Selected quad for the lemma: woman_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
woman_n	church_n	time_n	wilderness_n	1,494	5	9.8942	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35959	Truths victory over error, or, An abridgement of the chief controversies in religion which since the apostles days to this time, have been, and are in agitation, between those of the Orthodox faith, and all adversaries whatsoever, a list of whose names are set down after the epistle to the reader : wherein, by going through all the chapters of The confession of faith, one by one, and propounding out of them, by way of question, all the controverted assertions, and answering by yes, or no, there is a clear confirmation of the truth, and an evident confutation of what tenets and opinions, are maintain'd by the adversaries : a treatise, most useful for all persons, who desire to be instructed in the true Protestant religion, who would shun in these last days, and perillous times, the infection of errors and heresies, and all dangerous tenets and opinions, contrary to the word of God.	Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Sinclair, George, d. 1696.	1684 (1684)	Wing D1412; ESTC R3405	145,943	378

in the time of the ten Persecutions the visible church was much obscured and darkned And after these storms were over arose the Arians who did much trouble the church of Christ as is clear from History 5 Because two wings were given to the Woman that is to the Church of GOD two wings I say of a great Eagle that she might flie into the wilderness to hid her self Rev. 12. 14. 6 Because the Apostle Paul did foretel that general defection and apostasy of the visible church mentioned 2 Thes. 2 3. 7 Because Christ hath foretold that before his second coming he shall scarce find Faith on the Earth Luke 18. 8. 8 Because the church of GOD is alwayes lyable to trouble and persecution while it sojourneth in this world But troubles and persecutions do much obscure the brightness and splendour of a visible church Luke 21. 17. Iohn 16. 2. Psalm 129. 1 2 3. Quest. VII ARE the purest churches under heaven subject both to mixture and error Yes 1 Cor. 13. 12. Rev. 2. and 3. chapter Rev. 18. 2. Rom. 11. 18 19 20 21 22. Well then do not the Papists err who affirm that the church cannot err neither in matters absolutely necessary neither in other things which it proposes to be done and believed by us Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the visible church under the Old Testament oftentimes made defection to Idolatry Exod. 32. 8. Iudges 3. 7. 2 Because as long as we are here we know but in part and therefore we are subject and lyable to mistakes 1 Cor. 13. 9 12. 3 Because the seven churches of Asia to which Iohn did writ are accused of mixture and errors Rev. 2. 4 5. 4 Because while Christ was on earth the Disciples dreamed of a worldly kingdom and for a time even after his resurrection they did believe it Acts 1. 6. 5 Because before the day of Christ be at hand there shall be a falling away of the visible church from the true Orthodox Faith to Antichristianism which in great part is already come to pass and more than is to come between this time and his second coming 2 Thes. 2. 3. Rev. 13. 3. 6 Because one of the chief differences between the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant is this that the one can err but not the other 1 Cor. 13. 9 10 12. 7 Because Christ hath foretold that there shall arise false Christs and false Prophets and shall shew great signs and wonders in so much if it were possible they shall deceive the very Elect Matth. 24. 24. 8 Because when the Son of man cometh he shall scarce find Faith on the earth Luke 18. 8. 9 Because the converted Iews erred in being zealous for the Law thinking that the Ceremonial Law ought yet to be observed not understanding that the same was abolished by Christ Acts 21. 20. So did the Galatians err in admitting circumcision Gal. 1 6. And the Corinthians in their abuse of the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 18. Quest. VIII IS there no other head of the Visible Church but the Lord Iesus Christ No. Can the Pope of Rome in any sense be the head thereof No. Col. 1. 18. Eph. 1. 22. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err who maintains that not only Christ is the universal head of the Church but that there is another visible head under him who say they is the Pope of Rome Christs Vicar or Deputy under him Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because as not many husbands but one only is head of the wife so Christ only is head of the Church Eph. 5. 23. 2 Because the Church is espoused to one only namely to Christ 1 Cor. 11. 3. 3 Because the Church is the body of Christ only Eph. 1. 22 23. 4 Because among all the Ecclesiastick orders instituted and appointed by Christ we do not read of such a creature as an Universal Vicar of Christ Eph. 4. 11. 5 Because the Church is one body only unless it be a monster but one body cannot have two heads Rom. 12. 4 5. 6 Because Christ only can inspire or breath in vigour sense motion and spiritual life into his members Eph. 5. 29 30. Iohn 6. 48 50 51. Iohn 15. 1 2. 7 Because there must not be Lordship and soveraignty among them that are under Christ their head and Lord Luke 22. 25. 1 Peter 5. 2 3. 8 If the Pope be not so much as a Bishop of a particular Church he cannot be universal Bishop The first is true because he doth not perform the office of a Bishop which is set down 1 Tim. 3 2 Titus 1 7. 8 9. Do not likewise the Erastians and others as Arminians err who make the Supream Magistrate head of the Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Protestant Religion as it is contained in the Harmony of Confessions especially in the Confession of Faith recorded in the first Parliament of King Iames the sixth laitly ratified and confirmed doth not acknowledge any Supream Head or Governor in the Church neither Angel Man Pope Prince nor Potentate save the Lord Christ from whom alone all subordinate power and authority is derived to the officers of his own Church 2 Because if the Supream Magistrate be a church officer he must derive his power from Christ and must be a Spiritual and Ecclesiastick head and Governour and not a civil only And if such then Christ hath devolved his own place and office upon him which is without Scripture proof 3 Because if the Supream Magistrate be head of the church he must have a right to this Title either by humane Law or by a divine warrant Laws of a Nation cannot make him head of the church because such laws cannot make him an Ecclesiastick and Spiritual officer There is no divine warrant or commission from Christ as is clear from Matth. 18. 17. From the Epistles to Timothy and Titus From Ephes. 4. 11. Rom. 12. 7 8. And from 1 Cor. 11. 28. Quest. IX IS the Pope that Antichrist that Man of sin and Son of perdition that exalteth himself in the church of God against Christ and all that is called God Yes 2 Thes. 2. 3 4 8 9 Rev. 13. 6. Matt. 23. 8 9 10. Though this be denyed by the church of Rome yet the true discription of Antichrist agrees to him 1 Because he is not one single man but an order and race of men succeeding to one another in that same state and office which you will see by comparing 1 Iohn 4. 3. 2 Thes. 2. 7 8. together 2 His coming is after the manner of Satan 2 Thes. 2. 9. 3 As to his name he calls himself a Christian but in very truth an Adversary to Christ and by consequence one that denys Jesus to be the Christ Rev. 17. 14. Rev. 19. 19. 2 Thes. 2 8. 1 Iohn 2. 23. 4 he sitteth in the Temple of GOD as GOD 2 Thes. 2. 4. 5 He ruleth in

