England albeit that other parts of the Kingdome had not the like present regard as the City of London had cap. 26. The Writ of precipe in capite shall not be granted of any free hold whereby a man may be in danger of loosing his Court thereby It seemeth that it was one of the oppressions in those times that if a suit were commenced in the inferiour or Lords court concerning a free hold A Writ of praecipe in capite might be had upon a surmise that the free hold was holden in capite which might prove an absolute destruction to the inferiour Court and was the spoile of the demandants case and therefore I thinke the charter of King John instead of the word court hath the word cause There shall be but one known weight and measure cap. 27. and one breadth of Cloathes throughout the Realme of England This law of weights and measures was anciently established amongst the Saxons Ll. Edgar c. 3. as formerly hath been shewed and continued in the Normans times and confirmed by Richard the first and King John And as touching the measure of the bredth of Cloaths although it might seem to abridge the liberty of particular persons yet because it was prejudiciall to the common trade of the Kingdome it was setled in this manner to avoid deceit and to establish a known price of Cloths And it seemeth that Wine was ordinarily made in England as well as Ale otherwise the measures of Wine could not have been established by a Law in England if they had been altogether made in other Countries Inquisition of life and member shall be readily granted without fees cap. 28. It was a Law of latter originall made to take away a Norman oppression for by the Saxon law as hath been already noted no man was imprisoned for crime not baylable beyond the next County court or Sheriffs Torne but when those rurall Courts began to lose their power and the Kings courts to devoure trials of that nature especially by the meanes of the Justices itinerant which were but rare and for divers yeeres many times intermitted during all which time supposed offenders must lie in prison which was quite contrary to the liberty of the freemen amongst the Saxons it occasioned a new device to save the common liberty by speciall Writs sued out by the party imprisoned or under baile supposing himselfe circumvented by hatred and malice and by the same directed to the Sheriffe and others an inquisition was taken and triall made of the offence whether he deserved losse of life or member and if it were found for the supposed offender he was bailed till the next comming of the Justices and for this the Writ was called the Writ of inquisition of life or member and sometimes the Writ de odio atia But these inquests were soon become degenerate and subject to much corruption and therefore as soon met with a counterchecke from the Law Or first rather a regulation West 1. cap. 11 for it was ordained that the inquest should be chosen upon oath and that two of the inquest at the least should be Knights and those not interressed in the cause but yet this could not rectifie the matter for it seemed so impossible to doe justice and shew mercy this way Glocest cap 9. that the Writ is at length taken away and men left to their lot till the comming of Justices itinerant But this could not be indured above seven yeeres for though the King be a brave souldier West 2. cap. 29. and prosperous yet the people overcome him and recover their Writs de odio atia againe cap. 29. Lords shall have the Wardships of their Tenants heires although they hold also of the King in Petit Serjeanty Soccage Burgage or fee Farme Inferiour Lords had the same right of Wardships with the King for their tenures in Knightservice although their tenants did hold also of the King unlesse they held of him in Knight-service which was a service to be done by the tenants own person or by the person of his Esquire or other deputy in his stead but as touching such service as was wont to be done to him by render or serving him with Armes or other utensiles this was no Knightservice though such utensiles concerned warre Glanvil lib 7. cap. 9. but was called Petit Serjeanty as in the Lawbookes doth appeare Neverthelesse Henry the third had usurped Wardships in such cases also and the same amongst others occasioned the Barons wars cap. 30. No judge shall compell a freeman to confesse matter against himselfe upon oath without complaint first made against him Nor shall receive any complaint without present proofe This law in the originall is set down in another kind of phrase in the first part thereof which is obscure by reason thereof in expresse words it is thus No Judge shall compell any man ad legem manifestam which implieth that the matter was otherwise obscure if the party that was complained of or suspected did not manifest the same by his own declaring of the truth or matter inquired after and therefore they used in such cases to put him to oath and if he denied the matter or acquitted himselfe the Judge would sometimes discharge him or otherwise put him to his compurgators and this was called lex manifesta or lex apparens and it was a tricke first brought in by the Clergy and the temporall Judges imitated them therein and this became a snare and sore burden to the subjects To avoyd which