it for a recompence for taking Sarah away as the Septuagint read and Chrysostome expoundeth 2. Or to buy Sarah and her maid vailes to hide their beauty that others be not intangled ex Perer. 3. Or that it was a gift of honour to shew that Sarah was both chaste and innocent Latine translat and the great Bible so also Rasi 2. It is not understood of this excuse or dissimulation which Sarah used as though the sense should be this that she might use this vaile or colour of the truth among her ownr for they could not bee deceived but among strangers she should plainly confesse her selfe to be Abrahams wife Lyranus Tâ—status for what needed Sarah to use any such excuse where she was knowne 3. Some doe referre it as well to Abraham as to the gift and to all that now hapned that they were signes of Sarahs chastity Mercer But the better interpretation is to apply it to Abraham that he should be the veile of her eyes 1. That no man knowing her to be Abrahams wife should looke upon her to desire her Aben Ezra Cajeâ—â—n 2. It also putteth Sara in minde of her subjection to Abraham whereof the veile is a signe 1 Cor. 11. â—0 3. Oleaster also further stretcheth it that Abraham was her veile that is her just excuse that she did this for his cause being by him perswaded but the former exposition is the better QUEST XIII How Sarah was reproved SHe was thus reproved 1. The 70. reade speake the truth that is that I am innocent and touched theâ— noâ— but this reading dissenteth from the originall 2. So doth the Latine remember thou art deprehended Lyppoman saith it should be read reprehensam reprehended not deprehensam deprehended 3. Iunius readeth all this is done that thou maist be learned 4. But the better reading is all this was that sheâ— might be reproved or in all this she reproved her selfe so that they seeme to be the words rather of the writer concerning Sarah than of Abimelech to Sarah QUEST XIV Whether Abimelech were smitten with any disease Vers. 17. GOd healed Abimelech c. for the Lord had shut up every wombe 1. Aben Ezra is not right that thinketh that Abimelech himselfe was stricken with no disease but that he is said so to be because his wife and maidens were punished for the text it selfe saith that God healed Abimelech and it is most like that God sent upon him some infirmity in his secrets whereby he was kept from comming neare to Sarah QUEST XV. What the shutting up of the wombe signifieth 2. THe shutting up of the wombe is not to bee understood as Pererius doth of the difficulty of bringing forth for then the children being ready for birth and staying longer than their time should have beene suffocated and the text saith the Lord had shut up every wombe but all were not great with childe at one instant Neither need we with Calvin because in so short a time Sarah being conceived with childe of Isaack and not yet delivered there could be no experience or triall of their sterility and barrennesse to say the history is transposed and was done before for Abraham till now had no occasion to sojourne in Gerar therefore the meaning is that the women were hindred from conception so signifieth the shutting up of the wombe as the opening of the wombe betokeneth aptnes to conceive as we reade Gen. 29.31 The Hebrewes affirme that not onely in the women but the men also all their pores and passages were stopped as well of the mouth to take meat as of other places that expell them and that the hens could not lay their egges but the text beareth it not 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Adultery a sinne punishable with death Vers. 3. THou art but dead c. God threatneth death to Abimelech conditionally if he did not restore Abrahams wife Iun. whereby we see that in the justice of God adulterie is a sinne to be punished by death as Iudas adjudged Thamar to the fire for whoredome Gen. 38.24 Where the law then is more gentle than to inflict the punishment of death upon adulterers they may thanke the lenity of the Magistrate which useth not that rigour which may well stand with justice 2. Doct. Ignorance excuseth not sinne Vers. 6. I Kept thee that thou shouldest not sinne against mee c. Abimelech then if hee had touched Sarai though he did not know her to be anothers wife had sinned ignorance then excuseth not sinne though it doe some what extenuate and qualifie it Muscul. as it is in the Gospell He that knew not his masters will and yet did commit many things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes Luk. 12.48 he that sinneth willingly shall receive more stripes and he that falleth of ignorance shall have some also 3. Doct. The whole family blessed because of the Master Vers. 7. THou shalt die the death and all thou hast as the sin of the Master of the house bringeth a judgement upon the whole familie so the Lord also sheweth mercy to the whole house for the masters sake Luk. 19.9 This day is salvation come into this house because he is become the sonne of Abraham 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. No perfect righteousnesse in this life Vers. 5. WIth an upright minde and innocent hands c. This place is no ground for their opinion that thinke a man in this life may attaine to perfect justice for Abimelech doth not absolutely cleare himselfe from all sinne but onely in this particular in this degree of sinne that he had not committed willingly any act of uncleannesse with Sarah Calvin as the Prophet David useth to plead for himselfe Psal. 7.3 If I have done this thing if there be any wickednesse in my hands c. he onely purgeth himselfe from the suspition of a particular fact 2. Confut. The Scripture sendeth us not to pray to the dead but to be holpen by the prayers of the living Vâ—â—s 7. HE is a Prophet and shall pray for thee c. Neither doth this place make for the invocation of Saints that are departed for God sendeth not Abimelech to Noah or any other departed to pray for him but to Abraham then living Calvin The living then may pray for the living which duty may be mutually performed in charity while one knoweth anothers necessities But for the living to pray to or for the dead which know not their wants and they are already certainly disposed of in an unchangeable state as the living are not it hath no warrant upon any precept or example of Scripture or any sound reason drawne from thence 3. Confut. Against the heresie of the Tritheists Vers. 13. WHen God caused me to wander out of my fathers house c. The word is â—lohim Gods in the plurall number which maketh some to understand the Angels Vatablus Calvin but God and not the Angels first called Abraham from his Country fathers house
penitentiae contempsisse presentia c. because the reward is deferred let no man in his weaknesse repent that hee hath despised things present c. lib. 5. de Abrah c. 3. For God will be their exceeding great reward as our Saviour promised to his Disciples there is none that hath forsaken house or brethren c. for my sake and the Gospels but he shall receive an hundred fold c. Mark 11.29 30. 2. Observ. Honest marriage to be desired to have lawfull heyres Vers. 2. WHat wilt thou give me seeing I goe childlesse c. Abraham desireth not riches or long life for his reward but only that he might have one to heire inherit his labour Ambrose note hereupon is very apt that men should joyne themselves in honest mariage ne hujusmodi suscipiant liberos quos heredes habere non possunt c. lest they beget such children whom they cannot have to bee their heires lib. 1. de Abraham c. 3. for the law saith a bastard cannot enter into the congregation to the tenth generation Deuter. 23. 2. Men therefore if not for shame yet because of their inheritance and succession should give themselves to honest life not to live in adultery and filthy lust who might better goe childlesse than to beget children which should be monuments of their shame 3. Observ. God imparteth his promises not all at once but by degrees to his children Vers. 4. ONe that commeth out of thine owne bowels c. First God promised that Abraham should have an innumerable seed as the dust of the earth Genes 13.17 but yet Abraham knew not whether it should be his naturall or adopted seed now the Lord cleareth that doubt in this place and telleth him it shall be out of his owne bowels yet Abraham was uncertaine whether his seed should bee given him by Sara his wife or some other herein also the Lord resolveth Abraham afterward Genes 17.16 And thus we see that God revealeth not his will at once to his children but by degrees acquainteth them with his gracious promises Perer. and thus is that saying of the wise man fulfilled that the way of the righteous shineth as the light that shineth more and more unto the perfect day Proverbs 4.18 4. Observ. The experience of Gods former mercies confirmeth his servants Vers. 7. I Am the Lord that brought thee out of the c. by past experience of Gods deliverance the Lord giveth Abraham assurance of his protection afterward Thus the remembrance of former benefits received from God should confirme us in the hope of the continuance of his mercies Muscul As David because he slew the lion and the beare doubteth not but that hee should overcome the uncircumcised Philistine 1 Sam. 17.36 5. Observ. Gods patience abused bringeth a greater destruction in the end Vers. 16. THe wickednesse of the Amorites is not yet full c. Herein appeareth the great long suffering of God that spareth the wicked to see if they will be brought to repentance But by this example also is made manifest what they are to expect that abuse Gods patience and goe on in their wickednesse that their destruction shall be the more fearefull when it commeth as the Apostle saith that such as despise the patience and long sufferance of God doe heape unto themselves wrath against the day of wrath Rom. 2.4.5 Calvin 6. Observ. Vnjust complaint of persecution in England BUt here I cannot let passe a malicious note of Pererius upon this place wherein he glanceth at the present state of England his words translated stand thus If any man shall chance to marvell why God suffereth the cruell persecution of the Catholikes in England and the power of the English regiment so long to continue hee may leave off marvelling if hee consider what the Lord here saith that the iniquities of the Amorites are not yet full at the length the English shall be complete and then shall come the time of the divine revenge which may seeme late unto us but in respect of the secret reason of Gods providence timely enough which season if any man thinke now not to be far off the persecution of that nation being now growne unto such rage and cruelty he shall not in mine opinion misse the truth Thus farre this Ignatian sectary in 15. Genes Numer 96. Answ. 1. This complaint of persecution and cruelty exercised against the popish Catholikes is most untrue if it be persecution for men to enjoy their lands to grow rich to fare of the best to purchase lands then are the Recusants in England persecuted if some rebellious and traiterous popish Priests and Judasites have worthily suffered for their practising against the Prince and state this is no persecution but a just execution upon such evill members which no state in the world would endure The Protestants in Queene Maries dayes would have thought it happy if they might upon like conditions have redeemed their conscience as Popish Recusants hitherto have done 2. This frierly exclamation and out-cry might with greater reason bee returned upon their owne head for it is hard to say whether the Church of God have indured greater persecution under the unchristian Romane Emperours or Antichristian Popes they have so racked burned slaughtered whipped woried tormented both young and old as else where I have shewed that as Moses describeth the cruelty of the enemies of the Jewes so it hath beene true of them they will not regard the person of the old nor have compassion on the young Deut. 28.50 for thus have they not spared to put to the sword women great with child and to make their mothers wombs the infants sepulchres thus were the women of Merindol served the mothers slaine the infants tumbled forth of their mothers bellies and were trampled upon Fox p. 952. And thus as Hierome complaineth of the barbarous Hunnes the cruell Papists practised non aetati parcebant non vagientis miserebantur infantiae cogebantur morâ— qui nondum vivere coeperunt they spared not tender age nor pitâ—ed crying infants they were forced to die which had not begunne yet to live Hierom. ad Ocean 3. Wherefore we doe trust as the Apostle prophesieth They shall prevaile no longer for their madnesse shall be made manifest to all men 2 Tim. 3.9 that the iniquities of new Babylon have filled up their number and the time of their judgement cannot be farre off when that saying in the Revelation shall be accomplished O heaven rejoyce of her and ye holy Apostles and Prophets for God hath given your judgement on her Revel 18.20 But against the Church of England this Frier with the rest of that brood that have long looked for an overthrow and promised themselves a vaine hope of their popish Kingdome in this land thanks bee alwayes given to God are found false Prophets God hath disappointed them whereas they expected a change in the next change we in this change I trust shall see no change unlesse
but Iacob used thus to doe that Laban might have some increase of his colour although by this meanes the stronger fell out to be Iacobs QUEST XV. Whether Iacobs device were by miracle or by the workes of nature THis device of Iacob by the sight of particoloured rods to cause the eawes and goats to be conceived with young of the like colour 1. Is neither to bee held altogether miraculous as Chrysostome thinketh non erat juxta naturae ordinem quod fiebat c. it was not according to the course of nature that was done but miraculous and beyond natures worke hom 57. in Genes much lesse doe we receive the fabulous conceit of one Hosaias an Hebrew that the eawes â—onceived alone without the males by the sight only of the rods in the water ex Mercer 2. Neither do we ascribe this altogether to the work of nature although the cogitation and conceit of the minde be very much in the forming of shapes and therefore as Plinie noteth plures in homine quam in caeteriâ— animalibus differentiae there are more diversities of shapes among men than bruit beasts because of the variety of their conceits lib. 7. c. 12. Galen writeth of a woman that by beholding of a faire picture by a deformed husband had a faire childe libr. de theriaca Quintilian writeth of a Queene that upon the like conceit brought forth an Aethiopian Hypocrates maketh mention of a woman that being delivered of a beautifull childe much unlike both the parents should have beene condemned of adultery but was freed by a learned Physitian that imputed it to a picture which she had in her sight ex Perer. The Hebrews report of an Aethiopian that had a faire child and a Rabin being asked the reason thereof shewed the cause to be a white table that was in her sight at the time of conceiving The like report is that a woman brought forth a mouse because a mouse chanced to run before her when she was with childe Mercer The like operation hath the object of the sight in bruit beasts for this cause the fashion is in Spaine to set before the mares when they are horsed the most goodly beasts of that kinde Muscul. The like practice is used by the Dove-masters that they may have a brood of faire pigeons Isydor libr. 12. Etimolog Although then that nature had her worke yet we cannot say that nature wholly did it 3. Wherefore God wrought here together with nature and that after an extraordinary manner first because this devise was revealed vnto Iacob by the Angell of God in a dreame Genes 31.11 Secondly God gave a rare effect to this devise that it failed not whereas if it had beene according to the ordinary worke of nature there might have beene some change and alteration and it is well noted by Valetius that both the male and female concurred in the same imagination and fantasie of the parti-coloured which was the cause that they alwaies brought forth of the same colour lib. desacr philos c. 11. QUEST XVI Of the naturall reason why the imagination should be so strong to worke upon the body NOw further that we may see the naturall reason why that Iacobs sheepe brought forth party-coloured 1. That sheepe by drinking of certaine waters doe change the colour of their wooll Aristotle maketh mention as there is a River in Assyria called Psychrus of that coldnesse which causeth the sheepe that drinke thereof to yeane blacke lambs in Artandria there are two rivers the one maketh the sheepe white the other blacke the river Scamander doth dye them yellow Aristot. lib. 3. de histor animal c. 12. But this alteration is caused by the matter and quality of the water being received and drunke whereas Iacobs sheepe conceived by the very sight 2. The phantasie and affection is very strong to worke upon it owne body sometime upon another children have beene bewitched by the malitious sight of those that have intended them hurt some by immoderate joy have presently dyed as Philippides the Comicall Poet for his unexpected victory of his fellow Poets and a woman for the returne of her sonne whom shee supposed to have beene slaine in the warres in the extremity of joy ended her life as the Romane histories testifie hence it is that the very sight of that which goeth against the stomacke procureth vomit some by the seeing of others bloud have sounded others for feare looking downe from a steepe place have tumbled downe they which are strucken with sudden feare doe was pale in their face their hands tremble their voyce is taken away and all the body is distempered such is the operation of the conceit of parents in the conception of their children which causeth such variety of shapes of colour gesture ex Marâ—il ficin lib. 13. de Platon Theolog. cap. 1. 3. As we see by experience that the imagination of the minde doth bring forth such effects in the body so the reasons thereof may be yeelded to be these 1. The power and dominion which the soule hath over the body the one is the moover and stirrer the other the thing mooved the soule is to the body as the workeman to his worke which he frameth and fashioneth according to the idea and conceit of the mind and so it is in the conception and generation of children Tosta q. 10. in c. 30. 2. Another reason may be taken from the nature and property of imagination Imaginari non est neque animi neque corporis sed conjunctim to imagine is not proper to the soule or body apart but to them both together as the rest of the affections of love and hatred and the like are the mind then is like to that which it imagineth and the body with the mind begetteth that which is like to it selfe so it commeth to passe that the likenesse which the phantasie imagineth the body begetteth Valles 3. A third reason is from the nature and power of the seed which as it floweth from all the parts of the body and therefore worketh materially the similitude of the same parts so also is it procured by the minde and phantasie and therefore expresseth also that quality in the birth which was in the minde from whom it was sent Perer. ex Valles 4. Places of Doctrine Doct. 1. Abrahams seed begotten by the power of God Ves. 21. GOd opened her womb c. In that God made Leah and Rachel fruitfull of whom came the promised seed it sheweth that it was not the worke of nature but the gift of God Muscul. And as Abrahams carnall seed was propagated by God so much more the Spirituall which are borne not of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Doct. 2. The children of the barren wombe most excellent Vers. 24. SHe called his name Ioseph as the children of the barren are noted in Scripture to have beene most excellent as Isaack of Sarah
woman with child or shee be behind him and he knew it not and hee hurteth her with his heele that she die in this case the man deserved no punishment at all no not so much as a pecuniary mulct to be inflicted which yet is appointed by this law where death followeth not therefore this law meaneth not any such act which is altogether involuntarie Tostat. quaest 24. 2. Neither is this law to be understood of murther altogether voluntarie as if a man of purpose should smite a woman with child and shee die for this was provided for before what punishment should be laid upon him that committed wilfull murther 3. This law therefore is made concerning such violent acts as were of a mixt kinde partly voluntarie partly involuntarie as if a man striving with one and seeing a woman with child within the danger cared not whether shee was hurt or no Tostat. Or if striving with a man he thrust him upon a woman with child Galas Or a woman comming to rescue her husband receiveth hurt by the other that striveth Lyran. In this case if death followed in the woman with child the 〈…〉 to die foâ— it 4. And the reasons are these 1. Because adfuit laedendi animuâ— he that so striveth had a minde and intent to hurt Simler Consilii ratio habenda est his counsell and intention must be considered which was to assault the life of another and by this occasion he killeth one whom he intended not to hurt Iunius Piscator 2. Againe Vxor una carâ— est cum viâ—o quem intendeâ—â— pâ—râ—utere The wife is one flesh with her husband whom he intended to smite Lyran. 3. And beside instance is given of a woman with child who neither could shift for her selfe and a double danger is brought both upon her her child which she went with therefore in this case the law provideth that such oversights should be severely punished Tostat. q. 25. QUEST LVI Whether the death of the infant be punished as well as of the mother Vers. 22. ANd death follow not c. 1. Some thinke that this is to be understood onely of the death of the woman and not of the child Osiander That if the child died and not the woman he was onely to pay a peece of money not to lose his life for it and their reason is because he deserved not so great a punishment that killed an infant in the wombe as he that did stay a perfect man Oleaster who findeth fault with Cajetane for understanding the law indifferently of the woman and her child 2. But Cajetanâ— opinion is to be preferred for like as it is a more heinous thing to kill a man in his owne house than in the way so is it a prodigious thing to suffocate an infant in the mothers wombe qui nondum est in lucem editus which is not yet brought forth into the light of this world Calvin And againe Foetus quamvis in utero inclusus homo est The infant though yet inclosed in the wombe is a man Simler And the child in the wombe is yet a part of the person of the woman so that if there be corruptioâ—â—tius perâ—oâ—a aut partis a destruction of the whole person or of a part Iun. he that so hurteth a woman with child in her owne person or her childs is subject to this law QUEST LVII Whether this law extendeth it selfe to infants which miscarie being not yet perfectly formed NOw it being agreed that this law as well comprehendeth the infant that perisheth as the woman that beareth it yet there remaineth a question whether if the childe in the wombe bee yet imperfect and so not endued with sense and life that in this case though the woman die not but onely lose her birth he that did the hurt is to suffer death 1. Some hold the affirmative that if any child whatsoever by this meanes miscarrie the offender is subject to this law 〈…〉 propâ—â—qua est effectui The iâ—fant being now formed is so neere unto the effect thâ—â— is the life that who causeth the same to miscarrie may be said to have killed a man Gallas And therefore by the Civill law he that of purpose procured the birth to miscarrie if he were a meane person was condemned to the metall mines if a noble person to banishment Cicero also in his oration pro Cluentiâ— reporteth of one Milesia a woman who being hired of the heires in reversion to destroy the infant that shee went with had a capitall puishment therefore inflicted upon her Ex Simlero But these lawes were made against such as did of purpose seeke to destroy infants in the wombe and cause abortion of them here the cause is divers where the fruit of the wombe miscarrieth by some chance 2. Therefore this penaltie was onely by the law inflicted when as the infant perished that was endued with life So Augustine thinketh using this reason Nondum potest dici anima viva in eo corpore quod sensu caret c. The living soule cannot be said to be yet in that bodie which wanteth sense qu. 80. in Exod. And thus the Septuagint interpret If the infant came forth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not yet formed c. which forming of the infant beginneth fortie dayes after the conception as Procopius Cajetane giveth this reason why in such a case when the birth commeth forth imperfect the sentence of death is not inflicted quia homo in potentia non est homo because a man onely in possibilitie is not a man quia tunc non occiditur homo non est homicidium and because then a man is not killed it is no manslaughter Tostat. And the word jeladim sons signifieth as much that the law meaneth formed and perfect infants Simler And it is put in the plurall because a woman may have more infants than one in her wombe at once for otherwise why should one give life for life or soule for soule seeing such imperfect births are not yet endued with life soule As Augustine saith In Adam exemplum datum est c. An evident example is given in Adam quia jam formatum corpus accipit animam that the bodie when it is now fashioned receiveth the soule and not before For after Adams bodie was made the Lord breathed into him the breath of life So August lib. quaest vet nov Testam qu. 23. as he is alleaged Caus. 32. qu. 2. cap. 9. QUEST LVIII Why the action is given unto the husband Vers. 22. ACcording as the womans husband shall appoint him c. 1. Because the injurie is done unto the man in that his issue is cut off and because hee is the head of the woman the law referreth the prosecution of this wrong unto the husband Tostat. 2. But the taxation of the mulct is so referred to the man as yet if he should exceed a just proportion the Judges in their discretion are to moderate it Gallas 3. Tostatus