power force and oblige all his subjects to a Reformation of Religion and to a conformity to the true worship sound doctrine and discipline of the Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because it is foretold by the Prophet Isaiah that in the dayes of the Gospel Kings shall be nursing Fathers and Queens nursing Mothers to the Church of God Chap. 49. 23. 2 Because Artaxerxes who was but a Heathen King was very careful to make a decree that whatsoever was commanded by the God of Heaven should be diligently done for the house of the God of Heaven And that whosoever would not obey the Law of GOD and the King judgement was to be executed speedily upon him whether by death banishment confiscation of goods or imprisonment For which singular mercy Ezra blessed the Lord GOD of his Fathers who had put such a thing in the Kings heart chap. 7. 23 25 26 27 28. So did Nebuchadnezzar make a decree that if any People Nation or Language should speak any thing amiss against the GOD of Heaven they should be cut in pieces and their houses made a dunghill Dan. 3. 29. The like we read of Darius who made a Decree that all men should tremble and fear before the GOD of Daniel chap. 6. 26. 3 From the example of Hezekiah who removed the high places and brake the images and cut down the groves and brake in pieces the brazen Serpent to which the Israelites did burn incense 2 Kings 18. 4. 4 From the example of Iosiah who made a through reformation and made all Israel to serve the LORD their GOD. The word in the Original importeth that he in a manner forced and compelled them to the pure worship and service of God as a servant is forced and compelled to his work He by his Royal Power and Authority kept them in order forbidding Idolatry and commanding them to serve God no otherwise than according to his Word 2 Chron. 34. 33. and 2 Chro. 15. 12 13. They entered into a Covenant to seek the Lord of their Fathers with all their heart and with all their soul that whosoever would not seek the Lord God of Israel should be put to death whether great or small man or woman 5 Because whosoever blasphemed the name of the Lord was surely put to death Lev. 24. 16. This blaspheming was a peircing through or stabbing the name of the Lord as the original word properly signifies which may be done not only after this manner but by maintaining blasphemous errors and heresies 6 Because the supream Magistrate is Custos utriusque Tabulae a Keeper of both Tables of the Law of God As well of the first Table which relates to Religion and our duty to God as of the second which relates to righteousness and our duty to our neighbour If then he may punish evil doers who offend against the second Table and force and compel them to obedience by the sword of justice which God hath put into his hand much more may he punish Idolaters and blasphemers who offend against the first Table and force and compell them to obedience seeing there are many sins against the first Table which are more hainous and odious than the sins against the second Table And though it be the sinful practise of the Church of Rome to force men and women to be of their Religion which is superstitious and Idolatrous yet it is not so to others who have the true religion among them And though our blessed Saviour and his Apostles did not use such means for propagating the Gospel reserving the Glory of conquering of souls to himself and the power of his Spirit yet he has taught nothing to the contrary but that Kings and Magistrates whom he has made nursing Fathers to his Church may according to the laudable examples of the good Kings of Iuda improve their power for Reformation and maintainance of his own Religion And though Religion hath been much advanced by suffering yet it will not infer that a Christian Prince has not power to reform his own subjects or extirpate blasphemers and Hereticks Quest. III. IS it lawful for a Christian to accept and execute the office of a Magistrate when called thereunto Yes Prov. 8. 15 16. Rom. 13. 1 2 4. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who maintain that it is not lawful for Christians to carry the office of a Magistrate Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because there is no power but of God and the powers which are are ordained of GOD Rom. 13. 1. 2 Because Solomon says by me that is by the Lord Kings reign and Princes decree justice Prov. 8. 15. 3 Because the Magistrate exercises and executes Gods judgements Deut. 1. 17. 4 Because the Magistrate receiveth all things from GOD which are necessary for the performance of his office Numb 11. 17. 5 Because the Lord hath promised that Magistrates under the Gospel shall be nursing Fathers to his Church Isaiah 49. 23. And shall make the Whore desolate naked and shal eat her flesh and burn her with fire Rev. 17. 16. Quest. IV. MAY the Civil Magistrate now under the New Testament wage warr upon just and necessary occasion Yes Luke 13. 14. Matth. 8. 9 10. Rev. 17. 14 16. Acts 10. 1 2. Well then do not the Quakers Anabaptists and Socinians err Who maintain that it is altogether unlawful now under the New Testament to wage warr Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because GOD appointed and commanded lawful war Numb 31. 2. For it is said the Spirit of the Lord came upon Gideon when he was to fight the battles of the Lord against the Midianites and Amalekites Iudges 6. 34. Nay the Lord himself prescribeth the manner and way of making of War Numb 10. 9. Numb 31. 27. Deut 20. 2. And giveth knowledge and skill to his Generals and Heroes to fight his own battles Psalm 18. 34. Psalm 144. 1. All which are in no wise abrogated and taken away under the New Testament 2 Because the Centurion that was converted to the Faith did not lay down his office of a Captain of a hundred which surely he would have done if to war under the New Testament had been unlawful Acts 10. 1 2 47. The same may be said of the believing Centurion Matth. 8. 8 9 10. 3 Because the office of a Souldier is not reprehended and reproved by Iohn the Baptist but rather approven Luke 3. 14. 4 Because opposition and defence against unjust violence which often times cannot be done without war is the very law of nature 5 Because it is foretold that the kings of the Earth shall make war against the Beast Rev. 17. 14 16. Quest. V. MAY the Civil Magistrate assume to himself the Administration of the Word and Sacraments or the power of the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven No. 2 Chron. 26. 18. Matth. 18. 17. Matth. 16. 19. 1 Cor. 12. 28 29. Rom. 10. 5. Hebr. 5. 4. Well then

institution of Marriage for the Lord gave to Adam one wife only Gen. 2. 24. 2 Because the Law of God forbidds expresly Bigamie or two wives Lev. 18. 18. 3 Because the Lord doth find fault sharply with Polygamie many wives Mal. 2. 14 15. 4 Because Christ says he that puts away his wife except in the case of Adultery and marries another committeth adultery Matth. 19. 9. But if it were lawful to have at one time more wives than one he should not be guilty of adultery in marrying another whether he put away the former wife or not 5 Because Bigamie and Polygamie take away the true peace of a wedded life as is evident from the examples of Iacob Gen. 30. And of Elkana 1 Sam. 1. 6. 6 Because the invention of Bigamie was the device of a wicked man Lamech Gen. 4. 19. Quest. II. IS it lawful for all sorts of people to marry who are able with judgement to give their consent Yes Heb. 13. 4. 1 Tim. 4. 3. 1 Cor. 7. 36 37 38. Gen. 24. 57 58. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that forbids and discharges marriage to their Church men Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because marriage is honourable among all men and the bed undefiled Heb. 13. 4. 2 Because the Apostle commands for avoiding fornication every man to have his own wife and every woman to have her own husband 1 Cor. 7. 2. 3 Because the Apostle reckons up the forbidding of marriage among the doctrines of devils 1 Tim. 4. 3. 4 Because a Bishop must be the husband of one wife 1 Tim. 3. 2. 4. Titus 1. 6. 5 Because the Apostle reckons over the qualifications which are requisite for Bishops wives 1 Tim. 3. 11. 6 Because it can be gathered from Scripture that some of the Apostles and other Ministers of the Gospel have been married persons Concerning Peter the matter is evident Matth. 8. 14. Mark 1. 30. And we read that Philip the Evangelist had four daughters all of them Prophetesses Acts 21. 9. And sayes not the Apostle have we not power to lead about a sister a wife as well as other Apostles and all the brethren of the Lord and Cephas 1 Cor. 9. 5. Quest. III. OUght marriage to be within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity forbidden in the Word No. Can incestuous marriages ever be made lawful by any law of man or consent of parties so as these Persons may live together as man and wife No. 1 Cor 5. 1. Amos 2. 7. Mark 6. 18. Lev. 18. 24 25 26 27 28. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that speaks in the decrees of the Council of Trent after this manner If any man affirm that these degrees only of Consanguinity or Affinity which are set down in Leviticus may hinder a contract of Marriage to be made or may dissolve a marriage contract already made and that the Church hath not power to dispense with some of these degrees that is to say to permit incest or may not make new Laws and constitute far more forbidden degrees than are exprest in Leviticus let him be an Anathema and accursed Yes By what reasons are they confuted Before this be done take notice that there are here two heads to be considered First Whether or not we must stand to the forbidden degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity exprest in Leviticus Secondly Whether to these degrees set down as forbidden in Leviticus new degrees may be added by the Church of Rome which will render a marriage incestuous To which we answer that it is not in the power of any creature to dispense that is to say to suffer that to be used which is forbidden by the Law of God with any of these Laws in Leviticus which forbid incestuous marriages And next we affirm neither is it in the power of any creature to add to these degrees forbidden in Leviticus any other which are not forbidden 1 Because such a power of dispensing is not to be found in all the Scripture 2 Because the Lord sayes expresly what thing soever I command you observe to do it thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it Deut. 12. 32. But the Lord himself hath made these Laws and established these Marches so sure that no Council no Pope no Creature can either dispense with any of them or add new ones to them See Leviticus 18. 3 Because these Laws are of common and perpetual right and therefore cannot be dispensed with For the breach of them is reckoned up amongst the abominations wherewith the Nations about polluted and defiled the land Lev. 18. 24. 25 27. Quest. IV. IS it lawful to marry a second wife after the first is dead Yes Is it lawful after divorce to marry another as if the offending party were dead Yes Matth. 5. 31 32. Rom. 7. 2. 3. Matth. 19. 9. Well then do not the Novatians the Puritans of old truely so called and the Tertullianists err who absolutely condemned second marriages Yes This absurd tenet is confuted from Rom. 7. 2 3. and from 1 Cor. 7. 39. Do not likewise the Papists err who deny that after divorce second marriages are permitted to Christians Yes But here by two distinctions they explain their mind First They distinguish between Cohabitation the Bed and the Ty. The first is the dwelling together of man and woman in one family The second is the right of giving and requiring due benevolence The third is that whereby both are made one whereby the one cannot but be the others while they are both living They distinguish next between persons that are believers and that are unbelievers If then both parties or one of them be unbelievers they grant that the marriage is valide both as to Cohabitation to the marriage bed and to the Ty or Bond. But if both parties be Christians they think that the marriage may be dissolved as to bedding together and Cohabitation yet the Bond standeth sure and abideth unloosable especially if the marriage be contracted after Baptism and therefore a second marriage after divorce is unlawful to any of them But this is easily confuted 1 Because Christ permitted marriage after divorce Matth. 5. 31 32. Matth. 19. 9. Here Christ forbidding a man to put away his wife and to marry another in express words excepts the case of Fornication Therefore he suffers a man to put away his wife in the case of Fornication and to marry another 2 Because the Apostle says but if the unbelieving depart let him depart for a brother or sister is not under bondage in such cases 1 Cor. 7. 15. Therefore if a brother or sister when there is such a wilful and obstinate desertion be not under bondage then surely the Bond is dissolved and all remedies being tryed in vain for bringing back the obstinate party I doubt not but the innocent party may marry another without blame If this be then much more may the innocent party marry another when a Divorce is obtained Quest.

in the world is Catholick and Universal Acts 15. 23. Acts 24. 14. Gal. 5. 14. 10 Because the initial Visible seal admittance and enrowlment are things Catholick and Oecumenical For he that takes up his freedom in a whole Corporation or Kingdom is free of the whole and in every part thereof and hath right to all the general priviledges and immunities thereof There is a Patent for Baptism Go and baptize all Nations And by vertue of the Priviledges thereof they that are baptized in any one Church are accounted visible subjects of Christs Kingdom in all places of the Christian world Matth. 28. 19. 11 Because all Churches are one Body Rom. 12. 5. 12 Because Peter writting to the strangers scattered abroad throughout Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithynia calleth them all one Flock 1 Peter 5. 2. 13 Because all the Churches of the World are one sheepfold Iohn 10. 16. 14 Because the Visible Church is one great house 2 Tim. 2. 20. Quest. III. DOTH the Visible Church consist of all those thorowout the world that profess the Christian Religion together with their Children Yes 1 Cor. 1. 2. Psalm 2. 8. 1 Cor. 7. 14. Well then do not the Donatists Anabaptists and Puritans of old so truely named err who affirm the visible Church to consist of those only that are pious and holy Yes Do not likewise the Independents err who think none ought to be members of the Visible Church save those who in the judgement of men very spiritual and discerning are esteemed true believers and saints who have given sufficient proof of their knowledge in the fundamentals of Religion who have reported in order and given a good account of the experimental work of their conversion and effectual calling who have shewed their conversation in the world to have been without the omission of any known duty or commission of any known fault and that for a considerable length of time Yes Do not lastly the Quakers err who think the only visible Church of GOD on earth to be themselves and all others not of their profession and practise to be unregenerate and wanting the Spirit Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the visible Church is compared to a Garner in which there is not only Wheat but Chaff mixed with it To a Field in which Tares and Darnel are mixed among the good Corn. To a Net in which both good Fishes and bad are taken Matth. 13. chapter To a great House wherein are not only vessels of Gold and Silver but of Wood and of Earth 2 Tim. 2. 20. 2 Because Christ will answer some at the last day who will say to him Lord have not we Prophesied in thy name and in thy name casten out Devils and have we not eaten and drunken at thy table I know you not This evidently shews that many have been members of the Visible Church whom Christ will not own at the last day Matth. 7. 22 23. 3 From the Parable of the ten Virgins five whereof were foolish five wise Matth. 25. 1. 4 From the Parable of the Banquet where one was found at the Table without a Wedding Garment Matth. 22. 11. 5 Because many are of the Visible Church who are not of the invisible Church 1 Iohn 2. 19. 6 Because the Apostle calls the Church of Corinth the Church of Christ notwithstanding of their gross enormities 1 Cor. 1. 11. 1 Cor. 3. 3. 1 Cor. 5. 1. 1 Cor. 6. 7. 7 Because Moses did acknowledge even those then to be members of the Visible Church to whom yet he knew the Lord had not given ears to hear nor eyes to see nor a heart to understand the great and wonderful miracles which he wrought in their sight Deut. 29. 10 11 12 13. compared with the verses 2 3 4. 8 Because Iohn the Baptist did admit many thousands into the communion of the Visible Church without making a narrow search of their true grace and conversion Matth. 3. 9 Because the Apostles did instantly and without the delay of one day baptise all those that professed the Christian Religion Acts 2. 38 41. Acts 8. 12. Iohn 3. 26. 10 Because the preaching of the Gospel is appointed by God as an ordinary mean no less for the Conversion of men and women than for the advancement of those in grace that are converted Prov. 9 3 4. 2 Cor. 5. 18 19. 20 2 Tim. 2. 24 25 11 Because we are forbidden by the Apostle to judge the spiritual state and condition of our neighbour Rom. 14. 4. 12 Because Christ did acknowledge Iudas the Theif and Traitor as a member of his Visible Church whom yet he foresaw to be the son of perdition Matth. 