habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia This is as much as can be demanded when we heare that nothing was done in the Church to wit by the Bishop without the advice of his Presbyters The same is affirmed by S. Hierome upon Titus i. 5. Antequam Diaboli instinctu studia in religione fierent diceretur in populis Ego sum Pauli ego Apollo ego Cephae communi consilio Ecclesiae gubernabantur In that S. Hierome thinketh there were no Bishops till Churches were forced to that course to avoid schismes it hath been shewed he is not in the right But in that he affirmeth that at first Churches were governed by common advise we may well heare him speak in so good company of witnesses Last of all S. Cyprian having said once for all Epist 6. Quando à primordio Episcopatûs mei nihil statuerim sine consilio vestro Presbyterorum Diaconorum sine consensu plebis meae privatá sententiâ gerere how well he observed it is yet to be seen in the passage of divers businesses related in his Epistles Out of which the like is to be conceived of the Presbyters of Rome by those things that are touched there And this is the true reason why many times especially among the most ancient Church-writers Bishop and Presbyters both are comprised in the same styles and names not because there were then no Bishops as some men imagine but because both States concurred in the same office Clemens in the Epistle aforesaid pag. 54. speaking of the Ministeries instituted by the Apostles saith thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is They made the first-fruits of believers Overseers and Ministers that is Bishops and Deacons of those that should believe It seemeth indeed that Clemens calleth the Presbyters Bishops because as yet there was no other Bishop there as was proved afore for so the word is used in S. Pauls Epistles and the Acts of the Apostles for the same reasons as hath been said But in Ignatius his Epistle to Hero his Deacon at Antiochia you have these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do nothing without the Bishops that is without the Presbyters who were indeed Bishops in Ignatius his absence when this is pretended to be written And be he who he will be that writ it I believe it will not often be found that Presbyters are called Bishops in any monument of Church-writers after this time unlesse it be in these words of Tertullian De praescript c. 3. Quid ergò si Episcopus si Diaconus si vidua c where putting the Deacon next to the Bishop he seemeth to comprise the Presbyter with him in the same style For afterwards the name of Bishops became appropriate to the heads of Presbyteries as we heard S. Hierome say of the Presbyters at Alexandria that the head whom they chose themselves out of their own number they named BISHOP of Alexandria Otherwise as it is well known that the name of SACERDOS is common to both estates in regard of the offices of Divine service which were performed by both so in regard of the government of the Church common to both are they many times comprised together in the common style of PRESBYTERS the name of their age or ANTISTITES 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 PRAEPOSITI and the like the names of their charge For as the Apostle maketh himself an Elder when he writeth to them in this style 1. Pet. i. 5. The Elders I exhort who am also an Elder so is the like to be observed in that well-known passage of Clemens Alexandrinus related by Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 23. concerning the youth which S. John the Apostle commended to the Bishop of a certain place Clemens proceeding in the relation addeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the Elder saith he taking the youth home to his house c. calling him a Presbyter whom he had named a Bishop but just afore So Tertullian Apologet. c. 39. describing what was wont to be done in the Assemblies of Christians addeth Praesident probati quique Seniores honorem non pretio sed testimonio adepti not meaning to tell us that there was no Bishop to be seen at these meetings for in his book De praescript where he nameth Polycarpus whom we alledged afore cap. 32. Bishop of Smyrna he speaketh as much of Bishops that succeded the Apostles in the rest of the Churches of their planting but comprising both ranks and estates in one name of ELDERS And that upon the reason specified in the Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. iii. 8. where he giveth the reason why the Apostle passeth straight from Bishops to Deacons Because saith he every Bishop is a Presbyter though every Presbyter is not a Bishop who is the chief of Presbyters And the true S. Ambrose Offic. i. 20. Viduarum virginum domos nisi visitandi gratiâ juniores adire non est opus hoc cum Senioribus hoc est cum Episcopo vel si opus est cum Presbyteris With the Elders saith he that is with the Bishop or Presbyters Justine Martyr in his second Apology relating the orders of Christians in their Assemblies having spoken of reading the Scriptures Then saith he the Reader having done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler maketh a speech of instruction to the people exhorting them to imitate what was read And again of the Eucharist Then saith he bread and wine is offered to the Ruler 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Was it the Bishop alone or the Presbyters alone that preached and celebrated the Eucharist Sure both did it and the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was chosen on purpose by Justine to comprise both The same is to be observed in the words of S. Augustine Hom. ult ex quinquaginta cap. 11. Veniat peccator ad Antistites per quos illi in Ecclesia claves ministrantur à Praepositis sacrorum accipiat satisfactionis suae modum ANTISTITES in Ecclesia is not the Bishop alone but the Bishop and the Presbyters Hegesippus in Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 20. relateth how some of our Lords kindred were brought afore Domitian upon suspicion of danger to the State in regard of their title to the Kingdome but dismissed by him upon notice of their profession of life in tilling their grounds with their own hands tried by the hardnesse of them which it had wrought These saith Hegesippus were hereupon chosen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be leaders of Churches as both Cousins of our Lord and his witnesses comprehending both Bishop and Presbyters in one title As in Ignatius ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put in one word to expresse Bishops and Presbyters both as the circumstance of the place will evidence To this we must adde the words of Ireneus iv 43. Wherefore saith he it behoveth us to obey the Elders that are in the Church which have received according to the Fathers pleasure the certain grace of truth with
the succession of their Bishoprick And again iii. 3. he speaketh of the tradition coming from the Apostles which had been preserved in the Churches through the succession of Presbyters Ireneus that is wont to appeal to the succession of Bishops to evidence that which the Church then believed to have come from the Apostles here referreth himself to the Presbyters for the same purpose affirming that they succeeded the Apostles without doubt calling the Bishops by the name of PRESBYTERS in regard of the office common to both Thus are both ranks comprised in one name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the first Canon of the Councel at Antiochia where we reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where we are not to conceive that Deacons are reckoned among the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as hath been mistook but the sense is to be directed by distinguishing the words thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reckoning the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well Presbyters as Bishops neither more nor lesse then ANTISTITES in Latine which we had in S. Augustine before And thus you have both ranks comprised in the same style of PRAEPOSITI in S. Cyprian and of PRAESIDENTES in Tertullian The first Epist 62. Et cùm omnes omnino disciplinam tenere oporteat multò magis Praepositos Diaconos curare hoc fas est The other De Cor. mil. c. 3. Eucharistiae Sacramentum nec de aliorum manu quà m Praesidentium sumimus CHAP. VIII What pattern this Government might have in the Synagogue Aaron and his sonnes Correspondence of the Sanedrin with the Bishop and Presbyters BEfore we leave this point it will not be amisse to take notice what pattern the Apostles might have for this form of government in the Synagogue For when our Lord in the Gospel Matth. xviii 17. giveth his Disciples in the case of private offenses the rule Dic Ecclesiae it is to be supposed he reflecteth upon some Bench to which that people were wont to resort with their causes otherwise what could the hearers understand by these words intimating that his will was the Church which he was now founding to be provided of the like Neverthelesse in regard this Church was intended a mere spirituall State to be cherished and nourished in the bosome and entrails as it were of all Common-wealths there must no comparison be made in that which concerneth the temporall state of that people Let us see then Moses his charge Deut. xvii 8 9. thus we reade If there arise a matter too hard for thee in judgement between bloud and bloud between plea and plea between stroke and stroke being matters of controversie within thy gates then shalt thou arise and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall choose and thou shalt come unto the Priests and Levites and to the Judges that shall be in those dayes and enquire and they shall shew thee the sentence of judgement He that readeth here on the one side two sorts of persons the Priests and Levites for one and the Judge that shall be in those dayes on the other side two sorts of causes one concerning Ceremonies of the Religion in force the other the civil Laws of that people hath cause to think that the meaning of this law is that they should resort to severall persons according to the differences of their causes Especially being indifferent in the words to translate it thus Thou shalt come to the Priests the Levites or to the Judge that shall be in those dayes as after verse 12. it is read Had it been thus the correspondence had been clear between the high Priest and his inferiours in the Synagogues and the Bishop and his Presbyters in the Church But the practice of the Nation beareth it otherwise In which we must believe their Doctours when they tell us that the whole passage as well that of the Priests and Levites as that of the Judge that shall be in those dayes is referred to the Sanedrin whereof R. Isaack Abartincell giveth his reason in his Commentaries upon that place Because that Court for a great part consisted of Priests and Levites and therefore had the hearing of all sorts of causes And though they were brought hither from lower Courts whereof there was one of three and twenty persons in every place which conteined one hundred and twenty families one of three in lesse places by the Judges themselves as the Ebrew Doctours will have it arguing from the words THOU SHALT ARISE Thou that findest a matter too hard for thee in judgement shalt arise yet can we compare the Consistory of the Church with no Court but this First because all mother-Churches in mother-Cities are absolute in their rule so farre as the Scripture hath appointed it otherwise then as the law of love tieth Christians to assist one anothers necessities our Lord and his Apostles having instituted no other judicatories in spirituall matters but one of these Presbyteries in each Church and many of them in severall Churches when the matter required common advise And again because Jerusalem was