Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	book_n	scripture_n	tradition_n	2,890	5	9.1890	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89859	Weaknes above wickednes, and truth above subtilty. Which is the Quakers defence against the boaster and his deceitfull slanders. Clearly seen in an answer to a book called Quakers quaking; devised by Jeremiah Ive's against the dispised contemptible people trampled on by the world, and scorned by the scorners. In which the deceits are turned into the deceivers bosome, and the truth cleared from the accuser. In much plainesse, that the simple may see and perceive, and come to be gathered to the Lamb, from amongst the armies of the wicked, who have now set themselves against the Lord, and sees it not. Also some queries to Jeremy Ive's touching his false doctrine and deceits. / by one who is called, James Nayler.	Naylor, James, 1617?-1660.	1656 (1656)	Wing N327; ESTC R207303	22,439	32

an affirmative out of a negative if our mouths doe prove the Scripture to be the word then stop thy mouth who charges us for to denie it But thou goest on with thy divination because we say the Scriptures are a declaration of the mind of God from that thou devinest thus That which declares Gods will is Gods word But the Scriptures declares Gods will Ergo It is Gods word As much as if thou hadst said Balaams Asse declared Gods will Ergo Balaams Asse is Gods word Which I think few will affirme yet such is thy divination and thy proofe in this like the rest of thy Book And when thou hast thus done thou belyest us againe saying that we say the Scriptures are not Gods word which is false for where the Scriptures are given by Inspiration of God it is Gods word but when the Devill or the Infidell steals them out of a Book he gets but the letter which he wresteth to his own destruction in denying the Spirit therewith and opposing Christ the light of the world which is the next thing thou settest upon And though thou be made to confesse that Christ is the true light that lighteth every man that coms into the world yet would thou make people believe it is not sufficient and calls it an Errour for us to say that this light is able to teach a man to worship God rightly and yet here confounds thy selfe and confesseth that its nature and property hath such attendency that is sayest thou as if God had said I have done that which is sufficient for thy purgation and thus thou applyest to the light of Christ to prove that it is not sufficient and in plaine words afterwards confesseth that Christ had done that which is able to enlighten and informe the world and this light thou confessest he hath enlightned every one withall and yet calls it an Errour for us to say that his light is sufficient Hath not thy imaginations blinded thee herein doth this true light enlighten every man that cometh into the world and is able to enlighten and informe the world into the knowledge of it and hath it such a nature property and tendency and yet must be an errour to say that it is sufficient to guide in the wayes of God It seemeth thou mayest say a thing and confesse it for truth who denies it in the life but if we say it that live in it it is counted an Errour The next piece of thy divination is that if every man have received this light then every man hath received Christ for he is that Light and in this here is a double deceit First in seeming to deny what before thou confessed that Christ enlightens every man that comes into the world Secondly because Christ is that light thou wouldst make that light Christ which many have the light of Christ which lets them see their evill deeds but not believing and following never come to the new Birth or Christ formed in them but walk in darknesse though they see the light that doth reprove them thou bringest that Scripture John 11. 10. But if a man walk in the night he stumbleth because there is no light in him And with this thou wouldst deny that the light is in every man when as the words hath relation to his way which is true in the way of the wicked there is no light yet in the heart of the wicked there is a light which condemns his wicked wayes who is gone out of the light into the darknesse and so being in the night stumbles because the light is not in that way but in that which reproves that way so that he that is in selfe is in darknesse yet doth the light shine in the darknesse which manifests the deeds of darknesse and reproves them and this shall all men witnesse to whereby thy deceite shall be daily more laid open Thy next thing thou wouldst prove that the day of Judgement is not past I say my desire is that thou wouldst mind it and prepare for it by leaving thy lying and deceit and wicked envy for a wofull day will that be to thee if thou be found in thy sin pleading for it unrepented of all this heap of confusion in thy Book which thou hast raked together to cast upon the Truth will then lye heavy upon thy Head For thy Water Bread and Wine c. I have spoken to formerly which may stand till it be disproved Thy next work is to prove respect of persons a thing which God never commanded but hath often forbidden neither canst thou find one Scripture that commands it yet thy impudency is such that thou perverts that Scripture Lev. 19. 