inquired when this sentence began to take place that in what day soever Adam did eat of the tree he should dye the death 1. Some thinke that a day is not here to bee taken according to mans account of dayes but as it is before God with whom a thousand yeares are but as a day and so Adam died within a thousand yeares after so Iustinus dialog cum Triph. but this sense seemeth to bee strained 2. Neither doe we refer these words in what day soever to the first clause only thou shalt eat and not to the second thou shalt dye the death as though the meaning should not bee they should dye the same day wherein they did eat but at any time after for this seemeth also to be but a forced sense 3. But we rather allow Hieromes interpretation that Adam began in the same day to dye not actually but because then he became mortall and subject to death lib. tradit in Gen. so Symmachus readeth thou shalt bee mortall 4. And beside that then actualâ—y Adam entred into misery and sorrow labour hunger thirst which are the forerunners of death 5. Adde unto this also that in the same day death entred by sinne into the soule of Adam in the very same day of his transgression QVEST. XXX Whether God made death THirdly seeing that by Gods sentence death seased upon Adam the question is whether God made death and whether this corporall death be a punishment of sin We answer 1. that as death is a defect of nature beside the first intention of the Creator brought in by sinne into the world that God is not the â—uthor of it but it is so only the fruit and effect of sinne 2. But as death is a just punishment inflicted for sinne so it is of God who though hee first made not death yet now hee disposeth of it thereby shewing his justice upon mans transgression so that as Augustine saith speaking of the beginning of darkenesse Deus non fâ—â—â—t tenebras sâ—dâ—rdinavit God made not darknesse but ordered them so may it bee said of death 3. Eugubiâ—us objecteth that death is not properly a punishment of sinne because it remaineth in the faithfull and it is not taken away by Christ. in Cosmopeia To which we answer 1. That death also at the last shal be destroyed by Christ 1 Cor. 15.26 The last enemy that shal be destroied is death 2. That although the death of the body remaine yet in the members of Christ in them it is not now as a punishment but as a consequent of their corruptible nature because all flesh is now as grasse Isa. 40.6 and death now unto them is not a curse but turned to a blessing in Christ being both a cessation from labâ—ur and an entrance into rest Rev. 14.13 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord they rest from their labours and their workes follow them QVEST. XXXI Why it was not good for man to be alone Vers. 18. IT is not good for man to be alone 1. not as R. Sâ—l left if man would have beene alone hee might be thought to be chiefe Lord in earth as God was in heaven for if man had beene alone who should have so thought or spoken 2. Neither was it not good in respect of God who by his infinite power and wisdome could otherwayes have multiplyed and increased man but in respect of that order and course of generation which God appointed for other creatures 3. Neither is this so said as though no man could live without a woman as the Hebrewes have these sayings nothing is good but a woman â—e that hath not a wife is not a man for God hath given unto some a speciall gift which may supply this want 4. Neither is S. Paul contrary to Moses where he saith it is not good to touch a woman for he speaketh in respect of those present times of persecution wherein their wives might have beene a let unto them Mercer 5. But this is so said 1. in respect of mutuall society and comfort 2. in respect of the propagation of the world 3. especially for the generation and increase of the Church of God 4. but most of all it was meet that woman should bee joyned to man because of the promised seed of the woman of whom came our Saviour Christ after the flesh QVEST. XXXII Wherein woman was a meet helpe for him Vers. 18. LEt us make an helpe meet for him The word cenâ—gdâ— signifieth as one before him or against him But we neither allow the conceit of some Hebrewes as R. Sâ—lamon that the woman is said to be against man because she is contrary to him 2. Nor yet doe wee like of Tostatus conjecture because the male and female in respect of their naturall parts are contrary 3. Nor yet doe wee approve David Kimchi his collection that the woman is said to bee as before man that is as a servant to attend vpon him for shee is appointed to bee his fellow-helper not his servant neither is it like that if shee had beene ordained to any base use or service that she should have beene framed out of Adams side 4. Therefore shee is called a helpe like to man as Hierome readeth or according to him as the Septuagint or as before him as the Hebrew both because shee was made like unto man as well in proportion of body as in the qualities of the mind being created according to the image of God as also for that she was meet for man necessary for the procreation education of children and profitable for the disposing of houshold affaires 5. This maketh a manifest difference betweene woman which is alwayes before man cohabiting and conversing with him and other females which after their copulation forsake their males Luther QVEST. XXXIII When the woman was formed A Further doubt is moved by some at what time the woman was made where 1. wee reject the conceit of Cajetanus who making an allegory of this story of the framing of the woman out of Adams side is forced to affirme that God made man and woman together upon the sixth day and not the woman out of the man for thus the history of Moses is called into question and as well may the whole discourse of the creation of the world be allegorised as this narration of the making of woman And again it is contrary to the Apostle who saith that the woman was of the man 1 Cor. 11.9 2. We likewise refuse the opinion of Catharinus who thinketh the woman to have been made the seventh day for this also is contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 In six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is 3. So then we hold that the woman was made of a rib out of Adams side as Moses setteth it downe neither made together with him out of the earth nor yet made so long after him upon the seventh day but she was formed upon the sixâ—h day
affection upon her being flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones v. 23. 3. Other reasons are given why the woman was taken out of mans side as not out of his head that she should not be proud nor out of his feet as though she were mans vassell but from his side to shew the love and conjunction betweene them Muscul. R. Iosue giveth this reason why she was taken from under the armes that shee might acknowledge her selfe under subjection to man but that is ridiculous which some Hebrewes note that the woman was made of a bone to shew her hard and intollerable nature ex Mercer QVEST. XXXIX Whence the bone was taken whereof the woman was made SEcondly we hold that a curious question which is disputed of the Schoolemen how Eva was fashioned out of a bone whether by multiplication of it as Hugo thinketh or by addition of some new matter taken out of the earth as Tostatus or created of nothing as Thomas that seemeth more probable that God used no other matter in the making of woman but out of the man because the text saith she was taken out of man which had not beene true if shee had beene taken out of any other matter Wee therefore thinke â—he first opinion probable that this was done by multiplying of the matter August Mercer but we must not curiously seeke to finde out a reason of Gods omnipotent power QVEST. XL. How many ribs and whence taken THirdly 1. We neither thinke with Oleaster that God tooke two ribs out of each side of Adam one because the scripture saith v. 21. God tooke one of his ribs 2. Wee also deride that fable of the hebrewes that God made man and woman together but joyned by their sides and after parted and separated them for the text is contrary which saith that God tooke a rib out of Adam to make the woman for the word â—selang properly signifieth a rib and not the side and so R. Iosua taketh it 3. It is also a superfluous question out of what side of Adam Eva was taken whether out of the right or left it is resolved by most out of the left because Adams heart lay there but these are frivolous and needlesse matters QVEST. XLI Whether this rib were a necessary or superfluous rib FOurthly so also is that question unnecessary and more curious than profitable whether this rib were any one of Adams necessary and substantiall parts or one supernumerary and superfluous some think that whereas a man hath now 24. ribbes on each side 12. that this rib was one of them and that God created a new rib in stead thereof but this opinion seemeth to be contrary to the text because it is said God closed up the flesh in stead thereof if flesh were in stead of the rib then another rib was not made in stead thereof Againe God had already done with the creation of Adam v. 7. hee made man of the dust of the earth but if Adam had a rib created afterward then was he not before perfectly created Wherefore it is more like that this rib was above the usuall number of ribs created of purpose by the Lord not as a superfluous or monstrous part but as necessary for the creation of the woman which God intended Mercer Calvin And therefore Cajetanus needed not so to have beene perplexed with this question as not finding a solution thereof to have left the veritie of the story and stye to allegories QVEST. XLII Of the womans soule FIfthly though no mention be here made of the creation of the womans soule yet it may be gathered that she had her soule from God immediately as Adam had because they were both created according to Gods image Gen. 1.27 QVEST. XLIII How God is said to have built the woman Vers. 22. HE made or built a woman and brought c. 1. God is said to have built woman neither because of the frame and fashion of her body which is made broadest and lowest downeward like the building of an house as Rab. Sel. which though it be so that God framed the womans body as fittest for procreation of children yet Moses in thus speaking aimed not at it But by this is meaâ—â— both that man was yet as an unperfect building before woman was made and that by the woman the house and family is builded by procreation of children and thereof the hebrewes call a sonne Ben of Banah to build Mercer 2. Shee is called Ishah woman by a figure called Prolepsis for this name was afterward given her by the man 3. She is said to bee brought to man not as though shee were made in some other place but God doth present her and offer her to man and as it were marrieth and joyneth them together 4. But the Hebrewes have here some ridiculous observations as upon the word Iisgor in the former verse he closed up which is the first word with Samech used hitherto by Moses because Samech answereth to the first letter of Satan in sound which is Shin with a left pricke they note that Satan came into the world and so the occasion of evill by women so likewise out of the word Iebiâ—ah which letters make 24. in number they note that the woman was brought to man with 24. ornaments whereas they cannot deny but that she came naked QVEST. XLIIII How Adam knew the woman to be taken out of him Vers. 23. THe man said this now is bone c. 1. Adam understood this that the woman was taken out of him not so much by the contemplation of the similitude and likenesse of her shape Mercer or that he felt some alteration in his body as though somewhat had beene taken from it Reuchlin but hee had this knowledge especially by divine revelation Calvin 2. Adam looking upon the woman did not presently desire her company but sincerely with a cheerefull minde acknowledgeth how fit a mate God had provided for him Reuchlin 3. This now or for this time which words are not to bee referred with the Hebrewes to the time to come that though at this time a wife was prepared out of man yet it should not be so afterward but it hath relation to the time past that although before among all the creatures he could not find a fit companion yet now hee had obtained one Fagius 4. Hee giveth the woman her name to shew the authority of man over the woman and in the derivation of the word ishah from ish the antiquity of the Hebrew tongue appeareth the like is not to be found in any other language 5. The Hebrewes wel note that ish with Iod signifieth a man without Iod which is the first letter of the name Iehovah it is fire so where God is not the directer of the inward parts there is nothing but fire contention Mercer QVEST. XLV How a man is said to leave father and mother Vers. 24. THerefore shall a man leave c. 1. These are not the
goe upright before neither at that instant onely when Satan used him but whereas he did extoll himselfe against man he is brought to his first condition and his creeping and feeding of the earth which should not have beene ignominious before is acccursed and made reproachfull now Mercer Calvin QVEST. XXIV Of the enmity betweene the seed of the woman and the Serpent WHere the Lord saith I will put enmity betweene thy seed and her seed 1. This first is truly understood of Christ quia solus ita semen multeris est ut non etiam viri semen sit who was so the seed of the woman as he was not of the man and betweene Christ and Satan the greatest enmity was who consented to him in nothing 2. We may also understand by the seed of the woman all the Elect and by the seed of the Serpent all the wicked who are the sons of the Devill as Christ said to the unbeleeving Jewes Yee are of your father the Devill Ioh. 8.44 betweene whom the Elect and the wicked there shall be perpetuall enmity and therefore Rupertus saith the Scriptures are called the booke of the battells of the Lord Num. 21. which declareth the continuall combate betweene the Church of God and the world 3. Part of this sentence is literally true in the Serpent for as Rupertus noteth if a woman tread upon the Sepent with her bare foot he presently dieth but if he first bite her heele the woman dieth of that poyson But howsoever this be true it is most certaine that betweene man and those venomous creatures there is a naturall hatred that one cannot endure the sight and presence of the other 4. Some doe marvell why the Serpent is not made mute and dumbe seeing Satan abused his tongue and mouth to tempt the woman the Hebrewes thinke that the punishment is included in that dust is appointed to bee his meat for such whose mouthes are filled with earth cannot speake And to this day we see that the punishment remaineth upon the Serpent who maketh no perfect sound as other cattell doe but hisseth onely 5. Satan was accursed before God before nor any hope of recovery remained but now the sentence is declared to the comfort of man and Satans state declared to be irrepairable for his punishment shall endure all the daies of his life that is for ever 6. Some by the heele understand the end or extremity as Onkelos that in the end the Devill as a Serpent shall bite the heele some the inferiour part of the soule some the humanity of Christ which Satan pinched at when Christ was put to death but thereby Christ gave him a deadly blow upon the head But generally it signifieth the weaker parts of Christs body which is the Church that Satan shall bee nibling and biting at the heele as a Serpent doth when hee is overwhelmed and turned upon his backe that is hee shall touch the members of Christ and trie them with many temptations but hee shall not be able to hurt them Mercer 7. By the dust also some understand terrene and earthly things wherein the Devill is conversant being cast downe from heaven some the graves and sepulchers of dead men where the spirits appeare but this clause is properly referred to the Serpent who as he was Satans instrument to cause man to sinne and returne to the dust so that he should feed of the dust QVEST. XXV Of the sorrowes of women Vers. 16. I Will greatly increase thy sorrowes There is a threefold punishment inflicted upon the woman as Rupertus well noteth pro seductione conceptus multiplicitas pro gulae oblectamento vterâ— dolor pro scandalo quod viro exhibuit servitutis poena c. because she was seduced she hath sorrow in conceiving for the delight of her eye the paine of her wombe for the offence in enticing her husband subjection unto him But where the Lord saith I will multiply thy sorrowes and conceptions 1. It is neither with Oleaster to be referred to the bearing of the child so long in the womb for that is agreeable to nature and our Saviour was so borne in his mothers womb and therefore this was no part of the curse 2. Neither doth the curse consist in the multiplicity as Rupertus because many are borne which are ordained to destruction for simply the fruit of the womb is a blessing Psal. 27.3 3. But hereby the many sorrowes are signified which women doe endure in the conception of their children as faintnesse loathing of meat longing for strange things griefe ache unwilsomnesse perill of abortion and such like Secondly whereas women should before have brought forth without pain now their travaile is ful of labour in so much as many have miscarried in the birth of their children as Rachel and it is well observed of Aristotle that no other creature with such difficulty bringeth forth her young as woman doth which is an evident demonstration of this punishment laid upon them Thirdly where it is said the womans desire shall bee to her husband and he shall rule over her 1. It is not understood of the naturall desire the woman hath eftsoone of her husbands company notwithstanding her painfull travaile which is no punishment but a delight unto them 2. But of that subjection whereby by the law of nature practised among Pagans women doe depend upon their husbands The woman should before have beene obedient to man but of a loving society to be made partaker of all his counsells nor of an urging necessity as now whereby the woman in rerespect of her weaknesse both with her will dependeth of her husband for her direction and provision of things necessary and against her will she often endureth the hard yoke of an unequall commander QVEST. XXVI How the earth was cursed unto man Vers. 17. CVrsed be the earth c. 1. It is to be observed that the Serpent is onely pronounced accursed because his state is remedilesse and desperate but neither the man or woman are accursed for whom there is hope 2. The earth is accursed not in it selfe but in respect of the use of man as S. Paul saith that the creatures doe yet groane with us together 3. Some Hebrewes note that some men are exempted from this punishment to eat their bread in the sweat of their browes as Kings and Princes but no women are exempted from their punishment because the woman both sinned her selfe and enticed the man so did not Adam but this sentence is generall against all men that although one particular onely be expressed of the labour and toyle in tilling of the ground yet therein are contained all other the cares and troubles of this life from the which none are free 4. Some Hebrewes thinke that in mans innocencie he should not have travelled so for his bread as in threshing grinding bakâ—ng of it and it may very well bee that although man should not then have lived
5. the contagion or infecting of others shee gave to her husband 2. v. 7. Their eyes were opened till a man hath sinned his eyes are shut but afterward they see the greatnesse of it as David did acknowledge his sinne of adulterie after he had committed it 3. v. 10 Because I was naked I hid my selfe c. He was more ashamed of his nakednesse than of his sinne so many doe feare rather to offend because of publike shame than for any conscience of sinne â—as Caine rather grieved because he was made a vagabond than for that he had killed his brother 4. v. 12. Adam putteth off the fault to his wife she to the serpent so it is naturall to us to excuse our sinnes and to seeke to colour them and lay them upon others 5. v. 21. In that God made them coats of skinnes not of silke or any such costly or curious stuffe it sheweth that sober and plaine apparell best becommeth Adams sonnes CHAP. IIII. The methode or parts of the Chapter IT consisteth of two parts 1. of the historie of Caine and Habel 2. the genealogie the first to the 17. verse the second from thence to the end In the historie there is set forth 1. Their life both their birth and beginning v. 1. Their vocation and calling v. 2. Their divers manner of worship v. 3 4. Their divers successe Abel is accepted 4. Caine is rejected and reproved v. 6 7. 2. The sinne of Caine is killing his brother 1. the manner of the fact under pretence of friendship v. 8.2 The examination and conviction of Caine. 9.10 3. His punishment v. 11.12 4. The mitigation thereof containing the privilege or exemption of Caine from beeing murthered of others v. 14.15 The genealogie is either of the Cursed or of the righteous seed In the first are set forth their names and persons v. 18 19. Their gests or acts which are either civill or morall their civill as building of cities v. 17. The inventing of cents v. 20. Of instruments of musicke v. 21. Of carving in iron and brasse v. 22. Their morall acts namely the sinne of the flesh in Lamech in taking two wives v. 19. Of murther and revenge v. 23. The generation of the righteous sheweth the birth of Seth v. 25 Their conversation in invocating the name of God v. 26. The difference of translations vers 7. IF thou hast offered aright and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 divided aright hast thou not sinned S. if thou doest well thou shalt receive H.B. thou shalt be accepted G. there shall be forgivenesse or it shall be forgiven thee T.H. hebr nassah which signifieth both to receive and forgive thou hast sinned be quiet S. thy sinne lieth at the doore T.H.B.G.P. heb thy sinne is reserved against the day of judgement in the which revenge shall be taken of thee if thou art not converted Ch. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his turning shall be toward thee S. his desire shall be toward thee T.B.G.H. if thou turne it shall be forgiven thee heâ— shuch signifieth both a conversion and turning and a desire v. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sighing and trembling S. a fugitive or vagabond or unstable and runnagate T.H.B.G. Ch. P. nadh wandering or lamenting v. 13. my sinne is greater than can be forgiven S.H. Ch. B. my punishment than I can beare quam vt sustinere possim T.G.P. hebr nassah to beare to forgive v. 15. Shall be punished or avenged 7. fold S.H.T.B.G.P. heb for seven generations G. Ch. v. 16. He dwelt in the land of Naid or Nod. S.T.B.G. Ch. P profugus a wanderer H. v. 18. To Henoch was borne Gaidad Mathusala S. Irad Mathusael all the rest v. 21. This was he that shewed the Psalterie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. the father of them that sing to the harpe H. Ch. thâ—â— handle or play vpon the harpe T.B.G.P. heb taphash to handle v. 23. I have slaine a man to my wound S.H. or to the wounding of my selfe B. I would slaie a man proper vulnus because of my wound T. in my wound and hurt G P. I have not slaine a man that for him I should beare my sinne nor a young man that for him my seede should be consumed Ch. v. 26. This man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 trusted to call T. began to call H. then begun men to call upon the name of God Ch. B.G. captum est profanari began to be profaned T.P. challal signifieth both to begin profane But Iuniuâ— hath in his last edition ameÌ„ded that reading translating with the rest then began the name of God to be called upon The Theologicall explication QVEST. I. At what time Cain and Abel were borne Vers. 1. WHereas Heva saith I have obtained a man by the Lord per Deum 1. We refuse Rupertus conceit that thinketh this to be an oath it only signifieth that she had received a son by the Lords gift or coram Dâ—mino before the Lord as the Chalde paraphrast 2. Neither is it to be thought that she had other sonnes before Cain because she nameth him a possession because he was the first which she possessed from God 3. we reject that fable which is ascribed to Methodius that Cain was borne 15. yeares after Adam was cast out of Paradise and Abel 15. yeares after that and that an hundred yeare after Cain slew Abel and then Adam and Eve mourned another hundred yeare after for Habel and then Seth was borne 1. For neither is it like that they continued so long without children 2. Or that there was such distance betweene the birth of the children seeing God had made them fruitfull and said unto them increase and multiply 3. And it seemeth that Seth was presently supplyed in the place of Habel because the woman said God hath given her another seed for Habel 4. And the text is plaine that Adam at an 130. not 230. yeares begat Seth. 5. But that these sonnes of Adam were borne in Paradise as R. Sel. and other Hebrewes thinke it is but a dreame for Adam in the state of innocency should not have gotten so ungracious a sonne as Cain was and whether Cain and Abel were both borne together as Calvin thinketh it is uncertaine it is more like that they were borne at two sundry births Mercer QVEST. II. Wherein Abels sacrifice excelled Cains Vers. 4. 1. THough no mention be made of Adams sacrificing because no such notable accident fell out therein as in the sacrifice of his sonnes yet it is not to be doubted but that he used to sacrifice and that of him his sonnes learned to doe the like 2. Abels sacrifice was preferred before Cains in three respects 1. it was more plentifull as the Apostle calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a greater sacrifice Cain brought sparingly ex fructu of the fruit not fruits of the earth Abel brought plentifully 2. Abel brought of the fat and the best 3. hee offered in
