yet if wee bee vncleane and vnpure we make them all vnpure to our selues I say to our selues but not to others For why should they bear the blame of our impurity or why should they bee punished for our iniquity The Apostle speaking of the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. saith He that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth and drinketh iudgement to himselfe not discerning the Lords body hee cannot eate and drinke iudgement to other men but hee may to himselfe Likewise the same Apostle writing to Titus saith Chap. 1.15 Vnto the pure all things are pure but vnto them that are defiled and vnbeleeuing is nothing pure but euen their minde and conscience is defiled No man can defile the Sacraments to others but onely to himselfe forasmuch as they take their nature and borrow their force from God not from men and therefore are not to bee esteemed by the vice or vertue of the Minister but by the power and vertue of God If a Prince should send vs a pardon by his letters pattens and deliuer them into the hand of a wicked man as God sent Iudas the son of perdition to the Children of Israel to preach vnto theÌ„ that the kingdome of God was at hand would we refuse the pardon because of the wickednesse of the messenger Or may wee thinke it to bee lesse forcible and auaileable because hee is an vngodly person Woe then vnto those that bring in againe the damnable doctrine and practise of the Donatists long since buried and shaken in peeces who make a schisme in the Church depart out of the church for the faults offences of the Ministers because wee are not baptized into the names of the Ministers neyther are made partakers of the supper of the Ministers but we are baptized in the name of God and we are made partakers of the Supper of the Lord. They are therefore their owne enemies that looke too much vpon the messenger and too Vse 2 little vpon him that sendeth him vnto vs. Secondly is God the true and onely author and appointer of Sacraments Then none must adde vnto or take from the Sacraments instituted by him in the church no more then vnto the c Deut. 4. worde it selfe Deutronomy 4. Yee shall put nothing to the word which I command you neyther shall ye take ought there from that ye may keepe the commandements of the Lord your God which I command you And Reuel 22 18 19. If any man shall d Reuel 22 18 19. adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke and if any man shall diminish of the words of the booke of this prophesie God shall take away his part out of the booke of life If the Sacraments were the inuentions of men they might also fitly receiue the additions and subtractions the changes and the alterations of men but seeing they are the ordinances of God we must be content to haue them ordered by God All Ceremonies therefore and rites deuised by men as parts of Gods worship are so many abhominations and innouations of his seruice As God onely can gratiously promise so hee can onely effectually performe what he hath promised Wherefore we must condemne those as guilty of rebellion against God that bouldly breake out eyther to deuise new Sacramentes or to adde and detract from them that God hath ordained We are commanded to rest in those that he hath appointed to the Church in his worde for as well wee may deuise a new word as deliuer a new Sacrament aswell wee may coyne a new Article of faith as bring in a new confirmation of of faith Thirdly wee learne heereby that they which condemne Vse 3 the Sacraments and will not suffer them to bee of any force with themselues and making small account of them doe esteeme them as trifles or otherwise abuse them contrary to the institution will and commandement of Christ all these do greeuously sinne not against man but against the author of them that is God who hath ordained them and greatly indanger their owne saluation as 1. Cor. 11. He that eateth drinketh vnworthily e 1 Cor. 11 29 eateth drinketh his owne iudgement because hee discerneth not the Lords body If a man contemne or any way contumeliously abuse the seale of a Prince he is punished and therefore such as scorne and make a mocke of the Sacraments which are the seales of God cannot goe scot-free but shall bee indighted of high treason and rebellion against his Maiesty The last point to bee considered in the description of a Sacrament is the end of them where it is added Whereby Christ and al his sauing graces by certaine outward rites are signified exhibited and sealed vp to vs. This is proued directly by the Apostle 1. Cor. 10 16. The f 1 Cor. 10 16 cup of blessâ—ng which we blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the Communion of the bodye of Christ So Peter speaketh Acts 2. of the other Sacrament g Acts 2 38. Amend your liues and be baptized euery one of you in the name of Iesus Christ for the remission of sinnes and ye shall receiue the guifts of the Holy-Ghost And Paul saith in another place All ye h Gal. 3 27. that are baptized into Christ haue put on Christ Our soules are washed in the bloud of Christ his buriall his resurrection his sanctification his wisedome his righteousnesse his redemption is made ours all his benefits are ours as Christ is ours Vse 1 Let vs make vse of this point and apply it to our selues First is Christ the summe and substance of all Sacraments Then the Church of Rome is heere condemned that say we make the Sacraments bare and naked signes God forbid that we should say so or make them to be so they are the sure seales of Gods promises heauenly tokens spiritual signes and authentike pledges of the grace and righteousnesse of Christ giuen and imputed vnto vs. The Sacraments and sacrifices of the olde Testament were not bare signes Circumcision was not i Rom. 2 28.29 a bare signe as Rom. 2. This is not circumcision which is outward in the flesh but the circumcision of the heart And In Christ k Col. 2 11 12. yee are circumcised with circumcision made without hands by putting off the sinfull body of the flesh through the circumcision of Christ Euen so Baptisme is no bare signe it were great blasphemy so to speake it were very great iniquity so to thinke The grace of God doth worke with his Sacraments and therfore the signes are neuer receiued in vaine of the faithfull and worthy receiuer The water washeth not from sinne the bread and wine feede not to eternall life but it is the precious blood of Christ that doth cleanse vs from al sin and purchaseth for vs all grace which is the life and the truth of the outward signes Againe
compact which the eternall God hath in great mercy and compassion made with mortall and miserable men accepting them into grace and fauour promising to them remission of their sins and saluation of their soules The summe and effect of this Booke These things the iudicious Reader shall finde largely discussed in this Treatise which I haue therefore called The New Couenant because it layeth open the doctrine of the Sacraments which serue to confirme and strengthen vs in that Couenant and compact which the eternall God hath in great mercy and compassion made with mortall and miserable men accepting them into grace and fauour promising to them remission of their sins and saluation of their soules These my rude though renewed labours I willingly submit to the wise censure of my learned Brethren remembring that the spirits of the Prophets are subiect vnto the Prophets If I haue any where erred through humane infirmity 1 Cor. 14 32 or mistaken the matter any way which I go about to prooue or perswade I desire them heartily by some meanes to giue mee friendly notice thereof which I shall receiue as precious balme or as an excellent oyle that shall not breake my head Psal 141 5 The Lord God almighty from whom euery good giuing and euery perfect giuing proceedeth establish vs in the New Couenant and make vs carefull to keepe the conditions thereof to the increase of our knowledge to the growth of our faith to the furtherance of our obedience to the comfort of our soules and to the glory of his great name Amen Amen Thy Brother in Christ our Sauiour William Attersoll THE FIRST BOOKE OF THE Sacraments in generall Of the agreement and difference betweene the Word and Sacraments CHAP. 1. GOD euen from the beginning added vnto the preaching of the word a God alway gaue his sacraments to his Church his Sacramentes in the Church as the Scripture teacheth outwardly repesenting and visibly offering to our sight those things that inwardly hee performeth to vs as b Gen 2 9. the tree of life the tree of knowledge of good euil in the Garden After mans fall when a new necessity was added in regard of mans want and weakenesse he testified his loue and ratified his Coueant by sacrifices Ceremonies to our first Parents Hee gaue the c Gen. 6 14. Arke to Noah and his sonnes to confirme them in the promise which he made to them that they should not be drowned with the rest of the world Hee added to Abraham d Gen. 17 11. the signe of circumcision as a seale e Rom 4 11. of the righteousnesse of faith and to the Israelites hee gaue the Passeouer Manna oblations purifications the brazen Serpent the Rocke and such like spirituall tipes whereby he assured them of the promise that God for the onely sacrifice of Christ wrought vpon the Crosse would giue to all that beleeue forgiuenes of sinnes and euerlasting life Now the word of God may fitly bee resembled to writings and euidences and the f The agreemeÌ„t between the Word Sacraments Sacraments to seales which the Lord alone setteth to his owne letters They are as a visible Sermon preaching vnto vs most liuely the promises of God that as the worde wee heare doth edifie and instruct the minde by the outward eares so do the Sacraments by the eyes and other senses First then that wee may vnderstand the doctrine nature of the Sacraments wee are to consider what the word and Sacraments haue in common and how they agree one with another then what they haue peculiar and proper each to other and how they differ one from another The argument betweene them standeth in these points First both are of God and instruments which the Holye Ghost vseth to this ende to make vs more and more one with Christ and partakers of saluation not that God needeth them or that he is tyed vnto them for as he can nourish without meate and drinke so he can saue without word or Sacraments but because wee neede them hee vseth them when hee will and as often as it pleaseth him The same which is published and promised by the worde of God is signified and sealed by the Sacraments For they are not a deliuering of new promises and articles of faith but seale vp such as are offered in the word Secondly although God vse them as instruments of his grace yet the especiall working and forcible power of them is not in them but dependeth on God alone so that wee must not thinke that whosoeuer partaketh them is partaker of grace saluation forgiuenesse of sinnes and euerlasting glory but the vertue of them floweth from him onely as from a fountaine A man may heare the word and receiue the Sacraments all the dayes of his life and be neuer the better except God change the minde open the heart enlighten the vnderstanding cleanse the conscience and sanctifie the affections to his glory Thirdly as the preaching of the word profiteth nothing vnlesse it be vnderstood applied and receiued but g Heb. 4 1. tendeth to iudgement so the Sacraments except wee bring the hand of faith with vs cannot giue vs faith nor grace but tend to our condemnation Yet as the Gospell is alwaies the sauour of life vnto life of it owne nature and the h Heb. 4 12. word liuely and of comfortable operation howsoeuer the vnfaithfull turne it to be the sauour of death vnto death So the Sacraments cease not in themselues to bee true Sacraments although they bee administred by vnworthy Ministers and receiued by vnfaithfull people For mans wickednesse cannot peruert much lesse euert the nature of Gods ordinance Lastly as the best seede springeth not vp and bringeth not fruit so soone as it is sowne but lyeth a time couered in the earth to take rooting so the fruite reaped by the word and benefit receiued by the Sacraments presently appeareth not but groweth and increaseth at the time appointed of God who will blesse them in his elect at what season himselfe hath ordained Thus wee see what the word and Sacraments haue in common both are instruments of the same grace both haue their benefit blessing and force depending on God both require faith to bee mingled with them without which they are vnprofitable and lastly they profite not by and by at the same moment they are published administred heard or receiued but God afterward worketh oftentimes by them in his children to their great comfort when all fruite to come by them seemed to be buried The Disciples at the first vnderstood no more of Christs resurrection then the vnbeleeuing Iewes did when hee saide i Iohn 2 19. Destroy this Temple and I wâ—ll builde it againe in three dayes But they lay it vp in their hearts and long afterward remember the words he spake vnto them So wheÌ„ they saw Christ riding to Ierusalem the multitude spreading their garments in the way and cutting
