thee the euerlasting truth and beleeue or followe any brainsicke hereticke in the worlde what shoulde I aunswere or howe durst I appeare before thy face I confesse then it is most certaine and sure which thou hast saide of this blessed Sacrament This is my Bodie This is my Bloud And that euery heretike that saieth This is a figureof thy Body This is a figure of thy Bloud is a most blasphemous and impudent hereticke and lyar Chap. XXIII Wherin is declared that we ought as really and truely to receaue his Body with our mouthes to health saluation as Adam did eate the forbidden apple to death and damnation BVt it is a woonder what shiftes these false Prophets the heretickes haue to couer their lyes vnder some shewe of trueth as though we were to eate Christ at his Fathers right-hand and so to delude the simple for as a learned man of our time writeth of this matter in this sorte Concerning that Caluin willeth vs to goe into heauen by faith to eate Christes body know you not because our nature was not able to clime vp to the seat of God in heauen therfore the sonne of God came downe from heauen to earth to lead and lift vs vp to the fruition of his father Know you not that because our body more quickly draweth our soules downwarde then our spirite is able to drawe our body vpward therfore Christ toke not only the soule but also the body of man giuing vs in his last supper that body of his to the intent that our bodies taking holde in the Sacrament of the Alter of his bodye might be caried into heauen to haue the sight of God because faith without the Incarnation of Christ cannot lifte vp our bodies therefore Christ fulfilled faith with trueth and hauing taken of the Virgin our nature gaue his body in deede to our bodies and soules that we againe might in body and soule be lifted vp with it It is not then sufficient to eate Christ by faith only but to arise againe in Christ the second Adam we must eate him in this blessed Sacramente as reallye and verily as our first father Adam wherein we all fell did eate the forbidden fruit The fruite of the tree forbiden entred into the mouth and damned the fruit of the blessed Virgin of the tree of the Crosse must enter into our mouths and spiritually worke effect in our soules and thereby wee shal be saued For as a man that is cast into a deepe pitt calleth by the meane of his tongue for helpe but when a cord is lett down to him for the ayde and succour of him it is not then sufficient to vse his tongue still to let his hands alone Euen so our faith called for Christ to come from heauen to helpe vs to let downe the corde of his humanity and of his fleshe and bloud and shall we nowe when it is let downe to be fastened in our bodies and in the bottome of our hearts by eating it really shall we nowe refuse it and say we will goe into heauen by faith our selues and there take holde of Christ whereby we may be saued and deliuered out of the deepe vale of misery As though neede were that the corde shoulde haue beene let downe if we coulde haue fastned our bodies to any thing in heauen and yet our bodies are they which weigh downe our soules cheifly Authorities to proue the vndoubted trueth of this most blessed Sacrament bee almost inumerable For if I should reckon vp all holy Saints and blessed Fathers that haue written of the trueth of this B. Sacrament I should neuer make an ende S. Ambrose saith Lib. 4. de Sacram. This bread is bread before the words of the Sacrament but when Consecration commeth to it of bread is made the body of Christ and howe at Masse the Priest prayeth for Kings Princes and the people but when he commeth to the most venerable renowmed Sacrament then he vseth not his owne wordes saith he but the worde of our Lord Iesus God commaunded saith he and heauen was made earth was made all creatures were made thou seest then saith he of what vertue the worde of Christ is If then God made thinges before of nothing that were not how much-more able is he to make things to be that were before and to change them into another As for example to make that which before was bread wine by consecration his Body and Bloud and before the wordes of Christ saith he the Chalice is full of wine and water but when the wordes of Christ come thereunto there is then the Bloud that redeemed the people All the holy Doctours as Saint Chrysostome Saint Cyrill Saint Ciprian both the holy Gregories Saint Hierome Saint Augustine Saint Barnarde bee full of the like testimonies for this matter many of them recording woonderfull miracles that haue beene wrought by vertue of this Sacrament Saint Augustine amongst De. ciu Dei the rest recordeth howe a place beeing troubled with euill spirits One of his bretheren a. religious mā that was a frier or a moncke went and offred there the healthfull Sacrifice as much to say as he said Masse and so the euill spirites were driuen away Hard you euer anye such miracle wrought by their Communion all this time I haue probably hard how the Diuell hath appeared in some of their Churches of late and in the beginning of this Queenes time when Paules steeple was burnt the very communion table from all other thinges about it was burnt in token of Godes wrath and indignation against that venemous bread of theirs whereby they poyson the souls of the simple people In the four general Councels that S. Gregorie did honour as the fouer Gospells you shall finde the blessed Sacrament of the Altar spoken of in most reuerent sort as called An honorable Sacrament called a most pure and vnbloody sacrifice of Christs body blood a pure and vndefiled host the lambe of God and the like by vertue whereof as wee read in Saint Gregories dialogues and other holy Fathers the deaffe haue beene made to heare the dumme to speake the lame to walke many other cured of incurable diseases Being abused by Iewes Heretickes and Infidles it hath issued out of blood and sometimes bin seene with streames of glorious lighte proceeding from the same as auncient histories doe recorde and blessed Saints in their writings doe witnes To be breife then this blessed Sacrament and our pure and most blessed vnbloody Sacrifice being so plainlye declared to bee Christes blessed bodye and blood by Christes owne words the holy Apostles and Euangelistes and all good men that euer writte since Christes time by the generall practize of the Church by generall Councells that cannot erre because Christ hath promised his holy spirite to assist them and his Church in all truth and by so many and wonderfull miracles we may firmely conclude with that holy Father Saint Hillary I am de
it seeme bread to vs it changed by vnspeakable operation because we are weake and abhorre to eate raw flesh specially the flesh of man ther fore it seemeth bread but in deede it is flesh If these wordes can be glosed with a figure theÌ„ I know not what shal escape the hands of these figure makers They In apol 2. that acknowledge a change of the substance of bread into Christs body must needes meane a reall presence of that body whereinto the chainge is made When Iustinus the Martyr denieth vs to take the things consecrated as common bread and drinke shewing also that we haue learned them to bee not onely sanctified in quality but to bee the flesh and bloud of Christ which is another substance hee doth vs to vnderstand that he meaneth them not to bee after consecration the substance of common bread and wine but to bee the substance which Christ toke of his mother when the worde was made flesh S. Cyprian sheweth the bread which Cena Domini our Lorde gaue to the Disciples to bee changed not in shape but in nature ther fore the substance is changed S. Ambrose It is not that which nature De iis qui initiat cap. 9. formed but that which the blessing hath consecrated if nature formed the substance of common bread the words of blessing pronounced be This is my body it is not afterwarde any more the substance of bread but of Christs body grace is affirmed with the deniall of nature This argument is in manner at large and that of the reall presence but who so listeth to see more therein let him reade Gregorius Nissenus in oratione catechetica Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus in catechesi mistagogica 4. Eusebius Emissenus in orat 5 in pasch Hysichius in Cap. 6. Leuit. Theophilact Euthymius in Euangelia Damasceâ— lib. 4. Cap 14. All that affirnie the externall sacrifice of Christes body and bloud must needes teach the reall presence thereof sith that thing which is absent cannot externally be sacrifised S. Dionisius Areopagita De Eccl. hierar cap. 3. Luc. 22. Dial. 3. saith The Bishoppe excuseth himselfe for that he offereth a Sacrifice aboue his worthinesse or power crying out decently thou O Lorde saidst make this thing for remembrance of me Heretickes admit no Eucharist or offerings saith S. Ignatius in Theodorete because they doe not confesse the Eucharist to be the flesh of the Sauiour A maÌ„ would haue thought this had bin in our time against the Sacramentaries it agreeth with olde heretickes so much Eusebius Pamphili We offer a sacrifice Lib. 1. demonst Eâ—ang cap. 10. Can. 18. Lib. 4. C. 32. Lib. 2. ep 3. ful of God dreadful most holy we sacrifice after a new manner according to the new Testament a cleane sacrisice or host Concil Nicenum Lett vs vnderstand by faith the Lambe of God who taketh away the sinnes of the world being situated in that holy table to be offered vp bloudely of the Preists and that wee take indeede his pretious Body and Bloud And againe neither rule or custom hath deliuered that they who haue no power to offer sacrifice should deliuer the Body of Christ to them who offer Hereof S. Ireneus S. Ciprian S. Augustine De ciuit dei lib. 17. cap. 20. and all the rest may be reade for it is a known mater haÌ„dled of the fathers most frequently What shall Isay that the fathers teach that the Sacrament ought to be adored with godly honor as I shewed before That they teach that euil meÌ„ doe receiue and touch the body bloud of Christ and thereby be guilty of them as Iudas was That they teach our bodies to bee nourished with Christs flesh and bloud which cannot be nourished with a thing absent That they teach vs to be naturally vntied to Christ whilst he dwelleth Chrysost hom 24. in 1. Cor. Cypr. de cena doâ— coâ—porallye in vs That they affirme Christs body to be vpon the Altar vpon the holy table in the handes in the mouthes and the bloud to be in the cup That they giue it such names as onely may agree to the substance of Christ calling it Saluation Light Life Lorde Christ an Offering wholy burnt a Sacrament which quickneth maketh vs liue for euer That they teach euery man to receiue the same substance one measure equall proportion which is true neither of spirituall nor of corporall guifts but only of the flesh of Christ reallye present vnder the forme of bread That they vse Cyp. de ce na dom Hier in 26. Mat. 6 Aug de ciâ—i li. 10 cap. 5. in psal 39. Chry hom de prodiâ— Iude. in sheweing howe it is sanctified the verbes creating making working consecrating representing or making present such like which are not verefied of a matter only spirituall or abseÌ„t in sub staÌ„ce That they speak of it couertly saying Nornnt fideles The faithfull knowe because if they should plainly declare the truth therof then Infidles would mocke at it as now the heretickes doe for it is a misterye aboue all reason of man Which scoffing were not to bee feared Angli confes 9. ca. 13. Cypr. li. 1. ep 9. Aug de ciu li 17. ca 20. if it were but a mere figure for al kinds of religion haue ceremonies and figures That they applied it to the helping of soules departed as being the very selfe same substaÌ„ce which ransaked hell That they haue taught it to bee truthe which hath succeeded in place of olde figures That they haue vsed by the knowne truthe thereof to proue that Christ had true fâ—eash and true blood in a visible maner and two natures in one person against the olde heretickes That they Ieren li. 4. ca. 34. Theodore in dial 20. Ciril Catech mistag 4. Act. 5. haue so far preferred it before Baptisme and the other Sacramentes that no crumme mighte bee suffered to fall downe or to bee lost which was not so in the water of Baptisme for men were Baptized in the running water of the flood That the Catecumeni who were admitted to the preaching of the Gospell which is an excellente signe of Christes flesh and blood yet might not Disonise in Eccles. hierarch cap. 3. see the Euchariste because it was also the truthe it selfe vnder a signe that no man might eat it vnlesse he were first baptized and kept the commandements and yet the Cathecumeni had a sanctified bread also giuen to them which was a signe of Christ as S. August doth witnes Lib. 2. cap. 26. de pecc mor et remis Lett now the discreet reader weighe vprightly this doctrine so grounded in holy scriptures and ancient fathers and hee shall perceaue that whatsoeuer our adversaries bring for the other side it may proue the Sacrament to be a figure which we deny not but it cannot disproue the reall presence of Christs bodie and blood vnder that figure which is the thing that we stand