32. into a lye and faith it is Thou shalt honour the person What a standing Rule is this word of yours that the deceite can thus turne quite into another thing then it speaks the Devill likes such a word as he can turne every way to plead for his kingdome With it he can plead for his pride though it condemns pride For respect of persons though it forbid respect of persons For swearing though it say Swear not at all Nay is there any thing so vile which his subtilty in his servants cannot plead for therewith no wonder though in all his he thus contends for that to be the word which he can thus wrest for if the creature once believeth that to be the word which God hath written in their hearts which the Devill cannot change then is the Devill undone and his kingdome broken and his many wayes of deceit hedged up when that one way and one word comes to be known which word didst thou minde would judge the lyar in thee who faith we make it a note of our infallible ministry that we doe not reverence men and charges us with denying honour and respect due to Parents Masters Husbands and Wives c. a thing which never entred into our hearts but what our words and live doth witnesse against Another lie thou tellest That thou dare say not one of ten of us shall give the same Answer to a Question To which I say There is little that may be a reproach to the truth but thou dare say it But upon what ground doest thou say this having never proved ten of us therein and denying the Spirit of Prophesie in thee must it not be by the Divination of witchcraft by which thou can foretell such things as never was seen nor heard and indeed the more to be suspected because it is a lie Thy next thing thou would prove that Christ hath two bodies This I know That Christ is the head of one body and that Christ I own but how he hath two bodies and but one head or how thou wilt sever Christ from that body which ascended which is the head or make that into a head and a body I shall not here dispute with thee it serveth me to know that that body is my head and of the

true light and lighteth every man that cometh into the world but not within so that our Errour must be that we say the Light of Christ is spirituall and within and herein we have the witnesse of all those who had the faith of Christ and thereby knew what this light was which was in darknesse though the darknesse comprehended it not as Joh. 1. 5. which shined out of darknesse in their hearts which treasure they had in Earthen vessells 2 Cor. 4. 6 7. Ephes 5. 13. with many other places and much it matters not what the Infidell who hath denyed the faith of Christ saith against it Some Queries thou askes which I shall answer so far as there is any thing worth the answering in them 1. First then what need is there of Scripture to declare the mind of God I answer they testifie hereof against such as thee 2. Whether that Light will shew that the Virgin had a Son 3. Can it shew that Christ dyed and rose againe in three dayes 4. What favour it was to the people of Israel to have the written Law c. 5. Whether men by the Light within could have known Christ should have been born at Jerusalem c. To all which I answer all these things and much more was made known by the Light before they was written in the letter but being believed generally there is no such necessity that he should make a declaration of those things againe in this Nation but that he should Minister the substance to wit Christ in Spirit which none can know without this Light though they have the letter no more then they could know Christ when he came who read in the letter that he was to be born at Bethlem who might as well have askt him who bad them believe in the Light of the world that they might be the children of Light but would this Light have told us that there was an Ark builded by Moses and a Temple builded by Solomon and how many years it was a building and many other visible things which they too much doated on already and here was thou not blind might thou read thy selfe and more of thy Generation and see that the end of thy Queries is but to discover thy selfe where thou art Thou askes further Whether the Name of Christ may be known to all the world by the Light within them without Scripture or tradition I say yea and by nothing else without it for the Name of Christ consists not of Letters and sillables but in righteousnesse mercy and judgement c. which Name none can know but by the Light of the world though many of you read your Bibles who are the greatest enemies to his Name such is your knowledge as appears by your practice Other Questions thou askes the substance whereof is What then needs our books or our preaching is not that superfluous I say our preaching serves to direct people to the light which such as thou who are Reprobate to the Faith of Christ and knows not the mystery thereof which is held in a pure conscience have led them out from and some of our Book serve to manifest your folly and wickednesse before all the world but hadst thou not been partially blind thou might ask thy selfe this question and thy Brethren who would make the letter the Light and would hold it forth onely for sufficiency what need your divining from it if it be sufficient of it selfe but thy faith teacheth not that