nature of man were abolished after the Vnion he was mis-termed a man or the Sonne of man and hee could not possibly haue beene subiect to sufferings And on the other side it is absurd to hold two persons in Christ for so hee must not bee one Mediatour and one Iesus but two the Idioms and properties of the diuine nature where falsely in the Scriptures ascribed to the humane and those of the humane to the diuine Ioh. 3.13 as in these sayings Who hath ascended vp into Heauen at any time but the Sonne of man which is in Heauen The Sonne of man was not then in Heauen but God vnto whom man being vnited might be said by the communicating of properties Heb. 6.6 to be in Heauen They crucifie againe to themselues the Son of God The Sonne of God cannot be crucified nor his blood shed it is a property of the man-hood and by reason of the Vnion ascribed vnto God To conclude this errour breakes the Vnion of two natures in Christ and makes his suffering without merit or efficacy Quest 15. What neede was there that the Sonne of GOD should thus abase himselfe to become man Answ Great need on our behalfe who could not be ransomed from our sinnes by Angels or earthly Treasures but onely by his precious bloud 1. Ioh. 1.7 Explan It is the bloud of Iesus Christ saith S. Iohn that clenseth from all sinne and Saint Peter excluding all other things of greatest worth sets downe this alone 1. Pet. 1..8 Yee were not redeemed with corruptible things as gold and siluer but with the precious bloud of Iesus Christ as of a Lambe vndefiled Q. 16. Doth sinne deserue so ill that wee could not by any other satisfactory meanes bee deliuered heerefrom but by the death of the Sonne of God Answ Yet it deserues the infinite curse of the Law that is all iudgement in this world and euerlasting damnation in the world to come Rom. 6. Deut 27. Explan The Sone of God did not needlesly submit himselfe to the curse of the Law for without this we had all perished The wages of sinne is death and the Lord pronounceth all them accursed which continue not in all things that are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Now God will bee iust of his word not one tittle shall fall to the ground And therefore that Law supposed to stand in force without remission there must bee reall and equiualent satisfaction made either by the person offending or by some other in his stead which supply and suretiship cannot bee conueniently performed otherwise then by the same nature which offended nor can temporary satisfaction bee sufficient for the acquitting of an eternall punishment vnlesse performed by a sacrifice of infinite worth and power Wherefore Christ being God must take the nature of man that hee might repaire and restore man Certainly no creature was able to performe this for creatures are finite and cannot beare an infinite burthen such as is the curse of God due vnto sinne it must then be the Prince of Heauen alone the Sonne of God who could not vndergoe this as meerely God for God cannot suffer nor atchieue this as meere man for man cannot conquer Therefore hee must needs become man remaining God and so he reconciled God and man Q. 17. If hee must needs bee made fit to beare the curse why did he not to this end take vnto him some other nature more excellent Answ Man hauing sinned it was most agreeable to the iustice of God to receiue the payment of the debt of sinne in the same nature which committed it Canes 2. Explan It is true the euill Angels also sinned but they are without redemption kept in chaines of darknesse as witnesseth S. Iude Of other creatures man onely needed a redeemer man onely hath sinned and man onely must by the iustice of God dye the death according to that The same day that thou shalt eate thereof thou shalt dye the death and for that thou hast done this cursed art thou viz thou O man therefore the suffering of any other nature could not bee so pertinent nor kindly satisfactory Obiect If Gods law and absolute iustice bee vrged this due satisfaction must bee made not onely in the nature offending but also by the person offending for the direct Law is Amima quae peccat morietur The soule it selfe which sinneth that must dye for its owne sinne Solut. I answer The Law of God and so his Iustice may bee said to stand two wayes in rigore and in vigore If wee consider it in the vtmost rigor and strictnesse of the letter surely it doth not admit of any pledge or surety but requireth that euery singular man offending must beare his owne personall burthen Can you say that the Kings Law is satisfied if a condemned Traytor being to bee executed shall hire his friend to vndergoe that lot for him like a Damon for a Pithias But if wee consider Gods Law as remaining in vigor and vncancelled in regard of a full weight of debt or penalty to bee payed without remission of any the least graine of it then is it capable of a surety or pledge As for example if a man owe mee a summe of money I am no lesse satisfied if