they complaine of this new kind of triall and for remedy of this usurpation this law reviveth and establisheth the onely and old way of triall for Glanvill saith Ob infamiam non solet juxta legem terrae aliquis per legem apparentem se purgare nisi prius convictus fuerit vel confessus in curia Bracton fo 106 and therefore no man ought to be urged upon such difficulties unlesse by the expresse law of the land The old way of triall was first to bring in a complaint and witnesses ready to maintaine the same and therefore both appeales and actions then used to conclude their pleas with the names of witnesses subjoyned which at this day is implied in those generall words in their conclusions Et inde producit sectam suam that is he brings his sect or suite or such as doe follow or affirme his complaint as an other part also is implied in those words Et hoc paratus est verificare Seld. super Hengham For if the plaintiffs sect or suit of witnesses did not fully prove the matter in fact the defendants averment was made good by his own oath and the oathes of twelve men and so the triall was concluded No free men shall be imprisoned or disseised of his freehold cap. 31. or liberties outlawed or banished or invaded but by the Law of the Land and judgement of his Peeres Nor shall justice be
forefathers recepitque satisfactionem universa Domus Tacitus It would be too tedious to recite all the particular Laws with their changes and therefore they shall be left to the view in the severall Laws of Alfred Edmond Canutus and Edward the Saxon Kings Yet one custome first begun by the Danes Englishire Stamf. lib. 1. cap. 10. Miror cap. 1. Sec. 13. I cannot omit That if a man were found slain whose parents or friends were unknown by common intendment he was to be presumed to be a Dane and then if the delinquent were not taken nor fled to Sanctuary nor known where he is the whole Hundred was amerced for the escape Bracton lib. 3. tract 1. cap. 15 but if the party slain was known to be of English parents it was otherwise This custome lasted long after the Normans time the Dane being onely changed into the Norman Breach of peace Batteries Maimes Imprisonments Alured praes Lam. 19. and was called Englishire Batteries maimes imprisonments and other breaches of peace were punished by fine which they called Fightwitt Grithbrece or Frithbreck and the delinquent ordinarily put in sureties for the peace for future time The fine was increased by the number of delinquents joyning in the fact for if seven joyned it was a riot and the fine was then called Flothbote If the number were five times so many viz. thirty and five then it was a rebellion or warre Secondly the fine was increased by the time or season of the fact as in Lent or while the Army was in the field because in the first case the holy time was prophaned in the second the Country was more endangered when the strength was abroad and the Army might be discouraged at the news of the disturbance at home And therefore the Saxons punished this with death or fine sutable Ll. Edw. c. 31. Ll. Sax. cap. 36. Ll. Inae cap. 6. Thirdly the fine was the greater in case of the excellency of the place where it was holy ground or in the presence of great persons such as the King or Bishop The seventh Commandement Adultery amongst the old Germans was holden a crime of a high nature the penalty of the woman that committed that crime was death I finde not what became of the man in latter times of the Saxons it grew lesse penall Baronus Anal. 745. num 5. Concil Brit. 558. Ll. Canut 50. reg 22. and more common By Alfreds Law it was finable and the fine called Legierwit By Canutus the man was fined or banished the woman to lose her nose eares and her portion Incest was more penall to the man then Adultery and yet it touched not his life Incest Ll. Sax. 48. reg 19. Robbery amongst the Lacedemonians was accounted but a trick of youth the Athenians thoughts were more severe The Germans likewise differed in their censures concerning it The eighth Commandement the Saxons punish it with death but the Angles with fine onely yet Ina the King made it mortall and Canutus followed him therein Lind Ll. Ang. Sax. Ll. Sax. 4. reg 3 Miror 262. Burning of woods Burglary Ll. Edm. cap. 6. Ll. Canut p. 59 Trespasses And Edward the Confessor limited that punishment to thefts of twelve pence in value or above burning of woods was fineable by Inaes law but Burglary was felony In King Edmunds time onely the Danes made it finable possibly being guilty in their own consciences of their own propensity to rapine and plunderings This priviledge of the dwelling house was anciently called Hamsoca or Hamsoken or Hamsokne Trespasses committed upon ground were all comprehended under the generall name of Ederbrece or hedge-breaking and the penalty was not onely the dammage to the party but also fine to the King upon action which in these daies passeth under the name of Quare clausum fregit according to the words of the Writ Ll. Sax. cap. 36. The dammages were more or lesse according to the time or season when it was done for if when the Army was abroad the dammages were doubled and in like manner if done in Lent time If the trespasse was done by a beast the owner must pay the dammages Ll. Inae 56. Ibid. c. 