again cover'd me after I was departed from that Darkness and rampier of my punishments And again he saith lib. 10. cap. 27. It is
too late that I have loved thee O thou Beautifulness so antient and so new late have I loved thee and behold thou wast within and I was without and there was seeking thee thou didst call thou didst cry thou didst break my Deafness thou glancedst thou didst shine thou chasedst away my darkness Of this also our Countrey man George Buchanan speaketh thus in his Book de Jure Regni apud Scotos Truly I understand no other thing at present than that Light which is divinely infused into our Souls for when God formed Man he not only gave him Eyes to his Body by which he might shun those things that are hurtful to him and follow those things that are profitable But also hath set before his mind as it were a certain Light by which he may discern things that are vile from things that are honest Some call this Power Nature others the Law of Nature I truly judg it to be Divine and am perswaded that Nature and Wisdom never say different things Moreover God hath given us a compend of the Law which in few words comprehend the whole to wit that we should love him from our hearts and our Neighbours as our selves And of this Law all the Books of the Holy Scriptures which pertain to the forming of manners contain no other but an explication This is that Universal Evangelical Principle in and by which this Salvation of Christ is exhibited to all men both Jew and Gentile Scythian and Barbarian of whatsoever Countrey or Kindred he be And therefore God hath raised up unto himself in this our Age faithful Witnesses and Evangelists to preach again his Everlasting Gospel and to direct all as well the high Professors who boast of the Law and the Scripture and the outward knowledg of Christ as the Infidels and Heathens that know not him that way that they may all come to mind the Light in them and know Christ in them the Just One 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whom they have so long killed and made merry over and he hath not resisted Jam. 5.6 And give up their Sins Iniquities false Faith Professions and out-side Righteousness to be crucified by the Power of his Cross in them so as they may know within to be the Hope of Glory and may come to walk in his Light and be saved who is that True Light that enlighteneth every Man that cometh into the World The Seventh Proposition Concerning Justification As many as resist not this Light but receive the same it becomes in them a Holy Pure and Spiritual Birth bringing forth Holyness Righteousness Purity and all other Blessed Fruits those which are acceptable to God by which Holy Birth to wit Jesus Christ formed within us and working his Works in us as we are Sanctified so are we Justified in the sight of God according to the Apostles Words But ye are Washed but ye are Sanctified but ye are Justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6.11 Therefore it is not by our Works wrought in our will nor yet by good Works considered as of themselves but by Christ who is both the Gift and the Giver and the Cause producing the effects in us who as he hath reconciled us while we were Enemies doth also in his Wisdom Save us and Justifie us after this manner as saith the same Apostle elsewhere According to his Mercy he hath Saved us by the washing of Regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost Tit. 3.5 § I. THE Doctrine of Justification comes well in order after the discussing of the extent of Christ's death and of the Grace thereby communicated some of the sharpest contests concerning this having from thence their rise Many are the disputes among those called Christians concerning this point and indeed if all were truly minding that which justifieth there would be less noise about the Notions of Justification I shall briefly review this controversie as it stands among others and as I have often seriously observed it then in short state the controversie as to us and open our Sense and Judgment of it and lastly prove it if the Lord will by some Scripture Testimonies and the certain experience of all ever were truly Justified § II. That this Doctrine of Justification hath been and is greatly vitiated in the Church of Rome is not by us questioned though our Adversaries who for want of better arguments do often make Lyes their refuge have not spared in this respect to stigmatize us with Popery but how untruly will hereafter appear For to speak little of their meritum ex condigno which was no doubt a very common Doctrine of the Romish Church especially before Luther though most of their modern Writers especially in their controversies with Protestants do partly deny it partly qualifie it and seem to state the matter only as if they were propagaters and pleaders for good works by the others denyed Yet if we look to the effects of this Doctrine among them as they appear in the generality of their Church-members not in things disapproved but highly approved and commended by their Father the Pope and all his Clients as the most beneficial casuality of all his revenue we shall find that Luther did not without great ground oppose himself to them in this matter and if he had not himself run into another extream of which hereafter his work would have stood the better For in this as in most other things he is more to be commended for what he pulled down of Babylon than for what he built of his own Whatever then the Papists may pretend or even some good men among them may have thought experience sheweth and it is more than manifest by the universal and approved practice of their People that they place not their Justification so much in works that are truly and morally good and in the being truly renewed and sanctified in the mind as in such things as are either not good nor evil or may truly be called evil and can no otherwaies be reckoned good than because the Pope pleases to call them so So that if the matter be well sifted it will be found that the greatest part of their Justification depends upon the authority of his Bulls and not upon the Power Vertue and Grace of Christ revealed in the heart and renewing of it as will appear First from their Principle concerning their Sacraments which they say confer Grace ex opere operato So that if a man partake but of them he thereby obtains remission of sin though he remain as he was the vertue of the Sacraments making up the want that is in the man So that this act of Submission and Faith to the Laws of the Church and not any real inward change is that which justifieth him As for example if a man make use of the Sacrament as they call it of Pennance so as to tell over his sins to a Priest though he have not true contrition
him on whom God therefore truly accounteth Righteous and Just. This is so far from being the Doctrine of Papists that as the generality of them do not understand it so the learned among them oppose it and dispute against it and particularly Bellarmin Thus then as I may say the formal cause of Justification is not the works to speak properly they being but an effect of it but this inward Birth this Jesus brought forth in the heart who is the Well-beloved whom the Father cannot but accept and all those who thus are sprinkled with the Blood of Jesus and washed with it By this also comes that communication of the goods of Christ unto us by which we come to be made partakers of the Divine Nature as saith Peter ep 2. c. 1. v. 4. are made one with him as the Branches with the Vine and have a title and right to what he hath done and suffered for us So that his Obedience becomes ours his Righteousness ours his Death and Sufferings ours And by this nearness we come to have a sense of his Sufferings and to suffer with his Seed that yet lies pressed and crucified in the hearts of the ungodly and so travel with it and for its Redemption and for the repentance of those Souls that in it are crucifying as yet the Lord of Glory Even as the Apostle Paul who by his sufferings is said to fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ for his Body which is the Church Though this be a Mystery sealed up from all the wise men that are yet ignorant of this Seed in themselves and oppose it nevertheless some Protestants speak of this Justification by Christ inwardly put-on as shall hereafter be recited in its place Lastly though we place remission of sins in the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ performed by him in the flesh as to what pertains to the remote procuring cause and that we hold our selves formally justified by Christ Jesus formed and brought forth in us yet can we not as some Protestants have unwarily done exclude works from Justification for though properly we be not justified for them yet are we justified in them and they are necessary even as causa sine qua non i. e. the cause without which none are Justified For the denying of this as it 's contrary to the Scriptures Testimony so it hath brought a great scandal to the Protestant Religion opened the mouths of Papists and made many too secure while they have believed to be Justified without good works Moreover though it be not so safe to say they are meritorious yet seeing they are rewarded many of those called the Fathers have not spared to use the word merit which some of us have perhaps also done in a qualified sense but no ways to inferr the Popish abuses above mentioned And lastly if we had that notion of good works which most Protestants have we could freely agree to make them not only not necessary but reject them as hurtful viz. that the best works even of the Saints are defiled and polluted For though we judg so of the best works performed by man endeavouring a conformity to the outward Law by his own strength and in his own will yet we believe that such works as naturally proceed from this Spiritual Birth and formation of Christ in us are pure and Holy even as the Root from which they come and therefore God accepts them Justifies us in them and rewards us for them of his own Free Grace The state of the controversie being thus stated these following Positions do hence from arise in the next place to be proved § IV. First that the obedience sufferings and death of Christ is that by which the Soul obtains remission of sins and is the procuring cause of that Grace by whose inward workings Christ comes to be formed inwardly and the Soul to be made conformable unto him and so just and justified And that therefore in respect of this capacity and offer of Grace God is said to be reconciled not as if he were actually reconciled or did actually justifie or account any just so long as they remain in their sins really impure and unjust Secondly that it is by this inward Birth of Christ in man that man is made just and therefore so accounted by God wherefore to be plain we are thereby and not till that be brought forth in us formally if we must use that word justified in the sight of God because Justification is both more properly and frequently in Scripture taken in its proper signification for making one just and not reputing one meerly such and is all one with Sanctification Thirdly that since good works as naturally follow from this birth as heat from fire therefore are they of absolute necessity to Justification as causa sine qua non i. e. though not as the cause for which yet as that in which we are and without which we cannot be Justified And though they be not meritorious and draw no debt upon God yet he cannot but accept and reward them for it is contrary to his Nature to deny his own Since they may be perfect in their kind as proceeding from a Pure Holy Birth and Root Wherefore their judgment is false and against the Truth that say that the holyest works of the Saints are defiled and sinful in the sight of God For these good works are not the works of the Law excluded by the Apostle from Justification § V. As to the first I prove it from Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Here the Apostle holds forth the extent and efficacy of Christs death shewing that thereby and by Faith therein remission of sins that are past is obtained as being that wherein the forbearance of God is exercised towards mankind So that though men for the sins they daily commit deserve Eternal Death and that the Wrath of God should lay hold upon them yet by virtue of that most satisfactory Sacrifice of Christ Jesus the Grace and Seed of God moves in love towards them during the day of their visitation yet not so as not to strike against the evil for that must be burned up and destroyed but to redeem man out of the evil Secondly if God were perfectly reconciled with men and did esteem them just while they are actually unjust and do continue in their sins Then should God have no Controversie with them How comes he then so often to complain to expostulate so much throughout the whole Scripture with such as our Adversaries confess to be Justified telling them that their sins separate betwixt him and them Isa. 59.2 For where there is a perfect and full reconciliation there there is no separation Yea from this Doctrine it necessarily follows either that such for whom Christ died and whom he hath
