proferentem accipienda sunt Bacon Eliz. f. 11. As if I demise omnes boscos meos in villa de Dale for years this passeth the soile 14. H. 8.28 H. 8. Dyer 17. And if I sowe my Land with Corne and let it for for yeares the Corne passeth to my Lessee And if I grant ten pounds rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pounds rent because these words rest ambiguous whether I intend three pounds by way of addition or three pounds by way of deduction out of the rent of ten pounds it shall be taken strongest against me that it is three pounds addition to the ten pound of which more hereafter So Coke fol. 303. b. Ambiguum placitum interpretari debet contra proferentem An ambiguous Plea shall be taken strongest against the pleader for every one is presumed to make the best of his own Case and Coke l. 10. f. 50. Ambigua responfio contra proferentem est accipienda the Bishop of Sarums Case vide ibidem In obscuris secundum magis similius est judicandum vel quod plerumque inspici solet Regula I. C. and Coke l. 4.13 14. Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi secundum subjectam materiam In obscure and dark sayings we are to judge according to that which is most likely and which is wont to be and the sense of the words is to be collected from the cause of the speech and to be taken according to the subject of the matter which rule seemeth to qualify and moderate the other two vide ibidem S. Cromwells Case as first in words the Plaintiff bringeth an action upon the case for calling of him Murderer to which the Defendant said that as he was speaking with the Plaintiff concerning unlawfull hunting the Plaintiff confessed that he had killed diverse Hares with Engins to which the Defendant answered that he was a murtherer innuendo a murtherer of Hares and it was resolved that the justification was good for upon an action of slander the likeliest sense of words is to be taken and collected out of the occasion of the speech Coke ibidem And so in Deeds as if I have a free Warren in my land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren 32. H. 6. which is the more likely meaning for otherwise the Lessor would have excepted the Warren Vnivocum denoteth words of a certaine and distinct signification and expresseth the thing cleerly without any obscurity or Ambiguity of which the Law taketh especiall notice for that certainty in all contracts and conveyances is the cause of quiet and setlement of estates but incertainty is the author of variance and dissention from whence we have these notable grounds and maximes Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum Coke l. 5. f. 42. a. God forbid that the inheritances of men should depend upon incertaines and it is a miserable servitude where the Law is wavering and therefore Ployd f. 28. a. In every Common-wealth it is necessary and requisite that things should bee certainely conveyed for certainty engendreth repose and incertainty contention The occasions of which contention our Law foreseeing hath prevented and therefore ordained that certaine ceremonies should be used in the transmutation of things from one man to another and namely of Frank-tenements which are of greatest estimation in our lawes to know the certaine times when things do passe and therefore in every Feoffment the Law ordeineth that livery and seisin shall bee made and in every grant of a reversion or rents that attornement should be made which are points certaine containing time wherefore it is well observed by Sir Edward Coke in his Preface to the second part of his Reports that in all his time there have not beene moved in the Courts of Justice of England two questions touching the rights of descent escheats or the like fundamentall points of the common-Law so certaine sure and without question are the principles and grounds thereof That as Sir John Davis in his preface there is no art nor science which standeth upon discourse and reason which hath her Rules and Maxims so certaine and infallible and so little subject to diverse interpretations as the common Law of England Whence Sir Edw. Coke is bold to pronounce that the Common Law of England is not incertaine in the abstract but in the concrete and that the incertainty thereof is hominis vitium non professionis the imperfection of man and not of the profession and lib. 6. f. 43. a. in particular blameth hee the subtile inventions imaginations of men in the practise of uses which have introduced many mischiefs inconveniences contrary to the ancient common law which hath certain rules to direct the estates and inheritances of men and therefore is it without comparison better to have Estates and Inheritances directed by the certaine rule of the common Law which harh beene the ancient true and faithfull servant to this Common-wealth then by incertaine imaginations and conjectures of any of those new inventors of uses without any approved ground of law or reason Coke l. 6. f. 43. a. And therefore in all cases law and equity will that incertainty bee avoided as the author of contention and that there bee an end of all controversies according to equity and right which is the finall intention of all Lawes Coke l. 8. 53. And Coke l. 1. f. 85. a. The Judges ought to know the intention of the parties by certaine and sensible words which are agreeable and consonant to the rules of Law as if Land bee given by deed to two to have and to hold to them and haeredibus it is void for the insensibility and incertainty and though it hath a clause of warranty to them and their heires that shall not make the first wordes which are incertaine and insensible to bee of force and effect in Law although his intent appeareth but his intent ought to bee declared by words certain and consonant to Law So Coke comment f. 20. b. If a man letteth Lands to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in forma praedicta the remainder is void for the incertainty And therefore Ployd f. 272. a. giveth this ground that every contract sufficient to make a Lease for yeares ought to have certainty in three limitations in the beginning of the terme in the continuance and in the end of the same all which ought to be known at the beginning of the Lease and the Lease that wanteth them Mr. Brown said is but bibble babble vide ibidem Fullers case and Coke l. 6. f. 35. the Bishop of Bathes case Ployd f. 14. a. If I give all my mony in my purse to I. S. hee cannot have an action for it unlesse hee alledge the certainty of it so as without certainety the action is not maintainable according to
menace me in my goods and that he will burne certaine evidences of my Land which he hath in his hands if I will not make him a bond and if I enter into bond by this terror I cannot avoid it by plea because the Law holdeth it an inconvenience to avoid a specialty by such matter of averrement and therefore I am put to my action against such a menacer But if he restraine my person or threaten me with a battery or with burning of my house which is a protection to my person or with burning an Instrument of Manumission which is an evidence of my En-franchisement if upon such menace or duresse I make a bond I shall ovoid it by Plea 7. E. 4. 21. So if a Trespassor drive away my Beasts over anothers ground and I pursue them to rescue them I am a Trespassor to him upon whose ground I came but if a man assaile my person and I fly over anothers ground I am no Trespassor 13. H. 8.15 21. H. 7. 28. Bacon F. Max. s 29 30. vide ibidem plura An injury is two-fold either in factis or in verbis in factis as when a man is assaulted or beaten in verbis when a man is slandred and by termes diffamed the grounds of the first injury we have already surveyed which consisted in assaults and corporall injuries now are those of the second sort to be set forth which are grounded on slanders and diffamations from whence arise these grounds Lubricam linguae non facile in paenam est trabendum R.I.C. The lightnesse and rashnesse of the tongue is not easily to be drawn into punishment There are diffamatory words which proceed from the weaknesse or lightnesse of the braine or any rashnesse in the tongue which because they are not thought to be spoken malitiously passe for the most part unpunished for in all such cases words of collor and in heate as to call one cousener and crafty knave common extortioner and drunkard witch rogue Pillory knave villaine and unlesse he say villaine to such a man or regardant to such a mannor will beare no action for these are not malitiously spoken Finch Nomot f. 186. b. And by reciprocall reason the malice of those which bring actions of slanders debilitateth their cases and therefore Coke l. 4. f. 15. b. It was the resolutions of the Judges that actions of slanders shall not be maintained by any strained constructions or any favour shewn for the supportation of them because they abound more in these dayes then heretofore and the malice of men encreaseth malitijs hominum est obviandum But of such light hasty and rash speeches the civill Law also taketh no cognisance no though a man in this case speaketh ill of the Prince himselfe and the civill Law is so far from taking hold of such words that the Emperor himselfe hath said of them thus Siquis imperatori malediceret si id ex levitate processerit contemnendum est si ex in sania miseratione dignissimum If any should speak evill of the Emperor if it proceeded from lightnesse it is to be contemned if from madnesse it is most worthy of commiseration But in case that such workes be of hatred and malice as if one reprocheth another with any thing in his state and condition wherwith he is not justly to be charged then is it altogether punishable for that thereby charity between man and man is violated and the peace of the Common-wealth is many times broken and disturbed and as Coke saith l. 4. f. 15. b. ad verbis ad verbera perventum est and in this sense the rule of the Cannon Law may be taken to be true Omnis qui detrahit fratri suo homicida est every one who detracteth from his brother is a man-slayer to wit in fo ropoli for whosoever hateth his Brother is a murtherer 1. Joh. 3.15 And therefore at the common Law if a man malitiously utter any false slander to the indangering of one in Law as to say that he hath reported that mony is fallen for he shall be punished for such a report if it be false 9. E 1. Vttings case Or if he touch him with some hainous crime as that he went about to get poison to kill the child that such a woman goeth with and yet it is no Felony Or lie in waite to rob him or procured another or agreed with another to murder him though he were not murdered in deed or sought his life for his Land 17. Eliz. Hacks case Or for impairing his trade of life as to call a Merchant a banquerupt for it is his living but so it is not of a Gentleman or an Attorny an Ambodexter or to say he dealeth corruptly Finch Nomot f. 186. Or to call the Plaintiff theefe 27. H. 8.22 Or for calling a man a false or perjured man 28. H. 8. B. or for calling the Plaintiff a false Justice of Peace 4. E. 6. 112. An action of the case will lye for those are words of eminent slanders and of great import and such as concerne the estate condition and life of man and therefore Coke l. 44.15 In our Books actions for slanders are most rare and those that are brought are for words of eminent and great import Albeit diffamations and scandalls properly consist in words yet may they also be done by writings as by diffamatory Libels which by Bracton are called Carmina famosa and by Senica Contumeliosi Libelli infamous Rhimes and contumelious Libells which flow from malice and pride and tend to contempt and dissention and therefore Plato banished such out of his Common-wealth and the Romans punished them with death L. 1. de Civ Dei c. 12. St. Augustine Romani probris injurijs poetarum subjectam vitam famanque habere noluerunt capite etiam puniri sancientes tale carmen condere siquis auderet the Romans would not have their lives and fame Subject to the scofs and injuries of Poets ordaining that whosoever should dare to compose any such verse to be punished with death which also was one of the Laws of the twelve Tables ibidem c. 9. And they appointed the Aediles and Triumviri capitales to foresee that no prejudice should grow to the Common-wealth by Libells to sow the seeds of sedition and novelty whose prudent example the wise King Henry the seventh was induced to pursue Bacon Hen. 7. f. 138. who as Sir Francis Bacon historizeth it hanged and executed five meane persons for spreading of swarmes volleys of Libels against his Highnesse and contriving and dispersing thereof which as he saith are the femalls of sedition and which also in conscience is a hainous crime and little inferior to high treason and therefore particularly prohibited by the Law of God Exodus 22.28 Thou shalt not revile the Prince and according to the originall Gods nor curse the ruler of thy people and Ecclesiastes 10.20 Curse not the King no not in thy thought wherein Magistrates
the Law without having regard to the conclusion of the Jurors who ought not to take upon them the judgment of the Law for quod quisque novit c. Ploâ—d Câ—m Amie Townsdens case 5 H. 17. Carus case c. Coke Com. f. 3. b. If an office either of the Grant of the King or subject which concerneth the Administration proceedings or execution of Justice or the Kings revenue or the Common-wealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill and science to exercise or execute the same the Grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and uncapable to take the same pro commodo regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable of the same to serve the King and his people ibidem An Infant is not capable of the Office of a Stewardship of a Mannor either in possession or reversion ibid. and the Civill Law Impubes ab omnibus officiis civilibus debet abstinere Coke l. 11. f. 87. a. The case of Monopolies a Patent made to Sir Edward Bury for the making of Cards was void because he had no skill in making them though the Patent was to him and his Deputy yet if the Grantee himself be inexpert he cannot make a Deputy who is skilfull to supply his place Quia quod per me non possum nec per alium for what I cannot do by my self I cannot do by another Imperitia culpae adnumeratur Reg. s e. Imperitia maxima est mechanicorum poena Co. l. 11. f. 57. a. Ignorance and unskilfulness is accounted a fault and is the greatest punishment of Artists and Mechanicks As 7 E. 3. 65. b. If he that taketh upon him to work be unskilfull and ignorant it is sufficient punishment to him for if any man take upon him to work and doth it amiss an action of the case lyeth against him Ignorantia Juris non excusat The ignorance of the Law doth not excuse Dr. Stud. l. 2. c 46. Ignorance of the Law though it be unvincible that is to say that they have done that in them is to know the truth doth not excuse as to the Law for every man is bound at his perill to take notice what the Law of the Realm is as well the Statutes as the Common Law for all Statutes are made in Parliament and Burgesses are the representatives of the Commons and therefore is alone as if all the Commons had been there present An Infant of the years of discretion may be a Felon and a Trespasser according to the civill Rule Pupillus qui proximus est pubertati capax est furendi injuriae faciendae An Infant who is next to the age of puberty that is of fourteen years is capable of stealing and doing injury though he be ignorant of the Law but that is by the old Maxime of the Law for the eschewing of Murthers Felony and Trespasses Dr. Stud. l. 2. c. 46. vide ibid. plura Coke l. 1. f. 177. a. b. Anthony Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish because the said Robert had said and openly published that certain lands which lawfully appertained to the said Mildmay were lawfully assured for the terme of a thousand years to Ja. Talbot and Olyff his wife and that they of the interest of that term were lawfully possessed and so for slandring his estate and title shewing all in certain and how he was prejudiced by the said speaking brought his Action And Standish in his plea justified the words upon which the Plaintiff demurred and it was adjudged for the Plaintiff although de facto the said Talbot and Olife had a limitation of those lands by the Will of Sir Henry Sharington in writing for a thousand years which was the occasion that the said Standish being a man not learned in the Law affirmed and published the same yet for that he had taken upon him the knowledge of the Law and interposed himself in a matter not concerned him judgment was given against him for Ignorantia juris not excusat If the Clark mistake Debt for a Detinet in a Writ his ignorance of the Law doth not excuse 20 E. 4. 