40. But if it were occasioned through the complainants default as through his gap no dammages were paid The constant fine to the King in all such trespasses was by Alfreds law set at five shillings Ll. Sax. c. 36. Other actions also were then used as touching dammage done to goods and actions upon the case for in Alfreds time the Plantiff recovered not onely dammages for trespasses done to possessions and goods Miror p. 301. but also costs for injuries in point of scandall and defamation in case the complainant specially declareth that he is thereby disabled or indammaged in his preferment and maketh proofe of the same suitable unto the forms of our pleadings at this day The ninth Commandement which conclude with per quod c. or deterioratus est c. The Saxons were utter enemies to perjury they punished a Ll. Aethelst c. 10. with eternall discredit of testimony b Ll. Canut c. 6. and sometimes with banishment or with grievous fines to the King and mulcts to the Judge Spec. Sax. l. 3 art 53. For that difference I finde observed in those daies between fines and mulcts albeit the more ancient times used them for one and the same for so the Historian pars mulctae Regi In all these matters where any interest was vested in the Crown the King had the prerogative of pardon yet alwaies the recompence to the party was saved Ll. Edw. c. 18. besides the security of the good behaviour for time to come as the case required CHAP. XLI Of the Lawes of property of Lands and goods and their manner of conveyance THus passing over some tops of Saxon penall Laws besides the general rule or law of eye for eye tooth for tooth c. it now remains as lightly to glance at a few generals concerning the setling and property of possessions in point of title Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. Concerning which although it be true that the conquerours of this part of the Isle were a body aggregate of many Nations or peoples and so divers customes must necessarily settle by common intendment in severall places according as they chose their habitation Inheritance yet the generall custome of the Germans as touching discent of inheritance was to the eldest sonne For Tacitus speaking of the German Cavalry saith that the horse of the party dead went not to the eldest sonne ut cetera but to the most valiant man amongst them of that linage which words ut cetera doe plainly intimate that other matters of profit passed to the eldest sonne in point of descent Nor can I conceive how men should be induced to conceit that the custome of Gavelkind was the ancient generall custome of
rules for government I remember it s affirmed by some of those ancient Writers that the Duke or King would have brought in the customes of Norwey but the earnest mediation of the English prevailed against it and it evinceth two things to my opinion first that there was question made what law should be established Secondly that notwithstanding the interest that the Normans had in the Kingdome they could not prevaile to bring in the whole body of their law or of the customes of Norwey which were not onely the prima materia of their law but also in kind had a setling at that very time in those places of this Kingdome where the Danes had their principall seate and therefore not altogether strange to the Saxons themselves The summe of which will be this that upon debate a law must be setled and that not the law of the Conquerours own will nor the law that suits with his desire but the ancient law of the Kingdome and therefore if at any time the unquietnesse of some of the English brought the King to some thoughts of arbitrary rule and to shake off the clog of Saxon law it was long ere it stirred and sprang up too late to raise the title of conquest and withered too soon to settle it As touching the change of customes for that also is imputed to the Conquerour it cannot be denied but some alteration might be in matters of smaller consideration yet are the Writers not without mistake in the particular instances For whereas they tell us that the Conquerour tooke away the custome of Gavell kinde and brought the custome of discent to the eldest sonne and that Kent saved their liberties and continued this custome of Gavell kinde I shall not contend about the liberties of Kent but must till I see better reason hold the opinion of the change of inheritance to be a meere conceit For besides what hath been already said concerning that custome of Gavell kind if we believe Glanvile the difference was between Lands holden by Knights service Lib. 7. cap. 3. and in socage the first of which in his time by ancient custome alwaies descended to the eldest and those Lands that were holden in Socage if not partible by custome in which case they went equally to all the sonnes went by custome in some places to the eldest in other places to the youngest so as the rule of inheritance in the Norman times was custome as well as in former times And furthermore if the custome of Gavell kind had been the generall custome of this Nation the King by his change had contradicted his own Prerogative and granted as great a liberty to his subjects as could have been invented For had the custome of Gavell kind happened upon the Lands in Knight service it had brought