by words and externall signes If it be by words committed to writing for continuance we vse to those writings wherein be contained graunts couenants to put seales which serue for the further ratifying confirming of them If a man take possession of a peece of ground he doth it not only by vttering certaine words but for further confirmation thereof he diggeth vp and taketh a clod or péece of earth in his hand If a man make a promise to do this or that he doth it not onely by words and spéech but for ratifying thereof giueth his hand When a King or Quéene take vpon them the gouernement of a kingdome they do it not onely by certaine words but also they haue a crowne set vpon their head and a septer put in their hand which be outward signes and tokens of that dignitie dominion which they receiue And thus commonly wée deale in all other matters Whereby we sée and plainely perceiue that our gratious God hauing in mercy respect to our infirmitie as it were humbling himself to our capacity doth vse the like meanes in offring to vs our saluation in Iesus Christ that we vse in these earthly matters and affaires that is to wit his word wherin be contained his swéet promises of mercy 2. Cor. 6.16 that he will be our God and we his people that he will bée mercifull to our iniquities Heb. 8 â—0 12. neuer remember our sins any more sacrameÌ„ts which being outward signes elements he doth annex vnto his word to seale those promises the more effectuallie to confirme them vnto our consciences Hereby as I said we may learn the true nature and vse of Sacraments which is to seale confirme gods promises vnto vs thereby to strengthen our faith in them and to be gages and pledges to vs of our saluation in Christ Iesus For this cause it is said that Iesus tooke bread It now followeth And when he had blessed c. The papists by blessing vnderstand consecrating and by coÌ„secration they meane a conuerting by the speaking of certeine wordes of one thing into another But this is not true consecration but rather a magicall incantation neyther can they shewe any good Latine writer that euer vsed this Latine word Consecrare in such sense but it signifieth to dedicate a thing to a holy vse And so we do consecrate the sacrament when by preaching gods word rehearsing the institutioÌ„ of Iesus Christ and calling vpon God by prayer we do take the bread wine from a common vse to be a sacrament of Christs bodie and blood giuen for vs to be a seale of Gods promises and a pledge of our saluation in Christ Iesus This is our consecration which is true consecration as for their secreat whispering of certain words to turne one thing into another we will none of it we are content they vse it which is more méete for wicked coniurers then godly Christians But in this place by blessing is ment nothing els but thanksgiuing as most plainelie appeareth in the next verse for wheras it is said that Christ taking the bread did blesse in the verse following it is said that he taking the cuppe gaue thankes And whereas S. Matthew S. Marke say that he taking the bread blessed Matth. 26 2â— Mark 12.22 Luk. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 S. Luke and S. Paul say that he gaue thanks Wherby it most plainly appeareth that blessing and thanksgiuing is al one the which also is euident by that saying of S. Paul 1. Cor. 14.16 when thou blessest in the spirit how shall he that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned say Amen at thy giuing of thanks séeing he knoweth not what thou saiest heere it is most plaine that which S. Paul in the former part calleth blessing in the latter he calleth thansgiuing So that our sauiour Christ when he blessed gaue thanks to his heauenly father And as our Sauiour did neuer tast any of Gods creatures but always as the Gospel sheweth he gaue thanks to God his father to teach vs that we should walke in his steps and whensoeuer we receiue or inioy any of Gods benefites alwaies to giue God thanks for them from whose hand gratious goodnes we do receiue them so here at this time no doubt but our sauiour Christ had a further respect giueth thaÌ„ks to his father for his great infinite mercy to mankind for that great wonderful work of our redemption which he was then ready to accomplish Whereby we haue in like manner to learne that as we ought to giue God most hearty thankes for all good giftes which he giueth vs al benefits that he bestoweth vpon vs so when we come to this holy Supper of Iesus Christ wée ought to consider on the one side our owne mysery by sinne how that we be of our selues childreÌ„ of wrath enimies of gods grace vnprofitable seruants yea prodigall children which are not worthie to be called or counted Gods children on the other side gods great and infinite mercy who spared not his owne deare sonne but gaue him for vs to redéeme vs and reconcile vs to his mercy and to be a spiritual foode to norish vs to eternall life Of these inestimable mercies wée ought most specially when we come to this holy table to bée mindfull and to giue God most harty thanks for them Not onely in sounding forth the praises of God with our tongues but also in indeuoring carefully to yéeld holy obedience to God in our liues And for this cause the godly fathers called this sacrament Eucharistia which doth signifie thanks giuing for that it being a pledge of our redemption saluation by Iesus Christ we should when we receiue it giue thanks vnto god for the same The which I beséech you as at all times so specially when yée come to this holy mistery diligeÌ„tly for to do Xenoph. lib. 1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The old Persians condemned no sin more greatly nor punished none more seuerely then vnthankfulnes If therefore we be not sincerely thaÌ„kful to God for his great mercies powred vpoÌ„ vs by Iesus Christ we shal not escape his fearefull and terrible plagues It followeth He brake it and gaue it to his disciples c. The breaking of the bread doth set forth vnto vs the breaking of Christs body the powring of the wine the shedding of his blood vpon the crosse for vs for this sacrament is as it were a glasse for vs to beholde Christ crucified in hereunto we must apply all the holy actions vsed in the administration thereof So the giuing of the bread and wine representeth vnto vs the giuing of Iesus Christ for vs once vpon the crosse for our redemption and dayly to be a spiritual food to nourish vs to eternall life The receiuing also of the bread and wine into our bodies doth signifie shew vnto vs our inward receiuing of Iesus Christ into our hearts