another pay me it for him then if himselfe should bring it with his owne hands This is the admirable temper of Gods mercy in admitting a deputy or pledge in a capitall debt and of his iustice in receiuing the vtmost mites of the debt Thus that hee might spare vs hee spared not his onely Sonne O yee Angels admire and adore this wisedome Quest 18. How came it to bee thus with vs men were wee created sinners Answ No. God at the first made man righteous but by yeelding to the Deuils temptation hee made himselfe a sinner Explan This hath beene already further explained Qu. 3. Quest 19. Wherein did man yeeld to the temptation of the Diuell Answ In eating the forbidden fruit and not contenting himselfe with all other fruits of which the Lord had allowed him to eate Explan Reade of this in the third Chapter of Genesis and you shall see how craftily the Deuill comes to the woman vnder colour of wishing her well yea better then God himselfe whereupon shee yeelds to eate and offereth of the forbidden fruit to her husband who did also eate Now what this fruit was it is vncertaine and it is but lost labour to enquire after it Quest 20. Was God so angry that hee would curse man for eating an Apple or Figge or such like Answ That was not the cause of Gods anger but his vnthankfulnesse pride disobedience and crediting rather the Deuill then God Adams sinne in disobeying Gods commandement Explan In that one sinne of eating the fruit forbidden did concurre many sinnes all very great First disobedience when there was but one commandement and man so qualified as that he could easily haue kept the
long before both imediately after Adams sinning and punishment Gen. 3. The seede of the woman shall break the Serpents head and againe by the Euangelicall Prophet Esay Behold a Virgin shall conceiue and bring forth a Sonne Psal 7.14 And though the Scriptures doe not plainly teach thus much yet the Church of God doth constantly hold that Mary the mother of God was semper virgo alwayes a pure Virgin both because she neuer had childe after and Ioseph her husband was a man that feared God and therefore in all likelihood would not presume to knowe her whom the Lord had as it were appropriated vnto himselfe Now for so much as we read of his brethren Iudas Iames and Iohn it will not be amisse a litle to digresse to set downe the pedigree of Iesus Christ as it is registred by Epiphanius He had to his grand-mother one Annâ— Christ his brethren who had three husbands First â—oachim by whom she had Mary the mother of Christ who were both of the same tribe of Iudah according to Damâ—scene but according to Epiphanius she was of the tribe of Leuy then hee being dead shee was wife vnto Cleophas by whom shee had a second Mary who was afterwards wife to Alpheus and bare him Iames surnamed the sonne of Alpheus and Simon Cananeus and Iudas Thaddaeus Lastly shee was wife vnto Salome who begat of her another Mary which was wife to Zebedeus and bare vnto him Iames who was specially called the brother of the Lord because most like vnto him if it be true which is written vnder the name of Aegeâ—ppus that liued next to the Apostles times where it is also added that because hee was like vnto the Lord they sent Iudas before to shewe the one from the other she bare also Iohn the Euangelist So that all these were but his couzen germans and called his brethren onely according to the Hebrew phrase by which Abraham who was Lots Vncle Gen. 13.8 tells him We are brethren To returne againe vnto that from which we haue digressed this birth of the sonne of God is the chiefe and most stupifying wonder of the world The wonderful birth of Christ First in that a Virgin is a mother that she beares a Sonne who neuer knew man all the Historians in the world could neuer tell of the like all the Philosophers cannot finde out how this may be Another and farre more vnsearchable and venerable wonder is that the infinite God whom the Heauens cannot containe is borne of a woman the Creator of all becomes a creature hee that comprehends the world in his fist is comprehended in the steight compasse of a silly womans wombe hee that giues foode and raiment to all becomes naked and destitute of all things hee that is ruler of all is made obedient to poore man he that is eternall without beginning and end of his dayes is made mortall and subiect to the arrest of violent death nay of the most reproachfull and ignominious punishment And in this admirable birth of the Sonne of God of a woman there is a wonderfull correspondence to the fall which came by a woman Eue the first woman drew the curse vpon man Mary the best-beloued of women brought the saluation vnto man she gaue the fruit to man by which hee loseth Gods fauour becomes a sinner and subiect to death and damnation but this woman giues him fruit whereby he comes into Gods fauour is made righteous and inheritor of life and saluation And thus much for this that he was borne of the Virgin Mary Math. 1 21. He