we could punctually explain it and many of our Divines have already abundantly and often spent their studie and labour in it Wherefore we refer to the serious consideration of all Christian and pious hearts Whether men have cause and ground to judge and condemn us as Hereticks We for our part are assured that what hath not been for the first Christians necessary unto salvation in so many hundred yeers without which so many thousand Martyrs and so many millions of Christians are piously departed out of this life that cannot be also necessary for us in these last times and we may live and die as religious Christians without it For we need not any other Faith or Religion besides that wherein the Apostles and the Primitive Christians lived and died We have with them obtained like precious faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.1 The old Commandment which they had from the beginning 1 Joh. 2.7 The great Salvation which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him Heb. 2.3 The Faith which was once delivered unto tae saints Jude vers 3. And this is the true Catholike What is to be true Catholike or the Universal Christian Faith which hath been at all times especially in the Primitive times and as long as we stand fast to it we are indeed the true Catholike Christians Whereas those that adde thereunto any new Doctrine of Faith and Life as necessary which in the Primitive Church was not in use though they bear and boast of the Catholike name yet they are not true Ancient Catholike Christians but New-Catholikes which are equivalent with Vn-Catholikes And that Church which by its own Command imposeth such Doctrines and Traditions as necessary unto salvation though Christ had not commanded but rather forbidden them by his Apostles and yet will condemn and persecute other Churches doth thereby discover it self not to be a true Christian but rather Anti-Christian Tyrannical Church Which also hath need to stand in fear of the Apostolical curse If any man preach any other Gospel unto you though an Angel from heaven then that the Apostles have preached unto you let him be accursed Gal. 1.8 9 And if any man shall adde unto the Word of God God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in it and if any man shall take away from the Word of this book God shall take away his part out of the book of Life Rev. 22.18 19. But we hope that all understanding and conscientious men and such as love Truth and Peace amongst the Romane Catholikes will beware of this malediction and taking seriously to heart this Declaration of ours abstain hereafter from presumptuous judging and condemning us as Hereticks much lesse persecute us with Fire and Sword and Losses of our Goods and Honours as hitherto they have done which certainly doth not proceed from the Spirit of Christ but undoubtedly from the Devil who is that Arch-lyer and Murderer Of which the Apostle also doth faithfully warn us and especially the Romane Church lest it might imagine some special priviledges before others Those that are weak in faith receive you but not to doubtful disputations judge not their thoughts Who art thou that judgest another mans servant To his own master he standeth or falleth But if this warning will do no good to them certainly the other shall at length be fulfilled in them Be not high minded but fear For if God spared not the natural branches the City and Church of Jerusalem take heed lest he also spare not thee Behold therefore the goodnesse and severity of God On them which fell severity but towards thee goodnesse if thou continuest in his goodnesse otherwise thou also shalt be cut off Rom. 11.21 22. CHAP. V. That the Lutheranes have no ground to judge the Reformed Churches to be Heretical WHat we have spoken now of the Romish Church concerning its judging and condemning us the same we may partly well say of the Lutherans which indeed together with us have protested against this judging and condemning of Papists in the forenamed points of controversie and yet no lesse although in fewer points from whence also the Evangelical Churches and estates generally all are called Protestants do judge and condemn our Churches or Teachers as hereticks under the most-odious mens names who neverthelesse rely not upon any man but upon the Nature Word and Doctrine of Christ To whom according to the aforesaid Apostolical Rule we may make appear yet more plainly then to the Papists that they have no ground thus to judge and condemn us and the doctrine of our Church and Worship The principal points of Controversies betwixt Lutheranes and Reformed Protestants 1. In Ceremonies For in the first place what concerneth some controversies about Ceremonies both of their and our worshipping of God as that we use not in the holy Baptism the exorcism or conjuring of the devil to come forth out of the infants or young children because we do not hold them either spiritually or corporally possessed by the devil although they naturally are born in Original sin and we have no warrant to cast the devil out of them by such conjuring and therefore do justly abhor from taking therein Gods holy Name in vain