for the better if our sinnes let not and I hope to use the saying of Moses that their eyes shall looke till they fall out of their heads Deuter 28.32 before that shall befall us which they have so long desired True it is that this land aboundeth with many sins which God grant may be purged from among us but we trust that God will chastise us as a loving father with his owne hands and not give us over to bee punished of a nation more wicked than our selves though we are great offenders yet not as the Amorites an uncircumcised nation but as the Israelites the Lords owne people It is therefore great presumption in this popish writer to sit in Gods place to make them Amorites that are no Amorites and to threaten judgement where the Lord purposeth to blesse Ambrose upon those words in the Psalme 119.106 I have sworne and will performe thus writeth Noli usurpare exemplum sacramenti qui implendi sacramenti non habes potestatem c. let this example bee no warrant unto thee to take an oath unlesse you had power to keepe an oath so this prophecy against the Amorites can be no ground to the Frier of such false application unlesse he were appointed to be Gods Minister for the execution CHAP. XVI 1. The Method and parts THis Chapter hath two parts the giving of Hagar by Sarai to Abraham from v. 1. to 5. the sequele thereof from thence to the end In the first part 1. There is the cause that moved Sarai to give Hagar on her part because she had no children v. 1. on Hagars part shee hoped to have a childe by her v. 2. 2. The manner is expressed how Hagar was given and when v. 3. 3. The effects and fruits Hagar is conceived with childe v. 4. Secondly the sequele of this marriage is first the departure and flying away of Hagar v. 5. to 7. then her returne with the occasion thereof Hagar flyeth because Sarai corrected her this she did by Abrahams leave Abraham gave leave because Sarai complained because Hagar despised her v. 4 5. In Hagars returne 1. the Angell biddeth her goe and humble her selfe to her mistresse v. 8 9. 2. the Angell prophesieth of the number of her seed v. 10. of the name of her sonne v. 11. his quality and condition v. 12. 3. Agars thankfulnesse and obedience is expressed ver 13 14. 4. the accomplishment of the prophecie concerning the birth and name of her sonne 2. The difference of translations v. 3. she tooke Agar the Egyptian H. then Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Hagar caet v. 5. thou doest me wrong H.S.B.G. I have judgement against you C. the injury done to me be upon you Tr. mine injury is upon thee P. heb It is more like that Sarai maketh Abraham the cause of her wrong because he corrected no Hagars male pertnesse than that she wished evill unto him v. 7. which is in the way toward Sur in the wildernesse H. which is in the way Agara C. which is in the way to Sur. caet the Sept. have not this clause v. 11. The Lord hath received thy prayer C. marked thine affliction T.P. heard thy tribulation caet 12. His hand against every man and every mans hand against him caet but the Chalde hath he shall stand in need of all men and all men of him 13. I have seene the things behind him that seeth me H.P. I have seene him face to face that seeth mee S. I have looked after him that seeth me B.G. I doe see after him that seeth me Tr. that is I have seene God and live 14. Betweene Recam and Agara C. Cades and Bered 3. The explanation of doubts QVEST. I. Whether Sarai gave Agar to Abraham by Gods instinct Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid c. 1. It is most like that this Agar as Philo noteth though by nation an Egyptian yet in religion was of Abrahams faith for he would not be unequally yoked with one of a divers faith 2. It is also probable that seeing Abraham did goe in unto her only for procreation that after she conceived hee did no more company with her as Philo also observeth lib. de Abraham 3. But it is unlike that Sarai gave this counsell to Abraham to take her maid by Gods instinct as Iosephus thinketh for God would not goe against his owne ordinance they two shall bee one flesh Gen. 2.4 Neither did Sarai this so much for desire of procreation and to try as Chrysostome conjectureth whether the cause of sterility were in her or her husband but chiefly in regard of the blessing which was promised to Abrahams seed in which respect her fault is somewhat excused yet it cannot be defended because she faileth in the meanes 5. Neither is it like that this Hagar was Pharao his daughter as some of the Hebrewes but some of the maids rather of Pharao his house that were given to Sarai Gen. 12.16 QVEST. II. Why ten yeares of Abrahams dwelling are mentioned 3. THen Sarai tooke Hagar c. after Abraham had dwelled ten yeares c. 1. Plutarke hath the like story of Stratonica that being barren gave unto Dejotarus her husband Electra by whom he had children thus the heathen were readie to imitate the infirmities of holy men and women but not to follow their vertues 2. Mention is here made of tenne yeares not because this time is set as the Hebrewes imagine for the triall whether the wife is like to be barren or fruitfull for Rebecca was twentie yeares barren neither as Cajetan to shew that Sarai was past hope of children who was now 75. yeare old tenne yeare younger than Abraham but rather as Chrysostome noteth both to shew Abrahams constant and chaste love toward his wife that notwithstanding this experience of her barrennesse did content himselfe with her and his faith toward God that staying thus long after the promise yet despaired not of the performance thereof Perer. QVEST. III. Of Hagars sinnes Saraies faults and Abrahams infirmity Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly 1. In Hagar divers faults are discovered first her unthankfulnesse and contempt toward her mistresse that had so much honoured her secondly her obstinacy in refusing to be corrected but flying away then her froward mind in taking the way by Sur into Aegypt thinking never to returne Oecolamp and so to play the Apostata from her faith which she learned in Abrahams house 2. Sarai also diversly sheweth her infirmity first her patience in being so much moved at the insolency of her maid then her rashnesse in charging Abraham without cause and wishing God to bee judge against her selfe Musculus thirdly her too great sharpnesse and severity against Hagar as Ambrose noteth which was constrained to escape her hands by flying away immoderatius permissa ultione utitur c. Sarai in her anger doth intemperatâ—ly use the power committed to her lib. 1. de Abraâ— c. 4. so also
have heard thee c. God had promised before to Hagar that he would greatly increase her seed Gen. 16.10 and yet here it is ascribed to the prayer of Abraham whereby we learne that we are to pray even for those things which we know God purposeth toward us as our Saviour saith Your heavenly father knoweth whereof ye have need before ye aske of him Matth. 6.8 yet in the same place he teacheth his Apostles to pray Mercer 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against adoration of Angels Vers. 3. ABraham fell on his face and God talked with him If it were an Angell that in the person of God talked with Abraham then was this no gesture of adoration in that Abraham fell upon his face for the Angels will not suffer men to worship them Revel 22.9 But if they will needes have it adoration then it was God that talked with him and not an Angell as the words of the text insinuate Muscul. 2. Conf. The circumcision of the male how it served also for the use of the female Vers. 12. EVery man child of â—ight daies c. Though the males only were circumcised because the beginning of generation and so of originall corruption was from them yet it served also for the signe of the covenant for the female sexe because the woman is of the man as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11.8 and so was circumcised in the man But hence it followeth not that sacraments now may be applyed to the use and benefit of such as receive them nor which is an usuall thing in the popish Church because there is now no such reason or meanes of communicating the sacraments to the not receivers as circumcision both by the intention of the Author and order of nature in the male was forcible also in the other sex 3. Confut. Sacraments doe not actually conferre grace HEnce also it is evident that Sacraments doe not actually conferre the grace of Justification or remission of sinnes because Abraham was not justified by his circumcision But he was first justified by faith and afterward received circumcision the seale thereof as S. Paul sheweth Rom. 4.10 11. This Irenaeus concludeth Quod non per circumcisionem justificabatur homo sed in signum data est populo clarum fuit judicium ipse Abraham qui ante circumcisionem justificatur c. That man was not justified by circumcision but it was given as a signe to the people Abraham is a cleare evidence who was justified before circumcision Chrysostome also rendring a reason why Infants were circumcised thus writeth Altera causa fuit ut re ipsa discerâ—mus nihil animae circumcisionem illam profuisse sed eam signum tantum gratia esse factam c. Another cause is that we should learne that the circumcision did not profit the soule but was onely a signe of grace for children when they understand not what is done to them can reape no profit thereby to their soules Hence also is confuted the note of some Hebrewes that Abraham chap. 17. vers 1. is bidden to be perfect because he had not yet received circumcision whereby he was made perfect for circumcision was no cause but a signe of his election in the covenant Mercer 4. Confut. Baptisme wheretâ— it excelleth circumcision WHerefore whereas Pererius sheweth a threefold preeminence of Baptisme beyond circumcision 1. In the facility or easinesse of it because it is not so painfull to the flesh as circumcision was 2. In the universality and liberty for baptisme is free for both sexes for all Nations that professe Christ at all times circumcision belonged onely to the Israelites and to males and was tied to the eighth day 3. In the efficacie because baptisme absolveth a man from all sinne and the punishment thereof c. We willingly acknowledge the two first points of preeminence but such an efficacie actually to give remission of sinnes neither circumcision had then nor baptisme now for it would then follow that every one that is baptised is surely saved his sinnes being remitted or else that his sinnes being remitted may returne againe But God useth not where hee hath once forgiven sinnes to remember them any more Esech 18.22 Baptisme then we confesse significationâ— in signification and representation is more rich than circumcision was for washing is a more lively resemblance of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ and it is a commemoration of a benefit performed whereas circumcision was a type of the same to be exhibited But otherwise for the efficacie there is no difference they both are seales and confirmations of faith for the remission of sinnes nor actuall conferrers and bestowers of grace 5. Confut. Abraham the first that received circumcision FUrther Herodotus is here found to be in an errour that thinketh that the Egyptians were the first that were circumcised and that the Jewes received it from them Whereas it is evident that Abraham was the first that received circumcision by the commandement of God himselfe and that the Egyptians above 200. yeare after learned it of the Hebrewes that sojourned with them above 200. yeares more 6. Confut. Neither Circumcision under the Law nor Baptisme under the Gospell absolutely necessary Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male c. shall be cut off c. This place I shewed before quest 1. to be understood not of children that were uncircumcised which was their parents fault and not theirs but of such as were adulti of yeares therefore it is no good reading to say the uncircumcised man childe but the male Zachar for the infant of eight dayes old mentioned vers 12. is of purpose omitted here Hence then it is inferred that there was no such absolute necessity of circumcision that children wanting it should be damned 1. For the children of Israel were not circumcised for the space of fortie yeares all the time of their sojourning in the wildernesse Ios. 5.6 Neither is it noted to have beene any fault to neglect it because they were continually in their journey So they were charged to keepe the Passeover by an ordinance for ever and whosoever kept it not as it was prescribed should be cut off Exod. 12.14 15. yet upon extraordinary occasion as of some uncleannesse or by reason of a long journey they might deferre the eating of the Passeover till the foureteenth day of the second moneth Numb 9.10 11. yea it is evident that the Passeover after the first institution was but once kept in the wildernesse for the space of forty yeares namely in the first moneth of the second yeare Num. 9. 1. And it was not celebrated againe till Iosua his time Iosua 5.10 after they were entred into the land of Canaan 2. Cajetane a popish Writer giveth good evidence here Consentaneum est ut non puniatur nisi qui culpam admisit infantes antem nullam possunt admittere culpam proinde poena hic designata adsolos adultos spectat ut ii solum merito puniantur
vertue But that is not the meaning here it is given as a reason why Sarah doubted of a son because she was old and her Lord also 2. Neither is Pererius collection sound that because Sarah saith shall I have lust that Abraham and Sarah after the birth of Ismael had consented to abstinence from matrimoniall acts for Abraham long after this had children by Keturah which sheweth that there was in Abraham moderate lust and desire and Sarah though her desire that way had beene extinguished yet she was to be obedient Sarah then only speaketh comparatively that the heat and lust of youth was now abated in her QVEST. VIII Whether Abraham was simply unapt for generation FUrther 1. Some thinke that Abraham by reason of his great age was simply unapt for generation in himselfe but yet received a generative faculty from God to beget Isaak sic Thomas Aquin. Contr. Abraham 37. yeares after by Keturah had six sonnes Genes 25. 2. therefore it is like then hee was not simply unapt for generation nor yet enabled by an extraordinary faculty seeing also that many yeares after some at 80. yeeres of age and more had children as Cato and Massinissa Plin. lib. 7. cap. 14. 2. Wherefore Augustines opinion is more probable that Abraham was not simply unapt for generation but not by Sara for afterward by another wife he received children 3. Whereas the Apostle saith that Abrahams body was now dead being almost an hundred yeare old Rom. 4.19 this is spoken in respect of Abrahams owne opinion who was out of hope to have children hee considered not his owne body saith S. Paul Perer. And comparatively because his body was now dead being almost 100. yeare old and much more unable than before and if in his younger yeares he received no children by Sarah much lesse hope was there now Calvin QVEST. IX The reason of Sarahs barrennesse TWo reasons are also given of Sarahs barrennesse because she was old and the monethly custome of women had left her Sarah was now thirty yeares old which may seeme in those dayes when they lived long as Sarah attained to an 120. yeares Gen. 23.1 to be no sufficient reason of her not bearing for than one of ninety yeares might be esteemed as one of 50. now beyond which time women commonly beare not though some have children after those yeares as Cornelia bare Volusius Saturninus at 60. yeares Plin. lib. 7. c. 14. 2. Neither the staying of the monethly course may be thought of it selfe a sufficient cause of Sarahs barrennesse because as Aristotle writeth some may conceive without them though it be rare lib. 7. de histor animal c. 2. 3. But yet considering that Sarah both in her young time and while the custome of women continued with her was barren she being now both old and that use discontinued must needs be much more And therefore those both concurring in aged and barren Sarah doe make the worke more miraculous in that she now conceived QVEST. X. Sarahs laughter whether it argued her incredulity Vers. 12. SArah laughed 1. This laughter of Sarah can neither be altogether excused as Ambrose maketh it a signe of a mystery rather than an argument of incredulity 2. Neither yet did Sarah directly detract from the credit of Gods promise for she did not yet know that they were Angels 3. But of a womanly modesty shee shewed her selfe at the first incredulous and being guilty of her infirmity through feare denied it but yet when shee was rebuked shee stood not in defence thereof neither replied and was confirmed in her faith and beleeved August 4. And herein Gods mercy appeareth that is contented to chastise Sarahs incredulity with a simple reprehension whereas Zacharie for the like offence was stricken dumb Calvin 8. 87. Shall I hide from Abraham 1. Whereas the Septuag read from Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 puero my childe Ambrose sheweth that Abraham though old in yeares is called a childe or youth ob pueritia obsequium because of cheerefull obedience and prompt and ready services but wee need not stand upon this note seeing the word is not in the originall and yet it is usuall in Scripture by that word to understand servant QVEST. XI How a thing is said to bee impossible 2. LIkewise where the latine readeth can I hide from Abraham which in the originall standeth thus shall I hide Pererius observation how divers wayes a thing is said to be impossible or that cannot bee is impertinent yet because there may be use elsewhere of this annotation I will not omit it 1. A thing is said to bee impossible when meanes and strength is denied 1 Cor. 3.2 I gave you milke to drinke for yee could not c. 2. That which is seldome done though it may bee done Matth. 5. A City set upon an hill cannot be hid 3. That which is not fitting nor convenient Matth. 9. The children of the bridegrome cannot mourne so long as the bridegrome is with them 4. When a thing may bee done but against the will Gen. 37. 4. The brethren of Ioseph could not speake peaceably to him 5. That which cannot bee done of man or by any naturall cause though unto God not impossible as to cause a Camell to goe thorow the eye of a needle Matth. 19.6 That which is simply impossible both in nature and to God as including a contradiction as it is impossible God should lye Heb. 6.7 That which is forbidden by a superiour power as the Angell saith to Lot Gen. 19.22 I can doe nothing till thou be come thither 8. That which is evill and unseemely as Ioseph saith to his mistresse How can I doe this great wickednesse and sinne against God Gen. 39.9 QVEST. XII Wherefore the Lord imparted his counsell to Abraham concerning the destruction of Sodome Vers. 18. SEing that Abraham shall be indeed a great nation c. Two reasons are given why the Lord will not conceale from Abraham his counsell concerning the destruction of Sodome first in regard of the dignity and privilege which the Lord had indued Abraham with both carnall in that hee should be a father of a mighty people and spirituall because of him should come the Messiah in whom all the nations of the earth should bee blessed 2. In respect of Abrahams diligence and duty in teaching and instructing his posterity after him For this should seeme to have beene the godly practice of the fathers to catechise their families and instruct them concerning the creation of the world transgression of man destruction of the old world Gods providence the Messiah to be revealed everlasting life to come and such like Perer. 3. The Hebrewes thinke that because the Pentapolis or valley of five Cities belonged unto Canaan which was promised to Abraham the Lord imparteth this matter QVEST. XIII Of the greatnesse of the sins of Sodome Vers. 20. THe cry of Sodome is great c. 1. Foure sinnes are noted in Scripture to be crying
parts first the taking away of Sara Abrahams wife vers 1. 2. Secondly the restoring of her againe where first is set downe the admonition of Abimelech in a dreame vers 3. to 8. then Abimeleches expostulating with Abraham Thirdly Abrahams defence vers 9. to 14. Fourthly the restitution of Sarah with large gifts vers 14. to 17. Lastly Abrahams thankfulnesse in praying unto God and the effect of his prayer vers 17 18. 2. The divers readings v. 1. Dwelt betweene Recam and Agara C. betweene Cades and Sâ—r. caet v. 2. He feared to say she is my wife lest the men of the City should stay him for her sake this is added by the Septuag which the other have not v. 4. Wilt thou stay the ignorant and just Nation S.H. the righteous Nation cater v. 5. God came unto Abimelech by night S. the word came from the face of the Lord to Abimelech in a vision of the night Ch. the Lord came to Abimelech by a dreame in the night caeter v. 6. The Lord said unto him by dreame Ch. S. the Lord said unto him caet I spared thee S. I kept thee H.B.G. I did prohibite thee T. C. P. chasach to prohibite v. 9. That worke that no man ever did hast thou done to me S. things which were not worthy to be done Ch. which are not wont to be done P. which thou oughtest not to have done caeter heb which shall not be done v. 13. When God brought me out of my fathers house S.H. when God caused me to wander out of my fathers house caet when the people erred after the works of their hands the Lord applyed me to his feare out of my fathers house Ch. v. 14. Abimelech tooke a thousand drachma shillings S. the rest have not these words v. 11. A thousand didrachma S. a thousand silverlings H.B.G. a thousand sickles C. a thousand sickles of silver Tr. heb a thousand of silver v. 16. These things shall be for the price of thy face S. this shall be a vaile to thine eyes H.B. this shall bee a vaile of honour C. he shall be a vaile to thine eyes T. G. v. 16. Speake all things truly S. whither soever thou goest remember thou wast deprehended H. because I have sent to take thee and have seene thee in all things which thou hast said be thou rebuked Ch. was thus reproved B.G. and all this is that thou maist be learned T. heb she reproved her selfe v. 17. They were refreshed C. they bare children caet heb jalad to bring forth 3. The Explanation of doubts QVEST. I. Wherefore Abraham removed from the Plaine of Mamre where he had so long dwelt Vers. 1. AFterward Abraham departed thence toward the South Countrey c. Abraham had now dwelled in the Plaine of Mamre above fourteene yeare before Ismael was borne who was thirteene yeares old when he was circumcised Gen. 17.25 Now he removeth from thence not because of any famine as Pererius thinketh for the Scripture maketh mention but of one famine to have fallen in Abrahams dayes Gen. 26.1 2. nor yet for hospitality sake as some Hebrewes for he was now a sojourner in a strange Countrey 3. Nor yet forced through the injuries and wrongs offered by his neighbours 4. But it is most like that the fearefull spectacle of the ruine of Sodome with the pestilent and unwholesome ayre thereof rising moved Abraham to change his dwelling God so disposing that Abraham should not continue alwayes in one place as a possessor but shift from place to place as a stranger and sojourner QVEST. II. Of the desart of Shur Vers. 1. HE dwelt betweene Cadesh and Shur 1. Those were the names of two desarts the wildernesse of Shur was that into the which the Israelites entred when they had passed over the red Sea Exod. 15.22 2. It is the same which is called the desart of Ethan as Tâ—status proveth against Lyranus as may appeare by comparing Exod. 15.22 with Numb 33.8 2. This place of Abrahams dwelling is called afterward Beersheba Gen. 22.32 Iunius QVEST. III. Of Gerar where Abraham sojourned SOjourned in Gerar. 1. This was the South bounds of Palestina as is evident Gen. 10.19 Sidon Gerar Sodome Lasha are set downe as the foure utmost parts of the Countrey of Canaan Sidon Gerar from the North to the South on the West side Sodome Lasha from the South to the North-eastward 2. This Gerar was at the first a kingdome by it selfe distinguished from the five principalities of the Philistians Iun. It was the chiefe City of the region called Gerartiâ— Hierome 3. Here Abraham did sojourne with Isaack twenty five yeares from hence he went to sacrifice his sonne in the land of Moriah Gen. 22.1 Perer. QVEST. IV. How Sara retained her favour and beauty at ninetie yeares of age Vers. 2. ABimelech sent and tooke Sara Sara was now ninety yeares old how could she at these yeares retaine such beauty as that she should be desired of Kings 1. Neither is the history transported as Lyranus thinketh upon this reason for Abraham removed not from the Plaine of Mamre till after the overthrow of Sodome 2. Some thinke that this beauty in Sara was miraculous as the Hebrewes 3. But we need not seeke a miracle other reasons may be alleaged 1. Women then at ninety might be as fresh as now at forty for as seventy or eighty is now the full age of women so then they lived an hundred and thirty Sara died at an hundred twenty seven yeares Perer. 2. Moderate diet and chaste life might be a great helpe but especially Gods blessing as Moses Iosua Caleb retained their strength and vigor in their old age Deut. 34.7 Ios. 14.11 Luther And as Sarah had a childe at ninety so it is like her favour and colour was as it useth to be in childe-bearing women Mercer 3. The not bearing or nursing of children was a great meane to preserve her favour Perer. 4. Her inward parts and other womenly gifts might commend her as well as her favour and this comelinesse of her person was a singular gift from God among the rest Calvin These reasons may be yeelded that Sarah at those yeares did keepe her beautie which consisteth of three things the softnesse of the flesh the smoothnesse of the skinne the sweetnesse or freshnesse of the colour Perer. QVEST. V. Why the Lord dealt more mercifully with Abimelech than with Pharao Vers. 3. GOd came to Abimelech The Lord dealeth more mercifully with Abimelech than with Pharao for the like offence Pharao was not admonished by dreame but forced by plagues to confesse his sinne Gen. 12. 1. We need not with Rupertus to runne to allegories who by these two afflictions of Abraham in the taking away of his wife would have the two captivities of the Israelites signified one in Egypt where the Egyptians suffered many plagues the other under the Chaldeans from whence they were delivered by Cyrus with good conditions