26. 23. 13 Because Christ had a visible church on earth many hundered of years before ever there were such cattle as Quakers in the World Unless they will alledge that the primitive Christians and all the Saints since the Apostles dayes have been their Predecessors and claime kin to them as the Samaritans did to Iacob who were truely descended of the heathen who were brought thither out of Assyria as the Quakers are descended from the Enthusiasts in Germany about 160 years since as Nicolas Strokins Iohn Matthias and Iohn of Leyden notorious Hereticks blasphemers and bloody Murderers But how quite different the Quakers are to the primitive christians and holy men of God then and since will evidently appear hence that they did not contemn these two great ordinances of the Gospel instituted by Christ to wit Baptism and the Lords Supper They had Bishops and Deacons to govern and instruct them who were ordained to their functions by prayer and imposition of hands whom they did not revile with the ugly names of dumb dogs and hirelings These primitive christians had not in their assemblies Women-preachers as the Quakers have which is down right contrary to Pauls injunctions 1 Cor. 14. 35. Neither were silent meetings ever heard of among the primitive christians Nor did they ever out of contempt call churches places appointed for the publick worship of God Steeple-houses but resorted to them for performing their devotions and service to God as did our blessed Saviour and his Apostles Iohn 18. 20. Luke 4. 16. Acts 3. 1. Acts 13. 5. Do not likewise the Papists and Lutherians err who will have none members of the visible Church that are unbaptized Yes Do not lastly the Anabaptists err who will have no infants members of the visible church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because that God commanded infants and little ones should stand before him should enter into covenant with him Deut. 29. 10 11. 2 Because infants are called the people of God no less than men and women come to age Deut. 29. 11 12 13. 3 Because the promise of Grace belongs to children as well as to the parents Acts 2. 39. 4 If children be not members of the visible church they must be members of the visible kingdom of the devil for

there can be no midst Eph. 2. 12 13. And so there shall be no difference between the children of Believers and the children of Turks and Pagans 5 Because infants under the Old Testament had right unto the Covenant of Grace Gen. 17. 7 12. And children of Believers under the New Testament have lost no right to that covenant of Grace which children under the Old Testament had seeing the covenant of Grace now under the Gospel is not more strickly and sparingly administred than long since under the law Heb. 8. 6. Rom. 11. 12. 6 Because infants are commanded to joyn themselves to Gods ordinances Ioel 2. 16. 7 Because if Christ while an infant was head of the visible church then infants may be his members But the first is true from Isaiah 9. 6. Therefore the second must be true also 8 Because they whom the false Apostles would have to be circumcised after the manner of Moses and therefore infants were called Disciples Acts 15. 10. Quest. IV. IS there any ordinary possibility of Salvation out of the Visible Church No. Acts 2. 47. Well then do not the Enthusiasts Quakers and Libertines err who affirm that any man may be a true christian and be saved though he live within no Visible Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord IEHOVAH in his visible Church ordinarly commands the blessing even life for evermore Psalm 133. 3. 2 Because the visible church is the mother of all Believers Gal. 4. 26. By Ierusalem which is above I understand the true Christian Church which seeketh its salvation not by the first covenant of the law namely by the works of the law but by the second of the Gospel namely by the merits of Christ embraced by a true Faith which hath its orginal from heaven by the powerful calling of the Holy Ghost 3 Because they that are without the visible church are without Christ Eph. 2. 12. 4 Why are men and women joyned to the visible church but that they may be saved Acts 2. 47. 5 Because they that are without the visible church are destitute of the ordinary means of life and salvation Psalm 147. 19. 20. Quest. V. HATH Christ given to this Catholick-church-visible the Ministry Oracles and Ordinances of God for the gathering and perfecting of the Saints in this life to the end of the World Yes Shall there be alwayes a church on earth to worship God according to his will Yes 1 cor 12. 28. Eph. 4. 11 12 13. Mat. 28. 19 20. Matth. 16. 18. Psalm 72. 17. Psalm 102. 28. Isai. 59. 21. Well then do not the Socinians Anabaptists and Libertines err who affirm that the visible Church may fail and perish out of the world Yes Do not likewise the Scepticks commonly called Seekers err who affirm that the whole universal church which hath been upon the earth and all religious worship all external and outward preaching of the Word all administration of Sacraments and the use of all other religious things have perished a little after the Apostles times and are not to this day restored until Christ from Heaven shall send new Apostles with an extraordinary commission for restoring and raising up again the visible church And that in the mean time no man hath right or power to dispense the Word or administer the Sacraments or perform any Ecclesiastical duty and that they who are now called the preachers of the Gospel are not so Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord hath promised that his church shall endure so long as the ordinances of heaven shall continue Isaiah 66. 22. 2 Because Christ hath promised that the Gates of Hell shal not prevail against his church Matth. 16. 18. 3 Because there is no end to be put to the kingdom of Christ Luke 1. 33. And therefore no end to his church Isaiah 9. 7. 4 Because glory will be to him in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all Ages world without end Amen Eph. 3. 21. 5 Because Christ who hath given power to his Ministers to teach his church and to administer the Sacraments hath promised to be with them to the end of the World Matth. 28. 19 20. 6 Because the Lord hath promised to preserve a people to himself to the end of the world which he shall rule and govern by his Word and Spirit Isaiah 59. 20 21. Isaiah 9. 6 7. 7 Because the Lord hath chosen Zion he hath desired it for his habitation where he will rest and dwell for ever Psalm 132. 13. 14. 8 Because Christ hath given some to be Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints till we all come into the unity of the Faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God Eph. 4. 11. And he hath appointed a Ministry to continue even after the Apostles dayes as is evident from 1 Tim. 3 chapter From Titus first chapter where the Apostle sets down the ordinary qualifications of Ministers and the Rules for calling them to the Ministry 9 Because there is a general Rule set down for the government and discipline of Christs church which discipline and order is to continue in it to the end of the world Matth. 1 18. 10 Because the Lord commands that we forsake not the assembling of our selves together and hath promised to bless after a special manner any that are gathered together in his name any where but our assembling for hearing the word of God is done in the name of Christ Heb. 10. 25. Matth. 18. 20. Matth. 28. 20. 11 Because the death of Christ in the last supper is to be shewed till he come 1 Cor. 11. 26. 12 Because by the Word even preached Rom. 10. 17. we are born again 1 Peter 1. 23. Iames 1. 18. By Baptism we are ingrafted into Christ Rom. 6. 3 4. Gal. 3. 27. In the Lords Supper we have communion with Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. See more to this purpose chap. 21. Question eight Quest. VI. HAth the Catholick church been sometimes more sometimes less Visible Yes Rom. 11. 3 4. Rev. 12. 6 14. Well then do not the Papists err who affirm that the church hath been is and shall be most gloriously Visible to all the whole world far and nigh Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the church of GOD in the Prophet Elijahs time was brought to that pass that he thought none remained but himself 1 Kings 19. 10. Rom. 11. 2 3 4. 2 Because for a long time Israel was without the true GOD and without a teaching Priest and without the Law 2 Chron. 15. 3. 3 Because the Lord often complains that his church and people have forsaken him have not known him that the faithful city hath become a harlot that scarce a man could be found to do justice and follow truth all which is inconsistent with that glorious condition of the visible church which the Papists dream of Isaiah 1. 3 4. Ierm 2. 29. Ierm 5. 1. 4 Because