That we have no such Images in our Churches which by their own confession are abused in Popery unto Idolatry but rather approve and justifie the taking away of them if it be done by Christian Magistrates in an orderly way after the example of the Kings Hezekiah and Josiah That also in the holy Communion we use not the Hosties or Wafers but ordinary nourishing bread and observe the breaking of it how can they judge us therefore whereas they themselves hold their Exorcism Images Hosties not even absolutely necessary nor the breaking of the bread in it self erroneous but onely to be adïaphora indifferent things Although we for our part do not account them absolutely indifferent matters but in some regard necessary partly because of Gods command partly because of the example of Christ the Apostles and the Primitive Apostolical Church At least for our selves who should sin if we should against our consciences use the Exorcism or the Images or without any urgent cause omit the breaking of the bread Yet since we judge not nor condemn according to the above-mentioned Apostolical Rule those that do not judge the breaking of the bread necessary but give way to their pretended liberty It were fit they also should not condemn us therein but to impart to us so much freedom that we may herein follow the example of Christ which we may do more safely and without any sin as we likewise permit them to omit it and in stead thereof to follow the example of the Papists In like manner that we in our Catechism punctually retain all the Commandments as they are set down Exod. 20. Deut. 5 and do not omit 2. In the Doctrine
then to be extracted out of the same by consequence But if we desire to have a certain undoubted and necessary Exposition of these words Christ himself and the Apostle Paul hath declared it unto us That the breast and wine is called the Body and Blood of Christ because it is the New Testament and the Communion of his Body and Blood and because we ought to eat and drink it in remembrance of him If we desire also to know how we ought worthily to eat and drink the Body and Blood of Christ Christ himself hath taught it so plainly Joh. 6 that our Adversaries themselves must confesse that not onely the afore-mentioned Spiritual eating of the Lords Supper is principally required but also is the onely true and saving eating without which the oral manducation is rather noxious then profitable and wholesome Wherefore we hold this declaration of Christ sufficient unto Salvation and him that onely standeth to it or giveth us but libertie to stand to it we will in like manner not compel necessarily to receive our interpretations and expressions which we acknowledge to be conformable to the words and exposition of Christ much lesse will we judge or condemn any man for an Heretick because of the verbal alterations and disceptations in Schools whether what Figure or Tropus Metonymia or Synechdoche or praedicatio inusitata it may be called Likewise it is clear and manifest that Jesus Christ hath promised to be present with us and all Believers as true God and Man with his assistance and grace Spirit and gifts power and operation which no Christian can deny But to infer and conclude thereby that also his body flesh and bones must necessarily be present with us all creatures on earth That is no ways plain and evident so that some of their own Divines do contradict it themselves by other manifest and plain testimonies of the Scripture And thus much may we say of all other different Points of Doctrine betwixt us and them and also of the Controversie of Predestination and Election and what doth depend on it wherein we next to the holy Scripture not onely refer our selves to Augustine Prosper Fulgentius and other Ancient Fathers and withal to the principal Scholastick Authors and Divines among Papists Thomas Scotus and others that followed them especially to the Modern Dominicans but also to Dr Luther himself and many Ancient learned Lutheran Divines Brentius Herbrand Flacius Hofmann Spannenberg Althamer Heshusius and others CHAP. VI. Which is the chief and principal Question in this present Difference of Religion and what are the safest means for the settlement of a Christian Vnity COnsiderirg exactly every thing that hitherto hath been declared it is apparently manifest thereby that all differences in matter of Religion that now adays are in agitation betwixt the said Christians especially betwixt those who acknowledge the holy Scripture to be the onely perfect Rule of their Faith and Religion meerly reside in this chief and cardinal question which if it were rightly and unanimously answered on all sides no doubt all such Contention and Controversie or all uncharitable Judging and Condemning would fall of it self and a happie Unitie might be setled among all Christians in Doctrine and Religion as much as may be necessary unto their salvation Namely Whether besides the holy Scripture it self such Interpretations and Consequences or Inferences which by some Teachers or Particular Churches that follow them are collected and deduced out of the Word of God according to the understanding