by faith and seeth him not with eyes Thus much out of Augustin Where Augustin speaketh of that which is properly called Christs body he denieth that it is simply present here and doeth refuse such a presence of his body but when he speaketh of the Sacrament hee doeth affirme that his body is verily present and a true presence of his body yet not properly but as he himselfe doeth instruct vs according to his Maiestie according to his vnspeakeable inuisible grace whereof we wil speake more at large hereafter It is plaine therefore that the body of Christ in the sacrament is to bee vnderstood one way and that an other way which of necessitie must be in some place of heauen for the fourmes sake of a true body as hee saith Now let vs goe forward to other Gregor Nazianz oratione de Pasch Gregorie Nazianzene in his Oration of the feast of Easter saith thus But let vs be made partakers of the Passeouer but yet still figuratiuely albeit this Passeouer be more manifest then the old For truly the Passeouer of the Law I speake boldly was a more darke figure of a figure but within a while wee shall enioy it more perfect and manifest when the Sonne the Word it selfe shall drinke it new with vs in the kingdome of his Father opening and teaching vs those things which he hath now shewed sparingly Here Nazianzene called the sacrament of Thankesgiuing a more manifest Passeouer then the Passeouer of the Law yet still for all that a figure namely of that which wee shall enioy more perfit and manifest in the kingdome of his Father This Passeouer therefore which is performed in mysterie doeth differ from that which remaineth for euer wherewith wee shall bee satisfied in the world to come Gregor in hom Pasch The other Gregorie in his Homily of the Passeouer This wholesome sacrifice doeth renew to vs by a mysterie the death of the onely begotten Sonne which although he rising againe from death dieth no more nor death shall haue any more dominion ouer him yet hee liuing immortally and vncorruptibly in himselfe dieth againe in this mysterie and his body is also receiued euery where and his flesh for the health of the people his blood is not now shed into the hands of the vnfaithfull but is powred out in the mouth of the faithfull By this therefore we may iudge what maner of sacrament this is which for our absolution doeth alwayes represent the Passion of the onely begotten Sonne For what faithfull man can doubt that in the very houre of the sacrifice at the voyce of the Priest the heauens open and the company of Angels be present in the mysterie of Iesus Christ This Gregorie maketh a difference betweene this sacrifice and the other and doeth also shew that this death this passion this body which things be done in this mysterie doe represent and imitate those things which were done long agoe For if you follow the letter his body is not spred out euery where nor his flesh suffereth nor dieth any more although these things be said to be done in mysterie The same opinion had Eusebius Emissenus Euseb Emis de consecrat dist 2. whose wordes are rehearsed De consecrat Dist 2. as followeth Forasmuch as hee would take away from the eyes the body taken of the Virgin and would place it aboue the starres it was necessary that in the day of his Supper the sacrament of his body and blood should bee consecrated vnto vs to the end that that might be worshipped continually by a mysterie which was once offered for a ransome that seeing a dayly and vnceasing redemption did runne for the saluation of all men there might be a continuall oblation of redemption and that continuall sacrifice might liue in memorie and might euer be present in grace a true perfect and onely sacrifice to be esteemed in faith not to bee iudged by forme nor by outward sight but by the inward affection Whereupon the heauenly authoritie confirmeth that My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Let all doubt therefore of vnfaithfulnes depart seeing he that is the author of the gift the same is witnes of the trueth for the inuisible Priest by his word and secret power turneth the visible creature into the substance of his body and blood saying Take eate this is my body and after the blessing being repeated Take and drinke saith he this is my blood Therefore euen as at the becke of the Lord commanding it suddenly and of nothing the hie heauens the depth of the waters and largenesse of the earth was made so by the like power in spiritual sacraments where power doeth command effect doth obey By plaine words doth Eusebius teach vs that the proper body which he termeth taken vpon him is not in the sacrament but withdrawen from the earth placed aboue the starres and therefore is ordained the sacrament of the body wherein is contained the substance of the body yet in a mysterie and by grace not that substance which hee said before was taken away which if it were present the sacrament were not needfull but a spirituall substance and fit for the sacraments whereupon hee also calleth the sacraments spirituall And lest we should imagine it a more grosse substance then is fit hee alledgeth foorthwith the example of regeneration saying How great benefit therfore and worthy to be praised the force of the heauenly blessing doeth worke and how it ought not to bee a new and vnpossible matter to thee that earthly mortal things be changed into the substance of Christ aske thy selfe that art new borne againe in Christ Lately farre from life a stranger from mercie and inwardly a dead man from the way of health thou wast banished and suddenly professing the Lawes of Christ and by wholesome mysteries renewed thou hast leapt into the body of the Church not by sight but by beleefe and of the childe of perdition wast thought worthy by a secret purenesse to be the Sonne of God by adoption abiding still in the visible measure and made inuisibly greater then thy selfe without increase of quantitie For although thou wast the very selfe-same man before yet by augmentation of faith thou art become much otherwise for in the outward man nothing is added and all in the inward man is cleane changed and so man was made the sonne of God and Christ was formed in the minde of man Euen as therefore without corporall feeling the former basenesse set apart thou hast suddenly put on a new dignitie and as in this point that God hath healed those things that were amisse in thee put away thine infections wiped away thy spots thy eyes are not trusted vvithall but thy inward senses so when thou goest vp to the holy Altar to be fed with the spirituall meat behold in thy faith the holy body and blood of Christ honour it marueile at it touch it with thy minde take it in the hand
the faithfull be not in the sacrament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is deuourers of flesh as I may so terme it as the letter properly soundeth but that spirituall sence is required that is the forme of bread wine being retained the vertue of his flesh and blood is receiued of the faithfull as it is manifest by his owne words both here and those before rehearsed Bertram Wherefore Bertram following the opinion of the old Fathers hath thus written For according to the substance of the creatures they be the same also after that they were before the consecration They were before bread and wine in which forme being now consecrated they seeme to remaine Therfore is there a thing changed inwardly by the mightie power of the holy Ghost which faith beholdeth and feedeth the soule and ministreth substance of eternall life Likewise But now because faith doeth behold that whole whatsoeuer that whole is and the eye of the flesh perceiueth nothing ye shall vnderstand that those things which be seene be the bodie and blood Christ not in forme but in strength The same Bertram when he had rehearsed this saying of Isidore Which thinges for that cause be called sacraments because vnder the couer of corporall things the diuine power doth worke more secret saluation whereupon they be called sacraments also of their secret and holie vertues and in Greek it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because it hath a secret hid dispensation And after he addeth of his own this saying What be we taught therby but that the body blood of the Lord be for that cause called Mysteries because they haue a secret and hid dispensation that is they be one thing which they outwardly betoken and another which inwardly they inuisibly worke Of this also they be called sacraments because vnder the couer of corporall things the diuine power doth more secretly minister the saluation of those that receiue them faithfully By all these things which haue hitherto bene spoken it hath bene made manifest that the body and blood of Christ which in the Church be receiued by the mouth of the faithfull bee figures according to their visible forme but according to their inuisible substance that is the power of the heauenly Word they verily be the body and blood of Christ Whereupon according to the visible creature they feed the body but according to the vertue of their better substance they both feed and sanctifie the minds of the faithfull These bee Bertrams words Hitherto haue we declared what hath bene the opinion of the old true diuines of the Supper of the Lord aswell Grecians as Latines euen vnto Bertrams time who in the yeere after Christs birth 840. was a famous man both in life learning noted by no man of Heresie nor found fault with as hauing ill written but greatly praised by the iudgement of learned and good men Wherefore that Iohn called Abbas Trithemius Abbas Trithem doubted not to reckon him in the roule of diuine famous writers and to praise him by this his testimony that foloweth Bertram an Elder and Monke very expert in holy Scripture and notably wel learned in humanitie quick of wit eloquent of speech no lesse famous in life then learning writ many notable little treatises whereof a few haue come to my knowledge He writ one booke of Predestination a cōmendable worke To Charles the king brother to Lotharius the Emperor of the body and blood of the Lord another booke These things haue I the more willingly rehearsed to this intent to reproue that railing boldnes of tongue that some man hath vsed who in a book newly set forth of this controuersie when he had nothing wherewith he could answer Bertram thought it sufficient to despise this so famous a man to note him with the name of an heretike Bertram saith he or what other soeuer was author of that worke set forth in his name was a crafty and an impudent Heretike O shameles face and meet to be bridled Barnard also which liued 300. yeere after Bertram doth reiect all carnall vnderstanding in the wordes of the Lords Supper and acknowledgeth onely a spirituall whose words taken out of his Sermon in the day of the Lords Supper I haue here added A sacrament is called a holy signe or holy secret Many things certainly be done only for themselues some other also for other things betokened and they be called signes and be so As for example of vsual matters a ring is giuen absolutely for a ring there is no signification It is giuen to set a man in possession of any estate of inheritance and it is a token so that now he that receiueth it may say the ring is of smal value but it is the inheritance that I seeke After this sort therefore our Lord drawing neere his Passion was careful to set his disciples in possession of his grace that his inuisible grace might be giuen by some visible signe To this intent hee ordained the sacraments Idem de S. Mart. To this end is the partaking of the sacrament of Thankesgiuing The same man of S. Martin Without faile euen vnto this day is the same flesh giuen vs but spiritually not carnally neither haue we to finde fault that there is denied to this our time the appearing which was shewed to the Fathers of the olde Testament or that presence of his flesh which was declared to the Apostles For certainely neither of both can be prooued to be wanting to those that consider it faithfully For the true substance of his flesh is also now present with vs no doubt but in a sacrament and there be reuelations but yet in spirit and povver so that no part of grace can be prooued to be wanting in the time of grace that now is In cōclusion neither the eye hath seene nor the eare hath heard neither haue they ascended into the heart of man which God hath prepared for them that loue him Notwithstanding he hath reueiled them vnto vs by his Spirit Neither marueile thou that he gaue carnal apparances vnto them which looked for his carnall comming for it is necessary that we haue the grace so much more of force the reuelation of more dignitie as those things vndoubtedly be more excellent that we looke for It cannot be hid by these things that we haue spoken what was Bernards opinion of the presence of the flesh in the Lords Supper First folowing the old writers he appointeth two parts of the sacrament the outward signe and the invvard matter which he defineth to be inuisible grace Againe the flesh is giuen to vs but spiritually not carnally Finally that the very substance of his flesh is present but yet as it is fit for the time of grace in grace spirit and povver As for that other Sermon of the Supper of the Lord since it is not reckoned among Bernards owne works albeit it be not contrary to these things that we haue now
