Selected quad for the lemma: word_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
word_n	according_a	call_v	church_n	4,124	5	4.0870	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35632	The case of pluralities & non-residence rightly stated in a letter to the author of a book called, A defence of pluralities, &c. shewing the false reasonings and evil doctrines therein contained / by an impartial hand, and a hearty well-wisher to the Church of England.	Impartial hand and a hearty well-wisher to the Church of England.	1694 (1694)	Wing C966; ESTC R16560	28,436	93

hold two Bishopricks because some Primitive Bishops presided over two several Cities Now did ever any one in his right Wits assert the Bounds and Limits of Dioceses and Parishes to be fixed by a Jus Divinum Do not you frequently throughout your Book suppose them to be constituted and determined by Laws Humane and Ecclesiastical And if it be left to men to bound out the precincts why may they not alter unite and divide them as they please The Primitive Examples you your self answer and prove them to be of no force by the Canon which you quote part of which says Civitates praedictae nunquam proprios Episcopos habuerunt For if those Cities were never two distinct Dioceses then he who held them could not be a Dualist even according to your own argument unless you take it for granted That a Christian City qua talis be a Bishop's See which I am sure you will never be able to prove Some of our present Dioceses do indeed contain such an extent of Land as formerly made two but how came they of old to be two was it not meerly from humane Authority and why may not things be altered by the same Power they were at first constituted And therefore I am asham'd to hear you trifle and cry out Pag. 39. No humane Authority can make that lawful which God and the Nature of things have made unlawful Whoever said that God and the nature of things divided Dioceses and Parishes And what Child's play is it to talk as you do Pag. 42. where you would prove the lawfulness of Pluralities from the lawfulness of one that is Bishop of one Diocese to undertake the Administration of another during its vacancy or the incapacity of him to whom it belongs I will only observe that you make the Bishop of Sarum to lead the Van in both Cases and look upon it not as an argument but a Jest ad hominem It ill becomes one who pretends so great a Reverence and Tenderness for the Order as you do always to be aiming at a Bishop and studying to expose him tho hitherto God be thanked you have exposed your self most of all But if you do not take more care of your self you will become one of the Traditors before you are aware of it And yet as I said though I agree not with you in this medium yet thus far I agree with you in the Conclusion That Plurality is not in it self against the Divine Law and considering the Poverty of some Churches 't is absolutely necessary and some men may better merit and serve two than others one and therefore in God's Name let them have ' em Yet No Man ought to have more Souls committed to his Charge than he can or will watch over This doth evidently appear both from the Law of Nature and the Gospel whatever you pretend to the contrary For I think it will be needless to prove that by them both we are oblig'd to perform our promises and execute the several Offices we undertake and unless you have forgotten your Vows and Engagements plighted to God and his People at your Ordination you cannot but know that 't is the Vow and Office of a Presbyter of the Church of England to watch over and instruct the People committed to his charge And he who shall say that he is not obliged to serve in the Church committed to his charge doth in effect renounce his Orders in the Church of England And he who shall further assert That he is not obliged by the Vows and Promises which he hath made if they are not unlawful doth in consequence renounce the Christian and even Natural Religion And he who undertakes any Engagements which he knows he cannot perform or makes any Vows he resolves not to fulfill in taking of them he doth worse than break them So that he who accepts so many or great Benefices as he cannot or will not look after transgresses the Law of Christ and Nature too But there are two things pretended in this Case 1. The Dispensation of the Bishop To which I answer That there is no Dispensation to be had for perpetual Non-residence and neglect of the People Tho' I must confess the Dispensations are larger than a good man would wish for yet they will not come up to your purpose You often indeed call upon the Bishops to execute the Discipline of the Church and to make Incumbents perform the Terms and Conditions of their Dispensation that is to Preach Thirteen times a Year in each Church and to reside two Months which is too little in all conscience and yet as little as it is I do not doubt but if the good Bishops should take you at your word and send you and your Brethren to labour amongst your Rusticks you would think your selves severely handled and look on it as a harder imposition than that which the Parliament lays upon you and be ready to cry out of an eleventh Persecution I should look on that Pluralist to have something of Conscience who having gotten two of the best Livings in Thirty Miles distance should do at least what the Canon and his Dispensation requires of him 'T is but a low pitch of vertue to be just so good as the Law of Man would have us and yet it were well if such as you defend especially your dear self could do but this Your Dispensations which you now plead in your own defence shall hereafter rise up in Judgment against you For I know many Pluralists and I believe Sir you know one at least who Preach not half so often and reside not half so much upon both their Livings as they ought to do in each And yet after all if the Dispensation were as full as you could desire it would certainly be invalid as tending to the Breach of Vows which no Christian Bishop can pretend to without usurping a Papal Power He who shall undertake to annull a Minister's Vows of feeding the People committed to his charge may by the same Authority dispense with my Oath of Allegiance or with those Natural duties which I owe to my Parents or Children But some have answered That these Vows and Promises are to be taken in a legal sence and are qualified by those words according to the Order of this Church of England so that he who takes no more Liberty than the Canons of this Church allow cannot justly be accused for violation of his Faith But 1st The Church allows no such liberty as that of perpetual Non-residence and neglect of labour as is already proved 2dly These words do not at all affect our obligation to personal labour and therefore cannot in the least mitigate or abate it And that this may appear I will set down the whole Question of which these words are part Do you think in your heart that you be truly called according to the will of our Lord Jesus Christ and the Order of this Church of England to the Order and