my body And by this reason prooueth our Sauiour Christs bodie to be not spectrum or phantasma a ghost or phantasticall body as Marcion that monster blasphemed but a true body like vnto ours because the Sacrament is a figure of it which it could not be except it were a true body But the Papists doctrin in this point sauoreth strongly of Martions blasphemie for to say that Christs body is in heauen and earth yea and in infinite places of the earth at one instant and that the natural real body of Christ is vnder the formes of bread and wine without any forme quality or quantity of a body without breadth length or thicknes what is this but to make it no true body as Martion did And euen so S. Augustine intreating of Christs bodie saith Epist 57. ad Dardanum NaÌ„ spatia locorum tolle corporibus nusqueÌ„ erunt quia nusquam erunt non erunt Tolle ipsa corpora qualitatibus corporum non erit vbi sint ideo necesse est vt non sint i. for take from bodies the spaces of place they shal be no where and because they be no no where they be not at al. Take the bodies from the qualities of bodies there can be no place where they may be and therfore it must of necessitie be that they be not But the Papists attribute neither place nor qualitie to Christs bodie in the sacrament therefore by S. Augustines iudgement they make it no body and so as I said agrée in one with that monster Martian But to returne to my purpose and to shew that the fathers haue expounded those words of our sauiour Christ in that sense which I haue before declared Augustine saith I may expound that commaundement to be put in the signe Lib. cont Adunantum Maneche dist cap. 12. for our Lord did not doubt to say This is my body when he gaue a signe of his bodie In Psal 3. in 1. â—or 11. Again he admitted him Iudas to the feast wherein he commended and deliuered to his disciples a figure of his bodie and blood Ambrose saith De iis qui initiantur cap. 9. In eating and drinking we do signifie the bodie and blood of Christ which were offered for vs. Againe De Conseâ—ra dist 2. cap. Reuera before Consecration it is named an other kind after Consecration the bodie of Christ is signified The gréeke Fathers in like maner call the sacrament a signe figure or token of Christs body Gegory NazianzeÌ„ Apâ—lâ—g pâ—g 1◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 how dare he which first hath not offred himselfe a liuely sacrifice offer to God that outward sacrifice which is a signe or example of those great mysteries and the like he hath in his oration vpon his sister Gorgonia Basile saith Pag. 56. In Canâ—â—â—â—â—turgia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he hath left vnto vs memorials or remembrances of his passion by which commeth saluation which according to his commaundement we propound vnto you So Theodoritus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tell me therfore Dialog 2. those mysticall signes which of the priests bee offered to God of what things be they signes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Lords bodie and blood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of his true bodie or not of his true bodie or not of his true bodie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of his true bodie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verie wel for an image must haue a patterne whereof it is an Image 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 euen as Painters also do imitate nature and paint the images of those things that be séene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if then the diuine mysteries be signes or figures of a true bodie the bodie of our Lord is yet a bodie not changed into the nature of the godhead but replenished with diuine glory Homil. 27. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So saith Macarius In the Church is offered bread and wine examples of his flesh and blood These places that I alledge no moe sufficiently shew that it was not straunge to the godlie fathers to call this sacrament a signe token figure and example of Christs bodie and that they vnderstood these words This is my bodie in that sense the bread to be called Christs bodie because it is an holie signe example and pledge of Christs bodie offred vpon the crosse for vs. Now although I may seeme to haue sufficientlie spoken of the true sense and meaning of these words This is my bodie withall to haue opened the true doctrine of this sacrament yet because many men be not as yet satisfied in this point but the popish doctrine of Transubstantiation and carnall presence of Christs bodie vnder the formes of bread and wine sticketh still in their stomaks I haue thought it very néedfull further to prosecute this matter and more particularly and largely to confute the said errors and to lay open the nakednesse and weaknesse of them The false doctrine of the Papists concerning their Transubstantiation which they corruptly gather of those words of our Sauiour Christ consisteth in two speciall points the one in that they say that after the words of Consecration there remaineth no substance of bread and wine but onely the outward accidences thereof as whitenes roundnes c. The other that the very naturall bodie of Christ which was borne of the blessed virgin is there vnder the said formes of bread and wine As touching the first that there remaneth no substance of bread wine I say that this is contrary to the holy scriptures contrary to the writings of the auncient godly fathers contrarie to the iudgement of all our senses contrarie to the nature of a Sacrament lastly such a doctrin as bringeth with it many absurdities Matth. 26.29 That it is contrary to the scriptures I proue it thus Christ saith I wil drinke no more of the fruit of this vine vntill that day that I shall drinke it with you new in the kingdome of my father Our Sauiour Christ heere speaking of his supper and after his supper calleth it the fruit of the vine which is wine and not blood S. Paul saieth the bread which we break is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ 2. Cor. 10.16 S. Paul here not onely saith that bread is the Communion of Christs body but also saith Which we breake Now what do we breake onely accidences without a substance that is an absurd follie or doe we breake Christs body as Pope Nicolas with his counsell compelled that learned man Berengarius to affirme Dâ— Consec dist 2. cap. Ego Berengarius but that is wicked blasphemie Therefore it is manifest that that which is broken is bread and that bread broken is the communion of the bodie of Christ that is as I before declared a Sacrament and pledge vnto vs of our spirituall and yet