the onely seat of the whole State of Religion and Justice both in that people sacrifices being done no where else Well then as Ignatius in one of his Epistles distinguisheth two parts of the Bishops office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to rule the Church and to perform Divine service so must we inquire the correspondency of the Church with the Synagogue in both respects reflecting from the Bishop and Presbyters in regard of Divine service to be performed by their hands upon Aaron and his sonnes or the high Priest and the rest as S. Hierome hath done before us writing in these terms Epist ad Euagr. Quod Aaron filii ejus atque Levitae in templo fuerunt hoc sibi Episcopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicent in Ecclesia But in respect of Government and Discipline whereof our Lord speaketh in the Gospel aforesaid we must reflect upon the Sanedrin as the same S. Hierome hath done in another place upon the first to Titus saying of Bishops in respect of their Presbyters Imitantes Moysen qui cùm haberet in potestate solus praeesse populo Israel septuaginta elegit cum quibus populum judicaret So then Moses his Spirit is taken and divided upon seventie Elders to help him to bear the charge of the people Num. xi 25. The same thing is done when the Apostles ordain Presbyteries by imposition of hands Therefore we see the Spirit of Prophecy rest upon the Presbytery by which Timothy was ordained as well as upon that of Antiochia no otherwise then it did upon Moses his Sanedrin Num. xi 26. To continue and procure the continuance whereof upon their successours it was that this Court sate in the Temple as the old Ebrew Doctours observe it is said Thou shalt go up to the place which I shall choose signifying that the Temple in which the holy Ghost dwelt occasioned the influence of it upon the Court that
honour and good Rulers as well in respect of their diligence in the prime point as of their performance in the rest The personall gifts of the Holy Ghost were then distributed on severall persons as the Apostle sheweth that all might be usefull and such indowments in the time of spirituall graces might be imployed to the edification of assemblies as well as the gifts of ruling to assist the Presbyters in their office of Government But he that would take order now that who could pretend a gift in ruling should be helpers in government or in the word of Wisdome and Knowledge should stand up to edifie assemblies might soon find more help in government more words of Wisdome and Knowledge and in time more prophesying then himself would desire Well may we turn the world into confusion if we think to do what then was done but shall never find any Ministeries of place and succession in the Church but Presbyters and Deacons for of the coming-in of Bishops hath been said to the parts of whose office consisting in Ruling Teaching and Ministering all those other gifts of the holy Ghost are to be referred as assistant at that time and from whose office and the ordinary blessing of God upon it the effect of them all is to be expected at this time For let me ask What is become of those Doctours distinguished from Pastours in all succeeding ages Where have those ruling Elders hid themselves that they were never seen since the time of the Apostles Is it possible that the whole Church should conspire to suppresse such an institution of our Lord and his Apostles almost as soon as it was made Or is it imaginable had it not been suppressed that all Ecclesiasticall writers whereof there is such store should conspire so farre to suppresse the remembrance of it that among them all there is not one witnesse produced to depose for them unlesse it be by those that bring the meaning with them which they desire to find in their writings Were we alive in Tertullians time we might go into the assemblies of Christians and see with our eyes what now will not be believed though it be told us in terms plain enough to them that will understand when he saith as afore Praesident probati quique seniores honorem non pretio sed testimonio adepti We might see them sitting in the headroom of the Congregation by themselves apart from the people whereupon they are called by him otherwhiles Ordo and Consessus And were there occasion to see any of them censured to the losse of his office we might see him for his punishment sit and communicate in the rank of the people It hath not been my lot yet to meet with any thing in Ecclesiasticall Writers or out of them to bear an appearance of this difference but onely those words of the commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. v. 1. Vnde Synagoga postea Ecclesia Seniores habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia He speaketh in the time past of that which had been in the Church and was not and without doubt giveth men of excellent abilities men of incomparable merit in the Church occasion to mistake his meaning as if he had spoke of a sort of Presbyters which had been in the Church and now were not whereas they should have taken the whole clause with them when he saith Vnde postea Ecclesia Seniores habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia and then his meaning had been plain as in truth it is That the Church once had Presbyters that joyned advise with the Bishop in all Church-matters which my desire is to prove was so from the beginning and which he complaineth was now otherwise For so S. Hierome about the same time manifestly declareth that he thought an alteration in this point was come to passe when he saith that at the first Churches were governed by common advise but afterwards all was referred to one hereupon exhorting Bishops to communicate the government of their Churches with their Presbyters as Moses did his with the Sanedrin of Israel And this further appeareth by that which followeth in the said Commentaries Quod quâ negligentiâ obsoleverit nescio nisi fortè Doctorum quorundam desidiâ vel potiùs superbiâ dum soli volunt aliquid videri imputing the change to the negligence of Teachers or to their pride and therefore they are Teachers that were called Elders afore and through their negligence or the Bishops taking all on themselves all came into their hands which perhaps may be referred to that which by and by shall be said that the Bishops afterwards in some parts took the office of preaching in the Mother-Church where they lived in a sort to their peculiar not suffering the Presbyters to preach in their presence Which office of preaching neverthelesse as the matter is now being become the necessary charge of Bishop and Presbyters temporary graces being ceased and Dioceses divided Churches built and means assigned as it is without doubt and alwayes was accounted in regard of personall performance the most excellent work they are able to contribute to the service of God so is it for the use of edification as much to be preferred before other their imployment as Prophesying is by the Apostle preferred before speaking with strange languages Alwayes provided since we must not now presume upon immediate inspirations but expect Gods ordinary blessing upon humane indeavours that men and abilities may be stored for the work before the work be cut out for them so as the honour and reverence thereof may be preserved without offense For as the Apostle saith that if unbelievers should come into the assemblies of Christians and heare them nothing but speak languages which most understood not they would say they were mad So if the enemies of our Profession should heare in our Churches a great deal of tongue but the meaning of the Scripture not in it needs must this bring an evil opinion upon it CHAP. X. Offices of Divine service performed in chief by the Bishop after him by the Presbyters Order of Christian Assemblies appointed by Bishop and Presbyters Maintenance of the Church and poore disposed of likewise VVEll then this particular of labour in the Word and Doctrine is out of doubt common to Bishop and Presbyters both It is that which S. Peter most aimeth at when he exhorteth those whom he calleth his fellow-Elders to the office of feeding the flock It is that which S. Paul for the most part expresseth when he exhorteth the Presbyters of Ephesus to take heed to the flock which they were to feed Acts xx 28. according to his example that ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears verse 31. teaching them both in publick and from house to house as it is afore v. 28. And we shall find this office of teaching and instructing the Church to rest afterwards upon
of Cleophas sister of the blessed Virgin the wife of Alpheus and mother of James the lesse Wherewith agreeth Clemens Alexandrinus in Eusebius Eccles hist ii 1. where he acknowledgeth but two Jameses the son of Zebedee and this James of Jerusalem mentioned by the Apostle And herewith agreeth S. Chrysostome upon that text of the Apostle where he observeth that for S. James his honour S. Paul calleth him brother of our Lord whereas he might as well have called him sonne of Cleophas as the Evangelist had done Here it is plain that James the brother of our Lord and sonne of Cleophas is the Apostle sonne of Alpheus according to S. Chrysostome As for that which followeth that neverthelesse he was not of kin to our Lord according to the flesh but according to the opinion of the world it seemeth to depend upon Hegesippus in Eusebius iii. 11 26. where he maketh Cleophas brother to Joseph supposed father of our Lord. Which is possible to be true that Joseph and Cleophas brothers should take to wife the two Maries sisters or cousins But otherwise there is so much appearance in the Gospel that Mary mother of James and Joses is Mary of Cleophas sister to the blessed Virgin that it must needs be an inconvenience to deny this James to be kin to our Lord by her side As for other relations and conjectures of Church-writers the varietie whereof is endlesse and unreconcilable it is not reason to draw them into consequence to the prejudice of a conjecture which maketh so clear an agreement of this whole difference It was my desire to shew the true meaning of the Apostles words but it is not my purpose to build upon uncertainties Whosoever this James of Jerusalem was we find the Church of Jerusalem under his charge almost assoon as there was a Church there at least if we believe Ignatius Epist ad Trall where he saith S. Stephen was Deacon to this James of Jerusalem which must be betimes after our Lords death And therefore thus we see whom the Bishops of Jerusalem succeed CHAP. III. The Apostles planted mother-churches in mother-cities The Government of them estated upon Presbyteries Saint Paul at the beginning made no Bishops over those Presbyteries The reason Himself had the oversight of the Churches of his planting for the time The like in the Churches of S. Peters charge LEt us now go abroad with the Apostles and see how they followed this pattern in the Churches which they converted to the faith Tertullian l. De praescript c. 20. speaketh thus of them ac providè Ecclesias apud unāquamque civitatem condiderunt This slight circumstance which he but pointeth at that the Apostles founded Churches in Cities is very considerable in our businesse For it is plain they could not bestow their pains on all places reason required they should labour most to plant the faith in the most populous And common sense and the least knowledge of times will serve to shew that from thence it was propagated through the Countreys that lay to those Cities which therefore in time became and were called the Territories Parishes or Dioceses of such or such Churches Now the form of government estated by S. Paul over these Churches is pointed out to us Acts xiv 23. where we reade in the end of their first journey that Paul and Barnabas having ordained