they have for their part in the Scripture and held and received for certain undoubted or necessary expositions and consequences although they are not so plain and manifest that all other knowing and understanding Christians besides them may conceive them or as the Primitive Christian Church hath unanimously and undoubtedly received and taught ought yet to be absolutely necessary for all men unto salvation insomuch that all those that do not acknowledge and receive such Interpretations and Inferences as agreeable to Scripture may therefore be judged and condemned for Hereticks To which we directly answer No such matter But supppse that such Interpretations or Inferences were certain and true or in themselves necessary to be received by those that understand them yet they are not necessary for those that do not comprehend and conceive them as yet in their consciences neither can they therefore be judged as Vnbelievers but ought to be received as weak in faith according to the Apostles admonition Them that are weak in faith receive you but not to doubtful disputations not to judge their thoughts and to distract their consciences The main cause of all dissentions and differences in the Church of God I think rather even this to be the main and principal source and origine of all Divisions and Tyrannie in the Church of God that men set upon their own Interpretations Illations Comments Glosses Formula's Expressions which peradventure they pretend themselves to infer out of the Word of God according to the profunditie of their understanding or else adde thereunto out of Humane Traditions and Opinions as high nay a higher estimate and price and insist as vehemently thereupon as upon the Indubitable Word of God it self As if their words and expositions were as certain and necessary unto salvation as the Word of God yea as if they were able in some points to utter and deliver more plainly expresly fully and considerately the heavenly Mysteries then the holy Ghost hath expressed them in the whole Scripture Or as if all men did see whatsoever they think themselves to see and to know in the depth of their Understanding or though they do not see it yet were obliged to believe upon their word This this is the main and chief cause of all Divisions and Dissentions and of all unreasonable judging and condemning in the Universal Christian Church This is also the true fundamental point of Popery The Fundamental Point of Popery whereon all the Disputes and Controversies betwixt us and them depend That the Pope with his Prelates pretend to be an Infallible Judge of all different and doubtful Doctrines whose sentence and decision all men upon pain of damnation as certainly ought to believe and obey as the Word of God it self Upon this One onely ground all Popery is built And principally for this Point we are constrained to abandon it For otherwise for our part we could well yeeld to him his Primatum or Supremacie above all Bishops yea above Emperours and Kings as long as it pleaseth them upon condition he would not presume to take upon him Dominatum and ruling over mens consciences and expound also the Word of God the best he can and propound his sentence and opinion to his children within his Bishoprick or also to others that will believe and obey him if he would but acknowledge withal that he as well as others could erre and fail in those things which are not expresly and plainly
deny or omit what God hath ordained and commanded Whereby we should give yet a more dangerous offence first to our own Conscience who have the knowledge thereof out of the Word of God and then to others whether they have the knowledge thereof or not not only to do against erroneus or weak but against true-beleeving Consciences and withall against Gods command it self IV. But most of all when such false Doctrine or Religion which God hath forbidden is pressed upon us not only as sound and true but as necessary unto salvation or on the contrary when the true sound Doctrine and worship which God hath commanded is forbidden and condemned not only as unnecessary or erroneous but even as hereticall Which also if we did confesse or practice that and did deny or omit this against Conscience would not only prove a common sinne and offence to our and our neighbours Conscience but also idolatry and a denying of God For since we ought not to give way that such things which God in the Gospel left free and indifferent unto us as for example the Mosaicall distinction of meats or the Circumcision which was injoyned to the people of Israel in the Law should be as necessary imposed on us lest we might seek our salvation without Christ Gal. 5 v. 1 2 3 4. How much lesse then ought we to countenance those things which God hath absolutely forbidden whereby we would seek our salvation not only without but against Christ and because of mens Traditions and Doctrines make Gods commandement of none effect Matth. 