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used Perer. QVEST. XIX How the law held men in Servitude and bondage ONe which is Agar from mount Sinai which gendreth unto bondage 1. The one Testament which was given in Sinai is signified by Hagar which Sinai is out of the limits of the promised land and so are they strangers from the true Jerusalem that are not the children of Abrahams faith Calvin 2. The law is said to beget unto bondage not so much for that under the law all things were wrapped up in mystery and not revealed in such manifest sort as under the Gospel for so they are called servants that know not their masters will Ioh. 15.15 neither for that they were nourished with temporall promises as Abraham sent away the sonnes of Keturah but reserved the inheritance for Isaack But because the law held them in bondage under the hard yoke of ceremonies Act. 15.10 and they were kept in feare by reason of the curse and severe sentence of the law which they transgressed through the weaknesse of the flesh Perer. 3. Yet the law wrought not this effect upon all that lived under the law but only upon those that knew not the right use of the law which was to bring them unto Christ for many were in those times as Augustine saith Ministri veteris Testamenti haeredes novi though Ministers of the old Testament yet heires of the new QVEST. XX. How Agar is said to be mount Sinai Vers. 15. AGar is Sinati a mountaine in Arabia which is the better reading than to say Agar or mount Sinai for here Hagar is the type and mount Sinai which is taken for the law which was there given is that which answereth to the type 1. both because of the name which signifieth as they say the same thing in the Arabian tongue which Sinai doth 2. and the word Arabia signifieth also affliction humility 3. Sinai in respect of the site is without the land of promise 4. And Arabia with the inhabitants therefore lived in a servile state and condition and in this respect chiefly doth Sinai represent the law which bringeth a spirituall bondage Pererius QVEST. XXI How the mount Sinai is said to answer to Ierusalem Which answereth to Ierusalem that now is 1. not bordereth upon or is joyned to Jerusalem as the vulgar Latin and the B translation readeth for the contrarie is evident to him that beholdeth the situation of the countrey 2. neither because the way or journey is continued from Sinai to Jerusalem Aquinas 3. but in respect of the correspondency and similitude because the terrene and earthly Jerusalem retaining still the ceremoniall yoke of the legall ceremonies was held in spirituall bondage and servitude Beza Perer. QVEST. XXII Of Ierusalem that is from above Vers. 26. IErusalem which is above is free the mother of us all c. S. Paul setteth against the old testament and terrene Jerusalem the new testament and heavenly Jerusalem which is described by foure epithites 1. it is said to be from above because Christ the head thereof came from above Iohn 16.28 I came out from the father and because wee must have our conversation in heaven Philip. 3.20 2. It is called Jerusalem which signifieth the vision of peace It is free not with civill and outward freedome for many may be called being servants 1 Cor. 7.21 but it is free both morally in not being a servant or slave to the affections and desires of the flesh and spiritually in casting off all servile feare and celestiall liberty it hath in hope which shall bee an everlasting freedome both of body and soule 4. It is now the mother of us all and fruitfull of many children as Sarah at the first was barren but at the last brought forth Isaack whose seed was promised should be as the sand of the sea so she that was fruitfull the old Synagogue is now barren she that was barren the Church of God is now fruitful among the Gentiles according to that saying of Anna 1 Sam. 2.5 The barren hath borne many and she that had many children is feeble QVEST. XXIII Wherein Ismael resembleth carnall professors Vers. 28. THerefore brethren wee are after the manner of Isaack This then is the application which the Apostle maketh of this allegory 1. they which make account to be justified by the ceremonies or workes of the law are like unto Ismael borne of the bond-woman after the flesh they which belonged unto the faith of Christ are the childreÌ„ of promise by grace 2. As Ismael born of the bond woman persecuted Isaack so they which either live or teach after the flesh doe now persecute the servants of God as the Pharisies did the Apostles the Pseudocatholikes the professors of the Gospell 3. As the servant with her sonne were cast out for mocking of Isaack so the Jewes for deriding of Christ are cast out of the land of promise and so many as beleeve not in Christ whom they crucified are deprived also of the celestiall Canaan Perer. 4. Augustine further fitly expresseth this comparison betweene the carnall and spirituall Israelites by the history of Ionah resembling the Jewes envying the calling of the Gentiles to Ionah angry for the saving of Ninivie the ceremonies and carnall rites to the gourd that shadowed but for a time Christ to the worme that smote the gourd and removed the ceremonies bringing in true righteousnesse and everlasting comfort and refreshing 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Christians may have their plentifull feasts so they take heed of excesse Vers. 8. ABraham made a great feast This feast was more than ordinary at the which some say Sem and Heber and King Abimelech were present but of the first two guests no likelihood because no mention is made of them afterward of Abimelechs presence there is more probability Muscul. Howsoever in that Abraham maketh such great preparation for this feast we learne that it is lawfull for Christians to have their solemne and joyfull feasts and meetings so that they take heed of excesse and that the creatures of God may not only be used for necessity but in plenty and alacrity so there be no sâ—perfluity Calvin For as bread was given for mans sustenance so wine is ordained to make the heart cheerfull Psal. 104.14 2. Doct. God is otherwise with his elect otherwise with men of the world Vers. 20. GOd was with the child and he grew God was with Ismael by his generall providence 〈◊〉 care in that he grew up thrived in the world and prospered but there is a more 〈◊〉 grace and favour toward the elect as our Saviour promiseth to be with his till the end of the world Matth. 28.20 and in this sense S. Paul saith God is the Saviour of all men but especially of them which beleeve 1 Tim. 4.10 3. Doct. Children ought not to contract marriage without the consent of their parents Vers. 21. HIs mother tooke him a wife out of the land of Aegypt This sheweth
rare using of allegories ought to teach such that they also should be verie sparing 2. Unlesse they could say of themselves as Paul did I think I have the spirit of God 1 Cor. 7.4 They cannot challenge the like liberty in expounding of scripture as S. Paul did therefore it may be said unto them as Christ said to his disciples you know not what spirit you are of Luk. 9.55 3. Perer. to this purpose useth a good reason It only belongeth to God which inspired the Scriptures perfectly to know all things that were to come and not only to know them but to dispose direct them as it pleaseth him wherefore he only can appoint that things formerly done veram totamque figuram gerant c. should beare a true and certaine type and figure of things afterward to bee done Man therefore that cannot dispose of things to come is not to make types and figures according to his owne device 5. Confut. Types are said to be that is to signifie the things whereof they are types ANd Saint Paul saith these are 2. testaments that is Sarah and Hagar signifie two testaments Galath 4.24 so the rocke is said to be Christ that is prefigured Christ 1 Cor. 10.3 This Pererius acknowledgeth and yet could not see that Christ c. after the same manner said This is my body that is a figure of my body as both Tertullian and Augustine expound although there is great difference I grant betweene the figure and representation in types and in sacraments for there is only a signification of spirituall things but in the Sacraments there is a lively and effectuall oblation of the things signified and shadowed forth yet in the phrase and manner of speaking in both there is no difference Beza 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moral Mothers should nurse their owne children Vers. 7. THat Sarah should have given sucke c. Ambrose well noteth hereupon that by Sarahs example mothers should learne to nurse their owne children they which of necessity for want of milke or weaknesse doe put forth their children to nurse are excused but of nicenesse to refuse this duty is worthy of blame The Prophet saying thou hast given mee hope at my mothers breasts Psal. 22.9 and the Apostle commending widowes that had nourished their children 1 Timoth. 5.10 sheweth that God hath laid this duty upon mothers which they that refuse are but halfe mothers which nourish the infant in their wombes but forsake it when it commeth into the world 2. the infants many times drawing the milke of bad women doe imitate their evill manners as we see in plants and young cattell that follow the nature of the ground that feedeth them and the dammes that suckle them 3. The purpose of nature is made frustrate when for this end God hath provided milke for the food of infants for God hath made nothing in vaine Calvin 4. By this meanes also the mothers affection is alienated from the childe whom shee cannot so well fancy as whom shee hath nursed and kissed at her breasts Perer. 2. Moral Our affections must be subject to Gods will Vers. 11. THis was very grievous to Abraham yet Abraham though his affection stood otherwise after the Lord had spoken unto him doth bridle his naturall affection and submitteth it to Gods pleasure Wee likewise must learne to confirme our desires to the Lords will And if commendable and naturall love such as Abrahams was must be overswayed by our duty toward God how much more unnaturall and unlawfull lust ought to be extinguished which are flat opposite and contrary to the will of God Calvin a man is to forsake and deny himselfe for Christ. Mark. 8.35 3. Moral The counsell of inferiours not to be despised Vers. 12. IN all that Sarah shall say unto thee heare her voice Abraham is bidden to give eare to the counsel of Sarah And we must learne not to despise the advice of inferiours when they speake the truth unto us and perswade us to that which is right as the Apostle saith set up them which are least esteemed in the Church 1 Corinth 6.4 Muscul. 4. Moral The truest love leaveth not a friend no not in the instant of death Vers. 16. I Will not see the death of the child Hagars heart would not serve her to see her child dye but this was but a compassionate and effeminate love give me such a friend and lover as will not forsake one in the greatest extremity and will stand by him in the agony of death when hee hath most need of comfort I condemne not the first if it proceed of tendernesse of affection rather than of nicenesse and want of duty but I preferre the other So the Lord said to Iacob moving him to goe downe into Aegypt Ioseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes Genes 4.6 4. This duty is the dearest and nearest all other performed to their friends to close their eyes when they were dead 5. Moral God heareth our prayers every where Vers. 17. GOd heard the voyce of the child c. God is every where ready to heare the complaints of the poore Ismael was heard in the wildernesse Daniel in the Lions denne the three children in the fiery furnace Ionas in the whales belly Therefore Saint Paul saith I will that men every where lift up pure hands c. 1 Timoth. 2.8 no place is then barred to our prayers Muscul. 6. Moral Old rancour must be left where true reconciliation is made Vers. 25. ANd Abraham rebuked Abimelech c. Abraham did well being now to make a firme and faithfull league with Abimelech to powre forth all the griefe of his heart at once not as the fashion of some is which make semblance sometimes of reconciliation and attonement and yet doe retaine rancour and seeds of malice in their heart as Ioab did that embraced Abner with one hand and strooke him to the heart with the other 7. Moral Inferiour officers often abuse the name and authority of their Lords and masters Vers. 26. I Know not who hath done this thing c. also thou toldest mee not c. Abraham is found to bee here in some fault that finding himselfe grieved and wronged by Abimelechs servants would complaine of it before the King but powreth it out upon this occasion Luther so many that hold themselves quiet a long time sometime in their heat will utter their stomack But the greatest fault of all was in Abimelechs servants who abusing their masters name authority do without his knowledge take away a well from Abraham Such is the officious disposition of many inferiour officers and Ministers under Princes and other great men that they will father their injurious dealings upon their authority that neither knew nor consented So Gehezi abused his Master Elisha 2 King 5.22 CHAP. XXII 1. The Method THis Chapter entreateth first of Abrahams purpose to sacrifice Isaack his sonne with other things adjoyning vers 1. to 20. secondly of Abrahams
betweene these two words beâ—ula and gnalma which both signifie a virgin but because the first here used doth betoken a virgin corrupted as Ioel 1.8 mourne like a virgin for the husband of her youth therefore it is further expounded unknowne of man Leo Castro in 7. Isai. ex Perer. 5. But this may be a sufficient answer that the scripture useth sometime a repetition of the same thing in other words for a more sure demonstration of that which is affirmed as Augustine saith firmamentum esse sententiae in repetitione that the strength of the sentence is in the repetition and therefore for the more full manifestation of the virginitie of Rebecca because many goe for virgins that are not the same thing is twice expressed Mercer QUEST XV. Of the wâ—rd almah that it alwaies betokeneth a virgin NOw further as touching the word gnalmah whereas the Jewes to obscure that prophecie Isay 7.16 a virgin shall conceive c. doe affirme that it is sometime taken for a young woman corrupted as Prov. 30.19 the way of a man with a maid gnelam for answer hereunto 1. We neither will grant with Cajetane that the word is here taken for a woman not a virgin because saith he the way of a man with a virgin may be knowne by the markes of her virginitie but with a woman not so easily for the wise man speaketh not here of such markes but of the secret and close meetings of such which can hardly be known 2. Neither need wee with Lyranus to referre it to the incomprehensible mysterie of the incarnation of Christ in his mothers wombe who expoundeth this place by that of Ieremie a woman shall compasse a man Ierem. 31.22 for it is evident by the verse following such is the way of an adulterous woman Prov. 30.20 that the wise man speaketh of such lewd practices before 3. Nor yet doth it fully satisfie to say that the wise man calleth her a virgin which though shee bee not so yet would be so taken Iunius for still the objection remaineth strong against that prophecie Isay 7.16 that virgin should likewise be so taken there 4. But the best answer is that he speaketh of such a maid or virgin whose chastitie or virginitie is in the first attempt violated being a virgin till then and yet would conceale the fact as though no such thing were done so that notwithstanding any objection out of this place Hieroms observation is justified that gnolam in scripture is alwaies taken for a virgin uncorrupted lib. 1. advers Iovin QUEST XVI Of Rebeccaes receiving of the gifts Vers. 22. THe man tooke a golden abilliment c. It may bee questioned how it stood with the modestie of the maid to take these gifts of a stranger 1. Some defend it for that there was no danger seeing hee was an aged and reverent person of whom shee received them and it was done in the presence of the whole company that came with him Perer. 2. Some thinke that she might take them as â—â—â—ward or her paines which shee tooke in watering ten Camels whereof each as the Hebrewes 〈◊〉 will drinke â—en Hydria or great pitchers full 3. But the true answer is that before he gave her these gifts he had asked of her whose daughter she was as appeareth in the 47. verse and it is like she also had inquired of him so that he resolved upon her in his minde to be the woman appointed for Isaack and thereupon gave her these gifts Mercer QUEST XVII Of the jewell of halfe a shekel weight OF halfe a shekel weight 1. Leaving the Hebrewes conceits that this halfe shekel represented that halfe shekel which the Israelites were taxed at Exod. 30. the two bracelets the two tables the ten shekels the ten Commandements 2. The Jewell was not for the eares but an ornament of the forehead or nose weighed neither two sickles as the Latine nor one sickle as the Chalde readeth but halfe a sickle 3. Neither need wee to make it answerable to the bracelets of ten shekels weight to say with some Hebrewes that there was a precious stone in it that weighed halfe a shekel or with Vatablus that because a shekel is not here expressed but only bechang halfe that it weighed halfe the weight of ten shekels afterward expressed for it may appeare that where bechang is put alone there the other word shekel must be supplied as Exod. 38.26 halfe a shekel for a man 4. Wherefore the proportion was correspondent that the jewell for the frontlet should be but of halfe a shekel weight both in respect of the place which required no cumbersome ornament and for that it was of gold an halfe shekel whereof that is the 4. part of an ounce might be valued at 14. or 15. shillings sterling QUEST XVIII Why it is said she went to her mother not her fathers house Vers. 18. THe maid ran and told them of her mothers house c. 1. Not that her father Bethnel was dead as some thinke for he is named v. 50. 2. Neither is her mothers house named because shee might have a step-mother beside to whom she would not first tell this newes Cajetane 3. Neither went she to her mothers house because her father being old had committed the government to his sonne Laban 4. But for that the women dwelled in houses by themselves it is like she went first to her mother from whom the rest of the family presently heard it Mercer QUEST XIX How the Scriptures which in shew are contrary may be reconciled Vers. 38. THou shalt goe to my fathers house c. But Abraham said Thou shalt goe to my countrey and my kindred v. 4. and other things beside seeme to be diversly reported as v. 40. the Lord will send his Angell and prosper thy journey but Abraham saith v. 7. he will send his Angell before thee and no more againe v. 47. he saith he first asked Rebecca whose daughter she was and then gave her the jewels but v. 23. it is sâ—t downe that hee asked her afterwards Wherefore to reconcile these and such like places of Scripture which seeme to be repugnant certaine rules are to be observed The first rule is that where the difference is in words and not in sense as in the first place objected there is no contrariety at all The second that it is no repugnancy if in one place a matter bee set forth more fully and without circumstances if one expresse that which another denieth not but only concealeth as in the second instance proposed the difference is not great Thirdly if the order upon some speciall reason bee changed and that is set downe last which another hath first as in the third instance produced it need give no offence And these three varieties do often occurre in the Evangelists which doe rather commend and set forth the truth of the history than disgrace it that hereby it may appeare that they did not conferre together
proved 2. That hee was set over the whole Church of Christ is but a friers dreame all the Apostles were in equall commission and all were sent immediately of Christ to preach the Gospell a◠my father sent me so send I you Ioh. 20.21 that charge of our Saviour pasce oves feed my sheepe will not beare such universall jurisdiction for neither all Christs sheepe are committed only to Peter and feeding signifieth not ruling or commanding but teaching and instructing a duty Saint Peter himselfe being Judge common to all pastors and presbyters feed the flock c. 1 Peter 5.2 3. Neither is it true that Saint Peter first preached to the Gentles 1. for Saint Paul was converted Act. 9. before Peter saw that vision Act. 10. who immediately upon his conversion preached to the Gentiles in Arabia and Damascus Galath 1.15 16 17. 2. Saint Peter indeed was both the first and last that was resolved by vision of the calling of the Gentiles but Saint Paul was sure thereof before by revelation and communicated not with Peter about his vision before he preached to the Gentiles Galath ibid. 3. Neither is it true that Cornelius family was the first that was called among the Gentiles for Andronicus and Iunia were in Christ before Paul Rom. 16.7 who was converted before Cornelius was called 4. Though the priority of preaching to the Gentiles were yeelded to Peter yet the superiority goeth not together with it 5. Lastly all this being presupposed yet it is but a simple argument that is grounded upon types and figures as this is for Saint Peters supremacy out of this place 2. Confut. Marriage cannot be contracted by Proctors betweene the parties being absent Vers. 4. TAke a wife to my sonne Thomas Anglicus by this president would authorise the marriage of parties absent by messengers and proctors going betweene them in 24. c. Genes But no such thing can be hence gathered for Abrahams servant did not conclude the marriage betweene Rebecca and Isaack but only procured the espousals and promise of marriage which was not fully contracted and concluded till they both met and then the text saith he tooke Rebeccah and she was his wife v. 67. Perer. 3. Confut. Against the invocation of Angels Vers. 42. O Lord the God of my master Abraham though Abraham had said to his servant that the Angell of God should goe before him v. 7. yet the servant prayeth not to this Angell that was appointed to be the president of his journey but he only directeth his prayer unto God as the scripture biddeth Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve Matth. 4.10 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Not to sweare rashly Vers. 5. ANd the servant said what if the woman will not come c. The servant is very cautelous and circumspect in taking his oath lest he should binde himselfe to any inconvenience by his oath he casteth all doubts afore and desireth to have the matter explaned to the which hee sweareth Muscul. so ought wee to bee well advised in taking of an oath which the Prophet calleth swearing in judgement Ierem. 4.2 2. Observ. Our countrey not to be hated for some abuses therein Vers. 4. THou shalt goe unto my countrey c. Abraham hateth not his countrey though hee knew the same to be addicted to Idolatry As many doe in these daies who being runnagates from their countrey for superstition rather than religion have practised the subversion of Prince and countrey by forrein invasion Muscul. 3. Observ. All our affaires must begin with prayer Vers. 12. HEe said O Lord God of my master c. This servant commending the successe of his businesse and journey by prayer unto God doth teach us to begin all our actions and enterprises with prayer as the Apostle saith I will that men pray every where lifting up pure hands c. 4. Observ. A faithfull prayer hath present effect Vers. 15. YEt he had left speaking Rebecca came Thus the Lord gave present audience to the prayer of his servant as appeareth by the immediate effect thereof According to the saying of the Prophet before they call will I answer and while they speake I will heare Isay 65.24 Mercer So the Angell said to Daniel In the beginning of thy supplication the commandement came forth Dan. 9.23 as soone as he beganne to pray the Lord heard him 5. Observ. Children must not be brought up delicately Vers. 16. SHe went downe and filled her pitcher c. Rebeccah was trained up by her mother to doe domesticall and houshold works she was not brought up delicately even shee that was appointed to be the mother of Patriarks Prophets Kings had this simple and hard education which may be a lesson to fathers and masters not to bring up their children and servants delicately or wantonly but to bring them to labour in their youth and children and servants may here learne obedience not to thinke scorne to doe such homely services which their parents and masters shall thinke good to require of them Musculus 6. Observ. It is lawfull sometime to conceale part of the truth Vers. 39. WHat if the woman will not follow me Here the servant leaveth out in his discretion Abrahams charge given him Beware that thou bring not my sonne thither againe vers 6. as also other speeches of his master As the Lord that tooke me from my fathers house c. for these speeches would have but further offended them as though Abraham had held them to be a forlorne and wicked people that he counted it a benefit that God called him out from them and would by no meanes that his sonne should returne thither Mercer Muscul. We learne then that every truth in all places and upon all occasions is not to be uttered as Ieremy thereunto moved by the King concealed the chiefe matter wherein the King communed with him and telleth the Princes what he thought good to impart unto them Ierem. 38.27 THE SECOND TOME OR PART OF GENESIS Containing THE HISTORIE OF THE THREE PATRIARKS ISAACK IACOB AND IOSEPH divided into two Bookes The first of Isaack and Jacob the second of Ioseph HEB. 11.20 21. 20. By faith Isaack blessed Iacob and Esau concerning things to come 21. By faith Iacob when he was a dying blessed both the sonnes of Ioseph c. AMBROS Officior lib. 1. Quid sapientius sancto Iacob qui Deum vidit facie ad faciem quid justius qui ea quae acquiserat cum fratre divisit quid fortius qui cum Deo luctatus est quid modestius qui filiae injuriam mallet praetexere conjugio quam vindicare What was wiser than holy Iacob who saw God face to face what more just who what he had gotten parted with his brother what stronger than him who did wrestle with God what more modest who had rather right his daughters wrong with marriage than revenge it VERITAS †FILIA †TEMPORIS LONDON ¶ Printed by the