is Iesus viz. a Sauiour of his people for this name was Ioseph instructed in by the Angel before his birth saying Thou shalt call his name Iesus for he shall saue his people from their sins and in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Heb. 7.25 He is able perfectly to saue them that come vnto God through him and besides him there is none that can saue vs Act. 4.12 according to that There is no name giuen amongst men whereby we may be saued but the name Iesus and that of the Prophet Esa 43.11 I am the Lord and besides me there is no Sauiour And for the furâ—â—er proofe hereof see what hee hath done Was it necessaâ—â— that to ransome vs hee should empty the treasures of his riches and become euen poore and of no reputation Philip. 2.7 He did thus He made himselfe of no reputation Must hee endure the fiercenesse of Gods wrath against sinne his very curse due thereunto He did thus also Gal. 3.13 He hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law being made a curse for vs. Must hee performe absolute obedience to the law which we could not doe he did this also I came not therefore saith he to dissolue the law Mat. 5.19 but to fulfill it Lastly must he liue euer to prouide that what he hath done may be effectuall for our saluation Loe He still euer liues Rom. 8.34 and stands at the right hand of God making intercession for vs. So that he is truely another Iosua bringing vs out of the wildernesse of our miserable estate by sinne trampling our spirituall enemies vnder our feete and victoriously putting vs in possession of our heauenly Canaan Psal 2.2 He is also Christus Domini the Christ or annointed of the Lord for this name is commonly annexed vnto the other Christ Iesus In Hebrew he is called Messiah by a word of the same signification The Princes are assembled together against the Lord and against his Messiah or annointed and againe it is said of him God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse aboue thy fellowes Psal 45.7 and more peculiarly of Christ saith Daniel Dan. 9.26 After threescore and two weekes shall Messiah be slaine though one of our owne men lately commenting vpon this hath fowlely defaced this most pregnant testimony interpreting this Messiah the Kings and gouernors of the Iewes And this name Messiah Christ or annointed was familiarly knowne vnto the Iewes before his comming witnesse that speech of the woman of Samaria who could say I know well that the Messias shall come who is Christ Ioh. 4 25. and he will teach vs all things Now he is Christ that is annointed vnto a threefold office First of a King that he might bee King of his Church ruling in it by his lawes and in the hearts of beleeuers by his Spirit and defending it against all enemies for this is he said partly to be after the order of Melchisedeck that is the king of righteousnesse and he is also called Melchi Salem Heb 7. that is King of peace according to the last title giuen him by the Prophet Prince of Peace Secondly Esa 9.6 he is annointed to the office of a Priest that he might sacrifice for the sinnes of his people euen one all-worthy sacrifice that is himselfe vpon the altar of the crosse as a large
Manichâ—es and Marcion some haue reiected the Booke of Psalmes as the Nicholaitans and Anabaptists some the booke of Iob as some Rabbins and some Daniel as Porphyrius some haue reiected the Gospel of Luke as Cerdon some all but Marke as Cerinthus some the Gospel of Iohn as the Alogâ— some all Pauls works as the Ebionites c. Concerning the second some haue made the Apocryphall Books of equall authoritie with the fore recited Scriptures as the Papists and others haue more boldly long since obtruded for Canonical the fatherlesse brood of other books vnto these as the third and fourth of Eldras and Appendix of Iob a Preface to the Lamentation the third and fourth of the Macchabees a Booke called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Booke of Enoch the Gospel of Thomas and of Matthias the acts of Peter And in the yeare 1120 a certaine new Gospell called Euangelium aeternum the eternall Gospell was found out being full of blasphemies but all these and the like are damnable presumptions plainly forbidden by the Lord saying Deut 4.2 Ye shal not put ought vnto the word that I command you neither shall ye take ought there-from and grieuously threatned Reu. 22.18 19. If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this Booke and if any man shall diminish any thing God shall take away his part out of the Booke of life Now that the Books first aboue named are all Canonicall Scriptures and part of the word of God Epist Tom. 3. hath been acknowledged in all ages by the Christian Church Ierome writing to Paulinus of the study of the holy Scriptures doth both reckon vp all these bookes in particular and adioyneth to euery one of them a seuerall pithy commendation And vnto Leta he prescribeth an order of reading them with most safetie and profit As for the other Bookes Epist Tom. 1. which our Church adioyneth to the volume of the inspired Scriptures they are both entertained and in part publikely read in our Churches not as authentike Principles whereon to ground any doctrine but as wholesome precepts of moralitie and declarations of the estate of the Church in those times very profitable for deuotion and heauenly meditation Quest. 