them Presbyters in every Church returned to Antiochia But unto Titus the Apostle writeth thus Tit. i. 5. For this cause left I thee in Crete that thou mightest set in order the things that are wanting and constitute Elders in every city as I had appointed thee Elders in every Church in the one place and Elders in every city in the other both to the same effect not meaning one in a place but Presbyteries that is Colledges bodies companies of Presbyters with common advice to order the Churches planted in these Cities Such a Colledge of Presbyters it was that we spoke of in the last chapter instituted by the Apostles in the Church of Jerusalem the pattern whereof S. Paul followeth in the Churches which he converted out of the Gentiles And thus in the Church of Ephesus you shall see S. Paul Acts xx 17. sending for the bench of Elders there to Miletus Thus in the Church of Philippi you shall find that the Apostle directeth his Epistle to the Bishops and Deacons there which must be to the Colledge of Presbyters next above the order of Deacons Thus when the Apostle writeth to the Thessalonians 1. Thess v. 12. And we beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord the multitude whereof he speaketh is to be understood of the like company of Presbyters Thus in Ignatius his epistles you shall find him up and down reckoning next after the Bishops the Presbyteries of all the Churches to which he writeth The like in S. Cyprians epistles for the Presbyteries of Rome and Carthage To spare more words in all Church-writers you shall find continuall remembrance of these Presbyteries whensoever there is speech of Mother-churches in Mother-cities And therefore those we are to understand when we reade that Paul and Barnabas ordained Presbyters in every Church and Titus in every City And such Bodies or Colledges of Presbyters they were to whom the Apostle committed the Churches which he had planted But this being granted the question will be in the next place Where are the Bishops the chief and heads of these Presbyteries For had the Apostle from the beginning of his planting these Churches placed that rank over these Presbyters it is like we should have found some remembrance of it Now these Presbyters are styled by the name of Bishops as hath been observed ever since S. Hierome and which is more to averre the observation for this purpose neither in the relation of his planting and ordering the Churches nor in the style of his Epistles nor in his instructions concerning ministers of these Churches is there any remembrance or respect to be found but of Presbyters and Deacons which in so much eminence of place so much difference of Bishops office if any then had been could scarce have come to passe and maketh me conclude that the Apostle ordained none such from the beginning over the Presbyteries No Bishop the Apostle had yet settled at Ephesus when he used these words to the Presbyters there Acts xx 17. Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over whom the holy Ghost hath made you EPISCOPOS Bishops or Overseers For as he giveth the name to the Presbyters so he addresseth his instructions to none besides None at Philippi when he directed his Epistle to the Bishops and Deacons there neither the custome of the Church bearing more then one Bishop in one Church at once nor being a thing reasonable to think if any such had been that the Apostle would not have found a room for him in the style of his Epistle None in the Churches within
not yet made therefore he did not intend there should be any such in the Church Rather let me argue that because S. Paul left two of his principall Disciples in two principall places with charge to plant Presbyteries as there was means to propagate Churches therefore he gave a pattern of that which these Disciples and all the Church was to do afterwards in settling the government of those Churches in the Presbyteries of them and in their heads which themselves were for the time And this we shall find was done in good time in the Churches of Timothies charge if we take but a short consideration of the beloved Disciple John the Apostle and Evangelist what we find concerning him in Scriptures or otherwise received and credible in this nature He lived longest of all the Disciples as is said and he will easily shew us Bishops over the Churches of Timothies charge for such without doubt were the seven Churches of Asia unto whom the Apostle sending from our Lord seven Epistles ii and iii. chapt of his Revelation directeth them to the Angels of those Churches a style not competible to a person of common rank and the act of directing Epistles to one in the name and behalf of the whole Church arguing the eminence of the head fit to answer for the body he representeth Herewith agree the words of Clemens Alexandrinus in Eusebius iii. 23. concerning this Apostle that being returned from Patmus to Ephesus he used upon request to go among the neighbour-nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is in some places to constitute Bishops to wit where there were Presbyteries afore that yet had none in some to found whole Churches in others to ordain a Clergie out of such as were signified by the Spirit as we reade of S. Paul and Timotheus For will you have these to be Bishops according to the use of the word in S. Paul where it is all one with Presbyters Sure we must needs think of such as his own writings make Angels of Churches Ignatius that was his Disciple according to some in all his Epistles specifieth and sometimes by name the Bishops of some the same Churches and some of others together with their Presbyteries and in particular Onesimus Timothie's successour at Ephesus Tertullian and Ireneus the most ancient we can alledge have named Polycarpus in particular made Bishop of Smyrna by this Apostle It is not possible to say more in this case So often as we find mention of government in particular Churches in Scripture so often we meet with Presbyteries or the heads of Presbyteries Apostles themselves or deriving their charge from the Apostles Nay it is very much not pretending that Bishops came on otherwise then to be in stead of the Apostles over particular Churches that there is so much to be said for their office out of Scriptures all written during their time CHAP. V. The Presbyterie at Antiochia S. Peter and S. Paul heads of the Church there Likewise of that at Rome The difference about their next Successours Epiphanius his conjecture upon it Another Clemens succeeded S. Peter and Linus S. Paul The succession of the Apostles there is unquestionable THe Church of Antiochia is remembred next to that of Jerusalem in the Acts of the Apostles but of the government thereof we have nothing so distinct or expresse in Scripture Yet this we reade Acts xiii 2. Now there were in the Church at Antiochia certain prophets and teachers And as they ministred unto the Lord and fasted the holy Ghost said Seperate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away That these Prophets and Teachers were all of them Presbyters of that Church is more then can be affirmed because it is nowhere set down But when we reade that they ministred unto the Lord which must be understood of the service of God in their assemblies especially in celebrating the Eucharist and gave imposition of hands we find among the number of them the works of ordinary Ministers when there was no higher rank then that of Presbyters able to do the like For as concerning the Heads of this Church we must have recourse to Ignatius his Epistle ad Magn. where he useth these words For at Antiochia the Disciples were first called Christians Paul and Peter founding the Church And in the Epistle ad Antioch if it be his as the other unquestionably is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Ye are Pauls and Peters Disciples Remember Euodius that first had the rule of you put into his hands by the Apostles Be he what he will be that writ this let me be bold to say it agreeth marvellous well with what hath been said and with the Scripture In which it is plain there were at the beginning two congregations of Christians at Antiochia one of the Circumcision the other converted from the Gentiles because S. Peter Gal. ii 12. fearing those of the Circumcision withdrew himself and ate no more with the Gentiles In regard of the care of which two congregations performed by S. Peter and S. Paul according to the division agreed upon Gal. ii 9. the words of Ignatius are to be verified where he maketh both Apostles founders of the Church at Antiochia Who finding themselves imployed in other parts of the world took the same course with this Church which S. Paul did with those he commended to Timothy and Titus and put both congregations by that time united and concorporate in one under the charge of Euodius predecessour to Ignatius These two Apostles are usually counted founders of the Church at Rome as well as of that of Antiochia Ireneus iii. 3. Fundantes itaque instituentes beati Apostoli Ecclesiam Lino Episcopatum Ecclesiae administrandae tradiderunt Hujus Lini Paulus in iis quae sunt ad Timotheum Epistolis meminit Succedit autem ei Anacletus Post eum tertio loco ab Apostolis Episcopatum sortitur Clemens Where you see he referreth the foundation of that Church to both the Apostles as doth Dionysius also of Corinth some hundred and twentie years after their death in Eusebius Eccles hist. iii. 26. and others of later stamp sans number Whereupon Epiphanius Haer. 27. reckoning the succession of the Bishops of Rome putteth Peter and Paul in the first place But yet observe further the difference between the words of Ireneus which put Linus after the Apostles and the Latine Church which according to S. Hierome Catal. Script in CLEM. reckoneth Clemens in that place which Tertullian the most ancient of that language lib. De Praescript averreth To which difference we may ascribe the confusion that Baronius hath observed in the Pontificall book under the name of Pope Damasus an ancient piece but pieced indeed out of severall writings and crosse to one another divers times As for the purpose when it