21. But the Civilians have a Rule In paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur the Law doth help the party according to his age or ignorance in criminal penal causes which accordeth with the grounds of our Law as if an infant of tender years kill a man it shall not be Felony because he had no scretion or understanding and so it is if a man dedi non sanae memoriae kill another it is not homicide because he hath no memory nor understanding and this as Ploydon saith is properly said to be done ex ignorantia where unvoluntary ignorance is adjudged the cause of the act Ployd f. 19. a. Coke l. 6. f. 54. a. A Capias was awarded against a Countesse by the Court of Common Bench that the Sheriff or his Officer by his warrant without any offence may execute it for they ought not to dispute the authority of Court but they ought to execute the Writs to them directed and to it they are sworn and though it was objected that it appeared by the Capias that shee was a Countesse against whom by Law no Capias in such case lyeth ignorantia juris non excusat and principally the Sheriffs and other Ministers of Law and Justice except in some cases as in cases of contempt yet it was resolved that the Sheriff and his Ministers ought not to examine the judiciall act of the Court but they ought to execute the Writ ibidem in the Countesse of Rutlands case so Dyer fo 60. quod vide Ignorantia facti excusat Coke 2. f. 3. b. in Mansers case the ignorance of the deed excuseth as if an illeterate man be bound to seale a deed he is not tyed to doe it if not any be present to read it if required and also to expound it if it be written in Latine c for ignorantia facti non excusat quae est vel lectionis vel linguae the ignorance of the deed excuseth whether it be of reading or of the tongues Doct. and Stud. l. 2. c. 47. If a man buy an horse in open Market of him that hath no property in him not knowing but that he had right he hath good right to the horse and his ignorance shall excuse him but if he had known the seller had no right the buying in open Market had not excused him So if a man retaine another mans servant not knowing that he is retained by him the ignorance excuseth him both from the common Law and the Statute of 31. Ed. 33. and the penalty thereupon to wit paine of imprisonment if any one retaineth one servant without licence or reasonable cause and so hath the
generall words imply no certainty and with that accordeth 21. E. 4. If a man be bound to be nonsued in all Actions that he hath against him in the Common Bench he may say that he hath no action therein otherwise if the condition be particular to wit that he shall be non-sued in a Formedon c. so as that it appeareth that generall words imply no certainty neither do they conclude any person to say that he hath nothing there vide ibidem plura Cok. lib. 8.78 a. Bospols Case In an arbitrament when the submission is generall of all Actions and Demands c. that may well stand with the generality of the words that there was but one cause depending in controversy between them For generall speeches imply no certainty and the awaâ—d for one is good notwithstanding the generality of the words for though there were many matters in controversy yet if one onely was made known to the Arbitrator he may make an award of it For the Arbitrator is in place of a Judge and his office is to determine secundum alligata probata the duty of the parties which are greived and know their particular greifes is to make known the causes of controversy to the Arbitrator for they are privy to them and the Arbitrator is a stranger and every one is to do that which lyeth in his knowledge but when the condition is in speciall and with a proviso and condition that an award shall be made of the premises or words which amount to so much there the Arbitrator ought to make Arbitrement of all or else the award is void Generalibus semper specialia derogant Reg. f. c. Derg 180. Quando charta continet generalem clausulam posteaque descenâ—it ad verba specialia quae clausulae generali sunt consentanea interpretanda est charta secundum verba specialia f. 134. b. in Edward Althams Case Which rule is almost word for word put and agreed of by both parties In. 7. E. 3. f. 10. Margery Mortimers Case to wit where a Deede speaketh by general words and then descendeth to special words if the words special agree with the words general the deed shall be understood according to the words speciall As if a man grant a rent in the mannor of P. to be taken in an hundred Acres of Land parcell of that Mannor with a clause of distresse in those hundred Acres the Rent shall issue out of the hundred Acres onely and the generall words shall be construed according to the words speciall so if a man grant a Rent and go no further those generall words shall create an estate for life but if the Habâ—ndum be for years that shall qualify the words generall 7. E. 3. So if a man give Lands to one and his Heirs Habendum to him and the Heirs of his body He shall have onely an estate tayle and no fee expectant for the Habendum qualifieth the generall words precedent Ployd f. 541. a. A man maketh a Feoffment by Deede to one to have and to hold to him and his Heirs and if it happen that the feoffee dyeth without heire of his body that then the Land shall revert The generality of that gift to him and his Heires shall be corrected by the speciall branch after so as the Donee shall have but an estate tayle 13. R. 2. in Formedon Dyer 261. b. A man seised in fee deviseth all his Lands in one village and in one of the two Hamlets by name and there were two Hamlets in the said Village The opinion of divers Justices was that none of the Lands in the other Hamlet should passe for it is intendable that the intent and meaning of the devisor was that nothing more should passe then what he had expressed A. acknowledgeth a fine of the mannor of P. with an advowson and regrants the mannor with the Appurtenances the advowson shall not passe Temp. E. 1. F. title grants Ployd 173. b. If I give or lease all my Lands to one and stay there he shall have all my Lands in England but if I say further in the manner of Dale there it is now restrained but if the specialty limiteth a thing which is void and so appeareth it is otherwise as if I lease to one all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother and in truth I have no Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother if the Lessor have other Lands in Dale he shall not have those Ployd 160. a. A man giveth Lands to two Habendum to one for life and after his decease to the other and his Heirs the one shall have the entierly for his life onely notwithstanding the Joynture given in the Premisses by the better opinion in terme M. 8. E 3.427 Generalibus sempâ—r specialia insunt Reg. f. c. Specialls are alwayes contained in the generals and the universalls allwayes comprehend the particularâ— Ployd f. 68. a. The plurall number containeth the singular and more and therefore was it resolved by all the Judges That a pretensed right and title was within the penalty of the Statute of 32. H. 8. for the buying of pretensed rights and titles for pretensed rights and titles in the plurall number did containe a pretensed right and title in the singular number And whereas the Statute of 5 R. 2. c. 5. forbiddeth that none make entry into any Lands or Tenements unlesse in case where entry is given by the Law yet if one enter into a Tenement he shall be punished though the Statute speaketh in the plurall number and likewise whereas the Statute of 1. H. 5. speaketh of false Deeds in the plural number yet if one bring but one false Deed he shall be punished by the Statute as it is holden in many Bookes Ployd f. 467. b. The Statute of Gloucester giveth an Action of Waste against him which holdeth for years which is spoken in the plural number yet may it be taken for him which holdeth for a year or half a yeare vide ibidem plura Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae sunt specialiter comprehenfa Coke l. 8. 118. b. It is a ground and maxime in the Law that a generall clause is not extended to those things which are specially comprehended Doctor Bonhams Case by the Statutes of 10 14. H. 8. it was enactd that no man should exercise the faculty of Physike within the City of London or within seven miles of the said City unlesse he be admitted thereunto by the President and Colledge of the faculty of Physike and there is another speciall clause contained in the said Acts that any who evilly and not well exercise the said faculty c. shall be punished by Fine and imprisonment c. and it was adjudged that the said generall clause that none should exercise the said faculty of Physike unlesse he be admitted c shall not be extended to the speciall clause
holdeth his Lands and things by the Lawes of the Land wherein hee liveth and this commonly called the law of proeprty Nihil dat quod non habet Arist nemo potest plus juris in alium transferre quam ipse habet Coke com f. 309. b it is a common erudition in the Law that no man can grant that hee hath not Perkins f 15. for that is requisite that he who by his contract shall make another possessor of any thing should bee the proâ—rietor of the thing it selfe otherwise his contract is void Ployd f. 432 b. as if I possessed of an horse sell the Horse upon condition to another that he pay to mee at the feast of Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast I sell the horse to another and after the feast the first Vendee failes of payment by which I reseise the horse the second Vendee shall not have the horse for at the time of the second contract I had neither interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which is not sufficient to make me able to contract for the property and possession therefore it is meerely void Ployden So if a man grant a rent charge out of the Mannor of Dale and in truth he hath nothing in the Mannor of Dale and after purchaseth the Mannor of Dale yet hee shall hold it discharged Perkins H. 15. So if one not seised of Lands maketh a Lease to another it is a good Plea for the Lessee to say that the Lessor had nothing in the Tenements at the time of the Lease Litt. and the reason of this is for that in every contract there must be quid pro quo for contractus est quasi actus contra actum and therefore if the Lessor had nothing in the land the Lessee hath not quid pro quo nor any thing for which he should pay his Rent and in that case he may plead that the Lessor non dimisit Coke Com. ibidem f. 41. b. vide ibidem plura If the Conusee of a Fine before any Attornement bargaineth and selleth the Signiory to another the Bargainee shall not distraine because the Grantor could not distrain for no man can transfer more right to another then he himselfe hath Coke Com. 309. b. Coke l. 6. f. 57. b. He that hath no seisin in the Land charged cannot give seisin of Rent vide plura Bredimans for no man can give that he hath not The King pardoneth one for making a bridge this is onely good for the fine and he must make up the Bridge because the Kings Subjects have interest in it 37. H. 8.4 Da tua dum tua sunt post mortem tunc tua non sunt Ployd 280. a. when one hath property in goods the property cannot be in him no longer then he liveth for after his death the goods belong unto another Nemo videtur rem amittere cujus propria non fuit Reg. I. C. no man can loose that of which he hath no property and therefore in a Replevin if the Defendant claim property the Sheriff cannot proceed for it is a rule in Law the property ought to be tryed by writ and therefore in this case where the tryall is by plaint the Plaintiff may have a writ de proprietate probanda directed to the Sheriff to trye the property and if thereupon it be found for the Plaintiff the Sheriff shall make deliverance Coke Com. f. 145. b. F. n. b. f. 77. If A. endict B. for stealing of Horses or other goods he must say de bonis catallis cujusdam A. For if there were no property there could be no stealing or injury for nemini vim facere videtur qui suo non alieno utitur Reg. I. c. Nemo reditum invito domino percipere possidere potest Coke Com. 303. b. no man can receive or possesse another mans Rents against the will of the Lord as if one hold of me by Rent which is service ingrosse and another which hath no right claimeth the rent and receiveth it of my Tenant by coertion of distresse or otherwise yet by the payment of my Rent to a stranger I cannot be disseised or ousted without my will or election but that I may distrain my Tenant for the Rent or have an assize against the â—ernor Lit. for a man cannot be disseised of a a Rent-service in grosse Rent-charge or Rent-seck by Attornment or payment of Rent to a stranger but at his election for the rule of the Law is no man can receive or possesse an other mans rent against his will Coke ibidem Quod meum est id amplius meum esse non potest Coke Com. f. 49. b. And therfore if lessee for years enter he is in actuall possession and then Livery cannot e made to him that is in actual possession whereby the Franke-Tenement or fee may inure to him in the remainder for that which is once mine cannot be more mine ibidem Thirdly From the Anteprecedents Aequivocum and Univocum AEQuivocum denoteth words of ambiguous and many significations which as Boetius signifies nothing nisi ad quasque res secundum voluntatem significantis applicetur unlesse they be applyed to the thing according to the will of him that declareth or expoundeth them of which the Law taketh notice and giveth these grounds and maximes Nobiliores benigniores presumptiones in dubijs sunt praeferendae Reg. P. C. And Coke l. 4. f. 13. b. Benignior sententia in rebus generalibus dubijs est praeferenda In doubtfull speeches and sentences the more favorable presumption and opinion is to be perferred As if one doth charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe by the Law it is not actionable for it may be he hath forsworne himself in usuall conversation but an action is onely maintainable against him that hath forsworn himself in Court of Record so ibidem f. 21. An Action upon the case was brought for these wordes for my Lands in Dallinson they seek my life adjudged not actionable because he may seek his life upon just cause which are the more favorable constructions So verba accipienda sunt in meliori sensu Hub. f. 106. Coke l. 4. f. 13. Wordes are to be taken at the best for the speaker though some of them cannot stand with that construction As thou art a Theefe and hast stolen a Tree it shall be adjudged of a Tree standing not felled which is not actionable But as it is said there in Hubberd 106. This rule holdeth not in Deeds and Pleas for in those words are taken more strongly against the speaker of which this reason may be given because commonly words in common language proceed of a sudden from choler and heat whereas words in Deeds and Pleas are grounded upon mature deliberation and consideration and therfore in Deeds this is a general ground Ambiguum pactum contra venditorem interpretandum est Reg. I. C. and Ambigua verba contra