and propriety which they had to them Acts 5. 4. 2 Because the eight command which is of perpetual use to all men supposeth a distinction and propriety of Goods For if all Goods were common it were impossible to steal 3 Because there should be no giving of Almes there should be no Hospitality which is contrary to the Apostle Eph. 4. 28. Heb. 13. 2. CHAP. XXVII Of the Sacraments Question I. ARE the Sacraments holy signs and seals of the Covenant of Grace immediatly instituted by GOD to represent Christ and his benefits and to confirm our interest in him Yes Do the Sacraments put a visible difference between those that belong unto the Church and the rest of the World Yes Do the Sacraments solemnly engage men and women to the service of God in Christ according to his word Yes Rom. 4. 11. Gen. 17. 7 10. Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 23. 1 Cor. 10. 16. 1 Cor. 11. 25 26. Gal. 3. 7. Rom. 15. 8. Exod. 12. 48. Gen. 34. 14. Rom. 6. 3 4. And 1 Cor. 10. 16 21. Well then do not the Socinians err with the Anabaptists who maintain that the Sacraments are not seals of the Covenant of Grace instituted by God to represent Christ and his benefits but only bare tokens and Tests of our Christian profession Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Circumcision is expresly called a sign and seal of the righteousness of Faith Rom. 4. 11. Now if Circumcision was a seal and sign why ought not Baptism and the Lords Supper to be signs and seals also 2 Because the names and properties of the things signified are given to the Sacramental signs Thus Circumcision is called the Covenant Gen. 17. 10. The bread is called the Body of Christ Matth. 26. 26. And Baptism is called the washing of regeneration Titus 3. 5. For no other reasons but because they represent and confirm things spiritual to Believers 3 Because the cup of blessing in the Sacrament is the communion of the blood of Christ and the bread is the communion of the body of Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. 4 Because the Sacraments bring into our memories Christ and his benefits and therefore as it were they set him before our eyes and so increase and confirm our faith 1 Cor. 11. 24 25. Quest. II. IS the Grace which is exhibited in or by the Sacraments rightly used conferred by any power in them No. Rom. 2. 28 29. 1 Peter 3. 21. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that the Sacraments of themselves are true immediate and effectual causes of our Iustification and give life Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the holy Scripture attributes our Justification to Faith only as an instrumental cause and to no other thing Rom. 1. 17. Rom. 3. 28. Gal. 2. 16. And therefore the Sacraments cannot be the efficient causes of our Justification and life 2 Because the Scripture makes an express difference between the work of a man dispensing the Sacraments and the work of the holy Ghost Matth. 3. 11. 3 Because signs and seals of Grace cannot confer and effectuat Grace But the Sacraments are but signs and seals of Grace because to signifie and to have vertue and power to do differ in nature and in kind 4 Because many are partakers of the Sacraments who yet are not partakers of the Grace of GOD as Simon Magus Acts 8. 13. Ananias and Saphira Acts 5. 4 9. And how many thousands do eat and drink unworthily drinking and eating damnation to themselves 1 Cor. 11. 29. 5 Because many have been justified before ever they did partake of a Sacrament as Abraham Rom. 4. 11. And Cornelius with his fellows Acts 10. 46. Quest. III. DOTH the efficacy of a Sacrament depend upon the piety or intention of him that doth administer it No. Matth. 3. 11. 1 Cor. 12. 13. Well then do not the Donatists and Anabaptists err who maintain that the Sacraments dispensed by a wicked and graceless Minister are of no vertue or efficacy Yes Do not also some others now a days err who are not far from the same opinion Yes Do not lastly the Papists err who maintain that to the perfection of a Sacrament the actual intention of the Minister at least his vertual intention of doing that which the Church doth is necessary Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Iudas who was a Thief and a Traitour did according to the command of Christ baptize as well as the rest yet Christ never called in question his Baptism 2 Because the efficacy of the Word doth not depend upon the piety goodness worthiness or good intention of the Instrument Phil. 1. 16 Therefore neither doth the efficacy of a Sacrament depend upon the intention of him that doth administer it 3 If the efficacy of Baptism depended upon the good intention of the Minister then no Christian could be sure that he is baptized seeing no man can be sure of or know the Ministers intention 4 Because the operation and efficacy of the Sacraments depend upon the operation of the Holy Ghost and the Word of institution Matth. 3. 11. 1 Cor. 12 13. 5 Because the Papists themselves which is argumentum ad hominem cannot be sure that the bread in the Eucharist is Transubstantiat into the Body of Christ. And therefore in their Adoration and falling down to the Host they commit most damnable Idolatry in worshipping that which is neither GOD nor any divine thing I say they cannot be sure because the Priests intention may be deficient while he is consecrating the Bread Quest. IV. ARE there only two Sacraments ordained by Christ in the Gospel I answer two only namely Baptism and the Lords Supper Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 20 23. Well then do not the Romanists err who make seven Sacraments by adding to Baptism and the Lords Supper Confirmation Pennance Extream Unction Ordination and Matrimony Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because no other Sacraments save Baptism and the Lords Supper are instituted by Christ in all the holy Scripture 2 Because the description and definition of a Sacrament as you will find it in the first Question doth agree only to Baptism and the Lord Supper 3 Because Christ was a Copartner and sharer of Baptism and the Lords Supper which in his own person he did sanctifie and by them did testifie and profess his communion with his people of the New Testament but never was a sharer of any of these five Bastard Sacraments Quest. V. MAY Baptism and the Lords Supper be dispensed by any but by a Minister of the Word lawfully ordained No. Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 20 23. 1 Cor. 4. 1. Heb. 5. 4. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who maintain that the Sacraments may be dispensed and administred by any Believer Yes Do not likewise the Papists and the Lutherians err who maintain that it is lawful for Laicks or Women to administer the

Sacrament of Baptism in case of necessity Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ gave the power of dispensing the Sacraments to them only to whom he gave the power of Preaching Mat. 28. 19. But the power of preaching is not given to all men Heb. 5. 4. 2 Because all that ever did dispense the Sacrament of Baptism in the New Testament were either called Ordinarly or Extraordinarly as is evident from the examples of Iohn the Baptist and the disciples of Christ. From the example of Peter Acts 2. 41. From the example of Philip Acts 8. 38. From the example of Ananias Acts 9. 18. From the example of Paul and Silas Acts 16. 15. 33. 3 Because it is unlawful for any man to affix the Kings seal to a Charter or Letters-patent unless he be a person authorized and deputed by the King for that use But the Sacraments are seals of the Covenant between God and his people Rom. 4. 11. 4 Because women are not permitted to speak publickly in the Church therefore they have no power to dispense the Sacrament of Baptism 1 Cor. 14. 34. 1 Tim. 2. 12. 5 Because the Adversaries grant that it is unlawful to women or Laicks to administer the Lords Supper therefore it is as unlawful for them to administer Baptism No just cause of reason or disparity can be given 6 Because the benefit of regeneration is not tyed as the Adversaries may dream to the outward Baptism as is clear and evident from the conversion of the Thief upon the cross And from 1 Peter 3. 