perswade not move the mind to assent without the inward testimony of the holy Ghost But the Spirit of God when he once breedeth this most assured perswasion in our minds that the doctrine which is contained in the holy Bible is of a truth the will of God and worketh that comfort and change of our minds and hearts which is promised and taught in this book by our experience and feeling it is so confirmed that while this remaineth within us though all Angels and men should say contrary yet we would beleeve this to be the voice of God but if that remaine not or be not in us though all should say it yet we would not beleeve it Neither doth not the Spirit therefore establish the authority of the Scripture Object The Scripture beareth witnesse of the Spirit therefore the Spirit not of it Answer because we are to examine what the Spirit speaketh within us by the rule of the Scripture for before that this is done of us the Spirit himselfe declareth unto us that the Scripture is the word of God and inspired by him and that he will teach us nothing in our hearts which is not agreeable unto that testimony before set down of him in the Scripture And if this be not first most certainly perswaded us of the Spirit himselfe we will never re-call our opinions of God and his worship to the Scripture as the only rule to try them by Now then after it is declared unto us by divine inspiration that the Scripture is a sufficient witnesse of that divine revelation in our hearts then at length do we find our selves to be confirmed by the mutuall testimony of the same Spirit in the Scripture and in our hearts and we beleeve the Scripture affirming of it self 2 Tim. 3. 2 Pet. 1. That it was delivered by divine inspiration to the holy men of God 6 For what cause no doctrine besides the holy Scripture is to be received in the Church The Scripture is of God therefore the rule of faith Whereas it appeareth unto us that it is the word of God which the Prophets and Apostles have left in writing there is no man which doth not see that the Scripture must be the rule square by which all things which are taught done in the Church must be tried Now all things of which there useth to rise questions in the Christian Church do appertain either unto doctrine or unto discipline and ceremonies That the word of God ought to be the rule unto both sorts it is out of doubt But in this place we speak of the doctrine of the Church which consisteth in the sentences and decrees which we are bound by the commandement of god to beleeve or obey and therefore they cannot be changed by the authority of any creature and they are become obnoxious unto the wrath of God whosoever submit not themselves in faith and obedience unto them To these decrees and precepts the Papists adde many sentences which not only are no where delivered in Scripture but are repugnant unto it and they contend That the Church or the Bishops have authority of decreeing yea contrary and besides the Scripture what the Church must beleeve or doe and that mens consciences are bound by those decrees no lesse then by the words of the holy Scripture to beleeve or obey Contrariwise we beleeve and confesse That no doctrine is to be proposed unto the Church not only if it be repugnant unto the holy Scripture but if it be not contained in it And whatsoever either is not by the expresse testimony of the holy Scripture delivered or doth not consequently follow out of the words of the Scripture rightly understood that we hold may be without hurt of conscience beleeved or not beleeved changed abrogated and omitted The difference of the Scripture and of other mens opinions For we must ever hold a necessary difference between the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and the writings and doctrine of others in the Church The Scripture only is of it selfe to be beleeved the rule of faith That the Scripture onely neither hath nor can have any errour in any matter other teachers both may erre and oftentimes also doe erre when they depart from the written word of God Againe that the Scriptures are beleeved on their own word because we know that God speaketh with us in them others have credit not because themselves say so but because the Scripture witnesseth so neither a whit more then they can prove by the Scripture Wherefore we do not reject others doctrine and labours in the Church but only setting them in their owne place we submit them unto the rule of Gods word This doctrine first is delivered of God himselfe and that not in one place only of the Scripture as You shall not adde unto the word which I spake unto you neither shall you take away from it And I protest unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecie of this booke Dent. 4. Revel 22. if any man shall adde unto thâ—se things God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in this booke And if any man shall diminish of the words c. Neither only by these words is forbidden that no false things and openly repugnant to the written word be added to the doctrine of the Church but also that no uncertaine things or things not appertaining unto it be mingled therewith For it is not in the power of any creature to pronounce what we are to thinke of God and his will but this is onely to be learned out of that which is disclosed in his word And therefore the men of Beraea are commended Who searched the Scriptures daily Acts 17. whether these things were so 2 Faith is grounded only on the Word Secondly faith which is spoken of in the Church is a part of divine worship that is the sure assent by which we embrace every word of God delivered unto us because it is impossible for us to be deceived by it if we understand it aright Further also that it may breed in us a true worshipping of God and comfort of our soules it must stand sure and immoveable against temptations But there is no certain doctrine concerning God and Religion besides that which is knowne to be revealed in his word We may not therefore give the honour which is due unto God unto men neither may we go from certaine things to uncertaine but cleave only to the word of God in the doctrine concerning Religion and therefore humane decrees must not be accounted amongst those which we are to imbrace by faith Faith cometh by hearing hearing by the word of God c. 3 Things necessary to be beleeved or done are part of divine worship But things not prescribed are no part of divine worship Therefore they are not necessary Thirdly for so much as the worship of God is a worke commanded of God performed
evils And these though hell repines doth he work and witnes by the miserable cryes of men As it is said 2 Cor. 10.4 The weapons of our warfare are not carnall but mighty through God to the pulling down of the strong holds casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalteth it self against the knowledge of God and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ And having in a readinesse to revenge all disobedience when your obedience is fulfilled As therefore the basenes of the vessell detracts nothing from the worth of the wares it containeth so our meane and infant expression of the doctrine may not so far be slighted as than it should derogate one whit from the weight of those motives which invite you to an ardent study of Divinity But whiles I meditate with my self that I am to take a view of some of those motives in this rehearfall Preface I am sensibly so overwhelmed with an infinite masse of matter of main importance that scarcely can I resolve whence to make an entrance But seeing that some of them must come into consideration The necessity of Catechismal instruction is pressed from these motives 1. Gods command we will put that foremost which ought to rule all our actions and indeavours namely the serious will of God expressed in apparent commands For now we which are citizens of the Church have conference together and know for certain that the books of the Prophets and Apostles are most infallible declarations of the mind and will of God And in them here and there are certain precepts delivered and rehearsed which injoyn men a diligent search and knowledg of the doctrine contained in those books Such is the precept of the Decalogue touching the Sabbath Such is that speech of our Saviour Luke 10.41 One thing is necessary The knowledge of this wisdom saith he is eternall life This David commendeth as frequently in other places so in the first Psalme which he writeth as an Epitomie of it for that it is a companion of true blessednes But these have not satisfied our man-loving heavenly Father that is solicitous of our salvation He addeth further peculiar precepts touching that summe of doctrine that is to be published to all especially the youth namely the doctrine of Catechismall instruction Deut. 4.9 Teach them thy sons Deut. 6.6 7. These words shall be in thine heart Thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children c. And thou shalt binde them for a signe upon thine hand and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes Here doe we heare Parents and those to whom the charge of Parents is committed commanded that they care to teach or see taught the youth the youth commanded that they learne and both are commanded that they daily inculcate rehearse and meditate on this doctrine This doctrine would the Lord have both to be delivered unto children and also to be in our view continually And its apparent that brevity and plainnes are required which what else they but a Catechisme or summe of doctrine neither prolixe nor obscure So Saint Paul 2. Tim. 1.13 Hold fast the forme of sound words which thou hast heard of mee in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus In this precept of using and holding his Catechisme we heare the definition of ours The forme of sound words of Câ—â—echismâ—l instructâ—oâ— described 1 More largely The Apostle meaning a draught or plat-forme of sound positions concerning each point of doctrine methodically and briefly comprised as if it were painted before the eye together with a kinde and maner of teaching and expression as is both proper plain and agreeable with the stile of the Prophets and Apostles Therefore doth he name sound words delivered by him concerning faith and love in Christ i.e. in the knowledge of Christ as in sundry places he reduceth all piety to faith and love A Catechisme then is a summe of doctrine delivered by the Prophets and Apostles concerning faith and love in Christ 2 More briefly two wayes Or is a summe of doctrine of Christianity briefly methodically and plainly couched together For it is not for us to invent opinions but of necessity we must referre our selves as it is Esay 8.20 to the Law and the Testimony And there must be added an exposition which may be both a manifestation of the parts and method and an interpretation of words and phrases This reason if there were no more is of efficacy to them that are not of prophane minds to excite them to the study of this sacred doctrine For to such the command of God is a cause of all causes though nothing more be added But when as God is so indulgent to our weaknes as to declare unto us the causes of this command needs must we weigh them wtih reverence Now God avoucheth that therefore must we learn this doctrine because by the knowledge thereof 2. Motive our salvation and not any other way will he convert and save all that by age are of understanding and are to be made heires of eternall life Marvelous confidently is that spoken of Saint Paul Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is the power of God to salvation c. And 1 Cor. 1.18 The preaching of the Crosse is to them that perish foolishnesse but unto us which are saved it is the power of God And Ver. 21. It pleased God by the fool shnesse of preaching to save them that beleeve But this opinion howsoever it be delivered and confirmed by divers and weighty testimonies of the holy Spirit is oppugned by the utmost endeavours of Sathan Against the Zwenckfâ—â—dians touching the point of the â—fficacy of the Spirit by the ministiy of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the Father of lyes seeing how the Paradox of the foolishnesse of preaching the Crosse of Christ doth not a little pierce the minds of men snatcheth an occasion of suborning fanaticall minded men who cry out that the worke of the ministry is nothing lesse than the means of converting men but that God communicates himself to us immediately and that wee Ministers make our voice an Idoll They babble forth many wonderfull words carrying with them indeed a shew of special illumination but heare and consider I pray upon what foundation they relye and how they oppose their wisedome to the divine The omnipotent God say they doth not at all need that voice ministry reading meditation to convert men Therefore he useth not this instrument neither is a necessity of labour in learning it to be imposed upon those that are to be saved Now say I to you young men Is there any one among you so weak and childish in judgment that doth not perceive such a one to be hissed at that would so argue God can by his omnipotency easily bring to passe that one without bookes teachers study should become skilfull in all learning and doctrine as the Apostles and others of the Primitive Church spake with tongues
When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin Jam. 1.15 and sin when it is finiâ—â—ed bringeth forth death Here say they James saith that there is one sin finished when as the will upon deliberation consenteth to evill lust another not finished when a man sinneth without deliberation and to sin finished he ascribeth that it bringeth forth death We answer that the consequence of this is not oâ— force because that a property which belongeth to divers kinds when it is ascribed to one kind it followeth not thereof that it is to be removed from the other Actuall sin is an effect of Originall sin and a cause of death which though purchased by Originall yet is aggravated by Actuall For S. James distinguisheth the kinds or degrees of sins Originall and Actuall and saith that death followeth after Actuall not as if death did not follow after Originall but because that actuall is a middle between Originall sin and death as a cause of this and an effect of that and doth aggravate death or punishment which already was purchased by Originall sin Neither doth he chiefly speak of the degrees of punishments but of the cause and originall of them to be sought in the corruption of our owne nature Object 8. It is said Jam. 3.2 In many things we sin all Hence our adversaries will prove That the sins of the just are Veniall because they fall either into few sins or into no mortall sins To this as also to most of that which hath gone before we answer that the sins of the just who by faith retain or receive righteousnesse are Veniall not of their owne nature but by grace Gods justice is not at variance with his mercy though it judge the least sin worthy of eternall death Object 9. God is not cruell but mercifull nâ—â—â—her light in his love but constant Wherefore he doth not for every light sin judge a man worthy of eternall punishments Answ But they imagine that the judgement of God concerning sinne is at variance with his mercy which two are not at variance but do very well agree For God is in such wise mercifull as he is also just Now the justice of God requireth that hee judge all even the least offence and contempt of his majesty worthy of eternall damnation This judgement against every sin the mercy and constancy of Gods love doth not take away but for the shewing and declaring thereof it is sufficient that hee rejoyceth not at the destruction of them that perish and that for testimony thereof he inviteth all to repentance and forgiveth them who repent their sins which by themselves were worthy of everlasting death that is hee punisheth them and causeth satisfaction for them not in the sinners but in his owne Son sent to take flesh by punishment answering and satisfying his justice Object 10. It is said Mat. 5.19 Whosoever shall break one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of Heaven This they interpret after this sort That he who both by sin and teaching doth against the Law is fallen from the Kingdome of God and not he who in teaching subscribeth to the Law although sometimes he doth a little contrary to that he teacheth But the opposition or contrariety which Christ addeth But whosoever shall observe and teach them the same shall be called great in the Kingdome of God doth shew that Christ in the former part of the speech doth understand those who breake that is violate the Law which they teach so that the meaning is Although one teach well and yet violate one of these commandements which the Pharisees terme the least that is of the commandements of the Decalogue hee shall find these commandements so not to be the least but the greatest as himselfe thereby shall become the least that is in no place in the Kingdome of God Albeit it be granted unto them that in the words of Christ to teach so is the same that to teach contrary to the Law yet can it not at all be gathered thence that they alone shall be the least in the Kingdome of God who by teaching and sinning break the Law and not they also who by sinning only and not teaching Christ calleth them the least not as in his owne judgement but as in the judgement of the Pharisees and so he imitateth them in thus speaking transgresse it The first reason is in the very words of Christ because he calleth those commandements the least by a figure of speech called Imitation which are the greatest and the breach whereof whether it be committed in deed or in doctrine or in both God judgeth worthy the shutting out of his Kingdome even by our adversaries confession that is the whole Decalogue which the Pharisees did set behind their traditions The second reason is in the words which Christ addeth For I say unto you Except your righteousnes exceed the righteousnes of the Scribes and Pharisees ye shall not enter into the Kingdome of heaven In these words Christ sheweth that a far other righteousnesse is required by the Law of God then the Pharisees thought of and that those sins also are so great that they shut men out of the Kingdome of heaven which the Pharisees accounted either for light or no sins as to be angry with thy brother unadvisedly to say unto him Racha or foole to be troubled with an evill affection or desire of revenge for even these things also he saith are to be avoided if we will avoid hell fire and be the children of our heavenly Father Therefore he saith Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her Mat. 5.28 hath committed adultery with her already in his heart And Whosoever hateth his brother is a man-slayer and yee know that no man-slayer hath eternall life abiding in him 1 John 3.15 And therefore not they only which commit the greater sins but they also who commit the lesser cannot escape everlasting death but by the satisfaction of Christ imputed to them But as our adversaries accuse this sentence of too much rigour Sin made veniall unto the repentant by grace for the intercession and satisfaction of Christ That all sinnes are by themselves of their owne nature Mortall that is deserve eternall death so also the other sentence That sins are made Veniall to those that repent which of their owne nature are Mortall they reprehend as too gentle and repugnant to Gods justice because to call that Veniall which is Mortall is contrary to truth and justice But the answer is ready That God if we respect the nature of sin adjudgeth all sin worthy of everlasting death and giveth pardon to none but of free grace for the intercession and satisfaction of his Son our Mediatour The third division of sin THere is sin against the conscience and sin not against the conscience Sin against the conscience Sin against the conscience is when a man knowing