called them he also justified and whom he justified them he also glorified This is commonly called the golden chain as being acknowledged to comprehend the method and order of Salvation And therefore if justified were not understood here in its proper signification of being made just sanctification would be excluded out of this chain And truly it is very worthy of observation that the Apostle in this succinct and compendious account makes the word justified to comprehend all betwixt calling and glorifying thereby clearly insinuating that the being really righteous is that only medium by which from our calling we pass to glorification All for the most part do acknowledg the word to be so taken in this place and not only so but most of those who oppose are forced to acknowledg that as this is the most proper so the most common signification of it thus divers famous Protestants do acknowledg We are not saith D. Chamierus such impertinent esteemers of words as to be ignorant nor yet such importunat Sophists as to deny that the words of Justification and Sanctification do infer one another ye we know that the Saints are chiefly for this reason so called because that in Christ they have received remission of sins and we read in the Revelation Let him that is just be just still which cannot be understood except of the fruit of inherent righteousness Nor do we deny but perhaps in other places they may be promiscuously taken especially by the Fathers I take saith Beza the name of Justification largely so as it comprehends whatsoever we acquire from Christ as well by imputation as by the efficacy of the Spirit in sanctifying us So likewise is the word of Justification taken Rom. 8.30 Melancthon saith that to be justified by Faith signifies in Scripture not only to be pronounced just but also of unrighteous to be made righteous Also some chief Protestants though not so clearly yet in part hinted at our Doctrin whereby we ascribe unto the Death of Christ remission of Sins and the work of Justification unto the Grace of the Spirit acquired by his Death Martinus Boraeus explaining that place of the Apostle Rom. 4.25 Who was given for our sins and rose again for our justification saith There are two things beheld in Christ which are necessary to our justification the one is his death the other is his arising from the dead By his death the sins of this world behoved to be expiated By his rising from the dead it pleased the same goodness of God to give the Holy Spirit whereby both the Gospel is believed and the Righteousness lost by the fault of the first Adam is restored And afterwards he saith The Apostle expresseth both parts in these words Who was given for our sins c. In his Death is beheld the satisfaction for sin in his Resurrection the gift of the Holy Spirit by which our Justification is perfected And again the same man saith elsewhere Both these kinds of Righteousness are therefore contained in Justification neither can the one be separate from the other So that in the definition of Justification the merit of the blood of Christ is included both with the remission of sins and with the gift of the Holy Spirit of Justification and Regeneration Martinus Bucerus saith Seeing by one sin of Adam the world was lost the Grace of Christ hath not only abolished that one sin and death which came by it but hath together taken away those infinite sins and also led into full justification as many as are of Christ so that God now not only remits unto them Adam 's sin and their own but also gives them therewith the Spirit of a solid and perfect Righteousness which renders us conform unto the Image of the First begotten And upon these words by Jesus Christ he saith We alwaies judg that the whole benefit of Christ tends to this that we might be strong through the gift of Righteousness being rightly and orderly ordained with all vertue that is restored to the Image of God And lastly William Forbes our Countrey man Bishop of Edinburgh saith Whensoever the Scripture makes mention of the Justification before God as speaketh Paul and from him besides others Augustin it appears that the word justify necessarily signifies not only to pronounce just in a Law sense but also really and inherently to make just because that God doth other waies justifie a wicked man than earthly Judges For he when he justifies a wicked or unjust man doth indeed pronounce him as these also do but by pronouncing him just because his judgment is according to Truth he also makes him really of unjust to become just And again the same man upon the same occasion answering the more rigid Protestants who say that God first justifies and then makes just he adds But let them have a care least by too great and empty subtilty unknown both to the Scripture and the Fathers they lessen and diminish the weight and dignity of so great and divine a benefit so much celebrated in the Scripture to wit justification of the wicked For if to the formal reason of justification of the ungodly doth not at all belong his justification so to speak i. e. his being made righteous then in the Justification of a sinner although he be Justifyed yet the stain of sin is not taken away but remains the same in his Soul as before Justification And so dotwithstanding the benefit of Justification he remains as before unjust and a sinner and nothing is taken away but the guilt and obligation to pain and the offence and enmity of God through non imputation But both the Scriptures and Fathers do affirm that in the Justification of a sinner their sins are not only remitted forgiven covered not imputed but also taken away blotted out cleansed washed purged and very far removed from us as appears from many places of the Holy Scriptures The same Forbes shews us at length in the following chapter that this was the confessed judgment of the Fathers out of the writings of those who hold the contrary opinion some whereof out of him I shall note as first Calvin saith that the judgment of Austin or at least his manner of speaking is not throughout to be received who although he took from man all praise of righteousness and ascribed all to the Grace of God yet he refers Grace to Sanctification by which we are regenerate through the Spirit unto newness of life Chemnitius saith that they do not deny but that the Fathers take the word justifie for renewing by which works of righteousness are wrought in us by the Spirit And pag. 130. I am not ignorant that the Fathers indeed often use the word justifie in this signification to wit of making just Zanchius saith that the Fathers and chiefly Austin interpret the word justifie according to this signification to wit of making just so that according to them to he justified
such as their Converting of the Nations to the Christian Faith their gathering of the Churches their Writing of the Holy Scriptures yea and their Offering up and Sacrificing of their Lives for the Testimony of Jesus What may our Adversaries think of this Argument whereby it will follow that the Holy Scriptures whose perfection and excellency they seem so much to magnifie are proved to be impure and imperfect because they came through impure and imperfect Vessels It appears by the confessions of Protestants that the Fathers did frequently attribute unto works of this kind that Instrumental work which we have spoken of in Justification albeit some ignorant persons cry out it is Popery and also divers and that Famous Protestants do of themselves confess it Amandus Polanus in his Symphonia Catholica cap. 27. de remissione peccatorum pag. 651. places this These as the common opinion of Protestants most agreeable to the Doctrine of the Fathers We obtain the remission of sins by Repentance Confession Prayers and Tears proceeding from Faith but do not merit to speak properly and therefore we obtain remission of sins not by the merit of our Repentance and Prayers but by the mercy and goodness of God Innocentius Gentiletus a Lawyer of great same among Protestants in his examin of the Council of Trent pag. 66 67. of Justification having before spoken of Faith and Works adds these words But seeing the one cannot be without the other we call them both conjunctly instrumental causes Zanchius in his 5 book De Natura Dei saith We do not simply deny that good works are the cause of Salvation to wit the instrumental rather than the efficient cause which they call sine qua non And afterwards Good Works are the instrumental cause of the possession of Life Eternal for by these as by a means and a lawful way God leads unto the possession of Life Eternal G. Amesius saith that our obedience albeit it be not the principal and meritorius cause of Life Eternal is nevertheless a cause in some respect administring helping and advancing towards the possession of the life Also Richard Baxter in the book above cited pag. 155. saith that we are justified by works in the same kind of causality as by Faith to wit as being both causes sine qua non or conditions of the New Covenant on our part requisite to Justification And pag. 195. he saith It is needless to teach any Schollar who hath read the Writings of Papists how this Doctrine differs from them But lastly because it is fit here to say something of the merit and reward of works I shall add something in this place of our sense and belief concerning that matter we are far from thinking or believing that man merits any thing by his works from God all being of Free Grace and therefore do we and always have denyed that Popish notion of meritum excondigno nevertheless we cannot deny but that God out of his infinite goodness wherewith he hath loved mankind after he communicates to him his Holy Grace and Spirit doth according to his own will recompence and reward the good works of his Children and therefore this merit of congruity or reward in so far as the Scripture is plain and positive for it we may not deny neither wholly reject the word in so far as the Scripture makes use of it For the same Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies merit is also in those places where the Translators express it worth or worthy as Matth. 3.8 1 Thess. 2.12 2 Thess. 1.5 8. concerning which Richard Baxter saith in the above cited book pag. 8. But in a larger sense as promise is an Obligation and the thing promised is said to be debt so the performers of the conditions are called worthy and that which they perform Merit although properly all be of Grace and not of Debt Also those who are called the Fathers of the Church frequently used this word of merit whose sayings concerning this matter I think not needful to insert because it is not doubted but evident that many Protestants are not averse from this word in the sense that we use it The Apology for the Augustine Confession Art 20. hath these words We agree that works are truly meritorius not of remission of sins or Justification but they are meritorious of other rewards Corporal and Spiritual which are indeed as well in this Life as after this Life And further Seeing works are a certain fulfilling of the Law they are rightly said to be meritorious it is rightly said that a reward is due to them In the acts of the conference of Oldenburgh the Electoral Divines pag. 110 265. say In this sense our Churches also are not averse from the word merit used by the Fathers neither therefore do they defend the Popish Doctrine of merit G. Vossius in his Theological These concerning the merits of good works saith We have not adventured to condemn the word merit wholly as being that which both many of the Ancients use and also the reformed Churches have used in their confessions Now that God judgeth and accepteth men according to their works is beyond doubt to those that seriously will read and consider these Scriptures Matth. 17.26 Rom. 2.6 7 10. 2 Cor. 5.10 Ja. 1.25 Heb. 10.35 1 Pet. 1.17 Rev. 22.12 § XIII And to conclude this Theam let none be so bold as to mock God supposing themselves justified and accepted in the sight of God by vertue of Christ's Death and Sufferings while they remain unsanctified and unjustified in their own Hearts and polluted in their Sins lest their hope prove that of the Hypocrite which perisheth Neither let any foolishly imagine that they can by their own works or by the performance of any Ceremonies or Traditions or by the giving of Gold or Money or by afflicting their bodies in Will-worship and voluntary humility or foolishly striving to conform their way to the outward Letter of the Law flatter themselves that they merit before God or draw a debt upon him or that any man or men have Power to make such kind of things effectual to their Justification lest they be found foolish boasters and strangers to Christ and his Righteousness indeed But blessed for ever are they that having truly had a sense of their own unworthyness and sinfulness and having seen all their own endeavours and performances fruitless and vain and beheld their own emptyness and the vanity of their vain Hopes Faith and Confidence while they remained inwardly pricked pursued and condemned by God's Holy Witness in their Hearts and so having applyed themselves thereto and suffered his Grace to work in them are become changed and renewed in the Spirit of their minds past from death to Life and know Jesus arisen in them working both the will and the deed and so having put on the Lord Jesus Christ in effect are cloathed with him and partake of his Righteousness and Nature such
is ever taken away here And how injurious are they to the Efficacy and Power of Christ's appearance Came not Christ to gather a People out of sin into Righteousness out from the Kingdom of Satan into the Kingdom of the Dear Son of God And are not they that are thus gathered by him his Servants his Children his Brethren his Friends Who as he was so are they to be in this World Holy Pure and Vndefiled And doth not Christ still watch over them stand by them pray for them preserve them by his Power and Spirit walk in them and dwell among them even as the Devil on the other hand doth among the reprobate ones How comes it then that the Servants of Christ are less his Servants than the Devils are his or is Christ unwilling to have his Servants throughly pure which were gross Blasphemy to assert contrary to many Scriptures Or is he not able by his Power to preserve and enable his Children to serve him which were no less Blasphemous to affirm of him concerning whom the Scriptures declare that he has overcome Sin Death Hell and the Grave and triumphed over them openly and that all power in Heaven and Earth is given to him But certainly if the Saints sin daily in Thought Word and Deed as these men assert they serve the Devil daily and are subject to his Power and so he prevails more than Christ doth and holds the Servants of Christ in bondage whether Christ will or not But how greatly then doth it contradict the end of Christs coming as it is expressed by the Apostle Eph. 5.25 26 27. Even as Christ also loved the Church and gave himself for it That he might sanctifie and cleanse it with the washing of Water by the Word That he might present it to himself a glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing but that it should be holy and without blemish Now if Christ hath really thus answered the thing he came for then the members of this Church are not always sinning in Thought Word and Deed. Or there is no difference betwixt being sanctified and unsanctified clean and unclean holy and unholy being daily blemished with sin and being without blemish § VI. Fourthly this Doctrine renders the work of the ministry the preaching of the Word the Writing of the Scripture and the Prayers of the Holy men altogether useless and ineffectual As to the first Eph. 4.11 Pastors and Teachers are said to be given for the perfection of the Saints c. till we all come in the unity of the Faith and of the Knowledg of the Son of God unto a perfect man unto a measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ. Now if there be a necessity of sinning daily and in all things then there can be no perfection For such as do so cannot be esteemed perfect And if for effectuating this perfection in the Saints the ministry be appointed and disposed of God do not such as deny the possibility hereof render the ministry useless and of no profit seeing there can be no other true use assigned but to lead People out of sin into Righteousness If so be these ministers assure us that we need never expect to be delivered from it do not they render their own work needless what needs preaching against sin for the reproving of which all preaching is if it can never be forsaken Our Adversaries are exalters of the Scriptures in words much crying up their usefulness