excused from untruth howsoever he thinketh the first may in Gen. 27. Numb 57. Wherefore the best solution of this question is that Iacob told an officious lye to his father 1. As is evident by his three speeches I am Esau thy first borne and I have done as thou badest mee and eat of my venison for none of all these are true 2. Yet was not this dissimulation of Iacob either injurious to Isaack for he in this his errour perceived the purpose of God and was content the blessing should stand noâ— yet prejudiciall to Esau who in effect lost nothing due unto him but only the right by this meanes was restored to Iacob 3. God useth Iacobs infirmity and maketh it to serve his owne purpose this lye then of Iacobs though in respect of these circumstances it be extenuated yet is not justified nor yet to bee drawne into example of this opinion are our best writers Calvin Muscul Mercer Luther and of the other side Lyranus Tostatus Cajetan Lippoman QUEST IX Of the midwives excuse made to Pharaoh HEre because the example of the midwives which made that excuse to Pharao in preserving the childrens lives is some what like to this of Iacob I will briefly shew what is to be thought thereof 1. Gregory thinketh they lied saying to Pharaoh The Hebrew women are lively and are delivered before the midwife come at them Exod. 2.19 and therefore they only received a temporall reward it is said the Lord made them houses ulterius quod expectarent mercedis suae pramium non haberent and therefore should looke for no further reward lib. 18. moral Contra. But it is further added The midwives feared God and the Scripture pronounceth them blessed that feare the Lord Psal. 112.1 And none are blessed without the assurance of everlasting life 2. Thomas Aquinas saith that in respect of their feare and reverence of God they were everlastingly rewarded but for that externall act of lying they received onely a temporall reward In 2.2 qu. 100. arâ— ultim Contra. But the act of lying is simply evill and therefore is worthy of no reward God prospered the midwives not for their dissembling but because they feared God and refused to destroy the infants 3. Some commend the midwives for their disobeying of Pharaohs cruell edict but blame them for their dissembling Genevens annot at 4. But seeing the Scripture commendeth this fact of the midwives I thinke rather that they spake the truth and that the Lord gave extraordinary strength to the Hebrew women in this extremity to be delivered with speed because of the danger As for that reward in building of them houses it is to be referred rather to the increasing and propagation of the Israelites than to the midwives as the 20. verse sheweth God prospered the midwives and the people were multiplied Iun. QUEST X. How divers examples in Scripture may be defended from lying NOw that we may know how to discerne of such examples in Scripture which are produced by those which defend lying whether they are to be thought to have lyed these rules must be observed 1. It is one thing to conceale the truth another to lie as Abraham did hide the truth when he said Sarah was his sister 2. It is one thing to lie another to speake figuratively as it is said the seed of Abraham should be multiplied as the sand of the sea Gen. 21. 3. A sentence may be uttered in a mysticall or allegoricall sense without any lye or untruth as our Saviour saith I will dissolve this temple and build it in three dayes Ioh. 2. hee spake of the temple of his body 4. Though divers holy men and women be commended in Scripture we must not thinke that straightway all they did or said is commendable but as their doings were imperfect so in their sayings also they might erre Perer. QUEST XI How Isaack was deceived in all his senses Vers. 20. HOw hast thou found it so quickly c. 1. Two things gave occasion of suspition to Isaack to enquire whether it were Esau his sonne the voyce of Iacob and his so soone returne 2. And Isaack was thus inquisitive because he intended to blesse Esau whom he affected because he was serviceable and obsequious and provided his fathers diet and therefore intended to bestow his best blessing upon him Perer. 3. He mistrusteth his sight because it was dimme and his eares being heavy and thinketh to try out the matter by his feeling as Thomas would not beleeve till he had first felt Christs side The Hebrewes say Isaack used beside the sense of tasting in his meat and of smelling the odour of the garments and so used all his senses Mercer 4. Yet God did astonish and dull all his senses to shew that mans purpose cannot stand against the counsell of God and partly that Isaack thereby might bee rebuked for his preposterous love to Esau Calvin QUEST XII Why the Lord suffered Isaack to be deceived Vers. 23. FOr hee knew him not 1. Isaack though hee suspected somewhat was put out of doubt by his feeling and smelling by that opinion he had of Iacobs simplicity and for that hee thought he had spoken in secret to Esau without any others privitie 2. It pleased God that Isaack should be thus deceived beside the reasons before alleaged that we might know Nullum hominem plenam habuisse scientiam c. That no man ever had a fulnesse of knowledge but Christ Hierom. epist. 125. And Gregory hereby thinketh the calling of the Gentiles to be prefigured as it is in the Psalme A people which I have not knowne shall serve me Psal. 18. hom 6. in Ezech. 3. It seemed good also unto God that the blessing should be conveyed to Iacob by this meanes 1. That the manifold wisdome of God may appeare in bringing his purpose to passe by divers meanes and wayes 2. That his provident care toward Iacob might hereby bee made manifest 3. And the Lord would worke it this sodaine way rather than by revelation to Isaack leâ—t Esau a furious man if his father had willingly given away the blessing should have been incensed against his parents Pererius QUEST XIII Why Isaack compareth his sonne to the smell of a field Vers. 27. THe smell of my sonne is as the smell of a field c. 1. Isaack by the present smell of Esaus garments which savoured of the field taketh occasion as by an externall signe to utter a spirituall blessing Mercer And as every man borroweth similitudes from his trade as the mariner the souldier and such like so here Isaack blesseth by the similitude of the field wherein Esau was exercised as Hierome noteth of Amos who beginneth his prophecie thus The Lord shall roare from Sion Amos 1.2 because he being a field-man kept the woods where the Lions roared 2. The field is commended for three things pleasure in the variety of flowers to the eye sweetnesse of the fragrant odours to the smell abundance and
not to be stood upon 2. Some think that these children began to be borne in the beginning of the first seven yeares as R. Levi but the text overthroweth that conceit for Iacob went not into Lea till he had ended his terme of seven yeares vers 21. Some thinke that these and the rest of the children were borne to Iacob in the last seven yeares and the six yeares beside of Iacobs service but the story is otherwise that all Iacobs children were borne before he entred into a new covenant to stay still with Laban his two seven yeares being expired Genes â—0 25 But it is more probable that all Iacobs children only Benjamin excepted that was borne in the land of Canaan that is eleven sonnes and one daughter were brought forth in the compasse of the last seven yeares for it is not necessary to assigne their birth successively one to be borne after another but that their mothers might be with childe at once and so it is not improbable that foure women in seven yeares might bring forth 11. or 12. children Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God directeth even the least actions of his servants Vers. 1. IAcob lift up his feet that is he went cheerefully and willingly and in that mention is made of so small an action as the lifting up of his feet we learne that even the least and ordinary actions of the faithfull are directed by the spirit of God and guided by his providence Mercer as our Saviour taketh knowledge of Nathaniels sitting under the figge tree Ioh. 1.48 so the Apostle saith that all things worke together for the best to them that love God Rom. 8.28 2. Doct. Men may hold the truth in generall and yet faile in particular Vers. 15. SHouldest thou serve me for nought Laban here speaketh reason and seemeth to know what is just and right but afterward he failed and recompenced Iacob but meanely for his faithfull service as Iacob complaineth Thou hast changed my wages ten times Gen. 31.41 Thus we see that carnal men may hold generall principles a right but when it commeth to their owne particular then they are blinded with selfe-love Calvin So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist he did acknowledge him to be a just and holy man yet to please his wives daughter commanded him to be beheaded 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Custome not to be pretended where greater enormities are admitted Vers. 26. IT is not the manner of this place to give the younger before the elder He pretendeth a custome in the lesse matter in the meane time he transgresseth the custome and all good order in a thing of greater importance in thrusting upon a man in the night one sister for another thus after the like manner the Romanists object the custome of the Church against the marriage of Ministers whom they call Priests and in the meane time they breake all good order while for want of the due remedie fornication and uncleane lust is suffered to be practised amongst them Muscul. 2. Confut. Iacobs polygamie and marriage of two sisters not justifiable Vers. 30. SO entred he into Rachel also This multiplicity of wives which is called polygamie is diversly excused 1. Augustine saith Nulla lege prohibebatur it was forbidden by no law quandâ—mos erat crimen non erat It was no fault when the custome was so as in times past it was a shame for the Romans to have talares tunicas side garments but now every one of honest sort doth weare them Aug. lib. 22. cont Faust c. 47. Contra. 1. Though there were no written law in those times yet their owne conscience grounded upon the light of nature and the faithfull tradition of the fathers might have discerned it to be a fault seeing that God in the beginning for one Adam made but one Eve and Lamech of the wicked race is the first found in Scripture to have had two wives 2. And though custome may be pretended for many wives yet to marry two sisters there was no such custome Mercer 3. The example of long garments is nothing like for it is a thing indifferent which may be thought comely or uncomely as time and place doth vary but that which is simply unlawfull and against the first institution as polygamie is cannot be borne out by any custome 2. Some say that polygamie is after a sort against nature yet so as it may be dispensed with as it is like after the flood to Noah this indulgence was given Perer. in 29. Gen. numer 31. Contra. 1. If Noah had beene dispensed with for many wives then had there beene greatest cause to have used that liberty and if polygamie for propagation were tolerable God might have preserved in the arke more than for every man one woman 2. Against a written law and institution as this is of having one wife Gen. 2.24 A man shall leave father and mother and cleave to his wife not wives a dispensation unwritten cannot be admitted 3. Divers allegories are made of Iacobs two wives Augustine by Leah figureth the people of the Iewes by Rachel the Gentiles Rupertus saith contrary that Rachel was a type of the Iewes Leah of the Gentiles August ser. 80. de tempor Rup in Gen. 29. Gregorie by Leah interpreteth the active life by Rachel the contemplative Homil. 14. in Ezech. ex Perer. Contra. 1. By the diversitie of these allegories it appeareth they are mens collections and humane devices and therefore cannot excuse the transgression of a divine ordinance 2. And though these allegories might be warranted by the Scripture yet thereby is not the fact justified Christs comming for the suddennesse thereof in Scripture is compared to the comming of a theefe yet I trust thereby is not a theeves sudden approching approved 3. This then is the resolution of this question 1. that Iacob shewed his infirmity in this not double but quadriple marriage yea and the same incestuous in the marriage of two sisters 2. yet Labans fault was greater than Iacobs who by his craft induced him unto it 3. God in his deepe providence used this oversight of Iacob as a meanes greatly to increase and multiply his seed 4. Iacob and the rest of the Patriarkes in their manners and generall example of life but not in some particular acts such as this is are to be imitated Mercer 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Education of children in labour Vers. 9. RAchel came with her fathers sheepe for she kept them Thus in that simple age did they bring up their children not idly and wantonly but in labour and houshold workes Laban had many servants beside in his house yet he setteth this faire damzell to keepe his sheepe though this be not an example now to men of good sort and place thus to imploy their daughters for the particular yet they should follow it so far to provide that their children bee industriously brought up and not to give them the reines of licentious liberty
whatsoever he hath decreed concerning any mans salvation shall stand Calvin For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11.29 Yet must not this doctrine make us secure to sinne presumptuously trusting to Gods election but as the Apostle saith We must worke out our salvation with feare and trembling lest we be circumvented of Sathan and prevented of that which we vainly hoped for Confut. Against the errour of the Novatians THis example of Ruben notwirhstanding his fall restored to his patriarchal dignity doth further confute that error of the Novatians who denied pardon to those which were fallen and refused to receive them into their society and congregation Calvin We see that our Saviour Christ when Perer had thrice denied him yet vouchsafed to receive him to mercy and to confirme him in his Apostleship 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Amendment of life delivereth from dangers Vers. 2. THou said Iacob put away the strange Gods c Iacob being in great danger doth purge and cleanse hâ—s houshold so the next way to finde deliverance and to obtaine ptotection from God is to amend our life and to renew our hearts and to turne every man from his evill wayes Perer. Heereupon Balaam gave that wicked counsell to put a stumbling blocke before the Israelites to cause them to sinne that they might run into Gods displeasure and be out of his protection 2. Observ. The people must shew themselves willing to be reformed Vers. 4. THey gave unto Iacob all the strange gods Herein appeareth the singular and prompt obedience of Iacobs houshold who are contented to put away their idols iewels and caterings wherein they had so much before delighted Mercer which â—eacheth that the people should shew themselves ready and willing to be reclaimed from their superstitions and corruptions of life as we read that the souldiers and people came unto Iohn and asked him Master what shall we doe Luk. 3. 3. Observ. God striketh feare into mens hearts Vers. 5. THe feare of God was upon the cities Thus God is able to command the affections of men and to smite them with feare where otherwise there is no apparent cause of feare as here the strong and populous cities of Canaan are afraid of Iacob So Rahab confessed to the spies the feare of you is fallen upon us Iosu. 2.9 Thus God is able to deliver his Church whereas no other meanes are at hand by terrifying the hearts of the enemies thereof 4. Observ. It is lawfull and commendable to mourne moderately for the dead Vers. 8. IAcob and his company made such lamentation for the departure of that godly matron Deborah that he called the place the â—ake of lamentation It is not then unlawfull to mourne for the dead nay it is an uncomly thing to shew drie cheekes in the funeralls of parents wives and children as some doe S. Paul forbiddeth not to mourne for the dead but not as they that have no hope 1. Thessal 4. Muscul. 5. Observ. Our â—oyes in this life are miâ—ed with sorrow Vers. 19. THus died Rachel Iacob doth not so much rejoyce for the birth of Benjamin as he hath occasion of griefe offered for the losse and death of deare Rachel thus the Lord seeth it to be good to temper our joy with sorrow and therein we see the mutable and changeable condition of this life which affordeth no perpetuall and constant joy Perer. And therefore amidst our joyes it is good to arme our selves against sorrow as Iob in the midst of his prosperous estate did looke for adversity saying The thing which I feared is now come upon me Iob 3.25 6. Observ. One affliction followeth after another WE see further that Iacobs life was a continuall warfare still one temptation followed in the necke of another 1. Dinah was ravished 2. Simeon and Levi put the city to the sword 3. Deborah dieth 4. Then Rachel his beloved wife 5. Then Ruben commiteth incest 6. Ioseph is sold into Egypt 7. Isaack dieth 8. Benjamin is also taken from him to goe into Egypt Thus many are the tentations and tribulations wherewith the Lord trieth his children Calvin We learne that while we live here we should prepare our selves for crosses and afflictions and when we are escaped one to looke presently for another This was Iobs case when one messenger followed at the heeles of another bringing him evill tidings Iob 1. 7. Observ. Godly women may die in childbirth Vers. 18. AS shee was about to yeeld up the ghost c. The Hebrewes note three women in Scripture that died in travaile Rachel the wife of Phinehes the sonne of Eli and Michol Davidâ— wife because it is said she had no children till the day of her death but this is a simple conjecture the meaning is that she had no children at all Mercer But we see by this example that even godly women may have Rachels lot to die in travaile and therefore such are not to hee discomforted if it please God that they so end their daies 8. Observ. Great blemishes sometime fall out in the Church of God Vers. 21. RVben lay with his fathers concubine c. It need not then seeme strange if such blemishes fall out sometime in the Church of God and families of Saints as Ruben here committeth incest in Iacobs house and it seemeth Bilha the mother of two tribes in Israel was consenting thereunto so among the Corinthians a young man had his fathers wife 1 Cor. 5.1 Mercer CHAP. XXXVI 1. The Method and Contents IN this chapter the externall state and happinesse of Esau is set forth first by his polygamie and marriage of many wives with the fruits thereof his children and the adjunctes thereunto his riches vers 1. to vers 8. Secondly by his genealogie where his children and nephewes are rehearsed and described 1. By their nativitie of what wives he had them vers 8. to 15. 2. By their dignity vers 15. to 20. Thirdly by the estate of his country where first the old inhabitants the Hâ—rites are described vers 20. to 32. then the new inhabitants the Edomites first governed by Kings vers 31. to 40. then by Dukes againe vers 40. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 2. Eliba Sebagon S. Aâ—libama Sibeon cat v. 5. Ieul Ieglom S. Iehus Iaalon cat v. 6. all the bodies of his house S. the soules of his house caet he went out of the land of Canaan S. into another country H. C. G. P. into a country away B. into the region of Seir T. from his brother Iacob H. from the face of his brother S. B.G.P. because of his brother C. before the comming of his brother T. from the face of his brother heb v. 8. Iacob dwelt in the land where his father dwelt in Canaan S. v. 11. Kâ—nez and Châ—ra H. Kenes cater v. 13. Zaresome S. Zerach Sammah cat v. 14. The sonnes of Libemas the daughter of Enam S. of Aâ—libamah the daughter of Ana caeter
sometime be used appellatively for a merchant Prov. 31.24 But he was a Canaanite as we reade the like of Simeon that he had his sonne Saul by a Canaanitish woman Gen. 46.10 Mercer 3. No marvell then if Iudah matching into the cursed stocke of Canaan whose land was promised to Abraham and his seed which Iudah could not be ignorant of had no good successe in his children the fruits of this marriage who also were accursed of God Calvin 4. Iudah saw this woman he tooke her and went in to her all was done in haste so that his affection carried him headlong his judgement did not guide him Muscul. QUEST V. Er and Onan whence and upon what occasion so called Vers. 6. IVdah tooke a wife to Er his first-borne 1. Though Iudah tooke him a wife without the consent of his father yet he will not have his sonne so to doe Muscul. 2. Whence he is called Er it is not certaine some will have it to signifie watchfull Augustine doth interpret it pelliceus to have his name of skinne or leather such as Adam was cloathed with in token of his transgression lib. 22. cont Faust. cap. 84. Isaack Carus will have all these three sonnes to be named from Iosephs calamity Er because Ioseph was in a manner desolate or destroyed of gnariri Onan of the griefe of their father Shelah of the errour which Iudah committed in selling of Ioseph Ramban thinketh Onan to be so called of the paine of his mother in travell as Rachel called Benjamin Ben-oni and Shelah of his mothers errour in ceasiâ—g to beare afterward But if it bee lawfull to use conjectures I thinke upon what occasion soever they had these names given at the first that the event answered their names for Er was solitary without children Onan had a lamentable end and about Shelah Iudah committed a great errour with Thamar 3. Iudah gave Er his name the mother named the other two not that as the Hebrewes note the father did alwayes name the first-borne the mother the rest for as we saw before in Iacobs sonnes sometime the father sometime the mother indifferently gave the name but not without the consent of the father Mercer 4. Concerning Thamar some Hebrewes would have her the daughter of Seâ— the high Priest Melchisedeck because Iudah judgeth her to be burned according to the law of the Priests daughter committing fornication Levit. 21.8 but seeing Sem died ten yeare before Iacob he lived not to the 50. yeare of Iacobs as Mercerus it cannot be that Thamar a childe-bearing woman should bee his daughter Iacob being at the least an hundred yeare old It is like she was a Canaanitish woman Luther and a vertuous woman that did leave and forsake the idolatry of her Countrey to worship the true God Perer. ex Philone QUEST VI. Of the sinne of Er what it was Vers. 7. NOw Er was wicked in the sight of the Lord. 1. The wickednesse of Er was not as Augustine supposeth in being given to oppression or cruelty lib. 22. cont Faust. cap. 34. but it is like to be the same sinne of unnaturall lust which Onan committed as may be gathered both by the likenesse of the punishment as by the phrase that he was wicked in the sight of God as it is said of the Sodomites Gen. 13.13 his sinne was not secret as Tostatus but it was a sinne very hainous and grievous against the order of nature and institution of God for he abused himselfe and spoiled his seed not because he would not have any issue by a Canaanitish woman as Mercer for then he needed not to have maried her but rather as the Hebrewes conjecture that hee might long enjoy the beauty and favour of Thamar which would be impaired by bearing of children or some such like cause 2. So then this sinne was against nature which is diversly commited either alone when men doe vitiously procure and provoke their seed or with others either of a divers kinde as with bruit beasts or with the same kinde but not the right sex as with the male or with the right sex that is the female but not in due manner which was the sinne of Er and Onan 3. This sinne of Er was against the order of nature using the act of generation for pleasure onely and not for generation it was against God whose institution he brake against his wife whom he defrauded of the fruit of her wombe against himselfe in preventing his issue against mankinde which should have beene increased and propagated Perer. 4. Yet Onans sinne was not lesse than Ers as Augustine thinketh who maketh Er of that sort of wicked men that doe evill to others Onan of that kinde that doe no good to others but herein Onan exceedeth the wickednesse of Er both because he was not warned by his brothers example as Daniel reproveth Belthasar because his heart was not humbled by the fall of Nebuchadnezer his father Dan. 5.22 As also for that Onan committed this sinne of envie against his brother to whom hee should have raised seed whereas Er did it not of envie but of an immoderate desire of pleasure Perer. QUEST VII Whether in any case it were lawfull by Moses law for one to marry his brothers wife Vers. 8. IVdah said c. goe in to thy brothers wife Here a question is moved whether it were lawfull by Moses law for the brother to marry his brothers widow to raise up seed to his brother 1. Philo thinketh that it was not onely lawfull among the Israelites but that it was the custome so to doe among the Canaanites and that the Judges of the Countrey did give Thamar to Onan after the death of his brother Er but the contrary is evident out of the text for Iudah and not the Judges of the Countrey gave Thamâ—r to Onan And I thinke rather that it was a custome received among the fathers and afterward confirmed by Moses law than any usage learned of the Canaanites whose fashions they were not to imitate 2. Neither doe I thinke with the Hebrewes that Iudah was the first that brought in this kinde of marriage though hee be first mentioned but that he had received that custome from other of the fathers 3. Wherefore it seemeth that Moses gave liberty to the next brother to take the wife of his brother that departed without issue and not to the next removed kinsman onely that was without the compasse of the Leviticall degrees and so some expound that law Deut. 25.5 sic Genevens upon that place D. Fulk in 6. Mark annot 2. But the other sense approved by Mercerus Calvin Iunius which understand it of the naturall brother seemeth more probable for these reasons 1. Because the first president of such marriages is taken from this place where one naturall brother succeedeth another in taking his wife 2. The word used in the law Deut. 25.5 jabam signifieth not to doe the office of a kinsman but of
