its Integrity 2. The 4th Com. is but a Cipher 3. An holy prayer of our Church is frustrate 4. A gate is set open to Anabaptistry 5. The worship of God will languish decay 6. An old Tradition is kept in the place where the old Sabbath should stand 7. Men liue in the weekly sinne of Sabbath breaking 8. God is denied a parte of his worship Yea corruptly worshiped 9. Idolatry is committed by thowsand thowsands in the Kingdome And these are the Contentes of this booke A Defence of the Morall LAW CHAP. I. SECT I. THE scope and principall drift of this Treatise Christian Reader is the defence of the Lords Sabbathes to wit his ancient Sabbathes the Saturday seuenth dayes Sabbathes the which are expresly enioyned vs in the fourth Com. in these wordes Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it c. But the seuenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. Exod. 20.8.10 Against this ancient and most sacred ordinance of Gods I find two professed enemies against whom I must bend my forces the one are they who deny the Law of God the Morall Law or 10 Commandements to belong vnto Christians and so consequently they deny Gods Sabbathes also commanded in the Law and these are our Anabaptistes and our late sprung vp Antinomianes the other are they who deny the Integrity and perfection of the Law they embrace the Law of God indeed but not the whole law and these are both Protestantes and Papistes for these reiect that ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath day properly so called and expresly commanded in the morall law counting it for a ceremony and abolished by reiection whereof they reiect some thing commanded in the Law and so consequently they are partiall in the law and doe deny it in its integrity and perfection vrge an Anabaptist or Antinomian to the obseruation of the Sabbath day and he will answere you that the law is abolished at the comming of Christ as all those legall Ceremonies were vrge a Protestant or a Papist to sanctify the Sabbath day and your answere shall be that this part of the law touching the Sabbath day is a ceremonie and abolished at the coming of Christ thus Anabaptistes and Antinomians renounce the whole law Protestants and Papists renounce the wholenesse of the law the one would haue no law the other would haue no perfect law Against both these this booke is penned The partes of this booke are sixe diuided into so many Chapters also The first parte or chapter is in defense of the Morall Law and consequently of Gods Sabbathes against Anabaptistes and Antinomianes The other fiue partes or Chapters are in defense of the integrity and perfection of the Law and consequently of Gods Sabbathes against Protestantes and Papistes for this purpose the second parte or Chapter giueth the true sense and Exposition of the fourth Command and vindicateth it from the common and corrupt glosses and expositions of it The third Chapter sheweth the weaknesse and insufficiency of all those Scriptures and arguments which are vsually produced to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath day The fourth Chapter sheweth the insufficiency and feeblenesse of all those Scriptures and arguments which are vsually alleaged against the Lords Sabbath of the seuenth day or Saturday to make it an abolished ceremony The fifth Chapter conteineth sondry forcible and vndeniable arguments and Scriptures prouing the morallity and perpetuity of the ancient Sabbath day The sixte and last Chapter conteineth a Dispensation for a season touching the present practise and obseruation of the seuenth day Sabbath together with an Exhortation to a speedy reformation Thus you see my taske what it is my aduersaries who they are and the partes of this Booke One thing more would be premised for so much as we shall often haue occasion to vse these two words Morall and Ceremoniall it is sit that I here shew in what sense I vnderstand them 1. I would vse these words but for distinction sake for whereas there are two sortes of Sabbathes the wekly Sabbath and the yeerly Sabbathes the Sabbath which God wrote and the Sabbathes which Moses wrote the Sabbath which God spake and the Sabbathes which Moses spake the Sabbath written in the Morall law Exod. 20.8 and the Sabbathes written in the Ceremoniall law Levit. 23.32 c. for the distinguishing of these two sortes of Sabbathes one from the other I doe vse these two words calling the weekly Sabbath recorded in the Morall law the Morall Sabbath and the yeerly Sabbathes recorded in the Ceremoniall law the Ceremoniall Sabbathes these Sabbathes were also distinguished in respect of time the Morall Sabbath was first deliuered Exod. 20.8 yea Gen. 2.2.3 the ceremoniall Sabbathes were afterwards deliuered Levit. 23.32 c. neither did these ceremoniall Sabbathes euer come within the pale of the Morall law or were written in the Tables of stone 2. I see not but that I may call the weekly Sabbath the Morall Sabbath properly for 1. the seuenth day or weekly Sabbath it conserneth practise and manners which is signified by the word Morall 2. Since God spake all those words Exod. 20.1 why should not euery thing he spake be called morall as well as any thing he spake and since the Sabbath day or seuenth day is a thing that is expresly commanded in the Morall law and which may I say which may be retained in the Church with great profit why should it be denied the name of morall 3. Giue me a reason why the seuenth day Sabbath should not be called a Morall as well as the doctrine of the Trinity in the first Com or as the doctrine of originall sinne or lust Rom. 7.7 in the tenth Comm 4. Since the dueties of the Sabbath to wit Rest and Holy exercises are accounted Morall why should not the time or seuenth day also be accounted morall for the time is a furtherance vnto these morall dueties now that which furthereth a morall should me thinke be also called a morall 5. Herevnto agreeth Doctour Ames in his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. and also affirmeth it to be the iudgement of the best diuines saying It is receiued by all best diuines that the Morales were differenced from the Ceremoniales by this that all and onely the Morales were wrote by God in the Tables of stones c. The Saturday and weekly Sabbath then must needs be termed a morall Sabbath In a word why should this be strange for as there is a ceremoniall law and a morall law why may there not be likewise ceremoniall Sabbathes and morall Sabbathes and since God placed the seuenth day Sabbath in the morall law among the morales why should it not be termed morall and called the morall Sabbath The morall Sabbathes together with whatsoeuer else is commanded in the morall law I doe defend the Ceremoniall Sabbathes with all other Ceremonies I doe reiect It is the Decalogue and nothing else which I defend and this I stand to maintaine in
say this were a plaine forfeiture of the bond and that the debitor his calling the time but a circumstance vvas but a pore shifte this vvere a silly plea before the Iudg of Assises to say the time my Lord it was but a circumstance c. well hovv euer men dare not dally thus before an earthly Iudge and with an earthly king yet men dare palter thus with the king of kings were a man summoned to appeare at a day apponinted but in an inferiour courte who durst sleight that day They are only Gods dayes and Gods times then that may besleighted this bewraies that God is not reuerenced as is a mortall king or Iudg men dare not sleight the precise day of appearance in the Courtes of men but men dare sleight the precise day of appearance before the Lord chiefe Iustice of heauen earth in the Courtes of his fanctuary nor are men so afraid to make a forfeiture of the bond of Gods fourth comm by neglect of the day as they are a fraid to forfeite abond of 10. or 20. to a man by neglect of the day Thus much for the time and day in generall we shall hereafter come to the particularity of the time to shew how more specially what day it is which God requireth SECT III. Hauing laied forth the seuerall partes of this Com. in the foregoing Section detected some of the errours of our time in abusing the sense meaning of the Spirit of God in this Com. it now remaineth that I come to the Exposition of the same and whereas the com is laid downe partly affirmatiuely and partly negatiuely we will in the former place speake of the affirmatiue parte the which is conteined in these words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it Sixe dayes shalt thou labour and doe all thy worke In this affirmatiue parte first we will speake of the word day secondly of these words Sabbath day thirdly of the Commandement in this word Remember c. For the word Day to giue an Exposition of it according to the minde of the holy ghost we must serch how the holy Ghost vseth this vvord in Scripture for this purpose see Genes 1.5 And God called the light day but no where hath he called the darknesse day wherefore the light only is the day in Gods accounte see also 1 Cor. 3.13 euery mans worke shal be made manifest for the day shall declare it Where by the word Day the holy Ghost meaneth the light see 1 Thes 5.8 But let vs who are of the day be sober Where by day is meant light as appeareth by the Opposition of the word night in the former verse se Joh. 11.9 are there not 12 howres in the day if any man walke in the day he stumbleth not because he seeth the light the day therefore is the time of light by Scriptures accompt wherefore by the word day in the fourth Com. I vnderstand the time of light and of light only A second querie may be to know how long this day is and when it beginneth and when it endeth For the beginning of it we are to giue it the largest extent as to begin early in the morning by day breake or day peepe euen whilst it is but a little light and much darknesse see Ioh. 20.1 and Mark 1.35 this last text is to be reade as Chemnitius well obserues thus In the morning whilst it was very much night c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so Beza readeth it also Now as the day beginneth with the least light appearing in the skie so we are to thinke it lasteth so long as there is any sunne light in the skie or vntill the day be quite off the skie thus much be spoken of the word day shewing 1. what is meant by it to wit the time of light 2. How long this day is to wit from the first approch of the sunne light vnto the last departure of its light The consideration of these twoo Points discouereth vnto vs a threefold errour of our times the one is of such as hould that the Sabbath day beginneth at midnight and lasteth to the next midnight the other is of those who hould the Sabbath day beginneth in the morning lasteth to the next morning the other of such as hould it beginneth on the Euening of Saturday night al which opinions in they hould as well a night as a day to be a parte of the sabbath day but these are all erroniouse because growndlesse for the word day in the com signifieth the time of light this is the frequent vse of the word in scriptures that the word day must signify darknesse as wel as light I thinke cannot be showne in the Scriptures Wherefore as to giue God lesse then the wholl tyme of light is to giue God not a day but a peece of a day so to giue God more then the wholl time of light it to giue God more then a wholl day and so more then God hath commanded But against this it may be said that there it a day naturall a day artificiall the one cōsisting of 24 howres the other of 12 howres now we must giue God the largest day of 24. hovvres But for this pointe how euer this distinction may haue its vse in ciuill affaires yet is it not founded in Scripture the Scriptures indeed mention a day of 12. howres Ioh. 11.9 but of a day of 24. hovvres I no where reade it is not safe therefore to expound the word day in the fourth Comm. of a day of 24 hovvres Further it may be said that by the word day we must vnderstand the night and darknesse also euen the wholl time of 24. howres for so it is taken Genes 1.5 And the euening and morning were the first day where the euening is put for the darknesse and the morning is put for the light and both these are called the first day Where to I answer that this exposition is growndlesse to say that the Euening is put for the night or darknesse for it cannot be shovvne in Scripture that any where the word Euening is put for the night or darknesse Herevnto assenteth Mr. Perkins in his cases of conscience at the end of the second booke Secondly I answer to giue such an exposition of the Text Genes 1.5 as maketh a confusion of things is not safe for to vnderstand by the Euening the darknesse and so making the vvord day to signify or comprize both light and darknesse is to make a vvofull confusion for so one and the same vvord shall signifie things quite contrary as vvel might one suppose hell to be signified vnder the vvord heauen as night vnder the vvord day God hath distinguished the light from the darknesse as in nature so by sondry proper names calling the light day and the darknesse he called night Genes 1.5 let not vs then confound them a better exposition of the vvord Euening is therefore to be sought for this end
proue and try all things which we heare 1. Thess 5.21 and to serch the Scriptures with those Bereans to see whither the things taught vs be so or no Act. 17.11 Now what time can be more fit for this duety then the time presently follovving the hearing of the vvord There is a precept vnto parents Deut. 6.7 And these words which I command thee shall be in thine heart and thou shalt teach them diligently vnto thy children and shalt talke of them when thou sittest in thine house and when thou laiest downe and when thou risist vp Now what time is more fit for parents and masters to whet the word of God vpon their children and seruants then presently after they haue heard it in the Congregation but this cannot be if all sortes may fall to their seuerall vvorkes so soone as the publike assembly is dismissed And so much be spoken of the word Day SECT IV. We are now to speake of thes vvords Sabbath day that vve may giue a true exposition whereof and that we may also discouer the false glosses and horrible abuses of this our time touching these words of the Commandement we thus begin Of Sabbaths we must know that there were sundry sortes prescribed of God there were Sabbathes of yeeres and Sabbathes of dayes the Sabbaths of yeeres were such as lasted a wholl yeere of these vve read in Leuit. 25.2.3.4 but of these we haue not to speake partly because they were ceremoniall neuer commanded in the morall lavv partly because the 4th com treateth of Sabbaths of dayes not of Sabbaths of yeeres Againe Sabbaths of dayes are of two sortes for there vvere Annuall Sabbaths and there vvere vveekly Sabbaths of the annuall Sabbaths vve read in Leuit. 23.7.21.24.32.35.39 these Sabbaths came but once in a yeere only of the vveekly Sabbaths vvhich came euery 7th day or euery vveeke of these vve reade in the 4th com Exod. 20.8.10.11 As touching the Annuall and yeerely Sabbaths we haue not to doe partly because they vvere ceremoniall and neuer vvrote in the morall lavv in Tables of stone partly because they came but once a yeere but the 4th comm with which vve haue to doe treateth of Sabbaths vvhich come once a vveeke this vveekly morall Sabbath vvritten in the morall lavv is that vvith vvhich vve haue to doe and thus much of the seuerall sortes of Sabbaths This morall Sabbath may in generall be thus described The Sabbath day is a certaine sacred time sanctified by God and appointed to be sanctified by man A more particular description hereof you shall haue by and by after that vve haue by serch found out vvhich day of the vveeke this Sabbath day is For the vvord Sabbath ioyned vvith the vvord Day thus Sabbath day it is agreed on all sides that it signifieth Rest so then vvhen the Lord said Remember the Sabbath day it is as much as if he had said Remember the Rest-day Furthermore it is to be noted that hovveuer here be tvvo vvords to vvit Sabbath and Day or Rest and Day yet here is but one thing but one time and one day signified like as vve say the Virgine Mary these tvvo vvords signifie but one vvoman and the Apostle Paul thes signifie but one man and the Lords Supper signify but one thing or one meale It is true vvhen Diuines in expounding these vvords haue gone thus farre namely to haue showne that the word Sabbath signifieth a Rest here they leaue the point vvithout any further serch to knovv vvhich is the Sabbath day or Rest day least they should find it but vve not being afraid to find it but desirous to find it vvill proceed further As vvhen God commanded vs saying Honour the King 1. Pet. 2.17 Remember yee the law of Moses c. Mal. 4.4 And Moses said vnto the people Remember this day in vvhich yee came out of Egypt Exod. 13.3 It is not here enough to enquire vvhat the vvord King or Law or Day signifieth but a further serch ought to be made also and that is to knovv vvho and vvhich is the King that vve may honour him and to knovv vvhat and vvhich is the lavv of Moses that vve may obey it and those Israelites to knovv vvhich was the day in which they came out of Egypt that they might obserue it Euen so it is not enough to enquire vvhat the vvord Sabbath signifieth but also vvhich is the day that vve might sanctify it the which vnlesse we be acquainted vvith it vve shall be ignorant of the very subiect of the Com. The name Iesus it signifieth a Sauiour but if novv in the expounding of Scripture vvhen vve meete vvith the vvord Iesus vve haue respect onely vnto the signification of the vvord neuer enquiring further vnto the person to knovv vvhich Iesus the text speaketh of may vve not commit a foule mistake taking a common man for Christ Iesus our Sauiour For there is in the scripture a Iesus vvhich is Ioshuah vvho brought the Israelites into Canaan Act. 7.45 Heb. 4.8 And there is a Iesus vvho is called Iustus Col. 4.11 As it is needfull then after vve haue sought out the signification of the name Iesus in the next place to serch to knovv vvhich Iesus so is it vvith the vvord Sabbath day vve must serch vvhich day To this query then which day of all the weeke or of al the seauen dayes is the Sabbath day I answer it may be knowne 1. by this name of it which God hath imposed Sabbath day for the name of a thing doth giue light to the thing named and by mens names theire persones are found on t As Iohn and Thomas are proper names to two of Christs Apostles so Sabbath day is a proper name to one certaine day of the vveeke to vvit to Saturday the seuenth and last day of the weeke that thes words Sabbath day are a proper name for Saturday I thus proue it 1. because none other day of the vveeke was constantly called by the name Sabbath day but the seuenth or last day of the weeke which is Saturday see for this purpose thes Scriptures Exod. 16.22.23.26 Exod. 20.9.10 Exod. 23.12 Exod. 35.2 Leuit. 23.3 Mat. 28.1 Luk. 13.14 I proue it secondly by the testimony of all Iewes novv liuing at Amsterdam or else vvhere who call Saturday the Sabbath day where vnto I may add the Iewes rekoning of theire dayes of the vveeke Saturday they called Sabbath day Sunday they called the first of the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ioh. 20.1 monday they called the second of the Sabbath Tevvsday the third of the Sabbath c. In vvhich theire accompt as you see no day was called Sabbath day but Saturday 3. I proue it by the testimony of the Lattines vvho to this very day call our Saturday the Sabbath day Sabbathum and dies Sabbathi se the vvord Sabbathum so translated in all Lattine Dictionaries sinally I appeale to all Diuines if the vvord Sabbathum be not vsed in all auncient
Histories of the Church for Saturday the 7th day Thus it is euident that Sabbath day is a proper name signifying our Saturday and Saturday then is the day vvhich God meant and spake of in those vvords Remember the Sabbath day Secondly vve may knovv that Saturday is the day vvhich God meant by these vvords Sabbath day because God hath in his 4th com plainly deciphred out the day vvhich he called Sabbath day and that in these vvordes But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. And see Exod. 35.2 and Exod. 23.12 Leu. 23.3 so then the 7th day of the vveeke is the very day vvhich God vnderstandeth by Sabbath day novv the 7th day of the vveeke is our saturday for our Lords day or Sonday is called by all the 4 Euangelists the first day of the vveeke Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk. 24.1 Ioh. 20.1 vvel then rekon on and Saturday after vvill be your 7th day Furthermore it is not obscurly declared in the reason to the 4th com Exod. 20.11 Where Almightie God setteth out his ovvne ensample for vs to imitate hee Rested on the seuenth day and hee blessed and Sanctified the seuenth day for Sabbath vuhich seuenth day from the creation is our Saturday Finally the Sabbath day and the 7th day are vsed in the 4th com promiscuously the one for the other for t is said Ex. 20.11 that God rested the 7th day wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. where he should haue said thus Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. vnlesse the Sabbath day and the seuenth day be both one and the same and here I might ad the Testimony of Walaeus de Sabbatho pag. 61. who affitmeth and also proueth it that the word Sabbath in the 4th com is not vsed indefinitly and indeterminatly but for the seuenth day from the Creation Thirdly that our Saturday was the Sabbath day which vvas once commanded to the Iewes by the 4th com I proue by the Testimony of all Diuines for doe not all both Protestants and Papists acknowledg that our Sauiour was crucified on Good Friday and that hee lay in his graue al our saturday being the Iewes Sabbath day and rose on our Sunday wherby they confesse that our Saturday was the Sabbath day Further more doe not all Diuines affirme that Saturday the old Sabbath day was abolished by Christ c In which words they confesse that Saturday was the Sabbath day mentioned in the 4th com what neede of further proofes Hauing found out particularly which is the day of the weeke to which the 4th com had respect namely Saturday Now we may be bould to make a more particular description of the Sabbath day and thus it may be desribed The Sabbath day is that sacred time called Saturday counted the seuenth day from the Creation which was sanctified and hollowed by God and appointed to be Sanctisied by man I call it a sacred time and that in a double respect 1. by destination 2. By consecration the Sabbath day is holy by destination it being set a parte for holinesse and for the worship of God to be celebrated in it like as the Temple once was Remember the Sabbath day to Sanctifie it Exod. 20.8 The Sabbath day is Holy by consecration because at the Creation God consecrated it and made it an Holy day and this he did two waies 1. By his personall and exemplary Rest vpon this day And the 7th day hee rested from all his worke which he had made Genes 2.2 For if the grovvnd whereon Moses stood became holy grownd because of Gods presence there Exod. 3.5 what shold hinder it but that in like sorte the day wherin God him selfe rested shold forthwith become an Holy day 2. By his hallowing and sanctifying of this day So God blessed the 7th day and sanctified it c. Genes 2.3 other Sabbathes were holy but by destination only but saturday Sabbath was holy both by destination and by consecration also Hauing finished this point it remaineth that we make some vse and application of it the first vse then shall be for information and thus I reason if Saturday be the day and time which God aimed at in his 4th com by those words Sabbath day then may our Translatores in translating of the 4th com safly translate it Saturday for Sabbath day they may put Saturday saying Remember Saturday to Sanctify it For Saturday is that day properly meant by the words Sabbath day neither haue we any day of the weeke which will answer to the Sabbath day but our saturday only and if it be objected that the name Saturday doth not fully expresse the name Sabbath day because Sabbath signifieth a Rest I answer it is no more then but this that to the name Saturday vve add the word Rest and so we shall haue the full sense thus Saturday-Rest Remember the Saturday-Rest to sanctifie it It is obiected against this that so doing we shold bring an heathenish name as Saturday is into the Scriptures c. Hereto I answer I trust that as our holy vse of our Temples and Churches hath purged that abuse of them vnto which many of them were first erected so our Christiaen vse of the name Saturday may sanctifie and purge it from heathenish abuse 2. We vse the name but for distinction sake onely voide of all heathenish vanities now why may not the name Saturday be brought into the scripture of the 10 commandements as well as that heathenish name Mars into the scripture of the Actes of the Apostles Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars hill and said c. But I meane not to contend for this I leaue it vnto the wisedome and discretion of our lerned Translatores all that I aime at hereby is only this that I desire all meanes and helpes may be afforded whereby the true and proper sense of the scriptures may be easily vnderstood and that in as much as may be by the ignorant and vnlearned This one sore euill I find that whilst we retaine the word Sabbath in the Com. it being an Hebrevv vvord it is in our Church as it vvas in those dayes vvhere in the scriptures vvere in Lattine because the people vnderstood not the Lattine toung the priests might make vvhat Expositions they would and so it is here because the vvord Sabbath an Hebrevv vvord is not translated into English but redd in our Bibles and retained still our Ministers many of them giue what fained and fabulouse Expositions of the vvord Sabbath they please as a Sabbath and the Sabbath and a Rest and all to this end that they might dravv the 4th Com. vnto the Lords day and expound it of the Lords day or Sunday as if the name Sabbath day might be giuen indifferently vnto any day of the weeke none of vvhich corrupt glosses could delud the people if they had the words Sabbath day trāslated into English wordes for so they need not so vvholly rely vpon the Ministers
fidelity in Exposition as novv they must for they might see by their ovvne eyes plainly For example suppose we the 4th Com. were thus translated Remember the Saturday-Rest to sanctifie it if novv any doubt could be vvhich shold be the day appointed of God for Sabbath day it vvould easily be decided and that by an vnlearned man if any shold offer to corrupt the text by distinguishing of a Saturday and the saturday as they doe of a Sabbath and the Sabbath and of a 7th day and the 7th day as if there were more saturdayes in a vveeke then one he vvould be laught at for his paines Againe if any would goe about to turne Gods Commandement from the Saturday to the Sunday by this deuise because the word Sabbath signifieth a Rest and vve doe Rest now from laboures on the Sunday he vvold presently be ansvvered that that 's a friuolouse reason for the 4th Com. inioyneth not a Sunday-Rest but a Saturday-Rest lastly if any would be so idle as to apply the 4th com to the Lords day and expound it of the Lords day why euery child would see his grosse abuse of the 4th com for it directly speaketh not of the Lords day but of Saturday For it is not the name Lords day that God hath put into the 4th com but the name Sabbath day or Saturday Thus I haue showne what light would come vnto Gods commandement by the translation of the Hebrew word Sabbath and what fruit would come vnto euery one in the Church of God thereby if this I cannot obtaine yet this at least let me preuaile in that Ministers would be pleased hereafter in exposition of those words Sabbathday to signify vnto the people that thereby is meant our Saturday For this I haue proued abundantly and vndeniably both by Scriptures and by the Testimonies of both Iewes and Christians of all sorts Protestants and Papists this duety therefore in the true and faithfull exposition of Gods word vnto the people I require of them as they will answer the contrary before Almighty God at that Day let them bevvare of Sophisticating with Gods lawes when they expound them In the 4th comm God said Remember the Sabbath day but he said not Remember the Sunday or the Lords day nor remember the Monday the Tewsday or the Wednesday c. but remember the Sabbath day Now looke which day of the weeke was euer in ancient time named and called Sabbath day that is the day commanded in the 4th com If then they can shew me that either Sunday Lords day Monday Tewsday Wednesday c. or any day besids Saturday was wont to be named and called Sabbath day then may they haue some culler for their errour but now haue they none A second vse shall be against sueh Ministers as doe either expound the 4th com to belong to the Lords day or Sunday because then we Rest or else when the 4th com is vrged vpon them as requiring the seuenth day rest or Saturday-Rest they turne it off thus the vvord Sabbath signifieth in English a Rest now vpon the Lords day or Sunday we rest wherevnto I reply 1. that thus when God appointed the 7th day for his Sabbath day in his 4th com the people of the Iewes might thus haue answered God that the vvord Sabbath in his 4th com signifieth a Rest now when they keepe any one of those yeerely Sabbaths in Leuit. 23. they might say this vveeke vve haue kept one of those annuall Sabbaths suppose it fell vpon Tewsday or Wensday and in this day we had a Rest by this faire gloose might not God loose in that vveeke his morall weekly Sabbath inioyned by the 4th com which fell vpon Saturday and that because they kept a ceremoniall yeerly Sabbath that weeke vpon the Tevvsday or Wensday for vpon this Tevvsday or Wensday they did Rest What iugling trickes are these vvould a man beleeue it that Puritane Ministers professing the feare of God vvould vse such dissimulation and handle the vvord of God so craftily pardon me good Reader hovv euer I reuerence their holy profession yet I cannot speake of this their vile abuse of Gods sacred vvord vvithout indignation of spirit vvho that sincerly loueth God and his sacred Scriptures can passe it ouer in silence to see his holy vvord thus vvrested and basely abused Christmas day vvhen it falleth vpon some one of the six working dayes and so the Coronation day and so thos common holy dayes S. Mathews day S. Iohns day and the rest t is true we Rest vpon these dayes from our labours and that by an ordinance of our Church but will any be so absurd as to say that these holy dayes stand by vertue of the 4th comm because we Rest on these dayes or suppose the patrones of the Lords day vvho presse the 4th comm vpon it should vrge me to sanctifie the Lords day by the 4th com might not I answer them in their owne answer that the word Sabbath in the 4th com it signifieth a Rest novv on Christmas day and on Coronation day and on S. Matthews day c. vve Rest Secondly I reply be it that on the Lords day we rest vvhy this is not the rest spoken of in the 4th com for this is a Lords-day-Rest but the com calleth for a Saturday-Rest this is a first-day-rest but the com calleth for a Seuenth-day-rest this difference is bigge enough to be seene Finally if such ansvvers be lavvfull then vvhen wee meete with the name Iesus in a text wherin it is manifestly meant of Christ our Lord yet then may vve say vvhy Iesus it signifieth a Sauiour now Ioshua vvas a Sauiour for he saued the Israelits from the Canaanites c. but shall such cauilles goe for currant as by these trickes some men turne off the Lords Sabbathes so by the like may they turne off also the Lord Iesus their Sauiour it is but to play the foole a little with the name Iesus as they doe with the name Sabbath A third vse shall be against such Ministers as doe not onely in priuate but also in publike in their Pulpites call or miscall rather the Lords day Sabbath day in reference to the 4th com by reason of whose errour the people also haue learned to nick-name the Lords day calling it the Sabbath day But vvhat an horrible confusion of times and the proper names of dayes is this If this may goe on err long vvee shall scarce know one day of the weeke from another may not vve as vvell call our Saturday Sunday or our Sunday Saturday as call our Sunday Sabbath day which is Saturday if we shall make proper names of things common names vvhat an intollerable confusion doe we bring in to the vvorld Yet further if vve may call the Lords day which is holden to be a new institution Sabbath day by an old name why may we not call Baptisme which is a nevv institution Circumcision by an old name and vvhy may
we not call the Lords Supper which is a new institution the Passeouer by an old name For as Baptisme and the Lords Supper are come in the roome of Circumcision and the Passeouer so it is said that the Lords day is come in the roome of the Sabbath day Neuerthelesse this nicknaming of dayes as full of confusion as it is and as improper as the speech is yet it might be borne if it were not of euill consequence for hereby the poore ignorant people are deluded and hereby they are brought off the more assuredly to beleeue that the 4th comm doth bind them to rest from their labours on the Lords day but to the contrary vve haue proued that the 4th com doth bind onely to the 7th day or Saturday Yea I adde that men may as vvel say they eat Sacramentall bread at their common Tables and that they celebrate the Lords Supper when they eat bread and drinke vvine at their common Tables as to say they sanctify the Sabbath day vvhen on the Lords day they heare a Sermon pray and sing 〈◊〉 for the difference betvvixt the Sabbath day and the Lords day is as great as is the difference betvvixt the Lords Supper and our common Suppers betvvixt Sacramentall bread and vvine and common bread and vvine as shall be showne The name Sabbath day may be considered as diuinly imposed by God him selfe vpon a certaine day or as humanly imposed by man novv of all the dayes in the weeke God imposed the name Sabbath day onely vpon saturday the seuenth day of the weeke if therefore we vvill take God for our guide vve are to call no day Sabbath day in reuerence to his 4th com but that day which God himselfe hath named Sabbath day but as for the Lords day it is no where in all the scriptures called Sabbath day let the patrones of this day shew where in all the New Testament the first day of the weeke or Sunday is called Sabbath day the which since they cannot doe it is altogether grovvndlesse so to name it yet further wheras it is supposed that the Lords day was set vp for a new Sabbath at Christ his resurrection yet as it is to be noted this day had no nevv name put vpon it of many yeeres after that but it was still called by its old name to wit the first day of the weeke as we read in all the 4. Euangelists yea and when it vvas named Lords day in Reu. 1.10 yet it was not named Sabbath day then nor at any time else this name then Sabbath day being put vpon our sunday it is not of Gods imposition but of mans imposition and so t is but humane it vvere to be wished then that men vvould rater conforme theire speech vnto God then vnto man calling Saturday the Sabbath day as God did and not Sunday the Sabbath day as man doth It vvere the more tollerable I confesse if there were such a penury of words and scarcety of names as vve had no other name for our Sunday but vve haue 3 seuerall names for it to wit 1. Sunday 2. the Lords day 3. the first day of the vveeke here are names enough for one day ther 's no necessity therefore to robb the seuenth day of its name that so we might haue 4. names for one day no no it is not penury of names but ther 's an other matter in it the name Sabbath day it is an auncient name and it is an honourable name and God had made his promises to such as kept his Sabbathes if thou turne away thy foore from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on myn Holy day c. Then I will cause thee to ride vpon the high places of the earth and feede the with the Heritag of Iacob c. Isa 58.13.14 And the violation of this Sabbath day God had seuerly punished as we reade Numb 15.32.35 and Nehem. 13.18 Whereby God from heauen hath shovvne in what esteeme he had this day yea this Sabbath day God him selfe kept it and also hee Sanctified it and blessed is Genes 2.3 yet further God hath giuen a speciall commandement for this day and put it in Tables of stone vttered it vvith his owne voice and vvrote it vvith his ovvne singer Exod. 20. thus hath God honoured this day wherefore the name of it is also honourable novv the Patrones of our Lords day seing all this and finding no such honour put vpon their Lords day hence it is that they might aduance the Lords day in the minds of the multitude they haue robbed the Saturday of all its honourable ornaments that there vvith all they might decke vp and trimme vp the Lords day and hence it is that our Sunday must needs be called the Sabbath day and so by this meanes all those Scriptures which mention any thing of the Lords Sabbathes any vvhere they are together vvith the name translated vnto the Lords day vvhat is this but to robb the Mistris of hir Iewels to bestow them vpon the handmaide to take the honour due vnto the Master and giue it vnto the seruant or to take the Crovvne from off the head of the King to sett it vpon a common subiect for as for the Lords day it is but a common working day in Gods account it being one of those six dayes vvherin God said Sixe dayes shalt thou labour Exod. 20.9 T is true vve receiued a greate blessing on that day because our Lord rose then from the dead and t is as true also that vve receiued a greate blessing on friday because on that day our Lord laid dovvne his liefe for vs and suffered vpon the Crosse and yet for al that friday is accounted but for a common vvorking day for one of the sixe dayes vvherin vve must labour yet further the Lords day is but a common day in respect of Saturday as touching all thos particulares mentioned before for the name Lords day it is but nevv and put vpon Sunday but since Christ and that many yeerers too since Christ but the name Sabbath day it is auncient and put vpon the Saturday thovvsands of yeeres before Christ againe you no vvhere read of any blessings promised by God in all the New Testament to those which Keepe the Lords day Holy nor of any iudgments inflicted or threatened vpon any that worke on the Lords day further you no where in all the Nevv Testament find any commandement to keep the Lords day Holy No nor can it be showne that Christ euer Kept it In a vvord God neuer hallovved the Lords day nor blessed and sanctified it vvhereby it shold become an holy day but all these and more God did to the Saterday therefore is the Saturday as the King or Mistrise to the Lords day as then the King and all good subiects wold think amisse of him that taketh the crowne off the King and set it vpon the head of a common subiect yea though he were aboue a common subiect as is
a knight or a Noble man and as Friday and Sunday in some sense are aboue the other of the sixe dayes So no doubt will God and so shold euery Godly man think amisse of it to heare Ministers take that name of honour from off the head of Saturday to set it vpon the head of Sunday By this translating of the name Sabbath day from Saturday to Sunday common people when they read in the Scriptures of any thing of note touching the Sabbath day presently they cast that in they re minds vpon the Lords day thinking that to be meant of it thus being meerly deluded they honour the subiect for the king the maide for hir Mistris and misapply and abuse all those Textes of Scripture is it not high time then that this abuse were Looked vnto and the rather also because by theire carrynig of the name Sabbath day from the Saturday vnto the Sunday they hereby doe subtilly carry also the 4th commandement from the Saturday vnto the Sunday and thus they robb the Saturday both of its diuine name and also of its Commandement for novv no man cales the Saturday Sabbath day nor applies the fourth com vnto it at all by this robbery God and his Sabbathes are leesers but they are greate gainers for novv they haue not only got that deuine name Sabbath day for theire Sunday but also they haue got though but by vsurpation a Commandement too for theire Lords day the which had no commandement before It bewraieth theire beggarlynesse in ornaments for the Lords day when they must thus robb and pull from an other day to clothe and attire it vvith all neither hath the Lords day any thing in the nevv Testament to tye mens consciences with all but only what the patrones there of haue vniustly taken out of the Old Testament from the Saturday Sabbath and out of whose ruines they haue erected a nevv day For conclusion let me exhorte Ministers and people to refraine putting the name Sabbath day vpon the Lords day for hereafter we haue names enough besids we may call it Sunday Lords day or First day of the weeke doe not mocke God and deceiue the world any longer vvith vse of the name Sabbath day vnlesse you meant to giue God his proper Sabbath day the Saturday why should you retaine the name with out the thing this is to mocke God with a shaddovv for the Substance And here I cannot but speake of that common fault of Ministers in the pulpit vvhose very words and vvorkes are at iarr the more is the pitty for in application of theire doctrines they are frequent in pressing the obseruation of the Sabbath day amongst other virtues and holy dueties and on the contrary in many of there vses of reprofe they are very zealouse in reprouing the breach of the Lords Sabbaths together vvith other sinnes of drunkennesse Svvearing lying oppression pride and the like vvherein they doe very well if their words and their vvorkes vvent together if their words and their mind did agree for aske them in priuate vvhat day of the vveeke they meant by the name Sabbath day and they vvill tell you Sunday or Lords day so then with their toungs they call for the Sabbath day which is Saturday in Gods account as hath bene proued but they meane an other thing then they speake of for they meane it of Sunday or Lords day like as if a man should talke much and ernestly of Saturday but meaneth it of friday or of Sunday and meaneth it of Moneday Nay their ovvne mouthes shall condemne them for they call for the Lords Sabbaths in the pulpit vvhen they profane them in theire families and teach men so to doe nay the Lords Sabbathes find no greater enemies then these who call so much for them for they at other times vvill beare the people in hand that they are abolished and they vvill and dare vndertake to proue that that Sabbath day once commanded in the 4th com is a ceremony and abolished and yet these men I will haue the Sabbath of the Lord still in their mouthes and make a great clamour for it the Prophet Ieremiah reprooued those of his time saying Trust ye not in lying words saying The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord Ierem. 7.4 And may not I say of our time forbeare your homonymiouse and double meaning speeches refraine your words of aequiuocation and of mentall reseruation saying the Sabbaths of the Lord the Sabbaths of the Lord either be right dovvne for the Lords Sabbaths before the people or else let them be no more heard in your mouths doe not abuse that proper name Sabbath day diuinely imposed by God vpon our Saturday and by your aequiuocations and mentall reseruations meane it of Sunday Happily I shall preuaile vvith some to forsake the abuse of this name and in stead of it they will call our Sunday the Lords day and so presse the sanctification of it vnder that name To such I say let them doe so then if they can find any grounds out of Gods vvord to vvarrant them to presse the Lords day to be kept as the Sabbath day but this let them take with it that they must with the forbearing of the name Sabbath day refraine the vse of the 4th com also for these goe inseparablie together they must not presse the 4th com vpon the Lords day for the 4th com speaketh of a day vvhich by diuine imposition is called the Sabbath day and not of a day vvhich by humane imposition is called so as hitherto many of their owne braines doe or not of a day called the Lords day the com runneth thus Remember the Sabbath day c. not thus Remember the Lords day c. Some there are vvho allredy of their ovvne accord doe call our Sunday Lords day and not Sabbath day but I maruaile of all the rest vvith vvhat face these men can presse the 4th comm vpon that day vvhich themselues confesse is named Lords day and not Sabbath day vvhen as the 4th comm doth expresly mention a day which is named Sabbath day and not Lords day The name Sabbath day therefore and the 4th com must goe inseperably together hold the one and hold the other renownce the one and renownce the other also A fourth vse shall be for the confutation of a common but very friuolouse answer let a man vrge the 4th com for the 7th day or Saturday Sabbath and presently their answere will be that the com may be vnderstood not of the Sabbath day but of a Sabbath day But that I may discouer the idlenesse of this dist inction and such as vse it first vve must vnderstand what they meane by it by the Sabbath day they meane that certaine knowne day called the 7th day from the creation which is our Saturday and by a Sabbath day they meane some vncertaine day as one or other of the 7 dayes but not determined which whither this or that novv say they the com may be vnderstood either of these wayes for the vvord Sabbath
should command vs to labour on the first day of the vveeke and an other part of it command vs to rest from labour on the same first day of the vveeke is this to deale honestly and faithfully with the word of God in expounding it to make it contradict it selfe and that not in diuerse places but in one and the same text I see it is not vvithout cause that the Scriptures command people to Trie all things 1. Thessal 5.21 and so they had neede doe least they drinke in poison in stead of an healthfull potion Thus I haue discouered an other shamefull abuse of this 4th com wherefore vvhen hereafter you shall heare any of these preach for the Lords day and proue it to be a Sabbath day out of the 4th com then thinke of this vse collected from these vvords Six dayes shalt thou labour Yea when you heare them presse mens consciences for the Lords day to keepe it holy and rest from vvorke because the 4th Com. saith Remember the Sabbath day doe you then call to minde that this day which they vrge so it is not named Sabbath day but Lords day or Sunday novv the 4th com saith not Remember the Lords day c. but Remember the Sabbath day c. and further call to minde that the 4th com saith Six dayes shalt thou vvorke one of vvhich six dayes is the Lords day Hovv then can these men vrge me to rest vpon the Lords day which is one of the 6 dayes and that by the 4th com vvhen the same com biddeth me to labour on the Lords day as being one of the six labouring dayes Thus if people vvill be vvise thes Ministers if they will deceiue they shall but deceiue themselues SECT VII We haue finished the former and affirmatiue part of the com vve novv come to the latter and negatiue part in thes vvords But the seuenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. See the same repeated Exod. 31.15 Exod. 35.2 Exod. 16.26.28 Exod. 23.12 Leuit. 23.3 Deut. 5.14 in vvhich textes the 7th day is deliuered in praeceptiue and commanding termes prohibiting straightly the prophanation of it by vvorking and that vpon paine of death c. In this negatiue part of the Com. I vvill incist by vvay of exposition onely vpon the vvord seuenth for the true sense of this vvord vve must note that there are two sortes of numbers a Cardinall and an Ordinall the Cardinall number runeth thus one tvvo three foure fiue six seuen c. The Ordinall number runeth thus the first secōd third fourth fifth sixth seuenth c. the due vnderstanding vvhereof bringeth much light to this point as for the Cardinall number be it foure six or seuen it comprizeth all and euery one of the number as all the fowre all the six all the seauen but novv the ordinall number it euer notifieth but one of the number and that is euer the last of the number also for example The Third it compriseth not all the Three but onely one of the Three againe it signifieth not the second nor the first but the third vvhich is the last of that number 2. The fourth it compriseth not all the 4 but onely some one of the 4 againe it pointeth not to the second or third of the number but to the fourth only which is the last of the number Novv to apply this vve must knovv that this vvord in the 4th com seuenth it is not a cardinall but an ordinall number the propertie vvhereof is to notifie one onely and also the last of the number vvherefore vvhen the Lord said But the seuenth day is the Sabbath c. hereby he gaue vs to vnderstand that he meant it of the last day of the weeke and of the last day of that number not of the third day nor of the sixth day but of that vvhich is last of the number to vvit the Seuenth day And if you vvould knovv vvhich day of our vveeke this 7th day is see all the 4 Euangelists calling the Lords day of resurrection which is our Sunday the first day of the vveeke if then our Sunday be the first day of the vveeke then reckone onewards and Saturday vvill be this seuenth day and also the last of the number Come we now vnto the vses of the point and first is it so that this 7th day is commanded and deliuered in preceptiue and commanding termes as hath bene proued by sondry textes of Scripture then this bevvraieth the folly madnesse of some Diuines vvho seeing that here the Lord God doth so directly point at the Saturday for his Sabbath as they haue no way to auoide it Herevpon they fall to a blasphemouse deniall saying that these vvords But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. are no parte of the 4th com and that they are nothing but appurtenances forsooth thes men vvill take away no lesse at once then the Negatiue parte of a Com. they would haue no more in the 4th com but thes words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it I might easily shew them that thes words Sabbath day and seauenth day are vsed promiscuosly so as take avvay the one and take away the other graunt the one and graunt both see Exod. 20.11 Exod. 23.12 Luk. 13.14 yea they be vsed both to notify one the same day like as Lords day and Sunday be both names for our first day of the weeke so are Sabbath day and seauenth day names for Saturday the last day of our weeke if the one then belongs not vnto vs no more doth the other and if the one be a parte of the Com. so must be the other also But by these and the like euasions they vvill by hoocke or by kroocke as vve say by one bad means or an other reiect the proper day and time of the 4th Comm. and yet their very consciences tell them that the dueties of rest and holinesse vvhich vvere commanded together vvith the time and day in the selfe same com doe belong vnto vs novv vvhat an absurd thing it is for any to goe about to diuorse separate and disioyne those things which God hath married as it were ioyned together in the 4th Com. God ioyneth together the time and the duties to be performed in the time novv vvhat God hath ioyned together let no man put assunder They thinke the dueties commanded to the Ievves are descended to vs but not the time wherin those duties were to be performed this conceipt of theirs is much like absurd to these as if an house should descend to the heire but not the grownd whereon it stands or as if a bond of 10l paiable to the father vpon the 7th day of May some Lawyers should be of opinion that the some of mony indeed to wit the 10l. is descended to his sonne after his decease but not the time
Sabbath day to sanctify it and yet will not indure it that their people should Sanctify the Sabbath day but they vvill call it Iudaisme if they sanctifie it or they will haue one tricke or other one distinction or other to cast in their way whereby they will hinder them from sanctifying it They call vpon the people to keepe Gods 4th Com. and pray in vvith the Congregation to keepe this Law the 4th Com. yet they vvill not abide it that their people should doe the things commanded in this commandement one of the things commanded in this 4th com is that we should sanctify the 7th day but this they will none of vvhat an horrible kind of dissembling is this to call much frequently zealously vpon the people to kepe this Law of God and yet vvill not abide that their people should doe performe the things commanded in this Law Let me also speake a word or two vnto the people and first as touching their deuotions in the Congregation you heare the Minister reade thus Remember the Sabbath day c. But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. vnto the which you deuoutly add this prayer Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our hearts to keepe this Law By which prayer you doe yeeld your assent vnto what the Minister had vttered it is your dueties now also to see to it that you know what you pray else as the Minister saith one thing and meaneth an other so the people say they know not what you are loath to subscribe your name vnto a writing or put your seale vnto a bond vntill you haue read it ouer and vnderstand vvell vvhat it is that you put your hand or seale vnto Why this your prayer after the Minister hath recited Gods 4th com is as your handwriting or seale put vnto Gods com you must therefore vnderstand vvell vvhat you seale vnto When the Minister saith Remember the Sabbath day vvill you pray God to haue mercy on you incline your heart to keepe the Lords day and vvhen the Minister saith But the 7th day is the Sabbath Will you desire God to incline your heart to keepe the 8th day for the Sabbath I pray iudge in your selues vvhat this is better then babling before God vve must pray vvith the spirit and vve must pray vvith our vnderstanding also and that especially vvhen vve are redy to partake of the blessed Sacrament of the Lords Supper 2. Let me speake vnto the people as touching their keeping of this Lords day in conscience of this 4th com you see they cannot bring any proueing arguments to euince it that the 4th com belongeth vnto the Lords day besides you see I haue proued the contrary that the 4th com cannot belong vnto the Lords day vvherefore people may be as zealouse as they will in sanctifying of the Lords day and hope to please God thereby as a duety of the 4th com but let them beleeue it all this their zeale is as the Apostle speaketh a zeale without knowledge Rom. 10.2 All this their religion is but meere superstition they thinke to please God hereby but God may say vnto them who required this at your hands may not this truely be counted as a limme of that voluntarie religion and will worship condemned by S. Paul Col. 2.23 let men trye all things therefore and let them imitate the Bereanes to serch the Scriptures and pray to God for illumination then for reformation They may loose their Haye their Corne on the Lords day if they will in conscience of the 4th com but the 4th com calleth for no such matters on the Lords day they may neglect their seed time on the Lords day if they will in conscience of that comm Exod. 34.21 In the 7th day thou shalt rest both in earing time and in the haruest But let them know that this com concerneth the 7th day Saturday Sabbath not the 8th day Lords day Sabbath The like may be said of Brewers Malâ—sters they may if they will neglect to brewe tunn vp their beere to steepe dry their maulte on the Lords day in conscience of the 4th com but it is but their will worship and a voluntary religion it is altogether needlesse for them to make any such scruples The like I might speake to all other Tradsmen in Citties Townes I haue often heard many scruples questions moued touching the religiouse keeping of the Sabbath day meaning it of our Lords day as whither it be lawfull for Taylers to carry home fit new garments on the Sabbath day morning and whither Shoemakers may fit shoes in the morning c. and whither Water-men may row on the Sabbath day after Euening prayer and whither Marriners may set sayle begine a voyage on the Sabbath day and whither any May-games shooting and bowleing or like recreations be lawfull on our Sabbath day and I haue heard it much questioned vvhen the Sabbath day doth begine end at morning at midnight or on the Euening and the like To these the like questiones I answer 1. if the lawes of the Realme will permit these on the Lords day I answer the law of Gods 4th com is not against them but rather with them saying Sixe dayes shalt thou labour c. whereof the Lords day is one 2. I answer it is mens duty first of all to be inquisitive after the day it selfe to know which day is the Sabbath day before they inquire how the day should be spent what may be done on the day and what not there is a greater errour amongst vs then they are aware on their scruples questiones are like vnto the minte annise cummin but there is an other thing a weightier matter of the law neglected to be questioned that is to know whither the 7th day or the 8th day be the Sabbath day or to know whither we keepe the Lords Sabbath at all or not for I confidently auowch it that Gods Sabbaths commanded in his morall law are wholly neglected profaned I ernestly desire therfore that men would now for a season turne the current of their quaeries from these lesser matters vnto this weightier matter vntill by serching they haue found out the trueth the blessing of God be vpon their laboures Thus much for answer to the abused text of the 4th commandement for the Lords day SECT V. A second text produced to proue the Lords day a Sabbath day is Psal 118.24 This is the day which the Lord hath made let vs reioyce be glad in it Here say some the word made may be translated Sanctified further this day here spoken of was a type of the very day of Christs resurrection on the Lords day or first day of the weeke therfore God made or Sanctified this day for a Sabbath Before I answer this text least some should obiect vnto me that I debase their cause by bringing in
from the name that this day is called Lords day but how they will frame an argument from this name Lords day to proue it a Sabbath day I cannot deuise Thouching their collections from this name I answer 1. Let them remember that since they haue no com from Christ for this day therfore are put too it to magnifie their reason consequences prouided they be necessary consequences as they speake let them not forget I say when they bring vs a reason hence that it be not a probable one but one of their necessary consequences if I mistake me nor they shall find some what to doe to proue necessarily from the bare name of a thing 2. Seing that Paul did voluntarily omit the keeping of the Lords day when he might haue kept it if he vvould but haue spake the word as hath bene showne out of Act. 13.14.42.44 ther 's no probability therfore to think that any thing should be intimated here in these vvords Lords day to declare this day now to be a Sabbath day 3. Forasmuch as it shall hereafter be proued out of M. Perkins that sondry of the primitiue Churches did not obserue the Lords day for 300 yeeres after S. Iohns time who can thinke that in this Text S. Iohn did ratify the Lords day for a Sabbath vvhen the Christian Churches vvhich immediatly succeded him vvere ignorant of it further forasmuch as our Sauiour Christ the Lord of this Lords day did make it a trauailing day vvhen he vvas vpon the earth it cannot be thought that S. Iohn did intimate by these words Lords day that it should be kept as a Resting day or Sabbath day vnlesse you suppose that Iohn the Seruant put holinesse in that day vvherin Christ his Lord put none 4. You haue a Text in Mat. 24.10 besids many others in Act. 13.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 pray that your flight be not in the winter neither on the Sabbath day Where our Sauiour Christ allowed a conscience to be made of flying trauailing on the Sabbath day that is the 7th day Sabbath and that 40 yeers after his death Were the Patrones of the Lords day but as vvilling to imbrace the Lords Sabbathes as they are to vphould the Lords day here vvere a text for them that hath by farr more probability of trueth then this text hath Reuel 1.10 but they bewray their partiality when they will refuse that which hath better grownds in Gods word and imbrace that vvhich hath worse grownds yea no grownd at all 5. It is a rule in expounding of Scripture that vvords that are some vvhat ambiguouse and doubtfull be so construed and expounded as that they doe not contradict some other plaine expresse Text of Scripture now in the 4th Com. vve haue a most expresse plaine Scripture neuer yet repealed Sixe dayes shalt thou labour now this Lords day is the first of these sixe dayes wherfore these words Lords day must not be so expounded as if vve should Rest from labour on this day for so vve make a contradiction in Scripture by setting this text against the 4th Com. I come novv to answer more directly first for this name Lords day they take it for graunted that S. Iohn meante it of our Sunday or First day of the weeke but it may bedoubted of for our Sauiour Christ was Lord of the old Sabbath The Sonne of man is Lord euen of the Sabbath Mark 2.28 Wherefore the 7th day Sabbath may truly be called the Lords day now be it that our Sunday or First day of the weeke may also becalled Lords day because Christ our Lord rose on it So then if both the 7th day of the weeke and also the 8th day of the weeke may both be called Lords dayes it is your parte then to proue that by Lords day S. Iohn meant that Lords day which is our Sunday it may be he meant it of the Lords day vvhich is Saturday Suppose vve not with standing that S. Iohn meante it of our Sunday vvhat argument can thence be collected M. Perkins in his Cases of Conscience Chap. 16. Sect. 2. argueth thus that this day is called the Lords day as the last Supper of Christ was called the Lords Supper and that for this cause that as Christ did Substitute the last Supper in roome of the passouer so he substituted the first day of the weeke in roome of the Iewes Sabbath to be a day set a parte for his owne worship Touching this argument I shall not need giue any other answer then that reuerend diuine hath put into my mouth for he doth ingenuously confesse it in the same place that this is but a probable argument saying I suppose for in these points still we must goe by liklihoods that this day is called the Lords day as the last Supper of Christ was called the Lords Supper c. Well if then there can be no arguments drawne from this name Lords day but suppositions likelihoodes vvhat haue we to doe with them these are no necessary consequence for how shall a Minister with a safe conscience presse men peremptorily necessarily to a certaine keeping of the Lords day vpon probable suppositions likelihoods vncertainties can an vncertaine doubtfull argument bind men vnto a certaine vndoubted practise Ministers must haue a care and make a conscience of it that they doe not bind mens consciences straiter then Gods word doth when God speakes probably doubtfully they must not speake peremptorily certainly this were to make Gods Lawes straiter then they are if therfore it be but a likely matter that the Lords day is a Sabbath let Ministers leaue it deliuer it to people but as a likely thing so as if they profane it it cannot be said for certaine that they sinne in profaning it but Ministers novv a dayes are gone beyond Perkins where he saw but likelihoods they doe see certainties dare from such Textes as these presse mens consciences to the certaine peremptory keeping this Lords day vpon paine of damnation how they shall answer this to God I know not it behooueth them to forethinke of it In the meane space for the people if they be wise let them not suffer their consciences to be snared bound and inthralled touching the Lords day by such arguments as these Yet further that the vanity of this their collection from the name Lords day may appeare see it by the like of the day called the passeouer day of Pentecost day of the action caled the Lords Supper had not God added his word Com. to these dayes to this action therby declaring vnto vs vvhat vse vve should make of these dayes of this action who could from these names onely haue collected the vse of these dayes of the Lords Supper euen so it is here S. Iohn hath onely barely named this day Lords day herevnto he hath not added any word touching its vse or giuen
vs any reason why he so called it what man then can hence collect from its bare name what we should doe with this Lords day Furthermore some argue out of this Text thus that this Lords day is so called as Christs last Supper is called the Lords Supper novv the Lords Supper is so called because it was instituted in remembrance of Christ and so this day is called Lords day because it vvas instituted for a Sabbath in remembrance of Christ Herevnto I answer by deniall of this proposition that the First day of the weeke is called Lords day as Christs last Supper is called the Lords Supper in these words they affirme that there is the like reason or the same reason of the Lords day of the Lords Supper vvel novv they haue affirmed it in the next place it is their parte to proue it for bare affirmations are no arguments it is not therfore so because they haue said it is so for my parte I neuer heard it proued yet that the Lords day is so called for the same causes that Christs Supper is called the Lords Supper neither doe I beleeue that euer I shall heare it proued In the meane space let me shew the vanity of this affirmation argumentation by the like thus This Lords day is so called as the earth is called the Lords earth all that is therin for the earth is the Lords all that therein is 1. Cor. 10.26 Novv the earth is called the Lords earth because the Lord made it all things therein to serue man in his ordenary common vse Genes 1.29 Genes 9.3 and so this day is called Lords day because Christ ordeined it for mans ordenary common vse that is for a working day If they may take liberty to giue a bare affirmation then argue vpon it absurdly then so may I 2. it is said that wee are the Lords Rom. 14.8 Now wee Christians were redeemed by the Lord Christ that we should serue him in righteousnesse holinesse all the dayes of our life Luk. 1.74.75 and if vve must serue him all the dayes of our life then must we serue him in the ordenary workes of our calings thus then I may argue so is this day called Lords day that it may be spent by seruing God in the ordenary workes of our calings 3. Iames is called the Lords brother Gal. 1.19 Now may a man thus say argue this day is called Lords day as Iames is called the Lords brother novv Iames is called the Lords brother because he vvas allied to him so is this day called Lords day because it is allied to him see the absurdety of such collections as are made from this Text. 4. If this first day of the weeke must be a Sabbath resting day because called Lords day then must the earth rest be no more tilled because it is called the Lords earth then must we Christians hereafter rest from worke euery day all our liues long because vvee are called the Lords the Lords redeemed thus you see the vanity of their arguings from this Text the like may be said out of that Text Luk. 17.22 where is mentiō made of the Lords day or day of the Sonne of man But peraduenture they will obiect that these instances are not like their case for t is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with the article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 notifying some speciall thing and it is to be translated the Lords day not the day of the Lord whereto I answer 1. for the article looke into the Textes alleaged by me you shall find the article there also 2. For the translatiō that it neither maketh or marreth whither of the twaine we take is plaine in that Translatores doe promiscuously render it sometimes one way sometimes an other see 2 Thes 1.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the fyer of flame or in flaming fyer Gal. 1.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the brother of the Lord or the Lords brother see Iam. 2.1 and what difference is to be made betwene these the mount of holinesse the holy mount the Temple of holinesse and the holy Temple and so the day of the Lord and the Lords day 3. I will shew you two phrases of neerer affinity then theires and yet differ as farr as Creation Redemption the 7th day Sabbath is called the Feast of the Lord and the anniuersary Sabbaths are also called the Feastes of the Lord Leuit. 24.2.4 and yet the one of these is not euery way like the other for the one is a Signe of Creation the other of Christ redemption so may it be betwene the Lords day the Lords Supper c. I confesse vve may be bould to render a reason why Christs Supper was called the Lords Supper because vve haue a vvord of institution added to the name declaring its nature vse and end as 1. Cor. 11.20 23.24.25 but it is not so with the day called the Lords day Reuel 1.10 Yee haue nothing but its bare name mentioned not a word of the reason of the name nor of the vse and end of the day so named wherefore all consequences from hence must be as saith M. Perkins before quoted but suppositions probabilities likelihoods Some argue thus that which in Scripture is called the Lords that is to be consecrated to the Lord and to his worship I answer as vvell may they thus argue conclud that because the earth is called the Lords it must therefore be co secrated so to God as it must rest be tilled no more be imploied vvholly and onely to Gods vvorship And so Christianes being called the Lords must rest from vvorke and onely worship God Some Ministers argue thus that this day is called Lords day by way of excellency as excelling all other dayes of the weeke therfore it must be a Sabbath day for Sabbath dayes excell all other dayes Herevnto I answer that euery excellency of a day maketh not that day a Sibbath day vnlesse it excelleth as a Sabbath day for example good friday so euery friday since doe excell all other dayes of the weeke in this regard that on it Christ suffred his bitter passion for vs yet is not euery friday since a Sabbath day Hallow Thursday excelleth all dayes of the vveeke in this that on it Christ ascended vp into heauen yet is not Thursday become a Sabbath day So the Lords day excelleth all others in this that on it Christ rose yet is not the Lords day a Sabbath day ere the more for this excellency As the Minister excelleth all other men for a Minister yet he is not therfore a Magistrate so the Lords day may excell all other dayes for a resurrection day and yet it is not therfore a Sabbath or Resting day Loe with what idle stuffe they fill peoples heads withall to boulster out their fancies Others there are who thinke their bare naming of the day Lords
did not set vp the Lords day for a Sabbath as many hold beleeue among vs. Yea he citeth S. Augustine to haue bene of the same iudgement also saying that the obseruation of these things are at our liberty XI My 11th Testimony shall be that of Chemnitius in his Examen Cons Triden de diebus festis pag. 151. who thus writeth The Apostles assembled on the first day of the weeke to breake breade to heare the word Act. 20.7 they gaue Almes 1 Cor. 16.2 because on the first day of the weeke Christ rose from the deade Mark 16. because therefore of the resurrection that day was iudged the more fit for Church assemblies in the new Testament yet for all that did not the Apostles ordaine by any law or precept the observation of that day with any opinion of necessitie tying mens consciences vndor the new Testament but the observation thereof was free and at libertie and for orders sake Here you see Chemnitius citeth those very textes out of which many in our dayes think to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath to wit Act. 20.7 and 1 Cor. 16.2 yea moreouer he nameth the Resurrection as the occation of Church assemblies on that day yet for all these as things of no moment to proue the Lords day to be of diuine ordination he concludeth that the Apostles did neuer ordaine the Lords day to be sanctified as a thing necessary and tyeing mens consciences but that still its observation remained at liberty as a thing indifferent to be kept or not kept were it not for order sake to auoide confusion lest men should assemble some on one day some vpon an other without regard of the ordināce of the Magistrate c. You see then how this Authour estemeth the sanctificatiō of the Lords day but as a thing indifferent Againe Chemnitius in his Loc. Theolog de Lege Dei quarto praecepto pag. 55. thus writeth The Apostles tooke the first day of the weeke Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 in which Christ rose but not with this opinion that like as God at the Creation sanctified the 7th day c. So Christ by his resurrection did sanctifie the first day of the weeke that it should be observed vpon necessity of Salvation c. by by againe he thus saith that the Apostles might admonish vs that the Lords day in the N. Testament is to be kept not with that necessity as the Sabbath day was in the Law but at libertie only for order decency sake c. In which words besids that he concludeth that the Lords day is a thing of indifferent nature he layeth downe an other remarkable thing to wit that whereas the patrones of this new Sabbath doe affirme that like as God at the Creation did sanctifie the 7th day in memory of the Creation so Christ did sanctify the 8th day or first day of the weeke in memory of the Redemption the quite contrary doth Chemnitius affirme here saying but not like as God at the Creation sanctified the 7th day so Christ at his resurrection sanctified the first day of the weeke these two which they make to agree in similitude hee plainly saith are a dissimilitude XII My 12th Testimony shall be that of M. Perkins in his Exposition vpon Reuel 1.10 his third volume pag. 239. where he thus writeth It is commonly thought saith he that the Iewes Sabbath was changed into the Lords day by Christian Emperours longe after the ascention of Christ but it is more consonant to the new Testament to hold that Christ himselfe was the Author of this change then he brings his iij textes to proue it 1. Cor. 16.2 Act. 20.7 Ioh. 20.19.26 In which passage M. Perkins yeeldeth it to be the common opinion according to the Histories of the Church to thinke that the Lords day was not in vse for a longe time after Christ vntill Christian Emperours raised it vp as elsewhere he speakes out of Leo and Anton. Edict of holy dayes which was a matter of 300 yeeres the which bewrayes the nouelty and the weakenesse of this new Sabbath for had it bene any of Christs nevv ordinances as vvere Baptisme the Lords Supper can vve thinke it vvould haue bene forgotten so soone vvhat that the very next Churches vnto the Apostles shold so quickly forget it To mende the matter happily some vvill say that howbeit M. Perkins doth graunt it was the common opinion so to thinke of the change yet he addeth that it is more consonant to the New Testament to hold that Christ himselfe changed it so that Christ was the Author of this Lords day I grant indeed he saith so and indeauoreth to proue it to be so that by iij Textes of Scripture but then the question shall be whither M. Perkins iudged that it cold be proued by these Textes to be a necessary vndoubted trueth or but a contingent probable thing Now that he held was of opinion that it was but a probable trueth and somwhat likely onely himselfe else where shall expound himselfe for this purpose see his Cases of Conscience and second Volume pag. 106. vvhere the holy man speaking to the conscience of this new Sabbath durst not speake perēptorily as of a thing certainly infalliblie true but tremblingly as it were repeating ouer his doubtfull speeches three or fowre times in 6 or 8 lines writing these are his words The Sabbath day in the new Testament in all likelihood is tied to that we cale the Lords day that as I take it by Christ himselfe The reasons thereof are these 1. the Sabbath of the new Testament is called the Lords day Reuel 1.10 now J suppose for in these points still wee must goe by likelihoods it is called the Lords day as Christs last Supper is called the Lords Supper c. And then his second reason is taken out of 1. Cor. 16.2 and his third out of Ioh. 20.19 Now in prouing the Lords day to be the Sabbath he vttereth these doubtfull speeches in these fewe lines 1. in all likelyhood 2. As I take it 3. I suppose 4. For in these points we must still goe by likelyhoods Surely had there bene any sound and prouing arguments to be fetched out of these iij Textes Reuel 1.10 1. Cor. 16.2 Ioh. 20.19.26 M. Perkins would neuer haue gone so doubtfully to worke by suppositions thoughts and likelihods as here he doth So then it is manifest that when M. Perkins said it is more consonant to the tenour of Scripture to hold that Christ altered the Sabbath so instituted the Lords day that he spake these vvords not as of a certaine infallible trueth but as of a doubtfull disputable point The Lords day Sabbath then by M. Perkins iudgement when he had made the most and best of it that he could is but a probable thing a mere likelihood vncertaine whither euer Christ instituted it or not now tell me is
against them saying well ye reiect the commandement of God that ye may obserue your owne Tradition Mark 7.9 For they trample downe the Lords Sabbath day that they may keepe their owne Lords day My 4th reason disswasiue is because by the vphoulding of this Lords day Sabbath the sacred Scriptures vvord of God is profaned I make that appeare thus Ministers doe daily vrge the 4th Com. vpon the Lords day doe presse mens consciences to the Sanctifying of the Lords day by the 4th Comm. now the 4th Com. doth speake as he that hath but halfe an eye may see of the day called Sabbath day but this is a day called Lords day the 4th Com. was made for a sanctified hallowed day for God himselfe blessed it sanctified it Genes 2.3 but this Lords day is a profane day a common day neuer sanctified by God but on the contrary appointed for labour it being one of the sixe working dayes mentioned in the 4th Com. Christ himselfe trauailing on it c. Now for Ministers to apply this sacred word of Gods 4th Com. vnto a profane common and vnsanctified day time this or nothing is to profane the Sacred word of God Secondly many portions of Scripture in the New Testament with some also out of the old are hereby also wrested abused profaned the Spirit of God is made to speake for that which neuer came into his minde to thinke a most horrible vnsufferable thing in a Christian Church as for example these Texts Psal 118.24 Ioh. 20.1.19.26 Act. 1.2.3 Act. 2.1.14 c. Act. 20.7.1 Cor. 16.2 2. Cor. 5.17 and Reuel 1.10 these eight Textes at least besids the 4th Com. are abused for the maintenance of a forged new coined and counterfait Sabbath day who that hath any zeale of Gods glory or loue vnto his Holy word can endure it that Gods word and trueth should be thus profanly vsed profaned abused wherfore if you beare any reuerence vnto the sacred word of God let a reformation be made Looke vpon the third Com. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine now Gods word is a parte of his name wherby he is knowne Act. 9.15 therfore for men to abuse profane Gods word it is to abuse profane Gods name so a sinne against the third Com. now the reward of such profanation is this that God will not hold him guiltlesse that taketh his name in vaine hee shall surely therfore be punished vvithout repentance amendement But vvhat doe I speaking to deafe Adders men will not be charmed what they haue holden they will hold as for me I am but one meane they are many mighty so that I almost despaire of remedy howeuer I haue discouered their sinne vnto them at their perill be it whither they will amend it or not I abhorre to thinke of it yet this I am sure of that that is true amongst vs which the Lord once complained of by his Prophet Ieremiah that is that an horrible filthy thingis committed in the land the Prophets prphecy lies people delight therein Ierem. 5.30.31 that the Prophets prophecy lyes this is apparent as hath bene showne and the people delight therein this is manifest in asmuch as many that are both religiouse also counted wise are not ashamed to speake it that they wish from their hearts that I had neuer medled in this point so we haue for the most parte like Priest like people both delighting in this counterfait Sabbath both like vnto Nadab Abihu who offered straung fier before the Lord which hee had not commaunded them Leuit. 10.1 My 5th and last reason disswasiue is because it is a sinne for Ministers to preach for the Lords day This I proue because they cannot speake for it in faith now whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne saith the Apostle Rom. 14.23 now that they cannot preach for it in faith is plaine by this that they haue no word of God for the grownd of their faith we haue alredy showne that they haue no word of God for this Lords day Sabbath for they can not shew vs where Christ or any of his Apostles left any commandement for it no nor yet haue they any necessary consequences for it so often therefore as A Minister presseth the people to sanctify the Lords day Sabbath so often he sinneth And so much touching this Lords day Sabbath CHAP. IIII. An answer vnto all those textes of Scripture reasones arguments which are vsually profanly brought against the Sabbath day mentioned in the 4th com to wit the 7th day Sabbath I Haue now finished the 3 first partes of my booke the first whereof was in defence of the morall law the second was an exposition of the 4th com with adiscouery of the corrupt expositiones thereof the third was an answer to those Scriptures reasones that are brought for the Lords day and now I am by order come vnto the fourth parte of my booke herein I am to answer to the Scriptures and reasons whereby the enemies of the Lords Sabbathes goe about most wickedly vngodlily to throw them downe and here my purpose is not onely to make answer vnto those textes reasones which these 10 Ministers or any of them in the name roome of the rest haue impiously obiected against the Lords Sabbathes but also I purpose to answer vnto all obiectiones generally what soeuer I can heare or reade of Gods Ancient Sabbaths are not abolished or The Lords ancient 7th day Saturday Sabbath is not abolished SECT I. IN the first place let me discouer an high point of folly in these Antisabbatharians for a seruant to forsake his old Master before he knows where to haue a new or for any man to pull downe his old house before he had found for certaine that he was able to build vp a new house is a greate folly into this folly are falne not onely those other 9 Ministers by caling the Lords Sabbaths Ceremonies Iewish Iudaisme to bring them into reproch but especially M. Chappel by preaching against them openly now what an egregiouse folly is this in them to throw downe the old Sabbath before they knew where to find a new Sabbath to abolish the 7th day before they were able to raise vp the 8th day me thinke a smale portion of discretion should haue taught them to haue made sure worke that they were well able to defend the Lords day before they had aduentured to debase and abolish the Sabbath day I wish all men to learne wisedome by their folly that is neuer to debase striue to abolish the old Sabbath vntill they know how to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath so to set vp a new Sabbath That with the moreculler and shew of trueth men might abolish Gods Sabbathes besides their loading of them with reprochfull termes of Iudaisme and abolished Shaddowes and Ceremonies and
is radically indede in your Ministers for the blind doe leade the blind neuerthelesse you haue your share therin because you iustify their doeings approue of their sayings doctrines in this point Gods proceedings are on this wise that if the Minister doth not admonish the people of those things which are sinnes the Ministers indede shall answer to God for thy blood but what will this auaile thee for Thou shalt die for thine iniquity as you may reade Ezek. 33.8 for this cause it is fite I should giue you notice therof albeit I meane to lay the chiefeload vpon your Ministers backes lastly whereas you pleade that you are not able to iudge in such points as these Herevnto I answer that men should be ashamed to say they cannot iudge considering the time as the Apostle speaketh for men haue now bene trained vp a longe time in the doctrine of Christian religion therefore should be able to iudge the Apostle biddeth vs to Trye all things keepe that which is good 1. The 5.21 againe he saith I speake as vnto them which haue vnderstanding iudge yee what I say 1. Cor. 10.15 Here you see the Apostle would haue common people to be iudges of that which hee taught such were those noble Bereans Act. 17.11 wherefore you ought to iudge of this point to this end to reade about it to conferre of it and to studdy it It is true were it a point to be studdied out by your owne labour from the roote of it there were difficulty in it perhapes aboue your capacities but when a point is alredy studied to your hand a path way beaten oute for your foote steppes now there is no invincible difficulty in the matter it is true that commō people cannot plead a cause before the Iudge yet can they iudge hauing heard both parties plead people cannot preach yet can they iudge of a sermon preached so in this point of the Sabbath though people could not first finde it out nor yet dispute it when foūd out yet can they iudge of the cause when they see it laied plainly open before their eies if they will open their eyes to see it they may iudge of the cause when they haue seene it pleaded on both sides to this end I haue penned this booke wherein you haue the argumentes on both sides plainly laid downe so as you may easily discerne the trueth from errour Yet further to take away all excuses the point in question touching this Sabbath day commanded in the Morall Law it is A Catechisme point for all the 10. commandements they are Catechisme pointes like as are the Creede the Lords prayer now it hath pleased Almightie God to lay downe these Catechisme pointes of all other pointes in religion most plainly most familiarly that he that runeth may reade them the 10 cōmandements are expressed to the capacety of the meanest in the Congregation of all the 10 commandements there is not any one laid downe in more familiar easy termes words to be vnderstod then is this 4th com touching the Sabbath day for God hath most liuely plainly painted pointed it out from all other daies of the weeke so that no man can doubt which day of the weeke is that which God would haue for his Sabbath day no nor yet what dueties God requireth to be done in that day it is plaine that that is the day which is properly called Sabbath day in Scripture account which is the 7th day in Scriptures account namly our Saturday the dueties are Rest Holy actiones performed in that Rest these things are so plaine in the com as they neede no exposition for they are put downe in so many words in the com now what neede then is there of such store of lerning to attaine to the knowledge of these things as if common people cold not vnderstand them nor any but Ministers men of lerning could iudge of them men may as well say they vnderstand not English as to say they cannot vnderstand iudge which is the 7th day of the weeke what is meant by Rest from labour performance of Holy actiones for which is the 7th day we cannot but knowe since the Sunday or Lords day is the first day what is meant by Holy actiones or sanctifying of the day we know by the like actiones we performe on euery Lords day a smale deale of lerning is enough for a man to iudge of these points wherefore that is but an excuse for people to say they are no schollers they cannot iudge of such matters what can you not iudge of your Catechisme points which you lerned in your Childhoode I confesse for all this there is difficulty about this point to such as are not exercised in it by the way it is a shame for any man not to be so well exercised in all Gods 10 commandements as not to be able to defend them vnto the least iote title against all opposers but I desire thee good Reader but to obserue where the difficulty lieth for the cleering of this note with me these ij things The 4th com the opposition made against this 4th com For the former of these the 4th com together with the things therin commanded are laid downe most familiarly plainly as hath bene showne so as ther 's no difficulty at all about that no man but may easily vnderstand what it is which God requireth therin which day of the weeke God inioyned for a Sabbath wherefore the difficulty that is it is in the opposition made by Ministers against something commanded in the 4th com now it is true indeede that in this opposition there ariseth difficulty because they trouble the waters of mens vnderstāding by bringing many intricate reasones out of Scriptures against the Sabbath day written in the 4th com which intricate arguments if these Ministers would forbeare then there were no difficulty at all all were as plaine as a beaten path way wherefore since you see where the difficulty lieth my counsaile to all such people as plead ignorance want of lerning in this controuersy shall be that they would therefore rather follow God then their Ministers for Gods way is a plaine smooth easy beaten way so as euery man lerned or vnlerned may easily know what it is which God requireth in this Catechisme point of his 4th com but their Ministers way in setting themselues to abandon and roote out Gods Sabbath it is such a rugged way such a difficult way full of so many secret hidden windings turnings as people of common capacety cannot conceiue it nor iudge of it as themselues say wherefore my counsaile vnto these is this that they rather take parte with God with his Sabbath then with their Ministers against God his Sabbath because Gods way is an easy knowne way but mans way is an intricate
of conscience for at the day when God shall iudge the secretes of men their consciences will beare witnesse their thoughtes accuse or excuse them Rom. 2.15 ARGVM IX My 9th argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because vnlesse it be in force the whole 4th com with euery parte percell of it is abolished nullified altogether vselesse And thus it may be framed If the 7th day Sabbath be not now in force Then is the whole 4th com nullified altogether vselesse But the 4th com is not nullified become vselesse Therefore is the 7th day Sabbath now in force First a word or two of the minor or second proposition for the trueth of it namely that the 4th com is now in force this is plaine first by the Testimony of our Sauiour who ratifieth the very least of the commandements as you may see Math. 5.19 secondly it is ratified by our Church which hath ordered that the 4th com be reade in our Churches also that the people shall vse this prayer at the rehearsall of it by the Minister Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our hearts to keepe this Law Thirdly I know no Diuine one or other that denieth it or doubteth of it it were heinouse impiety for any to deny it for it were to deny one of the tenn Morall Lawes of Almighty God So much therefore for profe of the Minor I come then vnto the Major or first proposition wherein I affirmed that the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath doth draw after it the nullifying of the whole 4th com now I proue it In the 4th com are ij things to be considered the one is the commandement it selfe the other is the reason of the com and I shall proue that both these are nullified by abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath or by denying that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force To begine with the commandement it selfe that I may shewhow this is nullified first we must see what it is which they deny namely the 7th day Sabbath in which words we will consider that they deny the Sabbath day that is the old Sabbath day to be in force now then we will consider how they deny the 7th day that is the 7th day from the Creation to be in force now for both these they doe deny in denying that the 7th day Sabbath is now in force of these two I will begine with the Sabbath day that is the old Sabbath day which they doe deny by these textes Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16.17 now I proue that if the old Sabbath day specified in the 4th com be abolished not in force now then is the 4th com made nonsense and to stand for a Cipher and that this may appeare you shall see it made plaine to your very eyesight The Lord God said Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it Exod. 20.8 Now the Sabbath day here mentioned it was the old Sabbath day but this old Sabbath day say these new Sabbatharians is abolished not in force now which if it be so then in this commandement Exod. 20.8 the Lord God commandeth now at this time iust nothing at all for take away these ij words Sabbath day from out the commandement and in steade thereof put so many Ciphers as you haue letters in the two words as you may doe if those words or the thing meante by those words be abolished then the commandement is no more but thus much Remember the 0000000000 to sanctify it Thus you see by deniall of the old Sabbath day they haue made the word of God of none effect Gods commandement to become nonsense and a bundle of Ciphers this must be so vnlesse they can shew vs that God commanded vs two Sabbath dayes in his 4th com the one caled Sabbath day the other caled Lords day which all the Logick in their heads can neuer doe And so much for their deniall of the Sabbath day I come now vnto the other thing that they deny to wit the 7th day from the creation in this I will consider aparte these ij things first the word day then the word Seauenth first for the word day they say that the day to wit the old day is abolished as by other textes so also by these textes Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 secondly for the word Seauenth they say that the 7th day in order of time is abolished to wit the 7th day from the Creation whence it followeth 1. That if the day be abolished then is there no day now inioyned in the 4th com for take away that day which was commanded to wit the old day then is there now no day required for a Sabbath in the 4th com so then now an howre in a day may be sufficient for a Sabhath so a Sabbath day may be turned into a Sabbath howre Loe then if by deniall of the 7th day they haue not nullified the 4th cō or as good as nullified it for the Lord was wont to haue an whole day celebrated for his worship by the 4th com but now we need giue him but an howre in a day for his worship by the 4th com thus Sabbath daies may be turned into Lecture daies is not this a manifest violence done vnto Gods Law and thus it must be by their denial vnlesse they can shew vs that God commanded ij daies in his 4th com an old day a new day the 7th day the 8th day 2dly it followeth that if the 7th day from the Creation be abolished as they say it is then now a daies we are not bound by the 4th com to giue God one day in euery 7 daies for a Sabbath but we may giue God one day in 7 or one day in 14 or one day in a moneth or one day in a yeere or one in 7 yeeres or one in a mans life time for being that the 7th day in the cō is abolished none other day there is specified or put into its roome we are now left at randome to take a day when we please for the 4th com doth not tell vs how often we should keepe a Sabbath since those words the 7th day are abolished which teld vs how often we should giue God a Sabbath now iudge thou good Reader if they haue not as good as nullified Gods 4th com by abolishing the 7th day since God was wont to haue a 7th day once a weeke by his 4th com but now we need not by that com giue him a Sabbath aboue once in a yeere or once in 7 yeeres or once in a mans life for the time how often being abolished there remaineth in the 4th com no more but the duty to keepe a Sabbath day and that we may performe if we keepe but one in our whole life But we haue not yet done In the 4th cō there is ij thinges to be obserued the one is
said to remeÌ„ber the words of Iesus which he had said vnto him Mat. 26.75 and so it is here whereas God said remember the Sabbath day he speaketh to his people the Iewes of a day which they knew beforehand for it was consecrated not first at the giuing of the Law but long before euen at the Creation Genes 2.3 now the Iewes they knew no day for a Sabbath day and so could remember no day but Saturday the 7th day they knew not of the Lords day nor of any other and therefore this 4th com and the word Remember in it belongeth properly vnto no day of the weeke but Saturday 2. That day of the weeke and that onely is the Sabbath by the 4th com whose proper name is Sabbath day Remember the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 now no day of the weeke was euer called Sabbath day by the Scriptures or ancient fathers but Saturday therefore no day but Saturday can stand by the 4th com I am not ignorant that we cale Sunday Sabbath day but this is but a miscalling and nicknaming of daies as elsewhere is shewed see Mark 16.1.2 where Saturday was caled Sabbath day sunday was caled the first day of the weeke 3. Onely that day is Sabbath day by the 4th com which is the 7th day of the weeke But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God Exod. 20.10 now no day of the weeke is by any approued computation called and accounted the 7th day but Saturday as elswhere hath bene showne therefore Saturday is the Sabbath day by the 4th com see Mark 16.1.2 where Sunday is caled the first day of weeke if Sunday be the first day then Saturday which cometh after it must be the 7th day Thus you see none other day of the weeke can be Sabbath by the 4th com because none other day was euer caled Sabbath day nor counted the 7th day 4. No day of the weeke caÌ„ be Sabbath day by the 4th com but Saturday the 7th day because the reason of the 4th com Gods ensample of his rest on the 7th day therein conteined Exod. 20.11 cannot belong vnto any day of the weeke besids Saturday this point is elswhere cleered also Thus you see it vndeniablie proued that if one day in a weeke must be a Sabbath day by the 4th com it must of necessity be Saturday because the 4th com in all the partes thereof point vs out vnto Saturday and vnto no day of the weeke besids it ARGVM XXIII My 23th argument in defence of the Lords Sabbath proueth that it must be morall perpetuall because it is such an ordinance of Gods as doth greatly further the publike solemne worship of God tend vnto piety and furtherance of the dueties of the first Table nourish Christian Religion generally helpeth all sortes of people to the attainment of grace and groweth in all the dueties of piety towards God and Charity towards man yea because it is such an ordinance of Gods as tendeth vnto mercy and that not onely towards mankind in generall but also vnto mercy both vnto man beast And thus I argue That which is expressely commanded in the morall Law which by experience we find tending vnto and a notable furtherance of Gods publique priuate worship and seruice and of all sortes of people for their attainment and increase of grace godlinesse and growing vp in our Christian Religion yea and further which is commanded as a worke of mercy vnto mankind yea both to man beast that thing is morall perpetuall still in force But to rest from worke on Saturday the 7th day is expresly commanded in the Morall Law and we find it by experience tending vnto a notable furtherance of Gods publique priuate worship seruice of all sortes of people for their attainment increase of grace godlinesse and growing vp in our Christian Religion yea and further which is commanded as a worke of mercy vnto mankind yea both to man and beast Therefore to rest from worke on Saturday the 7th day is morall perpetuall and still in force As for the trueth of the Major I suppose none will deny it for it is a Rule in expounding the commandements that not onely the things expressed in the Decalogue are commanded as dueties binding vs but also all causes helpes furtherances vnto those dueties whence I reason thus if the helpes furtherances of morall dueties belong vnto vs though not expressed in the Law then by like if not by stronger reason such helpes furtherances as serue vnto morall dueties being expresly commanded in the Law doe belong vnto vs bind vs as morall yea further that duety which is commanded in the law as a worke of mercy that must needs be morall without all controuersy And as for the Minor I suppose it is as cleere as the Major for 1. it is expresly commanded in the Morall Law that we should rest from worke on the 7th day which is Saturday But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. Exod. 20.10 And 2. we find it by all experience that if we rested from our laboures on Saturday the 7th day it would greatly tend vnto the furtherance of Gods publike worship on that day and vnto the begetting groweth and increase of grace in all men for when men doe â—et a parte all worldly imployments to attend on the seruice of God then are they free from many distractiones incumberances which would hinder them in Gods seruice and then are they fiter for all Religiouse exercises c. The trueth hereof we see by our now keeping of the Lords day for our resting from worldly imployments on this day doth greatly further the worship of God all holy exercises iust so it would be with the 7th day if we had it in vse 3. That a rest from worke on the 7th day is commanded as a worke of mercy is plaine Exod. 23.12 In the 7th day thou shalt rest that thine oxe and thine Asse may rest and the sonne of thy maide and the stranger may be refreshed See to this effect also Deut. 5.14 So then God would that men should rest on the 7th day for the reliefe ease and refreshment both of man and beast God would that Masters should exercise pittie and mercy to their wearied and tired seruants by resting them on the 7th day Now in this respect I may cale the Saturday or Sabbath day the Seruants Iubile for on this day euery weeke they should haue release from their painfull and seruile laboures to refresh themselues therin on this day all Masters should exercise mercy to their wearied seruants how euer other times holy dayes for seruants refreshment are at the liberty plesure of gouerners yet this time day is not so for of duety God in the behalfe of Seruants requireth it of Masters so it is