true and effectuall communion with Christ Iesus Againe S. Paul saith immediatly after 1. Cor. 10.17 we that are many are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one Bread Againe as often as ye shall eate this Bread 1. Cor. 11.26 and drinke of this cuppe yée shew the Lords death till he come Againe whosoeuer shall eate this Bread and drinke the cuppe of the Lord vnworthely shal be guiltie of the body and blood of the Lord And again let a man therefore examine himself and so let him eate of this bread and drink of â—his cup. Here Saint Paul fiue times callâ—th it bread euen when it is receiued and eaten therfore I conclude that it is bread But here the Papists come in with a craftie cauillation and think they haue found a fine deuise to shift off these plain words of the Apostle they say that saint Paul calleth it bread because it was bread as Aarons rodde being turned into a serpent Exod. 7 1â— and being a serpent is called a rodde Aharons rodde deuoured their roddes I aunswere first that they compare things vtterly vnlike for in the Sacrament there must continue a similitude and agréement betwéene the signe and the thing signified as before out of S. Augustine I declared and therefore the substance of the signe must néeds remaine without which there can bée no such similitude But in this matter there is no such agréement betwéene the rodde and serpent but rather bee cleane contrary and therefore the reason of these two are not alike Secondly I say that because the conuersion of the rodde into a serpent was but temporall for a short time to continue Moses had good cause to call it a rodde because thereunto it was straight wayes to be restored and in the nature of a rod to continue Thirdly let the Papists shew that their bread is so turned into the bodie of Christ as that rodde was into a serpent and then they say something other wayes they proue nothing Lastly I may turne this Argument vpon their owne heads that as Moses called the serpent a rodde when it was not a rodde indéede but a serpent So Christ called the bread his body when it was not indéede naturally his bodie but in substance bread and by his ordinance a sacrament of his bodie And as the Papists will haue Saint Paul to call that bread which they say is not bread so why may not our sauiour Christ call that his bodie which not properly but sacramentally is his body Thus I trust this their cauillation is sufficiently confuted that you plainly perceiue that S. Paul calleth it bread because it is bread The which now Dialog 1 I will proue by the testimonies of the ancient fathers Theodoritus beside that plaine place before alledged where he saith that Christ hath honored the visible signes with the title or name of his bodie blood not chaunging the nature of them but Dialog 2 adding grace to nature hath a more plaine and pregnant place whose words be these Thou art catched in thine owne snares for the mysticall signes after sanctification or consecration leaue not their proper nature but they remaine in their former Substance and figure kind 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and be visible and tangible as they were before here not only Theodoritus plain words do affirme the nature and substance of bread and wine to remaine after consecratioÌ„ but also the whole drift of the disputation betwéene the true Christian the Eutican heretike tendeth to the same end But if the doctrine of transubstantiation had beene then in the Church receiued it had most fitly serued for the heretiks purpose that as the bread after consecration is turned into Christs body so Christs bodie after the ascention is turned into the deitie and so the heretike reasoneth but the true Christian answereth that he is catched in his own snare for as bread and wine after consecration are not turned into Christs bodie and blood but remaine in substance as they were before so Christs bodie after his ascention is not turned into the deitie but replenished with glorie and immortality Gelasius a Bishop of Rome writing against the same heretike Eutiches that Theodoritus did and vsing the same reason setteth downe the same doctrine in these words Gelasius contra Eurichen Certe Sacramenta c. i. Surely the sacraments of the bodie and blood of Christ which we receiue are a diuine thing and therefore by them wée be made partakers of the diuine nature and yet it ceaseth not to be the substance or nature of bread and wine and indeed an image and similitude of the bodie and blood of Christ is celebrated in the Accion of the mysteries c. Chrisostome also writeth thus Chrisost ad Câ—esarium Monachum Sicut enim antequam sanctificetur panis c. For as before the bread is sanctified we call it bread but when the diuine grace hath sanctified it by the meanes of the priest it is in déed deliuered from the name of bread and is counted worthy of the name of the lords bodie although the nature of bread doe still continue in it and is called not two bodies but one bodie of the son c. Both the words of Gelasius Chrisostome and also the drift of their discourses tending to the same end that Theodoritus doth most plainly shew that after consecration the substance of bread remaineth euen as after Christs assention the substance of his true body continueth or else these reasons taken from the sacrament do not only not make for them but directly against them yea and plainly make for those heretikes whom they by these arguments séeke to confute Origen also saith Panis ille c. Orig. in Matâ—h cap. 15. That bread which is sanctified by the word of God and prayer according to the material substance which it hath goeth into the belly is cast out into the draught but by the prayer which is ioyned to it according to the proportion of faith is made profitable By which it appeareth that it is the substance of bread and not Christs bodie which were blasphemie to affirme that is so cast out Cyprian saith De vnctione Chrismatis Dedit dominus noster c. Our Lord at the table whereat he did participate his last feast with his disciples gaue with his own hands bread wine but vpon the crosse he gaue his bodie to be wounded by the hands of the souldiers August de consecr dist 2. qui mandu Augustine also saith Quod videtur panis est c. That which is séene is bread and the cuppe which our eies also do shew vnto vs c. He saith it is bread and not séemeth or appeareth to be bread August in psal 98. And in another place Spiritualiter intelligite quod loquutus sum Nen hoc corpus quod videtis manducaturi estis c. .i. Spiritually