this respect of the representation of Christs Passion and knitting togither of his members with him the very and most B. Body of our Lorde giuen vs at his last supper is called a signe or Sacrament and yet neuerthelesse the thing it selfe that is his B. Body and Bloud not figured or signified by bread and wine but giuen vnder the formes or likenes of bread and wine For that which before consecration was bread wine is now by Christs wordes transubstantiate or wholy turned into the Body and Bloud of Christ as I declared before though to our outwarde eyes and carnall sences there seemeth no other thing then before yet by our faith we be taught farre otherwise as that it is most certainly without all doubt the very Body and Bloud of Christ without which diuine Sacrament a reall coniunction betwixt his fleash the fleash of man cannot be made by faith spirit and vnderstanding only for that is the coniunction of minde but not of fleash and bones as the man and wife by consent of mariage caÌ„not be one body vnlesse they come togither neither doth Christ come from his Fathers right hand corporally to be ioyned with our flesh but bread by consecration is turned into Christs flesh to the intent it may be receiued and made one with our flesh to the end we may be Concorporei as the auncient Fathers tearme vs one fleash and body with Christ Chap. XXV Declaring how it implieth not contradiction that Christ is in heauen and in the Sacrament in many places at once but only declareth an infinite and Almighty power of God that Diuine honor is due hereunto YOu see nowe in some maner and sort by this which is said in the former Chapter the excellencie of this most diuine mystery as our infirmity is able to declare to you and in what respect this B. Sacrament is called a signe or figure and yet the very thing it selfe wherefore you se the heretikes doe most pitifully and wickedly abuse the poore people to both their damnations that contrary to Christ the receiued faith of the Church and al auncient doctors would haue the B. Sacrament but onlie a bare peece of bread in signe figure Reade the holy Fathers and Doctors and when they speake of the Sacramentall receiuing of this B. Sacrament they so plainly without all tropes signes and figures call it verely really and substantially his bodye and bloud so often so pithylie with so firme reasons and so plainly that if they had spoken against the Sacramentaries heretickes of our time they could haue spoken no more plainly For what wordes can be playner then those of that most famous Councell of Nice wherein Arrius the enemy to the sonne of God by more then three hundred holy Fathers was condemned The wordes of the Nicene Councel to our purpose are these Iterum etiam hic diuina mensa c. Againe here also in the holy table let vs not basely attend the bread and cuppe set before vs but lifting vp our minde let vs vnderstand by faith that Lamb of God which taketh away the sinnes of the world Situm â—sse to be put and laid on that holy table Incruente a sacerdotibus immolatum to bee vnbloudely Sacrificed of the Preistes and that wee vere truly and in deed taking his owne pretious Bodye and Bloud doe beleeue this to be the misticall tokens of our redemption For this cause wee take not much but little that wee might knowe wee take not to fill vs but for holinesse Thus farre the Councell The blessed noble and most glorious Martyr S. Ciprian Decena Domini of the supper of our Lord is as plaine Panis iste c. That Bread saith hee which our Lorde gaue to his Disciples being changed not in outward forme but in nature through the almighty power of the word is made flesh And because mans heart is not quiet till it rest in God and because nothing can truly fil or content man saue only God therefore S. Hillary that strong pillar of Gods Church againste the Arrians teacheth vs in his 8. booke of the Trinity how Christ in this holy Sacrament naturally dwelleth in vs. St vere â— if the worde sayeth hee bee verely made flesh and wee verely take or receiue the worde flesh in our Lordes meate howe is he esteemed not to dwell naturally in vs Seeing then God is by nature the only euerlasting meate which perisheth not and seing he must be giuen to vs in his owne nature and wee are not able to receiue him as he is a spirit hee hath done for vs as good mothers and nources doe for their babes the mother eateth bread and by her eating turneth it into milke and that milke shee giueth to the infant and by that meanes the infant eateth bread and milke In the reall fleshe of Christ is the substance of God only made meate to bee eaten of man Faith is a great gift of God but yet a creature only wherein the fulnesse of the Godhead dwelleth not and therefore it is not able to attaine to the vnion of Gods nature and much lesse able to giue it by eating of Christ we corporally haue and carry God in our bodies corporally no otherwise in the worlde can be deuised for it As for the figure of bread it is the only true figure because it is a figure without substance of bread For whereas S. Augustine in his third booke sixteene chapter de doctrina Christiana vpon these wordes Nisi manducaâ—eritis c. Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the sonne of â—an and drinke his bloud c. saith videtur facinus c. how Christ seemeth to commande a heynous act or sinne it is a figure therefore saith he but vnderstand you of the Passion of our Lord commanding vs sweetly to rest in Christ c. These wordes are to be vnderstood of the maner of eating not as a dead carcase is torne in peeces in the shambles but Christ is to be eaten in a mistery and a Sacrament though verely and really yet after a spirituall maner Eor as the figure which was in that Paschall Lamb did not diminish the reall killing and eating thereof but only did refer it to a higher truth so the figure which is in eating Christs flesh doth not diminish the true eating thereof but only declareth the eating to be a figure because it is referred againe to a higher truth both in Christ whose flesh that once died is now eateÌ„ in vs who eate it not so much for to eate it corporally as to feede spiritually of God him selfe who maketh that flesh profitable August in Iohn tract 26. 27. that S. August though so it is euident by his owne words vpon S. Iohn Ye know not what is this maner of eating this flesh but except yee eate it Lo the maner of eating was secrete but the thing that shoulde bee eaten was naturall flesh these also be his wordes to the same
ful authority to forgiue sin as they had For euen as the lawful heire vpoÌ„ his fathers death hath the same power authority ouer his land people if he be a king that his father had EueÌ„ so to the worlds end the words of the holy Prophet be fulfilled in the Catholike Church the true inheritance land of the liuing Pro Psal 44. patribus tuis nati sunt tibi filii To these true sonnes and heires of the Apostles in the house of God which shall continew to the worldes end be giuen Apostolike power and authoritye to the same end which the Apostles had it Ad consummation Ephes 4. 12. sanctorum in opus ministerii To the edifying perfectioÌ„ of the Church of God which shall not wante her pastores and gouernours to the end As therefore God said once Increase and Gen. 1. multiply all things haue done so since as he said once to his Apost Go teach Mat. 28. 19. all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost and by those wordes Priestes to this daye haue had authoritye to teach and Baptize Euen so saying to his Apostles Whose sinnes you forgiue they be forgiuen hee gaue in those wordes authority to lawful Priestes to the worldes end to doe the same Thus you see by the plaine wordes of the holye Gospell Preists haue power giuen them to forgiue sinne by vertue of the Sacrament of Penance but they cannot knowe as lawfull Iudges in Gods stead what sins to forgiue and what penance to enioyne vnlesse the sinner confesse his sinne For no maÌ„ knoweth the secrets of mans hart but God alone therefore that a mans sins may be forgiueÌ„ he must confesse theÌ„ plainly to the Preist The minister then of this sacrament is a lawfull Preist with iurisdiction the forme is I absolue thee the matter called Remotior or the out ward matter belonging to this sacrameÌ„t be sins as wood is matter to the fire the matter of this Sacrament called Vicinâ—or or the inward matter is the sorowe of the penitent Contrition Confession and Satisfaction manye other thinges appertaine to this holye Sacrament of Confession that I cannot stand to reckon the fruites whereof bee many and vnspeakeable as that thereby wee be deliuered from damnation and to vs therby is opened the gates of Saluation thereby followeth purenes and ioye of soule and hart and to be briefe whereas before by sinne a man was the limme of the Diuell now by Penaunce he is made a member of Christ and childe of Saluation Those that bee Masters and haue charge of house-hold and children by experience know what the want of Confession bringeth a number vnto For in times past when the discipline of holy Church in Confession tooke place here in our countrey seruants children were affraid to offend God and that for confcience-sake did their labours as for God Hard it was to heare of a fellon executed a foure-score yeares ago at an Assise but now a number for want of due instruction feare of God make conscience of nothing so they may escape the halter Chap. XXI Of the most Blessed Sacrament and Sacrifice of Christs Bodie Blood substantially really truly vpon the Altar THe fourth Sacrament which is in the middest of the seauen Sacraments is the most high noble most excellent and worthy Sacrament that is the Sacrament of the Alter and as the sonne in the middest of the Plannets giueth light to the other starres and plannets and exceedeth the same in glorie So the blessed Eucharist wherin is Christ himself the fountaine of all grace excelleth the other Sacraments in dignity and is farre more excellent then any other Sacrament by how much the fountain exceedeth any litle riuer that proceedeth from it for in this most blessed Sacrament I say is contained the fountaine and wellspring of all grace and goodnes our Lorde Sauiour Christ Iesus himselfe his Blessed Body and Bloud who at his last supper when he was to depart this worlde the night before his Death Passion deuised the wayes meanes according to his promise to remain with vs stil leauing vs vnder the forme or likenesse of bread wine his very Body Blood in perfect memorie of his death and Passion Protestants other heretikes o monstrous blasphemous heresy holde teach you that this Sacrament is but only a bare signe figure remembrance of Christs Body and his death But we most stedfastly according to Christs words the gospel do holde beleeue as sure as Gods worde and the trueth cannot fail that the very selfe same Body Blood which was borne of the B Virgin Mary suffered death vpoÌ„ the Crosse is giuen vs in this B. Sacrament that it is not a bare peece of bread as it seemeth to the eye outwardly or is in the mouth by tast but far aboue reason contrary to our sensuall feeling wheÌ„ the preist in Christs persoÌ„ hath once spoken Christs words ouer that creature which before was bread it is theÌ„ wholy really substaÌ„tially turned into the very body blood of our redeemer christ by his mighty vvorde vvhich made all thinges of nothing and to vvhome nothing is impossible and this vvhosoeuer vvill bee saued barke the heretikes neuer so much to the contrary must stedfastly beleeue for vve proue it by Gods vvorde that cannot faile the Apostolike doctrine so to be First theÌ„ the foure Euangelists be plaine The sixt Chapter of S. Iohn hath so many plaine places vvhereby this holy Sacrament was promised that I cannot haue time to reckon them as in one place Christ there saith The bread which I will giue is my flesh for the health of the worlde for my flesh is verily meat my bloode is verily drinke he that eateth my fleshe drinketh my blood dwelleth in me I in him I will raise him vp againe at the last day vnlesse you eate the flesh of the sonne of man drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you Lo heare no figure or remembrance only is named as heretikes say I know not truly how our Sauiour coulde vse any plainer vvords againe in the other three Euangelists in as plain Mat. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. vvordes is mention made hovve our Sauiour instituted or ordained this holy Sacrament in this manner the night before he suffred after he had made anend of the Paschal lamb and olde Testament hee tooke bread blessed and gaue to his desciples saying Take and eate for 1. Cor. 11. this is my Body likewise when he had blessed the Chalice he said This is my Blood Likewise Saint Paul affirmeth that that which he receiued of our Lorde heâ— gaue to the Corinthians for our Lorde Iesus saieth hee the same night hee was betraied tooke breade and giuing thankes brake and gaue to his disciples saying This is my