haue lost by these our contentions Iesus Christ I say whose Victory Triumph Honour Praise and Glory be for euer and euer Amen ¶ A way of Reconciliation touching the trueth nature and substance of the Body or of the Flesh and Blood of CHRIST in the Sacrament WHat good man doeth not sorrow or what man zealous in Religion doeth not often bewaile the pitifull and vnluckie contention about the LORDS SVPPER which hath now many yeres troubled the Churches of CHRIST which haue imbraced the pure doctrine whereby not onely brotherly Loue is broken but also cities and whole countreys be thereby brought in danger For whereas after the expelling the darkenesse of Ignorance and the happy restoring to the Church the gift of tongues a certaine new Light was restored to the world and the Gospel had begun to take so great roote that thereby hope of very great fruit was offered to ensue By and by this sharpe and vehement contention bursting in among the chiefe champions of the Word hath miserably troubled these very good beginnings For looke what weapons they had valiantly vsed in setting foorth the trueth in ouerthrowing the enemies of the Gospel the very same after this strife was risen did they bend one against another So that the happie course of the Gospel that began to flourish is not only hindered but also by factions discords the matter is come to that passe that vnlesse the mighty Right-hand of the Lord do resist the trueth doeth seeme to appaule and decay againe yea and to returne to the former confusion For if we will iudge the matter truely no force hath so much withstand the inlarging of the Gospel no not the deceits and inchantments of the idole of Rome not the crueltie of Princes against the flocke of CHRIST not the troublesome motions of breeders of Sects as this onely rash contention hath done hurt which bringeth to the minds of godly men sorrow to the enemies cause to reioyce and to the weake and vnlearned offence and falling And surely there is no doubt but that our owne wickednesse hath bene the originall of this so great an euil as it hath bene of many other For wee not regarding or rather contemning the light offered vs are iustly thought vnworthy of so great a benefit Which thing also is the cause that albeit many learned good men vnderstand what profit it should be for the Christian common wealth speedily to pacifie this quarrell and to ende the contentions few notwithstanding doe earnestly traueile about this matter And if any haue attempted it it seemeth to fall out as vnluckily taken in hand to the contrary part For my part when I saw no end could be made of strife nor any hope in any one of better sequele I thought best to commit the matter to GOD by prayer and with silence to looke for helpe in season at his hands Yet in this meane space I thought it my part not to neglect a matter of so great waight but after examination had of the chiefe points of this controuersie to bolt out what was trueth and what not and then to determine vpon a sure grounded opinion both by authoritie of holy Scripture and by the vndoubted testimonies of the Fathers aswell to satisfie my selfe as to yeeld a reason thereof to any that should perhaps demand it of mee that the minde should not wauer continually to fro tossed as it were with the contrary violence of winds While I take this worke in hand diligently tread the steps of the old Interpreters me thinketh I perceiue vnlesse my opinion deceiue me that this controuersie is not so intangled nor darke as most men suppose and that these sharp cōtentions haue come rather by mens fault then by the nature of the matter and that the way of Reconciliation shall not bee so hard with men desirous rather of the trueth then of quarrelling Wherefore albeit I took in hand this worke whatsoeuer it be priuately to my selfe yet because among my friends certaine good men and well giuen were so desirous I did not greatly passe to haue it come to the eares eyes of other that if there be herein any profit it may also do them good The cause I haue thought good so to diuide that briefly it may bee brought to three especial points First wil I shew the trueth of the body of CHRIST in the Sacrament to be giuen to the faithful and that these termes Nature and Substance are not to be shunned but that they of old time disputing of the Sacrament vsed them Then will I declare the difference betweene the Lords proper body and that which is in the Sacrament and that the olde Fathers were of that opinion And lastly I will set foorth at large what maner of Body that is which is receiued in the mysterie why it is called by that name after the opinion of the selfe same Fathers Which things once expounded a man may easily iudge of the whole controuersie First it is manifest ynough by the declaration of the Euangelists Matthew Matth. 26. c. Matth. 14. c. Luke 22. c. Marke and Luke that our Lord IESVS CHRIST when he should depart out of this world and leauing the earth should goe vp to the Father did ordeine the Sacrament of his Body and Blood in the presence of his disciples at Supper and so when he had taken the bread he blessed brake it and gaue it to them saying This is my body After the like maner the Cup also saying This Cup is the new Testament in my Blood 1. Corinth 11. Doe this in remembrance of me Paul also writeth to the same effect to the Corinthians in his first Epistle the 11. chapter rehearsing in a maner the very same words Et cap. 10. in the tenth chapter The Cup saith he of blessing which we blesse is it not the partaking of the Blood of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the partaking of the Body of Christ By these words of the Euangelists and the Apostle they of old time were of that opinion that CHRIST our Lord which is Trueth it selfe spake these things truly and did in deed performe those things that he spake so that no place of doubt might any more be left concerning the trueth of the matter Moreouer those words which in the sixt chapter of Iohn Iohn 6. c. the Lord spake My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drinke indeed c. The bread which I will giue you is my flesh And vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his Blood c. The Fathers with great accord as well Grecians as Latines doe apply to the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing And that they haue interpreted those places so both in Iohn and the rest of the Euangelists and Paul to the Corinthians the testimonies that follow taken out of the authors themselues Iustin Martir Apol. 2. shal happily proue First Iustin Martyr
in his second Apologie writeth thus And this meate is called with vs that is Thankesgiuing c. whereof none other may be partaker but he which both beleeueth those things to be true which we say also hath bene purified with the washing which is giuen for the remission of sinnes and regeneration and also so liueth as CHRIST hath appointed For wee take not these things to be common and wonted bread and accustomed drinke but euen as the word of God IESVS CHRIST our Sauiour was made man and had both flesh and blood for our saluation Euen so in like maner wee haue bene taught that the meate which is hallowed by the prayers of the word that we receiued of him and by which our blood and flesh by a change made are nourished is both the flesh blood of the same CHRIST which was made man For the Apostles in their Commentaries which be called the Gospels haue left in writing that CHRIST did so command them and that he said when he had taken bread and giuen thankes Doe this in remembrance of me This is my body And that when he had taken the cup and giuen thankes hee said This is my Blood Partly the other words of this testimoniall doe affirme the trueth of his body and chiefly because by a similitude taken of the two natures in CHRIST he declareth that there be also two natures in the Sacrament namely of the outward signe and of the flesh Blood of IESVS CHRIST Alike vnto this is spoken in Irenaeus in his 4. booke For how say they againe that the flesh commeth into corruption doth not receiue life which is nourished of the body and Blood of the Lord Therefore let them either change their opinion or else abstaine to offer the things which are aforesaid but our opinion is agreeing to the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and this Sacrament againe confirmeth our opinion For wee offer those things that be his preaching agreeably the partaking and trueth of Flesh and Spirit For euen as the bread which is of the earth receiuing the calling vpon God is now no more common bread but a Sacrament of thanksgiuing made of two things earthly and Heauenly so also our bodies receiuing the Sacrament of thankesgiuing be not now corruptible because they haue the hope of resurrection The same man in his fift booke and because wee be his members and are nourished by the creature he giueth vs the creature making his Sonne to arise and raining as he listeth the same Cup which is a creature he confirmed to be his Body by which he increaseth our bodies When therefore both the Cup mixed and the bread made receiueth the word of God it is made the Sacrament of the blood and body of CHRIST whereof both the substance of our flesh is increased consisteth how then doeth he denie that the flesh is able to receiue the gift of God which is life Euerlasting seeing it is nourished with the blood and bodie of CHRIST These words of Irenaeus albeit not very dark yet wil they be more plaine if we adde certaine things to them out of S. Augustine August tit de consecrat dist 2. He in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus and is found De consecratione distinct 2. writeth thus This is it that we say and that by al meanes we labour to proue that the Sacrifice of the Church is made two maner awayes that it consisteth of two things Of the visible forme of Sacraments and the inuisible flesh and blood of our Lord IESVS CHRIST of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST As the person of CHRIST consisteth of God and man since CHRIST himselfe is very God and very man because euery thing conteineth in it selfe the nature and trueth of those things whereof it is made But the sacrifice of the Church is made of two things of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST There is therefore the Sacrament and the substance of the Sacrament the bodie of CHRIST S. Augustine repeateth that comparison between the person of CHRIST and the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and therein hee saith plainely that the trueth and nature of the bodie is conteined The same man De consecrat distinct 2. Idem ibidem Whether is this mysticall Sacrament of the Cup made in figure or in trueth The trueth saith My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Else how can it bee a great matter The bread that I shall giue is my flesh for the life of the world vnlesse it bee very flesh But because it is not godly that CHRIST should be deuoured with teeth the Lords will was to haue this bread and wine in mysterie to be by his power made his flesh and blood in veritie by the consecration of the holy Ghost and to be daily offered mysticallie for the life of the world That like as his true flesh is created of the Virgin by the holy Ghost without the companie of man so by this same Spirit the same bodie mystically is consecrated of the substance of bread and wine The body of CHRIST is both trueth and figure Trueth in that the bodie and blood of CHRIST by the power of the holy Ghost is made by the strength thereof of the substance of bread and wine And the figure is that which outwardly is perceiued The same man in the same title Idem ibidem They that eate and drinke CHRIST eate and drinke life To eate him is to be refreshed to drinke him is to liue That which is visiblie taken in the Sacrament is eaten and drunke spiritually in very trueth Idem ibidem The same man in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus in the same title saith But we in the forme of bread and wine which we see do honor inuisible things namely flesh and blood Neither doe we alike take these two formes as we did take them before the consecration seeing that we faithfully confesse that before the consecration they be bread and wine which nature hath framed but after the consecration they be the flesh blood of CHRIST which the blessing hath hallowed He againe vpon the 54. Psalme Vntill the world come to an end the Lord is aboue yet for all that the Lords trueth is also here with vs For it is fit that the body in the which he rose againe should be in one place but his trueth is spred euery where He also in his Epistle to Irenaeus CHRIST is bread of the which hee who so eateth liueth for euer whereof hee himselfe saith thus And the bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world And he expoundeth it how it is bread not onely according to the word whereby all things liue but according to the flesh that hee tooke for the life of the world For mans flesh which was dead through sinne being knit