21. Therefore there is no such necessity of Baptism as the Papists and Lutherians do fancy Quest. VI. ARE the Sacraments of the Old Testament in regard of the spiritual things thereby signified and exhibited the same for substance with those of the New Yes 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3 4. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that the difference between the Sacraments of the Old Testament and the New consists in this that those did deliniate and shaddow forth Grace these contain offer and confer Grace Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Apostle 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3. expresly says that the Cloud and the passing thorow the Red-Sea did signifie these same things to the Iews which Baptism signifies to us And that the Manna and the Water from the Rock did signifie the same thing to them which the Lords Supper signifies to us 2 Because the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament did obsignate and seal up the same righteousness of Faith Rom. 4. 11. 3 Because the Scripture applyeth to Believers under the Old Testament the Sacraments of the New 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3. And on the other hand the Scripture applyeth the Sacraments of the New Testament to Believers under the Old which is not done by reason of the sign for the signs are diverse and different therefore it must be done by reason of the thing signified and by consequence the Sacraments of the Old Testament must agree in the thing signified with the Sacraments of the New 4 Because the Sacraments of both Testaments agree in the Word of Promise Gen. 17. 7. Acts 2. 38 39. Rom. 4. 11 12 13. Gal. 3. 29. CHAP. XXVIII Of BAPTISM Question I. IS the Sacrament of Baptism with Water by Christs appointment to be continued in his Church to the end of the World Yes Matth. 28. 19 20. Well then do not the Quakers err who maintain that Baptism with Water is not an Ordinance of Divine institution and that there is no Gospel precept for it Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ taking his fare-well of his Disciples gave them this Commission Go ye therefore and teach all Nations Baptising them in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Or according to the Original Word make all Nations Disciples by your Doctrine Baptising them in the Name of c. All which words are spoken with one breath Whence it is clear that the same very persons that were commanded to make all Nations Disciples by their Doctrine were commanded to baptise them But it was not in their power to administer the Inward Baptism that is to baptise with the holy Ghost and with fire Men may well administer the Water or external sign but it is Christ that bestowes the inward Grace and thing signified as is clear from Matth. 3. 11. where Iohn the Baptist sayes I indeed baptise you with Water unto Repentance but he that cometh after me shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire If any man had received this power of Baptising with the Holy Ghost then surely Iohn should have received it whom Jesus so highly commends as that there was not a greater than he born of women Matth. 11. 11. And though our Saviour subjoyns he that is least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than he yet this will not infer that any among the Teachers of the Gospel had the power of baptising with the holy Ghost which he had not but only that they did shew Christ more clearly as having most perfectly accomplished whatsoever was requisite to our salvation and did publish this not only to the Iews but also to the Gentiles And so Christ as the Master employed only the Disciples as his servants to dispense and act ministerially in his service reserving the blessing of their employments to himself Now baptizing with the holy Ghost is the greatest blessing of the Gospel and so cannot flow but from Christ himself 2 Because the Disciples of Christ acted only ministerially under him in working of miracles therefore they could not administer baptism with the holy Ghost seing this is a greater power than the other The cureing of the soul is a far greater work than to cure miraculously the body The work of Conversion and regeneration is a work beyond the creating of heaven and earth There was only here the introducing of a new Form but no contrary Form or quality to be expelled But in this the heart of stone must not onely be taken away but a heart of flesh must be given That they acted only Ministerially under Christ it is evident from what Peter sayes ye men of Israel why look ye so earnestly on us as though by our own power and godliness we made this man to walk Acts 3. 12. And the same Peter says Eneas Jesus Christ maketh thee whole Acts 9. 34 See Mark 16. 17. 1 Cor. 12. 10. 3 Because if this commission empowred the Apostles to baptise onely with the Holy Ghost and not with water then they in the exercise of this Commission would onely have baptized men and women with the holy Ghost and not with water but the contrary is manifest Acts 2. 38. where Peter makes a distinction between being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and receiving the gift of the holy Ghost namely the gifts and graces of the holy Spirit which are common

and Familiarity with GOD but such are all these who walk inordinatly 2 cor 6. 16. 6 Because if the Church willingly and wittingly admit such persons they stir up the wrath of God against themselves for suffering Gods Covenant and his holy Symboles to be openly prophaned 1 Cor. 11. 30. 7 Because the Lord will not suffer such as are manifestly and contumaciously wicked to take his Covenant in their mouth and therefore to such persons the seals and symboles of his Covenenat ought not to be offered Psalm 50. 17. 8 Because ignorant prophane and godless persons ought to be esteemed as Heathens and Publicans Matth. 18. 17. CHAP. XXX Of CHURCH CENSURES Question I. HAth the Lord Iesus as King and Head of his Church appointed therein a Government in the hands of Church-Officers distinct from the Civil Magistrate Yes Isaiah 9. 6 7. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 1 Thes 5. 12. Acts 20. 17 18. Hebr. 13. 7 17 24. 1 Cor. 12. 28 Matth. 28. 18 19 20. Well then do not the Erastians and others err who maintain that in the Holy Scripture there is no particular form of Church Government set down and appointed by Christ Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered to the Ministers of his Church as to his own Delegates and Ambassadours and therefore according to his own laws the whole power of Governing the Church which he himself received from the Father to be managed and put in execution in his own name and authority Iohn 20. 21. Matth. 28. 19. Acts 1. 2. Eph. 4. 7 8 11. 2 Because all the substantials of Church Government under the New Testament which either concern Ministers Ordinances Censures Synods Councils and their power are proposed and set down in Scripture namely in the third Chapter of the first Epistle to Timothy Acts 15. chapter And 1 Cor. 14. 26 40. 3 Because the Lord Jesus Christ hath looked to the good of his Church no less under the New Testament than under the Old Therefore since the Church under the Old Testament had a most perfect form of Government prescribed to it and since there is as great need and necessity of Church order and discipline under the New Testament as was under the Old it must follow that there is a Patern and Form of Church government no less set down and prescribed under the New Testament than was under the Old Heb. 3. 1 2 4 5. Heb. 13. 8. 1 Cor. chap. 5. 1 Tim. 5. 20. And 1 Tim. 1. 20. 4 The end of the Church Government is spiritual namely the gaining of mens souls to Christ. But nothing that 's meerly of humane authority can reach this end Matth. 18. 15 16 17. 5 Because all the parts of Church Government are particularly set down in Scripture As first those things which concern the key of doctrine as publick prayer and giving of thanks 1 Tim. 2. 12. 1 cor 14. 14 15 16. Singing of Psalms Eph. 5. 18 19. Col. 3. 16. Publick reading of the Word Preching and Expounding the same Acts 6. 4. Acts 13. 15 17. Acts 5. 21. 2 cor 3. 14. Matth. 18. 19 20. 2 Tim. 4. 