doctrine to doe as they would be done by Thy fifth errour thou chargest us with is touching John Lawson being accused for saying the day of judgement was past and this is an accusation like the rest thou says he goes about to prove it in Sauls Errand so he having answered for himselfe it may be seen whether he own it or no by them that read that book For those words wherewith he is accused I own not The sixth Errour thou sayest that George Fox said he was the eternall Judge of the world and thy proofe is the Priests Petition and that George denies it not as thou sayes but saith the Saints shall judge the world to which I say to what George saith herein we own but the Priests accusation and thy proofe we deny Thy seventh errour was that George Fox said I am the way the truth and the life and this thou proves like the rest as thou proved foaming at our meetings because he denies it not but saith the old Man cannot endure to hear the new man speak and so doe I say so also for where Christ speaks in Male or Female he is what he testifies himselfe to be if thou canst receive it thou may Thy eigth Errour is that Fox said that he which took a text of Scripture and made a Sermon of it was a Conjurer and this thou would disprove by Phillips speaking to the Eunuch to which I say those are not Georges words as thou speaks them but the words of the accuser neither did George speak of what Phillip did who was immediately sent of God nor of what was done in that generation by them who owned the spirituall Light of Christ but of what is done now by such Diviners as deny the Faith of Christ and his Call and Spirit in them and what such raiseth must needs be conjuration who denyes the faith and Spirit of God Thy ninth Errour is that he saith the Scriptures are carnall and this is a lye like the rest for he saith the letter of the Scriptures are carnall for a Scripture is known before the letter was though the blind see it not and that Scripture we doe not say is carnall but own it to be the word of God and our Rule who doe not walk after a carnall rule though not contrary to the letter Thy tenth Errour is against one Leonard Hill a name I neither know nor own and so I passe it by as not necessary for me to contend about The eleaventh Errour is John Lawson againe that he said he had been in Hell and is now in Heaven to which I say though it seem an Errour to thee yet this is plaine that the Saints have witnessed being in Hell and in Heaven also as is plain in Scripture which thou that calls it an error art ignorant of as is plain in these Scriptures with divers others Jonah 2. 2. Psal 16. 10. Ephes 2 6. 2 Cor. 12. 2 4. And they was not in an errour who witnessed this nor he if it was true in him Thy twelsth Errour is that we say we are perfect and sin not and this thou repeats over againe in thy eighteenth Error and calls it a lye but the lye being thine own twice told over I leave it with thee till thou prove it yet doe we own perfection and believe in it which is not that we never had as thou falsly sayest but as we have received Christ so we have received perfection in whom all selfe boasting is

called a lye but not proved one and time will prove it otherwise The fifth lye is that James Naylor in a written Paper calls thee shamelesse Man for tempting him to deny the Lord. The sixth lye is that James Naylor in the same Paper said if he had come in his own name thou wouldst have received him as was confessed by thee To both which I answer as many can witnesse with me at the dispute which occasioned the Letter when I denyed thy faith to be the the faith of God or any of his Saints and proffered to prove it so before all the people if thou would put it upon tryall thou denyed my request unlesse I would deny my Call from God and say I was called some other way or else there work a miracle and then thou wouldst put thy faith on tryall according to my request which if this was not to tempt me to deny the Lord and his Call to obtaine a dispute wherein I could not be received while I confessed to come in the Name of God which another way in my own name and will thou proffered to receive me And this being done before many witnesses was the occasion of these words in my Letter as followeth O Shameless man was ever such a thing demanded by any child of God to tempt one to deny the Lord yea the Heathen would blush at such a thing to send for one to dispute and then to deny to come t otryall with that they call the Rule and touchstone unlesse they whom they did dispute with would deny their God first Hast not thou proved thy selfe worse then any that ever disputed with the Apostles or any of the Servants of God that ever he sent forth Dost thou professe the Scriptures and is it become such an odious thing to thee to come in the name of God that for that very thing thou drust not put thy Faith upon tryall by Scripture nor could receive me but if I would come in my own name thou would as thou plainly confessed that if I would say I was not sent of God thou would put thy Faith upon tryall c. Now the things being true before related as many can witnesse where the lye is in these words let honesty judge and let any mind the wicked one how he hath perverted my words to slander me with saying that I said if I had come in