election may be by voyces or hands or in othâ—â— sort and it is hard to discerne the certaine number and yet easy to see who had the greatest number 2. M. 128. vide Ployd f. 121. b. Coke Com. f. 303. c. Every Plea must be direct and not by way of argument or rehersall and an argumentative Plea is not good Ployd f. 122. a. b. for there is a ground in the Law that in declarations certainty ought to be alledged by apt words of affirmation otherwise the declaration is not good As in debt upon an obligation I declare that it appears by the obligation that the Defendant is bound to me in twenty pound the declaration is not good because it was alledged in matter of fact quod tenebatur mihi in twenty pound for bond is alledged for recitall onely So 11. H. 6. In an action of debt against a goaler who had let one at large who was in execution under guarde for the sum in demand and declareth that he let him at large by which the Plaintiff exclusus fuit de debito suo and the declaration not good because he did not say that he was not satisfied when he let him at large which is the cause of the action which he hath not alledged but by implication for by implication it is alledged for if he let him go at large by which he is barred of his debt against the prisoner by it is implyed that the debt was not then paid but the count was not good because it was not affirmed by precise words and 38. H. 6. f. 14. The Plaintiff in an action of debt counts that the Defendant retained him in his service for eight years to serve him in all occupations taking for every yeare 20 s. and the Defendant gageth his Law and though the Plaintiff was retained in husbandry and the service of husbandry was implyed in the words all occupations yet the Defendant was received to his Law because it was not fully expressed that he was retained in husbandry but onely by implication which would not suffice So Ployd f. 143. b. The Covenant in the Indenture was if one moyety of the Rent was behinde and unpaid after two moneths since the Feast c. that then c. and in the rejoynder it was alledged that one moyety was behinde per duos menses by the space of two moneths which was no answer because the Indenture is if it be behinde after two moneths post duos menses and he said it was behinde per duos menses which is no affirmation that it was behinde after two moneths but by implication and argumentation and not otherwise and therefore not good Every Recovery had in our Law must be pleaded certainly to every intent Ployd 65. a. as in 22. E. 4. f. 8. in a Scire facias to have execution of two hundred Acres of Land the Tenant pleaded that since the Scire facias sued that I. B. brought a Formedon of one hundred Acres inter alia and recovered and had execution judgement of the breif for parcell and there the opinion was the Plea was not good for every Recovery ought to be pleaded certianly to every intent and those words inter alia are certaine to no intent and it is good reason for every Recovery is entire and there is one originall and one judgment upon it and so the judgement is one and entire and therefore to say that inter alia he did recover is not good but ought to plead certainly If a Bar hath matter of substance and is good to a common intent it shall suffice although it be not good to every speciall intent Ployd Colthersts Case f. 26. a. and as Coke Com. 303. There are three sorts of certainties first to a certaine intent in generall as in counts replications and other pleadings of the Plaintiff 2. A certaine intent to every particular as in Estopples 3. A certainty to a common intent and this is sufficient in a Barr which is to defend the party and to excuse him and of this certainty it is said the Bar shall be good if it be good to a common intent Ployd f. 31. a. but this common intent is not such an intent which may be indifferent but such an intent that hath more vehement presumption in intendement then any other intent hath as fully to administer all the goods which were to the testator the day of his death is a good Bar yet it may be he had other goods which were never in the hands of the Testator which are Assets as debts paid after or goods which come in liew c. but that is not the most common intent but the more common intendement is that he had not any other goods but those which were the Testators So in a Formedon in descender ne donna pass is a good Barr yet it may be he hath recovered in value in which case other Lands were given and yet the Formedon lyes but that shall not be intended but the common intendement is to expresse the plaine guift by livery but if I pleade in Bar a lease for anothers life there the Bar is not good without averring the life of cefis que vie for it was indifferent whether he was in life or no and hath no more stronge intendement the one way then the other therefore his life must be averred by expresse words so in debt upon an obligation if the Defendant pleade in Barr a release bearing date since the obligation made that Bar is not good if he doth not shew by expresse words that it was delivered since the obligation made for prima facie one will presume that it was delivered when it bore date but of the other part it shall be presumed also that the other would not bring an action of debt if the release was delivered since and so one way it hath as vehement presumption as another and for that the intendement is indifferent it is not good unlesse it be shewen by the Plea that it was delivered since the obligation made Ployd ibidem vide plura f. 26. Grounds and Maximes proceeding from the Predicaments From the Predicament of substance SVbstantia prior dignor est accidente Arist 2. de anima the substance is more worthy and before the accident and therefore doth the Law prefer matters of substance before forme and circumstance as 21. H. 7. 24. b. Pleas in Barr and replications though the Plaintiff be afterwards non-suit make an Estopple for they are expresse allegations and substantiall as in debt upon an obligation if the Defendant pleade in Barr an acquittance made at D. or if the Defendant pleade an acquittance and the Plaintiff replyeth that it was made by duress of imprisonment at D. now in another action neither the Defendant shall pleade that the acquittance nor the Plaintiff that the duress was at another place because they were materiall But the matter in the writ and the count maketh no Estopple for they are
upon a false consideration the heire shall not be received to aver a false consideration against his ancestor Dier Ex nudo pacto non oritur actio Ployd 305. a. and 308. b. from a bare contract or promise no action riseth for it is not much argued by the laws of England what diversity is betweene a contract and a promise and a gift for the intent of the law is to have the matter argued not the termes A Nude contract is where a man maketh a bargaine and sale of his goods or lands without any recompence appointed for it As if I say to you I sell you all my lands or all my goods and nothing is assigned that the other shall give or pay for it this is a nude contract and is void in law and the vendee cannot bring an action for them Dr. and Student c. 24. And a nude promise is when a man promiseth to give a man certaine mony at such a day or to do him certaine service and nothing is assigned for them As if I promise to give you twenty pound to make your house anew there you shall have no action against me for the 20 l. because it is a nude promise as it is affirmed by Townsend T. 17. E. 4. Ployd f. 308. b. So if a Carpenter by word covenanteth and undertaketh to make a new house and he doth not and for not making it the Plaintiff bringeth an action of covenant against the Carpenter and it doth not appeare that he had any thing for making of the house it was adjudged in 11 H. 4. f. 33. that the Plaintiff should not take any thing by his writ Ployd 309. a. And if I promise to another to keep his goods safely till such a time and after I refuse to take them no action lieth against me but if I take them and after they be lost or impaired through my negligent keeping an Action lieth Doctor and Stud. c. 24. But otherwise it is if he to whom the promise is made have a charge by reason of the promise which he hath also performed then in that case hee shall have an Action for that thing is promised As if a man give land in Frankal-moine they are bound to make prayers to God for him and in consideration of such prayers he is bound to pay to the cheife Lord all the rents and services issuing out of that land Lit. a. Frankal And in 17. E. 4. 5. It is taken by diverse that if I promise a Surgeon a certaine summe to cure such a poor man or if I promise to a labourer certaine mony to repaire such a way which is in the high way that he shall have an action of debt for it for it is a thing of charity and I merit thankes of them for it and therefore shall not be called Nudum pactum Ployd f. 306. a. If I contract with another that if he will marry my daughter that I will give him 20 l. in this case if he take her to wife he shall have an action of debt for the 20 l. 22. E. l. Assi Pl. 70. by Thorp and yet I have nothing for it and if a man hath no regard to nature it shall be nudum pactum but because my daughter is advanced by it that is a good consideration to me Ployd f. 305. a. So Dr. and Stud. c. 24. f. 104. It is a good promise because he hath quid pro quo the preferement of his Daughter for his money But if a man promise to another 20 l. with his daughter in marriage if he marry the daughter and the money be not paid he shall not have an action of debt or an action of the case at the common law but he must sue for his money in the spirituall Court for here is no good forme of contract F. n. b. f. 44. a. And as Bracton saith matrimonium est principale ejusdem juris id est jurisdictionis eâ—â—e debet accessorium matrimony is the principall and the accessory ought to be of the same jurisdiction Gardiner brought an assumpsit and declared that the Defendant in consideration that he was indebted to the Plaintiff in 10 l. for pasturing and feeding of certaine beasts in the Plaintiffs grounds and for wheat and other Marchandises had and received by the said defendant did assume to pay to the said Plaintiff the debt that he had paid Vpon issue non-assumpsit was found for the Plaintiff and upon a Writ of error in the Exchequor-chamber that there must be some certaine cause of the debt assigned for it is not sufficient to say generally he was indebted for it might be for rents upon leases or for debts upon specialties but it was adjudged certaine enough and required not so much certainty as an action of debt upon a contract Hob. rep f. 7. Wolastone brought an assumpsit against W. and declared that whereas W. promised him 30 l. in consideration that the Plaintiff on the twentieth of August 1610. had given day to the said defendant for the payment of the same money untill the ninth of October following the Defendant did assume to pay him the same ninth day and upon issue non-assumpsit it was found for the Plaintiff and damages given Hob. f. 26. Wolastons case vide ibidem L. brought an assumpsit against B. and declared that whereas the defendant had felloniously slaine one P. M. the defendant afterwards required the Plaintiff to labour and doe his endeavour to obtaine his pardon from the King whereupon the Plaintiff upon the same request did labour c. to obtaine pardon for the said defendant and afterwards fi c. in consideration of the Premisses the defendant did promise to the Plaintiff to give him a hundred pounds and that he had not c. upon non-assumpsit it is found for the Plaintiff 100 l. ibidem f. 147. vide ibid. plura B. bringeth an action of the case against C. executor of Reade and counteth that whereas he had in M. terme 14. Jac. presented an attachment of priviledge against Reade rerurn in H. terme the testator knowing of it in consideration that at his request the Plaintiff would forbeare to prosecute the said writ did promise to pay him 50 l. and then averred c. and after verdict for the Plaintiff and exceptions in arrest of judgement the Court gave sentence Bedwels case vide ibidem plura A promise made for a thing past is void as if I promise one ten pounds because he hath builded me an house an action lyeth not there and if I promise to give another 10 l. in recompence of such a trespass that he hath done him an action lieth not against him the reason is because a contract properly is where a man for his goods shal have by the assent of the other party certaine goods or some other profit at the time of the contract or after but if the thing be promised fot a cause that is past by way of a recompence
of England I have been too copious in the exemplification of this ground by so many notable cases drawn on by the variety and curiosity of them they being exorbitant from the beaten tract of the common Law from which for the better effecting and doing of right the Law deemeth it convenient and necessary to swarve and deviate and that in favorem juris et recti To add one example more if an obligation be made beyond the Seas and it beareth date at Burdeaux in France where shall it be sued answere is made that it may be alledged to be made in quodam loco vocato Burdeaux in France in Islington in the County of Middlesex and there shall it be tryed for whether there be such a place in Islington or no it is not traverseable in that case Coke com 261. b. Executio juris non habet injuriam Reg. I.C. Hobaâ—t f. 266. The execution of the Law hath no injury As if a man bringeth an action upon a false surmise in a proper Court he cannot bring an action against him and charge him with it as a fault directly and ex diametro as if the suite it selfe was a wrongfull act for the execution of the Law hath no injury So Coke com f. 161. a. It is regularly true that a man shall not be punished for suing of Writs in the Kings Court be it of right or wrong ibidem And therefore 11. Eliz. a man brought a Writ of forger of false deeds the Defendant though he be found guilty could not have a scandalum magnatum and lay the charge contained in the action to be the scandall for no punishment was ever appointed for a suite in Law although it be false and upon vexation vide Dyer f. 285. Pl. 37. And so we rule it every day that if a man be imprisoned upon a formall suit though there were no just cause of suite yet if he give a bond for his release he shall not avoid it by duresse because it is incarceratio legitima Hob. 1. l. And though every thing by nature is good and as Saint Paul saith The Law is good if a man use it lawfully yet the abuse of the Law is the fact and therefore on the contrary part if you charge me with a crime in a Court that is no way capeable of the cause I shall have an action for it and lay that very complaint to be the slander as Coke l. 4. f. 14. b. Wood exhibited a bill in the Star-Chamber against Barkeley and inter alia charged him that he was a maintainer of Pirates and Murderers c. B. brought an action of the case against W. and counted that the said W. had exhibited a bill in the Star-Chamber containing inter alia that the said B. was a maintainer of murderers and pyrates c. and it was resolved that for any thing contained in the bill which was examinable in the said Court no action lyeth although the matter was meerly false because it was in course of Justice but for the said words not examinable in the said Court an action upon the case lyeth for that could not be in course of Justice vide ibidem plura And if a man sue me in a proper Court yet if his suite be utterly without ground of truth and that certainely known to himselfe and thus as the Civilians it be done animo injuriandi I may have an action upon the case against him for the undue vexation and damage that he putteth me unto by his ill practise though the suite it selfe be legall but I cannot complaine of it as it is a suite and therefore the sixteenth of E. 3. Fitz. deceipt 35. A Conusee of a Statute sued execution against his deed of defeasance whereupon the Conusor had an action of deceipt against him and his Assignee in the nature of an Audita querela yet though he was imprisoned upon the Statute could he not bring an action of false imprisonment if he had paid the mony before the day limited by the defeasance because he was imprisoned by course of Law 43 E. 3.33 And if a man sue me and hanging that suite commenceth another against me to this I have a Plea in abatement which proveth this latter suite unjust and vexatious but if he discontinue the former he may bring a new action 43. E. 3. for as Coke com f. 130. a. It may be he hath mistaken some thing in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaking the day or the like Likewise I hold I may have an action of the case against him who sueth me against his release or after mony duly paid yea though it be upon a single obligation Hob. ibidem But in these cases these two cautions are to be observed that the new action be not brought before the other be determined because till then it cannot appeare that the other was unjust 2. R. 1. And for this reason a Writ of conspiracy lyeth not untill the Plaintiff is acquitted The other is that besides the thing done amisse there must also be a damage either already suffered or else inevitable and therefore 19. H. 6.44 If a man forge a bond in my name I can have no action of the case yet but if I be sued I may for the wrong or damage though I may avoid it by Plea but if it were upon a recognizance or fine I shall have a deceit presently before execution for Quae incontinente aut certo fiunt in esse videntur and 43. E. 3. 