and perfection Now the Apostle tells us 2 Tim. 3.17 that the Scriptures are for making the man of God perfect And if this be denyed to be attainable in this Life then the Scriptures are of no profit for in the other life we shall not have use for them It renders the Prayers of the Saints altogether useless seeing themselves do confess they ought to pray daily that God would deliver them from evil and free them from sin by the help of his Spirit and Grace while in this world But though we might suppose this absurdity to follow that their Prayers are without Faith yet were not that so much if it did not infer the like upon the Holy Apostles who prayed earnestly for this end and therefore no doubt believed it attainable Col. 4.12 labouring fervently for you in Prayers that ye may stand perfect c. 1 Thes. 3.13 5.23 c. § VII But Fifthly this Doctrine is contrary to common reason and sense For the two opposite Principles whereof the one rules in the Children of Darkness the other in the Children of Light are Sin and Righteousness And as they are respectively leavened and acted by them so they are accounted either as Reprobated or Justified seeing it is abomination in the sight of God either to Justifie the Wicked or Condemn the Just. Now to say that men cannot be so leavened with the one as to be delivered from the other is in plain words to affirm that Sin and Righteousness are consistent and that a man may be truly termed Righteous though he be daily sinning in every thing he doth And then what difference betwixt good and evil Is not this to fall into that great abomination of puting Light for Darkness and calling good evil and evil good since they say the very best actions of God's Children are defiled and polluted and that those that sin daily in Thought Word and Deed are good men and woman the Saints and Holy Servants of the Holy Pure God Can there be any thing more repugnant than this to common reason Since the subject is still denominated from that accident that doth most influence it as a Wall is called white when there is much whiteness and Black when there is much blackness and such like But when there is more Unrighteousness in a man than Righteousness that man ought rather to be denominated Unrighteous than Righteous Then surely if every man sin daily in Thought Word and Deed and that in his sins there is no Righteousness at all and that all his Righteous actions are polluted and mixed with sin then there is in every man more Unrighteousness than Righteousness and so no man ought to be called righteous no man can be said to be sanctified or washed Where are then the Children of God where are the purified ones where are they who were sometimes unholy but now holy that sometimes were darkness but now are Light in the Lord There can none such be found then at this rate except that unrighteousness be esteemed so And is not this to fall into that abomination above mentioned of justifying the ungodly This certainly lands in that horrid Blasphemy of the Ranters that affirm there is no difference betwixt good and evil and that all is one in the sight of God I could shew many more gross absurdities evil consequences and manifest contradictions plied in this sinful Doctrine but this may suffice at present by which also in a good measure the probation of the
would affirm it never attainable then should there never be a place known by the Saints in this world wherein they might be free of doubting and despair Which as it is most absurd in it self so it is contrary to the manifest experience of thousands Thirdly God hath given to many of his Saints and children and is ready to give unto all a full and certain assurance that they are his and that no power shall be able to pluck them out of hand But this assurance would be no assurance if those who are so assured were not established and confirmed beyond all doubt and hesitation If so then surely there is no possibility for such to miss of that which God hath assured them of And that there is such assurance attainable in this life the Scripture abundantly declareth both in general and as to particular persons As first Rev. 3. v. 12. him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God and he shall go no more out c. which containeth a general promise unto all Hence the Apostle speaks of some that are sealed 2 Cor. 1.22 Who hath also sealed us and given the earnest of his Spirit in our hearts Wherefore the Spirit so sealing is called the earnest or pledge of our inheritance Eph. 1.13 In whom ye were sealed by the holy Spirit of Promise And therefore the Apostle Paul not only in that of the Romans above nored declareth himself to have attained that condition but 2 Tim. 4.7 he affirmeth in these words I have fought a good fight c. which also many good men have and do witness And therefore as there can be nothing more manifest than that which the manifest experience of this time sheweth and therein is found agreeable to the experience of former times so we see there have been both of old and of late that have turned the Grace of God into wantonness that have faln from their faith and integrity thence we may safely conclude such a falling away possible We also see that some of old and of late have attained a certain assurance sometime before they departed that they should inherit eternal life and have accordingly dyed in that good hope Of and concerning whom the Spirit of God testified That they are saved Wherefore we also see that such a state is attainable in this life from which there is not a falling away For seeing the Spirit of God did so testifie it was not possible that they should perish concerning whom he who cannot lye thus bare witness The Tenth Proposition Concerning the Ministry As by this Light or Gift of God all true knowledge in things Spiritual is received and revealed so by the same as it is manifested and received in the heart by the strength and power thereof every true Minister of the Gospel is ordained prepared and supplyed in the work of the Ministry and by the leading moving and drawing hereof ought every Evangelist and Christian Pastor to be led and ordered in his labour and work of the Gospel both as to the place where as to the persons to whom and as to the time wherein he is to minister Moreover who have this authority may and ought to preach the Gospel though without hamane Commission or Literature as on the other hand who want the Authority of this Divine Gift however learned or authorized by the Commission of Men and Churches are to be esteemed but as deceivers and not true Ministers of the Gospel Also who have received this holy and unspotted Gift as they have freely received it so are they freely to give it without hire or bargaining far less to use it as a Trade to get Money by yet if God hath called any one from their Employments or Trades by which they acquire their Lively-hood it may be lawful for such according to the liberty which they feel given them in the Lord to receive such temporals to wit what may be needful for them for meat and clothing as are given them freely and cordially by those to whom they have communicated Spirituals § I. HItherto I have treated of those things which relate to the Christian Faith and Christians as they stand each in his private and particular condition and how and what way every man may be a Christian indeed and so abide Now I come in order to speak of those things that relate to Christians as they are stated in a joynt fellowship and Communion and come under a visible and outward society which society is called the Church of God and in Scripture compared to a body and therefore named the Body of Christ. As then in the natural body there be divers members all concurring to the common end of preserving and confirming the whole body so in this Spiritual and mystical Body there are also divers according to the different measures of Grace and of the Spirit diversly administred unto each member and from this diversity ariseth that distinction of persons in the visible Society of Christians as of Apostles Pastors Evangelists Ministers c. That which in this Proposition is proposed is What makes or constitutes any a Minister of the Church what his qualifications ought to be and how he ought to behave himself But because it may seem somewhat preposterous to speak of the distinct Offices of the Church until something be said concerning the Church in general though nothing positively be said of it in the Proposition yet as here implied I shall briefly premise something thereof and then proceed to the particular members of it § II. It is not in the least my design to meddle with those tedious and many controversies wherewith the Papists and Protestants do tear one another concerning this thing but only according to the Truth manifested to me and revealed in me by the testimony of the Spirit according to that proportion of wisdom given me briefly to hold forth as a necessary introduction both to this matter of the Ministry and of Worship which followeth those things which I together with my Brethren do believe concerning the Church The Church then according to the grammatical signification of the word as it is used in the Holy Scripture signifies an assembly or gathering of many into one place for the Substantive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comes from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I call out of and originally from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I call and indeed as this is the grammatical sense of the word so also it is the real and proper signification of the thing the Church being no other thing but the society gathering or company of such as God hath called out of the World and worldly Spirit to walk in his LIGHT and LIFE The Church then so designed is to be considered as it comprehends all that are thus called and gathered truly by God both such as are yet in this inferiour World and such as having already laid down the earthy Tabernacle are passed into their
preferment men became such by birth and education and not by conversion and renovation of Spirit then there was none so vile none so wicked none so profane who became not a member of the Church And the Teachers and Pastors thereof becoming the Companions of Princes and so being enriched by their benevolence and getting vast treasures and Estates became puffed up and as it were drunken with the vain pomp and glory of this World and so marshalled themselves in manifold orders and degrees not without innumerable contests and alterations who should have the Precedency So the vertue life substance and kernel of the Christian Religion came to be lost and nothing remained but a shaddow and image which dead image or carcass of Christianity to make it take the better with the superstitious multitude of Heathens that became engrossed in it not by any inward conversion of their hearts or by becoming less wicked or superstitious but by a little change in the object of their superstition not having the inward ornament and life of the Spirit became decked with many outward and visible orders and beautified with the gold silver precious stones and the other splendid ornaments of this perishing world so that this was no more to be accounted the Christian Religion and Christian Church notwithstanding the outward profession than the dead body of man is to be accounted a living man which however cunningly embalmed and adorned with ever so much gold or silver or most precious stones or sweet ointments is but a dead body still without sense life or motion For that Apostat Church of Rome has introduced no less ceremonies and superstitions into the Christian profession than was either among Jews or Heathens and that there is and hath been as much yea and more pride covetousness unclean lust luxury fornication profanity and atheism among her teachers and chief Bishops as ever was among any sort of people none need doubt that have read their own authors to wit Platina and others Now though Protestants have reformed from her in some of the most gross points and absurd doctrines relating to the Church and Ministery yet which is to be regretted they have but lopt the branches but retain and plead earnestly for the same root from which these abuses have sprung so that even among them though all that mass of superstition ceremonies and orders be not again established yet the same pride covetousness and sensuality is found to have overspread and leavened their Churches and Ministery and the life power and vertue of true religion is lost among them and the very same death barrenness dryness and emptyness is found in their ministery so that in effect they differ from Papists but in form and some ceremonies being with them apostatized from the life and power the true primitive Church and her Pastors were in so that of both it may be said truly without breach of charity that having only a form of godliness and many of them not so much as that they are deniers of yea enemies to the power of it And this proceeds not simply from their not walking answerable to their own principles and so degenerating that way which also is true but which is worse their setting down to themselves and adhering to certain principles which naturally as a cursed fruit bring forth these bitter fruits these therefore shall afterwards be examined and refuted as the contrary positions of truth in the Proposition are explained and proved For as to the nature and constitution of a Church abstract from their disputes concerning its constant visibility infallibility and the primacy of the Church of Rome the Protestants as in practice so in principles differ not from Papists for they ingross within the compass of their Church whole Nations making their infants members of it by sprinkling a little water upon them so that there is none so wicked or profane who is not a fellow-member no evidence of holiness being required to constitute a member of the Church and look through the Protestant Nations and there shall no difference appear in the lives of the generality of the one more than of the other but he who ruleth in the children of disobedience reigning in both so that the reformation through this defect is but in holding some less gross errors in the notion but not in having the heart reformed and renewed in which mainly the life of Christianity consisteth § VI. But the Popish errors concerning the ministry which they have retained are most of all to be regretted by which chiefly the life and power of Christianity is barred out among them and they kept in death barrenness and dryness there being nothing more hurtful than an error in this respect for where a false and corrupt ministry entreth all other manner of evils follows upon it according to that Scripture adage like people like priest For by their influence instead of ministring life and righteousness they minister death and iniquity The whole back-slidings of the Jewish congregations of old is hereto ascribed The leaders of my people have caused them to err The whole writings of the Prophets are full of such complaints and for this cause under the New Testament we are so often warned and guarded to beware of false Prophets and false Teachers c. What may be thought then where all as to this is out of order where both the foundation call qualifications maintenance and whole discipline is different from and opposite to the ministry of the primitive Church yea and necessarily tends to the shutting out a Spiritual ministry and the in-bringing and establishing a carnal This shall appear by parts § VII That then which comes first to be questioned in this matter is concerning the Call of a Minister to wit what maketh or how cometh a man to be a Minister Quest. Pastor or Teacher in the Church of Christ. We answer by the inward power and vertue of the Spirit of God For as saith our proposition Answ. having received the true knowledg of things Spiritual by the Spirit of God without which they cannot be known and being by the same in measure purified and sanctified he comes thereby to be called and moved to minister to others being able to speak from a living experience of what he himself is a witness and therefore knowing the terror of the Lord he is fit to perswade men c. 2 Cor. 5.11 and his words and ministery proceeding from the inward power and vertue reaches to the heart of his hearers and makes them approve of him and be subject unto him Our adversaries are forced to confess that this were indeed desirable and best but this they will not have to be absolutely necessary I shall first prove the necessity of it and then shew how much they err in that which they make more necessary than this Divine and Heavenly call First That which is necessary to make a man a Christian Arg. so as without it he cannot
