Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	blood_n	bread_n	consecration_n	4,106	5	10.7048	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A79832	Seventeen sermons preach'd upon several occasions By William Clagett, D.D. late preacher to the Honourable Society of Grays Inn, and one of His Majesty's chaplains in ordinary. With the summ of a conference, on February 21, 1686. between Dr. Clagett and Father Gooden, about the point of transubstantiation. The third edition. Vol. I.	Clagett, William, 1646-1688.; Gooden, Peter, d. 1695. aut; Sharp, John, 1645-1714.	1699 (1699)	Wing C4398; ESTC R230511	209,157	515

debt_n to_o his_o memory_n to_o subjoin_v here_o a_o true_a copy_n of_o these_o paper_n there_o be_v several_a of_o they_o abroad_o both_o to_o prevent_v a_o imperfect_a edition_n from_o some_o other_o hand_n and_o lest_o mr._n gooden_o and_o his_o friend_n who_o be_v so_o silent_a in_o his_o life-time_n shall_v take_v occasion_n to_o raise_v any_o false_a report_n of_o this_o encounter_n if_o they_o think_v they_o can_v not_o be_v disprove_v now_o he_o be_v dead_a and_o if_o the_o great_a esteem_n i_o have_v for_o that_o excellent_a person_n and_o most_o useful_a instrument_n of_o god_n service_n in_o our_o late_a dangerous_a and_o critical_a time_n do_v not_o render_v i_o a_o very_a incompetent_a judge_n of_o whatever_o come_v from_o his_o hand_n the_o reader_n will_v find_v even_o in_o these_o short_a note_n enough_o to_o reward_v his_o pain_n and_o to_o keep_v he_o from_o think_v the_o time_n lose_v that_o he_o shall_v please_v to_o spend_v in_o the_o perusal_n of_o they_o a_o private_a conference_n between_o dr._n clagett_n and_o father_n gooden_o about_o transubstantiation_n etc._n etc._n father_n gooden_o propose_v the_o rule_n of_o faith_n to_o be_v the_o subject_a of_o the_o conference_n but_o upon_o the_o request_n of_o the_o lady_n for_o who_o sake_n it_o be_v the_o question_n of_o transubstantiation_n be_v take_v and_o the_o father_n desire_v that_o the_o doctor_n will_v be_v the_o opponent_n the_o question_n be_v state_v on_o both_o side_n dr._n that_o the_o doctrine_n of_o transubstantiation_n be_v false_a doctrine_n and_o that_o the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n be_v not_o in_o the_o sacrament_n but_o in_o heaven_n fa._n that_o after_o the_o word_n of_o consecration_n the_o true_a body_n and_o blood_n of_o christ_n be_v in_o the_o holy_a eucharist_n and_o that_o the_o manner_n be_v well_o express_v by_o transubstantiation_n dr._n this_o be_v not_o all_o the_o doctrine_n of_o transubstantiation_n in_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n of_o rome_n be_v this_o that_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o bread_n be_v change_v into_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n and_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o wine_n be_v change_v into_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n blood_n which_o change_v the_o church_n of_o rome_n do_v convenient_o call_v transubstantiation_n if_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n remain_v in_o the_o eucharist_n than_o it_o be_v not_o change_v into_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n but_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n remain_v in_o the_o eucharist_n therefore_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n be_v not_o change_v into_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n fath._n i_o deny_v the_o minor_a viz._n that_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n do_v remain_v d._n if_o bread_n remain_v the_o substance_n of_o bread_n remain_v but_o bread_n remain_v therefore_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n remain_v fath._n if_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n remain_v bread_n remain_v but_o if_o only_a the_o name_n of_o bread_n and_o species_n remain_v than_o bread_n do_v not_o remain_v dr._n that_o bread_n which_o be_v proper_o natural_a bread_n remain_v in_o the_o eucharist_n be_v prove_v from_o 1_o cor._n 11.26_o as_o often_o as_o you_o eat_v this_o bread_n and_o drink_v this_o cup_n you_o do_v show_v forth_o the_o lord_n death_n till_o he_o come_v 1_o cor._n 10.16_o the_o bread_n which_o we_o break_v be_v it_o not_o the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n now_o from_o hence_o we_o argue_v thus_o if_o that_o which_o be_v here_o say_v to_o be_v break_v and_o to_o be_v the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n be_v proper_o natural_a bread_n then_o that_o which_o be_v proper_o natural_a bread_n remain_v in_o the_o eucharist_n fath._n i_o grant_v the_o major_a dr._n but_o that_o which_o be_v here_o say_v to_o be_v break_v and_o to_o be_v the_o communion_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n be_v proper_o natural_a bread_n ergo_fw-la proper_o natural_a bread_n remain_v in_o the_o eucharist_n fath._n i_o deny_v the_o minor_n dr._n