10. deceit against one who procured a Formedon by collusion vide ibidem plura in Waterers case And this rule faileth in a Writ of Replevin against the Lord as if the Lord distraine for rent and the tenant bringeth a Replevin whereby the Lord is disturbed of the meanes to come to his rent this is in Law a disseisin Coke com f. 161. a. Nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria Coke com f. 147. b. No man shall take advantage of his own wrong as if B maketh a lease of one Acre for life to A. and A. seised of another Acre in fee granteth a rent-charge to B. out of both Acres and doth wast in the Acre which he holdeth for life B. recovereth in wast the whole rent is not extinct but shall be apportioned and yet B. claimeth one Acre under A. and so it is if A. had made a Feoffment to B. in fee and B. had entered for the forfeiture the rent is not wholly extinct but must be apportioned and the reason hereof is for that is a maxime of Law that no man shall take advantage of his own wrong And therefore seing the wast and the forfeiture were committed by the act and wrong of the Lessee he shall not take advantage thereof to extinguish the whole rent and the whole rent cannot issue onely out of the other Acre because the Lessor hath one Acre under the estate of the Lessee and therefore
tenant of the Land to be summoned whereas he was not summoned and the tenant looseth by default upon the grand Cape returned the tenant may have a writ of deceit against the recoverer and against the Sheriff for his false returne F. N. B. 97. C. and may defeate the judgement and no damages shall be recovered against the Sheriff in such case onely he shall be fined 5. E. 4 4â— And if he dye his heire may have an action of deceite and restitution of the Land 8. H. 6.5 If a man bargaine with another and assume upon consideration to enfeoff him of ceraine Land and he enfeoffeth another he to whom the assumpsit was made may have an action of deceite or an action upon the case at his pleasure 3. H. 7.14 If one selleth to another a horse which he knoweth to have a secret disease in his body or selleth Corne which is full of gravell an action of deceite lyeth 20. H. 6.36 without warranty but F.N.B. 94. C. is of the contrary opinion If the Sheriff arrest the body by a Capias ad respondendum and returneth not the Writ the party shall have an action of false imprisonment Kell way f. 3. b. The Law ordaineth that he who will be sure of his goods shall buy them in Market overt and that sale shall bind all strangers as well as vendors and yet it is agreed in 33. H. 6. That sale in open Market shall not bind him who hath right to the goods if the sale be by fraud or the Vendee hath notice that the property of the goods appertaineth to another So the Law hath ordained the Court of the common Pleas as Market-overt for the assurances of Lands by fine so as he that will be assured of Land not onely against the Vendor but against all strangers it is good for him to passe it in this Market-overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it 〈…〉 a Feoffment by Covin which amounteth to a wrong and disseisin Fine levyed by him who is particeps criminis and who had not nor pretended to have any right to the land shall not be a bar to the Lessor Coke l. 3. f. 78. Fermors Case A resignation made by an Abbot by covin shall not abate the Writ 4 E. 2. 22. A covenous Conveyance that assets shall not descend is not of force 34 E. 3. 19. 19 E. 2. 3. And 17 E. 3.59 That an estate made to the King and Letters patents granted over and all it by covin between him that granted to the King and the Patentee to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine shall not bind but shall be repealed A presentation obtained by fraud and deceit is voyd Dyer 339. b. Letters of administration obtained by fraud and covin are voyd and shall not repeale the former administration Dyer 339. a. vide Dyer 295. many Cases there put concerning covin If I sell to one cloath and warrant it to be of such a length and it is not of such a length the buyer may have an action of the case against me by vertue of the warranty although the warranty be by word and not written but if the warranty be made at some other time after the bargaine he may not have a Writ of deceit unlesse it be made by writing F. N. B. 98. k. If a man sell to one Seeds and warranteth them to be of another Countrey if they be not a Writ of deceit lyeth but if he warrant that the Horse which he selleth should go fifty miles in a day or that the Seeds shall grow it is otherwise And a Writ of deceit lyeth for selling of corrupt Victuall without warranty but not for selling of rotten Sheep though it be with warranty but to warrant a thing which is evident to sense as to be black which is blew is voyd unlesse the buyer be blind or the thing which is bought be absent 11 E. 4 7. 3 H. 4. 1. If I sell one certaine Pipes of Wine and warrant them to be good and they be corrupt the Vendee may have an action of the case against the Vendor F.N.B. 99. b. Yet according to the opinion of some an action will lye without warranty 7 H. 4. 14. But Master Fitzherbert saith that there ought to be a warranty and his taste ought to be his judge in such case and where it is with warranty the Writ must say that the Defendant at the time of the warranty made knew that the Wine which he sold was corrupt A Writ of deceit was brought for selling a certain quantity of Wooll and warranting it to be fifty sacks whereas it wanted of that measure the Defendant pleaded in bar that it was weighed before the sale and the servants of the Plaintiffe being his Factors did accept of it and carryed it beyond the Sea whereupon the Plaintiff demurred 13 H. 4. 1. Semper qui dolo fecit quominus haberet pro eo habendus est ac si habet Reg. J. C. Alwayes whosoever shall give or grant any thing by fraud whereby he may seem not to have it he is to be esteemed as if he hath it And therefore if a man by fraud make a Deed of gift of all his goods to one of his Creditors to deceive the rest the gift by the Statute of 13 Eliz. is voyd Twins case l. 3. f. 81 quod vide where you shall finde the signes and marks of fraud accurately and fully discovered And Coke l. 5. f. 60. a. b. debt against the heire upon an obligation the Defendant pleaded Riens per descent the Plaintiff replyed that he had Assets in D. c. and the Plaintiff giveth in evidence that the father dyed seised of lands in fee the Defendant sayd that he aliened before the Writ the Plaintif averred by covin and proved that it was done by fraud to defraud the Plaintiff and therefore it was resolved to be voyd by the Statute of 13 Eliz. c. 5. and that the fraud might be wel given in evidence because the Statute saith that the estate as to the Creditors shall be voyd and therefore shall be taken by favourable interpretation for to suppresse fraud and that it shall be mischeivous to the Creditors and increase maintenance and covin if the Plaintif should be driven to plead that the Feoffment was by fraud because it is commâ—nly hatched in arbore cava and so artificially covered and concealed that the party grieved hath no meanes to find and know it and therefore jâ—dgment was given for the Plaintiff viâ—â—e ibidem And Burrels case l. 6. f. 730. a. and l. 8. f 133. in Turners case So Hobart f. 72. Humbertons Case Humberton recovered a debt against T H. and dyed and upon a Scire facias against the Ter tenants the Sheriff returned J. H. Tenant of an house that was his at the time of the judgement and J. H. came in and pleaded that T. H.
of false imprisonment because that he is Iudge of the Cause 14 H. 8. 16. Factum a Judice quod ad ejus officium non pertinet ratum non est Reg. I. C. Coke l. 10. f. 76. b. Judicium a non suo Judice datum nullius est momenti An act done by a Iudge which doth not appertain to his Office is not allowed and a Judgment given by him is not his proper Iudge is of no weight nor moment As if the Sheriff who is prescribed by the Law to hold his Turn within a month after Michaelmas holdeth his Turn after the moneth and taketh an Indictment of robbery at the same Turn and the Indictment is by a Certiorari removed into the Kings Bench by advice of all the Iustices the party so indicted was discharged because the Indictment was utterly void coram non judice because at that time the Sheriff had no authority to hold it And if a man have a Leet which is holden at a day certain if he hold it another day such Court so holden is void and without Warrant but it is otherwise of a Court Baron Coke ibidem but if the Court of Common Bench holdeth plea without an Originall it is not void for they are Iudges of those pleas and it cannot be said that the proceeding is coram non judice 19 E. 4. 8. Iudgment in the Marshalsey when none of the parties be of the houshold of the King may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void 6 N. 2. So in Trespass before the Marshall if none of the parties be of the houshold of the King it is coram non judice because they passe their power 29 E. 4. 16. If one of the Queens houshold sue another of the same houshold and the Plaintiff is put out of service the plea depending the other may shew this and abate the Writ but otherwise it is if the Defendant be put out of service Lib. de divers des Courts f. 102. b. And if a man be impleaded in the common place for lands within the Cinque-ports the Tenant may shew to the Court that the land is within the Cinque-ports and by this plea the Court shall be outed of iurisdiction but if the Tenant doth plead in bar which is found against him and the Demandant haue judgment to recover the land tâ— is judgment shall bind the Tenant for ever Ib. 107. b And so it is of land in ancient Demesne if a Writ be brought for them in the common place if the Tenant appear and plead the bar and taketh no exception to the jurisdiction and the plea is found against him so that the Demandant recovereth he shall not reverse this by a Writ of Error because he might have taken exception to the jurisdiction of the Court and that should have been allowed ibidem But the Lord may reverse this judgment by a Writ of Deceit and make the land ancient Demesne as it was before If a man devise to one lands devisable the Devisee cannot sue for these lands in the Ecclesiasticall Court but if he make a devise of goods and chattles reall as a terme of years or of a ward he may for such sue in that Court F. N. B. f. 43. b. Jurisdictio est potestas de publico introducta cum necessitate juris dicendi Coke l. 10 f. 73. Iurisdiction is a power introduced by the publick for the necessity of decreeing and doing right The Iurisdiction of the Court of the Marshally was first instituted for the necessity of the rule and governance of the Servants of the Kings house-hold and therefore was it anciently stiled placita corona aulae hospitiâ— domini regis the Pleas of the Court of the house-hold of the Lord the King by which words it is proved that the one or the other party ought at the least to be of the house-hold of the King for how can these words stand when neither of the parties be of the house-hold of the King and that is the reason that it is not necessary in suites before the Steward and Marshall to alledge that the Plaintiff or Defendant were of the house-hold of of the King for the stile of the Court doth the same imply ibidem So the jurisdiction of the Court of Py-powders was introduced for the necessity of doing right in suits and matters concerning Markets and as that Court hath not jurisdiction but for things concerning the Market so hath it not Iurisdiction for matters concerning the Market unlesse they be done in the same Market M. 42. 42. Eliz in B. R. Hall brought a Writ of Error against Jones of a judgement given in the Court of Py-powders of the Market c. for Jones one of the Registers of the Bishop of Gloucester because Hall had published slanderous words of him c. and the judgement was reversed for two errors because those words did not concerne any matter concerning the Market and therefore the Court had no jurisdiction of it but if one slander any that shall come into the Market in any thing which concerneth his trade an Action well lyeth against hims and 2. it appeareth in the count that the words were spoken before the Market and not in it for the Court hath onely jurisdiction of those things which are done and said in the Market ibidem a. b. Where there is no colour to hold Plea as in a Court Baron of Land not holden of a mannor all is void but where there is colour to hold Plea though it be by plaint where it should be by originall yet the Iudgement rendred is onely voidable by a Writ of Error ibidem Non pertinet ad judicem secularem cognoscere de ijs quae sunt spiritualibus annexa Bract. l. 5. c. 2. It doth not appertaine to the secular Iudge to take cognizance of those things which are annexed to spirituall things And therefore the branches of Trees which are priviledged from Tithes shall be also priviledged but the suite for the Tithe branches of Trees which are not priviledged shall be in the spirituall Court as well as the suite for the Tithe of Trees themselves Res judicata pro veritate accipitur Coke com 103. a. The thing adjudged is taken for truth As in an Action of debt upon an Obligation against an Abbot the Abbot acknowledgeth the Action and dyeth the successor shall not avoid execution though the Obligation was made without the assent of the Covent for he cannot falsify the recovery in an higher Action and the thing judged is taken for truth and this is but a Chattle and so is it of a Statute or Recognizance acknowledged by an Abbot and Prior ibidem And therefore doth the Law so much respect the certainty of Iudgement and the credit and authority of Iudges as it will not permit any error to be assigned that impeacheth them in their trust and office and in wilfull abuse of the same but onely