all have in a measure but we understand men that are gracious leavened by it into the nature thereof so as thereby to bring forth these good Fruits of a blameless conversation and of justice holiness patience and temperance which the Apostle requires as necessary in a true Christian Bishop and Minister Thirdly they object the example of the false Prophets of the Pharisees and of Judas But first as to the false Prophets there can nothing be more foolish and ridiculous as if because there were false Prophets truely false without the Grace of God therefore Grace is not necessary to a true Christian Minister Indeed if they had proven that true Prophets wanted this Grace they had said something But what have false Prophets common with true Ministers but that they pretend falsely that which they have not And because false Prophets want true Grace will it therefore follow that true Prophets ought not to have it or need it not yea doth it not much rather follow that they ought to have it that they may be true and not false The example of the Pharisees and Priests under the Law will not answer to the Gospel times because God set apart a particular Tribe for that Service and particular Families to whom it belonged by a lineal Succession and also their service and work was not purely Spiritual but only the performance of some outward and carnal observations and ceremonies which were but a shadow of the Substance that was to come and therefore their work made not the comers thereunto perfect as pertaining to the Conscience seeing they were appointed only according to the Law of a carnal commandment and not according to the power of an endless life Notwithstanding as in the figure they behoved to be without blemish as to their outward man and in the performance of their work they behoved to be washed and purified from their outward pollutions so now under the Gospel times the Ministers in the anti-type must be inwardly without blemish in their Souls and spirits being as the Apostle requires blameless and in their work and service must be pure and undefiled from their inward pollutions and so clean and holy that they may offer up Spiritual Sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 As to Judas the season of his ministry was not wholly Evangelical as being before the work was finished and while Christ himself and his Disciples were yet subject to the Jewish Observances and Constitutions and therefore his Commission as well as that which the rest received with him at that time was only to the House of Israel Matth. 10.5 6. which made that by vertue of that Commission the rest of the Apostles were not impowered to go forth and preach after the Resurrection until they had waited at Jerusalem for the pouring forth of the Spirit So that it appears Judas's ministry was more Legal than Evangelical Secondly Judas's Case as all will acknowledge was singular and extraordinary he being immediately called by Christ himself and accordingly furnished and impowered by him to preach and do miracles which immediate Commission our Adversaries do not so much as pretend to and so fall short of Judas who trusted in Christs Words and therefore went forth and preached without Gold or Silver or Scrip for his Journey giving freely as he had freely received which our Adversaries will not do as hereafter shall be observed Also that Judas at that time had not the least measure of Gods Grace I have not as yet heard proved But is it not sad that even Protestants should lay aside the eleven good and faithful Apostles and all the rest of the holy Disciples and Ministers of Christ and betake them to that one of whom it was testified that he was a devil for a pattern and example to their Ministry Alas it is to be regretted that too many of them resemble this pattern over much Obj. Another Objection is usually made against the necessity of Grace that in case it were necessary then such as wanted it could not truly administer the Sacraments and consequently the people would be left in doubts and infinite scruples as not knowing certainly whether they had truly received them because not knowing infallibly whether the administrators were truly gracious men But this objection hitteth not us at all because the nature of that Spiritual and Christian Worship Answ. which we according to the truth plead for is such as is not necessarily attended with these carnal and outward institutions from the administring of which the objection ariseth and so hath not any such absurdity following upon it as will afterwards more clearly appear § XVIII Though then we make not humane Learning necessary yet we are far from excluding true learning to wit that learning which proceedeth from the inward teachings and instructions of the Spirit whereby the Soul learneth the secret wayes of the Lord becomes acquainted with many inward travels and exercises of the mind and learneth by a living experience how to overcome evil and the temptations of it by following the Lord and walking in his Light and waiting dayly for wisdom and knowledge immediately from the revelation thereof and so layeth up these heavenly and Divine Lessons in the good treasure of the heart as honest Mary did the sayings which she heard and things which she observed and also out of this Treasure of the Soul as the good Scribe brings forth things new and old according as the same Spirit moves and gives a true liberty and as need is for the Lords glory whose the Soul is and for whom and with an eye to whose glory she which is the Temple of God learneth to do all things This is that good learning which we think necessary to a true Minister by and through which learning a man can well instruct teach and admonish in due season and testifie for God from a certain experience as David did Solomon and the holy Prophets of old and the blessed Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ Who testified of what they had seen heard felt and handled of the Word of Life 1 Joh. 1.1 ministring the Gift according as they had received the same as good Stewards of the manifold Grace of God and preached not the uncertain rumors of others by hear-say which they had gathered meerly in the comprehension while they were strangers to the thing in their own experience in themselves as to teach people how to believe while themselves were unbelieving or how to overcome sin while themselves are slaves to it as all ungracious men are or to believe and hope for an eternal reward which themselves have not as yet arrived at c· § XIX But let us examine this Literature which they make so necessary to the being of a Minister as in the first place the knowledge of the Tongues at least of the Latine Greek and Hebrew The reason for this is that they may read the Scriptures which is their only
Apostle used the word Evangelist Calvin acknowledgeth that such as preach the Gospel in purity after some time of Apostacy may be truly called Evangelists and therefore saith that there were Apostles in his time and hence the Protestants at their first coming forth termed themselves Evangeleci or Evangeliks Lastly an Apostle if we look to the Etymology of the word signifies one that is sent and in respect every true Minister is sent of God in so far he is an Apostle though these Twelve because of their being specially sent of Christ were therefore called Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or per eminentiam i. e. by way of excellency And yet there was no limitation to such a number as some foolishly imagine it appears because after that number was filled up the Apostle Paul was afterwards so called therefore we judg that these are no distinct separate Offices but only Names used upon occasions to express the more eminent arising and shining forth of God's Grace as if any Minister of Christ should now Prosolyte or turn a whole Nation to the Christian Faith though he had no distinct Office yet I doubt not but both Papists and Protestants would judg it tolerable to call such an one an Apostle or an Evangelist For some of the Jesuits call of their Sect Apostles of India and of Japon upon this alledged account And Calvin testifies that there were Apostles and Evangelists in his time upon the account of the Reformation upon which account we have known John Knox often called the Apostle of Scotland so that we conclude that Ministers Pastors or Teachers doth comprehend all and that the Office is but one and therefore in that respect we judg there ought to be no precedency among them to prove which I shall not insist seeing it is shewn largely and treated of by such as have denyed the Diocesian Episcopacy as they call it § XXVI As to the first part of the objection viz. that I seem to make no distinction betwixt the Minister and People I answer If it be understood of a liberty to Speak or Prophecy by the Spirit I say all may do that when moved thereunto as above is shewn but we do believe and affirm that some are more particularly called to the work of the Ministry and therefore are fitted of the Lord for that purpose whose work is more constantly and particularly to instruct exhort admonish oversee and watch over their Brethren and that as there is something more incumbent upon them in that respect than upon every common Believer so also as in that relation there is due to them from the Flock such obedience and subjection as is mentioned in these Testimonys of the Scripture Heb. 13.17 1 Thess. 5.12 13. 1 Tim. 5.17 1 Pet. 5.5 Also besides these who are thus particularly called to the Ministry and constant labour in the Word and Doctrine there are also the Elders who though they be not moved to a frequent Testimony by way of Declaration in Words yet as such as are grown up in the experience of the blessed work of Truth in their Hearts watch over and privately admonish the Young care for the Widows the Poor and Fatherless and care and look that nothing be wanting but that Peace Love Unity Concord and Soundness be preserved in the Church of Christ and this answers to the Deacons mentioned Acts 6. That which we oppose is the distinction of Laity and Clergy which in the Scripture is not to be found whereby none are admitted unto the work of the Ministry but such as are educated at Schools on purpose and instructed in Logick and Philosophy c. And so are at their Apprenticeship to learn the Art and Trade of Preaching even as a man learns any other Art whereby all other honest mechanick men who have not got this Heathenish Art are excluded from having this priviledg and so he that is a Schollar thus bred up must not have any honest trade whereby to get him a Lively-hood if he once intend for the Ministry but he must see to get him a place and then he hath his set hire for a Lively-hood to him he must also be distinguished from the rest by the Colour of his Cloaths for he must only wear Black and must be a Master of Arts but more of this hereafter § XXVII As this manner of separating men for the Ministry is nothing like the Church in the Apostles days so great Evils have and do follow upon it for first Parents seeing both the Honour and Profit that attends the Clergy do allot their Children sometimes from their Infancy to it and so breed them up on purpose and others come to age upon the same account betake them to the same Trade and having these natural and acquired parts that are judged the necessary qualifications of a Minister are thereby admitted and so are bred up in Idleness and Pleasure thinking it a disgrace for them to work with their hands only if they study a little out of their Books to make a discourse once or twice in a Week during the running of an Hour-glass Whereas the Gift Grace and Spirit of God to call gift and qualifie for the Ministry is neglected and overlooked And many Covetous Corrupt Earthly Carnal men having a meer shew and form but strangers to and utterly ignorant of the inward work of Grace upon their hearts are brought in and intrude themselves and so through them Death Barrenness and Darkness and by consequence Superstition Error and Idolatry hath entred and leavened the Church and they that will narrowly observe shall find that it was thus the Apostacy came to take place of the Truth of which I could give many examples which for brevities sake I omit For so the Office Reverence and respect due to it was annexed to the meer name so that when once a man was ordained a Bishop or a Priest he was heard and believed though he had nothing of the Spirit Power and Life that the true Apostles and Ministers were in that in a short time the succession came to be of the Name and Title and the Office was thereto annexed and not of the Nature Vertue and Life Which in effect made them to cease to be the Ministry and Ministers of Christ but only a shadow and vain image of it which also decaying was in some ages so metamorphosed that not only the substance was lost but the very form wholly vitiated alterated and marred that it may be far better said of the pretended Christian Church as was disputed of Theseus's Boat which by the piecing of many new pieces of Timber was wholly altered whether indeed it were the same or another But in case that the first had been of Oak and the last pieces put in but of rotten Fir and that also the form had been so far changed as to be nothing like the first I think it would have suffered no dispute but might have easily been concluded to be quite