who wil thinke those distant from this naturall vnion which be vnited in one CHRIST by the vnion of one CHRISTS bodie For if all we eat one bread we be made all one body And within few wordes after But that this bodily vniting to CHRIST is attained by the partaking of his flesh Paul himselfe againe doeth witnesse disputing of the mysterie of godlinesse the which saith he hath not bene knowen to the sonnes of men in other generations as it hath bene reueiled now to his holy Apostles and Prophets in the Spirit that the Gentiles be coheires and ioyned in body and equall partakers of the promise in Christ The same man to Calosyrius Idem ad Calosyrium For that wee should not be afraide of the flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God submitting himselfe to our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that bee offered turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that the body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may bee found in vs whereupon he addeth Doe this in a remembrance of me Hitherto Cyrillus Cyprianus de coena Domini Cyprian of the Supper of the Lord This bread not in outward apparence but in nature changed by the mightie power of the Word is made flesh which the Lord did reach to his disciples And in the same place Who euen to this day createth and sanctifieth blesseth and diuideth to those that take it godly this his most true and holy bodie Hieron in Matth. de consecrat dist 2. Hierom vpon Matthew De consecrat dist 2. He tooke bread which is the comforter of man and passed to the true Sacrament of Passeouer That as Melchisedec for a figure therof before had done when he offered bread and wine he should represent it in the trueth of his bodie and blood Chrysost in Io. Hom. 45. Chrysostom vpon Iohn Hom. 45. But that not onely by loue but euen in very deed wee should be turned into that flesh he worketh the same by the meate which hee hath giuen vs. For when he ment to bring his loue vpon vs he ioyned himselfe to vs by his body and made himselfe one with vs that the body might be knit with the head The same man Homil. 61. Idem Hom. 61. Therefore that we should be this not only by charitie but in very deed should bee mingled with that flesh this is brought to passe by the meat which hee hath giuen vs. Chrysostom hath also many other sayings to the same meaning Those things that S. Ambrose writeth in his 6. Ambros lib. 6. de sacra cap. 1. booke the first chapter of the Sacraments do agree with these Euen as our Lord IESVS CHRIST is the true Sonne of God not as men be by grace but as a Sonne of the substance of the Father so is that which wee take the very flesh of CHRIST and they drinke his very blood as he himselfe said And a little after Then when his disciples could not away with the talke of CHRIST but hearing that he would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke they went away But Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life and whither should I goe from thee Lest therefore any moe should say this as though there should be a kinde of lothsomnesse of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine therefore receiuest thou the Sacrament in a similitude but thou obteinest the grace and vertue of the true nature The same man in his 4. booke the 4. Idem lib. 4. cap. 4. cap. Thou seest therefore how effectuall in operation the word of CHRIST is If then there be so great efficacie in the word of our Lord IESVS CHRIST that that should begin to bee which was not How much more is it of effect to make those things to be that were before and to be changed into another thing And so that which was bread before the consecration the same is become the body of CHRIST after the consecration because the word of CHRIST doeth change the creature And so of bread is made the body of CHRIST and the wine mixed with water in the cup is made blood by the consecration of the heauenly word But perhaps thou wilt say I see not the forme of blood But it hath a likenesse For euen as thou hast taken the likenes of his death so also doest thou drinke the similitude of his blood that there should be no abhorring of blood and yet the price of our redemption wrought Also before the wordes of CHRIST the cup is full of wine water after the words of CHRIST haue wrought there is the blood made which hath redeemed the people Therefore marke how the word of CHRIST is able to make alteration in all things Beside CHRIST himselfe doeth testifie that wee doe receiue his bodie and blood of whose fulnesse and testimonie we ought not to doubt Likewise peraduenture thou saiest I see another thing How prouest thou that I do receiue the bodie of CHRIST This remaineth yet for vs to proue that this is not it which nature hath fashioned but it that blessing hath hallowed and that there is greater force of the blessing then of nature because nature it selfe is also changed by the blessing Also But if the blessing of man was of such force that it could turne nature What doe we say of the very heauenly consecration whereas the very wordes of the Lord our Sauiour do worke For this Sacramēt which thou receiuest is wrought by the words of CHRIST But if the word of Elias was of such force that it could bring fire from heauen Shall not the word of CHRIST be of power to change the kinds of elements Eusebius Emyssenus de consecrat dist 2. Eusebius Emyssenus likewise who was in yeeres before Ambrose doth witnes in these wordes the opinion which was then had of the Sacrament and it is had De consecrat dist 2. Whereupon the heauenly authoritie confirmeth That my flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Let therefore all doubt of misbeliefe be laid aside because hee that is author of the gift is likewise witnesse of the trueth For the inuisible priest doeth turne with his word by a secret power the visible creatures into the substance of his bodie and blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body and the hallowing being repeated Take ye drinke ye this is my blood Therefore euen as the height of the heauens the depth of waters and largenesse of earth had their being of nothing suddenly at the becke of the Lord that commanded so with the like power in the spirituall Sacraments when power commandeth effect obeieth How great therefore and wonderfull benefits the force of the heauenly blessing doeth worke How it ought not to seeme a new vnpossible matter to thee that earthly and mortal things bee turned into the substance of Christ aske thy selfe that art
of thy heart and especially receiue it whole Christ with the thirstie draught of the inward man Eusebius declareth by this similitude what maner of change is made in the sacrament how earthly things be turned into the substance of Christ and what maner of substance that is without doubt like vnto that change wherewith wee be altered in our Baptisme and such a substance as wee put on in the bath of Regeneration when we be borne the children of God and made a new creature and new men when we passe into the body of the Church where in our outward part nothing is changed but all inwardly and for that cause calleth he it spirituall food which we behold in faith touch with minde take with the hand of our heart and receiue with the thirstie draught of the inward man Ambros in Epist ad Hebr. de consecrat dist 2. With this agreeth that that Ambrose writeth vpon the Epistle to the Hebrewes and is repeated De consecrat dist 2. In Christ was once a mighty sacrifice offered for an euerlasting Redemption vvhat doe vve then doe vve not dayly offer him yes but in remembrance of his death and it is but one sacrifice not many for Christ vvas once offered and this sacrifice is a paterne of that Ambrose saith plainely that that true sacrifice vvas once offered but this sacrifice is offered euery day and hee declareth in vvhat sort it is one sacrifice and not one vvhen he saith that this is a paterne of that The same man in his booke of Mysteries saith Idem in lib. de Myst. In that sacrament is Christ because it is the body of Christ it is not then a corporall but a spirituall food vvhereupon the Apostle also saith of the figure of it That our fathers did eate the same spirituall food for the body of God is a spiritual body the body of Christ is the body of the diuine spirit These things cannot be said of Christes true and proper body namely that it is a spirit for a spirit hath not flesh and blood vvhich that body hath as the Lord himselfe did vvitnesse before his disciples Feele yee and see you saith he for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue Idem de Sacr. lib. 4. Wherefore the same auctour De sacramentis lib. 4. saith thus Thou seest therefore hovv mighty in operation the vvord of Christ is If then there be so great force in the vvord of the Lord Iesu that those things should begin to be which were not hovv much more is it of force to make those things remaine which were and yet to change them into another thing The heauen was not the sea was not the earth was not But hearken to him that saith He spake the word and they were made he commanded and they were created Therefore that I may ansvvere thee it was not the body of Christ before the consecration but after the consecration I tell thee it is now the body of Christ He spake the word and it was made he commanded and it was created Thou wast thy self but thou wast an old creature after thou wast consecrated thou didst beginne to be a new creature Wilt thou know how new a creature Euery one is saith he a new creature in Christ Ambrose taketh his argument à maiore By the word of God new things are made then is it no marueile if things which now be and remaine are changed into another thing by his word vvhich thing is done in Sacraments Examples of the first are Heauen the Sea the Earth of the later man which before he be regenerate is an old creature but after regeneration by force of the word albeit he be the very same he vvas before namely a man still yet he receiueth an invvard change and of an old is made a new creature Like vnto this he affirmeth the change in the sacrament to bee when as both bread remaineth and yet getteth to it selfe a nevv substance that is to say a new dignitie That same thing doth hee yet more fully expound in his sixt booke writing thus Idem de sacrament lib. 6. Peraduenture thou mayest say How is it very flesh for I see a similitude I see not the trueth of blood in deed First of all I told thee of the vvord of Christ that it worketh as of force to change and alter the appointed kindes of nature Moreouer when the disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee vvould giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therefore any moe should so say but the grace of Redemption should remaine Therefore thou takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest attaine the grace and vertue of the true nature At the last he addeth to make vp the matter And thou which receiuest bread art made partaker in that spirituall food of the diuine substance We learne by the authoritie of this so great a man that that which we take in the sacrament is a spiritual not a corporall food neither that that flesh is to be taken after the maner of his proper flesh as the Capernaits did and vvith offence went backe but together with the outvvard signe we obtaine the grace and vertue of the true nature and receiuing the bread are partakers of his diuine substance And here also we see that Ambrose was of the same opinion that Emissenus was and far otherwise vnderstandeth both the alteration which is made in the sacraments and also the very terme of substance then it is either taken in proper speach or as Philosophers do naturally speake Idem de offic lib. 4. cap. 48. To the same purpose serueth also that which he writeth in his booke De officijs lib. 4. cap. 48. Here is the shadovv here is the image there is the trueth the shadow in the Lavv the image in the Gospel but the trueth in heauen In time past the Lambe was offered the calfe vvas offered Novv is Christ offered but he is offered as man as taking his Passion but hee as a Priest doeth offer himselfe here as in an image but there in trueth where hee maketh intercession for vs as an aduocate vvith his Father Hee putteth a difference in the one oblation from the other And albeit both after their maner be done in deed yet this vvhich is solemnized in the Church is done in an Image but the trueth it selfe remaineth as an Aduocate for vs vvith the Father And this place of Ambrose doeth seeme to be like to that place of Origen vpon the 38. Origen in Psal 38. Psalme vvhere he intreateth of that saying of Paul For the Law hauing a shadow of those good things to come hath not the very Image of the things c. And thus he vvriteth But if any man can passe from this shadovv let him
other Fathers but those things that follow be not so It is verely his body saith he that is knit with the diuinitie that body taken of the holy Virgin This before him no man had said If his meaning be of the proper body the authoritie of the Fathers that were before him cryeth out against him which plainely affirme that body to be taken from the earth caried aboue the starres and not to be here who also with manifest difference doe separate that body from the sacrament of the bodie vnlesse peraduenture we may so interprete it as that saying of Augustine The same body and not the same body the same by grace and power and not the same according to the proper maner of a body the which it may seeme that this Authors meaning was when he writ this For by and by there followeth Not that the body that was taken of the Virgin should come down from heauen but that the very bread and wine is chaunged into the body and blood of the Lord. By which woords hee himselfe testifieth that this body which is receiued in the Sacrament is to bee vnderstood one way and that body which was taken which hee denieth to come downe from heauen another way For if it abide in heauen without comming downe hither and if bread be made of the very same body that was taken sure the bread must be in heauen and the faithfull shall here receiue neither the bread nor yet the body which thing no man in his right wits can affirme But if wee leaue the body that was taken in his place in heauen as our faith doth require and say notwithstanding that the same is present in the sacrament by grace and power as the rest of the Fathers do pronounce and therefore this bread may be called and beleeued for the naturall propertie of a body that is coupled with it to be the body of Christ not properly as that body that he tooke vpon him but after a spirituall sort as the sacrament of that body the matter is not intricate but plainely opened neither shall there bee any neede to frame crooked mazes that be cleane contrary to our faith or to knit vaine ropes of sand or to shun the similitudes that the former Fathers vsed and to inuent other similitudes grosse and strange from mysteries as Damascenus doth in this place For euen as saith hee the bread in eating and the wine and water in drinking are naturally turned into the body and blood of him that eateth and drinketh them and be made another body then that they had before so the Shewe bread and the wine and water by inuocation and comming of the holy Ghost bee changed aboue the law of nature into the body and blood of Christ and be not two but one and the same What other thing doeth hee by