Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	action_n	case_n	plaintiff_n	6,385	5	10.7168	5	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A48960	Analogia honorum, or, A treatise of honour and nobility, according to the laws and customes of England collected out of the most authentick authors, both ancient and modern : in two parts : the first containing honour military, and relateth to war, the second, honour civil, and relateth	Logan, John, 17th cent.; Blome, Richard, d. 1705.	1677 (1677)	Wing L2834; ESTC R17555	244,594	208

by birth though they have no other Creation but shall not be partaker of these or other Priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly Those that are Barons and of the Nobility of Scotland or Ireland if upon the like Offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have this Tryal by Peers no though they were born in England for they received their Dignity from a King of England of other Nations But if the King of England do at this day create one of his Subjects of Scotland or Ireland an Earl Viscount Baron or other Peer of this Realm or by his ordinary Writ of Summons under his Great Seal do call him to the Upper House of Parliament and assign him a place and to have Voice free amongst the Lords and Peers there assembled he shall be partaker with them in all priviledges And thus much concerning the restraint of the Priviledges in respect of the persons 39 Ed. 3. And touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said Statute of Magna Charta chap. 29. That a Peer of the Realm shall be tryed by his Peers only in case where he is indicted at the King's Suit of Treason or Felony for the words of the Statute be Nec super eum ibimus c. But if any Appeal of Murther of Felony be sued by any common person against a Peer of the Realm he shall be tryed by common persons and not by his Peers And so was Fines Lord Dacres tryed in Appeal of Murther The Nobility of this Realm do enjoy this priviledge That they are not to be impannelled on any Jury or Inquest to make tryal or inquiry upon their Corporal Oaths between party and party for they may have a Writ for their Discharge to the Sheriff But it is a Rule in Law Vigilantibus non dormientibus subveniant jura For if the Sheriff have not received any such Writ and the Sheriff have returned any such Lord on Juries or in Assize c. and they thereupon do appear they shall be sworn if they do not appear they shall lose their Issues 35 Hen. 6. and in such case they must purchase a Writ out of the Chancery reciting their priviledges directed to the Justices before whom such Noble persons are so impannelled commanding to dismiss him or them that were so impannelled out of the said Pannel F.N.B. 165. This priviledge hath in two causes not been allowed or taken place 1. If the enquiry concern the King and the Common-wealth in any necessary and important degree or business of the Realm And therefore divers Barons of the Marshes of Wales were impannelled before the Bishop of Ely and other Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer to enquire of a notable outrage committed by Gilbert de Clare Earl of Glocester against Humphrey de Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex and his Tenants in Wales in the Twelfth year of Edward the First where Iohn de Hastings Edmond de Mortimer Theobald Beardmoe and other Barons of the Marshes challenged their priviledges aforesaid and much insisted upon the same But it was afterwards answered by the Court as by the words in the Record appeareth The Barons aforesaid did persist in the Challenge and in the end both the said Earls between whom the said outrage had been perpetrated submitted themselves to the King's Grace and made their Fines Secondly This priviledge hath no place in case of necessity where the truth of the case cannot otherwise come to light for the words in the Writ in the Register are Nisi sua praesentia ob aliquam causam specialiter exigatur c. If any Nobleman do bring an Action of Debt upon Account in case where the Plaintiff is to be examined which is always intended to be upon Oath upon the truth of his cause by vertue of the Statute of the fifth of Henry the Fourth chap. 8. it shall suffice to examine his Attorney and not himself upon his Oath And this priviledge the Law hath given to the Nobility That they are not Arrested upon any Warrant of a Justice of Peace for their good behaviour or breach of Peace nor by a Supplicavit out of Chancery or from the King's Bench For such an Opinion hath the Law conceived of the peaceable disposition of Noblemen that it hath been thought enough to take their promise upon their Honour in that behalf And as in Civil Causes the like Rule doth the Court of Equity observe in Cases of Conscience for if the Defendant be a Peer of the Realm in the Star-Chamber or Court of Chancery a Subpaena shall not be awarded but a Letter from the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper in lieu thereof And if he do not appear no Attachment shall go out against him For in the Fourteenth year of Queen Elizabeth this Order and Rule was declared in the Parliament