or difficulty to say this is my body when he gaue a signe of his body declaring thereby that by these words My body he vnderstood the signe of his body expounding the former by the latter It is also very waighty and worthy to be considered Epist 23. which he writeth in his Epistle to Boniface If the Sacrament had not a resemblance of the things whereof they are Sacraments they should not be SacrameÌ„ts at all but because of this most commonly they take the name of the things themselues so then as the Sacrament of Christs body is after a sort the body of Christ and the Sacrament of Christs blood is after a sort the blood of Christ so the Sacrament of faith is faith If he had verily beleeued that it is really the bodye of Christ he would neuer haue said this Sacrament is after a certaine fashion the body of Christ as euery man would laugh vs to scorne if we should say that Paul was after a sort a man or Peter was after a sort a man who were men truely and indeed And in another place he saith e Tract 50 in Iohan. Wee haue euer Iesus Christ according to the presence of his Maiesty but according to the presence of his flesh hee hath truely sa de to his Disciples Mee shall ye not haue alwayes Mat. 26 11. Origen also is plaine for vs writing vpon Mat. 15 Mat. 16 11 where he saith f Orig hom in Mat. 15. This meat which is sanctified by the word of God by prayer as touching his matter goeth downe into the belly and is voyded into the draught Let vs come to Chrysostome who aboue al the rest is vehement in his amplifications excessiue in the hight of his eloquence being desirous to draw the people to a reuerence of this Sacrament to redresse the abuses thereof crept in of which he complaineth in all places of his workes yet when hee speaketh properly he teacheth as others teach and writeth as others write as when he saith g Chrysost hom 83 in Math. If Christ be not dead wherof is this Sacrament a signe and token And likewise in that place When our Lord gaue the Sacrament he gaue w ne And if he gaue wine then by consequent hee gaue bread also which ouerthroweth such as h Dureus in Whâ—t say he took bread but gaue it not he tooke wine but gaue it not If these places bee not plaine and pregnant enough heare yet much plainer He demandeth i Hom. 24 in 1 Cor. What is this bread He answereth himselfe The body of Christ now least any should imagine some change of substance and the maintainers of Transubstantiation begin to lift vp their eares he addeth immediately And what are they made which partake thereof He answereth The body of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And in the same place he telleth vs We must mount on high like Eagles if we will come neare to that body And in the vnperfect worke vpon Mathew if that worke be Chrysostomes k Câ—â—â—â—ost oper inâ—â—â—â—â—r Mat. hom 11. If it bee so dangerous a thing to transferre to priuate vses those sanctisied vessels in which the true body of Christ was not but the mystery of his body how much more the vessels of our bodies which God hath prepared for his habitation But of all other testimonies none is more euident then an Epistle of his written to Caesarius in the time of his banishment which albeit it be not printed among his workes l Pet. Martyr loc class 4. c. 10. sâ—ct 31. yet is auouched to be extant in the Library at Florence Before the bread be sanctified wee call it bread but when the grace of God hath sanctified it it is surely freed from the name of bread and is thought worthy to be called the body of our Lord though the nature of bread remaine in it True it is m Bellar. de Euchar. lib. 2 cap. 22. Bellarmine denyeth that euer he wrote any such thing howbeit Gregory of Valence admitteth the words confesseth the place and yet goeth about to shift it off and to weaken this witnesse as if it were not written by that godly and golden Father n Greg. de Valen lib. de transub but by one Iohn of Constantinople Thus he would delude and deceiue his Reader forasmuch as that Iohn was no other then Iohn Chrysostome and Iohn Chrysostome was Bishop of Constantinople Their owne glosse maketh this exposition o De Cons dist 2. Vocatur corpus Christi id est significat corpus Christi It is called the body of Christ that is it signifieth his body Adde to these the witnes of Maximus the Greeke p In eccles Hierar Scholiast who opposeth the signes to the truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these things are signes but not the truth I will shut vp all these authorities and allegations with the words of Gelasius Bishop of Rome q Gelas in his booke of two Natures Surely the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ which wee receiue are diuine things for that also by them we are made partakers of the diuine nature and yet neuerthelesse the substance nature of the bread and wine do not cease to remaine Can any speake more cleerely and euidently then these do Or haue any of our owne writers written more plainely and distinctly against popish Transubstantiation How then are they deceiued that thinke we wrest the words of Institution Or that we impose vpon the people more to bee beleeued then can be collected concluded out of the Scripture or that we teach and receiue more as authenticall out of Caluine Beza and other later authors then the ancient Fathers euer deliuered I wil briefly answere an obiection which these produce out of Cyprian in his Tract of the Lords Supper Obiect r Cyprian de coen dom This bread is changed not in shape but in nature and by omnipotency of God is made flesh To which I reply 4. things First Answere a change of nature doth not euermore import a change of substance A wicked person when he repenteth and turneth vnto God changeth his nature but the alteration is in quality not in substance there is a kinde of conuersion but no Transubstantiation Secondly this booke is but a bastard it beareth vpon it the name of Cyprian but it is a counterfeit Å¿ Censur patruÌ„ authore Rob. Coco pa. 75 as is sâ—â—ficiently and substantially prooued euen by the confession of the Papists themselues And whosoeuer will vouchsafe to reade the booke it selfe may easily discerne by the style as it were by the smell that it came out of some Couent or Cloister it is in many places so barbarous Thirdly if the word Nature should be taken for Substance in this place it must expresly contradict sundry testimonies of those writers which wee haue alledged before who deny that the nature of bread is changed that is
ruinous it is whereas if it were strong enough it needed nothing to beare it vp euen so seeing God contenteth not himselfe with bestowing vpon vs and blessing of vs with his word but giueth vnto vs together with his word his holy Sacraments also so that our faith is not onely vnderset with the one but vnderpropped with the other it serueth to lay before our eyes our weakenesse our distrust and our vnbeleefe For if we had fulnesse and perfection of faith we should haue no neede eyther of the worde or Sacraments and therefore when this world shall haue an end the ministry of the word shall cease and the administration of the SacrameÌ„ts shall be abolished Seeing then the word is not sufficient but the Sacraments were added for further assurance wee must in this behalfe consider the great goodnesse of God towards vs who doth not onely giue vs faith by his word as by his sauing instrument but hath also added to his word Sacraments or seales of his promise and grace that by the lawfull vse of them he might vphold and strengthen our faith through his blessed Spirit For in asmuch as the Lorde not onely sent the blessed seede for the redemption of mankinde for the remission of our sinnes and for the brusing of the Serpents head but ordained for vs Sacraments to bee pledges of his promises testimonies of his faithfulnesse and remedies of our distrustfulnesse we must freely confesse and thankfullye acknowledge the bottomlesse depth of Gods endlesse mercy towards vs who vouchsafeth to be our God to be reconciled to vs being vile and miserable sinners to make a league couenant with dust and ashes and deliuer his onely Sonne to suffer the shamefull death of the Crosse for vs. And withall wee must â—abor more and more to feele our owne blindnesse distrust infidelity and peruerse nature wee would easily forget this mercy of God vnlesse it had beene continually represented before our eyes Againe seeing nothing is offered and giuen in the Sacraments Vse 2 which is not published in the Gospell seeing they cannot bee where there is no word and seeing the same Christ with all his benefits is propounded in both it meeteth with a common corruption and lamentable practise among many professors that desire and craue especially in sicknesse and extremity often to come to the Lords Table but esteeme little of the preaching of the word and that seeme to languish with a longing after the Sacrament but neuer mourne and lament for want of the word which is as great an error and madnesse as if one should euer looke vpon the seale of his writings but neuer regard the conueiance of his estate Is there not one God the author of both Is there not one Spirite that sealeth vp his promises by both Is Christ deuided that speaketh euidently vnto vs in both How is it then that many desire the Sacrament of the Lords supper seeme to pine away through want thereof who neuer wish or regard the preaching of the Gospell which is the foode of the soule the key of the Kingdome the immortall seede of regeneration and the high ordinance of God to saue those c Ro. 1 16 and 10 14. that beleeue And whence proceedeth it but from palpable ignorance in the matters of God and their owne saluation to be much troubled that the Sacrament is not brought vnto them and yet neuer couet to haue a worde of comforte spoken to them in due season Let all such persons vnderstand that as the Minister d Acts 15 21 and 19 4 and 2 42 40. is charged from God to teach euery Sabboath day and to preach the word in season and out of season to deale the bread to the hungry and to giue vnto euery one in the family his portion so is it required of all the people to desire the sincere milk of the word of God that they may grow thereby which howsoeuer it bee to them that perish foolishnesse yet to such as are called e 1 Cor. 1 24. it is the wisedome of God and the power of God Thus Origen a man excellently learned among the Ancients one of the most ancient saith When yee receiue the Lords supper with al heed reuerence ye take heed that no smal peece fal froÌ„ it by negligence to the ground how theÌ„ do you think it is a matter of lesse heinous offence to neglect his word then his body Wherby we see in the iudgement of this Father and Doctour of the Church the losse of the word is as great a want as the losse of the Sacrament and the neglect of the word is as high an offence as the neglect of the SacrameÌ„t for asmuch as one God is the author of them both and the worker by them both Wherefore we are deceiued if wee make account that there is lesse danger in neglecting the word of God then in neglecting the Sacrament of his last supper but wee must take heede that while wee willingly desire the one wee doe not wilfully despise the other For wee must carefully consider that as the Sacrament is a visible word so the worde is a speaking Sacrament and as God lifteth vp his voice vnto vs in the one so hee reacheth out his hand vnto vs in the other Wee must as well heare when hee calleth as receiue when hee offereth Now by his word preached hee calleth by his Sacraments administred hee offereth his graces vnto vs and as wee must haue hands stretched out for the one so wee must haue eares opened for the other Lastly seeing the Sacraments are so neerely linked together Vse 3 and ioyne as friends hand in hand one with another it checketh all such as are content to come ordinarily and vsually to heare the word and will scarce misse one Sermon howbeit when the Sacrament of the supper is administred they are so sencelesse and secure that except it bee at Easter when they come to it of custome rather then of conscience for feare rather then of faith they make small reckoning of it neither thinke it their duty to resort vnto it Woe vnto all them that vnioyne and put asunder those things which God hath coupled together woe vnto such as doe the worke of the Lord negligently or deceitfully This is to serue him 〈◊〉 halfes and to worship him after our owne inuentions For as it is a counterfeit repentance to leaue one sinne and cleaue to another so it is a fained holinesse to follow one ordinance of God and to omit or forsake another True repentance standeth in denying of all sinne and true religion consisteth in practising of all good things of God Among many that are often hearers of the worde you shall not finde many that are often receiuers of the Supper of the Lord. These are like vnto Ahaz mentioned in the Prophet Esay when God offered vnto him a signe and bad him aske it eyther in the depth Esay 7 11. or in the height