the death of the wicked but that the wicked turne from his way and live For thou art not a God that loveth wickednesse neither shall evill dwell with thee The foolish shall not stand in thy sight God made man righteous Eccles 7.31 but they have sought many inventions Our unrighteousnesse commendeth the righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.5 Rom. 5.12 Rom. 7.18 Sin ariseth from man himselfe By one man sin entred into the world and death by sin I know that in me there dwelleth no good thing Of this we conclude that God is not the author of sinne but that the originall of evill springeth from man himselfe by the instigation of the Divell yet so neverthelesse that wee say that the Divell being at the first corrupted did corrupt man but could have done nothing except man of his owne accord had consented to evill The cause of sin is to be sought in our first father through the Divels instigation and so by descent to be found in us Here are we to remember againe the fall of our father Adam God made Adam to his owne image and similitude that is he made him most good uncorrupt holy righteous and immortall he furnished him with most excellent gifts that nothing might be wanting unto him to all blessednesse in God Wherefore his Understanding was wholly divine his Will most free and most holy he had power of doing good and evill a law was given him of God which shewed him what hee should doe or what hee should not doe For the Lord said Gen. 2.17 Thou shalt not eat of the tree of knowledge both of good and evill God simply required of him Obedience and Faith and that the whole Adam should depend of him and that not constrained by necessity but should doe it freely Eccles 15.14 15. God made man from the beginning and left him in in the hand of his counsell saying If thou wilt thou shalt observe the commandements and testifie thy good will Therefore when the Serpent tempted man and counselled him to taste of the forbidden tree man was not ignorant that the counsell of the Serpent did not agree with the commandement of God Gen. 2.17 Yee shall not eat of the tree neither shall yee touch it lest ye die Wherefore it was in the hand of his counsell to ear or not to eat God declared unto him his will plainly charging him that he should not eat and adding the perill he did withdraw him from eating lest perhaps thou die Satan also as neither could he did not use any force but did probably move him unto it and at length did overcome him for when the will of the woman declined to the word of the Divell her mind departed from the word of God and rejecting a good law she committeth an evill work Afterwards she drew on her husband willingly following her to be partaker of her sinne That doth the Scripture inculcate in these words Gen. 3.6 So the woman seeing that the tree was good for meat and that it was pleasant to the eyes and a tree to be desired to get knowledge took of the fruit thereof and did eat and gave also to her husband with her and he did eat Here have you the beginning of evill the Divell and that which moved the Will of man that is the false commendation of the Divell and even as a meere lye and the delectable shew and sightlinesse of the tree Wherefore Adam and Eve doe of their owne accord that which they doe being led with a hope of more excellent wisdome which the Seducer had lyingly promised them We conclude therefore that sinne hath his beginning not from God who forbideth evill but from the Divell and the free electron of man The beginning of sin from the Divell and the free election of man corrupted by his seducement which was corrupted by the Divels falshood And therefore the Divell and mans corrupted will obeying him are the most true cause of sinne This evill floweth from our first Parents unto all their posâ—erity so that sinne hath not else-whence his beginning then from our selves and our corrupt judgement and wicked will and the suggestion of Sathan For an evill root and that first corruption bringeth forth of it a rotten branch agreeable to the nature thereof which Sathan now also setteth forward and laboureth it as it were plants by his guiles and lies but in vaine doth hee labour except we yeeld our selves to be fashioned and dressed by him That is called Originall sinne which proceedeth from the first Originall that is was derived from the first Patents into all by propagation or generation for this sin we bring with us in our nature out of our mothers womb into this life I was borne in iniquitie Psal 51.5 and in sin hath my mother conceived mee And of the Divell Christ speaketh thus He hath been a murtherer from the beginning John 8.44 and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him When he speaketh a lye he speaketh of his owne For he is a lyar and the father thereof To this may be added this reason Sin the proper effect of a reasonable nature transgressing the Law That sin cannot be a proper and naturall effect of any cause but of that which hath power to doe against the Law but this no nature hath power to doe besides the nature of Angels and of men for God is a Law unto himselfe and cannot doe or intend any thing against his Law And other creatures whereas they are not endued with reason and therefore the Law not made for them they cannot commit sin because take away the Law and there is no place left for sin Wherefore it necessarily followeth that sin is such an effect as agreeth to those Angels alone who fell and to men If humane reason doe here object That God is the author and causer of punishment God the causer of sins as they are punishments but not as they are sins If therefore sins be the punishments of sins it followeth that God is the cause of sins We answer that there is a fallacy of the accident in the Minor For it cometh to passe by an accident that is by the fault of those who sin that when by the just judgement of God either themselves or others are punished by evill men they in the meane season God permitting that is not shewing them that hee would have those things to be done by them for to punish them which things yet hee hateth and which he will punish both in this life and the life to come do fulfill their desires swerving from the Law of God and estranging themselves more and more from God by sinning do purchase more grievous punishments unto themselves Or if we will distinguish the Major it is in effect the same For punishments come from God as author and causer of them as they are punishments but inasmuch as they are sins so they
1.42 Rom. 1.3 9.5 Coloss 1.22 1 John 4.2 and Abraham the fruit of Maries womb Also when he is said to be made of the seed of David according to the flesh to have a body of flesh to have come in the flesh Hitherto belong all those places which attribute unto Christ things proper unto man as to grow to eat to drink to be ignorant of some things to rest to be weary to be circumcised to be baptized to lament rejoyce c. 3. That two natures in Christ make one person Hither are referred the places which by the communicating of the properties of each nature attribute those things to the person of Christ which are proper to either his divine or humane nature The Word was made flesh He was made partaker of flesh and bloud God purchased the Church with his bloud Before Abraham was I am John 1.14 Heb. 2.14 Acts 20.28 John 8.25 Matth. 28.20 Heb. 1.1 1 John 4.3 Rom. 9.5 1 Cor. 2.8 I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world He spake unto us by his Son by whom he made the world Jesus Christ is come in the flesh Who is God over all praised for ever Had they known it they would not have crucified the Lord of glory 6. Whether there may be moe Mediatours There can be but one Mediatour because there is but one naturall Son of God THere is only one Mediatour between God and man the reason is because the Son only is Mediatour and can perform the office of the Mediatour And there is but one only naturall Son of God Object The Saints also make intercession for us therefore they are Mediatours Answ There is great difference between the intercession of Christ and of the Saints who live in the world and pray for themselves and others yea for their persecuters and enemies for the Saints depend upon the merit of Christ Christ on his own merit and Christ only offered himself a surety and a satisfier sanctifying himselfe for us that is presenting himself in our stead before Gods judgment seat which thing can no way be said of the Saints Object Where are many means there is not one Mediatour But there are many means of our salvation Therefore there is not one only Mediatour Ans The Major proposition we deny For it is one thing to be the means another thing to be the Mediatour of our salvation Of the COVENANT of God IT was said that the Mediatour is a person reconciling parties which are at variance to wit God and men Now this reconciliation in the Scriptures is termed The Covenant and Testament which is the Correlative that is hath a mutuall respect to the Mediatour for every Mediatour is the Mediatour of some covenant and a reconciler of parties who are at enmity Wherefore the doctrine which treateth of the Covenant of God is linked with the Place concerning the Mediatour The chief Questions hereof are these 1. What a Covenant is 2. Whether it can be made without a Mediatour 3. Whether there be but one and the same Covenant or more 4. In what the old and new Covenant agree and in what they differ 1. What a Covenant is What a Covenant in generall is A Covenant in generall signifieth a mutuall contract or agreement of two parties joyned in the Covenant whereby is made a bond or obligation or certaine conditions for the performance of giving or taking something with addition of outward signes and tokens for solemn testimony and confirmation that the compact and promise shall be kept inviolable Hence we easily collect the definition and nature of Gods Covenant What Gods Covenant with us is For it is A mutuall promise and agreement between God and men whereby God giveth men assurance that he will be gracious and favourable to them remit their sins bestow new righteousnesse his holy Spirit and life eternall for and by his Son our Mediatour And on the other side men bind themselves to faith and repentance that is to receive this so great a benefit with true faith and to yeeld true obedience unto God This mutuall compact between God and men is sealed and confirmed by outward badges and tokens Sacraments the signes of the Covenant A Testament which we call Sacraments that is sacred signes testifying Gods good will towards us and our thankfulnesse and obsequious dutifulnesse towards him A Testament is the last will of a Testator whereby hee at his death disposeth of his things what hee would have done concerning them Testament and Covenant of like signification In Scripture the name of Covenant and Testament to expresse significantly this Gods Covenant are used and taken alike for one and the same thing for both of them shew our reconciliation with God or the mutuall agreement between God and man Why our reconciliation is called a Covenant This agreement and reconcilement is called a Covenant because God promiseth unto us certain blessings and on the other side demandeth of us as a pledge our obedience using withall certain solemn ceremonies to the confirmation and strengthening of the contract Why it is also called a Testament It is called a Testament because this reconciliation was made by the death of the Testator Christ coming betweene that so it might be firme and ratified or because Christ hath purchased this our reconcilement with God by his death and hath left it unto us even as parents at their decease deliver their goods unto their children This reason is alledged in the Epistle to the Hebrews Heb. 9.15 16 17. For this cause saith the Apostle is he the Mediatour of the new Testament that through death they which were called might receive the promise of eternall inheritance For where a Testament is there must be the death of him that made the Testament For the Testament is confirmed when men are dead for it is yet of no force as long as he that made it is alive For while the Testator liveth he retaineth a right to change detract or add any thing The Hebrew word Berith only signifieth a Covenant not a Testament yet the Interpreters translate it by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word with the Greeks signifieth both a covenant and testament whence it is gathered that that Epistle was not written in Hebrew as some think but in Greek Acts 20.28 Obj. A Testament is ratified by the death of the Testator But God cannot die Therefore his Testament is not ratified or at leastwise this reconcilement may not be called a Testament Ans The Minor is to be denyed because God is said to have redeemed the Church with his bloud therefore he died but he died according to his humanity for Christ is the Testator who is both God and man but he died according to his humanity only 1 Pet. 3.18 The same is called an intercession in respect of Christ who by intercession worketh it and reconciliation in respect of us who are
workes of both creations Whatsoever things the Father doth the same things doth the Son also The Father sheweth him all things whatsoever hee himselfe doth Therefore not only the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preservation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickneth so the Son quickneth whom he will But the Father was from the very beginning the giver of corporall and spirituall life By him were all things created which are in heaven and which are on earth things visible and invisible whether they be thrones Coâ— 1.16 17. or dominions or principalities or powers all things were created by him and for him And he is before all things and in him all things consist Thus far of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Repl. 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Ans No Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Repl. 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and joyned to their head Ans But the new creation is called a restoring from sinnes and death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Repl. 3. By whom also hee made the worlds Heb. 1.2 The worlds that is the new Church Ans 1. God made the old also by him because it is one Church having one head and foundation 2. The Greek word ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is used in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And further when it is there added Bearing up all things by his mighty word those words speake of the preservation not onely of the Church but of all things And moreover hee rendreth a cause why hee is the heire not onely of the Church but of all creatures namely because he is the Creator and Preserver of all things Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth and the heavens are the worke of thine hands Repl. In these wordes hee converteth his speech to the Father to prove that hee was able by his power to lift up the Sonne to divine majesty Answ This is an impudent shift and elusion 1. Because it is said before But unto the Son which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2. Because the Psalme doth intreat of Christs kingdom and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be understood next and immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the Father Repl. 1. If hee made all things then the Father made them not by him John 5. â—9 Ans Both he made them and they were made by him Whatsoever things the Father doth the same doth the Sonne also And yet the Father doth them by him Repl. 2. The Creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of things is not attributed unto Christ Answ Hee is not compared with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme proveth The heavens shall perish but thou dost remanine Repl. 3. If hee were Creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sit at his right hand Ans Wee may invert this and say of the contrary rather if he were not equall he could not sit at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heaven and earth Who being in the forme of God Phil. 2.6 Esay 45.23 Rom. 14.11 Esay 41.12 Rev. 1.18 22.23 thought it no robbery to be equall with God Thus saith the Lord that created heaven Every knee shall bow unto mee This is said of Christ Againe I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laid the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heavens when I call them they stand up together These words Christ applyeth unto himselfe In it was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret that the Sonne of God is by himselfe the life In the Word was life as is the Father and the fountaine giver and maintainer of all life as well corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the very beginning of the world John 5.26 Hee hath given to the Sonne to have life in himselfe as the Father hath life in himselfe They construe it That the man Jesus is the quickner and giver of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saved These are their words Unto which we reply If hee give eternall life to all so that no man hath it without him Therefore either no man was quickned before he was born of Mary which were absurd or he was the quickner and giver of life from the beginning Even as John affirmeth this of him as being verified in him also before he was made flesh Neither can this be understood only of his merit whereby he deserveth this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that he is John 5.21 10.26 by his efficacy and effectuall working the quickner and reviver as himself expoundeth it and the adversaries themselves confesse So are we also to understand his illightning of men that is the knowledge of God the authour whereof he was in all even from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Son and hee to whom the Son will reveale him And John Baptist saith Mat. 11.27 John 1.18 No man hath seen God at any time the Son hath declared him The light shineth in darknesse And the light shined in the darknesse and the darknesse comprehended it not Wee interpret it That this word even from the beginning hath both by naturall light and by the voice of heavenly doctrine shewed God unto men but those who were not regenerated by his Spirit have not knowne this light They say That he shined not before hee began to preach Ans 1. If so then should he not have been the true light that is the authour of light and the knowledge of God but only a minister thereof as was John Baptist but the Evangelist in this respect maketh John Baptist diverse from Christ 2. He should not have been the illuminaâ—or of all men which yet themselves are faine to confesse Christ himselfe saith of himselfe and Saint John here of him Hee lighteth every man that cometh into the world that is either with naturall light or spirituall Hee was in the world and the world was made by him and the world knew him not Wee as touching the time hereof say He was in the world it was from the beginning of the world unto his incarnation all which time the Son of God hath in the world which was created by him shewed God unto men but is not knowne of men They construe it of the time of his preaching when he was not heard but despised and persecuted Ans