all the sonnes under the law of Wardship and had made a ready way to inthrall all men of worth and undoe all husbandry the first whereof had been as advantagious to the Kings private interest as both destructive to the publique Nor is it cleare from any Authour of credit that the Normans changed the tenures of Lands albeit that it cannot be denied but such Lands as he had by forfeiture or otherwise were in his own power to dispose upon what tenure he pleased for as well before the Normans time as long after tenures were like as the services were all at the will of the donor and were of as many individuals almost as the minds of the owners some being of more generall regard and publique use Littlet are recorded amongst the grounds of English laws none of which appeare to me to be of Norman originall although they received their names according to that dialect The next thing objected is the change of Language which thing some Writers tell us the King endeavoured or which is worse to be so absolute as to be absolute tyrant and to publish laws in a forreigne language that the people through ignorance might the rather transgresse and thereby forfeit their estates This if true so far differed from the nature of a Conquerour as rather proveth that he was put to his shifts Neverthelesse the thing tasteth so much of spleen as it might occasion distrust of other relations concerning this subject For besides that it is nonsence for a Conquerour to entitle himselfe by a cheat where he hath an elder title by conquest I shall in full answer to that calumny insert a passage of an Historian that was in the continuall view of publique affaires in those times who speaking of the Conquerour saith That he commended the Confessors laws to his Justices in the same Language wherein they were wonted formerly to be written Ingulfus lest through ignorance the people might rashly offend And another Authour saith M. Paris fragm Gulielm that the King had a desire to learn the English tongue that he might the better know their Law and judge according thereto It s probable neverthelesse that the laws were in the Norman tongue and it s no lesse likely that the pleadings in reall actions especially were also in the same Language else must the Normans be put to schoole to learne English upon perill of losse of their estates but that either the written laws were wholy concluded into the Norman Tongue or that the publique pleading of causes by word of mouth in all actions where the issue was left to the Countrey were in any other Language then English no advised Reader will conceive seeing it had been a madnesse for an English Jury to passe their verdict in any case wherein its likely many of them understood scarce a syllable of the Norman language much lesse ought of the matter upon which their verdict should be grounded Adde hereunto that it s not likely but the Conquerour inhibited the use of the English language in all matters of publique Record in as much as the Charters made by him to corporate Towns and Franchises were sometimes in the Saxon more generally in the Latine but seldome or never in the Norman dialect and that pleadings and indictments were entered in like manner in the Latine Tongue as formerly by an old custome brought in by the Clergy was used for the Clergy who had gotten the Key of knowledge and Law into their own custody layd it up in that Language whereof the Commons had little knowledge that they might thereby be enforced to depend upon these men for justice as well as for piety The Normans therefore either found it too hard to alter the former custome in such cases or else thought it the wisest way to choose the Latine as a third Language indifferent as well to the Normans as Saxons and best understood of any forreine Tongue besides and yet endeavoured to bring both peoples into one Language as they were intended to be one people and to presse the use of the Norman Tongue in publique affaires so farre as might consist with good government and justice leaving
the Kings high way or open street but by the Kings Officer and speciall Writ because distresse is incident to service and that is due as from the fee and therefore by common right the same must be recovered from the fee and such as owe service in the same but the high way or open street are more properly a franchise belonging to the King although the soile happly may be the Lords and therefore it was an old law that they should be under the Kings safegard Ll. Inae Sit pax publica per communes vias and no violence must be there tolerated but by the Kings especiall Writ which presupposeth the especiall notice taken by the King of the nature of the occasion A moderation also must be observed in the taking of the distresse for it must not be excessive and also in keeping thereof for if the owner will he may replevy the same according to the ancient course Marlb cap 21. Glanvil lib. 12 cap. 12. and the Sheriffe must grant replevy if it be demanded although formerly no replevy was without speciall Writ and yet they also not alwaies readily obeyed For the times were such as the Lords were bold with the Kings courts and Ministers and refused the order of the law now in such cases wherein the matter concerned contempt of the Kings authority