the_o bread_n of_o which_o saint_n paul_n speak_v be_v bread_n that_o may_v be_v break_v and_o therefore_o it_o be_v true_o and_o proper_o natural_a bread_n fath._n i_o distinguish_v the_o antecedent_n as_o to_o the_o accident_n and_o appearance_n of_o bread_n it_o may_v be_v break_v as_o to_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n it_o can_v because_o it_o be_v not_o there_o dr._n this_o be_v to_o beg_v the_o question_n for_o the_o question_n be_v whether_o bread_n be_v there_o or_o not_o and_o the_o argument_n to_o prove_v that_o it_o be_v there_o be_v because_o saint_n paul_n speak_v of_o bread_n that_o may_v be_v and_o be_v break_v but_o it_o be_v no_o sufficient_a answer_n to_o this_o to_o say_v that_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n may_v be_v break_v because_o the_o bread_n be_v not_o there_o itself_o which_o be_v the_o thing_n that_o be_v disprove_v fath._n the_o question_n to_o be_v prove_v be_v that_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n be_v there_o therefore_o it_o be_v not_o a_o beg_n of_o the_o question_n according_a to_o the_o distinction_n give_v to_o say_v that_o the_o nature_n of_o bread_n be_v not_o there_o and_o consequent_o can_v not_o be_v break_v for_o the_o bread_n there_o speak_v of_o be_v not_o mean_v of_o natural_a bread_n but_o of_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n and_o which_o be_v the_o flesh_n of_o christ_n john_n 6.41_o i_o be_o the_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n john_n 6.48_o i_o be_o the_o bread_n of_o life_n ver._n 50_o 51_o 52_o 53_o 54_o 55_o 56_o 58._o from_o whence_o i_o infer_v my_o answer_n to_o be_v good_a that_o though_o the_o h._n eucharist_n be_v call_v bread_n and_o break_v as_o to_o the_o species_n of_o bread_n yet_o it_o be_v not_o natural_a bread_n but_o only_o in_o appearance_n of_o which_o st._n paul_n speak_v for_o the_o same_o st._n paul_n 1_o cor._n 11._o speak_v of_o the_o same_o bread_n say_v he_o that_o eat_v and_o drink_v unworthy_o eat_v and_o drink_v damnation_n to_o himself_o not_o discern_v the_o body_n of_o our_o lord_n christ_n also_o speak_v of_o the_o same_o bread_n say_v take_v eat_v this_o be_v my_o body_n matt._n 26.26_o also_o luk._n 22.19_o speak_v of_o the_o same_o eucharist_n this_o be_v my_o body_n which_o be_v give_v for_o you_o dr._n the_o answerer_n forget_v the_o part_n of_o a_o disputant_n have_v pretend_v to_o prove_v large_o by_o the_o six_o chapter_n of_o st._n john_n and_o other_o place_n of_o scripture_n that_o st._n paul_n in_o the_o aforementioned_a place_n do_v not_o speak_v of_o bread_n proper_o so_o call_v although_o he_o speak_v of_o bread_n that_o be_v to_o be_v break_v all_o which_o place_n when_o it_o be_v my_o turn_n to_o answer_v i_o will_v consider_v particular_o but_o if_o that_o which_o be_v here_o say_v be_v to_o go_v for_o a_o answer_n the_o force_n of_o it_o lie_v in_o this_o that_o by_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o we_o be_v to_o understand_v the_o bread_n which_o st._n john_n speak_v of_o namely_o the_o bread_n which_o come_v down_o from_o heaven_n by_o which_o the_o answerer_n understand_v the_o natural_a and_o proper_a flesh_n of_o christ_n but_o that_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o can_v be_v the_o natural_a flesh_n of_o christ_n i_o prove_v thus_o the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o be_v break_v but_o the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n can_v be_v break_v ergo_fw-la the_o bread_n which_o st._n paul_n speak_v of_o can_v be_v the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n fath._n as_o to_o the_o species_n and_o appearance_n of_o bread_n it_o be_v break_v i_o grant_v it_o as_o to_o any_o nature_n contain_v under_o those_o species_n of_o bread_n i_o deny_v it_o dr._n this_o distinction_n do_v not_o avoid_v the_o argument_n because_o if_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n paul_n and_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n john_n be_v real_o and_o proper_o the_o same_o and_o the_o bread_n in_o st._n john_n be_v real_o and_o proper_o the_o flesh_n of_o christ_n than_o what_o be_v affirm_v of_o the_o one_o must_v be_v true_a of_o the_o other_o and_o therefore_o if_o the_o bread_n be_v break_v in_o st._n paul_n than_o the_o natural_a body_n of_o christ_n must_v be_v break_v too_o which_o can_v be_v i_o add_v further_o that_o if_o by_o break_v of_o bread_n st._n paul_n mean_v break_v the_o accident_n of_o bread_n only_o and_o if_o the_o bread_n that_o be_v break_v be_v real_o that_o which_o be_v speak_v of_o in_o st._n john_n as_o aforesaid_a it_o follow_v also_o that_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n be_v proper_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n fath._n that_o which_o st._n paul_n call_v bread_n have_v in_o it_o both_o the_o accident_n of_o bread_n and_o the_o substance_n of_o christ_n body_n as_o to_o the_o