11. Heb. 6. 1. Gal. 6. 6. Secondly those parts likewise which concern the key of Discipline namely the ordination of Presbyters with the imposition of the hands of the Presbytrie 1 Tim. 4. 14. and 1 Tim. 5. 22. Titus 1. 5. Acts 14. 21 23. Thirdly the Authoritative giving of Judgement and sentence concerning doctrine and that according to the Word Acts 15. 15 24 28. Fourthly Admonition and publick Rebuking of those who have offended Matth. 18. 15 16 17. 1 Thes. 5. 14. 1 Tim. 5. 20. Fifthly The excommunicating of those who are contumacious and ungodly and who are convicted of manifest crimes and scandals Matth 18. 17. Titus 3. 10 1 Tim. 1. 20. 1 cor 5. 2 3 4 5. Lastly the receiving again into the fellowship of the Church persons cast out by excommunication having testified their Repentance 2 cor 2. 6 7 8 9. Do not the same Erastians err who make no distinction between Church power and the Secular power Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ hath committed the keyes of the kingdom of Heaven to the Officers of his Church which are Governours distinct from the civil Magistrate Matth. 16. 18 19. Matth. 18. 19. Iohn 20. 21 22 23. 2 Because Church power and civil power differ specifically The church and the common-wealth are Polities formally and essentially different They are not as such powers subordinate at least in a right line but co-ordinate Acts 4. 19 20. 2 chron 26. 18. Next God the Creator and Governour of the World is the Efficient of the power of the civil Magistrate Rom. 13. 1 2 4. But God-Christ our blessed Mediator and Lord of his church is the Efficient of the church particularly and of its Government The matter materia ex qua of the civil Government is the secular sword but the matter of the church Government are the keyes of the kingdom of Heaven The matter of the civil Government materia in qua may be a Senate many people the Person of one king of a child 〈◊〉 woman But the matter of the church government is not of this kind Heb. 13. 22. 1. Tim. 3. 15. 1 cor 14. 34 35. The matter of the civil Government materia circa quam are men and women as members of the common-wealth without as well as within the church but as christians and members of the church they are not such 1 cor 5. 13. The formal causes of both are distinct the one inflicts punishments meerly spiritual the other inflicts punishments meerly civil Lastly the end of this is the corporal and external good of a society but the end of that is the spiritual good of the church and its edification Matth. 14. 15. 1 cor 5. 5. 2 cor 10. 8. Do not likewise the Socinians Anabaptists Quakers many Independents and others err who maintain that the key of Doctrine or the publick preaching of the Word is proper to any man furnished with sutable gifts though not called and sent to that employment Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because no man can believe in Christ of whom he hath not heard and how shal he hear without a Preacher and how shal he preach unless he be sent Rom. 10. 14 15. 2 Because Women may have sutable and competent gifts for Preaching and yet they are forbidden to speak in the Church 1 Tim 2. 12. 3 Because the Scripture blames such as have run and yet have not been sent Ierem. 23. 21 32. 4 Because no man taketh this honour to himself that is he ought not to take it but he that is called of GOD as was Aaron Heb. 5. 4. 5 Because the Scripture mentioneth that GOD hath set apart certain peculiar Ministers for the preaching of the Word Rom. 1. 1. Ephes 4. 11. Titus 1. 3. 6 Because no man

can take the office of a civil Magistrate or of a Deacon of the church upon him unless he be called thereunto Luke 12. 14. Acts 6. 5. 1 Tim. 3. 10. And therefore no man ought to take upon him the publick preaching of the Word unless he be called thereunto likewise 7 Because he that taketh upon him this office without a call he usurpeth Authority in the church seing Preaching is an Act of Authority 1 Thes. 5. 12. 8 Because the Titles which are given to the Preachers of the Gospel are names of Office they are called the Ambassadours of Christ 2 cor 5. 20. Stewards of the Word Titus 1. 7. The Men of GOD 1 Tim. 6. 11. and Angels Rev. 2. 1. 9 Because there is not one approven example in all the Word of GOD for a gifted brother to Preach without a call and therefore seing it is not done in Faith it must be Sin Must every Fellow that takes a laxit in his tongue go up to the Pulpit and ease himself 10 Because there are Precepts and Rules set down in Scripture for all the Ages of the church to the end of the world anent the calling of men to be Ministers of the Gospel 1 Tim. 3. 2 3 6 7. and 1 Tim. 5. 21 22. Do not likewise the Independents Brunists and Anabaptists err who maintain that the Right and Power of Governing the church belongs no less to the multitude and community of Believers than to the Officers of the church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Scripture expresly teaches that GOD hath committed the Government of his church and the care of his people to certain chosen Persons and not to all and every one Ephes. 4. 11. 12 13. 1 Cor. 12. 28. 2 Because if the power of the keyes were given to believers in common either they are given to them as believers or as they are gifted by GOD with gifts and qualifications above others for Governing the church and chosen out of the rest for performing that office If the last part be affirmed it follows that the power and right of the keyes is committed not to a community of believers but to some select persons which we own and maintain but the Independents deny If the first be asserted then it follows first that the care of Governing the church is committed to Women and children being believers and so they must necessarly have the power of seeing as being eyes and watch men to the church the power of hearing as being the ears of the church and the body of the church must be deformed because the whole body is the eye and the whole body is the ear and whose many members are made one member 1 cor 12. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19. 2 It follows that the power of the keyes it not only given to all but to Believers only but it is evident by the example of Iudas and other Reprobates that many in Christs name have preached who were not Believers Matth. 7. 22 23. Phil. 1. 16 17 18. 3 Because to whom Christ has given the power of Governing the church to them also he hath promised to give gifts and enduments largely for performing that office Iohn 20. 21 22 23. 1 Cor. 4. 6 7. Matth. 28. 19 20. But to a community of Believers God has never promised a Spirit for the Ministry nor gifts for that employment Nor did he ever bestow or confer any such enduments 4 Because Christ our Mediator appointed Ecclesiastical Officers and Church-Governours before ever there was a formal church under the New Testament gathered and set up Luke 9. 1. Luke 10. 1 2 3. Iohn 20. 21 22 23. Matth. 28. 19 20. This was all done before his death And before his ascension he did the like Ephes. 4. 8. 11 12. Acts 2. 1 Cor. 12. 28. Now it is evident that there was no formal gathering together of a church before the Feast of Pentecost Acts 2. Ecclesiastick Ministers and Officers were appointed for calling in and gathering together the Mystical body of Christ to wit his Members therefore it was needful that Ministers baptizing ought to be before Persons baptized That Gatherers of the church ought to be before Persons gathered That callers and inviters to Christ ought to be before Persons called and invited 5 This Democracy or popular Government cannot but bring in great confusion whence many absurdities will follow As the church of GOD should not be an organical body That Women who are forbidden to speak in the church most have the keyes of the kingdom of Heaven hanging at their Belt forsooth All must govern and none must be governed All must attend the government of the church All must be rendred uncapable for going about their particular callings which God calls them to every day Therefore seing this sort of Government brings so much confusion with it it is most probable that it is not of God who is a God of Order and not of confusion 1 Cor. 14. 