it followeth Iesus tooke bread c. Here the Euangelist sheweth two causes of this sacrament the efficient material cause The efficient cause is Iesus Christ the sonne of God Iohn 1.29 who is the lambe of God that taketh away the sins of the worlde who hath made peace betweene God and vs by the blood of his Crosse Collos 1.20 hath reconciled vs in the bodie of his flesh through death 1. pet 1.18 who hath redéemed vs from our vaine conuersation receiued by the traditions of our fathers neither with gold nor siluer but with his owne precious blood who hath loued vs hath washed away our sinnes in his blood Apocal. 1. â— made vs kings and priests vnto his father euen this Iesus our only Sauiour redeemer hath ordained this holy sacrameÌ„t for vs left it vnto vs in remeÌ„braÌ„ce of his death for a gage of our saluation purchased thereby Wherefore if Iesus Christ and our saluation procured by him be deare and pretious vnto vs then also this sacrament which he hath deliuered vnto vs and instituted for vs to confirme our faith in him ought to be deare and precious vnto vs. Therefore we should be very carefull that neither negligently we absent our selues from it nor vnreuerently come vnto it nor that we make not smal account of it for if we vse to make great account euen of small things which our deare friends leaue vs at the houre of their death in remembrance of them How much more account ought we to make of this sacrament how small soeuer it séeme to the outward eye of flesh blood séeing that our deare redéemer Iesus Christ euen as it were at the houre of his death bequethed and committed it vnto vs and hath left to be a necessary foode vnto our soules that thereby we may dayly more and more grow vp in him But hereof I shall haue occasion hereafter further for to speake when I shal intreat of our dew preparation in comming to receiue this holy Sacrament The second cause touched in these words which is the materiall is bread and wine as after followeth which be the outward matter and elements of this sacrament and be holy signes of Christs blessed body offred and of his pretious bloodshed for vs. And here that we may the better know the true nature and vse of sacraments we are to vnderstand that God in offering to vs our saluation purchased by Iesus Christ vseth two things the one is his words wherein be contained his swéete and pretious promises of mercie grounded founded vpon Iesus Christ the other is externall signes which wée call sacraments be added to the word for seales to seale to confirme vnto our consciences the promises of the word euen to set that before our eyes which the promises of gods word do sound into our eares for we are to marke this that both the promises of the word and also the sacraments lead vs to one selfe same thing that is to Iesus Christ in him only to séeke our saluation for as the word doth this as appeareth by those places before alledged out of Iohn 1.29 Col. 1.20 1. Pet. 1.18 Apocal. 1.5 and infinite such other euen so do the sacraments lead vs as it were by the hand vnto the same liuely set the same before our eyes As for example baptisme doth teach vs to the eye that euen as water washeth away the vncleanesse of our bodies so Christs pretious blood which hee shed for vs cleanseth vs from the filthines and giltines of our sins And this sacrament of Christs supper teacheth and assureth vs that euen as bread and wine féede nourish strengtheÌ„ comfort mans hart so also Christ Iesus who offred his body and shed his blood once for al euen for vs féedeth nourisheth strengthneth comforteth our féeble sinful soules vnto eternal life And these two things his word outward sacraments God hath from the beginning vsed therby to offer our saluation to vs to assure vs of his fauour When God had created Adam Eue and placed them in Paradise he did not onely by word teach and admonish them to serue and honour him their creator but also he did set the trée of life in Paradise which should set before their eyes effectually teach them to imploy that life which they had receiued of God to Gods glorie When God had brought that fearefull floud vpon the world for the horrible corruption wickednesse thereof and did in mercie determine neuer in like manner to destroy it so againe Gen. 9.11 he did not onely assure vs therof by his word and promise but also the more to confirme it vnto vs did set his bow in the clouds that as often as we behold the same we should be assured of the performance of gods promise as euen to this day appeareth When it pleased God to accept Abraham and his séede to mercy he did not onely signifie the same to Abraham by making his couenant with him Gen. â—7 that he would be his God and the God of his séed and that in his séed al nations of the earth should be blessed but also he gaue vnto him the sacrameÌ„t of Circumcision to be a seale of this his couenant to assure them that by that blessed séed Iesus Christ he would circumcise the foreskinne of their hearts and cut away all their vncleanenes And when God as it were renewed this couenaÌ„t to the Israelites when he brought them out of Egypt he did not onely giue his Law vnto them wherein his couenant was conteyned but also ordeyned the passeouer and many other sacrifices to confirme the same vnto them in being holy figures and signes of Iesus Christ to come vpon whom the couenant was grounded Euen so to confirme the new testament and couenant made with vs wherof I made mention before Hierom. 3â— 31 Heb. 8.8 which is the same in substance with the olde but called new because it is renewed vnto vs in Iesus Christ reueiled adorned with greater graces of Gods spirit Christ hath ordeined sacrameÌ„ts in number as S. Augustine affirmeth fewest August Epist ad Ianuar. 118. in obseruation easiest in signification most excellent that is Baptisme his holy Supper And therefore our Sauiour Christ speaking of the cuppe as S. Luke and S. Paul report his words saith 1. Cor. 11.25 This cup is the new testament in my blood that is to say a sacrament and seale of the new testament and couenant of God confirmed vnto vs in his blood And this manner of teaching and delyuering of things by these two kinds of things words obiected to the eares and outward signes to the eyes it séemeth that we by the instinct of nature or rather of God haue in like sort receiued for in conueighing of things from one to an other we obserue the same order As if a man make conueiance of lands or goods he doth it