Priest as the Hebrewes imagine for he died ten yeares before Iacob was borne who was now above 100. yeare old and therefore Melchisedeck could not have a daughter so young to beare children neither was this punishment arbitrary in Iudah and inflicted without law according to his pleasure Burgens for Iudah had no such authority there nor yet as Lyranus and Tostatus was she worthy of the fire because she had committed not simple fornication but adultery because she was by law obliged to the third brother and so in a manner espoused for it was not adultery for the widow of the brother to marrie with some other than the surviving brother else Naomi would never have advised her daughters in law to get them other husbands in their owne Countrey Ruth 1.9 But I rather thinke that Thamars adultery was in this that she had played the whore whereas Iudah had betrothed and espoused her to Selah and that Iudah who never was minded to give Selah to Thamar fearing lest he might die also as is evident vers 11. was very forward to take this occasion to be rid of Thamar that Selah might not marrie her 3. But herein appeareth Iudahs too much rigour and injustice that before the matter was examined gave sentence and was partiall the truth being knowne in his owne cause and further it was a savage part to put to death a woman great with childe which is contrary both to divine and humane lawes for it is written Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not bee put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but if Thamar had now died the infant had died with her The Romans had a law that the execution of a woman with childe should be deferred till she had brought forth the same also was practised among the Athenians Aeltan lib. 5. And therefore Claudius the Emperour is noted for his cruelty that spared not to put to death women with childe Perer. ex Dion lib. 57. QUEST XI Wherefore the Midwife useth a red threed and what colour it was of Vers. 28. THe midwife bound a red threed c. 1. It is so rather to be read than with Oleaster a twine or double threed the word sani here used commeth indeed of sanah that signifieth to double which is rather to be referred to the double die and colour than the double matter Iun. Tostatus also is much deceived here that taketh it not for a red but a blacke colour twice died ex Perer. 3. The Midwife tied this red threed as a marke of the first-borne because he first put forth his hand and the purple colour very well agreeth to the birth-right or eldership Muscul. QUEST XII Whence Pharez was so called and whereof he is a type Vers. 29. HOw hast thou broken thy breach upon thee 1. Hierome is deceived that of this word pharatz that signifieth to breake or divide thinketh the Pharises to have taken denomination whereas they had their name rather of Pharas which signifieth to disperse or separate because they were separate from other in profession of life and their apparell Mercer 2. This story hath bin diversly allegorized by the fathers some by Pharez understand the beleeving Gentiles by Zarah the Israelites and by the red threed their bloudy circumcision sacrifices sic Iren. Cyril Some contrariwise will have Phares to signifie the Jewes Zarah the beleeving Gentiles Chrysost. 3. But this Phares is more fitly a type and figure of Christ who hath broken downe the partition wall and hath broken the power of hell and death Mercer And by this strange and extraordinary birth the Lord would have Iudah and Thamar admonished of the sin which they had committed and to be humbled thereby though he in his mercie had forgiven it Calvin 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The difference betweene the apparelling of widowes and wives Vers. 14. SHe put her widowes garment off c. It seemeth that it was the use in those dayes for widowes to be knowne from wives by their mourning and grave apparell in which case more is permitted to women that are married whom the Apostle alloweth to adorne themselves with comely and sober apparell without pride or excesse 1 Timoth. 2.9 to please and content their husbands but widowes having no husbands to whose liking they should apparell themselves ought not to decke themselves to please other mens eyes Luther 2. Doct. Friendship ought alwayes to be joyned with pietie Vers. 20. IVdah sent a kid by the hand of his friend This Hâ—rah Iudahs friend did performe an evill office in being as it were a broker for Iudah who should neither have requested any dishonest or uncomely thing of his friend nor the other yeelded unto it love truth and piety ought not to be separated as Saint Iohn saith Whom I love in the truth Epist. 3.1 Muscul. 3. Doct. Adultery in former times punished by death Vers. 24. LEt her bee burnt We see that even among the Canaanites adultery was judged worthy of death for Iudah inventeth no new kinde of punishment but speaketh according to the law and custome of that Countrey So the Lord himselfe said to Abimelech that had taken Sarai unto him Behold thou art but a dead man for this c. Gen. 20.3 Now although this law as peculiar to that Countrey bindeth not now neither in respect of the kinde of death for by Moses law onely the Priests daughter if she played the whore was burned Levit. 21.9 the rest were stoned nor yet in the inequality of the law for the women offending were burned the men escaped as appeareth in Iudah Calvin whereas both adulterers and adulteresses are alike guilty and though then there was greater cause of keeping their seed uncorrupt for preserving of their lives and the distinction of families in which respect it may be thought somewhat of the former rigour and severity may be abated yet this example condemneth the security and connivence of magistrates in these dayes in the punishing of this sinne when as faults of lesse nature are more severely censured than adultery And whereas the president of our Saviour is urged by some for the mitigation of the punishment of adultery because he would not condemne the woman taken in adulterie it doth not serve their turne for this mercie Christ shewed not to cleare or exempt the adulteresse leaving her to the magistrate but partly to shew that he came not to be a judge in such causes as neither in other like businesses as dividing of the inheritance Luk. 12.14 partly by this example he would teach what is to be required in the person of an accuser not to bee guilty of that crime whereof he accuseth others 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That it is not lawfull upon any occasion to marrie the brothers wife Vers. 8. GOe into thy brothers wife Because in this place as also Deut. 25.5 it is permitted to naturall brethren to marry the wives of their brother deceased Bellarmine
what sex the infant was better than see them on their stooles G. them is added or see them in their birth time V.S. B. looke in the stooles A. P.H. that is into them the word abenim signifieth the stooles of women in travell so called of banim children T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Why the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed Vers. 1. THese are the names of the children of Israel The names of the twelve Patriarkes are so often rehearsed in Scripture 1. because of them came the twelve tribes the Priestly also and the Kingly order sprang from thence 2. And this mysticall number of twelve is used in Scripture to describe the spirituall state of the Church under Christ as twelve thousand are chosen out of every tribe Apoc. 7. and the new Jerusalem is set forth by the twelve gates and twelve foundations Apoc. 21. Simler 3. And to shew the truth and constancie of Gods promises in increasing the seed of Iacob of twelve fathers into so many thousands Pellican 4. And beside the dignitie and prerogative of the children of God herein appeareth who are chiefely remembred in Scripture where mention is made of the wicked it is by the way and as it were by accident and in a manner besides the proper intention of the Scripture Ferus QUEST II. Why Iacobs sonnes are not alwayes rehearsed in the same order Vers. 3. ISsachar Zebulon and Benjamin the Patriarkes are seldome rehearsed in the same order for Gen. 46. first Leahs children then her maide Zilpaehs then Rachels sonnes and lastly Bilhah her maides are numbred but here Benjamin Rachels sonne is set before the sonnes of the handmaides the like order is kept Genes 35. So Reuben is here named first but in the order of the campe Iudah hath the first place Num. 2. and when the spies are sent out Numb 13. another order is observed Simler The reasons hereof may be these 1. because in the old Testament for the most part the order of nature not of grace is followed for though Reuben were the eldest in birth yet Iudah had the regall preeminence Bor. 2. This is done that we should not be curious observers of numbers or mens nativities Pellican 3. The Patriarkes had now all received their fathers blessing and were incorporate into one holy people to shew therefore their equalitie and that there was no difference of the tribes before God sometimes one is named first sometime another Ferus 4. But here and Gen. 35. all the children of Iacobs wives as sonnes of free women are rehearsed before the sonnes of the maide servants Iun. Vatab. QUEST III. How they are said to be seventie soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt Vers. 5. SO all the soules that came of Iacobs loynes were seventie 1. They were beside Iacob 66. with Iacob 67. with Ioseph his two sonnes 70. so then in this number Iacbos wives are not reckoned but onely those which came out of his loynes but Ioseph must be included and therefore it is added but Ioseph was in Egypt Iunius readeth cum Iosepho with Ioseph in the same sense 2. Whereas the Septuagint read 75. whom S. Luke followeth in Stephens storie Act. 7. because it was not safe to depart in a matter of number from the received translation Iunius thinketh that in that number all are comprehended beside Iacob that are rehearsed in that catalogue as Iacobs two wives Er and Onan which all make 75. But why should Iacob be left out in the number of 75. and included in the number of 70. and to what purpose should Er and Onan be comprehended in that summe seeing they were dead before and went not downe into Egypt But seeing the Septuag Gen. 46. doe rehearse five nephewes of Ioseph Machir and Gilead his sonne of Manasses Sutalam and Edem his sonne and Taam of Ephraim it is more like that S. Luke for the reason before alleaged therein followeth the Septuagint Aretius See more of this upon that question Gen. 46. QUEST IV. Of the wonderfull multiplying of the Israelites in Egypt 7. ANd the children of Israel fructified c. 1. The people increased exceedingly which is here expressed by foure words of like significations pâ—ru they fructified ijsrezu they brought forth in abundance as the fish ijrbu they were multiplied and jagghatzuus they waxed strong Simler 2. and so accordingly they multiplied that of 70. persons there came 700000. of every one tenne thousand Pellican Yea whereas above sixe hundred thousand of men able to goe to warre from twentie yeeres old and upward were numbred that came out of Egypt Numb 1.46 out of which number were excepted all the males under twentie and all the old men beside the women which were not so few as the men seeing it was not unusuall in those dayes for one man to have divers wives it may be supposed and is so judged by some that the whole number could not bee lesse than thirtie hundred thousand Perer. 3. QUEST V. In what time the Israelites so exceedingly increased FUrther this multiplying of the Israelites to take the longest time from the first going downe of Iacob to the returne of the Israelites thence was in the space of 215. yeeres Some thinke that the greatest increase was the first hundred yeere after that generation was dead vers 6. which is usually taken in Scripture for the space of an hundred yeeres Simler But there by that generation are understood onely the men of that age Vatab. Augustine taketh all the time after the death of Ioseph which Perer. counteth an 145. yeeres But the chiefe time of this increase was after Iosephs death before the time of their servitude how they increased also in the time of their bondage is declared afterward vers 12. Neither need this seeme strange that in the space of 215. yeeres the Israelites did so wonderfully increase seeing that forren authors doe write that Ninus who began to reigne 250. yeeres after the floud did lead in his armie against the Bactrianes 700. thousand footmen and two hundred thousand horsemen Diod. Sicul. lib. 3. cap. 2. ex Ctesia Perer. QUEST VI. By what meanes the Israelites increased HOw this wonderfull increase should be wrought 1. we neither need to thinke with Augustine that it was miraculous 2. nor with the Hebrewes to imagine that every one of them brought forth two or three at a birth Pellican For although it be often seene that women may have many at a birth as Aristotle maketh mention of one that had twentie at foure times five at every birth and that it is usuall in Egypt for the women to have two and three and sometimes five at a birth Trogus reporteth that in Egypt they bring forth sometimes seven at once Bor. yet this is not usually nor often seene 3. Therefore supposing as is most like that all the Hebrew women were very fruitfull that they bore betimes and were child-bearing long being not cut off by
might be stirred up to pray to God for their deliverance and to long for the land of Canaan 3. That God might take just occasion to shew his judgements upon Egypt 4. That the Israelites also might be occasioned hereby more justly to shake off the Egyptians cruell yoke 5. That Gods goodnesse and power might be seene in supporting his people and increasing them even in the middest of their affliction 6. That the Israelites remembring their cruell bondage in Egypt should have no mind to goe thither againe For seeing this notwithstanding if some rebellious of them attempted to make them a Captaine and to returne into Egypt Numb 14. what would they have done if they had lived in all fulnesse and pleasure there Perer. QUEST XIV Whether the Mid-wives were Egyptians or Hebrew women 15 MOreover the King of Egypt commanded the Mid-wives of the Hebrew women 1. Those Mid-wives were not Egyptian women as Iosephus thinketh to whom Pererius subscribeth with others as Aretiuâ— Simlerus for they were such as usually ministred to the Hebrew women as the text sheweth before this time and it is not to be thought that the Israelitish women had no Midwives of their owne besides their religion sheweth as much because they served God that they were Hebrew Mid-wives and the derivation of their names doth give conjecture thereof Shiphrah is derived of Shaphar to be bountifull to adorne and Puhah of Pahah to crie out a name fitting a Mid-wife that is best acquainted with the crying of children and whereas Iosephus giveth this reason because the Hebrew women would have beene partiall for kindred saith it may seeme no more unlikely that Pharaoh useth Hebrew women whom he might thinke for the feare of their life would obey his commandement then he did set Hebrew taske-masters over the rest of the Israelites Exod. 5.15 who might have beene thought also no indifferent overseeers I therefore rather thinke with Augustine that those Mid-wives were Hebrew women than Egyptians 2. Yet could they not be Iocabed Moses mother and Miriam Moses sister as some Hebrewes who was too young not above seven yeere elder than Moses to be imployed for a Mid-wife Simler QUEST XV. Why Pharaoh onely giveth his cruell charge to two Mid-wives THese two Mid-wives are named 1. Not as Cajetan because they attended onely upon the nobler sort of the Hebrewes whose children especially Pharaoh intended to cut off for Pharaohs charge is generall to kill all the male children 2. Nay there were many more called as Perer. but these named as the more famous 3. But these were the chiefe and had the charge and command over the rest and from them they are to take their direction Pellican Vatablus and whereas Cajetan denieth that there was any such presidencie or superiority among the Mid-wives it appeareth to be otherwise that among the Grecians there were some to whom the choise care of that businesse was committed as Plutarch testifieth and that publike schooles were kept for that service Iun. in Analys 4. Now it is easie to guesse why the male children were commanded to be put to death rather than the other 1. Because they feared not any rebellion or insurrection by that sex 2. They were fairer than the Egyptian women and so they might keepe them for their lust 3. They were industrious in spinning and needle work and for that cause might be kept for their service Perer. 5. But herein Pharaoh sheweth himselfe more cruell than either Athaliah in putting to death the Kings children or Herod in slaying the infants or then Astâ—ages and Aâ—â—lius that would have destroyed Remus and Romulus for these did not make a generall edict against the children of an whole nation as Pharaoh doth nor yet surprised infants newly borne Borrh. QUEST XVI Whether the Mid-wives made a lie and are therein to be justified Vers. 19. A And the Mid-wives answered Pharaoh because the Hebrew women are not c. The most doe hold that the Midwives doe here make a fained excuse by an officious lie 1. And of them which thus thinke most are of Augustines opinion that the Mid-wives herein offended because no lie being against the truth is just yet God rewarded them not for their dissembling but for their mercy remunerata est benignitas mentis non iniquitas mentientis the benignitâ—e of the mind not the iniquitie of the lie was rewarded so also Simler Borrh. with others and Augustine addeth this reason that if many times the works of the flesh are pardoned for the works of mercy that follow after much more merito misericordiâ— dimittuntur qua propter misericordiam committuntur for mercy sake those things are remitted which because of mercy are committed 2. Others thinke that the Mid-wives were hindred by their lie and that which might have beene eternall in terrenam est compensationem declinata was because of the lie turned into an earthly recompense Gregorie But seeing the feare of God hath not onely the promise of this life but of the next and the Scripture testifieth of these Midwives that they feared God it is spoken without warrant that they were onely temporally blessed 3. Some doe justifie this act of the Mid-wives and seeme to make it meritorious though not of an eternall yet of a temporall reward Thom. Aquin. But to this opinion may be opposed that saying of Aug. Non remunerata est in illis fallacia sed benevolentia Their fallacie was not rewarded in them but their mercie 4. Rupertus doth simply defend this dissimulation and holdeth it to be no sinne because it proceeded of charitie and God rewarded it and as well may Rahab be condemned for making the like excuse Iosh. 2. Cont But these reasons are very weake 1. This excuse proceeded not of charitie but from feare and though it did charitie must be alwayes joyned with veritie otherwise it is inordinate 2. Their mercy onely was commended and their infirmitie by Gods mercy pardoned 3. Not Rahabs infirmitie but her faith is commended if her excuse were untrue 4. But as Rahab may in that place be defended to have made a true excuse speaking of some other men that were departed from her which came to her house so here also the Mid-wives may say true that the Hebrew women having secret notice from the Mid-wives might be delivered in secret before the Mid-wives came Iun. And it is not unlike but as they were chaster than the Egyptian women so God might give them more strength and speedier deliverance Pellican Here it will be objected that it is said the Mid-wives preserved the men children because they feared God vers 17. and therefore it is like they were present Simler But this may be understood of the care that they had of the infants by whose meanes they were preserved Vatab. For otherwise it was not possible that these two in their owne persons could be present at every womans travaile to save the children QUEST XVII How the Lord is said to make