issuing of the bloud and posterity of the Woman and the Fathers and therefore to have been indeed begotten of the substance of Mary and to have taken true flesh By his office of Mediatourship The office of the Mediatour confirmeth the same The sinne of men in respect of Gods truth and justice could not be punished in any other nature than in a humane nature which should be of the same kind with ours But in the Mediatour which is Jesus Christ alone our sinnes were to be punished Therefore he must needs be true man who hath humane flesh not created of nothing or borne else-whence but sprung from the bloud of Adam as well as ours Moreover it was necessary for Christ not onely to take but also to retaine our nature for ever because God hath decreed to bestow and doth bestow the benefits which Christ by his death hath purchased for us by this man Christ upon them onely who are and remaine ingraffed into his masse and flesh as members into their head or branches into their Vine 1 Cor. 15.21 John 15.6 For since by man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead If a man abide not in me he is cast forth as a branch and withereth Lastly It behooved Christ to be made and to continue our brother for ever that as he is flesh of our flesh so we also of the other side might be flesh and bones of his flesh and bones by the same spirit dwelling in us Ephes 5.30 John 5.56 Ephes 4.12 16. Rom. 8.11 We are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones Wherefore except Christ had indeed taken our nature without which he cannot be our brother we should lose that comfort ever needfull and necessary for us which consisteth in the brotherhood onely of Christ with us I am of his flesh and of his bones Object 1. The flesh of Adam that is humane flesh issuing from Adam by generation unto his posterity is sinfull The flesh of Christ is not sinfull Therefore the flesh of Christ is not the flesh of Adam Answ The Major proposition hath a fallacy of the accident For it is not necessary that of whatsoever the accident of a thing is denied of the same the thing also or subject of the accident should be denied because an accident doth so cleave to the thing wherein it is as it may be separated from it Sin is not of the nature of mans flesh but an accident only thereof Sin is not of the essence and nature of humane flesh for that was created pure of God but sin came otherwise by the defection and falling of our first Parents from God Seeing then the flesh of Adam is sinfull only by an accident it followeth that the flesh of Christ is onely in respect of that accident not the flesh of Adam but is as touching the substance the same flesh with the flesh of Adam Wherefore they deale like Sophisters who deny the flesh of Christ for that it is void of sinne to be the same in substance or essence or kind with the flesh of Adam For he that could in the beginning create humane flesh pure of nothing he is able also by his omnipotent power and speciall working so to form it of the substance of the Virgin being a sinner as withall to let and stop any issuing of sin thereunto that is to make it puâ—e and holy There is no new or strange thing therefore if the omnipotent Lord hath taken humane substance without the accident sinne into the unity of his person Wherefore this their argument shall be rather thus inverted The flesh of Adam is true flesh Christs flesh is the flesh of Adam and therefore Christs flesh is true flesh and by a consequent Christ is true man See the explication of the 35 Question of the Catechisme Object 2. That which is conceived and begotten of another is of the same substance with him The flesh of Christ was conceived of the holy Ghost Therefore the flesh of Christ is no creature but came downe from heaven issuing from the substance of God Answ There is a faâ—â—acy in the diverse understanding of the particle of For that in the Major signiâ—â—eth the matter or materiall cause in the Minor the efficient cause onely that is That which is conceived or begotten of another transfusing or passing his substance or part of his substance into the thing begotten this is of the same essence with him who begot it Christs flesh was conceived by the holy Ghost not that he transfused or passed his substance into flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort he formed in the Virgins womb of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with originall sin Object 3. In God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Ans Meere particulars doe in force nothing For if the Major be taken universally it is false Whosoever is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Major therefore is true as touching God the Father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the Son incarnate Repl. 1. But nothing can be added unto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicity of his nature Christ is God Therefore the humanity could not be added to his divine nature Answ Nothing can be added to God by way of perfection that is whereby his essence may be changed and perfected but by way of copulation or union Now in that God the Word joyned the humane nature unto him personally there came no change or great perfection thereby to the Word which took it but to the nature which was taken Repl. 2. Humane nature cannot come unto him 1 Tim. 6. â—â— who dwelleth in the light that none can come unto Answ This is true if so God of speciall grace doth not assume and take it unto him Repl. 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ-man is God Answ The changing of the God-head into a creature would have been ignominious and reproachfull unto the Word but that the God-head should be united unto a creature is most glorious unto God as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowne his infinite both goodnesse and wisdome and justice and power to the whole world 2. Whether Christ be one person or moe IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures divine and humane is truly designed by the concrete termes or voyces of both natures For it is requisite that one and the same should be Mediatour both by merit and by power or efficacy But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Marcion and Nestorius See Iren. Lib. 3. cap. 17. advers haeret The one a man passive and crucified the other God not crucified
and only assisting the man Christ by his grace Object 1. In whom are two things which in themselves make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternity and the body and soule which being united make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Answ We deny that part of the Minor to wit That the body and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diverse from the person increate and eternall of the Word For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a body and reasonable soule is an individuall and particular or singular substance as being from other individuals of the same nature distinguished by certain properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person of subsistence For 1. A person is that which is not only a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not sustained in or of any other but Christs humane nature now from the very first beginning thereof dependeth and is sustained by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into unity of person and made proper unto the Word before and without which assumption or personall Union it neither was nor had been nor should be so that this Union being dissolved and loosed it must needs follow that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therefore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper unto it selfe 2. It belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an individuall incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Repl. That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The Word appertaineth and belongeth to the substance of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanity Therefore neither shall the Word be by this reason a person Answ That which is part onely of a person that is is so a part that besides of it selfe it is no person is no person or that which is a part of a person is not a person true it is not that person whose part it is Thus the Major proposition if it be understood simply or universally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the body is not a person but a part of a humane person which the soule together with the body doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the body is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall as are the Angels because it subsisteth our of the body by it selfe neither is a part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be construed aright and with indifferency That the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not only God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the God head truly subsisting before the flesh was that is the onely begotten Sonne of God For this selfe fame person existing in it selfe from everlasting and remaining for ever most simple and uncompound is by the assuming of mans nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Union or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ and are so called also of many of the ancient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumed did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the persons of the Word and the humane nature as being imperfect parts were made another perfect person of a certain third essence consubstantiall with neither of those two natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the divine nature onely doth now after the taking of the flesh subsist in two perfect natures divine and humane suffering no commixtion confusion or mutation that is The person of the Mediatour is said to be constituted of two natures divine and humane as it were of parts because these two are necessarily required and doe concurre to the absolving and accomplishing of the work of our redemption In this sense therefore both by ancient and later Divines and also by the Schoolemen are used well and without danger these phrases and speeches Christs person is compounded The two natures are as it were the parts of Christ The person of Christ is consisteth is constituted is made of or in the two natures of God and man The two natures concurre or come together into one person and subsistence They make one hypostasis or subsistence Both natures belong and concurre to the substance of one Christ Both are of the substance of belong and concurre to the substance of one Christ Both are of the substance of Christ The humanity with the Word or contrary The divine person or subsistence with the humane nature doth constitute or make the substance of one Christ Of the Word and the flesh assumed as of substantiall parts doth one Christ consist By these and the like phrases of speech used of this mystery singular and surpassing all capacity of mans wit the Orthodoxall that is men of a right and sound judgement in points of faith will signifie and some way expresse this only That the two natures are so united and linked in that one person of Christ as that they exist wholly in that one person or subsistence which is perfect and whole proper to the Word from everlasting by nature and is whole made in time the person of humanity also now assumed and destitute of the proper personality thereof and this is made by grace of union so that the devine subsistence or person of the Word being in it selfe most simple and most perfect doth notwithstanding subsist truly and individually in the two natures Wherefore seeing the thing it selfe is cleere and agreed upon among them who are of right judgement and sound in faith we are not odiously to jarre about words especially sith that concerning these supernaturall things no words of humane speech can be found which may at all suffice for the expressing of them But as it is not well said The person took the
man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ Nestorius heresie neither would have the Sonne of God but man onely to have died Doe not boast thou Jew saith Nestorius thou hast not crucified God but man The Ubiquitaries beleeve that the humanity of Christ The Ubiquitaries heresie from the moment of his incarnation was so endowed with all the properties of the God-head as that onely in this the humanity differeth from the God-head that the humanity hath by an accident whatsoever the God-head hath by and of it selfe Hereof it cometh that they imagine that Christ was in the time of his death yea when he was inclosed in the Virgins womb in heaven and every where not only as touching his God-head but with his body too This is it which they call the forme of God Phil. 2.6 Wherefore against all these we affirme and in the Creed beleeve that Christ died truly and corporally even by a true divulsion and separation of his soule from his body 1. Christ died truly and that a locall separation so that not onely his soule and body were not together every where but were not together in one place the soule was not where the body was Matth. 27.50 Marke 15.37 Luke 23.46 John 19.30 nor the body where the soule was Then Jesus cried againe with a loud voyce and yeelded up the Ghost Jesus cried with a lowd voyce and gave up the Ghost Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when he had said these words he gave up the Ghost He bowed his head and gave up the Ghost Object But as vertue that is his divinity is said to have gone out of him so also he gave up the Ghost Answ There is a dissimilitude in these Because the divinity remaining united with the humane nature yet did work abroad without it The soule did depart from the body The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his divinity is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soule finite and created But yet this is further to be added 2. Christ died without breach of the union of his two natures that although his soule was truly separated from his body yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither body nor soule but remained neverthelesse joyned both to body and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not divelled or sundered by that divulsion of the soule and body Object Why then cryed he Matth. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Answ Because of his delay and deferring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to have been divelled or sundred because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his own bloud And he was to be the Son of God who should die for our sins Acts 20.28 that he might be a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth cleerly appeare That The union of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquity For the soule being separated from the body was not in the grave with the body and by a consequent not every where because that which is every where can never be separated and yet in death and in the grave the union of both natures remained and continued 2. Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessary that Christ to make full satisfaction not only should suffer but also should die 1. In respect of the justice of God that so his justice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting and offending of the greatest good is to be expiated with the greatest punishment or with the utmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the guilty condemned for sinne according to that The wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 But Christ succeeded in our stead and took on him our person who had sinned and had deserved death not only eternall but temporall also For wee deserved destruction which is the dissolution of the soule from the body whereon ensueth the dissolution of the body as a house is said to be subverted and destroyed when one part is separated from another Now it was requisite that the Sonne of God should die that he might be a sufficient ransome for our sins For no creature could have sustained such a punishment as should have been equivalent to eternall punishment and yet withall should have been temporall Object They have deserved eternall punishment whosoever are not reconciled to God by Christ therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternall damnation Ans It doth not follow but this rather That therefore both body and soule must be together that they may suffer it which at length shall so come to passe Therefore it was necessary that Christ should die for us and his soule be separated from his body 2. In respect of Gods truth that the truth of God may be satisfied For God threatned and denounced death when ever we sinned which denouncing was to be fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himself In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obj. But Adam did not presently die Ans Truely he forth-with died not a bodily death Gen. 2.17 howbeit he became mortall straight upon it and by little and little he dayly died and even now already had he died spiritually eternall death and now was dead I heard saith he thy voice and I was affraid because I was naked Gen. 3.20 There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of all the gifts both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenity of the Gospel For God had not expresly said that he should certainly die wholly and presently For so had he perished for ever Wherefore the Son offered a mitigation and lenifying raised him up to a new life that notwithstanding he should remain subject to the corporall death which yet should not be deadly and pernicious unto him 3. In respect of the promise made to the Fathers both by words He is brought as a sheep to the slaughter and as a sheep before be shearer is dumb Esay 53.7 so openeth he not his mouth and by sacrifices whereby God promiseth that Christ should die such a death as should be an equivalent price for the sins of the whole world This could not be the work of a meere creature but of the Son of God only and therefore it was requisite and necessary that the Son of God should suffer so grievous a death for us Ob. Then they do not satisfie Gods justice who are punished because their punishment is endlesse and eternall Ans They satisfie by eternall punishment Rep. So then might we also be delivered from the curse by our selves Ans So then shall we never be
