Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
word_n blood_n cup_n shed_v 3,852 5 10.6243 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A88151 A battell with a vvaspes nest, or, A reply to an angry and railing pamphlet, written by Master Joseph Heming, called Judas excommunicated, or A vindication of the communion of saints &c. wherein his arguments are answered, his abuses whipt and stript, the question whether Judas received the sacrament debated, and the affirmative proved ... Lightfoot, Peter, 17th cent. 1649 (1649) Wing L2073; ESTC R42276 44,133 53

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

enough for him to make quidlibet è quolibet as he can doe it most excellently 3. He concludes that Christ washed not his Disciples feet at Bethany but at the supper at Jerusalem the same night he was betrayed Joh. 13. This is written in a Gospel of his own making for it is not written in Joh. 13 so is his next conclusion That the sop was given at an ordinary common Supper which Christ had the same night before he ate the Passeover Let him find fair evidence for either of these in any of the foure Evangelists that we read and I will say I never read them Sure this man would make an excellent new Gospel And now let me use his owne style and conclude too I conclude against all he hath said or can say but beare witnesse I challenge none of his friends 1. That the supper in Joh. 13. at which Judas received the sop was before the Passeover festivall ver 1. 29. 2. That every night for five or six nights together before the Passeover Christ lodged in the mount of Olives and if Mr. Heming can tell where but at Bethany let him shew it Mat. 21.17 Mat. 11.19 and 13.1 2. Luk. 21.37 3. That two nights before the Passeover he supped at Bethany Mat. 26.2 6. 4. That from that supper Iudas began his treason Mat. 26.14 5. That hee began his treason upon Satans entring into him Luk. 22.3 4. 6. That Satan entred into him upon his receiving of the sop Iohn 13.27 Ergo. 7. That Judas received the sop at Bethany two dayes before the Passeover Now because Mr. Heming according to his common charity doth charge me for contra-conscientiously and wickedly wresting the Scripture for the maintaining of this my conclusion I shall desire the Reader equally and impartially to judge between us whether of us wrest these texts that we have had to deal with about he or I. 1. I say the supper Ioh. 13. was before the Passeover day because the text saith It was before the feast of the Passeover ver 1. Hee saith That supper Iohn 13. was on the Passeover night though the text doth say It was before the feast of the Passeover Whether of us doe more wrest this Scripture 2 I say that when some of the Disciples thought that Iesus bade Iudas buy something against the feast the Disciples knew that the feast was coming and it was not yet come Hee saith what the Disciples thought proceeded from their ignorance whether of us do more wrest and wrong this text and the Disciples 3. I say that that supper at Bethany Mat. 26. Mar. 14. was two dayes before the Passeover because the Evangelists doe presently before speak of two dayes before the Passeover He saith that supper at Bethany Mat. 26. Mar. 14. was six dayes before the Passeover though the Evangelists do presently before speak of two dayes before the Passeover Whether of us doe more wrest the Scripture here 4. I say the method and order in that place of Mat. 26. Mar. 14. is direct and I take the stories without misplacing them He saith the method and order there is not direct and hee doth misplace the stories Whether of us do offer the more violence to the Evangelists 5. I say the supper in Ioh. 12. and the supper in Mat. 26. Mar. 14. were two different suppers because one is dated six dayes before the Passeover and the other two the one was in the house of Lazarus the other in the house of Simon the leper at the one Christs head is anointed at the other his feet Hee saith the supper in Iohn 12. and the supper in Mat. 26. Mar. 14. is one and the same supper though one be dated six dayes before the Passeover and the other two though the one were in the house of Lazarus and the other in the house of Simon the Leper and though at the one Christs head were anointed and at the other his feet Let all the world judg whether he or I doe more wrest the Scripture My second Assertion is this That Judas received the Sacrament of the Lords Supper For the proof of which I produce Mat. 26.20 Mar. 14.17 where it is said That Jesus sate down with the twelve and hee taxeth Judas for treason Mar. 14.13 Luk. 22.21 To this Mr. Heming saith but what he had said before 1. 'T is true saith he he sate down at Jerusalem with the twelve of whom Judas was one in the common or ordinary supper 2. 'T is as true that there as Mr. Light-foote doth most righteously affirm for the truth to the deeper wounding of his cause he taxed Judas for treason gave him the sop and discovered him and not at Bethany two dayes before Repl. I thank you that you wil once grant I speak truth but you think it is for your own turne But I pray you how doth that that I affirm wound my cause I say Jesus taxed Iudas of treason at the Passeover supper and I say he taxed him of treason at the supper at Bethany two nights before what wound do I give to my cause by this If you find any advantage by it make use of it Wel He granteth Iudas was at the common supper but how missed he of the Sacrament why Mr. H. will tell you as directly as if he had been there that he was taxed for treason and the sop given him so he discovered and packt away before the Sacrament was in hand And thus he makes a story of his own head of the sop given at the Passeover supper which he will never be able to prove while his name is Mr. H. but the story of the Evangelist that determines the case he slippeth over and speaks not one word to it I cite Luke 22.21 to prove Iudas present at the Sacrament and this M. H. saw was like enough to wound his cause and therefore I shall commend his wit another time he answers it with grave silence not speaking one word to it It is apparent by Luke that Iudas was at Table after the giving of the Sacrament Consider his words Luk. 22. ver 19. And he took bread and gave thanks and brake it and gave unto them saying This is my body c. ver 20. likewise the cup after supper saying This cup is the new Testament in my blood which is shed for you ver 21. But behold the hand of him that betrayeth me is with mee on the table What say you to this Mr. Heming where was Iudas now I pray you when his hand was on the table Give me a direct clear answer to evidence that he was not at table at the delivering of the Sacramentall cup and I shall say you are an oracle indeed But let me have your answer out of the Gospel of Matthew Mark Luk or Iohn not out of a Gospel of your own making Can any thing be plainer for my assertion then this But behold spel me those two words let me see