suppose a commandement had bene giuen in the new Testament for the Lords day in the same forme of words with the 4th com for the Sabbath day saying Remember the Lords day to sanctify it c. But the first day of the weeke is the Lords day in it thou shalt doe no worke c. for on the first day the Lord rose from the deade and therefore the Lord blessed the Lords day and hallowed it If any now should frame such a distinction against our Lords day Sabbath saying this name Lords day may be translated a Lords day that so he might turne the sense of the commandement from that day which hath so many hundrethes of yeeres bene knowne called by the name Lords day vnto any day of the weeke would not the Patrones of the Lords day cry fie on such a man it is pitty he liues that will so corrupt the Scriptures the case is their owne I appeale vnto their consciences if by these answers they haue not as shamefully corrupted and abused this portion of Gods Law the 4th com 2. Whereas they say the name Sabbath may be translated a Sabbath that this translation is vnfit and disagreing to the Scriptures and contextes I alleage against them all the lerned translatoures both new and old that euer translated the Bible for they all constantly doe render it the Sabbath not a Sabbath 3. If by the name Sabbath in the 4th com was meant a Sabbath vncertainly what day of the weeke then this absurdety followes that the Iewes were not bound distinctly vnto the Saturday Sabbath which they alwayes kept and held themselues bound to keepe but that they might haue kept Sunday Monday or some other day in imitation of God and in memory of the Creation Yea further since all men confesse that the Iewes by Sabbath day vnderstod the Saturday if now it be otherwise vnderstod then one the same word shall haue one sense for 2000 yeeres and more and afterwards the same word shall haue an other sense and so the words in Scripture shall change their sense as the times change what is more absurde 4. The absurdety of this distinction yet appeareth in this also for since there was neuer any day of the weeke weekly caled Sabbath day in all the Scriptures but the Saturday onely how can any man in his right wittes apply the 4th com to any day but Saturday it is as absurd as if one should suppose two Saturdayes in a weeke a Saturday the Saturday or two Christmas dayes in one yeere a Christmas day and the Christmas day I confesse we cale now a daies Sunday Sabbath day but what matters it what we cale who take liberty to cale and to miscale daies at our plesure but I speake of a Diuine nomination of daies vsed in the Scriptures for neither Prophets nor Apostles did euer cale the Sunday or Lords day Sabbath day nor any other day of the weeke saue Saturday Since therefore there is but one day in a weeke named Sabbath day by Diuine computation how can there be a Sabbath day and the Sabbath day 5. In my expâ—sition of the 4th commandement I haue at large proued it that by Sabbath day in the 4th com we must vnderstand the Sabbath day emphatically that is Saturday not a Sabbath day at rouers at randome vnto which profes forepast I referr my Reader see my Exposition vpon these words Sabbath day 6. The absurdety of this distinction appeareth in this if this word Sabbath should be translated a Sabbath then one the same word should haue diuerse senses in one and the same commandement for the name Sabbath at the latter end of the commandement Exod. 20.11 must be translated the Sabbath for it was not any day of the weeke which God blessed at the Creation but it was Saturday the 7th day onely and certainly it is absurd therefore to translate the same name Sabbath at the begining of the commandement Exod. 20.8 otherwise as a Sabbath as of a day at randome and vncertaine And so much for this distinction II. A second euasion I will touch and it is there distinction of a 7th day and the 7th day let a man vrge those words of the 4th com But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. to proue that we must sanctify the old Sabbath day which is the 7th day and they will make this for one of their answers that the commandement speakes of a 7th day not of the 7th day by a 7th day they vnderstand some day or other of the weeke at rouers and at randome but not any one certaine day of the weeke Were there nothing else against this distinction this one were enough that by refusing the 7th day which implieth a setled well knowne certaine day of the weeke to imbrace a 7th day at rouers as an vncertaine time hereby they labour to make things knowne when vnknowne when things certaine to be vncertaine as if they delighted in vncertainties and as if God should require a time for his worship but no man knew when 2. Were this answer tollerable what should stand firme in the Scriptures God commanded circumcision on the 8th day had some of our times liued in those times they could by this Law haue circumcised a child on the 9th or 10th day made it in their accompt a 8th day though not the 8th day for if they would but skip ouer the first or second day of the childs birth not rekoning them then the 9th day or 10th day would be a 8th day The Lord commanded the Passeouer to be eaten on the 14th day of the moneth loe we haue some by a new deuised computation could haue iustified it that by the same Law they might haue eaten the Passeouer on the 15th or 16th day of the moneth and all well enough for they could make the 15th or 16th day of the moneth an 14th day though not the 14th day for hauing said that the commandement may be vnderstod of a 14th day they can thus make it good they will not rekone the first day of the moneth for any of the number but begine their account at the second day and so the 15th day will become a 14th day is not this pretty iugling think you that these men thinke they haue to doe with a God when they thus expound his commandements or with some babe or child that cannot tell to 7 or to 14 but they will say perhapes they doe not so rekone nor skip ouer daies c. But that this is false I thus proue it our Sunday or Lords day is not onely the first day of the weeke in our common account and in the computation of all Chruches Iewes and Christianes Protestants and Papistes but also it is caled the first day of the weeke constantly in the Scriptures see Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk. 24.1 Ioh. 20.1.19 Act. 20.7 ij Cor. 16.2 Now that our new SabbathariaÌ„s might
Of this I may say as Christ saied ye haue made the commandement of none effect by your tradition God saied in it thou shalt not worke I say they this is not to be regarded by Christianes for it is but Application and Appurrenance yet further whither rend all these distinctions and euasiones wherby men would deny Gods 7th day Sabbath and what 's the reason that to this end Gods Law must be thus rent and torne assunder doe not the Authores of these things behaue themselues like men weary of Gods seruice and as if it were a burden vnto them to haue so many of Gods ordinances in his Church and therfore they diminish the number as if the fewer of them the rather it grieueth them that Gods sacred Sabbath should be morall lest they should be bound to sanctifie it were it not thus with them they would not invent such euasiones against this ordinance as they doe But they haue conceiued a preiudice against it and therefore downe it must V. An other euasion I meete withall and it is this let a man alleage the 4th commandement for the sanctification of the Sabbath day properly so caled and our answer shall be this the Sabbath day why doe we not keepe the Sabbath day the word Sabbath it signifieth a Rest and doe we not rest on the Lords day why we haue the Sabbath day alredy we keepe it euery weeke so long as we rest from our workes euery Lords day Let me shew you the absurdety of this slye euasion by the like suppose we a commandement giuen for the sanctification of the Lords day in the new Testament thus Remember the Lords day to sanctifie it but the first day of the weeke is the Lords day in it thou shalt doe no worke c. for on the Lords day Christ rose from the dead and therefore he blessed and sanctified the Lords day Suppose we also one of our new Sabbatharians should alleage vnto me this commandement for the obseruation of the Lords day if I should answer him thus the Lords day why doe I not keepe the Lords day the old Sabbath day on Saturday it is the Lords day for the 4th commandement saith the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. And doe I not then sanctify the Lords day when I keepe the old Sabbath day on Saturday were not this a slye eusiaon and yet such slye euasiones they vse as if because they can deceiue themselues blind the poore people by such sleites they could deceiue God himselfe too thereby but as in the supposed commandement for the Lords day it is manifest enough which day is the Lords day as namely not Saturday but Sunday for it is caled the first day of the weeke which is true of Sunday onely and it is caled the day wherein Christ rose which is true of Sunday onely so in the true commandement for the old Sabbath it is plaine enough to any but deceiuers which day the Lord meant for his Sabbath that is not the Sunday or Lords day but the Saturday for it is caled in the commandement the 7th day which agreeth to Saturday onely and it is said in the commandement to be the day wherein God rested at the Creation which agreeth to Saturday onely 2. May they not by the like sophistry keepe the Coronation day a fast day or Christmas day when it faleth on a working day and all by the 4th com and in stead of Gods Sabbath for the word Sabbath signifieth a Rest now on eueâ—y of these daies we rest from worke and doe we not then keepe the Lords Sabbath thinke you when we keepe the Coronation day a fast day or Christmas day thus wise meÌ„ yea Religiouse meÌ„ play with Gods com as a foole would play with an other mans nose and yet let a man in loue of Gods trueth with all meeknesse and submission to them for time was I so carried it towards them tell them in most friendly manner of these erroures and they are redy to flie in a mans face to fill the world with clamoures against him as one not worthie to liue any longer as one morefit for the iayle then to inioy common libertie These are good incouragements are they not to prouoke one to study and to discouer erroures and to set men in the right way these and worse haue bene my reward hitherto I might be larger in confutation of this sleite as by shewing that these words Sabbath day are a proper name of a day to wit of Saturday and therefore we must not rest in the bare signification of the word Sabbath but looke how the Spirit of God vseth it to what day he doth apply it namely vnto Saturday for as Lords day is a proper name for Sunday so is Sabbath day a proper name for Saturday whence it plainly appeareth that they dally and play with the word Sabbath when they flie to its signification neglecting its application and the Holy Ghostes vse of the word these with other things we might add but enough hath bene said for him that will vnderstand if further you desire to see of this point I referre you to my Exposition of these words in the 4th commandemeÌ„t Sabbath day so much for this euasion VI. An other euasion is this let a man alleage Gods Com. for the 7th day Sabbath and one answer shall be this The Sabbath day or the Lords day all is one for it is bur time you stand on and time is but a circumstance and why should you be so strict for a circumstance as if God regarded a time so much c. Because you say but a time and but a circumstance by way of sleiting you must know that this time this circumstance it is an ordinance of Gods yea one of the most ancient ordinances of God in the Church it is a time indeed but it is a Sacred and Holy time for God himselfe pleased to Hallow it and make it an Holie day at the Creation So God blessed the 7 day and sanstified it Gen. 2.3 Were it not blasphemy to but at Gods ordinances why might not some thus but at our Sacraments as well as these doe at Gods Sabbathes why may they not as well say the Sacramentes what need you be so strict for them they are but Signes of things c the water it is but well water the bread it is but Bakers bread c as you say the Sabbath why it is but a time and but a circumstance 2. We must know that some circumstances be but indifferent others be necessarie for example the circumstance of time when it is not commanded limited then it is an indifferent circumstance then a man may but at it by way of diminution thus the Sacraments are to be vsed but whither in the fore noone or in the after noone whither on the Lords day or on an other day is a thing indifferent because not Commanded On the other
that they profane Gods ancient Sabbath against the fourth Comm. of this Lavv and this shall be their ansvver that the fourth Comm. is partly Ceremoniall and that the old Sabbathday is Iewish and pertaineth to the Ievves only As for Protestantes vve tread in their steppes vp and dovvne saue that vve are not so impudently audacious as they for vve acknovvledge the second Comm. for Morall but come vnto the fourth Comm. and here vve iumpe vvith them saying the fourth Comm. is partly Morall partly Ceremoniall and the old Sabbath enioyned in the fourth Com. is Ievvish c. In respect therefore of Gods Sabbathes vvhich both they and vve deny vvee yeeld obedience to Gods Lavv but by halues and saying the fourth Comm. is partly Ceremoniall thereby vve are partiall in Gods Lavv against therefore this partiall dealing vvith God in his Lavves and ordinances shall the following partes of this booke be spent SECT II. The thing vvhich Almightie God intendeth generally in this Com. is hovv all the time and dayes of our liues should be spent and imployed in his seruice the vvhich is backed vvith an effectuall reason for my purpose is first to handle the commandement generally as in this second Section and then more particularly as in the thirth Section c. As for the time we haue a distribution of it in the comm and that into the Sixe dayes and into the seuenth day touching both of these God hath ordered it in this comm hovv he vvould be serued to vvit on the seuenth day by Sanctifying and Hallovving of it in the partes of his vvorship and seruice and a cessation from all seruile vvorkes on the sixt dayes by following some lavvfull calling or other vvich may redovvnd to the glorie of God according to that 1 Cor. 10.31 Whither therefore ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer yee doe doe all to the glory of God As for the reason it is a liuely mouing one it being fetched from God him selfe and from his owne ensample In this reason conteined in Exod. 20.11 vve haue also a distribution of time in to the sixe dayes and into the seuenth day vvherein it pleaseth God to declare vnto vs hovv he spent and imployed his time to vvit the first vveeke or seuenth dayes that euer the vvorld savv or heard of the sixe dayes that is those sixe dayes vvhich for order of number order of nature vvent immediatly before the first seuenth day or first Saturday that euer vvas these God spent in vvorking and in making the heauens and the earth and all the hoste of them This God hath reuealed vnto vs vnto this end for one that vve should in imitation of him make choyse of those same sixe dayes vvherin God vvrought that in them and none other vve should vvorke as God vvrought and in them vve should finish all our vvorkes as God in them finished all his vvorkes The seuenth day that is the seuenth day from the Creation or the first Saturday that euer vvas this day God spent in an holy cessation and resting from the vvorkes of creation and therefore this time this day aboue and before all other times dayes God blessed sanctified and this hath reuealed vnto vs to this end and purpose that we should in an holy imitation of God cease from the workes of the sixe dayes before and rest from all seruil labour and that we shold make choise of this very day to Sanctifie it and to hallow it like as God blessed it and hallovved it Novv that we are not left to our liberty in this imployment of the time and dayes of our liefe appeareth here by first because God hath commanded it and secondly God hath backed his commandement by a strong forcible reason dravvne from his owne ensample that we shold so imploy the dayes of the weeke as God him selfe at the Creation imployed them and this is noted by that rationall particle for Exod. 20.11 And this is that which God aimeth at in this com generally namely that we shold spend and imploy euery day and all the dayes of the weeke after the ensample of God or as God himselfe spent them The thing which Almightie God intendeth in this com specially and principally is the hallowing of that sacred time and day called the Sabbath day and the Seuenth day as in the third Comm. God inioyned the hallowing of his Sacred Name so in this fourth com God inioyned the hallowing of his Sacred day to wit the seuenth day the which him selfe had made holy aboue all dayes by his blessing of it and Sanctifying of it as we reade Genes 2.3 like as the king might say to his subiectes Remember my Coronation day to keepe it an holy day or Remember the Gunpowder Treason day to Keepe it an holy day so saith the king of kings Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy Exod. 20.8 Secondly the Sanctification of this day it is inioyned both affirmatiuely and negatiuely affirmatiuely in these words Remember the Sabbath day to Sanctifie it Negatiuely in these words In it thou sholt not doe any worke the affirmatiue parte of the precept requireth sanctity and the parformance of holy duties the Negatiue parte of the precept requireth a resting from laboures in our ordenary callings which hinder and thrust out those holy duties Thirdly the Lord God inioyneth vs in this comm tvvo things the one is the duety of the day the other is the dueties of rest from labours and the perfermance of sondry the parts of Gods worship and seruice in the day I call it the duety of the day because we are no lesse bound in duety to God to that day then to the dueties of rest and holinesse in the day or we are no lesse bound to performe the dueties of rest and holinesse on that day then we are tyed to performe the dueties of rest and holinesse them selues I cleere the point by these examples as in a bond you haue two essentiall parts the one is the some of mony to be paied the other is the day and time when it is to be paied and a man is equally and alike bound to both of these that is as well to the day as to the some of mony as appeareth by this that al though a man bring the full some of mony yet if he omit the day and come the day after his bond is forfeited And as in circumcision there was two things inioyned the one was the cutting off of the foreskine the other was the time and day when it was to be done namely vpon the 8th day Genes 17.12 and as in that other Sacrament of the passouer there was tvvo things commanded the one vvas the slaying and eating of the passouer lamb the other was the time and day when to bedone namely vpon the 14th day of the moneth Exod. 12.6.8 in both which Sacraments of circumcision and passouer the day time was no lesse a duety then were the actions to be performed
in those times and dayes for it was death to omit thes dayes Genes 17.14 Numb 9.13 Iust so in this fourth com God inioyneth vs expresly two things as essential parts of this comm the one is the duety of the day in these words Remember the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 and the seuenth day is the Sabbath vers 10. the other is the dueties in the day in these words To keepe it holy vers 8. and in it thou shalt not doe any vvorke vers 10. and here the time and day as you see is no lesse commanded and that both affirmatiuely and negatiuely then are the dueties in the day The thing vvhich Almightie God intendeth in this com lesse principally is the duety of labouring sixe dayes seruing God in some honest calling for which God hath giuen a commandement also saying Sixe dayes shalt thou labour and doe all thy worke Now this commandement as I conceiue it is subordinate to the former made for the Sanctification of the Sabbath day and made to backe it and to support it for because God wold haue his people to Sanctify his Sabbath day and to rest therin from labours that so a vacancy may be for holy dueties therefore hath God added an other precept commanding vs to doe all the workes we haue to doe with in the compasse of the sixe dayes that so no worke may be left to doe in the seuenth day Sabbath So then these tvvo Commandements to wit to Sanctify the seuenth day and to labour in the Sixe dayes may well goe in accompt but for one and be both called the fourth Comm. because they tend both to one thing that is to the sanctification of the seuenth day Sabbath a like case you haue in the 10th command in which are many commandements but because they agree all in this one of coueting therefore are they all counted but for one Thus much be spoken touching the generall suruey of the seuerales and particulares conteined in the fourth com In which passages for matter of vse we may note first what manner of computation of time God maketh when he speaketh of his Morall Sabbathes this may easily be gathered out of this fourth com for heere God diuideth all the dayes of the world into seauenes or weeks as thus Sixe dayes thou shalt labour but the seuenth day is the Sabbath and againe In Sixe dayes the Lord made heauen and earth c. and rested the seuenth day c And this account hath bene Kept in the Church all along from age to age both in the times of the Old Testament and of the New Testament see Genes 1.31 with Genes 2.2 see Exod. 16.22.23.26 Exod. 20.9.10 Mark 16.1.2 Act. 20.7 Luk. 13.14 Yet further because we are to be imitatores of God in this poinct it is needfull that vve diligently Marke which are those dayes the which in Gods account doe make vp a weeke or which of all the dayes in the yeere are those dayes which belong vnto this or that Number of Gods seauen the which if it be not well obserued vve may make a confusion of the account of Gods weeks and seauens and vvhereas he saith six dayes thou shalt labour if this be not obserued vve may so rekon our six dayes as vve may count the day peculiarly appointed for the Sabbath day for one of our sixe dayes and so make it a vvorking day quit against the mind of God and manie drifte and scope of his fourth comm yea if we haue no certaine rule where to begine our accompt then may we skipp ouer as many dayes as vve please before vve begine to rekon our sixe dayes and so God shall haue a Sabbath or seuenth day but once a moneth or once a quarter or once a yeere it is very needfull therefore that we learne this point of God to knovv vvhich day he counted for the first day of the weeke and vvhich for the seuenth day of the vveeke that so vve may knovv which are those dayes vvherein vve must labour and which for certaine is that day in which must rest from labour least the ignorant doe mistak one for an other and least the Cuning Sophisters of our times doe bequile the simple In this point we may be instructed from the reason in the fourth comm Exod. 20.11 For in six dayes the Lord made heauen and earth c. and rested the seuenth day if now you will know which dayes in the moneth or yeere those were which here God called the six dayes and the seuenth day looke but into the history of the Creation of heauen and earth whereof God speaketh in this reason and there you shall be satisfied see Gen. 1. That day God counted for the first day of the weeke or of the seauen wherein he created the light v. 4.5 and which was the first day that euer was this day is our Sunday or Lords day and called constantly by all the Euangelists and so by all Churches to this day the first day of the weeke it being the first day of the worlds creation see Matt. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk. 24.1 Ioh. 20.1 Act. 20.7 That day God counted for the second day of the weeke or of the seauen wherein he made the firmament v. 7.8 and this was the second day that euer was this day is our Monday That day God called the third day of the weeke or of the seauen dayes wherein he made the Earth to appeare and the Seas v. 10.13 and this vvas the third day from the Creation and this day is our Tewsday That day God called the fourth day of the weeke wherein he made the Sunne Moone and Starres v. 16.19 and this vvas the fourth day from the creation and this day is our Wednesday That day wherein God made the fishe in the Sea and the foule in the ayre he called the fifth day v. 21.23 and that day is our Thursday That day God called the sixt day of the weeke vvherein he made man v. 26.31 and this was the sixth day from the creation and this day is our Friday And that day God called and counted the seuenth day of the vveeke wherein he rested from the vvorks of Creation and which he blessed sanctified Gen. 2.1.2.3 this day is our saturday Forsomuh then as vve haue found out vvhich are those dayes which in the fourth comm God called the six dayes and which day he called the seuenth day it teacheth all ministres in expounding this fourth com to speake as God spake and to call count vnto the people the dayes of the weeke by those numerall names vvhich God hath put vpon them and therefore they must call our Sunday or Lords day the first day and our Saturday the Seuenth day And also as touching practise that they exhorte and perswade the people to be imitatours of God labouring on the first six dayes of the worlds creation and resting for the Sabbath day on the seuenth day from the creation vvhich is Saturday because God himselfe
it is to be noted that the vvord Euening in Scripture is vsed for the after-noone and so vntill day light befully ended according to our Engelish speech saying good Euen to you Sir when t is past noone and calling them Euening prayers vsed in the Church about 2. or 3. a clocke in the after-noone and so theire Euening Sacrifice in the Temple in the after-noone and in this sense see thes Scriptures Genes 24.11 Mark 15.42 Exod. 29.38.39 Deut. 23.11 Iosh 8.29 Ezra 9.4.5 Ierem. 6.4 Deut. 16.6 Wherefore according to the constant vse of the vvord Euening both amongst vs to this day and also in the Scriptures I wold interpret the word of the after-noone and so vvhereas it is said the Euening and the morning made the first day that is the after-noone and the forenoone made the first day vnderstanding by morning the fore noone as by euening the afternoone I knovv nothing against this interpretation vnlesse it be that some may obiect and say this is to make God put dovvne things misorderly for it had bene better to haue said so the forenoone and the afternoone made the first day rather then so the afternoone and the forenoone made the first day Whereto I answer 1. The darkenesse was for order before the light and yet God put the light before the darknesse in this very fifth verse and God called the light day and the darknesse he called night and why might he not also put the afternoone before the forenoone 2. Why might not God set the afternoone which is the latter before the forenoone which is the former as well as Christ our Sauiour setteth forth the Lord of the vineyard commanding his steward to call the labourers and giue them their hier beginning from the last vnto the first Matt. 20.8 and thus much touching the two formost erroures holding the Sabbath day to beginne at midnight and in the morning so as they will haue a night added to the day or light Now touching the third errour of those who would haue the Sabhath day to begin on the Euening before the day and so to conteine all that night that goeth before the day these seeme to haue many Scriptures to backe them as first Leuit. 23.32 from Euen to Euen shall ye celebrate your Sabbath Herevnto I answer this is a peculiar law for one of the annuall ceremoniall Sabbaths and it therefore concerneth not the weekly morall Sabbath in the fourth comm now we must not draw the law of this ceremoniall Sabbath vpon the morall Sabbath for then 1. must the morall Sabbath be annuall only 2. It must be vpon the teenth day of the moneth without regard had to the day of the vveeke for so it was with this ceremoniall Sabbath 3 It must last one wholl day and a parte of the day before it also for so it vvas vvith that ceremoniall Sabbath it vvas to hold vpon the teenth day and vpon a parte of the nineth day also Leuit. 23.27.32 An other text they produce out of Nehem. 13.19 And it came to passe that when the gates of Jerusalem began to be darke before the Sabbath I commanded that the gates should be shut and charged that they should not be opened till after the Sabbath c. Here say they Nehemiah tooke order for the Sabbath to begin vvhen the gates of Ierusalem began to be darke and this is on the euening Whereto I answer it follovveth not that because the gates vvere commanded to be shut vvhen it began to be darke that this vvas done least that euening should be profaned by buying and selling for it may be very likely that such as came into the citty with their packes of wares and pedds of fish as v. 16. so late in the euening vvhen it vvas almost darke vvould not open their packes that night nor goe into the fish stales in the market place at that time of the day but rather Nehemiah foreseeing that if he permitted them to come into the citty laden so late in the euening that they minded to be at their marketing early the next morning vvherefore to preuent that he shut them out of the citty ouer night but not because the Sabbath began ouer night in the euening 2. I ansvver if the Sabbath day began in the euening at vvhat time Nehemiah caused the gates to be shut in then these absurdeties vvill follovv 1. that they began the Sabbath before it vvas Sabbath and they kept the Sabbath till after it vvas Sabbath for so saith the text that the gates vvere shut in before the Sabbath and that they vvere not opened againe till after the Sabbath 2. If the shutting in of the gates doe declare vnto vs the beginning of the Sabbath so must it declare vnto vs by like reason the end of the Sabbath then this absurdety follovveth that vve must keepe one day and tvvo nights for our Sabbath for so long vvere their gates shut in for if they shut the gates in on fry day tovvards night they opened them not againe on Saturday the Sabbath day tovvards night nor in all likely hoode vntill our Sunday morning so their gates remained shut one day and tvvo nights A third text they produce is Mark. 15.42 And now when the euen was come because it was the preparation that is the day before the Sabbath Hence they collect that the Sabbath began in the euening and that then vvas the preparation of the Sabbath for ansvver hereto vve must knovv that on Saturday the Sabbath day vvherein Christ lay in the graue there vvas tvvo Sabbaths mett together vpon that one day to vvit the morall Saturday and vveekly Sabbath day and also an annuall ceremoniall Sabbath day as Beza Piscator and others affirme this ceremoniall Sabbath day it vvas the 15th day of the moneth the day after the Passouer and by the lavv it vvas a Sabbath day for on it they had an holy conuocation and assembly vvherein they did no seruill vvorke Leuit. 23.6.7 Novv the Ievves keeping their Passeouer on good fryday it vvas the 14th day of the moneth and consequently Saturday vvherein Christ lay in the graue must be the 15th day of the moneth and so it vvas this annuall ceremoniall Sabbath day Novv then here being tvvo Sabbaths on this one day to vvit the morall Sabbath and a ceremoniall Sabbath hence it is that the text may be vnderstood of the ceremoniall Sabbath not of the morall Sabbath and so the preparation spoken of on the euening before may concerne the ceremoniall Sabbath which vvas called the first day of vnleauened bread and indeed vve reade of a preparation that was euer vpon the day before this ceremoniall Sabbath and it was the making ready of a lamb it must be slaine and dressed and rosted before it could be eaten and a conuenient place must be prouided for it to be eaten in Exod. 12.6.8 Luk. 22.8.9.11 yea that this preparation had respect of the two Sabbaths only vnto the ceremoniall
it may be translated either a Sabbath or the Sabbath either of a day certaine or of a day vncertaine Herevnto I reply admit we should grant them that the com may be vnderstood of a Sabbath vncertaine which yet by Sabbath they must meane a Sabbath day whose name is of diuine imposition well can they now shew vs any day of the vveeke saue Saturday that is named by God in holy Scripture Sabbath day sure I am they cannot If then they cannot shew vs any day in the vveeke called in Scripture Sabbath day but Saturday must they not be inforced then to apply the 4th com to the Saturday and to it alone 2. By the like licentiouse libertie in expounding of Scriptures we may make most things that are certaine and well knovvne which to become vncertaine and vnknowne which for example the name Iesus vvhen the text declareth that it is spoken of Christ our Sauiour might not a vvrangler shift it off also by this ansvver that the name Iesus it may be translated a Iesus or the Iesus c. and so say that that text may be meant of a Iesus as Ioshua or vncertainly which Iesus and not of the Iesus which is Christ Againe whereas t is said I was in the Spirit on the Lords day that is on Sunday say they well may not I answer them as they answer mee saying it may be translated a Lords day or the Lords day and so it may be meant of some other day besides Sunday let a man read ouer 3 or 4 verses in the beginning of the first chapter of Genesis and let him in stead of the where he find it put a and he will be ashamed of his soreading it yet further why might not the Iewes haue the distinction of a Passeouer and of the Passeouer and of a Pentecost and the Pentecost as well as a Sabbath and the Sabbath And why may not vve haue a Lords day and the Lords day a Christmas day and the Christmas day an Easter day and the Easter day as well as a Sabbath day and the Sabbath day To conclude suppose we that Christ had left an expresse commandement in the New Testament for the Lords day in these words Remember the Lords day to sanctifie it how would the patrones of the Lords day Sabbath rage and storme to heare any goe about to wrest this commandement of Christs from Sunday the first day of the vveeke vnto some other day as to Saturday or to Monday c and yet in a sense euery day of the vveeke is the Lords day I desire them but to deale with Gods 4th com which mentioneth the Sabbath day like as they vvould haue others deale vvith the Lords day if it were commanded I come now to shew that by Sabbath day in the 4th comm is meant not an vnknowne and vncortaine day but a certaine and well knovvne day not a Sabbath day but the Sabbath day novv this hath bene sufficiently proued before neuerthelesse I vvill proue it furrher because some thinke that the name Sabbath day may as vvell be applied vnto Sunday as to Saturday and so the 4th comm may hold its morallity in binding vnto Sunday and first I vvill begin vvith the Testimony of all Translators both new and old looke into all our English Bibles both old and nevvly translated and you shall find that not only in the 4th com but also constantly in all other places of Scriptute vvhere is any mention of this name Sabbath day and you shall find them translating it not a Sabbath but the Sabbath which sheweth cleerly that hovv euer the word may be rendred a Sabbath yet that translation is not the best and therefore they haue reiected it and haue vnanimously translated it the Sabbath neither is this done by any that fauoured the 7th day Sabbath but by those vvho rather fauoured the Lords day and therefore no doubt but they would haue made some way for the Lords day by this their translation if it could haue bene 2. The Lord hath in the very com it selfe limited the Sabbath vnto a certaine and knowne day and that 1. by its proper name Sabbath day vvhich belonged properly vnto our Saturday not indefinitly and in common to any day as hath bene shovvne 2. By deciphering it out most plainly to be the 7th and last day of the weeke in these vvords But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. Now the 7th day is not vncertaine which day of the vveeke it is but well knovvne to be Saturday the last day of the weeke 3. It is that very day vvhich must be sanctified by man vvhich God himselfe sanctified and set vs for a patterne to vvit the 7th day from the creation as vve haue it in the reason assizmed to the com Exod. 20.11 Novv the day vvhich God rested on and the day which God blessed and sanctified is a certaine and knowne day see Gen. 2.3 it was the 7th day not a 7th day 3. I proue that the Sabbath spake of in the Comm. was a certaine knowne day and not an vncertaine day partly by the Testimony of Moses Exo. 16.23 where vpon the sixth day of the weeke v. 22. Moses teld the people thus saying To morrow is the rest of the Holy Sabbath c. so then the time of the Sabbath it was a certaine knowne time and so certaine and so knovvne that Moses could say of it the day before it came To morrow it shall be c. so much also may be collected out of Luk. 13.14 and Act. 13.42.44 Finally I proue it by the Testimony of all diuines vvho affirme that our Saturday vvas the Iewes Sabbath day which they Kept by virtue of the 4th com vntill Christ came as else where I haue already proued more largly Novv if Saturday were the day which they kept for the Sabbath day then by the practise of all the Church of the Iewes vntill Christ the Sabbath day vvas a certaine knovvne day euen as our Saturday is a certaine day Thus I haue proued vndeniably that the Sabbath day inioyned in the 4th com it was the Sabbath not a Sabbath it vvas a day certaine and not vncertaine it vvas not vnderstood of some one day of the weeke indistinctly but of one certaine vvell knowne day of the weeke which being so hovv fondly yea wickedly and profanly haue they done who by their false glosses and idle distinctions doe labour to make people beleeue that Gods certaine and knovvne times for his worship and seruice are vncertaine and vndetermined that so they might alter and change Gods times and make way for their humane inventiones that is to set the Lords day into the 4th com you haue seene it sufficiently proued that Saturday vvas the Sabbath day for thovvsands of yeers vntill Christ and that by the name Sabbath day was no other day knowne nor vnderstood but only Saturday vntill
Christ how vaine then are those men vvho vvould novv a dayes haue a nevv sense of the name Sabbath day for vntill Christ these words Sabbath day signified the Sabbath day but novv since Christ they must signify a Sabbath day then they signified the Saturday but novv they must signify the Sunday or Lords day was euer such madnesse heard of before must vvords be mutable and chang their sense with the chang of times that one vvord in diuerse Textes may signify diuersly is not strang but that one word or name in one the same Text should for thovvsands of yeeres signify one thing and the selfe same word or name after thowsands of yeers then should haue an other sense it is matchlesse this may be the queene of all absurdeties yet thus absurd are all they who would by their distinction of a and the Sabbath and the like bring the Sunday or Lords day novv into the 4th com and turne away the 7th day The approach of the gospell hath not altered the sense of words in the lavv for these words passeouer Circumcision Sacrifice though they be abolished and we haue others in their roome yet those words in the same Textes doe signify now none other thing then they were vvont to doe must only the word Sabbath be changed in its sense If words in the Old Testament shall haue one sense before Christ came and an other sense after his coming there vvil be no certainty of the sense of any of the Scriptures of the Old Testament This is quite to ouerturne all certainty of Exposition Were a man but to construe a peece of lattine out of some profane Author Terence or the like and should Engelish a word in a different sense from that sense which vvas vsed in that Authores time and diuerse from all Dictionaries and the like vvould it be borne with all thinke we and yet many of our diuines vvill deale worse with Gods sacred Scriptures then vvith a profane Author for albeit the word Sabbath vvas euer vsed in the Scriptures for Saturday and so in our Dictionaries also yet they will haue one foolish ansvver or distinction or other vvhereby they vvill turne off the Saturday to bring in the Sunday into the name Sabbath day and into the 4th com yea and neuer so much as blush at it neither iudg good Reader if the Scriptures be not fouly and shamfully abused by these men vvhen they vvill by their corrupt Expositions of the 4th com offer that violence vnto it that all men are a shamed to offer vnto A profane Authour as Terence or the like But haue you no more care of the soules of those God hath committed to your charge then thus to vse your vvites to blind their eyes least they should se the trueth and vvalke in the vvay of Gods 4th com se to it in time if Sabbath day did once signify the Saturday it must so signify to the vvorlds end Thus farr I haue laboured to vindicate Gods 4th com from the corruptiones of the time but before I passe this point I desire to lay before the eyes of our Ministers tvvo notoriouse abuses the one is the abuse of theire flockes the people of God the other is the abuse of Gods sacred vvord for the former by their corrupt pressing the 4th com so hard vpon the consciences of their people for the Sanctifying of the Lords day they haue drawne many well affected people to a great deale of zeale in keeping it holy in so much as many doe in conscience of the 4th com heare tvvo Sermones in a day if not in some places 3 or 4 they reade the scriptures priuatly at home they refraine all seruile labour all the day long they refraine so much as to talke of vvorldly businesses they neglect their gaine and proffites which else they might haue yea oft they sustaine losse and all in conscience of the day and time and of the 4th com and in hope and expectation that they performe a good vvorke and acceptable vnto Almightie God and such as shall one day be vnto their praise and glory but vvhat novv if this euen all this be in vaine and to no purpose in respect of their endes and grownds by reason it is a seruice which God requireth not haue not then such Ministers lamentably abused their people for this end consider what hath formely bene proued to wit that God in his 4. com requireth the Sabbath day not the Lords day the Saturday Rest not the Sunday-Rest the 7th day for Sabbath day not the 8th day or first day for Sabbath day so then to Sanctifie the Sunday or Lords day in conscience of the day and of the 4th Com. is meere superstition and needlesse religion because this Sunday or Lords day is no where commanded in the 4th com now to doe any thing in cōscience of the 4th com the which is not commanded in the same commandement it is meere superstition so all that care and zeale of good people yea all their paines and zealouse deuotiones are lost labour oh what a pitty it is so that vnlesse as vve may if vve may in the deepest and greatest of our charity hope that God will accept of those good meanings and good intensions of ignorant misled and deluded Papists vve can not hope that God vvill accept of the good meanings and intensions of our best people in their zealouse sanctifying of the Lords day but that rather when at that day they shall expect the praise of their piety God may say vnto them and who hath requireth this at your hand Isa 1.12 for because this day stands not by Gods Com. all our performances in conscience of the day becomes a limme of that voluntary religion and will-worship condemned by S. Paul Col. 2.23 it hath as he saith indeed a shew of wisedome but it is but a shew not the substance vve may a svvell Sanctify Friday as Sunday But it vvill be obiected vve haue the dueties as Rest and holinesse though vve haue not the day Wher to I ansvver that many indeed doe sooth and flatter themselues much with this ansvver but I say you haue not the duties to vvit the duties of the Sabbathday but all you haue is that you haue like duties to thos of the Sabbath you haue not the same for none can properly be called Sabbath day dueties but such as are done in the Sabbath day and by virtue of the 4th com vvhen you keepe a fastday or a day of publike thanksgiuing to God or an holly day on these you Rest and performe holy actions as vpon the Sabbath day but vvill you call these Sabbath dueties if you will then may you keepe thes holy dayes also in obedience to Gods 4th com for Sabbathes and then may you also say of these holy dayes though we haue not the day yet haue vve the duties of the day and so you may erect yet more Sabbaths and so stand
by the 4th com wherefore this obiection which is very common in the mouthes of Ministers and people is of no moment it vvill not free them of superstition and vvill-vvorship When Saul offred Sacrifice and Samuel should haue done it why Saul might haue answered why I gane God a Burnt offring a peace offering it vvas as much and the same which Samuel vvould haue offered here lacked nothing but the circumstance of the person it was Saul instead of Samuel I but this excuse could not serue the turne Samuel teld him he had done foolish for all that and God would depriue him of his kingdome for it 1. Sam. 13.9.10 c. so it is here they doe foolishly that alter Gods dayes and times and they shall leese their share of those blessings which God hath promised vnto them that keepe his Sabbathes Isa 58.13.14 because they keepe not his Sabbaths but their Lords dayes and they doe foolishly because they think as Saul did to please God vvith an halfe seruice doeing somthings which God commanded and leauing out and vndone othersome thing which God commanded Sauls obedience came shorte in the circumstance of the person and therfore reiected and these men that keepe the Lords day but not the Sabbath day their obedience faleth short in the circumstance of the time Gods Sacred day and therfore will be reiected of God Let them looke too it and receiue admonition And further whereas they please them selues saying they haue the dueties of the Sabbath though they haue not the time they must know that for so much as the day and precise time is as expresly commanded in the 4th com as are Rest and holy exercises therfore the day and precise time is no lesse a duety then are other things commanded in the same Com. so then when they please themselues saying they haue the dueties of the Sabbath and neglect that day and time they haue but one halfe or some partes of the Sabbathes duties for they want the sett time which is a parte of the Sabbathes duetie yea and such a parte too as being vvanting the dueties of rest and holy excercises become no better then common holy dayes dueties for on euery common holy day they doe such Sabbath dueties that is they Rest and heare Sermones c. Novv to returne if through the false Exposition of Gods 4th com Gods people be led into such an errour by keeping a vvrong day as they shall leese the revvard of their expected hopes and their religion in respect of this day become a superstition and their conscience of the 4th Com. proue a non-obedience vnto it is it not high time that this matter be looked vnto and haue not Ministers lamentablie abused the people Yet further when people in their priuate family prayers on Sunday morning before they goe into the Congregation pray to God to assist them and helpe them in the sanctification of that day Sabbath doe they not bable before God making him beleeue that that present Sunday is his sacred Sabbath day the vvhich God knoweth is most false the same is true also of the Minister vsing such prayers in his pulpit publikely Againe when night commeth doe not such as vse to call vpon God morning and Euening make an humble confesssion to God in their priuat families of their sinnes among which they rekone vp their failings in the sanctification of that Sabbath day novv past for one thus they ignorantly confesse sinnes vnto God vvhich are no sinnes and feare vvhere no feare is for if a sinne it must be a transgression of some law but shew me a law for the sanctifying of the Lords day ther 's one indeed for the Sabbath day but none at all for the Lords day neither in the old nor new Testaments Novv doe not such Ministers lamentably abuse their people who by abusiue expsitions of Gods commandement doe put a needlesse conscientie into men and cause them to thinke that to be sinne vvhich is no sinne and which is worse cause them to acknowledge vnto God more sinnes then God himselfe knowes and to aske pardon where they haue committed no offence is it not high time that God should raise vp some man to detect these errours yis doubtlesse and the times vvill in an irefull displeasure at him for his honest paines woefully reward him in body goods and good name Thus far of Ministers abusing of the people of God committed to their charge I come novv to Ministers abuse of the sacred word of God a thing to be thought on let a man trauaile vpon the Lords day or doe any common worke presently they charg him with a breach of the 4th com and with a profanation of the Lords Sabbath day a gaine in their pulpites to dravv men to a conscience of the Lords day they vrg hard the 4th com vpon the Lords day yea they apply also to the Lords day all those Scriptures which any where mention the Sabbath day and were made properly and solely for it as Numb 15.32 c. and Nehem. 13.18 where is mention made of Gods iudgments for profanation of the Sabbath day and Isa 58.13.14 where is mention made of the holy manner of keeping the Sabbath day and of blessings promised there vnto novv they making no difference betwene the Sabbath day and the Lords day doe apply all these Scriptures with others vnto the Lords day which are proper vnto the Sabbath day but thus doing they abuse these Scriptures and profane the vvord of God and thus I make it good as for the Lords day it is but a common working day for it is one of those sixe dayes wherin God hath commanded vs in the 4th com to doe our workes in and it is the first of those six dayes called in Scripture not Sabbath day but by an old name constantly to wit the first day of the weke and be it that we receiued a greate blessing on this day to wit Christ from the dead so we receiued also on Friday an other greate blessing to wit the Remission of our sinnes by Christ his passion and sufferance that day vpon the Crosse for vs and yet Friday remaineth a common working day for all that and so may and doth Sunday or the Lords day also if then the Lords day be but a common day and Ministers will apply Gods sacred vvord which vvas destinated and ordeined for sacred and holy time vnto common and profane time is not this to abuse and profane the holy and sacred vvord of God If any shall object that the time of the Sabbath day is not an holy time and the like I ansvver that as the Temple was an holy place so the 7th day or the Sabbath day is an holy time and an holy day for God himselfe made it holy when he blessed the 7th day and sanctified it Genes 2.3 like as then it is counted an vnsufferable profanation of Gods vvord for any Minister to pronounce the words of holy Baptisme
I Baptize thee in the name of the father c. vpon a child when he washeth his hands in common vvater or to pronounce those vvords of the other Sacrament Take eate this is my body c. to a man to whom the Minister giueth common bread at his Table in is priuate house so I iudge it an horrible profanation of Gods Sacred vvord for any Minister to take that parte of Gods vvord to wit the 4th com vvith those other Scriptures vvhich vvere peculiarly destinated of God for his sacred Sabbathes and to apply them profanly to the Lords day which is and common vvorking day as Friday is in a right account Thus I haue out of that zeale I be are to Gods Lavv and to Gods Sabbathes declared vnto Ministers hovv they doe a buse the people of God on the one side and profane the Sacred vvord of God on the other side and this I haue done not to aggrauate their past sinne but God knovveth that they may preuent the like in time to come but vvhat shall be done to the man that hath discouered all this will these Ministers loue him for it no they vvill hate him for it and reuile him for it and persecute him and say all manner of euill against him falsly saying he is of a provvd spirit to discouer any erroures in them and the like if it proue better t is more then I looke for and better then I haue found hither to but I passe not for their displesure so be I may keepe a good conscience to wards God Ministers must heare of their sinnes as vvell as common people And so much for the Exposition of these vvords Sabbath day and for detection of the errours about them SECT V. Hauing in the former Section expounded the thing commanded to wit the time of Gods vvorship in these words Sabbath day vve are novv to come vnto the Commandement it selfe and this is deliuered in diuerse words as in Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day in Exod. 31.16 Wherefore the children of Israel shall Keepe the Sabbath c. and in Deut. 5.12 Keepe the Sabbath day to sanctify it c. Wherefore the obseruation of the Sabbath day is not at liberty but it is necessary for it is stronghly Commanded and that vnder these two words Remember and Keepe For matter of vse since this time is commanded in the first Table a mongst our duties to vvards God and not in the second Table vve learne that as to hallovv and sanctify Gods Name in the third Com. so to Sanctify Gods Time in the 4th Com. is a parte of Gods worship and therfore this time is not to be sleited as it is by many saying the 7th day you stand so for it is but a matter of time and God regardeth not time so much c. but say I then why did God please so expresly to giue a Commandement for it saying Kepe it and Remember it and why did God place it in so high a rank as to set it into the first Table they doe well therfore who honour this time this sacred and sanctified time and who stand for it and speake for it For my parte I know no reason why vve shold not stand for the Sanctification of Gods Time as vvell as for the Sanctification of God Name they being both Commanded and both Commanded in the first Table An other vse of this pointe is it so that God hath charged vs to Remember his Sabbath day vvhat vvill become of such preachers theÌ„ as are so farr off from a remembrance of it as that they teach men publikly to forget it and to this euill end sinnefull they labour to be blurr Gods day by calling it odiously Iewish and Ceremoniall and to this end they haue coined many distinctions wherby they would peruert the straight vvay of the Lord and put a stumbling blocke before the people that so this thing commanded by God might be slighted yea they haue so handled the matter and blered the eyes of the people that they are so farre off novv from Remembring the Sabbath day as that poore people as they are they know not which day of the weeke should be called Sabbath day As these Minister shall vndoubtedly answer to God for the sinne of the people in profanation of the Lords Sabbath weekly so doe I vvish and aduise all people to lay the weight and perill of their soules vpon these their Ministers vvho tach them thus telling them plainly thus we see a plaine and expresse commandement of Almightie God for the Sabbath day but vve see none for the Lords day vvherefore vve dare not in our consciences speake against the Sabbath day no nor profane it by that common light of vnderstanding and conscience which God hath giuen vs to iudg by if we durst trust our ovvne iudgments vve durst not but sanctify the Sabbath day and God knoweth if you our Ministers vvere as vvilling as vve are we vvould keepe it holy vvherfore thâ— fault is not in vs nor the sinne ours if it be profaned see you to it therfore our blood be vpon you if we perish in this sinne eternally or be plagued of God for it heere temporally for it is only the râ—uerent regard vvhich vve haue of you and your lerning and honesty which maketh vs to disregard this thing commanded of God this we shall be able to plead before Almightie God at that greate day of Assises that we are innocent in this matter and if for all this it then goe ill vvith vs vve shall curse the day that euer vve knevv you and beleeued you thus I aduise people to disclaime and abandon the hauing any hand in this sinne and to lay the burden of it vvholly vpon such their Ministers as doe persist in enmity to the Lords Sabbathes or to any thing commanded in the 4th Com. novv the reason of this my aduise is because I finde the people generally indifferently affected and ready enough to imbrace Gods auncient Sabbath in conscience of Gods 4th Com. and the only bridle that causeth them to refraine consent is the reuerent opinion they haue of their Ministers vvho are contrarily minded and teach them otherwise c. Whereby it appeareth that the whole fault is in their Ministers and therfore haue I aduised the people to lay the waight and whole burden of this matter vpon their Ministers to prouoke them to reforme and cale backe their erroniouse Doctrines touching God Sabbathes least they haue the blood of many soules an other day laied to their charge An other vse of this pointe is against Ministers also and it is of exceeding greate consequence enough to cause the haire vpon their heads to stand right vp and their hearts to tremble againe if there be any loue and feare of God left in them it is this Is it so that Almightie God hath charged and commanded vs to Remember his Sabbath day to sanctify it and to this end hath giuen vs
his 4th com how dangerouse then is the case of such Ministers as haue by theire vaine distinctiones and fond obiections not only abolished the Lords Sabbath day it selfe but also by abolishing it haue quite and cleane for euer ouer throwne all the 4th commandement also so as the 4th com shall novv stand among the 10 commandements but as a Cipher of no vse behold vvhat hauocke some Puritane Ministers haue made that so they might make a way to bring in and vphold their Lords day Sabbath That it may appeare to the world that I taxe them not causlesly I proceed to proue what I haue said and that partly from their distinctions and partly from their obiections First for their distinctions they doe distinguish of the time in the 4th com and of the dueties of rest and holinesse in the time Now for the time the 7th day and the Sabbath day these are Iewish say they ceremoniall and abolished but the dueties in the time they onely are morall and perpetuall and to this head come all their other distinctions and from hence they are deriued vpon this distinction thus I argue If that time that is all that time which was commanded to the Iewes and comprised in these words the 7th day and the Sabbath day be a ceremony and abolished as Iewish then is there no time left in the 4th com for any Sabbath day But that time that is all that time once commanded to the Iewes and comprised in these words the 7th day and the Sabbath day is a ceremony and abolished as Iew sh Therefore there is no time left in the 4th com for any Sabbath day and by consequence no 4th com For the Minor they cannot deny it for it is a limme of their owne distinction for they say the 7th day is abolished and the Sabbath day to wit that ancient Sabbath day commanded to the Iewes in the 4th com that they say also is Iewish and abolished Wherefore vnlesse they can shew vs some new Scripture or some other partes of the 4th com which haue hitherto laine hidden and vnknovvne where there is mention made of any other 7th day then one and of any other Sabbath day thē one it must necessarily follow that when they say that that one 7th day and that one Sabbath day once commanded to the Iewes in the 4th com is abolished that then all the time once commanded is abolished for all the time then commanded was that one 7th day time onely and that one 7th day time was all the time that was commanded take away then one and you take avvay all For the Major its consequence it is cleere of it selfe That if all the commanded time in the commandement be abolished then there is no commanded time left in the commandement for a Sabbath day for example suppose a man hath a garden wherein are sondry bedes of herbes among the vvhich he hath one bedd of Tyme If now the gardiner come and cut vp by the rootes or roote out and digge vp all that bedd of Tyme may not a man soundly argue thus that if all the Tyme in the garden be rooted vp that then there is no Tyme left in the garden Why so it is in our case take away that time that was commanded and there is no time that is no commanded time Thus you see that by their abolishing of that very day and time which the Iewes kept to wit that Sabbath day and that 7th day they haue abolished all time out of the 4th com so as novv it commandeth not any day nor any time to be sanctified In the last place I am to proue that if there be no time left in the 4th com that is no commanded time that then by consequence there is no 4th com in vse but that it is a meere Cipher For this purpose remember they distinguished of the things commanded to be the time and the dueties in the time the time then being abolished as hath bene proued and as they every where professe to hold there remaineth nothing in the commandement as commanded but the dueties in the time to vvit Rest and holy actions and for these dueties there is no commanded time left now so that either the dueties must fall to the ground and be abolished together with the time as common reason would teach a man for the proper time or proper place for any thing being taken avvay the action to be done in that time or in that place must needs be taken avvay also and so the dueties must come to naught and be nullified for vvant of a fit and proper time to doe them in or if any time be to be allotted for these dueties in case me may absurdly suppose the dueties to surviue the time it is not a commanded time for that 's gone and abolisht as they say vvherefore it must be an indifferent time and at the vvill and pleasure of men onely or at most it must be no more time then can by force of necessary consequence be collected for the performance of thos dueties Rest and holinesse vvell then to proceed let vs see vvhat time it is which they can collect sure I am that from the consideration of the dueties of Rest and holinesse as they stand in the 4th com they can collect no more but this that if God hath commanded these dueties of Rest and holinesse to be performed then there must be a time or some time allotted out by man for the performance thereof Now be it granted that some time must be allowed for these dueties the question then is 1. when that time must be 2. How often that time must be 3. Hovv long that time must be For so much as novv by their opinions the time of the 4th com is vtterly abolished therefore thes questions cannot be satisfied by the 4th com the Church therefore must determine them To the first then I ansvver vvhen must the time or Sabbath be why euen then vvhen men please it should be as they can agree vpon the matter This age may appoint it at one time an other age may appoint it at an other time To the second question I answer for them hovv often must that time be for performance of thes dueties of the Sabbath vvhy since those vvords the 7th day is the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 be abolished vvhich taught vs hovv often to keepe a Sabbath day to vvit euery 7th day vvhy novv vve are left to our choise and liberty for novv vve are not by Gods commandement nor by any necessity of consequence in respect of the dueties vrged to giue God a Sabbath day frequently but the Commandement may be throughly fulfilled if we giue God a day either once in euery 7 dayes or once in euery 14 dayes or once in euery 21 dayes or once in a moneth or once in a yeere or once in 7 yeere or once in a mans liefe so be that once in a mans liefe a man doth
is abolished Thus hauing proued from their distinctiones that they haue abolished not onely the Lords Sabbaths but also the 4th Com. it selfe I am novv also to proue the same from their obiections vvherby ther profane abuse of Scripture shall appeare in that they so expound Scripture as therby they ouerturne one of the Tenn Morall Lavves the 4th Com. and by that time this be made apparant I trust all that loue God vvill hate their doinges and they that loue Gods Commandements vvill contemne their Expositiones for this purpose I vvill produce you two of ther strongest and maine Textes vvhence they collect their obiections the one is Col. 2.16 Let no man condemne you in meate or drink or in respect of an holy day or of the New Moone or of the Sabbaths vvhere by the word Sabbaths they vvill needs vnderstand the vveekly Sabbath commanded in the 4th Com. and so that shall be abolished in this text as a Shaddovv of Christ The other Text is Exod. 31.13 verily my Sabbaths ye shall keepe for it is a signe betweene me you c. Where say they the vveekly Sabbath mentioned in the 4th comm is made a Signe and so it is abolished Novv from thes two textes and obiections of theirs I gather two arguments as necessarily follovving for the vtter abolition of the 4th com The first is this that if these two textes doe as they say abolish that very Sabbath day vvhere of God spake in his 4th com then are these vvords in the com to vvit the Sabbath day a ceremony and abolished the reason of this consequence is because these vvords Sabbath day in their two textes are in their nature the same and of the same extent vvith the like or same words Sabbath day in the 4th com and it must be so for they oppose thes words Sabbath day in their two textes vnto the like vvords Sabbath day in the 4th com the one to abolish the other This being so I proceed if that these vvords in the 4th com to vvit Sabbath day be a ceremony and abolished then is the 4th com nullified and vtterly ouerthrovvne that this is so I pray looke the text Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it I haue put the vvords in controuersy in a parenthesis as you see novv let thes Ministers take a way those vvords in the parenthesis and you take quiet avvay the very subiect matter of the Lords speech you leaue a roofe with out a foundation God saith Remember the Sabbathday but if now there be no Sabbath day for that it is abolished as they say hovv then shall a man Remember it God commandeth to keepe the Sabbath day Deut. 5.12 but if there be no Sabbath day hovv shall a man keepe it Againe God saith sanctifie it but how shall we sanctify it if it be not vvhat can vve Remember to sanctify a nothing so thus I haue shown that the very commandement the 4th com is vtterly nullified by their obiectiones and made to speake non-sense or a nothing this is my first argument My 2d argument is taken from the vvord Sabbath in their owne sense vse of it for when I vrge thē with the name Sabbath in the 4th com they turne me off vvith this that the Hebrew vvord Sabbath signifieth a Rest in English vvell be it so a Rest let it signify from these two textes then I argue againe thus If the Rest in the 4th com be abolished thē is the 4th com it selfe vtterly abolished but that the Rest in the 4th com is abolished them selues confesse it in their obiected two Textes for in thes Textes is the vvord Sabbath see Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16 vvhich vvord Sabbath signifieth a Rest novv they doe oppose the word Sabbath which signifieth a Rest in Exod. 31.13 Col. 2.16 against the same vvord Sabbath in the 4th comm which signieth a Rest also prouing vnto vs that the Sabbath and Rest in the 4th com is a signe and a shaddovv and so abolished by these Textes Exod. 31. Col. 2. which being so hence it is apparent by their owne vvorke and sense that not onely the Hebrevv vvord Sabbath is an abolished ceremony and shaddovv but also that the Rest vvhich it signifieth is also a ceremony and an abolished shaddovv And so I come to proue the consequence namely that if the Rest in the 4th com be abolished then is the 4th com vtterly and for euer abolished this I make good thus if that Rest from our seruile laboures be abolished vvhich was once in the 4th com commanded then novv vve may labour in our calings not onely on the sixe dayes but also on the 7th day not onely on the vveeke dayes but also on the Sabbath day and if vve may on the Sabbath day be occupied a broad the fieldes after our businesses this doth necessarily exclud all necessity of assembling in the congregation to pray together and praise God togeather for hovv can a man be both a broad and at home in the field and in the Church plovving there and praying heere both together Thus I haue finished my arguments raised out of their two Textes vvherehy I haue proued that from their obiections and expositions there follovveth not onely an abolition of the Lords Sabbaths but also a nullification of Gods 4th com I must needs confesse I can but wonder that there is any Sabbath day at all kept in our Church vvhen I consider of thes common receiued distinctions and obiections for they doe directly ouerturne all force and virtue of the 4th com for the keeping of any day at all as thence and to goe about to raise a Sabbath day out of the Nevv Testament is impossible as shall be shovvne vnlesse some Nevv Scriptures can be found out that be not now in our Bibles wherefore considering these things it must needs be a singular vvorke and prouidence of God to incline the hartes of our Church to giue God a Sabbath vnto this day but it lyeth at the pittes brinke and at the last gaspe the least push of a profane minde vvho spurneth at piety would thrust it in and bury it for euer Thus much be spoken of this vse wherein I haue conuicted these Ministers of the vtter ouerthrow abolishing of the 4th com and that partly by this that they haue abolished that day and time which is prescribed in the 4th com so that now we can not haue the commanded time the Diuine time nor that sanctified time and as good therefore no time But suppose we must haue a time by force of consequence why then haue we for a Diuine time appointed by God an humane time by man and for a time sanctified by God we haue a profane time and vnsanctified and yet for all this this time is not a day nor weekly but an houre in a day once in a mans life or at the best but a Lecture day for a Saabath day thus much for the time Now as
for the dueties in the time either they haue vtterly abolished them also as hath bene showne or at the best they haue but counterfeit Sabbath dueties for true Sabbath dueties so much of the dueties Lastly they haue as hath bene showne taken away the very subiect matter of the 4th comm so as now God commandeth vs to Remember a nothing and to sanctify a nothing and so Gods commandement is made ridiculouse Loe this foule errour it is an errour worthy the discouery and high time it is that God should raise vp some man to discouer these things and to stand in defence of his 4th com and for this cause as I haue intitled my booke a defence of the Lords Sabbaths so haue I intitled it also a defence of the 4th com for you see how they haue by blotting out the Lords Sabbaths also defaced the whole commandement with them It is strang to see what violence this one finale portion of Scripture to wit Gods 4th com hath vndergone and it is the more strang considering the learning and knowledge of these times what vaine friuolouse distinctions of a Sabbath the Sabbath of one day in 7 of the Sabbath belonging to vs as it signifieth a Rest as it belongeth vnto all Nations that the time is a ceremony the duties in the time morall by all which they exclud the proper time in this 4th com and yet then againe to contradict themselues though the time of day be abolished yet still they will haue the day and a day out of the 4th com and a day too of 24 houres long and though the Sabbath day be abolished as they hold yet they vvill haue a Sabbath day still out of the 4th com too The 10. commandements they call them the Morall Law but bring them to this point of the Sabbath day and then they are become partly Morall partly ceremoniall they might as well say that that which in common speech they call white as the snovv that it is partly white partly blacke The Papists are blamed for making the 2d com Iewish and Ceremoniall and yet say we this 4th Comm. touching the Sabbath day is Iewish and Ceremoniall thus hauing contradicted our selues then vve fall to botching and cobling of the Commandement first it is fained that the Lords Sabbath day is abolished and vvorne out of vse and then to repaire the losse and breach againe that there may be a full number of ten Commandements the 4th comman wherein the breach vvas must be cobled vp againe the nevv leather where with all it must be amended it is the Lords day and it is put into the roome of the old and ouer vvorne Sabbath day so we haue now a new-old com or an old-new com whither you vvill for it is partly old and partly new Lastly as if all the former were not enough after sondry contradictions and after sondry fine distinctions whereby they haue violently torne a sunder what the Almightie hath inviolably and inseperablie ioyned together at last they cast them all quite away abolishing both time and dueties in the time and commandement all thes with others which I might reckone vp and with other violences and abuses which yet I am to discouer hath this one small portion of Scripture the 4th com vndergone I cannot thinke any one portion of Scripture in controversy betvvixt vs and Papists hath bene more wrested and abused by them then this by vs God amend it Paul telleth Timothy 1. Tim. 1.7 that there were some among them which desiring to be teachers of the law vnderstood not what they said nor whereof they affirmed This Scripture is verified of some Teachers in these dayes as may appeare by the premisses and as shall yet further appeare hereafter I come now to the word Remember and touching this word a reason may be demanded why the Lord should put a Memorandum vnto this com aboue any others of the 10 and why the Commandement should be expressed by this word Remember The common reason hereof rendered by diuins is to preuent carelesnes and forgetfulnesse on the six working dayes of the Sabbath day next ensuing least men should leaue some common workes of the six dayes to be done on the 7th day Sabbath this I confesse a trueth indeed but this is not all I suppose for if one demandeth a reason why God prefixed a Memento to this Com. more then vnto any other of the commandements this cannot be the reason because that by mens not forethinking of the Sabbath some vvorkes are left vndone on the six dayes to be done on the Sabbath day and so the Sabbath is profaned and the 4th com transgressed For seeing that vve are in like danger of breaking euery other of the Commandements by a carelesnes and a not forethinking of our dueties in them enioyned it should haue bene needfull therefore to haue had a Memorandum prefixed vnto euery one of the 10. Com. as vvell as vnto this 4th com least we breake them also through forgetfulnesse but since a Memorandum is put to this com and not vnto others such a reason therefore would be sought as agreeth to this com and not vnto others Novv in this point if I may take leaue to deliuer mine opinion I cannot finde out a better reason then this God foreseeing that after a long time that is about 364 yeeres after Christ for then was the Sabbath day abolished by the Laodicean Counsaile as afterwards you shall heare more this his Sabbath day vvould be not in part violated and profanely kept but that it vvould be vtterly and altogether blotted out of remembrance in all Christian Churches for 1200 yeeres together as it is to this day to preuent which forgetfulnesse and vtter neglect of his Sabbath day it pleased God to prefixe a Memento to this com that so if it be forgotten it might in time by one meanes or other be brought to remembrance againe which God graunt If we take a suruey of all the 10 Com. we shall find that nothing commanded in any of them is so wholly and vtterly buried and forgotten as is the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com vvhen they had buried Christ they laid a stone vpon him and sealed it to make all sure that he might neuer rise againe so haue they buried the Lords Sabbath day and least it rise againe they haue cast an heape of stones vpon it calling it Iewish and Iudaisme and a signe and shaddow and a buried abolished ceremony and vvhat not and all to bring it out of remembrance Now though Papists haue foully forgotten the 2d com yet all Protestants remember it well enough God be thanked I know not any one thing in all the 10. Commandements forgotten by Reformed Churches but this one thing onely to vvit the Lords Sabbath day and as for this this is forgotten of all both Protestants and Papists it was very needfull therefore that the Lord should prefixe a Memorandum to this
Comman aboue and before all others that so his Churches might come into a remembrance of his Sabbath day againe The Lords Sabbaths are novv forgotten they ley buried in abhorred forgetfulnesse like as a mans body lieth stinking in the graue God graunt them a speedy and glorious resurrection they are forgotten God of his mercy bring them once againe to remembrance I am but a poore and meane one euery way low and little timorouse by nature stammering in toung vnfitted for a businesse of this nature so as I durst not aduenture vpon a businesse of this consequence if by any other meanes or persons I could haue foreseene any possibility of a reuiuing the Lords Sabbaths but looking about and seeing none that would set to his hands but that still the Lords Sabbaths must remaine in obliuion I haue aboue and beyond my vvonted courage as it is vvell knovvne taken vnto me a fiery zeale for the Lord of Hoastes if it be rashnesse I vvill be rash if it be folly I vvill be a foole vvith Dauid if I perish I perish that small mite and single Talent vvherevvith all God hath be trusted me I vvill improue it and imploy it to the vtmost for the reducing Gods Sabbaths into remembrance againe in his Churches hitherto in comparison of this cause of Gods I haue not counted deere vnto mee Wife nor Children Friends nor Country maintenance nor good name but cheerfully in regard of the goodnesse of the cause haue parted with them all more or lesse I haue now nothing left but life and liberty and these I trust the same God that hath inabled me will still I am in a readincsse to depart with these also or either of these for God and to seale vp his trueth with my liefe or liberty that so I may once at length attaine vnto that ioyfull Crowne of Martyrdome for bringing Gods Sabbathes into remembrance againe Remember the Sabbath day A greate worke requireth many hands and can you yee Trib of Leuie gaze on to se the issue whilst one singly and alone striueth beyond his strength and laboureth till out of breath in Gods quarrel you neither animating nor parte taking nor putting your least finger to the vvorke I know you can not plead ignorance vnlesse it be affected the point is easy and familiar were you but as willing as able I could not warr alone said the Angell of the Lord curse yee Meroz curse yee bitterly the inhabitants thereof because they came not to the helpe of the Lord to the helpe of the Lord against the mightie Iud. 5.23 why abidest thou Leuie among the sheepfoulds to heare the bleatings of the flockes v. 16. come forth come forth to helpe the Lord the worke is mightie to cause through all Curches a remembrance of the Sabbaths of the Lord it is not a priuate cause that a single one only should combate the wholl army of Gods hoast must take vp armes the cause is publike and vniuersally generall but if nothing will auaile vvhat shall I curse as said the Angell of the Lord no Christianes must not curse but blesse I pray God giue them better hartes it vvas Pauls case at my first answer quoth hee no man stood with mee but all men forsooke mee wherfore vvith Paul I pray God it be not laid to their charge 2 Tim. 4.16 in meane time I faint not but fight I doe and fight I will vhhither with many of with fevv vvhilst I haue any breath or being And thus farre of the Commandement and of the vvord Remember SECT VI. The next vvords vve purpose to speake of shall be these Six dayes thou shalt labour and doe all thy worke Touching these words I purpose to enquire but after two things the one is to know vvhither these vvords be a Commandement or no the other is to knovv which dayes of our weeke these sixe dayes here mentioned are for the former some take these vvords to be a permission but I determine vvith Perkins in his Cases of Conscience Pag 106. C. that they be a Commandement and his reason shall be my reason which is this that they are a Commandement because they are propounded in Commanding termes like as all Commandements are of the same iudgment also is Musculus fol. 62. these vvords also in the dayes of Christ were houlden for a commandement saith the Ruler of the Synagogue there are six dayes in which men ought to worke c. Luk. 13.14 Hee said men ought as of duety to vvorke in the six dayes If any shall obiect that then a man is bound to labour all the 6 dayes I ansvver it followeth not for so the Lord said of the Sabbathday in it thou shalt not doe any worke Exod. 20.10 and yet for all that workes of mercy and vvorkes of necessity may be done and so here albeit that God hath said sixe dayes thou shalt labour yet lawfull recreationes when necessity is may be taken in the sixe dayes Yet further if any shall obiect that then we must keepe no holy dayes if we must labour the 6 dayes I answer it followeth not for 1. the com addeth thes words and doe all that thou hast to doe so that if a man can so finish all his workes that he hath to doe in lesse then 6 dayes so as no vvorke be left to doe on the Sabbath day then he may keep that time which he can spare for an holy day 2. it is true that some holy dayes may be keept as Christmas day Coronation day Gunpovvder Treason day and the like dayes of publike thanksgiuing dayes of publike fast which are one day in a yeere not a day euery week for we haue examples for it in Scripture Esther 9.27 Joel 2.15 now these being extraordinary cases an exception or dispensation may be admitted in the com but what 's this to our case for the Com. is to be vnderstood of an ordinary weekly practise when there is no iust and weyghty cause to the contrary but the case of holy dayes is of a rare and seldome action and vpon extraordinary occasiones The second query shall be to knovv which dayes those are vvherin God hath commanded vs to labour the ansvver vvill be those six dayes vvhich were the first six dayes of the worlds creation to vvit those six dayes vvhereof vve read Genes 1.5.8.13.19.23.31 the vvhich went immediatly before the first Sabbath day that euer the vvorld saw the Sabbath day vvheron God himselfe rested where of vve read Genes 2.2.3 these sixe dayes are these 1. Sunday 2. Monday 3. Tevvsday 4. Wensday 5. Thursday 6. Friday Novv that these and none other are the six dayes inioyned in the 4th com is proued 1. Because else there would be a confusion of Gods 7th day wherin he rested vvith the other sixe dayes novv this must not be for then God shall be defeated of his end and purpose which vvas to haue the 7th day sanctified as appeareth by the 4th com and that because
himselfe rested on it Genes 2.2.3 but if vve keepe not the dayes of the weeke distinct it vvold come to passe that vve shold worke somtimes on that very day wheron God rested from vvorke and vvhich God blessed and Sanctified for an Holy day 2. The reason of the 4th com Exod. 20.11 vvhich God dravveth from his ovvne example is by vvay of similitude vrging vs to tread in Gods steppes to be imitatores and follovvers of him that is to labour vvhen God vvrought and to rest vvhen God rested novv if vve should labour on the 7th day then slould vve not be like but vnlike to God for vve should vvork vvhen God did rest so should we not imitate God Wherefore vve must choose thes six dayes which vvent before the first 7th day or Sabbath 3. It appeareth by the constant practise of the Ievves vntill Christ and by the Iewes now liuing at Amsterdam and elswhere that the 4th com vvas to be vnderstood of those very six dayes vvhich vvere the first in the vvorlds creation and vvhich goe before our Saturday for the Ievves euer made and still doe make these their six vvorking dayes Sunday Monday Tewsday Wednsday Tursday and Friday Yea since Sabbath day is a proper name and a standing day by it the other sixe dayes may be knovvne 4. It appeareth by the Nevv Testament for euery vvhere the day of Christs resurrection is called the first day of the vveek Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 novv the day of Christs resurtection is our Sunday confessed by all sides so then our Sunday is the first of those six dayes vvherin vve ought to labour by the com and Friday then vvill be the last of our six labouring dayes hauing thus fond out vvith dayes of the vveeke we ought to labour in vve come vnto vses of the pointe Here I might incist by way of confutation of that errour of Mr. Greenwood vvho stifly defendeth it that these vvordes in this 4th com Sixe dayes thou shalt labour c. they are no parte of the 4th com but a parte of the 8th com as if God had not knovvne hovv to place his commandementes but had mingled some parte of the second Table vvith the things of the first Table and vvrote some parte of the 8th Com. in the 4th Com. either God hath misplaced things or Mr. Greenvvood hath mistaken things but supposing no other diuines will second him and that the bare mention of this absurdety is enough to confute it I passe on The first vse of this point is for the discouery of the errour of many vvho being vrged by the 4th Com. to keepe the 7th day for the Sabbath they answer that Sunday or the Lords day is the 7th day to them for they labour the six dayes which goe before the Sunday To vvhom I reply that albeit Sunday is the 7th day to them yet is it not the 7th day to God for that day vvhich they count the 7th day the same day God euer counted for the first day our Sunday is the first day of the vveeke in a diuine accompt not the 7 day last as we haue proued wherefore vvhosoeuer rekoneth Sunday for the 7th day he follovveth an vnvvarrantable and humane account and forsaketh the Scripture account vvhich calleth Sunday the first day of the vveeke constantly now in diuine matters vve must follovv a diuine accompt and in Gods matters vve must take Gods account againe whosoeuer rekoneth Sunday for the 7th day and therfore resteth on Sunday he doth not imitate God in resting vvhen he rested and in vvorking when he vvrought according as is prescribed in the 4th comm but rather he crosseth and thwarteth God by resting when God vvrought and vvorking vvhen God rested for on our Sunday vve rest but on our Sunday God vvrought in that he began the first dayes vvork in the creation vpon our Sunday making the light on this day Genes 1.4.5 againe we crosse God on our Saturday for in it we worke but in it God rested yea this day God blessed it and sanctified it for an holy day Genes 2.2.3 and yet this day vve profane it and make it a working day Thus it is plaine that it is a foule errour in any to count our Sunday or Lords day the 7th day and so a Sabbath or resting day when as it is one of the Six labouring dayes and so a working day The second vse of this point is for information for if by the 4th Com. our six dayes to wit Sunday Monday Tewsday Wensday Thursday and Friday be those six dayes wherin we are to worke after the example of God then it follovveth that no day of the weeke can be the Sabbath day or Resting day but Saturday the 7th day This is to be noted against all those who by their vaine glosses would expound the 4th com so as if some other day of the weeke besids Saturday might be the Sabbath day by the 4th Com. now this cannot be seeing God hath appointed all the dayes of the weeke besids Saturday for working dayes The third vse of this point is for confutation is it so that our Sunday or Lords day is by Gods com a working day it being one of the sixe dayes and the first of them hovv vn aduised then are those which goe about to set vp and vphold the Sunday or Lords day for a Sabbath day and resting day weekly when God appointed it for a vvorking day and also gaue it vs vnder his ovvne example himselfe vvorking on it for our imitation neither can any ansvver that this lavv six dayes thou shalt labour vvas a Ceremony and shaddow and so abolished by Christ for there is no grownd for that in scripture the contrary is rather manifest for what God did at the creation in vvorking on our Sunday Christ our Sauiour ratefied at the redemption for being risen from the dead vpon our Sunday the day of his resurrection he trauailed and two of his disciples also a matter of 15 myles Luk. 24.13 wherefore Sunday is a trauailing day a working day whother you respect Gods example at the Creation or Gods 4th Comm. vpon Mount Sinay or Christs example and his Disciples after the Redemption But chiefly and principally I mind to urge this vse against some Ministers vvho doe againe notoriously abuse this 4th com by prouing out of it an institution for the Lords day or Sunday to be a Sabbath thes men seeme for the time to haue laid aside both wit and learning are they not ashamed to goe about to vvrest that Com. to speake for and command the Sunday to be kept for a Sabbath and resting day the vvhich doth expresly command the contrary For this branch of the com Six dayes thou shalt labour Doth command labour on the six dayes Novv the first of thes six labouring dayes is our Sunday or Lords day novv vvas it euer heard before that one commandement should command contrary things or that one part of a commandement
day of its payment mentioned in the bond or where as our Sauiour taught the Iewes his Disciples in the 4th petition of his prayer saying giue vs this day our daily bread to beg for two things the one is bread the other is the day and time when to haue it to wite this day some Ministers should imagine that indede the petition concerning bread is Morall and concerneth vs Christian Gentiles but for the day and time that they vvould haue it this day that 's Ceremoniall and belonged onely vnto those Iewes the Disciples of Christ not vnto vs iust thus deale our Ministers novv vvith Gods 4th Comm. the dueties belong to vs say they but the time concernd the Iewes onely not vs neuer were there any Expositions more absurd then are our Expositions of the 4th Com. no for absurdety popish Iesuites themselues cannot out stripp vs rather then faile a parte of the Com. shall be denied too A second vse may be for confutation of such Ministers as will by one means or other so falsly expound these vvords in the Negatiue parte of the Com. vvhich mention the 7th day as they will make the people strongly beleeue that God meaneth the 8th day or the first day as if God had not knovvne hovv to speake but vvhen he nameth the 7th day he meaneth the 8th day vvhen he speaketh of the 7th and last day of the vveeke yet he meaneth the 8th or first day of the vveeke who would think these to be faithfull expounders of Gods vvord there are arguments lights enough in the Com. as hath bene shovvn wherby one that is but vvilling may see vvhich day of the vveeke God meant Neuerthelesse vvhatsoeuer can be said to the contrary thes men vvil apply vrge this 4th com hardly vpon mens consciences for the 8th day or Lords day as if the 7th day the 8th day were all one may it not truly be said of such Ministers as once the Lord spake of those priests Her priests haue wrested the Law Zepha 3.4 This vse may also be pressed against the people for suffering them selues to be thus deluded blinded it semeth they obserue not the rule of the Apostle to Trie al things nor the practise of the Bereanes to serch the Scriptures to see if the things be so or not but they handouer head take all that is spoken for gospell if the Minister be an honest man in their repute As S. Paul said O ye folish Galatians who hath bewiched you that yee should not obey the trueth so may I say to many English people O folish Auditoures who hath bevvitched you that yee should not vnderstand the trueth doe yee not knovv the right hand from the lefte the 7th day from the 8th the beginnig of the weeke from the end vvil you suffer your selues so to be abused that a Com. for the 7th day you should be brought to beleeue that it bindeth your consciences to the 8th day finally it seemeth you choose rather to beleeue man then God for God saith in expresse words the 7th day is the Sabbath but many Ministers say the 8th day is the Sabbath novv vvhither of these tvvaine you giue more credit vnto your selues shall be Iudges I know well they think to salue vp the matter with a distinction of a 7th the 7th and so our 8th day may be a 7th day though not the 7th day But we must know there is a Diuine accompt and an humane accompt now in diuine matters vve are to hould vs to a diuine scripture accompt not to such a one as vve may forge out of our ovvne braines beginnig at what day of the weeke vve please for the first of our 7. Novv forasmuch as God vseth to begine at our Sunday or Lords day for the first of the 7 both at the Creation Genes 1.5 and after the Redemption Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk. 24.1 Ioh. 20.1 Act. 20.7 if vve vvill rekone the dayes of the weeke as God rekoneth them and beginne where he beginneth vve must count our Sunday or Lords day for the first day of the vveeke or of the Seauen vvhich being so rekone forwards and you cannot possiblie make any day of the weeke the 7th besids Saturday yea Saturday is the 7th day euen in Nature for it is the 7th day from the Creation yea Saturday is also the 7th day in a Christian accompt if you rekone from the Redemption for Sunday or our Lords day being the day of Christ his Resurrection vvherin he had finished our Redemption and this Lords day being the first day of the vveeke in a Christian account for all Christianes so counte it so did the 4 Euangelists Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 Luk. 24.1 Ioh. 20.1.19 count forvvards and Saturday must needs be the 7th day to wit the 7th day from the Redemption so that Saturday is the 7th day euery vvay both from the Creation from the Redemption wherfore they vvho talke so of a 7th day as if any day of the weeke might be a 7th day they are neuer able to shew vs any day of the weeke to be a 7th in Scriptures accompt but Saturday what a folly is it then for them to talke of a 7th day as if Sunday might beit yet so they talke saying wee keepe a 7th day on Sunday though not the 7th day it is a 7th day indeed but a 7th of their ovvne deuise but neuer of Gods allovvance Some expound thes words the seuenth day to be meant thus one of seauen some one day of the 7. but what is this better or other then to say a 7th for both wayes they make Gods certaine time to be vncertaine for God spake of the 7th day which is for certaine the last day of the number weeke not of some one day or other vncertainely This one thing is to be noted as a greate folly in the Patrones of the Lords day they vvill haue a Sabbath in Remembrance of the Redemption as the Iewes had in memory of the Creation this their new Sabbath also that it may stand by the 4th Comm. it must be on a 7th day yet they cannot tell vvhere to find a 7th day in any diuine accompt for it vnles it be Saturday which they abhorre therfore in roome of a 7th day vvheron they tell vs they haue at last lighted on a first day are they not neere the matter think you furthermore they abhorr the 7th day from the Creation for their nevv Sabbath well then I would gladly knovv of them vvhence they vvould haue a 7th day it must be either a 7th day from the Creation or a 7th day from the Redemption there is no third to be imagined I knovv they vvill choose a 7th day from the Redemption vvell then since Sunday or Lords day is the day vvheron Christ rose and so the first day of Redemption vvherin he brought light liefe into the vvorld let them rekone
onwards Saturday though it greeueth them will be the 7th day from the Redemption wherefore if they will be like them selues Saturday must be their nevv Sabbath day if they vvill keepe a 7th day from the Redemption in remenbrance of it Saturday is not onely the 7th day from the Creation but also from the Redemption vvherefore vvhat day can be more fit for a nevv Sabbath then Saturday for it ansvvereth both to the Creation to the Redemption being the 7th day from both hovv fitly then might the memory of both Creation Redemption be celebrated both together vpon one day to wit Saturday euery vvay the 7th day To conclude suppose vve that Christ had left a commandement for the Lords day in these vvords Remember the Lords day to sanctifie it c. but the first day is the Lords day c. should not they be censured for corrupters wresters of the Scriptures who vvould attempt so to expound this first day which is Sunday or Lords day as it might be vnderstood of Monday the second day vvhich is the day after why iust so doe they novv deale vvith Gods 4th comm it saith Remember the Sabbath-day c. but the seaueuth day is the Sabbath day c. And yet they vvill make the 8th day which is the day after to be the Seauenth day vvhy might not the second day be vnderstood when Christ said the first day as vvell as the 8th day vvhen God said the 7th day SECT VIII The last thing in this 4th com to be handled is the reason of it in thes vvords for in sixe dayes the Lord made the heauen earth the sea all that in them is rested the 7th day wherfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Exod. 20.11 In these words or in this reason to the com these things are considerable 1. That God blessed and hallowed the 7 h day 2. The reason mouing God to hallow it 3. How these words are a reason to the 4th comm as for this third thing it shall be handled in a Section by it selfe For the first that God sanctified the 7th day or Saturday Sabbath see this plainely in this 4th com Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Exod. 20.11 see it also Genes 2.3 So God blessed the seuenth day and sanctified it So then this Saturday 7th day Sabbath is a blessed and a sanctified day looke vvhat God hath blessed it shall be blessed and what God hath sanctified it must be holy the Saturday 7th day Sabbath therefore is an holy Time an holy day Thus Musculus fol. 62. God might saith he haue commanded onely the actes and doings of the day but to set out the matter more pithilie he said Remember that thou sanctify the day of the Sabbath He chargeth that the day it selfe shall be reputed holy Where Musculus doth not onely affirme that the time and day was as well commanded as those dueties in the day of rest and holy exercises but also saith that the day it selfe is an holy day Neither is this day holy by any mans hallovving or sanctifying of it but by the proper worke of God himselfe for saith these textes the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and sanctified it and God blessed the 7th day sanctified it Hereby we see hovv God hath chosen out the Saturday for an holy day aboue all dayes of the weeke and God hauing made it an holy day he hath thereby put as much difference betvvixt it other dayes of the weeke as vvas wont to be betwixt A Priest a common man the Temple their common housen as is now betwixt Sacramentall bread common bread at our tables Hence it is that Saturday the 7th day is called the Sabbath of the Lord Exod. 20.10 and the holy of the Lord Isa 58.13 and my holy day Isa 58.13 and my Sabbath Isa 56.4 How meanly soeuer times now count of this day yet you see by these names and Epithites how God estemed of it I come to the second thing considerable which is the reason vvhich moued God to hallovv this 7th day Saturday Sabbath the reason then why God sanctified this day it vvas because himselfe had rested on this day from his great miraculouse worke of the Worlds creation see this most euidently Genes 2.3 So God blessed the 7th day sanctified it because that in it he had rested from all his vvorke You see one reason then of the Sabbaths institution consecration thus A Kingdome doth solemnize the Coronation day because on that day the King came to his Crowne men keepe their Birth dayes and Marriage dayes because on those dayes they were borne married Those Iewes Ester 9. kept the dayes of Purim because of their deliuerance from Hamans conspiracy I come now to the vses of these two points and first is it so that therefore God sanctified the Saturday 7th day Sabbath because that in it he had rested from all his vvorke why then say some men it matters not which day we giue God for a Sabbath so be we giue him one c Here was a reason you see mouing God to set apart Saturday rather then Sunday or any other day to wit because he had rested on that day and had God a reason mouing him to make a choise of dayes then is there no reason at all now but one day may be as meete as an other hath length of time worne this reason out of vse will any say it matters not which day we keepe for Coronation day birth day or Marriage day for Christs Passion day resurrection day or ascention day Is there not some reason euen in thes for one day aboue all others euen so is there not a reason why the 7th day should be solemnized rested on aboue all others since that God solemnized it rested on it and did therefore blesse it sanctify it because himselfe had Rested in it I desire this may be obserued by such as expound the com to be meant of one of seuen that is of one day of the 7 or of some one day of the 7 or other as if God had made no choise or difference of dayes as if God had as well sanctified Sunday monday tewsday c. and made them Holy dayes as Saturday his sacred day There are besids others these reasons why we should celebrate this day rather then any other 1. because on this day God rested and not on any of the other 6 dayes vve must imitate God 2. God hallovved and sanctified this day so he did not honour any other of the six dayes but appointed them for worke 3. God had speciall reason to sanctifie this day because himselfe had rested on it but he had no reason so to sanctifie any of the six dayes for he rested not on thos but vvrought on them 4. God commanded this day in speciall to be sanctified by his 4th
comm which vvere reason enough for vs to put a difference of dayes if we had none other We see then it is a friuolouse obiection to say the least of it for men to say it matters not so much which day we giue God for his Sabbath so be he hath one God is in loue with his owne choise no day can so please him as his owne chosen day The Iewes might as well haue said so be we offer Sacrifice in an house by a man it matters not which house nor what man yet God had chosen his Temple before all Housen his Priests aboue all men therefore they durst not alter Gods choise Might not we as well say now it matters not so much what man ministreth the Sacraments so be a man doth it nor what we drinke at the Lords Supper so it be liquor doe wee not abhorre such obiections If vve will keepe a Sabbath by the 4th com vve must betake vs to such a day onely vnto vvhich this reason of the Sabbaths institution mentioned in the 4th com doth properly belong it cannot be said of any of the other 6 dayes Sunday Monday Tewsday Wednesday Thursday or Friday that God blessed or sanctified any of them because he had Rested on them if therefore vve choose any of these 6 dayes 1. vve keepe a day vvhich God did not blesse nor sanctify for that end 2. We defeate disapoint God of his maine reason end vvhich moued him to ordaine command the Sabbath to blesse it and to sanctify it for because God had rested on the 7th day which is Saturday Therefore the Lord blessed the 7th day hallowed it Genes 2.2.3 I pray let this point be well obserued for it is of great consequence Vse 2. is it so that God hath sanctified hallowed this 7th day Saturday Sabbath hovv is it come about that this sacred time is novv euery where in all Churches so strangly profaned for as those Iewes dealt then with the Temple they bought in it sould in it changed their money in it Mat. 21.12 So doe we now profane the Saturday Sabbath by hauing markets therein by buying selling therein yea vve refuse not to doe the most base seruill drudgery vvorkes that the Kitchine hath on the Lords Sabbath day vve are farre vnlike our heauenly Father in the vse of this day he sanctified it we profane it he rested on it we worke on it he commanded vs to Remember it we forget it These things considered it is high time for euery man to make a serch inquisition to know what 's become of the Lords Sabbath and to be well informed of the reason why the Lords Sabbaths are now forgotten so strangly profaned The Priests lippes must preserue knowledge and people must seeke the law at their mouths Mal. 2.7 Wherefore I aduise people to haue recourse to their Ministers in this matter and in most seriouse manner demand of them what 's become of the Lords Sabbaths by what warrant this sacred time is now so profaned and if they cannot for the present giue you a sound reason desire them to take it into consideration to study the point better that so a full satisfaction may be giuen to Gods people in this matter or else a reformation may be sought it is no dallying the matter is weightie that a sacred day so hallowed by God should be now so profaned it standeth euery man vpon to haue sound arguments for it vnlesse he will be guilty of the sinne of profaning Gods Sabbaths weekly and transgression of the 4th com sleiting Gods example and president This one thing I dare confidently auovvch that no Minister is able to shew any text of holy writ which doth necessarily abolish this 7th day Sabbath as for those textes Coloss 2.16 Exod. 31.13 vvhich are their maine textes ther 's no necessity at all in them for abolition of the Morall Sabbath for there be ansvvers enough to them sufficient enough as shall be seene hereafter when we come to ansvver to all their obiections if those that oppose God in his Sabbaths did but please to retaine them and to sanctify them I am confident therefore that it is nothing but their meere willes pleasures that makes them inueigh against the Lords Sabbaths Let people therefore see to it what manner of arguments reasons they admit of from their Ministers for their profaning of the Lords Sabbaths which he hath hallowed sanctified let not euery trifling probable argument be auailable hauing but some liklihod to be so but let them call for such solid substantiall reasons as doe proue the abolishing of the Sabbath day necessarily cleerly vndeniably to the full satisfying of their consciences let Ministers giue them no reasons here for their iustifiable profaning of the Lords hallowed Sabbath but such as will hould currant before God at the day of iudgement when God shall call for an account of his sacred time holy Sabbaths neither let the people rest satisfied till they haue such reasons for their profanation of the Sanctified 7th day Sabbath as they doe verily beleeue are sound warrantable such as God will accept at their hands vvhen they shall be questioned therefore before his Tribunall for no probable contingent doubtfull arguments will then passe for current against an expresse commandement and so ancient sacred an ordinance as is Gods Sabbath I conclud this point with those words of the voyce from heauen to Peter Act. 10.15 The things that God hath purified pollute thou not So say I to Ministers when your people repaire vnto you for reasons to iustify them in the profanation of the Lords sacred holy Sabbaths haue a care least you dravv all the guilt of Sabbath breaking the sinne of transgression of the 4th com vpon your owne soules and that by your reasons you doe not pollute the things which God hath sanctified purified the Lords Sabbaths I meane the things that God hath sanctified pollute thou not SECT IX I come novv to the 3d thing considerable in the reason to the 4th com mentioned in these vvords For in sixe dayes the Lord made heauen earth the sea all that in them is rested the 7th day Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it These words sixe dayes you haue them tvvise mentioned in this 4th com the first time they are mentioned is in Exod. 20.9 and there they are to be considered as a commandement for they are deliuered in commanding termes The second time you haue them mentioned is in Exod. 20.11 and here they are to be considered as a reason and so much is manifest by the rationall particle for prefixed as you see Wherefore novv vve are to consider of these vvords as they are a reason vrged by God to induce vs to the Sanctifying of his Saturday 7th day Sabbath commanded in this 4th comm the reason is