that they shun to witness for Christ for fear of hurt to themselves lest they mistake them As for that private meeting of the Disciples we have only an account of the matter of fact but that suffices not to make of it a president for us and mens aptness to imitate them in that which for ought we know might have been an act of weakness and not in other things of the contrary nature shews that it is not a true zeal to be like those Disciples but indeed a desire to preserve themselves which moves them so to do Lastly as to that of Paul's being conveyed out of Damascus the case was singular and is not to be doubted but it was done by a special allowance from God who having designed him to be a principal Minister of his Gospel saw meet in hss Wisdom to disoppoint the wicked council of the Jews But our adversaries have no such pretext for fleeing whose fleeing proceeds from self preservation not from immediate revelation And that Paul made not this the method of his proceedure appears in that at another time notwithstanding the perswasion of his Friends and certain Prophecys of his sufferings to come he would not be disswaded to go up to Jerusalem which according to the fore-mentioned rule he should have done But lastly to conclude this matter Glory to God and our Lord Jesus Christ that now these twenty five years since we were known to be a distinct and separate People hath given us faithfully to suffer for his Name without shrinking or fleeing the Cross and what liberty we now enjoy it is by his Mercy and not by an outward working or procuring of our own but 't is he has wrought upon the hearts of our opposers nor was it any outward interest hath procured it unto us but the testimony of our harmlesness in the hearts of our Superiors for God hath preserved us hitherto in the patient suffering of Jesus that we have not given away our cause by persecuting any which few if any Christians that I know can say Now against our unparalleled yet innocent and Christian cause our malicious enemies have nothing to say but that if we had Power we would do so likewise This is a piece of meer unreasonable malice and a priviledg they take to judg of things to come which they have not by immediate revelation and surely it is the greatest heighth of harsh judgment to say men would do contrary to their professed Principle if they could who have from their practice hitherto given no ground for it and wherein they only judg others by themselves such conjectures cannot militate against us so long as we are innocent And if ever we prove guilty of persecution by forcing other men by corporal punishment to our way then let us be judged the greatest of Hypocrites and let not any spare to persecute us AMEN saith my Soul The Fifteenth Proposition Concerning Salutations and Recreations c. Seeing the chief end of all Religion is to redeem men from the Spirit and vain conversation of this World and to lead into inward communion with God before whom if we fear always we are accounted happy therefore all the vain customs and habits thereof both in word and deed are to be rejected and forsaken by those who come to this fear such as the taking off the Hat to a man the bowings and cringings of the body and such other Salutations of that kind with all the foolish and superstitious formalities attending them all which man has invented in his degenerate state to feed his Pride in the vain pomp and glory of this world as also the unprofitable Plays frivolous Recreations Sportings and Gaming 's which are invented to pass away the precious time and divert the mind from the witness of God in the heart and from the living sense of his fear and from that Evangelical Spirit wherewith Christians ought to be leavened and which leads into sobriety gravity and godly fear in which as we abide the blessing of the Lord is felt to attend us in those actions which we are necessarily ingaged in order to the taking care for the sustenance of the outward man § I. HAving hitherto treated of the Principles of Religion both relating to Doctrine and Worship I am now to speak of some practices which have been the product of this Principle in those Witnesses whom God hath raised up in this day to testifie for his Truth It will not a little commend them I suppose in the judgment of sober and judicious men that taking them generally even by the Confession of their Adversaries they are found to be free of those Abominations which abound among other Professors such as are Swearing Drunkenness Whoredom Riotousness c. And that generally the very coming among this People doth naturally work such a change so that many vitious and profane persons have been known by coming to this Truth to become sober and vertuous and many light vain and wanton ones to become grave and serious as our adversaries dare not deny yet that they may not want something to detract us for cease not to accuse us for those things which when found among themselves they highly commend thus our gravity they call sullenness our seriousness melancholly our silence sottishness Such as have been vitious and profane among them but by coming to us have left off those evils lest they should commend the truth of our profession they say that whereas they were profane before they are become worse in being hypocritical and spiritually proud If any before dissolute and profane among them by coming to the Truth with us become frugal and diligent then they will charge them with covetousness And if any eminent among them for seriousness piety and discoveries of God come unto us then they will say they were always subject to melancholly and to enthusiasm though before when among them it was esteem'd neither melancholly nor enthusiasm in an evil sense but Christian gravity and Divine revelation Our boldness and Christian suffering the call obstinacy and pertinacy though half as much if among themselves they would account Christian courage and nobility And though thus by their envy they strive to read all relating to us backwards counting these things vice in us which in themselves they would extol as vertues yet hath the strength of Truth extorted this confession often from them that we are generally a pure and clean people as to the outward conversation But this they say is but in policy to commend our heresie But such policy it is say I as Christ and his Apostles made use of and all good Christians ought to do yea so far hath Truth prevailed by the purity of his followers that if one that is called a Quaker do but that which is common among them as to laugh and be wanton speak at large and keep not his word punctually or be overtaken with hastyness or anger they presently say O!
greatly contribute to the commendation of Christianity and to the increase of the life and vertue of Christ if all superfluous titles of honour profuseness and prodigality in meat and apparel excess of gaming sporting and playing were laid aside and forborn And whether such as lay them aside in so doing walk not more like the Disciples of Christ and his Apostles and are therein nearer their example than such as use them Whether the laying them aside would hinder any from being good Christians or if Christians might not be better without them than with them Certainly the sober and serious among all sorts will say yea Then surely such as lay them aside as reckoning them unsutable for Christians are not to be blamed but rather commended for so doing because that both in principle and practise they effectually advance that which others acknowledg were desirable but can never make effectual so long as they allow the use of them as lawful And God hath made it manifest in this age that by discovering the evil of such things and leading his Witnesses out of them and to testifie against them he hath produced effectually in many that mortification and abstraction from the love and cares of this world who daily are conversing in the world but inwardly redeemed out of it both in Wedlock and in their lawful imployments which was judged could only be obtained by such as were shut up in Cloysters and Monasteries This much in general § III. As to the first we affirm positively that it is not lawful for Christians either to give or receive these titles of honour as your Holiness your Majesty your Excellency your Eminency c. First because these titles are no part of that obedience which is due to Magistrates or Superiors neither doth the giving them add to nor diminish from that subjection we owe to them which consists in obeying their just and lawful commands not in titles and designations Secondly We find not that in the Scripture any such titles are used either under the Law or the Gospel but that in the speaking to Kings Princes or Nobles they used only a simple compellation as O King and that without any further designation save perhaps the name of the person as O King Agrippa c. Thirdly It laies a necessity upon Christians most frequently to lie because the persons obtaining these titles either by Election or Hereditarily may frequently be found to have nothing really in them deserving them or answering them as some to whom it is said Your Excellency having nothing of Excellency in them and who is called Your Grace appear to be an enemy to Grace and he who is called Your Honour is known to be base and ignoble I wonder what law of man or what patent ought to oblige me to make a lie in calling good evil and evil good I wonder what Law of man can secure me in so doing from the just Judgment of God that will make me count for every idle word and to lye is something more Surely Christians should be ashamed that such Laws manifestly crossing the Law of God should be among them If it be said We ought in Charity to suppose that they have these vertues because the King has bestowed those titles upon them or that they are descended of such as deserved them I answer Charity destroys not knowledg I am not obliged Answ. by charity either to believe or speak a lie Now it is apparent and cannot be denied by any but that those vertues are not in many of the persons expressed by the titles they bear neither will they allow to speak so to such in whom these vertues are unless they be so dignified by outward Princes So that such as are truly vertuous must not be stiled by their vertues because not priviledged by the Princes of this World and such as have them not must be so called because they have obtained a patent so to be and all this is done by those who pretend to be his followers that commanded his Disciples not to call any man Master and told them such could not believe as received honour one from another and sought not the honour which cometh from God only This is so plain to such as will indeed be Christians that it needs no consequence Fourthly as to those titles of Holiness Eminency and Excellency used among the Papists to the Pope and Cardinal c. and Grace Lordship and Worship used to the Clergy among the Protestants it is a most blasphemous usurpation For if they use Holiness and Grace because these things ought to be in a Pope or in a Bishop how come they to usurp that peculiarly to themselves Ought not Holiness and Grace to be in every Christian And so every Christian should say Your Holiness and Your Grace one to another Next how can they in reason claim any more titles than were practised and received by the Apostles and primitive Christians whose successors they pretend they are and as whole successors and no otherwise themselves I judge will confess any honour they seek is due to them Now if they neither sought received nor admitted such honour nor titles how came these by them If they say they did let them prove it if they can we find no such thing in the Scripture The Christians speak to the Apostles without any such denominations neither saying If it please your Grace Your Holiness Your Lordship nor your Worship they are neither called My Lord Peter nor My Lord Paul nor yet Master Peter nor Master Paul nor Doctor Peter nor Doctor Paul but singly Peter and Paul and that not only in the Scripture but for some hundreds of years after So that this appears to be a manifest fruit of the Apostasie for if these titles arise either from the office or worth of the persons it will not be denied but the Apostles deserved them better than any now that call for them But the case is plain the Apostles had the Holiness the Excellency the Grace and because they were Holy Excellent and Gracious they neither used nor admitted of such titles but these having neither Holiness Excellency nor Grace will needs be so called to satisfie their ambitious and ostentive minds which is a manifest token of their Hypocrisie Fifthly as to that title of Majesty usually ascribed to Princes we do not find it given to any such in the Holy Scripture But that it is specially and peculiarly ascribed unto God as 1 Chron. 29.11 Job 37.22 Psal. 21.5.29.4.43.3.63.1.96.6 Isa. 2.10.24.14.26.10 Heb. 1.3 2 Pet. 1.16 and many more places Hence saith Jude ver 25. To the only Wise God our Saviour be Glory and Majesty c. not to men We find in Scripture the proud King Nebuchadnezzar assuming this title to himself Dan. 4.30 who at that time received a sufficient reproof by a sudden Judgment which came upon him Therefore in all the compellations used to Princes in the Old Testament is not to be