sate there But when Moses was dead a President was chosen over and beside the seventy whom they called the Nasi to be in his stead from age to age as R. Moses writeth such is the Bishop chief of the Presbyters after an Apostle All the difference is this The Sanedrin is but one as the nation to which God was known was but one whereas the Apostle and his successours remaineth head of so many Presbyteries as his office of preaching the Gospel to all Nations adviseth him to institute as hath been said CHAP. IX Presbyteries composed of no lay persons as the Sanedrin What is brought out of the Scripture to that purpose The labour of Presbyters in the Word and Doctrine Preaching went by Gifts under the Apostles Those Gifts make no different Ministeries Teaching and ruling belong to the same Presbyters No colour for lay Elders in the Primitive Church Preaching how rightly esteemed IT is well enough known how this comparison and the text that occasioneth it is drawn into consequence to prove that Presbyteries were intended to consist part of Elders of the people part of Ministers of the Church as the Sanedrin of some Priests and Levites some of the people And it is as well to be known what a forced presumption it is to require correspondence between the Church and the Synagogue in that point which the difference of a mere Spirituall and Temporall Common-wealth bringeth to passe The Sanedrin consisted of the chief of that people as well as of Priests and Levites because the chief causes of that Common-wealth as well as of Religion passed through their hands The Church is subject to all Common-wealths where it is mainteined in temporall matters In those which concern the soul whom shall we think our Lord leaveth her in charge with but those whom he trusteth with the keyes of his house Who those are we shall see anon In the mean time let this serve their turn that will needs presume that these Presbyteries must consist part of lay-persons as the Sanedrin while we prove that de facto they did consist of none but Ministers of the Church For upon this occasion it will not be amisse here to adde the utmost of the rest whereupon that platform is grounded in Scripture which is in effect no more then that text of the Apostle 1. Tim. v. 17. Let the Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour especially those that labour in the word and doctrine carrying at the first sound an appearance of two sorts of Elders some Preachers others nothing but Rulers It is seconded indeed by those passages of the Apostles wherein they reckon the graces for the edification of the Church distributed upon the members of it upon the Ascension of Christ Ephes iv 4. some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastours and Doctours or else both for edification and for other necessities Rom. xii 6. Prophecying Ministring Teaching Exhorting Communicating Ruling and 1. Cor. xii 28. Apostles Prophets Teachers Miracles Gifts of Healing Helps in Government Tongues and afore vers 8. those gifts which are called the manifestation of the Spirit given to every man to profit withall because of their use to the edification of the Church of that time are reckoned as followeth the word of Wisdome the word of Knowledge Faith gifts of Healing Miracles Prophecy Discerning of Spirits Tongues Interpretation of Tongues and 1. Pet. iv 11. Speaking and Ministring But that which is gathered hence is but in consequence to the two sorts of Elders supposed out of the Text aforesaid For out of these passages are culled the gifts of Ruling or Helps in Government and Ministring the offices of Pastours of Doctours or Teachers upon presumption of the difference aforesaid to argue That the Ministeries appointed to continue in the Church till our Lords coming to judgement are that of Pastours to preach in the Church that of Rulers or Helps in the government Elders of the people to assist in Ruling and last of all Doctours or Teachers to reade lessons in point of Religion not medling with Government besides Deacons to whom the gift of Ministring belongeth Here it is plain there is work cut out And sure it is a fit place to take into consideration the first part of that Office we pretend to prove common to Bishop and Presbyters consisting in labour in the word and doctrine as it was in the Primitive time and is understood by the Apostle Which withall will make appear upon what sort of persons the Rule of the Church was estated Without doubt when we have named the Preservation of the true faith by preventing the creeping in of heresies and errours the Instruction of those that are converted in the mysteries of the faith Diligence in propagating it by converting more and more we have named a very great work of labour in the word and doctrine and yet specified nothing but that which is conteined in the Presbyters office from the beginning For when the Apostle Acts xx 29. foretelleth to the Presbyters of Ephesus the coming in of grievous wolves that should not spare the flock and the rising up of perverse Teachers it is to the purpose to put them in mind verse 31 to be watchfull of these things as of their own charge vouching withall his own example vers 20. in preaching and teaching them both in publick and house by house admonishing them with teares every man in particular as it followeth vers 31. for them in their place and rank to follow And the rule of the Apostle Gal. vi 6. Let him that is catechized communicate to him that catechizeth in all good things without doubt aimeth at this private way of instruction whereof we speak Be the same said of the other Apostles instructions to his Elders 1. Pet. v. 2. Feed the flock of God which is among you taking the oversight thereof not by constraint but willingly not for filthy lucre because it is said the Elders that rule well are counted worthy of double honour that is reward but of a ready mind neither as being Lords of Gods heritage but being ensamples to the flock And again the office of Watching over the flock by which the leaders of the Church are charactered Heb. xiii 17. the parts of a Bishop in the instructions of Timothy and Titus that concern Teaching and Instructing in the faith as by the meaning of the words they may consist so for my part they are undoubtedly taken to consist most an end for the time of the Apostles in that private diligence those abilities that watchfulnesse that Presbyters were to use in guiding and instructing particular persons of Christians which in consequence must be understood of that labour in the word and doctrine specified in the leading Text 1. Tim. v. 17. And the reason shall be because then to the best of my judgement which if it prove otherwise then shall the spirits of the Prophets be subject to the Prophets the work of
the Bishop in chief and upon the Presbyters in consequence whether in private upon particular occasions whereof we find much argument of practice in S. Cyprians Epistles or in publick in the assemblies of Christians For thus the matter went afterwards the principall parts and offices of Divine service that is the Sermon and the celebration of the Eucharist were wont to be reserved to the Bishop in honour of his place and the eminence of it unlesse he were absent or it were disposed of otherwise Which I take to be the reason why Justine Martyr in the place alledged afore related that the Sermon was wont to be made and the Eucharist celebrated by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which name compriseth Bishop and Presbyters both as hath been said because the office belonged to the Bishop in the first place to the Presbyters in case of his absence or the like And you shall heare even now Ignatius his argument to perswade the Ephesians not to assemble for the Eucharist but with the Bishop For saith he if the prayers of one or two have that force that Christ is in the midst of them much more the prayers of the Bishop and Church Therefore it was the Bishop whose prayers the Eucharist was celebrated with And in the Life of S. Augustine is related that it was not the custome for Presbyters to preach in the Churches of Africk that is not if the Bishop were present whereupon the Bishop Valerius being a Greek and not so fit to speak to the people in Latine brought that into use there which he had seen practiced in the East and assumed S. Augustine to assist him by preaching in his presence The Commentarie under S. Ambrose his name so often alledged having said upon Ephes iv 11. as we had it afore that at the first all sorts preached in the Church but afterwards it was otherwise settled prosecuteth it with these words Vnde nunc neque Diaconi in populo praedicant And of Baptizing Tertullian l. De Baptist c. 17. Dandi quidem jus habet summus sacerdos id est Episcopus dehinc Presbyteri Diaconi sed non sine autoritate Episcopi propter Ecclesiae honorem quo salvo salvapax est To shew us That all services of the Church even to baptize belonged in chief to the Bishop in respect to his place that for the same reason the Presbyters were silent in their presence and the Deacons not suffered at all to preach at that time Now as the office common to Bishop and Presbyters was and is seen in the services of the Church so was it also seen in appointing the assemblies of the Church for that purpose This we have here to observe out of Ignatius his Epistles in consequence to that which was produced afore out of S. Paul and Clemens concerning the disorders of the assemblies at Corinth that to correct them and to prevent the like the order of the peoples Oblations of the Presbyters celebrating the Eucharist of the Assemblies of the Church for that purpose was regulated by the appointment of the Bishop and Presbyters His words are these Epist ad Smyrn 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That without the Bishop neither the people might bring their offerings nor Presbyters consecrate the Eucharist nor both celebrate the feasts of Love used at these assemblies And for the purpose of this particular it is that he is so earnest and frequent throughout his Epistles in exhorting to be subject to the Bishop and Presbyters Epist ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that is within the Altar saith he is pure wherefore he obeyeth the Bishop and Presbyters But he that is without is he that doth any thing without the Bishop and Presbyters He that is without the Altar in Ignatius his terms that doth things without the Bishop and Presbyters is meant of those of the people that assembled or those of the Presbyters that celebrated the Eucharist without the Bishop and Presbyters or their appointment which was called erecting Altar against Altar in the Primitive time For so Ignatius again in the Epistle to the Ephesians Let no man mistake saith he if a man be not within the Altar he cometh short of the bread of God For if the prayer of one or two be of such force that Christ standeth in the middest of them how much more shall the prayer wherein the Bishop and Church agreeth that is at the Eucharist which he spoke of when he mentioned the bread of God afore prevail And therefore in the end of that Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Obeying the Bishop and Presbyters without distraction of mind breaking one bread which is the medicine of immortalitie A plain case The intent of his exhortations is to perswade them to assemble without schisme because that to assemble and celebrate the Eucharist besides the Bishops appointment was then the due marke of aschismatick And that the Presbyters concurred with him in ordering these matters appeareth by the obedience he requireth to both And so still in Ignatius the Presbyters are assistant to the Bishop in all things And this is the meaning of that vith Canon of the Councel at Gangra whereof the tenour is If any man assemble in private beside the Church and will perform Ecclesiasticall Offices in contempt of the Church no Presbyter being there with assent of the Bishop let him be anathema Providing herein against schisme as the occasion of that Councel evidenceth Wherewith agreeth the xxxii Canon of the Apostles And in the viith and viiith Canon next following of the same Councel there is provision against bringing or receiving oblations otherwise then to the Church beside the Bishops mind or his that is trusted for these things for the benefit of the poore under pain of anathema The heavinesse of the sentence proceeding upon the mark of schisme which the action forbidden importeth though there is in it a respect to the maintenance of the Church and poore arising for that time out of the oblations of Christian people the dispersing whereof was then another particular of the office common to Bishop and Presbyters For as we reade acts xi 29. that the benevolence of the brethren of Antiochia was directed to the Elders at Jerusalem by the hands of Barnabas and Saul though the seven Deacons were made afore to attend upon the poore so are we not to think that their office went so high as to dispose of their maintenance but to execute the disposition of Bishop and Presbyters For when the Church of Antiochia mainteined foure thousand poore as is read in a passage of S. Chrysostome the Church of Rome two thousand and five hundred in Cornelius his time as is to be seen in his words related by Eusebius Eccles hist vi 43. it is not reason to imagine that all this means was put in the power of the Deacons Whose office S. Hierome well expresseth when he calleth them mensarum ac viduarum ministros as those that ministred