Chamber That an Attachment is not awarded by Common Law Custome or President against any Lord of Parliament And if he do appear and make his Bill of Complaint upon his Honour only he is not compelled to be sworn But by the Statute 5 Eliz. cap. 1. it is enacted That all Knights and Burgesses of Parliament shall take the Oath of Supremacy and so shall Citizens and Barons of the Cinque Ports being returned of the Parliament before they enter into the Parliament House which Oath shall be according to the tenor effect and form of the same as is set forth in the Statutue of 1 Eliz. Provided always that forasmuch as the Queens Majesty is otherwise sufficiently assured of the Faith and Loyalty of the Temporal Lords of her High Court of Parliament therefore this Act nor any thing therein contained shall not extend to compel any Temporal person of or above the Degree of a Baron of this Realm to take the said Oath nor to incur any penalty limited by the said Act for not taking the same If a Peer be sued in the Common Pleas in an Action of Debt or Trespass and Process be awarded by Capias or Exigit against him then he may sue out a Certiorari in the Chancery directed to the Justices of the Common Pleas testifying that he is a Peer of the Realm For unless the Court be certified by the King 's Writ out of the Chancery that the Defendant is a Peer of Parliament if a Capias or Exigit issue forth against him it is no Error neither is it punishable in the Sheriff his Bailiffs or Officers if they execute the said Process and arrest the body of such a Noble person for it appertaineth not to them to argue or dispute the Authority of the Court But if the Court be thereof certified as aforesaid they will award a Supersedeas which is in the Books of Entries in the Title of Error Sect. 20. And there are two Reasons or Causes wherefore no Capias or Exigit lieth against any Peer one because of the dignity of their persons and the other by intendment of Law

at pleasure and so it is adjudged and declared by Parliament in the First and Second of Philip and Mary cap. 8. fol. 156. But not between the Majestical Style of the King and the Title of Honour appertaining to a Subject this difference is between Grants or Purchases made by or to a Nobleman c. For in that first case it is necessary that the Name King be expressed otherwise they are void But if a Duke Earl or other Degree of Nobility do Purchase or Grant by the Name of Baptisme and Surname or other Title of Honour it is not void for it is a Rule in Law That every man's Grant shall be construed most to the benefit of him to whom the said Grant is made that it may rather be strengthened than made void for there is a great diversity in the Law between Writs and Grants For if Writs are not formally made they shall be abated which is only the loss of the same but if a Grant should be made void then the party hath no remedy to have a new one and for that cause the Law doth not favour Advantages by occasion of false Latin or such like mistake And if an Earl be Plaintiff or Demandant and having the Writ shall not abate but nevertheless he shall proceed and count by the Name of an Earl according to such Title of Honour as he did bear at the time of the Commencement of his Action But if the Plaintiff in a Quare Impedit be made Knight having the Writ shall abate There is a Statute made in the First of Henry the Fifth cap. 5. wherein is contained as followeth Item It is ordained and established That every original Writ of Actions personal Appeals and Indictments in which the Exigent shall be awarded in the names of the Defendants in such Writs original Appeals and Indictments additions shall be mâ—de of their Estates Degrees and Mysteries and the Towns Hamlets and Places and the County where they were or be conversant And if by Process upon the said original Writs Appeals or Indictments in which the said additions are omitted any Outlawries be pronounced that they be clearly void and that before these Outlawries pronounced the said Writs and Indictments shall be abated by the exceptions of the party wherein the said additions are omitted Provided that though the said Writs of Additions Personal be not according to the Records and Deeds by the surplusage of the Additions aforesaid that for this cause they be not abated And that the Clerks of Chancery under whose Names such Writs shall go forth written shall not leave out or make omission of the said Additions as aforesaid upon pain of punishment and to make fine to the King by the discretion of the Lord Chancellor or Keeper And this Ordinance shall begin to hold place at the suit of the party from the Feast of St. Michael then next ensuing Although addition of Estate Degree and Mystery to be added unto Names be written in the Statute first before the additions of the Places and Counties yet it hath been used always after the making of the said Statute to place the Addition of Estate Degree and Mystery after the Places and Counties in all Writsâ— Appeals and Indictments against common persons But the use is otherwise in Appeals and Indictments of Treason or Felony against Dukes Marquisses