inherent to him either by his Father or by any patent Theophilus had obtained from any of the Princes of the Earth or that he would have given it him in case he had not been truly Excellent and without this he proved which never can there can nothing hence be deduced against us The like may be said of that of Paul to Festus whom he would not have called such if he had not been truly Noble as indeed he was in that he suffered him to be heard in his own cause and would not give way to the fury of the Jewes against him it was not because of any outward Title bestowed upon Festus that he so called him else he would have given the same Compellation to his predecessor Felix who had the same office but being a covetous man we find he gives him no such Stile § V. It will not be unfit in this place to say something concerning the using of the singular number to one Person of this there is no controversie in the Latine for when we speak to one we always use the Pronoun TU and he that would do otherwise would break the rules of Grammar For what boy learning his rudiments is ignorant that it is incongruous to say vos amas vos legis that is you lov'st you readst speaking to one But the pride of man that hath corrupted many things refuses also to use this simplicity of speaking in the vulgar Languages For being puff'd up with a vain opinion of themselves as if the singular number were not sufficient to them they will have others to speak to them in the plural Hence Luther in his plays reproves and mocks this manner of speaking saying Magister vos es iratus Which corruption Erasmus sufficiently refutes in his Colloquys Concerning which likewise James Howel in his epistle to the Nobility of England before the French and English Dictionary takes notice that both in France and in other Nations the word THOU was used in speaking to one but by success of time when the Roman Common-wealth grew into an Empire the Courtiers began to magnifie the Emperor as being furnished with power to confer dignities and offices using the word You yea and deifying him with more remarkable titles concerning which matter we read in the Epistles of Symmachus to the Emperors Theodosius and Valentinianus where he useth these forms of speaking Vestra Aeternitas your Eternity Vestrum numen your Godhead Vestra serenitas your Serenity Vestra clementia your Clemency So that the word You in the plural number together with the other titles and compellations of honour seem to have taken their rise from Monarchial government which afterwards by degrees came to be derived to private persons The same is witnessed by John Maresius of the French Academy in the Preface of his Clovis Let none wonder saith he that the word Thou is used in this work to Princes and Princesses For we use the same to God and of old the same was used to Alexanders Caesars Queens and Empresses The use of the word You when one person is spoken to was only introduced by these base flatteries of men of later ages to whom it seemed good to use the plural number to one person that he may imagine himself alone to be equal to many others in dignity and worth from whence at last it came to persons of lower quality To the same purpose speaketh also M. Godeau in his preface to the New Testament translation I had rather saith he faithfully keep to the express words of Paul than exactly follow the polished stile of our tongue Therefore I alwaies use that form of calling God in the singular number nor in the plural and therefore I say rather Thou than You I confess indeed that the civility and custom of this world requires him to be honoured after that manner but it is likewise on the contrary true that the original tongue of the New Testament hath nothing common with such manners and civility so that not one of these many old versions we have doth observe it Let not men believe that we give not respect enough to God in that we call him by the word Thou which is nevertheless far otherwise for I seem to my self may be by the effect of custom more to honour his Divine Majesty in calling him after this manner than if I should call him after the manners of men who are so delicat in their forms of speech See how clearly and evidently these men witness that this form of speaking and these profane Titles derive their origin from the base flattery of those last ages and from the delicate haughtiness of worldly men who have invented these Novelties that thereby they might honor one another under I know not what pretence of civility and respect From whence many of the present Christians so accounted are become so perverse in commending most wicked men and wicked customs that the simplicity of the Gospel is wholly lost so that the giving of men and things their own names is not only worn out of custom but the doing thereof is accounted absurd and rude by such kind of delicate Parasites who desire to ascribe to this flattery and abuse the name of Civility Moreover that this way of speaking proceeds from a high and proud mind hence appears because that men usually use the singular number to beggars and to their servants yea and in their prayers to God Thus the superior will speak to his inferior who yet will not bear that the inferior so speak to him as judging it a kind of reproach unto him So hath the pride of men placed God and the beggar in the same Category I think I need not use arguments to prove to such as know congruous language that we ought to use the singular number speaking to one which is the common dialect of the whole Scripture as also the most interpreters do translate it Seeing therefore it is manifest to us that this form of speaking to men in the plural number doth proceed from pride as well as that it is in it self a lye we found a necessity upon us to testifie against this corruption by using the singular equally unto all And albeit no reason can be given why we should be persecuted upon this account especially by Christians who profess to follow the rule of Scripture whose dialect this is yet it would perhaps seem incredible if I should relate how much we have suffered for this thing and how these proud ones fume fret and gnash their teeth frequently beating and striking us when we speak to them thus in the singular number whereby we are the more confirmed in our judgment as seeing that this Testimony of Truth which God hath given us to bear in all things doth so vex the serpentine nature in the Children of Darkness § VI. Secondly Next unto this of titles the other part of honor used among Christians is the kneeling bowing and uncovering of the head to
more than these cometh of evil And saith James lest ye fall into Condemnation Which words both all and every one of them do make such a full prohibition and so free of all exception that it is strange how men that boast the Scripture is the Rule of their faith and life can counterfeit any exception Certainly reason ought to teach every one that it is not lawful to make void a general prohibition coming from God by such opposition unless the exception be as clearly and evidently expressed as the prohibition neither is it enough to endeavour to confirm it by consequences and probabilitys which are obscure and uncertain and not sufficient to bring quiet to the Conscience For if they say that there is therefore an exception and limitation in the words because there are found exceptions in the other general prohibition of this fifth chapter as in the forbidding of divorcement where Christ saith It hath been said Whosoever shall put away his Wife let him give her a writing of divorcement But I say unto you That whosoever shall put away his Wife saving for the cause of fornication causeth her to commit Adultery If I say they say this they not only labour in vain but also fight against themselves because they can produce no exception of this general command of not swearing expressed by God to any under the New Covenant after Christ gave this prohibition so clear as that which is made in the prohibition it self moreover if Christ would have excepted Oaths made before Magistrates certainly he had then expressed adding except in judgment before the Magistrate or the like as he did in that of divorcement by these words saving for the cause of fornication which being so it is not lawful for us to except or distinguish or which is all one make void this general prohibition of Christ it would be far less agreeable to Christian holyness to bring upon our heads the crimes of so many Oaths which by reason of this corruption and exception are so frequent among Christians Neither is it to be omitted that without doubt the most learned Doctors of each Sect know that these forementioned words were understood by the Antient Fathers of the first three hundred years after Christ to be a prohibition of all sorts of Oaths It is not then without reason that we wonder that the Popish Doctors and Priests bind themselves by an Oath to interpret the Holy Scriptures according to the universal exposition of the Holy Fathers who notwithstanding understood those controverted texts quite contrary to what these Modern Doctors do and from thence also doth clearly appear the vanity and foolish certainty so to speak of Popish traditions for if by the writings of the Fathers so called the faith of the Church of these ages may be demonstrated it is clear they have departed from the faith of the Church of the first three Ages in the point of swearing Moreover because not only Papists but also Lutherans and Calvinists and some others do restrict the words of Christs and James I think it needful to make manifest the vain foundation upon which their presumption in this matter is built Obj. § XI First they object That Christ only forbids these Oaths that are made by Creatures and things Created and they prove it thence because he numbers some of these things Secondly All rash and vain oaths in familiar discourses because he saith Let your communication be Yea Yea and Nay Nay To which I answer First that the Law did forbid all Oaths made answer 1 by the Creatures as also all vain and rash Oaths in our common Discourses commanding that men should only swear by the name of God and that neither falsly nor rashly for that is to take his Name in vain Secondly it is most evident that Christ forbids somewhat Answ. that was permitted under the Law to wit to swear by the Name of God because it was not lawful for any man to swear but by God himself and because he saith neither by Heaven because it is the Throne of God therefore he excludes all other Oaths even those which are made by God for he saith chap. 23.22 He that shall swear by Heaven sweareth by the Throne of God and by him that sitteth thereon whtch is also to be understood of the rest Lastly that he might put the matter beyond all controversie he answer 3 adds neither by any other oath Therefore seeing to swear before the Magistrate by God is an Oath it is here without doubt forbidden Secondly they object that by these words Oaths by Gods Name cannot be forbidden because the Heavenly Father hath commanded them Obj. for the Father and the Son are one which eould not be if the Son did forbid that which the Father commanded I answer They are indeed One Answ. and cannot contradict one another nevertheless the Father gave many things to the Jews for a time because of their infirmity under the old Covenant which had only a shaddow of good things to come not the very Substance of things until Christ should come who was the Substance and by whose coming all these things evanished to wit Sabbaths Circumcision the Paschal Lamb men used then Sacrifices who lived in controversies with God and one with other which all are abrogated in the coming of the Son who is the Substance Eternal Word and essential Oath and Amen in whom the promises of God are Yea and Amen who came that men might be redeemed out of strife and might make an end of controversie Thirdly they object But all Oaths are not Ceremonies Obj. nor any part of the Ceremonial Law I answer Except it be shewn to be an eternal immutable Answ. and moral preceept it withstands not neither are they of so old an origin as tithes and the offering of the first fruits of the ground which by Abel and Cain were offered long before the ceremonial Law or the use of Oaths which whatever may be alledged against it were no doubt ceremonies and therefore no doubt unlawful now to be practised Obj. Fourthly they object that to swear by the Name of God is a moral precept of continual duration because it is marked with his essential and moral worship Deut. 6.13 and 10.20 Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God and serve him alone thou shalt cleave to him and swear by his Name Answ. I answer this proves not that it is a moral and eternal precept for Moses adds that to all the precepts and ceremonies in several places as Deut. 10.12 13. saying And now Israel what doth the Lord thy God require of thee but to fear the Lord thy God to walk in his ways and to love him and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy Soul To keep the Commandments of the Lord and his Statutes which I command thee this day And chap 14. vers 23. the fear of the Lord is mentioned together with the Tithes And so also
to his Brethren Ninthly they object Isa. 65.16 where speaking of the Evangelical times Obj. he saith That he who blesseth himself in the Earth shall bless himself in the God of Truth and he that sweareth in the Earth shall swear by the God of Truth because the former troubles are forgotten and because they are hid from mine Eyes For behold I create new Heavens and a new Earth Therefore in these times we ought to swear by the Name of the Lord. I answer It is ordinary for the Prophets to express the greatest duties of Evangelical times in Mosaical terms as appears among others Answ. from Jer. 31.38 39 40. Ezek. 36.25 and 40. and Isa. 45.23 I have sworn by my self that unto me ever knee shall bowe every tongue shall swear Where the Righteousness of the New Jerusalem the purity of the Gospel with its Spiritual Worship and the profession of the Name of Cbrist are expressed under forms of speaking used to Old Jerusalem under the washings of the Law under the names of Ceremonles the Temple Services Sacrifices Oaths c. Yea that which the Prophet speaks here of Swearing the Apostle Paul interprets it expresly of confession saying Rom. 14.11 For it is written As I live saith the Lord Every knee shall bowe to me and every tongue shall confess to God Which being rightly considered none can be ignorant but these words which the Prophet writes under the Law when the Ceremonial Oaths were in use to wit Every Tongue shall swear whereby the Apostle being under the Gospel when those Oaths became abolished expressed by Every tongue shall confess Tenthly they object But the Apostle Paul approves Oaths used among men when he writes Heb. 6.16 Obj. For men verily swear by the greater and an Oath of Confirmation is to them an end of all strife But there are as many contests fallacies and differences at this time as there were ever Therefore the necessity of Oaths doth yet remain I answer the Apostle tells indeed in this place what men at that time did who lived in controversies and incredulity not what they ought to have done nor what the Saints did who were redeemed from strife and incrudulity and had come to Christ that Truth and Amen of God Moreover he only alludes to a certain custom usual among men that he might express the firmity of the Divine Promise that he might excite in the Saints so much the more confidence in God promising to them not that he might instigate them to swear against the law of God or confirm them in that no not at all for neither doth 1 Cor. 9.24 teach Christians the vain races whereby men often times even to the destruction of their Bodies are wearied to obtain a corruptible prize So neither doth Christ who is the Prince of Peace teach his Disciples to fight albeit he takes notice Luk. 14.31 what it behoveth such Kings to do who are accustomed to fight as prudent warriors therein Secondly as to what pertains to contests perfidies and diffidences among men which our adversaries affirm to have grown to such an height that Swearing is at present as necessary as ever that we deny not at all for we see and daily experience teacheth us that all