as we haue seene the truth of the doctrin let vs consider the vses therof First is the Minister of the substance of the Sacram. and a principall part of Christs institution Then he must consider it is his duty being authorised frō God by his Church to sanctifie the outward elements and administer the same to deliuer the outward signes offer thē to the receiuers His workes therefore are to put apart consecrate the signs to an holy vse to open declare the couenant of God to pray for his blessing promised vpon his owne ordinance to giue thanks for the blessed worke of our redemption to offer giue and deliuer aright the cretures so sanctified in baptisme to sprinkle with water wash the body to be baptized in the Lords supper to deliuer the bread to be eaten and the wine to bee drunke to the spirituall nourishment of the Church So then the Minister ought not to refuse to baptize such as are broght vnto him Shall the seruant refuse to doe the worke of his maister When Christ the maister shall say Goe and baptize shall he answere againe I will not when the Centurion saith to his seruant Goe he goeth when he saith Come he cometh If the Lord keeper of the Kings broad seale should proudly and presumptuously disdaine to set the seale to the Princes letters pattents were he not well worthy to bee displaced and remoued So if the Minister through enuy or hatred or any other sinister affection which ought not to be harbored in their breast shall refuse to put the seale to the Lords Couenant and hinder little children from comming to Christ he deserueth iustly to be displaced and to beare office no longer in the citty of God but to be remoued for his contempt q 1 King 2 35 as Salomon put downe Abiathar Vse 2 Secondly is it a necessary point of the Sacrament that it be ministred by a Minister Then it condemneth all those that put these seales into a wrong hand and all priuate persons that violently rush vpon this calling and take vpon them to meddle with the administration of the Sacraments with vnwashen hands seeing the dispensatiō of the word and Sacraments is so linked annexed and ioyned together by God that a deniall of licence to do the one is a deniall to do the other and contrariwise the licence to one is licence to the other Christ neuer gaue to priuate persons any such commandement hee neuer committed to them any such office hee neuer commended to their care these holy actions he neuer called thē to this honor he neuer laide vpon them this charge and therefore they haue no part nor fellowship in this businesse If notwithstanding these restrainings of authority from them they will run and rush forward where they should hang backeward their sinne lieth at the doore their punishment hastneth and their iudgement sleepeth not Lastly if the Minister be an outward part of the Sacrament Vse 3 we must beware and take heede wee ascribe not to the Minister that which is proper to Christ and so rob him of the honour due vnto his name The Minister may offer the signe hee cannot bestow the thing signified hee may baptize the bodye hee cannot cleanse the soule hee may deliuer the bread and wine hee cannot giue the body and blood of Christ Iohn may wash with water hee cannot giue the Spirite Man indeed pronounceth the word but God sealeth vp his grace in the heart man sprinkleth the bodye with water but God maketh cleane the soule by the blood of Christ man may take away the filth of the flesh but Christ must purge the conscience from dead works who is that blessed Lambe of God that r Iohn 1 29. taketh away the sins of the world For as Paul ſ 1 Cor. 3 6. planteth and Apollos watereth but God giueth the increase so the Minister offereth the element and outward signe but God giueth the heauenly grace It belongeth to the Minister to handle the externall part it belongeth as a peculiar dignity to Christ to bestow grace to giue faith regeneration t Mat. 3 11. and forgiuenesse of sinnes and to baptize with the Holy-Ghost This truth Iohn confesseth I baptize with water but one commeth after mee who is mightier then I he shall baptize you with the Holy-Ghost Where we see he maketh a flat opposition betweene himselfe and Christ betweene his baptisme and the baptisme of Christ As on the one side wee must take heede of the contempt of him that teacheth and ministreth the Sacraments because the contempt of the word Sacraments doth necessarily follow the contempt of his person so we must beware we attribute or giue not to him more thē his right lest the power of the word force of the Sacraments be attributed to his person whereby men rob God of his glory spoile themselues of the fruite of them both This was it wherein the n 1 Cor. 1 22. Corinthians offended when they said I am Pauls I am Apollos I am Cephas I am Christs Wherefore to keepe a golden meane betweene too much and too little we must doe as if a Prince should send vs some present by one of the meanest messengers of his house we would receiue him fauourably and entertaine him honourably for the guifts sake which he bringeth vnto vs but the guift it selfe we would receiue for the Kings sake from whom it was sent So it becommeth euery one of vs to doe God hath committed to his messengers and Ministers the word of reconciliation we must haue them in singular loue for their workes sake that labour among vs but the worde Sacraments we must receiue for the Lords sake from whō they come Thus much of the first outward part to wit the Minister CHAP. V. Of the second outward part of a Sacrament THe second outward part of a Sacrament a The word of institution a necessary part of the Sacrament is the word necessarily required to the substance of a Sacrament for b August in Ioh. 13. Tract 18. the word is added and ioyned to the element and there is made a Sacrament This sacramental word is the word of institution which God in each Sacrament hath after a speciall manner set downe consisting partly of a commandement by which Christ appointeth the administration of Sacraments and partly of a promise annexed wherby God ordaineth that the outward elements shal be instruments and seales of his graces as for example when Christ saith c Mat. 28 19. Goe teach all Nations and baptize them there is a commandement to warrant the vse practise of Baptisme the promise likewise is in the next words Into the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost So touching the other Sacrament of his supper when he saith d Mat. 26 26.27 Take ye eate ye drinke ye do this in remembrance of me loe there is the commandement
commanding the continuall vse thereof vntil the second comming of Christ The promise is This is my body which is giuen for you this is my bloud of the new Testament shed for you and for many for remission of sinnes Whatsoeuer signes of holye things God gaue to strengthen the faith of his children we may see discerne that God alwaies added the word to the seale the voice to the signe and doctrine to the sight so that when the signe was seene the worde was heard When one of the Seraphins bearing an hot coale in his hand which he had taken from the alter e Esa 6 6 7. touched the mouth of the Prophet hee said Loe this hath touched thy lips and thine iniquity shall be taken away and thy sins shall be purged Now wee know a coale hath not power and force to take away sinne but the word vttered by the Angell did assure him that he should be purged by the Holy-Ghost which was signified by the fire So when Ieremy saw the rod of an Almond tree the Lord saide vnto him Thou hast well seene for I will hasten my word to performe it He ioyneth the signe with the word for a more ample cōfirmation signifying by the rod of almond which first buddeth the hastye comming of the Babylonians against the Iewes Againe when Christ gaue to his Disciples the Holy-Ghost hee breathed on them and said f Iohn 20 22. Receiue the Holy-Ghost The corporall blast and breathing was not the Holy-Ghost but he added his word and promise with the outward signe to assure them that with the breathing hee bestowed a blessing Thus we see that the Sacraments haue the worde alwayes ioyned with them and without the worde whereby their institution and vse is declared they are as a dead bodye without life as a dumbe shew without voice as an empty cloud without water and as a barren tree without fruite Let vs apply this doctrine to our selues First it teacheth that they partake not the Sacraments aright that haue not the knowledge of the word that are ignorant both of the ordinance and institution of God and of the promise annexed to the institution of God of which sort there are many in the world that neuer labour to know what he hath appointed and commanded them to do If they do as others of the Church do therein they rest and seeke no further to be able to warrant their owne worke If they heare the word spoken if they see the body washed the bread broken and the wine poured out and receiue the outward signes they regard no more they go no higher they imagine that they haue done enough g Vnderstanding of the institution required of all they neuer desire to vnderstand the meaning of the words which are necessary to bee knowne comfortable to bee vnderstood and profitable to be marked If a man haue goods befallen or legacies bequeathed vnto him by any will or Testament will he not resort to his learned counsell to be carefull to vnderstand the Testament and know the meaning of the Testator Christ Iesus before his death made his will he hath made his children heires of his promise hee promiseth to them forgiuenesse of sinnes in this life and eternall life in the world to come Doth it not now behooue euery faithfull Christian to search into it and know what is promised and bequeathed vnto him Men of this world for the most part make their eldest and first borne heire of all and leaue little to the other but euery childe of God is as the eldest and as the h Exod. 4 22. first borne most deare to him he shall receiue his double portion the second shall haue no lesse then the first nor the third lesse then the second nor the younger then the elder the first shall be as the last and the last as the first for hee may doe with his owne what he list Againe if a man doe leaue all his sonnes heyres and rich inheritors for the most part lesse is bestowed on the daughters but all the children of God both his sonnes and daughters i Rom. 8 17. Gal. 4 7. shal be heyres euen the Heires of God and heyres annexed with Christ Iesus their share shal be as great as the portion of Sonnes Moreouer when a man hath passed all the dayes of his life in carke care what can he giue to his posterity but earthly riches and a transitory possession a fading inheritance leauing thē inheritors as well of his sorrow as of his substance It is not so with the children of God Christ by his last will and Testament hath promised to make his people sound in faith rich in hope blessed in the pardon of their sinnes heires of the kingdome which hee hath promised to them that loue him This is a great and vnspeakeable comfort to all Gods children whether high or low whether rich or poore So then we ought to bee much more carefull earnest to know throughly vnderstand perfectly the will of Christ then any naturall child is to search the meaning of the wil of his natural father And if men were not wholy carnall they would be thus far spiritually minded Againe is the word an outward part of the Sacrament Vse 2 Then the Sacraments must neuer be separated set apart from the worde They are not dumbe shewes and idle signes but haue alwaies the doctrine of God adioyning vnto them to shew the end vse and profite of them and the purpose of God in them This appeareth in all places where God gaue signes to confirme assure the truth of his promises When he gaue in mercy to Noah and al his posterity the k Gen. 9 11. Raine-bow immediately after the flood as a signe of his couenant hee addeth his word vnto the signe My couenant will I establish with you that from henceforth all flesh shall not be rooted out by the waters of the flood neither shall there be a flood to destroy the earth any more This is it the Apostle meaneth 1. Cor. 11. Ye shew the Lords death till he come Where hee teacheth that the Lords Supper cannot be truely deliuered and rightly administred vnles there be a declaration and shewing foorth of the death of Christ Wherefore it is no Sacrament except the worde and doctrine be ioyned vnto it by way of explication exposition of the outward signe Lastly those Sacraments are proued heereby to be no Vse 3 Sacraments which are foisted and brought in without the warrant of the word For take away the word and what is the outward Element but a bare signe What is the water in baptisme but common water What is the bread in the Lords Supper but common bread What is the wine but common wine such as men vse and all men may take at their ordinary tables Seeing therefore such signes and Sacraments as haue not Gods commandement for their institution nor promise of grace and