this similitude but open a way to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the eating of mans flesh which thing Cyrillus Theophylactus and other Fathers do detest How much better haue Cyprian Ambrose Epiphanius Emissenus and other said which affirme a like change in the sacrament of thankesgiuing as that which is made in Baptisme whereby it commeth to passe that the signes do remaine the same and by grace they get to themselues a new substance in like maner as one selfe man being not yet regenerate doeth belong to the olde Adam and after regeneration becommeth a new man and a new creature not by a fleshly meane which agreeth not to sacraments but after a spirituall sort But Damascenus forgetting himselfe who had before affirmed this meate to be spirituall as the regeneration in Baptisme now teacheth it to be carnall if this bread must passe into the body of Christ as common bread doth into the bodies of those that eate it vvhereby it happeneth that he falleth also into another errour for he denieth this bread and wine to bee a figure This bread and wine saith he is not a figure of the body and blood of Christ God forbid but the very deified body of the Lord. And no marueile it is that he denieth this if he be in opinion that this bread is so changed as common bread is into the body of the feeder But all they of old time throughout be repugnant and surely hee iarreth with himselfe for after those wordes cited out of the sixt Chapter of Iohn Vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. And My flesh verely c. by and by he bringeth another similitude of a coale farre diuerse from the former A coale saith he is not simple wood but coupled with fire so the bread of communion is not simple bread but coupled with the diuinitie How diuers is the maner of these two similitudes before he said that the Shewbread was turned into the body of Christ beyond nature as the common bread is naturally changed into the body of him that eateth it but that is not done vvhile there remaineth bread here he saith that the bread of communion is not simple bread but bread coupled with the diuinitie The bread therefore remaineth to what is it coupled to the diuinitie Where is then that grosse transmutation Againe a litle after This is that pure sacrifice without blood which God hath commanded by the Prophet should be offered to himselfe from the rising of the Sunne to the going dovvne of the same If hee speake of the body that hee tooke vpon him how is it without blood if hee speake of his spirituall body and blood he saith trueth Againe he saith This body is not consumed it is not corrupted nor cast into the draught If his meaning be of his spirituall and better substance of the sacrament vvee confesse it if of the outward signe Origen farre better learned then Damascenus saith As touching to that material part that it hath it goeth into the belly and is cast into the draught Damascenus goeth yet further and saith The bread is the first fruites of the bread to come which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but epiousios doth signifie either the bread to come that is of the world to come or els that which is taken for the consecration of our substance But vvhether it be this way or that way it is aptly called the body of Christ For the Lords flesh is a spirit giuing life because it was conceiued of a quickening spirit For that which is borne of spirit is spirit But this I speake not to take away the nature of a body but willing to shew his quickening and diuinitie How changeable is this speach sometime one and the selfe bread is one and selfe body another time it is the first fruits of the bread to come otherwhile flesh at another time spirit At last about the end he saith For albeit some named the bread and wine patternes of Christs body and blood as that holy man Basill yet after the sanctifying they called it not so but before the
vpon the Crosse out of his side and this body which in the mysterie of Christes passion is daily solemnized of the faithfull and that blood also which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull is a mysterie of that blood wherwith the whole world was redeemed Hee confirmeth that also by the authoritie of Hierom and after rehearsall of this place The blood and flesh of Christ is vnderstood two maner of wayes either that spirituall c. thus he concludeth With no small difference hath this doctour made a distinction of the body and blood of Christ For in that he saith that the flesh or blood which are daily receiued of the faithfull are spirituall and yet that the flesh that was crucified and the blood which was shed with the souldiers speare are not said to be spirituall nor diuine he doeth manifestly signifie that they differ as much one from another as do spirituall things and corporall visible and inuisible diuine and humane and that those things which differ from themselues are not all one But the spirituall flesh which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull and the spirituall blood which is daily giuen to the faithfull to drinke doe differ from the flesh that was crucified and from the blood that was shed with the souldiers speare as the authoritie of this man doth witnesse Therefore they be not all one For that flesh which was crucified was made of the flesh of the Virgin framed together of bones and sinevves and seuered with the features of the members of a man quickned with the spirit of a reasonable soule indued with reason into a life proper to it selfe and motions agreeable to the same But on the other side the spirituall flesh which feedeth spiritually the people that doe beleeue after the forme that it beareth outwardly is made of the graines of corne by the handes of the workeman framed together of no sinewes and bones seuered with no varietie of members quickened with no reasonable substance nor can exercise any proper motions For whatsoeuer giueth the substance of life it is of a spirituall force and of an inuisible working and of a diuine power Againe of the wordes of Augustine he concludeth in this maner By authoritie of this doctour intreating of the Lords wordes of the sacrament of his body blood we be manifestly taught that those wordes of the Lord be to be vnderstood spiritually and not carnally as hee himselfe sayeth The words which I speake to you bee spirit and life Namely the words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood for he spake it vpon that occasion whereat his disciples were offended Therefore that they should not bee offended the heauenly Master calleth them back from the flesh to the Spirit and from a corporall sight to inuisible vnderstanding We see therefore the food of the Lords body and the drinke of his blood are after a sort his very body and his very blood namely in that they be Spirit and life Hee addeth againe after the matter proued Therefore we see that there is a great difference betweene the mysterie of the body blood of Christ which is now receiued of the faithfull in the Congregation and that body which was borne of the Virgin Mary which suffered which was buried which rose againe which ascended into heauen which sitteth at the right hand of the Father For this that is ministred in the way is to be taken spiritually For Faith beleeueth that which it seeth not and spiritually feedeth the soule and doth reioyce the heart and giueth euerlasting life and incorruption while that is not minded which feedeth the body which is crushed with teeth which is broken in pieces but that which by faith is spiritually receiued But that body wherein Christ suffered and rose againe is his owne proper body taken of the Virgin Maries body able to be felt and seene euen after his resurrection as he himselfe said to his disciples Beholde my hands and my feet for I am euen he handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue Bertram writeth many things to this purpose but let it suffice that wee haue touched thus much Which mans exposition and manner of disputing vpon the Sacrament is in mine opinion diligently to be wayed and imbraced for tvvo respects First because hee sticketh to the authoritie and testimonie not onely of those fathers of whom he hath repeated a few but also many moe I might say of all the most auncient Secondarily because that where the credit of the man was so much that he was prouoked to write by a most famous Prince and his writing published abroad and in sight of all men he was praised of many reprehended of none or noted of any one spot of erronious doctrine whereby it came to passe that before these new grosse and naturall transubstantiation makers sprung vp the doctrine of Bertram touching the Sacrament was allovved by the iudgement of euery man that was best learned Albeit this terme of transubstantiation being indeed new not necessarie yet perhaps might haue some place as the word Trans-elementation if they had not brought in another change of the substances then a sacramentall and that which the auncient fathers did vnderstand which is brought to passe the former substance remayning still But they not satisfied with the noueltie of the terme haue inuented a monstrous interpretation For they appoint the very proper body of Christ to be in the Sacrament and plucke from it the true properties of a mans body whereas it should seeme that Aquinas himselfe was not ignorant of the distinction aboue mentioned Aquin. 3. parte Sum. q. 76. art 3. For he writeth 3. part Sum. q. 76. art 3. on this manner Christ is whole vnder ech peece of the formes of Bread and Wine not onely when the hoste is broken but also when it remaineth whole neyther is there distance of parts one from another as the eye from the eye or the eye from the eare or the head from the feete as there is in other bodies organicall for such maner of distance is in the true body of Christ but not as it is in this Sacrament He affirmeth the true body of Christ to bee one which is organicall and hath difference of members which also hee denyeth to bee in the Sacrament and that to be another which is in the Sacrament and wanteth varietie of members which thing if he meant of the spirituall body as the old writers did speake he iudged right but if hee meant to signifie any masse of flesh without forme it is a great absurditie and contrarie to the opinion of all the old writers Lombardus Lombardus also Author of the sentences concerning the verie and proper flesh of Christ lib 3. Sentent Dist 3. saith thus Christs flesh that was taken is neither heauenly nor of the aire nor of any other nature then of such as all mens flesh is Since
therefore the manner and nature of the flesh of Christ is common with the flesh of other men as Lombardus saith and such flesh as Aquinas affirmeth commeth not into the Sacrament it followeth by their testimonie that these two kindes of flesh differ much And that this may the better appeare and bee laide vp in memorie I thought it not without profit to adde of such things as we haue spoken of before a certaine distinction which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by comparison 1 The proper bodie of Christ hath the naturall forme of a mans body The mysticall bodie hath not 2 The proper body hath a head breast members seuered The mysticall hath not 3 The proper body hath bones vaines sinewes The mystical hath not 4 That may bee seene and touched This can neither be seene nor touched 5 That is indued with the true sences of a body This is without sence as Epiphanius saith 6 That is organicall This is not 7 That is no figure This is a figure of his proper body 8 That is not in mysterie This is in mysterie 9 That of his owne nature is humane and bodily This is heauenly diuine and spirituall 10 The matter of that is not subiect to corruption The materiall part of this is bread and is corrupted 11 No man may eate that by it selfe This both a man may and ought to eate 12 That is contained in one place This wheresoeuer the Sacrament is ministred is present but not as in a place 13 That is not a Sacrament of another body This is a Sacrament of another body 14 That being taken of the virgin Maries bodie was once create This is not taken of the Virgin but daylie by the mysticall benediction is create potentiallie by the testimonie of Augustin and Cyprian 15 That is a naturall body This is aboue nature 16 Finally that is simply This is after a sort 17 That properly perfectly This is a bodie vnproperly Hitherto wee haue spoken of the difference which the auncient Fathers haue godly and diligently obserued betweene Christs proper bodie and the Sacrament of the same bodie In the which although many things haue beene spoken which doe not only declare that there is a difference which in this place we meant to doe but also doe admonish vs vvithall what manner of bodie that is in the sacrament Yet because wee haue not hitherto so fully expressed this point as the weightines of the matter requireth We haue thought good from hence-forvvard to intreate of this part more fullie Namely in vvhat sort this Sacrament is the Lords bodie and wherefore our Lord himselfe at the first as the Euangelists make mention aftervvard Paul the Apostle lastly all they of old time following the authoritie of them haue left in writing that it is so called and is so indeed not that this manner which is a spirituall and hid thing can be found out by mans reason or that wee goe about to search out curiously such things as bee forbidden and denyed but that all mans inuentions set apart we may follow those things that haue bene left vs by the authoritie of Scriptures and auncient Fathers that agree with them and that manner which the Lord himselfe would wee should know and the Church instructed by him and his Apostles hath receiued not to depart from that This is to bee holden fast which wee proued before that not onely the Lordes wordes which be spoken in the 6. Chapter of Iohn Vnlesse yee eate the flesh c. And My