according to that which we conceived afore from the beginning Bishops were propagated through all Churches by no other means but by the assistance of neighbour Churches that had Bishops afore hereupon it proceeded to be a custome in the Church that a Bishop was not made without approbation and consent of the neighbour Bishops from whom he was to recieve imposition of hands and with whom he was to preserve the unity of the Church which at that time was actuated by no means but by the correspondence of Bishops in the name of their Churches This is the ground of the custome that under three Bishops it was not usuall to ordain one Novatianus was ordained by no lesse at Rome in the way of Schisme against Cornelius who was ordained by sixteen as we reade in S. Cyprian But when the proceeding of this businesse came to be regulated by the Canons of Nice and Antiochia the Church by that time being incorporate in the state of the Romane Empire then was it thought fit that a Bishop should be made by all the Bishops of the Province the Metropolitane that is the Bishop of the head City in chief without whom nothing to be done so that if some few agreed not the businesse neverthelesse to proceed and be executed by three at the least The intent was indeed so farre as opportunity should serve that these Acts should be done at the Provinciall Synods of Bishops to be held twice a year by the fifth Canon of Nice as may be observed among others in that which Saint Augustine mentioneth contra Cresc iii. 26. de vestris majoribus exstat secundi Tigisitani concilium cum paucissimis quidem factum apud Cirtam post persecutionem codicum tradendorum ut ibi in locum defuncti ordinaretur Episcopus If no such fell out it was provided that three might do it the rest consenting under their hands Can. 19. Conc. Antioch Thus without consent of the Bishops all proceedings of Clergy and people were quite disabled and becalmed if any faction any sinister practice appeared in them and all this upon the charge of the Apostle to Timothy Lay hands suddenly on no man neither be partaker of other mens sinnes And by virtue of their Ordination a Bishop was established and invested so that a Bishop with Jurisdiction before Ordination was an estate not yet come into the world so long as the primitive custome and rule of the Church was in force which it seemeth succeeding custome hath brought to passe since Now of all parts of the office common to Bishop and Presbyters this of Ordination is that which the Bishop first began to exercise alone so that with S. Chrysostome and S. Hierome it is taken in a manner for granted that it was to be done by him alone The one Hom. 11. in 1. ad Tim. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Onely in Ordination the Bishops go beyond the Presbyters that is it alone which they seem to have more than these The other Ep. ad Euagr. Quid enim facit Episcopus except â ordinatione quod Presbyter non facit excepting Ordination which a Bishop doth a Presbyter as he granteth doth not In which neverthelesse setting aside the stroke the Presbyters had in making their Bishops if we take not our marks amisse we shall find argument enough at least at the beginning for the concurrence of Presbyters with him in making of Presbyters and other inferiour Orders In the first place those generall passages of the Fathers wherein is witnessed that the Presbytery was a Bench assistant to the Bishop without advice whereof nothing of moment was done must needs be drawn into consequence to argue that it had effect in a particular of this weight Then the Ordination of Timothy by imposition of hands of the Presbytery will prove no lesse within compasse of the Scripture Indeed it is well known that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Ecclesiasticall writers signifieth divers times the office and rank of Presbyters which signification divers here embrace expounding imposition of hands of the Presbytery to mean that by which the rank of Presbyter was conferred But the Apostles words running as they do 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 oblige a man to ask when he is come as farre as the imposition of the hands of whom or whose hands they were he speaketh of which the next words satisfie had it been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sense might better have been diverted but running as it doth with the article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with imposition of THE hands it remaineth that it be specified in the next words whose hands were imposed as in the other place 2. Tim. i. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with imposition of my hands Thus this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Gospel Luke xxii 66. And in Ignatius his Epistles signifieth the Colledge of Presbyters which hath the nature and respect of a person in Law and therefore is read in the singular for the whole Bench and being assembled and set is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places and in Cornelius of Rome his Epistle to S. Cyprian where he saith placuit contrahere Presbyterium But to put the signification of the word out of doubt by the circumstance of the sense call to mind the Prophesies that went before concerning Timothy and compare his case with the Apostles and the prophesies that went before of him in like case and the imposition of hands which thereupon both recieved and sure it will prove an unreproveable ground to conclude that what is expressed in the Apostle is to be understood of the Disciple that these prophesies coming from the Ministers of the Church concerning the purpose to which God hath ordained them in his service occasioned that which they did about both in giving them imposition of hands and that as S. Paul received imposition of hands from the Presbyters of Antiochia so did Timothy from S. Paul and the Presbyters of that Church which he speaks of but names not Neither are the arguments of this interesse quite worn out of the practice of the Church either in the point of nominating the persons or that of imposing hands For when S. Cyprian expresseth himself so oft in this particular that it was not his purpose to do any thing without advice of his Presbyters and consent of his people it is not his meaning that the Clergy should bear no other part in this work then did the multitude but as they were distinct bodies so according to his own words to expect advice from them as concerning the persons to be promoted but consent from the people if there were no fault to be found of moment with the persons designed And in these terms the matter stands in the 22. Canon of of that which is called the fourth councel of Carthage where is provided Vt Episcopus sine consilio Clericorum suorum Clericos non ordinet it à ut civium assensum testimonium
the charge of Timothy and Titus set aside their own persons whereof we shall give account afterwards in whose instructions the Apostle is large in qualifying Bishops and Deacons such Bishops as we reade of Tit. i. 7. where having said that he left him in Crete to make Presbyters in every city the Apostle addeth For a Bishop must be blamelesse but of any other rank not a syllable None in the Church of Corinth The Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name yield this reason of the disorders the Apostle taxeth there 1 Cor. xi 21. Because there was no Bishop there The words are not of ordinary mark Hos notat qui sic in Ecclesiam conveniebant ut munera sua offerentes advenientibus Presbyteris quia adhuc Rectores Ecclesiis non omnibus locis fuerant constituti totum sibi qui obtulerat vindicaret schismatis causâ So whereas that whereof the Eucharist was consecrated should be spent by the assembly in the common feast of Love some made good chear others that had not offered went away without their share Therefore saith the Apostle ver 22. Have ye not houses to eat and drink in but despise ye the Church of God coming thither for dissensions sake and belly-chear not for the Sacrament and for peace and shame them that have not sending them away without enterteinment therefore verse 33. he exhorteth to stay for one another at their meetings Thus farre out of those Commentaries Which reason as it giveth a clear meaning to the whole passage of the Apostle so it groweth still more probable because we shall find afterwards that it continueth still in force at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle published not long since And men of learning have argued that this reason might better be yielded for their dissensions saying I am of Paul I am of Apollos I am of Cephas which the Apostle reproveth in the beginning of the Epistle to wit Because there was then no Bishop there and in the Apostles absence And indeed if we reckonnot amisse what reason have we to think that this Apostle should ordain in the Churches of his planting a higher rank of Bishops to govern the Churches above and with the Presbyters Do we not see that he chargeth himself with the oversight of these Churches wherein he had planted the Colledges of Presbyters aforesaid 2. Corinth xi 28. Besides those things which are without that which cometh upon me dayly the care of all the Churches To what purpose else is the journey he taketh Acts xv 36. to visit the Churches wherein he had ordained Presbyters afore Let us return saith he to Barnabas and visit our brethren in all cities where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they do We see he taketh care to exercise discipline upon the incestuous person at Corinth which it seemeth the Rulers of the Church there had neglected to do 1. Cor. v. 4. pronouncing sentence of excommunication and requiring the Church to see it ratified executed And for a thing remarkable observe in what terms he proceedeth 1. Cor. v. 4. When ye are gathered together and my spirit saith he his Spirit which ruled there in chief for the time So that it is not for nothing that Tertullian lib. De praescript cap. 36. reckoneth Corinth Philippi Thessalonica Ephesus and the rest of the same rank all Apostolicall Churches from this one Apostle because he planted and ruled them all for his time Apud quas saith he ipsae adhuc cathedrae Apostolorum suis locis praesident which is in good English neither more nor lesse then here is affirmed The Apostles chair rested in them all till Tertullians time therefore the Apostle for his time sate in it And to my apprehension all his Epistles are nothing else but so many acts of this government spirituall in chief which the Apostle reserved himself in the Churches of his own planting The like to be said of S. Peters Epistles and hath been observed in part by Eusebius Eccles hist lib. iii. cap. 5. That the title of his former Epistle addressed to the strangers dispersed through Pontus Asia Galatia Cappadocia and Bithynia that is to the Jews sojourning in those provinces argueth it to be a work of his care in preaching the Gospel to the charge he had undertaken according to the division alledged before Galat. ii 9. And therefore as hath been hitherto argued of the other Apostle so when we see S. Peter 1. Pet. v. 1. direct his exhortation to feed the flock to none but Presbyters we have cause to conceive that those Churches to whom he writeth and whom we shall heare Epiphanius say anon that he went sometimes from Rome to visit had as yet no Bishops over their Presbyters The same that S. Hierome hath argued long since out of Hebr. xiii 17. where the Apostle writeth in the plurall number Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves CHAP. IV. As the Apostles withdrew so Bishops came over the Presbyteries in their stead Timothy and Titus had not their charge till S. Paul left those parts His journey from Ephesus through Macedonia into Greece By the way he left Titus in Crete Why he wintered at Nicopolis At spring he returned by land into Macedonia There and then Timothy undertaketh the Church of Ephesus Timothy an Evangelist The prophecies that went before of him and the grace he received Titus and he over many Presbyteries Bishops over each afterwards The Angels of the seven Churches BUt as the Apostles began to wear out or otherwise as their occasions gave them not leave to attend in person upon the Churches of their care reason required if but in correspondence to the state of government that had hitherto rested in some Apostle and the Presbyteries of particular Churches there should be instituted some heads of these companies of Presbyters to whom the name of Bishops hath been appropriated ever since and certain it is that during the time of the Apostles instituted they were This agreeth extreme well with the charge and instructions of the Apostle to his Disciples Timothy and Titus over the Churches of Asia and Crete whom as all Ecclesiasticall writers after Eusebius acknowledge to be made Bishops of Ephesus and Crete so must we not fail to observe here that this was not done till it was revealed to the Apostle that from thenceforth the Lord would imploy him in the Western parts of the world The businesse is most an end agreed upon on all hands yet because the observation is so effectuall to this purpose let me take leave to inlarge it by clearing the whole passage of the Apostles last voyage from Ephesus through Greece and back again Acts xix 21. we reade at that time Paul resolved by the Spirit having passed through Macedonia and Achaia to go to Jerusalem saying When I have been there I must also see Rome In 2. Cor. i. 15. he writeth to them that he had formerly purposed to go