that is vnlike Lastly these words cannot enforce any thing to proue that there is any inherent force in the outward element seeing the Spirite is ioyned with it which addeth power and giueth efficacy to the water as it doth also to the worde in all the sauing hearers of it for as the word is a bare sound without the Spirite so baptisme cannot saue without the Spirite Obiection 4 The last testimony and witnesse is produced out of the Acts of the Apostles Chap. 2.38 where Peter exhorteth the Iewes that were at his preaching pricked in their hearts to beleeue in Christ Iesus whom they had betrayed and crucified saying Repent and be baptized euery one of you in the name of Christ for the remission of sinnes and chap. 22 16. where Ananias perswadeth Paul to bee baptized and to wash away his sinnes calling on the name of the Lord. In both which places forgiuenesse of sinnes is ascribed to baptisme and therefore it giueth and conferreth grace I answere Answere It is the beleeuing in the name of Christ that washeth away sinnes and purgeth our consciences from dead workes forasmuch as he maketh the outward worke auaileable by the inward grace of the spirite Againe hee ioyneth inuocation of the name of God with the outward signe which hath the promise of saluation annexed vnto it as the Apostle testifieth Rom. 10 13. Whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the Lord shall bee saued Thus we haue seene the principall pillars of the Romish error beaten and battered in pieces euery reason that caryeth any colour laid euen with the ground so that we are wholy to ascribe to the Spirite of God the lauer of regeneration and the answere of a good conscieÌ„ce toward God Againe is the Spirite of God an inward part of the Sacraments Then wee must learne and remember that we can neuer heare the word or receiue the Sacraments with fruite and comfort without the speciall assistance and inward operation of the Spirite of God Therefore the Prophet ioyneth the Spirite and word together Esay 59. I will make this my couenant with thee saith the Lord g Esay 59.21 my Spirite that is vpon thee and my words which I haue put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed nor out of the mouth of the seed of thy seed from henceforth and for euer A man indeede hath power to heare the word and to receiue the Sacraments his will is free in these outwarde workes but hee hath no power or strength to doe them with profite and comfort except it be giuen him from aboue Though we heare neuer so much though wee communicate neuer so often the Spirit must open our hearts as he opened the heart of Lydia So 1 Iohn 2. That annointing h 1 Ioh. 2 27. which ye receiued of him dwelleth in you and ye neede not that any man teach you but as that same annointing teacheth you of all things and it is true and is not lying Likewise Acts 10. Peter preached the Gospell to Cornelius and his houshold and while he yet spake to them The i Acts 10 44. Holy-Ghost fell on them all which heard the worde So also the Apostles being sent out with their commission and commanded to preach the Gospell to euery k Mar. 16 20. creature it is noted that they went forth and preached euery where and the Lorde wrought with them and confirmed the worde with signes that followed And Iohn 14. The l Iohn 14 26. Comforter which is the Holy-Ghost whom the Father will send in my name hee shall teach you al things bring al things to your remembrance which I haue told you Pharaoh often heard Moses Aaron but he harkened not but hardned his heart because there was no inward touching or teaching of the Spirite The Israelites had heard seene the wonderful things of God yet they profited not in faith in repentance in regeneration and the reason is rendred Deuter. 29. Yee haue seene all m Deut. 29 2.3 4. that the Lord did before your eyes in the Lande of Egypt vnto Pharaoh and vnto all his seruants and vnto all his Land the great tentations which thine eyes haue seene those great myracles and wonders yâ—â— the Lord hath not giuen you an heart to perceiue and eyes to see and care to heare vnto this day When wee come to heare the word which is a word of power of life and of saluation when wee come to receiue the Sacraments which are signes of Gods graces and seales of his promises we see many returne as ignorant peruerse corrupt froward rebellious hard-harted and disobedient as they came to these ordinances of God and whence commeth this how falleth it out and what may bee the reason heereof Surely it is not in him that n Luke 13 24. Rom. 9 16. willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercy who giueth eyes to see eares to heare heart to vnderstand to whom hee thinketh good in his heauenly pleasure Wherefore our dutye is seeing the natural man perceiueth not the things that are of the Spirite of God to pray vnto him to giue vs wisedome to see our corruptions blindnesse ignorance and hardnesse of heart Vse 3 Thirdly doth the Spirit worke in vs by the word Are the word and Spirite ioyned together and doth he teach vs by meanes of the word and Sacraments then we must not separate the Spirite from the worde and Sacraments as the Anabaptists do o Against anabaptists depending on reuelations which depend vpon reuelations and inward inspirations vpon priuate motions and diuine illuminations without the word They will not be taught by the word they wil not be strengthened by the Sacraments but take away the vse of both following their owne foolish fansies and diuelish dreames They boast of the Spirite of God and are led by the spirit of the Diuell We must for our direction and practise learne that as to rest vpon the Spirite without the worde is phantasticall and heriticall and the mother of al errors so the worde and Sacraments without the Spirite are no better then a dead carkasse without life an empty sound without substance a naked shew without truth an empty casket without the treasure and therefore we must knit them together and assure our selues that the Spirite speaketh euidently in the Scriptures the Spirite worketh effectually by the Sacraments and the Spirite helpeth our infirmities to profite by them both CHAP. XI Of the third inward part of a Sacrament THus much wee haue spoken touching the holy Spirite being the second inward part the third inward part a Christ is the 3. inward part of a Sacrament is Iesus Christ crucified the very subiect and substance of all Sacraments He was represented by circumcision and the Paschal Lambe by Manna and the water that flowed out of the Rocke and hee is represented in baptisme and in
in what multitudes the people in such dangers resort to the Church some desiring they may be baptized some that they may be reconciled from excommunication some that they may bee admitted to shew their repentance for their open crimes euery man desiring comfort euery man desiring the participation of the Sacrament In which case if there bee no Minister to be had what misery then followeth them that depart this life vnbaptized or bound in their sinnes Heereby hee meaneth the lawfull Minister of the Church inasmuch as hee ioyneth baptisme and reconciliation from the sentence of excommunication together If any man further shall aske the question Question seeing baptisme is limitted and as it were confined vnto the Minister whether baptisme ministred by hereticks bee auaileable or not For many incline to thinke that it is rather good which is ministred of a lay-man being a member of the Church then by him that is an hereticke Answere I answere hereticks are of two sorts some are remoued out of the Church some are tollerated in the Church and suffered to enioy their ministry So long as a Minister that is an hereticke keepeth his place and is not deposed from his function albeit hee should erre in the foundation yet he is a member of the Church though an vnworthy member and a Minister of the Church though an vnworthy Minister If he should depraue the institution and corrupt the essentiall forme which Christ hath appointed inuiolably to be vsed and obserued then were the baptisme void because the forme being changed the thing it selfe is abolished What is to be â—hought of â—he popish Baptisme Hence it is that the Baptisme celebrated in the Church of Rome is true baptisme because albeit the papacy be not the true Church yet the true Church is in the papacy God preseruing the remnants of it in the middest of the bowels of Anti-Christ as God continued light in the middest of the darkenesse of Egypt Baptisme therefore is in the papacy as the purse of a true man in the hand of a theefe or as an honest mans inheritance in the possession of an vsurper And albeit they haue no ministry rightly and lawfully called yet such as occupy the place of Pastors and hold the publike ministry are not to be accounted as priuate persons or meere lay-men and therefore the baptisme performed by them is not voide or of no effect both because they baptize in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the Holy-Ghost not in their owne name and because their ministry is not to be esteemed according to the persons but as seruing to the Church that yet lurketh secretly in the papacy What then Whether we may bring our children to be baptised of popish Priests may such as professe the reformed religion lawfully and with a good conscience offer their children to be baptized of popish Priests and Masse-mongers I answere albeit it be lawfull baptisme which they deliuer it followeth not that they may lawfully deliuer it or we lawfully seeke it at their hands and albeit it be auaileable wheÌ„ it is done yet neither haue they warrant to do it nor wee to goe for it True it is they haue a calling whereby they differ from priuate men but it is so faulty and corrupt that by no meanes we ought to vse it We ought not to do euill that good may come thereof Rom. 3. Rom. 2 8. 1 Thes 5 22. but it becommeth vs to abstaine from all appearance of euill 1 Thes 5 22. We may not by our practise and example allow and iustifie the horrible prophanations of the Sacraments the detestable corruptions of doctrine and the abhominable superstitions vsed in the worship of God and wee are bound and straightly charged to take heed we do not make our selues partakers of other meÌ„s sinnes 1 Tim. 5 22. We must beware we do not offend the weak brother for whom Christ dyed who may be imboldened by our example to approue of the reliques of Anti Christ and in the end to ioyne with that false Church Lastly 2 Cor. 6 14. 1 Ioh. 5.23 wee are commanded to flie from Idols temples to keep our selues from Idols the sheep of Christ heare his voice but the voice of a stranger they wil not hear It is better for vs to defer the baptising of our children theÌ„ to resort to their baptisme blended and mingled with so many toyes and impieties and though our Children in the meane season should dye yet we must comfort our selues in the Lord and lay hold on his couenant who hath promised to be both our God and the God of our seed and remember that it is not the want of the Sacrament that condemneth but the contempt from which we are free so long as we are ready and desirous to haue our children partakers of it when it may bee had orderly rightly and conueniently Obiection 4 The last Obiection deserueth not the name of an obiection much lesse any answere vnto it sauing that the ignorant may stumble at it some great Doctors of the church of Rome labour to add force vnto it and as it were to put life into a dead carkasse For Thomas Aquinas the darling of the Pope the Oracle of Schooles and the God of the Papists Gal. 3.27.23 alledgeth the words of the Apostle Gal. 3. As many as haue beene baptized into Christ haue put on Christ there is in Christ neither male nor female and therefore as wel women as men may baptize Answere I answere this is a most foolish and vnlearned collection and a plaine wresting and straining of the Scripture and therefore no maruaile if the saying of the wise man be verified heerein Surely the churning of milke bringeth forth Butter Prou. 30 33. the wringing of the nose bringeth foorth blood So the forcing of wrath bringeth foorth strife The popish diuinity is full of such conclusions I will giue thee a taste of them and then come to answere the obiection They reason on this manner Christ walked vpon the waters therefore the body of Christ may be shut vp in a piece of bread Peter walked vpon the waters therefore the Bishop of Rome hath authority ouer all Churches The Saints in heauen are like the Angels therefore they heare the prayers of all men Ioseph wrapped the body of Christ in fine linnen therefore the Priest must lay vp the body of Christ in the Altar The women came to the Sepulcher to see Christ therefore we must go on pilgrimage to visite the holy Sepulcher But I will passe ouer these fooleries and come to the place that is obiected The Apostle meaneth that in partaking of saluation there is no difference betweene male and female Iew and Grecian bond and free but there is great difference betweene man and man in the dispensation of the word and Sacraments Againe if this conclusion were necessary then a man might reason against the Apostle In Christ is neither