QUEST XII Of the education of Moses and his adoption to be Pharaohs daughters son Vers. 5. WHen she saw the Arke among the bulrushes she sent her maid to fet it c. The Chalde Paraphrast readeth here that she put forth her arme to take it for the word amah signifieth both a Cubite but then it is with dagesh and a maid then it is without dagesh amah not ammah as here and therefore Aben Ezra refuseth the Chalde reading Beside Pharaohs daughter comming downe to wash her it is not like she was among the flagges where the Arke was which had beene an unfit place to wash in Simler 2. By Gods providence Moses owne mother became the childs nurse Iosephus writeth by this occasion because when diverse Egyptian women were brought the child refused to sucke of them and would not take the breasts of any but of his mother but the true occasion is here expressed that when Moses sister perceived that she was in love with the child she offered to goe call a nurse of the Hebrew women 3. Pharaohs daughter adopted him to be her owne sonne not as Philo thinketh faining her selfe to be with child and making Pharaoh beleeve that is was her owne neither yet did the propernesse of the child onely allure Pharaoh to consent that his daughter should nourish him as her son especially if it were true as Iosephus writeth that while Pharaoh played with the child he tooke off his Diadem and Crowne which the Egyptian Priest that foretold of his birth did interpret to bee ominous to the Kingdome and therefore gave counsell the child should be slaine but Pharaohs daughter snatched him out of his armes and so saved the childs life This then is chiefly to be ascribed to Gods speciall providence who so wrought that the child should be brought up even among his enemies QUEST XIII Whence Moses had his learning of the Egyptians onely or of the Grecians also AS Pharaohs daughter adopted Moses for her sonne so as S. Stephen witnesseth he was learned in all the wisdome of the Egyptians being counted a Princes sonne had no doubt a Princely education 1. But here Philo is deceived who beside the arts and science which hee learned of the Egyptians as Arithmetick Geometrie and the Hieroglyphikes that is their hid and secret and Enigmaticall doctrine saith he was taught of the Chaldes Astronomie and Philosophy of the Grecians for beside that Stephen onely maketh mention of his Egyptian learning it is certaine that there was no profession of Philosophy or of learning among the Grecians before the seven wise men before whose time Moses was borne almost a thousand yeeres Perer. And Moses was about Inachus time long after whom in the eleventh generation Cadmus found out the Greeke letters after whom flourished Amphion Orpheus Museus Linus Simler 2. Neither is it probable which Artapanus an ancient writer affirmeth that beside many other benefits which Moses brought to the Egyptians hee taught them the use of letters and therefore was honoured of them under the name of Mercurius for seeing Moses received his learning from the Egyptians it is likely they had also the knowledge of letters 3. That also is as uncertaine which Clemens Alexandrinus alleageth from Eupolâ—mus that Moses taught the Israelites the knowledge of the letters for beside that Augustine thinketh that the Hebrew tongue was continued from Heber and preserved in the family of the fathers together with the letters long before the giving of the Law grounding his opinion upon that place Deut. 29.10 where the Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Moses appointed Scribes and instructors of the letters Iosephus also writeth that the Hebrew letters were in use before the floud and that they of Seths posteritie having learned of Adam that the world should be twice destroyed once by water and the second time by fire did make two pillars the one of brick the other of stone and did therein grave the principles of the artes and sciences that those profitable inventions should not be lost that if the waters dissolved the bricke yet the other pillar of stone might continue which Iosephus saith was to be seene in his time in Syria Ioseph lib. 1. Antiq. Ex Perer. QUEST XIV What kinde of learning Moses received of the Egyptians FUrther it will bee inquired what manner of learning it was which Moses learned of the Egyptian 1. Such profitable arts as were professed among the Egyptians as Arithmeticke Geometrie Astronomy Moses was instructed in as being fit to prepare him for that publike administration wherein hee should be employed 2. The Egyptians had more secret and hid kind of learning called the Hieroglyphikes which by certaine outward symboles and Emblemes did set forth divers mysticall morall politike principles which kind of doctrine was not knowne to the vulgar sort herein Iustinus Martyr thinketh that Moses was trayned up having the knowledge onely thereof not the use which was vaine frivolous superstitious Iust. qu. orthodox 25. 3. But that Moses by imitation of the Egyptian Hieroglyphikes did forbid certaine kindes of beasts to be eaten and some onely and not other to be sacrificed as Eleazer the high Priest answered the Ambassadour of Ptolemy Philodelphus as Pythagoras had also his Enigmaticall precepts Ignem gladio ne fodias Do not gall the fire with a sword that is provoke not an angry man Câ—â— non comedendum The heart is not to be eaten that is griefe is not to be nourished in the minde Hirâ—ndinem in domum non esse recipiendam Not to receive a swallow that is a brabler into the house and such like that Moses used many such legall helpes in prescribing of his legall rites and ceremonies it is not to be thought seeing he had his direction from God and saw a paterne of such things which belonged to the Tabernacle in the mount Exod. 25.40 QUEST XV. Whence the Egyptians received their learning BUt if further it be demanded from whence the Egyptians received their varietie of learning 1. Neither is the opinion of Iamblicus probable that Mercurius called Trismegistus because hee was a great Philosopher a great King and a great Priest was the author of the Egyptian learning whom heâ— alleageth certaine antient authors testifying to have written of the wisdome of the Egyptians 35535. bookes for this Mercurius the nephew as is supposed of the other Mercurius whose grandfather by the mothers side Atlas was in whose time Moses was borne as Aug. lib. 8. de civ Dei cap. 8. being after Moses could not be the inventor of the Egyptian skill which Moses long before learned 2. Neither yet is it certaine that Abraham instructed the Egyptians in these sciences as Iosephus writeth for his abode and continuance was not long in Egypt and so he wanted time there to lay the foundation of so many artes 3. Augustine yeeldeth to the opinion of Varro that Isis the daughter of Inachus first
worthie si quis salva fide refugiat periâ—ulum instans If one not violating his faith doth shun the instant danger unlesse we will say that Christ when he escaped out of their hands that sought to stone him did it of feare Luke 4. But I rather preferre the 7. exposition before touched QUEST XXII Why Moses sufferings are called by the Apostle the rebukes of Christ. BUt seeing so oft mention hath beene made of that place to the Hebrewes it shall not be amisse briefly to shew the meaning of those other words of the Apostle vers 26. esteeming the rebuke of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt 1. We refuse here the exposition of Lyranus that he calleth the rebukes of Moses the rebukes of Christ because by faith foreseeing what Christ should suffer hee by Christs example was confirmed to endure the like for in this sense they are Moses rebukes rather than Christs 2. Neither are they called Christs rebukes because they were such as Christ commendeth Blessed are they that suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake Matt. 5. 3. or for that Christ was to come of that people and therefore their rebukes are counted the rebukes of Christ Cajetan 4. or because Moses was a figure of Christ and suffered the like rebukes because that as Moses left the Court and palace of Pharaoh to be partaker of the afflictions of his people so Christ descending from heaven tooke upon him our infirmities Oecumenius Theophylact. 5. But they are called Christs rebukes because he suffereth in his members and accounteth their afflictions as his owne in which sense the Apostle saith he fulfilled the rest of the afflictions of Christ in his flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Col. 1.24 QUEST 23. Why Pharaoh sought to slay Moses Vers. 15. PHaraoh heard of this matter and sought to slay Moses The causes why Pharaoh sought Moses life Iosephus alleageth to be these three 1. Because the Egyptians envied his prosperous successe in the warres against the Ethiopians 2. They feared him as like to be one that aspired to great matters and might seeke some innovation and change in Egypt 3. The Egyptian Priests did prophesie of him that he was like to prove very dangerous to Egypt By these meanes the King was incensed against him But I rather approve that which Philo writeth that Pharaoh was not so much moved against Moses for the death of one Egyptian as for that by this he perceived that Moses was a friend and favourer of the Hebrewes whom he accounted his enemies and an enemie to the Egyptians his subjects and friends Philo lib. 1. de vita Mosis QUEST XXIV The causes why Moses lived in exile and banishment 40. yeares Vers. 15. THerefore Moses fled Zeiglerus thinketh that whereas at the fortieth yeere of Moses age there were 390. yeeres expired since the promise made to Abraham and that tenne yeeres onely remained of the affliction of the people which was to continue 400. yeeres in one place and other Genes 15.13 Moses thought to prevent the time there being but tenne yeeres to come and therefore God punished his presumption with fortie yeeres exile But this cannot stand with the Apostles testimonie of Moses that by faith he forsooke Egypt if it were a worke of faith how could it be a punishment for his presumption Therefore the causes of Moses flight and exile are better touched by Ferus 1. That the people should not depend upon man but trust in God for their deliverance 2. That Moses might be weaned altogether from the pleasures of Egypt and delicate life in Pharaohs Court 3. That he might be taught that the deliverance of Israel should not be by sword or strength but by the spirit of God 4. To punish the peoples ingratitude for not more thankfully accepting of this benefit that God had stirred them up a deliverer for not onely this Hebrew whom Moses rebuked rejected his calling but generally all the people made light of it as S. Stephen sheweth Act. 7.25 QUEST XXV Of Midian what countrie it was and where situate Vers. 15. ANd dwelt in the land of Midian 1. This was the chiefe Citie of the Midianites so called of Midian one of the sonnes of Keturah by Abraham it was situate in Arabia upon the red sea as Iosephus 2. Hierome saith there were two Cities of this name one on the South part of Arabia by the red sea the other by Arnon and Arcopolis the ruines whereof were to be seene in his time 3. The whole Countrie was called Arabia where the Midianites Amalekites Israelites dwelt together Philo. And these Arabians were called Petrei of their metropolis or chiefe Citie Petra Borrh. 4. This Midian was not farre from Mount Sinai for thereabout did Moses keepe his father in lawes sheepe Exod. 3. and thither came Iethro with Moses wife and children and S. Paul placeth Sinai in Arabia Gal. 4. 5. The women of this Countrie joyning with the Moabites inticed the Israelites to commit fornication Numb 25. These Midianites oppressed Israel seven yeeres of whom Gideon slew 135000. Iud. 8. QUEST XXVI Rehuel Iethro Hobab whether the same Vers. 18. ANd when they came to Rehuel their father c. This Rehuel was not the same with Iethro as the Septuagint and Latine translator here read Iethro and as Hierome thinketh they were two names of the same man 2. Neither had he foure names Iethro Rehuel Hobab Keni as Thostatus Lyranus for Hobab was the sonne of Rehuel Numb 10.29 and hee was called Keni of his nation and countrey because he was a Kenite Numb 24.21 Iunius 3 Pererius also is deceived thinking that Hobab was not Moses father in law but his wives brother and his father in lawes sonne because saith he Moses father in law departed from them at Mount Sinai Exod. 18. but Hobab staied with them still and was their guide in the wildernesse Numb 10.31 But Pererius herein erreth also for these two stories of Iethro and Hobab Exod. 18. and Numb 10. must be joyned together they were both one man and hee tooke his leave of Moses as it is shewed Exod. 18. but he returned againe unto them before they departed from Sinai to be their guide as Moses requested Numb 10. and it is like he brought his kindred and family with him because the Kenites are read afterward to have cohabited with Israel Iudg. 1.16.4 Wherefore Rehuel was grandfather unto Moses wife called also their father after the manner of the Hebrewes Iethro and Hobab are the same for they are both said to be the father in law of Moses Exodus 18. and Num. 10.29 and Hobab and Iethro was the sonne of Rehuel ibid. Iun. QUEST XXVII Whether Rehuel were Prince and Priest of Midian Vers. 16. ANd the Prince of Midian c. The Hebrew word is Cohen which signifieth both Prince and Priest and one that is preferred or exalted in any office or authoritie as Davids sonnes are called cohanim
Saints departed this life Isay 63.16 Abraham is ignorant of us and Israel knoweth not us and they might as well inferre thus The Saints alive doe one instruct and teach another Ergo much more the Saints departed 2. Their charitie is seene in that they doe in generall long to have us joyned with them in that blessed estate though in particular because they know not our wants they cannot wish our supplie 3. And though it be granted that this communion is in charitie this proveth no particular intercession made by them for us but as we in generall give thanks in earth for their peaceable departure and deliverance from the miseriâ—s of this life So they in generall desire that we may be partakers of the same blessed rest with them 4. Wee request the living to pray for us because they are present with us but the dead are absent and heare us not it may as well be inferred from hence that we may also consult with the dead and aske counsell of them which is directly forbidden Deut. 18.11 4. Argum. Absolom could not bee admitted to his fathers presence till Ioab had mediated for him and Bethshaba Salomons mother entreated for Adoniah So it is necessarie to have mediators to come unto God Answer 1. We have also one sufficient Mediator Christ Jesus who is able sufficiently to reconcile us unto God 2. Though many mediators are used in Princes Courts because either the Prince is ignorant of our affaires or his affection estranged yet it is not so with God who knoweth all things and the love of Christ toward us exceedeth the love of all other inferiour mediators which men can seeke unto 3. The example of Bethshaba is unfitly alleaged for shee obtained not her suite 5. Argum. Invocation of Saints is warranted by the Scripture 1. Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith concerning Iosephs two sonnes Let my name be named upon them 2. Iob 5.1 Eliphaz saith to Iob Call now if any will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne thee 3. Praise the Lord in his Saints Psal. 150.1 4. Ezeâ—h 22.30 I sought for a man among them that should make up the hedge and stand in the gap before 〈◊〉 c. but I found none Answer 1. Iacob meaneth by that phrase that they should be called by his name and counted as his children as the same phrase is used Isai. 4.1 seven women shall take hold of one man and say c. Let thy name be called upon us who will say that they prayed to their husband they desire to be called by his name 2. Though that had beene Eliphaz meaning that Iob should have made some of the Saints departed his patrones yet because Iobs friends maintained an evill cause and afterward are reproved of God for it all that they say is not to be justified but that is not Eliphaz meaning he speaketh of the Saints and righteous living to see if Iob could finde among any of them a patrone to defend his cause 3. The place in the Psalme is to be read Praise God in his Holinesse Iun. Or in his Sanctâ—ariâ— Vatab. Neither doth it follow because God is praised in his Saints therefore wee are to pray to Saints as it followeth in the next words Praise him in the firmament will they have also the firmament prayed unto 4. That place in Ezechiel is understood of men living not of the dead 6. Argum. The honour given unto the Saints redoundeth unto Christ as he saith Matth. 25.45 In as much as yee did it unto one of the least of those ye did it unto me Answ. Our Saviour speaketh of his members living here upon earth to whom we are to extend our charitie not of the dead and of such honour as is due unto the Saints not of that which is due unto God for to give that to any creature were not to honour but dishonour God 7. Argum. Many miracles have beene done at the tombes and sepulchers of the dead where prayers are made therefore God is well pleased that they should be prayed unto Answer 1. The argument followeth not so by the touching of Elishaes bones one that was dead was restored to life this was to confirme their doctrine and propheticall calling 2. Many of those miracles are fained and small credit is to bee given unto them 3. Some of them were wrought by the operation of Satan to deceive as the Lord warneth his people to take heed of such false Prophets which shew signes Deut. 13. And S. Paul saith That Antichrist shall come by the power of Satan c. in lying wonders Among the Gentiles such miracles and wonders also were wrought This may suffice for an answer to their reasons Our arguments follow Reasons out of Scripture disproving the invocation of Saints 1. THere is neither precept nor example extant in Scripture to warrant the invocation of Saints the Scripture sendeth us to God Call upon me in the day of trouble and our Saviour teacheth us to pray to his Father Our Father In matters of doctrine an argument drawne negatively from the Scriptures doth conclude strongly 2. The Saints know not our affaires Abraham is ignorant of us Isai. 63.16 they are not present to heare us they are at peace their soules rest under the Altar Revelat. 6. they doe not know our hearts therefore they are not to be prayed unto all these things are requisite in them to whom we should offer our prayers But they say that the Saints in the divine essence as in a glasse doe behold our affaires Contra Whether doe they behold all or what it pleaseth God to shew them not the first for they know not the time of the comming of Christ to judgement if the second then God must first be prayed unto to reveale our affaires unto them were it not then much better for us to goe the next way unto God 3. S. Iohn saith We have an Advocate with the Father Iesus Christ the righteous 1 Ioh. 2.8 We need then no other Advocates for we have greater cause to doubt of the love and inclination of the Saints toward us than of the love of Christ. 4. Christ biddeth us aske in his name and promiseth we shall receive Ioh. 16.24 Then are prayers made to others superfluous seeing by Christ we are promised to obtaine our requests 5. There is none other name under heaven than Christs whereby wee must be saved If we have salvation in Christ then all other good things It is the Apostles reason If God gave his Sonne for us How shall he not with him give us all things also Rom. 8.32 6. This invocation of the Saints maketh a way for superstition and Idolatrie for so the Heathen did invocate the name of the dead and place them in the number of the gods erect Temples and Altars and consecrate festivall dayes unto them 7. God onely is to be worshipped invocation is a part of the divine worship therefore to bee yeelded unto God They would
parents is set first in the second Table THis fifth Commandement is set before the other for these reasons 1. Lyranus Primò ponitur praeceptum circa operationem boni First this precept is put which concerneth the operation of that which is good as in giving honour to parents the other precepts are touching the shunning and avoiding of evill 2. Thomas giveth this reason because first those duties are prescribed Quibus homo ex aliqua speciali ratione obligatur c. whereby a man is specially bound to some particular persons as to parents then those follow Qua indifferenter omnibus debitum reddunt which indifferently yeeld the due unto all men 3. Tostatus thus divideth the precepts of the second Table according to the threefold facultie of the minde which are rationalis irascibilis concupiscibilis the rationall part the irascibile or irefull power and the coveting and desiring facultie the rationall is the most worthie in giving honour unto Superiours for by the rationall part wee desire such things which are of an higher degree than those things which brute beasts do covet the irefull part is seene in revenge either against a mans person directly which is met withall in the next precept Thou shalt not kill or against some principall thing belonging to his person as his good name which is provided for in the ninth precept The coveting facultie is seene either in the act it selfe which is twofold either in carnall desire toward a mans wife forbidden in the 7. precept or in a covetous eye toward his substance in the 8. or in the desire onely of these things as in the 10. Tostat. qu. 17. 4. Procopius yeeldeth this reason why this precept is set first Quia parentes secunda post Deum causa 〈◊〉 quòd simus Because parents are the next cause after God of our being And so as Thomas saith Est quadem affinitas hujus praecepti ad praecepta prima Tabulae There is a certaine affinity betweene this precept and the precepts of the first Table Likewise Tostatus because next unto God we must reverence our parents as most bound unto them as the Heathen Philosopher could say Quòd patribus diis non possumus rarebuere aequalia That to God and our parents wee can never render equally that is as wee have received Aristot. 8. Ethicor. 5. But the best reason is because this precept is Nervus fundamentum obedientiae c. is the very foundation and band of obedience to the other Commandements which would soone be violated if men did not stand in awe of the Magistrate the father of the Common-wealth And beside this precept is set first because of the promise annexed that wee should be the more easily allured unto obedience Vrsin QUEST IV. Why speciall mention is made of the mother THy father and mother c. Speciall mention is made of the mother for these causes 1. Because in these three things are children bound unto their mothers because they are the meanes of their generation as the father is the active and formall cause so the mother is the materiall and passive cause of their conception and beside the conception it is peculiar to the mother to beare the childe 9. moneths in her wombe with much sorrow and griefe and at the last with great paine and danger to bring forth The second thing is the education of the childe which being yet young and tender is brought up with the mother and is apt then to receive any impressions either to good or evill and therefore it is no small helpe to make a childe good to bee brought up under a vertuous mother The third thing is nutrition for the mother doth give the infant her pappes and though the man and wife should be separated it is the wives dutie to nurse the childe and that according to the Canons till it be three yeare old Extra de convers infidel cap. ex literis Tostat. quaest 17. 2. Because women are the weaker vessels and the chiefe government of the house is committed to the father the Lord foreseeing that mothers might easily grow into contempt hath provided by this law to meet with disobedient children Basting QUEST V. Whether the childe is more bound to the father or mother BUt if here it shall be demanded to which of the parents the childe is most bound the answer briefely is this that whereas the childe oweth three things unto the parents sustentation and maintenance honour and reverence dutie and obedience the first of these is equally to be performed unto them both to relieve the parents because they both are as one and feed at one table and therefore in this behalfe no difference can be made Likewise for the second as they are our parents they are equally to be reverenced and honoured but where there may bee more eminent parts of wisdome and vertue and such like as usually are in the father there more honour is to bee yeelded unto him but otherwise to the mother if shee be more vertuous Concerning obedience because the man is the head of the woman and the master of the familie obedience ordinarily is rather to be given to the commandement of the father than of the mother Tostat. QUEST VI. Why the Lord commandeth obedience to parents being a thing acknowledged of all BUt it seemeth superfluous that God should by law command obedience unto parents seeing there is no nation so barbarous which doth not yeeld reverence unto them Answ. 1. So also there are by nature printed in the minde of man the seeds of the other precepts but this law of nature being by mans corruption obscured and defaced God thought it needfull to revive this naturall instinct by the prescript of his law and the rather because men might be more allured unto this dutie by the promise propounded Simler 2. And the Lord intending herein to prescribe obedience to all superiours thought good to give instance in parents because these precepts Sunt quasi quadam conclusiones immediate sequentes ex principiis juris naturalis c. are as certaine immediate conclusions following out of the principles of the naturall law which are easily received and acknowledged of all but those things which are understood are Tanquam conclusiones quaedam remotae c. as certaine conclusions fetched further off Lyran. QUEST VII Who are comprehended under the name of fathers and mothers BY father and mother are understood 1. Parents of all sorts whether our naturall fathers or mothers or those so called by law as the father and mother in law and such as doe adopt children Tutors likewise and Governours 2. Publike officers as Magistrates which are the fathers of the Commonwealth 3. Pastors and Ministers as Elisha calleth Elias father 2. King 2. 4. Masters as Naâ—mans servants called him father 2. King 2. and generally the elder sort and aged persons whom usually we call fathers Vrsin The reasons why all these are comprehended under the name of fathers are