33. Quest. II. ARE Church Censures necessary for reclaiming and gaining of offending brethren for deterring of others from the like offences for purging out of that leaven which might infect the whole lump for vindicating the honour of Christ and the holy profession of the Gospel and for preventing the wrath of GOD which might justly fall upon the church if they should suffer his covenant and the seals thereof to be prophaned by notorious and obstinate sinners Yes 1 Tim. 5. 20. 1 Tim. 1. 20. 1 cor 11. 27. to the end Iude 23. verse Are the Officers of the church for the better attaining of these ends to proceed by Admonition by Suspension from the Lords Table for a season and by Excommunication from the church according to the nature of the crime or scandalous offence and demerit of the Person Yes 1 Thes. 5. 12 1 cor 5. 4 5 13. Matth. 18. 17 Titus 3. 10. Well then do not the Socinians Anabaptists Quakers and other Sectaries err who deny that any church censures should be inflicted upon offenders Yes Do not likewise the Erastians err who maintain there should be no suspension from the Lords Table or excommunication from the church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the power of the keyes is given to the Ministers of the church wherewith not only by the preaching of the Word but also by church censures they open and shut the kingdom of heaven as will appear by comparing these places of Scripture together Matth. 16. 19. Matth. 18. 17. 2 Because he that offends publickly and after Admonition persists pertinaciously in his sin should be esteemed as a Publican and Heathen Matth. 18. 17. 3 Because the Apostle says if any man obey not our Word by this Epistle note that man and have no company with him Note him that is either by excommunication or some other note of church censure 2 Thess. 3. 14. 4 Because the Apostolick church being moved by the same reasons which

he look to the good and conversion of a whole Congregation 6 Because any one single congregation with one Pastor only hath not the power of Ordination an instance whereof cannot be given either from Precept or Practise in all the New Testament Nay the Ordination of Ministers in the New Testament was alwayes performed by a Colledge of Pastors associate together Acts 6. 6. Acts 13. 1 2 3. 1 Tim. 4. 14. 7 Because from this doctrine of the Independents these and the like absurdities will follow First that the Prophets must be censured and judged by way of authority not by other Prophets but by the multitude and vulgar of the Congregation which is contrary to 1 Cor 14. 32. 2 That all the Councils in the times of the Apostles which were convocated upon necessary occasions for matters which concerned many churches alike were but during the time and extraordinary and so not obliging succeeding churches though the occasions and causes why these Councils were convocated then are and will be to the end of the world 3 That private Believers must be the Bishops of their own Bishops Watch-men of their own Watch-men No communion or fellowship among Ecclesiastick Ministers That single and particular churches though they have defiled and pudled themselves with the most black and ugly Heresies with the most abominable faults and vices yet are not lyable to any Ecclesiastick Censure but must be refered to the immediate judgement of Christ at the last Day 4 That a Colledge of Pastors and Presbyters conveened together from several congregations shall have no more power of the keyes of the kingdom of Heaven than any one particular man that is able to look to the good of his brother 5 That a Pastor out of his own Congregation hath no power to administer the Sacraments or to preach the Word or exerce any Ministerial Act. From which Absurdities it follows evidently that this kind of Church Government labours under a manifest defect of the Means of Propagating the Gospel 6 That Christ hath as many visible bodies as there are particular congregations That Men and Women are to be accounted Members only of a particular congregation and not of the Church-Catholick And that those who are excomunicated are only casten out of a particular congregation not out of the Church Universal Quest. II. MAY not the Ministers of the Church of themselves by vertue of their office meet in Assemblies with other fit Persons upon delegation from their Churches when Magistrates are open enemies to the Christian Religion Yes Acts 15. 2 4 22 23 25. Well then do not the Erastians err who maintain that the Ministers of the Gospel have no right or power in themselves or by vertue of their office to meet in a Synod or Council Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Church of GOD in the primitive times had power in themselves to convocate their own Assemblies for Worship and Government not only without but against the consent of the civil Magistrate as is evident from the Acts of the Apostles and Church Histories 2 Though the power and right of meeting in church Assemblies be visible in the constitution and exercise yet it is intrinseck and within the church as well as the power of Preaching Quest. III. MAY Magistrates lawfully call a Synod of Ministers and other fit persons to consult and advise with about matters of Religion Yes Isa. 49. 23. 1 Tim. 2. 1 2. Matth. 2. 4 5. Prov. 11. 14. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that the civil Magistrate hath no right or power to convocate Synods or Councils but that it belongs to the Bishop to convocate Diocesian Synods To the Metropolitan to convocate Provincial Synods To the Primate and Patriarch to convocate National Synods To the Pope onely to convocate and call Oecumenick and general Synods Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because under the Old Testament Councils and Synods were appointed and called by godly Kings 1 Kings 8. 1. 2 Kings 23. 1. 2 chron 29. 4. 2 Because it is the duty of the civil Magistrate being born within the church to take care that Peace and Unity be preserved and keeped in the Church that the Truth and Word of GOD be intirely and soundly Preached and obeyed that blasphemies and heresies be kept under and supprest that all corruptions in Worship and Discipline be reformed that all GODS Ordinances be lawfully established administred and preserved And if it should happen that both Church and State Iudicaturies should make an universal defection from the purity of doctrine and worship received and acknowledged it is the duty of a godly King by vertue of his Regal Power and Authority to set about a work of Reformation and to call and command all ranks of People to return to the true Worship and Service of GOD Isa. 45. 23. Psalm 122. 7 8 9. Ezra 7 23 25 26 27 28. Levit. 24. 16. Deut. 13. 5 6 12. 1 chron 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 2 Kings 23. from the first verse to the 26. 3 From the example of Constantine that did convocate the first Nicene council From Theodosius the elder that did call the first council of Constantinople From Theodosius the younger that did call the first council at Ephesus From Martianus that did call the Chalcedon council Quest. IV. MAY all Synods or Councils since the Apostles dayes err Yes And have not many actually erred Yes Well then doth not the Popish Church err who maintain that councils confirmed and solemnised by the Popes authority cannot err neither in explaining Doctrines of Faith nor in delivering Precepts and Rules of Manners common to the whole Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because all the Priests Levites and Prophets of the Iewish church who had the same Promises which the Christian church hath now under the New Testament 1 Cor. 10. 3 4. 2 Sam. 7. 16. Isaiah 49. 15 16. together with the High Priest have sometimes erred as is clear from the following Scriptures Isaiah 56. 10 11. Ierem. 6. 13. Ierem. 14. 14. Hos. 9. 7 8 9. Mic. 3. 9. The Lords Prophets that were immediately guided and inspired by him must be excepted 2 Because councils under the Old Testament lawfully called have often-times erred 2 Sam. 6. 6. 3. Ier. 26. 7 8 9. 1 Kings 22. 6. And under the New Testament Iohn 9. 35. Iohn 11. 47 48 52. Matth. 26 57 59 65 66. Acts 4. 5 6 17 18. 3 Because the Pope cannot shew a proof of infallibility Rom. 3. 4. 4 Because it is foretold in the New Testament that many Pastors and Teachers shall become false Prophets and turn Seducers and that Antichrist shall sit in the Temple of GOD shewing himself that he is God Mat. 24. 11 24. Acts 20. 29 30. 2 Peter 2. 1. 2 Thes. 2. 4. 5 It is most evident that many councils approven and authorized by the Pope have most foully erred and that