15. v. 6. Whether and how farre we may separate ourselves in the doctrine and religion of the erroneous Church V. From whence we conclude further when we because of such erroneous doctrine or Religion inforced upon us as necessary against the Word of God as much as in our conscience we may have knowledge of it are cried downe for Hereticks condemned excommunicated shut out and cut off from the Christian Church and the communion of the Saints That then we have not only good reason but also are in conscience bound and constrained of necessity and force to separate our selves and with-draw from that Church thus proceeding with us And not consequently those who of necessity as excommunicate and rejected men must separate themselves but those which do reject and force them to such a separation are properly guilty of the unjust uncharitable judging of mens Consciences and also of the scisme and division of all the miseries and distractions depending from the same VI. Yea that no man who in his Conscience acknowledgeth that this Doctrine is the truth of God which by such erroneous Churches or those that have charge over them is thus excommunicated and condemned may with a safe Conscience remaine in their outward communion and fellowship First because he cannot but play the Hypocrite and dissemble thereby against his own true beleeving Conscience and against the Word of God so that he would become to himselfe a heavie offence and stumbling blocke to his own conscience Then because he would also by his example be scandalous and offensive to other true beleevers who together with him did acknowledge the same and were excommunicated for it yea should strengthen and confirm their excommunication and condemnation as much as did lie in his power which certainly is a most grievous sinne not only against the confession of faith but against the Christian brotherly charitie Thirdly because he would also give an offence to the erring partie by confirming him both in such errours and in the uncharitable excommunication and condemnation with his own example and assent and by making himself partaker of their sinnes and persecutions VII Moreover when such Church or part of it although it doth maintaine such erroneous doctrine and religion yet inforceth it not upon ' its fellow-members as necessary nor excommunicateth or reiecteth them for it but in such erroneous points of doctrine permitteth the true-beleevers to inioy their liberty of conscience These then though they have reason to avoid and beware of the Communion of the erroneous doctrine and worship as of an abominable and pernicious leaven and to contradict it out of the word of God in due time and place with Christian charity and meeknesse yet in their other points of doctrine and Religion agreeable to the word of God ought not as yet utterly to withdraw and separate themselves from such a Church lest by their separation an occasion may be given to further scisme and division which many times is more prejudiciall and offensive then the errour it self Whereof we have set before our eyes not only the Prophets and other true-beleeving Israelites who lived in the idolatrous times at Bethel and during the Baal-service in Israel and yet not bowed their knees unto him But also the example of Christ himself and his Disciples before and after his ascension who did not separate themselvs from the Jewish Temple and Synagogues as long as they could be tolerated in them because of the leven of the Pharisees and Saduces yea the Lord rather exhorted them that though they should take heed and beware of the leven Mat. 16. v. 6. yet should labour to do and to observe whatsoever the Scribes and Pharisees did bid them observe in Moses seat out of the law Matth. 23. v. 1 2. VIII Out of all this we inferre yet further When and how farre we may undergo the Refomation If not only private particular persons but whole Congregations or the greatest and principall part of them especially they that have charge over them acknowledge and discover by the Word of God any dangerous errour and abuse which hath peradventure taken root in them Whereby somewhat that is erroneous and pernicious is added or somewhat that is sound and necessary is diminished or perverted in the Vniversall indubitable saving doctrine and worship That then they have good reason yea are bound in their Conscience and function to reform such dangerous abuses and errours according to the Word of God and the example of the Primitive undoubted Apostolicall Church yea withall to exhort and animate out of Gods Word other Congregations unto like Reformation lest they cast any further stumbling block and occasion to fall both in their own and their posterities way Deut. 13. Jos 22. Judg. 6. v. 10. 1 Sam. 7. 1 Chron. 13. 15. 2 Chron. 15. 17. 29. 30. 31. 34. c. 1 Cor. 5. v. 7. 11. v. 16. Gal. 5. v. 1.10 Revel 2. v. 5.14 15.24 3. v. 2 3. Yet so that they do not therefore rashly condemn other particular Churches which do not acknowledge such errours but rather carefully endeavour to conserve the bond of Christian charity and unity in the rest of the Universall undoubted Doctrine till they are likewise edified by their example and delivered from such dangerous errours But if other particular Churches are so much scandalized and offended at such
