Defendant in any Action or Suit is to do is to appear and shew himself in person or by an Attorny in the Court to answer the Action and defend the Suit He may also appear by an Essoin which is an excusation coming from the French word Exoine it doth delay the cause a Court day longer the common Essoin is de male vener and if he do not appear the next Court then it passeth by default Judgment entred and Execution issues out against his Goods and Chattels But after the Defendant hath once appeared in the Court by an Attorny there shall be no Essoin allowed But if he appear neither by an Attorny nor by Essoin then further Processe issues out against his Goods and Chattels viz. The Precept of Duces tecum and attachment and Distresse upon attachment infinite untill he do appear After the Processe executed the next Court the Plaintiff is to appear and file his Declaration to shew his cause of Action or matter of complaint in which must be shewn who complaineth and against whom for what matter how and in what manner the Action grew between the parties and at what time and place the wrong was done and in conclusion he must aver and profer to prove his Suit and shew the damage he hath sustained by the wrong done unto him Speciall care ought to be had that it be drawn in manner and form yet by the Statute of 36 E. 3. cap. 15. A Declaration shall be good if it have matter of substance though the terms he not apt however to avoid doubts and that the Attornies may not depend altogether upon uncertainties let them be diligent in taking right and full instructions from their Clyents and inform themselves of every puntilio which may be materially incident to the case that so they may know what manner of Action is most proper to be brought on the behalf of their Clyents In some cases manner and form is chiefly to be looked at but in other some not altogether so materiall As if an Action of debt be brought of the sale of a Horse for five pounds where the bargain was for two horses the Defendant pleads that he oweth him nothing in manner and form the Jury ought to find for the Defendant for that that the bargaine was for two horses for five pounds fo manner and form there is materiall and parcell of the charge and so it is in every case where the Action varies from the bargain or speciall matter But if an Action of the case be brought by the Husband alone upon an Assumpsit to him by R. the Desendant saith he did not assume in manner and form and the Plaintiff gives in evidence of an Assumpsit made to his wife and his agreement to it afterwards this is good and manner and form is not materiall If an Action be brought before there is any cause of Action the Declaration is insufficient But if a Trespasse was done the fourth day of May and the Plaintiff declareth the same to be done the fifth or the first day of May when no trespasse was committed yet if upon evidence it salleth out that the Trespasse was done before the action brought it sufficeth 19 H. 6. 47. 5 E. 4 5. 21 E. 4. 66. And Littleton saith That the Jury may finde the Defendant guilty at another day then the Plaintiff supposeth for the Law of England respecteth more the effect and substance of the matter then every nicity of forme and circumstance Apices juris non sunt jura Note that in actions of debt upon Emisset for Wares for Money or other things lent upon an In simul computassent actions of Trespasse Battery or upon the case c. you are not tyed to lay the certaine day but you may lay it any time after the cause of action accrued If an action upon the case be brought upon an Assumpsit the Plaintiff must declare upon the whole promise made and not upon part of it else the Declaration is not good Mich. 22. Car. b. r. If there be words in a Declaration which have no signification the words shall be adjudged to be void words and shall not hurt the Declaration but the Declaration shall be taken as if those words were left out of the Declaration Hill 23. Car. B. R. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Declaration ought not to shew a thing by implication it must be set forth expressely If the Plaintiff do alter his Declaration after the Defendant hath pleaded to it the Defendant may alter his Plea For by the amendment of it it may be so altered in matter that it may require a different answer from what was sormerly pleaded and in that case if he should not amend his Plea he might be triced sor want of a good Plea Prac. reg fo 235. A Declaration is sometimes called a Count as Count in debt Kitch 281. Count in Trespasse Brit. cap. 26. Count in an Action of Trespasse upon the case for a slander Kitch 251. But a Count is more properly used in Reall than Personall Actions And a Declaration more applyed to Personall than Reall F N. B. 18. a. 60. D. N. 71. a. 191. c. 217. a. If after Processe executed the Plaintiff do not appear and file his Declaration and the Defendant doth appear upon such default the Plaintiff is non-suited and the Defendant may have Judgment and Execution for his costs In every case where the Plaintiff may have costs against the Defendant there if the Plaintiff be non-suit or a Verdict passe against him the Desendant shall have his costs as in Trespasse Debt Covenant by Specialty or upon Contract Detinue Accounts Actions upon the case or upon the Statute for personall wrongs 23 H. 8. cap. 15. Administrators nor Executors shall not pay any costs neither upon Non-suit or Verdict because their Actions are brought upon Debts or Contracts not made between them and the Defendants But if they bring Actions for things done to themselves as for the taking away of goods from them c. and they be Non suit or Verdict passe against them in this case they shall pay costs After the Plaintiff hath appeared and Declaration filed upon the appearance of the Defendant Emparlance is to be entered Emparlance is when the Defendant being to answer the Suit or Action of the Plaintiff desireth some time of respite to advise himself the better what he shall answer being nothing else but a Continuance of a cause till a further day Now to demonstrate what the word Continuance signifieth it is after a Suit is begun and the Plaintiff hath declared he must continue his Suit from Court day to Court day or else the adverse party may take advantage of it and this is called a Continuance being but onely a proroguing of a Suit from time to time to keep it in being And this is by the Act or order of the Court and