and Earls for their Names of Degrees are in such case put before the Additions of Places and Counties as Charles Earl of Westmoreland late of Branspit in the County of Durham Names of Dignity as Dukes Earls Barons Baronets Knights c. are contained within the word Degree for the Sate of a man is his Mystery Brook Chief Iustice of the Common Pleas in Abridgment of the Case of 14 Hen. 6. fol. 15. titulo Nosme de Dignitate Injuries done to the Name and Honour of a Nobleman IN the Second of Richard the Second c. 1. that Counterfeits and Spreaders abroad of false and reproachful words and lies against the Nobility Prelates and Great Men in publick Offices as the Lord Chancellor or Keeper the Lord Treasurer Lord Steward of the King's Houshold the Judges c. whereby Debates and Discord may arise between the said Lords and Commons to the great detriment of the Realm if due Remedy be not provided It is sâ—raitly Enacted upon grievous pain to eschew the said Dangers and Perils That from thenceforth none presume to tell or report any false and scandalous News against any of the persons aforesaid whereby discord or any slander might arise and he that doth the same shall incur the punishment ordained by the Statute of Westminster cap. 33. which wills that he be taken and imprisoned till he have found him that first reported the same And further by another Statute Anno 12 Rich. cap. 12. it was enacted moreover That when the said Offender is taken and imprisoned and cannot find him that first spake them then he shall be punished by the advice of the Council And to the intent that such evil disposed persons which by their lewd speeches and slanderous words or reports do endeavour to break and disquiet the peace of the Realm might the sooner be enquired of found out and punished by a Statute made in the first and second of Philip and Mary it was established That the Justices of the Peace in every Shire City and Town Corporate within the Limits of their several Commissions shall have full power to hear and determine the Causes abovesaid in the two Acts of Edw. 1. and 2 Rich. 2. specified and to put the said Statutes and every part thereof in due execution that condign punishment be not deferred from such Offenders And besides the said Penalties to be so inflicted on Transgresâ—ors every Nobleman or great Officer of the Realm against whom any scandalous words false news or lies are spoken may prosecute the Offender in any Action de scandalis magnatum and recover damages against him And in like manner may every inferiour person for any such like words of infamy spoken against him recover damages against the Offender And in former times speeches tending to the reproach of others were so odious that King Edgar ordained That his Tongue should be cut out that spake any infamous or slanderoas words of another And the said Lord Beauchamp did sue an Action upon the Statute of Richard the Second cap. 5. de scandalis magnatum against Sirâ— Richard Châ—â—fts because he did sue a Writ of forging of false Deeds against the said Lord Beauchamp and the Defendant doth justifie the said slander by use of the said Writ c. And upon Demurrer the matter of Justification was good so that he was not liable to the punishment of the said Statutes but was quite discharged from the same There is no foul puddle that ariseth from the same corrupt Quagmire and distilled likewise out of a heart infected with Malice and Envy but it devised and practised by another meaner than

Honour deported themselves after the manner of Military Knights of those days To look further back ancient Histories do take notice of the Amazons of old whose Fame in Arms is sufficiently known Although Noble women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their Sex yet they are in Law Peers of the Realm and all or most of the prerogatives before mentioned which to the Noblemen are belonging do appertain unto them But the Opinion of some men have been That a Countess Baronness and other women of great Estate cannot maintain an Action upon the Statute de Scandalis magnatum because the Statute 2 Rich. 2. speaketh but of Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and of the Chancellor Treasurer Privy Seal Steward of the King's Houshold and other Nobles great Officers of the Realm by which words they conceive that the meanings of the Makers of that Statute was only to provide in that case for Noblemen and not for Noble women Also if any of the King's Servants within the Check-Roll do conspire the death of any Noble woman it is not Felony within the compass of the Statute 3 Hen. 7. 