my own name he would have received me as saith he I said he did plainly confesse and leaves out the rest which words as I writ them runs thus as thou plainly confessed That if I would say I was not sent of God then thou would put thy Faith on tryall The truth of which words will be witnessed by many that heard that thou pretended that very thing to hinder the tryall of thy faith because of my coming in the name of God And further thou added that if I was one sent of God it was to no purpose to put thy faith on tryall with me for I would overturne all thy proofes or words to that purpose as may be testified by many witnesses So the lyes be to thy selfe and on thy head till thou repent thereof but peace and truth to him that loves it Thy seventh lie is that while one ran from Bull Mouth to thy house for the Paper I slipt away which is a most abominable falshood as hundreds can witnesse that I went not away till the meeting broke up neither knew I of any such thing as the Letter fetching neither have I yet run from your filthy lyes envy much les shall I run from the truths written with my own hand which I here have owned and clearly proved to be truth thee to be the lyar and and shall further doe it if to the truth it may be service able And when thou hast done thou sayest these a are but a few of those Legions of Lyes that are in our writings and preachings when the Lyes are thy own raised by that Spirit of Insidelity who having denyed the Faith of Christ would turne his truth into a lye and was thou not impudent in thy wickednesse thou might be ashamed of thy birth thou hast brought forth who hath been hunting for accusations against the truth but canst find none and so runs to a sort of hurling Priests and their false accusations thou preachest for Truths being of the same nature with them their reports agree most with thy spirit and thy foundation being deceit thy work falls upon thy own head Then thou makes a boast of something that thou wouldst prove the first thing is the writings of the Scripture to be the word of God this thou wouldst prove from Mark 7. to where Christ saith They that doe not honour their father and mother maketh the word of God of none effect saying that he faith their making this written Law of none effect which is false for his words are Making the word of God of none effect through your traditions but thou that wouldst make the letter of that command the word which was written in stone if thou readest 2 Cor. 3. thou mighst find the Apostle denies that or to be any Minister of it and saith that ministration is done away and owns the ministration of the Spirit and not of the letter so thou hast lost thy word if the Apostle saith true and a new proofe thou must seek to prove the letter the word Another proofe thou brings is from Jer. 36. where thou wouldst prove that the letter of that Role is the word of God which Baruck read so by thy proofe the word of God may be burnt if that Role be it and so thy word of God is lost that which was written in that Role not so much as being in the Bible and with such confused stuffe as this thou makest thy proofes which the least of wisdome would be ashamed of If that engraven in stone be the word and that in Baruks role the word and both wanting the letter of the one and the matter of the other then there is two of the words lost and how thou wilt prove that which is lost to be the word now wisdome may judge who knowes the word of the Lord that endures for ever what ever becomes of the letter but a literall ministration suits best with thy made faith how should that faith which comes not from God believe the living word but like thy fore-fathers the Jews who were deaf and blind as thou art who could read the Scriptures but the word of God had no place in them who could heare Christ speak literally with their carnall ears but could not hear his word Thy next proofe is as confused as the rest thou sayest thou would prove the Scriptures to be the word of God out of our own mouths and yet thy accusation against us is that we deny the Scriptures to be the word what conjuration is this that thou art about who canst prove

Church which is his body which cannot be said to be Christ distinct from that body and so cannot properly be said to have two bodies the one of them being the Christ Neither doe we herein deny that Christ our head to take flesh wholly as thou falsly accuseth us but we own him that came from Heaven and is ascended into Heaven that word that became flesh and dwelt among us which thou knowest not who hath denied that faith which is the gift of God with Himancus Pluentus with whom thou wouldst charge us adding a lie thereto as though we say the Resurrection is past And another lie thou tellest that one of us being asked the Question answers that Christ was but a figure and to prove that lie thou sayest See Sauls Errand to Damascus page 54. when that Book hath but 37 pages in it a sutable proof for such a lie Neither is there such an Answer by any of us in all that Book as thus thou proves thy work with thy owne shame And thou goes on to tell whom we have affinity with as Gnosticks and Mamchers c. but is not thy affinity with them who art so well skill'd in their Opinions which we meddle not with and is it not by their