God which was in him and also teacheth him how they may be done By giving attendance to his reading 2 Tim. 1. 6. 1 Tim. 4.14 to exhortation and doctrine 3. He is lost by carnall security and by giving our selves to commit wickednesse against our conscience 4. By neglect of prayer 5. By abusing the gifts of the holy Ghost as when they are not imployed to his glory and to the safety of our neighbour Vnto him that hath shall be given from him that hath not Luke 8.18 even that he hath shall be taken away 10. Wherefore the holy Ghost is necessary HOw necessary and needfull the holy Ghost is and for what causes doth cleerly appeare by these places of Scripture Except that a man be borne of water and of the Spirit John 3.5 he cannot enter into the Kingdome of heaven Flesh and bloud cannot inhabite the Kingdome of God We are not sufficient of our selves to think any think as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God 1 Cor. 15.50 2 Cor. 3.5 Rom. 8.9 If any man hath not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Hence we may thus conclude Without whom we cannot think much lesse doe ought that is good and without whom he can neither be regenerated nor know God neither attaine unto the inheritance of the celestiall Kingdome without him we cannot be saved But without the holy Ghost these things cannot be done by reason of the corruption and blindnesse of our nature Therefore without the holy Ghost it cannot be that we should be saved and so it followeth that he is altogether necessary for us unto salvation 11. How we may know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in us WE know that we have him by the effect or by his benefits and blessings in us as by the true knowledge of God by regeneration faith peace of conscience and the inchoation or beginning of a new obedience or by a readinesse and willingnesse to obey God Rom. 5.1 4. Being justified by faith we have peace towards God The love of God is shed in our hearts Againe we know it by the testimony and witnesse which he beareth unto our spirit that we are the sonnes of God Moreover most certaine testimonies and tokens of the holy Ghost dwelling in us are comfort in the midst of death joy in afflictions a purpose to persevere in faith sighes and ardent prayers a sincere professing of Christianity * 1 Cor. 12.3 ON THE 21 SABBATH No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost In a word by faith and repentance we know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in us Quest 54. What beleevest thou concerning the holy and Catholike Church of Christ Ans I beleeve that the Son of God a Ephes 5.26 John 10.11 Act. 10.28 Ephes 4.11 12 13. doth from the beginning of the world to the end b Psa 71.17 18 Esay 59.21 1 Cor. 11.26 gather defend preserve unto himself c Mat. 16.18 by his Spirit d John 10.28 29 30. and Word out of whole mankind e Psal 129.1 2 3 4 5. a company chosen to everlasting life f Esay 59.21 and agreeing in true faith g Rom. 1.16 10.14 15 16 17 and that I am a lively member of that company h Ephes 5.26 and so shall remaine for ever i Genes 26.4 Revel 5.9 The Explication The Questions to be observed 1. What the Church is 2. How many wayes it is taken 3. What are the marks thereof 4. Wherefore it is called one holy and Catholike 5. What is the difference betweene the Church and Common-weale or civill State 6. Whence it is that the Church differeth from the rest of mankind 7. Whether any man be saved out of the Church 1. What the Church is WHen the Question is What the Church is it is presupposed that there is a Church so that it is not necessary to make question Whether there be a Church For there was alwayes and shall be some Church sometimes greater sometimes lesser because Christ alwayes was and shall remaine for ever the King and Head and Priest of the Church as hereafter in the fourth Question of this Common-place shall more plentifully be proved Now as concerning the name Ecclesia which we call the Church it is natively a Greek word The originall of the name and cometh from a word which signifieth to call forth For the custome was in Athens that a company of the Citizens were called forth by the voyce of a Crier from the rest of the multitude as it were namely and by their hundreds to an Assembly wherein some publike speech was had or to heare relation made of some sentence or judgement of the Senate And thus differeth the word Ecclesia from Synagoga or Synagogue How it differeth from Synagogue For Synagoga signifieth any manner of Congregation be it never so common and inordinate But Ecclesia betokeneth an ordained Congregation and such as is called together for some cause From hence the Apostles translated the name Ecclesia to their purpose terming the Church by it for resemblance and likenesse sake For the Church is Gods Congregation neither coming together by chance without cause nor being inordinate but called forth by the voyce of the Lord and the cry of the Word that is by the Ministers of the Gospel from the Kingdome of Sathan to heare or imbrace Gods word This Congregation or company of those which are called of God to the knowledge of the Gospel the Latines keeping still the Greek word call Ecclesia The Dutch word Kyrc which by adding letters of aspiration we call in English Church seemeth to come from the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth The Lords house The meaning of the word Church or Gods house But it shall be requisite that we a little more fully define what the Church is The Church of God is a Congregation or company of men chosen from everlasting of God to eternall life which from the beginning of the world to the end thereof The definition of the Church is gathered of the sonnes of God out of all mankind by the holy Ghost and the Word consenting in true faith and which the Sonne of God defendeth preserveth and at length glorifieth with glory and life everlasting Thus is the true Church of God defined whereof the Creed doth properly speak 2. How many wayes the Church is taken The false Church The true Church is THE Church is taken either for the true Church or for the false The false Church is unproperly called the Church and is a company arrogating unto themselves the title of Christs Church but which doe not follow the same but rather persecute it The true Church is either Triumphant 1. Triumphant which even now triumpheth with the blessed Angels in heaven and shall have their full accomplished triumph after the Resurrection 2. Militant The Militant
beleeved the Gospel promise that he would beleeve the Church more then the Gospel if the Church determine or propound any thing which is either contrary to the Gospel or can be proved by no testimony of Scripture This doubtlesse Augustine never meant Nay elswhere he denounceth Anathema and biddeth a curse to come to them who declare any thing besides that that we have received in the writings of the Law and Gospel And in the selfe-same place he witnesseth That he because he beleeveth the Gospel cannot beleeve Manichaeus for that he readeth nothing in the Gospel of Manichaeus Apostleship Therefore traditions or ordinances of the Church bring us unto the Scripture and tie us to that voice which soundeth in the Scripture The Papists wrangling about Traditions But here it must be observed how honestly and fairly the Papists deale For wheresoever they meet with the word Tradition that by and by they wrest to their traditions which cannot be proved out of the Word of God as when Paul saith I delivered unto you that which I received Straight-wayes they cry out Heare you traditions I hear but read on there in the words following Paul himself by writing declaring what those traditions are I delivered unto you how that Christ died for our sinnes according to the Scripture And that he was buried and that he arose the third day according to the Scripture Here you heare Pauls traditions to be double things written For first they were taken out of the Scripture of the Old Testament Secondly they were committed to writing by Saint Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lords Supper I have received of the Lord that which I have delivered unto you 1 Cor. 11.23 But this traditions after the Evangelists himself also hath set downe in writing 2 Thes 3.16 The Jesuites cite the saying of Paul Withdraw your selves from every brother that walketh inordinately and not after the traditions which yee received of us But a little after in the same Chapter he describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prove that many things are to be beleeved which cannot be proved by any testimony of Scripture The like impudency they shew in another testimony taken our of Luke Acts 16.4 They delivered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles and Elders which were at Jerusalem Ibid. 15.23 When a little before he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles How the Church may be said not to erre That opinion or saying of the Papists The Church doth not erre is true after this sort 1. The whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe erre 2. It doth not erre universally although in some points of doctrine it may 3. It erreth not in the foundation 5. In what the Church differeth from the Common-weale Seven differences betweene the Church and Common-weale THe Church differeth from the Common-weale 1. Because Common-weales are distinct and Kingdomes of the world are in divers places and times The Church is alwayes one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The Kingdoms and States of the world have many heads or one chiefe Head and many other inferiour heads besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heaven 3. The Common-wealth is governed by certaine Lawes made for the maintenance of outward peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the holy Ghost and the Word of God 4. The Common-wealth or civill State requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inward obedience as outward 5. In civill States and Common-wealths there is power and liberty to make new Lawes positive by the authority of the Magistrate the violating of which Lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserveth corporal punishments The Church is tied to the Word of God to which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The civill State hath corporall power wherewith it is armed against the obstinate and disobedient for he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing Gods wrath out of the Word of God 7. In the Church are alwayes some elect and holy but not alwayes in the Common-wealth 6. Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde Three sorts of men in the world THere are three sorts of men very much different one from another For 1. Some men are even in profession estranged and alients from the Church as who deny faith and repentance and therefore are open enemies of God and the Church 2. Others are called but not effectually which are Hypocrites who professe indeed the faith but without any true conversion unto God 3. Others are called effectually which are the elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Many are called Mat. 20.16 Election putteth the difference between the Church and others but few are chosen Now the difference being known let us in a word see what is the cause of this difference 1. The efficient cause of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather unto himselfe a Church in earth 2. The Sonne of God is the mediate executor of this his will and purpose the holy Ghost the immediate Acts 14.16 Rom. 9.18 John 6.37 Rom. 8.19 30. 3. The word of God is the instrumentall cause In times past God suffered all the Gentiles to walk in their owne wayes God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth All that the Father giveth me shall come to me Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called c. By these words we are taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or Beleevers God verily would have all to be saved and that 1. In respect that he loveth the salvation of all But the Elect onely have attained to that salvation 2. In respect that he inviteth all to salvation But the rest have beene hardened Rom. 11.7 7. Whether any one may be saved out of the Church NO man can be saved out of the Church None saved out of the Church John 13.5 Because without the Church there is no Saviour therefore no salvation also Without me you can doe nothing 2. Because whomsoever God hath chosen and elected to the end which is eternall life them he hath chosen to the meanes which is the inward and outward calling The elect therefore though they be not at all times members of the visible Church yet they are all made such before they die Object Therefore election is not free Answ It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordained men to meanes he never
after this life but onely desireth to be rid of his present misery and therefore through humane infirmity and impatiencie doth compare the sense and feeling of his present miseries with the death and state of the dead whatsoever it be as they who are grievously tormented with present distresses and calamities preferre any thing whatsoever before that which they suffer So also Chap. 7. he speaketh as one despairing of delivery in this life Chap. 7 7.10 Remember that my life is but a wind and that my eye shall not returne to see pleasure For so he expoundeth himselfe when he addeth He shall returne no more to his house neither shall his place know him any more So likewise Chap. 17. My breath is corrupt Verse 1. and the grave is ready for me They are words of one despairing of life and salvation God being wroth and angry But when it is said If he set his heart upon man and gather unto himselfe his spirit and his breath All flesh shall perish together Chap. 34.14 15. it is not said that the soule doth sleep or perish but that by the departure thereof the body dieth and is dissolved Further they adde If presently after death the godly were blessed then injury was done unto them who were called againe into this mortall life But to this we answer That neither God can be injurious to any man whereas he is in no mans debt neither can any thing happen better or more acceptable unto the godly then to serve for the manifesting of Gods glory either by life or by death as it is said As alwayes Phil. 1.20 so now Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it be by life or by death c. Last of all if they say That the soule hath neither sense nor action but by bodily instruments and therefore being naked and destitute of these is destitute also of sense motion and operation To grant unto them this Antecedent of the soule being in the body yet notwithstanding of the soule freed from the body both learned Philosophers confesse the contrary and the Word of God testifieth the contrary as We know in part 1 Cor. 13.9 and we prophecie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished 2. Where and in what estate it abideth being separate from the body THe Papists dreame that the soules of men passe out of their bodies into the fire of Purgatory there to be purged from their sinnes some sooner some later Not in Purgatory as the Papists teach Li. 4. di 21. cap. â— according as they in their life time more or lesse loved the transitory pelfe of this world as Lombard speaketh Contrariwise the Scripture teacheth us that not any fire after death but onely the bloud of Christ in this life cleanseth our soules from all sinne It farther instructeth us how that the soules of the faithfull deceased are not plunged into the place of torment there to be refined from the drosse of their sins but are gathered unto Christ and into Abrahams bosome and on the other side that the soules of the wicked are forth-with cast into hell whence there is no retire and are now tormented with infernall flames but yet reserved to more grievous tortures of that everlasting fire which at the time of Christs coming to judgement The estate of the soules of the godly Luke 23.46 Acts 7.59 Luke 16.22 Phil. 1.3 2 Cor. 5.8 The estate of the soules of the wicked Mat. 10.28 the wrath of Jehovah shall kindle Of the estate of the soules of the godly these places yeeld testimony Into thy hands I commend my spirit Lord Jesus receive my soule And so it was that the beggar died and was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome Therefore he feared not Purgatory The faithfull covet to remove out of the body and to dwell with the Lord therefore they passe not through Purgatory first before they approach unto the sight of the Lord. Of the state of the soules of the ungodly these places make sufficient evidence Feare him who is able to cast both body and soule into hell fire The glutton straight after his buriall was in hell torments and cried I am tormented in this flame Luke 16.23 whence he shall never escape Wherefore the soules of the wicked leaving their bodies are not forth-with transported into Purgatory whence there may be a gappe or way to escape but are violently thrust down into the unspeakable fire of hell 3. What the Resurrection is and the errours concerning it THe word Resurrection signifieth sometimes mans spirituall conversion unto God The signification of the word Rev. 20.5 As This is the first Resurrection But in this Article the resurrection of the flesh is A restoring of the substance of our bodies after death even of the same matter whereof they now consist and a reviving and quickning of the same bodies with life immortall and incorruptible by the same immortall soul whereby they now live which God will work by Christ in the end of the world by his divine vertue and power which restoring also shall be of the Elect unto eternall glory The parts of it but of the reprobate unto eternall paines That is there shall be 1. A restoring of the same body which is a re-collecting and gathering together of the same matter whereof our body was first composed and which after our death was scattered and severed into all the elements 2. An uniting of it with the same soule and a reviving of it by the same soule which it had before with a putting off of all infirmities and a putting on of immortality 3. A glorifying of the Elect and an eternall rejection of the Reprobare Three errours concerning the Resurrection The errours held of the Resurrection are of three sorts 1. Some have utterly denied it and have avouched the soules to die together with the bodies as the Sadducees of whom mention is made in the Acts The Sadducees say that there is no Resurrection Acts 23.8 neither Angel nor Spirit 2. Some have granted the immortality of the soule but have construed the resurrection to be a resurrection in this life meaning by this resurrection nothing else but regeneration but the bodies they denied to rise at all although the soules of the godly have fruition after death of everlasting happines Hymeneus and Philetus seeme to have been authors of this heresie of whom the Apostle saith 2 Tim. 2.18 Which as concerning the truth have erred saying that the resurrection is past already and doe destroy the faith of some 3. Some as Anabaptists deny that the very selfe-same bodies which we now have shall rise againe but they say that God at Christs second coming will make new bodies Against all these errours we are to beleeve the Scripture affirming that the dead shall certainly rise againe 4. Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall
they are offered In the objects For the word of the promise and commandement is promised without any difference to all To the unregenerate that they may either begin to beleeve and be regenerated or may be left without excuse to the regenerate that they may the more beleeve and be confirmed The Sacraments are given only to the members of the Church professing faith and repentance whose faith is by them confirmed and preserved The word is preached to all at once the Sacraments are given to every member of the Church severally one is baptised after another and the Supper is ministred to one after another Intheir use The Word is the instrument of the holy Ghost by which he beginneth and confirmeth our faith and therefore the Word must go before the Sacraments The Sacraments are the instruments of the holy Ghost by which he beginneth not but only confirmeth our faith and therefore the Sacraments must follow the Word The reason of this difference is because the Sacraments without they be understood never move nor confirm faith There is no desire after a thing which is not known Therefore some declaration and expounding of the signes out of the Word must first be used But yet in infants of the Church the case is diverse for in them faith neither is begun nor confirmed of the holy Ghost by the Word but by an inward working and efficacy and because they are borne in the Church to them in their infancy appertaineth the covenant and the promise In their necessity For the Word is necessary and sufficing unto salvation in them who are of an under standing age For faith cometh by hearing But the Sacraments are not precisely and absolutely necessary unto all neither of themselves without the Word suffice they to salvation For the seales without the Letters Patents have no force and that saying of S. Augustine is most true Not the want but the contempt of them condemneth In their manner of working The Sacraments by gesture the Word by speech declareth unto us the will of God The Word may be effectuall without the Sacraments but not the Sacraments without the Word Acts 10.44 The Word may be without the Sacraments as both in private and publike expounding of the Scripture and that effectually also as was apparent in Cornelius but the Sacraments cannot be nor be effectuall without the Word The Word is confirmed by the Sacraments The Word is that which is confirmed by signes annexed unto it the Sacraments are those signes whereby it is confirmed The Word may not be preached unto infants some Sacraments may be given them The Word is to be preached to those only who are of understanding The Sacraments are to be given unto Infants as Circumcision and Baptisme Augustine said that a Sacrament is a visible Word most briefly and most aptly expressed he both the agreeing and differing of the Word and Sacraments For when he saith That a Sacrament is a Word he sheweth in what the Word and Sacraments agree which is in that they teach the same When he addeth Visible he sheweth the difference that is that they differ in rite and ceremonie The briefe summe of all that hath been spoken is The signes by gestures declare Gods will unto us the Word by speech By the Word faith is begun and confirmed in us by the Sacraments it is only confirmed after it is once begun The Word profiteth without Sacraments but Sacraments profit not without the Word Men of yeers are not saved without knowledge they may be saved and regenerated without Sacraments if they neglect them not The Word pertaineth to all the Sacraments to the faithfull alone Quest 68. How many Sacraments hath Christ ordained in the New Testament Answ Two Baptisme and the holy Supper The Explication But two Sacraments in the New Testament IN the new Testament are onely two Sacraments the use whereof in the Church is perpetuall and universall by the consents of Ambrose and Augustine Baptisme which succeeded in the place of Circumcision and other purifyings of the Law and the Lords Supper which the Paschal Lamb and other sacrifices shadowed and prefigured These two and no moe are Sacraments of the New Testament because these two Christ did institute For those only are sacraments of the New Testament which are 1. Ceremonies 2. Instituted of Christ for the whole Church 3. Having the promise of grace adjoyned unto them But there are onely two such Sacraments as appeareth by their definition Wherefore we have two Sacraments onely The Papists other five Sacraments are no Sacraments The Papists besides those two reckon five other Confirmation Penance or private absolution Order Vnction and Matrimony But properly these are no Sacraments For it is certaine that penance and private absolution are onely the declaration and preaching of the Gospel But the preaching and publishing of grace must not be confounded with the annexed seales of the promise of grace Unction and laying on of hands and indeed ceremonies but neither were they instituted of Christ for the whole Church neither have they the promise of grace adjoyned Confirmation or laying on of hands in the Primitive Church was a signe either of a miraculous bestowing of the holy Ghost which soone ceased or of calling to the office of teaching The thing signified by extreme Unction hath ceased in the Church with other gifts of miracles Order or the ordaining of the Ministers testifieth indeed Gods presence in the ministery but God may be forcible by the ministery of the man yea though the mans person please him not Matrimony is no ceremony but a morall work The Papists reckon it among Sacraments because the old translation translateth the Greek work 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a mystery by the word Sacrament Ephes 5.32 where the Apostle speaketh of marriage But Paul himselfe is to be heard rather then the Latine Interpreter No man is ignorant that Mystery is of as large and ample an extent in signification with the Grecians as arcanum which signifieth any secret or hidden thing is with the Latines Wherefore they must confesse and grant all arcane and secret things to be Sacraments And also if Matrimony be the seventh Sacrament the will of God shall be the eighth Sacrament Ephes 1.9 Ephes 3.3 ◠1 Tim. 3.16 Chap. 5.32 and the calling of the Gentiles the ninth and godlinesse the tenth For so doth the same Interpreter in the Epistle interpret the same Greek word But S. Paul in that place of the Ephesians useth that word mystery to designe and signifie the conjunction of Christ and his Church and not the conjunction of man and wife Certain conclusions of the Sacraments in generall 1. GOD hath alwayes adjoyned unto his promise of grace and eternal life some signes and rites These conclusions were publikly disputed at Heidelberg Aug. 23. An. Dom. 1567. which the Church calleth Sacraments Circumcision was commanded and enjoyned Abraham By Moses
we are washed with the water of Baptisme Ans In the institution of Baptisme the words whereof are these Mat. 2â— 29 Goe and teach all Nations baptising them in the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost He that shall beleeve and be baptized shall be saved but he that will not beleeve shall be damned a Mat. 16.16 This promise is repeated again whereas the Scripture calleth Baptism the washing of the new birth b Titus 3.5 and forgivenesse of sinnes c Acts 22.16 The Explication THe confirmation of the definition and chiefe ends of Baptism is contained in the words of the institution Mat. 28.19 Mark 16.16 which are read in S. Matthew and S. Marke Go and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost He that shall beleeve and shall be baptized shall be saved but he that will not beleeve shall be damned These are briefly to be expounded and declared Teach all Teach all and not some Nations neither Abrahams posterity onely Here is the difference of the Sacraments of the old and new Testament For Christ did not institute this new Sacrament for the Jewes only to whom properly did belong the old Sacraments but to all others also succeeding Baptising them That is all who by your doctrine come unto me and are made my disciples And among them are numbred the Infants also of such as come unto Christ or are Christs disciples For their Infants also are disciples as being borne in the schoole of Christ For to be borne in the Church serveth to the Infants in stead of their profession The word is to go before the Sacrament The order here is to be noted and observed He willeth first that they be taught and after that they be baptized For he speaketh of men of yeeres which should be converted unto the faith and Gospel of Christ Wherefore he will not have the Sacraments to be dumb but signifieth that the Word ought to go before and then the Sacraments to follow Foure things signified in these words In the name of the Father Son and holy Ghost used in Baptisme In the name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost These words in the name signifie 1. That Baptisme was instituted by the common commandement and authority of these three and that these three persons doe command that they who will be members of the Church be baptized Wherâ—fore it is of like force when the Minister baptiseth as if God the Father the Son and the holy Ghost did baptize And hereof also it is manifest that these three persons are the three subsistents or persons of the God-head and are one true God into whom we are baptized 2. They signifie that these three persons confirme unto us by their owne testification that they receive us into favour and performe that unto us which is signified by baptisme which is salvation if we beleeve and be baptized where is noted the principall end of Baptisme 3. To be baptized in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost is That he which is baptized be bound to the knowledge faith worship trust honour and invocation of this true God 1 Cor. 1.13 who is the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost This is the second end of Baptisme which Paul also in these words declareth were yee baptized into the name of Paul As if he should say Ye ought to be his to whom ye have given your name and bound your selves in Baptisme 4. Baptising them in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost that is baptising them by invocation of the three persons invocating the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost upon them Which three persons receive us into favour And the Father verily receiveth us into favour for the Sonne by the holy Ghost whom the Sonne giveth us from the Father He that shall beleeve This condition is added unto the promise For they who are baptized cannot receive that which is promised and sealed in Baptism but by faith so that without faith neither is the promise ratified nor the Baptisme availeable And in these words is noted briefly the right use of Baptisme in which right use the Sacraments are ratified to them which receive them with a true faith What is the right and lawfull use of Baptisme But in whatsoever corrupt and unlawfull use and administration the Sacraments are no Sacraments but are Sacraments to them only who receive them with a true faith The right and lawfull use then of Baptisme is when the converted are baptized with observation of that rite and end which Christ appointed that is 1. When the ceremonies or rites instituted by Christ in Baptisme are not changed Whence it is manifest that the drosse and filth of Papists as oyle spettle and exorcisme or conjuration tapers salt The drosse which the Papists bloud with the simplicity of Christs institution in baptism is to be rejected and such like wherewith the defile Baptisme is to be thrown away Object But these appertaine and belong to order and comelinesse Ans The holy Ghost knew well enough what did appertaine to order and comelinesse in Baptisme Rep. But they appertaine to the signifying of some thing Ans It belongeth not to men to institute any signe of Gods will This also we are to judge and think of other ceremonies of the same hatching 2. The use of Baptisme is right When Baptisme is given to them for whom it was instituted which are all the converted or members of the Church and When of these it is received with a true faith according to that Acts 8.37 If thou beleevest with all thine heart thou maist be baptized 3. When Baptisme is used to that end whereunto it was instituted not to the healing of cattell and such like abuses 4. When Baptisme is administred by them to whom Christ hath given it in charge that is the Ministers of the Church whom Christ hath sent to teach and to baptize not by women or any other which are not sent of God And shall be baptized He would confirme us also by the outward signes and therefore this is added and shall be baptized that we may know that not only by faith but by the outward signe also we are assured that we are of the number of them who shall be saved Shall be saved That is let the baptized know that he hath those benefits which are signified by the ceremony or outward signe that is that he is justified and regenerated if he beleeve For without faith the promise is not ratified neither doth Baptisme profit at all Unto both both unto faith and unto Baptisme the promise is adjoyned but in a diverse manner unto faith as a necessary mean to apprehend salvation unto baptisme as a signe sealing the salvation we apprehend He that will not beleeve shall be condemned That is though he
is with in or under the bread they adde unto the words of Christ and depart from true simplicity For if that which Christ said is simply to be retained and that not to be admitted which he said not then may we not say The bread is both bread and the body of Christ but simply this only The bread is the body of Christ For he said not My body is with or in or under the bread or The bread is both bread and my body together neither addeth he as these adde of their own really substantially corporally but he uttereth these bare words of the bread This is my body Neither have the Transubstantiaries their opinion drawn from the words of Christ simply understood namely that of the bread is made the body of Christ or the bread is changed into the body of Christ for this is their own forgery and invention For Christ said not that the bread was now made or was a making or should be made but simply said The bread is my body where no change could come between so that the words of Christ be simply understood Therefore falsly do they perswade the people that they simply rest on the propriety of Gods word when as manifoldly and most farre they swerve and depart from it The true interpretation of Christ words We Protestants retain the words of Christ without adding or altering to wit that the bread is the body of Christ and indeed the true and visible body which was given for us But because these words literally taken would admit a sense repugnant to the truth of Christian faith for if bread were properly Christs body it would follow that bread was crucified for us therefore we affirm that in Christs words a convenient meaning must be inquired after that is Christs words must be understood sacramentally namely that the bread is called Christs body because it is a signe of Christs body the cup or wine in the cup is called Christs bloud because it is a sign of Christs bloud the cup is also called the new Testament because it is a signe of the new Testament even as baptism is termed a washing away of sins and a laver of new birth because it is a signe of both these which are wrought properly by the bloud and spirit of Christ The true sense therefore and naturall interpretation of Christs words is This is my body which is given for you that is This bread broken by me and given to you is a signe of my body delivered to death for you and an authentick seal of your conjunction with me so that he which shall beleeve and eat this bread he truly and really after a sort eateth my body Here therefore to the signe is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the conjunction which the thing signified hath in the right use of the Supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified In this exposition we are not led and over-ruled by Philosophy and humane reason as our adversaries traduce us and bear the world in hand we are but we observe those rules by which in the joint consent of all sound wise men wee are to censure the interpretation of any Scripture whatsoever namely by the analogie and rule of faith by the nature of the thing or subject by the testimonies of Scripture which teach the same thing Three rules wâ—ereby we may judge of the interpretation of Scripture For by help of these three rules the naturall sense of Scripture is wont to be examined as often as necessity driveth us from the letter to the sense and meaning 1. That no interpretation be received dissonant from the rule of faith or repugnant to any article thereof or any commandement of the Decalogue or any expresse testimony of Scripture for the spirit of truth is not contrary to it self 2. That the sense derived out of words signifying any thing have a congruity with the nature of the thing signified by the words as in this present subject of the Supper whereon wee insist when any question or doubt is moved therein we are to enquire seeing it is a Sacrament how the Scripture else-where speaketh of Sacraments and of the Supper it selfe 3. That other like places be weighed and considered by which it is either manifest and granted or may be demonstrated by some circumstance that they contain the same doctrine concerning the same thing which is contained in the place in controversie For if we be fully resolved of the meaning of any cleerer and uncontroversed place we shall also be resolved of the sense of the place in controversie if the same thing be delivered in both So then it is out of doubt that that meaning of the words of the Supper which is agreeable with these rules is true and those untrue which disagree from them But this our construing and interpretation which indeed is not ours but the doctrine of Christ himself his Apostles and all orthodox or right-beleeving antiquity doth every way sute with these rules wherefore undoubtedly it is most true and best beseeming the truth of the Gospel Now let us come to the arguments by which wee prove our interpretation to be true they are of four sorts 1. Some are taken out of the text it self and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper 2. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subject that is by understanding the speech as the thing it self doth bear and suffer namely according to the nature of all Sacraments 3. Some are drawn from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of Christian doctrine 4. Some are taken from other like places of Scripture where the same thing is delivered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controversie 1. The first sort of arguments taken out of the text and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper He sate down 1. CHrists humane nature at the first celebrating of the Supper by a corporall kind of placing sate in his proper place at the table and now is in heaven wherefore then it was not neither is it now corporally in the bread or in the place of the bread He took bread 2. Christ at the first Supper took not into his hands nor brake his body but bread wherefore bread is not properly and really the very body of Christ This is my body 3. Christs body was born of a virgin But bread is made of meal therefore it is not really Christs body 4. Christ said of the visible bread being broken This is my body and of the visible cup being distributed unto his disciples This cup is the new Testament in my bloud Therefore the Papists retain not the letter when they say My body is contained under the forms of bread and wine nor the Ubiquitaries when they thus speak My body is in with under this
an oblation as if hee offered swines bloud hee that remembreth incense as if hee blessed an Idoll Jerem. 6.20 In the sixth of Jeremy he sharply reproveth those who being defiled with their abominations yet durst appeare in his Temple Ezekiel the 20. he threatneth that he will not answer Ezck. 20.31 when he is asked by them who goe after other gods and then present themselves in Gods Temple when they are polluted In the same Chapter he saith verse 24. that they profane his Sabbaths and pollute his Sanctuary who when they have gone a whoring after Idols appeare in his Temple Amos the fifth Amos 5.21 hee rejecteth the sacrifices and worship of transgressors I hate and abhorre your feast-dayes and will not smell in your solemne assemblies Haggai the second he prohibiteth the uncleane in soule once to touch holy things where he speaketh of morall and ceremoniall uncleanenesse Prov. 15.8 The sacrifice of the wicked is abomination to the Lord. In the New Testament John admitteth them only to baptisem who confessed their sins and repented Bring forth fruits worthy amendement of life Leave thine offering before the Altar and goe thy way Mat. 3.6 first be reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift Therefore whosoever reconcileth not first himself unto his brother hee is to be debarred the Sacraments For Christ will that all submit themselves first unto God according to all his commandements before they approach to any Sacrament For by the name of Altar here are understood any Sacraments whatsoever Amend your lives Acts 2.38 8.37 1 Cor. 10.20 21. 11.27 and be baptised every one of you If thou beleevest with all thine heart thou mayest be baptised Therefore if thou beleevest not thou mayest not The things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to divels and not unto God Yee cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the Table of Divels Whosoever eateth unworthily is guilty of the Lords body But the wicked eating without faith and repentance eate unworthily Therefore they are guilty We ought not to partake in other mens sins and we ought not to wink at any mans destruction therefore wee may not admit the wicked to the Sacrament lest they eat unto themselves damnation 2. In respect of Christ and his Apostles speciall commandement If thy brother trespasse against thee goe and tell him his fault between him and thee alone Mat. 18.15 16 17 18. if hee heare thee thou hast wonne thy brother But if he heare thee not take yet with thee one or two that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be confirmed And if he will not vouchsafe to heare them tell it unto the Church and if he refuse to heare the Church also let him be unto thee as an Heathen man and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever yee bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever ye loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven But Christ will not that his Sacraments which he instituted for the faithfull alone be made common with Pagans and Publicans And lest this Mandate might be understood of some private and speciall judgement it is expresly added Whatsoever yee shall bind c. which words cannot be otherwise understood but of the publike power of the Keys I verily as absent in body but present in spirit 1 Cor. 5.3 4 5. have determined already as though I were present that hee that hath done this thing when ye are gathered together and my spirit in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that such one I say by the power of our Lord Jesus Christ be delivered unto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh Ibid. ver 11 13. that the spirit may be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus And againe With such a one eate not Put away therefore from your selves that wicked man For what concord hath Christ with Belial 2 Thes 3.6 14. or what part hath the Beleever with the Infidels We command you brethren in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that yee withdraw your selves from every brother that walketh inordinately and not after the instruction which yee received of us If any man obey not our sayings note him by a letter and have no company with him that hee may be ashamed 2 John ver 10. If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine receive him not to house neither bid him God speed for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evill deeds 3. The power of the Keyes is necessary in respect of Gods glory For God is reproached and despited if without difference wicked blasphemers goe in the number of his Children and his Kingdom and the divels be confounded 4. Lest the Sacraments be profaned and that given the wicked in the Supper which is denied them in the Word 5. That the purity of Gods doctrine and worship be preserved 6. For the safety of the Church which shall be punished if she wittingly and willingly profane Christs Sacraments or suffer them to be profaned 7. For the safety of the sinners that they being often admonished and put to shame may returne to repentance 8. For avoiding of offence in the Church that others weaklings be not corrupted by evill example 4.1 Cor. 5.6 Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump 9. For avoiding of offence among those that are without lest they who are not as yet members of the Church come not to it 10. That the name of God might not be blasphemed and evill spoken of by others and his Covenant despited and reproached 11. That from the sinners themselves punishment may be averted because the wicked approaching unto the Lords Table eate their owne damnation Wherefore that this may not come to passe the Church is bound to provide that such approach not thither 12. They who deny the faith and doctrine of Christ are to be excluded from the Church and from the use of the Sacraments For the Faithfull or Christians are not to be confounded or mingled with those who are not members of the Church or with those who are professed ungodly persons blasphemers revolters to Arrianisme Mahumetanisme and the like But they that deny and refuse to repent deny the faith and doctrine They professe that they know God but by workes they deny him And he that denieth the faith Tims 1.16 is worse than Infidels Therefore they who persist in their wickednes and deny to repent are to be shut out of the Church neither are they to be admitted to the use of the Sacraments 13. And here hath place that saying of Christ Give not that which is holy to dogges Wherefore neither to the Sacraments are dogges to be admitted namely those which persist in their wickednesse and make a mocke of Gods Word For if Christ speaketh this of his audible Word to wit the Word preached which yet was instituted
of prayer Some demand Whether wee be so tyed to this forme of prayer that in praying wee may use no other Answ Christ delivered this forme unto us not that wee should be tyed to these words but that wee might know 1. What things aske 2. How to aske them For it is a generall forme of the manner whereby and the things which we are to aske Now it falleth out oftentimes that particular benefits are necessary for us which we must aske of God according to those sayings of Scripture Whatsoever ye shall aske the Father in my name he will give it you John 14.13 James 1.5 Matth. 24.20 If any of you lack wisdome let him aske of God and it shall be given him Pray that your flight be not in the winter But these as touching the words are not in this prayer There are also many examples of prayer in the old and new Testament which as concerning the words 2 Chron. 20.6 2 King 8.15 Dan. 9.4 John 17.1 Acts 4.24 differ from this as the prayers of Josaphat Salomon Daniel Christ himselfe the Apostles and others which neverthelesse were heard of God Wherefore the forme of prayer delivered unto us by Christ is wholly a thing indifferent Object Wee may not be wiser than Christ Therefore seeing hee hath appointed us a certaine form of prayer we must hold us contented therewith and therefore we do amisse when we use other formes of prayer Ans We may not depart from that forme if Christ will have us tied unto it but he will not have us tyed to these words because his purpose was when he taught his Disciples to pray to deliver a briefe summe of those things which we are to aske of God Repl. That is to be retained than which no better can be invented Wee cannot invent a better forme and better words than are these of Christ himselfe Therefore wee must retaine also the forme and words of Christ. Answ We cannot invent better words neither a better forme to expresse this summe of such things as are to be desired which is as it were the generall of all things that are to be desired These generals of Gods benefits which Christ in this forme hath prescribed unto us to be desired cannot be proposed in a better forme but Christ will have us also to descend to specials and aske particular benefits according to our necessity For that form prescribed by Christ is nothing else but a set or course of certaine heads or generals whereunto all benefits as well corporall as spirituall may be referred And when Christ willeth us to desire the generals hee willeth us also to desire the specials And further also those which are here put in generall we are in like manner for this cause to declare in speciall that we may be led into a consideration of our necessity to a desire of making of our petition to God to help our necessity Now that we may doe this we have need also of speciall formes of praying For to the explication of generals by their specials we have need of another form But yet all other formes of prayer must agree with this forme prescribed by Christ Hence Austine testifieth August ad Prob. that All the prayers of saints extant in Scripture are contained in the Lords Prayer And he addeth farther that It is free for us to say the same things in other words when we pray but it is not free for us to say or mention other things than are comprised in this forme of prayer Quest 120. Why doth Christ teach us to call God our Father Answ That presently in the very entrance and beginning of the prayer hee might stirre up in us such a reverence and confidence in God as is meete for the sonnes of God which must be the ground and foundation of our prayer to wit that God through Christ is made our Father and will much lesse deny unto us those things which wee aske of him with a true faith than our earthly Parents deny unto us earthly things a Math. 7. v. 9 10 11 Luke 11. v. 11 12 13. The Explication THis Prayer of Christ hath three parts a Proeme Petitions and a Conclusion The Proeme is Our Father which art in heaven The Proeme hath two parts 1. A calling on the true God in these words Our Father 2. A description of him in these which art in heaven And the Lord used this kind of Proeme because he will be called upon with due honour This honour consisteth 1. In the true knowledge 2. In true confidence 3. In obedience Obedience compriseth 1. True Love 2. True Feare 3. Hope 4. Humiliation 5. Patience Our Father God is called Our Father 1. In respect of our creation The sonne of Adam the Sonne of God 2. In respect of our redemption God is our Father in three respects Luke 3.38 and receiving into his favour by his Son our Mediatour Christ is the only begotten and naturall Sonne of God wee are not his sons by our own nature but are for Christs sake adopted to be sons 3. In respect of our sanctification or regeneration by the holy Ghost in Christ Christ will have us to call God Father and so to invocate him Five causes why we here call God Father 1. In regard of the true invocation of God who is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2. In regard of the true knowledge of him that we may know him to be our Father who through and for his Son the Mediatour hath adopted us to be his sonnes when otherwise wee were his enemies John 20.17 I goe unto my Father and unto your Father and who farther also for his Sons sake regenerateth us by the holy Ghost and endoweth us with all gifts and graces necessary 3. In regard of reverence namely that in us may be stirred up and raised true reverence towards him that seeing hee is our Father wee therefore behave our selves as becometh sonnes and be affected with such reverence towards him as it becometh children to be affected towards their Father especially being adopted children and unworthy of Gods blessings and benefits 4. In regard of confidence that the same be raised in us whereby we may be assured that we shall be heard and that hee will give us all things which pertaine to our salvation For seeing God is our Father Rom. 8.32 and even so loving a Father to us That hee hath given his onely begotten Sonne for us to death how then shall hee not give us together with him all things necessary to our salvation 5. For a memoriall of our creation Now God will heare those onely that â—o pray because in them hee obtaineth the end of his blessings and benefits Object 1. We invocate the Father according to the prescript of his owne Son Therefore wee must not invocate the Sonne and the holy Ghost Ans The consequence of this reason is denied because the consequence holdeth not from the