Doctrine and Ceremonies which they have added in the latter hundred yeers without and against Gods Word Also there are two sorts of people amongst them The One who in their Christianity onely and principally cleave to the indubitable universal Apostolick Creed which they with us are baptized unto so that they seek onely 〈◊〉 salvation in Jesus Christ the crucified as their own Mediator and Saviour and testifie such beleef of theirs in the effect by Christian charity and godly conversation who also consequently will not condemn us as Hereticks who are united in spirit with them in such universal saving Faith working through love much lesse persecute us with hostility unlesse it were out of meer ignorance because they have no true information of our Doctrine and Faith How should we then condemn them Much more reason have we to account such Catholicks for true Evangelical and not for Popish Christians because their salvation is grounded not upon their own merits and satisfaction or upon other Popish traditions and Auxiliary concomitant means but onely upon the meer grace of God and the precious Redemption of our Lord Jesus Christ And that there hath been at all times a great number of such people and are still at this present even in the midst of Popery not onely the experience of them that live amongst them but their own Books before and after Luther's times do testifie it As Bernardi Anselmi Gersonis Tauleri Thomae de Kempis Erasmi Cassandri Feri Cardinalis Contareni Hosij Pighij Coloniensium in Anti-didagmate Enchiridio and of a great many more Especially their ancient Manuals concerning Meditations upon death which were commonly used a great while before Luther's times wherein the dying persons from all meritorious works and satisfaction and from all other humane means of salvation are onely directed to the precious merit and intercession of the onely Mediator and Redeemer Jesus Christ Formulae interrogandi infirmos inter Epistolas Anselmi Ars benè moriendi Monachi cujusdam Cisterciensis Hortulus Animae Georg. Cassander in Append. Opusc Joh. Roffensis Hosius in Confess Petricov cap. 73. Sacerdotale Roman Edit Venet. Ann. 1555. fol. 116. Sacra Institutio baptizandi Edit Paris Ann. 1575. fol. 35. Ordo baptizandi cum modo visitandi Edit Venet. Ann. 1575. fol. 34. In which Book the Spanish Inquisitors have ordained in their twofold Indice Expurgatorio Annis 1584. 1612. to deface and omit these Questions and Answers following Sacerdos Credis non propriis meritis sed Passionis Domini nostri Jesu Christi virtute merito ad gloriam pervenire Respondeat infirmus Credo Sacerdos Credit quòd Dominus noster Jesus Christus pro nostra salute mortuus sit quod ex propriis meritis vel alio modo nullus possit salvari nisi in merito passionis ejus Respondeat infirmus Credo By the Omission of which words they testifie against themselves that those amongst them who examined the dying persons upon this beleef wherein the principal fundamental Doctrine of salvation consisteth and died upon it have been verily addicted to our Evangelical Faith and Doctrine of the Church and not to their Popish beleef and doctrine And although such men have also adhered in their ignorance to some erroneous opinions according to the common course of those times out of want of better information yet they cannot be condemned or accounted for non-Evangelical because they fixed their comfort and hope of their salvation not upon such erroneous Doctrines not upon merits and invocation of Saints not upon Masses for the souls of the deceased 〈◊〉 â—pon Indulgences not upon Monastical orders and such other like things but onely upon Gods meer grace and mercy in Christ Jesus the crucified To the Objection that may be made That they neverthelesse went to Masse which we count Idolatrie and consequently must condemn all those as meer Idolaters We answer That such men went to Masse in the simplicity of their heart not even according to the new Masse-doctrine which but in the Councel of Lateran Ann. 1218. and after in the Councel of Trent was canonized but according to the pure ancient and simple beleef of Christs words in the holy Communion wherein even yet the moderate Papists so far must agree with us that it is Sacrificium commemorativum A Commemoration and Remembrance of Christs Sacrifice finished upon the Crosse and a spiritual meat of our souls Wherefore there is no doubt but many religious and pious hearts have at all times understood and eaten it after a spiritual sort who heard little or nothing of the Scholastical disceptations of Transubstantiation and had not yet known the depths of Satan as was said of those in Thyatira Revel 2. v. 24. Or have expresly rejected them and beleeved nothing else concerning the Holy Communion but what next to Augustine and other ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church Bertramus or Ratramus in the times of Carolus Calvus when the disputes of this subject had their first beginning hath declared in his Book De Corpore Sanguine Christi who at all times was accounted for a true Catholick Teacher And though some had beleeved the real and corporal presence and oral manducation of Christs Body in the Masse Yet we should