some times by the agreement of the Attorneys of both parties The Rule or dies datus is when further day is given to the Plaintiff to put in his Declaration or to the Defendant to put in his answer the time given is usually fourteen dayes or more or lesse according to the order of the Court and the agreement of their Attorneys The next Court after the filing of the Declaration and Emparlance given the Defendant is to put in his answer which he pleadeth and saith in bar to avoid the Action of the Plaintiff either by consession and avoidage or denying the materiall parts thereof It must be legall full and perfect for a bad or insufficient plea is in Law as no Plea If Issue be not joyned upon the answer then the Plaintiff is to file his Replication to the answer of the Defendant which must affirme and pursue his Declaration Then the Defendant must put in his Rejoynder to the Plaintiffs Replication which must pursue and confirme his answer for every Rejoynder ought to have these two properties specially that is it ought to be a sufficient answer to the Replication and also to follow and enforce the matter of the Bar. If the parties be not at issue by reason of some new matter disclosed in the Defendants Rejoynder that requireth answer then may the Plaintiff Sur-rejoyn to the said Rejoynder if there be cause but it salleth out very seldome This Sur-rejoynder is a second defence of the Plaintiffs Declaration opposite to the Defendants Rejoynder Demurrer cometh of the Latine word Demorari to abide and therefore he who demurreth in Law is said he that abideth in Law moratur or demoratur in Lege when so ever the Counsell of the party is of opinion that the Declaration or Plea of the adverse party is insufficient in Law then he demurreth or abideth in Law and referreth the same to the Judgment of the Court. Now there is no Demurrer in Law but when it is joyned and therefore when a Demurrer is offered by the one party as is aforesaid the adverse party joyneth with him and thereupon the Demurrer is said to be joyned and then the case is by Councell of both sides argued When the Declaration Answer Replication c. are defective in respect of some circumstance of time or place c. it may be remedied by consent of the Court or parties or by a motion to the Steward Non sum informatus is a formall answer of course made by an Attorney whereby he is deemed to leave his Clyent undefended and Judgment passeth for the adverse party It is a failing to put in answer to the Declaration of the Plaintiff in any Action by the day assigned which if a man do Judgment shall passe against him because he saith nothing to the contrary To an Action of Debt upon Specialty Not his Deed To an Action of Debt for mony lent c. He owes nothing by the Country To a Bond for performance of Covenants upon an Indenture or Arbitrament Not his Deed or not guilty To an Action of case upon an Assumpsit He did not assume To an Action of Trespasse Not guilty To an Action of Assault and Battery and Slander Not guilty To a Contract without Deed the Plea is Payment or an Obligation made for the debt c. To an Obligation the Plea is Payment c. but to plead payment to an Obligation without Acquittance is no Plea For an Obligation or other matter in writing may not be discharged by any agreement by word but by writing unumquodque dissolvitur eo modo quo colligatur But to plea d payment to an Obligation with Condition though no Acquittance by writing it is good for the Condition is in nature of a Defeasance to the Obligation To an Action of debt He owes nothing by the Country or by the Law or Paid If the Action be brought against an Executor or Administrator the ordinary Plea is that he never was Executor or hath fully Administred c. If the Suit be upon a Deed or Contract without Deed That he was within age when he made the Deed or Contract If it be against a woman That she was Covert that is to say had a Husband when she made the Deed or Contract If upon an Arbitrament That there was no Arbitrament legally made or That he hath performed the Award If upon an Action of Trespasse Damage feasant That the Beasts came in by the default of the inclosure of the Plaintiff or That he hath little of Common there c If upon an Action brought for Rent That there is no rent in arrear c. To an Action of Detinue That he doth not detain the thing sued for A release or gift to him by the Plaintiff or That he did tender the thing sued for before Action brought That the De-fendant did deliver it to him as Pledge for ten shillings which he hath not paid c. To an Action of the case for Slander Not guilty or Justifie the words Cafe upon a Warranty That he did not warrant Upon a Bond or Bill plead Conditions performed by Threats Duresse Imprisonment c. Upon a Demise Not demised To Trespass Not guilty an Arbitrament Tender of amends before the Action brought c. If diverse men do a Trespasse and one makes a good accord this will discharge and be a Bar to all the rest Co. 9. 79. If Freehold be pleaded the Court in that case can proceed no further There are divers Pleas to Actions of Trespass some of one nature and some of another as justification c. If the Defendant have matter of Justification or excuse to plead he must be sure to plead it specially for if he plead the generall Issue viz. Not guilty it will be found against him But now by the late Act made the 23 of October 1650. The Defendant may plead the generall Issue of Not guilty or such like generall Plea and give the speciall matter in Evidence Where the Defendant is not constrained to plead a speciall Plea he may plead the generall Issue proper for the Action brought and give the speciall matter in Evidence For every Plea must be so framed that it may give a full answer to the matter set forth in the Declaration to wit all such as are materially to be answered unto If one be sued upon an Obligation he cannot be compelled to plead before he have Oyer of the Condition of the Obligation If an Action of Debt be brought for Rent upon an Indenture of Demise for years the Defendant may plead payment without shewing the Deeds for the Lease shall be intended to be in being at the time of the Action brought Trin. 24. Car. B. R. If an Obligation of an hundred pounds be made with Condition for payment of fifty pounds at a day and at the
is aliorum negotiorum gestor for qui per alium facit per seipsum facere videtar likewise these Statutes following do institute Attorneys in the County Court viz. 6 E. 1. cap. 8. 20 H. 3. cap. 10. c. F. N. B. 156. I could instance many more but I hope these are sufficient to stop the black mouth of a scurrilous Antagonist In their practice they ought to be honest and just according to their office and oath not exciting men to Suits especially such as are forrain and illegall nor for little offences and small debts nor voluntarily argenti gratia delay their Clyents nor demand any sums of mony for the prosecution of the Action otherwise then is allowed by the Court. Of Bayliffs A Bayliff is a Servant or Minister of the Law and by consequence a Servant to the party at whose Suit he is to distraine the goods of any one Therefore he ought to be true faithfull and vigilant in levying of Distresses he ought not to be exoculated with common rurall bribes as too many of them are His office is thus described by Fleta Balivus esse debet in verbo verax in opere diligens fidelis ac pro diserto appruatore cognitus plegiatus clericus qui de communioribus legibus pro tanto officio sufficienter se cognoscat Et qui sit ita justus quod ob vindictam seu cupiditatem non querat versus aliquos c. He is to be contented with his wages and fees allowed him which are certain and known and as I have described particularly being usually paid if