Body which shal be betrayed or deliuered vp for you so likewise he spake of the cup calling it his blood And both the Euangelists Saint Paul doe agree that Christ bad his Apostles sacrifice or doe that which he had donne in memorie of his death and Passion not to offer a peece of bread in memorie of his death and Passion for that should be to base and slender a memorie as the heretikes your ministers be-lie the truth but to consecrate sacrifice and receiue after an vnbloody maner the very self-same body that the day after was bloudely once for all offered on the Crosse there as a full price of our redemption and here as a mean to make vs pertakers of that high price and ransome there once bloudely offered here the very selfe same flesh and bloude that there once bloudely was offred but here after an vnbloudy maner not deuided or not cut in peeces as the Iewes vnderstoode and the heretikes doe blaspheme but whole Christ though reallye and substanciallye here present yet after a spirituall and deuine maner that cannot be sufficiently expressed in wordes not one Christ here other there or in heauen not one to day a nother to morow but one and the self same which was offred vpon the Crosse and now sitteth at the right hand of his father is daily offred vp here in the Church in diuers places at once that by the mighty power of his Godhead which is al in al * In saying vnited to his sacred Body Videtur praeposte ra locutio For his sacred Body is vnited to his Godhead not confounded but knit and ioyned together o insigne miraculum two natures in one person vnited to his sacred body to whome nothing is impossible Wee doe not substitute then or ordeyne many * There is but one Sacrifice though daily yea oft euerie day in the Catholike Church renued by the ministrie of Preists .. 1. Cor. 11. 26. Sacrifices of Christ as the heretikes be-ly vs for so we might be iniurious to his Passion but one and the selfe same sacrifice though different in the maner with that vpon the Crosse is daily here offered vnto God there once bloudely here vnbloudely by the ministrye of Preistes heere in earth to appease Gods wrath renue in vs the fruit of his death and Passion wrought by that sacrifice once all bloudy vpon the Crosse for all Doe this that I haue donne saith Christ in memorie of me that is you shal represet or shew by this sacrifice the death of our Lord as sayeth S. Paul to his comming againe By which wordes of Christ Doe this that I haue donne he gaue his Apostles and Priests authority to consecrate his Body by vertue of his holy word For what did Christ He tooke bread blessed gaue to his Disciples said This is my Body and wine saying This is my Bloud And bad them doe that he had donne that is by power of his mightye worde to consecrate his blessed Body So by those verye wordes that heretickes abuse when hee saide Doe this in memorie of mee to make the holye Sacrament to bee but a bare figure and remembrance of Christ by those verye wordes I saye you see by uery reason and as holye doctors euer vnderstood Christ gaue authority to the Apostles and to all Preists and Bishopps their lawfull successors to offer vp daily that pure and vnbloodye sacrifice in consecrating his body and blood to represent and renue in vs his death and Passion till his comming to Iudgement againe And therefore at the holy Sacrifice of the Masse euery ornament and action of the Preist reduceth to our memory some thing Christ said or did during his life bitter death and Passion Chap. XXII That heretickes which deny Christs body in the Sacrament euacuate the fruites of Christs death and Passion in mens soules and prepare the way to Antechrist THe heretiks therfore that do blasphem haue abolished the holy most blessed dread full pure most honorable Sacrament sacrifice of the Masse doe as much as lieth in them to put out of mens minds the Passion of Christ and make voide in our soules the fruit thereof wherefore they in deed be very forerunners of Antechrist that shall denye Christ and all and yet like shamelesse blasphemous wolues and deceiuers are not affraid to call the high Preist of God Christes Vicar here in earth the Pope Antechrist who is in deede the cheife piller head of the Church here next to Christ spreading and vphoulding Christs faith against Turkes Iewes Heretickes and all Infidles throughout the whole worlde But these impostors call the Vicar of Christ Antechrist that they Antechristians and their Master Antechrist the vessell of Satan when hee commeth may be the lesse suspected so pull downe Christianity But Gods Church Christes kingdome shall not faile though we are to feare now in the later ende of the worlde Antechriste is neare hand as these certainlie bee his forerunners whoe at his comming shall raise a greater persecution against the Church then euer was before For hee shall deny Christ and God and also exalt himselfe aboue God with such false deceits and wordes that if it were possible the very elect should be deceaued and the holye and continuall sacrifice of the Masse shall in his time cease to be offered openly as the holy prophet Daniell foretould What other thing then Dan. 12. Heb. 7. 12 The turks though perhaps sometimes they baue some voluntary externall superstitious sacrifice yet no ordinarye set sacrifice-publike for as much as euer I red or heard do these hereticks but prepare a way for Antechrist whoe denying the blessed Masse ordained and first said or celebrated by christ at his last supper would leaue vs neuer an externall Sacrifice to worship God withall like very Turkes to whome being without externall sacrifice they bee most like Translato enim according to the Apostles doctrine Sacerdotio necesse est vt legis translatio fiat So that take away Preisthood take a waye sacrifice and so consequentlye God and all For that by externall sacrifice God is chiefely knowne and worshipped the want and honor most due vnto which sacrifice maketh vs you se so many Atheists that now a daies make a scoffing against Christ God to But Lorde be mercifull vnto this Countrey whether is it fallen for sinne and blinde heresy the worste weede that euer was sowne To be briefe you see here how in an eleuen plaine places in the fower Euangelistes and Saint Paul Christ calleth that most blessed Sacrament he ordained at his last supper his very bodye and blood Caluin Beza and the Protestantes and other heretickes of this time say it is but a figure shadowe or bare remembrance In a peece of bread of his body and blood must we beleeue Christes and Saint Paul then or your wise ministers and new vpstart heretikes of this time O Christ if I should forsake
is a great glorie in the profession of cookery to bee able to make of one kinde of stuff as for example of eggs alone sixteene or twenty diuers dishes but to doe that feate much labour many spices and sawces greate compositions and mixtures are required Christ in steede of all those shiftes vsed blessing and working words of thankesgiuing which were so sure to worke their intent that some meÌ„ haue doubed whether he gaue thankes first because he fore-saw the whole purpose out of hand should be obtained as himselfe wished or else which is more probable whether the very working of the feate were not the selfe thankes-giuing for the worke For his blessing and thankes-giuing was the saying ouer the bread This is my body ouer the wine This is my bloud By vertue of which wordes his body bloud beeing made of the creatures of bread wine as wel were a thankful sacrifice themselues to God as Christ also in his visible forme hauing wrought this did praise and thanke his Father for such an excellent effecte the which body and bloud his Apostles eating and drinking were made pertakers of the greatest most excellent banquet that euer was made on earth For the better vnderstanding whereof it may please a man to repeat in his minde howe God in the beginning adorned this world First with Angels heauenly spirits secondly with the heauens themselues thirdly with the elements of fire ayre water and earth and as the Angells occupie the highest place so doe the heauens with the lightes starres in them occupie the second place and the fower elements are beneath them When things were come after this sort froÌ„ the highest order of Seraphins to the earth which is the lowest element of al theÌ„ it pleased the wisedome of god to make as it were a reuolt of al things to return his creatures froÌ„ the bottome of the earth vpwarde again towards himselfe he therfore made the earth to bring forth greene grasse with al such kinde of things as haue animam vegetiuam in theÌ„selues to growe increase of which kind al hearbs springs trees be aboue those in a higher degre were birds fishes beasts which haue a life sensitiue being able to moue from place to place Lastly god made maÌ„ who hath not only vegetatiue power sensitiue in his soul but also reason vnderstanding in whose body are the vertues of the fower elements with the influence of the heauens in whose soul is free will and power to gouerne agreable to the nature of Angels and of heauenly spirits for this cause this creature hath beene worthelie called euen of the Christian philosophers Microcosmos a litle world for that he alone hath in him all the degrees of creatures both liuing and with out life both sensible and reasonable therefore hee is called in holy scripture Omnis creatura All creatures Nowe when the sonne of God taking pittye that this little world the worke of his great power was by the diuell seduced came downe and tooke flesh of the virgin Marye being true God true man in one person at that time were al things breifly brought againe to God whence they first were created brought forth Christ alone is all in one In his Godhead he is all that is aboue the heauens and that filleth the worlde In his manhoode which is the foote-stoole of God he is all that is in or vnder the heauens in this manhoode are al creatures most perfectly compiled without blemishe of nature of mind or of body so that seing this body of Christ wherein also all the fulnes of the Godhead dwelleth is giueÌ„ eaten at a banquett there is no doubt but the same is such a banquett as cannot bee made with all the creatures of heauen and earth gathered together In this one dishe is a composition most delicate of Angels heauens elements of herbs fishes birdes beasts of reasonable men and of God himselfe no kinde of salett meat sause fruites confection no * Vnderstand here that I mean not that any earthly thing is in the B. Sacrament after Consecration saue only the very Body and Bloud of Christ who because it pleased him after a humane sorte to conuert by eating drincking bread wine and other visible creatures into his sacred Body and Bloud therefore though the proprietie of such creatures be changed in substance yet iuxta aliquid in some manner and sort they be set on that table still but wholly conuerted into the Body and Bloud of Christ kinde of wine aqua-uitae aqua-composita liquors sirrops can be founde in nature made by art deuised by witt but it is all seâ—t vpon this table and that in a small roome where it cloyeth not with the abundance or annoyeth with the vncleane handling it filleth without lothsomenes it prouoketh the appetite without danger of surfeting to be short were it not a banquett prouided by the sonne of God no maÌ„ would think it possible to haue such a feast made in the de sart of this wicked world Thus do we catholiks teach of the supper of our lord beleue it agreable to his word worthy his worshipp this banquett feedeth the whole man There is a reasonable soul to feed our reasoÌ„ a natural substaÌ„ce of flesh to feed nourish our flesh ther is the spirit of God which quickneth both soul flesh to life euerlasting This is the true Manna which containeth the tast of all sweetnes hath in it selfe all manner of pleasaÌ„t refectioÌ„ this is the food of life the which who so eateth worthely shall liue for euer This is the feast wherof Salomon speaketh Hoc itaque visum est mihi bonum Eccles 3 5. 7. c. This therfore seemeth to me good that a man eat drinck enioy gladnes of his labour which words S. Aust expouÌ„deth thus Non est bonum homini nisi c. It is De ciuit Dei li. 17. cap. 20. not good for a man but that which hee shall eat drinck what more credibly is he vnstood to say then that which belongeth to the partaking of this table which he himselfe a preist mediator of the new testament offreth or giueth according to the order of Melchisedech of his bodye bloode If then the Prophet hath affirmed the greatest good that maÌ„ hath in this life to be eating and drincking that eating drincking be long to the supper of our lord Christ we may perceiue right well that the matter substance of Christs supper coÌ„sisteth not in bread wine for then we might not be better occupied theÌ„ in eating and drincking but in the reall flesh blood of Christ wherin al goodnes spiritual corporall is collected into one heape giueÌ„ vnto vs vnder the form of bread wine for so God hath appointed Instaurari omnia in Christo que in celis que in terra c. To renue al things
liue for euer In S. Mathew the 26. and S. Marke 14 Chap. His body his bloud of the new Testament In S. Luke the 22 Chap. His body which is giuen for vs and the Chalice which is the new Testament in his blood which is shed for vs. In S. Paul the first epistle to the Corinth and 11 Chap. The bread which we break is the communicating of our Lordes body the Chalice of blessing which we blesse is the communicating or pertaking of Christes bloud The newe Gospellers that saye they sticke only to Gods worde yet cannot finde one Apostle one Euangelist one Prophet or Patriarch that taught our Lordes supper to be a signe S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. threatheth damnation to him that vnworthily eateth it and he calleth vnworthy eating not only the contempt therof or lacke of faith but euen the omitting to proue or examine him himselfe before he eate our Lords body and that because hee maketh no difference betwixte it and common meates yet come the protestants with a newe doctrine affirming that we receiue not our Lordes body into our bodies but an euident signe and token thereof They admit no authority no rule no triall of matters belonging to faith but onlie the holye Scriptures immediately they breake their owne rule In so much as the holy Scriptures calling the Supper of our Lord his body and bloud they teache it to be an euident token of his body bloud if they keepe not their owne rule who can they binde to keepe the same But the Protestants will aske me perhaps whether the Lordes Supper bee not a Sacrament if a Sacranient then also a signe or token I aunswere they that prescribe rules of bleeuing to the worlde they that will haue all thinges prooued by the touch-stone of Gods worde they that for pretence of following the Gospell haue stirred vp so great strife through all Christendome must not talke with vs vvith if and and vvith conditions and peraduentures but they must bring forth the vvorde of God for that they saye So that although the Supper of our Lord were neuer so much a Sacrament surely to them it vvere none because they cannot proue out of the vvorde of God vvhere it is so named to vs it is both a Sacrament and a Sacrifice a Sacrament because vve are so taught by tradition from the Apostles a Sacrifice because Malachie the Mal. Cap. 1. Prophet in the person of God expressely saieth In omni loco sacrificatur offertur nomini meo oblatio munda quia mag num est nomen meum in gentibus In euery place a pure oblation is sacrificed offered to my name because