18. Honourable women as before noted are of three sorts by Creation by Descent and by Marriage And the King may create any woman into any Title of Honour at his pleasure and the King by his Letters Patents openly read in Parliament without any other Investure did create Mary Fane Widow the sole Daughter of Baron of Aburgaveny Baronness de le Spencer Noble women by Descent are either those to whom the Lands holden by such Dignity do descend as Heir and they are said to be Honourable by Tenure or by whose worthy Ancestors to whom they were Heirs was seized of an Estate descendable to them in their Titles of Dukedoms Earldoms or Baronies or those whose Ancestors were summoned to Parliament for hereby also Inheritance doth accrew to their Posterities Noble women are also those who do take to their Husbands any Lord or Peer of the Realm although they themselves were not of any degree of Nobility Question and doubt hath been made Whether if a man be summoned to Parliament and afterwards die without Issue Male the Dignity and Title of Honour may descend to the Heir Female And many Arguments have been pro contra in that case which at this time I purposely omit because I have before discoursed thereof in the Chapter of Barons Concerning the Title of Honour descendable to the Heir Female by reason of a Tenure of her Ancestors there needs no more doubt to be made than of Offices of Honour the which do much support the publick wealth and being of Estate of Inheritance do descend to the Heir Female if there be no nearer Heir Male As the Office of High Constableship of England challenged in the time of Henry the Eighth by the Duke of Buckingham and adjudged by the Advise and Resolution of the Judges as by a note of that Case extant whereof Dyer in his Reports hath a memorial 205. b. Kelway the Sixth of Henry the Eighth 170. b. which descended to the Daughter of Humphrey de Bohune Earl of Hereford and Essex as before is declared The Office of the Lord Steward descended to Blaunch Daughter of Henry Earl of Lancaster in whose right Iohn of Gaunt her Husband enjoyed the same The like may be said of the Office of Earl-Marshal which descended by an Heir Female unto the House of Norfolk All which Offices are as unfit to be exercised by a Woman as for a Woman of Honour to be summoned to the Parliament And when a Title of Honour doth descend to a Woman if question in Law do arise between the said Noble woman and any other person whether she be of that Degree of Nobleness or no the Issue shall be tried by the Record thereof and by the King 's Writ it shall be certified and not by a Jury of twelve Men even as it should have been in case her Ancestor had been party Although the Laws of the Realm regularly do make all the Daughters where there are no Sons equally to inherit Lands and Tenements and to be but one Heir to their Ancestor yet it is not so in the descent of Dignity and Titles of Honour for Inheritances concerning matter of Honour being things in their nature participating of Superiority and Eminency are not partable amongst many and therefore must of necessity descend unto one and that is to the eldest Daughter Sister Aunt or Cosin Female and inheritable where there is no Heirs Males that may lawfully challenge the same And so in this point is the Civil Law Nevertheless there was a Judgment in the time of Henry the Third touching the descent of the Earldom of Chester after the death of the Earl who died without Issue his Sisters being his Heirs which Judgment was That the said Earldom should be divided amongst the said Copartners as the other Lands and that the eldest should not have it alone But this Judgment was holden Erroneous even in those times wherein it was given For Bracton a Learned Judge who lived in that Age writeth thereof treating of partition between Copartners lib. 2. Case 24. by which it is evident That Baronies and Dignities of Honour do by the Laws of this Realm descend unto the eldest Copartner and the Judgment given once to the contrary thereof Bracton doth rightly account to be unjust His Reason is notable Forasmuch as the Honour of the Chivalry of this Realm doth chiefly consist in the Nobility Reason would not that such Dignity should be divided amongst Copartners whereby through multitude of partitions the reputation of Honour in such Succession and so divided might be impaired or the strenght of the Realm being drawn into many hands with decrease of livelyhood by such partition should be infeebled In which Resolution Britton the Learned Bishop of Hereford who compiled his Book of the Laws of this Realm by the Commandment and in the Name of Edward the First accordeth Britton 187. And therefore howsoever the Judgment was given or whensoever it is nevertheless very evident that it was soon redressed For if it were given upon the death of Ralph the last of that Name Earl of Chester who died about the Seventh of Henry the Third without Issue the Writers of that time do testifie that the Earldom of Chester came wholly unto Iohn Scott the Son of David Earl of Huntington and Auguish and Maud the eldest Sisters of the said Ralph if it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scott who died about the Four and twentieth of Henry the Third without Issue yet notwithstanding the said Judgment stood in force for that the said King assumed the Earldom into his own Hands upon other satisfaction made to the said Sisters Copartners of the said Iohn Scottâ— Ne tanta haereditas inter colos deduceretur Matth. Paris Monaster Sancti Allane in Crompton fol. 366. b. Nevertheless you may read in this Treatise of

Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Text snippets containing the quad