the Acts of the Apostles Chapter 9 Act. 9 37 verse 37. when Tabithae a woman full of good workes and almes-deeds was dead They washed her and laid her in an vpper Chamber or whether he meane it of the greeuous afflictions which the faithfull suffered for the Gospels sake vnto death as if he had said Why do we suffer aduersity vnto death Or why am I in ieopardy euery houre Or wherefore do I fight with beasts at Ephesus if there be no resurrection What shall all these aduantage me if the dead rise not Let vs rather eate and drinke for to morrow wee dye Both these interpretations are good and godly and in both these senses and significations the word is taken as wee haue shewed in the first chapter of this booke Wherefore to conclude this point it is no doctrine nor determination of the Apostle either that dead men should be bâ—ptized any more then they should be taught and instructed or that any of the liuing should vndertake the Sacrament of baptisme for the dead Conc. Carth. 3. can 6. and the counsell of Carthage hath decreed accordingly that the weake brethren must beware they doe not beleeue that such as are dead and departed hence may be baptized Thirdly The third abuse they are reprooued that admit such to bee partakers of baptisme as are Infidels and do not professe the faith nor repentance toward God The apostle Peter preaching vnto the Iewes saith Repent and hee baptized euery one of you â—n the name of Iesus Christ Acts 2. verses 38.41 And afterward Luke addeth Act. 2 38 41. They that gladly receiued his worde were baptized And Christ our Sauiour saith in the first place Hee that beleeueth Mar. 16 16. and then addeth in the second and is baptized So that both faith and repentance are required in all those of yeares that are to bee baptized And the reason is euident because without repentance the olde man is not put off and without faith the newe man is not put on Now the Sacrament of Baptisme is a Sacrament of regeneratioÌ„ through the blood of Christ Wherefore to admit such as are vnbeleeuers and vnrepentant sinners what is it but euen to tread vnder foote the blood of Christ and to make a mocke of the new Testament This barreth out very strongly from this priuiledge of the Church all Turkes Iewes Infidels and all sauage nations whatsoeuer that haue not the knowledge of true religion but remaine in blindnesse and ignorance of Iesus Christ and his Gospell and on the other side it teacheth that baptisme is by no meanes to bee denyed vnto them which make profession of faith and repentance Heere before wee do proceede any further we will answere a few questions that may bee demanded touching diuers persons whether they may bee bapâ—ized or not The first question shall be whether the infants of Turkes Iewes Whether the Children of Iewes Turks may be baptized and such like barbarous nations may be baptized I answere that eyther their parents or such are in stead of parents giue consent to haue them baptized or they will not giue their consent If they will not agree that their children should be baptized they ought not to be baptized against the liking and good will of their parents but if they be content and desirous they may be admitted and receiued vnto Baptisme This determining of the question holdeth touching infants and infants onely For all such as are of full age and are come to yeares of discretion to desire baptisme may not nor ought not to depend vpon the consent of parents but whether they be willing or vnwilling they must beleeue in Christ professe the faith practise repentance and desire to be entred into the Church saying with the conuerted Eunuch Acts 8.36 Act. 8. See heere is water what hinders me to be baptized And Philip said If thou beleeuest with all thine heart thou maiest For euery man should follow Christ his maister albeit his parents should disswade him or forbid him Howbeit for infants the case is otherwise they are vnder the iurisdiction of their parents and they rule ouer them so that they cannot without wrong and iniustice be taken from them to whom by the law of nature they do properly belong And therefore Christ commanded not the widdowes sonne whom he raised from the dead to follow him Luk. 7 15. but deliuered him to his mother neither could he be compelled to follow him against the good will of his mother for that had beene to abrogate and abolish the authority of the parents ouer their children But if they can be perswaded and will be contented to haue them baptized then they haue no wrong at all done vnto them for iniury cannot be offered to them that are willing Such fathers giue some hope that in time themselues wil professe the faith in this case the Church is as a tender mother ouer such infants and therefore may iustly and rightly baptize them Thus much touching their children that are out of the bosome of the Church The next question is touching the children of those which indeed liue within the doores of the Church but yet are prophane and vngodly who are in the Church Whether the children of prophane and impenitent persons may be baptized but not of the Church whether they may be baptized or not I answere if the infants of such impenitent persons be brought and offered to be baptized they cannot nor ought not to be barred and excluded from it For albeit their parents be wicked men and vnworthy of any grace or priuiledge of the Church eyther for themselues or their posterity yet it is no reason that their impiety should any way hurt or hinder the saluation of their Children that are borne in the Church or shut them from the meanes of furthering their saluation Heereunto commeth the saying of the Prophet Ezekiell The soule that sinneth shall dye Ezek. 18 20. the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father neither shall the father beare the iniquity of the sonne c. If any obiect and say Obiection The children of the faithfull onely are to be baptized because onely those infants are iudged to be in the couenant and onely holy I answere two things Answere first that in this point we are not to regard the vngodlinesse of such as are their naturall parents of whom they were begotten but the godlinesse of the Church in which and of whom they were borne for the Church is as it were their mother Secondly we must consider not onely their immediate parents but their forefathers and ancestors which haue led a godly and holy life So that albeit they be the children of vnfaithfull parents in respect of the Fathers of whom they came in the flesh yet they are not the children of such if we regard the ancient Fathers and the Church wherein they were borne which is their mother To this purpose Paul
Thirdly the peculiar actions and externall rites of eating and drinking do not agree to babes sucklings Thus likewise in the olde Testament circumcision was ordained for infants but the Passeouer for such as were of that age that they might enquire of their parents touching the substance and signification thereof Exod. 12 26. Exod. 12 26. Thirdly they obiect f Mar. 16 16. Mat. 28 19. that it is said Teach and baptize Obiect 3 and againe He that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued whereupon they conclude that such as beleeue not are not to be baptized inasmuch as Christ before baptisme commandeth teaching and afterward ioyneth baptizing with beleeuing But infants are not capable of doctrine neither do they actually beleeue therefore they are not to be baptized Againe g Act. 2 38. if repentance bee necessarily ioyned as Act. 2. Amend your liues and be baptized then infants must be separated and secluded who cannot repent But repentance is necessarily required therefore infants are to be barred from the Sacrament of baptisme Answere I answere first those sentences are not generall to all but belong only to men of sufficient yeares and discretion to discerne betweene good and euill By this fraud of extending stretching and falsely applying generall sentences of Scripture a man might reare and raise many monstrous conclusions If a man would goe about to proue that children are not to be nourished and fed with corporall food because the Apostle would haue none to eate h 1 Thes 3 10 but such as labour were he not worthy to be spitted at or hissed out of the schooles because he carrieth that indifferently to all ages which is limited and restrained to a certaine age So must we not racke and rent asunder the i Luk. 13 3 5. Rom. 10 17. Mar. 16 16. Heb 11 6. generall sentences of Scripture Except ye repent ye shall all perish faith commeth by hearing and hearing by the word of God hee that beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued These belong onely to men of discretion and are not to be applyed to Infants whom they do not concerne Againe Christ in those words instructeth his Apostles what order they should obserue in the coÌ„uersion of the Gentiles first they must instruct theÌ„ in faith then baptize them being instructed and lastly guide them in true obedience being baptized when he addeth k Mat. 28 20. Teaching them to obserue whatsoeuer I haue commanded you Besides if they strictly vrge and stifly stand vpon the words as they litterally lye in order why may wee not first baptize them before we teach them because it is said baptizing them in the name of the Trinity and teaching them to obserue what I command But he intreateth in this place of such as are growne vp which must first haue knowledge in the Gospell faith in Christ and repentance from dead workes before they be baptized but infants are baptized by reason of the promise made to their parents Moreouer we might oppose vnto these the example of circumcision which we know and they are not ignorant was giuen to infants who could not yet beleeue so that such as barre them from baptisme because they are not capable of faith and repentance might in like manner exclude the infants of the Israelites from circumcision Baptisme is the Sacrament of repentance and faith though neither of these be in infancy yet they are baptized to the repentance and faith to come which albeit they be not actually formed in them yet by the fruites afterward they shall appeare to be in them Lastly if baptisme should be giuen onely to those that truely beleeue it should likewise be denied to such as are of vnderstanding for wee are not able to pronounce of these that they do truely beleeue and certainly apprehend the promises of the Gospell Wherefore if infants are not to be baptized because they haue not faith and want repentance neither are they of sufficient age to be baptized of whom it cannot be directly and vndoubtedly saide they do beleeue S mon the sorcerer mentioned l Act. 8 13 20. in the Acts of the Apostles was baptized and yet remained an hipocrite If they say profession of faith is sufficient to make members of â—he visible Church I answere our Sauiour speaketh not of a bare profession of faith when hee saith He that beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued for then all that professe faith should receiue m 1 Pet. 1 9. The reward of their faith which is the saluation of their soules Againe profession of faith is for such as are capable of it which agreeth not to the age of infants as they cannot deny the faith before men which they haue not acknowledged no more can they confesse the truth of doctrine which they neuer learned Now to be borne in the Church and in the couenant is to infants in place and stead of an actuall confession and reall profession Such as are growne vp must beleeue with the heart n Rom. 10 10 and confesse with the mouth the Gospel of saluation it is sufficient for others to be the children of such as haue confessed the faith Fourthly they obiect in this manner Obiection 4 baptisme is giuen for remission of sinnes but infants haue not sinned they therefore cannot be baptized I answere Answere infants commit not actuall sin yet are guilty of originall sin they want inherent righteousnes they haue a pronenesse to al euil their whole nature is corrupted being in the seed of Adam Albeit therfore infants haue not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression in their owne persons yet they haue sinned in him and in his loynes in whom all are dead This the holy man o Iob. 14 4. teacheth Iob. 14. Who can bring a cleane thing out of filthinesse There is not one Likewise the Prophet p Psal 51 5. Rom. 5 14 19 Dauid confesseth this truth Psal 51. Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sinne my mother conceiued me So the apostle Paul Rom. 5. Death raigned from Adam to Moyses euen ouer them also that sinned not after the manner of the transgression of Adam which was the figure of him that was to come for as by one mans disobedâ—ence many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Wherefore such as hold infants without all guilt of sin neuer knew the greatnesse of Adams fall of Gods iustice of mans misery and of Christs endlesse mercy Lastly Obiection 5 they obiect that Christ himselfe was not baptized vntill 30. yeares of age I answere Answere no more did he preach before he was thirty yet hence it followeth not that none ought to enter that calling before that age True it is he that desireth that worthy office must bee no new plant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no younger Scholler none lately come to the profession gathered immediately from heathenish religion to the fellowship of
breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ If any obiect that Christs body neither is d Ioh 1â— 36. Answere nor was broken as Iob. 19 36. Not a bone of him shall bee broken that the Scripture should bee fulfilled I answere the Apostle hath respect to the sence and signification which the breaking of the bread importeth being taken for the tearing tormenting the paines and renting of the body of Christ and the violent sundring of his soule and body one from the other For as the bread is parted and diuided into diuers parts so the soule and body of Christ were sundred separated each from other Againe it is said This is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many for the remisâ—â—â— of sinnes or This cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for you these speeches are Sacramentall not proper by the confession of the aduersaries themselues where the thing containing which is the cuppe hath the name of the thing contained which is the wine the fruite of the vine So then they which cannot abide figures in the Sacrament must be constrained to confesse a figure and therefore cannot blame vs when we say the words are figuratiuely to be vnderstood But before we come to handle the vses of this part let vs briefly consider the words of Christ deliuered at the institution and administratioÌ„ of this Sacrament that so we may see the true and naturall meaning thereof These words e The words of institution are variably set downe are not recorded reported in so many words in the scripture or in so many sillables but the sence being one the sentence varieth and is not one Mathew deliuereth the words thus f Mat 26 26. Take eate this is my body whereunto g Mar. 14 22. Marke also accordeth Luke is somewhat more ample by way of interpretation h Luk. 21 19. This is my body which is giuen for you do this in remembrance of me And i 1 Cor. 11 14 Paul to the like purpose but in vnlike sound of words Take eate this is my body which is broken for you do this in remembrance of me Likewise touching the other signe of this Supper Mathew saith k Mat. 16 â—8 This is my blood of the new testament that is shed for many for the remission of sins Marke is somewhat more short then the rest l Mar. 14 23.24 This is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many but he addeth this more then the rest they all dranke of it Luke saith m Luk. 22 20. This cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for you But Paul declareth the same more at large This cuppe n 1 Cor. 11 25 is the new testament in my blood this doe as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me Thus we see expresly a difference in words by adding by detracting by changing yet inasmuch as nothing is added or detracted or changed in regard of the true meaning let vs come to the interpretation and exposition of the words seeing the Gospell standeth not o Ierem. 〈◊〉 cap. 1 ad Galat. in the words of the Scripture but in the minde and meaning of them Let vs therefore come to the right vnderstanding of the words of Chrst p The words of institution expounded briefly truly 〈◊〉 plainely Take to wit not only into your mouths but into your hands representing the soule and faith of the receiuer Eate that is not gaze and looke on not reserue not adore not offer it but diuide by chewing and preparing to concoction This that is to say not the shewes of bread but this very bread Is my body that is a true signe of my true body and signifieth vnto you my selfe with all that is mine or belonging eyther to my person or office or merits Which is broken for you that is which shortly shall be crucified for you immediately giuen to death for you Do this in remembrance of me that is practise these duties and call to remembrance Christ and his merits oftentimes So that it is in our choyce and liberty to do these duties or not to do them if we be not fit we must presently prepare to make our selues fit and we must do them often so that howsoeuer there be no set time yet the oftner the better due reuerence and regard being had thereunto Moreouer touching the other signe obserue thus much for interpretation This cup that is this wine in the cup Is the new testament in my blood that is this wine is a true signe of shedding my blood which confirmeth ratifieth the new Testament and Gods agreement with mankinde for their saluation This is briefly the mind of Christ and meaning of the Vs 1 words of institution From hence we learne first that Christs words are not properly but figuratiuely to bee taken True it is the words are plaine easie and manifest for tropes and figures were found out q Arist rhetor ad theodeâ—t lâ—b 3 cap. 6. C cer de orat o. lib. 3. not to darker but to open not to hide but to helpe the vnderstanding howbeit they must haue a right construction and a sound interpretation otherwise the plainest sentence may breed error and mistaking Now this is a sacramentall speech and sacramentall words must be sacramentally expounded as proper must be interpreted properly spirituall spiritually and mysticall mystically We may not take the letter in all places for as we haue shewed the Scripture standeth not in words r Hierom. co◠〈…〉 in Cap. 1. ad Gal. but in the meaning of the words not in the reading but in the vnderstanding not in the outward shew but in the inward substance Christ in the new testament is cald a lamine a lyon a way a bride-groome a head a dore a vine a g◠〈◊〉 a rock bread water light such like these words are 〈◊〉 euident yet must they be vnderstood metaphorically not properly spiritually not litterally So to come to the words of institution What did Christ take in his hand bread What did Christ command them to take and eate bread What did he call his body Was it any other thing then the same bread which he had taken which he had broken which he had giuen vnto them Neither is there any other antecedent going before whereunto it can be referred Now the bread and body of Christ are in nature Disparata sundry and diuers things and the one cannot be spoken of the other and verified of the other without a figure as to say one and the same thing should be both bread and Christs body but if it be bread it cannot be his body if it be his body it cannot be bread Wherefore true bread is a true signe seale of his true body Neither is this figure strange or new but common and vsuall when mention is made of the
Sacraments as Gen. 17. This is my couenant o Gen. 17 10.11 speaking of circumcision yet circumcision was not the couenant it selfe but a signe and token of the couenant as also it is afterward expounded It shall be a signe of the couenant betweene me and you The aduersaries cannot deny a figure in this speech Now what difference is there betweene these two speeches This is my couenant and this is my body are they not alike and in like manner to be vnderstood So Exod. 12. It is the Lords p Exod. 12 13 14. Passeouer properly the Lambe was not the Passeouer but serued to put them in remembrance of that benefit and it is expounded after the blood shall be a token for you vpon the houses where ye are this day shall be vnto you a remembrance Likewise the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 10. That rocke q 1 Cor. 10 4. was Christ whereas properly the rocke was not Christ but the water flowing from it did represent him Thus then we must vnderstand the words plainely truely and briefly r A paraphrase vpon the worâ—s of institution as if Christ had said in this manner This bread which ye haue seene me take breake deliuer and distribute and which I bid you take and eate is a signe or Sacrament of my true body signifying and sealing vp vnto you that my body shall be broken crushed and crucified for you to purchase vnto you eternall life let these Sacramentall rites and actions now performed by me and you be heereafter put in practise by you and all faithfull Ministers and professors for the strengthening of your faith by the remembrance of my death and by the applying of the benefit therof euery one to your owne selues Likewise hauing finished his Supper when he did eate the Passeouer with his Disciples hauing taken the cup and giuen thankes he gaue it being filled with wine to his Disciples and said drinke ye all of this for this wine in this cup is a signe Sacrament of my blood by the shedding wherof together with my death following the full forgiuenesse of sins and perfect saluation which I by my vnchangeable wil and decree do giue vnto you and all that beleeue in me are assured to you and all beleeuers Thus hauing opened and cleared the interpretation of the words wee shall hereafter need to spend the lesse time in confuting the contrary doctrine darkenesse shall flye before the light error before truth and cloudy mists before the Sun-shine of the day Againe seeing the words of institution are variably and Vse 2 diuersly set downe by the Euangelists and the Apostle Paul we learne that euery change of the words where the sence is nothing altered or diminished is not to be condemned as sinfull or vnlawfull so that the alteration being in the forme and frame of words not in the substance and sence of the matter the Sacrament is not destroyed For if it had bin an hainous sin to haue made any change or alteration or to haue missed of the tearmes or sillables of the institution no doubt the Euangelists would haue consented in the words and not haue swarued one from another as appeareth they haue done We see how the Apostles in the allegation of sundry places of Scripture borrowed out of the old Testament do not euermore strictly binde themselues to the Å¿ Mat 2 6. very words as Mat. 2. 6. Heb. 10 5. and in sundry other places but onely to the sence and therefore t Mat. 4 10. sometimes they adde as Mathew 4 10. sometimes they leaue out as occasion serueth True it is to alter any substantiall part or to wrest the wordes to a wrong and contrary meaning or not at all to expresse the sence of the words maketh the Sacrament void but an alteration onely of certaine circumstances u All change in the wâ—rds of institution makes not the Sacraments void as of number or person of Letters or sillables cannot make frustrate the whole Sacrament albeit we allow not any priuate and particular man to make any change of his owne head in such circumstances or to bring in a new frame of words So in baptisme the Greeke Church saith Let the seruant of Christ be baptized in this water c. and heereby nothing is detracted from the truth of the Sacrament because Christ Iesus hath not precisely appointed how many words the Apostles and Pastors of the Church should vse in the execution of their ministry Notwithstanding the obseruation of the words I baptize thee obserued in our Churches seemeth to draw nearer to the commandement of Christ and to confirme more fitly and fully the faith of the baptized and to answere vnto the words of Iohn the Baptâ—st I baptize with water Likewise in the Lord's Supper whereas Christ said Take ye eate ye doe ye this as speaking to many the SacrameÌ„t is not destroyed when the words are particularly rehearsed and specially applyed in our Churches saying take thou eate thou drinke thou Vse 3 Lastly seeing the words of institution are an outward part of the Sacrament necessary to be knowne read marked and vnderstood wherein the substance and comfortable vse of the Lords Supper consisteth it followeth that they are to be published and pronounced openly distinctly plainely not in a strange language but in a knowne tongue that the Church of Christ and people of God may be edified For wherefore serueth the commandement and promise set foorth in the Supper if they be not vnderstood Whether we do reade the Scriptures sing Psalmes poure out supplications receiue the Sacraments or whatsoeuer seruice we performe to God that he may be glorified and the Congregation instructed we must do all in a knowne tongue to be vnderstood This God commandeth this the Apostle prescribeth this the true church of God practiseth this reason teacheth this the Heathen acknowledgeth Notwithstanding a Concil Trid. sess 22 ca. 9. the sinagogue of Rome that it might take away all fruite and comfort from the faithfull and that it might broch horrible errors safely and securely and not be espyed hath not onely commanded to pronounce the words of consecration closely and in silence but forbidden to vse the common mother tongue of all the people The people of God must not be like Parrots or Pies or Rauens or such birds that chatter with voice record mens words and sound a sentence but vnderstand not the meaning therof As Pliny b Plin natur histor lib. 10. cap. 43. maketh mention of a certaine Rauen that had learned to say Aue Caesar Imperator All haile or good morrow Emperor Caesar saluting Tiberius and the two young Princes Germanicus and Drusus And Celius Rhodiginus writeth c Celius Rhodiginus that Cardinall Ascanius had a Popintay that could pronounce distinctly and orderly all the Articles of the Creed Such birds or rather beasts would they haue Christian men to be that would haue them pray and not d