my name is great among the Gentiles There is absolutely no cleane pure oblatioÌ„ but the sacrifice of Christs body bloud which was offered to death not in euery place but without the gate of Hierusalem alone the same is at this day vnbloudely offered in the Masse in euery place wheresoeuer amongst the gentiles the name of God is rightly called vpon Thus both they and we may proue the supper of our Lord to be a Sacrifice by Scripture but that it is a Sacrament we can proue because our forefathers deliuered such a Doctrine to vs they cannot proue the same seeing they will not be bounde to vnwritten Traditions If they flie to the Church for naming it it is a Sacrament the same Church teacheth them ther be seauen Sacraments but the Protestants say they find but two sanctified and deliuered by Christ allowed of the olde fathers Ambrose Augustine but concerning the deliuery of Sacraments by Christ they might haue founde it in the worde of God Confirmation in the 8. cap. of the Acts of the Apostles Penance Iohn 20. Extreame-Vnction Iac. 5. Preisthood Luc. 22. Matrymony Ephes 5. And not onely Baptisme and the Eucharist But what talke is this to say S. Ambrose S. Augustinâ— allowe the workes of Christ Was not the deliuery and consecration of Christ of sufficient authority except Ambrose and Augustine had proued it I thought Ambrose Augustine should haue beene allowed by Scripture and not Scripture by them I stande with them vpon the authority of the worde of God Proue me thence these two Sacraments alone yea proue that they are so named at all what Gospell called Baptisme a sacrament What holy write nameth the Supper of our Lord a sacrament Daâ—e they giue these thinges a name that which is not in the worde of God What warrant haue they for that deede They will say Ambrâ—se and Aâ—gustine call them so I replye Peter and Paul call them not so at other times and with other men I will stay vpon the authoritye of Ambrose and Augustine whom as I ought to doe I reuerence for men of excellent vertue learning but they were men as they were woont to say they might erre and be deceiued heare first the Scriptures to whom Protestantes appeale onely and afterwardes you shall heare what the Fathers say But first I say that neither the olde Testament nor the new calleth the Supper of our Lorde a Sacrament therefore the Protestantes that so call it goe from the assurance of the word of God to the good and laudable inuentions and Traditions of men which themselues condemne wheÌ„ they list And yet they so cal it a Sacrament that vpoÌ„ that only word the authors thereof ground all their doctrin thence it hath to be a signe to be a tokeÌ„ to be a badge a seale a patterne a counterpaine thence all the figuratiue doctrine riseth thence it commeth that the reall body and bloud of Christ is denied to bee vnder the formes of bread and wine Shall now so much as Christ hath plainlye spoken of his bodye and bloud so much as his Apostles and disciples haue preached and written in that behaulf shall now all this be ouerthrowne by an vnwritten veritye are these the men of God who flie from S. Mathew S. Marke S. Luke Saint Iohn Saint Paul to Augustine and Ambrose If none but Prophets and Apostles had written where had they found two Sacraments Where had they read that the supper of our Lord is a signe and token they make much a-doe about the worde of God vntill they haue gotten credite among the ignorant and then they quite leade them from al the worde of God I speake to such good Christians as haue the true loue of the worde of God lefte in their heartes to them I speake giue not ouer S. Mathew S. Iohn Saint Paul for Ambrose and Augustine giue not ouer Christ who is God and man to haue the opinion of whatsoeuer Doctor and Father in causes of beleife Some men in comparison of others be of great authoritye but in comparison of God all men be nothing at al God saieth This is my body nowe whatsoeuer man or Angell from heauen tell you this is not the bodye of Christ but onely a figure of it beleeue him not but
Bloud to be wordes figuratiue For when they call it a Figure they meane not a Figure of Rhetoricke but a misticall Figure and calling it a signe they meane not a naturall signe or token but a misticall signe that is to say a secret and miraculous kinde or token such as the state of the newe Testament requireth the nature whereof is to doe that which it sayeth because Christ the speaker performeth all that by his diuine power and substance which his worde spoken by the mouth of his manhoode in holy Sacraments doth vtter and signifie Now he that woulde the Sacrament of Christ so to be a signe that he shoulde not make that thing to be his Body in deede whereof in worde he saith This is my Body he most wickedly denyeth the godhead of Christ This blessed Sacrament of the Altar is such a signe as is withall a secret miracle for it is a miracle not shewed to Infidels but onlie to the faithfull For as the birth of CHRIST is a signe to the faithfull only who beleeue Christ being God and man trulie to haue beene borne of a Virgin without seede of man by the almighty power of the holy Ghost according to that Ipse Deus dabit vobis signum Esa 7. ecce virgo â—oncipiet pariet c. Right so the supper of Christ is a signe of his Body and Bloud to the faithfull only who beleeue the nature of bread and wine to be turned into his body and bloud without generation or corruption by the only power of the word of Christ who said after bread taken and blessing made This is my Body This is my Bloud doe this thing for the remembrance of me Beholde the making of Christs Body and Bloud for the remembrance of his death that is the signe we speake of this was the memory or the remembrance whereof Dauid said Memoriam Psal 110. fecit mirabilium suorum Our Lorde hath made a remembrance of his meruailous workes c. And thinke we that a remeÌ„brance of meruailous things is made of God without a miracle S. Cyprian Cipr. de Cena do saith the bread to be made fleshe Omnipotentia verbi By the Almightie power of the worde S. Augustine calleth it Aug. manu ca. 11. Chris de Sacerd. Lib. 3. Mirabile Sacrificium S. Chrysostome cryeth out O miracle o the goodnesse of God he that sitteth aboue with the father in the selse-same moment of time is touched with the handes of all men If thou aske howe it is made saith Damascene it is enough Damas de orthod fid Lib. 4 Cap. 14. for thee to heare that it is made by the holy Ghost euen as our Lord made for himselfe and in himselfe a body out of the Virgine Mother of God we knowe no more but that the worde of God is true strengthfull Eus lib. 5. demonst cap. 3. Beda in hom Vidit Iesus Basil in Liturg. Greg. Niss in orat de Pascat Hiero. in Leuit. Niceph. lib. 1. cap. 28. Almighty Eusebius calleth it Admiralem exitum oraculi A meruailous euent of the Oracle S. Bede nameth it A sanstification of the holy Ghost that cannot be vttered by speache The like wordes haue Saint Basil Saint Gregory Nissenus Saint Hierome Nicephorns Thus much I thought good briefly to say concerning the manner howe the blessed Sacrament of the Altar is a signe token mysterie or remembrance euerie worde whereof expounded according to the Gospell and to the state of the newe Testament doth proue the reall presence of Christes bodye and bloud vnder the formes of bread and wine It is a Sacrament which outwardlye signifieth that which is inwardly wrought it is a figure containing the trueth figured it is a signe meete for the inslitution of Christ whose signes are miraculous it is a secret token knowne onlie to those that beleeue it is the remembrance of Christes death by the presence of the body which died what shall I say more It is the body bloud of Christ couered from our eies reuealed to our faith feeding presently our bodies and soules to life euerlasting When Tertullian and S. Augustine say Christ gaue a figure or signe of his body the Protestant Grammarians vnderstand a Rhetoricall figure as Metonymia or Synechdoche or such a figure as it is set vp at an Ale-house or Wine-tauerne but the Doctors meane a peculiar signe and token miraculously instituted by Christ which conteyneth and giueth to the faithfull the truth which it betokeneth Signes and figures in the Sacraments consist of words and the matter as of Water and I Baptise c. Bread and Hoc est c. of Oyle c. Christs wordes make that which they signifie otherwise neither body nor figure thereof Againe which of the holy Fathers teacheth that Body standeth to signifie the figure of body Many Fathers say the wordes of Christ are plaine manifest true and effectuall but no man telleth of such a strainge taking of the wordes Body Bloud no man witnesseth them to be taken for the figures of body and bloud and no maruell for no man knewe that interpretation They Note well knowe that the true body of Christ giuen after such a sort vnder the formes of bread and wine was a figure of the selfe same body either walking visibly vpon earth or suffering vpon the Crosse or sitting nowe at the right hand of his Father or intending to come to iudgement They coulde tel that a thing present in a secret manner is a token signe and a watch-worde to all the faithfull of an open manner either past or to come in the same thing by this meanes they confessed the Sacrament to be the signe of Christes body and bloud but they knewe no such figure as the SacrameÌ„taries haue deuised they neuer could tell of Synecdoche or Metonymia they knewe sacramentall and not rhetoricall figures mysticall not poeticall holy and not prophane Lâ—t him therfore that wil haue any thing made at al of Christs wordes acknowledge them to be proper to signify somewhat and to make that they signifie which is the true body bloud of Christ vnder those outward ryndes or visible formes of bread and wine For as vnder the visible fleshe of Christ his Godhead lay priuy but yet was truely present and had assumpted his flesh into one person euen so vnder the visible forme of bread the fleshe of Christ is really present in the holy mysteries and therefore we touch that flesh when wee touch the forme of bread as S. Thomas did touch the Godhead wheÌ„ he touched the fleshe of Christ for in each place we touch not either the godhead or the fleshe visibly but by the meane of that thing wherein it is truely present that thing I say receiued of vs doth make his death resurrection to be remembred Hath he not al that euer Christ did presently before his eies who hath Christ himselfe present But take Christ away and afterward it
to S. Paul on earth and yet at that present sat at his fathers right hand in heauen To be briefe such a glorified deficate body to whome by power of his diuinity vnited thereunto nothing is impossible this I say if Heretickes woulde beleeue with vs then to them the flesh of Christ would profit much This is my Body this is my Bloud said Christ the pronounâ— This pointeth to body or bloud and not to bread and wine as appeareth by the genders contrary God prouided of purpose that the article This therefore shoulde neither agree with bread nor with wine but only with body bloud or with the Chalice wherin the bloud is conteyned and therefore this to be true that Christs very body and bloud is in the B. Sacrament of the Altar as being most expresse and plaine by the very words of christ we are bound to beleue though to declare the maner how excedeth mans reason because he said it to whom nothing is impossible And therefore for ignorant vnlearned meÌ„ especially when heretikes aske the reason how it is possible for Christ to be here there in many places at once it is not fit for theÌ„ to reasoÌ„ but to haue recourse to faith which is aboue reason plainly say I beleeue Christ that said This is my body to whose power nothing is impossible and let the heretike demand scof or flout neuer so much go you nofurder with him but leaue him to the more lerned that caÌ„handle him better For with his whyes how 's he deceueth the simple souls as the serpent did Eue who begaÌ„ first with the woman the weaker vessell whereby diuines vnderstand the sensual part or inferior part to reason proposed things that seemed delectable reasonable and good and so in the end drew reason and all awry making her to consent by answering first doubtfully and so made her doe the things vnlawfull but if shee neuer had stood to haue reasoned or answered the wily serpeÌ„t but had fled him at first she had neuer bin ouercome The diuel theÌ„ in like maner against the simple childreÌ„ of Gods Church taketh the bodies of heretiks his members speaketh in theÌ„ as in paradise he spake in the body of the serpent so poore simple soules listning to his wily crafts he deceiueth vnder pretence of good casteth them out of paradise Christs kingdome that is his holy Church wherefore flie you alwaies the whispering of that olde serpent in heretikes that you be not deceiued with theÌ„ For heresy creepeth as a canker and the diuels deceipts be diuers many somtimes he armeth hiÌ„ selfe against the people of God with the word of God euill vnderstood to ouerthrow the truth of Gods word in this SacrameÌ„t other misteries of our redeÌ„ption as wheÌ„ Christ saith poore men shal you Ioh. 12. 