he take more then he ought or commit any error in the Execution of his Office contrary to the tenure of his Precept then is he to forfeit forty shillings and to be convicted thereof by the examinations of the Justices of Peace or any of them 14 E. 3. cap. 9. And the Sheriff ought not by his oath to have any Bayliff but such as he will answer for and such as be true and sufficient men in the County and make each Bayliff take an oath for the true execution of his office but such things are now not taken notice of And by the Statute of 27 Eliz. cap. no Bayliff or other person ought to take a Distresse nor to execute any Processe untill he be sworn but now common experience and practice at this day bears testimony to the contrary Alfred once King of England hanged Judge Arnold for saving a Bayliff from death who had robbed the people by Distresse and for extorting of Fees If the like Law were executed upon some of our grand Malefactors it would make the Remainder more honest What Actions may be brought in this Court HAving precipitated my self thus far before I enter upon the Proceedings of the Court I will demonstrate the grounds and cause of Proceedings and that is Actions which is the form of a Suit given by Law to recover a mans right or actio nihil aliud est quam jus prosequendi in judicio quod sibi debetur Therefore what Actions will hold in this Court take as followes All Actions of debt either upon an account made by the parties for wages after a hire sums of mony owing or due from one man to another whether by writings or otherwise it is grounded sometimes by writing as an Obligation Bill Covenant or other especialty sometimes without writing as an Arbitrament Rent mony lent Parol Contracts or the like All Actions of Detinue Trover and Conversion deceit upon a Warranty a Delivery Nusance Case for scandalous words case upon Assumpsits and other Actions of the case as for a Dog killing Cattell abusing a Distresse spoyling my Goods c. Actions of Trespass Assault and Battery c. All these Actions would afford very much matter to treat of at large but least this Treatise should swell beyond its limits I will refer you to the reading Fitzherberts Natura brevium which doth learnedly treat of the nature of all Actions that lye in any Court of Judicature Within what time Actions must be brought ALL Actions of debt grounded upon any lending or contract as Book-debt without especialty and for Rents in arrear all Actions of Trespasse quare clausum fregit Actions of Trespasse Trover Detinue and Replevin for taking away Goods and Chattels Actions of account all Actions of the case except Actions for Slander which shall be sued must be commenced and brought within six years after the cause of such Action or Suit accrued if the Plaintiff be then of full age discovert compos mentis at Liberty out of Prison and in England otherwise within such time after he becomes so and not after All Actions of Trespasse for Assault Menace Battery wounding and imprisonment within four years after the cause of Action and not after All Actions of the case for scandalous words within two years next after the words spoken and not after Who may bring Actions and who not IDiots mad men or such as have lucida intervalla such as are deaf and dumbe or any other man woman or child except persons disabled by Law being wronged may bring the proper Action appointed for remedy in that case and all or any of these wronging others may be sued And if an Idiot sue or be sued he must doe it in person An Infant must sue by Prochein amy and being sued must defend by Guardian A Feme covert cannot sue but with her Husband An outlawed person is disabled to sue any Action against any man in any Court of Law or Equity yet as Executor he may sue because it is not in his own right but in trust for another but any man may sue him by Coo. Sup. Litt. 128. A man that is attainted in a Praemunire may not sue in any Action Idem 129. And a man that is a convict recusant is disabled so long as he so continues No Barretor can maintain any Action in this Court nor have Judgment unlesse it be required by all the Suitors West 1. cap. 3. But note all these disabilities remain during the continuation of the same impediment Of Pledges in this Court PLedges are absolute except it be for Forrainers or such as live out of the County or out of the Jurisdiction of the Court or such as are unmarried that have no goods distrainable and it is if these be Plaintiffs but if the Defendant should non-suit the Plaintiff and have Judgment against the Plaintiff and his Pledges I never yet saw the forme of the Judiciall Precept that ever issued out to levy the costs upon the Pledges goods Of the Proceedings in the Court BEcause I would not have the Country and young Practisers ignorant of the Proceedings in the Court which is the life of practice I thought it necessary to make an Abridgment of the terms of Law now used in the Proceedings And first of Appearance because it is the first thing done after goods attached The first thing the
have an action of the case against him that made such return See Co. 5. 90. 11. 40. and 4. 67. In Mich. term 8. Jac. The words of a Return were these viz. By vertue of this Writ to me directed I have taken the body of E. M. whose body I have here ready in Court at the day c. and as for the other two they are not to be found in my Bayliwick And at the end of the return was set down The answer of S. H. c. which S. H. at the time of the return was not then officer to the Court nor to the King and so disabled to make a return and therefore the return insufficient The Writ was directed to the Sheriff and so ought the Return to have been by the Sherif for none can make a returne of a Writ but such a person who at the time of the returne remained an Officer to the Court. If the old Sheriff be removed before the day of the return the new Sheriff is to make the return and to this purpose is the book of 22 E. 4. fol. 33. and 34. in the case of a Writ of Error to reverse a false Judgment given before the Major and Sheriffs in the Court at Coventry and Co. 3. fol. 72. Westbyes Case where it is resolved that after the election of a new Sheriff and before delivery over of the Prisoners to him they do remain in the custody of the old Sheriff and after the delivery of them over to the new Sheriff he at the day of the return ought to return Cepi corpus but in this case the return by the new Sheriff before any delivery over of the Prisoners to him by the old Sheriff is no return at all in Law And the old Sheriff can now make no return he being no Officer at all to the Court but the new Sheriffe is the Officer to the Court and ought to make his answer unto the Kings Writ to him directed and he doth not here return a Cepi corpus but only an indorsment in this manner setting his hand also to the return with this Postscript viz. This Writ as it is above subscribed I the now present Sheriff have received from my Predecessor the old Sheriff going out of his office and this upon the matter is no return at all Here the new Sheriff hath made a Return but