of a Grant be good in parcels and for parcels not that which is for the advantage of the Grantee shall be taken to be good As if a man granteth unto me an annuity provided that it shall not charge his person the Proviso is void and the Grant good 20 E. 4 8. by Townsend 14 H. 4. 30. by Hank And if an annuity be granted pro consilio impendendo though the Grantee be well skilled in divers professions of art yet counsell shall be given in that faculty onely which was intended at the time of the Grant 4. 1. E. 3. 6. If the King grant to a man that he and his Heirs shall be quit of Tax for the lands which they have this is a good Grant though there be no Tax at the time of the Grant 38 H. 6. 10. And so is the Law of Tenths and fifteens ibidem Ployd f. 29. a. If a man maketh a Lease for life and after the decease of Tenant for life that the lands redibus to A. B. in fee it is held a good remainder because it is held for a principle that the Livery of every one shall be taken more strong against him 18 E. 3. f. 28. If a man give land to one haeredibus it shall be a Fee-simple without the word suis and though he doth not give him a Fee-simple expresly yet every mans livery shal be taken strongest against him Ployd f. 18 b.a. If I make a lease for years upon condition that one moneth after he shall have fee he shall have it after the moneth accordingly for the thing shall pass according to the convention more strong against the Donor Ployd ibidem So if I make a lease to two upon condition that if one doth dye within seven years that then after the death of the other it shall remain to a stranger in fee that remainder is good for the reason of the condition to give the estate to privies or strangers is all one in regard that he had first given an estate to which the condition may be annexed for the livery and limitation shall be taken strongest against him that made it ibidem If I give land to one filio suo primogenito and he hath no Son at the time of the gift and after he hath a Son that son shall have the land by way of remainder and yet the remainder was not out of the Lessor neither did it vest at the time of livery but the Law construeth the livery and limitation more strong against the Lessor P. 17 E. 3. f. 29. Ployd vide ibidem plura If two Tenants in Common grant a rent of ten shillings this is severall and the Grantees shall have twenty shillings But if they make a Lease and reserve ten shillings they shall have onely ten shillings between them So an Obligation to pay ten shillings at the feast of our Lord God it is no plea to say that he did pay it but he must shew at what time or else it will be taken that he paid it after the feast for every act shall be taken more strictly against him that made it Noy Max. f. 15. 2 E. 3. p. M f. 140 b. 161. b. A generall pardon ought to be taken more beneficially for the Subject against the King 37 H. 8. f. 21. Coke l. 4. Vaughans case If I. S. submit himselfe to arbitrement of all Actions and Suites between him and I D. and I. N. it shall be intended collective of joynt Actions and distributive of severall Actions also because the words shall be taken stronger against him that speaketh 2. R. 3. 18. 21. H. 7. 29. If I grant 10 l. rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pound rent it shall be strongest taken against me the grantor for three pounds addition to the ten 8. Ass Pl. 10. So if I sow all my Land with Corne and let it for yeares the Corne passeth to the Lessee if I except it not So if I have a free Warren in my owne Land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren discharged and extracted during the Lease 8. A. 7 32. H. 6. If I. give Lands to I. S. and his heires males this is a good Fee-simple and the words males is void Bac. Max. f. 12. vide ibidem plura Yet this rule also faileth when another which the Law holdeth worthier cometh in place and which is of more equity and humanity It is a rule in the Civill Law valeant eo modo quo valere possunt and at the Common Law Benignae faciendae sunt interpretationes chartarum propter simplicitatem laicorum ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com f. 30 b. The interpretations of Deeds and charters because of the simplicity of the people are favorably to be made that the thing may rather stand and subsist then fall and perish and let all things stand by the same meanes they may stand And therefore if I give Lands to I. S. and his heires rendring five pounds yearly to I. D. and his heires this implyeth a condition to me that am the grantor Littleton yet were it a stronger exposition against me to say that the limitation shall be void and the Feoffment absolute So if a man make a lease to A. for yeares and after by his Deed the Lessor voluit quod haberet teneret terram pro termino vitae willeth that he should have and hold the Land for terme of his life this is adjudged by the word volo to be a good confirmation for life Coke com f. 301. b. Though it were stronger to say those words are void because they are not proper words of confirmation So if the Disseisor granteth a rent to the Disseisee and he by his Deed granteth it over and after doth re-enter in this case one and the same words doe amount to a grant and a confirmation So if the Disseisor maketh a Lease for life or in taile the remainder to the Disseisse in fee and the Disseissor by his Deed granteth over the remainder and the particular tenant atturneth the Disseissee shall not enter upon the tenant for life or in taile for then he should avoid his own grant which amounteth to a grant of the estates and a confirmation also ne pereat Coke ibidem 302. So if A enfeoffeth another upon condition that he and his heires shall render to a stranger and his heires a yearely rent of twenty shillings although this reservation be meerly void for that no estate moveth from the stranger and that he is not party to the Deed and therefore can be no rent yet shall it be taken for a penalty or for an annuall summ in grosse so as if they will not pay it according to the forme of the Indenture they shall loose the Land by the entry of the Feoffor and his heires which is to be observed that
feoffment be made to a man and a woman and their heirs with warranty and they inter marry and after are impleaded and recover in value moyeties shall not be between them for though they were sole when the warranty was made yet at the time when they recovered and had execution they were husband and wife at which time they cannot take by moyeties Ployd 483. Nichols case So if a reversion be granted to a man and a woman and their heires and before attornement they inter-marry and then attornement is made they in this case shall have no moieties No more if a Charter of feoffment be made to a man and a woman with a letter of Attorney to make livery and they inter-marry and then the livery is made secundum formam chartae they shall have no moiety Coke com f. 187. a. Although at the common law a man during the coverture could neither in possession reversion or remainder limit an estate to his wife yet a man now may by the statute o 27. H. 8 Covenant with others to stand seised to the use of his wife or make a feoffment or other conveyance to the use of his wife for by it the estate is executed to such uses for an use is but a trust and confidence which by such a meane may be limited by the husband to the wife but a man cannot covenant with his wife to stand seised to her use because they are one person in Law And if cesty que vie doth devise that his wife shall sell his land and make her Executrix and dyeth and she take another husband she may sell the land to her husband for she doth it in anter droit and her husband shall be in by the devisor Coke com f. 112. a. If a free man marry a woman which is a neife she shall be free for ever although the husband dyeth and she surviveth because they are but one person in law unlesse there be some speciall Act made by the wife afterwards as devorce or cognisance in Court of record F. N. B. f. 78. g. If an english man marry an alien borne she shall be a Denizen for the same reason Abri of Ass by Brooke Demzen Iâ— the husband and wife â—aile goods to one they shall not joyne in an Action of Detinue for it is the bailement of the husband onely and void as to her The husband may have an Action of trespasse for taking away his wife F. n. b. f. 53. b. A man may have an Action at the common law de muliere abducta cum bonis viri if she hath attained to the age of consent and hath actually consented to the marriage because it is not properly a marriage till she doth consent 13. E. 1. c. 35. Yet Brooke 4. 47. E. 3. trespasse f. 420. rather thinketh that it shall be intended a good marriage till she doth disâ—ssent but where the marriage is compleat though the wife is dead or divorced at the time of the Action brought the action is maintainable but the word rapuit must be in the writ as well as abduxit 43. E. 3. and therefore it will not lie against a woman because one woman cannot ravish another 43. E. 3. 23. Fulb. l. 1. f. 79. Hereupon it is that the wife can never answer in any Action without her husband and if upon an Action of trespasse the wife cometh in upon a cepi corpus and the husband doth not appeare she must be set at large without any mainprise till her husband doth appeare but he appearing may answer without her and therefore a protection cast by the husband serveth for the wife also Finch Nomot f. 41. If tenant in taile enfeoff a woman and die and his issue within age taketh her to wife he shall be remitted for he cannot sue a Formedon in this case unlesse he will sue against his wife because by the enter-marriage he is seised in her right ibid. Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis Coke l. 6. f. 53. b. and l. 4. f. 118. b. If a noble woman marry an ignoble man she ceaseth to be noble as when a Barronesse marrieth under the degree of a Baron by such marriage her dignity is determined but that is to be understood of a woman hath attained her nobility by marriage of a Duke Countesse or Baron and if such an one marry with one is ignoble she loseth her dignity to which shee hath attained by the marriage with one of nobility but if a woman be noble by descent as a Dutchesse c. though she marry one under the degree of nobility yet her birth-right shall remaine for it is annexed to her blood and it is a Character indelebilis ibidem And if a Dutchesse marry with a Baron of the Realme she remaineth a Dutchesse and loseth not her name Coke com f. 16. b. Vir est caput mulieris Bracton Coke com 1 2. a. The husband is the head of the wife for God saith Ployd f. 305. hath divided reasonable creatures into two sexes male and female and the male is more soveraine and the female more base as Aristotle l. 1. Polit. Mas est praestantior deterior vero faemina and therefore doth the female change her sir name into the name of her husband and also men for the greater part are more reasonable then women and have more discretion to guide things then women have and therefore Aristotle in the same place saith mas ad principatum aptior est natura quam faemina the man is more apt by nature to rule then the woman and as the woman is not so apt to governe in high matters so is shee not in things of a lower degree and therefore saith Bracton l. 2. c. 15. Omnia quae sunt uxoris sunt ipsius viri non habet uxor potestatem sui sed vir all things which are the wifes are the husbands and the wife hath not power of her selfe but her husband for all personall things shee hath are meerly his and at his disposing and as the office of an executor f 210. are so setled in the husband upon the marriage as any other that were his own before so as if goods be given to a Feme-covert and another the joynture is severed and the husband and the other are tenants in common and the executor of the husband shall have all the goods that were given to the wife 21. H. 7. 29. All the reall Chattells of the wife are also the husbands for as Hoberd f. 4. Radfords case though the lease were at the first the wifes and that the husband was possessed in her right so as though he had purchased the Fee-simple the Lease had not been extinct yet by the inter-marriage he had full power to alien it and if he survive the wifâ— he is to enjoy it against her Executors or Administrators vide Ployd 191. But where the wife hath a terme for yeares the husband cannot devise it to another
words contrary to the simple intent as Tully saith in his Offices is calumnia quaedam ninis callida malitiosa Juris interpretatio ex quo illud summum jus summa injuria a kind of a calumny and malitious interpretation of the law from whence that saying proceeded the rigor of right is the extremity of injury As he putteth the example of one had made a truce for 130. daies with his enemy and in the night he plundered and depopulated his possessions because he said the truce was for daies and not for the nights which Cicero accounteth meere injury and injustice and admonisheth men to avoid the like interpretation of the law and to observe the intent of the words and certainly words are but testimonialls of the intent and therefore Ployd f. 107. b. It is said it is the offices of Judges to take and expound the words as the common people doe use them to express their intent according to their intent As a Lease was made for life and that after his decease the tenements redibunt to a stranger it shall be taken as a remanebunt because to that purpose it was there used and therefore by 18. E. 3. f. 28. It shall be taken by way of remainder So a lease for life the reversion to a stranger shall be taken as a remainder for the reason abovesaid 30. M. 1. ante 157. vide ibidem plura in Hills case And so Ployd f. 291. a. Where a covenant cannot be performed according to the words it shall be performed according to the intent as neere as may bee as in the case of Littleton where a man maketh a feoffment upon condition that the feoffee shall make an estate in speciall taile to the Feoffor and his wife and the heires of their bodies if the Baron dieth before the estate made the estate shall be made as neere to the condition as may be to wit to the feme for life without impeachment of wast the remainder to the issues in taile according to the first limitation and if the feme be dead then the feoffee ought to give the lands to the issues and the heires of the bodie of his father and his mother engendred If the words be performed and not the intent the agreement is not performed Ployd f. 291. b. according to the rule of the civill law leges non ex verbis sed ex mente sunt intelligendae lawes are not to be understood and construed by the words but by sense and meaning of the parties as where the Defendant was obliged upon condition that if his feoffees of his Mannor of W. should grant to the Plaintiff an annuall rent of forty shillings out of the said Mannor that then c. and he had three feoffees and two of them granted to the Plaintiff the rent There the words of the condition were performed for the feoffees had granted the rent and yet he had not performed the condition for all the Justices there held that all the feoffees ought to have granted the rent and so it should be sure for there the third might have the land by survivor and he might avoid the rent and also more then two parts of the Mannor were not charged with the rent and so the intent is not performed though the words be M. 22. H. 6. f. 10. So if a man be bound to enfeoff me of the Mannor of D. and he maketh a feoffment ro another of parcell of it and then enfeoffeth me of the Mannor he hath performed the words but yet he hath not performed the intent which was that I should have had all the Mannor as it then was H. 3. H. 7. 