words This is my body We are to consider that it is no maruell if our sauiour Christ heare speaking of a Sacrament do speak sacramentally and do vse a phrase of speach vsual and common to all Sacraments that is to giue the outward signe the name of the thing signified for whereas a sacrament consisteth of two things an earthly and an heaueÌ„ly as Irenaeus saith Lib. 4. cap. 14. the outward element and the thing wherof it is a sacrament and that there is a similitude agréemeÌ„t betwéene these two as namely in this sacrameÌ„t for as bread wine as aboue I haue declared do nourish strengthen comfort mans heart body euen so doth Christs body and blood nourish streÌ„gthen comfort the soules of Gods children by reason of this agréement the name of the thing signified being the heauenly is attributed to the signe being the earthly And this is done for good and great reason that we in receiuing this Sacrament should not set fixe our minds vpon the earthly thing the bread and wine but thereby be lifted vp to behold the heauenly thing that is the body blood of Iesus Christ giuen for vs. This doctrine the auncient Fathers do most plainely set downe how straunge soeuer it séeme to the fauorers of the rotten ruinous Religion of Rome Augustine writeth thus August Epâ—st 1â— ad Boâ—â—facium Si enim sacramenta quandam similitudinem c. i. If sacraments had not a certaine similitude and likenesse of those things whereof they be sacraments they were no sacraments at all And by reason of this similitude they do often take the names of those things As therefore after a certaine sort the sacrament of Christes bodie is Christes bodie and the Sacrament of Christes blood is Christs blood so the sacrament of faith is faith And againe August Leâ—â— quest â—7 Solet autem res quae significat eius rei nomine quam significat nuncupari c. The thing that signifieth is wont to be called by the name of the thing which it signifieth as it is written the seuen eares of corne are seuen yeares for hée did not say Genes 41.26 they signifie seuen yeares And the seuen kine be seuen yeares and many such like Hence commeth it that was said The Rock was Christ for hée said not The Rock doth signifie Christ but as though it were that which in truth by substance it was not but by significatioÌ„ In like manner doth Theodoretus in his first Dialogue Theodoretus dialog 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Therefore our sauiour chaunged the names 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to his bodie hath giueÌ„ the name of the signe to the signe the name of his body So he that called himself a vine hath also called the signe his body 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This thou hast spoken truely but I would learne the cause of this change of the names 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The scope end is euident to them that be instructed in diuine matters for our Lord would that they which be partakers of the diuine misteries should not set their minds vpon the nature of the things that are séene but by the chaunge of the names to beléeue the chaunge that is wrought by grace for he that called his naturall body wheat and breade and againe called himselfe a vine the same hath honored the visible signes with the name and title of his bodie and blood not chaunging nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but adding grace vnto nature hitherto Theodoritus In which words he flatly affirmeth that the name of the thing signified is giuen to the outward visible signe and sheweth the cause and reason why it is so done And that it is a vsual and common phrase as I said before in al sacracraments it is most plaine by many places of the scripture Cap. 17. 〈◊〉 Hoc est pâ—ctum pag. 13 〈◊〉 In Genesis God saith of Circumcision This is my Couenant And againe My Couenant shal be in your flesh Here Circumcision is called the Couenant and yet it was not the Couenant for this was the Couenant that God would be God to him and to his seede after him c of this Couenant Circumcision was a signe and seale as in the same place is said yée shall circumcise the foreskinne of your flesh Genes 17.11 and it shal be a signe of the Couenant betwéene me and you This Circumcision which was a sacrament and signe of Gods Couenant is called the Couenant it selfe to the end they vsing remembring it might be put in minde of Gods Couenant which it signified sealed Exod. 12.11 â—stenim phase iâ— est transitus domini and confirmed vnto them So the Paschal lambe is called the passeouer in these words Yée shall eate it in hast for it is the Lords passeouer And againe Choose out and take ye for euery of your households a lambe and kill the passeouer So our Sauiour Christ also calleth it in this Chapter Vers 18. I wil kéepe the passeouer at thine house with my Disciples Here yée sée that the lambe is called the passeouer and yet the lambe properly was not the passeouer for the passeouer was the passing of the Angel ouer the houses of the Israelits where the blood of the lambe was sprinckled when he destroyed the first borne of the Egyptians Now the Lambe was a sacrameÌ„t holy signe and pledge of this passeouer and deliuerance and so consequentlie of that true deliuerance from eternall destruction and damnation by Iesus Christ The sacrifices in the olde Lawe were called sinnes because they were offred for sinne in which sense God by the Prophet saith of the priests they eat vp the sinnes of my people Hose â— 8 meaning the sacrifices which they offered for the sins of the people So likewise Christ is called sinne He that knew no sinne 2. Cor. 5.21 was made sinne for vs that we should bée made the righteousnesse of God in him The Rocke is called Christ The Rock was Christ saith S. Paul 1. Cor. 10.4 yet the Rock was not properly Christ but a Sacrament of Christ But to come nearer to this matter 1. Cor. 10 1â— Saint Paul saith the bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ in which words he meaneth and affirmeth bread to bée the communion of the body of Christ And yet properly bread is not the communion of the body of Christ but a Sacrament and pledge of that spirituall communioÌ„ which we haue with Christ for as the bread receiued into our bodies is ioyned vnto vs and made ours so Iesus Christ receiued by faith into our soules is made ours Ephes 3.17 1. Iohn 1.3 Ephes 5.30 we haue fellowship with him yea and be made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones Moreouer whereas Christ saith as S. Paul recordeth This cuppe is the new Testament in my blood