maketh Linus to succeed the Apostles and suffer martyrdome the same year who neverthelesse sitteth twelve years according to Eusebius whereas Cletus next in order unto him beginneth seven years after in time but Clemens third in rank one yeare after Linus suffering in the third year of Trajane long after both their deaths Epiphanius in the place afore-named stumbling as it seemeth at the credit of those that put Clemens first propoundeth this conjecture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These words of Clemens quoted by Epiphanins are yet extant in his Epistle to the Church of Corinth published not long since wherein he telleth him that was the occasion of the schisme he writeth against there that a generous man and so forth would say in that case I depart I withdraw let the people of God be in quiet Epiphanius it seemeth meeting them at the second hand alledged for Clemens his advice to some man mentioned in the Epistle as they are indeed conceived neverthelesse they might have reference to his own case advising to withdraw and give way to Linus and Cletus for the quiet of the Church which now by reading the Epistle proveth otherwise Besides he sticketh not to digest the inconvenience of admitting more then one Bishop in the same Church at once For because according to his conjecture Linus and Cletus as well as Clemens that gave way to them must be made Bishops by the Apostles he addeth that Bishops might be made there during the time of the Apostles because they travelled sometimes from Rome S. Paul into Spain as indeed he purposeth Rom. xv 24. S. Peter into Pontus and Bithynia whither he directeth his first Epistle and must not leave the Church unprovided there But if it be worth the while to vent a conjecture that shall avoid this inconvenience and make all good that is reported by these ancient Fathers that matters of circumstance wherein they are at difference destroy not their credit in the main wherein they are at agreement let this be mine That there were at Rome from the beginning as at Antiochia two congregations of Christians one of the Circumcision the other of the Gentiles That S. Peter was head of the one S. Paul of the other according to the division aforesaid That after their death Linus who was Deacon to S. Paul if we believe Ignatius in the Epistle to the Trallians succeeded him over the one Clemens who was Deacon to S. Peter according to the same Authour there succeeded him over the other till both Congregations being concorporate and united in one because governed by Clemens that survived And if any man be so disfavourable as upon these differences of the By to discredit the main let him know that though he allow not the pillars of the Church in their time the credit of discreet men to have reason for what they report yet must he allow Ireneus and Tertullian to be men of common sense when they alledge the succession of Bishops in the Churches of that time wherein that of Rome is alwayes one for an evidence of the faith which had been preserved in them ever since the Apostles the force of the reason lying in that which Calvine hath exceeding well observed That it was a thing known and received at that time that de facto the faith which the Churches professed came by succession from the Apostles from which succession the Hereticks were fain to separate and make Congregations apart wherein to professe the belief which themselves had devised Be all the world judges now whether a man in his right senses would appeal to the succession of Bishops if it had been a thing questionable whether any such were or not The like is to be said of Optatus and S. Augustine when they appeal to the succession of Bishops in the Church of Rome to prove the Donatists schismaticks not communicating with the lawfull successours both of the faith of the Apostles which both sides granted and of their places from which they argue CHAP. VI. Dionysius the Areopagite Bishop of Athens S. Mark of Alexandria No Bishop at Corinth when Clemens writ his Epistle How they were propagated and by what rule THus we are out of the Scripture But because we are not yet out of the time of the Apostles I will name further Dionysius the Areopagite S. Pauls convert Acts xvii 34. because there is so ancient a witnesse to depose for him Dionysius of Corinth some hundred and twenty years after that averring in Eusebius that he was the first Bishop of Athens And so the last I will name shall be the Church of Alexandria and that for S. Hieromes sake and in his words because he it is that is perswaded and perswadeth men to think that the order of Bishops came in by mere custome of the Church to avoid schismes that arise for want of heads In his Epistle to Euagrius thus we reade Nam Alexandriae à Marco Evangelista usque ad Heraclam Dionysium Episcopos Presbyteri semper unum ex se electum in excelsiori gradu collocatum Episcopum nominabant How that can be said to come in by custome for avoyding of schisme which was practiced at Alexandria from Mark the Evangelist let S. Hierome devise it shall serve our turn that so it was there from the Apostles time Otherwise it is reasonable enough to believe that upon such occasions Bishops came in over some Churches in particular the Church of Corinth in which we find a schisme but can find no Bishop at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle some few years after the death of the Apostles Because the reason produced afore to argue that there was no Bishop at Corinth when S. Paul writ his Epistles continueth still in force at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle For p. 52. he is very earnest with them to keep due order and decorum in bringing their Oblations and celebrating the Eucharist For when he nameth there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the one we must understand the species of fruits of the earth and meats which the people offered out of which the Eucharist being celebrated the rest was spent in the Agapa or feast of Love to which the words of the Apostle are to be referred By the other the Eucharist for celebration whereof he is so earnest with them to keep due order in their assemblies alledging that these things which the Lord had commanded to be done these he had not commanded to be done disorderly and at randome but at set times and seasons when and by whom they should be done Where God hath appointed an order when and where and by whom Christians should celebrate their assemblies is not to be found in Scripture further then the Apostles rule 1. Cor. xiv 40. Let all things be done decently and in order It seemeth he argueth from the pattern of the Leviticall Priesthood for so it followeth p. 53. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. To the high Priest saith he are
preaching in the assemblies of Christians at that time so farre as we understand by the Apostle went more by mens gifts then by their places in the Church Reade the fourteenth chapter of the first to the Corinthians throughout and consider what great use there was of the gifts of prophecying and speaking strange languages in their assemblies which the Apostle there regulateth sure you will never imagine for there is not a syllable to intimate it that these were all Presbyters ordinary Ministers in the Church The like must be said of the gifts reckoned vers 8. The word of Wisdome the word of Knowledge Discerning spirits and the like of the gifts of Teaching and Exhorting Rom. xii 7 8. of Pastours and Doctours mentioned by the Apostle Ephes iv 14. The Office of the Presbyters at Thessalonica the Apostle recommendeth to the brethren there in these terms 1. Thess 5. 12. We beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you And to esteem them very highly in love for their works sake But we are not bound to think them all the same persons whose graces he recommendeth when he addeth vers 19. 20. Quench not the Spirit Despise not prophesying Acts xiii 1. There were in the Church of Antiochia Prophets and Teachers and of them they were that gave Paul and Barnabas imposition of hands And 1. Tim. iv 14. these are those that prophesied of him and Presbyters they were I suppose that gave him imposition of hands with the Apostle And so it was argued from hence afore that the Spirit of Prophesie rested upon those Presbyteries But that all such Prophets were Presbyters or all Presbyters such Prophets neither is it written in Gods book nor of it self credible in such varietie of graces specified which all being given for edification and used in the assemblies to that purpose must either rest in the rank of ordinary Ministers or be counted personall graces whether miraculous or otherwise used for the edification of the Church in supplement of their indeavours which have served the turn in after ages He that writ the Commentaries upon S. Pauls Epistles under S. Ambrose his name upon Ephes iv 10. having laboured to accommodate the gifts there specified to the Ministeries then in use in the Church is at length driven to this point Tamen postquam omnibus lociâ— Ecclesiae sunt constitutae officia ordinata aliter composita res est quà m coeperat Primùm enim omnes docebant omnes baptizabant quibuscunqâ—â—diebus vel temporibus fuisset occasuâ— And after a while Vt ergò crescere plebs multiplicaretur omnibus intâ— initia concessum est evangelizare baptizare Scripturas in Ecclesia explanare That which he saith of aâ—â— persons publishing the Gospel is justified by that which we reade Act viii 4. Therefore they that were scatered abroad went everywhere preaching the word And again Acts xi 19 Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as farre as Phoenice and Cyprus and Antiochia preaching the Word to none but unto the Jews onely That which he saith of expounding the Scriptures that is speaking in the Church will be justified no lesse if it be referred to that variety of gifts specified out of the Apostle most an end miraculous and concerning that time the use whereof was for edification in the assemblies And the reason that is to be given for this must needs appear