the same is not good being but parcel of that which he ought to have returned For as to the other two his return is They are not to be found within my Bayliwick this Return is not good for he ought to have said that those two nor either of them were to be found And it is said that the old Sheriff put his hand to the Writ he was at that time out of his office and so he was no Officer of the Court and so it is in effect as if he had not put his hand at all to the return and and so the return being as no return in Law is meerly void Upon an Elegit the Sheriff returned that to be executed and the extent of the Church of S. Andrews alias S. Edes and it was prayed that the Sheriff might amend it and make it Andrews only for that was the true name and the Court said that the alias dictus is surplusage and will not hurt the return of the Writ Winch. Rep. fol. 27. A Writ of Proclamation upon the Exigent was returned by the Sherif out of office at the time upon which the Outlawry was adjudged void Stat. 6. H. 8. Dyer 103. To return Rescous upon a Latitat is no good return for the Sheriff might have had a Posse Comitatus aswell for the serving the same Processe as an Execution 10 H. 7. 26. 33 H. 6. 1. 10 E. 4. 3. F N B. 102. Dyer 162. If a Writ be directed to a place where there are two Sheriffs as London York c. and one of them doth return the Writ it is insufficient for though one according to custome doth execute it yet it must be returned in both their names 21 Ass 20. Br. Officer 22. If the Sheriff upon a Capias ad satisfaciendum returneth a Cepi corpus and hath not the body at the day c. he is chargeable for an escape Or if upon a Fieri facias he returneth a Fieri feci and hath not the money at the day c. he is chargeable with the money Br. Ret. 107. Yet in all Writs of Execution except an Elegit as upon a Cap. ad satisfac Habere facias seisinam vel posessionem Fieri fac Liberate c. If the Execution be duly done although the Writ never be returned or filed it much matters not if the Plaintiff have his demand for then he hath no cause of further proceeds in it But in case of an Elegit because the Extent is to be made by an Enquest and not by the Sheriff alone that ought to be returned otherwise it is invalid Coo. 4. 67 and 5. 90. But where no Enquest is to be taken but onely Land to be delivered or seisin had or goods to be sold which are but matters in fait these are sufficient although the Writ be not returned Co. 4 67. a. It is no good return for the Sheriff to say that the party will not pay his fee ergo he did not execute the Writ 34 H. 6. Br. Ret. 10. All Sheriffs and Bayliffs who have return of Writs ought to set both their names of Baptisme and sir-names to their returnes Plo. 63. a. so that the Court may know of whom they received such returns if necessity require And this is by force of the Stat. of 12E 2. Cap. 5. Yet by the Stat. 18 Eliz. cap. 13. imperfect or insufficient returns of Sherifs are corrigble Upon a Replevin the Sheriffe returns I have commanded the Bayliff of the Liberty of c who will make no deliverance c. these are no good returns for the Sheriff himselfe ought to have entered the Franchise and to have made deliverance of the Cattle c. Fitz. 68. f. He shall be amerced for the default of his Under-sheriff County Clerk or Bayliff 38 Ass p. 13. Br. 77. 1 R. 3. c. 4. But by the Stat. of 27 H. 8. c. 24. Amerciaments for insufficient returns of Writs made by Bayliffs of Liberties shall be impos'd upon such Baylifs and not upon the Sherifs Every return ought to answer the Writ ad punctum and therefore where the VVrit was That you make known to the heires of the Lands and Tenements which were of A c. And the Sherif returned That he made known to B. Esquire sonne and heire of the said A c. which was not good and assigned for Errour c. because he did not return him heire of any Lands or Tenements as the writ required for his writ was not to summon the heire of the said A but
necessary to be done in for or about the better effecting of the premisses as fully and amply to all intents and purposes as I my selfe might do in person or otherwise and whatsoever my said Attorneyes or either of them shall joyntly or severally do in the premisses according to the true intent and meaning of these presents I do hereby allow of ratifie and confirme In witnesse c. The Grant of a Stewardship TO all to whom these presents shall come A. B. Knight sendeth greeting Know ye that I the said A. B. for divers good causes and considerations me thereunto moving have for me my heires and assignes given and granted and by these presents do give and grant unto John Preston of B. Gent. the Office of chiefe Steward and the place and execution of the Stewardship of my Mannor of Skipton in Craven in the County of York And the holding and keeping of all Courts Court-Leets viewes of Frank-pledge and of all other Courts of what kinde soever the same be to the said Mannor belonging or in any wise appertaining To have hold execute and enjoy the aforesaid Office of chiefe Steward and the place and execution of chiefe Stewardship and the holding and keeping of all manner of Courts usually held and kept within the same together with all manner of fees wages rewards profits advantages and emoluments to the said office of chiefe Steward or Stewardship of the said Mannor or Lordship belonging or appertaining or at any time heretofore accustomed and used to be paid rendered to or received by the chiefe Steward or Stewards there for the time being for or by reason of the said office of chiefe Steward or Stewards there for the time being from henceforth for and during the naturall life of him the said Iohn Preston In witnesse c. THE COURT OF Pypowders The definition of it what it is and why it was instituted together with its jurisdiction THis word Pypowder hath its definition from the French words pied i. pes and puldreux i. pulverulentus or as Skene de verb. significat Pede pulverosus dusty feet a Vagabond Pedder or Scotch Merchant who hath no certaine dwelling place and by whom Fares are usually kept to whom justice should be summarily ministred within three flowings and ebbings of the Sea or as some define it to be curia parvi ponderis and this is to be pedis-pulverizati and so the Lord chiefe Justice Anderson did use to define it for the speed and celerity there used in the present dispatch of businesse This Court of Pypowders is a Court of Record instituted and set up for the speedy and sudden dispatch of matters and differences arising in a Fare or Market and for the speedy doing of Justice and this in case of necessity for the sole benefit of Tradesmen and Merchants and for the present determination of all doubts and questions there then arising and that only upon sales and contracts had in the Fare and Market during the time thereof but not for matters acted and done before or at any time after the Fare or Market held but for matters happening and arising in pleno Mercato or in plenaferia 8 H. 7. fol. 4. b. This Court is of two kindes viz. 1. Either by prescription and this is an absolute jurisdiction 