Fathers did teach touching the two natures of the deitie and humanity in our Sauiour Christ that they are neither to be distracted a sunder and seperated as did Nestorius nor the properties of them to be confounded as did Eutiches but the said properties are to be distinguished Euen so are we to deale in this matter of the sacrament concerning the signe and thing signified that neither they are to be distracted a sunder deuided nor to be confounded â—ogether but to be distinguished The sign which is the bread and wine are things visible and corruptible which wil in short time putrifie Iesus Christ the thing signified is to our outward eyes inuisible and is incorruptible The bread and wine are vpon earth Iesus Christ is in heauen at the right hand of God The bread wine are receiued with our mouthes broken with our téeth and féede our bodies Iesus Christ is fide digerendus saith Tertullian Tertull. de resurrect carnis receiued and eaten by faith féedeth our soules to liue to God eternally The bread and wine are receiued of all both faithfull and vnfaithfull godly and wicked Iesus Christ is onely receiued of them who be faithful Ephes 3. in whose hearts he dwelleth by faith They that do eate the bread and wine do die not onely this outward death but also many die eternally Iohn 9.51 but he that eateth this bread that came downe from heauen which is Iesus Christ himselfe shal liue for euer Thus a difference is to be put betwéene the externall sacrament and Iesus Christ of whom it is a SacrameÌ„t And yet we must not distract seperate altogether Iesus Christ from the sacrament but beléeue that he is truely offered to all and effectually receiued of those that be gods children and haue a true faith which is the very mouth of the soule whereby they eate his flesh drinke his blood as Christ saith Iohn â— 35 I am the bread of life he that commeth to me shall neuer hunger and he that beléeueth in me shall neuer thirst Now I will onely shew briefly the vncertainty of this doctrin of Transubstantiation Lib. 4. dist 11. cap. Si autem and so I will end this discourse Peter Lombard the master of the sentences writeth thus Si autem quaeritur qualis sit illa conuersio an formalis an substantialis vel alterius generis definire noÌ„ sufficio formalem tamen non esse cognosco quia species quae ante fuerant remanent i. If it be asked what kinde of conuersion that is whether formal or substantiall or of any other kind I am not able to define But yet I know that it is not a formal conuersion because that the formes and shewes which were before do still remaine Afterward he addeth some think that it is a substantiall conuersion saying that one substance is so coÌ„uerted into an other substance that the one is essentially made the other to the which sense the fore alledged authorities do séeme to consent But some do not graunt that the substance of bread is at any time made the flesh of Christ Others be graunt that that which was bread or wine after consecration is the body and blood of Christ Some doe say thus that that conuersion is so to be vnderstoode that vnder those accidences vnder which before was the substance of bread and wine after consecration is the substance of the body blood but others haue thought that the substance of bread and wine doe there remaine and that there also is the body and blood of Christ Hitherto the master of all the Popish schoolemen whose booke of Sentences was of such credite and autority with them that it was more read expounded then the holy bible Whereby wée may plainely sée how vncertaine this their doctrine is and what diuers opinions haue bene of it So Gabriel Byell Gab. Biell in exposit Canonis Missae lect 40. an other great scholeman writeth thus Quomodo ibi sit Christi corpus an per conuersionem alicuius in ipsum an sine conuersione incipiat enim corpus Christi cum pane manentibus substantia accidentibus panis non inuenitur expressum in canone Bibliae Vnde de hoc antiquitus fuerunt diuersae opiniones .i. How the body of Christ is there whether by conuersion of some thing into it or without conuersion there beginne to the body of Christ with the bread the substance and accidences of the breade remaining still it is not found expressed in the canon of the bible Whereupon in old time there were diuers opinions hereof And afterward he rehearseth foure Besides this what if Iohn Fisher bishop of Rochester a great patrone of the Pope and his doctrine doe flatly confesse that this presence of Christs body and blood in the sacrament cannot be proued by the scriptures Ioh. Roffens Episc in defentio Regiae assertionis cont captiuit Babilonicam M. Lutheri N. 8. O. Whose words be these Hactenus Mattheus c. Hitherto Matthew who onely maketh mention of the new Testament neither is there any word here set downe whereby it may be prooued that in our masse there is made a true presence of Christs bodie and blood for although Christ made of the breade his flesh and of the wine his blood it doth not therefore follow that we by vertue of any word here set downe can doe the like when we attempt the same Again he saith Non potest per vllam scripturam probari c. It cannot be proued by any scripture that either a layman or priest as often as he attempteth the same can in like manner make of bread and wine the bodie and blood of Christ as Christ himselfe made séeing this is not conteined in the scriptures And again he concludeth this matter thus Ibid. Ex iis opinor c. By these things I suppose euery man perceiueth that the certenty of this matter depeÌ„deth not so much of the gospel as of the vse and custome which so many ages hath bene commended vnto vs from the verie first fathers Héere by the iudgement of Bishop Fisher this doctrine of Transubstantiation and reall presence dependeth not so much vpon the Gospel as vpon custome that it cannot be proued by the Scriptures whereby we may sée how vncertaine it is So that we may say with Tertullian Nihil de eo constat Lib. de carne Christi quia Scriptura non exhibet .i. We know nothing thereof because the Scripture doth not shew it And againe Lib. de monogamia Negat scriptura quod non notat .i. The scripture doth deny that which it doth not expresse wherefore let vs forsake this doubtful doctrine yea this erronious absurd and false doctrin and let vs imbrace the truth before declared let vs not séeke Christ here vpon earth but let vs lift vp our hearts into heauen there by faith eate Christs blessed body that was offred and drinke his