very considerable Because that among men chosen out of those that were newly converted to the faith in their elder years for which they are called PRESEYTERS and that in respect of other kind of abilities tending to other parts of their office there should be found men fit to speak in publick assemblies upon humane parts and indeavours so as to preserve the decorum and reverence of so great a work is beyond the compasse of common discretion to imagine these qualities being not often found but in those that are habituated to them from their youth Do but look on those of our Lords kindred that confessed him before Domitian and therefore were made leaders of Churches as was related before from Hegesippus and think whether men whose hands were hardned with the plough already struck in years were fit to make Preachers when they were made Rulers of Churches So farre is it from us to think that in the cradle of the Church no Presbyter was made but for his abilities in preaching Let us now look back a little upon the platform pretended and ask what commission men have to turn temporary indowments into perpetuall places or according to personall gifts and graces to distinguish oecumenicall offices And yet it will not appear that ever Pastours were distinguished from Doctours by the Apostle For he never said that Christ hath given some Pastours some Doctours but his words are Ephes iv 11. that he gave some Pastours and Doctours having said afore that he gave some Apostles some Evangelists some Prophets distinguishing those but comprising these If Teaching and Preaching must make two offices as then they were two graces why shall not Exhorting come in for a share and demand that there may be an office instituted for the purpose of it as well as for Teaching which it standeth in equipage with Rom xii 7 8 why should not the word of Wisdome and the word of Knowledge do the like for these mentioned 1. Cor. xii 8. are of perpetuall use although Prophesies and strange languages were but for the time There is one good reason to be given and no more Because perpetuall Ministeries are one thing temporary Gifts are another thing Those we know by the institution of them in Scripture by the office of them specified in the Acts and in the Epistles by the practice of them in all ages of the Church those we know were in time of the Apostle but not instituted for Ministeries because not continued The Office of Presbyters we know was both for Government and Teaching Both are found in S. Peters exhortation to the Presbyters of his charge 1. Pet. v. 2. feeding the flock and overseeing it both in S. Pauls charge to the Presbyters of Ephesus Acts xx 28. and afterwards both in the qualities of Bishops that is as is acknowledged of Presbyters wherein Timothy is instructed by the Apostle 1. Tim. iii. 2 5. both conteined in that very passage that is alledged to bring in a difference of Presbyters 1. Tim. v. 17. For those Elders that rule well are such as labour in the word and doctrine Why might not the Apostle then difference Presbyters by the execution of their functions as well as by the functions themselves Why might not some Presbyters shew more diligence in the most eminent point of the office taking speciall pains in the Word and Doctrine which speciall pains the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth and yet others be counted worthy of double
which is called Anathema With these the proceedings of the Christian Church keep some correspondence according to Scripture For when our Lord saith If he heare not the Church let him be unto thee as a Heathen man and as a Publicane he intimateth withall a course the Church had to take for his correction and amendment that should give car to it Which as it might perhaps end in a verball admonition of the Church and reall amendment of the party yet those that were under the discipline of Penance we know were in a sort excommunicate because they were not admitted to the Communion of the Eucharist besides that as those which were separated among the Jews they put upon them the state and fashion and habit of mourners And I shewed afore what we find in Scripture to argue this course directed by our Lord and practiced by the Apostle But here was a difference that in that state we find not that a man was cut off from the conversation of Christians those which were admitted to Penance being alwaies accounted in the way of salvation supposing the performance of their injoyned Penance That was the effect of that grievous censure whereof our Lord speaketh Let him be unto thee as a Heathen man and as a Publicane Not because he meaneth to forbid Christians to converse with Heathen men and Publicanes who being to be converted from among them must needs be compassed with them on every side And therefore that case the Apostle hath resolved 1. Cor. v. 9 10. where he informeth them that whereas he had written to them not to converse with fornicatours his meaning was not to forbid them to converse with the fornicatours of this world that is Gentiles or with the covetous or extortioners or with idolaters for then must ye go out of the world and as it followeth vers 12. For what have I to do to judge those that are without do not ye judge those that are within But our Lords meaning is that Christians should shew that respect to a brother that should be refractary to the Church as the Jews did then to Gentiles and Publicanes which the Apostle secondeth there vers 11. Now I write to you not to converse if any man that is called a brother be a fornicatour or covetous or an idolater or a railer or a drunkard or an extortioner with such a one no not to eat which is to avoid them as the Jews did him that stood separate And the sentence whereupon this is to be practiced is intimated in the next verse For what have I to do to judge those that are without Do not ye judge those that are within And this censure it seemeth the Apostle presupposeth when he writeth to Titus iii. 11. A man that is an Heretick after the first and second admonition reject For his meaning is not to instruct Titus alone what he in his person should do but in the person of Titus to instruct all the Church to reject and avoid refractary Hereticks and therefore in the consequence of avoyding them it seemeth he intimateth the censure whereupon they are to be avoyded The same censure against the incestuous person at Corinth he intimateth by the same consequence when he saith 1. Cor. v. 13. Therefore put away from you that wicked person which he calleth giving over to Satan in the same case vers 5. afore and in the case of Hymeneus and Alexander 1. Tim. i. 20. and which he signifieth 1. Cor. xvi 22. If any man love not the Lord Jesus let him be anathema Maranatha where anathema is the term that cometh from the Synagogue and so doth the other as some men think So that this censure cutteth men off from the conversation of Christians which forfeit the priviledges to which they pretend and so delivers them to Satan by consequence as those that lodged without the camp of Israel were in danger to be lickt up by the Amalekite Which course neverthelesse as it was preservative in regard of some members that they might not be tainted as the Apostle signifieth when he saith 1. Cor. v. 6. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump So was it medicinall in respect of the sick shame and grief being a good way to the cure which the Apostle seemeth to respect when he directeth 1. Cor. v. 6. to deliver him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit might be safe in the day of the Lord Jesus and 1. Tim. i. 20. whom I have delivered to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme This is the correspondence between the proceeding of the Church and Synagogue And therefore as looking backward to the Synagogue whereupon our Lord reflecteth when he saith Dic Ecclesiae we see to whom they had recourse so shall we see looking forwards upon the Church which our Lord pointeth towards in the same words to whom he directeth his followers to have recourse The Keyes of Gods house are given in the Gospel to S. Peter with the effect of binding and loosing and the same power to all the Apostles in equivalent terms of reteining and remitting sinnes For if there were advantage it were an inconvenience that in the third place the power of binding and loosing should be given to the Church which is pretended given to S. Peter for a priviledge beyond the Apostles Well then might S. Cyprian argue Epist 27. that because our Lord promised to S. Peter the keyes of his Church therefore the acts of government of it were to passe through the Bishops hands and without him Apostates could not be reconciled And it is the same which S. Augustine affirmeth so oft as he teacheth which many times he doth that S. Peter in receiving the Keyes represented the Church as Ep. 79. Si hoc in Ecclesiâ fit he speaketh of binding and loosing Petrus quando claves accepit Ecclesiam sanctam significavit For what was promised to S. Peter was given the rest of the Apostles but was to rest in the Church to which it is also given in the same terms as S. Cyprian is willing to acknowledge so oft as he calleth the Presbyters his Colleagues and professeth to do nothing without their advise So that it is not possible to give a more impartiall meaning to the words of our Lord in the Gospel then the practice of those times hath expressed when that power was exercised in common by the Bishop and his Presbyters This it is Tertullian hath shewed us Apolog. c. 39. alledged afore where having commended the gravitie and integritie of Ecclesiasticall censures to shew by whom they were done he addeth as afore Praesident probati quique seniores honorem non pretio sed testimonio adepti And S. Augustines words are plain which we had afore Veniat peccator ad Antistites per quos ipsi in Ecclesia claves ministrantur à praepositis sacrorum accipiat satisfactionis suae modum And in S. Cyprian there is so much mention
untill there be reasonable appearance of the effect wrought by it For if in S. Cyprians discipline the people rested so unsatisfied of some whom his gentlenesse had reconciled that they were hardly perswaded to admitte them to communicate as he writeth Epist 55. just cause have good Christians to be scandalized when they see them admitted to communicate of whose offenses they are sure but have no cause to be sure of their amendment CHAP. XII Of Ordinations what is remembred in Scripture The course held in the Primitive Church The Election and constitution of Bishops upon what grounds Presbyters had their part in Ordinations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was not Election by holding up hands Ordination of Deacons for common businesse of Churches The interesse of the people is satisfied in the course now practiced What the Primitive form requireth in the Constitution of Bishops AS for the constituting and ordaining of Ministers which is behind of my promise these are the particulars remembred concerning it in Scripture for the most part touched upon occasion heretofore Acts xiii 3. And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away Acts xiv 23. Paul and Barnabas when they had ordained them Elders in every Church and had prayed with fasting they commended them to the Lord on whom they believed and 1. Tim. iv 14. Neglect not the gift that was given thee by prophecy with the imposition of hands of the presbytery which is 2. Tim. i. 6. by imposition of my hands And the charge of the Apostle unto him 1. Tim. v. 