2. To be in a Fare and Market and to this a Court of Pypowders is incident And here two things are requisite viz. 1. This Court to be for matters arising in the Fare or Market 2. The matters to be determined there within and during the continuance of the Fare and Market and this appeares to be so by the Statutes of 17 E. 4. cap. 2. and 1 R. 3. cap. 6. and this is in a Court of Pypowders annexed unto a Fare or Market But in a Court of Pypowders which one hath by Prescription there they may heare and determine matters done before Bolstrod 2. part fol. 21. Goodson against Duffill Cro first part fol. 33. For in case of a Prescription such a Court may well be without a Fare from time to time and from day to day 13 E. 4. fol. 8. b. it was so adjudged in point of a Writ of Error where the error assigned to reverse a judgment given in curia pedis pulverizali there alledged to be held secundum consuetudinem ejusdem civitatis the Error insisted upon was because he shewed not that the matter upon which the action was brought was in pleno Mercato or in plena feria it is there expresly adjudged that this was no Error because the same was layd to be held secundum consuetudinem civitatis so that such a Court may be held without a Fare or Market and that the King may well grant such a Court to be held from day to day and such a Court may well be held by Custome without any Fare or Market and its proper denomination is from the speedy dispatch of businesse there so that the jurisdiction of this Court held by prescription may be extended unto all contracts and bonds to actions of trespasse and actions upon the Case and to this purpose was the case betweene Chambers Plaintiffe against Pert Defendant Hill 33. Eliz. Rot. 124. where an action of trespasse for an assault and battery was brought in a Court of Pypowders for an assault done long before and well maintainable as it was held But this Court held by prescription doth much differ from the ordinary Court of Pypowders and that by many circumstances This Court may be thus used and held viz. 1. Either by way of Grant 2. By way of confirmation And being thus held it differs from the ordinary Court of Pypowders which is incident to every Fare as appeareth by 12 H. 7. fol. 16. b. and 13 H 7. fol. 19. And the same Court is thus incident to a Fare and that of common right as it appears 13 E. 4. fol. 8. b. Old book of Entr. fol. 168. Fit dette en Gailor placito 1 f. 18. Fit account in Execution placito 3. If one will declare upon a matter in this Court in Fare there in such a case of necessity he ought to set forth in pleading that the same was done in pleno ferio or in plena Mercata otherwise not good But it is not so in case where a man hath and holdeth this Court by prescription in which Court they may heare and determine actions upon the case for words but not so in an ordinary Court held during the time of the Fare And by 6 E. 4. fol. 3. b. If a man in his Fare hath this Court here the Steward is Judge and no other for there are no Suitors and for a Judgment given in this Court a Writ of Faux judgment lieth not but a Writ of Error and with this agrees 7 E. 4 fol. 23. And where one claims to hold this Court by prescription and also by Charter if the Charter be not contrary
no such promise within six yeares ibid. Never Executor 134 Fully administred and Replication ibid. Not guilty 135 Bar by which in age ibid. Payment upon a Bill and a Release produced ibid. Free-hold 136 No action to cause one to render an accompt will lie in this Court ibid. In arrest of Judgment ibid. Conditions performed and Replication 137 138 Rejoynder ibid. Detain he doth not ibid. Bar by a generall acquittance and replication ibid. Justification of scandalous words 139 Tender of amends in Replevin ibid. Part of the debt paid the residue tendered before suit and refused and Replication 140 141 Not his Deed 141 By threats and Replication ibid. and 142 By hardnesse of imprisonment and Replication ibid. The assault made by the Plaintiff and Replication 143 The Defendant pleadeth the Plaintiff within age to bring his Action and should have brought it by Guardian and not by Attorney 144 To a trespasse in walking not guilty and as to the residue of the trespas tender of amends and Replication and Rejoynder 144 145 Misnomer in Baptism pleaded in abatement of the writ of Justicies 146 Plea in abatement for that the Plaintiff hath one name in the writ and another in the Declaration ibid. The Defendant justifies for horse meat not satisfied in answer to a Declaration in trover for the same horse 147 The Defendant plead leaves and liberty granted to him by the Plaintiff to enter and feed his cattle 148 The Defendant justifies in replevin the taking of the cattle for rent in arrear 149 The Defendant saith that the goods were taken as a pawn or pledge for money lent 150 Replication that he took them injuria sua propria without such a cause 151 Concord in assault and battery ibid. Replication No such concord or agreement made 152 The Defendant saith that as to the taking of the Oxe that he tooke it by the name of an Herriot ibid. Justification in trespasse for want of reparation of the hedges by the Plaintiffe 153 The Defendant justifies upon a Replevin the taking of the Cattel doing damage-feasant 154 Misnomer in the writ of Justicies ibid. Non cepit to a Replevin 155 Poverty ibid. Demurrer ibid. Joyning in Demurrer 156 Presentment in a Leet of petty Treason 342 Presentment of felony for burning a house 343 Presentment of a Felon ibid. Presentment of an Accessary ibid. Presentments in Court-Baron 375 The finding of the death of a Tenant and of a Surrender made to the use of his will with an admission of the Tenant according to the will ibid. The finding of the death of a Tenant 376 Pains found and set upon tenants for want of suit of Court ibid. 377 The presentment of a Surrender made out of Court into tenants hands with the admission of the tenant accordingly 377 The finding of a Surrender made into tenants hands to the use of a mans will 378 The finding of the death of a tenant and of the lands and that the youngest son is next heir according to the custom c. with his admission ibid. The finding of a sale made of Freehold lands with a distresse to the Bayliffe to distrain for want of taking it up 379 The acknowledgement in the Court of a Legacy paid ibid. A presentment of a Surrender made out of Court with the admission of the tenant 380 A presentment made in Court of an agreement made between the Son and his mother touching her Dower and the mothers release of her Dower 381 A pain set for an incroachment ibid. A pain set for the amending of the same ibid. A presentment for an offence done and a charge to the Jury to enquire and further day given for giving their Verdict 382 R REplevin 39 132 alias Repl. 40 Plures Repl. ibid. Return of a Tolt 43 Return of a Recordare fac Lo. 58 59 of a Pone 59 60 of a writ of False judgment 61 62 63 of an Accedeas ad curiam 65 66 of a Writ for the Election of a Coroner after the death of another 66 of an Exigent 66 67 68 of a Proclamation 69 of a