to be applied to the com on this manner 1. On the 7th day thou shalt rest from thy labours because I the Lord thy God at the Creation rested from my worke on the same day or on the 7th day 2. On the sixe dayes thou shalt labour finish all thy workes so as nothing be left to be done on the 7th day because on the six dayes I the Lord thy God did worke finish all leauing nothing to be done on the 7th or Sabbath day Thus stands the reason in relation to the com as I conceiue it as in the former part of the 4th comm God presseth vs to the obseruation of the Saturday Sabbath by virtue of the 4th com in commanding termes saying Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it so in the latter part thereof God presseth vs to the obseruation of the same day by his owne example so then if either precept or president will auaile with vs if either an imperiouse commandement or a sweete gentle reason will auaile any thing with vs then vve must keepe Gods Saturday Sabbath and such with whom neither Gods commandement no nor yet his patterne example proposed for vs to follow will preuaile they shew themselues not children of God but rebelles to God God is pleased many times in Scripture to propound himselfe for our patterne as 1. Pet. 1.15 As he which hath called you is holy so be ye holy c. Our Sauiour Christ exhorteth vs to doe good to those which harme vs that so we may be the children of our heauenly father c. then he concludeth thus you shall therefore be perfect as your father which is in heauen is perfect Matth. 5.48 and so in this 4th com God hath set forth himselfe for our patterne saying Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it for I the Lord sanctified it on the 7th day thou shalt rest for on the 7th day I the Lord rested if therefore you will be led by reasons as reasonable men shold then let Gods reason take place with you or if you vvill be led by examples let Gods example be of force vvith you to keepe his Saturday Sabbath Wherefore laying aside Gods commandement I now vrge onely Gods reason vpon you and Gods example vpon you exhorting you in the vvords of the Apostle Be yee therefore followers of God as deere children Eph. 5.1 Hee kept the Sabbath day doe you so too But if yet you shall enquire which is the day I ansvver see but vvhich day of the vveeke it vvas on vvhich God rested at the Creation Genes 2.2.3 that is the day vvhich God persvvadeth vs to keepe else it vvere impertinent for God to persvvade vs to keepe the 8th or 9th day because he kept the 7th day The premisses the conclusion must be vnderstood of the same thing as Logiceans know well the 7th day therefore is the day to vvit the 7th day from the creation vvhich is Saturday for on this day God rested and to this day God persvvaded vs. The vse of this point is for the iust reproofe of our times vvith vvhom neither precept nor president vvill preuaile for neither Gods commandement nor Gods example can doe any thing now a dayes no nor yet Gods reasons can moue any whit if any of these 3 or if all of them together would take place with vs behold vve haue them all in this 4th com For 1. God commanded the Sabbath day 2. God kept it himselfe 3. He allureth vs by a strong reason taken from his ensample noted by the particle for How could a point be more thorowly pressed of all sortes of people vvhich come vnder this reproofe I find none more guilty then some of the Clergie for as for the Laity though they be guilty hereof yet a little matter would soone reclaime them but as for these of the Clergie they are intoxicated and euen drunken with reason Sophistry for Gods reason which he vseth here in this com to allure men to keepe his Sabbaths it is vvith them as no reason for either they will make this reason no parte of Gods comman or but as some needlesse appendix vnto it or let it stand still for a cipher as no reason at all so they make a shevv to imbrace Gods 4th com but not his reason which hee added to the same cōmandement it is the property of an vnreasonable man to reiect Gods reasons Or else by their subtill vse of reason they can tosse it as a man doth a Tennis bale from one day vnto another as if the reason must runne thus Therefore God blessed sanctified the 7th day because vve should keepe the 8th day therefore God hallowed the Sabbath day because we should sanctifie the Lords day As absurd as it is for the conclusion to be vnderstood of one day the premisses of an other yet can they put some culler or other on it whereby the simple yea themselues too are deceiued and this deceipt is the more dangerouse in that it is cullered ouer vvith a shevv of learning common people verily beleeue that because they are so learned conscionable therefore they vse their learning conscience in euery matter they medle withall I wish it were so Oh that Lot Dauid and Peter had alwayes vsed that knowledge conscience that was in them Were it the common people that violated Gods Sabbathes vve could soone check them with the 4th com with the example reason of Almightie God to the contrary but novv since it is the syne of Ministers no bonds nor reasons of God can hould them for they haue fond out so many distinctions answers obiectiones as they can both violate profane the Sabbath day yet againe make God man beleeue that they keepe the Sabbath day as you see none cale more for it then they witnesse their Sermons so these can profane Gods Sabbathes with a grace they can doe it defend it when they haue done they can doe it neuer blush at it these therfore are in a most dangerouse well nigh desperate case smale hope of repentance This one thing I demand of them let them put all their lerning all their honestie together try if by them both they can tell hovv to apply this example reason which God addeth here to this 7th day Sabbath vnto their 8th day Lords day Sabbath God hath vrged his Sabbaths 1. with a Memorandum prefixed to them more then to any other thing Commanded 2. with a Commandement 3. with his owne example 4. with a strong reason what may be the reason why these Clerkes professing to be Masters of reason Artes should not see or acknowledge these most reasonable things or should so foully misapply them as formerly we haue shovvne they doe It cannot be the difficulty of the point for that 's easy familiar nor can it be the strength of Scriptures against the
for so he thought Luther saith the Author should beginne all that hee deemed intollerable not to be indured Thus you see scandall hath formerly bene taken at the meanenesse of the person great Clerkes will neither attempt the reformation of abuses them selues nor yet can they beare it that their inferioures should doe any thing neither the reason I take to be because in the former they are in danger to loose their greatnesse in the latter to loose their goodnesse it is lamentable to see how now a dayes the word trueth of God is receined with respect of persones and that among the best both Ministers people they inquire not now a dayes vvhat hee saieth and hovv agreeablie to the rule of Gods vvord hee speaketh but vvhat is hee whence comes hee is hee a lofte in the vvorld benifised with a good liuing richly attired is hee a man of note can hee coutenance vs and the point he speakes for these the like carnall childish respectes haue Christians in receiuing Gods vvord it would discourage any man almost that is lesse then A Doctour of Diuinity of the highest ranke for honour vvorldly dignities to be industriouse in the study of the Scriptures so as thereby to ad further light vnto profession because vvhat he saith shall be as meanly accounted of as his person is S. Iames saith my brethren haue not the saith of our Lord Iesus Christ in respect of persones Iam. 2.1 Who that looketh vpon these so many stumbling blockes with many others that might be showne can wonder that men of a sharp sight yea holy liefe should haue their eye sight dazâ—lled not see such a trueth as is encountered with so many difficulties were it such a trueth as the knovvledge publike profession thereof vvould stand vvith antiquity vniuersality publike applause approbation facility of reformation credit reputation liueings preferments then should I wonder vvonder againe if Ministers should not find it out presently professe it publikly but this is such a trueth as is at the first thoughts of it oppugned by a vvhole army of gaine saying obiections all vvhich are preualent vvith manes naturall corruptiones let not people therfore think it a thing altogether impossible for many Godly lerned Ministers to side it together against such a trueth to bewillingly ignorant of it and let such Ministers themselues serch out which of these obstacles here mentioned or the like to them hath so blinded their mindes dazelled their reason as neither Gods Memorandum prefixed to the Saturday Sabbath nor Gods Commandement nor Gods ensample no nor yet Gods reason perswasion all written in the Morall Lavv can preuaile with them to take in to Remembrance againe the Lords Sabbath day for doubtlesse there must besome beame or other in the eye of their reason which cannot see reason in Gods reason Before I conclud this section one thing more I would commend to your consideration this it is vvheras this 4th com generally considered hath two partes the one is the Commandement it selfe the other is the reason of the commandement as formerly I haue showne you that our Ministers haue by their renovvncing of the time in the Com. renownced abolished by iust consequence the whole 4th com also so much I am to discouer a further errour of theirs which is that by their abolishing of the time in 4th com to wit the Saturday 7th day Sabbath hereby also they haue nullified abolished the reason to the com which is taken from Gods owne example and conteined in these words For in sixe dayes the Lord made the heauen the earth the sea all that in them is rested the 7th day Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it All these words I say they haue vtterly nullified so as now they stand but for a cipher to fill vp an empty place What I haue charged them with I thus make good The argutum thing which God would persvvade his people vnto it is the obseruation sanctification of the 7th day Sabbath as you may see in the com foregoeing this reason to this end it pleaseth God to frame propound vnto vs a most notable liuely reason taken from his owne example to this effect Remember you to sanctifie the Sabbath day for because I sanctified the Sabbath day Doe you rest from vvorke on the 7th day for because I rested from worke on the 7th day therefore I hallowed sanctified the 7th day Sabbath Now suppose we that the 7th day Sabbath were abolished as they say it is which is the argutum or thing argued wherevnto God did by this reason perswade then what vse can there be of this reason which God here propoundeth for example now that Circumcision the Passeouer Sacrifices are ceased what vse is there now of those reasons wherby Gods people the Iewes were then perswaded to those dueties of Circumcision the Passeouer Sacrifices such is the case here take away the Sabbath day you take away the reasons that belonged to it to perswade vnto the sanctification thereof for what need reasons motiues to perswad vnto that which is not But happily they will say though vntruely that the Sabbath day is not abolished it is only but changed vnto the Lords day Well say we for this time grant them this for argument sake then thus I make it good against them the reason of the 4th comm cannot possible be a reason vnto the Lords day for it is most absurd for any man to thinke God should perswade vs to keepe the Lords day because hee kept the Sabbath day or that God should perswade vs to keepe the first day of the weeke because kept the 7th last day of the weeke Thus the conclusion the premisses should not be of the same but of sondry things For the day vvhereof the question is as novv they would haue it to vvit the Lords day it differeth much from the day mentioned in the reason to the com that thus 1. The day in the reason God rested in it but the day in the question God vvrought in it 2. The day in the reason God sanctified it and hallovved it but the day in their question to vvit the Lords day vve no vvhere reade that God blessed it sanctified it so the one differeth from the other as much as an hallovved or holy day doth from an vnhallovved or vvorking day If it be so then that this reason proposed by God cannot be applied vnto the Lords day then it follovveth that this reason is made by such as oppose the Lords Sabbaths a very cipher of none vse but to fill vp a voide place A very vvicked fact it is vvhosoeuer are guilty of it Yet further that this reason stands now a dayes since our Lords day is come into vse and the Sabbath day abolished as a meere cipher it
vvill further appeare if you doe but take a suruâ—y of the Sermons of Ministers in the Pulpit of their writings in bookes for of all the arguments reasons vvhereby they vrge people to the obseruation of the Lords day you shall neuer heare them make any vse at all of this reason the vvhich God himselfe hath thought most meete to be vrged and hath therefore annexed it to his com When did you heare any say it is your duety to sanctify the Sabbath day we now keepe because on it God Almightie rested from his worke and it is your duetie to keepe this Sabbath day because God did at the Creation blesse it and sanctify it No if they should vse these reasons their davvbing vvould be seene into euery man can tell them this Day that vve keepe is not the day wherein God rested but the day vvhere in he vvrought and this day is not the dâ—y vvhich God blessed sanctified for this day is the 8th day but God sanctified the 7th day vvherefore they are ashamed to vse this reason therefore they let it stand vntoucht thus it hath stood for a Cipher this many hundreth of yeeres me thinketh the consideration but of this one point should be enough to certify them that they are wrong for asmuch as they dare not presse this Sabbath we novv keepe vvith Gods reason annexed to his 4th Comm. now of all reasons that men can inuent what reason more forcible then that which is taken from Gods owne example that he rested on that day sanctified it but now this argument from the example of God is stale in the Churches is quite out of vse vvho doth excite stirre vs vp in thes our dayes from the example of God saying let vs keepe the Sabbath day for God Almightie kept it let vs rest from our laboures on the Lords day because God rested from his workes on this day let vs sanctifie hallovv the Lords day because God Sanctified hallowed it at the Creation Genes 2.2.3 let vs keepe the Sabbath day an Holly day for God made it an Holly day by hallowing it Exod. 20.11 Genes 2.2.3 Let vs honour it as the most auncient holly day it being as auncient as the world Genes 2.2.3 as the most honourable holly day it being made an holy day by God himselfe not by man Genes 2.2.3 all men follow the example of the king who would not follow this example of God the king of kings if it were vrged if therfore the Lords Sabbaths be neglected for want of forcible most preualent argumeÌ„ts reasons let such Ministers beare the blame who depriue the people of this so effectuall mouing an argument what a maruailouse thing is it that God should in his wisedome goodnesse to vs besids his Com. perswade vs by such mouing powerfull reasons as he hath annexed to his Com. yet Ministers are Mute silent as if ther were no such things in the Law word of God is it not meete that such af oule errour as this is should be discouered But suppose that some haue Sophistically by playing with the Homonymie of the word Sabbath improperly applied to our Lords day both deceiued themselues others so vrged a farre off this reason vpon our day surly they haue toucht it but lightly as glad when they are safely got off it againe least they should bewray all for example suppose a man that knowes the difference betwixt the day called Sabbath day in scripture and the day called Lords day the one being the 7th last day of the weeke the other the first day of the weeke the one being the day before the other the one being for memory of the Creation the other for memory of the Redemption if now a Minister should tell him it is his dutie to sanctify the Lords day because God sanctified the Sabbath day would not the man think the Minister iesteth vvith him since he knowes God sanctified the 7th day of the weeke but our Lords day is the 8th day or first day of the weeke since he knowes that the reason which he vseth speakes of the day named Sabbath day but the day he applieth this reason vnto it is of another name to wit the Lords day vvould he not thinke the Minister hath foully mistaken himselfe to misapply so the example of God to a wrong day for if the Minister would presse a man to sanctify the Lords day from the example of God he must bring an example where God rested on the Lords day and where God blessed sanctified the Lords day Wherfore to conclud this point either they are a shamed of Gods reason dare not vse it at all or if they doe they must play the egregiouse Sophisters vvith the peopse by playing with the Homonymie of the vvord Sabbath vseing it in an other sense then it is vsed by God thereby to couer their doubling from the eyes of the people but for the most parte of them I am suer they vse not this reason at all these doe lesse euill then those which abuse it Thus then you see they haue first abolished the whole 4th Commandement as elsvvhere I haue proued here againe you see they haue abolished the reason to the Com. Gods example now then let vs put them together then the totall some vvill be that they haue by abolishing the Time in the 4th Com. abolished also the vvholl Commandement not onely that but also the reason example of God annexed to the Com. so they haue made cleere vvorke for they haue taken away all euen all roote branch Thus you see then the time and 7th day in the Com. is of some consequence euen as the foundation is to the building vvhen as it being once remoued all comes tumbling downe let this time therfore be more regarded if you vvill haue the 4th com at all regarded SECT X. Hauing finished the Exposition of the 4th Com. discouered the manifould erroures shamfull abuses of it that I might yet further make these erroures appeare I purpose here to mention two things The former is to shew how our Congregations which is much to be lamented vvill for the must parte of them come shorte of their hoped for reward for Sabbath keeping that the residue doe but dally if not mocke vvith God this cogitation doth present it selfe to me when I think of the publike prayers of the Church for there the Mimister in the name of God with loude audible voice a mongst other of Gods 10 Com. pronounceth these words being the 4th com Remember the Sabbathday to keepe it holy Sixe dayes shalt thou labour doe all thy worke But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sone nor thy daughter nor thy man seruant nor thy maide seruant nor thy eattell nor thy stranger that
had mett with the reward of their dawbing doubling For as I suspected them so I find them like Moab Ierem. 48.11 setled on their lees like the men in Ierusalem Zephan 1.12 frozen in their dreges The second thing I purpose to mention for the further appearance of the abuse of this Comm. here follovveth wheras words argumentes vvill hardly auaile I purpose in the last place to try if sense will be informed for which purpose I will giue you an occular demonstratioÌ„ so as the sense of seing shall be conuinced of the abuse of this Com. That this may be I will set heere before your eyes the whole 4th com intirly as God wrote it in the Tables of stone furthermore as for these things vvhich so many Ministers say are ceremoniouse abolished in this Com. those things I will compasse about with a parenthesis or two halfe moone circles that so you may se which partes of the Com. they hold for Morall which for ceremoniall behould it thus Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it Holy Sixe dayes shalt then labour doe all thy worke But the Scauenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sone nor they daughter thy man seruant nor thy maide nor thy beast nor thy stranger that is with in thy gates for in six dayes the Lord made heauen carth the sea all that in them is and rested the 7th day Therfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Loe which partes of this 4th Com. they make Ceremoniall abolished to wit all those wordes which are inclosed vvith in the parenthesis for the vvord day this they abolish for a ceremony by these Textes Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 for the vvord Sabbath that they hould for an abolished ceremony by these Textes Col. 2.16.17 Exod. 31.13 and for these words these 7th day is the Sabbath this is that vvhich of all other partes of the commandement they abhorre as a Ievvish ceremony so much for the commandement come we next vnto the reason of the com noted by the vvord for vvhich conteineth a most effectuall persvvasion from Gods ovvne example herin these vvords rested the 7th day doe stand for a Cipher no Minister at any tyme in these our dayes vseing thes vvords as a reason to moue and excite vs to rest on the 7th or 8th day because God rested at that time secondly these vvords the Sabbath day doe stand for a Cipher also for no Minister doth perswade vs in these dayes to sanctify the Sabbath day because God sanctified the Sabbath day to vvit the Saturday Sabbath for it is the Saturday vvhich God hallovved sanctified at the Creation Novv cast thine eye backe good Reader see the com behold vvhat they allow of it to be morall and hovv much of it they will needs haue to be ceremoniall like a cipher did thine eyes euer before behold such a mingle mangle such a hotch potch the 4th com is by these Interpreters become halfe fish halfe flesh A Lynsey wolsey A morrall Ceremoniall Commandement partly lasting partly faded There be many Statute Lavves in this Kingdome t is said many Lavvyers vvill doe much for money but can such an instance as this be showne vvhere the Lavvyers haue by their expositions pleadings so mangled any of the Kings Lawes as haue our diuine Lawyers who in this case haue taken away the key of knowledge Luk. 11.52 How can a mans eyes but abhorre to looke vpon behold any vvriting thus interlaced with parenthessese many hundreth of yeeres after it was written but how should a Christian looke vpon any of Gods ten commandemeÌ„ts vvith any patience to see them or any of them thus mangled defaced vvas God so mindfull to place all the morales by themselues in the Tables of stone to exclud the Ceremonials and vvright them elsewhere as vnsit to be matched vvith the lasting Morals and are there novv so many Ceremoniall words crept into this Morall law We reade in 2. Sâ—m 10.4 how King Hanun tooke Dauids seruants and shaued off the halfe of their beards and cutt off their garments in the midle euen to their buttocks and sent them away me thinke these men could not looke more ill fauouredly disguisedly then doth this 4th com Now it is thus barbared and notched by our late barbers If I would haue a thing vgly done indeed these men shall doe it for me Furthermore the indignity offred vnto this com is such as it is not now onely shamefull to looke vpon but also it is by their corrupt exposition made very non-sense ridiculouse to this purpose let vs collect together so much of this comm as they allovv to be memorall and omit that vvhich they make ceremoniall that is so much as is put within the halfe moone circles see what a peece of senselesse stufe there will be and this then it is Remember to keepe holy Sixe dayes shalt thou labour doe all thy worke But of the Lord thy God thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sonne nor thy daughter c. see if by their distinctions subtilties they haue not picked out the heart and sense of this com by picking out the time Thus for the comm but further for the reason which God hath annexed to his com taken from his resting on the 7th day and from his sanctifying and hallowing of the 7th day this reason I say hath not onely some vvords pickt out of it as had the com but vvhich is more the vvholl reason it selfe as God laid it dovvne vvrote it in Tables of stone is vtterly by them abolished vselesse no mention of it in these our dayes thereby to excite persvvad people to the obedience of the 4th com Wherefore by your eye sight you may behold the abuse of this comm and by your obseruation you may take notice how the reason to the com is nullified two remarkable things to be obserued The consideration of these things me thinke should plead strongly against all the enemies to the Lords Sabbaths that so all their reasons they bring against them should be suspected reiected because by their abolishing his Sabbaths they must needes make such hauocke of Gods 4th com as you see Their textes of Scripture also Col. 2.16.17 and Exod. 31.13 with the rest are to be suspected as corrupted grosly abused by them seeing that they vvill so vrge presse them against the 7th day Sabbath in the 4th com as that by one text of Scripture they will mangle another so vnderstand one text of Scripture as it shall eate out the very bowels of an other so setting Scripture against Scripture the text Col. 2.16 shall eat out the bowels of the 4th com yea this text Col. 2.16 with other the like certain reasons they haue shall picke out the very heart sense of the
then hee vvill haue an account of his vvholl Lavv not of peeces and percels of it as vve please Thus vve se vvhat the duety of Ministers is namely to teach the people to obserue the Lords seauenth day Sabbath which is one of the commandements though you make it the least and it is their duetie also if they vvill be freed of Christ his Cursse to obserue keepe the 7th day Sabbath before the people so leading them by liefe doctrine together but hovv sarre off is the practise of most Teachers from obseruing the minde vvill of Christ in steade of practising the 7th day Sabbath in their ovvne persones for example vnto others they could be content to persecute any that they se forward this way oh fearfull In stead of teaching the people this vvhich they count the least of Gods commandements vrging them to keepe euery iote and title of Gods Lavv so the Lords Sabbath day they teach openly publikly the quite contrary as namely that this least of Gods commandements it is abolished and that the Sabbath day commanded it is abolished thus this least of Gods commandements is trampled downe because it is a little one a ceremoniall one a circumstantiall one not the Law of Nations nor found novv in the hartes off all men falne corrupted as a Law of Nature and because commanded to the Iew and the like but vvhat soeuer be their shiftes suer Iam the Sabbath day is not lesse then one of the iotes and titles of Gods Law nor is it lesse then the least of Gods commandements wherefore vvho soeuer teacheth in opposition to this Sabbath day he bevvraieth himselfe to be no frend of Christs and that he regardeth not his mind and vvill in teaching and obseruing all euery of the Commandemets nay he proclaimeth him selfe in open pulpit to be a professed enemy to Christ our Sauiour and these his vvordes Mat. 5.18.19 and to the integrity vvholnesse as I may call it of Gods Lavv he had rather haue it lamed percelled out that so he might serue God by halues and by peece meale then to haue an indifferent respect vvith Dauid vnto all Gods Commandements Psal 119.6 rather then he vvould haue Gods Lavv intire compleate in the perfection of partes vnto a iote and title Is not it true of such Ministers werewith the Lord charged those corrupt Priests Mal. 2.9 to vvit that they were partiall in the Law are not these also in our time partiall in Gods Law when not with standing vvhat Christ hath said for the integrity of the Lavv yet these men wil reiect a parte of it and so become like those Priests partiall in Gods Lavv for a parte of Gods Lavv they vvill haue an other parte they vvill none of the dueties of rest and holinesse in the 4th com this parte of the 4th com they vvill haue but the other duetie of the Time this parte of the same 4th com they vvill none of Were these Ministers of the lovver ranke for zeale of the Number of those vvhich are not accounted so zelouse of Gods Lavves it vvere the lesse to be vvondred at but being puritant Ministers and such as vvould be displeased at him vvho should say to them they had not an indifferent respect vnto all Gods commandements vvith out exceptions that these I say should picke and choose take leaue become like those profane Priests partiall in Gods Law it is to be maruailed at Mistake me not good Reader it is not purity that I mislike in puritanes for of all men I honour no men more then such as are endeauour to be of pure harte holy liefe but this I hate in them to se their practise belye their doctrine professiō for they teach daily for vniversall obediēce to all Gods com without exceptions resernations but Loe they are found here halting one of the least as they say of Gods Commandements ratified by our Sauiour they neglect and contemne Others there be of the same ranke which be not so impudent as the former they preach teach not against the Lords Sabbaths therefore are not guilty of the Cursse of Christ for breaking this least Com. teaching men so yet are they enemies to this least Comm. for haueing heard of my former booke which I vvrote in defence of this least Com. and for the Lords Sabbath yea and after they haue seene it reade it ouer they spitt fyer at it cry out burne the booke t is a foule errour c. These men like Iames Iohn not knovving of vvhat Spirit they are vvould haue fyer come downe presently although they know not either how to proue their Lords day to be a Sabbath day nor yet hovv to disproue the Lords Sabbath day or to confute the booke yet they can cry burne the booke t is a foule errour c. Thus these are so farre from teaching this least com to the people as that they vse all their diligence to scare afright simple people vvith greate vvords that so they might still remaine caught in theire snares in blind ignorance if the Lawes of this Realme vvere fitted to these mens minds it should be vvoe to him that toucheth this Lords day Sabbath the Diana of our time but seing they doe it out of a good affection I shall vvith Paul make it mine hearts desire and prayer to God for them that they may repent for I beare them witnesse that they haue the Zeale of God but not according to knowledge They thinke it much that they cannot preuaile vvith the rude multitude for the keeping Holy of the Lords day Sabbath but that say they vvhat they can yet they will reuell riote profane it vvell the case is novv become their ovvne it shall be seene whither all that I haue said can preuaile vvith them for the sanctifying of the Lords Sabbaths on the 7th day suer I am I haue said shall say much more more soundly for the 7th day Sabbath to moue them to keepe it then euer they did or could say to profane persones for the keeping of the 8th day Sabbath if therfore synister affections preuaile so vvith them that they vvill not liften to mee no more then their profane hearers will to them let them tell me then what is the difference betvvixt them selues and their profane auditours An other sorte there are who are disobedient to Christs will by deniall of the integrity wholnesse perfection of Gods law in as much as they doe not onely refuse to teach the people this least of Gods commandements namely which is the proper day time of Gods worship seruice but if they finde that by the paines of any others more faithfull in this point then themselues any of their flocke are taught instructed in this way of the Lord more perfectly that they begin to see a further light into this Law of
God then they were wont presently they be labour it to extinguish this light in them to these I may fitly apply that word of the Lord Ierem. 23.30 Therefore behold I will come against the Prophets saith the Lord that steale my word euery one from his neighbour These then be sacrilegiouse theeues who will not sow the seed of Gods word in the hearts of their people but vvill watch vvhen it is sowne that they may come steale it away againe I trust Gods Ministers will bridle corrupt nature and giue me leaue to lay the plaister where the sore is knowing it is their office to doe the like to others dayly they vvho teach others to take a reproofe are not to learne in this point Let me speake one vvord novv to all these 3 sortes of Ministers together vvhy are yee you Tribe of Leuie such enemies to the integrity wholnesse perfection of the Lavv of your God deliuered vvith such maiestie and terrour vpon Mount Sinai Exod. 20 Why oppose you your selues also against those iotes titles of this lavv ratified by our Lord Christ vnto eternity in his sermon on the Mount Mat. 5.1.8 Why doe you not according to his vvill mind teach the people this least commandement touching the proper time of his worship and seruice Nay why are you so vnlike your selues For it is a rule approued in expounding of the Scriptures that things are to be taken in the largest sense if nothing hinder Now why then in expounding of this 4th com doe you abridge it excluding the proper time thereof as if nothing but the dueties of rest and holinesse belonged vnto vs Whereas you ought to expound it more largly as including both the time of the 7th day the dueties of rest holinesse also since there is nothing that you can iustly say against the time Againe it is another rule in expouding of Scripture in speciall of the Morall law that vnder one thing expresly commanded or forbidden are comprehended all of that kind with the least cause or occasion thereof See here how they enlarge the lavv to be vnderstood not onely of the things there by name mentioned but also of things not mentioned as of the causes occasions and yet the same men being to expound the 4th com are so farre off from enlarging it as they will miserablie curtaile it and clippe it and pare it vntill they haue quite pared away the 7th day Sabbath Why are you so inconstant so vnlike your selues is it a rule with you that things not mentioned in the Comm. are to be brought in that so the Com. may haue the largest scope compasse and will you exclude and thrust out things by name mentioned in the Com. as the 7th day Sabbath Againe when we are to deale against Papists then we are very zealouse for the integrity perfection of the law witnesse M. Perkins in his first Volume pag. 400. where he proueth that a Papist cannot goe beyond a Reprobate because they make the whole law vaine and this he affirmeth in these words If one frustrate but any one point of any one commandement the whole law thereby is made in vaine Cannot a Papist goe beyond a Reprobate if he frustrate any one point of any one commandement can a Protestant goe beyond a Reprobate when he doeth frustrate some one point in some one commandement as we doe in the 4th comm Must the law stand in euery point of euery commandement vvhen we haue to doe vvith our Aduersaries abroade is the case altered when we be among our selues at home It is made a marke of sincerity and of the trueth of grace vvhen a man hath respect vnto all Gods commandements without exception of any But come vpon the matter with them then they that deliuer this marke to others can scarcely finde it in themselues For albeit they seeme by this marke to iustify the law in the integrity and perfection of it yet aske them what they thinke of Gods 7th day Sabbath commanded in the 4th com and this they will baulke and except vnder one pretense or other by miscalling it Iewish Ceremoniall and by saying falsely that it is abolished and is this the respect they haue vnto all Gods commandements It is a rule also that the law it is wholly copulatiue that is the things therein commanded are firmly combined knit together so as not any one thing can be seuered from the law and thus farre they maintaine the law in its perfection integrity but how then cometh it about that novv you haue made such a hiatus such a gape in this lavv one of the Linkes of this chaine is broken the commanded time of 7th day in the 4th com is taken out and seuered from all the rest so novv this copulation is vncoupled and the lavv is not wholly copulatiue it is but partially copulatiue Behold how the enēmies to the Lords Sabbaths to the integrity perfection of the Lavv of God say and vnsay it againe abroad vvith our aduersaries t is a point of reprobation to frustrate but any one point of any one commandement at home t is a point of Iudaisme to maintaine defend them all What should I say more iustly may the Lord lament ouer England as once he did ouer Ierusalem saying O my people they that leade thee cause thee to erre Isa 3.12 SECT XI Thus I haue defended the Morall lavv against both Anabaptists Libertins and also the integrity perfection of this lavv against Protestants and Papists to this end I haue opened expounded one branch of this lavv to vvit the 4th com and discouered many foule grosse errours in the ordinary receiued exposition thereof Now for conclusion I purpose to adde an Exhortation to the loue of this lavv of God It is called a royall Lavv But if yee fulfill the royall law according to the Scripture c. Iam. 2.8 It is called a righteouse Law What nation is so great that hath ordinances and lawes so righteous as all this law which I set before you this day Deut. 4.8 It is as a light in darkest night Thy word is a lanthorne vnto my feete and a light vnto my path Psal 119.105 Of all men the Prophet Dauid excelleth in this argument in his 119 Psalm Thy Testimonies are my delight my counsailers v. 24. My delight shall be in thy commandements which I haue loued v. 47. Thy statutes haue bene my Songes in the house of my pilgrimage v. 54. Oh how loue I thy Law it is my meditation continually v. 97. I hate vaine inuentions but thy law doe J loue v. 113. Yee see heere how Dauid was in loue with Gods lavv Now this his loue he doth expresse partly by his desirs and prayers and partly by comparisons by prayers Open mine eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law v. 18. Hide not thy commandements from mee v. 19. Mine heart breaketh
day vveekly Sabbaths but the text Col. 2.16 is and may be vnderstood of the yeerly Sabbaths and forasmuch as none euer doubted that the 4th com was for the weekly Sabbaths and many haue vvrote it that this text Col. 2.16 speaketh not of the vveekly Sabbaths it is partiality to choose Col. 2.16 before Exod. 20.8 Whither is the more safe thinke you to imbrace the Lords Sabbaths from the 4th Com. or to reiect them from this text Col. 2.16 Ponder it vvell in your minds vvhither of these tvvo textes of Scripture should most preuaile with you to vvit Exod. 20.8 or Col. 2.16 this note also that if this text Col. 2.16 preuaile with you then it must eate out the very heart bowels of the 4th Com. If you imbrace the text in their sense to be vnderstood of the 7th day vveekly Sabbaths therefore beware what you doe but if you vnderstand this text Col. 2.16 onely of the yeerly Sabbaths such as you reade of Leuit. 23.24.32.39 So you may retaine both textes still one Scripture shall not shoulder out an other I haue the rather incisted vpon this texte of theirs Col. 2.16 because it is their Master chiefe and choisest text against the Lords Sabbaths 2dly that you may the better iudge of these two textes Exod. 20.8 Col. 2.16 note that not these tvvo textes are compared together as Scripture vvith Scripture but the collection exposition of one of these textes is compared with and set against the other Text it selfe for as for the Text Exod. 20.8 this commandeth the 7th day vveekly Sabbath expresly in so many words with out collection or consequence of ours the 4th com hath euer bene vnderstood of the 7th day weekly Sabbaths by all the Prophets by Christ him selfe witnes their practise but the Text Col. 2.16 doth not disswad from the 7th day weekly Sabbath expresly and in so many vvords but it must be dravvne haled and vvrested to the 7th day weekly Sabbath by feeble blind reason collectiones consequences so that vvhosoeuer doth imbrace the Text Col. 2.16 against Gods Sabbaths rather then the 4th Com. Exod. 20.8 for Gods Sabbaths he chooseth consequences before Scripture collections before Gods expresse vvord and preferreth mans blind reason before Gods expresse vvill and plesure I desire the Christian Reader to marke this last passage vvith double and treble diligence for in all my booke there is hardly any thing of greater consequēce the summe vvhereof is this that menes collections reasons consequences made out of some text of scripture are not of that diuine nature infallibility that they should countermand ouerturne an expresse Cōmandement of Almightie God And this is the very case betvvixt my aduersaries mee for I bring an expresse Commandement for the Lords Sabbaths and against them they bring nothing else but their ovvne reasons collections consequences fetcht out of this text Col. 2.17 vnnecessarily fetcht also Thus by the comparing of these two textes of Scripture together it appeareth to euery eye that whosoeuer refuseth the Lords Sabbaths vpon that text Col. 2.16 rather then embraceth them from this text Exod. 20.8 hee preferreth weake insufficient arguments before able strong arguments the which whosoeuer doeth after fufficient notice giuen him he bewraieth that he loueth not Gods law in trueth of heart for it selfe but out of by respectes for by his preferring this weake text Col. 2.16 before that strong text Exod. 20.8 he ouerturneth raseth to the grownd a parte of Gods law who can ouerthrow a parte of Gods law yet loue Gods law Suppose we that the Title of A Ministers Liuing or of any mans Inheritance were to be tried he could shew but as good Euidence for it as the 4th com is for the Lords Sabbaths thinke you he would feare to leese the day to one that eould shevv no better Euidence then is the text Colos 2.16 against the Lords Sabbaths no vndoubtedly or suppose we the Title of A Ministers liuing or of any mans Inheritance were to be tried there were 2. Kinds of Euidence at his choise to pleade the one as strong as the 4th comand is for the Lords Sabbaths the other as weake as the text Col. 2.16 is against the Lords Sabbaths if novv this Minister or other person vvould make choise of this weaker Euidence Col. 2.16 vvould not euery man say surely this Minister or this other partie care not for their Liuing or Inheritance they doe not loue them iust so it is an argument that men loue not Gods Law nor his Sabbaths therin commanded vvhen they vvill parte vvith them so easily so growndlesly it is a signe they are vnvvilling to know acknovvledge the vnknovvne partes of Gods Law vvhen they goe thus partially to vvorke in the tryall of the point did men loue Gods lavv aboue Gold Silver as did David they vvould not parte vvith his commanded Sabbaths so lightly a man shall find something to doe to vvring mens gold siluer from them but for Gods Sabbaths you shall haue them from them vvith out strife vvhere then is the loue to Gods Sabbaths vvhere is the loue vnto Gods lawes Ministers people may say talke much make them selues others beleeue that they stand for Gods lavves loue his commandements but let them selues all men iudge vvhither they speake truly or not by this marke is this a loue to Gods Lavv to ouerthrovv a parte of it vvhich vvas euer vnderstood by all the Prophets Apostles of the weekly Sabbaths by a text Col. 2.16 vvhich doth neither mention the vveekly Sabbaths at all nor yet speake of all Sabbaths generally so as the vveekly Sabbaths must be included necessarily this is to supplant a certainty by a text which is doubtfull vncertaine is this loue Thus much of the first vvay vvherby men bevvray theire regardlesnesse theire vnvvillingnesse to be taught instructed in the perfection of the lavv in the vnkowne partes ther of that by prefering vveake arguments before able strong arguments The 2d vvay vvherby men bevvray theire vnvvillingnesse to be instructed in the perfectiō of the Lavv in the vnknovvne partes thereof is in that they admit of insufficient disallowable Testimony for the triall of the point that this is so is plaine by this that all people vvell nigh put all theire trust confidence for the triall of this point in theire Ministers saying our Ministers say the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the 4th com is a Ceremony abolished they are men of lerning honest godly men therefore we rest in them renonvvce the Sabbath day though it be commanded by God in the 4th com they haue studied the point they are a multitude of them this contenteth mee I knovv they durst not speake othervvise then they thinke they be such godly holy men c. I must confesse
the text all the people wept when they heard the words of the Law Nehe. 8.9 And is there not like cause for our people to vveepe also when in the Congregation they heare these Tenn Oracles reade and yet but nyne or nyne a peece of them kept for that vvhich concerneth the 7th day Sabbath is altogether by euery one neglected Ezra the Priest vvhen he tooke into consideration the vnlavvfull Marriages of the people it is said he rent his cloathes and pluckt of the haire of his head and beard and sate downe astonied Ezra 9.3 because of their strange Marriages hovv should vve then be affected to thinke of the strange Sabbathes vvhich now are kept for vve haue diuorsed put avvay from vs Gods ancient Sabbaths and vve are married to a nevv Lords day Sabbath a strange Sabbath neuer heard of in Scripture for a Sabbath Greate cause we haue to lament for 1. the Sacred holy day vvhich is of greatest antiquity is profaned this Holy day being as ancient as the vvorld it selfe Genes 2.3 secondly the most honourable Holy day is vnhallovved For God him selfe made it an holy day by blessing it and sanctifying it Genes 2.3 Yea and God himselfe rested on it Genes 2.2.3 Therfore it is two vvaies honourable 3. That day vvhich God expresly commanded Exod. 20.8 is profaned and by profaning of it not onely Gods 4th Com. is violated but also Gods example is profaned and set at naught for vve doe not novv imitate God by resting on the 7th day as he did vve haue an other day to vvit the 8th day And also Gods reason vvhich he annexed to the 4th Com. to allure and persvvad men to keepe his 7th day Sabbath this is nullified and out of all vse in these our dayes so Gods reasons are profaned as not vvorth the naming in our Churches is not this to be lamented vvhen neither Gods Com. nor Gods example nor yet Gods reasons can auaile vvith vs somtimes things honourable somtimes things Auncient are admired and esteemed but heere loe neither the Antiquity nor yet the Honourablenesse of the Lords Sabbaths can auaile vvith vs and is not this to be lamented vvhat an yron age liue vve in that none of all these cane moue vs A 4th cause of lamentation is because by this neglect of the right day and keeping of a vvrong day by setting a common vnhallowed day to wit the Lords day in roome of a Sanctified and holy day namly the Sabbath day all our Religion in keeping this vnballowed day for God neuer hallovved it in Conscience of the 4th com is meere superstition and God may say vnto our people an other day vvho required this at your hands thus are people abused and is not this a cause of lamentation some lament for the Ceremonies of the Church as the Surplisse and the like some complaine of Arminianisme how it spreads some complaine of Popery vsed in corners of the land euery one complaines of his grievance but I heare none of them all complaine of the profanation of the Lords Sabbaths of Gods example of Gods reasons and of Gods 4th com no man takes these to heart albeit euery one of them haue theire hands in these profanationes I wish the current of mens complaintes vvould turne vnto these things which more neerley concerneth them then those others A 5th cause of lamentation is because vnto the conscionable sanctifying of the Lords Sabbaths there are promises annexed see Isa 58.13.14 and on the other side to such as profane them there are curses annexed se Numb 15.32.35 Nehem. 13.1718 now inasmuch as vve profane that very day to wit the Saturday Sabbath vnto vvhich these promises were properly made it follovveth that we are not novv capable of any of those promises because vve keepe not the day vnto vvhich the promises vvere made I confesse that our Diuines haue and doe apply these promises vnto a Counterfaite day to wit the Lords day that they might doe it with the lesse suspition with the greater applause they haue like counterfaiters dissemblers called this Lords day Sabbath day thus by their humane imposition of new names vpon the daies of the weeke the simple vvell meaning people are beguiled but the day vnto vvhich these promises properly doe belong it is the day called in a Divine accompt Sabbath day not vnto the day so called in an humane accompt not vnto the day called Lords day And is not this to be lamented when people neglect their proffites commodites on the Lords day some loose their Corne some their Hay many poore men their labour and vvorke wherby they maintaine their families vvith many other losses and damages to their estates which might be rekoned vp and all these the vvell minded people of the land doe vvillingly neglect and loose all in hope of these promises trusting to make a better exchang that for losse of erthly things in conscience to Gods Command they shall gaine heauenly things and interest into Gods promises but behould they must faile of the promises because they faile God in the Condition for Gods promises rune thus if thou performe the condition which is to Sanctify the day named Sabbath day not the day named Lords day tell me novv is not this matter of iust lamentation to see the people of the land thus beguiled and deceiued and that both in their temporall estate also of the promisses of God if men haue any compassion brotherly loue in them they cannot but sorrow and mourne for these things On the contrary as for those forementioned Curses annexed to the Sabbath day and the profaners of it vvheras our people hope to auoide them by a religiouse sanctifying of the Lords day behould the people to be pittied for all that they fale into the danger of these Curses because they profane that very day named Sabbath day vnto the profanation of vvhich these curses vvere poperly made for these curses were neuer made vnto the profanation of the day named Lords day or vnto the day nicknamed counterfeitly called Sabbathday as now the Lords day is for these curses were threatened long before euer the Lords day had any being or could be kept for a Sabbath day if it had euer so bene kept as for their religiouse sanctifying of the Lords day in conscience of this 4th com God may say vnto them who required it at your hands is not this also matter of iust lamentation to see well minded people striue and endeauor with greate dilligence to auoide Gods Curses and yet by reason of miseinformation corrupt teaching to fale into danger of them yea it is the more pittifull in that the selfe same labour deuotiōs had they bene performed both on the day before they had for certaine out of all doubt both bene liable to all the promisses made to them that keepe Gods Sabbaths and also bene freed from the least danger of the Curses
Christ vpon the Lords day farre vnlike to the example of God on the 7th day and therefore we may follow the example of Christ and be as vnlike on the Lords day to the example of God on the 7th day as Christ was Against this some Ministers obiect thus that happily the new Sabbath was not yet knovvne the Church being in hir infancy and Christ being newly risen from the dead things were not yet established in the Church c. Herevnto I answer 1. if this new Sabbath was not knowne vpon this first Lords day why then they graunt me what I would haue which is that the Lords day was not constantly weekly kept in the dayes of Christ his Apostles as now they vrge vs to keepe it euery where and so they ouerthrow their owne doctrine 2. This obiection maketh the matter worse then it was before for now they will to maintaine their errour cast blame vpon Christ for if this nevv Sabbath was not knowne to the Church no not this chiefe principall Lords day whose fault was it but Christs in that hee being their Pastour had not taught it them yet no not when it was more then time that they had knowne it that so they might haue kept it The Lords day being instituted by Christ to be kept for a Sabbath day in remembrance of our Redemption as our new Sabbatharians imagine it could not but make as much for the Memory of Christ his death as the Lords Supper did of which Christ saied doe this in remembrance of mee now can any man thinke that Christ could passe ouer the doctrine of this a point of such consequence that in so seasonable a time vvhithout some neglect if there had bene any such thing to be taught them they cannot plead that Christ could not conveniently come at his Disciples erly enough in the morning to haue minded them of it for he rose very erly c. neither wanted he meanes to haue sent them vvord of it for he sent them word by Mary Magdalene that they should goe downe into Galile and there they should see him Mat. 28.1.10 hee might as easily haue sent them vvord also that it was his will that they should keepe that present day for a Sabbath if euer he had intended any such matter 3. I answer that this obiection spoiles all for if through infancy of the Church and the like as some infant-like-men imagine this first Lords day was not instituted for a Sabbath whither I maruaile then vvill they rune for an institution for there is not any mention in the Scriptures of any word of institution nor of any practise or example of Christ or of any of the Apostles about their sanctifying any Lords day after this first Lords day vntill Pentecost day Act. 2. vvhich was 6 or 7 vveekes after this first Lords day so here then is a greater errour for not onely the first Lords day vvas omitted for a Sabbath but also there is no footing for any Lords day kept like a Sabbath for 6 or 7 weekes together after Christs resurrection Thus the further vve serch in to this point the more vaine it doth appeare in so much as it irketh me to blot so much paper as I haue done and must doe to answer to such an idle argument as is the Lords day Sabbath it vexeth me to see men of such able partes for lerning naturall endovvments and so renoumed for sanctity thus to befoole themselues in the defence of such a friuolouse tenet as is this Lords day Sabbath But it fareth with them as I thinke like men that haue had wrong possession a long time when the true owner comes to claime his right yet since they haue possest it so long they will invent somthing to defend it still they vvill find trickes quilites and quirkes in the Lavv to hould possession still against the true ovvner so it is here the Lords day hath thrust out the Lords Sabbath day from possession novv this many yeeres and since it is done the Lords day hath hath had the possession long some culler must be set on the matter somthing must be invented to maintaine possession still though neuer so vvrongfull though neuer so to the shame of the defenders of it But for all this they are redy to reply thus but vvhat is the matter that this Lords day is so often repeated in the Nevv Testament aboue any other day of the vveeke and vvhy vvere such notable vvorkes still done vpon that day as Christ rose then and appeared to his Disciples the Holy Ghost descended Act. 2. Peter preacht and converted thovvsands Paul preacht on that day and here vvas a Collection for the poore on that day S. John receiued a Reuelation vpon the same day now all this cannot but point at something c. Where vnto I ansvver t is true all these doe point at some thing but vvhat is the thing vvhich they point vnto they should tell vs vvhat thing they point vnto not say onely they point at something I doubt not but they point at something but vvithall I beleeue they point at nothing for their purpose to helpe to proue the constant vveekly practise of the Lords day for a Sabbath if they did they vvould not be ashamed to say what they point vnto in particular turning it off thus in generall termes all these point at something In the night time Ioseph had a reuelation concerning Christ Mat. 1.20 Mat. 2.13.14 In the night Christ came vnto his Disciples vvalking myraculously on the Sea Mat. 14.25 In the night time Christ vvas betraied Mark 14.27 In the night time vvas brought by the Angel to the Shepheards those most ioyfull tydinges of a Sauiour borne into the vvorld Luk. 2.8 In the night Paul Silas sung Psalmes vnto God Act. 16.25 In the night Paul preached at Troas raised vp Eutychus falne dovvne dead Act. 20.7.8.9 Novv all these you may say pointed at something indeed true it is But tell vs proue it vnto vs what is that somthing they will not say we must hence learne to keepe Popish Vigiles or holy nightes I trust 2. Whereas they speake of the often repetition of the Lords day in the Nevv Testament the Sabbath day is oftener repeated then it t is true the 4 Euangelists doe euery one of them mention it but all that is but as if it vvere once mentioned onely for the Euangelists doe but mention one the same thing albeit it be 4 times repeated by them all that there are more Sabbath dayes spake of then Lords dayes see these textes Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 Thirdly vvhereas they make some greate matter of it because there vvere so many notable vvorkes done vpō this Lords day this point is much in their mouthes J ansvver 1. the day vvheron notable vvorkes vvere done is vsually put dovvne in Scripture for the more certainty sake novv to
learne more Logicke or confined to their studies for a season that they might grow better acquainted with the holy Scriptures before they be permitted to make publike interpretatiōs of them they let not to damne men to the pit of hell for not keeping this Lords day constantly for a Sabbath and that vpon these idle grownds were it fit to put a sword into a mans hand that knovves not when or vvhere to vse it should these men be betrusted vvith the keyes to shut men out of heauen and to locke men into hell thus causlesly By what hath bene said it appeareth 1. that it can no where be proued that the Lords day was in Christs the Apostles times kept constantly weekly for a Sabbath day 2. That the first Lords day was not kept for a Sabbath day by Christ nor by his Apostles Disciples Wherefore it followeth that if this Lords day was not kept constantly vveekly in the dayes of Christ his Apostles then we are not tyed in conscience in imitation of their examples to keepe euery Lords day vveeke by vveeke as now we doe it is sufficient if vve keepe but some Lords day sometime as one in a yeere or one in thre moneths or one in 6 moneths or the like but a vveekly obseruation is a needlesse growndlesse obseruatiō since it cannot be showne nor proued in the holy Scriptures Thus much touching the Scriptures Novv a vvord or two out of the Histories of the Church We reade it mentioned by Mr. Perkins in his first Volume vpon the 4th com pag. 48. that the Lords day vvhich he there cales Sabbath day was neglected and not obserued by those primitiue Churches which liued next after the Apostles vntill it was established by Christian Emperours c. Thus you see the Lords day vvas not obserued by many of the primitiue Churches for 300 yeeres for so long it was ere Constantine enacted a law for it who was a Christian Emperour Now who can imagine that the Lords day was euer kept in the Apostles dayes weekly and constantly for a Sabbath day when as those Christian Churches who immediatly succeded the Apostles kept it not at all for 300 yeeres together is it credible that those purest Churches should neglect such an ordinance of Christ as the Lords day Sabbath if any such ordinance there had euer bene in the Church No no the vveekly constant obseruation of the Lords day Sabbath it is but a nouelty and lately sprung vp The vse I vvould make of this point is this is it so that the Scriptures doe not bind vs to a vveekly keping of the Lords day but that it is enough if vvee keepe it at some times onely Why then doe Ministers presse the people so hardly to keepe euery Lords day and euery Sunday none excepted may it not in this respect be said of these Ministers as the Lord spake of those Prophets I haue not sent these Prophets saith the Lord ye◠they ranne I haue not spoken to them and yet they prophecied Ier. 23.21 Why are these Ministers more strict then God himselfe why doe they presse to a vveekly practise when Gods vvord speaketh but of a seldome practise Why should vve be tied to keepe the Lords day oftener then did the Apostolike Churches Forasmuch as vve are bound to keepe but some Lords dayes in a yeere vvhy are people hindred in the time of haruest to gather in their corne on the Lords day that vpon payne of damnation if they doe vpon pretense of a breach of the 4th com since they may both worke on euery Lords day all the time of haruest yet keepe some Lords dayes after haruest is done Also in the time of wheat seile barly-seile why may not the husbandman plow his ground some his seede on the Lords day since he may keepe some Lords day in a yeere after these busy times be past In the time of Hay-seile vvhy should not men make their haye on the Lords day seeing they may keepe Lords dayes enough all the yeere after When a Fayer fales vpon the Lords day why may they not keepe it vpon that day or if it fale vpon the Monday why may they not ride to it driue cartes to it on the Lords day the day before it as vvell as Christs Disciples trauailed 15 myles vpon the Lords day and vpon the most eminent Lords day since they may keepe some Lords dayes on the other times of the yeere vvhen there is no fayer It is true I verily beleeue that the 7th day Saturday Sabbath is still in force and that I beare a reuerence a religiouse respect vnto that day and for the conscience and duety I ovve vnto it I doe sanctify the Lords day not for it selfe but for the Sabbath dayes sake vvhich goeth before it giuing God one day for an other by vvay of a change vntill the time of reformation as they did change the Passeouer day Numb 9.1.3.11 It is also true that most of our Ministers hould the 7th day Saturday Sabbath for a ceremony abolished novv could I be perswaded in my conscience that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished as they say they are I doe protest it that I vvould not make any conscience or scruple of doeing the ordenary vvorkes of the 6. dayes vpon the Lords day neither vvould I in any respect of any diuine institution or conscience of the 4th com vvithhold any of my family from doeing the like should I leese my haye in time of Hay-seile or my corne in time of haruest or but hinder my vvorkes there abouts or suffer my conscience to be in thraled for such nifling trifling reasons as these no I trust not the like I say vnto men of all trades occupationes in Citties Townes if they can be satisfied in their consciences before God that the old Sabbath day on the 7th day is abolished then let them not feare or doubt to doe any ordenary workes of their calings vpon the Lords dayes or Sundayes no more then vpon any other dayes of the weeke for there is nothing forbidding them so to doe in all the scriptures nay there is warrant for them so to doe by the Scriptures if they will harken to them rather then to their Ministers for God saith in the 4th com Sixe dayes thou shalt worke c this Lords day is the first day of these Sixe dayes neither vvas this law euer yet repealed 2. Christs Disciples made this Lords day a trauailing day also Christ him selfe trauailed in it too fro as hath bene proued wherefore if vve may receiue instruction from Gods 4th com or if vve may follovv the example of Christ of his Disciples then may vve safly doe the vvorkes of our calings on the Lords day as vvell as vpon any other day of the weeke But herevnto some of our Ministers as those who are so hote for the Lords day Sabbath will
be redy to reply say But Sir you giue too great liberty to our people you lay the reines vpon their necke you speake most profanly c. to whom I answer I know indeed that it is full sore against their wills that I haue discouered this secret vnto their people for they had rather haue ploded on in their old errour deceiuing the people still then this light should haue bene seene but for my part I had rather please God then please men Knovving that God cannot away with it that his Ministers shold teach for his Doctrines their owne inventiones Traditiones I Know well that they doe daily reuile me reproch me say all manner of euill against me falfly before their people that so my person being brought into contempt that which I speake against their new Sabbath may be contemned likewise but I desire them to forbeare such vnchristian cuning courses I desire them that they would no more backbite me slaunder me behind my backe vvhere I cannot come to ansvver for my selfe but this is a more faire course vvich I vvill propound vnto them if they thinke in deede in trueth that I haue giuen too greate libertie vnto their people haue done vvrong vnto their nevv Sabbath then let them put pen to paper confute this booke so they shall bevvray to the vvorld that they speake as they thinke vvhen they so bitterly inueigh against me against my booke euery silly creature can say t is an errour t is a foule errour t is an abominable errour t is a wicked booke an hundreth more but I would haue Ministers that are schollers leaue vvords fale to blovves let them confute the booke neither doe I exhorte them to this as a matter at their choise to doe it or not to doe it but I vrge it vpon them as a duetie both to man and to God it is their duetie in respect of men because they haue so confidently taught them that this day is the Sabbath day and that vpon payne of damnation they are bound to sanctify it in conscience of the 4th com vvherefore either they must acknovvledg that they haue bene in an errour labour so soone as they can to reforme it which is parte of amends an argument of an honest minde or else they must defend it that so their people may see that they play not fast loose with them that they teach them no more in the pulpit then they will be redy to defend by their pen if any oppose it I cannot see how they can defend themselues for honest men vnlesse they doe thus it is not enough for them to belch out now then some reprochfull words with a kinde of scorne and disdaine to vilifie the booke the Author of it euery foole can answer a booke so It is also their duetie in respect of God for they say that I am in a foule errour and that the Lords day is a constant Sabbath of Gods institution Well then and will they not defend Gods cause who should stand vp for God if Gods Ministers will not wherefore haue they both their liuings and their office of Ministrie but to manage Gods causes defend them against all oppositions vvill they thinke you giue their liues in defence of this Lords day as they tell their people they will who will not giue their labours to defend it when as Peter the Apostle did but by his example bring in Iudaisme into the Church of Antiochia Paul the Apostle withstood him to his face and reproued him before all men Gal. 2.11.14 If therefore I like Peter haue offended against the Lords day then they like Paul in zeale of Gods glorie should rise vp to confute me before all men else they cannot iustify themselues so farre as I can see to be faithfull in their places and to be followers of the Apostles As for the people me thinke they should neuer cease pressing of their Ministers by these the like arguments to the answer of this booke for the quieting of their consciences and for the cleering of the trueth in this point they should say vnto Archippus take heede vnto the ministerie that thou hast receiued in the Lord that thou fulfill it Col. 4.17 vnlesse they desire to liue in ignorance and errour and in doubt which is the trueth It is true it hath bene reported to me that some of these 10 Ministers haue bene thus moued by their people but they haue returned this answer Wee What wee shall vvee answer his vaine booke let some Cobler Tayler or Shomaker answer it c. and are not these loftie spirits who could forbeare to reproue them openly that knoweth them in an errour in a foule and grosse errour and after sufficient meanes of conuiction tendred vnto them both priuatly publikely and done also in all meeknesse and forbearance for all this they still persist carry it out in the height of pride scorning disdaining him that shall in loue respect vnto their persons admonish them as my former booke will witnesle for me So much be spoken touching the former question wherein you see that they cannot proue it that euery Lords day or Sunday was kept for a Sabbath in the Apostles dayes as now they are SECT III. I come now vnto the second maine question which is to know whither it can be proued that any one Lords day is a Sabbath day by Gods ordinance or not For I deny not only that euery Lords day is a Sabbath constantly and weeke by weeke but also I deny that there is so much as any one Lords day a Sabbath day For the better scaning of this point I will examine all their Scriptures all their reasons which they produce in this case First for their Scriptures I haue reade ouer many the workes and writings of the patrons of this Lords day to see their grownds for it but yet among all the textes of Scripture which they alleage I can no where find a Commandement for it alleaged by them out of any parte of the new Testament and this seemeth to me a straung thing if you demaund of them who is the Authour of this new Sabbath they will tell you Christ in the next place if you demaund of them where Christ left any commandement for it by himselfe or by his Apostles here they are at a non plus they can finde no com for it in all the new Testament no nor any exhortation to keepe it nor promise or threatening to those who keepe or profane it now this at the first entrance doth breede a shrewd suspition that this new Sabbath is but some forgery when there is neither commandement nor exhortation for it in the booke of God neither promise to them who keepe it nor threatening to them who profane it when the old Sabbath was set vp it was done by an expresse Commandement and can there a
by the 4th Com. some diuines foreseing the grossenesse of others vvho hould that the 4th Com. doth bind to the Lords day properly are ashamed of this therfore they haue found out a nevv way of binding that is not that the 4th Com. should bind to the Lords day properly but improperly Analogically by way of resemblance similitude but how euer this distinction is some what neate pretty may serue the turne in schooles yet vvhen it comes a broad into the Country it is very absurde for 1. none of our Country diuines will vse it 2. This is an absurd distinction that one and the same Command should binde both properly improperly properly for two thowsand yeeres improperly euer after Yea this is contrary to our selues for vve abhorre it in Papists that they should make 4 senses of Scripture the Litterall Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall as Perkins hath them in his Arte of Prophecying pag. 651. where he affirmeth that the sense of Scripture is but one onely novv vvhy may not Papists as vvell make 4 senses as any of vs make 2 senses a proper litterall sense an improper analogicall sense 3. The 4th Com. inioyneth vs to labour 6 dayes so by consequence vpon the Lords day therfore it cannot command rest vpon the same day Neither can the reason of the 4th Com. be drawne to this 8th day c. 4. By this diuise may we reuiue all the Ceremoniall Lawes in the Old Testament saying they bind vs novv analogically which is flat contrary vnto the Apostle Ephes 2.15 Colo. 2.14.5 The fourth com cannot bind to the Lords day being a new day analogically because the Sabbath day which is the old day is not yet abolished as shall be showne and so it must bind still to the old day properly Other answers there be also in my other booke of the Sabbath vvhich here I omit for I purpose not to stand vpon this point because I thinke few or none will vrge it In the next place let vs come to them that are ashamed of nothing for they hould that the 4th com binds to the Lords day properlie these haue many deuices to deceiue themselues others as sometimes they haue this argument that the Hebrew word Sabbath signifieth a rest novv on the Lords day vve Rest therfore the 4th Com. belongeth vnto it Hereto I answer 1. that the word Sabbath vsed in the 4th Com. vvas neuer vsed for a Rest generally vpon any day but Synecdochically for a Rest particularly vpon the 7th day onely 2. By the like reason vve may hould ffast dayes Christmas day and Coronation dayes Sabbathes by the 4th Com. also for on these dayes vve Rest also Others haue this for an argument they affirme that by Sabbath day 7th day in the Com. may be meante not the Sabbath the 7th day but a Sabbath a 7th day are not these those necessary consequences whereof they talke so To vvit because these words Sabbath 7th may be vnderstood of a Sabbath and of a 7th day that Therfore they must so be taken with them then this is a necessary consequence that vvhat may be must of necessity be it may be it shall raine too morrow doth it therfore follow that for certaine it necessarily must raine too morrow but these friuolouse childish arguments my stomacke is so loathed with them as I vvill proceed no further hauing in my exposition vpon the 4th com sufficiently discouered these vanities The third argument is Mr. Chappels which he deliuered in publike thus he argueth If one day in Seauen must be a Sabbath day and not the Seauenth day then the Lords day must be the Sabbath day But one day in 7 must be a Sabbath day not the 7th day Therfore the Lords day must be the Sabbath day As for the consequence this he proued by this argument because the Lords day is the fitest of all the sixe and that because there was a weekly collection theron 1. Cor. 16.2 with other the like Textes which are vsed in defence of the Lords day ordenarily but I omit answer to this proofe of his consequence in this place because I shall haue hereafter a more fit place to answer this argument that the Lords day is the fitest c. In this place I vvill onely answer his maine argument vvhich growndeth vpon the 4th Com. for this is our taske in this Section to deale vvith the 4th com onely I come to his Minor which consisteth of two partes But one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day not the 7th day for the former parte of it in these words But one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day for proofe of this hee alleaged my Testimony and the Testimony of those of the same iudgement with me saying as for this parte of my Minor themselues confesse it for they hould that one daye in seauen must be a Sabbath but hoe there Mr. Chappell you must not carry it away so vve must discouer your fraudulent conveiances first good Sir doe not abuse vs in our tenets and thereby abuse your auditory also vve vse not to speake so promiscuously so generally and so indistinctly as you report vs for vve vse not to say one day in seauen must be a Sabbath day but thus the last day of seauen must be a Sabbath day let this be noted and this vve doe to avoide the amphibolie or double meaning of the phrase which you charge vpon vs for these vvords one day in seauen may haue a double meaning either they may be vnderstood generally for any one day in the seauen as vvell this as that as wel the first of seauen as the last of seauen or any other of the seauē or they may be vnderstood for some one certaine particular day as the 7th day last day of the seauen Now vve to auoid all doubling equiuocationes doe addict our selues vnto the simplicity of speech therfore doe choose to say the last day of seauen rather then one of seauen but Mr. Chappell quite contrary he delights to vse in publike and to put vpon vs such phrases as haue a double meaning that so he may the better double before his people and delude them novv of the two senses propounded if vve shall vse his phrase vve doe choose the latter doe vnderstand by one day of seauen that one day which is the last day of seauen but Mr. Chappell doth choose the former sense vnderstanding by one day in seauen any one day of the seauen indefinitly this or that or any other Now in this sense his Minor is most false neither shall he euer be able to proue it out of the 4th Com. that there is commanded any one day of the seauen for there is onely commanded that one day onely which is the last of the seauen furthermore he hath abused both vs but that 's not much but his
they can put into it againe what they please But the greatest riddle is behind hovv can a man take a thing away and yet leaue it there still or how can a man say a thing is ceremoniall yet make it Morall abolished by Christ yet remaine after Christ many hundreth yeeres none but these men can answer this riddle Wherefore since the time in the 4th Com. is abolished as themselues say there is no time therefore left in the 4th Commandement for the Lords day My 4th argument against them is because the 4th Com. cannot agree to the Lords day for 1. the day commanded in the 4th Com. is a day called properlie the Sabbath day Remember the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 But this day vvhich they vvould haue is called Lords day so that they differ palpablie in their names 2. The day commanded in the 4th Com. it is the 7th day But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. Exod. 20.10 but the day vvhich they talke on it is the 8th day or the first day of the vveeke novv is there not difference enough to be sene betwixt the 7th the 8th Betwixt the first the last the one day is at the begining of the weeke the other is at the ending of the weeke 3. The day commanded in the 4th Com. it is that day vvhich God blessed sanctified Genes 2.3 and it is that day vvhereon God himselfe rested but the Lords day which they vvould haue it is not that day which God blessed and sanctified nor that day wheron God rested 4. The day vvhich is commanded in the 4th Com. it is that day vnto which the speciall reason annexed by God to the 4th Com. Exod. 20.11 doth properly belong but the Lords day vvhich they would haue stand by the 4th Comm. vnto it that speciall reason neither doth belong nor can possiblie be made to belong 5. The day inioyned in the 4th Com. was a day knowne by those Iewes in vse before the giuing of the Law on Mount Sinay as the word Remember at the begining of the 4th Com. importeth for vve remember things knowne before c. But the Lords day I trust is not of such antiquity nor was it knowne or in vse before the giuing of the Law and therfore the Lords day was not commanded in the 4th Com. Herevnto I might yet add an other difference that the day commanded by the 4th Comm. it is a day to be kept in memory of the Creation But the day which they would haue the Lords day it is to be kept in memory of the Redemption and is it not a likly matter thinke you that both these dayes differing as farr as the Creation doth from the Redemption should be commaunded by one and the same Com. vnlesse men vvould studdy hovv to bewray their folly I cannot deuise hovv they should doe it more grosely if this be not botching cobling to thrust this nevv Sabbath day into an old Commandement I know not vvhat is to coble is to put a peece of new leather vnto an old shoe and to botch is to put a peece of nevv cloth vpon an old garment vvhen that which was there before is growne old and worne out iust so they deale in these Diuine things the 7th day Sabbath being old and vvorne out as they say they haue novv vvith all their skill vvrought into the Com. a nevv peece to vvit the Lords day such a peece of Taylery vvas neuer seene before Should Popish Iesuites thus abuse the Scriptures in point of difference betvvixt them vs as vvorse I thinke they doe not nor cannot hovv vvould euen these very Ministers make them a scorne a reproch iustly among the people But if wee doe it among our selues no man must speake of it but let my tounge cleaue to the roote of my mouth if I be silent vvhen Gods Lawes are thus mangled and his holy sacred word corrupted abused and all to this end to maintaine superstition in keeping a nevv invented Sabbath Thus you see vve haue dispossessed them of their strongest hould for their Lords day Sabbath to vvit the 4th Com. let vs in the next place make some vse of this point Is it so that they cannot proue by their 3 arguments that the Lords day is a Sabbath day by virtue of the 4th Comm. and is it so that the contrary is proued to vvit that the 4th Com. cannot be applied to the Lords day as binding mens consciences vnto it then let Ministers take heede hovv they abuse the 4th com in their pulpits hereafter by applying it vnto the Lords day falsly for they must giue an accompt to God one day for their diuiding and applying Gods word and if they make the Spirit of God to speake vvhat hee neuer meant it vvill be woe vnto them that 's one point An other is this that it behoueth Ministers to haue a care so truly and plainly to interpret the 4th Com. to the people that when they reade the Com. they may vnderstand vvhich day of the weeke it is which God inioyneth for his Sabbath day you know on Sundaies the 10 Commandements are publikly solemnly reade vnto the people with greate deuotion as it is meete they should be and also at the solemne administration of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper then these 10 commandements are reade vnto the people againr novv it is the duety of euery Minister vvhen hee standeth in the roome of God in pronouncing of the Law vnto the people that he doe not dissemble saying one thing and meaning an other vvherefore vvhen he saith Remember the Sabbath day he must not desire in his heart that the people should vnderstand him of an other day that is not the Sabbath day but of the Lords day for this is to say one thing and meane an other which is a sinne in all men but a double sinne in a Minister againe vvhen he pronounceth these vvords with an audible voice But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God c. he must not desire in his minde that the people should vnderstand him of a day that is not the 7th day but of the 8th day the day after the 7th day for this is dissimulation now for a man to dissemble at any time is a sinne but vvhen the Minister is in Gods vvorship seruice yea at the blessed Sacrament ready to eate the body drinke the blood of our blessed Sauiour then to dissemble is a notoriouse sinne For a Minister to dissemble vvith one man is an euill but for him to dissemble vvith an vvhole Congregation this is a foule euill but thus to doe vvhen he representeth the person of God vnto the people stands in his roome vvho is the God of Trueth novv to dissemble it is the foulest euill of all What a straung thing is it that Ministers should in Gods roome say vnto the people Remember the
such weake textes as no man of note will make vse of this way for to this purpose one M. Pottes an auncient diuine beiond the Seaes obiected this very text vnto me as finding fault with me for putting it into my former booke so lightly hee esteemd it now to wipe away such preiudiciall thoughts let it be knowne I could instance Authoures in printed bookes who doe vrge it but sparing them I will nominate one of my 10 aduersaries standing vpon this text stifly and it is M. Gallard Minister of Sprowston in Norff sometyme pupill to the foresaid M. Pottes and so I come to the answer My 1. answer to this Text is that vvhereas M. Gallard saith the vvord made may be translated sanctified I answer him that so the vvord may be translated made also and that to translate it made is the more fitting in this place all our Translators both old and nevv doe beare me vvitnesse for they all render it made Novv if it may be translated made how vvill he proue that it must be translated sanctified for hee must remember that it is his part to proue that the vvord must necessarily be translated Sanctified Happily he vvill say that the vvord signifieth to sanctifye vvhen it is referred to dayes c. but so the vvord vsually signifieth also vvhen it is referred vnto men and yet in one place it signifieth appointed or ordeined thus the Medes Persians are said to be sanctified of God Isa 13.3.17 That is appointed of God to execute his iudgements vvhy may not the vvord then be once so meant also vvhen it is referred to dayes 2. I ansvver him suppose it must be translated sanctified then I distinguish of Sanctification of dayes some dayes are sanctified for Sabbaths for the Church to Rest on other some dayes are sanctified for other endes as for some particular mans vse in the Church as here in this text Ps 118.24 This day which the Lord made or sanctified he made it or sanctified it for Dauids vse properly for the day wherin he should come to the Crowne and so typically for Chtist his vse and for the day wherein he should be honourablie raised from the dead the Lords day now this Psalme is to be vnderstood in this latter sense as he that hath but halfe an eye may see how then vvill he proue that this Lords day whereon Christ rose was sanctified for the Church to sanctifie vvhen it vvas sanctified for Christ alone to rise in for this day vvas not sanctified for the vvhole Church and people but for Christ alone not for the Church to rest on but for Christ to rise on 3. I answer by an other distinction the word Day is some time taken in Scripture for a shorte ordenary day of 12. howres or the like and sometime it is taken for a long space of time conteining many dayes vveekes moneths or yeeres as Ioh. 8.56 Abraham reioyced to see my day c. and 2. Cor. 6.2 behold now the day of saluation Now the word Day in Psa 118.24 may be taken in this latter sense for all that time vvherein Dauid raigned and so for all that time of Christ vpon the earth after his resurrection or longer wherein he raigneth in his Church as King how then vvill M. Gallard doe to proue that by day here must be meant a shorte ordenary day of 12 or more howres or a weekly Sabbath day 4. I answer say the vvord day be to be taken for a short day then let it be proued that this is a prophecy of a weekly day as of euery Sunday or Lords day for it may be a prophecy of a yeerly day onely as of Easter day since on that day Christ rose from the dead and if it be no otherwise how will they doe for a weekly Sabbath on euery Lords day 5. I answer that this Psalme cannot be a prophecy that the Lords day or day wherein Christ was to rise should be a Sabbath day and that I proue because Christ kept not this Lords day or day of his resurrection vvhen it came as a Sabbath day but as a vvorking day for hee trauailed vp and downe too and fro on that day and so did his Disciples yea the Apostles themselues were ignorant that this first Lords day should be a Sabbath for they beleeued not that Christ was risen but sorrowed vvept all the day long vntill it vvas nere night and so could not kepe it a Sabbath in memory of the resurrection These things haue bene proued alredy Novv had this Psalme bene a prophecy that the first Lords day vvhereon Christ rose should haue bene a Sabbath day Christ must haue kept this day together vvith his Disciples as a Sabbath day because Christ must fulfill all things prophecied of him And thus much for ansvver to this abused text of Scripture SECT VI. Thus we haue answered the Scriptures vvhich they abuse bring out of the Old Testament in the next place vve come vnto those Scriptures which they alleage out of the New Testament abuseing them also the first vvhereof is that Text Act. 2.1.14 c. Where Peter preached on Pentecost day and also converted 3000 soules and administred the Sacrament of Baptisme vnto them and this Pentecost day was on the Lords day and therfore the Lords day must be a Sabbath day Here vnto I answer and in answering I must be the larger because in this Text they put greate confidence saying heere vvas a Sermon heere vvas thowsands converted heere vvas the Sacrament of Baptisme administred on this day the Holy Ghost descended vvhat vvould you haue more saith Mr. Gallard admit that this Pentecost day was our Lords day yet forasmuch as it vvas onely our Lords day vvhich vve call White-Sunday if it be a Sabbath it doth not follow that any more Lords dayes in a yeere must be Sabbaths then one that vpon our White-Sunday 2. I answer it is not to be supposed but it must be proued by them that this Pentecost day vvhereon Peter preached vvas that yeere vpon the Lords day or Sunday for it is houlden by many that Pentecost day doth follow according to the day of the Moneth variably and not according to the day of the vveeke constantly Waleus vpon the 4th Com. Pag. 161. saith it is caled into question of some whither this Pentecost day fell then vpon the Lords day or not Yea he addeth that Pentecost may fale on any day of the weeke To this agreeth Aynsworth on Leuit. 23.11.15 alleaging it to be the opinion of Sondry Rabbines and according to the Hebrew Canones and translations of the Chaldee Septuagint that Pentecost followeth the day of moneth and so is variable being one yeere vpon one day of the weeke an other yeere vpon an other day of the vveeke and herevnto also doe beare witnesse the Iewes wheresoeuer novv liuing for they keepe their Feast of Pentecost by the accounte of the Moone and
one yeere vpon one day of the weeke and the next yeere vpon an other Wherefore since it is the most likely that Pentecost day then fell vpon some other day of the weeke as Saturday or the like hovv vvill they proue it fell novv vvhen Peter preached on the Lords day or Sunday 3. I answer but suppose we that it was the Lords day wherin all this vvas done it yet doth not follow that this day was therfore a Sabbath day for these actions were no proper actions of a Sabbath day done onely vpon Sabbath dayes for they were common weeke dayes actions such as might be may be and were done vpon any day of the weeke let vs rune thorough the particulars briefly and first for the Holy Ghostes descending how will they make it appeare that the Holy Ghost in his discent doth vvaite for a Sabbath day to come downe in vve reade of the Holy Ghosts descending in Act. 10.44 and in Act. 19.6 But not a vvord that these dayes were Sabbath dayes If notable actions done in a day must sanctify that day for a Sabbath day vvhy are not good Friday wherin Christ suffered Hallow Thursday vvherin Christ ascended made Sabbaths also for these workes vvere as behoofefull for the Church as was the descent of the Holy Ghost 2. For the Sacrament of Baptisme the administration of this is no proper worke for a Sabbath but may be done in any common day Else why doe vvee baptise children on any day of the vveeke and vvhy did Phillip Baptise the Eunuch on a trauailing day Act. 8.38.39 Paul baptized Lydia hir houshold vpō the Saturday Sabbath Act. 16.15 Sacraments were neuer appropriated to the Sabbath day as vve may see in Circumcision it vvas on the 8 day were it Sabbath day or not the Passeouer it was on the 14th day of the moneth were it Sabbath day or not Christ did eate the Lords Supper on Thursday night the night before he was crucified 3. For Peters sermon we know preaching is no worke so proper vnto the Sabbath day as it may not be on any day of the weeke also else why preach wee on Lecture dayes on any of the weeke dayes preaching may be on any day of the weeke according to that 2. Tim. 4.2 preach the word be instant in season and out of season Christ preached on a vvorking day to the Samaritan vvoman his Disciples being gone into the Citty to buy meate Ioh. 4.8 the Apostles preached daily in the Temple and from house to house Act. 5.42 thus it appeareth that these are such actions as may be done on any day of the weeke hovv then will it follow that this day of Pentecost was Sabbath day because these actions vvere done in that day these are farr from necessary consequences I am suer No maruaile they pretend necessary consequences for the Lords day and magnify their reason so highly in the want of a Commandement for the day I see novv ther is some cause indeede that they should set a good face vpon the matter and hauing no Com. from Christ for the day yet they should make the world beleeue that they haue good consequences for the purpose and doe you not see how good they are had they neither consequence nor Com. for the day they should haue iust nothing for it they had need therefore extoll their necessary consequences Doe not vve on a Christmas day vvhen it falleth on a working day or weeke day both pray preach vse the Sacraments and rest from laboures and sing Psalmes in the Congregation and vvill any wise man say ther 's necessary consequence in it that we keepe it for a Sabbath day what vanities are these The vtmost that can be collected by good consequence from this Text Act. 2. is that the Church kept this day of Pentecost for a Lecture day like as vve haue Lecture dayes euery vvhere on vveeke dayes on Tewsdayes or Thursdayes the like Further it is to be noted that Peters Sermon heere it vvas meerly occationall extraordenary therfore can not binde vs to ordenary practise For vpon the extraordenary Myracle of the Holy Ghosts deseent in clouen fiery tounges some people vvere amazed astonished doubting said what may this be Act. 2.12 Others mocked and said the Apostles vvere full of new wine and drunken Act. 2.13 now here vvas greate occation for Peter to preach a Sermon vnto them partly to informe instruct those that vvere amazed doubted partly to confute those vvho scosted at the Apostles as if they had bene drunken so heere was matter enough to moue Peter to preach though he had no respect vnto the day as a Sabbath day It is true hence a Minister by consequence may gather such a consequent or doctrine as this namely that it is the duety of Ministers to preach the vvord vpon all occations but for any to collect hence not onely that vve must preach vpon all occations but more then this as namely that vve must also euer more preach vpon the same day and in the same time vvherin the Apostle Peter preached that is vpon the Lords day vvhither there be extraordenaty occation or none this is idle absurde for the Text will not beare vs out in any such collections nor can it be gathered hence that vve are bound to preach at all vpon either one day or vpon an other vnlesse it be vpon extraordenary occationes such as vvere Peters here in this Texte Further vve may aswell coliect hence also concerning the place as the time saying that vve must euermore preach in a populouse and famouse Citty also as London Norwich and the like for Peter preached in Ierusalem a famouse Citty And also when vve preach there we must keepe that day for a Sabbath day too 4. My 4th last answer to this text is by shewing their absurd consequence hence for if that the coming downe of the holy Ghost Peters sermon the convertion of 3000. the baptizing of them c. did declare the day to be a Sabbath day wherein they were done then is Pentecost a Iewish ceremoniall feast day moralized made a Christian Sabbath day and so Iewish abrogated ceremonies shall be reuiued in the Church the reason thereof is because the holy Ghost doth not call this day here Lords day or first day of the weeke but he calleth it Pentecost day and when the day of Pentecost was come Act. 2.1 This day might be called by 3 seuerall names as 1. Lords day 2. The first day of the weeke and 3. Pentecost day Now in that the holy Ghost reiecteth both those names of Lords day and first day of the weeke which should make for their purpose chooseth this name Pentecost day which was a ceremoniall day it followeth that if these actions had any force or virtue to declare the day whereon they were done to be a Sabbath day they shewed vs that this day considered
not as Lords day but as Pentecost day is our new Sabbath day Suppose we that vpon a Friday there fall ij holy dayes the one Gowries day the other King Charles his Coronation day here this one day may haue 3 names as Friday Gowries day and the Kings Coronation day if now an Acte of Parliament be made hauing relation to this day and calleth it Coronation day rather then by those other ij names vvill not euery one thinke that that Acte hath rather reference to this day considered as King Charles his Coronation day then to it considered as Friday or as Gowries day so t is here no man can thinke but that the holy Ghost in relation of these things done on this day and naming it Pentecost day not Lords day had rather reference vnto it considered as Pentecost day to make it a Pentecost Sabbath then to it as Lords day to make it a Lords day Sabbath Furthermore I make it appeare that if we imitate Peter here and the Church at Ierusalem vve must keepe the Lords day as a ceremoniall day as Pentecost day for they all kept it so as Ierusalem Act. 2.1 and this I thus proue 1. It is graunted by all that the Ceremonies of the lavv had 40 or 50 yeeres vntill the destruction of the Temple allovved for their honourable buriall Whereby is intimated that vntill then the Legall Ceremonies vvere in vse at Ierusalem 2. It is cleere by Scripture see Act. 21.20.17 vvhere the Apostles teld Paul that all the belecuing Iewes vvere still zealouse of the Law Yea further the Apostles perswaded Paul that novv he being come to Ierusalem that hee vvould Iudaize also by purifying himselfe contributing c. v. 24. and all vvas done to this end that the beleeuing lewes might thinke nothing to the contrary but that Paul himselfe also kept the law to vvit the Ceremoniall Lavv by vvhich passages it is more then manifest that at Ierusalem the Apostles and all the beleeuing Jevves they still obserued the ceremoniall lavv and that zealously novv this vvas all long after Pentecost day so that if they kept the ceremoniall lavv so long after Christ much more then at Pentecost vvhich vvas vvithin 6 or 7 vveekes after his resurrection Wherefore vve are to thinke that these Iewes at Jerusalem kept Pentecost as a Iewish ceremoniall Sabbath day vvhereof you may reade Leu. 23.15.21 and so by consequence it follovveth that if these vvorkes of the holy Ghosts descending and of Peters preaching c. doe declare this Lords day to be a Sabbath day that then vve must haue a Pentecost Sabbath day rather then a Lords Sabbath day a ceremoniall Sabbath day not a Christian Sabbath day and the Lords day is not to be kept as Lords day but as Pentecost day Behold then the absurdety of these men who glorie so much in this text Act. 2.1 as being so strong for their new Sabbath day when as they may by the same reason bring into the Church againe this ceremoniall abrogated day of Pentecost behold how vnconscionably they deale vvith the Scriptures and vvord of God making them a nose of vvaxe turning it vvhich vvay they please as may best fit their fancies if any conscience be left in them they had need I auowch it aske God mercy vpon their knees for such abuses offred vnto his sacred vvord For conclusion let the patrones of this Lords day Sabbath remember that this is their taske if they will proue the Lords day a Sabbath 1. They must proue that this Congregatiō Rested from labour all this day and that in conscience of it as a Sabbath day not occationally c nor as pentecost day for rest from labour is a parte of the Sabbath dayes duety 2. they must proue that these holy actiones which were performed of preaching the like that they were done by Peter the residue in conscience of the 4th com for Peter might preach in conscience of that com which Paul gaue 2. Tim. 4.2 preach the word be instant inseason out of season These are the ij maine things besids many others which they should proue but these they can passe ouer whith out any word tending this way SECT VII An other text they alleage out of the new Testament to vvit Ioh. 20.19 vvhere mention is made that Christ appeared to his Disciples and it vvas vpon the Lords day too and this reason is currant in euery mans mouth Ministers people Why Christs apparitions say they vpon the Lords day proue it to be a Sabbath day c. but Ministers begine to be ashamed to vse this ouer worne argument any longer well they may be ashamed of it but that it is so frequent now in peoples mouths we may thanke Ministers for it for it is one of their ovvne arguments vvhich they hau put into peoples heades an erroniouse conceipt once fastened in the minds of people by their Ministers vvill hardly be remoued be it neuer so idle But in one vvord to shew their absurdety and abuse of this Text of Scripture also for they make a practise of abusing the Scripture if Christs apparition doth declare that day to be a Sabbath day vvherin hee appeared to his Disciples then was a fishing day a Sabbath day also for Christ appeared to his Disciples on a fishing day whe they vvere a fishing at the Sea of Tiberias see Iob. 21.1.2.3.4 Yea then must Hallow Thursday be a Sabbath day also for then Christ appeared againe to his Disciples vvhen he ascended from them vp into heauen Act. 1.9.11 Yea vve must keepe Fowrty Sabbathes together once in a yeere for Christ appeared to his Disciples being seene of them by the space of 40 dayes Act. 1.3 and thus much for this text vvhereby you see how the Holy Scriptures haue bene abused the Holy Ghost is made to speake what he neuer meante vvere it not high time therfore that these things vvere reformed SECT VIII A 3d texte they alleage abuse in the nevv Testament is Act. 20.7 vvhere they say is an example of the Lords day kept as a Sabbath day by Paul the Church at Troas for Paul abode at Troas 7 dayes on the 7th day it being the first day of the vveeke then the Church assembled Paul preached now ther 's no mention of any sermon vpon any of the other dayes and therefore this vvas their Sabbath day Yea they had not onely a sermon on this day but also the Sacrament of the Lords Supper for the Disciples came together to breake bread as the Text saith Wherefore this day must be a Sabbath day This text M. Benton Minister pressed vpon me very eagerly Herevnto I answer 1. if the Lords day or first day of the weeke vvere kept here by Paul for a Sabbath day why did not Paul doe the like vpon euery Lords day in all Churches where he came and where he might if he vvould haue done it for this purpose see Act.