a fine was set upon the offender but in case it concerned onely a tort done to the party he was amerced the one is called redemption because the penalty otherwise must lie upon the person Miror cap. 5. Sec. 3. if it be not redeemed by pecuniary fine the other is called amercement which is originally a satisfaction unto the party wronged by recompence out of the personall estate of the delinquent Distric Scac. Artic. mag cart cap. 12. Thirdly as touching the matter of the distresse it must not be of Plough beasts or sheep unlesse in case of dammage fesant if other distresse may be had for the Law had a care of such Cattell as were most of publique concernment and which was the maine stocke of subsistence so farre as justice would allow and therefore the unjust taking of any mans Cattaile by any person whatsoever is liable to the same penalties that unjust distresses are West 1. cap. 16. Fourthly concerning the using of the distresse it must not be sold no not in the Kings case till fifteen daies be past after it is taken Marlbr cap. 4. Distric Scac. nor must it be carried out of the County but it must be so impounded as the owner may come to feed it and it must be discharged if the owner give security of satisfaction before the returne of the Writ Artic. sup cart cap. 12. Fifthly the intent of the distresses must be that which is just and therefore not for other suit then by the feofment is due or else by prescription and in case many are joyntly seised Marlbr cap. 9. the suit shall be by one and the rest shall contribute cap. 22. Nor must any man be compelled to shew his title to his Land by distresse cap. 13. The Common pleas shall be holden in one certaine place The Office of Judge of the Common-pleas was in my opinion distinct and severall from that of the Crown pleas nor though one and the same man might execute both authorities doth it therefore follow that it was by one and the same power as if being Judge he had thereby power in all matters of the Common pleas and also of the Crown for though it be true that Bracton saith the King hath one proper court wherein are the chiefest Judges Capitales Just nostri which both by his own testimony and Britons also did heare and determine causes of all sorts yet is it true also that it was by appeale or Writ of errour as in case of false judgement and that the King had plures curias Marblr cap. 20. which doubtlesse had their proper worke and in the time of Henry the second its cleare that six were especially assigned for the Common pleas throughout the whole Realme and yet by another especiall Commission or Letters patents the same men might also have power to determine matters of the Crown as at this day in their severall circuits This law therefore doth not as I conceive worke any alteration but onely in this that whereas formerly the Judges of Common pleas attended on the Kings Court continually as all other Judges did and whither the King removed they did the like which was a great uncertainty and grievance unto the Commons Henceforth they are fixed to a certaine place Assize of Novel Disseisin and Mortdancester shall be determined in the proper County onely cap. 14. and by the Iustices itinerant sent by the King or his chiefe Iustices The law was so declared in Henry the seconds time and was questionlesse put in practise so farre forth as with convenience to the Judges might be but now the convenience of the people is preferred and they must not be brought up to the Kings Court but the Justices must come down to them and yet in case of difficulty the bench where the Common pleas are holden must determine the matter and where the time in the Iter in one County is too scant the remanets shall be adjourned over to be tried elsewhere in that circuit which sheweth that the Judges itinerant had their time proportioned out to every County These trials also were so favoured Westm cap. 51. as in the then holy times of Advent and Septuagesima or Lent they might be tried which although was gained by prayer made by the King to the Bishops as the words of that law are concluded yet it shewes that the Parliament had so much light as to hold the time not inherently holy but meerely sequestred by the will of the Clergy The Plantiffs also in Mortdancester may be divers if there be divers heires of one ancester by one title Stat. Gloc. ca. 6. And if there be joyntenants and the Writ be against but one and the same pleaded Conjanct feofat An. 34. E. 1. Stat. Gloc ca. 1 the Writ shall abate but if joyntenancy be pleaded and the plea be false the defendant shall be fined and imprisoned And if in the action the verdict be for the plaintiffe he shall recover dammages cap. 15. Darraine presentment shall be taken onely in the common Banke Trials in the common bank or other Courts at VVestminster have ever had an honourable esteem above those in the County by Nisi prius although all be equally availeable This might be one cause why the Titles of Churches were still retained at the common Bank when as all other rode circuit For that Churches affaires in those times were of high regard Speed of triall also was not little regarded herein for Justices by Nisi prius properly were but for inquiry till the Statute at Westm the second made them of Oyer