8. alwaies hauâ— c. meaning passible in forme of pouerty but not by withdrawing himself from vs by his corporal preseÌ„ce in this B. Sacram. as wheÌ„ it is said he is risen asceÌ„ded into heaueÌ„ we must vn derstand he is neuerthelesse in his sacred flesh meat indeed in this miraculous mistery and so in spirit truth with vs all daies euen to the end of the worlde For Christ ascended into heaueÌ„ there sitting at the right hand of his father and leauing vs the beliefe thereof as a chiefe article of our faith Christ made his owne supper saying This is my Bodye and commaunded his Apostles and their successors to make the same saying doe and make this thing for the rememberance of me Therfore neither the making of Christs bodye neither the beleefe thereof can be contrary to the sitting of Christ at the right hand of his father Againe sith nothing is impossible to God albeit that which implieth contradiction in it selfe be therefore impossible because it repugneth to the truth it felfe which is God is it not possible to God Christ shoulde both be in heauen after one visible sort and in the Sacrament after a misticall sort It were impossible for the body of Christ both to be in heauen and not in heauen or to be in the Sacrament and not to bee there in the same respect but to bee in heauen and in the Sacrament or to bee in many places at once that maketh no contradiction but only sheweth an allmighty infinite power in him who worketh it In somuch as Christ is allmighty to sitt at the right hand of God he is able to performe his owne word gift in the Sacrament of the Altar and therefore in the sixt of S. Iohn when hee spake of eating his flesh and drinking his bloud which he would giue he also declared that he would go vp into heauen in his man-hoode where hee was before in his god-head And that thing hee spake as S. Cirillus hath noted to declared that he was God and therfore able to worke that which hee spake of in so much as his wordes were Spirit and Chris de sacerdotiâ— lib. 3. Life For this cause S. Chrysostome crieth out O miraculum O dei benignitatem O miracle O goodnes of God hee that sitteth aboue with the Father in the same very momente of time is touched with the handes of men and deliuereth himselfe to those that will receaue and imbrace him seeme these thinges worthy to bee despised and neglected thou shalt perceaue our holye things not only to bee wonderfull but also exceed all wondring and astonying of the mind Thus saith S. Chrisostome This Blessed Sacrament then thus miraculously instituted by Christ for a perfect memorye of his death and pleadge of his infinite loue with all reuerence and honor is to bee vvorshipped and vvith gratefull memories and pure hartes to bee receaued of vs seeing hee coulde shevv vs no greater token of vnmeasurable loue then this by giuing himselfe wholy vnto vs nor deuise any more excellent way to declare the same For as a man that in fight is wounded with a scarre in his face for his friendes sake comming with that in his face putteth his frend in more perfect memorye of his loue then if hee left or sent him an hundreth other tokens so Christ for our loue taking a deepe vvounde to death coulde leaue vs no more perfect memory thereof then his ovvne bodye in an vnspeakable mistery whereby his death is shewed vntill hee come to iudgment at the end of the vvorlde For euen as the noble actes vvhich other men haue donne bee written vpon their sepulchers so in this memorie of Christ his actes are daylie shewed and rehearsed Then his Incarnation is beâ—okened most mistically vvhen breade is made fleshe as the vvorde was before made fleshe and that Incarnation is represented in outvvarde shevv also by singing of the Angells hymne Glory bee to God in the highest Then See here how in the B. Sacrament at Masse the whole life death and resurrection of Christ is represented the going before of
Sacrament actuallie that naturall dimension and occupying of place which it hath otherwise but as hee hath ordayned it to be so is it vnder diuers formes of bread in diuers places at once by his omnipotencie to whome nothing is impossible Here I am sure many will stand with mee and say they beleeue not so to whome I aunswere that by so saying they haue condemned themselues Iohn 6. 64 to bee of those of whome Christ sayed There are some of you whoe beleeue not For if CHRIST sayed by that which vvas bread before his blessing which still seemed bread if Christ said thereof This is my body and gaue it vnder twelue peeces or formes seeing they for the most of them I thinke confesse him to be able to make his body present vnder diuerse formes and to haue promised to giue his flesh and to haue said This is my body and to haue giuen it to twelue how can they denie that his bodye was present at that supper vnder twelue dyuers formes of bread beeing whole and all vnder each forme The confessing also of that which Christ said is a thing appertaining to faith because the speaker is God to whom all faith belongeth to beleeue this that God saieth must needes bee a vertue and to discredit it is a great vice But some will still perhappes alleadge that The flesh profitteth nothing Iohn 6. the wordes of Christ are spirit and life That is true and therefore I beleeue that vvhen he said Take eate this is my body he gaue his body not without life and spirit but yet as really as euer by saying Gen. 1. Let the light bee made hee made the light for his words be not deadfleash which profiteth nothinge but quicken and giue life how and whensoeuer it pleaseth him much better then the spirit and soule of a man is able to quicken and make liuelye the bodye wherein it is These two saying This is my body and my wordes are spirit and life stand so well together that I beleeue the one for the others sake Christs wordes neuer want spirit and life power to quicken other things euen as his fleshe neuer lacked all kinde of spirite in it selfe For when the soule was out of it yet the God-head remayned and corporallye dwelte in it and the soule returned to it againe the third day Collos 2. Therefore when Christ said This is my body which is giuen for you I am bound to beleeue that his bodye is neither without soule nor godhead for else it were not truly said it is giuen sor vs if it vvere not profitable to vs. Thus you see that I beleeue all the wordes of Christ together and that you not doing so are without you repent certaine to bee condemned sor not beleeuing these words Take eate this is my body you will say you beleeue these wordes yet not carrially but spiritually as it is meete for Christs wordes to bee beleeued O Sir he that assigneth a meane how he wil beleeue Christs words in that very fact sheweth himselfe not to beleeue them For beliefe inuenteth nothing of his owne but followeth the authority of God that speaketh I beleeue in deede that Christs wordes cannot be carnall as you take carnall words for foule grosse meanings but I see it to be a very cleane and pure meaning that the most pure substance of the flesh of Christ should be giuen vnder the forme of bread to the end it may be eaten of vs and the chiefe and the cleanest thing we vse to eate is bread to giue therefore the chiefe and most healthfull flesh in the worlde to be eaten vnder rhe forme of the purest eatable thing is a very pure and cleane worke farre from carnality You will say it is more pure if it be rather beleeued to be eaten only of the hart of man by faith and spirit then by mouth and body I answere that it is no pure eating of a corporall thing which taketh away the truth of corporall eating Againe both waies of eating are better then one of theÌ„ alone I beleeue his reall flesh to be eaten with hart and mouth to be eaten with body mind to be eaten in deed in faith Here faileth your beliefe because of two true things you beleeue but one the other you discredit To be short let vs imagine him that beleeueth the real presence of Christs body and bloud vnder the formes of bread and wine to stande before the seat of Gods iudgment and that Christ asketh him why he did beleeue and worship his body and bloud vnder the formes of bread and wine may he not well answere in this vvise I beleeued so and did so because your Maiestie taking bread and hauing blessed it doubted not to say This is my body which wordes all my forefathers vnderstoode to be spoken properly and to be true as they sounded and therefore at the commandement of my Prelates I a dored your bodye vnder the forme of bread If CHRIST reply that hee had Preachers whoe taught him otherwise cried to him to beware least he committed Idolatry First that obiection might not bee made to any man that died aboue 80. yeares past because no Preacher taught publikely any such doctrine Secondly if so much were said to one of our time he might answere that hee had moe forefathers and moe Preachets and those much more auncient and more honest men who required him to beleeue Christs wordes and to worship the body of his maker Well nowe wee are come to the point all the Catholickes haue preached with one accorde that it is the true body of Christ and the Gospell witnesseth that CHRIST said This is my body here is the worde of God and the tradition and preaching of man ioyned togither I aske whether it bee possible for CHRIST vvhoe requireth of vs nothing so earnestly as beâ—iefe to condemne that simple man who being otherwise of good life beleeued his worde and his forefathers and the Preachers agreeable with both or no answere me for what fault shall this poore man be condemned First to beleeue Christ it is no fault Secondly Christ said This is my body Thirdly he beeing an infant was of his parentes taught that to be the body of Christ which was holdeÌ„ ouer the Priests head Fourthly as many and moe preach to him when he commeth to lawfull age say this is the body of Christ as there are that afterwarde preach the contrary tel me then what was his fault for which hee may bee condemned If you say his eyes tould him it was not the body of Christ hee vvill ansvvere that for the reuerence he bare to the worde of God hee denied the sensible instruction of his eyes as giuing more credit to Christ then to himselfe is that a fault If you replie that by that means he might haue worshipped the rock in steede of Christ hee will answere he knoweth not what you meane he neuer had any rock
Diuel and all his members and to our vnspeakable comfort and endlesse ioy in heauen that whereas here vvee nowe truly receaue CHRIST in this vnspeakeable misterie there wee may bee fedde and enioy his presence in that endlesse glorie vvhich hee onr LORD IESVS graunt who bee blessed for euer But yet moreouer one thing is to bee considered touching the manner of receauing this blessed Sacrament vvhich is that although CHRIST gaue this blessed Sacrament vnto his Apostles vnder both kindes that is his body and bloud apart and although both Bishops and Priests as oft as they celebrate Masse according to Christs institution are to receaue vnder both kinds yet the holy Church vpon most weighty consideration giueth the lay people but only one kind that is the holy Host Christs body and that which the Priest or Clarke giueth them after in the Chalice or in a glasse is but wine to washe their mouthes lest any of the holy Host shoulde be left behinde or sticke in the mouth neither are lay persons in this receauing vnder one kinde defrauded of the bloude of Christ nay they receaue in that one kinde as fully and perfectly Christ as the Priest that may liuely represent Christs Passion and shedding of his bloud as the publicke Minister of the Church receaueth both For though his body be consecrated apart and his bloud apart in mistery to signifie the effusion thereof and his death in his Passion yet Christ is not deuided and therefore whosoeuer receaueth his bodye likewise receaueth hys bloud as being nowe inseperably ioyned together For although through the force of the words of the Sacrament by consecration the body and bloud be seuerally present vpon the Altar yet by the concommitance naturall and inseparable vnion betwixt them it necessarily followeth that where the body is there also is the bloud and where the bloud there likewise the body Yet sor feare of inconueniences that might chaunce if the common people should receaue vnder both kindes yea and for conseruation of vniformity in receauing this B. Sacrament the knot of peace in all persons and places of the worlde and for other iust causes the holy Church who hath to dispose of this B. Sacrament as of the rest according to time and place for the most edifying of the people giueth it them vnder one kinde only knowing that Christ hath promised as much grace and saluation to the one kinde as to both For he that said the 6. of S. Iohn Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the sonne of man drink his bloud you shall not haue life in you hee likewise in the same chapter saide He that eateth this bread shall liue for euer yea he our Sauiour likewise as appeareth the 24. Chap. of S. Luke gaue it two of his disciples vnder one kind when he tooke bread blessed and gaue to them and their eyes were opened and they knewe him which was that bread as manye learned fathers vnderstand that bread of life I saye that came downe from heauen Christ himself his blessed body which would GOD the heretickes in true faith and charitye would dispose them selues with vs yea and the Disciples of Christes to receaue then no doubt their eyes would bee opened to see and bee partakers of the truthe whose eyes alas infidelity pride and other sins haue so blinded that whereas at first some of them began to contend for the cup the bloud of our Lord in breaking vnity charity in departing from the church they haue of Gods hea uy iustice and iudgement who in obstinat sinners suffereth one sinne to bee the punishment of an other lost both body bloud the price of their redemption al. Likwise as it appeareth in the acts of the Apostles they also themselus Act. 2. 42. ca. 20. 