flesh is verily meate and the rest that followeth in the same place but also these wordes of the Lords supper Take ye eate ye this is my body and This is my blood are to bee vnderstood spiritually not carnally and that one maner of eating is meant in both places When I say Not carnally I meane Not according to the letter nor as the words doe properly sound for this is to vnderstand carnally as Chrysostome witnesseth vpon Iohn of these words The flesh profiteth nothing What is it Chrysostom in Ioan. Hom. 46. saith he to vnderstand carnally To vnderstand the things simply as they be spoken and nothing else For those things that be seene are not so to be iudged but all mysteries are to be considered with inward eyes that is to say spiritually Let not this rule of Chrysostome go out of our minds But these two Carnally and Spiritually are contrary when the one is forbidden the other is commanded and contrarywise And that carnall sense hath no place in this mysterie not onely Chrysostome is the Author as we recited euen now and Cyprian where he saith Neither doth carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth and Theophylactus writing thus But because we vnderstand it spiritually we be neither deuourers of flesh and yet be sanctified by that meat But to be short I may in maner say that all the ancient Fathers with one voice do forbid vs to vnderstand the wordes of the Lords Supper carnally and command a spirituall meaning The which by many testimonies repeated in this peece of worke euery man may readily perceiue Neither is this sufficient if we auoyd one maner of vnderstanding carnally and fall into another For he that doth vnderstand the eating of Christs flesh after the letter and as it were a proper kinde of speech he is a carnall Capernaite whether he suppose it to be done properly one way or another That is plaine by these wordes of Augustin vpon the 98. Psalme Augustine in Psal 98. It seemed a hard matter to them that he said Vnlesse a man eate c. They tooke it fondly and imagined of it carnally and thought that the Lord would haue cut out peeces of his body and haue giuen to them And a little after That which I haue spoken vnderstand ye spiritually You shall not eate this body which you see I haue commended to you a certaine sacrament if it be spiritually vnderstood it will giue you life Here Augustine calleth carnall vnderstanding foolishnesse and appointeth spirituall vnderstanding as necessary And his meaning is not that this is onely a carnall sense if a man should imagine of the cut pieces of the Lords body albeit he rehearseth but this one carnall way of vnderstanding but also of all other the like For it is a likely matter that euen all the Capernaites did vnderstand it carnally and yet not all after one way Cyprian For one maner is rehearsed of Cyprian writing thus It seemed to them a horrible and wicked matter to feed of the flesh of man imagining that this had bene so spoken as though they should haue bene taught to eate his flesh either sodden or rosted or cut in gobbets Cyrillus And Cyrillus doth impute to them another kinde of carnall vnderstanding for he saith For after they had heard Verily verily I say to you vnlesse ye eate the flesh c. they thought Christ had called them
say This is my body when he gaue the signe of his bodie Chrisostome And Chrysostome vpon the 26. of Matthew Homilia 83. For if Christ be not dead whose figure signe is this sacrifice Finallie of some it is called a figure and a badge as of Origen and Chrysostom of some other an example patterne and image as of Ambrose Basill and Origen wherefore not without cause it hath also the name of that thing whose figure badge and patterne it is Wherefore it is the more to be maruelled what commeth into their mindes that cannot abide to haue it called a figure nor doe acknowledge any figure in the words of the Supper but doe reprochfully call them that doe acknowledge it figure framers whereas it is plaine for all that that all old writers did so call it and that by those words of the Lords supper the Lorde did consecrate the Sacrament of his body this being manifest also that after the letter proper manner of speech the bodie of Christ signifieth one thing and the Sacrament of his bodie another And if it shall not be a figure it shall neither be a signe nor a sacrament And so such as be ready to call other men sacramentaries they themselues doe take away the sacraments altogether Therefore let no man doubt but this sacrament is both a figure and therefore doeth also take the name of that thing whereof it is a figure We said there was another thing which the auncient Fathers acknowledging in this sacrament would haue it verily to be the Lords body and that is the vertue of the body it selfe that is of force and giueth life which vertue by grace and mysticall blessing is ioyned with the Bread and Wine and is called by sundry names where the matter it selfe is all one Of Augustin an intelligible inuisible spirituall body Of Hierom diuine spirituall flesh Of Irenaeus a heauenly thing Of Ambrose a spirituall foode and body of a diuine spirit Of other some such like thing And this also doth make much the more that the sacrament is most worthy to haue the name of the true body and blood seeing not onely outvvardly it showeth forth a figure and image of it but also inwardly it draweth with it a hid and secret naturall propertie of the same bodie that is to say a vertue that giueth life so that it cannot now be thought a vaine figure or the signe of a thing cleane absent but the very body of the Lord diuine indeede and spirituall but present in grace full of vertue mightie in operation And it hapneth often that the names of the thinges themselues be giuen to their vertue and strength We say leauen is in the whole lumpe wheras a small quantitie of leauen cannot spread so farre abroad but the strength and sharpenes of the leauen We say that the fire doth warme vs when the heate of the fire doth it we being a good way off from the fire Likewise that the Sunne is present doth lighten burneth nourisheth when indeede the heat of the Sunne doth it and the Sunne himselfe cannot goe out of his spheare So is a King said to be in all his realme because of the power of his dominon Neither doth the scripture want these examples for we often meet with them Wee will at this time bee content with one of them but very manifest Christ spake of Iohn saying He is Helias because he was indewed with the vertue or power of Helias the angell vnto Zacharie witnessing the same and saying Hee shall goe before him in the spirit and power of Helias Likewise therefore as Iohn was Helias because he had the spirit and power of Helias So the Lords bread is the body of Christ because it hath his grace and liuely power ioyned therewithall But that this is not a fained or a lately sprung opinion but was receiued and allowed of the auncient writers we wil confirme it by their open testimonies partly reciting some of the forenamed places and partly adding other Augustin vpon Iohn tract 27. If therefore yee shall see the Sonne of man where hee was before What meaneth this by this hee answereth that which had troubled them by this he openeth the cause why they were offended by this plainely if they would vnderstand For they thought that hee would haue giuen among them his body but he said that he would ascend into heauen euen whole When ye shall see the sonne of man ascend where hee was before surely euen then shall ye see that hee giueth not his body in such sort as ye imagine surely euen then shall yee vnderstand that his grace is not consumed by biting nor perisheth by eating The same man out of the sermon of the words of the Lord and it is rehearsed de consecrat Dist 2. The faithfull doe know how they do eat the flesh of Christ Euery man taketh his part whereupon the parts bee called the grace it selfe by parts hee is eaten and he remayneth all whole by parts he is eaten in the sacrament and remayneth all whole in thy heart The same man vpon Iohn tract 50. Thou hast Christ both at this present and in time to come presently by signe presently by the sacrament of Baptisme presently by the meate and drinke of the Altar Thou hast Christ presently but thou shalt haue him alway for when thou shalt goe from hence thou shalt come to him that said to the thiefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise And soone after The poore shall yee alway haue with you but mee shall yee not alwayes haue Let good men receiue this also and not be troubled for he spake of the presence of his body For according to his maiestie according to his prouidence according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace that is fulfilled which he hath spoken Behold I am with you daily euen vnto the end of the world But according to the flesh which the Worde tooke vpon him according to that that hee was borne of the Virgin according to that that hee was taken of the Iewes that he was fastned to the tree that hee was taken downe from the Crosse that he was wrapped in linnen clothes that he was laid in the graue that hee appeared in his resurrection yee shall not haue him alwaies with you Why Because according to the presence of his body he was conuersant with his Disciples fortie dayes and they being in his company and seeing him and not following him he ascended into heauen and is not here for he is there hee sitteth on the right hand of the Father These be Augustins words Whereas he said before that Christ is present with vs by faith and by the sacraments afterward he said that he is present with vs by Maiestie by vnspeakeable and inuisible grace and so that is fulfilled by him which hee spake Behold I am with you to c. But according to the proper presence of the flesh that he is not
here which proper nature of the flesh also he hath dilated plentifully by a Periphrasis to exclude altogether such a manner of presence to establish his presence in the sacraments by grace power Augustin teacheth vs by the Lords words that his true and proper body is ascended into heauen euen whole but the grace of that body we receiue by the sacraments which is neither consumed by biting nor perished by eating Idem in Psal 65. To this agreeth that the same Author writeth vpon the 65. Psal The murtherers dranke the same blood by grace Idem in Ioan. tract 26. which they shed through madnes The same man vpon the Gospel of Iohn tract 26. Giue eare to the Apostle I would not saith he haue you ignorant bretheren that our Fathers were all vnder a cloud and all did eate one maner spirituall food Spirituall truely all one but corporall another for they did eate Manna we another thing but the same spirituall meat that wee doe And they all dranke the same spiritual drinke yet they one thing we another in outward appearance which notwithstanding did signifie all one in spiritual power He calleth the sacrament spirituall food for the spirituall power ioyned therewith which power also was in the sacraments of the old testament albeit our outward signes and theirs were diuerse The spiritual power was all one in both That of a body to bee borne at his time This of a body alreadie borne suffered and raysed againe So Manna was to them the bodie of Christ as the sacrament of thankes-giuing is now to vs. For this spirituall power Augustin also called it as we said before a spirituall inuisible and intelligible body wherby is signified the visible body of the Lord and able to be felt Hereunto also belongeth that saying of the same Author The body of Christ is both trueth and a figure Trueth while the body blood of Christ by the power of the holy Ghost in power of the same is made of the substance of bread wine but a figure is that which is outwardly seene The meaning of these words be that the substance of bread wine be made the body of Christ for the power of his body giuen to them by the holy Ghost The same man in Psalme 77. Idem in Psal 77. Their meate and drinke therefore in mysterie was all one with ours yet in signification not in outward appearance for the selfe same Christ was figured to them in the rocke but to vs he was made manifest in flesh But hee saith That God was not well pleased with them all In that he saith not with all there were some then there in whom God was pleased And albeit the sacraments were common to all yet his grace which is the power of the sacraments was not common to all This place of Augustin if it bee well weighed doth much helpe to vnderstand how Christ is present in the sacraments For he ioyneth together these two Signification and Grace which hee affirmeth to be the strength of the sacrament To these agree those things which Ambrose writeth lib. 6. de Sacramentis Afterward Ambros de Sacra lib. 6. when the Disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therfore any moe should so say as though there should be a kind of loathsomenes of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine thou therefore takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest obtaine the grace and vertue of his true nature Ambrose doth plainely teach how it is true flesh For hee hath noted both The figure where hee saith thou takest it in a similitude and the inward strength because vndoubtedly it giueth the grace and vertue of the true nature Which place being diligentlie marked the residue which be found of his may easilie be expounded The same man in his booke De ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Idem de ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Christ is in that sacrament because it is the bodie of Christ Therefore it is not a corporall but a spirituall food whereupon the Apostle speaketh of the figure of it that our fathers haue eaten spirituall meate haue drunke spirituall drinke For the body of God is a spirituall body The body of Christ is the body of a diuine spirit By these words of Ambrose we be admonished what manner of body this is and why