c. 1. Cor. 11.25 I would aske of these men that grate so earnestly vpon the letter and vrge so eagerly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word whether the cup that is made either of siluer gold or wood for by the way as Bonifacius the martyr sometime said B. Rhenanus in Annotat. in Tertull de Corona militis In old times we had wooden Chalices and golden priests but in these dayes we haue golden Chalices and wooden priests be the new Testament No no say they by the cuppe is ment by a figure the thing in the cup. Thus they that haue cried out against figures and figuratiue speeches in the sacramēt and haue scornefully called such as haue vsed them figurators M. Anto. Constantius fol 2. c. tibi saepe are now forced to flée to a figure to forsake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the expresse words and by the cuppe to vnderstand the thing contained in the cuppe But to graunt them this what is in the cup wine say we blood say they Now to grant them this their owne assertion for disputation sake I will aske them whether blood be the new Testament I suppose they cānot with any forehead or face say that blood is the new Testamēt for what is the new Testament but the new leage couenant which God maketh with vs in Christ Iesus as it is set forth in Ieremie and the Epistle to the Hebrewes in these words Hierem. 31.31 Hebr. 8.10 This is the Testament that I will make with the house of Israel after those dayes saith the Lord I wil put my Lawes in their minde and in their heart I will write them and I wil be their God and they shal be my people I wil be merciful vnto their vnrighteousnesse and I will remember their sinnes and their iniquities no more This promise of mercy is the new Testament And therfore neither wine nor blood is properly the new Testament but a Sacrament a holy signe and seale of the new Testament confirmed vnto vs in the blood not of Oxen or Goats but of Iesus Christ the sonne of God Whereupon I thus reason with the Papists as the Cuppe or that in the cuppe is the new testament so is the bread the body of Christ but neither the cuppe nor the thing in the cuppe is properly the new Testament but a holy signe and Sacrament of the new testament So the bread is not properly the body of Christ but a holy signe and pledge of his body offred vpon the crosse for vs. And this phrase of speach in attributing to the Sacrament the name of the thing whereof it is a sacrament which séemeth so rough in these fine mens mouthes both the spirite of God in the holy scriptures we in our common talke vse to giue too bare naked signes which do not exhibite as sacramēts do the thing signified but barely signifie the same as in the example before alledged by S. Augustine Genes 41.26 the seuen thinne eares of corne and the seuen leane kine are said to be seuen yeares when as they did but onely barely signifie the seuen yeares of famine which were to come Genes 40.11 So also Ioseph saith of the thrée branches of the vine and of the thrée white baskets the thrée braunches be thrée dayes and the thrée white baskets be thrée dayes 16. when they did but onely signifie the thrée dayes wherein the butler should be restored and the baker hanged So S. Paul calleth the wiues vaile or couering of her head 1. Cor. 11.10 her power being but a bare signe of her husbandes power ouer her and many such other examples might be alledged out of the scriptures but these shal suffice In our common speach we vse to call bare pictures by the names of those persons whereof they be pictures Alluding to the pictures which hang in my lord S. Iohns great Chamber So we say this is king Henry the seuenth this is king Henrie the eight this is Francis the french king this is the Lord Cromwal and yet those pictures be not those personages but only and barely represent them Now if we vse to speak thus of pictures which be but bare signes of men and do but only represent the formes shapes of thē How much more may we so speake of this Sacrament and call it the body and blood of Christ being not a bare signe representation thereof but an instrument of Gods grace whereby the bodie and blood of Christ is truly offered to all and effectually receiued of the faithfull children of God to nourish and comfort their soules Yea moreouer the very prophane Poets haue vsed this phrase of spéech as Virgil saith faliere dextras for to breake promise where by Dextras the right hands he meaneth promises made by giuing the right hand Iliad 3. So Homer saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. The Herolds brought from the citie the faithfull othes of the gods two lambs pleasant wine the fruite of the earth And againe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibidem post i. but the gorgeous Harolds brought forth the faithful othes of the gods In which places by the faithful othes are ment the lambs and wine which they slew and powred out in confirmation of those promises made touching the combate betwéene Menelaus and Paris and so Eustathius vnderstanding it expounding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the faithful othes that is the sacrifices Where we sée that the external sacrifices the lambes slaine and wine powred out to confirme those othes that they which did not performe them might be slaine and their blood braines powred out as those lambes and wine were are called the othes themselues These places to this end only I alledge to shew vs that it should not séeme so straunge a thing to attribute to the outward signe and Sacrament the name of that thing wherof it is a sacrament and for the confirming whereof vnto vs it is ordained and vsed But that this exposition of mine or rather of God himselfe as hath béene proued by many places and reasons out of the scripture may plainly appeare to agrée with the doctrine of the auncient and godly fathers of the Church I will set downe some places out of their bookes to be as witnesses to giue testimony to the truth of this doctrine Tertullian saith Lib. 4. aduers Marcionem Christ professing that he did greatly couet to eat the passeouer as his owne for it were vnméete that God should couet that which were an others taking the bread and distributing it to his disciples made it his bodie saying this is my bodie that is to say a figure of my bodie but it should be no figure vnlesse Christs bodie were a true bodie for a vaine or void thing such as is a ghost cannot haue a figure Phantasma Héere Tertullian expoundeth these words This is my body by this that is figure of