Non est inventus 197 of a Cepi corpus in the Common Pleas ibid. of a Cepi corpus in the Vpper-Bench ibid. of a Cepi corpus and Non est inventus ibid. of a Cepi corpus and Languidus in prisona 198 of a Mandavi Ballivo libertatatis where the Bayliff makes no returne of the Sheriffs warrant or where he makes an insufficient return 198 and also where he returneth to the Sheriffe he hath taken the body and the like in case the Bayliffe returneth a Languidus in prisona or as he shall certified the Sheriff by his returne ibid. of a Scire facias where a Scire facias is returned ibid. of a Nihil to a Scire facias ibid. of Scire facias for one and Nihil for the other 199 of an Attachment and Proclamation in Chancery ibid. A Nihil returned of a Venire facias upon an Indictment presentment or information and summons returned of the like ibid. The Return of a Distringas nuper vic or Balliv ibid. of a Venire facias jur 200 of a Distringas or Hab. corp Jur. ibid. of an Exigent where one bringeth a Supersed one rendereth himselfe the other appeareth not ibid. of a Proclamation 201 of an Allocat ibid. of a Tarde ibid. of a Hab. corp where the Defendant was taken by a former Sheriff 202 of a Pone ibid. of a Scire fac for the release of Prisoners ibid. of Nihil to a Scire fac against the heir and ter-tenants ibid. of a Summons in Dower ibid. of a Cap. in manus in Dower 203 of a Summons upon an originall against an heir ibid. of a Habere facias possessionem Cap. where judgement is signed with costs ibid. of a Liberate out of Chancery 204 of an Acced ad cur ibid. of a Re. fa. lo. ibid. averia elongat and Cepi corp for damages 205 of a Rescous ibid. of a Devastavit 228 of a Nulla bona Devastavit by inquisition ibid. of a Fieri fac 229 of a Fieri fac where part of the debt is levied and for the residue a Nulla bona 230 another of a Fi. fa. ibid. of a writ where the Sheriffe dieth after execution thereof and so returned prout indorsat by the present Sheriffe ibid. of an Elegit where lands are in the Kings hands 231 of an Extent in the Exchequer 232 of a Scire fac against the heir and ter-tenants where notice is given 234 of a summons in Dower 235 Records upon a writ of False judgement and Accedeas ad curiam 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 Recognizance of a Coroner to binde witnesse to appear at the next assizes 290 Release of Lands made in a Court Baron 388 S SCire facias post diem annum 47 against an Executor after Judgement against the Testator ibid. after marriage 48 Subpoena or a Warrant to
and governed himselfe Notwithstanding the said A. B. not ignorant of the premisses out of his meer and wicked malice preconceived indeavouring the name and same of the same W. B. to hurt detract make worse darken and utterly to destroy and also into perturbation vexation and insamy to lead and induce certain salse and scandalous words and lies of the same W. B. the 8. day of April in the yeare of our Lord 1656. at c. and within the liberty and jurisdiction of this Court in the presence and hearing of many faithfull subjects of the said Commonwealth said repeated and spread abroad in these English words following to wit W. B. meaning the same W. B. hath stoln my horse out of my Close which I will prove By pretext of speaking and spreading abroad of which said salse scandalous words the same W. B. not only in his good name and same is hurt but also in performance of his businesse with honest persons with whom the said W. B. in buying selling and lawfull bargaining is much hindred and damnified and also some subjects and people of this Common-wealth for that occasion will draw themselves from the company of the same W. B. and to converse with him or any wayes to intermeddle refused and yet do refuse whereupon c. damages to 39 l. And thereof he bringeth suit c. And the said A. B. by S. D. his Attorney cometh c. And saith that the said W. B. his action aforesaid against him ought not to have because he saith that he is not guilty of the speaking and spreading abroad of the words in the Declaration aforesaid specified nor of any part of them in manner and form as the said W. B. above against him complaineth And this c. Therefore according to the custom it is commanded to the Bailiff of the Weapentake of Ouze and Dar that c. that he cause to come before the Steward of the same Court at the next Court of the County aforesaid such a day 12. c. And that he then have there the same Precept together with the pannel of the names of the Jurors aforesaid the same day c. At which County Court held at the Castle of Y. aforesaid according to the custom before the Steward there upon Monday the 2. day of April came as well the same W. B. by his Attorney aforesaid as the same A. B. by his Attorney aforesaid c. and the same Bailiff of the Weapentake aforesaid returned the precept to him directed in all things served together with a Pannel of the names of the Jurors Annexed to the precept to wit in the same pannel are named L. M. N. R. c. to make a Jury between the parties aforesaid in the plea aforesaid who to speak the truth of the premisses being elected tried sworn say upon their oath that the said A. B. is guilty of the speaking spreading abroad of the said words in the said Declaration specified and they assessed the damages of the said W. B. by occasion of the speaking of the same words besides his costs and expences by him about his suit in this behalf laid out to 4 l. 5 s. for those costs expences to 8 d. Therefore at the same Court that the said W. B. should recover against the said A. B. his said damages by the Jury aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed and also 3 s. 8 d. for his costs and expences which said damages in the whole do amount unto 5 l. 17 s. 4 d. In witness whereof the seal of the Steward of the Court aforesaid is put Dated at the Castle of Y. the 12. day of March in the year of our Lord 1657. And hereupon the same VV. B. prayeth that the same A. B. may shew to the Court here and assign the defects wherein false Judgment is made in the said plaint if any be done to him whereupon the same A. B. saith that the same Record is vitious and much defective to wit in that it doth not appear by the Record before whom the first Court was held and in this that the said VV. B. by his Declaration did complain himself to be damnified and made worse to the value of 40 l. whereas by the law of the land that Court cannot hold plea of 40 s. In this also that the same Court held the 12. of March was held before the Steward whereas it ought to be held before the Suitors of the same Court and the Sheriff of the County for the time being so that the same Judgment was given Coram non Iudice Also in this that by the same Record it appeareth that the same VV. B. appeared by P. P. his Attorney and the same A. B. appeared by S. D. his Attorney but in the Record is not mentioned any Warrant of Attorney for the same VV. B. or for the same A. B. in the said plaint And to the same A. B. saith that divers manner of ways in the County Court aforesaid false Judgment is made to him in the said plaint