manner of deceit and malice doth encrease among worldly men and false Christians but not among true Christians but because men cannot trust one another and therefore require Oaths one of another it will not therefore follow that true Christians ought to do so whom Christ has brought to true faithfulness and honesty as well towards God as one towards another and therefore has delivered them from contests perfidies and consequently from Oaths Eleventhly they object We grant that among true Christians there is not need of Oaths Obj. but by what means shall we infallibly know them It will follow then that Oaths are at present needful and that it is lawful for Christians to swear to wit that such may be satisfied who will not acknowledg this and the other man to be a Christian. I answer It is no waies lawful for a Christian to swear whom Christ hath called to his essential Truth Answ. which was before all Oaths forbidding him to swear and on the contrary commanding him to speak the Truth in all things to the honour of Christ who called him that it may appear that the words of his Disciples may be as truly believed as the Oaths of all the worldly men Neither is it lawful for them to be unfaithful in this that they may please others for that they may avoid their hurt for thus the primitive Christians for some ages remained faithful who being required to swear did unanimously answer I am a Christian I swear not What shall I say of the Heathens some of whom arrived to that degree For Diodoris Siculus relates lib. 16. that the giving of the right hand was among the Persians a sign of speaking the Truth and the Scythians as Qu. Curtius relates said in their conferences with Alexander the Great Think not that the Scythians confirm their friendship by swearing they swear by keeping their promises Stobaeus in his third Sermon tells that Solomon said A good man ought to be in that estimation that he need not an Oath because it is to be reputed a lessening of his honour if he be forced to swear Pythagoras in his Oration among other things hath this maxime as that which concerns the administration of the Common-wealth Let no man call God to witness by an Oath no not in judgment but let every man so accustom himself to speak that he may become worthy to be trusted even without an Oath Basil the Great commends Clinias an Heathen that he had rather pay three talents which are about three thousand pound than swear Socrates as Stobaeus relates Serm. 14. had this sentence the duty of good men requires that they shew to the world that their manners and actions are more firm than Oaths the same was the judgment of Isocrates Plato also stood against Oaths in his judgments De Leg. 12. Quintilianus takes notice that it was of old a kind of infamy if any was desired to swear but to require an Oath of a noble man was like an examining him by the Hangman Marcus Aurelius Antonius the Emperor of Rome saith in his description of a good man Such is his integrity that he needs not an Oath So also some Jews did witness as Grotius relates out of Maimonides It is best for a man to abstain from all Oaths The Esseans as Philo Judaeus relates did esteem their words more firm than Oaths and Oaths were esteemed among them as needless things And Philo himself speaking of the third Commandment explains his mind thus viz. It were better altogether not to swear but to be accustomed alwaies to speak the Truth that naked words might have the strength of an Oath And elswhere he saith It is more agreeable to natural Reason altogether to abstain from Swearing
when he would teach us to know what the Divine Goodness is calls not for speculation but sensation Taste and see how good the Lord is That is not the best and truest knowledg of God which is wrought out by the labour and sweat of the Brain but that which is kindled within us by an heavenly warmth in our Hearts And again there is a knowledg of the Truth as it is in Jesus as it is in a Christ-like nature as it is in that sweet mild humble and loving Spirits of Jesus which spreads it self like a Morning-star upon the spirits of good men full of Light and Life It profits little to know Christ himself after the flesh but he gives his Spirit to good men that searcheth the deep things of God And again it is but thin airy knowledg that is got by meer speculation which is usher'd in by Syllogisms and demonstrations but that which springs forth from true goodness is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Origen speaketh it brings such a Divine Light to the Soul as is more clear and convincing than any demonstration § III. That this certain and undoubted method of the true knowledg of God hath been brought out of use hath been none of the least devices of the Devil to secure mankind to his kingdom For after the light and glory of the Christian Religion had prevailed over a good part of the World and dispelled the thick mists of the heathenish Doctrine of the plurality of Gods he that knew there was no probability of deluding the World any longer that way did then puff man up with a false knowledg of the true God setting him on work to seek God the wrong way and perswading him to be content with such a knowledg as was of his own acquiring and not of God's teaching And this device hath proved the more successful because accommodated to the natural and corrupt spirit and temper of man who above all things affects to exalt himself in which exaltation as God is most greatly dishonoured so therein the Devil hath his end who is not anxious how much God be acknowledged in words provided himself be but always served he matters not how great and high speculations the natural man entertains of God so long as he serves his lusts and passions and is obedient to his evil suggestions and temptations Thus Christianity is become an art acquired by humane science and industry as any other art and science is and men have not only assumed unto themselves the name of Christians but even have procured to be esteemed as masters of Christianity by certain artificial tricks though altogether strangers to the Spirit and Life of Jesus But if we shall make a right definition of a Christian according to the Scripture videlicer that he is one that hath the Spirit and is led by it How many Christians yea and of these great Masters and Doctors of Christianity so accounted shall we justly divest of that noble title If then such as have all the other means of knowledg and are sufficiently learned therein whether it be the letter of the Scripture the traditions of Churches the works of Creation and Providence whence they are able to deduce strong and undeniable arguments which may be true in themselves are not yet to be esteemed Christians according to the certain and infallible definition above-mentioned And if the inward and immediate Revelation of Gods Spirit in the Heart in such as have been altogether ignorant of some and but very little skilled in others of these means of attaining knowledg hath brought them to Salvation Then it will necessarily and evidently follow that inward and immediate Revelation is the only sure and certain way to attain the true and saving knowledge of God But the first is true Therefore the last Now as this Argument doth very strongly conclude for this way of knowledge and against such as deny it so herein it is the more considerable because the Propositions from which it is deduced are so clear that our very Adversaries cannot deny them For as to the first it is acknowledged that many learned men may be and have been damned And as to the second who will deny but many illeterate men may be and are saved Nor dare any affirm that none come to the knowledge of God and Salvation by the inward Revelation of the Spirit without these outward means unless they be also so bold as to exclude Abel Seth Noah Abraham Job and all the Holy Patriarchs from true Knowledge and Salvation § IV. I would however not be understood as if hereby I excluded those other means of Knowledge from any use or service to Man it is far from me to judge as in the next Proposition concerning the Scriptures shall more plainly appear The question is not what may be profitable or helpful but what is absolutely necessary Many things may contribute to further a work which yet are not that main thing that makes the work go on The sum then of what is said amounts to this that where the true inward Knowledge of God is through the Revelation of his Spirit there is all neither is there any absolute necessity of any other But where the best highest and most profound Knowledge is without this there is nothing as to the obtaining the great End of Salvation This Truth is very effectually confirmed by the first part of the Proposition it self which in few words comprehendeth divers unquestionable Arguments which I shall in brief subsume First That there is no knowledge of the Father but by the Son Secondly That there is no knowledge of the Son but by the Spirit Thirdly That by the Spirit God hath alwayes revealed himself to his Chilldren Fourthly That these Revelations were the formal Object of the Saints Faith And Lastly That the same continueth to be the Object of the Saints Faith to this day Of each of these I shall speak a little particularly and then proceed to the latter part § V. As to the first viz. That there is no Knowledge of the Father but by the Son it will not need much probation being founded upon the plain words of Scripture and is therefore a fit medium to draw the rest of our Assertions from For the infinite and most wise God who is the Foundation Root and Spring of all Operation hath wrought all things by his Eternal Word and Son This is that WORD that was in the beginning with God and was God by whom all things were made and without whom was not any thing made that was made This is that Jesus Christ by whom God created all things by whom and for whom all were created that are in Heaven and in Earth visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominions or Principalities or Powers Col. 1.16 Who therefore is called the first born of every Creature Col. 1.15 As then that infinite and incomprehensible Fountain of Life and Motion operateth in the Creatures by his
own Eternal Word and Power so no Creature has access again unto him but in and by the Son according to his own express words No man knoweth the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveal him Matth. 11.27 Luk. 10.22 And again he himself saith I am the Way the Truth and the Life no man cometh unto the Father but by me Joh. 14.6 Hence he is fitly called the Mediator betwixt God and Man For having been with God from all Eternity being himself God and also in time partaking of the nature of man through him is the goodness and love of God conveighed to mankind and by him again man receiveth and partaketh of these mercies Hence is easily deduced the probation of this first Assertion thus If no man know the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveal him then there is no knowledge of the Father but by the Son But no man knoweth the Father but the Son Therefore there is no knowledge of the Father but by the Son The first part of the antecedent are the plain words of Scripture The consequence thereof is undeniable except one would say that he hath the knowledge of the Father while yet he knows him not which were an absurd repugnance Again If the Son be the Way the Truth and the Life and that no man cometh unto the Father but by him then there is no knowledg of the Father but by the Son But the first is true Therefore the last The antecedent are the very Scripture words The consequence is very evident For how can any know a thing who useth not the way without which it is not knowable But it is already proved that there is no other way but by the Son so that who so uses not that way cannot know him neither come unto him § VI. Having then laid down this first Principle I come to the second viz. That there is no Knowledg of the Son but by the Spirit or that the Revelation of the Son of God is by the Spirit Where it is to be noted that I alwayes speak of the saving certain and necessary Knowledge of God which that it cannot be acquired otherwayes than by the Spirit doth also appear from many clear Scriptures For Jesus Christ in and by whom the Father is revealed doth also reveal himself to his Disciples and Friends in and by his Spirit as his manifestation was sometimes outwards when he testified and witnessed for the Truth in this World and approved himself faithful throughout So being now withdrawn as to the outward man he doth teach and instruct mankind inwardly by his own Spirit he standeth at the door and knocketh and who so heareth his Voice and openeth he comes in to such Rev. 3.20 Of this Revelation of Christ in him Paul speaketh Gal. 1.6 in which he placeth the excellency of his Ministry and the certainty of his Calling And the Promise of Christ to his Disciples Lo I am with you to the end of the World confirmeth this same thing for this is an inward Presence and Spiritual as all acknowledg But what relates hereto will again occur I shall deduce the proof of this Proposition from two manifest places of Scripture The first is 1 Cor. 2.11 12. What man knoweth the things of a man save the Spirit of a man which is in him Even so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God Now we have received not the Spirit of the World but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things which are freely given us of God The Apostle in the verses before speaking of the wonderful things which are prepared for the Saints after he hath declared that the natural man cannot reach them adds that they are revealed by the Spirit of God ver 9 10. giving this reason for the Spirit searcheth all things even the deep things of God And then he bringeth in the comparison in the verses above mentioned very apt and answerable to our purpose and Doctrine that as the things of a man are only known by the Spirit of man so the things of God are only known by the Spirit of God that is that as nothing below the Spirit of man as the Spirit of Brutes or any other Creatures can properly reach unto nor comprehend the things of a man as being of a more noble and higher Nature so neither can the Spirit of man or the natural man as the Apostle in the 14 verse subsumes receive nor discern the things of God or the things that are Spiritual as being also of a higher Nature which the Apostle himself gives for the reason saying neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned So that the Apostles words being reduced to an argument do very well prove the matter under debate thus If that which appertaineth properly to man cannot be discerned by any lower or baser Principle than the Spirit of man then cannot these things that properly relate unto God and Christ be known or discerned by any lower or baser thing than the Spirit of God and Christ. But the First is true Therefore also the Second The whole strength of the argument is contained in the Apostles words before mentioned which therefore being granted I shall proceed to deduce a second argument thus That which is Spiritual can only be known and discerned by the Spirit of God But the Revelation of Jesus Christ and the true and saving knowledg of him is Spiritual Therefore the Revelation of Jesus Christ and the true and saving knowledge of him can only be known and discerned by the Spirit of God The other Scripture is also a saying of the same Apostle 1 Cor. 12.3 No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost The Scripture which is full of Truth and answereth full well to the inlightned understanding of the Spiritual and real Christian may perhaps prove very strange to the carnal and pretended follower of Christ by whom perhaps it hath not been so diligently remarked Here the Apostle doth so much require the Holy Spirit in the things that relate to a Christian that he positively averrs we cannot so much as affirm Jesus to be the Lord without it which insinuates no less than that the Spiritual Truths of the Gospel are as lyes in the Mouths of carnal and unspiritual men for though in themselves they be true yet are they not true as to them because not known nor uttered forth in and by that Principle and Spirit that ought to direct the mind and actuat it in such things they are no better than the counterfeit representations of things in a comedy neither can it be more truly and properly called a real and true knowledg of God and Christ than the actings of Alexander the great and Julius Caesar c. if now transacted upon a Stage might be called truly and really their doings or the persons representing them might be said truly