4. So a remainder was limited to B. Si ipse vellet in-habitare residens esse if he would dwell and bee resident on the land during the terme there it is taken that if he was resident one week during the terme he had performed the words of the condition but not the intent for the intent was that hee should be resident all the terme 4. E. 6. ante 23. So an Abbot was Parson Emparsonee of a time c. and he had annuity for the time of which no memory runneth in right of the Parsonage and he as Abbot without naming himselfe Parson brought a Writ of annuity and counteth upon a prescription in him and his predecessors Abbots and the prescription traversed and found for the Plaintiff there every word of the Verdict is true and yet attaint lay against the Jury because he brought the Writ in the name of the Abbey and so claimed the annuity whereas he was not seised by that forme but as Parson and for that he did not claime as Parson they ought not to have found the issue with him and so the words of the Verdict and the intent of the Verdict did not agree in one M. 10. E. 4. f. 16. Ibidem in Chapmans case It is not requisite alwaies that the agreement shall be performed according to words because the intent is performed which is the principall point of the agreement Ployd f. 295. a. b As if a man be bound to pay a lesser summe upon a day certaine if I pay the summe before the day the condition is performed H. 10. H. 7. 24. So if the condition be in a Mortgage that I pay the money at such a place if I shall pay it at another place and the Mortgage accept of it it is well enough for the value is the effect So if a feoffment be made upon condition that if the feoffee doe not pay the Feoffor such a summe at such a day that then the feoffor shall enter If the feoffee before the day make a feoffment over and at the day doth not pay the summe there the second feoffee at the day may tender and pay the summe though the agreement was no other but that the first feoffee shall pay the summe Litt. vide ib. plura If a man make a feoffment on condition to enfeoff two in fee at such a time and before the time one dieth the feoffment ought to be made to the survivor and his heires onely for the intent which appeareth in the condition Ployd f. 345. 4. H. 7. f. 127. Every one who groundeth an Act with discretion hath an intention in the inception and neither beginneth any thing but to some end and in the progression hath the same intent and so in the consummation so as the same intention is the cause of every part and therefore the intention is principally respected in all humane acts and especially in those which concerne the disposition of our estates and in feoffments and grants A feoffment by deed of a Mannor with an advowson appendant and no livery made the advowson passeth not yet an advowson may pass without livery but the intention and the meaning was that the Mannor and it should pass together Finch Nomot 58. A bargaine and sale of Land and a reversion by deed not enrolled the reversion passeth
of the Law when one thing is provided for in the words that every other thing in the like kind shall be provided for in the same words And so when the words of a Statute enact one thing they enact all other things which are in the semblable degree As whereas the Statute of 9 E. 3. c 31. ordaineth that in an Action of Debt against Executors he that commeth in by distresse shall answer the said Act shall be extended by equity to Administrators for whosoever of them commeth in first by distress shall answer by the equity of the said Act because they are in the like degree So the Statute of 4 H. 4. c. 8. giveth an especiall Assise to him who is disseised and ousted of his land by force against the Disseisor and it is enacted that he shall recover against him double damages And so it is in an Assise of Nusance to turn the course of the water from the Mills of the Plaintiff with force it was adjudged that he should recover double damages and yet he was not put out of his land neither was there a disseisin but the Nusance was to the damage of his Frank-tenement and so by the equity of the said act the Plaintiff recovered double damages because the Nusance was in the like kind So the Statute of Gleucester giveth an Action of Wast c. against him who holdeth for life or for yeares and by the equity of it a man shall have an action of Wast against him who holdeth for a yeare or for twenty weeks and yet it is out of the words of the act because it is in the like degree and the cases which are of such degree in our Law are infinite Ployd f. 165. a. And there is another sort of equity which abridgeth and taketh from the letter and is a correction of the generall words Ethie 30. l. 10. and is defined by Aristotle to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a correction of a Law wherein it is any way wanting because of the generality of it which also in our Law is of much use As when an act of Parliament is made that whosoever shall do such an act shall be a Felon and be put to death and yet a man non sarae memoriae or an Infant of tender age who hath no discretion doth it they shall not be Felons c. or if a Statute be made that all persons who shall receive or give meat or drink or other aid to one who shall do a felonious act shall be accessory to the Offence and be put to death yet if one doth such an act and commeth to his wife who knowing it receiveth him and giveth meat and drink unto him she shall not be accessory nor Felon for in the generality of the said words of the Law he of non sanae memoriae nor Infant nor a Wife shall not be included and so equity correcteth the generality of the Law in those cases and the words generall are by equity abridged so the Statute of Champerty W. 2. l. 49. Arti. super Chart. contra probatos men generally do receive Lands and Tenements while the thing is in plea yet M. 16. R. 2. accord it was said by the whole Court in a Writ of Champerty that if I bargaine any lands before any Writ brought and after the Writ purchased I deliver Seisin That the Writ of Champerty doth not lye because it shall not be intended that the Bargain was made for such cause and that by equity for when he bargained and promised the land upon just consideration before any action brought against him it was his act to perform it notwithstanding the action And Costle promoter of the King brought an action of Extortion H. 21. H. 7. 16. against an under-Sheriff grounded upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. c. 10. which ordaineth that neither the Sheriff Goaler or Ministers nor any of them by colour of their Office shall take any thing profit c. of any person for fine fee or ease of prison but for the Sheriff 20 d. the Bayliff 4 d. and the Goaler 4 d. supposing that he had taken 20 d. above the same limited upon the Statute and upon demurrer it appeared upon evidence to the Court that all under Sherifs of the same county have used from the time whereof memory doth not run to have of every prisoner in their ward for suspition of Felony when they are acquitted twenty pence called the Bar fee and the twenty pence supposed to be taken were taken from the person named in the count being acquitted for a Bar-fee and the opinion of the whole Court was that it was out of the raise of the Statute though it was within the words of the Statute for that the sum of a Bar-fee was assigned to the Sheriff at the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court in respect of his labour and charge he had with the prisoners and for his attendance and for his ministry when the prisoners are brought to their delivery and so that payment was with reason and good conscience which the intent of the makers of the act was not to take away and so equity did put an exception to the generality of that text of the Statute Law So the Statute of W. 2. c. 4. ordaineth that where a man rat or dog escapeth alive out of a Ship neither the Ship nor any thing that is within it shall be adjudged wrack but all the things shall be saved and kept by the view of the Sheriff c. in the hands of those of the Towne where the things were found so that if any one can prove that they are his within a yeare and a day they shall be restored to him and whosoever doth otherwise shall be awarded to prison and remaine at the will of the King and render damages yet if the goods within the Ship be such things as will not endure for a yeare and a day the Sheriff may sell them and deliver the mony taken for them to the Towne to answer for it and that by equity though it be against the words of the said Act. So the Act of 2. E. 6. c. 14. Which giveth to the King all Lands and Tenements by any assurance conveyance given assigned or limited to find any preacher to have continuance for ever c. if the words of that act should be taken generally they give to the King al the houses and glebe Lands of all Parsons and Vicars but equity putteth in that text the exception of Parsonages and Vicarages because it was not the intention of the makers of that Act Ployd f. 466. vide ibidem plura There is another excellent use of equity which consisteth in guiding the grounds and maxims of of things which seem to crosse and thwart one another for as Sir John Doderidge English Lawyer f. 209. it is scarcely possible to make any second rule of Law but that it shall faile in some particular
making of the banks of a River to be contributory to it for Qui sentit commodum c. Coke l. 7. f. 39. b. If a man grant a Rent-charge for life out of his land and the rent is behind and the Grantor enfeoff A. and the rent is behind in his time and after A. enfeoffeth B. and the rent is behind in his time and then the Grantee dyeth the Executor shall have an action of debt against every of them for the rent behind in his time for qui sâ—ntit commodum c. and so was it holden in Ognels case l. 4. f. 49. a. 50. Barons uses f. 27. If a man bind himself and his Heires in an Obligation or do covenant in writing for him and his Heires or do grant an annuity for him and his Heirs or do make a Warranty of land binding him and his Heires to warranty in all these cases the Heir after the death of the Ancestor is by Law charged with this Obligation Covenant Annuity and Warranty yet with these three cautions 1. That the party must by speciall name bind himself and his Heires 2. That some action must be brought against the Heir whilest the land or other inheritance rested in him unaliened except the land was conveyed away by fraud and one purpose to prevent the Suit intended against him And 3. That no Heire is further to be charged then the value of the land descended unto him from the same Ancestor c. nor to be sold out-right for the debt to be kept in extent at a yearely value untill the debt or damage be run out Neverthelesse for his false plea shall he be charged of his own lands for this Deed of his Ancestor and the reason of this charge is Qui sentit commodum sentire debet incommodum onus vide ibidem plura Dilationes sunt in lege odiosae Ployd f. 75. b. Delaies are tedious in the Law and therefore doth the Law favour Assise because they are the more speedy Suits the Law hath given as the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. in its recitall saith Et quia non est aliquod breve in Cancelaria per quod quaerentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve Nove disseisinae And therefore because it is the more speedy Suit the Law the more greatly favoureth it ibidem For for speed to the Plaintiff the Jurors shal have the view before appearance by the words of the Writ And though Warranties are favoured in Law yet none shall vouch in Assise any one if he be not present and that is for the speed of the Plaintiff No. Nat. br f. 178. And a protection will not defend the party against an assise but assises are accepted by the words of protection p. 2. H. 6. 42. Bâ— protection 53. And all things and pleas which go in retardation or abatement of Assises are esteemed odious and therefore exceptions which will abate other Writs shall not abate Assises if it be so that there is a Disseisor and a Tenant for it is the substance of the Suit and therefore the misnaming of one of the Defendants shall not abate the assise if there be another Disseisin and Tenant and yet the Writ was alwaies false Ploâ—d f. 98. a. b. And if the Tenant plead Joynt-tenancy with a stranger not named although the Plaintiff confesse it yet it shall not abate his assise but for it onely for the remnant the Writ and Plaint shall stand in his force and yet the Plaint was altogether false and if there be a Disseisor and Tenant for any part then it sufficeth for other verity in the Writ or Plaint the Law requireth none and to say that one named in the Writ is dead before the Writ purchased or that there was never any such in rerum natura is alone and shall be adjudged no plea in abatement of the Writ but if there be another Disseisor and a Tenant the Writ shall be good against them Ployd f 90. a. vide ibidem plura And though in actions reall as the weight of the cause requireth there are longer times given in their proceedings then in personall actions yet it appeareth by Fortescue de lib. l. A. c. 5. 3. that they are not too long nor admitted without just cause Crebro enim saith he deliberationibus iuâ—icia matur scunt sed in accelerato processu numquam And as Hobert saith f. 133. Festinatio jâ—stitiae est nâ—verca infortunii Festination of Justice is the step-mother of mischief but many times by deliberations Judgments grow to ripenesse but in over hasty processe never yet the Demandant shall come to a finall end by these actions which he shall never do by prosecution of personall actions for the tryall of a Freehold or Inheritance Co. ep ad lectorem lib. 8. And in all cases the Law favoureth speeding of mens Causes and hateth delayes as 3 H. 6. 15. b. He that pleadeth a Record in delay as to prove the Plaintiff excommunicate must have it ready to shew but otherwise it is if he plead in bar In dilatory pleas both Defendants must joyne 12 H. 7. 1. A Plea in bar that is dilatory must be good to every common intent 8 H. 7. 9. One who is in Court ready to joyn with the Defendant may do it without processe As the Vouchee the Plaintiffs Lessor being prayed in aid of when the Defendant in a Replevin avoweth upon him or the Mesne when the Lord Paramount voweth upon him But Joynder in aid cannot be by an Attorney without processe 2 H. 6. 1. b. One who is a Debtor to the King of Record in the Exchequer if he be seen in the Court may be brought in to answer 2 H. 6 4. b. An assise of Darrein presentment was brought and it was pleaded in abatement of the Writ that the same Plaintiff had brought a Quare impedit against the Defendant for the same Church and the Court was of opinion that it was a good plea for the Quare impedit is of an higher nature for the right and possession and the Statute of W. 2. l. 5. saith that it may be in the election of one to have an assise of Darrein-presentment or a Quare impedit ergo not both And it was adjudged p. 15 Jaco that one cannot have two Quare Impedits of one Church for one avoidance Hutton f. 403. When the Law giveth a man severall remedies for a thing he cannot have both of them together as Littleton saith for then he should recover one thing twice which should be a double charge and a double vexation to the Defendant Co. Com. 145. a. as if I grant by Deed a Rent-charge to another the Grantee hath election to bring a Writ of Annuity and charge the person onely to make it personall or to distrain upon the land and make it reall but he cannot have both after the Grantee hath determined his election but this determination of election must be by action in