Spirit which thou boasts to know what ten of us will say before hand their Spirits we deny and thine also with the Papists and the rest which thy filthy mind would compare us to to make us odious that with the rest of thy bundle of light vain frothy talk and stories which thou hast set in thy Book which airie spirit stinks and its words in the nostrills of all sober men as thy long story of a Monk set in a Chaire of carrying a bushel of coals to Newcastle of Hares and Hounds of Apes and coulting language and such filthy stuffe as thou fillest thy Book with might sute a Stage-play more like then a sober Christian all which we turn thee back with the heap of thy confusion which in thy Book is not worth answering Then thou comest to the conclusion as thou sayest and thou exhortest that every one would compare what thou hast writ with the holy Scripture and then judge So say I also that they may see thee a perverter of Scripture and a liar as I have proved thee Another lie thou tellest also that all that thou hast writ against us is either from our own mouths or our own writings when the greatest part of the accusations thou hast gathered out of a bloody persecuting Petition of the Priests of Westmorland which are their lies cast upon us not our words nor writings And the rest are such as with thy Divination thou hast raised out of the bottomlesse pit which with the truth are turned upon thine own head but us they touch not Something more thou makest as though thou couldst say of the evill manners of some of our Teachers but thou forbeatest To which I say they that are blind may believe it is thy moderation but who hath an eye to see how into the depth of Satan thou art gone to drag up all this filth in thy book to cast upon us who are clear of it I say he who well notes this will find cause to be of another mind Thou addest a Postscript to thy Book no lesse full of wickednesse then the rest and that is wherein thou hast perverted my words into a lye who was speaking of the two Seeds the Old Man and the New one born after the flesh the other after the Spirit and because I said that Christ is not born after the flesh but after the Spirit this thou wouldst pervert as though I denied Christ come in the flesh at Jerusalem which some seeing thy murtherous mind at that time did write down the words then spoken and have set to their hands which may shew thy wickednesse and clear the truth as followeth 22d 4th Month 1656. At the Bull Mouth in Martins London JAmes Naylor declaring of the two Seeds the Seed of the Woman and the Seed of the Serpent the light being in the One and the Darknesse in the other in reference to what Jeremy Ives alledged from that Scripture He that walketh not according to this Rule it is because there is no light in him said That Christ was not born after the flesh but after the Spirit That that which was born after the flesh was flesh and that which was born after the Spirit was Spirit and except a man was born of water and the Spirit he cannot see the Kingdome of God Jeremy Ives hearing what was spoken said I have now what I lookt for and afterwards demanded of James Naylor the same thing againe James Naylor said That Christ was not borne after the flesh but after the Spirit and immediately adjoyned For that which is born after the flesh is flesh and that which is born after the Spirit is Spirit And also said that Christ was begotten of the Father and born of the Virgin that he was true flesh and true blood and that he appeared in the likenesse of sinfull flesh but was not sinfull Hest And these words he spake together whereof we are Witnesses George Bishop Richard Greneway Robert Rich. William Wilson Richard Davies Humfrey Wollrich Robert Dring John Clarke AND whereas thou sayest the Scripture makes no such distinction as born after the flesh and after the Spirit read Gal. 4. 29. and thou mayest see that lie contradicted And that be that is born after the flesh is a persecuter of him that is born after the Spirit So it was before Christ suffered at Jerusalem and so it is now Neither was Christ as he was born of Mary born after the flesh but by promise begotten and brought forth though he was true and holy flesh in the likenesse of sinsull flesh but not sinfull flesh being begotten not of sinfull flesh but of the Holy Ghost by the word of the promise which word became flesh but is not after the flesh but how shouldst thou know what he is that came down from Heaven or how he is born who hast denied the faith which is the gift of God Thy earthly faith knowes not the heavenly body whose flesh is the life of all Creatures how it is begotten neither how it is born A Promise thou makest in the latter end of thy Book which here I mind thee of which if thou perform may be profitable to thy soule therefore I am the more willing to put thee on it The Promise is this That if by the words of truth it shall be made manifest that thou hast spoken any untruth thou shalt with readinesse of mind make a publick acknowledgement of it unto the world which if thou perform now that thy lies are clearly laid open there is not much of thy Book that must stand undenied But that Spirit which made the Promise so far before hand whose repentance stands in thy own will will never perform this Promise Thou