al the people to drink of the cup they might pretend this example of the Israelites but inasmuch as they vtterly deny them this part of the cup they ouerthrow theÌ„selues in their malice and yet in their blindnes they do not see it Finally many of the Fathers did both eate Manna and drinke water out of the Rocke if not in the same place yet at one and the same time n Exod. 16 21 inasmuch as they gathered thereof euery morning and it ceased not a Iosh 5 12. vntill they entred the frontiers and confines of the land of promise But they neuer allow without a tolleration and dispensation the people in any place at any time vpon any occasion and in any respect to taste of the cup in the Lords Supper Ninthly if the cup of the new testament may bee taken from the Lords people in like manner the water in baptisme may be taken away from theÌ„ For the blood of Christ whereby remission of sins is purchased and procured is represented by the wine of the Lords Supper as well as by the water in baptisme But the water in baptisme without great sacriledge cannot be omitted or neglected wherefore then should the cup be taken away Tenthly in the matter of the Supper our aduersaries alledge the words of Christ in Iohn Iohn 6. If you drinke not my blood you shall haue no life in you If these words be thus to be vnderstood then by depriuing them of the cup they depriue the people of life and saluation Againe if drinking of the chalice be a priuiledge of the Clergy how commeth it to passe that Kings and Princes haue a part in this priuiledge How is it that they are permitted as well to drinke of the consecrated wine as to eate of the consecrated bread But heerein was a notable piece of cunning a great point of policy vsed partly to aduaÌ„ce the dignity of the Clergy and partly to stop the mouthes of Princes For as by this order or rather disorder the proud Clergy are made companions with Kings and Princes euen equall vnto them so they thinke to hood-winke them make them content to swallow the rest of their superstitions because they are pleased to grace theÌ„ with this priuiledge aboue the people as with a speciall fauour Moreouer it is not to be omitted that a principall end of this Sacrament was instituted to set foorth the death of Christ not onely as an idle narration but as a profitable application thereof to the conscience How then shall the people know that the fruite of shedding his precious blood belongeth vnto them as the nourishment of their soules except besides the looking vpon the cuppe they be partakers of it It is therefore necessary to vnderstand by eating and drinking that God doth not nourish them by halfes but that Christ yeeldeth whole nourishmeÌ„t vnto them Such then are worthily taxed of rashnes themselues that complaine how the people rashly presume to receiue the Sacrament vnder both kindes for as well they might say that it is rashnesse and presumption to imitate and follow Christ And they may iustly be condemned of heresie who pronounce them hereticks and worthy to be punished by the secular power that speake against receiuing in one kind onely as if it were heresie to follow the example of Christ left to the Church For what remaineth more but to proceed one degree farther euen to pronounce Christ himselfe an Arch-heretick and all the Apostles hereticks also and to condemne them to the Inquisition as deceiuers and impostors seducing and misleading the people Lastly if any part of the Supper might be taken away from the people then likewise the word of God may bee taken from them for in this point there is the same reason and respect of them both A Sacrament is nothing else but a visible word and a sealing vp of the word and the offence seemeth to be the same whether a man breake the seale or rent the writing But the word cannot be withdrawne from Christian people it being the instrument of faith and the life of the Church Wherefore it is the greatest wrong and iniury done to the people of God to take from them the cup of saluation The answere to this reason must be to confesse the parts and yeeld the conclusion forasmuch as by forbidding the people the reading of the scriptures they haue robbed them of the word of God and taken from them b Luk. 11 52. the key of knowledge neither entring themselues into the kingdome of heauen nor suffering those that would enter No maruaile then if they take the cup of blessing from the people who haue taken from them the free vse of the word of God To conclude these reasons it is Antichrist who contrary to the doctrine of Christ contrary to the institution of the Supper contrary to the practise of the Apostles and contrary to the vse of the former churches hath excluded the people languishing and thirsting after the blood of Christ as the dry earth for the sweet showers of raine froÌ„ taking the cup of the Lord and left them a dry communion to eate the bread of the Sacrament alone Hauing considered the truth of God by sundry reasons grounded in the Scripture that the people haue good interest and title in the cup denyed vnto them let vs answere the c Obiections for taking â—he cup from the people of god Arist in Top. Cicer. lib 1 ad Heren et de Orator obiections of the aduersaries made against the former doctrine For it is not sufficient onely to teach the truth and to confirme our owne cause except wee labour soundly to infringe and confute the contrary First they pretend that Christ administred it to the apostles onely and not to any of the people and consequently the institution for taking the cup can be no generall commandement for al men thus d Rhem. Test vpon Mat. 26. and Mar. 14. the Rhemists reason without reason I answere first it may bee doubted and disputed whether onely the Apostles were present at his last Supper For seeing diuers were added vnto the Church and professed the faith of Christ seeing he had other Disciples beside the twelue seeing many godly men and women followed him to see his miracles to heare the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth why should wee thinke that none of them were admitted to his table who had often heard his preaching and depended vpon him in their liuing Againe the Passeouer was celebrated in the house e Mat 26 17.18 of a faithfull man as may be collected by sundry circumstances now then either the Lord Iesus annexed that family vnto his as the law in one case appointed or else we shall haue two Passeouers at one time in one house which hath no warrant of Scripture no colour of truth no probability of reason We reade in the institution and celebration of the Passeouer of ioyning house to house
midst of them that are gathered together in his name and therefore it neuer happeneth that all become vnworthy The word of God hath his effect and one part of the seed falleth into good ground as we see in the parable of the sower Luk. 8 15. And if it could come to passe which is heere imagined it were better to abstaine for a season then to break the commandement of Christ according to the rule of the Apostle When ye come together to eate tarry one for another 1 Cor. 11 33. Furthermore the Priest knoweth not the worthinesse or vnworthinesse of the greatest part if any offer themselues to receiue they must be receiued when their sinne is not knowne Secondly they say that priuate Masses may bee called Obiection 2 common because the people heerein communicate spiritually and because they are celebrated by the publike Minister Answere Heere wee haue common Masses without a communion and without any Communicants howbeit this is true that heere is no communion at all in breaking of bread and eating it beeing broken commanded in the Gospell What agreement then is there betweene Christ sitting at the Table with his Disciples distributing the bread and ministring the cup vnto them and the Masse-Priest standing alone at an Altar and eating all alone without being seene of the people Besides if a Minister pray alone in a corner of the Church yet his prayer cannot be called publike albeit it be made by a publike person and offered vp for all that are absent and conceiued in a publike Temple The like may be saide of the administration of the Lords Supper Thirdly they pretend that the cause why the people Obiection 3 do not communicate is their want of deuotion and good affection that they ought to haue to holy things Heere is a new colour set vpon a foule and deformed face Answere A man would thinke that heareth these excuses that the Church of Rome did onely tollerate priuate Masses but not command them and that they desire they should be publike common were it not for the slothfulnesse and the backwardnesse of the people Sess 7. Howbeit the Councell of Trent not onely suffereth but alloweth and commandeth priuate Masses wherein the Priest alone communicateth Againe if they desired that the people should communicate they would reproue their negligence and stir them vp to greater diligence whereas they confirme them and continue them in it and apply themselues vnto it and leade them into error by their owne example Neither haue they cause to make such a generall complaint seeing the people for the most part are more deuout and religious then the Pastors of the Church of Rome as it was in the dayes of Hezekiah 2. Chron. 30. Obiection 4 Fourthly they demand whether it be the fashion at feasts to constraine them to eate that are not disposed to eate Is not euery one left to himselfe whether hee will eate or not eate I answere Answere the Church of Rome leaue it not at liberty for the people to eate or not to eate but vtterly forbid them and restraine them Secondly at our common feasts no man is compelled to eate because there is no absolute commandement of God to binde them vnto it but in this holy feast it is farre otherwise for we haue the expresse commandement of God to take and eate all of vs. Lastly this comparison of a feast ill besitteth their whole purpose For who euer saw a feast where all the guests that are bidden stand by and eate nothing and the Gouernor of the feast deuoureth and swalloweth vp all alone as it falleth out in the Masse where no body but the Priest eateth Or who euer heard of a solemne feast whereunto no body is inuited But in priuate Masses no man or woman is bidden to come or receiued if they come Obiection 5 Fiftly they adde if the people wil not come would you haue vs leaue the seruice of God Should we be negligent when they are negligent Or should we follow the humor of the people Answere This obiection standeth vpon a double supposition and both of them false The first is that they desire the people should come and receiue whereas all men know the contrary and some men haue accounted it no lesse then heresie to require the partaking of the people at this Supper The second is that the Eucharist without Communicants is the seruice of God these points they take for granted but they neuer go about to prooue them and confirme them If we will receiue such trash at their bare word so it is if not they haue not a dram of reason to establish it Furthermore whereas they adde that the ordinances which God hath commanded ought not to be left for the indisposition of particular men I would know whether the Minister should pray in the Church openly when there is none to ioyne with him Or whether hee should preach the word when there are none to heare him If he may not then how should hee deliuer the Supper when there are no guests I will heere conclude with the complaint that Chrysostome vseth in his time when this corruption began to creepe in O custome O presumption Chrysost Homil. 3. in Ephes In vaine is the daily sacrifice offered in vaine do we stand at the Altar seeing no body communicateth Tell me if a man that is bidden to a feast wash his hands and sit downe and bee placed at the Table and yet eate not doth hee not wrong him that bad him Were it not better that such a one were not present So thou art present thou hast sung the hymne and in that thou hast not retired thy selfe with them that are vnworthy thou hast made profession that thou art of the number of those that are worthy how then dooest thou stay and not partake of the Table Lastly they demand farther Doth the essence of the Obiection 6 Sacrament depend vpon the peoples communicating thereof I answere Answere All communions without communicants do ouerthrow the nature of a Sacrament For Saint Paul defineth this Sacrament to bee a Communion of the bodye of CHRIST 1 Corinthians chap. 10. verse 10. and therfore the Church of Rome destroyeth the definition and consequently the essence thereof But of this wee haue spoken sufficiently before And thus much of the sole communions and priuate Masses brought into the worship of God against the example of Christ against the practise of the Apostles against the vse of the Church against the authority of the Fathers against the light of reason and against the name and nature of the Sacrament it selfe Vse 5 Hitherto we haue pulled downe the heresies of the church of Rome and haue raked in the dirt and dunghill of their deuices the sauour whereof hath annoyed heauen earth now let vs obserue out of this last outward part of the Sacrament how we are directed and instructed thereby to further our knowledge and obedience Did Christ command the