land of the Tenant is void Dyer 199. b. Custome that the Tenant shall be amerced if he do not put his Cattell in the Pound of the Lord 21 H. 7. 20. Malus usus est abolendus Lit. Sect. 212. 9. Co. com f. 141. a. An evill use is to be abolished for every use that is evill is against reason for vertue is an habit consentaneous to reason Arist 6. Eth. c. 13. in consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est consideranda In customes the long continuance of time is not to be considered but the soundness and solidity of reason and for that reason the Brechon Law in Ireland was by Lionell Duke of Clarence wholly abolished because it was not a Law but a lewd custome and absonant to reason for by that Law Bastards did equally inherit with legitimate Sons which is contrary to the divine Law and the Lawes of Nations which is grounded on naturall reason So coke l. 4 f. 38. b. Two Lords of two severall Mannors had two Wasts adjoyning parcels of their Mannors without inclosure or separation yet the bounds of both Mannors were well enough known by certain marks In which Wasts the Tenants of both Mannors had reciprocally Common because of vicenage of time whereof the memory of man did not run to the contrary But yet in this case one may inclose against the other and by it take away the Common for cause of vicenage because the Tenants of one Mannor could not put their beasts in the Wasts of another Mannor and that the Cattell of the Tenant of one Mannor did stray into the wasts of the other Mannor and therefore the enclosure is lawfull onely to prevent the escape of the Cattell malus usus abolendus Consuetudo tollit legem coke com f. 31. b. Custome taketh away the common Law as by the custome of Gavelkind the wife shall be endowed of the Moyety so long as she keep her self sole and without child which she cannot wave and take the Thirds for her self The customes of Gavelkind and Borough-english are against the maxime of descent of Inheritance 35 H. 6. 26. a. And the Customes of Kent The Father to the Bough and the Son to the Plow is against the Maxime of Escheats And that the Lessee in tail shall enter notwithstanding the Feoffment of his Father with Warranty is against the Maxime of Discontinuance and there are many other customes which are contrary to the particular grounds of the Law and yet are reasonable for they may have a reasonable beginning and are neither prejudiciall to the Common-weal nor to the present interest of any particular person Davis Rep. f. 32. a. b. Custome and Prescription cannot take away an act of Parliament Coke com f. 113. a. Dr. Student l. 1. c. 26. f. 47. A custome or prescription of this Realm against the Statutes of the Realm prevail not in Law But as Coke com f. 115. a. There is a diversity between an Act of Parliament in the Negative and in the Affirmative for an Affirmative Act doth not take away a Custom as the Statutes of Wills of 32 H. 8. do not take away custom to devise lands as it hath been often adjudged Moreover there is a diversity between Statutes that be in the Negative for if a Statute in the Negative be Declarative of the ancient Law that is an affirmance of the Common Law there as well as a man may prescribe or alledge a custome against the common Law so a man may do against a Statue for as our Author saith Consuetudo privat communem legem As the Statute of Magna charta provideth that no Leet shall be holden but twice in the year yet a man may prescribe to hold it oftner and at other times for the Statute was but in affirmance of the common Law So the Statute of 34 E. 1. provideth that none shall cut down any Trees of his own within a Forrest without the view of the Forrester but insomuch as this act is in affirmance of the common Law a man may prescribe to cut down Trees in a Forrest without the view of the Forrester vide ibidem plura Consuetudo licet sit magnae authoritatis nunqâ—am tamen praejudicat manifestae veriti coke l. 4. f. 18. a. Custome though it be of great authority yet doth it never by prejudice hinder the manifest truth As that the Plaintiffs bring an action in London for that the Defendant called the wife of the Plaintiff Whore and the Defendant by an Habeas corpus removed it into the Kings Bench and it was moved to have a Procedendo to remand it because that the Action was maintainable in London for the same words but not at the common Law and the Procedendo was denied by the whole Court for such a custom to maintain actions for such brabling words is against the Law and custome though it be of great force yet doth it never prejudice the manifest truth Coke l 6. f. 6. b. In Sir John Moulins case the question was Whether a Mannor was holden of the King and though that divers Offices Licences of Alienations and other Records were shewn by which it appeared that the Law had alwaies so taken it that the said Mannor was held of the King in Capite acd that custome is the best Interpreter of the Lawes yet in so much as by construction of Law upon the Letters Patents it appeared that there was no immediate Tenure of the King the Offices c. should not alter the true Tenure that originally did appear to them as Judges of Record and though custom be of great authority yet doth it never prejudice the truth ibidem Consuetudo debet esse certa nam incerta pro nullis habentur Davis f. 33 Custome ought to be certain for incertainties are esteemed for nothing in the Law and it must be as Littleton ex certa causa rationabili usitata for there are three essentiall qualities of a custome reason ableness usage and certainty A Writ Dum fuit infra aetatem was brought against an Infant the Tenant pleaded custome that when the Infant was of such an age that he could count twelve pence and measure a yard of cloath that his Feoffment shall be good It was adjudged void for the incertainty 13 E. 3. Fitz. dum fuit infra aetatem 3. In trespass for Trees carried away the Defendant pleaded custome that the Tenant of the Mannor which first came to the place where c. shall have the Windfalls there that custome was void also for the incertainty vide ibidem plura Consuetudo semel reprobata non potest amplius induci Davis f. 33. b. A Custome must have continuance without interruption of time whereof c. for if it be discontinued within the time of memory it is gone As if a Copyholder be leased of the Lord of the Mannor for life or for years according to the course of the common Law it shall never
of debt for the arreaâ—ages before the coverture yet when as the Statute giveth to the Baron an Action of debt for the arrearages the words shall be taken with effect and shall be construed for the arreages due before It is a rule in the Law that verba restringuntur ad habilitatem personae vel ad aptitudinem rei Bac. Max. f. 14. Generall words are to be restrained to the condition of the person or fitnesse of the thing as if a man grant to another common inter metas bundas villa de Dale and part of the vill is his severall and part of his wast common the Grantee shall not have common in the severall yet this is the strongest exposition against the Grantor so by all the precedent rules and grounds it appeareth that the rule that words shall be taken more strongly against the Grantor doth yeild to them as the more worthy and equitable vide ibidem plura where this rule with its differences and exceptions is amply and accurately discussed The grant of a common person shall be taken more strong against him but the grant of the King shall be taken more strong against a stranger and more favorable for him Ployd f. 243. a. As a Mannor granted by the King the advowson shall not passe without speciall words 2. H. 7. 8. So the King may grant a thing in action Ibidem And if the King grant a Mannor or Land without limitation of any estate the grant is void for the incetrainty and the Grantee shal not be tenant at the will of the Lord Davis Rep f 45. vide ibidem plura This rule hath no place in Acts of Parliament Verdicts Judgements or Devise Bacon f. Max. 21. Expressio eorum qâ—ae tacite insunt nihil operatur Coke l. 4. f. 73. b. The expression of those things which are covertly implyed worketh nothing for the expression of a clause which the Law implyeth operateth nothing as in 30. Ass Pl. 8. A Lease is made to two for terme of their lives diutius eorum viventi and after they made partition and the one dyeth and he in reversion entereth and his entry adjudged lawfull notwithstanding the said words diutius eorum viventi for without those so much was covertly implyed by the Law 17 E. 3. 7. Hulls case whereupon Coke giveth this observation that in case of lease for life it is more beneficiall for the Lessor to have the joynture severed then to have it continue but otherwise it is in a Lease for yeares for if a man makes a Lease for yeares to two with a proviso that if the Lessees dye within the terme that the terme shall cease the Lessees make partition or one alieneth his part and dyeth the Lessee shall not enter into his part that is dead but the Grantee or the Executors of the Lessee shall 〈…〉 So if the King maketh a Lease for yeares rendring rent without limiting of any place or to whose hands it shall be paid the Lessor may by the Law pay it either to the receipt of the Exchequer of the King or to the hands of the Bailiffs or receivors of the King whom the King hath authorized to such purpose and therefore the usuall and speciall limitation of the payment of rent at the receipt of the Exchequer c. doth import no more then the Law will imply and therefore nihil operatur Ibidem Coke l. 8. f. 26. b. If the King reciting that another holdeth the Mannor of D. for life granteth the said Mannor to B. for his life in this case the Law implyeth that the second grant shall begin and take effect after the determination of the first grant and therefore there is no incertainty in the grant though it be not expressed so for the expression of a clause which the Law implyeth operateth nothing ibidem in the Earle of Rutlands case Coke l. 10. f. 39. a. By the Statute of 32. H 8. Tenant in taile may make a Lease for three lives or ten yeares and by the Statute of 4. H. 2. c. 24. he may levy a fine and by the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 36. by it bar the issues and therefore if a man make a guift in tail and further grant that he may lease for life or for yeares or levy a fine with proclamations to bar the Issues nihil operatur for when one maketh a tacit guift in taile he giveth those incidents to it Ibidem And therefore are such conditions and expressions called by Sir Francis Bacon clausula vel dipositio inutilis an unprofitable clause and disposition and to no use because the act or the words do express no more then the Law by intendment would have supplyed and that therefore the doubling and iterating of that and no more then which the conceite of the Law doth in a sort prevent and preoccupate is reputed nugation And thâ—refore if a man devise Land at this day to that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was his Son and heire it is void because the disposition of the Law did cast the same upon the heir by descent 32. H. 8. Gourd 39. Ber. And yet if it be by Knights service Land and the heire within age if he take by the devise he shall have two parts of the profits to his own use and the guardian shall have the benefit but of the third Brooke devise 41. But if a man devise Lands to his two Daughters havnig no Sons then the devise is good because he doth alter the disposition of the Law for by the Law they shall take in coparcenary but by the devise they all take joyntly Dyer 12. Bacon f. 74.75 vide ibidem plura Yet Littleton saith it is well done to put in such clauses to declare and expresse to the lay people which are not learned in the Law what the Law is in such cases Co. lib. 4. f. 73. b. Expresum facit cessare tacitum Coke com f. 183. b. A matter or thing expressed causeth that to cease or to be of no effect which by intendement of Law was implyed and not expressed As if one grant Lands to two without expressing what estate they shall have they have a joynt estate for terme of their lives but if a Lease be made to two Habendum to the one for life the remainder to the other for life this doth alter the generall intendement of the promises so if a Lease be made to two Habendum the one moiety to one and the other moiety to the other the Habendum doth make them tenants in common for that which is expressed doth make that which is secretly intended to cease Ibidem for as he in another case saith if the generall words should stand without any qualification then the speciall words should be altogether vaine Coke l. 8. f. 154. in Edward Althans case quod vide Coke Com. f. 210. a. b. If the Feoffee in mortgage before
entire and whereof no division can be made by metes and bounds a woman cannot be endowed of the thing it selfe yet the woman shall be endowed thereof in a speciall and certaine manner whereby shee may have satisfaction as of a Mill a woman shall not be endowed by metes and bounds nor in common with the heire but either shee may be endowed of the third tole-dish or of the whole Mill by every third moneth and so of a villaine either the third dayes worke or every third weeke or moneth So a man shall be endowed of the third part of the profits of stallage of the third part of the profits of a Faire or of the third part of the profits of the Marshalsey of the third part of the profits of keeping of a Park of the third part of the profits of a Dove-house and likewise of a third part of a Piscary by the third Fish or the third cast of the Net or the third Presentation to an advowson and a Writ of Dower lyeth for the third part of the profits issuing out of the custody of a Goale of the third part of the profits of Courts Fines and Heriots and a woman shall be endowed of tithes and the surest endowment of tithes is of the third sheafe for what Land shall be sowen is uncertaine Exception But in some cases of Lands and Tenements which are divisible and which the heire of the husband shall inherit the wife shall not be endowed as if the husband maketh a Lease for life of certaine Lands reserving a rent to him and his heires and after taketh a wife and dyeth the wife shall not be endowed neither of the reversion because there was no seisin in Deed or in Law of the free-hold or the rent because the husband had but a particular estate therein and no Fee-simple Coke com f. 32. a. vide ibidem plura Impossibile est unum corpus in duobus locis esse simul it is impossible for one body to be at two places at one and the same time Pop. Rep. 58. 3. 4. Eliz. As if a man make a lease of two Barnes rendring rent and for default of payment a re-entry if the tenant be at one of the Barnes to pay the rent and the Lessor at the other to demand the rent and no body be there to pay it yet the Lessor cannot enter for the condition broken because there was no default of the tenant he being at one Barne for it was not possible for him to be in two places together and Popbam Walmestâ— and Fenner said that also perhaps that the tenant had not money sufficient to pay it at either of the places but it is sufficient for him to have and provide one rent which cannot be at two places together ibidem Jura naturalia sunt immutabilia Bracton l. 9. c. 23. Coke l. 7. f. 15. b. The Laws of nature are unalterable as if a man have a ward by reason of a Signiory a signiory and is outlawed he forfeiteth his wardship to the King but if a man have the ward-ship of his own son or daughter which is heire apparent and is outlawed he doth not forfeit this ward-ship for nature hath annexed it to the person of the father 33. H. 6. 