13.14.42.44 where mention is made how Paul vvent into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day to vvit the 7th day Sabbath at Antiochia and there preached Now sermon being ended the text saith that the Gentiles besought that they would preach these words to them the next Sabbath day accordingly it vvas so done v. 44. Now it is to be noted that these Gentiles vvere conuerted beleeuers as the text bewraieth v. 42.43 and it is to be noted also that this day being Saturday on which they thus desired Paul Barnabas to preach vnto them these words the next Sabbath day that the next day after their petition being Sunday or Lords day this was the Christian Sabbath day if any such they had and this was the proper Sabbath day for these beleeuing Gentiles if any such there vvas Wherefore 1. it seemeth that these beleeuing Gentiles vvere vtterly ignorant of any such new Sabbath for else they vvould haue desired Paul Barnabas to haue preached vnto them the next day not the next Sabbath day the next Lords day not the next Sabbath day for they being an hungry finding a sharpe appetit to Pauls doctrine vvould not haue fasted for it 7. or 8. dayes vntill the next Sabbath day but vvould rather haue bene fedde with it on the next morrow the day after it being the Lords day and appointed for sermons Sabbath day but in as much as they desired it not on the Lords day it argueth that these Christians knew not of any such new Sabbath as now vve know keepe on the Lords day 2. Seeing it was the vvisedome of the Apostles to acquaint the Churches vvith the new ordinances of Christ vpon the first opportunity as vve see they baptised those that vvere but newly conuerted Act. 2.41 Therefore we are to thinke that if these beleeuing Gentiles had neglected their duetie or had not formerly bene taught that the Lords day vvas their new Sabbath yet now Paul Barnabas if the one forgat it the other might minde it they had a most fit opportunity to reueale to these beleeuing Gentiles their new Sabbath day they might haue taken a fit occation to haue answered their suite thus vvhat doe you desire to heare the same doctrine againe the next Sabbath day Why you need not stay so long that 's 7 or 8 dayes hence and that 's Iudaisme the Iewish Sabbath day c. but to morrow that 's the Lords day that is your Sabbath day seeing you are Christians assemble your selues together therefore to morrow and then you shall heare the same words preached againe so the Apostles had sit occation to haue informed these Disciples at Antioch of their new Sabbath if there had beene any nay I cannot see how with discharge of their function they could haue omitted such an occation Besides as I said the Apostles might haue kept this Lords day heere if they vvould for nothing hindered forasmuch as these Gentiles were suiters vnto the Apostles to preach vnto them it was at the Apostles liberty to appoint the day and time vvhen and the sooner the rather if therfore here vvas fit opportunity also it was at the Apostles liberty to appoint the Lords day to preach in and to assemble the Church on that day and yet for all this did not appoint the Lords day vvho can thinke that the Apostles Paul and Barnabas esteemed the Lords day to be Sabbath day and hereby it appeareth also that Paul kept not this Lords day constantly at all times and in all places which is an argument that when Paul did preach on the Lords day as heere he did at Troas Act. 20.7 that he kept it not for a Sabbath day for then he vvould haue kept euery Lords day where euer he came as well as this one at Troas And this is my first answer 2. I answer whereas the Patrones of this new Sabbath take it for granted that Pauls Sermon and the Lords Supper were actions performed on the Lords day or first day of the weeke this I deny them this they must proue for it vvill be found that both the sermon and the Lords Supper were done in the night time which is no parte of the day and consequently that these actions were not done on the Lords day I confesse the Disciples mett on the Lords day or first day of the weeke but it followeth not thence that therfore Paul preached administred the Lords Supper on this first day vvherin they assembled that this is no paradox you shall see the Text giueth me light vnto this answer as for Pauls Sermon that this vvas performed in the night time after the Lords day vvas past see the Text which saith there were many lightes in an vpper chamber where they were assembled v. 8. Ergo it was in the night time that they vvere assembled againe the Text saith that Paul continued his preaching vnto midnight v. 7. Wherefore it is manifest that Pauls Sermon was in the night Further as for the Sacrament of the Lords Supper it vvas in those dayes an euening or night vvorke see Mark 14.17.22 1 Cor. 11.21 and Paul did not celebrate the Lords Supper in all liklihood vntill midnight after his Sermon was finished see Act. 20.11 so both the Sermon and the Sacrament were performed in the night It is likly also that the Disciples here at Troas assembled not in the morning but in the latter end of the Lords day about the shutting in of the day for it is said in the Text that the Disciples came together to breake bread v. 7. that is to receiue the Lords Supper now forasmuch as the Lords Supper was an Euening or night worke in those dayes as hath bene proued it is to be thought that when the Disciples mett to eate the Lords Supper that they mett not in the morning or at breakfast time to eate their Supper but at Supper time and at Euening time at the end of the day Againe the text saieth Paul continued his preaching vntill midnight Now it is a most vnreasonable thing to imagine that Paul should begine his sermon in the morning about 8 of the clocke continue his preaching vntill midnight it was neuer heard that there should be a sermon made of sixtene howres long vvherefore it is the most likely that Paul might begine his sermon after Supper about 9 or 10 a clocke at night so held on till midnight There is no likely hood therefore that Paul preached in the day time much lesse that he begane in the morning vnlesse you vvill absurdly imagine that the Disciples mett at Breakefast time to goe to supper and also that Paul preached a sermon of 16. howres long vvhich no Auditor could beare vvith patience proffit Neither will that hinder this in that the text saith that the Disciples mett on the first day of the vveeke v. 7. for as a man may be said to pay a summe of mony on such a day though he
for a collection for his ordinance vvas onely for a preparation to a collection Now these ij differ much to collect mony is one thing and to prepare or make mony redy for a collection is an other thing Paul indeed spake touching a collection when he said concerning the gathering for the Saints 1. Cor. 16.1 but yet he did not here ordaine that this collection whereof he spake should be then presently made this he gaue order for afterwards concerning the time when it should be done onely he would haue them in a readinesse with their money that so whensoeuer after he should giue order for the collectiō to be made mens money and what they would bestow might not be to seeke but laied vp by them euery mans money by himselfe in a readinesse forasmuch as men were to giue with respect vnto their estats and abilities as God had prospered them it was needfull there should be a day appointed for them wherein to cast vp their accounts and rekonings to see how God had prospered them in their estats and then that done to lay vp by them what they could spare against the day that Paul should send for it For the cleering of this text therfore we may borrow light from 2 Cor. 9.5 where S. Paul speaking of collections v. 1. he hath reference in this his second Epistle vnto the collection mentioned in his first Epistle 1. Cor. 16.2 as you may perceiue by these words where he speaketh of a collection appointed afore or as our new Translatoures haue it where of yee had notice before 2 Cor. 9.5 now this collection where of Paul had giuen them knowledg before it was not made before but to make still as appeareth by these things 1. in that he now telleth them of sending the bretheren as collectours that they might finish their beneuolence or make vp before hand their bounty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby you see this collection was yet to be finished and made vp 2. he sseth an argument to perswade the Corinthians to a liberall contribution 2 Cor. 9.6 now this perswasiue argument had come too late if the collection had bene past first so by this text 2 Cor. 9.5 it appeareth that what Paul spake in the 1 Cor. 16.2 it was not of any collection then to be made but only it was a preparatiue to a future collection wherefore you see their grownd whereon they build is false grownd for they cannot proue by this text that here was either any collection vpon the Lords day no nor any assembly how then will they gather that there was a Sermon on this Lords day so a Sabbath if they cannot proue that there was any assembly or congregation on this Lords day thus you see that hitherto they cannot proue by any one text that there was at any time so much as any one Lords day kept for a Sabbath Now when they are at their furthest can goe no furder then they fall to quaeries but why say they was this collection appointed vpon the first day of the weeke rather then on the second day or some other surely there was something in that Hereto I ansvver if surely there vvas something in it then let them shew vs vvhat it vvas for it is their parte to find it out if any thing there vvas that might proue it a Sabbath day doubtlesse there vvas some thing in it vvhy this collection or preparatiue vvas on this day rather then on any other but you knovv there may be many some things reasons of it yet none of them such as will proue it a Sabbath day let them refraine therefore this begging of questiones of vs fale to prouing themselves let them proue it that this collection or preparatiue appointed on the Lords day rather then on any other day must make it a Sabbath day 2. I answer if Paul did ordaine the Lords day for a Sabbath to be kept by the Church of Corinth heere vvhy did Paul him selfe voluntarily omit the keeping of the Lords day vvith the Church at Antioch vvhen he had a most fit occation as lately I haue showne did rather keepe the Sabbath day Act. 13.14.42.43.44 When as yet he might haue kept the Lords day if he vvould one vvord of his mouth would haue done it Surely had the Lords day bene a Sabbath day Paul would haue kept it in all Churches vvhere euer he came asvvell in one as in an other 3. I ansvver let all be granted and yet it vvill not doe suppose therfore that here vvas a collection an assemblie and a sermon yet it cannot by all these be proued a Sabbath day all that can be hence collected is no more but this that the Lords day vvas a collection day an assembling day and a sermon day that is a Lecture day but not a Sabbath day For to a Sabbath day is more required then to haue an assembly a collection a sermon for all these 3. we haue on lecture dayes in London other partes of the kingdome on Wednesdayes Thursdayes other dayes of the vveeke vvhich are no Sabbath dayes If the patrones of the Lords day vvill proue that at Corinth they kept this day for a Sabbath they must remember to proue these thinges 1. That the people did refraine all seruile labour on the Lords day from breake of day till night for this is a parte of the 4th com In it thou shalt do no manner of worke 2. They must proue that they spent this Rest in holy exercises And that they did both these in conscience of the 4th com the which ij things if they cannot proue out of this text as it is most certaine they cannot then haue they foully abused this portion of Scripture also yea not only this parte of Gods word haue they abused profaned but also thereby haue they abused and corrupted with errour the mindes of such their people as are most ingenuouse tractable a thing much to be lamented of euery godly heart thus by goeing about to justifie their Counterfaite Sabbath they add one sinne vnto an other SECT XII A 7th text out of the new Testament which they alleage abuse for the Lords day is Reuel 1.10 I was in the Spirit on the Lords day c. Some from this text thinke this Lords day must be a Sabbath day because S. Iohn receiued a Reuelation in it but fewe doe vrge it thus thus there is not the least force of prouing in it for how will it appeare that because Iohn had a Reuelation on this day that therfore it must be a Sabbath day there 's no likelihood that euer this can be proued Ezekiel had a vision or Reuelation from God on the 5th day of the moneth Ezek. 1.1.2 must this 5th day of the moneth be therefore a Sabbath for euer But I come to the second sorte these are the most of those which vse this text they gather all
day is argument sufficient to convince any man to proue that the Lords day must be a Sabbath day so strong they are in conceipt so weake in argument and thus they argue why this day which we keepe it is called in the Scriptures by S. Iohn the Lords day is it not well what would you haue more then is not this enough for any reasonable man I answer if it be called the Lords day then the Lords day let it be still for me I goe not about to giue it any other name albeit it may be questioned but this is that I say that S. John did not call this day Sabbath day did he if hee had called it Sabbath day as he called it Lords day then would I beleeue it had bene a Sabbath day but now I beleeue that it is but a Lords day not a Sabbath day because S. Iohn called it but Lords day not Sabbath day Their last vpshot vvhich is a note that they are at non plus is to quaeries in steade of proofes as thus I but vvhy thinke you this day was called Lords day rather then any other there was something in it extraordenary doubtlesse c. I answer t is true something in it there vvas something extraordenary too as namely it was called Lords day because on it Christ rose from the dead so he did not vpon any other day But if any thing they will haue more then this let them shew vs vvhat it is proue it when they haue done but let them leaue this idle begging of questiones of vs the which is a most frequent thing with them Thus you see what poore hould they haue for this new Sabbath from this text Reuel 1.10 full little did S. Iohn thinke when he wrote this Reuelation mentioned the Lords day in it that euer Christians after him would haue so abused this name to the seting vp of a new Sabbath vpon it To conclud since they will be so confident as to collect a necessary institution from a bare nomination I desire them first to proue it that this name Lords day vvas of diuine imposition there is cause to doubt there are many names in scripture that are not diuinly imposed as Mars streete Purim Mathew c. so may this be too and the rather considering that this name Lords day was vnknowne in the Church for many yeeres after Christ for all the 4 Euangelists named it by the old name the first day of the weeke onely and so did S. Paul Act. 20.7 it might therfore be so named first by the Church afterwards by S. Iohn in his Reuelations now if this name might be humane then may the institution vse of it be humane also SECT XIII Thus you haue seene their Scriptures what pittifull worke they haue made with them the feeblenesse insufficiency whereof being singly considered of well viewed they full well seeing though loath to confesse it now they haue a new deuise that 's this albeit say they or some of them that these Scriptures cannot proue the Lords day a Sabbath singlie a lone considered yet put them all together they vvill proue it Quae non prosunt singula multa juvant Hereunto I answer it is well that at last they are forced to confesse it that none of their Scriptures can proue the point alone by themselues singly by yeelding this they haue fairly yeelded their cause for I desire of them to shew me in one argument framed out of all these textes together how they can proue the Lords day a Sabbath any better then they could out of them all singlie and alone considered one after an other the vvhich can not be done For it is vvith these textes singlie and together as it is vvith a single cipher and a multitude of ciphers if a single cipher standeth for nothing then add to it an hundreth more ciphers they increase not the number the totall summe of them will be nothing still an 100 ciphers cānot make one single vnity And so it is vvith these Textes if euery one of them singlie and alone haue no force of prouing the Lords day a Sabbath then add them all together if there vvere an hundreth more of them and all of them shall proue nothing arguments doe not chang their nature being a multitude from that they vvere single vvee esteeme not of arguments by number but by vveight many probabilities cannot make one infallibility When a Chapman is to buy of a Merchant many particular things of one kinde packed together the Chapman least he be deceiued will take them asunder viewe them singlie one by one but if the merchant dares not suffer him to looke vpon them trye them euery one singly but will enforce him to take them in the grosse in the lumpe whithout a particular sight the Chapman needeth none other argument then this to perswade him that there is packing as they calle it that this Merchant is about to play the crafty merchant as they say vvith him so it is heere if now their textes must be no longer viewed scanned seuerally singlie one by one but we must haue them thrust vpon vs in the lumpe all ioyned to gether vvho can but suspect iugling and double dealing vvas it euer knowne that such deuices vvere vsed but all this is still to hold such as they haue once taken in fetters of blindnesse superstition these cannot say as Paul said that they haue renounced the hidden things of dishonestie not walking in craftines nor handling the word of God deceitfully 2. Cor. 4.2 If to refuse a single triall of euery text they bring particularly by it selfe be not out of some hidden dishonestie craftinesse handling the word of God deceitfully I cannot tell what is And thus much be spoken in answer vnto all their Scriptures both out of the old new Testaments in all which you see they cannot proue vnto vs so much as one Lords day kept for a Sabbath no not in all the Scriptures In the next place we are to come vnto their reasones if their Scriptures cannot proue the point I trust their reasones consequences shall doe as little vnlesse their reasons be growne more potent then the Scriptures are SECT XIIII Amongst all their reasones for the Lords day Sabbath this is one that it is the fitest day for a Sabbath therfore it must be a Sabbath that it is of all other dayes the fitest this they proue because Christ rose on it and Paul preached on it and collectiones for the poore were made on it c. Hereunto I answer 1. by demaunding of them in whose account this fitnesse is to be allowed of in Gods account or in mans account if they say in mans account what hath man to doe in valuing making choise of dayes for Gods worship God neuer left it vnto man to make choise of his
Sabbaths for man to take vpon him this office it is but an vsurpation If they say in Gods account then I answer as for the 6. dayes they are vnsit for a Sabbath in Gods account because God appointed them for labouring dayes Sixe dayes shalt thou labour c. Exod. 20.9 wherefore if we may take that day for a Sabbath which God esteemeth fitest then must we haue the Saturday Sabbath for that God esteemed this the fitest day of all others it appeareth in that he gaue a com for the sanctifying of this day aboue all others God commanded this day he neuer commanded any day besids this day But hereunto they will thus reply but we meane it of the 6 dayes only that day of the 6 begining at Sunday for the first of the 6 which is the fitest that day must be Sabbath day for as for the 7th day we hould that to be abolished I answer admit for argument sake that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished which is more then euer they shall proue let vs take them in their meaning of the 6 dayes yet it followeth not for this their arguing is but a sley begging of the question that by taking that in their argument for granted which they should first haue proued to wit that some one of the 6 dayes must be a Sabbath and then this being proued in the next place they may consider which of the 6 dayes is the fitest for the Sabbath and that in Gods account for things may be fit for an vse in mans account which God neuer ordeined to that vse This their arguing is like in absurdety vnto this a man hath 7 sonnes concerning these thus one may argue the eldest sonne is a Lawyer because he is the fitest of all the rest the eldest sonne is a Phisitian because he is the fitest for a Phisitian and yet for all this fitnesse he is neither Lawyer nor Phisitian the eldest sonne is fitest for a gentleman yet he may be a beggar Saul of all men present was fitest to offer sacrifice yet God neuer ordeined him to offer sacrifice so the Lords day may in a sense be said to be the fitest for a Sabbath and yet God neuer ordeined it for a Sabbath but these are idle things first therefore let them handle their argument prouing that Christ hath ordeined any one or some one of the 6 dayes and then let them proue it shewing that the Lords day is fitest when a man goeth into a glouers shopp he must not vse such logicke as this this paire of glones is sitest for mee therfore they are mine he must first know if the glouer will parte whith them so or not for there must be something else besides fitnesse or else you must goe whith out them so first let them shew vs that Christ will haue one of the 6 dayes and then let them shew which of the 6. hee will haue In the meane space I will disproue them and shew that none of the 6 dayes are fit for a Sabbath for 1. God with ut any repeale bath giuen a com that these 6 dayâ—s wee should labour Exod. 20.9 and therefore these 6 dayes are not fit any of them for a Sabbath 2dly I will shevv that of all the 6 dayes the Lords day is not fit for a Sabbath and that because Christ and his Disciples vvith his approbation trauailed on this day at least 15 miles vvhich vve knovv of as hath bene proued out of Luk. 24.13.15.33.36 the vvhich hee vvould neuer haue done if hee had iudged it fit for a Sabbath day 3dly S. Paul did voluntarily omit the keeping of the Lords day vvhen he might haue kept it vvith those Christians at Antioch for but a vvord speaking as hath bene shovvne out of Act. 13.14.42.43.44 vvhich Paul vvould not haue omitted if he had iudged this Lords day fitest for a Sabbath Wherefore none of the 6 dayes are fit in Gods account for a Sabbath no not the Lords day it selfe they must therefore bring some other better argument then this of fitnesse to proue the Lords day a Sabbath of all our Lambes those vvhich are spotlesse are fitest for a sacrifice yet no man must novv Sacrifice them 2. I ansvver to their reason vvhere by this argument is proued they proue the Lords day to be fitest for a Sabbath day because certaine famouse vvorkes vvere done theron as 1. Christ rose on it 2. appeared on it 3. the holy Ghost descended on it 4. Peter preached converted 3000. Baptised them on it 5. Paul preached on it 6. there vvas collections on it and this reason is very plausible with common people But I deny that these things doe fit a day for a Sabbath day in Gods account as for mans account I regard not what he accountes or thinks fit in matters necessary to be obserued vpon paine of damnation in matters of Gods worship I desire them to shew vs how they come to know Gods minde in this point hath God at any time reuealed it that such actiones as are forementioned should fit the dayes wherin they were done for Sabbathes or hath the Church of God at any time found out Sabbathes or made choise of Sabbathes by such and the like actiones or hath God left it to the liberty and vvisedome of men to choose him out his Sabbathes by such like actiones if none of these can be shovvne how dare they be so presumptuous to affirme that such actiones doe fit the dayes vvherin they were done for Sabbathes mans reason is a more blind thing in the dueties of the first Table then in the dueties of the second Table now the point of a Sabbath is a matter of the first Table dare men be so audaciously bould then vvith their reason consequences heere yea such poore reasones and friuolouse consequences it stands not vvith the feare of God and reuerence of Gods Majestie to be so bould vvith God I vvish therfore that men especially Ministers vvould make lesse vse of their reason consequences and more vse of the Scriptures and conscience Further I answer that if men will be directed by examples in the Scripture for the erection choosing of dayes for publike solemnities they shall find that such famouse actions haue not caused those very dayes vvherein they vvere done to be holy dayes but God and the Church haue made choise of the next dayes after Thus God ended his vvorke of Creation on the 6th day now he sanctified the 7th day which is the day after the Church Ester 9. did likewise for those Iewes who had deliuerance from Hamans conspiracy on the 13th day of the moneth they kept the 14th day of the moneth the day after a day of feasting ioye v. 17. those Iewes who had deliuerance on the 14th day of the moneth they solemnised the 15th day of the moneth the day after v. 18. wherefore if they would follow the Church of
the Iewes then must they thinke that these famouse actiones must be remembred not on the day wherein they were done the Lords day but the day after it on Moonday this day must be our new Sabbath or if they vvill imitate God and borrovv any light from him then must they thinke that the day after all is done must be the Sabbath and as God set vp the 7th day in remembrance of his vvorke of Creation on the 6 dayes so they are to thinke that Christ vvho in this pointe imitated God as they say set vp the 9th day of the vveeke in remembrance of his worke of Redemption done on the 6th 7th 8th dayes of the vveeke so all those notable actiones should betoken vnto vs that Moonday is our nevv Sabbath day it being the day after We vvill be thought to grownd this Lords day vpon Scripture yet not follow either the example of God or of the Church of God recorded in Scripture for we will not keepe the day after but the very day vpon which those actiones were done SECT XV. An other of their arguments for the Lords day to be a Sabbath day is because on this day Christ rose from the dead this is in euery mans mouth saying why should the Lords day be a Sabbath doe you aske why did not Christ rise on this day thus they argue so confidently as if it could not be doubted of but that the Resurrection must needs raise vp a new Sabbath But herevnto I answer by the like reasoning shewing that by as good reason as this is we may haue euery friday euery thursday Sabbathes also for friday may not a man say thus friday must be our Sabbath day because on this day Christ suffered for vs on the crosse it is Christs Passion day and can any aske why friday should be Sabbath day since it was Christs Passion day for thursday may not a man say as much for it also Thursday must be our Sabbath day because on this day Christ ascended vp into heauen c. Thus you see by like reason we may as well haue 3 Sabbathes in a weeke as this one of Lords day If any shall obiect that the Lords day was the greatest therfore most fit that it before the other ij should be the Sabbath I answer if we may compare them friday vvas the greatest for on it Christ bore the vnsupportable vvrath of his father for vs vvhich made him cry out my God my God why hast thou forsaken me but on the Lords day there was onely Christs soule put into his dead body so reuiued againe now it was agreater matter as I think euery one will confesse for the Diety to support the humanity on his Passion day vnder that vnsupportable wrath of God then to put his soule into his dead body in his resurrection day 2dly I answer how come they by this knowledg that they can say that this day must be a Sabbath day because Christ rose on it is not this one of their audaciouse presumptuouse assertiones who are bold to affirme what they lift in the matters of Gods worship suer I am the Scriptures say no such thing nor doe they relate any such matter when they speake of Christ his Resurrection I find the Scriptures thus saying that Christ died for our sinnes rose againe for our iustification Rom. 4.25 where we heare what vse we are to make of Christs resurrection that is that it vvas to iustifie vs but vve no vvhere reade that Christ rose to make the Lords day a Sabbath day As for this action of Christs riseing on this day can any man thinke that God vvould raise vp nevv ordinances in his Church as this Lords day Sabbath is by a bare action vvithout a vvord of institution added to it suppose vve that Christ at his last Supper had onely brake the Bread giuen a morsell to this man a morsell to that man without any words of institution added vnto this action to declare vnto them what they should doe with the breade and what vse they should make of it and suppose be had onely giuen the Cup to this man to drinke to that man to drinke and neuer said any thing vnto them touching this Cup tell me now could the Apostles without a myracle haue knowne what vse they should make of this bread of this wine Why so it is here Christ rose vpon this Lords day but neuer added any word of institution vnto it to signifie vnto vs that therefore he rose on this day because his Church should keepe it for a Sabbath how then I pray can any the patrones of our Lords day Sabbath gather by their consequences any thing from this bare action of Christs rising on this day Nay let me come neerer suppose the Iewes had read it in the Scripture that God himselfe Rested on the 7th day but had neuer read it in the 4th com that they should imitate God and Rest on the 7th day also how could they haue gathered from that bare action of Gods Rest on the 7th day that they ought in conscience to imitate God Rest on the 7th day also when God had added no com or word of institution vnto his owne Rest for their direction what can men know Gods minde without his word to teach it them yis doubtlesse our nevv Sabbathairans can a bare action vvithout any vvord of institution is enough for them had these but sene Christ breake the bread onely it had bene enough for them or heard say that God Rested on the 7th day these needed no more it is enough they knovv thus much that Christ rose vpon the Lords day they can convert this to their owne vse well enough to deceine the simple coosine themselues SECT XVI An other argument they haue for the Lords day and that is this If the Iewes kept a Sabbath in memory of the Creation then much more ought we Christianes to keepe a Sabbath in memory of the Redemption The reason hereof they say is this because the worke of Redemption is greater then the worke of creation I answer first to their argument herein they haue altered the state of the question by putting in the vvord keepe into their argument in steade of the word institute or ordeine for our question is not about the keeping of the Lords day but about the institution ordination of the Lords day let them therefore first proue that the Lords day vvas instituted once appointed by God for a Sabbath then they may saue themselues the labour of prouing vnto vs that vve must keepe it for vve are not vnwilling to keepe it if once it be proued to be a Sabbath this is but a peece of their Sophistry to proue one thing vvhen they should proue an other Behold vvhat difference there is betwixt these ij Sabbathes and the practise of the Iewes our practise for there vvas
lighted vpon men on the Lords day vnto their contempt of Gods ordinances of preaching and prayers performed in that day it is rather to be thought that God punisheth the contempt of his ordinances then the neglect of the day for such as profane the Lords day come not at Church then to serue God vvhen euery body doth serue God it is a signe that they be ordenary contemners of Gods worship seruice most iustly therefore may God plague them for contempt of his ordinances when they are growne to that height of impiety that they dare ordenarily neglect Gods worship yea and vpon solemne times also appointed by the Church and vvhen all men meete together to vvorship God then to shew a contempt is a greater sinne then otherwise so it is rather the contempt of Gods ordinances then the neglect of the day that God punisheth 3. Well nigh all men are perswaded in their consciences that the Lords day is the Sabbath day inioyned by the 4th Comm. albeit in trueth Saturday is the Sabbath day by the 4th Com. now if men doe neither giue God the right day through their ignorance nor yet will giue God a wrong day whereof they are notvvithstanding well persvvaded in their consciences that it is the right day then they sinne against conscience whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 now it is iust with God to plague men if they will neither giue him the 7th day for a Sabbath nor the 8th day neither for so they are guilty of the breach of the 4th Com. in that they giue God no day no Sabbath no not that day vvhich their consciences tell them is Sabbath day thus God may punish them for a sinne against conscience though not for the day sake and hereby it appeareth that their arguing is amisse when they say that God punisheth men for breach of the Lords day for it is rather to be thought that God punisheth for other causes SECT XIX Their second argument fetched from Testimony is from the practise of the primitiue Churches after the Apostles for the Histories of the Church say they make mention that they kept the Lords day constantly Herevnto I answer 1. that it seemeth this practise was not vniuersall in all Churches but onely in some places or not in all times but at some time onely for Mr. Perkins vpon the 4th Com. affirmeth out of the Histories of the Church that the Sabbath meaning it of the Lords day Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but afterwards it was reuiued established by Christian Emperours And for confirmation hereof he alleageth his Author Leo and Anton. Edict of Holy dayes Whereby it appeareth by the History of the Church also by confession of M. Perkins that this Lords day vvas not kept in the primitiue Churches constantly as now we keepe it in our Churches for it was not kept vntill Christian Emperours established it now the first Christian Emperour that enacted a Law for the Lords day as farr as I can find was Constantine this was about 300 yeeres after Christ so that this Lords day was not onely not kept by the primitiue Churches but also it was not kept in all probability not of 300 yeeres after Christ so that they haue no greate cause to alleage the practise of the primitiue Church for their Lords day 2. I ansvver but admit the primitiue Churches had kept it constātly in all places at all times alwaies yet there is a tvvofould keeping or solemnizing of a day the one is the keeping it a Sabbath day the other is the keeping of it for an Holy day now I deny that they kept it for a Sabbath day for it is most likly that they kept it for an holy day vvhich is more remise and slenderly kept then a Sabbath day and this appeareth 1. by Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians where he exhorteth both to the keeping of the Sabbath day also to the keeping of the Lords day both in one the same page novv it is not likely that Ignatius did exhorte his people to keepe two Sabbath dayes in a vveeke the Saturday Sunday and therfore it is likely that the Lords day they kept it slenderly as an holy day Againe hee cales the Lords day there the Quene Princesse of dayes where you see he left an higher roome for the Sabbath day accounting it as the King prince of dayes therfore it is likly kept not the Lords day as they did the Sabbath day Yet furher it is to be noted that Ignatius exhorting his people to the keeping of both the Sabbath day the Lords day he refuseth to giue that word vnto the Lords day vvhich he giueth to the Sabbath day vvhich is most proper for a Sabbath day for in exhorting to the Sabbath day he vseth this vvord Sabbatizet but in exhorting to the Lords day he changeth the vvord and vseth this vvord celebret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in liklihood noteth a difference in the vse of these two dayes the one being kept as a Sabbath the other as a Festiuall day 2. It appeareth by a law made by Constantine as any may reade it reported by M. Fox in his booke of Martyres the new Edition pag. 93. thus The Sunday hee commanded to be kept holy of all men and free from all Iudiciary causes from markets Martes fayers all other manuall laboures onely hushandry excepted Where you see the workes of husbandry as plowing the like excepted this might be done in those dayes and in that Church on the Lords day Now Constantine was the most famouse defender of the Lords day of any Emperour would he thinke you haue giuen men leaue to goe to plough carte on the Lords day if hee had esteemed it as a Sabbath day no surely for this is plaine contrary to the very letter of the 4th com In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke no not in earing time nor in haruest Exod. 34.21 wherefore since Constantine gaue leaue to plough sowe the like workes of husbandry on the Lords day it is a manifest thing that in his time the Lords day was not kept for a Sabbath day but rather as a light holy day hereby it appeareth that the patrones of the Lords day haue little cause to glorie so much in the law that Constantine made for the keeping of the Lords day holy 3. It appeareth by this that Constantine made a law for the keeping holy of Friday of Sunday both the Friday because of Christ his passion the Sunday or Lords day because of Christs resurrection For this see Euseb de vita Constant lib. 4. Cap 18. and see Sozom. lib. 1. Cap. 8. these ij dayes were inacted in one the same law in one the same manner whereby you see that the Lords day vvas accounted in the primitiue Churches no more an holy
sauing their libertie to doe otherwise In which passage we may learne these things from Bastingius 1. That the Church hath alloted the Lords day or First day 2. That the Church may either wholly omit the Sanctification of the Lords day or change it vnto an other day And that it is at the liberty of the Church to doe otherwise in this pointe then they now doe if they please XIX My 19th Testimony shall be that in the Harmony of Confessiones de feriis c. pag. 168. and in the Appendix at the latter end of the booke Where it is thus recorded But we teach that Traditions are not to be condemned which command nothing contrary to the Law of God and haue some politicall end to wit which are made for this purpose that things may be done in the Church in order of which sorte are the Traditions of Holy dayes as of the Lords day the Natiuity the rest These things we willingly retaine in our Churches as things indifferent which out of the case of scandall may be omitted lawfully Here we may note these particulars 1. That the Sanctification of the Lords day is no better then a Tradition 2. That the Lords day and Christmas day are both of like authority 3. That the Lords day is a thing indifferent XX. My 20th Testimony shall be that of the lerned Minister and Godly Martyr of Christ M. William Tyndall who suffred Martyrdome in the dayes of King Henry the VIII as we finde it in his workes bound with the workes of M. John Fryth Doctour Barnes all iij in one Volume Will. Tyndall in his Answer to Sir Thomas Moores Dialogue pag. 287. where hee thus writeth And as for the Sabbath we be Lords ouer the Sabbath may yet change it into the Monday or into any other day as we see neede or may make euery Tenth day Holie day onelie if we see a cause why Neither was there any cause to chang it from the Saturday but to put a difference betwixt vs the Jewes Neither need we any Holie day at all if the people might be taught without it Thus we see M. Tyndall was of iudgement that the Sabbath or Lords day is of no higher nature then that the Church may freely alter and chaunge it hither and thither at their plesures And that the Church may aswell keepe Monday for the Sabbath day as Sunday or the Lords day XXI My 21th Testimony shall be that of an other lerned Minister godly Martyr of Christ M. Iohn Fryth vvho also suffred Martyrdome for the Gospell in the dayes of King Henry the viijth as vve finde it in his vvorkes bound together with the vvorkes of M.W. Tyndall Doctour Barnes Iohn Fryth in his Declaration of Baptisme pag. 96. vvhere he thus writeth Our forefathers which were in the begining of the Church did abrogate the Sabbath to the intente that men might haue an ensample of Christian libertie c. How be it because it was necessarie that a day should be reserued in the which the people might come together to heare the word of God they ordained in steade of the Sabbath which was Saturday the next day following which is Sunday And all though they might haue kept the Saturday with the Iewes as a thing indifferent yet did they much better to ouersett the day to be a perpetuall memorie that we are free not bound to any day we are in a manner as superstitiouse in the Sunday as they were in the Saturday yea and wee are much more madd for the Iewes haue the word of God for their Saturday sith it is the 7th day they were commanded to keepe the 7th day solemne wee haue not the word of God for vs but rather against vs for wee keepe not the 7th day as the Iewes doe but the first day which is not commanded by Gods law And by by againe he addeth He that thinketh that a man sinneth which worketh on the Holy day if he be weake or ignorant he ought better to be instructed so to leaue his hould But if he be obstinate perseuere in his sentence hee is not of God but of the Deuill for hee maketh sinne in such things as God leaueth free In which passages of Mr. Iohn Fryth we may obserue these remarkable things 1. How the Godly Martyr affirmeth that our forefathers did ordaine and appoint the Sunday for an holy day so then Christ his Apostles did not ordaine it 2. Hee affirmeth that now the Sabbath day to wit the old Sabbath day being abolished wee are free and not bound to sanctify any day at all so consequently we are not tied to sanctify the Lords day 3. He affirmeth that such as so zealously doe sanctify the Sunday or Lords day they are in so doeing no better then Supperstitiouse 4. He affirmeth that they who so zealously sanctify the Lords day they are besides theire right wittes or become frantick and madd his reason thereof is this because they practise that for which they haue no scripture or word of God but rather the word of God is against them We haue some Ministers not ashamed to tell their people they will giue their liues for the Lords day Sabbath but heere you see two worthy lerned Godly Ministers and Martyres to wit Mr. Tyndall and Mr. Fryth who did not say only they would but did also giue their liues for Gods trueth these men you see would neuer haue giuen their liues for the Sunday Sabbath for they would not so much as spend their breathes for it or speake a good word of it but altogether against it 5. Saith Mr. Fryth hee that thinketh that a man sinneth by working on this Holy day or Lords day if he obstinatly perseuereth in the same opinion he is not of God but of the Deuill that because he maketh a sinne where God maketh none If this be so how many in this Land who professe themselues the Ministers of God are notwithstanding of the Deuill For they make the people beleeue that they sinne fearefully and damnably if they doe any seruill worke on this holy day the Lords day let this speech of the lerned and Godly Minister and Martyr be well obserued XXII My 22th Testimony shall be the iudgement of the Lords Spirituall Temporall with the Commons assembled in Parliament in the fifth yeere of Edward the Sixte In an Acte intituled An Act for the keeping of holy daies c. In which Statute it is thus inacted It is not to be thought that there is any certaine time or definite number of daies prescribed in holy Scripture but that the apointment both of the time also of the number of daies is lefte by the Authoritie of Gods word to the liberty of Christs Church to be determined assigned orderlie in euery Country by the discretion of the Rulers Ministers thereof as they shall iudge most expedient Be it therefore enacted by
the King our Soâ—eraigne Lord with the assent of the Lords Spirituall Temporall the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that all the daies hereafter mentioned shall be kept holie daies c. That is to say all Sundaies in the yeere c. S. Mathew S. Mark S. Iohn Baptist S. Peter S. Iames c. Then a prouiso is added Prouided alwaies it is enacted by the Authoritie aforesaid that it shall be lawfull to euery Husbandman labourer fisher man to all euery other person or persones vpon the holie daies aforesaid in Haruest or at any other times in the yeere when necessitie shall require to labour ride fish or work any kind of work at their free wills plesures any thing in this Act to the contrarie in any wise notwithstanding These things are remarkable in this Statute 1. That our Sunday or Lords day was by these Law-makers rekoned to be of no higher nor other authority then are the other holy dayes of the Apostles as S. Mathews S. Marks S. Iohns dayes and the rest 2. That the Sunday or Lords day is ordained by the Church and State for a Sabbath day or holy day that it is at their liberty to doe in this matter as they shall iudg most convenient 3. A most remarkable thing in this Statute for our purpose is that the Lords Spirituall and Temporall with the Commons and so consequently the Church of England were cleere of iudgment openly in this Act professed it that our Sunday or Lords-day-Sabbath is not of Diuine institution for they declared it whilst they said it is not to be thought that there is any certaine time or definit number of daies prescribed in the holy Scriptures so then there is no Scripture for the Lords day Againe But that the apointment both of the time and also of the number of daies is left by the Authoritie of Gods word to the libertie of Christs Church to the Rulers thereof to be determined so then ther 's no Diuine institution for the Lords day SECT XXII Hauing finished my answer touching the Lords day Sabbath for a conclusion of this Chapter I purpose to spend a few words in this Section by way of Admonition dehortation from Superstition voluntary religion will-worship the which as I direct it vnto all men whome it may concerne so in a speciall sorte I apply it vnto such patrones of the Lords day Sabbath as haue alredy made head against my former booke with greate zeale haue scandalized it among the people so occationed this booke by name Mr. Hutchinson Mr. Benton Mr. Furnace Mr. Gallard Mr. Yates Mr. Chappell Mr. Grenewod Mr. Stinnet Mr. Iohnson Mr. Ward These men obstinatly persisting in their erroniouse false doctrine after sufficient meanes of conviction ought to take these things into consideration First touching the Admonition by the whole discourse touching the Lords day already finished thou maiest see Christian reader that there is no footeing or grownd in the word of God to make the Lords day a Sabbath wherefore I doe hereby admonish both Ministers and people and desire them to take knowledge of it henceforth that this their zealouse sanctifying of the Lords day in conscience of the 4th com of Christ his institution it is no better before God with wisemen then Superstition and needlesse religion for when men will doe that in Gods seruice in obedience vnto God the which hee hath no where commanded them what is this but a needlesse religion and superstition when men cannot shew Gods will for that they doe then it must follow that it is of their owne willes so their religion in that point is a voluntary-religion and a will-worship Let me not be mistaken the Lords day may be considered as an ordinance of God or as an ordinance of man as it is ignorantly conceiued to be an ordinance of God in this sense only I speake against it but as it is an ordinance of man that is as it is commanded by the Magistrate so at his will and plesure to continue it or discontinue it in this regard I haue nothing against it so much for the Admonition I come now vnto the Debortation my first reason disswasiue is because we hate Superstition will-worship in others how doe we beare against our aduersaries the Papistes because of their superstitiouse Traditiones and Religion of will-worship and can we see an errour in them and cannot we see the same errour in our selues had we bene wise for our selues we might haue seene this errour long agone for they haue often admonished vs in their writings against vs telling vs that our Lords day is but a Tradition from the fathers and a Tradition of the Church herein giue the deuill his right as they say they haue spoken most truly albeit we haue giuen deafe care vnto them laboured to shifte it of and will we condemne them for will-worship superstition practise the same our selues well heare what S. Paul saith therefore thou art inexcusable O man whosoeuer thou art that condemnest for in that that thou condemnest an other thou condemnest thy selfe for thou that condemnest doest the same thinges Rom. 2.1 Many Ministers thinke them selues farr enough of from superstition will-worship whilst in the pulpit they can cry out against the superstition of Papists when as indeed and in trueth themselues are euen then very Papistes in this point greate patrones and maintainers of superstition will worship wherefore let them reforme themselues or else let them be silent touching Papistes you haue seene it proued by good Authority that the Lords day is but a Tradition of the Church shall we retaine Popish Traditiones will these Ministers be still patrones and supporters of vnwritten Traditiones I would hope better of them My second reason disswasiue is because we shall all leese our labour in the Sanctification of the Lords day vve shall labour in vaine For if we like seruants will be doeing of such vvorkes as our Maister neuer appointed vs doe vve thinke our Maister vvill thanke vs yea reward vs for them you haue heard that God neuer commanded vs to sanctify the Lords day by the 4th Com. that Christ neuer appointed it in the New Testament if therefore we will be hallowing of the Lords day thinke you that God will reward you for it or that Christ vvill thanke you for it many men that are honestly disposed of ingenuouse minds being misled by some Ministers they leese some yeeres their Hay in the field some yeers their corne in the field all of conscience thinking it a duety for them so to doe rather then to labour on the Lords day many others keepe the Lords day very strictly both priuatly publikly erroniously misperswaded that that text Isa 58.13 inioyneth theÌ„ so to doe but is not all this Labour in vaine God neuer commanded it Christ neuer
appointed it neither will God or Christ euer reward it nay God may answer them thus who required this at your hands Isai 1.12 My third reason disswasiue is because God hath manifested his dislike of superstitiō in many passages of his Holy word see Deut. 12.32 Whatsoeuer I command you take heede you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Here you see that God will haue nothing added to his worship seruice Thou shalt put nothing thereto saith the Text but now the Patrones of this Lords day haue put some thing thereto for they haue put the Lords day vnto the 4th Com. of God a most dangerouse presumptuouse attempt such as they can neuer answer before God nay they cannot iustifie it before men by good argument how then shall they be able to stand before God think they to add an other day to Gods Com. and iustifie it before God by such their friuolouse consequences as they vainly pretend to be necessary consequences let Ministers thinke of this that seriously too let thē doe it in time also In the New Testament God hath reucaled himselfe this way also If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke Reuel 22.18 If Christ vvas so carefull that nothing be added to this parte of his will wrote by S. Iohn in his Reuelation no doubt he hath the same care of all partes of his will in the New Testament wherfore let our Ministers that are Patrones of our new Sabbath thinke of this Text also for when they say teach the people that Christ instituted appointed the Lords day which is false for Christ neuer instituted it as appeareth by my answer vnto all their arguments in so teaching the people they doe add vnto the New Testament they add vnto Christ his institutiones a day which Christ neuer instituted thus they haue added vnto Christ his ordinances of Baptisme the Lords Supper they hau added vnto these I say an other ordinance that is none of Christs which is the Lords day now let them heare their doome without repentance God shall add vnto them the plagues that are written in this booke of the Reuelation and one plague I sinde there written which is a plague of plagues it is hell fyer to haue a parte in the lake that burneth with fyer brimstone which is the second death Reuel 21.8 I know they sleite contemne mee think if they can so carry it with the people as they may but saue their credits with them a while they hope to quench mee for euer I being but one and such a vile one in their eyes wherefore I haue taken vnto me more helpe now I haue God on my side Christ on my side they shall defend me against these men and these men must know it now or shall will they nill they hereafter that they dispised not me but God Christ and that now they haue met t with their Master God will deale with them if they will be adding vnto God God will adde vnto them You haue an other Text also Numb 15.39 that ye may Remember all the Commandements of the Lord doe them that yee seeke not after your owne heart nor after your owne eyes after the which ye goe a whoring Where we see how God detesteth to haue mens deuices brought into his worship he calleth it a whorish tricke to hould the Lords day to be commanded by God or instituted by Christ when it cannot be proued it is to goe a whoring after their owne heart after their owne eyes An other Text you haue Mark 7.7.8 But they worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines the commandements of men for ye lay the commandement of God a parte obserue the Tradition of men a like Text you haue Isa 29.13.14.15 where a woe is denounced vpon the people whose feare towards God was taught by the precepts of men And their feare towards mee was taught by the precepts of men Whereas the former Text saith yee say the commandement of God aparte how true this is of these 10 Ministers forenamed who reiect as Iewish Ceremoniall the Lords Sabbath expresly commanded in the Morall Law let all men iudge for doe they not lay this Commandement of God a parte which inioyneth most directly the 7th day Sabbath this by the way but the words that belong vnto our purpose are these teaching for doctrines the commandements of men The Lords day Sabbath it is a doctrine taught frequently and bouldly but it is no commandement of Gods and therfore it must be onely a Commandement of men The next words for our present occation are these and obserue the Tradition of men That the Lords day is a Tradition of the Church not onely Papists auowch it but also diuerse of those Authores which I haue cited against the Lords day doe expresly affirme it that the Lords day is but a Tradition and all of them say that it is but an ordinance of men and a Commandement of man yea so much the wholl Church confessed in the dayes of K. Edward so then in kepeing it in preaching for it you keepe the Tradition of men preach for A Tradition of man And so also they that are afraide to transgresse the Lords day to worke in it this their feare toward God it is taught by the precepts of men for God hath left no precept for the Lords day the breach whereof we neede be afraide of Heare then the doome that belongeth vnto such needlesse religion all this their worship it is a vaine thing In vaine doe they worship mee c. Yea there belongeth a woe vnto such worship this is the reward of it woe vnto them c. Isa 29.15 The last Text that I will mention is Colo. 2.23 which things haue indeed a shewe of wisedome in voluntary Religion or in will-worship Iudge now good reader if I doe them any wronge to rekone the Lords day as a limme of this voluntary Religion as a branch of will-worship for if they cannot shew vs where God hath commaunded it then it is a voluntary thing and of mans owne will and therfore may be called a voluntary Religion a will-worship happely there may be in the eyes of such as haue bene nusled vp from the cradle in this superstitiouse practise a shewe of wisedome in it as the Text speaketh But if S. Paul may be iudge they are things of no value as he speaketh in the same Text. Wherefore since God hath in all these Textes of Scripture manifested his dislike of Superstition let this be enough to disswad euery man from the practise of it And that so much the rather because the vphoulding of this day is the iusling shouldering out of the Lords Sabbath day mentioned in the 4th Com. so as the words of our blessed Sauiour are true
is this The time of the 7th day it was and also it may now againe if men so please be an helpe and a furtherance vnto these Morall dueties of Rest from laboures and the worship of God commanded in the 4th Comm. for the 7th day furthereth these dueties as time and place doe further all dueties and is it not to be wondered at that men will reiect and abolish such a thing or things as be helpes and furtherances vnto Gods worship and vnto Morall dueties Diuines teach that not onely the dueties expressed in the Decalogue are to be obserued but also all helpes and furtherances vnto those dueties but behold here they reiect as Iewish and Ceremoniall the 7th day which was in ancient time and may be againe an helpe vnto Gods worship and the other Sabbath dueties Yea such an helpe as no other day cā be so fit for no day but it is a sanctified day Genes 2.3 nor a commanded day Exod. 20.8.10 nor that hath Gods president Exod. 20.10.11 I might here alleage the Testimony of many but I will content my selfe with iij or iiij who though no friends to the ancient Sabbath yet herein iustify me Doctour Bownde in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 40. saith That the 4th Com. can no more be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast Yea as well may one suppose the second Com. also to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall To the same effect hee in pag. 36. citeth Wolph Chron. lib. 2. ca. 1. saying but the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing typicall nothing to be abrogated M. Richard Byfield in his Doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated against M. Brerewod pag. 88. saith the 4th com is parte of the law of nature and so parte of the Image of God and is no more capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is For conclusion you shall heare doctour Ames speake in the name of all best diuines In his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. Thus he writeth This is a most certaine rule receiued by all the best Diuines that the morall commandements were thus differenced in their deliuery from the ceremoniales that all onely the morales were proclaimed publikly before the people of Israel from Mount Sinay by the voyce of God himselfe after also were written the second time written as it were by the finger of God that in Tables of stone to declare their perpetuall and immutable continuance Now doe you not heare how these mē affirme it that the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes that all best diuines hold that all onely morales were wrote in the Tables of stone and that the 4th com is no more capable of a ceremony in it then God is and that you may as absurdly say the same liuing creature is partly a man partly a beast as to say the 4th com is partly morall partly ceremoniall Before I produce their argumēts I desire to propound iiij things more both vnto our opponentes also vnto my Reader The for most is this before they begine their opposition wicked worke I desire them to cast their eyes first vpon the vglinesse of it to viewe it well for they fight not for God blessed for euer but against God my warfare is for God to defend his Title touching his Sabbaths but theirs is alltogether to defeate God of his Title and Sabbaths my strift is to defend Gods law in the Integrity and perfection vnto a iot title of it but their strife is with might and maine to lame Gods law and to clype it as traitoures doe the Kings coyne they will none of the law in its integrity and perfection that so they may serue God by halues by peece-meale An other thing I would propound is this I desire to know of these who are such implacable enemies to the Lords Sabbaths if they haue any Countermand or contrary commandement vnto the 4th com and that in as plaine expresse termes as the 4th com you know that a law enacted in parliament cannot be reuoked but by an other law enacted for the reuersing of it in the court of parliament so it must be in this case for the 7th day Sabbath there was a law to wit the 4th com enacted from heauen in the old Testament they must therefore shew vs a law from heauen againe countermanding it in the new Testament against the 7th day Sabbath or if in case they cannot shew vs A law in exprese words against the Sabbath day the which they cannot doe then if they be enforced in stead of a commandement to flie to reasones consequences made out of textes of Scripture they must make suer that their reasones collectiones and consequences be so cleere and apparent so sound and so necessarily true that they may be as vndoubtedly true as a commandement it selfe the reason hereof is because these consequences must stand in the roome of a commandement for the reuoking of that Sabbath day which was commanded in the 4th com euery sleity probable reason therefore collected out of a text is not enough to ouerturne an expresse commandement yea a morall commandement shall a sleity collection or consequence fetched by mans feeble shallow reason out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 Colos 2.16.17 ouerturne a sacred time expresly commanded in the morall law Exod. 20.8 God forbid We must shew more loue and honour vnto those 10 commandements which God hath honoured aboue all portions of Scripture by writing them with his owne finger deliuering them by his owne voyce then to suffer them or any parte of them to be snached wrested out of our hands by probabilities likelihoods feeble reasones A man may well doubt of it whither any man or Church may abolish any things expresly commanded in the Morall Law by any collection or consequence of mans reason whatsoeuer yea albeit it be thought of all men to be a necessary consequence for how often doe men take that to be sound of necessary trueth which once within a fewe yeeres after the same men find to be faulty let men know therefore that they who dare attempt so bould an enterprise as to diminish any iot or title of the 10. morales by reasones fetched out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 and Colos 2.16.17 they must be such reasons as be as cleere as the Sunne in its brightnesse so satisfactory as euery one that heareth them cannot but applaud imbrace them saying God is in these reasones and collectiones the reason hereof is because these reasones and consequences they must beare downe confront an expresse commandement written by the finger of God
rigorousnesse he that can invent how to make this Rest the most rigorouse he is the best expositer And hence comes that vaine distinction of the Iewish Rest as if for sooth the 4th com conteined two kinds ef Rest in it A Iewish Rest A Christian Rest but the vanity hereof will appeare by by when you shall haue seene the vanity of their arguments to proue this rigorouse Iewish Rest Now let me shewe you their arguments in order and first I will lay downe 3 arguments vsed by a worthy Diuine and late writer to proue this rest rigorouse whose name I spare for honour sake the first whereof is this that the Iewe might not on the Sabbath goe forth or take a iourny any whither for any busines of his owne Exod. 16.29 this saith hee was temporary and doth not concerne these times of the newe Testament Hereunto I answer that this text Exod. 16.29 forbad the Iew to trauaile on the Sabbath indeede but by the context it doth appeare that here the Lord forbad trauailing friuolouslie when there was no neede to trauaile for in as much as on the 6th day God gaue them Manna enough for ij dayes the 6th the 7th so rained downe none on the 7th day therefore he forbad them to goe forth on the 7th day or Sabbath day this was the iourney which God forbad namly an vnnecessary iourny for why should they goe abroad to seeke Manna on a day wherein there was none in the field and why should they seeke for it on the 7th day when God gaue them enough on the 6th day both for it and for the 7th day also now I pray shew me where is that rigorouse strictnesse of the Iewish rest for which end this text is brought is that to be esteemed a rigorouse rest when men are forbidden to trauaile on the Sabbath day when they haue no neede at all to trauaile when their iourney is friuolouse to no purpose if this be a Iewish strictnesse we Christians vse it and vrge it at this day for we permit not to trauaile on the Lords day vpon euery sleity occation And doe they not want matter thinke you against Gods Sabbathes when they are forced to racke vp such poore stuffe as this is against them SECT III. An other reason hee vseth taken out of Exod. 35.3 where the Iew is forbiddē to kindle a fier on the Sabbath day yee shall kindle no fier throughout your habitationes on the Sabbath day and herein saith hee stood the rigorousnesse of the Iewish rest Herevnto I answer that this text if vnderstod generally it is set vpon the tainter hoockes and stretched beyond measure yee haue a text to wit the 4th com saying in it thou shalt not doe any worke this text the same diuines can vnderstand it expound it with a due limitation to wit of common ordenary and seruile workes why then by like reason can they not add the same limitation in the same case to this text also Exod. 35.3 and so vnderstand it thus thou shalt kindle no fier that is to doe ordenary common seruile workes withall like as common Bakers and Brewares doe by making it parte of their trade thus workes of necessity and charity to be done on the Sabbath shall be no more forbidden in this text Exod. 35.3 then they are in the 4th com Exod 20.10 to kindle a fier as Bakers doe is a seruile worke but otherwise it is a worke of mercy when but to warme one and the like Also it might haue a speciall reference vnto the building of the Tabernacle Exod. 35.3.4.5 whereof there was no such necessary hast as that they should kindle fiers on the Sabbath to worke about it For vs to thinke that God who allowed a beast to be led to the water on the Sabbath and allowed the Iewes to lift a beast out of the ditch on the Sabbath to plucke and rubb eares of corne on the Sabbath wold forbid them to kindle a fier on the Sabbath to dresse a morsell of warme meate for their dinner and to warme them selues in cold winters weather when they came from Church that so they might be the more fresh and liuely to serue God againe in the afternone ther 's no shew of reason in it would God haue mercy shewed to a beast on the Sabbath and none of a man that is made after his Image what likelihod is there of this Further our Sauiour saith the Sabbath was made for man Mar. 2.27 so to expound this text Exod. 35.3 therefore as if a man might not no not in a case of necessity kindle a fier in the time of froft and snow to warme himselfe and the like is to make the Sabbath not for man but against man and to make man for the Sabbath contrary to the words of our Sauiour Againe our Sauiour Christ was present at a ffeast on the Sabbath day Luk. 14.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 c. now at a feast there is commonly a fier to dresse meate for the guestes there is attendance to be giuen by seruants and the like now Christ by his presence at this feast allowed of fier kindling of others as great workes as the kindling of a fier is wherby it appeareth that this text is wrested when it is vnderstod so rigorously as if God had forbad his people to kindle a fier in any case thus you see that it is but a slaunder brought vp vpon the Iewish Rest to say it was rigorouse but such slaunders are frequent to loath men of Gods Sabbath SECT IV. A third reason hee fetcheth out of Ierem. 17 21. and Nehem. 13.15 take heede to your selues and beare no burden in the Sabbath day here saith hee the Iewes might beare no burdens on the Sabbath Herevnto I answer briefly that these texts as any man may see by the context speake onely of burthens bearing in an ordenary common case as a seruile worke but that all bearing of burdens was forbidden to the Iewes is false for Christ him selfe commanded the sicke man to carry his bedd on the Sabbath day Ioh. 5.8.9.10 seeing therefore that God did not forbid a man to carry a burden on the Sabbath day in his necessity where is there any grownd then here for any man to say the Ieweish Rest was strict and rigorouse I neuer yet could see but that God allowed the Jewes as much liberty on the Sabbath day as he alloweth Christianes and as much liberty as Ministers grant vnto Christians on the Lords day therefore it is but a meere slaunder to say the Iewish Rest was rigorouse the distinction betwixt the Iewish rest and the Christian Rest is a distinction without a difference for all workes of mercy and workes of necessity might be done by the Iewes on the Sabbath day as well as by vs Christianes now Loe these deuices wise men haue to defeate God of his Sabbaths SECT V. A fourth text I will
add which is vsually aleaged to the same purpose bake that to day which yee will bake and seeth that which yee will seeth and all that which remaineth lay it vp till the morning for you c. Exod. 16.23 heere say they the Iewes were commanded to dresse all their meate on the ffriday the day before their Sabbath so by consequence they might not dresse any meate on their Sabbath Herevnto I answer 1. for asmuch as we find that God hath added and expressed an exception to some Sabbaths we may therefore thinke that the same exception is to be vnderstod in all Sabbaths see Exod. 12.16 no worke shall be done saue about that which euery man must eate that only may yee doe in which words you see that albeit God forbad all manner of worke yet he gaue an exception allowing men to worke so farr forth as may cōcerne their present necessity that is to dresse their meate on that day which they must eate on that day I confesse this was a ceremoniall Sabbath but for asmuch as God put no difference betwixt the ceremoniall the Morall Sabbaths for strictnesse of rest for it was death to any man that did any worke on either of them both as you may see Leuit. 23.30 Exod. 31.15 therefore we may thinke that there is the same reason of both 2. I answer that this text is not rightly vnderstod applied for they suppose that Moses bad these Iewes bake to day that was on friday all the Manna which they had gathered that day to wit the ij omers so as none should be to bake on the next day being Sabbath day but it is to be noted that Moses left it to their will how much to bake that day how much to leaue vnbaked for saith the text bake that which yee will bake and seeth that which yee will seeth he said not bake all seeth all but bake seeth what ye will againe where he saith that which remanieth lay it vp vntill the morning they vnderstand these words thus that that which remanieth baked should be laied vp but so much cannot be collected out of this text but the contrary is rather the trueth namely that that which remained vnbaked was laid vp vnbaked vntill the morning this the context giueth light vnto for on other daies if they reserued any vntill the morning it stank v. 20. but on this day what they reserued it stank not v. 24. now forasmuch as Moses recordeth it as a wonderfull thing that it stanke not nor was full of wormes by reseruing it it giueth vs to vnderstand that it was laied vp vnbaked for what wonder had it bene that it stanke not nor had wormes in it if it had bene baked seing that baking doth preserue things from stinking and wormes breeding it is more likly therefore that as they baked euery other day so much as they did eate on that day so they did on the Sabbath day So this text proueth not that the Iewes baked boiled all their foode on friday One answer I heere giue vnto all their 4. texts together if the Rest commanded to the Iewes in the 4th com be a rigorouse Rest so ceremoniall then is the whole Sabbath 4th com vtterly abolished as rigorouse ceremoniall also for there is but one kind of Rest in the 4th com take away that and take away all Rest if that be rigorouse ceremoniall take away that and then may men follow their laboures in their seuerall housen and in the fields An other answer I giue vnto all their 4. textes which is this that if it could be proued that the Rest which the Iewes kept was rigorouse then might we more safely hold that the rigorousnesse of their Rest was Iewish and ceremoniall then that any thing commanded in the Morall Law is Iewish and ceremoniall for this Law of kindling a fier on the Sabbath being not mentioned in the Morall Law but written elsewhere it may be questioned rather whither it was any branch of the 4th com or exposition of it or whither it was some speciall Law peculiar vnto the Nation of the Iewe because in those hote countries they might better want a fier then wee in coulder rigiones can and better feed on cold meates dressed the day before then wee in these colder countries cane and so the Morall Law should be maintained still in its Integrity and perfection why may not these particular Lawes not being written in the Morall Law and Tables of stone be aduentitiouse and onely added to the 4th com as peculiar to the Iewes and those times Regiones as was that Reason prefixed to all the 10. com that God brought thē out of the land of Egypt which is also added to the 4th com Deut. 5.15 and as was that Law of offering ij Lambes on the Sabbath daies Numb 28.9.10 Thus then you haue seene their textes for the prouing of the Iewes Rest to be full of intollerable strictnesse rigour but you se how they faile in the matter wherefore I may safely conclud that it is but a slaunder raised vpon the Lords Sabbaths to make men afraide of them and to loath them for God required no more strictnesse of a Iew then he doth of a Christian nor any lesse of a Christian then he did of a Iew the 4th com it is one the same to Iew to Gentile as are all the other 9. commandements SECT V. Hauing made answer vnto their textes whereby they would proue the Rest of the Sabbath partly ceremoniall because rigorouse we are now to come vnto their textes wherby they would proue the time to wit the 7th day in the 4th com to be a ceremony so abolished but first this would be noted that since they cannot proue the Rest in the Sabbath rigorouse and ceremoniall now there is nothing commanded in all the 10 commandements which they can except against but onely the question it selfe betwixt vs to wit the time 7th day now how they will disproue this you shall see Their first texte which I will produce is that Mat. 12.8 for the sone of man is Lord of the Sabbath hence some argue thus that because Christ is called the Lord of the Sabbath day therefore he did alter chang the Sabbath day Herevnto I answer that admit the Heire of a Mannour house because he is Lord of that house he may destroy it and pull it downe yet it doth not therefore follow that he will or hath destroyed it pulled it downe so be it that Christs as Lord of the Sabbath might destroy it yet it followeth not that he did destroy it no the contrary rather followeth that because Christ was Lord of the Sabbath therefore he did and for euer will maintaine vphold the Sabbath for it is the property of Lords to vphold their mannour howsen to defend those things whereof they are Lords to the vtmost of their power
but in regard of Christs pouerty it is not vnlikly that he vsed browne or corse bread 2. By the like the Iewes might haue thus absurdly reasoned also whereas the Sabbath day was commanded on Mount Sinay Exod. 20. yea one moneths iourney before they came to Mount Sinay in the wildernesse of Sin Exod. 16.1.23 yea and in an other remote place as in that parte of the world where about Paradise was since the Sabbath was from the Creation hence the Iewes might thus peruersly haue argued saying wee are now in Canaan or in Captiuity in a country that is farr remote from Mount Sinay where the Sabbath was commanded or from the wildernesse of Sin or that parte of the world where Paradise was and where the Patriarkes kept the Sabbath and therfore we here cannot keepe the Sabbath for our Sabbath in this country begineth not at that point of time iust when the Sabbath begineth at Mount Sinay the wildernesse of Sin or about Paradise loe their folly God requireth not a people to begine his 7th day Sabbath when other remote Nations begine theirs but onely thē when by the light of the Sunne which rules the day God begineth to that people his Seauenth day This point is further prosecuted in my former booke but enough too much hath bene here said to this idle argument men haue so little reuerence of God and of his lawes and of his ancient ordinance the Sabbath that they thinke any thing is good enough how idle and ridiculouse soeuer to throw against the same euery frothie conception of an idle braine is matter sound enough to buze and make a noise in peoples eares against that sacred time which God himselfe hath hallowed sanctified honoured amongst his morales SECT VIII A 4th text is that Isa 66.23 From moneth to moneth or from new Moone to new Moone from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before me saith the Lord. Whence some collect that the Sabbath here was made a Signe of the euerlasting Sabbath in heauen others would haue it a Signe of the Church vnder the new Testament and of the Church triumphant in heauen both so it being a signe it is abolished Herevnto I answer 1. it is doubtfull what may be the proper sense of this text it being a Prophecy deliuered in Metaphoricall and Allegoricall speeches for instance what shall be meant by these words from new Moone to new Moone it is doubtfull wherefore this text being difficult it is not fit to haue a controuercy decided by it much lesse to haue it vsed to the abolishing of any thing commanded in a morall law it is not meete that the 4th com being vttered in plaine proper speeches should be contradicted countermanded by a Prophecy which is vttered in difficult improper speeches what is this but petitio principij 2. I answer by the word Sabbath here may be vnderstod not the weekly 7th day morall Sabbath inioyned in the morall law but some of the anniuersary ceremoniall Sabbathes which neuer came into the morall law as that Sabbath of the Seauenth yeere or of the fiftith yeere Leuit. 25.10.4 for since the text speaketh of a continuall worshiping of God vnder the new Testament therefore the Sabbath of a yeere is more fit to be a type of it then the Sabbath of a day the 7th day 3. I answer the Sabbath day here mentioned is not made a Signe but rather the other 6 dayes which goe betwence Sabbath and Sabbath for so the text saith from Sabbath to Sabbath that is all the dayes betwene the Sabbaths shall all flesh come to worship c. so then it is not the Sabbath day that was made a Signe but those Six dayes which went betwene the Sabbathes SECT IX A 5th text of theirs is Heb. 4.10.11 where there is mention of a Rest and in v. 9. there remaineth therefore a Rest vnto the people of God Here say they the Sabbath or Rest is made a type of the Rest in the Kingdome of heauen now all types are abolished as ceremonies Herevnto I answer 1. many thinke indeed that here is some greate matter in this text for their purpose but it will proue vpon better examination nothing so for if this Rest here mentioned be a type of heauen it is so farr off from making any thing against the Sabbath day as that it rather maketh for it for the nature of types is to last in the Church vntill the thing typed out by them be come thus all sacrifices lasted vntill Christ our pascall Lamb was comne sacrificed for vs wherefore by like reason if this Rest or Sabbath heere be a type of the kingdome of heauens rest then may this Rest and Sabbath last in the Church vntill we all come to a rest in the kingdome of heauen so then all the time we liue on earth this Sabbath may be kept 2. I answer if the aduersaries to this ordinance of Gods Sabbath could tell how to proue the Rest in the 4th com a ceremony by this text then hereby they must wholly ouerthrow the 4th com for take away rest from laboures as an abolished ceremony and then may men labour in their caleings euery man in his seuerall family in his seuerall field and how then can there be any publike assemblies of the people together in the Church to keepe a Sabbath 3. I answer suppose we that there was a type in the word Rest yet since it speaketh not of a dayes rest but of an euerlasting rest therfore may the yeere of Iubile the 50th yeere be made a type here rather thē the 7th day for there is greater similitude betwene the 50th yeere Leuit. 25.10.11.4.1 and the euerlasting rest then betwene the 7th day Exod 20.8 and the euerlasting rest SECT X. A 6th text they vse which is Numb 28.9.10 where it was commanded vnto the Iewes to offer ij lambes for a Sacrifice on the Sabbath day whence they would collect that if the Sacrifices being a duety of the Sabbath be abolished then is the Sabbath it selfe aboiished Herevnto I answer 1. if the Sabbath day be abolished togeather with the sacrificing of the ij lambes then must for the same reason also be abolished rest from laboures and the morall worship of God in the Sabbath for the sacrificing of the lambes on the Sabbath day hath as much respect vnto rest from labour Gods worship to declare them also to be ceremonies as vnto the time to declare it to be a ceremony abolished 2. I answer that this law of offering ij lambes on the Sabbath day it was aduentitiouse onely added to the 4th com to the Sabbath for a time and therefore no parte of the 4th com nor essentiall Sabbath duety for it was neuer wrote by God in Tables of stone but wrote by Moses as were other ceremonies all after the writing of the moral law was finished and therefore no parte of