And hereupon prayeth that the said Judgment for the said defects and others being in the same Record as false and erroneous may be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And the same A. B. to the said 5 l. 17 s. 4 d. which the said A. B. by vertue of the same Judgment for his damages by occasion of the premisses recovered against him and unto all things which he by occasion of the same Judgment lost may be restored c. And the same W. B. saith that in the Record aforesaid there is no errour nor to the same A. B. in the same County Court held at the Castle of Y. aforesaid false Judgment is made in the same plaint and prayeth that the Justices here proceed to the examination of the same Record and to resorm and correct the false Judgment if any be found therein proved or can be made appear And because the Justices here will advise themselves of and upon the premises before they further proceed therein day is given c in Oct. pur to hear thereof what the Court hereof and upon the premises shall consider because the Justices hear thereof not as yet c. At which day here came aswell the said A. B. as the said W. B. by their Attorneys aforesaid And because the Justices here further will advise themselves of and upon the premisses aforesaid before they proceed further therein further day is given c. in Mens Pas to hear thereof what the Court hereof and upon the premisses aforesaid shall consider for that the Justices hear thereof not as yet c. If any errors and defects be found in the proceedings then will the Judgement be reversed and a Writ of Restitution awarded It was commanded the Sheriff if A. B. and C. D. should secure the same Sheriff of prosecuting their complaint then in his full County he should make to be recorded the plaint which was in
plaint and in his executed and assigned from the beginning of the World until the day of the date of the said Bill and this c. if Judgement c. Replication THe Plaintiff saith that he ought not to be barred c. because he saith that the aforesaid Bill of acquittance is not his deed and this he prayeth c. Justification of scandalous Words ANd c. when c. and saith that the said G L. his action aforesaid against him ought not to have for that he saith that before the speaking of the pretended scandalous words in the said declaration mentioned that is to say the day year c. at c the said G L. one Wether-sheep to the value of 10 s of c. of the goods and chattels of the said H. A. in the said Declaration mentioned then and there being sound feloniously did steal take and carry away contrary to the publick peace By reason whereof the said P. G. afterwards that is to say the said day year c. at c. the pretended scandalous words in the said Declaration mentioned did say affirm and declare to the said G. L. that is to say thou meaning the said G. L. art a Thiefe and stole H. A.'s Sheep and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he demandeth Judgement if the said G L. his action aforesaid against him ought to have c. Tender of amends in Replevin AND the said H. saith c. the just taking of c. ought not to avow because he saith that after the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. und before the day of the issuing forth of the precept of Replevin of him the said H. that is to say the day year c. aforesaid at W. aforesaid he the said H. offered 12 d. to pay the said W. and I. to the use of the said W. for the damage of the said W. which he sustained by occasion of the trespass aforesaid which the cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid two acres of Land made which said 12 d. were sufficient amends for the trespass aforesaid which the cattel aforesaid in the said two acres of Land made which said 12 d. the aforesaid W. and I. then and there wholly refused to receive of the said H. and this c. Part of the debt paid The residue tendred before Suit and refused ANd c. when c. and saith that the aforesaid I. G. ought not to have or maintain his said action against him because he saith that the said I. A. the day year c. before the beginning of this action well and faithfully paid to the said I. G. 20 s. part of the above mentioned debt in the said Declaration specified that is to say at B. aforesaid and within the jurisdiction of this Court And as to the five shillings six pence the residue of the debt in the said Declaration specified the said I. A. further saith that he afterwards that is to say the day year c. abovesaid before the commencement of this action at B. aforesaid tendred to the said I. G. the said five shillings six pence which said five shillings six pence the said I. G. then and there refused to accept of and this the said I. A. is ready to prove and demands Judgment of the Court if the said I. A. ought to have his said action against him c. Replication ANd the said I. G. as to the plea of the said I. A. as to the said 20 s. parcel of the debt aforesaid saith that he by any thing before alledged ought not to be barred from having his said action against him for he saith that the said I. A. did not pay the said twenty shillings to the said I. G. as the said I. A. above hath alledged and this he prayes may be inquired of by the Countrey and the said I. A. likewise c. And as the said plea of the said I. A as to the said 5 s. 6 d. residue of the said Debt and the said I. G. saith that the same plea of the said I. A. in manner and aforesaid pleaded and the matter therein contained is insufficient in the Law to bar the said I. G. from having his said action against the said I. A. and that he to the plea aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor is bound by the Law of the Land to answer whereupon for want of a sufficient plea in this behalf the said I. G. prayeth Judgment and the said 5 s. 6 d. residue of his debt aforesaid together with his damages by reason of the detaining of that debt to him to be adjudged c. Not his Deed. ANd c. when c. And saith that he ought not to be charged with the said debt by vertue of the writing aforesaid because he saith that the said writing is not his Deed. And of this he putteth himselfe upon the Countrey And the said A. likewise c. By threats ANd c. when c. And saith that the said A. ought not to have his said action against him because he saith that the said A. at the time of the making of the said writing at N. aforesaid did impose upon the said B. such so great threats of his life may ming of his body to be inflicted on him unless he would make and seal unto the said A. the said writing that he the said B. did then and there make unto the said A. the said writing for feare of those threats And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth judgment if the said A. ought to have his said action against him c. Replication ANd the said A. saith he by any thing before alledged ought not to be barred from having his said action because he saith that the said B. at the time of the making of the said writing aforesaid was of his own power at large And did make to the said A. the said writing of his meer and voluntary will and not for fear of threats as the said B. hath above alledged And he prayeth that this may be inquired of by the Countrey And the said B. likewise c. By hardnesse of imprisonment ANd c. when c. And saith c. because he saith that at the time of making of the said writing he was imprisoned by the said A. and other of his Covin that is to say at N. aforesaid and there in prison detained until the same B. by force and hardnesse of that imprisonment had then and there made to the said A. the said writing And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth Judgment c. Replication ANd the said A. saith that he c. because he saith that the said B. at the time of making of the said writing was of his own right at large and out of prison and did of his meer and