55. In the same manner maris faminae conjunctio est de jure naturae the conjunction of a man and a woman is of the law of nature as Bract. l. 1. c. 33. Dr. and Student c. 31. doe hold now if he that is attainted of felony or treason is slaine by one who hath no authority or executed by him who hath authority but pursueth not his warrant in this case his eldest son can have no appeale for he must bring his appeale as heire which being ex provisione hominis he loseth it by the attainder of his father but his wife if any he have shall have an appeal because she is to have her appeale as his wife which she retaineth notwithstanding the attainder because the conjunction of man and woman is by the law of nature and therefore it being to be intended of true and right matrimony is indissoluble and this is proved by the book 33. H. 6. f. 57. So if there bee mother and daughter and the daughter is attainted of felony now cannot she be heire to her mother for the cause aforesaid yet after her attainder if she killeth her mother this is parricide and petit treason for yet she remaineth her daughter for that is of nature All which accord with the rule of the civil law jura sanguinis nullo modo dirimi possunt the lawes of consanguinity and the lawes of blood can no way be broken and therefore the corruption of blood taketh away the privity of the heire which is nomen juris and not the privity of the son which is nomen naturae as if an attainted person be killed by his son this is petty treason for the privity of the son still remaineth but if a man attainted be murdered by a stranger the eldest son shall not have the appeale because the appeale is given to the heire for the youngest sons shall not have it 36. H. 6. 57. 58. 21. E. 3. 17. If the son be attainted and the father covenanteth in consideration of naturall love to stand seised of Land to his use this is a good consideration to raise an use because the privity of naturall affection remaineth So if a man attainted have a Charter of pardon and be returned on a jury betweene his son and I. S. the challenge remaineth for he may maintaine any suit of his son though the blood be corrupted If a villaine be attainted yet the Lord shall have the issues of the villaine borne before or after the attainder for the Lord hath them jure naturae as the increase of a flock Bacons Maxims f. 49. and 50. vide ibidem plura If the father be slaine the son shall have an appeale of it for it is a loss to the son to lose the father and the common law giveth the appeale to the son before any other for the earnest intent of revenge which the law supposeth to be in him against the offender for the killing of him and that the son by presumption had the more great love and affection Ployd ibid. f. 304. b. And from thence Bromly said that it was an ancient usage when a felon was found guilty in an appeale of murder that all those of the blood of him was murdered should draw the felon with a long cord to execution which was grounded upon the loss that all the blood had by the murder of one of them Ployd 406. b. Ed. 6. 3. The father being impleaded made a feoffment to his eldest son and heire apparent hanging the suit and the King brought a writ of Champerty against the father and son and by the opinion of most the action was not maintainable because by any law the son is to aide the father and
yet it is in danger of the words of the Act. In an appeale brought by the wife of the death of her husband the son being an abettor shall not render damages but shall avowe the abettment as neer in blood Cuique natuâ—ale est id quo'd procreavit tueri Ployd 304. a. As matrimony is necessary betweene man and woman and that there is a naturall desire in them and all other living creatures to procreate and relinquish a thing like unto themselves id non animi judicio not by the arbitrement of the mind nor as a thing indifferent which a man may doe or not doe but is a naturall appetite to which nature urgeth us so hath nature instilled love in the procreator to the thing procreated which urgeth him to have a care to the education of the thing procreated to provide for him all things necessary and to defend him against all perils and therefore hath the common law given to the father the custody and education of his son and if any one take him from him he shal have the writ against him Quare filium heredem suum rapuit and that law is in satisfaction of nature but in his writ he must say Cujus maritagium ad se pertinet because the marriage of his son and heire and of his daughter and heire appertaineth to him who being once married he cannot have this Writ 11. H. 4. 23. M. 33. H. 6. 55. Fulb. l. 1. 80. And if a man taketh way another mans son and heire apparent and bestoweth upon him good aparrell and the father seiseth his son he shall not be impeached for taking of the apparrell for in that he may make a good justification for the taking of the body it must needs extend to the apparrell of the body because the law considereth not bare and elementall bodies but bodies apparrelled 12. H. 4. 16. 8. E. 2. Trus. 31. 32. E. 3. Guard 32. Ibidem Amor descendit Ployd 293. b. Osbornes case it is an old saying that love descendeth which by experience is found to be more true then to ascend and for that reason the law which greatly tendreth the preservation of infants hath appropriated the custody of them and their lands in Soccage to their parents because they love their children best and in default of them to their other Ancestors more neere in blood and in naturall affection to them and that is for the profit of the infant for the guardian must keep the infant with the land and of the rest of the profits give an account to the infant and if the guardian die the executors shall not have the guard of the infant because they are voide of such naturall affection but the neerer Ancestor shall have it Quaelibet haereditas naturaliter quidem ad haeredes descendit nunquam autem naturaliter ascendit Glan l. 7. c. 1. Every inheritance doth naturally descend to the heires but never naturally ascendeth Coke l. 3. f. 4. in Ratcliffs ease of which Bracton giveth this reason quod quasi ponderosum quiddam jure naturae descendit nam omne grave fertur deorsum that as a certaine ponderous thing it by the law of nature descendeth for every heavy thing descendeth downewards to which this reason may be added that as the affection of love so doth the effects of love descend for as Aristotle the reason why parents love is so fervent and permanent to their issues is because love doth descend and their descending love appeareth in that they make provision for the present sustenance of them and future maintenance and continuance of their name and therefore as Mr. Ployden saith it is a great blessing of God upon Parents to have issue male to whom they may leave the fruits of their labours and establish their estates and inheritances in their names Ployd 305. b. to which by love and naturall instinct they are incited But on the contrary as the love and provision of children towards their Parents doth not naturally ascend for the thing procreated doth not actually provide for the procreator where it is sui juris so there estates and inheritances should not ascend and therefore as Mr. Littleton it is a maxime in our law that inheritance can lineally descend but not lineally ascend wherein the civill law unnaturally differeth from the common law for the civill law alloweth lineall ascention as well as lineall descent lineall and collaterall descent but not lineal ascention of inheritances as it doth which as Coke is one of the causes of such diversities of opinions in cases of descents in the civill law and the contrary is one of the causes of the certainty of the rules of the common law in cases of descent inheritance Coke l. 3. f 49. b. If there be father Vncle and son and the son dyeth the Vncle shall be heire to the son because inheritance cannot lineally ascend for by this maxime onely lineall ascention in the right line is prohibited and not in the collaterall Coke ib. com f. 11. b. but otherwise it is in case of purchase as if a lease bee made to the sonne the remainder to the next of blood the father in this case shall have the remainder because he is next of blood and so administration may be granted of the goods of the son or daughter to the father and mother as next of kin 5. E. 6. Coke ibidem Haeres est alter ipse filius est pars patris Arist Coke l. 3. f. 12. The heir is another son and the son is a part of the father and for that reason if a man be seised of three Acres of Land and acknowledgeth a recognisance or a statute c. and enfeoffeth A. of one Acre B. of another and the third descend to the heire in this case if execution be sued onely against the heire he shall not have contribution for the heir sitteth in the seat of his Ancestor and though the father be dead yet is he as it were not dead because he hath left his like and the heir is a second same and the son is part of the father and therefore the heire shall not have contribution against any Purchasor though in truth the purchasor came to the land without any valluable consideration for the consideration of purchase is not materiall in this case and though in the case of a recognisance statute or judgement the heire is charged as terre-tenant and not as heire 27. H. 6. Execu 135. because in either of them the heire is not bound yet hee shall not have contribution against the purchasor contrary to the opinion of Finchden in 48. E. 3. f. 5. b. for the reason abovesaid yet is the heire not charged meerely as terre-tenant for he shall have contribution against those who are heires as himselfe Popham f. 171. And for the like reason if a man bindeth him and his heires to pay a certaine sum at a day and dieth it is at the election of
words in a condition shal be taken out of their proper sense ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com 213. a. If one giveth Lands to two and the heires of their two bodies ingendred the Donees have joynt estates for life and severall inheritances for if one of the Donees hath issue and dyeth the other shall have all by survivor during his life but if the Survivor hath issue and dyeth then the issue of the one shall have the one moiety and the issue of the other the other moiety of the Land and shall hold the Land together in common and the cause why they shall have severall inheritances is for that they cannot by any possibility have an heire between them engendred and when the grant is impossible to take effect by the letter there the Law shall-make such constâ—uction as the guift by possibility may take effect Co. 83. b. If Lessor of an house for twenty yeares maketh a Lease for two yeares rendring rent and after granteth all his terme and interest to another if the Lessee atturne the Reversion shall passe and if no Atturnement be had yet the ieterest in the Reversion shall passe so as the Grantee shall have the Land after the two yeares determined for the grant of one shall not be adjudged void if to any intent it may take effect Coke l. 4. f. 53. b. If a Termor grant his Terme Habendum immediate post mortem suam the Grantee shall have it presently ut res magis valeat quam periat Noy Max. f. 16. So if a man make a Lease for ten yeares and after for twenty yeares the latter shall be a good Lease for ten yeares after the first is expired Ibidem A release of all Actions against a Prior and Covent shall be construed all Actions against the Prior for an Action cannot be brought against the Covent Coke l. 1. f. 76. Gardiner and Bredons case Tenant for life of Land the Remainder in taile Tenant for life and he in the first Remainder in taile joyne in a fine sur conusans de droite come ceo c. to another in fee who granted a Rent charge of forty pounds to tenant for life it was agreed by all the Justices that the fine levied by tenant for life him in the first Remainder was no discontinuance of the first Remainder in taile nor of the second because every of them did only give that they may lawfully give and no forfeiture in the case be cause the law which abhorreth all wrong shal conster it first to be the grant of him in the Remainder in taile and then the grant of Tenant for life ut res magis valeat quam pereat but if a Feoffment had been made by word then it is the surrender of Tenant for life and the Feoffment of him in the Remainder Ibidem Coke l. 1. f. 45 a. In 2. R. 3. 4. it is holden by Starky and others that if the Patent of the King may be taken to two intents good then it shall be taken more beneficially for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another intent void then it shall be taken to that intent to make the grant good and not to that intent to make it void ut res magis valeat c. vide ibidem plura in Alton Woods case Coke l. 5. f. 8. a. In Cessavit where the Tenure is alledged by Homage Fealty and Rent and the Demandant counteth that in doing the said services he did cease it shall be taken by construction to such services onely of which a man may cease 6. H. 7. 7. as of Rent and not of Homage and Fealty and the reason of this is ne res destruatur least the thing should perish vide ibidem plura Ployd f. 197. b. Anthony Browne Justice said that it is an office of a Judge to expound the thing ut res magis valeat quam pereat and to make all parts of the Deed and intention of the parties also to agree together Coke l. 4. f. 4. If I grant to you that you and your heires shall distraine for a rent of forty shillings to wit within my Mannor of S. that by construction of Law shall amount to a grant of a Rent out of my Mannor of S. for if it shall not amount to a grant of a rent the grant would be of little force or effect if the Grantee shall not have but a nude distresse and no rent in him for then he shall never have an Assize of it and for that reason it hath been often times ruled that it shall amount to the grant of a Rent by construction of Law ut res magis valeat 3. E. 3. 12. c. Benedicta est expositio quando res redimitur a destructione Coke l. 4. f. 25. b. Blessed is the exposition when the thing is redeemed from destruction every Mannor which consisteth of Frank-tenements and Copy-holders hath two severall Courts the Court of Frank-tenements wherein the Suitors are Judges and is called the Court Baron and the Court of Copy-holders wherein the Lord or Steward of the Mannor are Judges and if all the Tenements escheate or the Lord release the tenure and service of his Frank-tenements yet the Lord may hold his Court of Copy-holds and make admittance and grant of them ne res destruatur it is a ground in Law verba debent intelligi ut aliquid operetur Coke l. 8. f. 24 words must so be understood that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was resolved that a demise and grant upon consideration of fifty pound for ninty nine yeares amounted to a bargaine and sale for the said yeares for when a Frank tenement or tenement passeth by Deed indented and inrolled it is not necessary to have those precise words of bargaine and sale but words which amount to so much are sufficient as if a man covenant in consideration of mony to stand seised to the use of his Son in fee if the Deed be enrolled it is a good bargaine and sale and yet there are no words of a bargaine and sale but amount to as much Coke l. 7. f. 40. So if a man for mony alien and grant Land to one and his heires or in tail or for life by Deed indented and enrolled it shall amount to a bargaine and sale and the Land shall passe without any livery and seisin It is a ground in Law verba sunt accipienda cum effectu Coke l. 4. f. 51. a. b. Words are to be taken with effect as if a man hath in the right of his wife any estate in Fee-simple Fee-taile or for terme of life c. the Baron shall have all the arrerages as well before marriage as after the death of his wife by the Statute of 10. H. 6. 11. for though by the Common Law the Executors c. of the wife might have an Action