the morall law or law of the Sabbath 3. I answer by deniall of the consequence for since the dueties in the Sabbath day were many it followeth not that if some one of those dueties be abolished the day must also be abolished wherin it was done for since the other dueties of Rest and Gods worship remaine still the time and day may remaine still for these dueties sake SECT XI 7. They argue out of ij textes together Ioh. 7.22.23 and Mat. 12.5 in which textes it is written that on the Sabbath day they did circumcise a man◠and on the Sabbath day they did 〈◊〉 the Sacrifices now these were both ceremonies and the Sabbath day gaue way vnto them wherefore the Sabbath day must be inferiour to ceremonies and so abolished with them I answer by the like absurd reasoning they may say the 6th com thou shalt not kill is abolished also for it gaue way vnto Abraham to slay his sonne Isack the like may be said of the 7th com which gaue way vnto polygamie a diuorce c. when Christ gaue way to be circumcised of a Priest to be baptized of Iohn doth it hence follow that Christ was inferiour to the priest or to Iohn or that the strong are inferiour to the weake because they giue way vnto the weake Rom. 15.1 or that the Morall Law is absolutly abolished because in some sense it gaue way vnto the gospell 2. I answer that not onely the day time to wit the 7th day gaue way vnto circumcision vnto Sacrifice but also the Rest and cessation from labour and the worship of God in the holy exercises of the Sabbath both these gaue way as well as the time wherefore if this their argument be good for the prouing of the time to be a ceremony and abolished then must it be as good also for the prouing those duties of rest and holy exercises to be ceremonies abolished and then what is become of the 4th com and where is the morallity of Rest and the performance of holy exercises inioyned in the 4th com thus still you see lik men of a maleuolent spirit they hunte all the Scriptures ouer to find out somthing or other against Gods ordinance what will be the issue of all their paines why euen this they will at last make the morall law hereby to be a morall-ceremoniall law the 10 goolden linkes of Gods law shall haue one linke become partly goold partly lead there shall be now a shaddow ceremony fansied to be in the heart of a morall law in a word the issue will be that now they may be partiall in Gods Law serue him by halues SECT XII 8thly they argue from Ioh. 4.21 The hower cometh when yee shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem worship the father In which words Christ foreteld of the destructiō abolishing of the Temple as the place of Gods worship now if the Temple which was the place of Gods worship be abolished so is also the Sabbath day which was the time of Gods worship Herevnto I answer there is not the like reason for whilst the Curch of God was confined to the narrow limites of the land of Canaan all people might possiblie goe vp to Ierusalem to worship in the Temple there 3 times a yeere Exo. 23.17 but when at Christ his death the partition wale being brokē downe the Church enlarged to Iew Gentile all the world ouer thē all people could not possibly come vp to the Temple at Ierusalem to worship 3. times a yeere there for their dwellings would be too farr distant from Ierusalem therefore it was necessary that the Temple should be no longer the peculiar place for Gods worship but that now we might worship God in Spirit trueth euery where but ther 's not the same reason for the Sabbath day the time of Gods worship for the Sabbath day and 7th day from the creation is euery where all a like amongst Iewes Gentiles all the world ouer the same 7th day any nation had at the creation the same 7th day it hath still to this day so as the 7th day this time of Gods worship it is not too narrow for the bounds of the Church as the Temple was for it is as large as the Church of God is or can be therefore ther 's no necessity that it should be altered SECT XIII 9thly they argue from all those textes of Scripture whereby they vse to proue the Lords day to be a Sabbath day instituted by Christ thus they argue thence that the old Sabbath is altered changed by the coming in of the new Sabbath this is that which is so common in many mens mouthes saying why Christ abolished the old Sabbath the Iewish Sabbath by bringing in of the Lords day Herevnto I answer 1. by deniall that Christ hath set vp any new Sabbath as hath bene showne 2 admit that Christ had set vp the Lords day on the 8th day for a new Sabbath yet this doth not hinder but that the old Sabbath on the 7th day may stand still for example the Lord set vp the morall weekly Sabbath on the 7th day Exod. 20.8.9.10 afterwards he set vp other ceremoniall yeerly Sabbaths also Leuit. 23.32.38.39 now the coming in of these other yeerly Sabbaths did not alter change or abolish the weekly Sabbath no here was an addition of Sabbaths no alteration of Sabbaths Iust so it may be here suppose that Christ had set vp a new Sabbath on the Lords day then haue we ij Sabbaths to keepe weekly the old Sabbath on the 7th day the new Sabbath on the 8th day so that the setting vp of this Lords day Sabbath is but an addition of a new Sabbath vnto the old Sabbath like as when a man buildes a new house by the side of an old house this is but an additiō of house to house it is no alteration or change for the raiseing vp of a new house by the side of an old house is not the demolishing throwing downe of the old house SECT XIV 10. they argue from all the new Testament negatiuly saying of all the 10. commandements the 4th com is no where mentioned in all the new Testament neither is the keeping of the Sabbath day vrged any where wherefore the Sabbath day is not of vse to vs vnder the gospell To this Anabaptisticall obiection I answer first see whither it tendeth namly vnto Anabaptistry prophannesse for if the old Sabbath be abolished we shall haue no Sabbath at all for the Lords day can neuer be proued a Sabbath 2. It tendeth to the ruine of the Integrity and perfection of Gods Law so as we shall haue but a lamed and vnperfect Law 3. It tendeth to make Gods morall Law to be a Morall ceremoniall Law Further I answer and will you acknowledge no more of the Old Testament then what is particularly mentioned repeated in the new Testament
then what doe we with the old Testament it seemeth then that not onely the old Sabbath is abolished but also the whole old Testament is abolished also now it standeth for a cipher if this arguing be good why did S. Paul send vs to the old Testament saying whatsoeuer is written a fore time is written for our lerning Rom. 15.4 2. If you will acknowledge no more of the morall Law then what is particularly repeated in the new Testamēt then what will become of the 10th com where is it repeated in euery branch thereof particularly in all the new Testament I know it is found writtē Thou shalt not lust but to come to particulars where is it written thou shalt not lust after or couet thy neighbours house thy neigbours wife his man seruant maide oxe asse or any thing that is thy neigbours you may as well therfore conclude against sondry things cōmanded in the 10th com as agaimst the Sabbath commanded in the 4th com for neither of them are repeated in the new Testament particularly in an expresse commandement 3. I will shew you how the 4th com is repeated in the new Testament generally consequently the Sabbath is there vrged also in a generall manner see Mat. 5.18 where Christ prophecieth of the lasting of the Morall Law and of euery iot title of it to the worlds end now in these words is the 4th com and the 10th com euery commandement yea euery iot title of euery commandement conteined the like may be proued by Rom. 3.31 Iam. 2.10 It is to be obserued that of all the 10. commandements there was the least need nay there was no neede to repeate the 4th cō nor to vrge the obseruation of the Sabbath day in particular for in the daies of Christ his Apostles both Iewes Gentiles were very zealouse for the obseruation of the Sabbath day for the Iewes they were more strict for the keeping of the Sabbath if I may so say then Christ him selfe was for Christ would allow the plucking and rubbing eares of corne on the Sabbath day to carry a bedd and the like but the Iewes could not endure it what hote contentions did the Iewes moue against Christ his Disciples for doeing some petty workes on the Sabbath day yea vpon a time they would haue slaine our Sauiour for healing of a sicke man vpon the Sabbath day Ioh. 5.16 what neede then was there that Christ or his Apostles should repeate the 4th com to the Iewes or vrge them to keepe the Sabbath day since they were so hote for it alredy it was enough that the 4th com the obseruation of the Sabbath day should be spoken of onely in some generall termes as you haue it Mat. 5.18 Ia. 2.10 And for the Gentiles there was no need to presse them neither for they coming into the Inheritance of the Iewes ioyning in communion with the beleeuing Iewes did redely imbrace the very ceremonies of the Iewes as circumcision the like how much more then did they imbrace the Morals with the Iewes as the Sabbath day as you may see Act. 13.42.44 Act. 16.13 looke therfore wherin the Iewes were very zealouse it is to be thought that the beleeuing Gentiles were zealouse also therefore was it needlesse that the Sabbath day or 4th com of all the commandements should be vrged pressed in the new Testament Neuerthelesse somthing we find touching the Sabbath in particular in the new Testament as Mat. 24.20 Pray saith our Sauiour that your flight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day In which words Christ alloweth a conscience to be made of the Sabbath day for aboue 40. yeers after his death 2. we find that it was the constant practise of the Apostles after Christ his ascention to obserue and keepe the Sabbath day see for this purpose Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 that the Apostles did here keepe the Sabbath with the Iewes to beare with their weaknesse is a weakenesse in any to thinke so they cā neuer proue it I am suer when the Apostles yeelded obbediēce vnto Magistrates which was commanded in the 5th com worshiped God which was cōmāded in the first Table may any absurdly growndlesly say they did these things to beare with the weaknesse of the Iewes and why then should any say when the Apostles performed the things commanded in the 4th com that they did this for the weaknesse of the Iewes where as some say the Apostles kept not the Sabbath in cōscience of the 4th com they hauing no grownd for what they say may as well say when they worshiped the true God obeyed the Magistrate that they did not these in conscience of the first 5th cōmandements 3 In the new Testament and after the death of Christ and abolition of ceremonies we find the Sabbath day kept in cōscience of the 4th com the Holy Ghost commending it by rekoning it among ranking it with other commendable actiones saying they rested the Sabbath day according to the commandement Luk. 23.56 SECT XV. 11. They fetch an argument from Deut. 5.15 where the 4th com is repeated and at the end of it there is added as a reason these words For remember that thou wast a seruant in the Land of Egypt that the Lord thy God brought the out thence by a mightie hand Therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to obserue the Sabbath day Hence they argue to this effect that because the Sabbath doth depend vpon the deliuerance out of Egypt therefore since the deliuerance out of Egypt belongeth not vnto vs no more doth the Sabbath day this text M. Chappell vrged Herevnto I answer it is true indede that therfore God commanded the Iewes in this place to obserue the Sabbath day because he brought them out of the Land of bondage but if hence men may gather that we Christians are not bound vnto the Sabbath day as M. Chappell did then 1. it followeth that we now haue no Sabbath day by the 4th com and so the 4th com is vselesse as a cipher or abolished for this reason of Gods deliuerance of the Iewes out of Egypt it is added not to any parte of the 4th com onely but vnto all the 4th com wholly now in the 4th com the aduersaries of Gods trueth doe distinguish betwixt the time of the 7th day and the dueties of holinesse and Rest now the time is that which they would faine trample downe as for the duetie of an holy Rest this they would haue still morall but if this their argument be good then haue they hereby at once ouerthrowne not onely the time but also the dueties of holinesse Rest in the time and so quite nullified the 4th com the reason hereof is plaine for that argumēt of Gods deliuerance of Israel out of Egypt which they bring to abolish one parte of the com to wit the time it doth also
word day in Exod. 31.13.14 for it mentioneth onely the word Sabbaths whenc I gather that though the word day be implied yet because it is not mentioned therefore if any thing be made a signe of Christ it is rather the Sabbaths then the day wherefore if the Sabbaths be a signe of Christ which signify Restes then are the Restes ceremonies and abolished signes of Christ so the Rest in the 4th com which they hold to be morall by this text they make to be ceremoniall so we haue a morall ceremoniall Rest a contraicted Rest A third absurdety that these meÌ„ fale into who will haue God serued by halues and by peecemeale is this that whilst they make a gloriouse shew to the people that they stand for the 4th com as well as for the rest of the commandements they doe notwithstanding so gelde it picke out the life soule of it as they leaue it but like a deade corpse for by their consequences such as they are they would out of this text Exod. 31.13 make the Sabbath day a signe so a ceremony and so then abolished well then be it so hence then I argue If that Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com be an abolished signe ceremony theÌ„ is the 4th com nullified like a dead corpse for it standeth for a cipher and commandeth iust nothing for the cleering of this point let vs see the 4th com thus it is written Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifi it Exod. 20.8 let any man now take out of these words in this commandement these ij words Sabbath day then let him tell me what it is which the 4th com commandeth you may as well take away these ij words Sabbath day which they say are a signe and ceremony and abolished in stead of them put so many ciphers in the commandement as there be letters in these ij words that is tenn then we may write this commande thus Remember the 0000000000 to sanctifie it Exod. 20.8 I remember our Sauiour Christ hath a similitude wherin he likeneth such hearers as heare but doe not vnto a foolish man who builded his howse vpon the sande Mat. 7.26 but I now tell you of builders builders in Gods house too who are more foolish then this foolish man for he built though not vpon a rocke yet he built vpon the Sande so as his house might stand vntill the floodes came the winds blewe but these meÌ„ would build Gods 4th com vpon worse then sand for they build it vpon nothing 0000000000 and make it to command nothing 0000000000. all this must needs be true against them vnlesse they can shew vs that there were two Sabbath daies spoken of in the 4th com one vpon the 7th day an other vpon the 8th day and this they cannot doe seing the Lord spake in the singular number in his 4th com saying Remember the Sabbath day and not in the plurall number Remember the Sabbaths or Remember the Sabbath daies now forasmuch as they haue robbed the 4th com of one Sabbath day there must now be no Sabbath day in the 4th com vnlesse they cane by helpe of their magnified reason consequences proue vnto vs that God commanded ij Sabbaths in his 4th com A fourth absurdety that these men fale into who are aduersaries to the Integrity perfection of Gods Law by reiecting his Sabbaths is this that they set Scriptures togeather by the eares text against text and God against himselfe for whereas it is a rule that no exposition by like reason no consequeÌ„ce or collectioÌ„ is to be giuen of and from any text which is contrary vnto other plaine texts of Scripture as for example the 10. commandements the analogie of faith c. yet these aduersaries of Gods trueth haue giuen such expositiones of consequences from this one text Exod. 31.13 as whereby they doe vtterly nullify something plainly expresly commanded in the 10 commandements as for example the 7th day Sabbaths First then their absurdety appeareth in sweruing from the common receiued approued rule secondly in making one portion of holy write to contradict an other yea to contradict an ordinance commanded in the Morall Law which is yet worst of all they make their owne idle brained consequences fetched out of this text which neuer were in it to contradict an expresse commandement of the greate Gods so that now mans sawcy reason friuolouse collections shall confront a plaine commandement of his Gods yea it shall sit in equall throne with God I which is worse it shall take the right hand of God also for their consequences doe more auaile with men then Gods expresse commandement their collections shall be a Counter mand to Gods commandement yea they shall take the vpper hand of it shoulder it qui e out of place as we see to our hearts astonisâ—ment it doth when we looke vpon the ruined 7th day Sabbath on times oh manners oh wicked manners of these sinefull times some men doe so pride themselues in their wit beare themselues so strongly vpon their lerning as by these they dare make an assault vpon God and Syllogistically crush to nothing what God once establisht in his Church with terrible thunder and lightening were this done by some profane person it were not so much to be thought on but the Authores stife Agents in this most horrible fact are such as drawe nere vnto God and called puritane Ministers oh that they shewed more purity then this comes to it grieueth me thus to blow vp the Skirtes of my bethren but I haue none other way left vnto me now but onely this one to discouer them vnto the world that they may be ashamed of their folly to preuent men in following them else they will leade the world after them so mad they are in their dotages so vnmouable the Prophet Dauid hath a passage which will beare me out in this fill their faces with shame that they may seeke thy name o Lord. Psal 83.16 I might for these reasons absurdeties of theirs reiect their arguments as vnworthy any answer at all for they deserue none yet as Salomon saith Least they be wise in their owne conceit Pro. 26.5 and thinke there is worth and excellency in their arguments I will misespend some time and waste some paper and inke to shew them their vanity so I come to their arguments I conceiue they may argue out of this text Exod. 31.13 these wayes the first whereof is this All Signes are abolished But the 7th day Sabbath is a Signe Exod. 31.13 Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is abolished To this argument I answer as for the minor it shall be answered in the after passages but as for their Major I deny it for they can not proue it I giue instances to the contrary shewing that all Signes are not abolished for example the Raine bow God made it
was the signe not abolished but to be vsed An other instance of like kind we find in Isa 7.14 you may see it at your leisure by all which instances this one thing appeareth that a signe may remaine lōg after the thing signified by it be come thus is their 3d argument answered Oh how doe these men loue the Law of God who thus dispute against it and what would be the issue if they could obtaine their desires why this Gods Law should become A Monstre we Protestantes should become Anabaptistes profane persones kepeing no Sabbaths at all for besides this Sabbath they shall neuer be able to shew vs any other Hauing answered to all that they can say out of this text to euery argument seuerally now I come to giue iij. answers more which may serue to euery of their 3. arguments but first I desire my aduersaries either to imbrace these my answers and distinctiones whereby I would preserue Gods Sabbaths or else to study such others as may please them better or else they bewray abhominable partiallity to Gods Law trueth for they cane preserue nyne commandements halfe of the 4th why not the other halfe so all the tenn intirely First whereas they take it for granted that the Sabbath here mentioned Exo. 31.13 which they say is made a signe of sanctification that it is the 7th day Sabbath mentioned in the 4th com this I deny there are ii sortes of Sabbaths the weekly 7th day Sabbath the yeerly Sabbaths now this their text may be vnderstod of the Annuall and yeerly Sabbaths which neuer came into the Morall Law if therefore I shall make it appeare that this text of theirs may be vnderstod of the Annuall and ceremoniall Sabbathes and not of the morall weekly Sabbath then is all their labour lost and all their 3 arguments friuolouse for all their arguments haue argued onely against the yeerly ceremoniall Sabbaths the which no man will defend for this purpose therefore note these things 1. It is very improbable that all those verses v. 13.14.15.16.17 which are 5 in number should treate but of one kind of Sabbath to wit the 7th day Sabbath as may appeare by the very reading of them ouer vnlesse you would say here were a Tautologie ouer and ouer againe with the same thinge Wherefore it is more probable that in this long and large discourse of Sabbaths Moses speaketh of ij sortes of Sabbaths of the yeerly Sabbaths in Exod. 31.13.14 and of the weekly Sabbath in Exod. 31.15.16.17 some light is added herevnto if we doe but obserue Moses for he vseth often in speaking of the Sabbath to mention both kinds before he hath done that is both the anniuersary Sabbaths and the weekly Sabbath as you may see in Exod. 23.12.14.15.16 and in Exod. 34.21.22.23 and in Leuit. 23.3.4.24.32.38.39 A 2d reason may be this the Lord had giuen Moses in charge to build the Tabernacle Exod. 25.8.9 the making whereof would cost greate longe labour now least the people should thinke that because the worke about this Tabernacle was an holy worke perteyning vnto God for his seruice and worship that therefore they might put no difference of dayes whilst they were in this worke but that they might worke vpon the Sabbaths also whither weekly Sabbaths or yeerly Sabbaths as well as on the 6 working dayes to preuent this Notwithstanding saith the Lord my Sabbaths yee shall keepe c. Exod. 31.13 c. as if the Lord had said albeit I will that you make me A Tabernacle c. Yet I will not that you worke about it on my Sabbath dayes now because the people were as prone vpon this occation of building the Tabernacle to worke vpon the yeerly Sabbaths when their turne came as vpon the weekly Sabbath on the 7th day therfore it is meete for vs to thinke that God would as well make prouision heere for his yeerly Sabbaths as for the weekly Sabbath and that therefore in this text Exod. 31. Moses spake of the yeerly Sabbaths as in v. 13.14 and of the weekly Sabbath as in v. 15.16.17 that so the people appointed to worke about the Tabcrnacle as Bezaleel and Aboliab and the rest they might not worke either vpon the yeerly or weekly Sabbath but were all these 5 verses spent onely about one kind of Sabbath as the weekly Sabbath onely then had not God made provision heere for his yeerly Sabbaths which cannot be likly A third reason may be this that in these fewe verses v. 13.14.15.16.17 there is threatened the punishment of death to those that doe any worke on the Sabbath two seuerall times in two seuerall verses as in v. 14. whosoeuer worketh therein the same person shall be cut of from his people and in v. 15. whosoeuer doth any worke in the Sabbath day shall dye the death Now it is not likly that one and the same punishment should be repeated and twise together threatened for the breach of one kinde of Sabbath day and therefore to auoid a Tautologie and needlesse repetition it is most likly that here Moses spake of two kinds of Sabbaths of the yeerly Sabbath in v. 13. and so threatened death to the transgressoures of them in v. 14. and of the weekly Sabbath in v. 15. and so threatened death also to the transgressours of it in the latter end of the same v. 15. A 4th reason may be this that the Sabbaths in v. 13.14 are made a signe of Sanctification or Redemption by Christ as they say but the Sabbath in v. 15.16.17 is kept in memory of the Creation and is a signe of Creation to remember that in 6 dayes the Lord made beauen and earth and rested on the 7th day as you haue it in v. 17. now these diuerse signes doe intimate that here may be diuerse Sabbaths spoken of in these verses for Sanctification and Redemption may be applied to the one kind and Creation to the other kind of Sabbaths for it is nothing probable that Redemption and Creation should be both applied vnto one kind onely Thus you see what liklihod there is that the Sabbaths mentioned in v. 13. vpon which they grownd all their arguments are not the 7th day Sabbath which is our question but that they are the yeerly Sabbaths which neuer came into the morall law and about which we make no question at all wherefore vnlesse they cane take away these answers and proue vnto v. that by the word Sabbathes in v. 13. is meante the weekly 7. day Sabbath they are besids the question all their labour hath bene in vaine and all being granted them which this text cane afford them it will make onely for the abolishing of the yeerly Sabbaths but nothing for the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath for suppose it granted that the yeerly Sabbaths in v. 13.14 were signes of Sanctification and Redemption by Christ and therefore abolished yet it will not follow that the weekly Sabbath
in v. 15.16.17 which was kept in memory of the Creation and was a signe that God created the world v. 17. must also be abolished and so much for the formost of my generall answers My other generall answer to this text Exod. 31.13 and te all their arguments hence deduced is this suppose we that be the word Sabbathes in v. 13. is meante the 7th day Sabbath yet it followeth not that because it is made a signe or a signe of Christ that therefore the Sabbath day must be abolished for we must know that the signe of the Sabbath may vanish yet the Sabbath may remaine still for the cleering of this consider with me that the Sabbath may be considered abosolutly or relatiuly absolutly without any signe or relatiuly with its signe like as an Iuey bush or the like signe hung vp at a Vineteners house you may consider its absolute nature as it is no signe but as it is an Iuey bush onely you may consider it relatiuely as it it is a signe that wyne is to be sould at that house these two may be parted for take downe the Iuey bush then it is no longer a signe it hath lost its relatiue nature but yet it is a bush still so it retaineth its absolute nature thus the Sabbath it hath an absolute nature it hath a relatiue signifificatiue nature now these two may be parted for it may leese its relatiue nature as a signe yet retaine its absolute nature as a Sabbath iust as in the similitude of the Iuey bush But here happily some may aske of me what it is which I cale the absolute nature of the Sabbath what the relatiue nature To whome I answer I count that to be the absolute nature of the Sabbath which is not considered typically relatiuly significatiuly euen all that is to be considered in the Sabbath ouer besids its typicall significatiue nature that is its absolute inature more particularly the absolute nature of the Sabbath t is an holy rest vpon the 7th day because God rested vpon the 7th day and all this as commanded by God in which absolute nature are comprised these particulars 1. a rest from laboures 2. a performance of sacred and holy actiones 3. that both these be done on the 7th day 4. that these three be done in imitation of God because God rested on the same day blessed it and sanctified it Exod. 20.11 fiftly that all these be so done because God commanded them Exod. 20.8.10 these 5. things are the absolute nature of the Sabbath now for the relatiue nature of the Sabbath it is whatsoeuer is added vnto these 5. things significatiuly to signe signifie any thing thus the Sabbath was made a signe of the Creation of Gods Rest on the 7th day at the worlds creation Exod. 31.17 thus was the Sabbath made a signe also of the Redemption or of Christs sanctification of vs as they would haue it out of Exod. 31.13 which being supposed the Sabbath had a double relatiue nature the one to signify the Creation as past the other to signify the sanctification of Christ as to come which double signe being considered my insueing instances might be a litle more distinctly carried but as they are it may suffice to giue you a taste and thus you haue the absolute nature of the Sabbath declared and also its relatiue or typicall nature I come now to shew that the Sabbath may leese its typicall nature yet it may retaine its absolute nature first I shall giue you instances where things had a double type or signe the one of them vanisheing neuerthelesse the thing was obserued still with a respect vnto the other signe that remained The first instance for this purpose shall be that Sacrament of Circumcision cōsidered as vsed after the children of Israel were come into the land of Canaan here we are to note that circumcision typed out two things the one was that God would giue vnto the Israelites the land of Canaan Genes 17.8 the other was that God would make Abraham a father of many nationes Gen. 17.7.4 that God would be God vnto Abraham to his seede after him Genes 17.7 now after that the Isralits the posterity of Abrahā were come into the land of Canaan did inherit it then was one of these things typed out by circumcision fulfilled then was circumcision to loose its relatiue significatiue nature as typing out Canaan to come for it was come they were in it yet this signe of circumcision remained still in the Church for many hundreth yeers that as hauing reference vnto the other thing typed out by it to wit that God would be God vnto the seede of Abraham that hee should be a father of many nationes thus you see the action of circumcision remained in the Church still when one of the antitypes was come why then may not the duty of the Sabbath day remaine still in the Church after one of its antitypes be come so long as an other of its antitypes is still in force admit the Sabbath was a signe of Christ to come and so therefore it be no more kept as a type of Christ to come yet may it still be kept in the Church and so for euer as a type or signe of the Creation for our ages and so all posterity vnto the worlds end may as well keepe the Sabbath as a signe of the Creation as the Iewes and people of God did at any time Why may not the Sabbath be retained for one of its antitypes sake as well as circumcision was retained for one of its antitypes sake A second instance for this purpose shall be that other Sacrament the Passeouer considered as it was vsed after the Angel had smitten dead the first borne of the Egyptians and passed by the housen of the Isralites and here we are to note as before that the Passeouer was a type or signe of two things the one was that God would passe ouer the housen of the children of Israels spare them when at midnight he would destroy others Exod 12.11.12.13 The other was that it was a signe of Christ our Passeouer 1. Cor. 5.7 Now after that the Angell had destroyed the first borne of the Egyptians spared the Isralites then one of the types of the Passeouer was fulfilled neuerthelesse the Passeouer was retained in the Church for many hundreth yeeres after and this was because of the other type which was not then fulfilled 2 The Passeouer cold not be a signe vnto those Proselytes who ioyned to the Iewish religion when they were in Canaan of their deliuerance from the destroying Angell who smote all the first borne of Egypt and yet it remained as a signe to them of Christ their Passeouer to come these Proselite Gentiles left the Iewes in that which was proper and peculiar vnto the Iew that is to
absurdety appeareth partly in this that they will oppose an ordinance of Gods yea one of his most ancient ordinances established in his Church and partly in this that they will set themselues against the same voluntarily and wilfully for no cause at all but because they will doe so The 2d absurdety that these doe fale into by forceing this text Col. 2.16.17 so any other text also against the Sabbath day commanded in the morall law is this that hereby they are manifest enemies to the Law of God I say to the morall law of God Exod. 20. written by the finger of God Exod. 31. â—8 they bewray their enmity in this that they are enemies to the Integrity and perfection thereof they feare they should rune into Iudaisme if they should yeeld obedience to alâ— the tenn commandements for whereas the text saith God spak all thesâ— wâ—â—ds Exo. 20.1 yet these men will reiect some of these words namly all those words which concerne the 7th day Sabbath thus they will not haue as the Prophet Dauid speaketh Psalm 119.6 a respect vnto all Gods commandements But they will serue God by halues and by peeces they will take and leaue where and what they list in Gods law for they will not imbrace and maintaine the whole law of God as God deliuered it but some peeces of it they acknowledg other peeces they renownce and thus they deliuer to the people but a parte of Gods will and but a broken partiall and imperfect law if one parte of Gods law be good for vs Christians is not an other parte of it good also if the greatest parte of Gods law be good for vs is not the whole law and are not all the partes of it good for vs also depriue vs not of the Integrity and perfection of Gods law A 3d absurdety commited by these is this that they foulely contradict themselues by bringing this text Col. 2.16.17 against the Lords Sabbath day for whereas the question betwixt them and mee is solely about the time and day to wit the 7th day this their text which they bring against this day it doth not so much as mention they word day at all for the word dayes in the text Col. 2.16.17 it is not in the originall as you may perceiue by this that our translatoures haue written it in smaler letters the originall hath nothing but the word Sabbaths whereby I gather that rather the Sabbaths then the word day and the time are made a shaddow of Christ now the Hebrew word Sabbath signifying a Rest from labours as they will haue it if any thing therefore be a shaddow of Christ it is this Rest from laboures now they all teach and maintaine that the Rest in the 4th com is morall and perpetuall and yet behold here by this their text Col. 2.16.17 and by their argument out of it they dispute against this Sabbath or Rest for they make it a shaddow of Christ and so abolished and so this Rest it shall be morall ceremoniall perpetuall and yet long since abolished it shall be morall by their Doctrine in the pulpit and ceremoniall by their arguments in Disputation is not this a grosse contradiction for this text Col. 2.16 if it maketh any thing against the 7th day Sabbath it maketh as much if not more against the word Sabbath and Rest as it doth against the day and time which is the thing in question And this I make plaine by this reason also they say that by the word Sabbaths in Col. 2.16.17 is meant all Sabbaths both the weekly and the yeerly Sabbaths which if it be so then looke how largly the word Sabbaths is expounded touching the yeerly Sabbaths so largly this word Sabbaths must be expounded touching the weekly Sabbath for this one word Sabbathes cannot be taken in ij diuerse senses now this word in reference vnto the yeerly Sabbaths doth includ both the time day and also the Rest dueties to be performed in that time and day and so all are abolished as Shaddowes both the Rest and the day iust so it must be touching the weekly Sabbath if it be meant in the word Sabbaths then both the day and the Rest of the day also must be included and so day and Rest must be abolished as shaddowes both A 4th absurdety committed by these enemies to the perfection and integrity of Gods law is this that by bringing this text Col. 2.16.17 or any other text or textes against the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com hereby they doe nullify vtterly bring to naught the 4th com for whereas the 4th com commandeth the Sanctification of the Sabbath day these men will by this text proue this Sabbath day to be a Shaddow of Christ and so therefore to be abolished whence it must follow that by their doeings the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com is abolished as a shaddow which being abolished the 4th com is nullified and made as a cipher it commanding iust nothing at all for if these words Sabbath day be a shaddow and abolished then these 10 letters which are in these 2 words may in sense be put away as abolished and in the roome of them put 10 ciphers then whereas the 4th com runeth thus Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it why now according to these patrones of the Lords day it may rune thus Remember the 0000000000 to sanctify it and thus they haue nullified this commandement for you see it now commandeth iust nothing vnlesse they can tell how to proue vnto vs by the virtue of their consequences that God commanded two Sabbath dayes in his 4th com the one vpon the 7th day the other vpon the 8th day suer I am the Iewes neuer knew but one and Christ neuer kept but one and God spake not in his 4th com of Sabbaths in the plurall number but of a Sabbath or the Sabbath in the singular number as but of one singularly and this one Sabbath they haue made a Shaddow and so abolished Finally whereas all Diuines affirme that some time or day in generall for Gods worship is morall and in force by the 4th com if this text Col. 2.16 be vrged against the time and day to wit the Sabbath day in the 4th com then this absurdety also followeth that there is not some time or day for Gods worship morall by the 4th com the reason is because looke what was commanded in the 4th com vnder these words Sabbath day the selfesame is a bolished by Col. 2.16 vnder the same words Sabbath dayes if this text be set against that for these words must haue as large a sense in Col. 2.16 as they haue in Exod. 20.8 and so we shall haue no time morall in the 4th com for Gods worship which is contrary to all Diuines A 5th absurdety which these enemies of the perfection and integrity of Gods law doe fale into by producing this text Col. 2.16.17 or any other text against the 7th
against not onely something in the 10 commandements but also against euery thing in the 10 com againe Hebr. 7.12 Jf the priesthod be changed then of necessity must there be a chang of the Law whence a man might also say something against the whole Law bring Scripture to backe him too but forasmuch as the Law that is the Law Morall is an excellent Rule of our liues a notable Rule for the expounding of other hard darksome places of Scripture therefore we will not be so absurd as to question it least so we fale to question euery thing leaue no certainty in the Scriptures nor any thing that migt be a Rule a light vnto other Scriptures in conclusion be driuen to the Pope againe to determine of the sense of Scripture for vs. So much for this their absurdety that they deny Maximes in Religion and Principles in Diuinity who deny the 7th day Sabbath dispute against it One absurdety more is that they who alleage this text Col. 2.16 or any other against the Sabbath day mentioned in the Morall Law they herein shake hands ioyne with lawlesse Libertines Anabaptistes who doe by these textes oppose Gods Sabbaths so liue profanly without any Sabbath conscience of this diuine ordinance shall wee Protestantes shake hands with Anabaptistes in ouerturning Gods Sabbaths God forbid Thus hauing showne the diuerse sondry grosse absurdeties which they rune into who bring this text Col. 2.16.17 or any other against the Sabbath day written in the Morall Law now in the next place let vs see their arguments out of this text that so we may answer them their arguments are two the one of them is this that by the word Sabbaths or Sabbath daies in this text Col. 2.16 is meant all Sabbath daies vniuersally generally so if all Sabbath daies be abolished then the 7th day Sabbath also is abolished Herevnto I answer there is a Law Morall a Law ceremoniall now when we read that Christ hath abolished the Law of cōmandements Ephe. 2.15 againe that Of necessitie there must be a chang of the Law Heb. 7.12 if any man should presse these textes to the abolishing of all lawes we would answer them by distinguishing of Lawes into Morall ceremoniall saying that these textes doe abolish onely the Law ceremoniall but not the Law Morall So may I answer them in this point for the Sabbath day is a branch of the Morall Law for it is written in the Morall Law commanded in the Morall Law wherefore I answer them by distinguishing thus there be weekly Sabbath daies commanded in the Morall Law there are yeerly Sabbath daies which were neuer written in the Morall Law Leuit. 23.24.39 now this their text may be vnderstod onely of these yeerly ceremoniall Sabbaths not of the Morall weekly Sabbath thus are these two scriptures Exod. 20.8 Col. 2.16 reconciled And whereas they say that all Sabbaths are meante in this text I answer that this all may be meant of the ceremoniall Sabbaths that all those Sabbaths are abolished for there is an all of them for they are many so then we may vnderstād this text to abolish all Sabbaths generally that is the generality of all yeerly Sabbaths since there is a generallity of them or by all we may vnderstand all these Sabbaths excluded the Morall-Law or Tables of stone that is all the Sabbaths written in the ceremoniall Lawes so the 7th day Sabbath is not touched in this text thus you see there is no necessity at all why they should hale in the 7th day Sabbath into this text for a fit distinction may salue all wherefore if they will violently wring the 7th day Sabbath into this text it is wilfully done of them to satisfy some corrupt humour or other you see this text may safely soundly be expounded of the annuall Sabbaths onely without any the least violence offered vnto this text Furthermore I answer it is to be obserued that the Apostle speaking heere of Sabbaths which are a Shaddow he doth not say all Sabbaths vseing the generall particle all but he speaketh indefinitly saying Sabbaths or Sabbath daies without this word all therefore may be vnderstod but of some Sabbath daies particularly It is true indeed that the Apostle speaketh of Sabbath daies in the plurall number but yet it doth not thereof follow that therefore he spake of all Sabbath daies generally ther 's a differēce betwixt a plurality a generality betwene Sabbahts plurally Sabbaths generally for the Apostle may make Sabbaths plurally that is many Sabbaths to be Shaddowes yet not make Sabbaths generally that is all Sabbaths to be Shaddowes for example a man may say the Trees doe shaddow mee and yet all Trees in the world doe not shaddow mee Againe Ministers teach that the bread in the Sacrament is the very body of Christ yet it followeth not that all Ministers doe teach so for protestant Diuines teach the contrary so might Paul say that Sabbaths were a shaddow yet neither say nor thinke that all Sabbaths were a shaddow and thus is their former argument answered By the weaknesse of which argument we may see the weaknesse of their loue to God his ordinance to his Lawes for strong loue would neuer permit them to rase downe to the grownd so honourable an ordinance as Gods Sabbath to oppose Gods Law the 4th com with so weake an argument and what would be the issue if they might obtaine their desires why this Gods Law shall be mangled defaced it shall be denied its integrity perfection it shall be made a Monstre partly morall partly ceremoniall way made for Anabaptistry the floud of prophanesse to flowe in vpon vs by the want of Gods Sabbath An other argument they draw out of this text against the Lords 7th day Sabbath for they are wonderouse eagre vpon it desire exceedingly to find or make if they cannot find something to defeate God his Church of the Sabbath day for this purpose they will faine a necessity vpon it that by Sabbaths in this text we must of necessity vnderstand the 7th day Sabbath for one because say they vnder the words Holy day is meant all the ceremoniall yeerly Sabbaths so then vnder the words Sabbath daies must be meante the weekly Sabbaths Herevnto I answer that it cannot be proued that vnder these words Holy day all yeerly Sabbaths are comprised for it may be that none of the yeerly Sabbaths are therin cōprised to make this appeare let it be obserued that the word translated Holy day doeth signify also a feast the words translated in respect may be translated in parte so for these words in respect of an holy day you may haue in roome of them these words in parte of a feast 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then the text should rune thus Let no man condemne
you in meate drinke or in parte of a feast or of the new moone or of the Sabbath daies c. Now the question is to know what daies are signified by these words in parte of a feast for this purpose looke into Leuit. 23.34.39 where you haue two feastes mentioned either of them were to last 7 daies a peece now the first day of the 7 should be a Sabbath day likewise the 8th day should be a Sabbath day as the text speaketh v. 35.36.39 now forasmuch as the first 7 daies were the whole feast when the first day of those 7 was taken out for a Sabbath day then the 6 daies remaining which went betwen the two Sabbaths these were the parte of a feast and these 6 daies being the parte of that ceremoniall feast these were those which S. Paul might say were a Shaddow of Christ so abolished so now you see what daies they were which S. Paul speaketh of vnder these words translated Holy day which may be translated in parte of a feast hereby is nothing else signified but those 6 festiuall daies which went betwene the two Sabbaths were a parte of the whole feast which lasted by the Law 7 daies so then whereas they would haue all the ceremoniall Sabbaths comprised vnder the words Holy day inconclusion you see ther 's none of them at all comprised in them for the Apostle may be vnderstod to speake onely of those 6 daies which went betwen the 2 Sabbaths but were no Sabbaths themselues so it will not follow that by the word Sabbaths in Colos 2.16.17 must be vnderstood the 7th day Sabbath In conclusion let me shew you what may be vnderstod by these words holy day or in parte of a feast and these words Sabbath dayes by those words holy day or in parte of a feast may be meant those 6 festiuall dayes which went betwen the ij Sabbaths but were no Sabbaths themselues then by those other words in the text Col. 2.6 Sabbath dayes may be meant these ij Sabbath dayes which were the bounds of the 6 festiuall dayes to wit the first day and the 8th day v. 35.36.39 together with all other annuall Sabbath dayes But if this pleaseth not then thus by the words holy day or rather feast you may vnderstand the Apostle to speake of those ij feastes of 7 dayes a peece in v. 34.39 ioyning the first day Sabbath with the following 6 dayes and both these to make vp one feast consisting of 7 dayes onely then these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be translated rather in respect then in parte for the words may be rendered both wayes now if you put the first day Sabbath vnto the 6 festiuall dayes then by these words Sabbath dayes in Col. 2.16 may be vnderstod the 8th day Sabbaths which followed the 7 festiuall dayes and also all other yeerly Sabbaths with it as those mentioned Leuit. 23.7.8.21.24.27.32 Or if this yet pleaseth not for they are hard to please so eagre they are against the Lords Sabbaths then thus if by holy day or feast you will needs vnderstand all dayes both the feastes of 7 dayes a peece and all other single Sabbath dayes forementioned then by the word Sabbaths 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Col. 2.16 the Apostle may be vnderstod to speake not of the Sabbath of dayes but of the Sabbaths of yeeres of which you may reade Leuit. 25.4.8.10.11 where you haue mention of the 7th yeere to be kept for a Sabbath likewise of the 50th yeere the yeere of Iubile so in all these wayes the 7th day Sabbath is not spokē of By all which answers it may appeare that it is no impossible thing to reconcile these two Scriptures Exod. 20.8.10 Col. 2.16.17 for it appeareth how many wayes the Apostles words may be taken and still the Sabbath day written in the Morall Law not touched at all by this text Col. 2.16 and are they not wilfull and malitiouse enemies to the perfection of Gods Law to his ordinance the Sabbath day who when the Apostles words may be taken any of these wayes or some of these at least so as Gods morall Sabbath may be preserued but yet none of them will please them but some other vnnecessary sense must needs be violently thrust vpon vs and namly such an one as may perpetually destroy the Lords Sabbath why is there no way to expound one text of Scripture but so as it must ouerthrow an other doe men delight themselues to make collectiones and gather conclusiones out of one portion of Scripture which shall ouerturne for euer that expresly commanded in an other portion of Scripture where is the feare of God all this while and reuerence to his word and ordinances are not these men guilty of the sinne of adding to Gods word Deut. 12.32 of that curse threatened for the same cause Reuel 22.18 for like as they haue added diuerse inventions to that text Exod. 31.13 against Gods Sabbaths so haue they added Gods 7th day Sabbath to this text Col. 2.17 for the ruine of it and they haue added this their invention to S. Pauls words that he spake vniuersally of all Sabbaths when he spake but indefinitly of some Sabbaths Thre things more I haue to add by way of answer vnto this text Col. 2.16 the formost is this that there are reasones in this text why it cannot be that this word Sabbaths should be vnderstod of the Sabbath written in the morall law the former reason is this that all the other things mentioned in this text Col. 2.16 are such things as neuer came into the Morall Law as 1. meate drink 2. holy day or feast 3. new Moones wherefore this giueth vs an hint to conclude that the other thing mentioned in this text namly the Sabbaths should be of like kind to wit such Sabbaths as neuer came into the Morall Law neither for who could thinke that all the other words and things in this text should be pure ceremonies and such as neuer came into the morall law and this one word onely to wit Sabbaths should conteine in it a Morall day and ceremoniall dayes or dayes some whereof were neuer wrote by the finger of God as the yeerly Sabbaths and some such as God wrote with his owne finger in the morall law as the 7th day Sabbath An other reason fetched from the text is this that if in this word Sabbaths they will includ the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law then doe they abolish by this text Col. 2.16 Not onely the 7th day and also the Rest but also the very commandement it selfe the 4th com that is abolished vnder these words where it is said that Christ hath Put out the handwriting of ordinances v. 14. In which words the written 4th com is abolished and this I make appeare thus the 16th verse of this second Chapter to the Colossians is a conclusion as you may perceiue by the
note of inference vsed in it Therefore one of the premisses whereof you haue in v. 14. Now the Apostles argument is on this wise If the handwriting of ordinances which is the written Law which commanded meate and drink and holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies be put out and taken away Then let no man condemne you in meate and drinke holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies But the handwriting of ordinances is put out and taken away Therefore let no man condemne you in meate drink holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies The Apostles Minor you haue in v. 14. and his conclusion in v. 16. now forasmuch as it is a rule with Logiceans that there must not be more in the conclusion then is in the premisses hence it followeth that if by the word Sabbaths in v. 16. they will vnderstand the 7th day Sabbath written in the 4th com then by these words handwriting in v. 14. they must vnderstand also the handwriting of the 4th com or else there is more in the conclusion then in the premisses for the premisse v. 14. speaketh but of the haÌ„dwriting of ceremonies writteÌ„ by Moses onely but in the conclusion v. 16. if they will includ not onely the ceremoniall law writteÌ„ by Moses but also a parte of those things written by God in the Tables of stone then in the conclusion I say they haue both Moses his handwriting and also a parte of Gods handwriting and so there is more in the conclusion then in the premisses wherefore to auoid this absurdety they must vnderstand the word handwriting in v. 14. to include not onely the handwriting of the ceremonies by the hand of Moses but also they must vnderstand thereby that parte of Gods handwriting whereby he commanded the 7th day Sabbath which is the 4th com and so you see they abolish the handwriting of the 4th com it selfe and so we shall haue no 4th com at all thus you may see wherevnto the opposition of Gods Sabbaths out of this text Col. 2.16 tendeth namely to the subuersion of the 4th com let them talke what they will of obedience to Gods 4th com and that they haue a respect with Dauid vnto all Gods commandements yet all is but talke and words iudge the Tree by the fruits you see all their endeauors tend vnto the subuersion of one of Gods Morall Lawes and this is the first of my 3. Answers which I tould you I had more to adde Now I come vnto an other of my answers and it is this that they that expound this text Col. 2.16 of the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law they doe crosse and contradict their owne Authours such writers of their owne as are of high estimation with them I will produce a fewe of them in steade of many that might be alleaged I will begine with M. Perkins who frameth an obiection of some aduersaries which they make out of these ij textes Col. 2.16 and Gal. 4.10 saying that if we obserue any difference of dayes now in the new Testament then we are no better then Iewes vnto which textes M. Perkines thus answereth That both these places speake of the feasts of the Iewes and of d fference of daies that stands in force by the Iewish ceremoniall Law Cases of conscience Chapt. 16. Sect. 3. Pag. 108. Where you see M. Perkins freeth this text Col. 2.16 from hauing any thing to doe against the Morall Law or against the difference of dayes in force by the Morall Law by saying that it speaketh of a difference of dayes which stode in force by the Iewish ceremoniall Law now the 7th day Sabbath was neuer commanded in the Iewish ceremoniall law but in the morall law Let vs heare also what M. Dod saith in this point he answereth to an obiection framed out of this text Col. 2.16 against the Sabbath day on this wise We must know saith he that here the Apostle speaketh of such Sabbaths as are in the ranke with the meates drinkes whereof the spake before of which sorte were the first day of euery moneth and the first and last daies of euery one of the 3 solemne feastes of the Iewes of these he speaketh in the plurall number and not of the Lords Sabbath day in the singular number which hath a singular excellencie and how euer times change it neuer changeth Dod on the 4th com Pag. 132. In which words you see M. Dod affirmeth that this text Col. 2.16 speaketh onely of the yeerly Sabbaths which the Iewes kept in their 3 yeerly feastes or 3 solemne feastes doth plainly deny that this text saith anything of the Lords 7th day Sabbath which he caleth the Lords Sabbath day in the singular number by way of excellency Of this same iudgement is M. Greeneham in his worke vpon the Sabbath of the same iudgment also is M. Elton vpon the Colossians on this text Col. 2.16 of the same iudgement likewise is Doctour Ames in his Thesis touching the Sabbath To these fiue I might add many more that are of the same iudgement as themselues cannot but know seing they read them dally one more I will add who is newly come forth M. Richard Byfield against M. Brerewood on the Sabbath who saith in expresse words that this text Col 2.16 doth not abolish the Sabbath day in the 4th com but those other Sabbaths c. See him Pag 130. Thus you see that they who would haue the Apostle to speake of the morall Sabbath mentioned in the morall law as M. Chappel his 9 confederates would they are contrary vnto Diuines of greate note of their owne side Obiection say they why doe you alleage M. Perkins and M. Dod and others why they doe not defend your opinion for the 7th day Sabbath doe they Herevnto I answer it is not my purpose in this place to alleage them as if they spake for the 7th day Sabbath but onely for this purpose to shew that they euen thire owne Diuines will not indure it that this text Col. 2.16 should be pressed any further then against the Iewish ceremoniall law and that it concerneth not the Lords Sabbath day spoken of in the 4th com singularly but those yeerly Sabbaths spoken of plurally c. This is all I aime at by alleaging their Testimony now the Testimony of a man against himselfe is euer accounted strong and good for me to produce one of my aduersaries to iustify my cause it is better and more forcible then if I should alleage an â—undreth Diuines that are of the same iudgement with mee and so much for this point My third answer to this text is this suppose we that the 7th day Sabbath were a shaddow of Christ by this text Col. 2.17 yet â—ence vvill nothing follow necessarily but that the Sabbath is abolished as touching its typicalnesse and shaddowish quality that so it shall be no more vsed as a type or as a shaddow of Christ to come but for
difficult way And further let them not dare to liue in the weekly transgression of the 4th com profanation of Gods Sabbath day bearing themselues onely vpon this poore grownd that their Ministers say they may so doe that their Ministers bring many arguments out of the Scripture for the abolishing of Gods Sabbath day since those argumentes as themselues confesse they vnderstand not nor are able to iudge of for want of lerning when they heare or reade them disputed of the Apostle saith whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 If then they cannot comprehend conceiue of the opposit arguments brought against the Sabbath when they are disputed too fro on boths sids how can they worke in their calings on this Sabbath day they cannot doe it of faith they must doe it doubttingly so sinfully wherefore the better easier known way is the surer safer way that is to follow the example of God resting vpon the 7th day because God rested on the 7th day thus much for people I come now vnto Ministers the first thing I lay to their charge is the profanation of the sacred Scriptures and word of God by wresting of many and sondry textes of Scripture against the 4th com and the Lords Sabbath day therein mentioned there are many and sondry textes of Scripture both out of the old Testament out of the new Testament which they abuse against the Lords Sabbath day the particulars whereof you haue heard in all this Chapter hitherto and how vainly impertinently and friuolously they haue vsed them doth euidently appeare by my seueral answers vnto them now doe they not know that one day they shall giue an accompt to God for taking Gods Name in vaine and for vnreuerent tossing of Gods word hither and thither like a Tennise bale yea which is worse they turne the point of Gods sword his word I meane against himselfe setting Scriptures together by the eares for they set aboundance of Scriptures both out of the old and new Testaments against the Lords Sabbath day commanded to be kept by the 4th com like as a man should set abundance of dogges vpon a Beare for they set all these textes of Scripture against this one text of the 4th com now what may be the grownd of all this I cannot deuise any besids this that their minds are forestaled with a preiudice against Gods Sabbaths as that they are Iewish and the like and therefore downe they must and to this end the Scripture must be set against them It hath euer bene the practise of all sober and Godly Diuines to study and endeauor the reconciliation of Scriptures seemeing to make opposition and contradiction but these men are of a contrary Spirit for hauing to doe with Gods tenn commandements and by name the 4th com they cannot abide to heare me speake of a reconciliation and to make a reconcilment betwixt the 4th com Exod. 20.8 and this text Colos 2.16.17 but all their study and invention is how they may make these two portiones of holy writ with others to oppose one an other in the highest manner one to shoulder out an other my indeauors are by a reconciliation to cause an Harmony and sweete accord among the Scriptures that so we may still retaine a most ancient and proffitable ordinance of Gods in the Church but their indeauors are to reiect all reconciliation to cause a iarre and discord in the Scriptures that so they may depriue the Church of God of a most ancient and proffitable ordinance of Gods commanded in his morall Law This is a profane vse and abuse of Scripture to cause it to be at oddes variance with it selfe when as by a reconciliation and fit sense it may be made to agree accord in a swete Harmoney The 2 d thing I lay to the charge of Ministers is that they haue liued a long time in this sinne of Sabbath breaking and transgression of Gods 4th com in their seuerall families the which without vnfeined Repentance wil make them liable vnto all those Curses temporall and eternall thereatened in Gods word against such as liue in the transgression of Gods Lawes And further if still they shall in time to come liue in the wilfull violation of this ordinance of God I giue them hereby to know that they shall be guilty of a weekly sinne against Gods 4th com drawing downe Gods curses vpon themselues and their families euery Saturday or Sabbath day weeke by weeke so long as they so liue This errour touching Gods Sabbath day is not like vnto some other erroures which are erroures in iudgement onely but like vnto those more dangerouse and perniciouse erroures which are erroures both in iudgement and in practise also for you see that such as are erroniously perswaded that this sacred and Sanctified time the 7th day Sabbath is abolished forthwith they fale to an erroniouse practise also to trample vpon Gods Sabbaths by profanation of them openly and by calling them Iewish reprochfully But happily they will reply saying wee doe not throw downe Gods Sabbath but God himselfe doeth it for it is God that hath abolished the 7th day Sabbath and therefore you doe ill to taxe vs for it wherevnto I answer that it is false which they say to father this their owne deede vpon God is an heinouse euill that God hath not done this thing is apparent in asmuch as none of all those Scriptures of Gods which they haue brought against this Sabbath doe necessarily abolish it as you haue seene by my answers vnto them one by one so it is not God then but themselues that haue done it and so I taxe them iustly Yet further Ministers are guilty not onely and alone of the sinne of Sabbath breaking in their owne families but also which is more fearefull they are guilty of the same sinne committed by the people weekly for what 's the cause why the people doe not Sanctify the Sabbath day properlie so called is it not hence because Ministers teach people that it is abolished Iewish and therefore they ought not to keepe it holy the people will lay the load of this sinne vpon their Ministers an other day when God shall rekone with them for it crying out vpon their Teachers who misled them S. Iames telleth vs if some man hath converted an other from his errour he shall saue a soule and shall hide a multitude of sinnes Iam. 5.19.20 If then this be an argument to perswade all men to labour to bring their brethren out of errours because so they shall hide a multitude of sinnes what a terrour then should it be vnto all Ministers to thinke that they haue seduced the people and led them into erroures for thus they haue opened a fountaine of sinnes for euery single person in their congregation Master seruant Mistris maide Parent childe euery one of these doe hereby fale into the sinne of Sabbath
breaking euery weeke that is 50 times in one yeere so as if a man hath liued but a matter of 40 or 50 yeeres he is guilty of the breach of Gods 4th com Twenty hundreth times what a multitude of sinnes are heere all these are the Minister guilty of these are the multitude of sinnes committed by one single person in his congregation but if a Minister hath 400 or 500 persones or a thowsand persones vnder his charge what an infinit number of sinnes is hee guilty of let this be ceriously thought on Furthermore if it doth come into the heart of the Magistrate at any time to thinke of a reformation as God graunt it may what is it that quencheth that motion of Gods Spirit in him is it not this that hee bethinketh him that his Minister and so other Ministers are of a contrary iudgement affirming with one consent that this Sabbath day is abolished and ceremoniall Iewish so then Ministers are not onely guilty of the breach of Gods Sabbaths among the people for time past but also they hinder Reformation in the persones in whose power it is to make Reformation By the mercy of God we liue in a kingdome that is gouerned by Christian Magistrates and vnder such gouerners as haue alredy made reformationes in many things wherein they haue bene informed by the Clergie and I verily beleeue they would as willingly take this point into their considerations if moued therevnto by the Ministry as they haue done other things but behold they who should informe them and cale vpon them are dumbe and silent nay enemies and aduersaries to the cause wherefore that this Sabbath breaking is defended by Authority and not reformed but the reformation of it opposed by Authority this is to be imputed vnto Ministers let this be ceriously thought on Herevnto happily some will reply but these Ministers who doe these things are very zealouse godly men c. To whom I answer the more zealouse the worse the more godly the worse it were enough for the most godlesse profane men to set themselues against an ordinance of Gods to oppose his Sabbaths but for men fearing God zealouse for God that these should shew themselues so regardlesse of Gods ordināce such enemies to his Sabbaths this is in them a double iniquity for who but they should stand for God and defend his Sabbaths In the third place I lay many things to the charge of such Ministers as doe oppose Gods ancient Sabbath as 1. that thereby they haue defaced Gods royall-Law mangled it robbed it of its integrity perfection they haue diminished the compleate number of Tenn Commandements they haue made it a morall-ceremoniall Law an hotch potch a very Monstre 2. They bewray a greate want of loue vnto Gods Law they doe not loue it for it selfe for they indeauor might maine to ouerthrow a parte of it yea they are horribly partiall in that they will defend all the other partes of Gods Law against Anabaptists but will not defend this parte also against them 3. They open a flood gate to impiety and prophanesse among people draw vs to Anabaptistry by throwing downe Gods Sabbaths 4. They are guilty of that sinne in Deut. 12.32 and of that curse in Reuel 22.18.19 threatened to such as doe either add to Gods word or detract from it for by that text Ex. 31.13 they haue vnnecessarily detracted from Gods Law the 7th day Sabbath to that text Colos 2.16.17 they haue vnnecessarily added the 7th day Sabbath for the ruine of it now in thus doeing they behaue themselues like men that are weary of Gods seruice as if it were a burden vnto them to sanctifie Gods Sabbaths as if it grieued them that Gods Sabbaths should be morall were it not thus with them they would neuer manage such arguments and Scriptures against Gods Sabbaths as you see they haue done oh preiudice oh temporizing But admit that by reason of swaying with the times a preiudice against the Sabbath as Iewish is fastened in their breasts I see no cause why they should reiect the Matchlesse example president of God himselfe Exo. 20.10.11 is this Jewish too for they cannot abide it that the Church and people of God should be imitators followers of God like deere Children that is that they should labour on those daies wherin God wrought rest on that day wherin God rested sanctify that time which God sanctified yea and also commanded but like men that loued not to be like God they will haue the people rest when God wrought worke when God rested prophane the time which God Sanctified they had rather goe any way then treade in Gods steppes follow him The last thing which I lay to the charge of Ministers is that they haue taken away one whole com from the 10. commandements in the former point I haue taxed them for takeing away some parte of a com but here I taxe them for taking away a whole com by name the 4th com and this I thus make good against them 1. They haue taken away the time to wit the 7th day in the com the which being gone there is no day time lefte in the com so that an howre vpon any day in the weeke spent at a Lecture in prayer singing a Psalme hearing Gods word is as much as the 4th com can now require by their expositiones now therfore the 4th com needeth no longer goe thus Remember the Sabbath day for it may goe thus Remember the Sabbath howre 2. They haue abolished the dueties in the day to wit rest Holy actiones for the word Sabbath signifying rest this rest they haue abolished by making the word Sabbath rest in the 4th com a signe Exod. 31.13 and a Shaddow Colos 2.17 so abolished now if the Sabbath and rest be abolished then may men labour in their callings euery man in his owne house seuerally this taketh away holy Assemblies in the congregation all publike dueties of a Sabbath thus haue they abolished by their corrupt glosses expositions both the time the dueties to be performed in the time now these being gone I pray shew me what is lefte behind in the 4th com for they haue abolished euery thing that was commanded 3. By making these words Sabbath day a signe Exo. 31.13 and a Shaddow Col. 2.17 and so abolished thus they haue taken away the Substance of the 4th com lefte vs nothing but a shaddow so as now we may reade the 4th com thus Remember the 0000000000 to Sanctify it thus much for the body of the 4th com Lastly they haue taken away the Reason and Motiue which God tooke from his owne example added it to his 4th com Exod. 20 11. this whole verse v. 11. conteining ij most liuely reasones effectuall they haue robbed Gods Church of the vse of them for they neither vse them
themselues no neither can man else vse them vnto the day we now keepe for God did moue vnto the obseruation of the Saturday 7th day 1. Because him selfe at the Creation rested on it 2. Because he had blessed that day hallowed it so made it an Holy day now these two reasones neither are nor can be applied to our Lords day for God at the creation did not rest on our Lords day no neither did he then blesse sanctify the Lords day for the Lords day was not then knowne Thus you see how they baue made cleere worke for they haue taken away both the body of the 4th com the reasone annexed to it by God thus they haue taken away the whole 4th com head taile roote branch it stands for vs now onely to looke vpon Loe now we may say with the Prophet Dauid It is time for thee Lord to worke for they haue destroied thy Law Psal 119.126 Thus since I haue faithfully plainly discouered this Notoriouse errour I haue done what in me lyeth towards a reformation onely this remaineth that with the residue of the congregation I make this prayer vnto God That it may please him to bring into the way of trueth all such as haue erred are deceiued CHAPT V. This Chapter conteineth sondry substanciall arguments out of the word of God proueing that the Lords Sabbath day written in the Morall Law is still in force so ought to be vnto the worlds end like as are the other morales I Haue now finished the fowre first partes of my booke the first whereof was in defence of the Morall Law The second was an exposition of the 4th com with a discouery of the corrupt expositiones thereof The third was an answer vnto those Scriptures reasones wich are vsually brought to proue the Lords day the Sabbath day The fowrth was an answer vnto those abused Scriptures which are brought against the Lords Sabbath day And now by order I am come vnto the fith parte of my booke and herein I am to proue vnto you the perpetuity of the Lords Sabbath and that it is still in force and so ought for euer to be Touching the Sabbath I note two things 1. I see many lerned and greate Diuines of late prime men and of the formost ranke in the Vniuersities both on this side and beyond the Seas disclaiming and wrighting against the Lords day Sabbath but I see none of them shew vs where we shall haue an other Sabbath in the absence of this as the former bewrayed their learning and iudgement so this latter bewrayed their forgetfulnesse what shall the Church of God be left without a Sabbath now shall we turne from Superstition to Anabaptistry I ioyne with them in throwing downe the Lords day for a Sabbath but I dare not put an end to the worke when it is but halfe done 2. As those Iewes of old cried the Temple of the Lord the temple of the Lord so I obserue the Patrons of the Lords day to cry out of the prophanation of the Lords Sabbaths the prophanatiō of the Lords Sabbaths as if they were the onely friends to Gods Sabbaths whereas in deed in trueth they are the chiefe enemies to them and are foulely mistaken in their iudgement for they are the Lords dayes which they meane not the Lords Sabbath dayes if therefore any man may in a right accompt be said to be a true friend to Gods Sabbaths it is not they it is hee that writeth for them and defendeth them against the world and corruptiones of the time hee may indede say with Eliah I haue bene very Ielouse for the Lord of hostes for they haue forsaken thy Couenant broken downe thy Sabbaths and I onely am left The Lords Sabbaths are still in force or Gods ancient 7th day Saturday Sabbath is still in force SECT I. IN defending the Lords Sabbath I purpose to obserue this method first I will proue the point by arguments lesse forcible and then by arguments more forcible first by arguments shewing that it is a thing meete convenient and very befiting vs to keepe the Lords Sabbath then by arguments shewing that it is a thing very necessary in regard of Gods appointment ordination By the way whereas there are many light and triuiall obiections vsually brought against the Lords Sabbath and some place would be reserued to answer them I think it vnfit to place them after the point is proued by necessary arguments for when Gods will is once knowne there is no place left for carnall and triuiall obiections against it and therefore I hold it better to place these obiections next after the point is proued by probable arguments and arguments of conveniency and so these triuiall obiections shall rather come in by way of opposition vnto arguments of conveniency then vnto arguments deriued from Gods ordination Wherefore I purpose to spend the first Section about arguments of conveniency and the second Section in answer vnto sondry obiections and then the third Section in arguments prouing the point necessarily from Gods ordination To begine with the first of these namly conveniency and arguments lesse forcible in handling of this point first I will proue by sondry arguments that it is meete we should keepe a Sabbath day one or other indefinitly and then I will proue that it is most meete fitest to keepe the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath before any other One reason mouing me to handle these two points is to preuent Prophane and carnall men thus to thinke why you haue throwne downe the Lords day Sabbath now therfore what need we any more Sabbaths c I procede therfore to giue such reasones as may take place in a carnall mind For the former of these I proue that it is meete we should keepe a Sabbath day because it is a worke of mercy that this may the better appeare we will consider of it in respect of man beast touching man we will consider of him generally and then particularly and first for man in generall it is a greate comforte and worke of mercy vnto all men to keepe a Sabbath day for therein their bodies are exceedingly refreshed and comforted for looke as the Bedd at night is a greate refreshment vnto man that hath bene occupied all the day before in his painfull calling so is the Sabbath day a sweete refreshment vnto men after that they haue bene exercised Sixe dayes one after an other in continuall laboures the trueth of this point euery man findeth by good experience We haue a prouerb that men must worke to day as they may worke too morrow that is that men doe not so ouerworke themselues in one day as they be vnfit for worke the next day this prouerb may well be applied to our present occation that men must worke this weeke so as they may worke the next weeke also that is they must not so worke and tyre out their
doubtfull then when the matter is in our choise which day of the weeke to take it is the surest and safest to make choise of that day whereof there is some doubt whither it be abolished or not we haue showne it is certaine that the 7th day is not abolished but suppose there were some doubt of it as it cannot be but doubted of by the stifiest Anti Sabbatharians since that some place is lest for doubting be it that we doubt neuer so litle of it yet it is better and safer to keepe it then to keepe any other day of the weeke to neglect the 7th day being once Commanded of God and it cannot be cleerly proued that euer God countermanded it here vpon some scruple at least must remaine in mens consciences touching it and therefore it is fitest to keepe the 7th day so shall we make suer worke that God shal haue nothing against vs out of his 4th coÌ„ but doeing otherwise we shall laye in perpetuall doubts feares that we liue in the transgression of the 4th com So much be spoken for this point the which I haue insisted vpon not so much hereby to proue that the 7th day must be the Sabbath for that I shall doe after the next section by solid arguments but chiefly to this end to stay satisfie the minds of carnall men with carnall reasones with Testemonies and the like for some men there are I feare me that could wish in their hearts that there were no Sabbaths at all of such an ignoble and base Spirit they are all their minde is for worke worke vncessantly it is meete therfore that it should be declared vnto such men that it is not onely necessary to haue a Sabbath in religiouse diuine respects but also in carnall respectes as for necessity of nature and the like and that otherwise all Churches would condemne vs for not onely the primitiue Churches but also all Christians euery where of euery Sect doe set a parte one day in 7 for Gods worship yea our owne Church would rise vp in iudgment and condemne such conceipts by hit contrary and daily practise SECT II. I come now to giue answer vnto many friuolouse obiectiones which are daily raised against the Lords Sabbath which being done I shall haue a cleere way opened for me to proue that the Lords Sabbath day is still in force these rubbes being taken out of the way first OBIECT I. One obiection they haue against the Lords Sabbath day and it is this what shall we keepe the Sabbath day the 7th day the Saturday Sabbath why that is the Iewes Sabbath day Herevnto I answer my desire it not to striue aboute names were the Lords Sabbath day called the Jewes Sabbath day in none other nor worse sense then that it might likewise be called the Christians Sabbath day I should say nothing to the contrary but finding it so called reprochfully I desire to rescue it from vnder the feete of contempt I desire therefore of such men as so cale it reprochfully to giue me a reason why the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com should rather be called the Iewes Sabbath day then the Lord our God whom we are commanded to Haue in the first com should be called the Iewes Lord God for my parte I can see no reason but that the one may be so called reprochfully as well as the other nor any thing can I see to the contrary but that we may as well cale the Sabbath day which the Iewes Sanctified our Sabbath day also as to cale the Lord God whom the Iewes worshipped our Lord God But to take of vniust scandall let not men nickname the Lords Sabbaths but rather in an holy reuerence of God let vs cale them as God himselfe calleth them that is the Lord Gods Sabbaths for thus the Lord himselfe named them in his 4th com when he said The 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God So then it is Gods Sabbath not the Iewes Sabbath it is the Sabbath of the Lord and not the Sabbath of the Iewes The Lord telleth vs by his Prophet Isaiah that we should cale the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable Isa 58.13 So then we should vse the name of the Sabbath honourably but loe how men will vse it reprochfully caling it Iewish and the Iewes Sabbath in scorne and contempt Yet further the Sabbath was ordeined from the Creation Genes 2.3 Now at the Creation there was no difference of Iew Gentile how then can the Sabbath be called the Iewes Sabbath it may be therfore the Gentiles Sabbath as well as the Iewes Sabbath so much for this name or nickname OBIECT II. An other obiection is this oh but this were to bringe into the Church such strictnesse as is intollerable for if we admit of the Iewes Sabbath day then must we not so much as kindle a fyer on the Sabbath day nor doe any worke at all how needfull soeuer it be Herevnto I answer that this is but an euill reporte and a slaunder brought vp against the Lords Sabbaths by those who are professed enemies vnto them and delight to bring them into disgrace with the people for we haue formerly showne that the Lord neuer forbad the Iewes to kindle a fyer in a case of necessity on the Sabbath but onely for the doeing of such workes as might be done the day before or tarry vntill the day after we haue showne how Christ himselfe was present at a feast on the Sabbath day where in all likelihod was a fyer kindled to make prouision for the guests or as greate workes done in attendance to the guests by the seruants as is the kindling of a fyer which may be done in an instant and without almost any labour yea our Sauiour allowed in his time of all necessary workes and workes of mercy to be done vpon the Sabbath day as to plucke and rubb eares of corne to lift a beast out of the ditch or to leade a beast vnto the water and the like In a word there was no more strictnesse required of the Iewes in keeping of the Sabbath day then is at this present required by Diuines in keeping of our Lords day so this obiection is but a slaunder OBIECT III. An other obiection is that it is a thing impossible to be reformed since the Sabbath day hath bene out of vse so many hundâ—eth yeeres and since the Lords day hath bene in vse so longe Wherevnto J answer impossible say you what impossibility is there in it the impossibility and all the difficulty is onely in the minds of men in that they are not willing with it for the Commonwealth should not loose euery man a penny by the change of the day for it is all one to them whither they keepe Saturday for their Sabbath or Sunday all the difficulty in the matter is as farre as I can see to possesse the minds of our Gouerners with this
trueth of Gods and espetially his Majestie and if once God shallincline his heart to the loue of this trueth a word from his mouth may reforme it his Decree proclamation or the like were enough to make this impossible thing possible OBIECT IV. An other obiection is that Gods Church is now at a sweete peace and concord and the bringing of this point to light will but make a greate hurly burly and disturbance in the Church wherefore the Author might be better occupied or else be silent Herevnto I answer this obiection is indeed euery where heard of and indeed the peace of the Church is to be sought to the vtmost but yet we must not be so mindfull of peace as to forget holinesse for the Apostle hath ioyned these ij together saying Follow peace with all men and holinesse without the which no man shall see the Lord Heb. 12.14 peace with the Church in keeping the Lords day and warre with God in profaning of his Sabbath day is no comfortable nor safe peace Let me desire such as rest vpon thes obiection to reade perpend what the Lord spake by his Prophet Isaiah against the people that would not heare Gods Law but rather such things as might please them make no disturbance amongst them saying It is a rebelliouse people children that would not heare the Law of the Lord which say vnto the Seers see not and to the Prophets Prophesy not vnto vs right things but speake flattering things vnto vs Isa 30.9.10 The gloriouse Gospell the Gospell of peace the word of Trueth did it bringe peace into the world no I am come saieth our Sauiour to put fier on the earth Luk. 12.49 againe Thinke not that I am come to send peace into the earth but the sword to set a man at variance against his father the daughter against hir mother Mat. 10.34 such is the frowardnesse of mans nature as this trueth of Gods Sabbath will neuer enter neither with the peace of men OBIECT V. An other obiection is this what shall we doe say some Ministers are at variance one saith the old Sabbath day is in force still others say that it is abolished longe agone by the coming of Christ wherefore I shall giue no regard to this new Doctrine vntill Ministers can agree among themselues and till all men be at one accord in this matter for they bring reasones on both sids so as a man cannot tell which to beleeue Herevnto I answer if men shall tarry till all men are agreed so they shall professe no trueth nor any Religion for all men are not at accord in any Religion nor almost in any point of Religion wherefore it is a better way first to consider of the matter in question whither it be a difference about words or about things and whither about things substantiall or circumstanciall as ceremonies are and as the matter is of weight more or lesse so to regard it more or lesse for such may the controuercy be as it may concerne not some men but all men such it may be as may concerne all men very neerly now of this kind is this controuercy for it is not a difference about words or vnnecessary circumstances or about that which concerneth but some few men onely but it is about an ordinance of God expresly commanded in his morall Law and therefore it is a substanciall matter and concerneth all and euery man neerly like as doe all the 10 commandements and therefore people must not put off the matter vntill Ministers be agreed vnlesse they will be wilfully ignorāt in a matter off greate importance and which so nerely concerneth them as doth all the things commanded in the 10 commandements It is a Catechisme point to know Gods Sabbath day and a point of greate consequence neerly concerning vs all as appeareth not onely because it is an ordinance established by the Morall Law but also in this that it is put downe in euery Catechisme as behofefull for euery one to be acquainted with all now if such a point come into controuercy all men should giue attendance vnto it and study it vntill the trueth be boulted out Neither let this be any stumbling blocke because this Doctrine is new for albeit it be new vnto our times yet it is as old Doctrine as is any in the 10 commandements but what if it be new to thee the Doctrine of the Gospell was as new to the Bereanes as the Doctrine of the Sabbath can be to thee and yet they did not argue thus carelesly as you doe saying Paul hath broched a new point of one Christ c. And he is singular and all alone all our Doctoures teachers are contrary to him wherefore we will not harken to what he saith but contrarywise they tooke the matter presently into consideration they fell to serch and examine the Scriptures to see if the things Paul taught were so or not and are therefore commended by the holy Ghost vnto all Posterity oh that men in these times would turne Bereanes and serch the Scriptures to see if I speak according to them or not if I bring not an expresse commandement for that I cale for let me be reiected or try whither they or I come with Thus saith the Lord in our mouthes I bring you the plaine Scripture to wit the 4th com and they bring you nothing but their reasones and consequences which they say come out of Scripture if one may beleeue them but since their reasons and consequences doe thwart and crosse a plaine commandement of Almightie Gods therefore their reasons consequences against the Sabbath day are to be reiected for mans reason must not contradict Gods expresse word vnlesse we will set reason aboue Scripture would people but marke these things they should not be long in doubt vnlesse they will Neither should they neede care that Ministers are at variance for they might easily see which side to take parte withall side it with him which bringeth the expresse word of God rather then with them which haue no word but onely a fewe reasones in vented by mans cauilling braine OBIECT VI. An other obiection is this to say that the old Sabbath day is still in force is to say by consequence that our Church is in an errour now can it be thought that the Church of God can lay in such an errour as this touching Gods Sabbath day it is impossible Herevnto I answer that it is meete we should hold as honourable an opinion of our Church as may be and yet for all that we are not bound to beleeue that it is a thing impossible for our Church to be in an errour in as great an errour too as is this there are ij sortes of erroures there is an errour of maliciousnesse wilfulnesse against the light of conscience there is an errour of frailty ignorance this latter kindof errour may doth befale euery godly person and