that he is God but in heauen in that he is man Againe Ille absens est praesentia corporis August in Psal 127. sed presens vigore maiestatis .i. he is absent in respect of the presens of his bodie but present by the power of his maiesty And again Sursum est dominus c. i. the Lord is aboue August in Ioan. tract 30. but also here is the Lord the truth For the body of the Lord wherin he did rise can be but in one place but his truth is dispersed euery where Againe let good men also take this August in Ioan. tract 50. and not bée carefull for he spake of the presence of his bodie for as touching his maiesty his prouidence his ineffable and inestimable grace that is fulfilled which hée said behold I am with you alwaies to the end of the world But touching the flesh which the word took to it touching that by which he was borne of the virgine apprehended of the Iewes crucified vpon wood taken from the crosse wrapped in clothes laid in the sepulchre reueiled in the resurrection ye shall not alwayes haue him with you Why because he was conuersant with his disciples 40. dayes in respect of his bodely presence they waiting on him seing him but not following him he ascended into heauen and is not here for he is there sitting at the right hand of the father and he is here for he hath not left vs by the presence of his maiestie c. Contr. faustum lib. 20. cap. 11. Againe Augustine saith Christ according to his corporall presence could not be at once in the sonne in the moone Lib. 1. coâ—â— Euticâ—eâ— vpon the crosse Vigilius a godly Bishoppe of Tridente and Martyr giueth most plaine witnesse to this truth saying Nam vide myraculum vide vtriusque proprietatis mysterium c. for sée a myracle sée the mysterie of the property of both the natures The sonne of God according to his humanitie is gone from vs according to his diuinitie he said vnto vs. Behold I am with you alwayes to the end of the world if he be with you how doth he say The day shal come when ye shall desire to sée one day of the sonne of man you shall not sée it But both he is with vs he is not with you for whom he hath left and from whom he is departed in his humanitie he hath not left nor forsaken by his deitie for by the forme of a seruant which he hath taken from vs into heauen he is absent from vs but by the forme of God which doth not depart from vs he is present in earth with vs so he being one and the same is both present with vs and absent from vs. And againe the same Vigilius saith Lib. 4. contr Eutichen Deinde si verbi carnis c. Moreouer if there be one nature of the word and flesh how commeth it to passe that the word being euerie where the flesh is not also founde to be euerie where for when it was in the earth it was not in heauen and for that now it is in heauen it is not in earth and in so much it is not that according to it wée looke for Christ to come from heauen whom according to the word we beléeue to be with vs in the earth Therefore according to your doctrine either the word is conteined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the word seeing that one nature receiueth not in it selfe any thing contrary and diuers Hitherto Vigilius whereby we may sée how néere the papists ioine with that old heretical Abbot Eutiches condemned in the counsell of Calcidone in confounding the properties of both natures and holding that Christs flesh and body is at one instant both in heauen and earth and in infinit places of the earth Therfore we are not to séeke our sauiour Christ in earth but we must be Eagles to soare vp by faith into heauen and there to eat his flesh drinke his blood S. Paul exhorteth vs to seeke the things that be aboue Colloss 3. â— where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God in which words he moueth vs to seeke the things that be there where Christ is but Christ is aboue in heauen therefore wée must seeke the thinges that bée aboue in heauen and not the thinges that be vppon earth But if Christ bée vpon earth as the Papists teach then either Paules reason is not good or we may seeke the things that he vppon earth which he doth in expresse words forbid vs. But I will prosecute this matter no further onely I will lay forth certaine absurdities that follow of this grosse doctrine of Transubstantiation First If Christs real and natural body be there vnder those formes of bread and wine as they teach then we do with our mouthes receiue and eate the verie bodie of Christ and drinke his blood but this is not onely an absurditie but also wickednesse and impietie as S. Augustine saith August lib. 3. de doct christ cap. 16. whose words are worthy wel to be marked and considered He giuing rules how to vnderstand the scriptures amoÌ„gst others giueth this for one That if the scripture seeme either to command any thing that is euill and nought or to forbid any thing that is good and profitable then it is not a proper speach but a figuratiue The example that he bringeth is this Except ye eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood ye shall haue no life in you He seemeth to commaund saith he a horrible and wicked thing Therefore it is a figure commaunding vs to communicate vpon the Lords passion and sweetly and profitably to hide vp in memory that his flesh was crucified and wounded for vs. In which words S. Augustine not onely condemneth that grosse and Capernaicall eating and drinking of Christs flesh and blood which the Papists imagine but also sheweth what it is to eat his flesh and drinke his blood euen faithfully to beleeue and acknowledge in our hearts that his bodie was crucified and his blood shed vpon the crosse for vs. But Pope Nicolas with the Romane counsell enforcing that excellent learned maÌ„ Berengarius to recant and denie the true doctrine which he had mainteyned caused him to confesse as appeareth in the Popes owne decrees the very body of Christ in truth to be handled by the priests hands De consec dist 2. Ego Beringarius manibus sacerd frangi fidelium dentibus atteri and to be broken torne by the téeth of the faithful The which is so absurd and grosse that the very barbarous writer of the glosse vppon that place giueth warning warely and wisely to vnderstaÌ„d Beringarius words or else we may fal into greater heresie then he held An other absurditie is this that if Christ naturall bodie be in the sacrament then our sauiour Christ did eat his owne body