remit not Therefore wee are not remitted Answ He that remitteth not fully and perfectly is notwithstanding remitted so that he remit truly and sincerely We therefore shall be forgiven if we forgive truly and sincerely Object 2. Christ willed us to desire that God will so remit us our sinnes as we remit our debtors But we doe not perfectly remit our debtors Therefore he willed us to desire that God will not perfectly remit us our sinne and this is to pray for our owne perdition and destruction sith God condemneth even the least sinnes Answ This is a fallacy of speech deceiving by mis-construing a word For the particle As in this petition doth not signifie the degree of remission or a comparison of our remission with that remission wherewith God remitteth us our sinnes but it signifieth the kinde of remission namely the truth and sincerity of our remission whereby we forgive others from our heart and with a ready will of forgiving them or to speake shorter here is not made a comparison according to degrees but according to the truth of the thing or according to the truth and will of remission so that the meaning is So perfectly God remitteth us our sinnes as we truly and certainly remit and forgive our neighbour Luke 11.4 or forgive us our debts because we forgive our debtors Repl. Then is our remission of others the cause why God remitteth us Answ This is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For our remission wherewith we forgive others though not perfectly yet sincerely is only an argument and testimony unto us that God will remit us our sinnes For our remission and forgiving of others cannot merit 1. Because it is imperfect 2. Albeit it were perfect yet should it not merit because what we now performe that we owe unto God For were it so that we did not performe perfect obedience to God yet were we bound of duty to performe it Repl. But neverthelesse yet here is betokened an equality of remission in us and God Answ Not an equality but a likenesse and similitude of the kinde of remission Object 3. He that remembreth injuries and is desirous of revenge doth not truly remit and forgive But we all remember injuries and are desirous of revenge Therefore we do not truly remit and forgive Answ They that remember injuries that is without a resistance and dislike of this remembrance or with a yeelding thereto do not truly remit If then we withstand and resist the remnants of sins which as yet cleave fast to us and do not yeeld to them nothing hindreth why we may not be said to remit others truly and from our heart and so also to attaine to that in regard whereof this particle As was added of Christ to wit which before also we mentioned to desire and pray rightly Now we rightly pray and desire in faith and repentance both which this petition confirmeth Faith is confirmed and strengthened by this petition because when we truly remit our neighbour we may and ought certainly to resolve that our sins are also remitted us and so have we a good conscience and are assured that we are heard according to this promise of Christ If ye doe forgive men their trespasses Mat. 6.14 your heavenly Father will also forgive you True repentance also is confirmed and increased in us by this petition For by this clause As we c. we are provoked and incited to true repentance the chiefe part whereof is the love of our neighbour For if we will be forgiven we must forgive others Both causes are contained in the words of Christ before alledged out of Matthew as also in the rest which are presently added in the same place in Matthew by way of opposition If ye do forgive men their trespasses your heavenly Father will also forgive you that is assure your selves also that your heavenly Father heareth you in which words is comprehended the confirmation of our faith But if ye doe not forgive men their trespasses no more will your Father forgive you your trespasses In these words is added a spurre to repentance Object 4. Paul obtained remission neither did he yet forgive all men their trespasses because he saith 1 Tim. 4.14 Alexander the Copper-smith hath done me much evill the Lord reward him according to his works Therefore it is not necessary that we should forgive Answ There is a threefold remission or forgiving Remission is threefold Of revenge Of revenge This belongeth to all men because all men ought to remit and forgive revenge Hereof speaketh this petition and this Paul did forgive Alexander Of punishment Of punishment This as all cannot inflict so neither can all remit but neither the Magistrates also unto whom yet the same otherwise is committed ought alwaies to remit this but only for certaine causes For God will have the execution of his justice and law But Paul forgave Alexander the punishment also as much as concerned himselfe yet he will notwithstanding have him punished of God but with a condition that is if he persist in sin Of judgement Of judgement This is not alwaies to be remitted For God who forbiddeth lying will not have us judge of knaves that they are honest men but he will have us discerne the good from the bad This also Christ commandeth saying Mat. 7.6 10.16 Give not that which is holy to dogs neither cast pearles before swine And againe Be ye simple as doves and wise as serpents Therefore Paul sinned not in retaining his judgement and opinion of Alexander as of a wicked man as long as he repented not ON THE 52. SABBATH Quest 127. What is the sixth petition Answ Leade us not into temptation but deliver us from evill that is Because we our selves are so feeble and weake by nature that we cannot stand so much as one moment or instant a John 15.5 Psal 103.14 and our most deadly enemies Sathan b 1 Pet. 5.8 Ephes 6.12 the world c John 15.19 and our owne flesh d Rom. 7.23 Gal. 5.17 doe instantly oppugne and assault us uphold thou us and establish and strengthen us by the might of thy spirit that we may not in this spirituall combate yeeld as vanquished but may so long stoutly withstand them e Mat. 26.41 Marke 13.33 untill at length we get full and perfect victory f 1 Thessal 3.13 5.23 The Explication HEre some make one some two petitions but we are not to strive so that nothing of the doctrine be taken away but that this be made full and plaine Now they are rather two parts of one petition Leade us not into temptation is a petition of delivery from future evill Deliver us from evill is a petition of delivery from present evill The speciall Questions 1. What Temptation is THere are two causes of temptation Two kinds of tempting 1. Gods tempting Gen. 22.1 Psal 139.1 Deut. 13.3 1
13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday to day and the same for ever 1 Cor. 8.6 We have one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things and we by him d 1 Cor. 10.4 All did eate the same spirituall food and all did drinke the same spirituall drinke for they dranke of the spirituall Rock which followed them and that Rock was Christ 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are all baptised into one body both Jews and Greeks and have beene all made to drink into one Spirit Ephes 1.4 5. He elected us in him before the foundation of the world was laid and hath predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his will IV. The spirituall grace or the thing signified is with the signes received in the true use of the Sacrament which is when with true faith and conversion to God the Sacrament is a received for God so instituted the Sacraments that the signes ordained to confirme our faith should be received out of the hand of the Minister the promise annexed to the signes and spirituall grace it self promised should be received by faith from b God as the promise cannot be received but by faith Hence the Sacraments are not availeable to those that are without faith and conversion Testimonies of Scripture and of others a John 1.26 33. I baptise you with water but he standeth in the midst of you whom yee know not he it is who baptiseth with the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 3.6 I have planted Apollo hath watered but God gives the increase b Rom. 2.25 But if thou breakest the Law thy circumcision is become uncircumcision 1 Cor. 11.20 When ye come together therefore into one place this is not to eate the Lords Supper Apol. August Confes Tit. De usu Sacram. Therefore as the promise is ineffectuall if it be not received by faith so the Ceremonie is unprofitable if faith be not added which truly assureth us that here remission of sins is proffered V. Here is the true use of Sacraments when the Sacramentall signes are received with true faith and a repentance and are directed to that end for which they were ordained by God Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Mark 16.16 He that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved Rom. 2.25 Circumcision indeed availeth if thou fulfill the Law Apol. August Confes De Sacram. c. Therefore we teach that in the use of the Sacraments faith is required which may beleeve these promises and may receive the things promised which are there offered in the Sacrament and it is a most plaine and firme reason that the promise is uselesse if it be not received by faith Idem De usu Sacram. And such an use of the Sacrament is the worship of the New Testament when faith quickneth the affrighted soule Idem But that faith acknowledgeth mercy and this is the principall use of the Sacrament VI. By reason of the Sacramentall signification obsignation and exhibition of things by signes it comes to passe that oftentimes the signes do retaine the names of the things signified which phrase is called Sacramentall Testimonies of Scripture and of others Gen. 17.18 This is my Covenant Verse 11. This shall be the signe of the Covenant betweene me and you Exod. 12.11 This is the Lords Passeover 1 Cor. 11.24 25. This is my Body This Cup is the New Testament in my blood August Ad Bonifac. Epist 23. If Sacraments had not a certaine similitude of these things of which they are Sacraments they could not be Sacraments at all and by reason of this similitude many times they receive the names of the things themselves Idem Tom. 4. in Levit. quaest 57. The thing which signifieth is wont to be called by the name of that thing which it signifieth as it is written The seven sheaves are seven yeares VII We therefore reject these truly Sacramentarian errors which are partly Papisticall and partly Ubiquitarian as 1. That there is no need of the generall doctrine of Sacraments 2. That Sacraments are not fully but onely in some sort defined by the efficient and small cause or by their effects as the Apology of Exfurt teacheth 3. That they are not the Seales of the promises of grace nor do they confirme our faith as the Jesuits and Anabaptists contend 4. That they containe justifying grace in them as it were the pitchers or vessels thereof that they are the instruments of justification by conferring it 5. That by their force they conferre justifying grace by the work wrought as they say 6. That there is not the same spirituall grace in the Word and in all the Sacraments nor the same communion of Christ 7. That the old Sacraments were bare signes without the true exhibition of the things themselves in their true use 8. That the spirituall things signified no lesse then the signes signifying are carried in and dispensed by the hands of the Minister 8. That spirituall things are received by the wicked even without faith 9. That there are no phrases figurative and Sacramentall but all proper in the Sacraments 10. That there are seven or more Sacraments then the two of Baptism and the Lords Supper instituted by God ARTICLE IX Of Baptisme I. WE beleeve that Baptisme is the laver of water in the Word by which Christ cleanseth his Church regenerating and renewing it by the holy a Ghost that is to say that it is a Sacrament instituted by Christ in which God witnesseth to those that are baptised with water in the Name of the Father Son and holy b Ghost that he receiveth them into the Covenant of grace through Christ and that he reneweth and cleanseth them from sin by the holy Spirit through his bloud Testimonies of Scripture a Ephes 5.26 Even as Christ loved the Church and gave himselfe for her that he might sanctifie her having cleansed her by the laver of water in the Word Tit. 3.5 By his mercy he hath saved us through the laver of regeneration and renewing of the holy Ghost b Mat. 28.19 Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father Son and holy Ghost Mark 16.16 He that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved 1 Cor. 6.11 You are washed you are sanctified you are justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are baptised into one body II. We say that it consisteth of the Element and the a Word according to that vulgar saying Adde to the Word the Element and it becomes a Sacrament as if it were a visible word and therefore it consisteth of a two-fold b washing the one external of water obvious to the sense the other internal of bloud and of the holy Ghost and of this the Word instructs us The externall signifying washing which is a signe is done by the Minister touching the body externally the internall which is the thing signified
that the nature assumed the nature or the nature assumed the nature mediately the person immediately assumed the nature because as they speake the union is immediatly terminated in the person mediatly in the divine nature III. The humanity in Christ is not a person subsisting in it selfe but a nature having no proper personality but by reason of the union fully capable and participant of the person of the Word The Animadversion It is rightly said that the humanity wants a proper personality for a personality is a subsistence or the power of subsisting by it selfe without any other and without any other suppositum or supporting subject of a rationall nature which power the humanity neither had Whether and how the flesh is capable of the person nor hath but it is a new improper and deceitfull saying that by force of the union the flesh is made fully capable and partaker of the person of the Word It is first new because neither the Scripture nor the Church speaketh thus that the flesh is capable of the person 2. Improper because the flesh neither containes nor incloseth the person of the Word as the place is said to be capable of the thing placed He begins to speake thus Thes 44. neither becomes it the person it selfe or is it informed by the personality as the subject is capable of the forme 3. Deceitfull because the Sophister useth this phrase as a preparative for the reall communication of the properties in the natures to wit that he may say that the flesh is after the same manner capable and partaker of the deity and omnipresence as it is according to his saying partaker and capable of the personality and that therefore not by its owne but by the deity and immensity of the Word it is God and omnipresent even as not by its owne but by the personality of the Word it subsisteth But orthodox men confesse with Damascen that the person of the Word by reason of the union is common to both natures that now the humanity subsisteth in Christ by the same personality that the divinity doth but they deny that the flesh is made so capable and partaker of the person as if it were the person it selfe as they also deny that it is made so partaker of the deity and omnipresence as if it were the deity of God himselfe the omnipresence or omnipresent c. neither doe they grant that it is otherwise partaker of the person of the deity of the omnipresence or can be then by the union which maketh not that the humanity but that man is the person is God is omnipresent in which sense the Apostle saith That the Son of God was made partaker of the flesh and bloud of the children to wit Heb. 2. by assuming the seed of Abraham into his personality or by the hypostaticall union whereby not the deity of the Son but God the Son is made flesh and blood that is to say true man In this sense also it may be rightly said that the flesh or humanity of Christ is partaker of the person of the deity of omnipresence to wit by the union with the divine person and omnipresent which union makes not that the humanity of Christ but that the man Christ is a person is God is omnipresent IV. This in the Scripture is called flesh by which word not the onely corporeall masse is understood but the full and entire humanity consisting of a true body and a reasonable soule V. For the Son of God is made partaker of flesh and bloud as we are to wit in all things made like to his brethren except sin The Animadversion He saith well That under the terme of flesh is meant the entire humanity consisting of a true body and soule so he would adde these words With the true properties of both and withall the infirmities except sin For if he be like his brethren in all things then surely in locality and circumscription hee is made like to them and that in the union and in the Word For without the union and without the Word the flesh hath neither being nor subsistence at any time Therefore that is false which he affirmes in the 36. Thesis That the flesh by power of the union hath in a most eminent way transcended all locality in the illocall Word and that it hath obtained an illocall manner of existence VI. Therefore the Word did not assume an imaginary but a true and solid body consisting of flesh and bones Luke 24. of flesh and bloud John 16. which also in glory remaines a true body conformable to the glorified bodies of the Saints both in substance and qualities The Animadversion This Thesis alone doth strongly refute these ensuing subterfuges 1. For if the Word assumed not a fantasticall but a true and solid body then doubtlesse it assumed a body endued with quantitie dimension visibilitie and localitie For that is not a true body but an imaginary that wants quantitie nor can that be solid which wants dimensions and that hath no dimensions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is indivisible illocall for an uncircumscribed nature is invisible saith Theodoret. Now such a body as the Word did assume such a body assumed is in the Word Therefore it is false That the body of Christ in the Word which is illocall did obtaine an illocall way of subsisting that is that it is made and becomes illocall 2. If the body assumed by the Word consisteth of flesh and bones Luke 24. of flesh and bloud Hebr. 2. certainly that body which is feigned to lurk in a crust of bread or under the accidents of bread and to be eaten by the mouth is not that true and solid body assumed by the Word because it hath not flesh and bones 3. If also it remaines in glory such a bodie to wit solid and true consisting of flesh and bones having dimensions then doubtlesse in glory it retaines the definition of a true bodie from which definition the three dimensions and by reason of these circumscription and locality can be no more separated then rationality from man 4. If it be conformable to the glorified bodies of the Saints in substance and qualities it cannot then be illocall immense every-where for our bodies shall not be illocall nor every-where but shall have their Vbs by Christs owne testimony John 17.24 Father I will that they whom thou hast given to me may be with me where I am John 14.2 3. I goe to prepare a place for you and if I goe and prepare a place for you I will come againe and receive you unto my selfe that where I am there you may be They need not then cavill thus That the body is such in its owne substance but in the Word by reason of the union it is not such for whereas it hath its being not in it selfe but in the Word which assumeth it and alwaies had doubtlesse it is and remaineth such in the Word and in the