vs to sanctify the Lords day it is no where said in the new Testament Remember the Lords day to sanctify it 2. As there is no expresse commandement for the Lords day so is there no collection or consequence that can be made out of any text of Scripture whereby it can be necessarily infalliblie proued that euer Christ ordeined this day or left any commandement touching it with his Disciples or Apostles that this is so I proue 1. by the third parte of this my booke where by way of answer I haue showne that none of all their Scriptures nor reasons which they doe alleage for the Lords day will or can proue it any more then a Lecture day at the most they cannot proue it a Sabbath day this first argument is of greate consequence and much to be thought on I proue it also by the Testimony of Diuines of note first of M. Perkines who thus doubtfully argueth for the Lords day in his second reason for it in his Cases of Conscience Chap. 16. Sect. 2. pag. 106. The Sabbath day in the new Testament saieth he in all likelihood is tied to that which we cale the Lords day that as J take it saith he by Christ himselfe And then by by he addeth these words for in these points still we must goe by likelihoods by all which doubting speeches you may see that M. Perkins was of opinion that it could not be proued out of the Scriptures necessarily infallibly that the Lords day is a Sabbath as for doubtfull probable proofes and likelihoods what haue we to doe with them in points of this consequence for if the matter be doubtfull then it cannot be done in faieth Rom. 14.23 He that doubteth eateth not of faith saith Paul and whatsoeuer is not of faieth is a sinne 2. Doctour Prideaux in his worke vpon the Sabbath day thus writeth where finde you saith he amongst the Euangelists or Apostles any distinct institution of the Lords day yea where is the text of Scripture saith he whereby you can necessarily proue it pag. 143. Herevnto add the Testimony of Caluine of Zanchie of Vrsinus with many others who I haue formerly cited as S. Augustine Peter Martyr Paraeus Chemnitius Zuinglius Melanchton Hemingius Bastingius the two godly Matyrs M. Fryth M. Tindall with the whole Parliament assembled in the daies of Edward the Sixte all saying that the Lords day cannot be found in the Scriptures for a Sabbath My second profe of the minor is from this that our Sauiour Christ made the Lords day a trauailing day for he trauailed too fro in the Country from Ierusalem to Emmaus a matter of 15 miles vpon the Lords day as you may reade Luk. 24.13.15.29.36 so also the Disciples of Christ made this day a trauailing day as you reade in the fore alleaged text Luk. 24.13.15.29.36 yea which is more the Disciples and Apostles of Christ they were altogether ignorant that the Lords day was a Sabbath day this I thus proue the Lords day as the Patrons thereof hold is celebrated in memory of the resurrection of Christ now the Apostles themselues did not beleeue that Christ was risen from the dead vntill the day was past or vntill night as you may see Mark 16.10.11.13.14 Luk. 24.36.38.41.45.46 Ioh. 20.19.26.27 Now since Christ his Apostles did not know beleeue that Christ was risen from the deade vntill this Lords day was past how could they keepe this Lords day in memory of Christ his resurrection wherefore since Christ his Disciples made this Lords day a trauailing day since the Apostles themselues did not so much as know that this Lords day was a Sabbath day therefore no man fearing God may defend the Lords day to be a Sabbath day vnlesse he will reproue not onely Christ but also his Disciples for traualing vpon it and vnlesse hee will be thought to be wiser then the Apostles were that is by knowing the Lords day to be a Sabbath day which they were ignorant of My third profe of the Minor is from the 4th com for there the Lord commandeth vs to labour Sixe dayes saying Sixe dayes shalt thou labour c. Now this commandement was neuer repealed the Lords day is one of these 6 dayes and by name it is the first of the 6 or the first day of the weeke wherefore by Gods ordinance and commandement this Lords day is a labouring day a working day therefore no man fearing God may speake to defend the Lords day to be a Sabbath day a resting day vnlesse he will contradict Almightie God ARGVM II. My 2d argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath still in force is because it was neuer yet abolished thus it may be framed Euery man fearing God must maintaine defend either that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force or else that is was abolished But no man fearing God may maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath was abolished Therefore euery man fearing God must maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force For the Major or first of these propositiones it is of vndeniable trueth for either the 7th day Sabbath must be abolished or else it must be in force one of these two must be a trueth for there is no third way so then this first proposition cannot be denied I come to proue the minor or second proposition to wit that no man fearing God may maintaine defend that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished and my reason hereof is because it cannot be defended in faieth no man can say in faieth that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished this I proue because there is no word of God for the grownd of their faieth for there is not in all the new Testament any commandement or Prohibition as a Countermand to the 4th com where it is expresly written Thou shalt not sanctify the 7th day Sabbath no neither is there any text of Scripture out of which it can be necessarily proued that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished that this is true it appeareth by the 4th parte of my booke where by way of answer vnto all their abused textes which they brought against the 7th day Sabbath I haue showne the vanity and absurdety of their arguments wherefore since they cannot soundly infallibly proue that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished therefore may not any mā speake against the 7th day Sabbath for if he doth he speaketh against it not of faieth whatsoeuer is not of faieth it is sinne Rom. 14.23 no man fearing God will wilfully vse his tounge or penne sinnefully 2. I proue the point by many absurdeties that such doe rune into who defend the 7th day Sabbath to be abolished as 1. hereby they deface Gods royall Law mancle it rob it of its Integrity perfection diminish the compleate number of Tenn commandementes make it a morall ceremoniall Law a very monstre among
parte of the Law and may challeng it of right then are the commandements of murther adultery stealing 2. In a bond there the debitor is bound vnto ij things the one is the summe of money the other is the Time day when it must be paid now will any man say that the Time and day mentioned in the bond is no parte of the bond there is the same reason of the thinges in a bond and of the things in the bond of the 4th com 3. The Iewes were commanded to circumcise vpon the 8th day to eate the passouer on the 14th day now will any man thinke that these daies commanded were no partes of those Commandements 4. An other reasoÌ„ to proue the time day to be a parte of the Law is because if it be taken away then the Law is vnperfect lame for take away these words But the Seauenth day from the 4th com then you leaue the 4th com imperfect and lame for it wanteth those words which the Almighty wrote in it to wit these words But the Seauenth day 2. As hereby the Law is lamed in its words so also is it in things for our new Sabbatharians when they haue abolished the old Sabbath the 7th day Sabbath then they thinke the Law is imperfect for it wanteth a day therfore they haue patched it vp againe with a new day to wit the Lords day saying the 4th com commandeth now the Lords day wherefore themselues are my witnesses that the Time day is a parte of the Law and also a parte so necessary as they hold the Lawe vnperfect vntill they haue put in a new peece to make vp the breach when a stud or pillar of an howse is taken away so as they must set in a new stud or pillar into its roome then that old stud surely was in right account a parte of the house so is it here since a new day must be put into the 4th com in the roome of the old day surely the old day was a parte of the 4th com a man may therefore as well take away the studes or pillars of an house as abolish the 7th day Sabbath and as the one tendeth to the ruine of the house so the other tendeth to the ruine of the whole Law of God but specially of the 4th com 5. If these words But the 7th day is the Sabbath be no parte of the Law or 4th com then are we not now bound to giue God one day in 7 for a Sabbath for one day in 700 may suffice more we are not commanded if so much 6. Those words which expresly forbid seruile labour are a parte of the Law or 4th com But these words The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt doe no manner of worke doe expresly forbid seruile labour Therefore these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. are a parte of the Law 4th com 7. Those words the breach whereof are punishable with death are a parte of the Law or 4th com for punishment implieth sinne and sinne presupposeth a law But these words The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt doe no worke are punishable by death see Exod. 31.15 Exod. 35.2 Therefore are these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. a parte of the Law or 4th com 8. If these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. be no parte of the Law or 4th com then by so saying you condemne all Expositors for they affirme that in these words one day in 7 is commanded c. which could not be if these words were no part of the Law or 4th com and thus much for my 5th argument ARGVM VI. My 6th argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because it is the 7th day besides which there is no 7th day thus I frame it That day which is a 7th day besids the which there is no 7th day that day must be our Sabbath day But Saturday the 7th day is a 7th day besids which there is no 7th day Therefore Saturday the 7th day must be our Sabbath day For profe of the Maior or first proposition many Diuines are of iudgement that the 7th parte of time is Gods to be consecrated to his worship seruice as morall wherefore all such Diuines must approue of this Major to wit that that day which is a 7th day besids which there is none other 7th day that day must be our Sabbath day consecrated to Gods worship and seruice my reason hereof is because that day which is the 7th day besids which there is no 7th day it is the 7th parte of time in the strictest and best accounte 2. All Diuines in expounding of the 4th com doe expound these words The 7th day is the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 to be vnderstod of a 7th day and so they would haue a 7th day to be in force though not the 7th day wherefore since they hold a 7th day to be in force they must needs grant that that day which is a 7th day besids which there is none other 7th day it must be our Sabbath day and thus all Diuines doe iustify my Major wâ—ither hey hold a 7th parte of time to be Morall or that a 7th day is Morall and so much for proofe of the Major I come now vnto the profe of the Minor or second proposition to wit that Saturday the 7th day is a 7th day besids which thereis no 7th day For this purpose note that a 7th day must be so accounted either Naturally or Diuinly first for the account Naturall Saturday must needs be a 7th day naturally besids which there is none other 7th day for Saturday is the 7th day from the Creation and there is no 7th day besids it from the Creation now the account which fet cheth its begining from the Creation that is the naturall account because time and dayes begane at the begining of the Creation and he that counteth daies in number as they were in being he followeth the Naturall computation Further as Saturday is naturally the 7th day besids which there is none other so Saturday is the 7th parte of time in a naturall accounte besids which there is no 7th parte of time this is very apparent at the first viewe 2. For the account Diuine Saturday must needs be a 7th day in Diuine account besids which there is none other 7th day for the Scriptures whose computation is Diuine doe informe vs that Saturday is a 7th day inasmuch as they cale the day whereon Christ rose the first day of the weeke Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.2 that is our Sunday now if Sunday be the first day of the weeke in a Diuine account then Saturday which went before it or the Saturday which comes after it must be the last and a 7th day of the weeke in a Diuine account forasmuch as the Scripture
to the Redemption but we speake of a Sabbath that was a signe of the Creation therefore the Sabbath we heere speake for it differeth from those Sabbaths which the Apostle abolished as farre as the Creation differeth from the Redemption this yet further appeareth in their text for it speaketh of a Shaddow of thinges to come so that those abolished Sabbaths had respect vnto things to come afterwards as vnto Christ but this Sabbath for which we plead it was a signe of things past done before as of the Creation so that this Sabbath differeth from those abolished Sabbaths as farre as things past doe differ from things to come so then it doth not appeare that any thing once made an helpe to keepe in memory the Creation was euer abolisâ—ed indeed it were contrary vnto all reason that it should for albeit that such signes should vanish as had respect vnto things future when once the substance was come in presence yet is it farre otherwise with such signes as had respect vnto things past for here the substance or thing signified should neuer be come any neerer then at first it was vnto the signe but rather farther off still so as the longer the signe lasted the more vse neede there would be of it so much for answer to this fond obiection I come now vnto the profe of the minor or second proposition to wit that the 7th day Sabbath was a speciall helpe meanes to preserue the memory of the Creation in the Church of God this I proue because the Sabbath day was made a signe of the Creation signes are helpes meanes to keepe memory of those things whereof they are signes here then my taske is to proue vnto you for the confirmation of my Minor these two propositiones the one that the Sabbath day was once a signe of the Creation the other that signes are helpes meanes to keepe memory of the things they signify For the former of these to wit that the Sabbath day was once a signe of the Creation This I proue first by the Testimony of all men and secondly by the Testimony of the Sriptures For the Testimony of men that the 7th day Sabbath is a signe this all of them grant when they alleage that text Exod. 31.13 against the Sabbath as an abolished signe further that this signe respected the Creation as the thing signified by it is found to be the iudgement of Diuines euery wherein their writings as might be showne if it were needfull yea this is plaine by the common arguments in euery mans mouth for when they would proue that the Lords day must be a Sabbath they thus argue if the Iewes kept a Sabbath in memory of the Creation then so ought we Christians to keepe a Sabbath in memory of the Redemption againe the Lords day was instituted say they in memory of the resurrection like as the Sabbath day was instituted for me mory of the Creation by which kind of reasoning they doe confesse it that the Sabbath day was instituted for the memory of the Creation So much for the Testimony of men next I come to proue it by diuine Testimony from the Scripture for this purpose see Ex. 31.17 where the Lord speakeing of our 6 daies labour of our 7th day Sabbath saith thus It is a signe betwene mee the children of Israel for euer for in sixe daies the Lord made the heauen the earth in the 7th day he ceased rested as if the Lord had thus said because I laboured in the 6 daies at the Creation rested on the 7th day therefore your 6 daies labour 7th daies rest is a signe betwene mee you of my 6 daies labour 7th daies rest thus the sense must be rendered if we take the words as they are translated but because this kind of sense making is difficult not so familiar vnto our vnderstandings by reason the thing signified by the signe is not expressed but collected therefore to make the sense of the text appeare more cleerly it is better to put the word that in the roome of the rationall partice for then the sense will be very familiar easy for so the thing signified by the signe shall be expressed in the text then the text should be read thus Jt is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel for euer that in sixe daies the Lord made heauen earth in the 7th day he ceased rested Thus you see it plaine that as all men hold the 7th day Sabbath was kept in remembrance of the Creation so this text confirmeth it saying that it is a signe that God laboured 6 daies rested on the 7th day Now that this particle translated for may be translated that it appeareth 1. By the Septuagint which rendereth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which may be indifferently translated for or that according as may best fit the text 2. In sondry other textes our Translatores haue translated the same Hebrew word that rather then for as you may see Deut. 29.6 That yee may know that I am the Lord your God Thus I haue proued the one of the propositiones to wit that the 7th day Sabbath was a signe of the Creation The other proposition which I am to proue is that Signes are helpes and meanes to keepe in memory the things they signify and this is so plaine as I might spare the labour toproue it for it is the very nature propertie of a signe to be a meanes to bring to minde the thing fignified by it wherefore serues the picture of a mans absent frieÌ„d but to helpe to bring him to minde The raine bowe in the clowds it is called a signe or a token Genes 4.13 the Lord said he would looke vpon the bowe that he might remember the CoueaÌ„t which was the thing signified by the bowe v. 16. The passeouer was a signe or tokeÌ„ which when the Angell saw he remeÌ„bred the Couenant spared the Isralites Exod. 12.13 The Lords Supper it is a Sacramentall signe it is of this vse to be an helpe meanes to remember vs of the death of Christ 1. Cor. 11.24 you may reade the like also in Gen. 17.11 Exo. 31.13 by all which instances it is plaine that signes are helpes and meanes to bring to mind preserue in memory the thing absent signified by those signes Thus much for the Minor or second proposition also for my 7th argument whereby you haue seene it proued that the 7th day Sabbath must still be in force because it is a singular meanes to preserue in memory the myraculouse worke of Gods Creation ARGVM VIII My 8th argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because God hath expresly commanded it in his morall Law thus it may be framed Whatsoeuer God hath expresly commanded to be done in his Morall Law or
10 commandements that is still in force But to sanctify the 7th day Sabbath God hath expresly commanded it to be done in his Morall Law or 10 commandements Therefore to sanctifie the 7th day Sabbath is still in force Here I will begine with the minor or second proposition prouing that first because it will be soonest done the point then I am to proue is that God hath commanded the sanctification of the 7th day Sabbath in his morall Law or 10 com here first I will proue that the Lord hath commanded the sanctification of the Sabbath day 2dly that this Sabbath day is the 7th day for the former see Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy or to sanctifie it where you see an expresse commandement giuen to Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it or keepe it holy so the former point is proued The next point to be proued is that this Sabbath day it was the 7th last day of the weeke which is our Saturday this I shall proue first by humane Testimony 2dly by Diuine Testimony for humane Testimony 1. the Iewes wheresoeuer they liue they kepe the 7th last day of the weeke our Saturday for this Sabbath day here commanded as it is well knowne 2. All Christians both Protestants Papists confesse that the 7th last day of the weeke our Saturday was the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com which point I haue incisted more largly vpon in the Exposition of the 4th com I shall proue the same also by Diuine Testimony and that before the Law at the giuing of the Law after the giuing of the Law 1. Before the giuing of the Law see Exod 16.26 Sixe dayes shall yee gather it but in the 7th day is the Sabbath in it there shall be none So here you see before the Law was giuen by Sabbath day was vnderstod the 7th day 2. At the giuing of the Law see Exod. 20 10. But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord. So here at the giuing of the Law was vnderstod by Sabbath day the 7th last day of the weeke 3. After the giuing of the Law see Exod. 23.12 Sixe daies thou shalt doe thy worke and in the 7th day thou shalt Rest. And see Exod. 31.15 Sixe daies shall men worke but in the 7th day is the Sabbath of the holy Rest. See also Exod. 34.2 Sixe daies thou shalt worke in the 7th day thou shalt Rest both in earing time in haruest see also Leuit. 23.3 Sixe daies shall worke be done but in the 7th day shall be the Sabbath of Rest And so it continued in the Church vntill Christs time as you may see Luk. 13.14 yea after Christs death as you may see Mat. 28.1 Mark 16.1.2 thus you haue seene it proued that by the word Sabbath in the 4th com God and the Church of God vnderstod the 7th last day of the weeke so you haue seene it proued that God commanded the sanctification of the 7th day Sabbath in his morall Law Now I come to the Major or first proposition the profe of this will cost me longer time then the former not but that it is as cleere as the former but that men of peruerse minds haue wilfully bent their wites lerning against it as they haue done against the former but t is no matter trueth shall preuaile God assisting it the point then that I am to proue is this that whatsoeuer God hath commanded in the Morall Law or 10 commandements it is still in force or now to be obserued and obeyed if they deny this Major then I require them to giue me an instance to the contrary let them shew me where God hath commanded any thing to be done in the 10 commandements which is abolished not in force now remembring that they bring not the thing in question for their instance 2. Happily they will answer by lymitation distinguishing and so deny some parte of this Major for example sometime they distinguish of the substance of the commandements of the Accidentes granting those denying these by substance they vnderstand that which they please to make morall in the Decalogue as the Rest in the 4th com the holy actiones of prayer reading preaching Gods word by Accident they vnderstand that which they please to make ceremoniall in the Decalogue as the time of Gods worship to wit the 7th day but this is a foolish distinction and so much the more vile in that it is made against God for hath not God as well commanded the Accident time as the substance and Rest is it not necessary to obey God in one commandemēt as well as in an other for the one is as well commanded as the other did they distinguish betweene things commanded things not commanded it were tollerable but they distinguish of things all of them commanded as betwene great commandements and little commandements the one they cale substances the other Accidents now the greater commandementes which they cale substances these they will imbrace but as for the lesser commandements which they please to cale Accidents these they will reiect deny so then Gods greater commandementes they will obey but as for his lesser commandements these they will not obey that because they are little and light in their esteeme but our Sauiour Christ hath taught them an other lesson saying whosoeuer shall breake one of these least commandements he shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 Let them cale them Accidentes if they will yet since they are commandements they are not lesse then the least commandements of which our Sauiour speaketh That no distinction is to be receiued whereby any thing inioyned in the 10 commandements is denyed I thus further proue it 1. this is a position so cleere as the Sunne that All Gods 10 commandements doe bind vs to obedience of them are still in force now if it be lawfull for any man barely to deny this trueth saying by way of answer that some of his commandements doe not bind vs to obedience then euery priuate mans bare deniall shall be as authenticall as this cleere trueth and orthodox position which is most absurd for thus a froward aduersary may put a man to bring a light cleerer then the Sunne that is hee may put him to proue whither any of Gods commandementes doe binde vs now or not for example a Minister reproueth an adulterer from the 7th commandement thus he frameth his argument against him All the 10 commandements doe bind vs c. But the 7th com is one of the 10 commandements c. Shall it be lawfull for this vncleane person to deny the Major in some parte of it by a distinction put the Minister to proue that All the 10 commandements doe bind vs what an impiouse and vngodly answer were this why this is our case for in my
the reason of the 4th Com. to shew you how they haue nullified made voide that also for they haue made most horrible hauocke with Gods Commandement by reiecting the Saturday Sabbath The body of the 4th Com. is conteined in iij. verses Exod. 20.8.9.10 and I haue showne how these iij. verses of the xx Chapter of Exodus are made voide and nullified and now I come to shew how they haue made frustrate also an other whole verse to wit verse the 11th and so they shall haue filled vp the mesure of their iniquity fulâ— by a sacrilegiouse robbing God of iiij whole verses out of his Morall Law by taking away the key of knowledge from them for I account it all as one to rend iiij verses of sacred Scripture out of the Bible to peruert the sense of them or to turne the sense vse of them into Ciphers That I may shew you how by denying and abolishing the 7th day Sabbath they haue nullified made voide the reason of the 4th Com. also first I will recite the reason for in sixe daies the Lord made the heauen the earth the sea all that in them is and rested the 7th day Therfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Exod. 20.11 This 11th verse is a reason giuen by Almightie God thereby to perswade vnto the obedience of the 4th Com. The Commandement was this that we should worke vpon those sixe daies which were the first sixe daies from the begining of the Creation that we should rest from labour on the 7th day from the Creation now the reason whereby God would perswade vs herevnto is a reason drawne from his owne example because that in those sixe daies God himselfe laboured and in the same 7th day God himselfe rested yea and therfore hallowed sanctified this 7th day Now what reason can be more liuly then a reason drawne from Gods example what argument can be more moueing with the sonnes daughters of God then an argumeÌ„t fetched from the example of their heauenly fathers but let the oldest man liuing tell me if euer he heard any Minister in the pulpit presse the keeping of the 4th com by this reason which God hath here added vnto his 4th com or let any man tell me if euer he heard the sanctification of the Lords day which is the first day of the weeke pressed by this reason here added by God vnto his 4th com Nay what Minister will not be ashamed to perswade men either to the keeping of the 4th com or to keeping of the Lords day by this reason which heere God hath propounded for we neither worke on those 6 dayes wherin God wrought neither doe we rest on that 7th day wherein God rested for we rest on the 8th day or first day not as God did on the 7th day our Lords day God did not rest on it for our imitation but he laboured on it for our imitation so as there is no correspondency betwixt our Lords day Sabbath our now keeping of the 4th com Gods example reason propounded vnto vs. When did you euer heare any Minister say thus Let vs rest from our laboures on the Lords day because God himselfe as our Patterne rested on the Lords day and let vs sanctify hallow the first day because God blessed sanctified the first day you see how God hath added a most liuely effectuall reason to his 4th com drawne from his owne example to moue vs to rest on the Lords day to sanctify the first day tell me if euer you heard any Minister thus presse this reason Gods example or if yee haue heard any houer aboute it as loath to touch it he hath nicknamed dayes caling the Lords day Sabbath day the 8th or first day the 7th day wherefore because Ministers cannot deuise how to make Gods example and exemplary reason to fit square to our new Sabbath therefore they are mute sileÌ„t touching it and thus you see the reason of the 4th com standeth in our Bibles but for a Cipher men are a shamed to vse it least they should shame themselues is it not a lamentable thing that Ministers are ashamed to deliuer the whole will counsaile of God least thereby they should both shame themselues bewray vnto the people their foule errour in abolishing of Gods Sabbaths for if this reason were vsed men would easily see how wide we are from the marke in keeping the Lords day in conscience of the 4th com when as the very reason of the 4th com would plainly â—each vs that it is the 7th day Sabbath wherein God himselfe rested that we should rest and not on the 8th day Sabbath To summe vp all you haue seene how they that abolish the 7th day Sabbath they haue turned the body of the 4th com into a company of Ciphers this hath bene declared proued many wayes yea they haue also turned the reason to the 4th com into so many words so many Ciphers for it standeth in the booke of God for a mute and is like a blanke in a Lottery no Minister vseing this reason of God before his people to perswade them to the keeping of the Lords day or of the Sabbath day by it So then since they haue not onely nullified the commandement but also made voyde and vselesse the reason annexed to the commandemeÌ„t hereby you see they haue by reiecting Gods hallowed and sanctified time the Saturday Sabbath reiected also the whole 4th com with euery parte and persell of it roote and branch There are not many verses in the Morall Law and behold how of those fewe verses they haue turned into Ciphers made voyde vselesse no lesse then iiij whole verses v. 8.9.10.11 there are not aboue 15 or 16 verses in all the Morall law now whosoeuer reiecteth the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath you see he maketh voyde frustrate no lesse then 4 of those verses it is an errour caling for deepest consideration a speedy reformation Thus much for my 9th argument ARGVM X. My 10th Argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath mentioned in the law is still in force is because our Sauiour Christ ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law to endure for euer Mat. 5.18 thus it may be framed He that ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law vnto the least letter to last for euer he ratified the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force But Christ ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law vnto the least letter to last for euer Therefore Christ ratified the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force As for the Major or first proposition it is cleere of it selfe for nothing therin can be doubted of for admit that the 7th day Sabbath be the least thing commanded in the Morall Law why then hee that ratified euery thing commanded in the Law vnto the very least
thing therein call it an accident or a circumstance of time or what else diminutily you will he did ratifie this litle thing also the 7th day Sabbath the argument is good a minori for if Christ would not haue a title of a letter in the Law altered much lesse an ordinance commanded in the Law as is the 7th day Sabbath I come next vnto the Minor or second proposition and this is most cleerly proued by the words of our Sauiour Christ For truly I say vnto you vntill heauen earth perish one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law vntill all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 In which words our Sauiour Christ plainly ratified the very least things commanded in the Law to last for euer for as Chemnitius saith vpon this text iote is a letter of the Hebrew Alphabet of the least value of all other letters in the Alphabet title saith hee is as a pricke to a letter or as a comma to a seÌ„tence whereby we see that inasmuch as Christ would not haue one of the least letters of the Law no nor so much a title of a letter as a pricke is vpon the letter i in no wise to departe from the Law hereby he ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law that Christ ratified the Law vnto a iot and title extendeth to the very least things in the Law more emphatically more voide of exception then if he had said nothing shall passe from the Law Had the 7th day Sabbath bene to be abolished a while after Christ should haue forknowne it well enough then remembring that he would neuer haue here ratified the Law so vniuersally vnto a very iot and title of it This is plaine if we looke but vpon the very next verse vers 19. Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be caled the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 So here then in plaine words you see our Sauiour ratifieth the very least coÌ„mandement yet further Christ intended to ratify not onely the least comman but also the least branch of euery commandement for he ratified not onely the 6th com touching murther but also the least thing therin conteined as rash anger and caling an other foole v. 22. the 7th com hee ratified it to the least iot title of it euen to the adultery of the heart and to a lustfull looke v. 28. the seconp Table of loue Christ ratified it to the vtmost extending it euen to the loue of our enemies v. 44. by all which it is most apparent that our blessed Sauiour intended to ratify this Diuine Law of his heauenly father to the very vtmost vnto the very least thing therin commanded neither can any man I think invent should he study 7 yeeres for it how to expresse himselfe in words more vniuersally emphatically to comprize euery thing vnto the very least of all so as his words should be liable to no exceptions then our Sauiour Christ hath expressed himselfe heere so emphatically so vniuersally and so full are his words heere spoken to that end Thus you haue sene this argument firmly proued neither can I deuise what should be more plaine pregnant for the maintenaÌ„ce of this ordinance of Gods morall Sabbath then this text vttered by our Sauiour Christ but by how much it is the cleerer by so much the more Sathan stirreth vp opposition againstit let vs therefore see what trickes and quillets the wit of man can deuise against it that so all rubbs being remoued our faith may rest vpon this rocke of Christs word the more firmly and securly 1. One answer brought against this argument is this that by the word Law may be vnderstod both the morall and Ceremoniall Lawes But this is an vnwarrantable enlargment of the word law for it is a rule that generall words must be restrained vnto the Subiect matter in hand as in Heb. 7.12 if by the word Law there we should vnderstand both morall and ceremoniall Lawes we should make foule worke wherefore as the word Law in Heb. 7.12 is to be rastained vnto the Leuiticall ceremoniall Law according to the matter there spoken of so must we by the word Law in Mat. 5.18 vnderstaÌ„d onely the morall Law according to the matter here spoken of for as you may se plainly by the context our Sauior speaketh of the morall Law for our Sauiour hauing ratified the Law in generall in v. 18.19 then he descendeth vnto particulars giuinge examples in the 6th com touching murther as in v. 21. in the 7th com touching adultery as in v. 27. in the third com touching swearing as in v. 3. the latter parte of the Chapter is spent in dueties of loue towards our neighbour conteined in the second Table whereby we see our Sauiour spake onely of the morall Law 2. I proue that the ceremoniall Law cannot be here meante for Christ said but in the verse a forgoing that he came not to destroy the Law or the Prâ—phets which phrase our Saniour vseth in this Sermon for the Morall Law onely Mat. 7.12 and neuer otherwise Mat. 22.40 secondly then should Christ haue ratified the ceremoniall Law vnto the worlds end in Mat. 5.18 which is contrary vnto all Scriptures and therfore Christ spake nothing of the ceremoniall Law in this place 3. Since Christ spake here of the duration continuance of the Law for euer it is absurd to thinke that in this case he would ioyne the Morall and the Ceremoniall Laws together as if they were both of a like perpetuity lasting nature and therfore onelie the Morall Law was here meante 4. Can it be thought that Christ should make here in v. 17. an Apologie for the Ceremoniall Law when elswhere he preached against it Ioh. 4.21 Besids since Christ intended a little after to abolish the Ceremoniall Law he would rather haue bene silent now then to say ought that might ratifye it 2. An other answer made against this argument is that the duration of the Law here spoken of by Christ is but vntill Christ his passion noted in those words vntill all things be fulfilled v. 18. for at Christ his passion all things were fulfilled But this answer is very absurd for these words of Christ are a prophecy of the continuance of the Law which prophecy was ratified by a greate Asseueration saying verily or truly I say vnto you c. Now the time when Christ made this prophecy it was not aboue a matter of two yeeres before his passion or there about now who could thinke that Christ should make a prophecy that in such solemne a maner with such an Asseueration that the Law should last continue yet two yeers longer Further if this answer exposition be iustifiable then by the same answer may we now reiect a greate parte of Christs sermon in the mount especially his exposition vpon the Morall
to deale against the enemies of Gods law who would abolish the whole law as Libertines Anabaptists our new vpstart Eatonists they doe defend Gods law to be Morall perpetuall by this text for one Math. 5.18 Nay I know not any text we haue in all the new Testament that is more auailable for this purpose theÌ„ is this one text but if now our diuines will stand to defend these 4 answeres which I haue confuted then why may not any of these Libertines or the rest make the same answers to them when they produce this Text Mat. 5.18 to defend the perpetuity of Gods Law as first why may not these Libertines answer saying by the word Law in Mat. 5.18 may be meant both the Morall the Ceremoniall Laws and so Christ should ratify the Morall Law no more then he did the Ceremoniall Law 2. And why may they not answer also that the duration of the Law here spoken of by Christ is but vntill Christs passion 3. And why may they not answer you also that there are some iotes things in the Law that belong not vnto vs Christianes as in the preface to the Commandements Gods deliuerance of the Israelites out of Egypt And the reason to the 5th com that thy daies may be long in the Land that the Lord thy God giueth thee that is in the Land of Canaan that so you shall not from this text defend all and euery of the tenn commandemeÌ„ts Wherefore either they must withdrawe renounce these 3 answers made to mee or else they must receiue them at the hands of Libertines Anabaptists Antinomians Thus much for my 10th Argument whereby I haue proued that our Sauiour Christ ratified the 7th day Sabbath coÌ„manded in the Morall Law because hee ratified the very least things commanded in the Morall Law ARGUM. XI My eleauenth argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath still in force is because our Sauiour Christ would haue it obserued for about â—0 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies saying Pray that your flight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day Mat. 24 20. and it may be thus framed He that commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes possible that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working trauailing moileing toileing on it for about 50 yeeres after the death end of all Ceremonies hee would haue the Sabbath day sanctified still in force But Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all possible meanes that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working crauailing moiling toiling on it for about 50 yeeres after the death and end of all Coremonies Therefore Christ would haue the Sabbath day sanctified and still in force For the Major or first proposition two things are there in considerable as for the former it is a most cleere case for he that would not haue the Sabbath day profaned he would haue it sanctified and obserued like as in the 7th com in that God would not haue a man commit adultery it followeth that God would haue him liue chastly the remouing of one contrary is the bringing in of the other the forbidding of a sinne is the commanding of its contrary virtue And further he that willeth all possible meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of any euill he would that that euill should be auoided the contrary good brought in so he that commanded all possible meanes to be vsed that the Sabbath day might not be profaned he would not haue the Sabbath day profaned but that the contrary good should be brought in which is that the Sabbath day should be sanctified for to that very end that it might not be profaned but sanctified he appointed the meanes to be vsed now no man commandeth meanes to be vsed for the obtaining of that thing which he would not obtaine The other thing considerable is that he that willed the Sabbath day should be sanctified and kept from profanation 50 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies he willed that the Sabbath day should be still in force vnto this day the reason hereof is because there was but one proper time for the abolishing of all ceremonies all ceremonies they were abolished together at once therefore whatsoeuer was ratified to be obserued 40 or 50 yeeres after the proper time for the death end of all ceremonies that thing was no ceremony for if it were it should not haue suruiued all ceremonies neither was it abolished with ceremonies as a ceremony for then no care shoul haue bene vsed so long after for its obseruation now if it was not a bolished with ceremonies at the proper time when all ceremonies were abolished then was it no ceremony but a Morall consequently to last perpetually I grant that many ceremonies were in vse in the Church long after they were abolished but it was by connivency and by sufferance onely for the weakenesse of those times but neuer by the authority of the Lord of them as this is for the Sabbath day it was not by conniuency for Christ commanding his Disciples to pray against the profanation of the Sabbath day doth thereby warrant the sanctification of it Furthermore whatsoeuer was authorized to be vsed in the Church 40 or 50 yeeres after Christ his death that is still to be retained vsed in the Church for all things which the Apostles did either erect or continue in the Church for 10.20.30 or 40 yeeres after Christ his Passion not as conniued at but as authorized as a duety those things are still in force in the Church no instance can be showne to the contrary And so much for proofe of the Major I come now vnto the Minor or second proposition this I proue out of Mat. 24.20 But pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath day Which wordes of our Sauiour doe fully proue my Minor for 1. these words are a commandement of Christs in that he biddeth them pray But pray c. 2. This commandement it was directed vnto his Disciples as you may see Mat. 24.1.2 3dly This commandemeÌ„t was that they should vse all possible meanes to auoid their flight vpon the Sabbath day for there was none other meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of this flight but onely prayers to God for their study care and other humane naturall meanes could doe nothing in this matter for the Preuention of this flight so then prayer being all the meanes that possiblie could be vsed Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes that was possible to be vsed yea since prayer must be accompanied with all meanes indeauores of man if more meanes could haue bene vsed Christ would haue had more vsed 4. This meanes of prayer to God which Christ commanded them to vse was to this end that they might not profane the Sabbath day for so saith the text pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day Whereby you
see that our Sauiour would not haue them profane the Sabbath day by their flight vpon it for the further cleering of this point because it is of the greatest consequence I will proue vnto you that when our Sauiour bad them pray against flying on the Sabbath day hee spake it because he would not haue them profane the Sabbath day by that their flight For this purpose note that it is the common opinion of expositers vpon this text that when Christ spake of flight vpon the Sabbath day he spake of it in a religiouse respect this may be yet further confirmed vnto vs if we consider the Author of these words who was Christ who was a Phisitian for the soule all his Doctrine tended to the furtherance of the kingdome of God wherefore all his speeches are if possible to be vnderstod as concerning the soule the kingdome of God but especially when he mentioneth matters of Religion as is the Sabbath day then we cannot but thinke he spake of it in relation to the soule and to the 4th commandement for the furtherance of the kingdome of God the obseruation of the will of his heauenly father shewing what conscience men ought to make of doeing Gods will keeping of his Sabbaths yea the text giueth light herein for why should they pray not to flye in the Winter but because of discomodety of flight then by foulnesse couldnesse of weather c So why not on the Sabbath day but because of incommodiouse trauailing then by reason of the 4th com and mens consciences which is a religiouse respect Nay how can it enter into any mans head to thinke that Christ should command them to pray that they might not flie on the Sabbath day in any other sense then this because he would not haue them profane it and because he would haue the will of his heauenly father reuealed in the 4th com carefully obserued obeied and because he would not haue those his Disciples pollute their consciences with profanation of Gods Sabbath For the yet further cleering of this point let it be noted 1. what is comprised in this word flight suppose Christ had foreteld them that ouer a few yeeres such an house should be on fyer in one of the seauen dayes and had also bidden them pray that they might not be put to quench the fyer on the Sabbath day what could this imply but that Christ would not haue them worke labour moyle toile so on the Sabbath day â—eueÌ„ so it is here for this end consider that this is such a flight as is made out of a citty by the inhabitantes when the enemies haue beseiged it with souldiers as you may see Luk. 21.20.21 Now when the beseiged distressed Cittizens flie out from the violence of their enemies they vsually carry out with them whatsoeuer things of worth they haue in the citty euen as much as possible they can as their young infantes and children their best apparell and other things of price euery man carries forth euen as much as his backe can beare with his safety so that they goe laden out besids they doe not walke at ease as men doe on the Sabbath day for recreation but they flie and trauaile with all possible labour and speede so as the day of their flight it was a day of moyleing and exceeding toyleinge I need not mention the disquiet and distraction of the mind their careing how to saue their owne liues and the liues of their wiues and children how to saue their goods all which disinabled them for and were enemies to the sacred dueties of the Sabbath and the worship of God therein all this neglect and putting by of the sacred dueties of prayer reading heareing conference c. doth necessarily follow the labour of the body by flying on the Sabbath day Thus much is comprised in the word flight so that when our Sauiour bid them pray against flight on the Sabbath day it is all one as if he had bidden them pray that they might not be driuen to carry burdens on the Sabbath day and that they might not be put to laboriouse and painfull trauailes on the Sabbath day 2. Let it be noted that to beare burdens and to trauaile on the Sabbath day were euer accounted for breaches of the 4th com and for profanation of the Sabbath day as you may read plainly in Nehem. 13.15.17 For Nehemiah reproued the Rulers for bearing of burdens on the Sabbath day saying what euill is this that yee doe profane the Sabbath day see also Ioh. 5.10 Exod. 16.29 VVhereby you see it most apparent that when Christ bad them pray against flight on the Sabbath day he meante it that they should pray against profanation of the Sabbath day for these ij are both one to flie carry-burdens on the Sabbath day to profane the Sabbath as you see by Nehemiahs words and what doth the word Prophane signify but to make a thing common what doe they else by flight on the Sabbath but make it a common day to wit a trauailing a labouring day The will of Christ doubtlesse was none other then the will of God in the 4th com that is that his Disciples should be carefull to keepe an holy Rest on the Sabbath day to refraine all seruile laboures according as it is in the 4th com In it thou shalt not doe any worke c. But here I must take away a maine obiection they will be ready to say that it is no profanation of the Sabbath day to trauaile on it in a case of necessity and to flie to saue a mans life as they doe who are beseiged c. Herevnto I answer yis it is a prophanation of the Sabbath for what is it to prophane an Holy thing but to conuert it vnto common vse be it men trauaile to saue their liues yet since trauailing labouring are common workes by trauailing and labouring on the Sabbath day as they doe on common daies they make the Sabbath day a common day and so prophane it neither will it follow that because it is no sinne to trauaile on the Sabbath in a case of necessity therefore it is no prophanation of the Sabbath for God hath permitted vs to prophane make common the Sabbath in a case of necessity and so prophanation of it is no sinne as otherwise it would haue bene the prophanation remaines still but it is no sinfull prophanation 2. The consideration of this obiection doth strengthen my argument for if our Sauiour would not haue men to flie trauaile worke on the Sabbath day no not to saue their liues if possibly by means of prayer they might auoid it much lesse would he haue men doe any worke on the Sabbath when there is no necessity and in a common case it is a signe that Christ was maruailously zealouse of his fathers Sabbaths to haue them religiously carefully sanctified after his death when he
would not haue his Disciples to doe no not such necessary works as might saue their liues on the Sabbath if they might be preuented thus I haue sufficiētly proued the 4th thing in my Minor The 5th and last thing to be proued in my Minor is that this flight on the Sabbath day was spoken of to be aboute 50 yeeres after the death end of all Ceremonies that the destruction of Ierusalem by Vespasian was a matter of 40 or 46. yeeres after Christ his passion it is confessed by all that this obseruation of the Sabbath was to be 40 46 or neere 50 yeeres after the death of all ceremonies is proued by this that all ceremonies ended with Christ vpon the Chrosse as you may reade Ephes 2.15 Colos 2.14 Now the Sabbath day being to be obserued by an holy Rest at the destruction of Ierusalem by Vespasian which was neere 50 yeeres after Christs passion at which time all Ceremonies ended it followeth that the Sabbath was to be obserued neere 50 yeeres after the end of all Ceremonies and thus I haue proued and confirmed both propositiones in my argument Yet I cale to mind iij obiections more that may be made against this argument the one is that Christ had not respect so much vnto the Religion conscience of the Sabbath as rather to this that he had a care to the safeguard of the liues of those beseiged for if they should flie in the winter they should be hindered by the foulnesse of the waies and if on the Sabbath day they should be hindered by their superstitiouse needlesse conscience which they would make of the Sabbath so it might come to passe that their enemies should surprise them because they could not make that speede that was fiting in such a time of danger Herevnto Iāswer 1. It is agrosse cōceipt of any to account that obedience superstitiouse needlesse which was done according to the prescript of a Morall Commandement to wit the 4th com seeing they cannot proue the old Sabbath mentioned in the 4th com to be abolished 2. I haue before showne that Christ when he spak of slight on the Sabbath he spake it in a religiouse respect but admit that Christ spake these words for the safeguard of their liues yet so it will come to the same still that Christ ratified the Sabbath day for as in the winter the deepenesse of the waies the shortnesse of the daies tediousnesse of the weather would aggrauate theire crosse hinder their speedy flight so on the Sabbath day the greate sorrow of heart that would seaze vpon them for that they were vrged to moile toile worke so hard vpon that day wherein they were wont sweetly to Rest with the people of God to praise God in the assemblie of the Saintes for that they were inforced to profane the Sabbath which they would gladly haue sanctified in obediēce to Gods 4th com these things would aggrauate the crosse and sticke so in their minds as it would make their heartes to faile them and so hinder their speedie flight thus the winter would be an impediment to their bodies and the Sabbath would be an impediment to their soules so the whole man would be disabled for a speedy flight and for the safeguard of their liues Further more as touching their superstitiouse conscience what reason can be imagined that it should be more vnfit to flie on the Sabbath day then on a weeke day or why should their speedy flight be more hindered on the Sabbath day then on an other day if not for this cause that they made a conscience of flying trauailing on the Sabbath day more then on any other day now forasmuch as our Sauiour commanded them to pray to God that they might not fly on that day for the offence of their consciences thereby he allowed of approued of their making conscience of the Sabbath day suppose our Sauiour Christ had commanded Agur Prov. 30.8.9 to pray that he might not haue too much least he should grow proud and hauty nor too little least he should steale he should thereby approue of Agurs feares of growing prowd of stealing so it is in our case for in that Christ bad them pray that they might not flie on the Sabbath day least thereby their consciences should be offended their hearts filled with sorrow for profaning Gods Sabbath thereby Christ allowed of their conscience of the Sabbath day of their sorrow for profaning it and so it was no superstitiouse conscience had the Sabbath day bene abolished long before this seige as this obiection supposeth so the conscience of Christs Disciples bene but superstitiouse then would Christ neuer haue commanded them to pray to God in this case for this were to giue gold for drosse to spend Substance for shaddowes would Christ think you haue bidden them spend Diuine prayers for the satisfying the desires of a superstitiouse needlesse conscience had not this bene an abuse of holy prayer and of the Maiestie of God to begg of him things for their lust vaine desires If their conscience were a vaine needlesse conscience then they should pray to God to fulfill the desires of a vaine needlesse conscience and Christ should instruct them so to doe too which is most absurd Had the conscience of Christs Disciples bene superstitiouse touching the Sabbath day then would Christ haue reproued them for it and rather haue rectified their iudgements taught them now before hand that as touching the Sabbath if it fell out that they must flie on the Sabbath day they should then take no care for that for he came to abolish that amongst other things and it should be nullified long before their flight so as that should be no let vnto their flight thus would Christ haue prepared them beforehand and streng thened them against this superstition if it had bene superstition nay had it bene superstitiō Christ had nusled them vp flattered them in it when he bad them pray to God that their superstitiouse consciences might not be crossed or disquieted therefore it was no superstitiouse but a iustifiable religiouse conscience which they made of the Sabbath day and this is yet the more strengthened by consideration of the persones that should make this conscience of the Sabbath they were Christs owne Disciples of his owne teaching and can we thinke he would leaue them in superstition at this time and in this case when it was so needfull that they should be instructed therein Happily it will be said they were not fit to heare now of the abolishing of the Sabbath it being a thing so highly honoured amōgst them c. but why I pray were they not as able to heare of the abolishing of the Sabbath as to beare of the destruction of the Temple for they had the Temple in honour no lesse then the Sabbath Yet further it appeareth by the context
that their conscience was not a fained superstitiouse conscience but a true religiouse conscience for the other things whereof Christ admonisheth them are not fained things but true and reall things as whē he said woe shall be to them which are with child which giue sucke v. 19. This was no fained thing for it was a true euill for women to be put to flie when greate with child or with children sucking on them againe to flie in the winter v. 20. it was no superstitiouse conceipt in Christs Disciples to thinke the winter a very vnseasonable time to flie in but it was so indeed so we are to thinke semblably of their conscience of the Sabbath day that it was no needlesse superstitiouse conceipt in them to thinke it an offence vnto God a breach of the 4th com a grieuouse matter to trauaile on the Sabbath day at what time they should be seruing and worshiping of God and thus much for this obiection The 2d obiection is this that by the word Sabbath mentioned in the text may be meant not the 7th day and weekly Sabbath but some one of their yeerly Sabbaths so then if Christ had ratified any thing in this text it had not beene the 7th day Sabbath but a ceremoniall Sabbath c. and the rather they thinke thus because it is thought that when the Iewes fled out of Ierusalem it was not vpon the 7th day Sabbath but vpon a Festiuall Sabbath But herevnto I reply 1. That it was no yeerly Sabbath whereof Christ spake for the yeerly Sabbaths being all Ceremonies and to be abolished long before that seige of Ierusalem if Christs Disciples had made consciēce of those then their consciences had bene superstitiouse But their conscience was not superstitiouse as hath bene showne therefore the Sabbath whereof Christ spake and they made conscience it was no yeerly ceremoniall Sabbath but the 7th day and weekly Sabbath 2. The word Sabbath when in Scripture it is put absolutly without any addition when the context giueth no light to the contrary it is to be vnderstod of the 7th day weekly Sabbath for this was the most frequent ordenary Sabbath Christs his speeches are to be vnderstod in an ordenary not in an extraordinary sense and of those things which were vsuall rather then of those which were rare seldome As for their reason that it is thought they fled vpon a yeerly Sabbath day not vpon the weekly Sabbath day this proueth not that therefore their conscience was not of the weekly Sabbath day but rather that their conscience was of the weekly Sabbath day for inasmuch as Christ commanded his Disciples to pray that they might not flie vpon a Sabbath day it is to be beleeued that they did pray accordingly further it is to be beleeued that since they prayed at Christs commandement and being Christs Disciples that they prayed in faith and that therefore they obtained their prayer whence it may be collected that they prayed against flight on the weekly 7th day Sabbath because they did not flie on the weekly 7th day Sabbath for God heard their prayer But to thinke they made conscience of a yeerly ceremoniall Sabbath prayed against it and yet were driuen to flie on it is absurdly to suppose that God crosed their prayers and denied their petition And thus much for the 2d obiection The last obiection or rather answer is that by the name Sabbath day Christ might vnderstand the Lords day But why may they not as well say when Christ spake of Winter he meant the Sommer and when in the new Testament there is mention of Circumcision therby may Baptisme be meant where did they euer read the Lords day named Sabbath day in Scripture suer I am the holy Ghost putteth a plaine difference betwixt the Sabbath day the Lords day or first day of the weeke see Mark 16.1.2 Finally who that considereth how Christ his Disciples made the Lords day a trauailing day Luk. 24.13 Could thinke that Christ would not permit his Disciples 50 yeers after to trauaile on the Lords day to saue their liues if by this Sabbath day he meant the Lords day thus much for my eleauenth argument which standeth good against all their obiectiones and gainesayings ARGVM XII My Twelueth last argument to proue that the 7th day Sabbath is still in force is because 1. The Apostles did constantly obserue keepe it after Christs resurrection 2. The primitiue Churches did obserue and keepe it after the dayes of the Apostles for 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ time 3. Our owne Church doth daily pray to God to incline our heartes to keepe it and it may be thus framed That day wich the Apostles of Christ did constantlie obserue and keepe after Christs death and which the primitiue Churches did obserue keepe after the dayes of the Apostles for 300 or 400 yeeres which our owne Church doth daily pray to God to incline our heartes to keepe That day is still in force But the 7th day Sabbath the Apostles of Christ did constantly obserue and keepe after Christs death and the primitiue Churches did obserue and keepe it after the dayes of the Apostles for 300 or 400 yeeres our Church doth daily pray to God to incline our heartes to keepe it Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force As for the Major or first proposition it needeth no proofe so cleere it is it consisteth of 3 branches as you see as for the first of them which is that that day which the Apostles did constantly obserue is still in force or must be our Sabbath day this point must needs be granted me because it is the very position of my aduersaries for they thus argue for their Lords day Sabbath that That day which the Apostles did constātly obserue must be our Sabbath day Wherefore they cannot doubt of my Major Furthermore it may be confirmed by this that we are bound to imitate and follow the practise of the Apostles Be ye followers of mee euen as I am of Christ 1. Cor. 11.1 Therefore that day which the Apostles did constantly keepe that day must be still in force and we must keepe it It is true indeed if that the Apostles had kept a day but now then as once in a moneth or once in a yeere or once in many yeeres as they kept the Lords day then it had not followed But that day which they kept constantly vsually euery weeke weeke by weeke there can be no reason imagined why that day should not be still in vse in the Church No nor can we with a good quiet conscience reiect the constant practise of the Apostles If the example yea the frequent and customary example of the Apostles shall not be auaileable with vs what then will auaile with vs In other cases the very mention of it that S. Paul did so or that
some other of the Apostles did so it is sufficient to bind vs to doe the like why then should we not be followers of them in this case also keeping that day for our Sabbath which they kept constantly kept also As for the other 2 branches of my Major they cannot be denied vnlesse men dare censure those purest and primitiue Churches which liued next after the Apostles as if they should liue in an errour of practise 300 or 400 yeeres together I should rather suspect our owne times then their times Nor vnlesse men would make frustrate an holy praier of our Church And so much for the Major I come now to the profe of the Minor or second proposition this consisteth of 3 branches which I will proue in order one after an other the first branch is this that the Apostles did constantly keepe the Sabbath day after Christs death for this purpose see Act. 13.14 But when they were departed from Perga they came to Antioch of Pisidia went into the Synagogue on the Sabbath day c. Here you see the Sabbath day in vse and on this day Paul preached a Sermon to the congregation assembled as you may reade in the following partes of the Chapter Againe see Act. 13.42.44 And when they were come out of the Synagogue of the Iewes the Gentiles besought that they would preach those words to them the next Sabbath day and the next Sabbath day came almost the whole Citty together to heare the word of God Loe here againe was an other sermō preached vpon the Sabbath day and further note the constancy of keeping the Sabbath day for here were two Sabbath dayes together kept the one immediatly following after the other this is signifind by those words the next Sabbath day Againe see Act. 16.13 And on the Sabbath day we went out of the Citty besids a riuer where they were wont to pray and we sate downe and spake vnto the women which were come together Loe here at an other time and in an other place or Citty the Sabbath day was kept also and further it is to be noted that on this Sabbath day was Lydia converted shee hir houshold Baptized Againe see Act. 17.2 And Paul as his manner was went in vnto them and three Sabbath daies Disputed with them by the Scriptures c. Loe here at an other time in an other place or Citty the Sabbath day was kept note also the constancy of their keeping the Sabbath that three Sabbath dayes together were here kept as the text speaketh note also that i◠was no rare and seldome thing for the Sabbath to be thus kept but that it was in the Apostles times a most ordenary constant thing so to doe and this is signified vnto vs by those words And Paul as his manner was So it was a custome with S. Paul to keepe the Sabbath day euermore wheresoeuer he came Againe see Act. 18.4 And he Disputed in the Synagogue euery Sabbath day exhorted the Iewes the Grecians Loe here againe at an other time and in an other place or Citty the Sabbath day was kept note the constācy of the keping the Sabbath day for in this citty Paul kept euery Sabbath day so saith the text euery Sabbath day not a Sabbath day once in a quarter of a yeere but euery Sabbath in a yeere What can be more plainly proued then this point is that the Sabbath day was kept yea and constantly kept in the dayes of the Apostles Furthermore it shall not be amisse to shew also by whom the Sabbath was kept and here I shall proue vnto you that this obseruation of the Sabbath day it was an Apostolicall practise and therefore the more to be regarded for this purpose let vs looke backe vnto the texts fore alleaged see Act. 13.13.14 Now when Paul and they that were with him c. Where you see that the Apostle Paul kept the Sabbath day and also other Christianes that accompanied him in his voyage namly those who were with Paul as the text speaketh Againe see Act. 13.43.44.46 Where mention is made of Barnabas the Apostle who ioyned himselfe with Paul those other Christianes in the obseruation of the Sabbath day Againe see Act. 16.1.3.13.19.20 Where is mention made of Timotheus of Silas both which ioyned with Paul in the sanctification of the Sabbath day Thus you haue seene that the Sabbath day was obserued after Christs resurrection by the Apostles Paul Barnabas by Timotheus Silas and by other Christians that accompanied Paul in his voyage wherefore we may safely cale the obseruation of the old Sabbath day an Apostolicall Christian practise for it was obserued by the Apostles of Christ and by such as were Preachers of the Gospell of Christ and therefore the obseruation of the old Sabbath hath Authority sufficient to backe it by those that published and preached the Gospell of Christ vnder the new Testament Thus you haue seene it proued that the Sabbath day was kept and constantly kept after Christs death resurrection 2. That it was kept by the Apostles themselues and by such as published and preached the Gospell 3 It shall not be amisse to shew you how vniuersallie the Sabbath was kept for it was kept in diuerse and sondry places as at Antiochia Act. 13.14.42 And at Philippi Act. 16 12.13 and at Thessalonica Act. 17.1.2 And at Corinth Act. 18.1.4 So you see the Sabbath day was kept in these 4 Christian Churches to wit in the Church at Antioch at Philippi at Thessalonica and at Corinth all these we know of Albeit we haue sufficiently proued both the Major and also the first branch of the Minor yet all is not done in this argument which some that are very scrupulouse require for say some it is true indeede that the Apostles kept the Sabbath after Christs resurrection but it was amongst the Jewes and in the Iewish Synagogues but proue vnto vs that euer the Apostles kept the Sabbath among the Gentiles But herevnto I reply This distinction of keeping the Sabbath among Iewes but not among Gentiles is fond and vaine for these men make doubtes differences where the Apostles made none as I shall proue vnto you for the Apostles kept the Sabbath day among both Iewes Gentiles ioyned in one congregation togeather see Act. 18.4 And he disputed in the Synagogue euery Sabbath day exhorted the Iewes and the Grecianes Here you see the Sabbath was kept both with Iewes Gentiles for the Grecianes were no Iewes but Gentiles see also Act. 17.2.4 And some of them beleeued ioyned in company with Paul Silas also of the Grecianes that feared God a greate multitude Here you see a multitude of Grecianes or Gentiles were present with the Iewes in the same congregation when Paul Silas kept the Sabbath day as in v. 2. so then the Apostles made no difference in keeping the Sabbath day betwixt Iewes
Gentiles Neuerthelesse I will proue vnto you that the Apostles kept the Sabbath with the Gentiles see Act. 13.42.44 And when they were come out of the Synagogue of the Iewes the Gentiles besought that they would preach these words to them the next Sabbath day the next Sabbath came almost the whole citty together to heare the word of God Loe here is a most pregnant text for the purpose for here the Apostles Paul Barnabas kept the Sabbath with Gentiles yea with the whole citty almost of the Antiochian Gentiles wherefore the Apostles made no difference of keeping the Sabbath betwene Iewes and Gentiles for they kept it indifferently as well amongst Gentiles as amongst Iewes An other text whereby I shall proue vnto you that the Apostles kept the Sabbath among the Gentiles is Act. 16.12.13 And from thence to Philippi which is the chiefe Citty in the partes of Macedonia and whose inhabitants came from Rome to dwell there and we weere in that Citty abiding certaine daies on the Sabbath day we went out of the Citty besids a riuer where they were wonte to pray we sate downe spake vnto the women which were come together c. In this text it is to be obserued that these at Philippi with whom Paul Timothie Silas kept the Sabbath day v. 3.19 they were Gentiles for 1. Lidia who was then converted she hir houshold baptized shee was a Gentile for she was of the Citty of Thyatira as the text speaketh v. 14. It doth not follow that shee was a Iewesse because the text saith shee was a worshiper of God as some thinke for so was Cornelius also a worshiper of God Act. 10.2 But yet he was no Iew no nor so much as a proselite for he then was vncircumcised Act. 11.3 secondly it is plaine in the text because the text saith that these Philippians were Romanes Whose inhabitants came from Rome to dwell there v. 12. now the Romanes were not Iewes but Gentiles which appeareth further in v. 20.21 by the opposition betwixt Iewes Romanes These men who are Iewes trouble our City and preach ordinances which are not lawfull for vs to receiue seing we are Romanes These philippians therefore were Romanes so Gentiles and so it is euident by this text also that the Sabbath day was kept among Gentiles that the Apostles were as redy to keepe the Sabbath when they came among the Gentiles with the Gentiles as they weere to keepe it when they came among the Iewes with the Iewes they made no difference betwixt Iew Gentile for this point Finally suppose it could not be proued that the Apostles kept the Sabbath with the Gentiles at all but onely with the Iewes is it lawfull therefore to reiect the examples and practise of the Apostles if it be then these absurdeties follow 1. That when the Apostles exhorte vs to become imitatores and followers of them as in 1. Cor. 11.1 and 1. Cor. 4-16 Phil. 3.17 then these textes must be vnderstod with this vaine limitation that we must imitate the Apostles onely in such actiones as they did doe among the Gentiles but not in those they did among the Iewes 2. If we must imitate the Apostles onely in such things as they did doe among the Gentiles then is the example of the Apostles of little or no vse for our direction for all their actiones well nigh were done among the Iewes onely or else among Iewes Gentiles mixed together as you may read euery where see Act. 2.14 Act. 13.14.42 Act. 14.5 Act. 17.4.5 Act. 18.4 So much for their first answer An other answer they vsually bring against the Apostles keeping the Sabbath day after Christs resurrection is that it was so done for a time onely to beare with the weakenesse of the Iewes who would not be suddainly weaned from the Sabbath day no more then they would from Circumcision Herevnto I reply 1. That it was no weakenesse in the Iewes I trust nor so to be esteemed of vs for thē to yeeld obediēce vnto a morall precept which inioyneth the Sabbath day neither are they to rank the Sabbath day with circumcision supposing the Iewes to be as superstitiouse in the one as in the other vntil they know how as well to proue the Sabbath day to be abolished as it is easy to proue Circumcision to be abolished If the Apostles keeping Sabbath was to beare with the weaknesse of the Jewes then I would gladly know why they kept Sabbath with the Gentiles this was not I trust to beare with the Iewes weaknesse see Act. 13.42.44 this repetition sermon or sermon preached againe at request of the Gentiles it was not made for the Iewes sake but for the Gentiles sake who requested it now what cause was there then that Paul Barnabas should preach this sermon vnto the Gentiles vpon the Sabbath day to beare with the weaknesse of the Iewes for whose sake it was not preached had this sermon bene preached at the request of the Iewes and so for their sakes happily this might haue had some better culler but it being prached for the Gentiles sakes at their request it is absurd therefore to thinke that the Apostles should haue regard to the Iewes in this case and so much for the Sabbath day kept among the Gentiles at Antioch Act. 13.14.42.44 The vanity of their answer will further appeare if we looke into that other Church where Paul Timothie Silas kept the Sabbath day also to wit at Philippi that too among the Romane Gentiles Act. 16.12.13 now forsomuch as we reade not of any Iewes dwelling at Philippi but haue proued the cōtrary nor can they proue that any dwelt there who could thinke that S. Paul and the rest should keepe the Sabbath there infauor of the Iewes or for the weaknesse of the Iewes since there were no Iewes either in that Citty or in their Assemblies of whom the Apostles should be afraied or for whose sakes they should doe it But here it is answered that albeit there were no Iewes in this Citty or Assembly yet if Paul had not kept the Sabbath here it would haue bene by one meanes or other carried to the Iewes where they dwelt whereat they would haue bene offended therefore Paul kept the Sabbath here at Philip. But how vaine this conceipt is appeareth 1. Because this supposeth that the Apostle durst not free the Gentiles from the obseruation of needlesse ceremonies in their owne Church for feare he should offend the superstitiouse Iewes in some other remote Church 2. By the like reason Paul should not haue reproued Peter for Iudaizing in the Church of Galatia Gal. 2.14 nor haue durst to speake against Circumcision nor to haue wrote to the Colossians against Meates and drinkes new Mones yeerly Sabbaths Colos 2.16 for by one meanes or other this would haue come to the hearing of the Iewes offended them 3. By this it should haue come to passe
haue we done and said much more in defence of the Lords Sabbaths thē they haue said or can say in defence of the Lords day who are patrones of it this Lords day Sabbath were it not the Diana and darling of our time supported by men of learning holinesse and zeale I would say of it that it is the most idle friuolouse thing that cane be invented for besids other defects in it they cannot proue a constant practise of it no nor that it was euer kept weeke by weeke two Lords daies together one after an other in any place nor at any time I can but wonder therefore that any man that hath but either learninge or honesty should after the consideration of these things preferre the Lords day aboue the Sabbath day or neglect the ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath day to imbrace this nouill Sabbath of the the Lords day I haue now finished my 12th last argument as touching the first branch of it wherin I haue proued that the Apostles of Christ did constantly keepe the Sabbath day after Christs resurrection now I am to procede and to proue vnto you the second branch of my Minor or second proposition which is That the primitiue Churches which liued after the daies of the Apostles kept the Sabbath day for 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ And this trueth I shall confirme vnto you by sondry Testimonies 1. I will begine with that which M. Perkins reporteth saying The obseruatiō of the Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but afterwards it was established by Christian Emperours his Author for it is Leo Anton Edict of Holy daies Perk. in his first volume vpon the 4th com pag. 48. by the word Sabbath M. Perkins vnderstandeth the Lords day Sabbath Now of this Lords day he saith according to his author that the Churches which succeded the Apostles they neglected it vntill it vvas established by Christian Emperours now these Churches were the primitiue Churches for they liued immediatly after the Apostles they liued in the neglect of the Lords day Sabbath for about 300 yeeres after the daies of the Apostles as is gatherable by this that he saith it was established by Christian Emperoures now the first Emperour that established the Lords day was Constantine the greate as saith Hosp Cap. 9. pag. 27. this Constantine liued aboute 300 yeers after the Apostles now for asmuch as these Churches liued about 300 yeeres without the Lords day Sabbath it followeth that they all that time kept the 7th day Sabbath vnlesse we shall vncharitably censure them to haue liued profanly without any Sabbath day all that while which were absurd to thinke many Churches kept both Sabbaths together to wit the Sabbath day and the Lords day as you shall see by and by now can it be thought that some of the Primitiue Churches should be so zealouse as to keepe two daies other some so key could as to keepe none at at all wherefore since these Churches kept not the Lords day therefore it must follow that they kept the Sabbath day thus you see it followeth that the Sabbath day was in vse in the primitiue times for about 300 yeeres after the Apostles so then as the Apostles kept the Sabbath day constantly after Christs resurrection so the primitiue Churches that succeded next after the Apostles they kept it for a matter of 300 yeeres longer 2. My next Testimony shall be out of the Centuries where it is thus recorded Romae conventus ecclesiasticos non fuisse in Sabbato quemadmodum in aliarum terrarum ecclesiis Centur iiij Cap. vj. pag. 477. de ritibus ecclesiae Romanae The summe whereof is this that There was no Ecclesiasticall or Church assemblies vpon the Sabbath day at Rome as there was in other Churches In which words there is an opposition made betwixt the Church of Rome an other Churches to wit Christian Churches aboute keeping of the Sabbath day now it is recorded that there was no Church meetings vpon the Sabbathday at Rome but yet there was Church assemblies vpon the Sabbath day in other Churches abrode in the world so then by this Record it is plaine that the most Churches kept the Sabbath day albeit Rome did not and it is no maruaile that Rome had learned of the Laodicean Counsaile to reiect the yoke of Gods 4th com with the first further ' this Testimony was of what was done in these Churches for 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ so then you see that the Sabbath day was obserued in the most Churches 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ so much for this second Testimony 3. My third Testimony shall be from an acte made by the Laodicean Counsaile in the yeere of Christ 364. Laodicenum Concilium celebratum circa annum 364 sanxit Non oportere Iudaizare Christianos in Sabbatho vacare sed potius operari in eadem die Dominicam praeponendo Sabbatho quod si inventi fuerint Sabbathum Judaeorum observantes anahemate ibidem feriuntur Hospin de origin Fest Chap. 9. pag. 27. The summe whereof is this The Laodicean Counsaile held about the yeere 364 made a Law that Christianes should not Judaize rest vpon the Sabbath day but rather worke vpon it that they should praeferre the Lords day aboue the Sabbath day And if so be any were found obseruing the Iewes Sabbath they should be excommanciated or accursed By this Law then it appeareth that the Sabbath day was in vse in those times for else this Law had bene made in vaine which forbad Christians to kepe the Sabbath day any more vpon paine of excommunication for gouernes doe not enact Lawes against nothing 2. Note that as the Sabbath day was in vse in those times so also it was in vse amōgft Christianes for this law as you see was bent against the practise of Christianes forbidding Christianes to keepe the Sabbath day whereby we see that in these times the Sabbath day was honoured among Christianes 3. Note that vnto this time Christianes did honour the Sabbath day with or aboue the Lords day this I gather from hence because this Counsaile ordeined that for time to come Christianes should preferre the Lords day before the Sabbath now they neded not to haue made a law to bind Christiās to preferre the Lords day before the Sabbath day if they had done so before the making of this law this is a remarkabl thing that in these times the Sabbath day was had in such honour with Christiās as it was as highly or rather more highly set by then the Lords day was 4. Note the time this Law was made 364. yeeres or there about after Christ whereby we see that the Sabbath day was in vse amongst Christianes for nere 400 yeeres after Christ A digression by the way shewing 1. the Invalidity of this Laodicean Counsaile Decree made against the Lords Sabbaths 2. The Originall of the Lords day Sabbath 3.
