Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	bread_n	call_v	consecration_n	3,097	5	11.0977	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47125	The arraignment of worldly philosophy, or, The false wisdom its being a great hinderance to the Christian faith, and a great enemy to the true divine wisdom / by George Keith.	Keith, George, 1639?-1716.	1694 (1694)	Wing K143; ESTC R1585	27,083	30

Philosophers understood nothing of for it is a great part of that wisdom that Paul said he spoke among them that were perfect Eph. 1. 4 5 6 7 8. and Eph. 3. 10 11. And there is scarce any Doctrine of the Christian Faith that the carnal and fleshly wisdom of man doth more contradict and oppose and argue and contend against than this high and mysterious and yet most comfortable Doctrine of the Christian Faith plainly and amply testified of in the holy Scriptures 13. And lastly The worldly Philosophy and fleshly Wisdom hath invented many Words Terms and Phrases that do rather darken and obscure the Truth than tend to discover it so that what God said unto Joh might well be said concerning them called Philosophers both ancient and late Who is this that darkneth Counsel with words without knowledge And multitudes of dark and obscure Words hath bred a multitude of dark obscure and fallacious distinctions and these have be got endless disputes and controversies in that called Natural Philosophy and as that called the Natural Philosophy is greatly corrupted with fallacious Terms Phrases Distinctions and Maxims or Axioms so called so the mixing or mingling that called Philosophy with Matters of Religion which is not for the most part true but false this hath done great hurt and hath occasioned a great corruption in the Doctrine relating to the Faith of Christ and the Christian Religion commonly called Divinity and Theology especially that taught in Universities commonly called School Divinity being stuffed with the Words Terms Phrases vain and fallacious distinctions definitions and Maxims of the World's Philosophy which has not a true Foundation in the truth of things but is only grounded on mens imaginations and traditional glosses that have but guess'd at things that hath led the minds of Men into a Labyrinth and Wilderness of Confusion and unprofitable jangling and disputing deservedly called by the Apostle Paul the Opposition of Science falsly so called for well may that be Science falsly so called that is only a sophistical Art of wrangling contending and opposing what another man saith whatever it be and so dispute things endlesly pro and contra insomuch that there is scarce any conclusion or assertion in that called Natural Philosophy but both the Affirmative and Negative by point-blank contradiction is defended by multitudes of Authors and what one builds another destroys what one proveth to be truth another as he thinketh proveth to be error and both pretend to Reason and Philosophy Beside that the Worldly Philosophy for the most part is rather a skill to talk of things with a multitude of words without any true knowledg than a real solid knowledg of them Hence it is that Paul defineth it to be the wisdom of words and the enticing words of man's wisdom also the wisdom of man which God will destroy 1 Cor. 1 and 2 Chapters And as many of them called Old Philosophers held many false and absurd Opinions directly contrary to the Christian Faith so do many of late pretending greatly to Philosophy among those called Christians especially the Masters and Professors so called of Philosophy in Universities and publick Schools of Learning in the Church of Rome tom whom too many Protestant Professors have borrowed some of their corrupt Leaven of false Philosophy which they have mingled with that they call Divinity or Theology but is not pure Divinity or Theology not being the Truth as it is in Jesus which is free from all mixtures of Error and Falshood whatsoever And of such Errors held by Popish Professors of Philosophy I shall first instance some concerning body or bodily substance and matter I. One gross Error held by them is That the quantity and other accidents of a Body can subsist or remain without the substance And on this absurd Error in that called Philosophy they build their false Faith that after the words of Consecration the quantity of the Bread and Wine and other accidents of Colour Smell Taste and Feeling in that called the Eucharist remain in the consecrated Wafer or Cake while the substance of the Bread and Wine is gone and ceaseth any more to be II. A second gross Error in their Philosophy is That there can be a penetration of bodies and bodily parts so that one whole body remaing a body still can be in the same place with another body of the same quantity occupying the same room and space at one and the same time and consequently that the whole substance of a man's body may occupy no more room or space than the least grain or atome of bread and on this absurd Error they build their false Faith That the same Body of Christ that was crucified and raised again and ascended into Heaven is in every grain or atome of the Eucharistical Bread III. A third gross error concerning bodies they teach is That one and the same body in all its parts undivided one from another can be in many places at once And on this absurd error they build their false faith That the visible Body of Christ is in many thousand places at once to wit not only in every consecrated Cake or Wafer but in every grain thereof IV. A fourth gross error they teach is That one body can be transubstantiated into another body which is to say That the substance or essence of the body is changed into another substance or essence And on this absurd error they build their absurd Doctrine of Transubstantiation affirming That the substance of the Bread and Wine in the Eucharist or Supper after Consecration is transubstantiated that is changed into the substance of Christ's Body But as the Popish error of Transubstantiation is exceeding gross and hurtful so is the error of some no less gross but rather much more both gross and hurtful who feign That the glorified Body of Christ is Omnipresent so not only attributing to it above what a Body is capable of in its highest exaltation but what is a proper and peculiar Attribute of God Almighty and essential to him Into which gross error having fallen by their great ignorance they seek to defend it by grosly pervetting that place of Scripture Eph. 4 10. He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens that he might fill all things But it is not said here nor any where else in Scripture That his Body that was raised from the dead filleth all things but it is expresly said Acts 3. 21. That the heavens must receive him until the time of the restitution of all things which must needs be understood of his Body or bodily presence concerning which Christ said himself The poor you have always with you but me ye have not always viz. bodily though spiritually present But I would not have any to think that I deny that Christ's glorified Body can extend its Vertue to men here on earth as he pleaseth for that I readily grant and believe that both his Soul and Body