for the more clear and universal Revelation of the Gospel to all both Jew and Gentile he gave up himself a most satisfactory Sacrifice for sin which becomes effectual to as many as receive him in his inward appearance in his Light in the heart Again this very place sheweth that no other reconciliation is intended but the opening of a door of mercy upon Gods part and a removing of Wrath for sins that are past so as men notwithstanding their sins are stated in a capacity of Salvation For the Apostle in the following verse saith Now then we are Ambassadors for Christ as though God did beseech you by us we pray you in Christs stead be ye reconciled to God For if their reconciliation had already been perfectly accomplished what need any intreating then to be reconciled Ambassadors are not sent after a peace already perfected and reconciliation made to intreat for a Reconciliation for that implies a manifest contradiction Secondly they object verse 21. of the same chapter For he hath made hiw to be sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him Obj. From whence they argue that as our sin is imputed to Christ who had no sin so Christ's Righteousness is imputed to us without our being Righteous But this interpretation is easily rejected for though Christ bare our sins Answ. and suffered for us and was among men accounted a sinner and numbred among transgressors yet that God reputed him a sinner is no where proved For it is said he was found before him Holy Harmless and Vndefiled neither was there found any guile in his mouth That we deserved these things and much more for our sins which he indured in obedience to the Father and according to his counsel is true but that ever God reputed him a sinner is denyed Neither did he ever dye that we should be reputed Righteous though no more really such than he was a sinner as hereafter appears For indeed if this argument hold it might be stretched that length as to become very pleasing to wicked men that love to abide in their sins For if we be made Righteous as Christ was made a sinner meerly by imputation then as there was no sin not in the least in Christ so it would follow that there needed no more Righteousness no more Holyness no more inward Sanctification in us than there was sin in him So then by his being made sin for us must be understood his suffering for our sins that we might be made partakers of the Grace purchased by him by the workings whereof we are made the Righteousness of God in him For that the Apostle understood here a being made really righteous and not meerly a being reputed such appears by what follows seeing in the 14 15 and 16 verses of the following chapter he argues largely against any supposed agreement of Light and Darkness Righteousness and Vnrighteousness which must needs be admitted if men be to be reckoned ingrafted in Christ and real members of him meerly by an impurative Righteousness wholly without them while they themselves are actually unrighteous And indeed it may be thought strange how some men have made this so fundamental an article of their Faith which is so contrary to the whole strain of the Gospel A thing Christ in none of all his Sermons and Gracious Speeches ever willed any to rely upon alwaies recommending to us works as instrumental to our Justification and the more 't is to be admired at because that that Sentence or term so frequent in their mouths and so often pressed by them as the very basis of their hope and confidence to wit the imputed Righteousness of Christ is not to be found in all the Bible at lest as to my observation Thus have I past through the first part and that the more briefly because many who assert this Justification by bare imputation do nevertheless confess that even the Elect are not Justified until they be Converted that is not until this imputative Justification be applyed to them by the Spirit § VII I come then to the second thing proposed by me which is That it is by this inward Birth or Christ formed within that we are so to speak formally Justified in the sight of God I suppose I have said enough already to demonstrate how much we ascribe to the Death and Sufferings of Christ as that whereby satisfaction is made to the Justice of God remission of Sins obtained and this Grace and Seed purchased by and from which this Birth proceeds The thing now to be proved is That by Christ Jesus formed in us we are Justified or made Just. Let it be marked I use Justification in this sense upon this occasion First then I prove this by that of the Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 6.11 And such were some of you but ye are Washed but ye are Sanctified but ye are Justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God First this Justified here understood must needs be a being really made Just and not a being meerly imputed such else Sanctified and washed might be reputed a being esteemed so and not a being really so and then it overturns the whole intent of the context For the Apostle shewing them in the preceeding verses how the unrighteous cannot inherit the Kingdom of God and descending to the several species of Wickedness subsumes that they were sometimes such but now are not any more such Wherefore as they are now Washed and Sanctified so are they justified for if this Justification were not real than it might be alledged that the Corinthians had not forsaken these evils but were though still they continued in them notwithstanding Justified Which as in it self it is most absurd so it luculently overturneth the very import and intent of the place as if the Corinthians turning Christians had not wrought any real change in them but had only been a belief of some barren Notions which had wrought no alteration in their affections will or manner of Life For my own part I neither see any thing nor could ever yet hear or read any thing that with any colour of reason did evince Justified in this place to be understood any other ways than in its own proper and genuine interpretation of being made just And for the more clear understanding hereof let it be considered that this word justifie is derived either from the Substantive justice or the Adjective just Both which words import the Substantive that true and real Vertue in the Soul as it is in it self to wit it signifies really and not suppositively that excellent quality expressed and understood among men by the word justice and the Adjective just as applyed signifies a man or woman who is just that is in whom this quality of Justice is stated for it would not be only great in propriety but also manifest falsity to call a man just meerly by supposition especially if
he were really unjust Now this word justifie formed or from justice or just doth beyond all question signifie a making just it being nothing else but a composition of the Verb facio and the Adjective justus which is nothing else than thus justifico i. e. justum facio to make just and justified of justus and fio as justus fio I become just justificatus i. e. justus factus I am made just Thus also is it with Verbs of this kind as sanctifico from sanctus holy and facio honorifico from honos and facio sacrifico from sacer and facio all which are still understood of the Subject really and truly endued with that vertue and quality from which the verb is derived Therefore as none are said to be Sanctified that are really unholy while they are such so neither can any be truly said to be Justified while they actually remain unjust Only this Verb Justifie hath in a Metaphorical and Figurative sense been otherwaies taken to wit in a Law sense as when a man really guilty of a crime is freed from the punishment of his sin he is said to be justified that is put in the place as if he were just For this use of the word hath proceeded from that true supposition that none ought to be acquitted but the innocent Hence also that manner of speaking I will Justifie such a man or I will justifie this or that is used from the supposition that the Person and thing is really justifiable And where there is an error and abuse in the matter so farr there is also in the expression This is so manifest and apparent that Paraeus a chief Protestant and a Calvinist also in his opinion acknowledges this We never at any time said saith he nor thought that the Righteousness of Christ was imputed to us that by him we should be named formally just and be so as we have divers times already shewed for that would no less soundly sight with right reason than if a guilty man absolved in Judgment should say that he himself were formally just by the clemency of the Judg granting him his Life Now is it not strange that men should be so facile in a matter of so great concernment as to build the stress of their acceptance with God upon a meer borrowed and metaphorical signification to the excluding or at least esteeming that not necessary without which the Scripture saith expresly no man shall ever see God For if Holyness be requisite and necessary of which this is said then must good works also unless our Adversaries can shew us a Holy man without good works But moreover Justified in this Figurative sense is used for approved and indeed for the most part if not always in Scripture when the word justifie is used it is taken in the worst part that is that as the use of the word that way is an usurpation so it is spoken of such as usurp the thing to themselves while it properly doth not belong unto them as will appear to those that will be at the pains to examine these places Exod. 23.7 Job 9.20 27 5. Prov. 17.15 Isa. 5.23 Jer. 3.11 Ezech. 16.51 52. Luke 10.29 16 15. which are all spoken of men justifying the wicked or of wicked men justifying themselves that is approving themselves in their wickedness If it be at any time in this signification taken in good part it is very seldom comparatively and that so obvious and plain by the context as leaves no scruple But the question is not so much the use of the word where it is passingly or occasionally used as where the very Doctrine of Justification is handled Where indeed to mistake it viz. in its proper place so as to content our selves with an imaginary Justification while God requires a real is of most dangerous consequence for the disquisition of which let it be considered that in all these places to the Romans Corinthians Gallatians and elsewhere where the Apostle handles this Theam the word may be taken in its own proper signification without any absurdity as where it is often asserted in the above mentioned Epistles to the Romans and Gallatians that a man cannot be justified by the Law of Moses nor by the works of the Law There is no absurdity nor danger in understanding it according to its own proper signification to wit that a man cannot be made just by the Law of Moses seeing this so well agrees with that saying of the same Apostle that the Law makes nothing perfect And also where it is said We are Justified by Faith it may very well be understood of being made just seeing it is also said that Faith purifies the heart and no doubt the pure in heart are just and the Just live by Faith Again where it is said We are justified by Grace We are justified by Christ We are justified by the Spirit it is no ways absurd to understand it of being made just seeing by his Spirit and Grace he doth make men just But to understand it universally the other way meerly for acceptance and imputation would infer great absurdities as may be proved at large but because I judged it would be acknowledged I forbear at present for brevities sake But further in the most weighty places where this word justifie is used in Scripture with an immediate relation to the Doctrine of Justification our Adversaries must needs acknowledg it to be understood of making just and not barely in the legal acceptation as first in that of the 1 Cor. 6.11 But ye are Washed but ye are Sanctified but ye are Justified as I before have proved which also many Protestants are forced to acknowledg Neither decide we saith Thysius because of the most great and strict connexion that Justification doth sometimes seem also to comprehend Sanctification as a consequence as in Rom. 8.30 Tit. 3.7 1 Cor. 6.11 And such sometimes were ye but ye are washed c. Zanchus having spoken concerning this sense of Justification adds saying There is another signification of the word viz. for a man from unjust to be made just even as Sanctified signifies from unholy to be made holy In which signification the Apostle said in the place above cited and such were some of you c. that is of unclean ye are made holy and of unjust ye are made just by the Holy Spirit for Christ's sake in whom ye have believed Of this signification is that Rev. 22.11 Let him that is just be just still that is really from just become more just even as from unjust he became just And according to this signification the Fathers and especially Augustine have interpreted this word Thus far he H. Bullinger on the same place 1 Cor. 6. speaketh thus By divers words saith he the Apostle signifies the same thing when he saith ye are Washed ye are Sanctified ye are Justified Secondly In that excellent saying of the Apostle so much observed Rom. 8.30 Whom he