hypostaticall union may be called a composition to wit that by it the person of the Son of God before subsisting of one nature now subsisteth of two remaining in the interim perfect and simple in it selfe But not as if the person of the Word incarnate were made up of two natures or of a person and a nature neither of which that person is as man is made up of a reasonable soule and body but neither of these is man After the same manner the flesh may be said to belong to the integrity of the person of the Word incarnate not as a part integrating and completing an incomplete person but as a nature assumed into the hypostasis of the Word in which the same Word inhabiteth whole and entire corporally as it were in his Temple and exhibits himselfe as it were clothed with a garment or vaile to be seen and felt he being in himselfe invisible and unpalpable For so we see the Scripture speaks of that inhabitation of the Word in the flesh assumed John 2.21 Phil. 2.8 Hebr. 10.20 and so doe the Orthodox Fathers among the rest Austin Lib. 1. c. 21. de Trin. The Word saith hee was made flesh that is man yet not converted nor changed into that which was made but clothed with flesh that he might be seen of fleshly men in a fleshly manner Neither doth our Adversary speak otherwise when he saith Thes 18. that the whole Word was clothed and covered with flesh The Word clothed with flesh not accidentally but personally But let us not imagine that the flesh accidentally only and by way of an externall habit is super-added and joyned to the Word as a garment extrinsecally adheres to a man or accidentally and changeably which as Lombard witnesseth was the opinion of some for the flesh is so assumed into the most intimate and inward hypostasis of the Word that the union thereof with the Word is truly hypostaticall that is it hath the same subsistence with the Word These things being observed there will be no danger of fallacies for it will be easie out of the distinction and true explication of the phrase to destroy whatsoever the Adversary can hereafter alledge from thence for the omnipresence of the flesh For the entire and whole person of the Word incarnate is God and immense and omnipresent eternall also and begotten of the Father and illocall c. Although the flesh assumed into that person be not or is not made God nor immense nor omnipresent and much lesse eternall begot of the Father illocall c. For it will not follow saith Austin that whatsoever is in God must be every-where as God X. The person then of our Saviour consisteth not of one nature onely but of two coupled together immutably and without confusion so likewise indivisibly and without separation and so they meet together in one hypostasis according to the Canon of the Councell of Chalcedon The Animadversion The person of our Saviour consisteth of two natures not by the composition of one third of integrall parts or essentiall either as of matter and forme as this Doctor doth tacitely imply but onely by that way which was declared in the first and ninth Thesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for otherwise there would be a quaternity The words of the Canon of the Councell of Chalcedon sound thus The Son of God was manifested in two natures without confusion without conversion without division without separation the difference of the natures being no waies abolished by the union but rather the propriety of each nature meeting in one person or hypostasis is preserved That fiction then of our Adversary which followeth in the 36. Thesis is repugnant to this Canon to wit That the humanity in respect of the union hath most eminently transcended all localitie in the illocall Word and hath obtained an illocall way of subsisting For so the properties of both natures should not be preserved but confused for the flesh should lose its localitie in the illocall Word and consequently its circumscription dimensions quantity and substance Neither can it be in any case both locall and illocall for it is impossible that one and the same nature can be susceptible of contrary properties or affections together Theod. dial 2. Damasc l. 3. c. 3. l. 4. c. 19. as with Theodoret Damascen teacheth every-where XI Hence there is but one Lord Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 8. and in the two natures and nativities which are more then generically different there is but one onely Son in his eternall generation without a mother in his temporall nativity without a Father Hebr. 7. XII Neither did the Father from eternity beget one Son and Mary his mother another by a temporall birth and conception but that onely one Son of God and man The Animadversion As the Father begot not one Son from eternity and Mary another in time but the very same so there is not a different but the person of the Word before and after the Incarnation is the same in essence and number For the second person of the Trinitie was neither changed by the Incarnation nor was it multiplied or perfected therefore the younger Divines were well warned to take heed and rightly to understand the Adversaries phrase Thes 9. when he saith that the flesh belongs to the integrity of the Word incarnate and that the person of the Word incarnate was composed For it is very improper to say That the person of the Word is a part of the person of the Word incarnate because the person is not made a part of the person either of its owne or of anothers For if of its owne then the whole should be a part of it selfe if of anothers there would not be the same Son begot of his Father and borne of his mother and necessarily there will follow a multiplication and quaternity of the persons therefore Austin saith well Christ is one person of a double substance saith he Lib. 3. c. 10. cont Max. because he is God and man and yet neither God nor man can be called a part of this person otherwise God the Son of God before hee took the forme of a servant was not whole and he encreased when man was added to his divinity XIII As Gabriel said What shall be borne of thee shall be called holy and the Son of God Hence Elisabeth being full of the holy Ghost calls her the mother of her Lord. XIV By reason of this identity of the person or hypostasis the Word was said to be made flesh John 1. The branch of David Jehovah Jerem. 23. The Son of man Son of the living God Matth. 16. The second man the Lord from heaven 1 Cor. 15. And the second Adam made a quickning Spirit Ibid. XV. Now there is one Christ not by conversion of the Deity into flesh but by assumption of the humanity into God XVI Wherefore lest the phrase of the Evangelist The Word was made flesh
them working what is proper to it but not without the communion of the other Even so saith Hierome it is knowne that one and the same Christ is God and man and that he did work according to both formes Ad Paulam Eustoch to wit of the humanity and divinity and that by this he exercised two operations For both formes or natures did operate the one communicating with the other in that which was proper to it The Word operating what is proper to the Word and the flesh putting in execution what belongs to the flesh c. But in many things the Similie will not hold For in man there is an union of two finite natures but in Christ of a finite nature and an infinite In man both natures are shut up within the same bounds but in Christ the divinitie is not confined to the narrow limits of the flesh In man the union is the composition of matter and forme but in Christ the flesh is not the matter of the divinitie nor this the forme of the flesh In man there results a third thing out of the composition which is neither of the other two but in Christ the Word or person is the same before the union but naked and simple after the union clothed with flesh and in a manner compounded In man the union is dissolved by death but Christ will never lay aside the nature which he once assumed Lastly to this purpose serves that which Thomas observes Part. ult quaest 2. In man saith he there is a two fold unitie made up to wit of the nature and of the person of the nature when as the soule is formally united to the body perfecting it that of two there may be made up one nature as of the act and potentiality of the matter and forme and in this regard the similitude consisteth not because the divine nature cannot be the forme of the body 2. Of the person as when of these is made up one man consisting of a body and a soule and in this is the similitude for one Christ subsisteth in the divine and humane nature XXI Therefore as the soule in respect of its substance is not without the body for it is all united to its body so the whole Word incarnate can neither be nor be found nor ought to be enquired for out of its owne flesh The Animadversion By a manifest fallacie from that which is said respectively or secundum quid to that which is spoken simply of a similitude hee concludes a falshood For this is Hunnius his collection The Similie drawne from man is more fit then from other things Ergo it agrees in every thing and consequently the reason is alike of the soule and of the deity that as the soule is confined to the bounds of the body so the deity doth no where subsist without the flesh Who may not here sensibly perceive the imposture He makes a comparison between the soule and the Word as if there were a parity between them whereas there is an extreme imparity for the soule being a finite spirit cannot be without the bodie in which it is so long as it is tied to the bodie though it be all in all and all in every part But the Deitie of the Word is not a finite spirit but immense and most pure by its most simple immensity all in the finite flesh and all and the same together without the finite flesh and subsisting without all things For who will say that the Deitie of the Word was onely there suppose in the mothers womb in the Temple in the Justice-Hall on the Crosse in the Sepulchre c. where his flesh was said to be circumscribed and to be absent in other places where his flesh was not Who will say that he did not fill heaven and earth that he was not at Rome at Athens and every-where without Judea at the same time when his bodie that was most united then to him did remaine within the limits of Judea alone Surely he who affirmes the contrary either feignes a Deity enclosed and circumscribed in the narrow bounds of the bodie or else a bodie diffused every-where with the Deity that is to use few words hee makes either a finite Deity or an infinite bodie This then is one of these false hypotheses by which this Sophister under-props the ubiquity of the flesh He addes also sophistically that the Word neither is nor can be sought or found without its flesh which words neither have the same meaning nor the same truth For Orthodoxe men confesse that the Word is not to be sought out of the flesh because in the flesh onely as in his temple he will be sought and worshipped by faith and prayers And from hence they gather against the Ubiquitaries that the flesh of the Word doth not lurk within a sacramentall crust because they neither worship it nor ought they to worship it yet they deny not therefore that the Word is not elsewhere by that essentiall immensitie which hee hath in common with the Father and the holy Ghost For so the Word being enclosed within finite flesh should be terminated or bounded or else the flesh should have an immensity every-where with the immensity of the Word both which is false Nor doe the Orthodox Fathers otherwise speake or thinke Athanasius De Incarnat Verbi The Word is in the flesh and over and above all things Ibid. He subsisteth over and above all things Ibid. At the same moment when he was in an humane body hee was over and above all things So Hieron ad Marcel He who was infinite was also in the Son of man totall August Lib. 2. de Incarn The Son of God was totall in the body and totall every-where XXII They are deceived then and they reduce this admirable union to the narrownesse of one onely place who dreame that the Word in the flesh is in one and onely in that place where the humane nature of Christ visibly dwells but besides this place that it subsisteth over and above it in other places innumerable The Animadversion He condemneth for an errour not ours but the doctrine both of holy Writ and of godly Antiquity for the Scriptures unanimously witnesse that the humane nature of Christ was visibly confined still to one place and not to two or more at once invisibly the incomprehensible Word in the meane time shewing its presence both in its flesh and else-where where the flesh is not and the union still remaining entire The Fathers also write cleerely that the Word was so in the flesh that it was not shut up within those narrow confines but that it subsisted out of it and over and above all things else It is a fallacy if not a falshood when he saith that now this admirable union is not to be confined to the narrow inclosure of one onely place for though the flesh be shut up in one place it will not follow that therefore the union
Supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the words of the institution 2. In respect of the end and purpose of the institution because it must be done in remembrance of Christ Shew the Lords death That is beleeve that Christ dyed and that for you and then professe it also publickly before all Till he come Therefore it must be observed unto the worlds end neither is any other externall form to be looked for untill the day of judgement The words of the institution which have been hitherto expounded 1 Cor. 10.16 may be made more plain and cleer by these words of the Apostle The cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ The cup of blessing That is the cup of thanksgiving which is received namely to this end that we may yeeld thanks to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the body likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partakers of Christ and all his benefits the same spirit being in us which is in Christ John 15.2 â—phes 5. 1 John 1.6 and working the same in us which he worketh in Christ Or it is a spirituall fellowship of the faithfull with Christ as of members with the head and branches with the vine Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe and testimony of our communion with Christ But this our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are many are but one body Whence it is most easie to collect That this communion of Christ is not a corporalleating For it is wrought only by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the head and we the members and all wee who are members have also a communion of all Christs benefits Therefore the head is common the benefits common and so the members also common among themselves wherefore their love and dilection is common and mutuall Quest 78. Are then the bread and wine made the very body and bloud of Christ ON THE 19. SABBATH Ans No verily a Matt. 26.29 Mark 14.24 But as the water of baptism is not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a signe and pledge of those things that are sealed unto us in baptism b Ephes 5.26 so neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the very body of Christ c 1 Cor. 10.16 11.26 although according to the manner of Sacraments and that forme of speaking of them which is usuall to the holy Ghost d Gen. 17.10 11. Exod. 12.11 13. 13.9 Titus 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 1 Corinth 10.4 the bread is called the body of Christ The Explication THe Papists Transubstantiation under which also Consubstantiation maintained by the Ubiquitaries and others is comprehended is in this Question of the Catechisme consuted and rejected and the sacramentall kind of speech which we use with the true sense of those words of Christ This is my body examined and unfolded We will first intreat of that forme of speech which we use and of the true meaning of Christs words then will wee handle the controversie of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation That therefore which hath been heretofore spoken in generall of sacramentall phrases and termes must be restrained to this Sacrament For thus Austine himself descendeth from the generall rule of sacramentall termes unto a particular instance of eating Christs flesh Eâ—ist 23. ad Bonifâ—â— This saith he is the only way to find whether a phrase be proper or figurative That whatsoever in Gods word cannot properly be referred to some point of morall duty or to the truth of faith you may be assured that it is figuratively spoken And a little after hee produceth this example Except yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drink his bloud yee have no life in you Hee seemeth saith Augustine by these words to injoyne us some hainous crime It is therefore a figurative speech instructing us that wee are to partake of Christs passion and joyfully and fruitfully to recall to mind how his flesh was crucified and wounded for us Wherefore as of Baptisme as hath been already declared so of the Lords Supper also the Scripture speaketh sometimes properly and sometimes figuratively The speech is figurative when Christ saith of the bread This is my body and of the cup This is my bloud Likewise when Paul saith This cup is the new Testament in my bloud For in these the name of the thing signified is attributed to the signe Paul also then speaketh figuratively when he saith This is my body which is broken for you because he attributeth the property of the signe which is to be broken to the thing signified Thus Cyprian must be understood When we drink of the cup we cleave to the crosse Serm. de Coena Hom 24. in 1 Cor. 10. Hom. 27. wee suck Christs bloud and lay our tongues in our Redeemers wounds Thus Chrysostome is to be interpreted when he saith Christs bloud is in the chalice Christs body which is in heaven is presented on earth to our view and is not only seen but touched of us nor touched only but eaten also he is held bitten and eaten of us in token of love as sometimes wee bite at him whom we love and touch his flesh with our tongue These sentences are not truly spoken or understood of the body of Christ but by a trope and figure usuall in sacraments Now the speech is proper when Christ saith Doe this in remembrance of me and when the Fathers every where say The breaking of bread is a memoriall a lively shadow of Christs sacrifice The bread signifieth the body of Christ It is a figure a signe a sacrament of the body of Christ Of the controversie concerning the words used in the Supper NOw whereas our adversaries the Papists and others deny that Christs words are sacramentally spoken and say we are to keep the letter wee must here adde something touching the controversie of the letter and meaning of the letter The Papists bear us in hand that by the vertue and force of consecration there is made a transubstantiation or changing of the bread into the body of Christ the accidents only remaining Others tell us of a consubstantiation or co-existence of Christs body in or with the bread The Transubstantiaries The Transubstantiaries and Consubstantiaries relie not on the simple meaning of Christs words together with the Consubstantiaries doe boast and glory that they understand the words of Christ simply and aright But neither perform that which they brag and boast of for that is the true simplicity and property of the word whereunto for the just understanding and interpretation thereof nothing is to be added neither ought to be taken from it neither any thing altered But as many as hold that the body of Christ