have as little reason to condemn them as the Lutherans if they have but grounded the principal comfort and hope of their salvation not upon the carnal but spiritual eating of Christs Body as being the onely Sacrifice and Propitiation for their sins Likewise though they have much declined in the Ceremonies of the Masse from Christs first Institution and have added thereunto many humane partly superstitious partly idolatrous Ceremonies Yet all those cannot presently be accounted for damnable Idolaters who in those times and places where the Supper of the Lord was not otherwise to be had nor the errour made yet so apparently evident went to the common Masse in their simplicity because of the remnant of Christs Institution therein to the end that they might be made partakers of Christs Body and Blood for the quickning of their souls Like as they used the Holy Baptism for to cleanse and wash them from their sins notwithstanding the superstitious humane Ceremonies that were added thereunto Who also though they kneeled down before the consecrated bread and wine being a Sacramental token of remembrance and exhibitive signe of Christs Body and Blood like as the Lutherans also at the administration of their Communion and the Reformed Protestants in England use to do Yet have not fixed the Adoration and confidence of their hearts on the bread and wine but on Christ himself sitting on the right hand of his Father in Heaven And therefore are much lesse to be esteemed Idolaters then for their kneeling and bowing down before painted 〈◊〉 carved Crucifixes which Christ never ordained for signes of remembâ—◠〈◊〉 instead of adoring Jesus Christ in Heaven Though we must confesse that all such things have been used in Popery at
and separate us from the righteous party in the profession of the Truth calling good evil and light darknesse Cursed be he that perverteth the judgement of the stranger fatherlesse and widow Deuteron 27. vers 19. Should he then not be guilty also of the curse that would wilfully pervert or deny the judgement of the Church yea the Judgement and Truth of God Whereby they also though in their own persons they might not be inclinable to condemn and persecute any man would yet make themselves by their assent partakers of the condemnation and persecution which proceedeth from others who according to the prophesie of Christ shall hate and reproach us separate us from their company and cast out our name as evil Luke 6. vers 22. To let passe how they scandalize others in their conscience by such dissembling and denying both the true beleevers from whom they separate themselves and the erring whom they confirm with their example in the errour whereas they might have induced and perswaded them by a free profession of the known Truth at least to a further inquisition or also to a brotherly reconciliation Now although we cannot generally judge any thing else of the obstinate erring and of such dissembling persons but that they in this manner live in a dangerous condition of their souls and even for this reason we exhort them as tenderly as they love their own salvation to the knowledge and profession of Truth or at least to the mitigation of their uncharitablenesse Yet we may not therefore instantly and rashly condemn the persons but rather hope and pray to God he may if not now by our admonition yet finally before their last gasp illuminate and bring the erring unto the knowledge of the Truth or unto Christian love and reconciliation and move the dissembling to a sound and wholesome Confession Conclusion of the second Part. NOw by the Declaration of this Apostolick Rule even the most unlearned Christian may sufficiently learn both what and how far we ought not to judge and what and how far we ought to judge in controverted and different matters of Religion The Sum and result of it is this 1. We ought to judge and condemn none as Unbeleeving if he doth but closely retain the Universal Undoubted Fundamental Doctrine of Faith and love of Christ which is necessary for all men unto Salvation 2. Although he doth not receive our own or our particular Churches and Teachers Opinions and Interpretations which we acknowledge as agreeable to Scripture and necessary for us to beleeve because he hath no knowledge of them as yet out of the Word of God 3. On the contrary although he adheres to his own or his particular Churches and Teachers singular Opinions which he esteemeth to be consonant to Scripture and necessary for him to beleeve Yet to such Opinions which are uncertain or unnecessary or erroneous also and repugnant to the Word of God or to the saving fundamental Doctrine it self by a necessary consequence 4. As long as he doth not acknowledge such consequence and retaineth but the fundamental Doctrine it self positively and without any mutilation and doth also not erre out of malice of heart but onely out of weaknesse of understanding 5. As long as he doth not make quite fundamental Doctrines of them nor imposeth them on others as necessary neither judgeth and condemneth others therefore or disturbeth the Church of God with prejudicial and unnecessary disputes 6. As long