it is so called because it hath the spirituall vertue of the true bodie For these termes Not a corporall but a spirituall food and The body of the heauenly spirit bee most aptly applied to the grace and vertue of his true bodie Which thing also Eusebius Emissenus confirmeth de consecrat Dist 2. Eusebius Emissenus Seeing hee meant to take from our eyes the body taken of the virgin and would place it aboue the starres it was necessary that in the day of his supper the sacrament of his body blood should be consecrated vnto vs to the end that that might bee worshipped continually in mysterie which was once offered for a ransome for vs that seeing a daylie and vnceasing redemption did runne for the saluation of all men it might be a continuall oblation of redemption and that continuall sacrifice might liue in memorie and might euer be present in grace a true perfect and only sacrifice to be esteemed in faith not to be iudged by forme nor outward sight but by the inward affection It is manifest by the wordes of Emissenus that the body that was taken of the Virgin was taken from vs and was placed aboue the starres and therefore that the sacrament of the same was necessarily ordayned that that true perfect and onely sacrifice which vvas once offered vpon the Crosse might liue continually in memory and might alvvay be present in grace that vve should not cease to remember continually the benefit of our perpetuall redemption neither haue any cause vvhy vve should require the presence of his flesh seeing vve feele the presence of the same by grace to be of no lesse efficacie vvhich is to bee esteemed by faith not to be iudged in forme or outward appearance but n the inward affection Idem ibidem And that which he writeth immediatly after in the same place For the inuisible priest doth turne with his word by a secret povver the visible creatures into the substance of his body blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body c. And least we should imagine it a more grosse substance or that called againe which he said before was taken avvay he alledgeth foorthvvith the example of Regeneration saying Hovv great benefit therefore the force of the heauenly blessing doth worke and hovv it ought not to be a nevv and vnpossible matter to thee
as oft as they of old time treat of the Sacrament they all apply to the Sacrament the vvords of our Lord vvhich are spoken in the sixt chapter of Iohn My flesh is verily meat my blood is verily drinke The bread which I will giue is my flesh and vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. Which things shal be proued by their ovvne sayings before alledged and also by those that shall follovv Neither are they to bee allovved that deny this chapter of Iohn to be referred to this Sacrament seeing so great a troupe of vvitnesses be against them But the opinion of them seemed more probable vvho as they iudge this Euangelist to set forth the humanitie of Christ lesse then the rest and his diuinitie more amply so doe declare that these things vvhich are rehearsed by the other Euangelists concerning the institution and outvvard ceremonie of this Sacrament are not at all mentioned of Iohn but that he openeth expoundeth more plainly vnto vs the true and right vnderstanding of them And it is plaine that the mindes of the Capernaites vvhen the Lord said My flesh is verily meat And vnlesse ye eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. vvere much offended and troubled and therefore leauing him departed for they vnderstood him too grosly and after the common sort But his Tvvelue Apostles that taried by him being admonished and lift vp to a more higher meaning and of more Maiestie heard of him The words which I haue spoken be spirit and life Vpon this it commeth to passe that all the old vvriters do flie the common iudgement and vsuall vnderstanding in those vvordes This is my body and vvhich the Lord spake of eating his flesh and follovv a more diuine vvay of vnderstanding them and more agreeable to the Sacraments as they themselues affirme Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Hom. 83. Chrysostom vpon Matthew 26. hom 83. expounding the vvords of the Supper Take ye eate ye this is my body c. doth aske this question Why were they not troubled vvhen they heard this And he ansvvereth Because he had taught them alreadie many and great things concerning this point before Wherefore also hee did not confirme that vvhich they had often before perceiued And not long after hee addeth Hee himselfe did also drinke of it least at the hearing of those vvordes they should say What do vve then drinke blood and eate flesh and vpon that might be troubled For at the first also when he spake of these matters many vvere offended onely for the wordes Lest therefore this should then also haue happened he did this first himselfe that hee might bring them to the partaking of these mysteries vvith a quiet minde We be taught here by Chrysostom that the Apostles were not troubled when they heard the Lord say Take ye eat ye this is my body Because they had bene alreadie taught before hovv that which vvas spoken ought to be vnderstood namely where others were offended as it is in Iohn said This is a hard saying they abode and had learned It is the Spirit that giueth life the flesh profiteth nothing The wordes that I haue spoken vnto you are spirit life that is to say as the same Chrysostom in the same place expounded it they are spiritually to bee vnderstood which selfe thing the Lord himselfe confirmeth by his owne deed vvhen hee did eat the same bread drinke the vvine vvith them lest they should thinke vpon any base or common matter but should be brought to the partaking of the mysteries with quiet minds It is no hard matter to perceiue by this that Chrysostom vvriteth in this place that it is one way a body that Christ himselfe called his body when he said Take ye eat ye this is my body the which he also receiueth himselfe together with his disciples and another vvay to bee his proper body which was fed vvith the other The one did eat the other was eaten after a diuers sort either of them is called his body To this purpose maketh also that vvhich Clemens Alexandrinus schoolemaster to Origen Clemens Alexand lib. inscrip Paedagogus teacheth in his booke intituled Paedagogus when he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The blood of Christ is two maner of wayes the one fleshie whereby vve are vvashed the other spirituall vvherevvith we haue bene anointed Hierom. in Epi. ad Ephes ca. 1. Whom Hierom follovving vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians the first chapter saith The blood and flesh of Christ saith he is vnderstood tvvo maner of vvayes that is either that spirituall and heauenly whereof he himselfe spake My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke And vnlesse you eate my flesh and drinke my blood you shall not haue euerlasting life Or else the flesh and blood that vvas crucified that was shed vvith the speare of the souldier There bee tvvo things that Hierom teacheth in this place That those vvords in the 6. chap. of Iohn do appertaine to the Sacrament euen as Chrysostom doth and that the flesh that vvas crucified doeth differ from that vvhich is in the Sacrament vvhich he calleth Spirituall Diuine The same man vpon Leuiticus and is to be seen De consecrat Idem in Leuit. de consecrat dist 2. dist 2. Of this sacrifice vvhich is by miracle vvrought for the remembrance of Christ it is lavvfull to eate but of that which Christ offered vpon the Altar of the Crosse it is of it self lavvful for no man to eat A plaine and manifest distinction Augustin in lib. senten Prosperi August in lib. Sent. Prosperi It is his flesh vvhich couered with the forme of bread we receiue in the Sacrament and his blood which vnder the forme and tast of wine we drinke that is to say the flesh is the sacrament of flesh and blood is the sacrament of blood By flesh and blood being both inuisible spirituall intelligible is betokened the visible sensible body of our Lord Iesus Christ full of the grace of all vertues diuine Maiestie Who seeth not hovv plainly Augustine putteth a difference between the proper body of Christ which he termeth visible and sensible and that flesh which we receiue in the sacrament vvhich he affirmeth to be inuisible spirituall intelligible and a signe of the other body Idem in Epist. ad Iren. The same man in his Epistle to Irenaeus You shall not eat this body which you see and drinke that blood which they that shall crucifie me shall shed The same truely and not the same The same inuisiblie and not the same visibly He putteth a difference when hee saith Not this body and againe The same not the same The maner of the difference is the same inuisibly which hee termeth before the inuisible body namely the Sacrament of the body and not the same visibly or the visible body which is referred to the proper body for this body
come to the Image of the things and see the comming of Christ made in the flesh Let him behold that hie Priest both novv offering sacrifices to the Father that shall hereafter offer And let him vnderstand all these things to be the Images of spirituall things and that heauenly things be noted by corporall Offices It is therefore called an Image vvhich is receiued for the present time and may be discerned by the nature of man If thou canst vvith thought and mind pearce the heauens and follovv IESVS vvho hath pearced the heauens and is novv present before the face of God for vs there shalt thou find those good things of vvhich the Lavv had a shadovv and Christ shevved the Image in the flesh vvhich are prepared for the blessed vvhich neither eye hath seene nor eare heard nor ascended into the heart of man vvhich things vvhen thou shalt see thou shalt vnderstand that he that vvalketh in them and continueth in desire and earnest affection after them such a one vvalketh not novv in an Image but in the very trueth it selfe Origen writeth to the learned and practised and therefore not easie to be vnderstood of all men Notvvithstanding he shevveth plainely that the sacrifices vvhich be here offered be Images of that trueth vvhich pearced to heauens and abiding before the face of God is intercessor for vs And therefore that the Images of the trueth be one thing and the very trueth another And that although these Images haue also their trueth yet this differeth from that proper trueth vvhich vve shall there indeed attaine to vvhen vve follovving Christ shall pearce the heauens vvhere hee abideth the vvhich after a sort vvee also enioy here while in our deuout meditations our mindes being lift vp to heauen we behold those secret good things He also vpon Matthew cap. 15. Idem in Mat. cap. 15. saith Neither is it the material bread but the word that is spoken ouer it that profiteth to him that eateth not vnvvorthily of the Lord. And these things are spoken of the figuratiue and mysticall body Many things beside may be said of the Word which was made flesh Here Origen doeth declare that the true flesh that is to say the true nature of man which Christ being the Word tooke vnto him to bee one maner of flesh and an other thing to bee his figuratiue and symbolical body with which words he calleth the Sacrament To this purpose serue the wordes that he writeth Contra Celsum lib. 8. Idem contra Celsum lib. 8. We obeying the Maker of all things for his great benefits bestovved vpon vs when we haue giuen Thankes are fed with the loaues set before vs which by intercession and prayers are made a certaine more holy body These words A certain more holy body do not agree to the proper body of Christ but they agree to the sacrament of Thankesgiuing which after a certaine maner is his body The same man vpon Leuiticus Homil. 7. Idem in Leuit. Homil. 7. expoundeth the same matter more plainely saying But you if ye be the children of the Church if you bee indued with the mysteries of the Gospel if the Word made flesh dvvelleth in you acknowledge you these things which we speake that they be the Lords lest peraduenture he that is ignorant be ignorant still Acknowledge that they be figures which be written in the holy Volumes therefore examine them as spiritual not carnall men and vnderstand those things which bee spoken For if you take those things as carnal men they hurt you and doe not nourish you For there is also in the Gospel a letter that killeth The killing letter is not onely found in the olde Testament There is also a letter in the nevv Testament that can kill him which will not spiritually marke those things that bee spoken For if thou follow this that hath bene spoken according to the letter Vnlesse ye eat my flesh and drinke my blood this letter slayeth Seeing then the Authors euery where referre these wordes to the sacrament and Origen commandeth so much to flee the letter as to say that it killeth Who seeth not that Christes flesh is in the sacrament one way to bee vnderstood and another according to the letter and in proper speech Epiphanius in Anchorâ—to is of the same opinion Epiphanius in Anchorato where he saith For wee see that our Sauiour tooke into his hands as the Gospel coÌ„taineth that he rose in the Supper and tooke these things and when hee had giuen Thankes he said This is mine c. And we see that it is not equal nor like neither to the Image that is in flesh nor to his inuisible Godhead nor to the features of his members for this is of a round fashion and without sence as much as to the povver of it selfe appertaineth And therefore his will was to speake by grace This is mine c. And euery man beleeueth his saying for he that beleeueth not that he is true as he hath said hee is fallen from grace and health But that which we haue heard wee beleeue that it is his for vve know that our Lord is altogether sence all indued with sence all God all moouing all working all light all incomprehensible but yet he that hath giuen vs this with grace Epiphanius doeth in this place endeuour himselfe to proue that man being made after the Image of God hath in deed the Image of God not according to the proper nature of diuinitie but after grace and vseth the similitude taken of the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing the which according to the proper nature of a body he denieth it to be the body of Christ since it hath neither the forme of a true body and lacketh feeling and mouing and yet it is verily beleeued to be his body by grace Cyprian de Coena D mini Cyprian also in his sermon of the Supper of the Lord doeth very godly and plentifully reason to the same effect out of the which I haue thought sufficient to touch these fevv places For none of the Fathers haue more extolled the dignitie of the Sacrament and shutting out all carnall sence more plainely declared the true vnderstanding of so great a mysterie An vnconsuming meat saith hee the Master did set before his disciples neither were the people bidden to a sumptuous and cunningly dressed Banquet but there is giuen an immortall food differing from common meates retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible vvorking that the diuine vertue is present Againe There did sometime arise a question as it is read in the Gospel of Iohn of the noueltie of this word and at the doctrine of this Mysterie were the hearers amazed vvhen the Lord said Vnlesse you eate of the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you Because certaine for that they did not yet beleeue nor could vnderstand went backe for that it seemed