146. What speciall proofe is there making manifest that those Bookes of Scripture are the word of God Answ The antiquity of those books some of them being before all other bookes sundry times oppugned and sought to be burnt vp by persecutors and yet wonderfully preserued and by miracles from heauen confirmed is a manifest proofe that they came from heauen and are not of mans inuention That the â—oly Scriptures are Gods word Explan Amongst all arguments there is none of that force in the conscience of man that this is of being taken from the diuinitie of the holy Scriptures For let it appeare that they are of God and what heart dares doe any other but yeeld vnto them Now that they are of God may bee plainely prooued by sundry reasons First by their Antiquitie for the first and most ancient writings in the world concerning Religion must needs be Gods but these are the first and most ancient therefore must needs be Gods 1. That the most ancient are Gods Scriptures is plaine because otherwise either some other Instructor must haue beene before God or else God the Ruler of the whole world must haue beene without any thing recorded whereby the world ought to be ruled till that man had inuented something to gouerne man by both which are most absurd That the holy Scriptures are most ancient appeareth by the most ancient humane writers Orpheus the first of all writeth of the two Tables deliuered to Moses Whence he saith that he learned what he knew of God Linus wrote of the Tower of Babylon described by Moses c. making plaine heereby that the Bookes of Moses were long before any of their writings and so the most ancient in the world Hence it is that Tacianus affirmeth that it appeareth out of Berosus a Caldee Writer Tatiani Oratio aduersus gentes Moses fuit Baccho antiquior plurimis diis gentium Clem. Alexandr out of the writings of the Phoenicians and Annales of the Egyptians that Moses wrote long before Orpheus Linus Amphyon Homer or the most ancient Ethnickes Now the Bookes of Moses are in effect the whole Scriptures all that followeth tending onely to the further explanation heereof Wherefore the Scriptures are most auncient and consequently the vndoubted word of God 2. This is further prooued by the preseruation of the Scriptures in all ages other ancient Bookes being perished either in part or in whole but the holy Scriptures though more oppugned then any by persecutors who haue sought to blot out the memory of them yet are wholly preserued without diminution or corruption of any part of them Had they beene of man certainly it would haue happened vnto them as vnto many other humane writings which are most ancient which if they haue not perished yet they haue been falsified yea one complaineth that hee himselfe yet liuing to see it Fratribus rogantibus vt scriberem Epistolas scripsi has Apostoli Diaboli Zizanijs alia eximentes alia adâ—icientes Dionysius Areoâ— pag. repleuerunt The Brethren requesting I wrote Epistles these the Apostles of the Deuill haue filled with tares adding some things and taking away othersome Now the holy Scriptures haue been singularly preserued heerein in the hands of the Iewes who haue misliked some things and forbidden them to be read as Daniel because he speaketh so plainly of the Messiah in the hands of the heathen as when at the request of Ptolomee they were translated by the Septuagint and in the hands of Heretikes who haue corrupted Fathers and Councels yet neuer durst but haue beene restrained from heauen from corrupting the Scriptures 3. This is further proued by the miracles which haue been wrought to confirme the Scriptures to be of God the Author of all true miracles of this sort are the miracles wought by Moses by the Prophets by Christ and by his Disciples For all these miracles doe plainly testifie of them that they were sent of God and if they were of God then the word by them set forth is the word of God 4. The same is proued by the prophesies contained in the Scriptures some being of things to come to passe many hundreds of yeares after as that the seed of the woman should breake the serpents head that Abrahams posterity should be numberlesse that they should be strangers 400. yeares that Josiah should burne the bones of Baals Priests where Ieroboam did sacrifice that the people of Israel should be in captiuity 70. yeares that Cyrus expressely forenamed should giue them leaue to returne and diuersly honour them c. From hence we may reason thus Those Scriptures which in their reuelations exceed all the vnderstanding of all creatures are vndoubtedly his who is aboue