7 sometimes gaue it the people vnder one kinde as the Church now vniuersally doth through the whole world practise and vse and of most auncient time the people receaued vnder one kind as by many testimonies miraculous examples when in the Primatiue Church this B. Sacrament vnder one kinde as now was reserued caried about and giuen to the lay people if leasure and time would permit me I could shewe most euidently proue The Arke of God also carried about the wales of Hierico with solemnity of trumpets whereby the munitions of the impious fell downe betokening this B. Sacrament the Arke of the liuing God with all honour solemnly carried in Procession with all jubely of harts melody of voyces grauity of the Ecclesiasticall and noble personages adorned with most precious attire and riche ornaments assisted vvith troupes of the deuout people of both sectes euerye one occupied in their degree some hanging the streetes and wales with cloath of their best Tapestrie and Aurice like the true Israelites that furnished the tabernacle and adorned Salomons temple with their riches and Iewells others with the deuout companies of the Iewes spread their garments in the waies and strew the streats with rushes herbes flowers palme boughs and fragment blossomes others like valiant souldiers of that worthye Gedeon carry vvith exultations torches and lightes in their handes and sound out with great solemnity and pleasant harmony the sacred bells materiall trumpets of Christ his Church and other musicall instruments others with holy Ioseph Nichodemus and those deuout woemen couer as is meete the most maiesticall and venerable Sacrament the most blessed bodye of our Lorde with their white and finest sindons and most precious Iewells others with all or with the greatest parte of their riches and posessions chiefly in the honour hereof haue erected Altars of the best marble siluer golde and precious sâ—ones and haue builded most magnificent temples in diuers nations of the world litle inferour to Salomons temple in greatnes but farre excceding it in true honor and glory by the pure gratfull and sincere worship of God in that healthfull Sacrisice In temples this diuine mistery is reserued in guilt tabernacle with lampe and light to the comfort of the faithfull and health of the sicke from hence in solemne procession it is caried in holye vessell and sacred hands through Church princely street and couered path young olde of all states degrees prostrating themselues in body and mind singing with ioyfull harts sweet coÌ„sent in voice with those deuout children of God Hosanna filio Ioh. 12. 13. Dauid blessed be he that commeth in the name of our Lord. And so the deuout army of God carying the banners displaied with the triumphant ensigne and standerd of the Crosse beseech him for Christ his sonnes sake there present al of one hart and accord that the rocks of sinne and walles of Satan may be pulled down that the people of God may haue true libertye the weedes of iniquitye may be rooted out true vertue may be exalted iustice executed God chieflye honoured and gloryfied in his people that so Christ resting in his sacred tabernacle remayning in his holy
same they be praised by most ancient Fathers and manye of them practised in the Apostles time and by experience we find stirre vp reuerence and deuoton in mennes heartes and therefore may not be left off for heretikes scoffing who in so doing not onlye shew themselues ridiculous but of all graue and good men rather to be lamented than with tauntes aunswered Chap. IX Of the holy Sacrament of Baptisme and of the necessity thereof NOwe in disposition of these Sacraments in number seauen Godes prouydence wisedome is cheifly declared whereby he gouerneth nourish eth and confirmeth the best ordered common-weale his holy Church for as you see in a temporall common wealthe first for the encrease thereof be required procreation of Children euen so in Christes common-weale the Church is required a Spirituall regeneration or newe-birth as it were of Children wherby we be made Christians and heires of God and this is performed by the first Sacrament which is Baptisme whereby we be all borne againe in Christ For euen as vnlesse we were borne of Adam wee should not haue original sinne euen so vnlesse we by Baptisme at least in will and desire bee borne agayne in Christ we cannot be iustified which Sacrament is of such necessitye that none without it can be saued at leastwise if he cannot come to it in will and affection or in bloode with the Innocents and this is plainly Christs own wordes who taught vs Vnles we be borne again of Mat. 28. Mar. 16. Ioh. 3. Water and the Holy Ghost we cannot enter into the kingdom of God Aud therefore because it is so needfull that none but in that sort as I said before without it can be saued therefore see the goodnesse of Christ our Sauiour that did ordaine the matter thereof in no other liquor but in water only which is common to all and most easily may be had yet besids that though none but a Priest is the ordinary minister of the Sacrament yet if a Priest cannot be had rather than the Childe or Person should die without Baptisme so be lost for euer god hath ordained that either Man or Woman Turke or Iewe or Heretike in time of neede when no other person can be had may baptise yea and it is truely Christened and cannot be Christened againe so they haue intent to doe that the holy Church doth vse the same wordes with Water together which the Church doth which is most easie as I Baptise thee in the name of the Father and of the Sonne of the Holy Ghost Amen And the reason why Baptisme is of such necessitye that none can be saued without it is this because al we by the trespasse of our first Parents Adam and Eue are all borne in Originall sinne sonnes of wrath perdition for as I said before we all sinned in Adams fal as taking body of him which being corrupted in him who of God was created good but sinned of himselfe as in the root and being begotten of the same masse wherof he was the In this place I woulde imitate S. Austen in his Enchiridion alibi first Father next to God the creator man but not of sin we be all by Gods iust iudgement borne thral to the same damnation that he was in that he disobeyed God in token whereof we feele in our selues the very same infirmity in our bodies and mindes that hee incurred by sinne For such was the state of our first Parentes that were created in Originall iustice that in keeping GODS holy Commaundement they shoulde without death of bodye freelye haue passed without labour and paine through this transitorye life to euerlasting life But as soone as man hadde disobaied GOD he and all his issue fell into infinite miseries as GOD threatned hym he shoulde doe saying if hee broke his Commaundement he shoulde dye as being subiecte to the death of bodye and soule whereas before Adams fall mans Free-will was of such valewe and force that his bodye was altogether if the faulte were not in himselfe through GODS grace subiecte to reason and his vvill But novve by loosing of that first iustice quite contrarye mans Free-wil though not quite lost as Heretikes lye yet it is so much enfeebled that without Gods speaciall grace and assistance it can doe nothing good in his sight to the obtaining of Saluation Hereuppon it commeth to passe that the holye Apostle complaineth that he felt a Lawe in his members repugnant to the Lawe of his minde leading him captiue and subiecte vvhether hee vvoulde not that is as much to saye a kinde of rebellion that by Adams trespasse we his poore children feele in our bodies vvhich is concupiscence that reigneth in vs and prouoketh vs to euill contrarye to right reason vvhich if it be not resisted it leadeth vs to sinne and damnation Our good Lord then full of mercie and pittye seeyng vve could fall without him but not rise without him sent his only begotten sonne the Seconde Adam to take vpon him our fraile nature and to be made like vnto vs in all thinges sauing sinne and some such infirmities and defectes as doe proceede of sinne VVherefore that vessell of God that most pure immaculate blessed Virgine conceiued him without sinne of the holy Ghost without knowledge of man which Sauiour though he is God yet is hee perfect man also in one person that is Christ God and man vvho beecause he being God tooke vpon him our nature without al spot of sin therefore Some other causes likwise be why christ was not subiect to death of duty except only the wil ordinance of his father who of his one good will gaue his life for vs. he was not subiect to death of duty necessity which other men be for sin Wherefore the Diuel who had all mankind subiect to death for sinne yet him he had not in that thraldome Christ was only except which that old wily serpent not perfectly knowing to bee Christ the wisdome of God intrapped him in his own snare For the Diuell enuying our Sauiour by his holy life and preaching drawing such multitudes frō sin euill life was affraid the whole world woulde haue followed him and his kingdome haue decaied Wherefore hee stirred vp his ministers the Iewes to make a ready dispatch and put him to death which malice of the Diuell and his ministers Christ turned to the saluation of the whole worlde for whereas thereby the Diuell thought to haue wonne many he lost all for putting our Sauiour to death vniustlye hee lost those whome he possessed before in some sort iustly Chap. X How necessarie and fruitfull Christs passion is to all that follow him in pacience good workes and how by Baptisme the vertue thereof is applied to our soules BVt you must vnderstand though Christ died to saue the whole worlde yea one drop of his precious blood in that sort as it was euer after the Incarnation vnited to his diuinity
carnis sanguinis Christi veritate in hoc Sacramento non est relictus ambigendi locus The reall presence proued by authorities of fathers There is no place lefâ—e at all to doubt touching the verity of Christes body and blood in this most holye and venerable Sacrament But yet to satisfie some-thing more your godlye desire I will sett downe some authorities as I finde written in a famous late writer breifly collected by him touching this matter If euery man saieth he is to be credited and ought to haue authority in his owne art and facultye if when wee buylde wee call a Carpenter to counsell and when we make gardens a gardener how much more must wee esteeme the Doctors of the Church who are not onlye cunning by long labour bestowed vppon the science of Diuinitye but also haue so vertuously vsed them selues that they haue been a boundantlye instructed in all knowledge by maruelous inspirations of the holy Ghoste whose names bee so great that the verie Heretickes cannot denye them to be holy Saintes in Heauen and therfore they pretend to haue the first sixe hundred yeares of their sides It is theÌ„ a good sure way to work with the aduice of those auncient Fathers whose sayinges because they be otherwhere as in manye bookes of common places and other writters more at large and more particularlye alleadged I will here be more breife First very many Fathers speaking of Christs wordes or deedes when after bread taken and thankes giuen hee said This is my body alleage the Almightye power of God to defend The veritye of those deedes and wordes therefore the same Fathers beleeued those wordes This is my body to be true in so wonderfull a manner as they sounde at the first sight and seing they meane according to their most vsuall sounde that this which is pointed vnto though it seeme still bread is not-withstandinge the substance of Christes body we ought to thinke that those Fathers beleeued the reall presence of Christs body otherwise they woulde neuer haue alleadged his God-head or Almighty power and omnipotencie for the instituting of a figure and signe of his owne bodye sith for the institution of signes and figures such an authoritie might haue serued as God gaue to Moyses who was but seruant to Christ and not God S. Ireneus saith How can they be sure Lib. 5. cap 34. the bread whereon thankes are giuen to be the body of their Lorde and the Chalice of his bloud if they say not him to be the Sonne of the maker of the world S. Ireneus was so sure that Christ through his Diuiue power made the bread whereon thankes were giuen his owne body that if the God-head were denied which shoulde worke that presence no man could be sure of the presence of Christes body and he might haue beene sure of a figuratiue presence though Moyses had beene the minister of that Sacrament not Christ Saint Ciprian that bread which our In ser de cena Do. Lord gaue to the disciples by the omnipotencie of the worde was made flesh what needed omnipotencie to be alleaged for a fact that were not supernaturall S. Hillary speaking of the Sacrament Lib. 8. de Trin. sayeth By the profession of our Lord it is truly flesh and truly blood is not this thing the truth it may in deed chaunce not to be true to them whoe deny Iesus Christ to bee true God as who should say if his Godhead maye stand his flesh must needes bee truely present Saint Basill to shew that these words In reg bre quest 172. This is my body make full perswation alleadgeth out of Saint Iohn the glorye or God-head and also the Incarnation of Christ because except hee were both true God and true man This is my body should not make full perswation sith if he were not man he should not haue a body whereof those wordes might be verified If hee were not God wee might doubt how he were able to make his worde true but seeing hee is God and man and said This is my body there is no doubt of the presence of his body de iis qui init cap. 9. li. 4. De sacra cap. 4. 5. de sacer dot lib. 3. Euseb hom 5. â—n Pascha Saint Ambrose our Lord Iesus himself crieth This is my body he hath said it was made Saint Chrisostome O Miracle he that sitteth aboue c. And againe lett vs euery where giue credit vnto his wordes specially in the misteries Eusebius Emissenus Let the very power of him that consecrateth strengthen thee Saint Cirill of AlexaÌ„dria seeing God worketh let vs not aske how Damascene wee know no more but that the worde of God is true strengthfull allmighty but the maner is vnscrutable No wise man requireth vs earnestly to beleeue the words which himselfe doth thinke to bee figuratiue and parabolicall but he rather shoulde bidd vs beware that wee mistake them not as Saint Chrisostome In Gen. hom 21. vpon those wordes God repented crieth out see a grosse worde not that God repented God forbid but God speaketh to vs according to the custome of man Likewise Saint Augustine saith in respect In Iohn tract 4. Mat. 17. Iohn 1. of those wordes Iohn Baptist is Elias Our Lorde spake figuratiuely but Saint Iohn saying I am not Elias aunswered properly If now these words This is my body were figuratiue wee should haue been warned by the watch-men of God to beware of them as now we are required yea we are so required to beleue them that it is wonderfull to see and to consider how earnestly Doctors speake in Basil in reg q. 172. breuior that behalfe The certainty of our Lords words who saide This is my body which is giuen for you doe this thing for a remembrance of me in gender full perswasion Surely figuratiue words cannot make full perswasion because themselues are imperfect as lacking their proper signification which is the cheife vertue of wordes whereby they shoulde fully enforme vs for no figuratiue speech is so plaine as a proper speech is Epiphanius who so beleueth not In anchor sermon Catech. myst 4. the saying to be trew as him selfe spake hee is fallen from grace and saluation Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus Seeing Christ him selfe affirmeth so and saith of the bread This is my body who hereafter may be so bold as to doubt S. Ambrose Our De Sacra mento lib. 4. cap. 5. in Matth. hom 83. Lords Iesu him selfe giueth witnes vnto vs that we take his body and bloud ought we any thing to doubt of his fidelity as witnesse bearinge S. Chrysostome Because our Lord said This is my body let vs not be intangled with no doubtfulnes but let vs be leene and see it with eyes of vnderstanding Eusebius Emissenus Let al doubtfulnes of Hom. 5. in pasch ad Calosyrium infidelity depart for so much as the author of the guifte himselfe