to them an horrible and hainous thing to feed vpon mans flesh thinking hee had spoken this after that sort as though they should haue bene taught to haue eaten his flesh sod or rosted and cut in pieces whereas the flesh of his person if it should bee deuided into morsels could not haue bene sufficient for all mankinde which being once spent Religion should seeme to perish vvhich should not haue aftervvard a sacrifice remaining any longer But in such like thoughts flesh and blood profiteth nothing because as the Master himselfe hath expounded These words be Spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse Faith be added too The Bread is food the Blood is life the Flesh substance the Body the Church A body because of the agreeing of members in one Bread for the conformitie of nourishment Blood for the effect of life giuen Flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken Also hee sayth This common bread beeing changed into flesh and blood doeth procure life and encrease to the bodies and therefore by the accustomed effect of things the weakenesse of our faith is aided and taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternall life is in the visible Sacraments and that we be knit to Christ not so much by corporall as by spirituall passage Also this bread which hee reached to his disciples beeing changed not in forme but in nature by the omnipotencie of the Word is made flesh and euen as in the person of Christ the humanitie was seene and the diuinitie hid so into the visible Sacrament vnspeakeably doeth the diuine substance powre it selfe Also the Master truely of this Institution sayd that Vnlesse wee should eate and drinke his blood we should not haue life in vs instructing vs by a spirituall lesson and opening our vnderstanding to so hidden a matter that wee should knowe that our eating is an abiding in him and our drinke as it were a certaine incorporation by submitting our seruice and ioyning our willes and vniting our affections Also hee sayth Among the guests of the Lords table the natural man is not admitted whatsoeuer flesh and blood doeth appoint is shut out from this company it sauoureth nothing it profiteth nothing whatsoeuer the finenes of the sence of man doth goe about Cyprian hath these and many other places to the same purpose The very words of Cyprian doe sufficiently declare that which belongeth to our purpose How the Letter is not to bee followed in these things which be spoken of this mysterie how the vnderstanding of the Flesh is vtterly to be shunned and all things to be referred to a spiritual sense That there is the presence of the diuine power in this Bread the effect of euerlasting life and that the diuine substance is powred thereinto that the words are spirit and life that a spirituall lesson is giuen that this Body this Blood and Flesh this substance of body ought not to be taken after a common sort nor as mans reason doth appoint but to be named thought of beleeued for certaine excellent effects powers and properties ioyned thereto which be euen within the body and blood of Christ by nature namely that it doeth both feede and reuiue our soules and prepareth our bodies to resurrection and immortalitie Cyrill in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 14. The same opinion hath also Cyrillus who though he affirme in many places the trueth and nature of the body of Christ to be in the Sacrament yet hee is in opinion that it is a spiritual and diuine matter and not to be vnderstood after the manner of men For first he declareth that the same maner of eating is set foorth in the words of the Lords Supper which the Lord himselfe signified when he said Vnlesse you eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. For so he writeth in his 4. booke vpon the 14. Chap. of Iohn Where after he had spoken somewhat of them that did say How can this man giue his flesh to be eaten hee addeth these words Therefore they ought first to haue set the rootes of faith in their minde and then to seeke for those things that are to be sought for of man but they before they would beleeue did seeke importunately For this cause therefore the Lord did not open how it might be but exhorteth to seeke it by faith So to his disciples that beleeued he gaue the pieces of bread saying Take ye and eate ye this is my body The cup also in like maner he caried about saying Drinke yee all of this This is the cup of my blood which shall be shed for many for the remission of sins Thou seest manifestly that by no meanes he would declare the maner of the mysterie to them that sought it without faith but to them that did beleeue and did not seeke it he plainely declared it Likewise in cap. 21. Idem in cap. 21 vpon these words This is a hardsaying thus he saith And such as want sharpenesse of wit are wont to abhorre knowledge which should be sought with great study and much labour but yet the spirituall man accustomed to the Lords doctrine as to great dainties doth continually sing How sweet be thy words vnto my throat yea aboue hony to my mouth But the naturall Iew doeth thinke this spirituall mysterie full of foolishnesse and where by the Lords words he is stirred to an higher vnderstanding of things yet he falleth still to his accustomed madnesse Likewise in his cap. 22. expounding these words Doeth this offend you Idem in cap. 22 c. hee writeth on this sort For ignorance many which followed Christ not vnderstanding his words were troubled for when they heard him say Verely verely I say vnto you vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you they thought Christ had called them to the cruel maners of beasts and stirred them to eate the rawe flesh of a man and to drinke blood which be euen horrible to heare For they had not yet knowen the maner of this mysterie and the godly ministration thereof Also in the 24. chapter Idem cap. 24. The words therefore that I haue spoken to you bee spirit that is spirituall and of the spirit and life that is to say they be of the liuely and naturall life Idem ad Calosyrium The same mans words are rehearsed to Calosyrius which follow For least we should abhorre flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailty powred into the things offered the power of life turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine seed that giueth life might be found in vs. By these and many other places in Cyrillus we be lift vp from the letter to the spirite from the sence of the naturall man to a more hie vnderstanding of a spirituall mysterie It must not
be thought here that we eate the rawe flesh of a man or drinke his blood but that the words bee spirituall and spiritually to bee vnderstood that they be termed flesh and blood but ought to be vnderstood of spirit and life that is to say of the vertue of the Lords flesh that giueth life And therfore saide hee that the povver of life was put into the outward signes Idem in Ioan. lib. 11. cap. 26. and called it by an apt signification the body of life The same man vpon Iohn lib. 11. cap. 26. doth expound somewhat more plainely how wee be coupled corporally both with Christ and with our selues and that by the partaking of the sacrament although we be seuered both in body and soule It must be considered saith he whether to the vnitie of consent and will wee may also finde a naturall vnity by which we shall be lincked among our selues and we all vnto God For peraduenture we are ioyned also with corporall vnion although we be seuered one from another that ech one apart hath his being and distance of place For although Peter and Paul be one by vnity in Christ yet Peter is not Paul Afterward within few words hee thus concludeth The originall therefore and the way whereby wee bee partakers of the holy Ghost and vnited to God is the mysterie of Christ for we bee all sanctified in him Therefore that hee might vnite vs one to another and euery one to God although we bee seuered both in body and soule yet hath hee found a vvay agreeable to the counsell of his Father and to his ovvne wisedome For hee blessing those as beleeue with his body through the mysticall communion doeth make vs both with himselfe and also among our selues one body It is plaine that Cyrillus spake not of the same kind of body when he saith Although they bee seuered in body and soule yet they which beleeue through the body of Christ and by the mysticall communion be made one body with Christ and betvveene themselues For euen as the faithfull being ioyned in that spirituall body are one body although their proper bodies remaine seuered Euen so also wee being ioyned with Christ in that spirituall body are made one body with him although his ovvne proper body bee farre distant from our bodies Let vs adde one place more taken out of this Father Idem in lib. ad Euop Anat. 11 which is in his booke Ad Euoptium Anath 11. where he speaketh thus of Nestorius Doeth not he pronounce this mysterie to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a deuouring of mans flesh and violently driue the mindes of the faithfull without conscience into false interpretations and with mans inuentions take those things in hand which are receiued by an onely pure and vnsearchable faith Cyrillus doth in this place obiect against Nestorius That to maintaine this error he did speake too grosly of the Sacrament as though the faithfull doe properly therein eate mans flesh which by the Greeke word hee calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But such kind of thoughts hee termeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say as Budaeus doeth interpret it counterfeite not right not sincere For so much as here is no place for such kinde of worldly and common imaginations We ought to thinke the like of Theophylactus who although in some place he may seeme to haue follovved a more grosse opinion as vpon Matthew the 26. Chapter whose words wee haue aboue rehearsed wherein he seemeth to denie that the bread of the Sacrament of thankesgiuing is a figure of the Lords body but the very body indeede yet when he saith It is no figure he meaneth that it is not onely a figure as in another place where vpon Marke and Iohn it is read for else hee should haue repugned against all the olde Writers and that is not likely who throughout terme this Sacrament a figure an image a signe and patterne Besides in that he said it was the body in very deede his meaning was not to haue it taken after a worldly and common sort as it shall manifestly appeare by those things that follow for he writing vpon these words in the sixt Chapter of Iohn Theophylac in Ioan. cap. 6. The Iewes therefore did striue among themselues saying How can this man giue vs his flesh to eate saith thus It behoueth vs therefore after that wee heare vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man yee shall haue no life in taking the heauenly mysteries to keepe stedfast and vnwauering faith and not to be inquisitiue how For the naturall man that is hee that follovveth mans carnall and naturall thoughts is not apt to conceiue such matters as bee aboue nature and spirituall and euen so he doth not vnderstand the spirituall eating of the Lords flesh whereof who so bee not partakers shall not bee partakers of euerlasting life And by and by hee expoundeth thus these words Hee that eateth my flesh c. In this place vve learne the Sacrament of the communion For he that eateth and drinketh the Lords flesh and blood abideth in the Lord himselfe and the Lord in him for there is a new mixture made and aboue reason so that God is in vs and wee in God Here the Author teacheth that faith must be had in the mysteries and not to be inquisitiue how and therewithall he remoueth apart mans carnall or naturall thoughts and requireth onely a spirituall meaning and commendeth a more hie maner of eating For he addeth not long after vpon these words This is a hard saying who can heare him c. But see their folly For their duetie had been to haue asked and learned those things whereof they were ignorant But they drew backe and did expound nothing spiritually but all things as they outwardly appeared For in as much as they heard of flesh they thought he would compell them to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is deuourers of flesh and blood But because we vnderstand it spiritually neither wee bee deuourers of flesh and yet be we sanctified by such meate By and by also expounding this It is spirit that quickeneth thus he writeth Because as we haue often sayd they that carnally expounded such things as Christ spake were offended he sayth When those things that I speake are spiritually vnderstood that onely bringeth profit but the flesh that is to say to expound them carnally profiteth nothing but is occasion of offence So therefore such as heard carnally those things that Christ spake were offended He addeth therefore The words which I speake are spirit that is to say they be spirituall and life hauing nothing that is carnall and bringing euerlasting life Let vs adde hereunto those things which he writeth vpon Marke 14. cap. 1. For the bread is not onely a figure and a certaine patterne of the Lords body but it is turned into the very body of Christ For the Lord sayth The bread which I will giue is