also as he doth not obstinately reject better information but rather laboureth to search further the Truth in the Word of God and to testifie his Faith by Christian charity and godly conversation So that he is not to be accounted for an obstinate unfaithful schismatical heretick but for a weak Beleever and erring Brother Contrarywise 1. They that will have their own erroneous or controverted and unnecessary opinions to be necessary fundamental Doctrines in so much that they repose their comfort and hope of salvation in them 2. Which they also inforce upon others as necessary fundamental Doctrines or judge condemn exclude and separate from the Communion of the Christian Church others therefore whereby they cause Schisms and Divisions in the Church of God 3. Especially such opinions which are not onely doubtful and erroneous but also repugnant to the true undoubted Articles of Faith and fundamental Doctrine if not directly and expresly yet by a necessary consequence 4. They also who cruelly and uncharitably persecute others because of such humane opinion and thereby occasionate not onely Schisms in the Church but distempers and distractions in Common-wealths 5. And that not meerly out of ignorance and humane infirmity but out of a wilful blindnesse and malice so that they will not hearken nor receive any information of the Truth much lesse search into it themselves but obstinately oppose it out of carnal blinded affections Those we may and must thus far judge out of the Word of God First Concerning the matter it self That we no wayes make our selves partakers of such errours and other sins arising from thence but had rather be condemned rejected separated and persecuted by them lest we may become a stumbling block and offence first to our own then to other true beleeving or erring consciences Secondly As much as concerneth the persons That though we cannot judge any thing else of such persons in general but that they in this manner are in a dangerous and damnable condition yet we condemn none in particular First Because we cannot directly discern in no man whether he doth erre out of humane weaknesse or obstinate malice Secondly Because though he did erre out of malice yet we ought still to hope seek and pray to God for his conversion and commit the judgement concerning him to the Soveraign Judge Would to God That all that are called Christians or at least Catholicks and Evangelical did agree with us herein with one minde seeing that all those that will not proceed against conscience nor parallel and equal mens words with Gods word neither place themselves in Gods Tribunal must herein agree Then the Christian love and peaceablenesse would raign instead of this unhappy Schism cruel distraction and lamentable devastation of Christendom And the easiest and safest way be opened unto right Christian Unitie in the Doctrine of Truth instead of the manifold dissensions and differences in Doctrine and Religion The Apostle Paul hath not onely most earnestly and faithfully exhorted us all in general and especially the Romane Church to which he directeth his Epistle but also added most efficacious and pregnant motives thereunto Wherefore let us not judge one another any more Why That is evident by the precedent words We shall all stand before the Judgement-Seat of Christ So then every one of us shall give accompt of himself to God Rom. 14. v. 10 12. Like as he writeth to the Corinthians Therefore judge nothing before the time untill the Lord come who both will bring to light the hidden things of darknesse and will make manifest the counsels of the heart and then shall every man have praise of God 1 Cor. 4. v. 5. If we had that great day of Judgement of the Lord continually set before our eyes especially the Divines and Ecclesiasticks who before all others should be the Sons of Peace Luke 16. v. 6. yea the true Ambassadours of Peace Isai 33. v. 7. 52. v. 7. Nah. 1. v. 15. whereas many are Authors of most of the disturbances in the Christian Church by their unchristian judging and condemning They would not be so rash and severe in judging one another but every one would first think and consider with himself how we shall give once an accompt of our selves before that Tribunal And though we must judge for conscience sake because of our function yet we should not more rigourously judge others then we our selves desire to be judged by the Lord viz. not for our ignorances nor for our weaknesse not for every faulty word nor according to other mens words or traditions of men or humane opinions yea not after the severity of Gods Law nor uncertain doubtful Interpretations of the Word of God But onely according to the undoubted saving Gospel of Grace and Truth of Christ in Fatherly goodnesse tendernesse grace and mercy Wherefore we conclude with the words of the Apostle James 2. v. 12 13. So speak ye and so do as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty For he shall have judgement without mercy that hath shewed no mercy And mercy rejoyceth against judgement To him the Father of Judgement and Father of Mercy be adscribed all honour and praise for ever and ever Amen FINIS