The time when and the persones by whom the ancient Sabbath was first throwne downe First of the first that this Decree made against Gods Sabbaths is not to be regarded or esteemed shall thus appeare because it was an vngodly act decree for they made a Law directly against Gods Law for God said Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it but they decreed that no Christianes should obserue the Sabbath◠day to sanctify it and therefore this Counsaile was guilty of that brand of that wicked one Prophecied of by Daniel Who should speake words against the most high and thinke that he may change times Lawes Dan. 7.25 Now this Counsaile did here change times to wit sacred times sanctified of God the Sabbath day and decreed that this time should now be profaned men yea Christians should profane it by working on it further they changed this day for an other day to wit the Lords day casting downe sinfully the Sabbath day setting vp in its roome and preferring aboue it superstitiously the Lords day And as this decree against the Lords Sabbaths was vngodly in them so was it Schismaticall also for they now begane not onely to decline from ancient purity but also to rend Chureches and to diuide betwixt Church and Church Christianes Christianes for other Churches which liued about their time together with them kept that ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath as we haue proued already out of Perkines and out of the Centuries and as you may perceiue by those Testimonies which you shall see by by and other Christanes kept the Sabbath also euen among themselues as appeareth by their law inacted against Christians for keeping the Sabbath day thus it appeareth they rent themselues both from those other Churches liuing then with them and from Christianes then in their owne Church also You shall see by and by also how this Counsaile hath made a rent from the Churches whereof those famouse lights Athanasiius Ignatius were Bishopes which liued before this Counsaile therby you shall perceiue how they haue made a Schisme rent also from the most ancient and purest Churches that liued before them Neither is any man to wonder at this for if we consider what was Prophecied of this Church of Laodicea whereof this Counsaile hath its name we can expect no better from it for of all the 7 Churches which Iohn wrote vnto in his Reuelation this of Laodicea it was the worst and therefore saith Christ because thou art luke warme neither could nor hote it shall come to passe that I will spue thee out of my mouth Reuel 3.16 Christ here forteld them that it should come to passe that he would spue them out of his mouth as most loathsome vnto him and thinke you that they did not well deserue it at this time when they begane to make a Schisme rent from other the Churches of Christ and to change Gods time and to enact lawes against Gods Law considering therefore what an vnzealouse Church Christ foretould this Laodicean Church should be it therefore is not to be regarded what they decreed against Gods Sabbaths Yet further if we shall note the time wherein this Counsaile liued and made this decree their decree will grow more suspitiouse and lesse to be regarded for it was 364 yeeres after Christ about which time begane the Mysterie of iniquity to worke for the purity of the primitiue Churches begane to decline and be Ecclipsed then superstition popery begane to insinuate it selfe and creepe into the Churches for those pure Churches of the primitiue times are compared to a riuer the which the further off it runneth from the spring heade the more filth it gathereth so it was with these Churches for as you may reade in Perkins his Demonstration of the probleme about the 300 and 400 yeeres after Christ then begane Images to creepe into Churches The Crosse to be adored Invocation of Saints prayers for the dead Pilgrimage Purgatory Single life of Ministers Monkery Monasticall profession c. Till at last they had corrupted the second commandement by Images Crucisixes and the breaden god now what maruaile that they had also corrupted the 4th com and abolished the Lords Sabbaths when those times had corrupted the second commandement wherefore their decree made neere 400 yeers after Christ is to be suspected because then was the time of the Churches declining and faleing away from their former purity A second thing to be obserued by the way from the decree of this Counsaile is to note the Originall and first vpspringing of our new Sabbath caled the Lords day as a sole Sabbath and generally receiued The pite out of which it was digged is the Laodicean Counsaile the Antiquity that can be alleaged for it it is no higher thë 364 yeeres after Christ for 1. vntill about the time of this counsaile since hitherto this Lords day was neuer generally receiued in the Christian Churches for the Churches whereof Perkins speaketh wich liued immediatly after the apostles they neglected the Lords day for a matter of 300 yeers vntill Christian Emperours established it it is true that Constantine enacted a Law for the generallobseruatiō of the Lords day which was 300 yeeres after Christ and so a matter of 64 yeeres before this Counsaile but in Constantines time the Lords day was not kept as a sole Sabbath for the Sabbath day was then kept also as by by we shall proue by Athanasius who liued in Constantines time 2. Vntill the time of this Counsaile and since the Lords day was neuer receiued and kept for a sole Sabbath as now it is for before the time of this Counsaile the Sabbath day and the Lords day were both kept together in many Chuches as you shall see by those Testimonies which by by I shall produce out of Socrates and from Jgnatius but now at the time of this Counsaile begane the Sabbath day to be reiected and also the Lords day to be set vp as the sole Sabbath without any other and now the Lords day must forsooth be preferred before the Sabbath day and so you see the first Originall of our Lords day Sabbath to be a sole Sabbath was this Counsaile of Laodicea The third and last thing to be obserued is that here we take knowledge of the persones by whom the Lords Sabbaths were first throwne downe and of the time when they were first throwne downe The persōes that did commit this horriblefact they were that lukewarme people of the Church of Laodicea none others durst attempt to change Gods times to make a sacred time become a profane time but these the time when it was in that declined time to wit 364 yeeres after Christ the former times which were the more pure times they durst not lay violent hands of Gods ordinance thus we see when by whom Gods Sacred Sabbaths were rooted out of the Church Thus my digression finished I returne
whence I came 4. My fourth Testimony shall be the words of M. Perkins and Doctour Prideanx M. Brerewood For M. Perkins he moueth a question to know who changed the Iewes Sabbath And then his answer is this It is commonly thought saith hee that the Iews Sabbath was changed into this Lords day by Christian Emperours long after the Ascention of Christ Perk. in his Exposition vpon the first Chapter of the Reuelation and verse the 10th In which words M. Perkins doth deliuer though not his owne yet the common opinion and iudgment of others now the common opinion is saith hee that the Iewes Sabbath was changed long after Christ his Ascention and that by Christian Emperours so then it is the common opinion that the Sabbath day lasted in the Churches a long time after Christ his Ascention euen 300. yeers For Doctour Prideaux saieth he in his worke vpon the Sabbath pag 140 Annon Sabbathum Iudaeorum oum Iudaeis sine scrupulo murmure obseruarunt Apostoli caetus in Sabbatho coactos libentissime instituerunt Annon insequens Ecclesia tam Sabbathum hoc quam diem Dominicum per aliquot annorum decursum sacris conventibus distinauit Notiora sunt ista quam vt probatione indigeant The summe whereof is this did not the Apostles saith hee obserue the Iewes Sabbath with the Iewes without the least scruple making did they not most willingly appoint assemblies on the Sabbath day and did not the Church which followed them appoint both the Sabbath day the Lords day for holy assemblies for diverse yeeres these things are so well knowne that they need not to be proued By whose Testimony you see that the Churches which followed the Apostles they obserued and kept the Sabbath day for diuerse yeeres this is so plaine by History that it needeth not any quotations or profe For M. Brerewood Professor in Gresham College in London in his Treatise of the Sabbath day against M Bysield pag. 77. thus writeth And little doe you know saith hee of the ancient condition of the Church if you know it not that the ancient Sabbath did remaine was obserned together with the Lords day by the Christians of the Easterne Church aboue 300 yeers after Christs death c. And againe The Sabbath of the 7th day was religiously obserued in the East Church 300 yeeres more after our Sauiours passion That Church being a greate parte of Christendome Thus by the iudgement of those who are well seene into the Histories of the Church it is a plaine case that the Sabbath day was religiously obserued and that by Chrïstians for more then 300 yeeres after Christ 5. My fifth Testimony shall be that recorded by Zanchie out of Sozomen the summe whereof is this That those of Constantinople almost all others haue Ecclesiasticall Assemblies to heare Gods word on the Sabbath day on the Lords day Zanchie vpon the 4th com Thes 1. Here you see that not onely at Constantinople they kept the Sabbath day but also almost in all other Churches the Sabbath was kept 6. My sixth Testimony shall be out of Socrates the summe whereof is this Assemblies were wonte to be in the Churches euery weeke vpon the Sabbath day vpon the Lords day Socrat. Chap. 8. lib. 6. againe At Cesarea Cappadocia in Ciprio vpon the Sabbath day vpon the Lords day the Presbiters Bishopes did euermore interpret expound the Sciptures Socrat. Cap. 21. lib. 6. here you see a weekly obseruation of the Sabbath day a constant practise of Presbiters and Bishopes to expound the holy Scriptures vpon the Sabbath day But before I proceed any further it shall not be amisse to answer a doubt that may rise in the minds of some that reade these Antiquities may they say what did the primitiue Churches keepe two Sabbath daies euery weeke for it seemeth so because they kept both the Sabbath day and the Lords day For answer hereto we must know that howbeit they kept two daies yet it is not to be thought that they kept them both for Sabbath daies resting from labour all day long according to the 4th com for 1. This were more then euer God required in his morall Law to rest two daies in Seauen 2. Jgnatius put a difference betwixt the Sabbath day and the Lords day as betwene the King and the Quene for he caled as you shall see by by the Lords day the quene of daies hereby intimating that the Sabbath day whereof he spake also in that place was the King of daies 3. The Christianes against whom the Laodicean Counsaile enacted that law forespoken of they honoured the Sabbath day aboue the Lords day as there we shewed 4. Many Churches of Christianes they kept not the Lords day at all for 300 yeeres together as we haue showne out of Perkines 5. In Cōstantines time he gaue leaue for men to goe to plough and other workes of husbandry on the Lords day as else where we haue showne by all which it is more then manifest that the primitiue Curches though they kept the Lords day yet they kept it not for a Sabbath day or like the Sabbath day but rather much like as we now keepe a common Holy day or a lecture day wherin we come to Church heare the word of God but we keepe not the whole day in a rest from laboures in conscience of the 4th com thus you see albeit they kept two daies in a weeke yet but one onely was kept for their Sabbath the other was kept lightly and partially they kept these two daies in a weeke then much like as we now kepe the Lords day and some light Holy day or the Lords day a Eecture day when they fall both in one weeke 7. My seauēth Testimony shall be that of Athanasius who liued about the time of Constantine 300. yeeres after Christ who in his Homilie de Semente saith thus Wee assemble together in the Sabbath day not as if we were infected with Iudaisme but therefore wee meete together in the Sabbath day that we may worship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath Centur. iiij Cap. vj. pag 410. In which words we see what was the practise of the Christian Curches in the daies of Athanasius for then they kept the Sabbath day as we see here Furthermore it is worth our obseruation to consider that Athanasius doth not onely barely auowch it that they then kept the Sabbath day but moreouer he doth Iustify defend their keeping of it for whereas some might obiect vnto him saying but doe your Churches keepe the Sabbath day still why that is Iudaisme c. of this mind was the Laodicean counsaile that liued not long after Athanasius and it seemeth that this slaunderouse opinion of the Sabbath was creeping into the Church in the daies of Athanasius growne to ripenesse within a matter of 60. yeeres after him for now the Laodicean counsaile durst cale it Iudaisme in
plaine termes for Christianes to keepe the Sabbath day but see how this famouse Athanasius godly Bishop foreseeing this mischeife meeteth with the priuy obiectiones of some in his time who were alredy infected with this leauen saying not as if we were infected with Iudaisme The iudgement therfore of this Godly Bishop was that a Christian Church might sanctify the Sabbath day without any tainte or tincture of Iudaisme I wish all Ministers now would learne to know of Athanasius that to keepe Gods Sabbath it is no Iudaisme but how is it to be lamented to see the most diuines rather to follow that Schismaticall decree of the counsaile of Laodicea caling the keeping of Gods Sabbath Judaisme then to follow that famouse Athanasius who defendeth it that the keeping of the Sabbath day is no Iudaisme Further it is to be noted that the Christian Churches in the time of Athanasius kept the Sabbath day and that this was about 300 yeeres after Christ so that the Sabbath day was in vse with Christianes for 300 yeeres after Christ Now the first 300 yeeres after Christ are accounted for the most pure times the freest from corruptiones and the after times were lesse puer abateing of their purity daily as the Church grew elder now forasmuch as the Sabbath day was honourable amongst Christianes and religiously obserued in the most puer times this is much to be regarded for what if the Sabbath day begane to be trampled vpon and counted for Iudaisme 60 or 100 yeeres after these puer times what 's that to vs for if we follow any we will choose rather to imitate the more puer Churches I trust so then those that were lesse puer now the more puer Churches as you haue seene it abundantly proued they kept the Sabbath day To conclude so long as the Churches retained their best purity so long the Lords Sabbaths were in vse honour but when the Churches begane to decline and fale away as to set vp Images to adore the Crosse to pray to Saints to pray for the deade to beleeue a purgatory and the like then they begane to esteeme the Lords Sabbath Iudaisme that so they might forsake them and set vp dayes of their owne invention but my trust in God is that as he hath caused a reformation of the abuses of the second commandement which crept into the Church in those times so the same God will find a time to reforme the abuses of the 4th com also which crept in then too but remaine to this day vnreformed 8. My eight last Testimony shall be that of Ignatius who liued about an 100 yeeres after Christ Let not vs saith hee keepe the Sabbath day in a Iewish manner pleasing our selues with a rest or idlenesse for he that will not labour let him not eate c But let euery one of vs keepe the Sabbath day Spiritually reioyceing in the meditation of the lawe not in a remisnesse or idlenesse of the body but in an admiration of the workemanship of God not reioyceing in daunceings and vnciuill Showtinges c. And after the Sabbath day let euery one that loueth Christ celebrate the Lords day beinge the quene of dayes c. Ignat. in his Epistle to the Magnesianes In this exhortation of Ignatius we may note 1. That hee speaking both of the Sabbath day and also of the Lords day doth insinuate a plaine difference betwixt them as touching their estimation for the Lords day he counteth as the queene of daies and so leaueth a place for the Sabbath day to be in account as the King of dayes yea speaking of the Sabbath day he vseth the word Sabbathizare but speaking of the Lords day he vseth the word celebrare 2. We may note that hee speaking of the Sabbath day doth consider it doublie first as the Iewes in those dayes did vse it or abouse it rather 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reioyceing in idlenesse or slothfulnesse as hee speaketh And secondly as Christianes ought to vse it for the former we may note by Ignatius his words that the Iewes in his dayes did keepe the Sabbath day indeed but yet they kept it profanly as a feast of Bacchus with idlenesse with daunceings with showteing and the like now this kind of Sabbath keeping Ignatius did abhorre saying it is better for the Iewes to labour on the Sabbath day then thus to keepe it for he that will not worke saith hee let him not eate which words are to be referred vnto the Iewes not vnto the Christianes to whom he wrote vnlesse they would ioyne with these profane Iewes in reuelling and roioting on the Sabbath day by which manner of speaking Ignatius alludeth vnto a like forme of speech vsed by God himselfe in a like case saying I cannot suffer your new Moones nor Sabbaths c. My soule hateth them c. Isa 1.3 Now God did not simply hate their Sabbaths since he had commanded them but he hated their irreligiouse hypocriticale obseruation of the Sabbaths and so Ignatius did not meane simply that the Iewes should worke vpon the Sabbath day or else they should not eate but comparatiuly and respectiuly as if he had thus said rather then men should keepe the Sabbath as doe the Iewes in reuelling sporting idlenesse let them be forced to labour worke in it by denying them foode for it is better to worke on the Sabbath day according to that commandement which inioyneth labour 2. Thes 3.10 then to rest according to that commandement Exod. 20.10 when a man dothit onely to please the flesh and not to further him in the worship of God it is better to keepe no Sabbath then to keepe it onely in a carnall manner honest labour is better on the Sabbath then carnall slouthfull reuelling rest Now this kind of profane carnall keeping of Gods Sabbath is that which Ignatius doth admonish Christians of and doth dehorte them from saying Let not vs keepe the Sabbath as doe the Iewes or in a Iewish manner c. In the next place Ignatius speaketh of the Sabbath as Christianes ought to keepe it that is not profanly and carnally but religiously and Spiritually But let euery one of vs saith hee keepe the Sabbath Spiritually and then he proceedeth to mention the dueties of the Sabbath particularly the one whereof is to reioyce in the meditation and Diuine contemplation of the Law of God reioyceing in the meditation of the Law the other is to make an holy admiration of the Creation of the world of the prouidence of God in the gouernance of the same c. In an admiration of the workmanship of God Now vnto this Holy Spirituall religiouse obseruation of the Sabbath day did Ignatius exhorte those Christians vnto whom he wrote saying But let euery one of vs keepe the Sabbath day c. In which exhortation you see that Ignatius did not onely permit the keeping of the Sabbath day among Christianes but he goeth
regenerated see M. Perkins in his Commentary on the Galatians Chap. 5. v. 4. pag. 311. where treateing of the Law thus he writeth The Law it is wholly copulatiue all the partes of it are linked one to an other he that is bound to one Commandement is bound to all he that keepes one indeede keepes all he that breakes one in respect of the disposition of his heart is a breaker of all Iam. 2.10 he that makes no conscience to keepe some one commandement if occasion be offred will breake any Hence it followes that true regeneration is that which is a reformation chang according to the whole Law of God Iosias turned to God according to the whole Law Zacharie Elisabeth walked in all the Commandements of God Dauid saith he shall not be confounded when he hath respect vnto all the Commandements of God Here you see M. Perkins vrgeth it as a note of true regeneration that men be reformed according to the whole Law and exemplifies it by that of Iosias Zacharie Elizabeth the prophet Dauid if that regeneration then be a reformation according to the whole Law then is the whole Law still in force so men may not deny its Integrity wholnesse men may not mancle lame it vnlesse it grieueth them that the 10 Commandements should be all Morall To conclud we must either reassume and reedify Gods ancient Sabbaths or else we must reiect and demolish the integrity and perfection of Gods royall Law ARGVM XXII My 22th Argument in defence of the Sanctified hallowed Saturday Sabbath Genes 2.3 is that it must be Morall still in force partly because all Diuines with one accorde do hold and maintaine that one day in a weeke is Morall still in force by the 4th Com. and partly because there can be no day sanctified by the 4th Com. of all the 7 daies but Saturday only And thus I argue If one day in a weeke must be sanctified for a Sabbath by virtue of the 4th Commandement then Saturday Gods ancient sanctified and haâ—lowed 7th day Sabbath must be our weekly Sabbath day But one day in a weeke must be sanctified for a Sabbath day by virtue of the 4th Com. Therfore Saturday Gods ancient sanctified hallowed 7th day Sabbath must be our weekly Sabbath day First I will proâ—e the Minor namely that some one day in a weeke must now be kept for a Sabbath day by the 4th Com. then in the second place I will proue the Major namely that that one day must be our Saturday For the former I will proue it first by the Testimony of our Church in generall and then by the Testimony of many particular Diuines of nâ—te First then for our Church see the booke of Homilies Homilie the 8th of the place time of prayer pag. 138. where it is thus written As concerning the time which Almighty God hath appointed his people to assemble in together solemnely it doth appeare by the 4th Com. And t en a little beneath And therfore by this commandement wee ought to haue a time as one day in a weeke wherein we ought to rest giue our selues wholly to heauenly exercises And by and by againe Thus it may plainly appeare that Gods will Commandâ— was to haue a solemne time a standing day in the weeke wherein the people should come together and haue in remembrance his wonderfull benefites and to render him thankes for them Here our Church acknowledgeth teacheth that by the 4th Com. we ought to set a parte a time as one day in a weeke to haue a standing day in the weeke for the worship of God Bishop Babington in his exposition of the Commandements and on the 4th Com. Pâ—g 168. thus wriâ—eth To haue one day in the seauen to serue the Lord in that was Morall and remaineth still binding vs vnto it Doctour Willet in his Hexapla on Exodus and vpon the 4th Com. pag. 356. thus writeth This then may safely be affirmed that to keepe one day of seauen holy to the Lord is Morall not ceremoniall And agaâ—ne pag. 363. This Commandement as it is Morall continueth still namely that a certaine day should be set a parte for the publike seruice of God that as Chrysostome saith in circulo hebdomadis c in the compase of a weeke one whole day should be set a parte c. Hom. 10. in Genes-Musculus in his Common places on the 4th Comm. at the latter end saith thus Touching the Sabbath it stands with the Law of nature that we should some day giue our selues vnto holy exercises in this respect we must not shake off the sanctification of the Sabbath which is so farr deliuered vnto vs by the Law of nature that all people vniuersally haue their standing Holy daies consecrated for the doeing of holy things Peter Martyr in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romanes Chapt. 14. v. 5. pag. 436. saith thus It pertaineth to the 10 Commandements that out of the whole weeke shold one day be consecrated to the worship of God Purchas in his pilgrimage pag 21. Some saith hee make question of the Sabbath Howbeit I must confesse that I see nothing in that Commandement of the Decalogue praescribed but is naturall morall that the obseruing of one day of seauen in euery weeke appeareth both by the first order estabilished in nature when God blessed Sanctified the 7th day and by necessity of a Sabbath as well before the Law in the daies of the Patriarkes as in the times of Dauid or Salomon by the generall consent of all that it is Morall to set a parte some time to the Lord c. Thus we see it abundantly proued that one day in a weeke is still in force by the 4th Com. I might be infinite well nigh in the profe of this point out of M. Perkins M. Dod many others yea what pulpit is there in the Kingdome of England which doth not on all occationes seale vnto this trueth by proclayming and publishing it vnto the people Hauing proued the Minor that one day of the weeke must be a Sabbath hy the 4th coÌ„ now J come vnto the Major to proue that this one day must be our Saturday or t' is that if one day in a weeke must be a Sabbath day by the 4th com then Saturday must be our weekly Sabbath day my reason of this point is because none other day of the weeke can be a Sabbath day by the 4th com besids our Saturday this I shall proue by sondry arguments taken from the 4th com we will fetch our first argument from the first word of the â—th com Remember That day and that day of the weeke onely must be Sabbath day by the 4th com the which this word RemeÌ„ber doth send vs vnto now this word hath reference vnto Saturday the old Sabbath day onely for the word Remember implies a thing foreknowne thus Peter is
the Seruants by right from God Thus you see it cleere that to rest on the 7th day is a worke of mercy vnto maÌ„ beasâ— a worke greatly tending to the furtherance of all the dueties of piety and charity In a word the obseruation of the Sabbath day must needs be a thing greatly tending to the good of mankind because it was made for them The Sabbath was made for man Mark 2.27 vnlesse therefore we will accuse God of vnskilfulnesse in making things for men which are not good and proffitable for them we must needs yeeld that the obseruation of the Sabbath is a thing tending vnto and a furtherance of mans good in generall What answer may be framed to this argument I cannot foresee vnlesse it be some such as this that the rest from labour is it onely which tendeth vnto piety and is a worke of mercy but not the day to wit the 7th day this helpeth not c. But contrarywise 1. The day helpeth vnto a religiouse sanctification of the rest because it is a sacred day aboue all others in the weeke for God hallowed it at the creation and it onely Genes 2.3 therefore it doth best besuite sacred actioÌ„s addeth a kind of a more reuereÌ„t respect vnto them thus a man is touched with a more sublime and honourable regard of the duety of prayer in the Church as of ancient in the Temple then in a common house see Genes 28.16.17 Eccles 4.17 Leuit 19.30 ij Chron. 8.11 Mark 11.15.16.17 And Moses must put off his shoes because the place was Holy grownd Exod. 3.5 Thus Nehemiah required of the people behauiour sutable vnto the day the people must not weepe because the day was Holy Nehem. 8.9.10 and This is the day which the Lord had made let vs reioyce be glad in it Psal 118.24 Here the day minded them of the dueties in and of the day to wite ioy and gladnesse like as the Coronation day when it cometh it mindes vs of the dueties of the day that in a more liuely maner then any other day if therefore sacred places did further men in sacred dueties by touching their heartes with a more then ordenary reuerence and religion channge of behauiour and if daies doe mind vs of the dueties of the daies then why should not also the sacred day of the Sabbath when it cometh be of like vse it being of like kinde why should not the presence of this sacred day the more moue vs to be holy because the day is holy if Moses must put off his shoes because the grownd where on he stoode was holy grownd why should not we be the more moued to put off all carnall and sinnefull affectiones because the day wherein we are is an holy day if the people in Nehemiahs time must not weepe because the day was holy must not we learne to absteine from worke the rather because the day is holy So thus we see sacred places sanctified daies haue added somewhat vnto the increase of holy affectiones reasones haue bene fetched from the holinesse of the places and daies to mâ—ue vnto more reuerence in gesture outwardly in body inwardly in heart and to decline such things as doe not besâ—te these places or times this may yet further appeare in the Lords day for it being supposed a sacred day and of Diuine institution the day thus considered doth not a little further our rest from laboures so helpe vs to a more proffitable vse of all holy exercises in the day which would not be so if the day were in esteeme but a common day 2. One duety of the Sabbath is to sing Psalmes vnto the praise of God as we may see by the title of the 92 Psalme and among other things the Church doth praise God for that his marvailouse miraculouse worke of the CreatioÌ„ of the world whereof the Sabbath day or 7th day is a signe Exod. 31.17.15 Now this very day doth not a little further this sacred duety of praising God for the Creation of the world that 1. Because this day being the same day in the weke for order whereon God rested at the Creation it doth more liuely represent vnto vs Gods rest then can any other day of the weeke 2. Because God made this day to be a signe of the Creation Exod. 31.17.15 as the Elements of bread wine and water in the Sacraments be signes of the redemption now signes doe further the remembrance of the things signified by them therefore the Sabbath day being a signe of the Creation it doth further the thankfull remembrance thereof and our cheerefull praises of God for it since by it wee haue life being wel being without which should haue had no being at all 3. The 7th day being that day whereon God himselfe rested at the Creation Genes 2.2 this day hath a force in it aboue all daies in the weeke to perswad men to rest themselues and giue rest vnto their seruants on that day in an imitation of God because God rested on it and thus it furthereth 1. The work of mercy in afording rest vnto poore seruants and 2. It furthereth the workes of piety religion for the more freely that men rest the more cheerefully they worship God this efficacy no other day hath 4. As a place so the time of the 7th day is a furtherance to Gods worship for thereby we haue time to serue God in without which God cannot be serued yea further this time day doth further the continuance and frequency of Gods worship for were it not for this some men would thinke it enough to giue God but one howre or two in a day and one day in a moneth or quarter of a yeere 5. The time and day was commanded at once together with the duety of rest both in one commandement both in one sentence in that commandement both with one breath Exod. 20.10 The one as a duety the other as the proper time for the performance thereof now it is consentaneus and agreable to all reason to thinke that these two things being thus inioyned immediatly together should both tend together vnto one and the same end each after its manner and kind so as if the one tendeth vnto the worship of God so should the other also and it is absurd to thinke that the one should tend vnto oen end the other vnto another and diuerse end A decre is made that one the 5th of Nouember the day should be kept in a thankfull remembrance for that deliuerance c. that people shall refraine their laboures resorte to their parish Churches where the Ministers shall publikly praise God c. now who cold imagine but that as the duety of resting from worke tendeth vnto the publike praise of God so doth the place appointed thereto to wit the Church and so doe the persones to wit the Ministers and so doth the time and day also
make their Lords day Sabbath to become a 7th day so accord to the 4th com they must skip ouer Sunday in their accompt not rekoning it for the first day of the number so begine their rekoning at Monday counting Monday for the first day of the weeke then the Sunday or Lords day following will be a 7th day thus by their distinction cuning iugling together that day which our Church all Churches cales dies octavus the 8th day these haue made it a 7th day that day which the Scriptures cale the first day the same they haue made a 7th day I abhorr with my heart soule to see Gods people thus deluded and his sacred Scripture I meane his 4th com thus abused and made a nose of waxe to be turned hither and thither as the times please I know some are redy to wish I had spent my time better then to haue medled in this point of the Sabbath so in loue they are with their wonted erroures and others haue wished me and my booke hanged vp together with the like so rash is their furiouse zeale for their new Sabbath and so madd they are and enraged against me for discouering this their abhominable abuse both of Gods people and the sacred Scriptures but whither I haue done well or euill in this point and whither they or I doe rather deserue this censure I leaue to the indifferent and vnpartiall reader 3. An other absurdety against this distinction is that if a 7th day may be vnderstod in the 4th commandement indefinitly vncertainly then were not the Iewes tied to sanctify the Saturday Sabbath no more then any other day in the weeke 4. All Translatores both new and old are against them for they constantly translate it the 7th day as the most fit not a 7th day 5. Since there is no more 7th daies then there is Saturdaies in a weeke it is a foolish distinction to talke of a 7th day as if there were or could be more 7th daies in a weeke then one for since our Sunday or Lords day is the first day in a Diuine account as hath bene proued and also in all other approued computationes therefore Saturday following and onely Saturday must be both the 7th day and a 7th day without difference 6. That it must be translated and also expounded of the 7th day to wit Saturday and not of a 7th day vncertainly which day I haue proued it in my Exposition of these words of the 4th com But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord c. Vnto which place I referre my reader 7. The absurdety of this distinction appeareth thus if the word seauenth may be translated a 7th as of a day vncertaine then one and the same word in one and the same commandement should haue diuerse senses for the word seauenth at the latter end of the commandement Exod. 20.11 must be trāslated the 7th as of a day certaine for God rested the 7th day to wit on Saturday Genes 2.3 it is absurd therefore to translate the word seauenth in the former parte of the commandement Exod. 20.10 a 7th as a day vncertaine And so much for this distinction III. A third euasion they haue this is very frequent in all mens mouthes let a man vrge the 4th com for the Saturday Sabbath your answer shall be this One of Seauen the 4th com it inioyneth one day of 7 so they reiect the 7th day and will haue one of 7. Thus they leane vpon this false exposition of the com that by the 7th day is to be vnsterstod one day of the 7 by one of 7 they meane any one of the 7 or some one day of the 7 or other with out difference Thus these enemies to Gods Sabbath doe corrupt the proper sense of the scriptures rather then they will see their old erroures and be take them to a reformation glad they are if they can inuent any thing for the subuersion of this sacred ordinance Gods Sabbath day My first argument against this euasion shall be this that the word Seauenth vsed in the 4th com it is not a Cardinall as they cale it but an Ordinall word of number it noteth but one of that number and its order also as that it is the last for order of that number named thus the Tēth is not any one of the 10 but the last for order of the 10. The fowrth moneth of the yeere it is not any one moneth of the 4 but the last moneth of the 4 so the Seauenth day of the weeke it is not any day of the 7 but the last for order of all the 7. they doe therefore most shamefully corrupt the word of God who when they heare God say But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord which 7th is the last day of the number or weeke then they will come in with their deuices to defeate God of his day and time saying by the 7th may be meante one of 7 or some one day of the 7 that is as well the first day of the weeke or any other as the last day 2. The absurdety of this answer and exposition may appeare by the like cases The passeouer was by the Law to be eaten vpon the 14th day of the moneth now according to these Expositers of Gods Law a man might haue eaten the passouer vpon one of the 14 daies as on the 5th or 8th or 12th daie and iustifiably too for their Exposition of Gods law is by 14th to vnderstand one of 14 or some one day of the 14 that is any one day of the 14. Againe they were to circumcise a child on the 8th day I say these men that is vpon one or vpon some one of the 8 daies so they might at their choise circumcise a child on the 4th or 6th day of its age thus by their exposititiones they make Gods Lawes of none effect for God made choise of one certaine day aboue all others and these haue made all daies common God would haue the 7th day which is the last of the 7 for his Sabbath but these tell vs one of 7 some one of 7 or any one of the 7 may suffice as if God had not made his choise of the day but left vs the prerogatiue to make the choise good Lord deliuer vs from such Expositers and such Expositiones I could haue borne this griefe with silence as a long time I did if these Antisabbatharians or enemies to Gods Sabbaths would haue taken knowledge of these their erroures in loue and the spirit of meeknesse either in priuate before I printed my former booke or in publike by my former booke but now they maintaine thē with an high hand vtterly cōdēning me protesting against me both in publike and in priuate wherefore I doe the world to know how I abhorre these their vngodly proceedings in abusing Gods people and in corruption the sacred Scriptures 3.
If by the 7th day may be vnderstod one of 7 indifferently theÌ„ might the Iewes haue kept any one day in the weeke without difference for their Sabbath as Sunday Monday or some other but this is absurd to imagine yea a greater absurdety for since all meÌ„ coÌ„fesse that the Iewes with their Prophets Christ himselfe vnderstod by the words Sabbath day one certaine day of the weeke as Saturday if now we will expound the same words in the 4th com of a day vncertaine then shall the words of scripture chang their sense as the times chaÌ„g the same words for 2000. yeeres shall signifie one thing and euer after that an other thing oh manstrouse absurdety 4. If by the 7th day may be vnderstod some one day of the 7 without difference then may we Christianes keepe the Saturday Sabbath againe with the Iewes for this is one day of the 7 but this they hold a fowle errour to keepe the Iewes Sabbath therefore by the 7th day we must not vnderstand one day of the 7 indifferently 5. If by the 7th day in the 4th com be vnderstod one day of 7 then is there no ceremony in the 4th com for if one of 7 be the true exposition of the 4th com it was euer the true sense of it if one of 7 indifferently both was now is the true exposition of the Com. where I pray is the ceremony where is the time which we say was abolished by Christ since the sense of the com is euery way the same now which it was But our new Sabbatharians all say there is a ceremony in the time Therefore is not one of 7 the true sense exposition of the 7th day in the 4th com 6. The 4th com it inioyneth one day of 7 but one one day of 7 to wit the last of the 7 now since they oppose this text Colos 2.16 which abolisheth Sabbaths to the 4th com against that Sabbath there hereby they abolish that one day of 7 in the 4th com how absurd then is it for them to talke of one day of 7 as if still one day of 7 were morall by the 4th com when themselues haue abolished that one day of 7 there commanded by Colos 2.16 they will abolish a thing and yet maintaine it still 7. That by these words in the com the 7th day must be vnderstod the 7th day as of a knowne certaine day and not one of 7 indifferently and indefinitly I haue proued it in my Exposition of the 4th coÌ„ vpon these words But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. whither I referre my Reader and thus much for this euasion that by the 7th day they say may be vnderstod one of seauen or some one day of the 7. IIII. Some seing how hardly they are beset in the former distinctiones haue found out an other new euasion and they seing that these words of the coÌ„ beare so strongly against them to wit But the 7th day is the Sabbath they therfore haue thought it fit to reiect these words alltogether and so all the after parts of 4th com also therefore they answer thus that ther is no more of the 4th com morall but these words at the begining of it Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it and as for all the residue of the com that they reiect altogeather as appurtenances to the com and as application I must confesse I neuer heard any man so impudent saue one M. Greenwood a silenced Minister one of my 10 professed aduersaries and one man more whose name I spare neither would I haue iudged it worth the confutation but that I feare the rest of my aduersaries may be take them to this refuge when they be hardly put too it When I looke vpon this mans answer togeather with those forementioned me thinkes they haue dealt very honourably with Gods Law for they haue not dared to deny any parte of it in right downe termes but this man as they say without feare or witt layes violent hands on Gods Law rendeth or teareth away the greater parte thereof at once me thinke he that makes conscience of a Surplisseâ— should make some conscience of doeing violence to a Morall Law and of denying such a portion of Sacred Scripture I heare indeed of much conscience vsed in other matters I see too little vsed in disputation woe is me that it is so any thing shall be said or done yea Gods Lawes shall be mancled quartered rather then God shall haue his Sabbathes againe But first it is absurd for any man to put asunder what God hath ioyned togeather could any thing be more neerly ioyned to other then the latter parte of the 4th Com. is to the former and yet this man dares sunder them Our Sauiour said that the Law in euery iotâ— tittle of it should last for euer Mat. 5.18 But M. Greenwood saith not onely that some iote or title of it is abolished but also that many letters yea words of it are abolished the Lavv of the 4th Comm. had not one hundreth vvords in it and be hath here reiected aboue Fovvre score of them is that a contrite spirite that trembleth at Gods word Isai 66.2 vvhich reiecteth his vvord 2. The latter parte of the Comm. naming the Seauenth day hath as good right to be Morall as the former parte naming the Sabbath day for like as the Lords day and Sunday be tvvo names both notifying one the same day to vvit our present Sabbath day so are Sabbath day Seauenth day tvvo other names both notâ—fying the Saturday and therfore the Holy Ghost vseth them promiscuously the one for the other for that vvhich in one place is named the Sabbath day as in Exod. 20.11 in an other is named the Seauenth day as in Genes 2.3 Exod. 23.12 Exod. 34.21 yea it is so in one and the same verse Exo 20.11 if therefore the Sabbath day be morall then must the 7th day be morall too 3. As the other commandements haue two partes an affirmatiue and a negatiue so hath this 4th com the affirmatiue you haue in these words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it The Negatiue you haue expressed also in these words The 7th day is the Sabbath c. in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. Now this man by denying these words he denieth a parte yea the Negatiue parte of the 4th coÌ„ and is it not absurd to imbrace the affirmatiue parte of a commandement and to reiect the negatiue parte thereof yet nothing is so fowle but it may be said to abolish Gods Sabbaths Where is rest commanded and seruile labour forbiddeÌ„ if not in this latter parte of the com take away then this latter parte of the Com. you take away Gods commandement which forbiddeth all seruile laboures on the Sabbath day now shall the duety of rest from labour be morall not that parte of the Com. which expresly inioyneth
it shall we haue no Law now against working on the Sabbath day 4. If these words But the 7th day is the Sabbath be not morall but abolished then this absurdety followeth that we are not tied by the 4th com to giue God a Sabbath once a weeke or one in 7 daies but it is enough if God hath a Sabbath once a moneth once a yeere one in 7 daies or one in 700 daies for in what parte of the commandement will you find on what day in 700 you shall keepe your first Sabbath if you abolish those words But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. were it not for these words might you not begine your first Sabbath at the 700th day as well as at the 7th day 5. If no more of the 4th com be morall but these words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it then is the commandement Sixe daies thou shalt labour and doe all that thou hast to doe Exod. 20.9 a bolished also now I maruaile what offence these words are vnto any that this command must be rased out too were these wordes typicall or ceremoniall at any time that they must be also abolished is it Judaisme too to obserue this commandement yet further take away the latter parte and words of the 4th com and then 1. you abolish the cause grownd of the Sabbath institution noted in these words And rested the 7th day wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Exo 20.11 Genes 2.2.3 now it is very absurd to retaine the Sabbath and to reiect the grownd cause of its Institution 2. You abolish also that Matchlesse example and perswasiue president reason which God gaue vs taken from his owne example to moue vs to keepe the Sabbath Exod. 20.11 what is Gods example now become Jewish and to treade in his steppes Iudaifme may not Christians be followers of God as deere children as well as Iewes 3. You blot out the memory of the Creatiō in remembrance of which Myracle the 7th day Sabbath was solemnized Exod. 31.17 6. I alleage the Testimony of M. Perkins against him for of all the other words in the cō M. Perkins did iudge these words to be morall see his Comentary on the Galatians Chap. 4. v. 9. pag. 286. Jt may be saith he the first words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it and these words In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke are spoken of the Iewes Sabbath But the words sixe daies thou shalt labour c. And the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God are morall and containe a perpetuall trueth And againe see M. Perkins in his Cases of Conscience pag. 106. D. vpon these words for in sixe daies c. where he thus writeth The second reason is taken from Gods example That which the Lord himselfe hath done in persō the same must mā doe But the Lord himselfe rested the 7th day Therefore man must doe the same This reason made by God to the creature must stand in force till he reuerse it which yet he hath not done Thus M. Perkins doth expresly affirme it that this reason annexed to the 4th commandement is still in force In a word I might be infinite in alleaging Authores this way for what writer but holdeth these latter words of the Com. to be still in force as appeareth in that in theire Expositions on the 4th com they vnderstand by these words the 7th day is the Sabbath one day of 7 to be meant to be morall but M. Greenwod will be contrary to all Authores rather then God shall haue his Sabbaths againe 7. If onely those first words of the commandement Remember the Sabbath day be morall then is the 4th com vtterly abolished for they alleage these texts Exod. 31.15.16 Col. 2.16 where is mention made expresly of the Sabbath day for the abolishing of the Sabbath day in the 4th com as a signe and shaddow wherefore since by these textes they abolish the Remembrance of the Sabbath day mentioned in the begining of the 4th commandement it must nedes follow that those words in the begininge of the com Remember the Sabbath day are abolished and so if no other words be morall in the 4th com but those then are none at all morall but all abolished Now whereas some say all but the first words of the com are Application it is more likely that they are Explication now they will not reiect J trust the Explication of the commandement 2. to say they are application it doth imply that the words Sabbath day in the begining of the commandement are certaine generall words which may be applied vnto any day and so the latter parte of the commandement should apply them to the 7th day but their foundation is sandy for they cannot shew where at any time these words in the 4th commandement Sabbath day were taken generally or for any other day then Saturday the 7th day 3. Since that these words Sabbath day at the begining of the commandemēt these the 7th day is the Sabbath towards the end of the commandement are promiscuously vsed in Scripture the one for the other as hath bene proued it is absurd to suppose the one of these to be the Application of the other 4. Since that we are commanded to sanctifie the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 and probibited to worke on the 7th day Exod. 20.10 It is absurd to say that this latter is an Application of the former is it not rather an Addition and that of one parte of the commandement to an other 5. If the after partes of the commandement be but Application and belonge not to vs why then doe all Diuines out of these after partes of the commandement determine that one day in 7 is morall And whereas some say that all the latter words of the com are appurtenāces to the com I reply if they be but such appurrenāces as may safely be seuered from the com then 1. we haue no neede now as those Iewes had of Gods insample reason mentioned in the 4th commandement Exod. 20.11 to moue vs to sanctifie the Sabbath day 2. Then need we not giue God a Sabbath once in 7 daies or once in 700 daies c. 3. Then doe we abolish Gods expresse prohibition of doeing seruile workes on the Sabbuth day Exod. 20.10 fourthly then why haue Diuines and Expositers affirmed that one day of 7 is morall out of these words the 7th day is the Sabbath 5. that these words the 7th day is the Sabbath are no appurtenances but of higher nature I haue proued in my 5th argument in defence of the Lords Sabbaths where I proued that these words are a parte of the 4th com and so cannot be seuered from the commandement as appurtenances may be To conclude there is a Tradition among vs that these words the 7th day is the Sabbath c. in it thou shalt doe no worke is but Application and Appurtenances
Against this distinction J conceiue these things 1. that by the same distinction we may still retaine all those Ceremoniall and anniuersary Sabbaths in Leuit. 23. holding them all morall in force still quoad genus as touching some time to be annually allotted for Gods worship but abolished as touching those speciall dayes quod ad Speciem attinet and so there shall be no more morallity in the 4th com then there is in those Ceremoniall commandements which is iust none at all or else the 4th com shall be euery white as much a Ceremoniall commandement as any of those commandements for those yeerly Sabbaths in Leuit. 23. Yea what morallity shall there be in Gods Sabbath more then is still in the Tabernacle or Temple for hence Diuines collect that some place must be assigned now for Church assemblies and publike worship and they collect no more from Gods Sabbath in the 4th com as namely that some time be allotted now for Gods worship 2. Since that the authores of this distinction doe grant that some day in generall is by the 4th com morall and perpetuall I will proue that that day must be Saturday the 7th day my reason is because the other Sixe dayes are commanded in the 4th com for the dayes of worke and labour Sixe daies thou shalt labour and doe all thou hast to doe Exod. 20. now this commandement of Sixe dayes labour is morall and perpetuall neuer yet altered and so saith M. Perkins in his commentary on the 4th Chap. to the Galatianes v. 9 pag. 286. But the words saith he Sixe daies thou shalt labour c the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord c are morall conteine a perpetuall trueth and in his Cases of conscience pag. 106. D. thus This reason made by God to the creature must stand in force till he reuerse it which yet he hath not And further the Sixe daies mentioned in the 4th com are Sunday Monday Tewsday VVednesday Thursday Friday namely those Sixe dayes wherein God himselfe wrought at the Creation Genes 1.5.8.13 c. Exod. 20.11 For Saturday neuer came into the number of the Sixe dayes neither by the commandement did the Iewes obserue or rekone any other daies for those Sixe but these I haue mentioned as I haue proued in my exposition on these words of the 4th com wherefore if one day of the 7 be morall by the 4th com and then the former 6 of those 7 daies be ordeined for worke by the 4th com then it must follow that that one day which is morall by the 4th com is Saturday the 7th day and the last of the number because of all the 7 dayes none is left vacant for a Sabbath but Saturday the 7th day all the other daies being appointed by the 4th com for worke Hereby it appeareth that this distinction is friuolouse saying that some one day is morall by the 4th com in generall but not that particular day which God commanded the Iewes constantly kept 3. That this distinction is absurd I proue it because it ouerturneth one of Gods tenn moralls to wit the 4th com for as for a time or day in generall this is commanded in the 2th com where Gods worship is inioyned for if God must be worshiped then of necessity a time or a day in generall one or other must be allotted therefore so then deny that speciall time to wit Saturday the 7th day and you abolish the 4th com vtterly and grant no more morall in the 4th com but a time in generall and you confound the 2th com with the 4th com make thâ— 4th com a needlesse repetition 4. If some one day in generall be morall by the 4th com and not determined which day then the Church may choose Saturday the Iewish Sabbath day againe But they hold it Iudaisme to keepe Saturday the Iewes Sabbath day Therefore is not some one day in generall vndeterminedly morall inioyned by the 4th com or the Church may appoint the day of Christs Natiuity Christmas day or the daies of Christs passion our Fridayes for Sabbath dayes by the 4th com since the 4th com is holden not to determine the speciall day and time 5. If some one day or some time in generall be all that is morall in the 4th com then are we not tyed to giue God a Sabbath weekly it may suffice if we giue God a day once a moneth one in a yeere or one in 7000 daies for thus there shall be a day and some time in generall allotted for Gods worship and this is an other absurdety whereof this distinction is guilty 6. If one day or some time in geneaall be all that is morall in the 4th commandement so as the speciall day time must be allotted and appointed by the Authority of the Church then this absurdety followeth that this sacred ordinance of Gods sabbath shall be partly Diuine partly humane a mingle mangle for God commands a time man commands the time Yea so one ordinance of God to wit his Sabbath it shall stand by virtue of two seuerall commandements as if one were not enough for it shall stand by the 4th com as it is a time and so commanded of God by the 5th com as it is the time and so commanded by the Magistrate 7. That the absurdety of this distinct on may yet further appeare let it be obserâ—ed the old Sabbath day which was expresly commanded in the 4th com and which the Iewes kept to wit Saturday they say that this speciall time and day was abrogated as appeareth by Exod. 31.13 and by Colos 2.16 and other like textes now they oppose these textes which speake of Sabbath daies not onely vnto those anniuersary Sabbath daies in Leuit. 23. but also to that weekly Sabbath day in the 4th com Exo. 20. and hereby they hold the 7th day Sabbath abolished now I would faine know of them if the word Sabbath in Colos 2.16 be not of as large a sense as the word Sabbath in the 4th com if there be no difference as none they can shew then if followeth that if the Sabbath day in the 4th com be abolished by this text Colos 2.16 which speakes of Sabbath daies then are all Sabbath daies and times in the 4th commandement abolished that both specially and generally for euery aniuersary Sabbath abolished by this text is abolished both generally and specially so then since they apply this text Colos 2.16 against the Sabbath mentioned in the 4th com it is a friuolouse tenet to say the time in the 4th com is morall quod ad genus attinet and to say that by the 4th coÌ„ some day or time in generall onely is morall this cannot be vnlesse it be vainly supposed that the name Sabbath day in the 4th com hath a genus but the same name in Colos 2.16 hath none 8. If onely the time commanded in the 4th com quod ad genus
persons what qualified men are bound to those precepts 11. Whereas they say that the 4th Com. belongeth vnto vs no othervviâ—e then as it is the Lavv of nature hereby they graunt that some time in generall is prescribed as Morall in the 4th Com. for they all say the Lavv and light of nature teacheth that some time in the generall is to be allotted for the vvorship of God And hereby they deny that there is any thing else commanded in the 4th Com. as Morall saue onely some time in generall novv the absurdety of this opinion that onelie some time in generall is all vvhich is Morall in the 4th Comm. I haue by sondry other arguments confuted in their 8th euasion the Section last before this vvhither I referr my reader for a further confutation of this distinction if further he desireth to see it confuted And so much of this Atheisticall Antichristian blasphemouse and most absurd distinction vvherein I haue taken the more paines because I find it stood vpon euen by all as a common and sound ansvver X. The 10th euasion not vvorth the naming but that the Patrones of it put confidence in it is that the Sunday or Lords day may be the 7th day as vvell as the Saturday for if you beginne at Sunday for the First day of our number then Saturday follovving vvill be the 7th day but contrarivvise if you beginne at Saturday for the First day then Sunday before it vvill be the 7th day like as if you lay dovvne 7 counters in order one after an other in a right lyne beginne at the first counter to vvards the left hand and then the last counter next the right hand vvill be the 7th but beginne at the first counter tovvards the right hand the last counter next the left hand vvill be the 7th I may vvell call this account a counter-play or a counterfaite play they see the 4th Comm. so expresse for the 7th day as they wring their wittes hither thither to make the Lords day the 7th day but all in vaine for Saturday onely is the 7th day The very mention of this euasion is enough to confute it for who euer rekoned backwards before to rekone thus Sunday the first Monday the second Tewsday the third c is allowable and all men so rekone but to beginne at the last day saying Saturday the first Friday the second Thursday the third c this foppish deuice was neuer heard on before this is worse then Carter like to set the Carte befâ—re the horse to account a day for the first before it is or hath a being why may we not reade vvords in the Scripture backward as well as reâ—one backwards I dare say it such men would chide their children if they should beare them rekone the dayes of the weeke thus backvvards but any childish toye is answer good enough to defeate God of his Sabbathes The Law was that the passouer should be eaten on the 14th day of the moneth but by this new account they might counting the 14th day to be first day haue eaten it one the first day of the moneth To conclude not onely our Church but also the fowre Euangelists call the Lords day the first day of the weeke and consequently Saturday after the 7th day But these counterplayers thinke they may deale with the dayes of the weeke as they doe with their counters beginne where they list and so what God our Church accounts for the 7th that these men count the first againe what they count the first these count the 7th enough of this deuice M. Yates XI to conclude whereas they distinguish in the 4th com betwene the dueties of rest holy exercises the time wherein they were to be done saying the dueties are Morall but the time is a ceremony abolished these absurdeties this distinction is guilty of 1. that if the time to wit that of the 7th day be abolished then whensoeuer we performe the duetie of rest and holy exercises we may be said to keepe the Sabbath day and yeeld obedience to the 4th Com. as on Wednesdayes and Fridayes Lecture dayes common Holy dayes for on these dayes we rest doe religiouse actions 2. Not onely this but all the forementioned distinctions are guilty of these absurdeties 1. that they are horrible partiall in that they can find distinctions to preserue the Morall Law against Libertines here will invent distinctiones to ouerturne Gods Sabbath which is a parte of that Law Yea they can defend the common Holie daies of the Saints vsed in our Church from being Popish as some would haue them yet will not defend that Holie day of the Holy one of Israel from being a ceremony Iewish but rather vndermine it by distinctions 2. They are partiall in Gods Law laming maiming it of its Integrity perfection 3. They make Gods 4th Comm. a monstre halfe Morall halfe Ceremoniall 4. They set open a gate to Anabaptistry that so Gods Church should haue no Sabbathes 5. They reiect that which was againe may be an helpe to the worship of God 6. They make an Holy prayer of our Church to be a babling with God 7. They condemne those most ancient the Primitiue Churches who liued next the Apostles of erroniouse practise 8. They shew no loue to Gods Law for it selfe to his ordinances for if they did they would imbrace as much of it as many of them as possible they could but this they doe not for they reiect what they are not compelled to reiect God send his Lawes ordinances better friends I pray God These with other absurdeties formely mentioned are these distinctions guilty of Thus much for confutation of their vaine distinctions And here ends the defence of the Lords Sabbath SECT V. Of the Antiquity of the Sabbath day TOuching the antiquity of the Sabbath I finde two opiniones the one holding that it was from the Creation the other that it was first instituted in the vvildernesse after the people of Israel came out of Egypt how be it much I suppose cannot be said on either sides yet of the two I hold the former to be the more orthodox to carry the greater probability with it you shall see the reasones on either partes and first for those on the contrary parte I. On the contrary parte they reason against the Antiquity of the Sabbath out of Exod. 16.23 where it is thus written To morrow is the rest of the Holy Sabbath vnto the Lord. Hence they gather that the Israelites were ignorant of the Sabbath vntill this time and consequently that the Sabbath was not from the Creation for if it had Moses should not haue needed to tell them that it was to morrow c. Herevnto I answer the Lord teld his people from Mount Sinay that the 7th day was the Sabbath Exod. 20.10 Againe after that he teld them in Leuit. 23.3 that the 7th day was
to rest in or for man if not for both I rather thinke for man for as for God he rested no more on the 7th day then on the 8th 9th and 10th daies and so euery day after but to man it might be otherwise he might rest on the 7th day and worke on the 8th 9th and 10th daies c. yea many holy daies God hath made since the Creation Leuit. 23. but it can no where be showne that he made any for himselfe but alwaies for man yet more plainly that God sanctified the 7th day for mans vse it shall appeare by the 4th com Exod. 20.11 where the Lord vseth a reason to perswade vs to rest on the 7th day and it is this because God himselfe rested on the 7th day blessed it and hallowed it which reason is drawne from the Sanctification of the 7th day at the Creation Genes 2.3 as if the Lord had said you shall rest on the 7th day because I blessed it and sanctified it at the Creation for the selfe same end hereby then it appeareth that the 7th day at the Creation was sanctified with reference vnto man yet further it shall appeare by the words of our Sauiour Mark 2.27 saying The Sabbath was made for man c. it is plaine then that when God made the Sabbath at the Creation he made it for man thus it appeareth that the Sabbath was from the Creation Herevnto some answer that the Sabbath at the Creation was exemplary indeede but not obligatory vntill the 4th com was deliuered in the wildernesse But the vanity of this distinction shall thus appeare 1. If the law of the Sabbath the 4th com did not bind vntill it was deliuered on Mount Sinay then did none of the other Nyne com bind neither vntill they were deliuered on Mount Sinay vnlesse you will say that the Law had not euer tenn commandements in it and that the law is not of a Copulatiue nature 2. It were most strange to suppose that God should giue an example more then 2000 yeeres before any should follow it for wherefore are examples but for to be imitated 3. When our Sauiour said The Sabbath was made for man Mark 2.27 he meaneth not that it was made at the Creation for an example vselesse but for mans vse as to rest in it c. 4. Can any man thinke it that God should sanctify the 7th day and so make it an holy day at the Creation and then suffer it to be profaned and polluted for 2000 yeeres after vntill the Isralites came into the wildernesse or can any man thinke that God should make a Sabbath day at the Creation for the people of the Iewes onely who were not a people distinct of nere 2000 yeeres after and not for the Patriarkes also who liued before the flood or can we thinke that the Fathers before the flood had Sacrifices and no Sabbaths that they had the worship of God and no time allotted for it or can we thinke that the Church of God from the Creation had no day set aparte for a thankfull holy remembrance of the Creation of the world vntill they were come into the wildernesse II. My second reason to proue that the Sabbath was from the Creation is because the 4th com must be supposed to be as ancient as are the other nyne commandements of the Decalogue for the Decalogue is holden of all to be as ancient as the world and so it must be for else the Law were not of a copulatiue nature the 10 commandements were not linked together as a chaine of many linkes for one linke to wit the 4th in midest of the chaine should be wanting contrary vnto Iam. 2.10 contrary to the doctrine of all Diuines 2. If the 4th cō were not as ancient as the other 9 commandements then it must be absurdly supposed that the Decalogue had not alwaies 10 commandements in it as it had Deut. 10.4 If then the 4th com be as ancient as are the other 9 commandements then the Sabbath therein commanded must be as ancient as is the Morall Law which is for antiquity from the Creation It may be obiected that there is no mention of the Sabbath day vntill the Law was giuen vpon Mount Sinay Exod. 20. or at soonest in the wildernesse of Sin Exo 16.1.23 well be it so but doth it follow that because it was not sooner mentioned it was not therefore sooner in vse the Law against murther it is not mentioned at the soonest vntill after the murther of Abell Genes 4.15 but will it thereof follow that there was no Law against murther before Kaine killed Habel we know many things there were which were not recorded for else the world could not conteine the bookes Ioh. 21.25 on the contrary for so much as we find that the Sabbath was in vse Exo. 16.23 before the 4th com was giuen on mount Sinay Ex. 20.1.8 it is therefore the most likly that it was from the Creation for if it had not its first originall at Mount Sinay when can it be thought to haue its begining but at the Creation together with the other commandements of the Decalogue III. My third reason that the Sabbath was from the Creation is because we find not the Spirituall workes of the Sabbath day particularly expressed in the 4th com giuen vpon Mount Sinay Exod. 20. nor yet in the mention of the same Law before in the wildernesse of Sin Exo. 16. which is an argument that the Sabbath day was in vse and the manner how to sanctify it was well knowne vnto the Iewes before either of these Lawes were written Exod. 20. or Exod. 16.5.23.28 otherwise God himselfe would in some of these textes haue expressed particularly vnto them after what manner and where withall they should sanctifie this day The same is also confirmed by the first word of the 4th com Remember Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it signifying that they knew before and could cale it to minde againe how to Sanctify the Sabbath day and therefore touching this point the Lord needed not say any more vnto them but Remember it c. I haue often maruailed in my selfe why it should please God so punctually expresly to mention the corporall obseruation of the Sabbath in resting from bodily laboures and be so silent as it were in the Spirituall dueties of the Sabbath which are the more excellent doubtlesse the reason is because the Sanctification of the Sabbath did not then begine when the Law was giuen Exod. 20. or Exo. 16. but that it was an ancient ordinance of Gods long before in the Church in the memory of all men before the giuing of the Law as were the other Morales in the Decalogue so as they knew how to sanctify the day and with what dueties I confesse it that the Lord vseth the word Sanctify in the 4th com which doth in generall imply the particular meanes and waies of sanctifying the day but it doth not
shew vs how or whereby in particular the day should be sanctified how know we at this day where withall to sanctify the Sabbath day we rather find is by obseruation how the Church of God euer did sanctifie it then by the 4th com as farre as euer I could vnderstand we find the people and Church of God constantly sanctifying it with sacred actiones for they had on that day holy conuocationes and assemblies Leuit. 23.3 then the people resorted vnto the Prophets for instruction ij King 4 23. then the Sacred Scriptures were publiquly red Act. 15.21 then they sung Psalmes Psal 92. then the people did worship before the Lord at the gate of the Temple Ezek. 46.1.3 on this day our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles after him did constantly preach vnto the people Luk. 4.16 c. Act. 13.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 Now as we learne what God meant by the word Sanctifie in the 4th com by the obseruation how Gods Church did sanctify the Sabbath day in their practise so no doubt those Isralites in the wildernesse knew what God meant by the word sanctify by the constant practise of their ancestores before them IV. My 4th reason is drawne from the first word of the 4th com Remember Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it c. now in asmuch as God commanded those Iewes at Mount Sinay to remember the Sabbath day it implieth that the Sabbath day was in vse before then and that they knew it and could cale it to minde againe for remembrance implieth the caling to mind of a thing forepast and foreknowne Hereto some may thus answer admit this word remember hath relation to the Sabbath as foreknowne yet there may be a double relation the one to the Sabbath as instituted from the Creation the other to it as commanded in the wildernesse of Sin Exod. 16. But that this word remember hath relation to a knowledge beyond that in the wildernesse of Sin consequently vnto the Creation it will appeare 1. By this that God bad them remember to Sanctify the Sabbath day now how to sanctify the Sabbath day in a speciall manner as hath bene showne they lerned not by the 4th commandement Exod. 20. Nor in the wildernesse of Sin Exod. 16. and therefore this word remember had reference to times before their being in the wildernesse of Sin 2. It is nothing probable that this word should haue reference but vnto the Israelites being in the wildernesse of Sin for the mention of the Sabbath in the wildernesse of Sin was but one moneth before the giuing of the Law on Mount Sinay as you may see Exod. 16.1 Exod. 19.1 Now can it be thought the Jsraelites were of so brittle memories to forget a law giuen them but one moneth before as they should stand in need to haue the word Remember added so shortly after is it not by farre the more likly that this word had reference vnto some long time before as vnto the Creation the memory whereof stod in neede of a speciall Memorandum least they should forget it yea doth not the reason annexed to the commandement Exod. 20.11 drawne from Gods hallowing of the 7th day at the Creation to moue the Iewes to sanctifie the 7th day imply so much as if the Lord said because I rested on the 7th day at the Creation therefore blessed it sanctified it for your holy vse therefore forget it not though it was done long since but Remember it to sanctifie it c. V. My 5th reason we doe not onely learne it from our Sauiour that the Sabbath was made for man Mark. 2.27 But also more particularly we find that it was made for the exercising mercy vnto man yea both to man beast as we read Exod. 23.12 Deut. 5 14. that so poore tiered seruants might by a rest then be refreshed hence I thus argue if that the Sabbath was not from the Creation and so before the Israelits came into the wildernesse then this absurdety shall follow that God was not so mindfull to shew mercy vnto the poore tired seruants of the Patriarkes as he vvas vnto the seruants of the Iewes in the wildernesse nor so mercifull before the giuing of the Law as after 6. My 6th reason for the Antiquity of the Sabbath shall be the vnanimouse consent of well nigh all Diuines for this purpose Doctour Bownd in his booke on the Sabbath pag. 6. saith The Sabbath was from the begining from the Creation it came in with the first man must goe out with the last man for confirmation hereof he alleageth sondry Authores as Vatabl. Iunius Peter Martyr Bullinger Hospinian Danaeus Zanchie pag. 12. Chrysostome Beza Bertram Athanasius To the same effect Walaeus de Sâ—bbatho citeth sondry Authores of best note pag. 43. as Philo Judaeus lib. 3. be vita Mosis among Christianes Chrisostome Hom. 10. in cap. 2. Gen. Theodoret quaest in Genes Augustine ad Casul Epist 86. Luther in 2. Cap. Genes Zuinglius comment in 20. Cap. Exod. Caluine in 20 Cap. Exod. in 5. Cap. Deut. Beza in 1. Cap. Apocalyp Martyr in 2. Cap. Genes and in 4. praecept Bullinger in Cap. 12. Mat. Zanchie de operibus creationis Cap. 1. Vrsinus Catech in 4. praecept Gualtherus in Math. 12. Homil. 162. The institution of the Sabbath saith he is most ancient neither is there any thing in all the worship of God more ancient c. Aretius tom 1. loc com loco 30. Bertrame in libello de Politia Iudaicea cap. 2. Mercerus in Cap. 2. Genes Anton. Faius Junius in 2. Genes Pareus in 2. Genes Zepperus lib. 4.24 de legib forens Iudaeorum Alstedius Theol. Catecheti Sect. 3. Cap. 6. Hauing quoted all these Authores with others more to proue the Sabbath was from the Creation then Walaeus concludeth thus The same also is affirmed almost of all other interpreters of the Reformed Church neither saith he haue I euer yet seene any that hath directly denied it vnlese some one or two of our late writers who haue bene bould to question it Here let me add what I find recorded by M. Aynsworth in his Annotationes on the 92. Psalme vpon the Title of it where he saith the Chaldee paraphraseth vpon it thus An hymne a song which the first man Adam said for the Sabbath day It seemes therefore by the iudgment of Antiquity that the Sabbath was from the Creation and that Adam himselfe sanctified it Let these reasones Testimonies be put into the Scale togeather with those on the contrary parte I beleeue those will not hold weight with these and so much for the antiquity of this sacred ordinance the 7th day Sabbath Now shall we suffer so ancient an ordinance to be causelesly and needlesly trampled vnder foote who that loueth Antiquity but should be in loue with this so ancient an ordinance then the which is not a more ancient ordinance now in the Church of God or if there be it
is not aboue one day older this ordinance it is well nigh as ancient as the world it selfe So much for the Antiquity of the 7th day or Saturday Sabbath CHAPT VI. THis Chapter conteineth a Dispensation touching the present practise shewing that a Christian is not necessarily bound in conscience to make a rente from our Church in his present practise but that he may waite for the fitnesse of season opportunity and the publike reformation of the Magistrate And then it concludeth with an Exhortation to vse all possible and lawfull meanes for a publike generall Reformation A Dispensation touching the present practise SECT I. WHen I had founde out by diligent study Christian Reader that this most ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath is still in force in the next place I gaue my selfe seriously to thinke of the practise of it whither to fale to present practise or to waite some more fit season When I thought of a present practise then these inconveniences presented themselues 1. If we fale vpon the present practise then the Magistrate will be offended because we make a schisme and rente in the Church 2. Our Christian brethren will be offēded because we diuid separate from their fellowship both of these will take it the worse when they thinke of our rashnesse inconsideracy that we will forsake the practise fellowship of the Church before we haue giuen them time sufficient to consider of the matter as we our selues haue had whereby we should haue waited for their approbation in iudgement reformation together with vs in practise and herevpon may arise greate diuisiones of heart much hartburning betwixt brethren who should liue in amity godly loue 3. As in the two former we should doe that which would be euill to our brethren so also should we doe that which would proue euill vnto our selues that in a double respect 1. in regard of our bodies 2. in respect of our soules for the former we liue not as they doe in some parte of the world who are at liberty to practise what they will in matter of conscience but we liue vnder an established gouernment where we cannot transgresse the lawes thereof without perill to our persones goods For the latter if we enter vpon a present practise of the Sabbath then we rune into this spirituall inconuenience that we shall pine our soules for want of that spirituall food which we were wont to inioy vpon the Lords day which is needfull vpon the Sabbath day for the lawes of our kingdome will not permit priuat conuēticles or that a minister should preach in priuate therfore we cannot haue the benefite of an able Ministry to helpe vs in the sinctification of the Sabbath to feede our soules with the bread of life these are the inconveniences which attend vpon the present practise But when I thought of a delay and to waite some more fit season for the practise then this euill presented it selfe that by the neglect of a present practise we fale into sinne and transgression of the 4th commandement by prophanation of the Sabbath day we should be guilty thereof vntill that sit season of reformation cometh so whither soeuer I turned me I saw my selfe in a straite for the former inconveniences would be auoided but this latter of necessity must be shuned VVhilst I was at a stand it pleased God to cause me thinke of a dispensation the which after J had seriously considered of I resolued that the word of God would beare a dispensation in this case so it should come to passe that we should shune the inconveniencies on the one side the sinne on the other so we might walke on comfortablie without offence either to God or to man or iniury to our selues Let vs now therefore addresse our selues vnto this Dispensation touching which first we will handle this question in generall whither a man is bound in conscience to conforme his practise at all times without dispensation or exception to the doeing of that which the word of God saieth must be done hee knoweth must be done or noe 2. we will handle this question in particular whither the Sabbath day may not be neglected in a case of necessity for a season vntill the time of reformation by those who are verily perswaded that it is still in force if in case they giue God for it an other day in the meane space as the Lords day by way of change And first of the former of these two questiones SECT II. In this section I shall proue vnto you that by sondry iustifiable examples that a man is not bound at all times without dispensation exception to the doeing of that thing which the word of God saieth must be done and hee knoweth must be done For this purpose note that God hath giuen vs a morall Law touching wedlocke to wit the 7th commandement Thou shalt not commit adultery now our Sauiour saith that whosoeuer marrieth a diuorced woman committeth adultery the woman committeth adultery also in case shee was diuorced for any thing besids hir adultery Mat. 5.32 Neuerthelesse for the hardnesse of the Iewes heartes in a case of necessity to auoid cruelty towards their wiues or the like Mat. 19.8 a marriage was permitted to with the diuorced woman as you may reade Deut. 24.2.3.4 Where the Lord by Moses speaking of the diuorced womans second marriage speaketh not of it by way of prohibition but by way of a permission and it were strang if the woman being an innocent party should be denyed that remedy of marriage for the hardnesse of hir husbands heart for his default onely Here then we see is a dispensation in a case of necessity The consideration of this may be of vse to stopp the mouths of such as cry out saying what a dispensation from a Morall Law if the Sabbath be a morall then there can be no dispensation but loe here they see the contrary the 7th commandement is a Morall yet there was a dispensation touching it for Moses permitted that for the hardnesse of the lewes hearts which from the begining was not so which our Sauiour accounted to be adultery so against the 7th commandement but we shall touch this point further by by in answering to an obiection A second instance shall be that of Dauid it was a law of God that whoso sheddeth mans blood by man shall his blood be shed Genes 9 6. Now Dauid being king Ioab murthered two Captaines 1 King 2.5 here it was the duety of Dauid to haue executed vengeāce for he was Gods minister to take vengeance R. 13.14 Neuerthelesse Dauid finding Ioab too strong for him ij Sam. 3.27.39 Omitted the execution of Ioab gaue it in charg to his sonne Salomon to doe it after his death 1 King 2.6 Here Dauid knew well that it was his office to haue put Ioab to death he was willing so to
two if the case be at such an hard point that the one must be neglected cannot be auoided then such is the mercy of God to man as his ordinance of the Sabbath shall giue way I trust none will beso profane vngratiously vngratefull as to abuse this mercy of God making necessity when he needeth not Now that I doe not abuse these words of our blessed Sauiour shall appeare if you looke but into the context Mark. 2.23.27 Where our Sauiour defendeth his Disciples plucking rubing the eares of corne on the Sabbath to satisfie their hunger by shewing one vse end of the Sabbath day namely that it was made for mans benefiâ— as forthe good of his soule so also euen for the good of his body in so much as if in case he were pinched with present hunger destitute of other helpes then he might worke on the Sabbath day to releeue his prâ—sent necessity for so did the Disciples here by plucking and by rubing eares of corne 5thly I proue that the Sabbath may be neglected and prophaned in a case of necessity and that by all men who are subiectes and vnder the jurisdiction of Magistrates now my reason is because seruantes may prophane the Sabbath in a case of necessity Thus I argue If seruants may prophane the Sabbath then subiectes may doe so too For there is one and the same reason betwene the subiect and the Magistrate that there is betwene the subiect and the Magistrate that there is betwene the seruant and master But seruantes in a case of necessity may prophane the Sabbath As namely in this case of necessity when their masters command them to worke on the Sabbath then there is a necessity vpon them for God commandeth seruants to obey their Masters Col. 3.22 Therefore subiects may in a case of necessity prophane the Sabbath also If any shall aske if there be like necessity for subiects to prophane the Sabbath as there is for seruants when commanded by their Masters I answer there is for 1. our Magistrates command vs to follow the workes of our calings on Saturday which is the Sabbath day And 2. Gods word commandeth subiects to yeeld obedience to Magistrates Rom. 13.1 But against the Minor the 4th commandement will be obiected which forbiddeth seruants to worke on the Sabbath day and we must obey God rather then man I answer by a deniall the 4th commandement doth no where forbid a seruant to worke on the Sabbath when he is commanded by his Master to worke but onely when he may forbeare worke by his Masters allowance For the cleering of this note that as the 5th com is directed vnto inferioures so the 4th commandement is directed vnto Superioures the commandement saith not Thou seruant shalt doe no worke as spoken to the seruant but Thy seruant shall doe no worke as spoken of the seruant but to the Master binding the Master absolutly and expresly and the seruant consequently and in this respect if he may haue his Masters allowance the 5th commandement speakes of Superioures but laies the charge expresly on Inferioures so the 4th commandement speakes of Seruants but laies the charge on Masters expresly Honor thy father this is spoken to the Sonne so Thy seruant shall doe no worke in propriety of speech is spoken to the Master it is the Seruant that is spoken of it is the Master that is spoken to Further I answer that as no clause in the commandement so no conuincing argument can be fetched out of the commandement to proue that a seruant is absolutly bound to rest on the Sabbath his Master commanding him the contrary 2. I answer in Deut. 5.14.5 There is a reason added to the 4th commandement perswading to the obseruation of it and it perswads Masters to giue rest vnto their seruants on the Sabbath day That thy man seruant thy maid may rest as well as thou c. VVhich sheweth that the 4th commandement foregoing was directed vnto Masters not vnto seruants and there fore bound the Masters absolutly and expresly but not the seruantes for this reason cannot be applied vnto seruants 3. considering that the seruant is not at liberty nor hath the power of himselfe but is at his masters command common reason inclineth vs to expound the commandement rather as giuen to and binding the Master then the Seruant this point you may see learnedly obserued and handled by M. Brerewood on the Sabbath against M. Bysield And so you see that the Sabbath day may be profaned in a case of true necessity And so much for my former argument whereby it appeareth that in case of necessity the Sabbath day may be changed and so the Lords day keptin roome of the Sabbath day till the time of reformation My second argument to proue that the Sabbath day may be changed for a season is because the Passeouer day might be changed for a season and thus I frame it ARGVM II. Jf the Passeouer day might be neglected and an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessitie Then the Sabbath day also may be neglected and an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessitie But the Passcouer day might be neglected an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessitie Therefore the Sabbath day also may be neglected and an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessitie I proue the first proposition or the consequence to be good because there is like reason of both that is of the Passeouer day and of the Sabbath day and this I make appeare in these particulars 1. As the Sabbath day was commanded by God Exod. 20.8 So also the Passeouer day was commanded by God Exod. 12.2.6 2dly As on the Sabbath day there must be holy Assemblies and no seruile worke dore Leuit. 23.3 So also on the Passeouer day or Passeouer Sabbath day there was to be holy Assemblies and no seruile worke done Leuit. 23.8 3dly as the breach of the Sabbath day was to be punished with death Exod. 31.15 So also the breach of the Passeouer day was to be Punished with death Numb 9.13 Thus you see how like the Passeouer day was to the Sabbath day for 1. they haue both the same Author God 2. They were to be sanctified with holy assemblies and rest from laboures both alike 3. They were to be strictly kept the one as well as the other for there was one and the same punishment to be inflicted vpon the transgressoures of both alike Now they being thus alike both what hindereth that there should not be like reason of them both it was a sinne to trangresse the one and it was a sinne to transgresse the other also now if it were no sinne then to neglect the one make a chang in a case of necessity why should it be a sinne to neglect the other make a chang in a case of
necessity why should there not be like reason of things that were so like But herevnto happly some will obiect that the Passeouer day was a Ceremony but the Sabbath day you hould to be a Morall and therefore ther 's not like reason Wherevnto I answer that this is a friuolouse obiection for 1. God hath aswell permitted a dispensation in morales as in ceremoniales for God by Moses permitted a dispensation against the 7th commandement in some kind and that too vpon worse conditiones then is our present case of necessity as shall appeare for Diuorce was permitted for the hardnesse of the Iewes heartes but our dispensation shall appeare to be a better case condition then that to be a more warrantable necessity as you shall see when we come to it by by 2. I answer be it that because the one was a Ceremony and the other a Morall that therefore God had lesse regard vnto the Ceremony then he hath vnto the Morall yet this maketh but a difference betwixt them of lesse more the one being lesse regarded the other more regarded Now this difference hindreth not the argument Magis minus non variat speciem as Logiceans speake a peece of siluer of nyne pence is like a peece of siluer of twelue pence they being both siluer though the one be a lesser peece the other a greater peece now if it be permitted vnto A Debitor to exchang with his Creditour giue him sixe pence in stead of his nyne pence in a case of necessity then by like reason proportion euery man will iudge that it is permitted vnto him in like case to giue him a nyne peny peece for a peece of twelue pence but especially if the necessity for the greater chang doth exceed the necessity for the lesser chang this is our case for the chang of the Ceremoniall Passeouer day which is the lesser might be vpon this one necessity if a mā were in a farre iourney but our chang of the Sabbath day which is the greater is vpon a necessity consisting of 4 branches as you shall see by by which as they exceed the other in number so also in weight if they be compared together By which demonstration you see this obiection though common yet friuolouse And thus much for profe of the consequence or first proposition I come now to proue the Minor or second proposition to wit That the passeouer day might be neglected and an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessity for profe of this see Numb 9.5 where the Isralites kept the passeouer in the 14th day of the first moneth according to the time appointed of God at its first institution as you may see v. 1,2 and Leuit. 23.5 and Exod. 12.2.6 now it so fell out that some men in the Congregation were defiled by touching of a dead corpse and so they were debarred from keeping the passeouer at that time with the Congregation Herevpon they came before Moses Aaron for counsaile Moses not knowing what to doe in this case he repaireth to God for direction wherevpon the Lord maketh him this answer If any among you shall be vncleane by reason of a dead body or be in a long iourney he shall keepe the passeouer in the 14th day of second moneth c. Numb 9.6.7.8.9.10.11 So hereby you see that howbeit the passeouer was by its prime institution to be kept in the 14th day of the first moneth yet in a case of necessity the time was changed from the first moneth vnto the second moneth and so the daies and times commanded in the Law at the prime institution were neglected and profaned by those which had this necessity vpon them the cases in which the passeouer time was changed were 1. If a man had touched a dead corps 2. If a man were from home in a farre iourney and thus much for profe of the Minor Neuerthelesse to this argument some doe answer thus that it is true indeed that there was a dispensation for the passeouer day but it was giuen by God himselfe but so is not your dispensation for the Sabbath day for there is no exception that can be showne for the chang of the Sabbath day in the Scriptures as their is for the passeouer day Herevnto I reply that this answer is very absurd for it denieth all argumentation collectiones from the Scriptures for they will not grant the question vnlesse it be proued by an expresse text of Scripture in so many words for they will haue an expresse dispensation in so many words showne for a chang of the Sabbath day in the Scriptures as well as there is a dispensation to be showne for the passeouers chang in the Scriptures Furthermore if they will not grā that the Sabbath day may be changed now because the passeouer day might be changed in old time how will they doe to proue that we may baptize infants now because they did circumcise infints in old time for ther 's no expresse word of God for either they must both be inferred by collection from other Scriptures yet further wherefore is it that S. Paul sendeth vs to the things written in the old Testament if we may not collect and learne from them to doe the like in like cases Whatsoeuer things are written a fore time are written for our learning Rom. 15.4 After the Law for the passeouer was giuen there fell out extraordinary occurrences in which Moses could not tell what to doe wherefore he had recourse vnto God for direction Numb 9.10.11 So after the Law for the Sabbath was giuen there is falne out an extraordenary occurrence the Sabbath hath bene profaned now for 1000 or 1200 yeeres now how to worke a reformation hereof we are at our wites ends we cannot now a daies haue such recourse vnto God as Moses had for direction wherefore now we must to the Lawe to the Testimonies and borrow light from former presidents Finally I shall proue it vnto you that we may extend this dispensation of the passeouer day further then it is expressed by Gods dispensation in Numb 9.10.11 so be we doe it by like reason for this end note that the Lord gaue leaue to chang the the passeouer in these two cases 1. If a man had touched a dead corps 2. If a man were in a farre iourney but the good King Hezekiah keeping the passeouer long after he fell into other extremities and straites and he could not keepe the passeouer on the 14th day of the first moneth but profaned it and made a chang vnto the 14 day of the second moneth and that vpon these two occations 1. Because hee had not Priests enough sanctified or because the Priests were not sufficiently sanctified 2. Because the people were not come vp together to Jerusalem or had not assembled themselues at Ierusalem as you may reade ij Chron. 30.2.3 Now these two extremities reasons of Hezekiah
Sabbath daies meales and this is an other case of necessity whereinto we fale if we keepe the Sabbath day and for the auoiding whereof we may make a chang of the Sabbath day into the Lords day for a season Hence it is that obedience to the 4th commandement requireth an assent and fellowship of others which is not required in the other commandements for a man may yeeld obedience to euery other commandement singlie and alone by himselfe though no man else will ioyne with him but for this 4th commandement it cannot be obserued as it should be without the fellowship and society of others ioyning with him Now a word or two for the iustifying of these two necessities touching the soule to be true necessities and such as may warrant a chang of a day appointed by God for the former namely Assemblies the want of assemblies was one cause of the change of the Passeouer day by Hezekiah as you may reade ij Chro. 30.3 For the latter namely Ministers the want of Ministers or Priests was an other cause of the passeouer dais chang by Hezekiah as you may reade in the forealleaged place And the King and his Princes And all the congregation had taken counsaile in Ierusalem to keepe the Passeouer in the second moneth for they could not keepe it at this time because there were not Priests enough sanctified neither was the people gathered to Jerusalem 2 Chro. 30.2.3 Where you see the want of the peoples assembly and the want of Priests were the ij causes of the chang of this day from the first moneth to the second moneth I confesse our new Translatores reade it thus because the Prists had not sanctified themselues sufficiently But this cometh still to the same for our Ministers haue not yet sanctified their vnderstandings from a profane opinion of the Lords Sabbaths and therefore we cannot haue their helpe to the sanctification of the Sabbath day so it is all one whither there be not Ministers enough or whither those that be are not willing to yeeld vs their helpe for both waies we shall want the helpe of the Ministry if we keepe the Sabbath day and if the Priests vnsufficiency were cause enough to chang the day much more then when Priests and Ministers are both vnsufficient and also vnwilling so as they cannot be perswaded to lend vs their helpe and thus you see that the want of people and the want of Ministers are a sufficient cause to make a chang of a day and that the old day should be profaned whilst an other is kept in its roome and steade If any shall aske me now why I keepe not the Sabbath day since it is my iudgement that it ought to be kept my answer shall be 1. That a man is not bound in all cases and at all times to put in practise what he knoweth should be done as I haue showne by the examples of Moses touching diuorcement of Israelites omitting Circumcision of Dauids spareing Ioab and eating Shewbread and the rest And further and more particularly I keepe it not because as I haue proued by two good arguments that an other day may be kept for it for a season 2. My answer shall be that I keepe not the Sabbath day because I cannot keepe it necessity lying vpon me Now I cannot keepe it 1. Because so I should haue but 5 daies in a weeke to follow my caleing 2. Because so I should impouerish my selfe and my family which is a iustifiable plea in this case of the Sabbath 3. Because I cannot haue assemblies on the Sabbath to ioyne with in holy Sabbath exercises and specially because Ministers will not preach to vs vpon the Saturday or Sabbath for how should we keepe the Saturday Sabbath when Ministers will not come to Church and preach vnto vs on the Saturday and my 4th reason and necessity is that as I am a Subiect so J stand bound to obey my gouerners so long as they command me nothing which Gods word hath forbidden mee now they command me to follow my caling on the Saturday Sabbath the 4th com doth not forbid me the same I being considered as a Subiect seruant vnto my superioures But herevnto some will be redy to say why if you can not keepe the Sabbath day as you would why keepe it then as you may without assemblies and without a Minister for God requireth no more of a man then he can doe c. Herevnto I shall giue none other answer then this that the same obiection layeth as well against the practise of the godly King Hezekiah as against mee hereby the absurdety thereof shall appeare why might not you as well obiect to Hezekiah when he put off the passeouer day from the 14th day of the first moneth to the 14th day of the second moneth vpon my reasons saying why did not Hezekiah keepethe passeouer vpon the 14th day of the first moneth which is the right day the day established at the institution of the passeouer since it was his iudgement that it ought to be then kept what and if he could no haue the assemblies of the people as he would why yet he might haue kept the passeouer with that company he had in Ierusalem as himselfe and his Princes and Courtieres and Cittizens of Ierusalem what needed he to profane the first passeouer day and to chang it vnto an other day for want of the residue of the people and what if he had not priests enough already sanctified or not sufficiently sanctified why yet he might haue kept the passeouer as he could with those priests he had or with the priests such as they were whither sufficienly or vnsufficiently sanctified for whē Hezekiah had tarried till the secōd day yet thē many in the Congregation were not sanctified as they should be therfore he praied saying The good Lord be mercifull toward him that prepareth his whole heart to seeke the Lord God though he be not cleansed according to the purification of the Sanctuary ij Chro. 30.18.19 And why could not Hezekiah haue kept the passeouer on the first day with people and Priests vnsufficiently sanctified as well as on the second day yet for all these obiectiones you see Hezekiah in hope to haue things in better order and in hope of a reformation against the second day therefore he neglected and profaned the first day and made a chang of the day Others will be redy to obiect thus why your soules neede not pine for you may haue supply the next day by keeping Sunday or Lords day also and herein you shall haue assemblies and Ministers both Herevnto I answer 1. That is more then euer God required that we should keepe two Sabbaths in one weeke and also it is more then the necessity of our caleings will permit 2. Suppose we should keepe the Lords day also yet so doeing we should want our daily bread that is that spirituall foode which is appointed of God for
A Defence Of that most Ancient and Sacred ordinance of GODS the SABBATH DAY Consequently and together with it 2. A Defence of the iiijth Commandement 3. A Defence of the integrity and perfection of the Decalogue Morall Law or X. Commandements 4. A Defence also of the whole and intire worship of God in all the partes thereof as it is prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue 5. A Discouery of the Superstition impurity and corruption of Gods worship yea and Idolatry committed by multitudes in sanctifying the Lords Day for a Sabbath Day by the iiijth Commandement Vndertaken against all Anti-Sabbatharians both of Protestants Papists Antinomians and Anabaptists and by name and especially against these X Ministers M. Greenwod M. Hutchinson M. Furnace M. Benton M. Gallard M. Yates M. Chappel M. Stinnet M. Iohnson and M. Warde The second Edition corrected and amended with a supply of many things formerly omitted BY THEOPHILUS BRABOURNE Printed ANNO DOM. 1632. Thus saieth the Lord stand in the wayes and behold and aske for the old way which is the good way and walke therein and yee shall finde Rest for your soules Ierem. 6.16 This is that old and that good way Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy c. The vijth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. for on the vijth day the Lord Rested Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Exod. xx viij x. xj Obserue it walke in it For verily I say vnto you vntill heauen earth passe one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law vntill all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least Commandements and teach men so hee shall be called the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 Whatsoeuer thing I commaund you take heede you doe it Thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought there from Deut. 12.32 Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 To the Kings most excellent Maiestie CHARLES by the grace of God King of Great-Brittaine Fraunce and Ireland Defender of the Christian faith c. MOST dread and renowned Soueraigne may it please your excellent Maiestie such is the power of Trueth and specially in Religion that they which haue once tasted it cleaue vnto it more then vnto all the hopes of this life besides The Law of thy mouth saith Dauid is better vnto mee then thowsands of gold siluer Psal 119.72 Yea such is the excellency of Gods blessed Trueth as his meekest seruants will stirr in the defence of it the mildest fight before it shall be indamaged by their forbearance I durst not petition your Highnesse nor aduenture these lines vnto your Maiesties consideration vntill I had by diligent studie first so setled my conscience in the certaine trueth of them as my minde gaue me that I am tied in conscience rather to departe with my life then with this Trueth so captiuated is my conscience inthraled to the Law of my God Here therefore I tender this Trueth with my life vnto your Maiestie that vnto your Godly consideration this vnto your clemency mercy and both to the pleasure of the Almighty I remember when the Booke of the Law had bene lost and was found againe by Hilkiah the Priest in the Raigne of Iosiah 2. King 22. that Hilkiah sent it by Shaphan the Chaunteller vnto the King which giueth me to vnderstand that in matters of Gods worship in case failings and corruptions be found out the Supreme power the King is to haue knowledge of it More particularly when the Lords Sabbath was thought to be prophaned by the Disciples of Christ by plucking eares of corne Mat. 12. to whom did the Pharises complaine but vnto Christ the Lord and Master of the Disciples And when in Nehemiahs time the Sabbath was prophaned by treading the Winepresse bearing of burdens Nehem. 13. to whom did Nehemiah turne himselfe but vnto the Rulers Nobles of Iudah for redresse I addresse my selfe therefore vnto your Maiestie humblie beseeching you to take it into consideration 1. That that most ancient sacred ordinance of Gods Sabbath prescribed in the Morall Law and religiously practised by the most anciët primitiue Churches neere 400 yeeres after the Ascention of Christ euen so longe as they retained their brightest purity and which ought religiously to be sanctified to the worlds end it is now prophaned trampled vnder foote 2. That the Decalogue Law of God is not taught maintained in our Church in its fulnesse integrity and perfection but onely partially by peeces 3. That God hath not his whole intire worship seruice prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue but is denied one quarter or fowrth part thereof weekly 4. That by the common doctrine in our Church the 4th Commandement is wholly frustrate altogether nullified both roote and branch 5. That by most men in our Church there is grosse superstition committed Gods worship is corrupted and by many plain idolatry wrought by keeping the Lords day for a Sabbath by the 4th Com. Amongst other things I haue as I beleeue made these fiue things manifestly appeare in this Booke and now I humbly present them vnto your Highnesse consideration trusting the cause will speake for it selfe and its bare mention will call for a Reformation It was the laudable and Godly care of your deere Father to cause in his time a new Translation of the sacred Bible for the correction of but here and there a word how much more I trust will his suruiuing Sonne Heire be mindfull of such weighty matters as these are Almighty God hath honoured this eternall Law of the 10 Commandements with such honour as he vouchsafed not to any one portion of Scripture besids in all the Sacred Bible for hee deliuered it in most Maiesticall and terrible manner in flaming fyer the earth trembling Moses the people quaking hee spake it proclaimed it with his owne voyce and wrote it with his owne finger in Tables of stone The Eternall Sonne of God whilst on earth bewraied such care of this Law as that hee ratified it and euery iote title of it to the worlds end saying Verily I say vnto you that vntill heauen earth passe one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law till all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 The Church of God in this Christian Kingdome honoureth at this day this Law of God for shee hath inrouled it in hir Booke of Common Prayers and ordered that it be deuoutly reade at the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at other times of holy Assemblies I trust therefore your Maiestie will afford this sacred honourable portion of Gods Word your best protection The Law it is the inheritance of the Church as wee reade Deut.
well as anciently vnto Ievves yea our Sauiour testifieth in an other place that it is more easie for heauen and earth to passe away then that one title of the law should fall Luk. 16.17 sooner then shall the earth be remoued and the sunne fall from heauen then this law be abolished 2. Children obey your parents in the Lord c. Honour thy father and thy Mother which is the first commandement with promise c. Eph. 6.1.2 Here wee haue one branch of the lavv vrged to wit the fifth comm and it is vrged with respect to obseruation and obedience yea it is also vrged vpon the Children of Christians or Christians Children for as this whole Epistle to the Ephesians was directed vnto the Saintes Ephes 1.1 so this whole sixt chapter is likewise I know they are ready to say that these exhortations were sent vnto the multitude as Sermons are preached vnto a mixed company of good and bad but this precept is vrged vpon the good to wit beleevers for as the duety of children is a branch of the fifth comm so is the duety of seruants now the Apostle in v. 5. speaketh vnto beleeuing seruants for he vrgeth them to obedience to their masters as vnto Christ implying thereby that they did obey Christ and now he exhorteth them to like obedience vnto their masters as they did performe vnto Christ Eph. 5.24 now if they did obey Christ then surely they were beleeuers and did beleeue in Christ and such as these seruants were on whom this fifth command was vrged such wee are to thinke the children were to whom the same comm was vrged at the same time in the same place and all in one breath as it were 3. Doe wee then make the law of none effect through faith God forbid yea wee establish the law Rom. 3.31 In the former parte of this chapter the Apostle had disputed of faith and the faith of Iesus and of remission of sinnes and iustification by faith in Christ for these he stood a maine but as for the lavv and iustification by the workes of the law these he stood against stifly these things being laid downe the Apostle foreseeing some Anabaptisticall spirit ready to snach and to abuse this his doctrine to the subuertion of the lavv he vvisely preuenteth it by a God forbid As if he had said doe you thinke that because I deny iustification by the law and affirme it to be by faith that I intend thereby to abolish the law vtterly no God forbid for I establish the law the law must stand still in force c. that is for obseruation though not for iustification for Paul must be vnderstood so to abolish the lavv in some sense as for all that he ratifieth the lavv in another sense Hereby we see then that the doctrine of faith and iustification by faith doe not abolish the law yea so much the Apostle saith expresly doe wee then saith he make the law of none effect through faith Whence I thus argue that if faith doth not make void the law what should make it voide for our Antinomians say that it is faith and being in Christ that freeth vs from the law the law say they is a scholemaster to bring vs vnto Christ and being in Christ once which is by faith then we are no longer vnder this schoolmaster of the law in any respect we are freed from the law wholly and altogether but the cleane contrary S. Paul affirmeth here namely that faith doth not abolish the lavv that is in all respects Furthermore if faith doeth not abolish the law then the faithfull man is not freed from the lavv So thē when the Apostle saith that he established the lavv it followeth that he established it to the faithfull yea they were the persones of whom Paul spake as you may see by Rom. 3.30 for there circumcision of faith is put for the circumcised and faithfull 4. Owe nothing to any man but to loue one another for hee that loueth another hath fulfilled the law for this Thou shalt not commit adultery Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steale Thou shalt not beare false witnesse Thou shalt not couet and if there be any other commandement it is briefly comprehended in this saying Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe Rom. 13.8.9 Behold hovv the Apostle presseth the obseruation of the law and hovv that he repeateth 5 or 6 of the seuerall commandements thereof one after an other yea further that all this is vrged vpon beleeuers is plaine in v. 11. vvhere the Apostle vseth a reason to moue to the obseruation of these commandements saying for now is our saluation neerer then when wee beleeued it therefore he spake to them vvhich beleeued vnlesse absurdely you vvill say the question vvas concerning one sorte of people and the argument concerned an other 5. For brethren yee haue bene called vnto liberty only vse not your liberty as an occasion vnto the flesh but by loue serue one an other for all the law is fulfilled in one word which is this Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe Gal. 5.13.14 In these words the Apostle presseth the duty of loue vvhich is the summe of the lavv and hee presseth it for obseruation and that he doth by this reason because in so doing the lavv shall be fulfilled now vvhy should the Apostle moue the Galatians to the duety of loue because of or in respect of the lavv if the lavv did not at all appertaine to these beleeuing Galatians Furthermore the Apostle presseth the lavv here vpon beleeuers for hee calleth them brethren and such brethren also as had obtained a liberty by Christ stand fast therefore in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made vs free Gal. 5.1 of this liberty by Christ he speaketh againe in v. 13. saying brethren yee haue bene called vnto libertie c. Wherefore since they to vvhom the Apostle spake had abtained vvere called vnto a liberty by Christ it is more then manifest that they vvere beleeuers to vvhom he spake here then it is plaine that they that had obtained liberty by Christ from the ceremoniall lavv stood yet bound still vnto the Morall lavv In a vvord it is manifest that Paul spake here vnto beleeuers for he spake vnto them that did runne well v. 7. who were they that did runne vvell but the beleeuers and he spake vnto them that did waite for the hope of righteousnesse by faith v. 5. and who were they but beleeuers and he spake vnto them in vvhom vvas the combate betvvixt the flesh and the spirit v. 17. and vvere not these beleeuers 6. But if yee fulfill the royall law according to the scriptures which saith Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe yee doe well Iam. 2.8 So speake yee and so doe as they that shall be iudged by the law of libertie Iam. 2.12 Was not Abraham our father iustified through workes when he offred Isaack his sonne c. yee see then how that
Rest and performe holy exercises a vvhole day long he hath fulfilled the Commandement for it requireth by their doctrine novv no more but Rest and holinesse a day long vvith out any mention hovv often To the third question I answer for them hovv long must that time be vvhen it cometh vvhy not a day long for the time and the vvord Day in the 4th Com. is abolished say they so then novv the Com. requireth not a day to begiuen God vvhither a day of 12 or of 24 hovvres it only requireth the duties of Rest and holinesse vvell then if the Church giue God but one hovvre in a day vvhen the day commeth in the duties of Rest and holinesse the com is fulfilled and thus the Church needeth not vnlesse they vvill giue God any other Sabbath but one hovvre vpon some one day by hearing a Sermon for all that hovvre they performe the duties of the Sabbath to vvit Rest and holinesse so then to summ vp the Sabbath which thes Ministers must haue It is a Rest from laboures and an holy exercise of prayer vvith the Minister and harkening vnto Gods vvord preacht an vvholl hovvre long and that once in a vveeke or once in a moneth or once in 7 yeeres or once in a mans lief time behould your Sabbath One thing I must remember you of vvhich is this that Gods time being abolished this time of an hovvre or the like vvhich comes now by force of collection it is not a Diuine time but an Humane time so the com is embased by the chang of a Diuine time for an Humane time Iudg novv Christian reader if by theire distinctions houlding the time in the com ceremoniall they haue not nullified with the time the vvholl 4th Comm. also for 1. vvhereas the time should be at Gods appointement when novv they haue brought it to be at manes appointement when he vvill 2. vvheras the Sabbath day vvas frequent once in 7 dayes now it needeth not be once in 7 yeeres 3. vvheras the Sabbath vvas a day longe novv it needeth not by the 4th com be aboue an houre long vvheras then the Commandement was Remember the Sabbath day now it may rune thus Remember the Sabbath hovvre I may novv with Dauid turne my speech from men vnto God and say It is time for thee Lord to worke for they haue destroyed thy Law Yet further I proue against them that they haue abolished the vvhole 4th Com. and that by their abolishing of the proper time in the 4th Comm. vvheras they say there are twoo things in the 4th Com. the one is the time and this is abolished the other is the duties in the time as rest and holinesse and thes they hould Morall if then I shall proue that thes duties are nullified and abolished then you vvill say vvith me that they haue abolished the 4th Com. indeed for both the time and the duties also vvill be abolished For this purpose we must know that there are Sabbath day duties and 4th Com. duties properly so called and there are duties very like vnto them as one egg is like an other but the like is not the same or as a counterfait shilling is like a true and current shilling but yet it is not a true shilling and paiable by the Kings authority thus Samuels Sacrificing and Sauls Sacrificing where alike but Samuels Sacrificing vvas properly a Sacrificing Sauls was but an Apish imitation and a counterfait for he vvas not the person that should doe it So to rest from laboure an vvholle day and to sanctifie it in Holy proformances this day being the 7th day which is properly called Sabbath day thus these duties are properly called Sabbath day and 4th Com. duties but on the other side to rest an whole day from labour and to sanctifie it by holy proformances and this day not being the 7th day but some other day these dueties novv are very like the other indeed as one egg to an other as a counterfait is to a currant shilling and as Sauls Sacrificing was to Samuels but they are not the same duties nor can they be properly called Sabbath day duties nor 4th Com. duties no more then a counterfait can be called a true shilling or Sauls Sacrificing be counted Samuels Sacrificing be cause this was not the day vvhereon these shold be done For example the Iewes had yeerly Sabbathes and weckly Sabbathes now albeit the rest and the holy actions done on the yeerly Sabbath day vvere a like and all one for kind with those done on the weekly Sabbath day yet no man vvill say they were the weekly Sabbath day dueties or the 4th Com. dueties for they vvere done by virtue of an other speciall Com. Againe the Iewes had Sabbath dayes and they had fast dayes and also dayes of publike thanksgiuing as vve haue on Coronation and Gunpovvder treason dayes and the like Novv albeit they did rest vpon these dayes and performe like dueties as vpon theire Sabbath day yet no man will say these were Sabbath day dueties properly and 4th Com. dueties I trust no man thinketh that those are Sabbath day duties and 4th Com. dueties vvhich vve doe on Christmas day vvhen it falleth on a weeke day or on Coronation day and the like no these are but like them Thus it is for our Lords day albeit we doe the like dueties on this day which ought to be done on the Saturday Sabbath yet are they not the same for they differ much as 1. they differ in the day those vvere done on the 7th day properiy called Sabbath day and so Sabbath day dueties these on the 8th day called Lords day and so Lords day dueties 2. those vvere done in memory of the Creation these in memory of the Redemption 3. those vvere done by the appointement of God in the Lavv these are supposed to be done by the appointment of Christ in the gospell 4. those vvere done in imitation of God at the Creation who then rested on the 7th day and hallowed the 7th day Genes 2.2.3 But these dueties of Rest and holinesse on the Lords day are not done in imitation of God at all for it is the 8th day Novv vvere there no more but the first difference in that thes duties were done on a wrong day it vvere enough to shevv that these are no Sabbath day dueties nor 4th Com. dueties no more then Sauls Sactificing was Samuels Sacrificing or a true and commanded Sacrificie but all the 4. differences put together it is manifest that the dueties of rest and holinesse which we performe on the Lords day are not Sabbath day dueties nor 4th com dueties though they be neuer so like them wherefore since thes be not the dueties commāded in the 4th com which we performe it followth that the proper dueties of the 4th Com. are nullified and abolished as vvell as the time and day and so the time and the dueties in the time being both abolished the whole 4th Com.