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man neither be partaker of other mens sins And the whole instructions of the Apostle to Timothy and Titus by whom he had appointed them to be ordained To which must be added the choice of Matthias and the seven Deacons where is said that they the Congregation put up two Acts i. 23. and the twelve said unto them Acts vi 3. look ye out among you seven men of honest report and verse 5. And they chose Steven and the rest and verse 6. They set them before the Apostles and when they had prayed they layed hands on them Which are alledged by S. Cyprian for the interesse of the people in this businesse Wherein we shall discern the course of proceeding in the Primitive Church by that which is read in an Heathen who being an enemy to all can not be thought partiall to any rank of Christians it is in the life of Alexander Severus where you have related how that excellent young Prince being to promote to the government of Provinces or the like charges was wont to set up the persons names inviting the people to come in against any of them upon any crime whereof they could make evidence upon pain of life if any failed in it And then it follows Dicebátque grave esse cùm id Christiani Judaei facerent in praedicandis Sacerdotibus qui sunt ordinandi non fieri in Provinciarum rectoribus quibus fortunae hominum committerentur capita These words in praedicandis Sacerdotibus qui sunt ordinandi the learned Casaubon understandeth to be meant of that publication of mens merits and qualities which must needs fall out in discussing the competence of persons put up to the approbation of the people to be ordained in any rank of Ministers in the Assemblies of Christians according to the custome then in practice which custome S. Cyprian commendeth upon the pattern of Eleazar made and invested high Priest by Moses in sight of the people whose interesse he specifieth when he saith Ordinationes Sacerdotales sub populi assistentis conscientia fieri ut plebe praesente vel detegantur malorum crimina vel merit abonorum praedicentur ut sit ordinatio justa legitima quae omnium suffragio judicio fuerit comprobata But before mens deserts and qualities could be scanned it behoved that their persons should be nominated in the first place the publication whereof is called in the sixth canon of the Chalced on Councel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where it is provided 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That no man be ordained Presbyter or Deacon or in any rank of the Church at large unlesse he be published to be ordained in some particular Church of a City or village That which is called here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Praedicatio in Latine meaning the Publication of persons names that were put up to be ordained seems to come nearer that which the Historian meaneth when he saith in praedicandis Sacerdotibus because hereupon followed the examination of their competence which S. Cyprian declareth to be the interesse of the people For if we conceive that all men indifferently had the right to nominate we must think a great deal of unsufferable confusion must needs follow at such assemblies And the same S. Cyprian when he writeth to his Clergy Ep. 24. concerning the ordination of Saturus and Optatus in these words Quos jampridem communi consilio Clero proximos feceramus excusing himself to them that he had ordained them alone upon this that they had before promoted them to be next the Clergy by common advise sufficiently sheweth that the course was to advise with the Presbyters and rest of the Clergy about the persons to be propounded to the people We need then no more to shew us the course of that time There was first nomination of the person to the people upon their knowledge and approbation of the persons and agreement there followed imposition of hands wherein consisted the accomplishment of the work from whence the whole was called in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as ordinatio in Latine compriseth the whole work whereby they are promoted In the Ordination of Bishops there must needs be something particular By the praecedent which S. Hierome hath recorded us in the Church of Alexandria where he said afore that the Presbyters were wont to chuse a Bishop out of their own rank it is plain their stroak was the greatest in nominating the person to be approved by the people and ordained by the Bishops And the Commentaries under Saint Ambrose his name upon Ephes iv 11. tell us that at the first the next of the Presbyters in rank was wont to be assumed and so might it well be practiced in some places untill it was tried that divers times they fell out to be unfit for the place Then saith he immutata est ratio prospiciente consilio ut non or do sed meritum crearet Episcopum multorum Sacerdotum judicio constitutum nè indignus temer è usurparet esset multis scandalum The course was changed upon advise which provided that a Bishop should not be made by rank but by merit to be esteemed by the judgement multorum Sacerdotum signifying by this term as well the Presbyters of the own Church by whom he was desired as the Bishops of other Churches by whom he was ordained For because
conniventiam quaerat And as for imposition of hands we have in the Epistle aforesaid of Firmilianus Bishop of Caesarea Cappadocia if not rather of the whole act of Ordination Omnis potestas gratia in Ecclesia constituta est in qua praesident majores natu qui baptizandi manum imponendi ordinandi habent potestatem And in Ignatius his Epistle to Hero whosoever writ it it is ancient enough to speak to our purpose speaking to his Deacon of his Presbyters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They baptize they celebrate the Eucharist they impose hands in Penance they ordain thou ministrest unto them as holy Stephen at Jerusalem to James and the Presbyters And where it is provided Conc. Carthag 4. c. 3. that the Presbyters when the Bishop giveth imposition of hands shall likewise impose their hands by his it behoveth us in their case also to call to mind that this is and was and ought to be in signe of their consent to what is done the Apostle having said to Timothy Lay hands suddenly on no man neither be partaker of other mens sinnes But the interesse of the people is inhansed beyond all measure or rule of primitive practice It will not serve the turn that the people had then satisfaction of the persons and their competence to the Ministeries to which they were ordained unlesse we will believe that when it is said Acts iv 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the meaning is that they were made by most voices of the people signified by holding up their hands as we find in Demosthenes and others that custome to have been in Greekish Communalties Saul and Barnabas doing nothing but moderating the choice that is in effect telling the voices And to this purpose is alledged that of the Apostle 2. Cor. viii 19. And not that onely but who was also chosen of the Churches to travel with us with this grace that is administred by us where in the Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying Election as they would have it and not Ordination seeing the office of carrying almes requireth no imposition of hands To which let me adde if they refuse not that help the words of Ignatius much in the same kind for in his Epistles ad Smyrn ad Polyc. out of his care and affection to his Church at Antiochia having received news of their good estate and finding himself in the like he desires the Church of Smyrna and Polycarpus to chuse one to go with their letters to Antiochia whom he will have called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it should be read not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a messenger in matters belonging to God to certifie them of his good estate and to congratulate with them of their own this office it seemeth requireth no imposition of hands and therefore that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which Ignatius desireth them to appoint it signifieth as it should seem not Ordination but Election by the same reason as that of the Apostle The rest that is brought to avouch this new conceit is the words of Zonaras upon the first of the Canons of the Apostles where in down right terms he delivereth the use of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to come from the fashion of giving voices by holding up hands used in the Church at first to discern on which side most voices were from whence it came afterwards to be used for imposition of hands But let them bethink themselves that if these Presbyters were made by Saul and Barnabas by holding up hands of the people then were they not made by imposition of their own hands for if we take that sense of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the other must needs be excluded And then let me ask if it be a thing reasonable to measure the sense of the Apostles language by what was done at Athens rathen then by that which among the Jews from whence the faith of Christ was transplanted was known and in use Or to imagine that the Apostle to follow the fashion of Greekish communalties never heard of in after ages of the Church should balk the Ceremony which the people of God had received from Moses which was from old time frequented in creating their Sanedrin Judges which the Apostles in their own persons practiced which the Church hath alwayes observed in promoting of Ministers signifying the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost and praying to obtein it To the words of the Apostle and Ignatius seeing they have in them no appearance of resolute sense let me answer two wayes First though they were not ordained by imposition of hands yet it is no inconvenience they should be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 using the word in a generall sense for those that are ordained or constituted in any form because this form was so frequented in divers occasions As for the purpose among the Jews all their Rabbies are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the letter signifieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or ordained by imposition of hands because at the first so they were made though they be not promoted after that form but made as since they are ordinarily made by writing or word of mouth as Rab. Moses in Sanedrin chap. 4. writeth But in the second place observe the words which Ignatius writing to Polycarpus about this matter useth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where for the constituting of a person fit for this purpose he adviseth him to convent one of these Assemblies wherein they used to advise about Ordinations as hath been said And therefore it seemeth no inconvenience to think that he desireth him to be ordained to that purpose Whereupon it will not be amisse to inquire a little further to what Ministery in the Church such a person may be thought to be ordained wherein if we fail not perhaps it will make us able to give a fair conjecture at that of the Apostle by the correspondence of the cases Ignatius in the Epistle to the Philadelphians writeth to them for the same purpose as here he doth to those of Smyrna though the sense is hitherto disguised in the printed copies in which the words runne thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which words it is plain make no sense But I have seen the written copy of an old translation of these Epistles in barbarous Latine in Caius Colledge Library here with us in which these words are rendred thus Quod annunciatum est mihi pacem habere Ecclesiam quae est in Antiochia Syriae Decens est vos ut Ecclesiam Dei Ordinare Diaconum ad intercedendum illic Dei intercessionem in congaudere ipsis in idipsum factis glorific are nomen He that made this translation read here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in stead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which now is read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and maketh it no sense and this is without