to the cruel maner of wilde beasts and that they were prouoked to an appetite to eate the raw flesh of man and drinke blood which things bee horrible euen to bee heard Wherefore if we beleeue that the flesh of Christ properly so called is there present whether we thinke it raw rost or sodden either whole or cut in gobbets open or couert the sense is vtterly carnal the words be carnally vnderstood For it is not therefore to be thought a spirituall sense because they say the flesh of Christ is present inuisibly For if their meaning be of the proper flesh we cannot say that we eate him not therefore carnally because we see him not The blinde see not those things which they eate and men many times in pottage and brothes eate egges and flesh which neither they see nor otherwhile feele in taste But none of all these is a spirituall sense or doth containe a more hie meaning but as the wordes simply do signifie eate egges and flesh which Chrysostome termeth carnall vnderstanding Since therefore all carnall meaning of the words set apart a spirituall must be had and retained therein we ought godly to seeke and reuerently to search out what maner of vnderstanding that is that hath bene set foorth and commended vnto vs the which we also wil indeauour our selues to doe not departing from the footsteps of the very same Fathers Euen as there be two parts whereof the sacrament doth consist that is the outward signe and inward vertue so is that spirituall sense which is here required taken of both these parts The carnall vnderstanding doth follow the letter as Nicodemus when he had heard Vnlesse a man bee borne againe of water and the spirit c. hee asketh this question How can a man be borne againe Can he returne againe into his mothers wombe The spirituall man departeth from the letter and so are we borne againe in Baptisme And the washing is of two sorts Outward and inward carnall and spiritual the one according to the letter and is made by water the other doth shunne the letter and is performed in spirit Either of them is said to be truely done but after a diuers maner The first maner of speaking is proper the other figuratiue and the figure hath otherwhile relation to the outward similitude otherwhile to the vertue inwardly hid It is figuratiuely spoken All flesh is grasse For the withering grasse hath a certaine similitude of a man that soone perisheth Beware of the leauen of the Pharises This is taken of the proper strength of leauen which spreadeth the taste therof thorowout the whole lumpe very like whereunto is the infection of ill doctrine Now in this sacrament the Fathers of old time haue noted tvvo things for either of the which it may well be called and accompted the body of Christ but especially when it comprehendeth them both For both because the Bread is a figure of the true body it is iustly called his body and much more because it hath the liuely force of the same ioyned thereto but in especiall because it comprehendeth both And that the figure of any thing hath by good reason the name of the same and is called the thing it selfe indeed Esay sheweth where he saith The people bee verily hay and He verily hath borne our iniquities By a similitude is the people called hay and the Lord vpon the Crosse had in him a similitude of a sinnefull man although he himselfe was without sinne after which maner also Christ is said to be the true Vine I am the true Vine saith he and other places which a man shall often finde in the Scriptures Iohn Baptist spake the trueth when he said Behold the Lambe of God The Lord himselfe said the trueth when he said of Nathaniel Behold an Israelite in deed in whom is no deceit That word Verily or Indeed is not to be referred to the outward but to the inward circumcision for the people of God also vvhich is gathered of the Gentiles is now more truely called Israel then the Ievves themselues according to the saying of Paul We be the Circumcision which worship God in spirit And this He is not a Iew which in outward appearance is a Iew but he is a Iew which is a Iew in secret Yet be we not for all that properly Iewes but we are called so by a figure all these figuratiue speaches for the outward similitude of the things Wherefore it ought to seeme neither a new thing nor yet a marueile if the Lords bread be said to be verily the body where it is a figure of the body August ad Bonif. epist. 23. Hereupon Augustin to Boniface in his 23. Epistle saith For thus wee speake oftentimes As when Easter is at hand we say The Lords passion shal be to morrow or the next day where hee suffered so many yeeres agoe and that passion hath neuer been done but once Likewise vpon the very Easter day wee say To day the Lord rose againe when since hee rose againe so many yeeres are past Why is none so foolish to reproue vs and say we lie in so saying But because wee vse to call these dayes according to the similitude of them in which these thinges were done So that it is called the same day which is not the same but by course of time is like vnto it and it is said to be done that day for the ministring of the Sacrament which was not done that day but long agoe Was not Christ once offered in himselfe yet in the Sacrament not onely in all the solemnities of Easter but euery day hee is offered to the people Againe he lieth not that being asked the question doth answere that he is offered for if the Sacraments should not haue a certaine likenesse of those things whereof they be Sacraments they should be no Sacraments at all and of this likenes also many times they take the names of the things themselues Euen as therfore after a certaine manner the Sacrament of the bodie of Christ is the bodie of Christ and the Sacrament of the blood of Christ is the blood of Christ so also the Sacrament of faith is faith By this place of Augustin and many other both of his other fathers we see that the figures and similitudes of things bee often called by the name of the thinges themselues and that this is one cause though not the onely why this sacrament is called verily Christs bodie To this agree those things that we commonly finde amongst olde writers who tearme this Sacrament otherwhile a figure as Tertull. cont Mart. lib. 4. Tertull. This is my body saith he that is to say a figure of my bodie And Nazianzene Nazianzene which said the old Passouer was a figure of a figure Augustin And Augustin The bodie saith hee of Christ is the trueth and a figure Sometime a signe as Augustin contra Adimant cap. 12. The Lord put no doubt to
see him but maiest touch him and haue him in thee Chrysostom doth here command vs to beleeue Christ vvhen he saith This is my body but to behold it with the eyes of vnderstanding For he saith that neither any sensible or bodily thing is giuen in the sacraments but by those things that be sensible the very gifts to be vnderstood and incorporall are giuen vs and that not onely in Baptisme but also in the Supper of the Lord. But if Christ do giue vs himselfe in his Supper and yet no bodily thing is giuen for he saith that the gifts be incorporall It is manifest that Chrysostome doth agree with the rest of the Fathers that Christ is present in the vse of the sacrament by grace and vertue of his body And although this Author doe vse in some places deuout Hyperbolicall speeches disputing of this sacrament which thing he hath also done here when hee affirmeth that Christ is set before vs not only to be seene but also to be touched yet an indifferent reader may easily perceiue by this place and some other Theodoritus Dial. 1. what was his right opinion of this matter The very same thing doth Theodoritus plainely teach in his first Dialogue in this wise Ortho. Our Sauiour himselfe chaunged the names and gaue the name of the figure to his bodie and the name of his bodie to the figure Sodal Thou saiest true but I would learne the cause of this change of names Ortho. The cause is plaine to them that bee instructed in the heauenly mysteries for his will was that they which partake the heauenly mysteries should giue no heed to the nature of the thinges which bee seene but by the change of names they should beleeue the alteration that is made by grace for he which before had called his naturall body meat and bread and againe calleth himselfe a Vine the same hath honoured the figures which be seene with the title of his bodie and blood not altering the nature but ioyning grace to the nature Nothing can bee spoken more plainely then Theodoritus doth here expounde how bread is the body of Christ that is to say because the nature of bread remaineth and yet by grace is made his bodie in that grace is ioyned to the nature of the bread The same man Dial. 2. Idem Dial. 2. For neither doe the mysticall signes after the sanctification depart from their proper nature for they tarie in their former substance shape and forme and may bee seene and touched euen as before but they be vnderstood to be the things that they bee made and so beleeued and worshipped as though they were the same which they be beleeued He said before that the nature of the signes did remaine but that there was a change made by grace that the nature was not changed but that grace was ioyned Here doth he plainely say that the substance fashion and forme of the outward figures bee the same after sanctification that they were but yet they be made other things to our vnderstanding and faith that is to say by grace as he taught vs before singing al one song with Chrisostome That no sensible or corporate thing is here giuen but that they bee things intelligible and incorporate which be giuen by grace and with vertue Euthymius in Matth. cap. 64. Hereunto appertaine the words of Euthymius vpon Matthew chap. 64. Therefore euen as the olde Testament had sacrifices and blood so hath the new also namely the body and blood of the Lord for hee saide not These bee signes of my body but These bee my body my blood Therfore we must not take heed to the nature of those things which bee set before vs but to the vertue of them For euen as aboue nature hee deified the flesh that was taken of the Virgin if it bee lawful to vse this phrase so also doth he vnspeakeably change these things into his verie liuely body and into his verie precious blood and into the grace of them In that hee saith Wee may not regard the nature of those things that be set before vs he teacheth that the nature of the bread remaineth and in that hee addeth But to the vertue of them hee sheweth that by vertue they be the body of Christ and not by any carnall meanes Finallie he addeth by interpretation And into the grace of them that hee might exclude carnall imaginations Leo Synod Ro. de con dist 2. Leo and the Synode of Rome de consecrat Dist 2. doe not differ from these for thus bee the words Because in that mysticall distribution of spirituall food this is giuen and this is receiued that wee receiuing the vertue of this heauenly meate may become his flesh which was made our flesh You haue almost the very words which Emissenus and Chrysostome vsed as we rehearsed before The distribution of the heauenly food the vertue of the heauenly meate receiued and that so we become his flesh What other thing is this then that wee be ioyned with his flesh by grace and vertue For how can we otherwise be channed into his flesh To this tendeth also the saying of Hilary there brought in among other Hilarius For the visible quantitie is not to be esteemed in this mysterie but the vertue of the spirituall sacrament Moreouer Theophylactus which is counted as it were a certaine follower and interpreter of Chrysostome doth affirme this most plainely as we haue aboue more fully set foorth out of the which I will repeate a few thinges here the rest Reader thou maist thy selfe take out of him For both he taketh vtterly away carnal imaginations and affirmeth that the words of this mysterie are spiritually to be vnderstood as those which haue no things carnall but bring euerlasting life and he sheweth the manner and way how to vnderstand them writing in this wise And how saith he is not flesh seene O man Thoph in Mar. cap. 14. this is done for our infirmitie for insomuch as the bread and wine be of those things which we be acquainted withall we abhorre them not but if we should see blood and flesh set before vs we could not abide it but should abhorre it Therefore God of his mercie fauoring our frailtie retaineth still the forme of bread wine but he changeth the creatures into the power of flesh and blood The same man in Ioan. cap 6. vpon these words Idem in Ioan. cap. 6. This is a hard saying who can away withall c. See their follie for their dutie had been to haue asked learned those thinges whereof they were ignorant but they started backe and did construe nothing spiritually but all things as they outwardly appeared For when they heard of flesh they thought hee would compell them to be deuourers of flesh and blood But because wee vnderstand it spiritually neither wee be deuourers of flesh and yet we be sanctified by such meat The opinion of Theophylactus is certaine that