4th com make it senselesse as you see of like nature are all their distinctions therefore worthily to be abhorred of all such as loue Gods lawes God will vndoubtedly one day accurse all such distinctions expositions of any text of Scripture as are made in opposition to his Lawes is there no way to expound the Gospell but so as it must needs quite ouerturne the law or some part of it and is it meete to receiue such vnnecessary distinctions as shall rend out rase out some portion of Gods law the Decalogue or 10 Com. I meane But it may be obiected that vve doe not make such hauocke with the 4th com nor make it so voide senselesse but that we doe still retaine it doe presse it vpon mens consciences vvell nigh euery sermon c. True indeed you vrge the 4th com but how absurdly let all men iudge like as if a man should cancell a bond plucke off the seales yet stifly plead his bond still so these after by their doctrine they haue made the comman a peece of senselese ridiculouse stuffe yet still they call and cry out the 4th com the 4th com yee transgresse Gods 4th com Furthermore the reason annexed to it by God as most effectuall to perswade men to obedience of this com taken from Gods ensample this you altogether omit neglect For when are you heard to perswade the people thus Let vs rest from our workes on the Lords day because God rested on the 7th day Gen. 2.2 Exod. 20.11 Let vs sanctifie the Lords day because God sanctified hallowed the 7th day Gen. 2.3 Exod. 20.11 Let vs be imitators followers of God as deere children and keepe that day vveekly for an holy day vvhich God himselfe made kept an holy day at the Creation No no such matter for so they should contradict themselues If they should persvvad men to follovv Gods example so the mysterie of their iniquity vvould be discouered for God kept the 7th day from the creation but our Lords day is the 8th day from the creation the day vvhich God kept vvas kept in memory of the Creation but our Lords day is kept in memory of the Redemption thus as the com is nullified so the reason to the com is made a meere superfluouse cipher altogether vselesse let them say what they vvill to the contrary As for the law it selfe you vrge it indeed vpon mens consciences but vvith small conscience you vrge it for you abuse prefane Gods word as hath bene showne by applying that to the Lords day which is a common vvorking day as fryday is vvhich should be applied by Gods ordinance to an holy day vvhich himselfe had hallovved as to the 7th day as well might you profanely apply those Sacramentall vvords of institution to common bread to common water as Gods 4th comm to a common day not sanctified by God And thus much for Exposition of the 4th Commandement THus I haue endeavoured to make it appeare hovv they haue corrupted abused the lavv and thereby corrupted abused the people also What remaineth but that they may be driuen to repentance I minde them of that fearefull denuntiation vttered by our Sauiour Christ after that he had ratified the law in the integrity perfection of partes euen to a iot title of it Mat. 5.18 Whereto he addeth these words Whosoeuer therfore shall breake one of these least Commandements teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of heauen but whosoeuer shall obserue teach them the same shall be called great in the Kingdome of heauen Matth. 5.19 In which words our blessed Sauiour doth perswade to the keeping of the Morall Lavv in euery iote title of it vnto the worlds end Further our Sauiour sheweth wherein or in what manner he would haue euery iot title of the Law kept and this is two wayes the one by doctrine noted in these words and teach men so The other by practise noted in these words Whosoeuer shall obserue c. whereby wee see it was the minde of Christ to haue euery title of the lavv not onely obserued practised but also he would haue euery title of it taught vnto the people vrged pressed vpon them and on the other side because the bare doctrine of the Minister is forcelesse it many men vvithout his practise least they should say he layeth heauy burthens vpon other men but himselfe vvill not touch them vvith one of his fingers therefore Christ ioyneth practise to doctrine saying Whosoeuer shall obserue teach c. Furthermore vve are in speciall manner to note vnto what manner of persones these words are directed not vnto lay men as they call them but vnto the Clergie vnto Ministers in speciall as vve may vnderstand by the vvords teach men so so then this portion of Scripture it is directed vnto the Ministry the vvill of Christ to them is that they shall both teach to the people and also practise before them vnto the worlds end euery iot and title of the Law Now in the next place we haue Christ his arguments to moue perswade Ministers to these tvvo dueties and because Ministers are of tvvo sortes some though but a smale some vvill teach and practise euery iot title of the Lavv to the vtmost of theire povver but others vvill neither teach nor practise the same therefore hath Christ fitted his Arguments to both sorts by name to such Ministers as doe both teach practise to them our Sauiour promiseth this blessing that they shall be called greate in the Kingdome of heauen oh that there vvere yet many more that would couet this greatenesse in Gods fauour by teaching reuealing the whole counsaile of God euen all his Ten commandements intirly in euery iot title of them But now as for those other Ministers vvho refuse either to teach or to practise this Lavv of God intirly to these our Sauiour threateneth a Cursse to vvite that these shall be called least in the Kingdome of heauen novv vvheras our Sauiour denounceth this cursse vnto them vvhich breake one of the least of these commandements suppose vve the Time commanded in the 4th com vvhere the very least of the commandements because they vse to cale it but a circumstance and the like vvhy yet for all that so long as it is a commandement though the least of all the commandements yet Christ denounceth this Cursse vnto such Ministers as refuse to teach the people this least com and refuse to practise it before the people they haue pleased to miscale it a ceremony Iudaisme the like but let them try if this vvill free them before Christ his Iudgment seate from this Cursse of Christ vvhich he denounced being on earth I beleeue all they re subtilties shiftes vvherby they blind the eyes of men here vvill hardly so blind the eyes of Christ
for the desire to thy iudgements v. 20. Giuâ— me vnderstanding that I may learne thy commandements v. 37. J am thy seruant grant me vnderstanding that I may know thy Testimonies v. 125. By comparisons he setteth forth his loue vnto Gods law I haue had as great delite in the way of thy Testimonies as in all riches v. 14. The Law of thy mouth is better vnto mee then thousands of gold and silner v. 72. Thy Testimonies haue I taken as an heritage for euer for they are the â—oy of my heart v. 111. Therefore loue I thy commandements about gold yea aboue most fine gold v. 127. In a word the law of God it is the Churches inheritance possession Moses commanded vs a law for an inheritance of the Congregation of Iakob Deuter. 33. â— hence it was that Dauid had taken vnto him he law as his inheritance for euer Psâ— 119.111 hence no doubt it is that our Church hath taken this law also vnto hâ—r as hir inheâ—itance for euer causing it to be read publikly in the Congregation in most solemne manner the Assembly all vpon their knees praying to God to incline their hearts to keepe this Law Here be arguments and reasons enough without further amplification to moue euery Godly heart to loue the law of God for it is a royall law a righteouse law a light for our comfortable direction a law most louely oh how loue I thy law a law to be desired Mine heart breaketh for desire of thy iudgements It is better then thousands of gold and siluer it is an inheritance and the inheritance of the Church What neede of more As there is no Christian Church in the world which inioyeth this Law of God intirly in its perfection So is there no member of our Church that I know who inioyeth this Lavv in its integrity in his iudgment practise both albeit it were much to bewished it being the Inheritance of the Church wherin euery member may challeng his share I diuide our Church Congregations therfore in to two sortes purposing to make application of this doctrine vnto them both the one sorte that the fewest by infinite numbers are such as are informed in their iudgments inlightened in this Law of God in the integrity perfection of the partes therof The other sorte those the most remaine yet it darknesse ignorance of this their Inheritance the Law of God in its perfection Touching the former sorte is it so that thou louest his Law of God then let this thy loue to it appeare that by harty firuent prayers vnto Almightie God daily that he vvould be pleased to infuse the light of this knowledge in to the minds haerts of all men that it would please God to incline the heart of our soueraigne Lord King together with all the greate gouerners in Church Common weale to embrace this Law of God in its integrity perfection that so a reformaiion being made we may inioy the Lords Sabbath in practise as well as in iudgment To this end two things are required of thee who arte already inlightened doest loue this Lavv of God in the perfection thereof the one is that thou further disperse the knowledge thereof as farre forth as thy place calling will peremit vnto thy frends acquaintance thus did Dauid Teach me thy Statutes saith he then he addeth these words with my lipps haue I declared all the iudgments of thy mouth Ps 119.12.13 and againe I will speake of thy Testimones before Kings will not be a shamed Ps 119.46 Hereto accordeth S. Paul wherefore exhorte one an other edify one an other euen as you doe 1. Thes 5.12 and Exhorte one an other daily while it is called to day Heb. 3.13 he that loueth the Law must not onely loue it in the knowledge of it but also in the practise of it hovv shall he attaine the practise of it vnlese it be made knowne vnto all that so a generall reformation may be The other thing required of thee is that in loue to Gods Law thou beest redy in thy place to defend it the integrity perfection of it against all gainsayers as the Apostle Iude saith contend for the maintenance of the faith which was once giuen vnto the Saints Iud. 3. so should we contend for the maintenance of the integrity and perfection of the Law which vvas once giuen vnto the Saints and Church of God This is that vvhich God laied to the charge of his Church long since that No man contendeth for the trueth Isai 59.4 bevvare it be not laid to our charge also Moses had many brethren the Hebrewes yet vvould he not suffer any one of them to suffer vvrong of the Egyptianes but rose vp in their defence and defended them so one after an other that at last he vvas forced to flie for his ovvne liefe Exod. 2.11.15 so vve brethren if vve loue this Lavv of God it vvill Kindle in vs an holy zeale of Gods glory indignation against the enemies of Gods trueth so as vve shall rise vp to defend rescve any one and euery one of Gods commandements against those that would be shredding pareing some thing or other avvay from the same Dauid saith Gods testimonies they were the ioy of his harte and againe oh how lou I thy Law thinke vve that Dauid could vvith patience haue seene this Lavv vvhich he so loued mangled and hacked and so defaced as vve novv are forced to behould it I come novv to the other sorte of people in our Church they are those vvho be yet in darknesse ignorance vvho albeit they know much of this Lavv of God yea the most of it yet are ignerant of it in its integrity perfection for they are ignorant of Gods 7th day Sabbath conteined in his 4th com and so they knovv not all the Lavv they are not acquainted vvith the vvhole Lavv and vvill of God for number these are the most and therfore the case is the more lamentable yea and by so much also the more lamentable yet in that they are not fully instructed in a matter vvhich neerly concerneth them for this they must take speciall notice of to vvit that by this Lavv vve shall be iudged at that dreadfull day of iudgment as many as haue sinned in the Law shall hr iudged by Law Rom. 2.12 and againe so speake yee and so doe yee as they that shall beiudged by the Law of libertie Iam. 2.12 Now it is a fearefull thing for a man to be ignorant of any one parte ar percell of that Lavv vvhereby he shall be adiudged it concernes euery man therfore to study this Lavv and to take in information of it of all the partes of it that vvith speed But you may say hovv shall this exhortation to loue the Lavv of God in its perfection concerne such as you say are ignorant of the
be vpholden by Antiquity vniuersality c there be other things vnknowne of Gods will the knowledge whereof would but tend to their reproch and shame and would be generally distasted of all the Ministry and might be a meanse to depriue them of their liuings they crossing all Antiquity vniuersality c in so much as if God should now demand of these petitioners what they would haue of him whither that he should bestow vpō them the whole knowledge of his will intirly whither it make with them or against them or onely that part thereof which might tend to their present commodety it is to be vehemently suspected they would choose this latter onely albeit they would blush to say so I appeale to their consciences examined if I hit not the marke the reason of my such suspicion is this in part The knowledge of this part of Gods law touching his Sabbaths it is not put vpon them to study it out with great paines but it is brought home to their dores redy studied for them 2. The point is most easy familiar to be vnderstood no difficulties in it saue what themselues doe voluntarily vnnecessarily put vpon it by their vaine distinctions friuolouse obiections as some thing may be obiected against any thing that it is easy I know it my selfe for I haue fathomed it diued good deepe into the bottome of it I know it also by others both of the Ministry and priuate men who can see it cleerly and without difficulty Wherefore I can impute their ignorāce to nothing else but that they are willing to be ignorant haue no desires to be acquainted with that vnprofitable incommodiouse part of Gods will for vvhat is there in this controuercy of the Sabbath that exceedeth the capacety euen of the meanest but especially if you speake of Ministers who haue a dexterity when they will in vnderstanding questions of Diuinity it is not possible for them to be ignorant had they a willing mind I am very confident that if they prayed to God out of an vnfeined sincere loue to Gods Law that he would informe them in the vnproffitable part of his will as vvell as in the proffitable part that God would soone send them a cleere light thereof especially since the way is now made so open easy I wish they vvould but make experience of God in this case according to my counsaile desire and if they doe not it will be bitternesse first or last In a word Ministers haue heard that Gods Sabbath is now in question but which of them haue gone into their studies and deeply minded the point out of a desire to find it defend it if it might be found and defended I appeale to their consciences Let vs novv try the people by this rule and see if there be not like Priest like people it is true these pray for an increase of knovvledge in Gods lawes also but doe they meane to obtaine a knowledge of all the law of God wholly or of so much onely as may serue the time and please their Ministers what their desire is shall appeare by their practise t is voiced abroade that the Lords Sabbaths are profaned the 4th comman weekly transgressed and that there is a booke newly come forth to that effect well how doe people now behaue themselues vpon these tidings If a man should cry fyer fyer in the night so in loue men are vvith their housen and so desirouse to preserue them that instantly they startle leape out their bedds make inquiry where and search round about their housen without and with in and will not be perswaded to bedd againe till they be suer all is safe Did men loue Gods lawes as they doe their housen and possessions they vvould not be at rest till they had scanned the point and examined the booke ouer againe and againe But I shall tell you one of the ordinary questions they moue vpon these tidings to wit what think you Sir may not a man goe to heauen in the ould opinion though he be ignorant of this parte of Gods word touching his proper Sabbath to passe by what I thinke of heauen let me tell you vvhat I know of hell I am suer a man may goe to hell in the ould opinion these questions way intimate that men resolue to giue to God no more seruice then what neglected they plung body soule in to hell fier this is no filiall but a seruile minde affection this is farre from Dauids prayer open thou mine eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law Let me tell you also the successe which these tidinges produce vvith most others say they it were much to be wished this booke had neuer comne forth that this point bad neuer bene questioned I wish the Authour had bene better aduised it vvill cause much stirre in the Church before we vvere finly quiet this novv vvill cast rubbes in our vvay our consciences vvill be checking of vs c. All the ansvver these shall haue from me is to aduise them to see to it that by such obiections they be not like to those rebelliouse Ievves vvho vvould not receiue instruction vvhen God vvould haue taught them children that would not heare the Law of the Lord which say vnto the Seers see not and to the Prophets prophesie not vnto vs right things but speake stattering things vnto vs c. Isa 30.9.10 to conclude let these their common obiections speake for them if therby they doe not bevvray that in their prayers they intend to obtaine no more of God but a partiall knovvledge of his Lavv and this their partiality may breed a shrewd suspition their loue to Gods Law is not sound and sincere for if it vvere they vvould not reiect the meanes of knovvledge before they haue tasted it So much be spoken by vvay of vse from this that an vnfeined loue of Gods Lavv cannot but desire the knovvledge of the vnknovvne partes thereof I come novv to make some application of that other propertie is it so that vvho so loueth Gods Lavv in trueth he vvill vvith all redinesse cherefulnesse and vvillingnesse imbrace the knovvledge of the vnknovvn partes thereof vvhen the same is tendred vnto him if vve shall put men vpon the triall for this point also here vve shall in the first place find many in the Ministery guilty hovv vnvvilling they are that the knovvledge of this parte of Gods Lavv touching his Sabbaths should come abroade into the vvorld or into their owne heads both their ovvne consciences are priuy to and the vvorld takes knovvledge of vvere the knovvledge of a good liuing tendred them I dare say it fevve or none of them but vvould haue runne and ridd about it vvith all diligence long before this could any man informe thē though but doubtfully of some Tyeth vnpaid belonging to their liuings if Lavvyers vvould not bring them Counsaile they vvould ride make out to them
the priests lipps should preserue knowledge they should seeke the law at his mouth Mal. 2.7 therfore I haue hitherto advised people to repaire to theire Ministers for direction information in this point but vpon better aduisment I shall recant that I vvill doe so no more for I finde theire Testimonyes affirmations protestations in this point false t is true the Priests lippes should of right preserue knovvleg but I find they doe destroy knowledg it may be saied of them as the Lord saied of those Priests But yee are gone out of the way yee haue caused many to fall by the law Mal. 2.8 iust so our Ministers novv a dayes if the people goe to them for instruction in this 4th com they shall haue destruction the lavv shall be so expounded as they will cause men to fall by the lavv saying the lavv commandeth the Lords day for Sabbath not the 7th day vvhich is as false as false can be 2. I finde theire Testimony insufficient therefore I shall no more aduise peopleto take theire Ministers counsaile in this matter I come then to shevv the insufficiency of our Ministers Testimony In an approued alovvable testimony 3. things are required the vvant of any one vvhereof doth nullify the testimony as all Diuines vvill confesse the first is wisedome for hovv can he be thought to giue a right true verdict that is ignorant the 2d is honesty for hovv can vve hope he should giue a true verdict that is dishonest the 3d is Good will for hovv can vve expect that he should spake that trueth vvhich he knovveth vvhich is an enemy to it this euill will to the cause wil not permit him to vtter his knowledge to the furtherance of it or if he doth speake it he wil deliuer it in such equiuocall doubtfull words manner as a man shall be neuer the better for it For the 2d of these properties to wite honesty for I wil begine with the second I grant it to be in our Ministers be it they be all godly religiouse yet this is but one of the properties of a vvarrantable Testimony Neuerthelesse because many people plead much the honesty of their Ministers saying they are godly holy very zealouse men c. for my parte if I could be moued to question theire honestie here is cause enough for what greater cause can there be to moue one to suspect theire zeale to be ignorance their holinesse to be hollovvnesse fained then to heare them speake or dispute against Gods word ordinance against an expresse com in the morall law a man wold thinke that man can not be sound at the core heart that dares oppose god that vnnecessarily the which they doe that oppose his commanded Sabbaths For the first of these properties to wit wisedome I graunt they haue wisedome learning enough to vnderstand this point but haue they employed this their wisedome learning in the impartiall serch of this point for the finding of it out for take a wise learned mans testimony in any Arte or in any point about Druinity wherein he is not studied he is like an vnlerned man as Sampson when his Lockes were cut he was weake like an other man Now be it that they haue neuer so much learning wisedome yet since they haue not imployed theire wisdome learning for the finding out of this point what auaileth it that they are wise lerned for in this matter they are neither wise nor learned because they haue vsed neither of thē in this study that this is so appeareth from theire own cōfessiō for some of the very chiefe principall of thē haue confessed vnto mee others vnto my frends who haue related it truly to mee that they haue saied that they haue studied indeed to maintaine A Sabbath day out of the 4th com but whither it should be vpō the 7 day or the 8th day on the Saturday or on the Sunday this point neuer came into their minds to study it well then if it hath not bene studied by the chiefe of them that haue bone the most studious serching it must be yeelded that the residue of them haue much more ouerskipt it tell me then if the sayings of these men against this point of the Lords Sabbaths be to be regarded when as it is a point vvhich never so much as came in to their minds to study it Let people no more boast of the vvisdome lerning of theire Ministers then nor yet of theire Multitud c. that they all whith one voice haue cried out spake against the Lords Sabbaths as ceremonies can a blind man iudge of cullers or a wise man speake of what he is ignorant of let people no more therfore rely vpon the wisdome lerning of their Ministers in this point but let them imitate those noble Bereans Act. 17. Let them serch the Scriptures daily to see if these things I tender vnto them be so or no and this is one cause vvhy I reiect the verdict of our Ministers in this point because it wanteth one of the properties of a warrantable testimony to vvit the vse of their wisdome lerning hereby it appeareth also vpon what poore grownds our common people haue hither to gone in relying their soules in this matter vpon their Ministers zeale holinesse learning vvhat if they be neuer so zealous holy pure lerned it is but a zeale vvithout knowledge vvhich speaketh of things not soundly studied And so I come to the 3d property namely good will this propertie of a warrantable testimony our Ministers want for they haue no good vvill at all to the cause but all euill vvill that may be witnesse all their words and deedes in about this matter if a man hath a cause to be tried before the Iudge by 12 Iury men if he suspecteth some one of the 12 to be his enemy they say it is lawfull for him to except against that mā for that cause the Iudge vvill cause that man to be drawne and an other to be svvorne in his roome vvhich declareth that a man suspected to haue no good will is not esteemed a sit man to determine of a controuercy Now that there is cause for vs to suspect most Ministers to haue euill vvill to this cause of Gods Sabbaths appeareth 1. by their vvords and deeds to the contrary among others let those many slaunders reprochfull speeches and hard vsages which they haue vsed against mee for defending this cause of Gods let these I say testify whither they be friends or enemies to the cause 2. There is great cause to suspect they will be no friends to the cause because all their liues long hitherto they haue taught the people to the contrary to vvit that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished and if novv they should be friends to this cause they must vnteach vvhat
honest auditory also that 's worse in alleaging of our Testimony in publike as if vve did vphould iustify his false Minor which we doe vtterly renownce neuer vseing his phrase in his sense the man is liuing of whom I speake if he thinke I vvrong him he can right himselfe And so I come to the other part of his Minor to wit And not the 7th day where he affirmeth that the 7th day is not the Sabbath day for proofe hereof he referred his auditory at that time to what he had in former sermons deliuered my selfe not being present at his former sermons as I was at this and being vnsatisfied with this reference I went vnto him after his sermon was ended and desired him to giue me a coppye or notes of what he had formerly preacht against the Lords Sabbaths and he asked me to what end I desired his notes my answer to him was thus I promise you that I will either confirme them or confute them I gaue him also certaine reasons to induce him to giue me his notes as this that he was the Lords Champion and therefore who but hee should defend the Lords cause I told him further that hee in speciall sorte aboue all Ministers had ingaged himselfe in this quarrell in as much as he had openly contested against my booke the Lords Sabbaths therein defended and howbeit I did not rashly and of mine owne head goe vnto him vvith this request as I told him but with the aduise of some Minister neere friend of his who thought hee neither would nor could deny me this request yet say vvhat I could I could get no notes of him so then for the latter part of his Minor and the proofe of it I must take it vpon his bare word that he had formerly confuted the Lords Sabbaths but whither he had or he had not I can say nothing because I cannot obtaine a sight of his notes but I know what I thinke of it This one thing I remember that M. Chappell was highly magnified applauded not onely by his parishoners but also by all Puritane Diuines that heard him for his solid learned ouerthrowing of the Lords Sabbath the which let vs take for granted and so you shall see how the crafty are caught in their owne craftinesse from this impiouse vngodly doctrine of M. Chappell thus I argue If that the old Sabbath mentioned in the morall law be abolished by M. Chappell then hee cannot proue infallibly that we haue any new Sabbath jure diuino then must M. Chappell his parishoners those Puritane Diuines that so applauded his doctrine all turne Anabaptists forthwith and so keepe no Sabbath at all The reason hereof is plaine for if we haue neither the old Sabbath nor any new Sabbath then we haue no Sabbath at all and so must become Anabaptistes Hauing answered their arguments whereby they would proue the Lords day a Sabbath by the 4th com I desire the Reader but to looke backe vpon them they are but 3 in number to consider how poore feeble they are and withall to thinke with what face they can so bouldly vrge the 4th com in the pulpit vpon the Lords day and so I come to disproue them and to shew that the 4th com cannot be vrged vpon the Lords day and let it be considered whither their reasons for it or mine against it be the more cleere and haue better force of prouing My first reason to the contrary is that the Lords day cannot be a Sabbath day by the 4th com because the 4th comman doth command vs to worke on the Lords day for the 4th com saith Sixe dayes shalt thou labour and doe all thy worke Exod. 20.9 and the first of these 6 dayes is the day called the Lords day as vve haue proued in the exposition of the 4th com Now this law inioyning vs to labour sixe dayes consequently on the Lords day was neuer repealed for it was noe Type or shaddow of Christ c. Nay Christ ratified this law by his owne practise for he laboured and trauailed vp downe too and fro on this Lords day after his resurrection Luk. 24.15 Now can any wise man thinke that this 4th com should command vs to Rest from worke on the Lords day when the same comm commandeth vs to worke on the Lords day behold whither these men are not fit expounders of Scripture when they are so ignorant therein as they make not onely one Scripture contradict an other Scripture but then the which is nothing more absurd they make one and the same Scripture to contradict it selfe for they make the 4th com to say Thou shalt not worke on the Lords day when it saith the quite contrary Sixe dayes thou shalt worke of which 6 the Lords day is one may not I truely say of these Ministers who thus abuse Gods law in expounding it as Paul said of some that they would be Doctours of the law and yet vnderstand not what they speake neither whereof they affirme 1. Tim. 1.7 My second argument against them is this That Sabbath day which is commanded in the 4th com it is a weekly Sabbath on euery 7th day But it cannot be proued that the Lords day is a weekly Sabbath for in Christs time and in the Apostles times it vvas not kept constantly and vveekly but once in a yeere or the like as hath bene showne Therefore the Lords day is not nor can be commanded in the 4th com My third argument to the contrary is because the time the circumstance of time as they cale it in the 4th Comm. is abolished as themselues say teach for they teach that by these Textes of Scripture Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 and Colos 2.16.17 the time of the 7th day commāded in the 4th com is a ceremony a Ievvsh ceremony c. Now from their owne doctrine I argue against them thus If the commaunded time in the 4th Com. be a circumstance and a Iewish ceremony and abolished then very foolishly doe they that vvill rune to the 4th Com. for time for the new Sabbath or Lords day aske them by what precept this time of the Lords day is to be sanctified they vvill tell you by the 4th com so that they will fetch a time out of the 4th Comm. and yet they say this time is abolished what contradicting folly is this wherefore vnlesse they can proue that there vvas two dayes and two times the 7th day and the 8th day commanded in the 4th com their doeings are like vnto a foolish gardiner vvho hauing but one bed of time in his garden first he vvill cut it or roote it all vp and then he will make all men beleeue that yet for all that he can fetch as much time out of that bed as he could doe before it was rooted vp of such pulpit gardiners vve haue too many they can take out of the Com. what they please
for it is a signe betwene me you in your generationes that ye may know that I the Lord doe sāctifie you This text M. Chappell vrgeth so doth euery man now because they put no smale confidence in this text for the abolishing of the Lords Sabbaths I must therefore take the more paines in answering it for they haue no more but this text an other if they faile in these two textes as they haue done in all the former then haue they no culler or cloke left them for maintaining the abolishing of this ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbaths then this fearefull sinne of a weekely transgression of the 4th com violation of the Lords Sabbaths will lay heauy vpon the consciences of the patrones of the Lords day for these are they who doe teach stifly that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished and doe warrant the people that they may with a safe conscience violate the Saturday Sabbath and behold these are their grownds for it which we haue already answered and are in answering But before I come to lay downe their arguments out of this text and my answers I will in the first place shew how they are cōdemned by their owne Authores who doe apply this text to the Sabbath in the 4th com and would make it a signe so abolished then I will shew also how absurd they are to make attempt to proue any thing out of this text against the Lords Sabbaths It is well knowne I might here alleage the Testimonies of many both godly lerned who writing on the doctrine of the Sabbath day in the 4th com haue defended it against this texte of Exod. 31.13 shewing that it is not so a signe as it can be therefore a ceremony abolished of which number is M. Greenham on the Sabbath M. Richard Byfield pag. 88.99 of late come forth Doctour Bownde Doctour Ames others cited in the first Section of this Chapter with diuerse others whose words names I spare as well knowne vnto such as are seene into this controuercy for nothing seemed more absurd vnto them then to thinke God should put a ceremoniall signe and shaddow into the body of the 4th com and heart of the Morall Law all which writers doe condemne those who would make the Sabbath day a signe so abolished by this texte Exod. 31.13 For matter of absurdety 1. it appeareth in this that by bringing this text Exod. 31. against the morall and weekly Sabbath commanded in the morall Law hereby they picke quarrels with God his ordinances for this text doth not say that because the Sabbath is a signe therby you shall know it for certaine that it shall be abolished no but because the Sabbath is here caled a signe therefore hence they will needs collect that it must be abolished for furtherance of this wicked collection all their wites invention are set on worke partly so to expound this text as it may not be vnderstod of the yeerly Sabbaths by no meanes least so the morall weekly Sabbath should be preserued from ruine and destruction therfore they will expound it of this morall and weekly Sabbath that so it may be abolished its light extinguished partly how to proue all signes to be abolished the like and this is done to this euill end also that so they may bring the Sabbath of the Lord within the compasse of an abolished signe and so quite rase it out of the morall Law and roote it out of the Church thus you see how they seeke out for and study to find matter against Gods ordinance and all this needlesly and causlesly saue that they beare a grudge against the Lords Sabbaths and would haue them prophaned for what other reason can they render of this their fact suer I am this text Exod. 31. doth not compell them to say any thing against the 7th day Sabbaths for they are faint to vse their best witts to inuent something in it that may make against Gods Sabbath and is not this then to picke a quarrell with Gods ordinance S. Paul saith Loue thinketh no euill 1. Cor. 13.5 suer I am these men thinke no good for did they loue Gods Sabbaths and Gods commandements for themselues vnlesse some spirit of slumber for the present hath possessed them they could not but shew their loue to Gods 4th com as well as to the rest of the commandements manifest their loue also in time of triall by thinking good and that which might make for the preseruation of Gods Sabbaths 4th com intirly rather then by thinking euill of them to doe some act against them how can men think worse of any thing then to labour its abolition ruine and destruction yea that too when they need not so doe hauing no cause mouing them therevnto saue a corrupted mind this is a malitiouse wicked spirit that will study the ouerthrow of an ancient ordinance of God yea an ordinance as ancient as any in the Church of God what soeuer and labour to vndermine it causlesly I wish M. Chappel his other 9. confederate Ministers would thinke of this point at the latter end after I had handled the 4th com I gaue sondry effectuall reasones to moue vs to the loue of Gods Law is this the loue that men beare to it to seeke out how which way they may ouerthrow for euer some parte of it And what will be the issue of all this why euen this hereby Gods Morall Law shall become a morall-ceremoniall Law Gods Law shall be maimed denied its integrity perfection yea a godly prayer of our Church shall become a babling before God those most ancient Churches which liued next the Apostles are therfore accounted the most pure Churches shall be condemned in that they religiously obserued this Sabbath day A second absurdety that these men who are partiall in Gods Law doe fale into by sharpening their wites to fetch an argument out of this text Exod. 31.13 against the 7th day Sabbath is this that hereby they doe contradict them selues most foulely for they teach maintaine that the Rest in the 4th com is morall perpetuall yet for all that they will bring an argument out of this text which doth plainly ouethrow this Rest as well as any thing else for the Hebrew word Sabbath signifieth Rest now then if the Sabbath here mentioned Exod. 31.13 be a signe and so abolished so must also the Rest signified by the word Sabbath be a signe also abolished too and yet for all this will they haue this Rest morall perpetuall will they haue this Sabbath or Rest both morall and ceremoniall what a grosse contradiction is this Yet further it is to be noted that whereas the cōtrouercy betwixt vs is about the time day onely for they would abolish the 7th day this text which they bring doth not so much as mētion the
a Signe that he would neuer more destroy the world by a floode of waters Genes 9.12.13 neuerthelesse the Raine bow is not abolished for wee see it still in the cloudes in rainey weather For other signes still remayning see the proofe of the next Major see these Scriptures Ro. 3.25 Phil. 1.28 2. Thes 1.5 and thus much for answer to this argument An other way whereby they may argue out of this textis this All Signes of Christ are abolished But the 7th day Sabbath is a Signe of Christ Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is abolished But I deny this wholl argument both Major and Minor For the Major I deny that all signes of Christ are abolished For they can not proue it and because there are sondry signes of Christ remayning still for example the Bridgroome was made a type or signe of Christ Ioh. 3.29 Reuel 29.9 and as we reade euery where in the booke of the Canticles so the Shepheard Ioh. 10.11 was made a signe of Christ and yet these relationes remaine still we haue Bridgroomes still and Shepheards still 2. certaine meates legally vncleane as the Hare the Conie and the Swine Leuit. 11.5.6.7 they were made a signe of Christ Act. 10.14.15 Col. 2.16 and yet for all that all Hares Conies and Swine are not abolished no nor as touching abstenence from them as in a fast 3. The Rocke in the wildernesse was made a signe of Christ 1 Cor. 10.4 and yet the Rocke is not vanished out of its place because it was once a signe of Christ nor is it become vselesse but that men may wash and cattell drink at it to this day 4. I might add that circumcision being a Sacrament it was a signe of Christ Rom. 4.11 yet those infāts circumcised a little before Christ his death their circumcision was not gathered as the Apostle speaketh or nullified and abolished immediatly after Christs death nor in all the time of their liues after see 1. Cor. 7.18 by all which instances it is manifest that all signes of Christ are not abolished I come now to the Minor and here I deny that the 7th day Sabbath was at any time a Signe of Christ considered as incarnate their text Exod. 31.13 saith indeed that the Sabbath was a signe but it doth not say that the Sabbath was a Signe of Christ indeed the text speaketh of Iehouah God the father vnder this word Lord but it is altogether silent of God the Sonne Christ Iesus considered as mediator incarnate wherefore this text maketh nothing for their purpose and thus is this second argument answered Neuerthelesse some reply and vrge this text further for the prouing of this Minor saying that God sanctifyeth vs by Christ considered as incarnate as is plaine Eph. 1.3 Herevnto I answer behold what shufling is heere is this the way to proue by necessary consequence when they are forced from one text to flie vnto an other text were there that necessary consequence where of they talke in their argument out of this text they should not neede to flie vnto an other is not this to picke aquarrell against Gods ordinance voluntarily without any necessity to seeke out for matter against God but all this will nothing auaile them For 1. I haue some exceptiones against the text in my former booke p. 138. 2dly admit that God doth sanctify by Christ yet it followeth not that what souer is made a signe of God the Father and of God the Sonne considered as God it must also be a signe of God the Sonne considered as redeemer and incarnate so greate is the difference betwixt Christ considered as God coequall with the father and considered as God-man incarnate as that which being a signe of God the father though it must also be a signe of God the Sonne considered as God coequall to the father yet it is not necessary that it should be a signe also of God the Sonne considered as God-man and incarnate Further more I will giue three answers more vnto this argument the first is by distinguishing of Signes if the Sabbath here be a signe of Christ then there are some signes of Christ which are euer present with the thing signified as in this text Exod. 31.13 where the text speaketh in the present tense doe it is a Signe that I the Lord doe sanctify you where you see this is a Signe of somthing as present there be some Signes of Christ which are farre distant from the thing signified where the signe was present but the thing signified was future of this kind was circumcision sacrifices meates and drinkes new Moones and yeerly Sabbathes now the former sense is it which they must imbrace by this text Exod. 31.13 and in this sense I deny that such signes of Christ are abolished for albeit it were so that of the latter kind of signes where the signe and the thing signified were farre assunder in time that at the presence of the thing signified the signe vanished yet is there not like reason in the former kind of signes for then the Sabbath day which was made a signe of Christ as they say then presently sanctifying the Isralites should haue vanished and haue bene abolished euen in those dayes wherein Moses wrote this text Exod. 31.13 for then at that time was the Signe and the thing Signified present together It is a signe that I the Lord doe sanctify you saith the text My second answer is this whereas they build so strongly vpon it that the Sabbath day was here made a signe of Gods and so also of Christs sanctification as if sanctification were a maine thing signified and typed out by the Sabbath this I deny the Sabbath was not made a signe of Sanctification but onely a signe of God the Lord. For the word Sanctifie in this text is vsed as a description of God not as the antitype or thing signified the antitype or thing signified is onely the Lord as if the text were thus read My Sabbath is a signe that yee may know that I am the Lord or that I am the Lord who doe sanctifie you For confirmation of this see Ezek. 20.20.12 where the same matter is repeated thus Sanctify my Sabbathes they shall be a signe betwene me and you that ye may know that I am the Lord your God Hereby you may see that the thing signified by the Sabbath was the Lord our God for God would giue his people a signe whereby they might know him that sanctifieth them from all false Gods now if the word sanctify had bene the thing signified and typed then that word would not haue bene omitted here as being the chiefe thing intended Thus you see the Sabbath was no signe of Sanctification and yet vpon this supposition they build all this their argument My third answer is by distinguishing of the word sanctify it may be taken 1. For that inherent grace of holinesse which is wrought in the hearts of the Elect by
the holy Ghost or 2. For an externall priuilege whereby a Nation or people are seuered from other Nations and people to participate of the outward ordinances of God as the word and Sacraments c. Rom. 3.1.2 Rom. 9.4 Deut. 4.8.34 Exod. 19.10 now admit the Sabbath was made a signe of Sanctification then may the word Sanctifie in the text be vnderstode of this latter kind of Sanctification onely now this Sanctification cannot haue reference vnto Christ considered as incarnate for if it hath then the text must rune thus keepe yee my Sabbaths for they are a Signe that I the Lord Christ doe sanctifie you Now the Lord Christ considered as incarnate could not be sayed to sanctifie those Isralites in Moses his time that is to take the people of the Iewes then from other Nationes and bestow vpon them those holy Privileges of his Oracles circumcision and the rest for hee was not incarnate of 2000 yeeres after that A third way whereby I suppose they may argue out of this text Exod. 31.13 is this All signes whose things signified or antitypes be come weare forthwith abolished But the 7th day Sabbath was a signe whose antitype is long since come Therefore the 7th day Sabbath was forthwith at the death of Christ abolished For the trueth of the Major this they thinke to proue partly by that text Col. 2.16.17 and partly from that common receiued axiome that when the body is come the shaddow or signe vanisheth Herevnto I answer 1. for the text Col. 2.16.17 that this text will not helpe them for our question now is aboute signes But this text saith nothing of Signes for it speaketh onely of Shaddowes now there may be greate difference made betwixt a signe and a Shaddow For euery Shaddow may be a signe but euery Signe is not a Shaddow we haue the word Shaddow vsed but thrice in the new Testament as in Col. 2.17 and in Heb. 8.5 and in Heb. 10.1 and it is euer vsed to signifie a thing to come futurlie as the Apostle speaketh plainly Which are a shaddow of things to come Col. 2.17 And againe The law hauing a shaddow of good things to come Heb. 10.1 But now Signes are vsed to signify things past Exod. 31.17 Rom. 4.11 and somtimes things to come Genes 17.8.11 and somtime to signify a thing present as Exod. 31.13 wherefore seeing there is so greate a difference betwixt a signe and a Shaddow we must not confound them the Apostle would abolish no more but such signes onely as did signify things to come and the Sabbath in Exod. 31.13 is made onely a signe of a thing present Haue these men an indifferent respect with Dauid vnto all Gods commandements Psal 119.6 think you when they belabour it so studiously to ouerthrow a parte of them and may not these men be said to loue Gods law from the heart and to be true friends vnto it when they vse all their wit and lerning to ouerthrow an ordinance of Gods commanded expresly in that law and what will be the issue of this their thanklesse worke why this the bright shining law of God which is a light vnto our feete Psal 119.105 it shall by this their greate study haue a darke shaddow or ceremony placed in the very heart of it yea it shall be made a very monstre among Gods lawes For of all Gods lawes from Genesis to Malachie there is not one like it such a hotch potch they haue made it it shall be partly fish parly flesh partly white partly blake partly morall partly ceremoniall partly abolished partly entaining may they not be in loue with this their worke to behold the vglinesse of it 2. I answer to their axiome and so also to their Major by deniall that all signes must forthwith vanish when the antitype and thing signified is come and I giue these instances to the contrary 1. The Passeouer Lamb it was a Signe that God would spare the Israelites at midnight when he came to destroy the first-borne of the Egyptians now this Passeouer it was eaten in the Euening before this midnight so that it was a signe of a deliuerance to come as namly in the night after now midnight being come and the Angel bauing Passed-ouer spared the firstborne of the Israelites here then the antitype or thing signified by the Passeouer was come and yet for all that this Signe of the Passeouer it was not forthwith abolished for it lasted many hundreth of yeeres after euen till the last Supper of Christ see Exod. 12.6.13.29.25 Luk. 22.15 yea it remained still as a signe of thier deliuerance which was past come and gone long before as you may see Exod. 12.26.27 loe here the signe remained long after the thing signified was come and gone for the fathers were to instruct their Children when they were in Canaan that this Passeouer was kept in remembrance of Gods deliuerance from the destroying Angell whilst they were in Egypt which deliuerance was long before this Passeouer and this Passeouer long after the deliuerance signified by it And vvhy may not the Sabbath last also in the Church if it were a signe long after Christs coming in the flesh euen till his last coming vnto iudgment I can see nothing to the contrary but that it pleaseth not our Ministers to haue it so indeede they talke much that the Sabbath it was a signe the Sabbath it was a signe and now the body Christ being come the signe must of necessity be gone but here they see the contrary the signe of the Passeouer it lasted in the Church many hundreth of yeers after the thing signified by it was come 2. Circumcision it was a signe that God would giue the Land of Canaan to the Israelites Genes 17.4.8.10 well then Canaan was the thing signified by the signe of circumcision now when the Israelites were come into the Land of Canaan then they had receiued the thing signified but did not this signe of circumcision last in the Church many hundreth yeers after that yis euen to the coming of Christ for he was circumcised and why may not the Sabbath if a signe remaine still in the Church after Christs death if they say that circumcision was a signe of something else besids the Land of Canaan so say I was the Sabbath for it was a signe also of the creation or of Gods rest then Exod. 31.17 A 3d instance The Lord gaue Moses a signe or token that hee had sent him to deliuer the Isralites now the signe was this that after he had brought the Israelites out of Egypt both hee they should serue God vpon the Mount Horeb Exod. 3.1.12 where you see that the signe was a good while after that the thing signified was come for the thing signified was this that Moses should goe vnto Pharaoh and also bring the children of Israel out of Egypt Exod. 3.11 now after hee had bene with Pharaoh after he had carried the Isralites out of Egypt then
may befale any Church of God on earth for it is a property of the Church Triumphant in heauen to be freed from all erroures Now that A Church of God on earth may faile I proue by theise instances The Patriarkes they liued in polygamie hauing many wines which for any man now to doe were a sinne against the 7th com Againe the Iewes vsed to put away their wiues giuing them a bill of diuorce now that Church liued a long time in this errour against the 7th commandement vntill Christ came who reformed it Mat. 19.7.8.9 Againe did not the Church of Galatia fale into a greate errour when the Apostle taxed them as if they had bene remoued away vnto an other gospell Gal. 1.6 Againe did not Christ reproue the Churches of Pergamus and of Thyatira for corruptiones in them by suffering them that maintained the doctrine of Balaam of the Nicholaitanes and the woman Iezabell Reuel 2.12 13.14.15.18.20 Lastly and to add no more how came it about if a Church of God cannot erre about such a point as the Sabbath day that those purest and primitiue Churches which liued immediatly after the Apostles did neglect to keepe this Lords day Sabbath for diuerse hundreth of yeeres for so saith M. Perkins they did and citeth his author Leo Anton Edict see Perk in his first volume vpō the 4th com pag. 48. surely my aduersaries will iudge this a foule errour in those Churches by all which examples it is too too apparent that a Church of God may erre that too in Morall dueties commanded in the Morall Law whence it is plaine that they erre who build their faith vpon this fundation that the Church of God cannot erre OBIECT VII An other obiection against the Lords Sabbath is this that if we admit of the old Sabbath againe thē we shall bring Iudaisme into the Church and be guilty of a kind of Heresy c. Wherevnto I answer it followeth not for the Primitiue Churches were of a contrary iudgement as it appeareth by Athanasius in his Homilie de semente wee assemble togheter saith Athanasius in the Sabbath day not as if we weere sicke of Iudaisme but therefore we meete on the Sabbath that we may worship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath Where you see that Athanasius in the name of the Church testifieth that they were not infected with Iudaisme because they kept the Sabbath day the same may also be true of our Church we may keepe the Sabbath day and yet be free from Iudaisme It is to be noted that not euery thing which the Iewes practised was to be accounted for Iudaisme for then the whole Morall Law should be Iudaisme wherefore those things onely are to be accounted for Iudaisme which neuer came into the Morall Law or 10 com and which were written by Moses of which number were their Sacrifices Priestes meate new moones feastes annuall Sabbaths but as for this old Sabbath wherin God himselfe rested this was put into the Morall Law and written by the finger of God and to sanctify this Sabbath is no more Iudaisme then to honour our Superioures is Iudaisme for why should the things commanded in the 4th com be more Iudaisme then the things commanded in the 5th com Since they cannot proue this Sabbath to be a ceremony and abolished as you haue seene in the 4th part of this booke it is therefore absurd for them to call the Sanctification of the Sabbath Iudaisme Yet further since they onely who keepe the Sabbath doe obserue yeeld obedience to the Law in the integrity perfection therof and doe giue God his wholl worship in all the parts thereof they may as well say it is Iudaisme for a man to be intire and pefect in the Law and to giue God his wholl worship intirly and brand him with Iudaisme vnlesse he will mancle Gods Law and be partiall in the Law and in Gods worship seruing God by halues And further if it be Iewish and Iudaisme to keepe the Sabbath day to wit the old Sabbath day then 1. the 4th com is Iewish for it commands nothing but Sanctification of the old Sabbath day 2. If it be Iudaisme to keepe the old Sabbath then is it Iudaisme for Ministers to call in the Pulpit for the Sanctification of the Lords Sabbaths to vse the name Sabbath day for this is as well a Iewish name as the keeping of it is a Iewish practise if we may vse the name without tincture of Iudaisme why not the thing named also 3. What is the keeping of the Lords day better then Iewish for doe not we resemble the Jewes by setting a part on wholl day in euery weeke for Gods worship as they did 4. Since the Sabbath day was commanded to be kept in imitation of God as that we should Rest on the 7th day because God rested on the same day Exod. 20.10.11 men may therefore say it is Iewish Iudaisme to become followers of God 5. Since the Sabbath was kept in memory of the Creation men may say it is Iewish to celebrate weekly a thankfull remembrance of the Creation For matter of Haeresy both Athanasius Ignatius and the primitiue Churches obseruation of the Sabbath day will cleere vs of Haeresy to obserue the Sabbath with its typicall shadowish quality as a signe Shaddow of Christ if euer it were so this were Haeresy but renowncing all shadowish respectes to keepe it onely as a signe of the Creation remembrance thereof as a sacred time for the worship of God as a fit time to exercise mercy in to man beast by a rest from laboures so as an helpe vnto these morall dueties of rest God worship this can be no Haeresy for we refraine those meates in a fast which were shadowish obserue Whie-Sunday or Pentecost day which was a shaddow of Christ yet are farre enough from Haeresy see Act. 21.20.26 Rom. 14.5 hereto I might add the Testimonies of all those Diuines iustifying this point for orthodox which you shall find hereafter in my third argument for the defence of the ancient Sabbath I grant the Laodicean Counsaile anathematized it but the more ancient more pure Churches Sanctified it If it be Haeresy to keepe Gods Sabbaths then 1. it is Haeresy for Ministers in Pulpits to vse the name Sabbath day 2. It is Haeresy to celebrate a day weekly in a thankfull remembrance of the Creation 3. It is heresy for the Church and people of God to become followers of God by working whē he wrought resting when he rested 4. It is heresy to walke in obedience to the 4th cō 5. It is heresy to be intire perfect in Gods Law to haue an vnpartiall respect vnto all Gods commandements yea it is heresy to giue God his wholl worship intirly In a word since the Sanctification of the Sabbath is a part of Gods worship if for all that men will call it heresy I say
Gods lawes this no man fearing God should doe 2. Since the Lords day is no Sabbath day they that defend the 7th day Sabbath to be abolished they cast downe all Sabbaths of Gods and so draw vs to Anabaptistry and open a flood gate to all impiety prophanesse among people which no man fearing God should doe 3. Since no day can be Sabbath day by the 4th com but the old Sabbath day as hath bene proued therefore they that hold and make it abolished they make that holy prayer of our Church a meere babling with God for the 4th com being rehearsed in vaine we say Lord haue mercy vpon vs and incline our heartes to keepe this Law now no man fearing God should make frustrate such a deuout and ancient prayer of our Church by his absurd tenentes I might mention other absurdeties but I list not to repeate them ARGVM III. My third argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath to be still in force is because so much is confessed by Diuines that are no friends but enemies vnto it thus it may be framed If such as are no friends but enemies vnto the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force then the 7th day Sabbath is still in force But such as are no friends but enemies vnto the old Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is still in force As for the consequence it is cleere for albeit the Testimony of a man in his owne case and for his owne aduantage be of smale esteeme yet a testimony which a man giues against himselfe is euer accounted strong wherefore if I shall proue that such as mislike of the 7th day Sabbath doe for all that affirme that it is still in force then the point must needes be yeelded to me And so I come vnto the Minor here I shall proue that such as are no friends to the 7th day Sabbath doe confesse that it is still in force and this I shall proue either by their expresse words or else by necessary consequence from their words for albeit they neuer intended to speake a word in defence of Gods Sabbath yet so cleere and apparent hath bene the trueth as they could not but speake for it albeit they fauoured it not my first Testimony shall be that of Doctour Prideaux in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 140. It is manifest saith he that our Sauiour did often contend with the Pharisies about the superstitiouse obseruation of the Sabbath day but where is there any thing about the abrogation of it at vbi de abrogatione ipsius suspicio and where is there any mention of setting the Lords day in the roome of it did not the Apostles keepe the Sabbath of the Iewes with the Iewes without any scruple after the ascention of Christ did not the followinge Churches doe the like for many yeeres If then there be no suspicion of the abrogation of the Sabbath day in the new Testament as Doctour Prideaux saith then it necessarily followeth that the Sabbath day is still in force My second Testimony shall be that of M. Perkines on the Creede speaking of the Creation Pag. 152. where he speaketh of the place of Gods worship then to wit the garden of Eden also of the time of Gods worship to wit the Sabbath day Touching the time of Gods worship it was the 7th day from the begining of the Creation the Sabbath day And here we must note saith he that the keeping of the Sabbath is morall some indeed saith he doe pleade that it is but a ceremony yet falslie for it was ordeined before the fale of man at which time ceremonies signifying sanctification had no place Here is no speech of the Lords day the 8th day it was not knowne at the Creation but all this is spoken of the Sabbath day the 7th day and M. Perkins doth plainly affirme that this 7th day Sabbath is morall and contesteth against those who hold it to be a ceremony saying they speake falsly c. Now if it be morall no ceremony then it must needs be still in force My third Testimony shall be that of M. Dod on the commandements who in his exposition of the 4th com pag. 122. saith that the Sabbath is morall perpetuall againe Arguments to proue the Sabbath day to be perpetuall Now that all this must be true of the old Sabbath day not of the Lords day is plaine 1. Because he nameth the Sabbath day the SeaueÌ„th day 2. Because he fetcheth reasons to proue the morality froÌ„ Gods rest at the creatioÌ„ because it was a day blessed now these things cannot agre to our Lords day 3. In pag. 129. he thus concludeth So that these reasones doe most euidently confirme to the artes of all Gods childereÌ„ that the keeping of the Sabbath day is a morall Law and bindeth vs and all men to the end of the world as much as it did the Iewes afore Christ 4. In pag. 124. he brings an other reason for the morality of the Sabbath from the time of its first institution in Adams innocency saying Now then since it was instituted in Paradise c. it may not be reputed among ceremonies Now this cannot be vnderstod of the Lords day other reasons of his I spare well if the old Sabbath day be morall as it must be by these his words and reasones then it is still in force My 4th Testimony shall be that of Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 40. The 4th com saith he caÌ„ no more be partly morall partly ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast yea as well may one suppose saith he the second Commandement to be partly morall partly ceremoniall also If then the 4th com be not partly ceremoniall as touching the 7th day then is the 7th day still in force My 5th Testimony shall be that which I find quoted by Doctour Bownd in his booke of the Sabbath pag. 46. out of Wolph Chron. lib. 2. cap. 1. saying But the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing Typicall nothing to be abrogated If the Decalogue conteineth nothing ceremoniall or to be abrogated then is not the 7th day ceremoniall but still inforce My 6th Testimony shall be that of M. Richard Byfield on the Sabbath against M. Brerewod pag. 88. where he thus writeth The 4th com is parte of the Law of nature so a parte of the Image of God 〈…〉 capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is If â—â—n there can be no ceremony in the 4th com then is not the 7th day therein a ceremony therefore it must be still in force so absurd it semeth to me it semed vnto these Diuines to suppose a ceremony to be in
because wee may together with Antinomiās Libertines Anabaptists as well abolish all the Morall Law by the Scriptures as with them abolish the Saturday Sabbath and thus I argue If wee may together with Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists abolish by the Scriptures the Saturday Sabbath as a Jewish Ceremony Then may wee with them also abolish by the Scriptures the wholl Law of God euen all the tenn commandements as Jewish Ceremonies But neither wee may nor yet may those lawlesse Christians of Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists abolish by the Scriptures the wholl Law of Gods tenn commandements as Iewish ceremonies Therefore wee may not together with Libertines Antinomians Anabaptists those lawlesse Christians abolish by the Scrïptures the Saturday Sabbath as a Iewish Ceremony For profe of the consequence it is well knowne that those Lawlesse Christians of Libertines Antinomians Anabaptistes doe reiect the Santification of all Sabbaths not but that they keepe the Lords day as a Sabbath together with those Protestant Churches amonge whom they liue but they keepe it onely as an ordinance of the Magistrate and as in obedience to their gouerners yet so too as in case they could doe any common seruile worke on the Lords day without offence to any they would and doe professe it that they would but to keepe any Sabbath as a Diuine institution and as an ordinance of Gods and by virtue of the 4th commandement this they doe reiect as Iewish and Ceremoniall and for their warrant among other textes of Scripture as wee doe so doe they alleage Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 against the Saturday Sabbath shewing that it is abolished as a signe and shaddow c. Thus they bring Scripture against the old Sabbath as well as wee the same Scriptures that we bring so then wee are iustly ranked with Libertines Antinomians and Anabaptists for abolishing by the Scriptures the ancient Sabbath day Now J procede to proue the Major for as for the Minor it needeth no profe if wee may by these Scriptures Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Together with these Sectaries abolish the Saturday Sabbath which is one thing commanded in the morall Law then may we together with them also by these Scriptures Eph. 2.15 Heb. 7.12 Heb. 10.1 Col. 2.14 Abolish the wholl Morall Law all things commanded therein the reason hereof is plaine and manifest for these Sectaries doe bring Scripture against the wholl Law of God as well as against that one parte thereof which commandeth the Saturday Sabbath now if we will shake hands with them in the one why not in the other also if we will ioyne with them in vrging pressing these textes Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Against the 7th day Sabbath which is one branch of the Law why then should we not by the same reason ioyne with them also in vrging pressing these other textes Eph. 2.15.7.12 Heb. 10.1 Col. 2.14 Against the wholl Law euery branch thereof and so abolish it too ther 's the same equity for both let vs not therefore abolish Gods Sabbath day vnlesse we minde to turne Anabaptists and Antinomians and abolish the wholl Law also Happily it will be thought ther is not so good reason to abolish the wholl Law by these Scriptures which these Sectaries doe alleage against it as there is in those other Scriptures which they alleage against the Saturday Sabbath But for this matter I shall make it appeare that as these Sectaries haue as little cause to vrge these textes against the wholl Morall Law as they or wee haue to alleage those textes against the old Sabbath day so they haue as good cause as strong reasons to alleage these textes against the wholl Law as they and we haue to alleage those textes against the old Sabbath day for this purpose let vs compare the textes on either partes First for the textes brought against the Sabbath day Exod. 31.13 Colos 2.16.17 Here say they wee the Sabbath in the Morall Law is made a signe a shaddow now all signes Shaddowes are abolished at Christs coming hee being the substance of those shaddowes 2. In the text Col. 2.16.17 Say they and wee here we haue the very thing in question expressy mentioned namly Sabbaths and Sabbaths too in the plurall number so all Sabbaths both weekly annuall in the Morall Law and in the Ceremoniall Law are abolished Now on the other parte for the textes brought against the wholl lawsee Heb. 10 1. for the Law hauing a shadow of good things to come c. Where the things commanded by the Law are called a shadow hence I thus reason if the Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law be abolished because Sabbaths commanded in a Law are a shadow Col. 2.16.17 Then are all things commanded in the Morall Law abolished and consequently the Law also because things commanded in a Law are a shadow Heb. 10.1 Is not there as good reason for the one as for the other come we to the other textes also see Eph. 2.15 Col. 2.14 Heb. 7.12 Where it is said there is a chang of the Law that the handwriting of ordinances is put out that the Law of commandements is abrograted In which texts it is affirmed that the law is abolished here then may they say in like manner in these textes we haue the thing in question expresly mentioned namly the Law by Law in Scripture is somtimes meant both the Morall Ceremoniall Law Mal. 2.7 And so the wholl Law is abolished both Morall and Ceremoniall well then hence I thus reason if the Sabbath in the Morall Law be abolished by Col. 2.17 Because there is mention of Sabbaths abolished then must not the Morall Law be abolished also by Eph. 2.15 Col. 2.14 Heb. 7.12 Because here is mention made of the law abolished is there not the same reason in both for if you will extend the word Sabbaths which is onely vnderstod of the Sabbaths in the Ceremoniall Law vnto the Sabbath inioyned in the Morall Law why may not they extend the word Law which is onely vnderstode of the Ceremoniall Law vnto the Morall Law whereas you alleage that in Col. 2.16.17 There is mention of Sabbaths in the plurall number and therefore all kinds of Sabbaths weekly and anniuersary must be abolished why may not they and you with them argue also and say that in Eph. 2.15 and in Col. 2.14 There is mention of ordinances commandements in the plurall number and therefore are all Gods ordinances and all Gods commandements whither in the Morall Law or in the Ceremoniall abolished Thus you see then there is as good reason for vs to ioyne with Antinomians and Anabaptistes in casting away the Morall Law as to ioyne with them in casting away the Sabbath day commanded in the Morall Law we may as well cast away by the Scriptures misapplied euen all Gods commandements and all Gods ordinances as Gods Sabbath day we may as well turne Anabaptists in
remaining in vs doth allow of approue of This is one thing I desire may be in speciall manner obserued that such as reiect Gods Sabbath they reiect a most ancient ordinance of Gods expresly commanded in the Morall Law saying that very day and time is not morall nor concerneth our practise as doe the rest of the 10 commandements when as not withstanding our consciences and that light of naturall reason which is in vs doe consent vnto it approue it and allow of it as a thing very good and commodiouse for vs if we had it in vse among vs shall not such opposites be condemned by their guilty conscieÌ„ces for opposing of that ordinance of Gods which is no way against them but euery way good for them their consciences being witnesses thereof should we vrge the practise of any thing impossible to be kept or vnnaturall to be done the which nature riseth against abhorreth theÌ„ if it were opposed it were the lesse maruailouse but when we vrge stand to defeÌ„d nothing but a braÌ„ch of the morall law nothing that nature dissalloweth of but rather cheerefully imbraceth that such a thing should be opposed as no morall nor appertayning vnto vs but as Jewish and I cannot tell what this is the matter of wonder so much for this argument For conclusion let me goe a little further then my argument drawes me I see not but it might be proued that the 7th day Sabbath is a Law of nature euen in their owne sense who say they would imbrace it if it were a Law of nature for as the Gentiles some of them found out the true God so some of them found out the true 7th day Sabbath for the profe hereof I referre you to Walaeus de Sabbatho pag. 46. 47. who affirmeth the point himselfe also proueth it for he citeth diuerse ancient Authores as 1. Philo the Iew lib. 2. de vita Mosis Our custome saith Philo doth adominish all Barbarianes Graecianes Europianes and Asianes of duty for who doth not honour that sacred day which returneth euery weeke ij he citeth Iosephus lib. 2. aduersus Appionem circa fineÌ„ libri saying There is not any Citty Graecianes or Barbarianes nor any Nation vnto whom the obseruation of the 7th day in which the Iewes rested is not come Thus Iosephus iij He citeth a most ancient author Theophilus Antiochenus Patriarcha lib. 2. ad Autolicum As touching the 7th day saith hee which among all mortall men îs greatly famouse it is caled the Sabbath c. iiij He citeth Clemens Alexandrinus lib. 5. stromatum Not onely the Iewes saith hee but also the Gentiles knew that sacred 7th day c. 5. He citeth Eusebius praeparat Euangel lib. 13. who proueth the same out of Plato Hesiod Homer Callimachus and others for further proofe hereof I referre you to M. Richard Byfield on the Sabbath pag. 81. who there alleageth sondry Testimonies shewing that the Gentiles kept the 7th day or Saturday Sabbath amoÌ„g the rest these Seneca in his 95 Epist and Macrobius Saturn lib. 1. Cap. 7. And Aretius problem de Sabbathi obseru thus you see that the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath was found out by and in vse among the Gentiles wherefore the 7th day Sabbath stands firme by the Law and light of nature Thus much for my arguments whereby I haue proued the morallity and perpetuity of the Lords Sabbaths wherein as I trust I haue giuen satisfaction abundantly to the conscience of any man that is not vn-willing to see a trueth but as for such as reade with preiudicate opiniones resoluing before hand to stop their eares least they should hear shut their eyes least they should see which is a brand of an hearte hardened by the iust Iudgement of God I leaue them to him that shall iudge them an other day Consider what J haue saied and the Lord giue you vnderstanding in all things SECT IV. WHereas we haue made profe of the morallity perpetuity of the Lords Sabbath and finding that men haue sondry distinctiones and euasiones whereby they would shune the force of our arguments I haue therefore reserued this Section purposly to confute those distinctiones and to shew the vanity and absurdetie of such their euasiones that so all rubes scruples being remoued our arguments may haue free passage and be receiued without all doubtinges it is true I shall handle many of those distinctiones euasiones here which I haue touched before by way of vse in my Exposition of the 4th commandement but those things which there I did but touch cursorily here I shall handle more largly as the more proper place for them but say I should but repeate them it were not labour lost for being they are the common answers often beaten into the mindes of people there is need of an often confutation of them that so what is said it may sticke the faster remaine the longer in mens mindes I. The first euasion which I will deale withall shall be their distinction of a Sabbath the Sabbath for an argument being brought for the morallity of the Sabbath day out of the 4th com they are ready to blunt the force of it by this answer for one to wit that the word Sabbath may as well be translated a Sabbath as the Sabbath To discouer the vanity of this idle distinction for many care not how idlely and absurdly they answer so be they may say something against this sacred ordinance of Gods first we must know what is the difference betwixt a Sabbath and the Sabbath by the Sabbath is meant that common and well knowne Sabbath day to wit Saturday the 7th last day of the weeke the which the Iewes kept for thowsands of yeeres this I cale the Sabbath emphatically and by way of excellency and as a certaine well knowne day Now on the contrary by a Sabbath they would vnderstand some one day of the 7 but vncertainly which not any one rather then an other not any certaine standing knowne day of the weeke but so as the 4th commandement may indifferently be applied vnto any day as vnto Sunday or Monday or Tewsday c. The sense of this distinction being giuen the absurdety of it wil appeare by the like cases the Lord said let the earth bud forth the bud â—f the herb c. Genes 1.11 were it not a senslesse translation to render it thus Let a earth bud forth c againe then the man said the woman which thou gauest me shee gaue me of the tree c. Genes 3.12 were it not an absurd translation to render it thus then a man said a woman which thou gauest me c as well may they translate it a earth for the earth a man and a woman for the man and the woman as a Sabbath for the Sabbath for as there was but one earth and but one man and one woman so was there but one Sabbath day Againe
the Sabbath now will it hence follow that because God teld the Israelites in Leuit. 23.3 that the 7th day was the Sabbath therfore the Israelites were ignorant of the Sabbath before Againe in their owne text Exod. 16.25 Moses said eate that to day for to day is a Sabbath vnto the Lord c. will it hence follow that because Moses teld the Jsraelites that that day present was the Lords Sabbath therefore they knew not so much before the contrary is plaine but two verses before For in Exod. 16.23 Moses had teld them ouer night or the day before that on the morrow should be the Sabbath day The text therfore is not to be vnderstod as if Moses had informed them of the Sabbath day whereof they were before ignoraÌ„nt but that he informed theÌ„ what they should doe with their Manna on the Sabbath day whereof they were ignorant before for this see the context in v. 19. Moses had said that no maÌ„ should leaue of their Manna till the morning now since on the 6th day they had gathered enough for that day and for the next day v. 22. the Rulers could not tell what to doe with this ouerplus for Moses had said they should keepe none vntil the next day therfore the rulers came vnto Moses for counsaile in this matter v. 22 herevpon Moses informeth theÌ„ what they should doe with their ouerplus of Maâ—nâ— on the Sabbath day v. 23. saying to morrow it being the Sabbath day let the ouerplus be laid vp vntill then or vntill the morning v. 23. so whereas in v. 19. Moses had said they should not lay vp any Manna till the morning he doth here expound himselfe in v. 23. as if he had said that precept was but for the 6 dayes onely not for the Sabbath day for this is excepted they might lay vp Manna vntill the Sabbath day morning though not vnto other mornings Thus you see this text clered and nothing for their purpose II. Againe they reason against the Antiquity of the Sabbath from Exod. 31.13 where the Sabbath was made a signe betwixt God and the Israelites whence they thus reason that if the Sabbath had bene from the Creation it had bene no more a signe vnto the Israelits then vnto the Gentiles c. I answer if the Sabbath had bene a signe from the Creation as it was a Sabbath from the Creation as this argument falsly supposeth the argument had had more culler it cannot be proued that the Sabbath was made a signe from its first institution no more then the Rocke was a signe from its first Creation 1. Cor. 10.4 The Sabbath became a signe but after the giuing of the Law as we see Exod. 31.13 The signe was but aduentitiouse added to the Sabbath after its institution wherefore the Sabbath if it had bene a signe from the Creation then it should haue bene a signe as well vnto Gentiles as vnto Iewes but it being made a signe among the Iewes onely it might be a signe vnto Iewes and none vnto Gentiles since therefore the Sabbath was not a signe originally as it was when it made a difference betwixt Iewes and Gentiles this argument is of no force III. Againe they reason thus If the Sabbath had bene from the Creation and so vnto all people the Lord would haue reproued the Gentiles for prophaning of his Sabbaths as well as the Iewes But God no where reproued the Gentiles but onely the Iewes c. I answer forasmuch as the Law written in the heart begane to be obliterated before the giuing of the Law therefore the Gentiles might be ignorant of Gods Sabbaths so God in mercy might spare them The time of this ignorance God regarded not saith Paul Act. 17.30 The Iewes hauing a cleerer light then the Gentiles they were the more obnoxious and these the lesse 2. whereas they say that God no where reproued the Gentiles for Sabbath breaking how know they this since all things done among the Jewes were not written much lesse the things done among the Gentiles 3. by the like absurd reasoÌ„ing we may proue that other of the moralls were not from the Creation because God neuer reproued the Gentiles for the breach of them neither So much for this argument IIII. Lastly they argue from Deut. 5.2.3 where Moses saith The Lord made not this Couenant with our fathers but with vs who are aliue this day c. Here Moses speaking of the Couenant of the Morall Law saith it was not made with their forefathers and so the Sabbath which was a part of this couenant was not from the Creation I answer 1. if these words be taken properly then they will make as much against the antiquity of the wholl Morall Law as against Gods Holy Sabbath now it is manifest that the Morall Law was more ancient then the giuing of the Law on Mount Sinay for we read of diuerse parts thereof in the booke of Genesis 2. whereas Moses said the Lord made this Couenant with them aliue onely in Horeb v. 2. it is manifest that it was not onely made in Horeb but before for we reade of one branch of this couenant made at least a moneth before in the wildernesse of Sin that was for the keeping of Gods holy Sabbath as it is there caled Exod. 16.23.28 for these causes an other sense of the text must be giuen thus therfore it may be vnderstod that the Lord made not that couenant with their fathers that is not with them so expresly and apparently with such terrour and such maiestie as with those aliue at the giuing of the Law like textes requiring like expositions see Eph. 6.7 Psal 51.16 Ierem. 31.34 Thus we see this text maketh nothing against the Sabbaths antiquity these are the chiefe reasones alleaged by Gomarus against the antiquity of the Sabbath in his booke de origine Sabbathi and how weakly you haue seene Thus you haue heard of the reasones against the Antiquity of the Sabbath and now we come vnto the reasons for the Antiquity thereof touching which let this be noted that I doe not determine whither the Sabbath was instituted in Paradise before mans fall or instantly immediatly after mans fall and so I proceed I. My first reason is drawne out of these words So God blessed the 7th day and sanctified it because that in it he had rested from all his worke which God created and made Genes 2.3 after that God had created the world in 6 daies on the 7th day and so euer after he rested from that worke in memory whereof God blessed the 7th day sanctified it that is God consecrated the 7th day by consecrating it he instituted the 7th day aboue all the daies in the weeke for an holy day for to sanctify consecrate a day to hallow a day to make a day to be an Holy day I take to be all one Now the question may be whither God did sanctify this day for himselfe
his chang were not the very same which God specified in Numb 9.10.11 but yet they were such as might be collected by like reason whereby it appeareth that we may goe beyond the letter of the text so be we hold closse to the like reason this I haue done in fetching my argument from the passeouer day to the Sabbath day for I haue held me to like reason of them both as you haue seene And so much for proofe that the Lords day may be kept for the Sabbath day by way of A change for a season in a case of necessity But yet it remaineth that I proue now that our case in changing the Sabbath day for the Lords day is a case of necessity this being done all is firme for this therefore see the next section SECT IV. In this section I shall proue vnto you that there is a true necessity vpon vs to neglect the Sabbath day for a season and to keepe the Lords day with our Church for it and in roome of it This necessity I shall declare vnto you 1. In respect of our bodies 2. In respect of our soules 3. In respect of our brethren first of the first of these touching our bodies and in this respect I shall make necessity appeare two waies the former is this that if we keepe the 7th day or Saturday Sabbath then we shall haue but 5 daies in a weeke to prouide for our bodies and to compasse the workes of our caleings in for when we haue kept the Saturday Sabbath the Magistrate will compell vs by the lawes of the Realme to keepe the Sunday also so we shall haue but 5 daies in euery weeke or in euery 7 daies to performe the workes of our caleings in now it is of necessity that we should haue 6 daies in euery weeke ordenarily or in euery 7 daies to doe the workes of our caleings in because else God would not haue allowed man 6 daies to worke in for himselfe haue taken but one for his worship as he did in the 4th com Exod. 20.8 now since there is a necessity that we haue 6 daies ordinarily in euery weeke to follow our caleings in it is of necessity that we neglect the Sabbath day worke in it for a season vnles the Magistrate will dispense with his Lawe touching the Lords day or vntill it shall please God to incline the heart of the Magistrate to proclaime a reformation that so the Sabbath day may be kept for vnlesse the Magistrate doth one of these two we can haue but 5 daies in euery weeke for our caleings and so much for the former necessity in regard of our bodies I come now vnto the other necessity in respect of our bodies which is this if we keepe the 7th day Sabbath then we offend the Magistrate and transgresse the Lawes of the Realme herevpon will follow imprisonment of body consequently pouerty for when a man is imprisoned he must neglect his caleing meanes of maintenaÌ„ce so he shall be brought to a morsell of bread hee his wife children which depend vpon him shall come to want of things necessary now who so shall incurre these euils by keeping of the Sabbath day to him there is a necessity to neglect the Sabbath day namely the necessity of wante pouerty hunger Now least any man should maruaile that I will plead this kind of necessity of all others therefore I will strengthen it and that by the allowance of our Sauiour Christ and practise of his Disciples for you reade Mat. 12.1.2 How Christs Disciples did neglect the Sabbath day fell to plucking eares of corne to rubbing them in their hands Luk. 6.1 which workes they did on the Sabbath day to preuent a little hunger and Christ iustified this action Now if hunger was a case of necessity in Christs Disciples why should not hunger be a case of necessity in vs also and if they might worke on the Sabbath day to preuent hunger why may not we doe so too to preuent hunger and imprisonment also yea to preuent penury not in himselfe alone but in his whole family wife and children so our necessity is greater then was that of Christs Disciples The consideration of this may be vsefull to satisfy the obiectiones that rise in the minds of some saying it seemeth then you haue more minde of your belly then of God of your safety then of Gods Sabbaths but the vanity of this obiection shall appeare by this that the very same obiection beareth as strongly against Christs Disciples as against vs for may not such obiections rise in your minds also against Christs Disciples saying it seemeth you minde your bellies more then your God and you feare a little hunger more then the breach of Gods Sabbaths thus you see the weaknesse of this obiection so much for the necessity in regard of our bodies I come now vnto the necessity in regard of our soules here I shall make it appeare that to keepe the Sabbath day as things stand yet it will pine our soules And this I shall shew in two respectes the former is this you know the Sabbath day ought to be solemnised with Assemblies Leuit. 23.3 Now the benefit of company fellowship in sanctification of Gods Sabbaths is of greate vse to kindle zeale and forwardnesse in our frâ—zen heartes like as coales laid together burne more firuently I reioyced saith the Prophet Dauid when they said to me wee will goe into the house of the Lord Ps 122.1 Now such as are convinced of this trueth to beleeue that the lords Sabbaths are still in force are fewe in number as one in an house two in a Towne 3 or 4 in a Citty like the clusters that grow neerest the sunne here one and there one ripe before the rest now if these thus dispersed should keepe the Lords Sabbath continually solitarily alone it is much to be feared that their zeale wold waxe could like burning coales when scattered vpon the hearth put asunder and so their soules should languish and pine away as it were The other respect whereby it will appeare that there is necessity to chang the Sabbath day lest the soule pine is this you know that to the sanctification of the Sabbath day is required the helpe of the Minister Luk. 4.16 Act. 15.21 To goe before the people in the duety of prayer to God to open the Scriptures feeding them with the bread of life diuiding the word of God a right now because the lawes of our kingdome will not permit priuate Conuenticles because there cannot be a Minister in euery family therefore if we keepe the Lords Sabbaths as things stand now then wee must keepe them without that ordinance of Gods Ministry so our soules should languish pine away for lacke of the daily breade the heauenly food of our soules for we should be depriued of our Sabbath dayes bread and want the