in against them When Protestantes to couer their heresies about the Sacrament giue it honorable tearms we may say to them Lib. 8. de Trim. as Saint Hillarye saied to the Arrians who called Christ Lord Dominum licet nuncupes c. Albeit you name him Lord Yet you meane him not to bee the Lord because he is a Lord to you rather by a common kinde and familiar name then by nature Euen so pretende what honorable opinion or doctrine the Protestants list of Christs supper yet as long as by nature and substance they thinke not that externall gifte to be his body which himselfe called so they rather sooth it by a better name than meane it to be any better thing than a bare signe or figure Ebion although he denied Christs Godhead Epiphan Her 30. yet as Epiphanius telleth he affirmed him to rule Angells and all that euer was made by God and his scholers called him a Prophet and the Sonne of God which notwithstāding forsomuch as they beleeued him not to be God by nature the Catholikes neuer doubted to say that they taught him to be Nudum hominem A naked bare man Right so whatsoever holinesse bee annexed to bread and wine be it the signe of neuer so great a vertue and efficacy be it neuer so much called the body and bloud of Christ yet if it remaine still in the former substance if the trueth which it is appointed to signifie be absent it is bare bread and bare wine and a bare token of Christs Body and Bloud Some signes containe the trueth they signifie as a loaf set out that bread is there is to be solde another kind of signes signify the trueth absent as the Iuy-bushe doth wine The latter signe is a bare signe but not the first The Catholickes say the best and richest kinde of seales is in the sacrament because there is Christs body really present to signifie and as it were by seale to witnesse his owne death and Passion The bloudy sacrifices of the olde Lawe did better signifie Christs Passion than Protestants bread wine beeing but a bare signe Melchisedeche likewise had besides his bread wine the reall body of Abraham present whō he offered to God in him Iesus Christ his seede and so that also farre more excellent than bakers bread The body of Christ vnder the forme of bread is of it selfe both the thing and also a figure of the mystical vnity of the Church Res Sacramenti that is the thing of the Sacrament is the grace of God The substance of Christ vnder the forme of bread is the signe For Christ commeth in his own corporall presence to seaze and to endue vs with his grace Hence it commeth that S. Augustine so ofte calleth this Sacrament a figure because the body it selfe is heere not for it selfe but to put vs in possesion of so great a grace as the vnion with God is Moreouer those that say the bodye of Christ is eaten by faith only and no otherwise bee against the Gospell that affirmed Christ gaue his bodye with his owne handes beeing present and not at his fathers right hand But faith is Heb. 11. an argument of thinges to bee hoped for not appearing If in S. Iohn spirituall eating by faith bee only spoken of why is it said Dabo I will giue wheras sprituall eating was already giuen to all that euer beleued and therfore it was not to come but the bread which Christ will giue is his flesh and the guift therof is to come therfore it is more then a spirtuall eating by faith which was both past and present Note that the place in S. Iohn which Ioh. 6. heretiks take to make most for them in very deede maketh most against them What saith Christ If you see the Sonne of man ascending c. Whereby is declared the power of our Sauiours Godhead whereby onlye hee ascended which if the Capharnaits and heretikes woulde perfectly beleeue they woulde then neuer doubt of Christes reall presence in the Sacrament which through the omnipotencie of his godhead hee is able to performe Consider also against the heretikes these figure makers that it standeth well together the Eucharist to be a signe the truth as Christ is the Image of God and yet also God the higher euery signe or Image is the lesse it differeth from the truth and therefore the figure of Christs bodye and bloud differeth in forme but not in substance from Christ him selfe and so although the Sacrament be a figure yet the words This is my Body be not tropicall or vnproper Hoc that is the word This signifieth not bread but that is contained vnder bread Hoc facite doe this the making of the sacrificed substāce also must needes be a Sacrifice not only suffering himselfe to be seene of those that desire him as saith S. Chrysostome but also to In Iohn hom 45. be toucht eatē teeth to be fastned in his flesh al to be filled with desire of him Besides the reall presence sacrifice Christes body also hath a locall being in vs in respect that the substance of Christ occupieth the same place vnder the forme of bread which the substance of bread did occupie before when we haue that kinde of bread in vs euen so Christs beeing is locall in vs. Moreouer as Christ at his Incarnation came not from heauen by forsaking his glorie but by asumpting fleshe of the Virgin so nowe at the time of the Consecration his bodye commeth not downe from heauen but the bread is changed into his body by that meane his body is present with vs. And as after his resurrection hee ascended into heauen so after the communion the formes of bread and wine being consumed Christ ceasseth to be corporally with vs to the end wee should againe desire his presence well knowe these Note wel two cheife points of our beleife the one that the ende of the conioyning consisteth in spirit rather thā in flesh the other that the flesh of Christ really eaten is the means whereby we haue accesse to the spirite of God with trust confidence Now Christ cannot bee better present in spirite and grace then if hee bee present in his selfe therein to conuert to vs his spirite and grace for the cause of his taking flesh was to make his flesh an instrument to deliuer his spirite grace to our flesh to the end that no meane of prouiding for our saluation might be omitted by so louing a father In consideration wherof S. Ambrose saith Thou that Lib. 6. de Sacram. Cap. 1. takest his flesh art made pertaker of his diuine substance in that foode Note that the spirite and substance of God commeth to vs by taking Christes flesh Chap. XXIIII Of the excellency of the most blessed Sacrament and in what respect it is called a Sacrament signe or figure and yet is the very thing it selfe which it betokeneth IT
malecontent went his way This minister you see in his action declared what their communion bread is nothing but bare bakers bread in deede speake they neuer so gloriouslye of it to deceaue the simple and so bad that it is not worth the taking vp vvheras I haue proued to you before by most sure authority that the Blessed Sacrament that Christ left vs is no more bread but his very body and bloud in deed But they say you must receiue it in faith spirit how in faith spirit they speak a thing that neither they themselus nor any man els vnderstaÌ„deth for to say the truth there Communion is such a minion that they know not what to define or make of it or what to affirme such is the blindnes of heretikes when they haue once lost the high way for was there euer any that hard how a maÌ„ could eat Christ in a peece of bread nothing but breade or may we thinke them so strong in faith and spirit that with S. Paul they bee alwaies rauished when they come to their comunioÌ„ to the third heauen that so they may â—ate Christ at his fathers right hande but these slender â—uasioÌ„s be shifts for simple babes ouer childishe sauing that they wante not malice to bee answered Truthe it is the holye Catholicke Church teacheth two kinds of receauing the one is Sacramentall that is wheÌ„ we receiue the body bloud of Christ not with hart only earnest desire but also really truly and substantially in the B. Sacrament Christ god maÌ„ which euery christiaÌ„ is bound to do at due times when he can come to it Another manner of receiuing is with spirit feruent desire wheÌ„ a man caÌ„not or is not prepared sacramentally to receiue of this kind of receiuing S. Aust saith Crede manducasti beleiue thou hast eaten Now heretikes coÌ„found both these maÌ„ners of receiuing sacramental spirituall together so that when the holy Fathers speake of spirituall receiuing by ChristiaÌ„ charitable faith desire which euery good christiaÌ„ maÌ„ as oft as he think eth of this B. Sacrament or is present at it ought to haue that so more morâ— he may be fast lincked vnited and incorporate with Christ then do they either ignorantlye or maliciouslye vnderstand and peruert the holye Fathers as though they speake of Sacramentall receiuing and so in brabling of receiuing Christ by faith alone would exclude him out of the holy Sacrament contrary to his institution and so in that Sacrament by denying of Christ wherein our faith is cheifly excercised they lost both Christ therein yea faith deuotion religion and all But the holy Fathers which heretikes seldome reade or if they doe little vnderstand or not beleiue them when these blessed men I say spake of spirituall receauing as oft they doe they not onlye teach vs the great and stedfast faith earnest desire we ought to haue to this blessed Sacrament but the due preparation we ought to make worthely to receiue the same which is by innocent life and pure conscience remaining in Christ by feruent loue charity which is spiritually to receiue Christ that so he may remaine in vs we in him with this preparation if a man could not come to receiue sacrameÌ„tally the blessed Sacrament al the dayes of his life yet no doubt he should be saued for that thus spiritually he eateth Christ In like maner the holy Doctors namely Saint Augustine tearme this B Sacrament a signe or figure which we deny not for euery Sacrament is a figure of signe otherwise it could not be a Sacrament but in that the heretikes call it a bare signe as it were or an only figure and signe that by the holy Fathers doctrine we vtterlie denye and by Gods worde proue the contrary For the Sacrament of the Altar is both a signe or figure and yet the thing it selfe also which it signifieth or figureth as for example you see a loafe of bread stand before the bakers shopp to be sould it is both a signe that bread is there to be sould and yet very bread it selfe so the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar is a signe of Christes body and yet his very body it selfe How a signe of Christs body will you say Marry a figure and signe of Christes body dead broken crucified in an other quality then we receiue him in the blessed Sacrament For in the blessed Sacrament wee receiue Christes bodye though a very true and naturall bodye yet not subiect to those alterations and qualities our bodies bee and therfore wee receiue him with al if I might so tearme it which is verelie naturall a supernaturall bodye an impassible bodye a glorified body though in very deede before his Passion also hee gaue to his Disciples the very same bodye we nowe in the same Sacrament receiue giuing his owne body in his owne handes to his Disciples by his mighty diuine power vnited to that body to which power nothing is impossible So that as saith a late famous writer wee verely teach beleene the figure and the truth to stand together the supper of our Lord to bee the signe of Christs body and to bee his owne bodye the weaker parte is the signe the greater is the truth but both doth not only stand together in one Sacrament but furthermore the true nature of euery Sacrament of Christ is to haue both that is to say to haue one certaine truth and one certaine signe of the same truth the truth is hidden vnder the signe the signe is witnesse of the truth which once being declared you shall se the vaine doctrine of the Protestants The signes and miracles Christ wrought outwardly were tokens of his Godhead hidden from our eyes likewise the supper of Christ is both a signe of his body also his true body a signe outwardly and the true bodye inwardly a signe by the sound of words when it is first made and a truth by the inwarde working of the holy Ghost by consecration So that Christ intending to leaue certaine holy misteries vn to his Church thereby to conuey vnto her the fruit of his Passion and death as well for regard of his owne self in whose person two natures were vnited as for regard of vs who consist of bodye and soule made the said holy Sacraments to bee of a double sorte and nature so that the one parte thereof might appeare to the sences the other should lye priuye and onlie bee seene by faith Saint Chrisostome in an Homely of the treason of Iudas saith Sacerdotis ore c. that is The wordes are spoken with the Priestes mouth and by the vertue and grace of God the thinges set before our eyes are consecrated This is saith he my Body by this worde the thinges proposed be consecrated It is to be noted that how many Fathers soeuer call the Sacrament a Figure yet none of them all teacheth these words This is my Body and This is my