Ministry of Priesthood And I need only set them down to shew that they do not at all concern the present Controversie And 't is the only instance of modesty which you have given us in your whole Book that you have not so much as mentioned this Argument as some miscall it But Further another plea whereby you endeavour to wash off the Clergy-mans obligation to labour among his People and which seems to be the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the fundamental Error of your whole Book is that Ministers are not ordained to one Diocese or Parish but to the Catholick Church Pag. 43. passim Tho' you acknowledge so much of the truth viz. That good order and discipline do require that the exercise of their Office be confined to some certain limits and place as will determine every good man against the Conclusion you would draw from it For if he who sits not down on his Cures and will not confine the exercise of his Office to the Church or Churches intrusted with him do break discipline and good order 't is plain that he is guilty of a great crime But I shall further shew that this Notion of a Minister's being ordained not to this or that Parish or Diocese but to the Universal Church is false Not but that upon occasion he may exercise his Function in any part of the Church and upon whatever shore he is cast he ought not to be re-ordained but that when he enters into Orders he is design'd for the service of some particular Church or Diocese more than of the whole As for the Church of England she ordains none except in one or two special Cases which cannot break a rule fine certo Titulo And in the Office for ordering of Priests Can. 33. among other questions asked by the Bishop this is one Will you maintain and set forward Quietness Peace and Love amongst all Christian people and especially among them that are or shall be committed to your charge And your self I presume have made answer to it in the words of the Office I will do so the Lord being my Helper Now in this question other Christian People are contradistinguished to those of your Cure and in the answer you oblige your self to prosecute your duty more especially amongst the latter But you that would be called the true Sons of the Church of England write and act as if you were so much her fondlings as that you had a particular priviledge of contradicting her You can be very severe upon your Brethren of the Clergy who mutilate or disuse her Ceremonies but think it no fault in your selves almost or altogether to lay aside the exercise of your Functions at least in such places as the Canons and Constitutions of the Church do peculiarly require your labours I know no labouring Clergy of our Church who do mutilate or disuse her Ceremonies but if I did I should think them more excusable who do something of their duty than they who wholly neglect it And Sir 'T is such as these that betray her Cause that open the mouths of her Adversaries and give just occasion of scandal And let me tell you That you are partaker of these mens sins by pretending to justify them And take my word for it the Church is very little beholden to you for your doing so especially since you have made bold with her for a little arguments sake so far as to contradict her Offices and Canons But alas Canons and Rubricks and such like things were not made for Authors and Grand Pluralists They are so far from being obliged to obey them that one would think they never read or at least remembred them Otherwise how could any one who did not think himself above Canons confidently assert That Priests are not ordained to this or that Parish but to serve the Church of God in general when the Church has solemnly decreed That they are or ought to be ordained to some particular Cure and obliges them there more especially to prosecute their Office And even in the Primitive and Apostolical Churches Men were not ordained so much for the service of the whole as of one particular Diocese The Apostles themselves were indeed Catholick Bishops in the largest sence and had a Commission to teach all Nations and had every one of them the care of all the Churches But tho' they did not themselves sit down and take up their Residence in any particular Diocese yet they constituted distinct and setled Governours for every Church as soon as it was raised Thus St. Timothy was created Bishop of Ephesus Titus of Crete Linus or Cletus or both of Rome even during the Apostles lives And as Bishops were then design'd for every particular Diocese so as the Number of the Christians grew 't was absolutely necessary that they should have Presbyters subservient to them And 't is evident that those Presbyters did not only live in subjection to the Bishops of those distinct Dioceses to which they were ordained so long as themselves thought fit but were obliged not to leave them without the consent of the Diocesan And when the Levity of some prompted them to break this standing Custome of the Church there were Canons made to confine all Bishops and Presbyters to the Service of that Diocese to which they were first ordained And there is only this difference between the Primitive Platform and our own viz. That in the former Presbyters were ordained not for the Service of one particular Congregation but of the whole Diocese to serve the Bishop in the more full and perfect discharge of his Office to be sent to such parts of the Diocese and for such a time as the Bishop thought fit whereas by our Constitution every Presbyter has his particular Allotment and his distinct Dividend in the endowments and labours of the Church But they were no more designed for the Service of the Church at large in those days than they are now If we enquire why every particular Presbyter had not his distinct Cure allotted him in the primitive Church we must needs allow it to be its infant and unsetled State So that when the Empire came into the Church and Christianity began to be the Religion of Rome and Greece all Churches soon fell into a Parochial Division And that so early that at the Council of Chalcedon it seems to have been a general Establishment for there it is provided that No one shall be ordained a Priest or Deacon at large 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be at his own Liberty but should be assigned particularly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to some Church either in the City or in a Village Can. 6. or Martyrdome or Monastery I know you are not willing to allow Parish-Priests or Churches to have been generally constituted at this time but I think this is a better Authority for it than you can produce against it It could not indeed be so early in our Church which was