to the prescription this shall be good by way of confirmation As a Court-Baron is incident to a Mannor so a Court of Pypowders is incident to a Fare and by the Grant of the Fare this doth passe and with this accords 19 H. 8. Brooks case fol. 2. placito 7. and Brook tit incidents placito 34. and not to be fevered from them neither by grant nor by reservation 2 3 Phil. and Mar. Dyer fol. 133 pla 80. the Plaintiffe in a Court of Pypowder doth count of a contract made in the last Fare before where no plaint was then begun nor any judgment of Amerciament of the Defendant then given and this was held a good Error in both by all the Justices of both Benches Mich. 42. and 43 Eliz. B. R. Co. 10 fo 73. in the case of the Marshalsea where Hall braught a Writ of Error against Jones to reverse a Judgment given against him in the Court of Pypowders of the Market in the City of Glocester for that that Hall had published slanderous words of him viz. Mr. Jones and his Clerk have by colour of his office extorted and gotten 300 l. per annum by unlawfull meanes for many years together above their ordinary fees for proving of Testaments and granting of Administrations the which judgement was reversed for two Errors viz. 1. Because words did not concern any matter touching the Market and therefore the Court had no jurisdiction of it but if one slander any with Trades and Merchandizeth in the Market in any thing which concernes his Trade there an action for this well lieth 2. It appeares in the Count that the words were spoken before the Market and not during the time of the Market for as this Court hath no jurisdiction but in matters concerning the Market so the same Court hath no jurisdiction for matters concerning the Market unlesse they were acted and done during the time of the Market Bracton lib. 5. fo 335. a. De brevi de recto 1. de diversitate divisione summonitionis It is there said per quindecim dies ante diem quo comparere debeat summonitio ought to be Et talis summonitio dici debeat legitima Si minus spatium contineat possit illigitimam judicari nisi ob causam legitimam minus tempus statuatur ut propter personas qui celerem habere debeant justitiam sicut sunt Mercatores quibus exhibetur justitia Pepoudrous by the Statute of 17 E. 4. capite 2. And in this Court no Steward or other Minister shall hold plea upon any action at the suit of any person unlesse the Plaintiffe or his Attorney in presence of the Defendant do sweare that the contract in the Declaration c. was had and made during the time of the Fare and within the jurisdiction of the Fare but this oath so taken shall not conclude the Defendant for pleading in abatement of the action and to the jurisdiction of the Court this by the Statute of 1 R. 3. cap. 6. is made perpetual in this principal case here the Defendant in the Court at Rochester was condemned in an action of debt for 300 l. upon a Bond and Contract formerly made and entered into and for this cause the judgment was erroneous Note that in this Court the Steward is Judge because there are no Suitors there neither can the Steward delegate a Deputy 6 E. 4. fol. 3. 7 E. 4. fol. 23. A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL MATTERS contained in the BOOKE A A Merciament in the County Court 6 How they are forfeited in Court-Leet and what shall be causes to amerce c. 313 Of Amerciament 314 Attorneys in the County Court 10 how qualified 11 Actions within what time they must be brought 12 Who may bring Actions and who not 13 Appearance what it is 14 Answer what 17 Accompts of the Sheriff with a particular of some usual charges or fees paid by him at the rendring of them up 224 225 Appeals 295 The Sheriff shal have Counter-rolls of Appeals c. 297 Accessaries who 326 Alehouse keepers 332 Assize of bread 333 B BAyliffs in the County Court 11 how qualified ibid. Burglary what 324 Bond taken by the Sheriffe upon a Fieri facias for the payment of money in Court not within the Stat. of 9 E. 4. 50. 185 Burning of houses or Barns 326 Bail what it is 212 Any person making a warrant c. without original processe upon examination c. shall be committed without bail 214 Such as are in Execution c. not to be bailed ibid. None to be bailed that are prohibited by the Statute of West 1. cap. 15. he cannot bail any suspect of felony as formerly ibid. The Sheriff cannot refuse to baile one bailable upon tender of sufficient sureties ibid. Traytors or Felons not bailable 215 In the Vpper Bench the baile not chargeable till default assigned in the principal c. ibid. The new rules concerning speciall bail ibid. and 216 Bridges decayes 328 Boundaries 330 Bloodshed 331 Barretors ibid. Brewers 333 Butchers 334 Breaking of Pownds 338 Beadel why so called 347 Bastard may not inherit 351 C COunty Court when instituted 3 Now the Sheriffs Court ibid. By whom first exercised ibid. What action may be brought in it 4 5 6 12 The time when it is to be holden 5 Where it is to be kept 6 What actions will not lie in it ibid. Proceedings in it 14 The manner of keeping the Court 23 24 25 Processe of the Court Original 37 Judicial 43 County Clerk how to be qualified 7 He cannot practise as an Attorney 8 Can act nothing without the Suitors 9 His care in deputing Bailiffs 9 How he must enter plaints ibid. How he is punishable ibid. Count what it is 16 Continuance what 17 Challenge of Jurors What are good causes 21 Capias ad satisfac where it lies 71 174 Cap. lies not after an Elegit and Why 179 Note where it lies after an Elegit 178 What it is 179 One taken upon it must be kept in salva arcta custodia ibid. This Writ lies where a Capias lies in the originall ibid. Nothing but the body can be taken by this Writ 180 A man in the custody of the Sheriffe and a second writ is delivered to him he shall be in his custody upon it although not actually arrested ibid. Two bound in an obligation joyntly and severally both may be sued and taken in Execution ibid. This Writ lies not for damages in a Writ of Dower ibid. No return is required upon it ibid. Capias pro Fine what it is 181 An Elegit sued after one is taken for the Protectors fine he shall go at large ibid. No one taken upon it in trespasse c. ibid. Capias ut legatum what it is and where it lies 181 182 Capias ut legat inquiras de bonis catallis What it is 182 Capias ad valentiam what it is and Where it lies ibid. Coroners