break a sunder and burne the orders godly rules and statutes of these religious fathers left to their children and posterity can Antichrist doe more when hee commeth then pluck not only religious men but pure virgins and religious women that serued Christ their spouse and husband out of their cloysters make them harlots and common strumpets yet had we a number of most B. men Carthusian Monkes with some others also that in defence of the truth manfully shed their bloud Chap. LXII Of holy water and how creatures being blessed by the word of God miracles sometimes by the same be wrought to the expelling of Diuelles and confirmation of Christian religion AS â—or ceremonies of holy water and holy bread Agnus Dei blessed by the Pope heretickes at the beginning before they plucked off their vizardes began to set litle store by as they did by religious folkes and so by little and litle not only denyed sacramentals but sacraments and all see by what degrees mischiefe getteth the vpper hand But we be taught by holy Scriptures that all thinges which God hath created or made and whatsoeuer is rightly blessed or sanctified by his holy word is good yea by meanes of his word is bettered and more sanctified For so when Elizâ—us cast salt into the water it was amended Others you shall reade of olde that by Gods blessed word were made healthfull and multiplyed to profit of body soule and the confusion of the Diuel that is afraide of one drop of water blessed with Gods word as we daily see by experience in some possessed This holy water we take then remembring Gods grace giuen vs once in that healthfull water of Baptisme and in taking of it with faith deuotioÌ„ sprinkling our selues the wicked spirits haue lesse power of vs and the places where we be with many other fruits that followe yea among Infidels that neuer heard of Christ before sometimes miracles are wrought by one droppe of holy water as in the Indians in diuers places to this day Now because our faith wheÌ„ it was first planted amongst vs was then confirmed with miracles therefore it is not requisite that miracles be so ordinarily wrought amongst vs though sometymes it pleaseth God to shew them where they may do good be not derided as hereticks would do if any were heere wrought attribute them to sorcery witchcraf but God will not haue his pearles cast to hogges Fitt it were for hereticks good men to bring some miracles to confirme their new no faith But our Catholick faith hath bene and is God be blessed by miracles sufficiently in al ages confirmed to this day Chap. LXIII Of holy Bread giuen the people in remembrance of that most blessed Sacrament and in some sort taught vs by Christ in those loanes blessed and multiplyed by him in the desert HOly Bread we vse to take on those dayes we receaue not the blessed Sacrament and this holy Bread is a remembrance of the blessed Sacrament for you must vnderstand that in the primitiue church they receaued the blessed Sacrament almost euerie day such was the deuotioÌ„ of the people whilst Christs bloud was yet warme in their harts but in processe of tyme as deuotion euer by litle and litle decayed so did they lesse vse the same so that the holy Church Concil later can omnis vtriusque sextus c was coÌ„strained to make a law that once a-yeere at least about Easter euery one should receaue and that vnder paine of deadly sinne yf one haue no lawfull impediment Yet the holy Church wisheth men often to receaue yea with due preparation the oftener the better if it were euery weeke or fortnight But because euery one is not thus disposed yet in many countries shee giueth holy Bread somewhat to nourish charity therby in the people in remembrance of Christ in the most blessed SacrameÌ„t the bread of life that came downe from heauen that fedde the people miraculously with holy blessed Bread in the wildernes and shall feede vs with life euerlasting once as now dailie in the meane time he feedâ—th vs with his grace Chap. LXIIII. Of receauing vnder one kinde and how the same fruite is reaped by one kinde as by both that peace vnity and charity is the end of this blessed Sacrament THough when I entreated of the B. Sacrament of the Altar I spake something of receauing vnder one kinde yet I thought good to giue some further admonition in this place touching the same matter for that I finde by experieÌ„ce many vnlearned persons that after receauing of the blessed SacrameÌ„t when wine of decency and coÌ„ueniency is giuen them to drinck do take it for the very bloud of our Lord which notable negligence grosse ignorance in them may either come by forgetfulnes and ouer litle care due consideration of this blessed Sacrament as not duly preparing themselues well and often to remember what how they are to receaue Or els perhaps sometimes for want of good instruction due information of those that first admit these simple lay persons to this blessed SacrameÌ„t which euery good Priest that hath charge of meÌ„s soules as a prudeÌ„t dispeÌ„sator of the misteries of God ought to be careful of that nothing be waÌ„ting of his part but that either publikly with great discretion or at least priuately his voice wheÌ„ he entreth into the sanctuary of our Lord may be heard For if the people in the old law could discerne when the high Priest weÌ„t to offer sacrifice by the noise of his bels hanging at his vesture how much more in this law of grace ought the Priest of God to take heed he be not dumme but so to extoll his voice that the very simplest person of reason may heare him and receaue sufficient foode of his doctrine to their saluation that they discerne not onlye when they are to offer their prayers to God by his sacrifice but what and how they are to receaue with him that is as I said before that although Priests more liuely to represent Christs Passion receaue vnder both kindes that is both Christs B. body in the host and bloud in the Chalice to represent more effectually according to his institution the shedding of his bloud vppon the crosse to which end he said to his Apostls only no lay person being present and to their successors bibite ex hoc omnes drinck yee all of this yet all lay persons vppoÌ„ waighty considerations as for feare sometimes of shedding of the sacred bloud of christ in being giuen to so many which neither without great indecency and inconueniency could be consecrated for so manye to receaue but vnder one kinde that is the blessed Host body of Christ but not the Chalice as Priests do yea if it were conuenient to vse so great vessels for so precious and sacred a thing yet hard it would be in some places far north to gett wyne sufficient to consecrate for so
also is witnesse of the truth S. Cyrillus of Alexandria doubt not whether it be true sith Christ saieth manifestly This is my body but rather take the worde of our Sauiour in faith for seeing he is the truth he lieth not And againe Lib. 4. 13 lett vs take great aduantage by the sinnes of other men giuing stedfast faith vnto the misteries let vs neuer in so high misteries speake the worde quomodo how Saint Gregorius Nazianzenus Eate In orat 4. â—â— Pasc the bodye and drincke the blood without confusion or doubt if at the least thou arâ— desirous of life neither do thou with draw faith from the sayings which concerne the fleshe The same Saint Hillary Leo Isichius Theophilactus Paschasius diuers others haue spokeÌ„ requiring vs not to doubt of the truth of this misterie that especialy because Christs words make ful perswasion and take away all occasion of doubting but if they be figuratiue it is not so then one may vnderstand this kynde of figure another that kynde one may think it is to be a Metaphore and an other that it is Sinecdoche the third that it is Metonimia the fourth that it is altogether an Allegorye or parable and without all ground of history others doubt to expouÌ„d this is my body as if it were said in this with this or vnder this or about this my body is yea from that day wherin the proper naturall sence of those words was denied I think neuer any words haue beene more vncertaine and more doubted of then This is my body yet the Fathers were so farre from this vncertainty that they counted him an Infidell and fallen from grace and saluation who so did not beleeue them euen as Christ spake them to witt euen so as they sound at the first sight If the truth of Christs body bee the reall substance thereof they that intreatinge of the Eucharist affirme the truthe of his flesh must needes meane that his substance is really present in that Sacrament whereof they speake S. Hillary speaking of the holy mysteries Lib. 8. dâ— Trin. saith There is lefte no place of doubting of the truth of flesh and blood Yet surely if the substance of flesh blood were not present not only some place but the cheife place of doubting were left S. Ambrose It is the true flesh of Christ De Sacra lib. 5. cap. 1. de ieiunio mensis serm 6. which we take Doubt you nothing at all Saith Leo Concerning the truth of christs body Be like he spoke to Catholickes for doubles the sacrameÌ„taries doubt so vehemently therof that they beleue the truth of Christs body to be only at the right hand of his father Isichius He receaueth In leuit li. 6. Ca. 22. De ortho side lib. 4. Cap. 4. by ignorance who knoweth not this to be the body and blood according to the truth Damascenus The bread and wine is not the figure of Christes body and blood God forbid but it is the self deified body of our Lord The like assertion Theophilact Euthymius In. 6. Ioan in 26. Math. and diuers other fathers haue They that name the supper of Christ a figure a sacrament or a remembrance doe not thereby exclude the true substance of Christes flesh but they meane to shew that it is present vnder the signe of another thing after a misticall and secret manner Saint Cyprian The diuine substance In serm de cena dom lib. 8. de Trinitat hath vnspeakably infused it selfe in the visible Sacament Saint Hillarius Wee take in deed the flesh of his body vnder a mystery Loe the fleshe the substance of God is present in truth but vnder a signe Cirillus Hierosolymitanus Vnder the figure Catech. Mistag of bread the body is giuen to thee Who now knowing the SacrameÌ„t to consist of two parts wil wonder that sometimes it is named the one and sometime of the other S. Augustine The Body and Bloud of Christ shall then bee life to euery man De verb. dom Ser. 2. if that thing which is visible receiued in the Sacrament be the truth it selfe eaten spiritually Beholde there is a thing in the Sacramente and so reallye it is there that it is visibly reâ—eaued therefore it is not a spirituall thing onlye for no such matter is visiblye receiued but it is there and thence it must be eaten spiritually and in the truthe it selfe that is to saye it must not onlie bee taken in the mouth but into the harte also and then it shall bee life to the receiuer This thing so receiued in the Sacrament must needes bee the body of Christ vnder the forme of bread for nothing else is to bee eaten spiritually It were too tedious to alleadge all that Saint Augustine hath written in this behalfe but his other wordes beeing conferred with these will make it plaine that when soeuer he nameth it a figure hee meaneth the truth hidden vnder a figure which is more shortlye named a misticall figure He that alleadgeth mannes fleshe why the flesh and blood of Christ is not seene in the misteries presupposed allbeit an invisible yet a most reall presence thereof Fluctuantem me conuerto Aug. â—n Psal 98. ad Christum quia ipsum quero hic â—â— venio quomodo sine impietate adoretur terra sine impietate adoretur scabellum pedum eius suscepit enim de terra terram quia caro terra est de carne MARIE carnem accepit quia in ipsa carne hic ambulauit ipsam carnem nobis manducandam ad salutem dedit Nemo autem illam carnem â—anducat nisi prius adorauerit Inuentum est quemadmodum adoretur scabellum pedum Domini non solum non peccemus adorando sed peccamus non adorando Which wordes may be thus englished I conuert my selfe being in doubt to Christ because him here I seeke and find how without impietie the earth may be worshipped without impietie his fooâ—estoole may be worshipped for hee tooke earth of earth because fleshe is earth and of the fleshe of MARIE he took flesh and because he walked here in that flesh gaue that flesh to vs to be eaten for our saluation but no man eateth that flesh vnlesse he first worship it It is found out how the footestoole of our Lordes feete may be worshipped and not only we doe not offend in worshipping it but wee doe offend in not worshipping it S. Ambrose saith it is not seene in his owne forme Vt nullus horror De sacr lib. 4. cap. 4. cruoris sit et precium tamen operetur redemptionis To the end there maye bee no lothsome abhorring of rawe blood and yet the price of our redemption maye worke in vs So that by his iudgement the truthe of bloode is present to worke in vs the effect of Christs death yet the forme of the blood is not seene because wee should not abhorre it Theophilact Although