faithful of his family to eate and drink that which he deliuereth without laying any further burden or bondage vpon them Then we must vnderstand o It is no precept of Christ to receiue the Lords Supper fasting it is no precept of Christ to receiue the Lords Supper fasting before any other meates and drinkes True it is the people whose zeale goeth beyond their knowledge make a great scruple of conscieÌ„ce in this point to come fasting p August epist 118. which custome we do not condemne but commend so it be without superstition in themselues and iudging of others But howsoeuer many make as great a matter to communicate fasting as to come in faith yet this is no necessary rule or commandement binding the conscience to the obseruation thereof For the word of God and institution of the Sacrament are perfect directions to the Church teaching all matters of faith and obedience yet they teach no such practise And our blessed Sauiour teacheth his Disciples what they should do the Euangelists deliuer what they did and among al their doctrine we finde not this precept of fasting Againe Christ administred it not fasting the Apostles receiued it not fasting not that we are bound to celebrate the Supper at that time but to shew that Christ would neuer haue chosen to doe it after supper if that time had bin simply vnlawfull Besides the Apostle 1 Corinth 11. reprouing the abuses crept into this Sacrament and labouring to reduce it to the first institution exhorteth the Corinthians to tarry one for another and if any be hungry q 1 Cor. 11 36 that he cannot tarry he must beforehand eate at home that so he may better waite for the rest of the congregation Now hee would neuer haue giuen counsell and commandement if it had beene vnlawfull or vngodly to take some little repast and short refreshing before in regard of the present infirmity and weakenesse of the body Lastly he teacheth in another place That the kingdome of heauen is not r Rom. 14 17. meat nor drinke but righteousnesse and peace and ioy in the Holy-Ghost To conclude as he willeth that he which eateth despise not him that eateth not and he which eateth not condemne not him that eateth Å¿ Rom. 14 3.5 19. so must it be in this indifferent practise he that can take it let him take it but let not him that receiueth fasting iudge him that fasteth not and let not him which fasteth not condemne him that receiueth fasting he standeth or falleth to his owne Maister Who art thou then that iudgest another mans seruant Let euery one be perswaded in his owne minde and looke to the warrant of his owne worke Let vs follow those things which concerne peace and wherewith one may edifie another If any list to be contentious we haue no such custome neither the Churches of God Lastly obserue with me that the actions commanded Vse 6 vnto the Communicants after the Minister hath taken and blessed broken and distributed the bread taken and blessed and deliuered the cup are these to take the bread and to drinke of the cuppe of the Lord these are in themselues necessary these are commanded and expressed by the Euangelists other gestures may serue to comelinesse and decency but not to the essence and nature of the Sacrament How much then are they deceiued who besides taking eating and drinking prescribed in the Gospell doe striue for the necessity of sitting at the Supper as if it were a maine pillar of religion cry out against the humble lowly reuerent gesture of kneeling as if it were a matter of impiety and abhorre and detest the order of our Church as the sinne of Idolatry There is nothing necessary to bee obserued as a point of faith but we haue faire warrant for it out of the Scriptures but for this sitting to bee so straitly vrged we haue none at all Christ saith indeed Take ye and therefore taking is necessary Christ saith Eate yee therefore eating is also necessary for vs. He saith Drinke yee therefore drinking is also necessary But hee neuer said to any Sit ye therefore we conclude that sitting is not necessary Howbeit diuers doe make sitting as necessary in the action of receiuing as eyther eating or drinking albeit we haue a commandement for the one but no commandement for the other And albeit it be an argument concluding negatiuely from authority yet it is from the authority of God wheras theÌ„selues reason negatiuely from the authority of men in matter of history that because they speake nothing of kneeling therfore it was not vsed I am not ignoraÌ„t how farre this point hath beene caried in heat of zeale and what our learned and reuerent brethren haue written of the absolute necessity of this sitting at the Sacrament of the Supper insomuch that they teach touching our kneeling that in the outward acte of Idolatry there is no difference to be discerned betweene the Papists and vs whereas they kneele to their breaden God but we giue thankes vnto God for giuing to vs the Sacrament of his body and blood and do not worship the bread nor yet kneele vnto it and therefore there can be no acte or shew of Idolatry in vs forasmuch as we haue no Idoll before vs as they haue Besides I would haue all men know what an vncharitable vnchristian censure sentence they giue of our Church which although it haue banished Idolatry and is as far froÌ„ it as themselues yet is charged with Idolatry sin greater then Idolatry Arg. 4. Pag. 62. For thus they write What speake we of seeming heerein to doe the same outward acte of Idolatry that the Papist doth seeing there is also in this so great appearance of the inward and spirituall Idolatry of the heart in that this gesture seemeth to be both inioyned practised euen with a superstâ—tious intent meaning to adore the Sacrament it selfe Heere is a grieuous accusation of priuate men against an whole Church but no proofe at all of the accusation And who made them Iudges of the heart or opened them a window to looke into it Againe they speake afterward these words Arg. 4. Pag. 66. Adde heereunto that for men to tye themselues in their prayer to adore God in or before any creature without warrant of the word is Idolatry And that it were farre lesse sinne and an appearance of an Idolatry that is nothing so grosse to tye vs in our prayers to kneele before a Crucifixe then to binde vs thus in praying to God to kneele before the bread and wine I could wish that this sentence had perished in the birth and neuer seene the light then should it not haue beene grauen as with a pen of iron and remaine to be read of euery man neither should those of the separation alledge it and take occasion to slander our Church and profession by it For by this it appeareth that they iudge our kneeling to
those from the number of Sacraments which want the warrant of the word The third outward part of a Sacrament is p Marke 1 5. the signe for wheresoeuer there is a Sacrament there must of necessity be an outward element so that neyther must wee make an Idoll of the Signe by aduancing it too high nor cleane abolish it as the Church of Rome dooth by their doctrine of Transubstantiation The last outward part is the q Gene. 17 12 Receiuer so that the Sacraments without their lawfull vse are no Sacraments at all so long as the signes are reserued and not applyed The inward partes also are Å¿ 1 Cor. 3.7 foure First God the Father offering and applying Christ Iesus as surely as the Minister doth the outwarde signe which is a great comfort to such as come to the Sacraments The second inward part of a Sacrament is t Titus 3.56 the holy Spirit working by the worde so that wee can neuer heare the word or receiue the Sacraments aright without the speciall direction and inspiration of the spirit of God neither must we hang vpon extraordinary reuelations which openeth a wide doore vnto all disorders inasmuch as the Spirite is not separated from the word The third inward part is Iesus u 1 Cor. 10 3 Christ who is the truth the life of all Sacraments nowe if God the Father haue giuen him vnto vs a Rom 8 32. how shal he not with him giue vs al things else Let vs therefore lay hold vpon him especially in all difcomfits and troubles when our faith is assaulted by the enemies of our saluation The last inward part is the faithfull Receiuer for except we b Ro 14 23 send out faith to bring Christ home to dwell with vs in our hearts we shall in vaine looke to receiue profite by the Sacraments so that the Reprobate who are vessels of wrath and the children of perdition cannot receiue Christ albeit they partake the signes of Christ As for the elect who are the Lords fealed vp to the day of redemption before their conuersion and gathering into the sheepefold of Christ they also onely receiue the outwarde signe without Christ inasmuch as they are without faith but after they are called with an holie calling effectually and haue receiued to beleeue vnfaignedly they are partakers both of the signe and of the thing signified These are the outward and inward parts Now there c Actes 8 36 is a fit proportion and agreement betweene these partes each verie aptly answering the other For euen as the minister by the word of Institution offereth and applyeth visibly the outward element to the bodie of the Receiuer so the father by the spirit offereth and applieth Iesus Christ inuisibly to the faithfull receiuer Wee shewed before that in a Sacrament wee are to obserue two points his parts and his vses Hitherto we haue spoken of all the parts both such as are outward and such as are inward Now it remaineth to handle his vses The vses of a Sacrament d 3. cheefe vses of a Sacrament are chiefelie three first e Rom. 4 11. to strengthen secondly f Ge. 17 1 11. to seale vp the couenant betweene God and vs thirdlie g Ephes 2 11 to be a Badge of our profession and as a banner displayed to witnesse our warefare vnder our chiefe Captaine Christ Iesus If these be the true vses and ends of the Sacraments then we learne to take notice of h Mark 9 23 our owne failinges and infirmities of Faith that GOD refuseth none for weakenesse and wauering of Faith i Rom. 4 11 that there is an assurance of Fayth to be attained vnto in this life that as God euermore keepeth his promise with his people k Num 23 15. who is not as man that hee should lie l 1 Iohn 3 13 nor as the sonne of man that hee should deceiue so must we be carefull to keepe the Articles of agreement betweene God and vs namely to beleeue his word to loue our bretheren to obey his will that the Sacraments belong not to the vnfaithfull and can do them no good at all forasmuch as they be effectual vnto vs by faith Lastly as our priuiledges are great to beare the badges of Christ our Lord so it teacheth that we are not our owne m 1 Cor. 6 19 20. but are bought at a great price not with n 1 Pet. 1 18.19 coruptible things as siluer and gold but with the precious blood of Christ as of a lambe vnspotted and vndefiled Hitherto of the nature of the Sacraments now of the number of them as we vnderstand the word for such as are seales of our communion with Christ The Sacraments o The Sacraments of the new testameÌ„t are onely two of the new testament are two baptisme and the Lords Supper neither are there any moe left vnto the Church For Christ taught no moe p 1 Cor. 10 1.2 Act. 20 27. Sacraments to the Apostles the Apostles deliuered no moe to the Churches who yet were faithfull witnesses and reuealed the whole counsell of God without concealing and keeping backe of any doctrine which themselues had receiued Besides these two Sacraments are altogether perfect and sufficient both to enter a Christian into the Church and to retaine him continually in the same From this number of two Sacraments we learne first to acknowledge the great loue of God toward vs who hath eased vs of the r Act. 15 10. heauy burthen of infinite ceremonies prescribed in the law and deliuered vs Å¿ Aâ—g de dâ—â—â— Câ—â—â— â— 3. c. 9 a few Sacraments in stead of many Secondly we see heereby the difference betweene the old Testament and the new and betweene the Sacraments of the old Testament and the new they had sundry significant signes and ceremonies whose interpretation was not easily knowne vnto them Thirdly seeing God hath giuen vnto vs two signes and added two seales to his word and writings we ought to haue the stronger faith in his mercifull promises For wherefore hath he doubled the signes but that we should increase in faith as it were double our assurance of his graces Lastly this number of two ouerthroweth the number of seaueÌ„ Sacraments maintained in the Church of Rome which iust number was t 〈…〉 first broched by Peter Lumbard afterward ratified in the Counsell of Florence and lastly established in the Counsell of Trent and is now become the common doctrine of that counterfeit Church For besides baptisme and the Lords Supper which wee receiue they u The number of seauen Sacraments is faâ—se and forged haue installed into the number of SacrameÌ„ts Confirmation Penance Matrimony Orders and extreme Vnction contrary to the doctrine of the Scriptures contrary to the nature of Sacraments contrary to the euidence of sundry reasons And first of all a Confirmation no Sacrament Confirmation be lifted vp into the seate