c. she which dwelleth with an infidell is not polluted or uncleane For the unbeleeving husband is sanctified by the wife 1 Cor. 7.14 But the fornicator and much more the adulterer maketh the members of Christ the members of an harlot 1 Cor. 6.14 6. In hac vita secum innumera mala trahit This sinne of adultery and fornication bringeth an innumerable company of evils with it in this life beside the punishment of the next Cogitur vitam miseram infoelicem vivere he liveth a miserable and unhappy life Alienam domum trepidus ingreditur omnis timet liberos servos he entreth trembling into anothers house hee is afraid of every thing of the servants and the children c. Sic fere Chrysost. super Ioan. hom 62.7 Thom. Aquin. A woman committeth three great sinnes in the sinne of adultery she is first Sacrilega she committeth sacrilege in going against Gods ordinance in parting that asunder which God hath coupled secondly she is Proditrix she sinneth by betraying her husband under whose government she is and giving her selfe over to another for the woman hath no power over her owne bodie but the man and so likewise of the man 1 Cor. 7.4 Thirdly she is furatrix she committeth theft Ex alieno viro sibi constituit filios she getteth her children by another man Thom. in opuscul 8. This sinne of adulterie is one of those which excludeth out of the Kingdome of heaven 1 Cor. 6.9 and whoremongers among the rest shall have their part in the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone Revel 22.8 And in this world though adulterers and adulteresses should escape the censure of men as often they doe yet God will not suffer such to goe unpunished hee will judge them himselfe Heb. 13.4 Therefore the Wise-man setting forth the adulterous woman saith that shee forsaketh the guide of her youth and forgetteth the covenant of her God Prov. 2.17 God therefore will take revenge of such as transgressors of his covenant This made Ioseph that hee would not consent to the unlawfull desire of his Mistresse saying How can I doe this great wickednesse and so sinne against God Gen. 39.4 QUEST VII Adultery as well forbidden in the husband as in the wife FUrther it will here be enquired whether this precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie doth not indifferently binde both the man and the woman that as well the husband as the wife if hee goe unto any strange flesh committeth adulterie In Augustines time men tooke unto themselves great libertie herein and it was growne to be such a generall custome ut jam mulieribus fere persuasum sit licere hoc viru sed non licere mulieribus That women are almost now perswaded that it is lawfull for men but not for women for it is often heard that the wives have beene brought to the market place to be punished quae facto cum servis invent a sunt which have beene found with their servants but it was never heard of that a man was set in the market place qui inventus est cum ancilla which was found with his maid Augustine by divers reasons overthroweth this wicked custome shewing that it was par peccatum a like sinne both in the husband and wife and in the like sinne that the man seemeth more innocent facit non divina veritas sed humana perversitas not the divine veritie is the cause but humane perversitie Then he useth these perswasions 1. From the faith that is made mutually by both the husband and the wife unto Christ Quod à me exigis redde mihi fidem tibi debeo fidem mihi debes fidem Christo ambo debemus c. That which thou exactest of me render unto me I have plight thee my faith and thou hast plight me thy troth we both have plight our faith unto Christ c. 2. He reasoneth from the like Noliteire vos quò eas sequi non vultis Yee men got not that way wherein you would not have your wives to follow say not I goe not to another mans wife I goe unto my maid Vis ut dicat tibi uxor tua c. Wouldest thou thy wife should say unto thee I goe not to another womans husband I goe unto my man or servant 3. From the preeminence and superiority of man Say not we cannot Quod potest foemina vir non potest Can a woman forbeare and cannot a man For what illa carnem non portat c. is not shee also flesh and bloud was not the woman first beguiled of the Serpent But you will say that the woman may easily avoid adulterie because shee is held in by the watchfulnesse of her husband and by the terror of humane lawes Multa custodia faciunt foeminam castam virum castum faciat ipsa virilitas Many keepers make a woman chaste and let manhood it selfe make the man chaste nam ideo mulieri major custodia quia major infirmitas for therefore a woman had need of more strait keeping because shee is the weaker her husband and the terror of lawes watch over her and God watcheth over thee To this purpose Augustine 4. Further the very letter of the precept which in the Hebrew is put in the Masculine to tineaph Thou that is the man shall not commit adulterie Augustine well inferreth that although it be onely expresly forbidden to the man Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife Ista lex non solum viris sed foeminis data est Yet this law is not onely given unto men but unto women also and so this precept as well bindeth women as men as all the rest of the Commandements doe Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steale c. August qu. 71. in Exod. 5. Lastly the Apostle sheweth that as the woman hath no power of her owne bodie but the husband so neither hath the husband power over his owne bodie but the wife 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore as well the one as the other are restrained of all carnall libertie to goe unto strange flesh QUEST VIII Whether adulterie be a more grievous sinne in the man or the woman BUt this being agreed upon that adulterie is a sinne as well in the husband as in the wife it will further be demanded in which of them it is a greater sinne or whether it be not equall in both 1. Augustine thinketh as is shewed before that it is par peccatum a like sinne whether in the husband or in the wife And Thomas addeth further that in the time of the law there was not an equalitie for the man among the Jewes might have many wives but not the wife many husbands Ideo matrimonium nunquam statum perfectum habuit nisi in lege Christi Therefore matrimonie had never any perfect state but under the law of Christ. But to this it may be answered that the institution of matrimonie being first made in Paradise was the same both under the law of Moses and
presume to understand above that which is meet to understand but that he understand according to sobrietie Rom. 12.3 CHAP. XXI 1. The Method and Argument IN the former Chapter was propounded the Morall law chiefly mixed with ceremoniall constitutions in the end of the Chapter now follow the Judiciall lawes unto the 10. verse of the 23. Chapter from thence unto the 20. verse are propounded certaine ceremoniall orders in generall as touching sacrifices and their feasts the more speciall and particular prescriptions concerning ceremonies are at large set forth in the booke of Leviticus This Chapter consisteth of three parts The first is of the manumission and setting at liberty Hebrew servants both men and women unto vers 12. Concerning the man servant these Lawes are given 1. How long he shall serve vers 2. 2. When his wife is to goe out with him when not vers 3.4 3. What is to be done to the servant that will not be made free vers 5. to vers 7. Concerning the maid servant 1. Upon what condition she may be sold to her masteâ— not to be sold againe to a stranger vers 7 8. 2 What is to be done unto her if she be betrothed to his sonne vers 9. 3. What must be performed to her if he marry another wife vers 10. 4. What must be done if he doe not performe these things vers 11. Secondly there follow certaine mulcts and punishments for divers offences committed by man as of murther vers 12 13 14. smiting of parents vers 15. stealing of men vers 16. cursing of parents vers 17. hurting of a man vers 19.18 beating of servants to death vers 18 19. hurting of women with childe vers 22. blemishing of servants in their eye tooth c. vers 24. to 28. Thirdly of mischiefe and dammages that are occasioned by other mens default as by their oxe that useth to push and goare man or woman vers 28. to 33. or hurteth anothers oxe vers 35 36. and of dammages which are caused by the digging of pits and wells vers 33 34. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. If he came with his body A.P. alone with his body I. If he came in single V. or alone B.G.C.S. The sense is kept not the word better than with what garment he entred c. L. but the word guph signifieth a body as gupha in the feminine is taken Exod. 21.3 Vers. 7. She shall not goe out as men servants B.G.V.I. cum caeter not as maids S.L. Vers. 8. Who hath not betrothed her I.V.A.P. better than betrothed her B.G.C.L. S. for here the negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lo is omitted Vers. 8. In dealing deceitfully or perfidiously with her I. or trespassing against her A. better than in despising her B.G.C.L.S. for bagadh signifieth properly to deceive and breake covenant as Malach. 2.10.14 the meaning is he hath broken appointment of marriage with her Vers. 10. Her rayment and dwelling or habitation I.A. conversation S. better than price of her chastity I. or recompence of her virginity G. or duty of marriage B. V. lying with her C. her time P. ghorah of ghâ—r signifieth an habitation or dwelling Vers. 16. And it be found in his hand I.A.P.C.V.G. that is the person which he hath stollen better than if it be proved upon him B. or if he be found in it S. if he be convicted of the fault L. Vers. 22. If no destruction follow B.V.I. or death G. A. P.C. better than if the child come forth without fashion S. or but she liveth L. for it is as well understood of the infant as of the mother if neither of them dye c. 2. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the necessity of the Iudiciall lawes Vers. 1. THese are the judgements c. 1. After the Morall law followeth the Judicials for the Civill law issueth out of the Morall law which is the fountaine and foundation of all other Lawes And as the Morall law is principally grounded upon the Law of Nature so in the next place the Civill law also floweth from the same fountaine as it may appeare by the generall use thereof seeing no common-wealth can stand without Civill and Judiciall constitutions Borrh. 2. And Moses having propounded the Lawes which binde in conscience so now he setteth forth the Penall lawes whereby the obstinacy of men might be restrained for if a man were left to himselfe Nemo est qui non suo arbitrio mâ—lit vivore there is none that had not rather live as he list himselfe Galas 3. Therefore because it might fall out that all would not be obedient to the Morall precepts necessarium suit praescribere c. it was necessary to prescribe what punishment every transgressor of the Law should be subject unto Rupertus QUEST II. The difference of the Morall Iudiciall and Ceremoniall lawes THe judgements 1. The Judiciall lawes Ceremoniall and Morall are thus distinguished some precepts have vim obligandi ex ipso dictamine rationis power to binde by the very inducement of naturall reason though there were no other Law to enforce them such are the morall precepts some Lawes doe not absolutely binde by the instinct and perswasion of naturall reason sed ex institutione divina vel humana but by a divine and humane institution which if they concerne such things as appertaine unto God are ceremonials if they respect the ordering of men and directing of humane affaires they are Judiciall lawes two things then are required in Judiciall lawes that they concerne ordinationem humanam the ordering and directing of men and that they doe binde non ex sola ratione sed ex institutione not by reason onely but by the institution Thom. 1.2 qu. 104. art 1. in Cor. 2. Now there are foure sorts of Judiciall lawes one of the Prince toward the subjects another of the Citizens among themselves the third of the Citizens toward strangers and the fourth concerning domesticall duties as of the fathers masters husbands toward their children servants wives Thomas QUEST III. How the Ceremonials are abolished FUrther concerning the validity of the Ceremoniall law 1. The Ceremonies were of two sorts either such as were meerely figurative signifying such things as were to be performed in Christ as Circumcision and the paschall Lambe which are in no respect to be observed for this were in a manner to deny Christ to be come if the figures should still remaine in use then the body is yet to be expected 2. There was another sort of ceremonies which doe not directly concerne the signification of Christ to come but only shewed munditiam populi illius sanitatem the cleanlinesse and health of that people as to abstaine from swines flesh which if one should now observe as it was commanded in the Law he sinneth but if for some other end as for his health or such like he offendeth not Tostatus quaest 1. 3. Some ceremonies were partly figurative of things to come and significative of
their necessity yet if they should hold them in perpetuall servitude they should usurpe upon the Lords right seeing they were his servants 2. Another reason is taken from the manner and condition of their service Deut. 15.18 Hee hath served six yeeres which is the double worth of an hired servant which is so said either because the service of six yeeres is double to the time of hired servants who used to covenant from three yeeres to three yeeres Vatab. Or rather because their workes were more laborious than were the hired servants Iun. For hee was to doe his worke for the which he was hired and no more but the other when he had done in his businesse in the field came home and ministred to his master first before hee did eaâ— himselfe Luk. 17.10 And they only served not their master by day but by night they kept their flockes in the field as is evident in the example of Iacob Gen. 31.40 Simler 3. A third reason is taken from a promise of blessing The Lord thy God shall blesse thee in all that thou doest Deut. 15.18 Simler 3. Though this Law concerning the freedome of servants did specially concerne the policy of the Jewes and so belongeth not unto us for now servants are not bought and sold among Christianâ— in the Romane Empire but only hired Osiander Yet the equity of this Law doth binde us that all they which have others in subjection under them should use their authority moderately and in mercy Galas 4. The word here used châ—pshi interpreted free signifieth also solitarie because servants were not solitary or alone by themselves in the house but attended on their masters they which were free were solitary and by themselves giving no attendance upon any Oleaster QUEST XIII Why the space of six yeeres is limited for their service BUt concerning the limiting of the space of six yeeres for service and the appointing of the seventh for liberty what might be the reason thereof thus it is diversly scanned 1. Some doe thus moralize it by six yeeres they understand the perfection of the active life because in six dayes the Lord made the world hee that will come unto contemplation must first approve himselfe in action Lyrâ—n 2. Isidâ—re maketh this application in sex atatibus hujus sâ—culi servientes c. when wee have served the six ages of this world in the seventh which is the eternall Sabbath we shall be free 3. But I preferre rather Rupertus conjecture that this privilege of going out free in the seventh yeere and serving six was proper to the Hebrewes Quia videlicet pater â—orum Iacob sex annis pro gregibus Laban servivit c. Because Iacob their father served six yeeres for Labans flockes and went out free in the seventh chusing rather to sojourne with his fathers Abraham and Isaack than to serve among his kindred for more profit therefore Haec ingenuit as patris illam posteris apud Dominum thesaurizavit This ingenuous minde of their father did treasure up this privilege before the Lord for his posterity that none should be compelled to serve above six yeeres Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 35. 4. But the best reason of all is because as the Lord had from the beginning given them a Sabbath of dayes which was the seventh day of rest so also he gave them a Sabbath of yeeres that every seventh yeere the land should rest and servants should rest from their labours and debters from their creditors and they had also a Sabbath of seven times seven yeeres prescribed that when they had counted seven times seven yeeres then the fiftieth yeere should be the great yeere of remission the yeere of Jubile which was a lively figure of that acceptable time of generall remission at the comming of the Messiah QUEST XIV How the servant is said to come in with his body and to goe out with his body Vers. 3. IF he came himselfe alone 1. Some read If he came with his garment he shall goe out with his garment Hierom. Lyran. But the word is guph which signifieth a body not gaph a wing of a garment the true reading therefore is If he came with his body that is alone without either the body of his wife or children Oleaster And so read both the Chalde and Septuagint If he entred alone he shall go out alone 2. But this case is excepted that if he in the time of service should marry a free woman and not a maid servant given him by his master in this case the free woman should not lose her freedome but should goe out with her husband Tostat. qu. 7. 3. And beside as if he brought a wife with him he went out with his wife so by the like reason if he had children before they should be free likewise Iun. Nay if he should gâ—t children during his service by a wife married before his service those children also should â—oe out with him and not remaine with his master partus sequitur 〈◊〉 the childe followeth the condition of the mother Tostat. quaest 6. 4. And of the former reading If he come in with his body rather than with his garment these two reasons are given 1. Because it is not like that the same garment with the which he entred could continue six yeeres Pallican 2. And the servant was not to bee sent out with his garment alone but with a liberall reward of shâ—epe corne and wine Deut. 15.14 Simler 3. Beside the next clause confirmeth this reading but If he were married c. so to come in alone is to come without a wife or children Iun. QUEST XV. What manner of wife the master was to give to his servant Vers. 4. IF his master have given him a wife 1. Some indifferently understand any maid servant whether a stranger or an Hebrewesse and that such wife and her children shall be her masters till the time of servitude come out Genevens But the master had no power to give an Hebrewesse maid to his servant to wife but he must either take her himselfe or give her to his sonne vers 7 8. Piscat Tostat. It is understood therefore of such maid servants as were of other nations Osiana 2. But it seemeth that the master could not give a Cananitish woman to his servant to wife for they are forbidden to contract marriages with them Deut. 7.4 Tostat. quaest 7. Neither had the master power to give any free woman to his servant for the master was to give onely his owne but a free woman was none of his possession Tostat. 5. This must be understood if the servant will take a wife for otherwise he was not to be compelled for if there were not a free consent it is held to be no marriage and the Master could no more compell the servant to lye with a maid against his will to get children for his masters profit than to force his maid to play the whore for her masters advantage It must be
pay 25. asses that is so many three farthings which mulct being too easie one Lucius Neratius in a bravery used of purpose â—o beat and buffet those with his fists whom he met and caused his man presently to pay him the penaltie of the law whereupon the Pretors of Rome devised to impose a greater mulct and punishment for such assaults and batteries Gâ—ll. lib. 20. ex Calvin Marbach QUEST LII Who should beare the charges if a servant had done the hurt HE shall beare his charges But what if one servant had beaten another or a servant had smitten a free man that hee kept his â—ed upon it 1. In this case either the master of the servant was to beare the charges or else he was to deliver his servant and he was to serve or to be sold to make it good if hee had not of his owne to make satisfaction as the like order was taken for theft Exod. 21.3 2. But here is a further doubt what if the servant that did the hurt were an Hebrew who could not be sold over for more than six yeares and it might so fall out that there remained but one yeare untill the seventh being the yeare of remission came and so his service for so short a time could not make sufficient recompence The answer is that in this case the servant might be sold to serve six yeares more after the yeare of remission as in the case of theft if hee had not wherewithall of his owne to make satisfaction but for longer than six yeares he could not be sold nor more than once But if the servant were a Gentile he might be absolutely sold over to serve a longer time 3. Now if the charge would not come to the value or worth of six yeares service in this case the servant was to serve no longer than till his service would make sufficient amends as if a mans service for six yeares were esteemed at six pounds and the charges of healing arise to three then the servant was to bee sold over onely to serve three yeares which would countervaile the charge Tostat. quaest 23. QUEST LIII What servants this law meaneth and what kinde of chastisement is forbidden Vers. 20. IF a man smite his servant with a rod c. 1. This law is concerning such servants as were no Hebrewes for them they were not to use so hardly and cruelly Levit. 25.38 neither could the Hebrew servant be said to be their money for hee was not absolutely sold but onely for a time Tostat. 2. This case is propounded if the master smite with a rod or any other thing which is not likely to kill but if he smite him with a sword or casting of a stone or such like if the servant die whether under the masters hand or afterward the master shall be surely punished that is shall die for it because in smiting his servant with a deadly weapon it appeareth that he intended to kill him Simler Tostat. quaest 23. 3. And in case it be evident that the servant die of that beating within a day or two the master was likewise to be punished for it but if as the Hebrew phrase is hee stand a day or two after that is be whole and sound that he may goe about his businesse Simler Nam stare tantâ—ndem valet ac vigere omnibus integris membris For to stand is all one as to be perfect and sound in all the parts and members Calvin then the master was free So also expoundeth Procopius Vbi ex vulnere vel verbere convaluerit servus c. Where the servant recovereth of the stripe or wound though he afterward die the master is held to be innocent Likewise Thomas Aquin. Si â—asio certa esset lex poenam adhibuit c. If the hurt be certaine and evident the law appointeth a punishment for a maime the losse of his service vers 26. for the death of the servant the punishment of manslaughter but where the hurt is uncertaine the law inflicteth no mulct incertum enim erat â—trum ex percussione mortuus c. For it is uncertaine whether he died of the beating 4. This law for servants was more equall than that cruell custome of the Romanes that give unto masters power over their servants life as in Augustins time Vedius Polliâ— used to cast his servants that offended into the fish ponds but afterward this cruell custome was mitigated for Antoninus made a law that hee which killed his servant without cause should die for it as if he had slaine anothers servant Galas And Adrianus the Emperour banished one Vmbra a matron for five yeares for handling her maids cruelly Ex Simler 5. But whereas this law giveth libertie to the master to beat his servants though it were extremely so that death followed not wee must consider that this law requireth not an absolute perfection Sed Deus se accommodaviâ— ad 〈◊〉 populi c. But God applieth himselfe to the rudenesse of the people tolerating many things among them for the hardnesse of their hearts Galas QUEST LIV. The meaning of this clause For he is his money FOr he is his money 1. That is bought with his money hee seemeth to have punished himselfe sufficiently in the losse of his servant Iun. 2. But if this reason were 〈…〉 way the 〈◊〉 to be punished though his servant died under his hand for hee 〈◊〉 iâ— his money 3. For answer to this objection a servant is to be considered two wayes as he is a man and as he is made apt and fit â—o labour the servant oweth not to his master his life but his labour therefore if the master take away the life of the servant directly as if he die with beating under his hand the master is to be punished for it for as hee loseth a servant so the politike state is deprived of a man and herein hee doth wrong to the Common-wealth But if the master indirectly procure his servants death as in overcharging him with labour in denying him competent food in immodeâ—â—te correcting him now the master is not guiltie of his servants death for now puâ—iâ—â—at eum tanquam possessionem suam ut eâ—â—enâ—â—ret he did punish him as his possession and servant to amend and correct him not as a man therefore the reason holdeth in this indirect kinde of killing He is his money c. and not in the other Tostat. quaest 23. QUEST LV. Whether this law meane the voluntarie or involuntarie hurt done to a woman with childe Vers. 22. ALso if men strive and hurt a woman with childe 1. Some Hebrewes thinke that this case here put is of involuntarie hurts and killing as a man striving against his will hurteth a woman with childe and shee dieth for this the man was not to die in their opinion but to redeeme his life with a peece of money Contra. But where any slaughter is committed altogether against ones will as if a man shoot an arrow and kill a
other feasts of the Reconciliation in the â—0 day and of Tabernacles which began in the 15. Osiander But here I approve rather Calvins reason Gravin fuisset tam diuturna mora So long abode together at Jerusalem had beene burthensome for the space of three weekes together from the first day of the seventh moneth to the 21. when the feast of Tabernacles ended therefore this third time of their going up was against the feast of the Tabernacles as is evident Deut. 31.10 and that these were the three times in the yeere is directly mentioned Deut. 16.16 These three times in the yeere shall all the males appeare c. Tostat. quaest 25. QUEST XXXV Who were bound to appeare before the Lord whether their servants Vers. 17. SHall all thy men children appeare 1. The women were not bound by this Law to appeare because it was necessary that they should be left at home to attend the domesticall affaires and have a care of the young children yet they might come up voluntarily as Anna the mother of Samuel did and Marie the mother of our blessed Saviour especially those which dwelt neere to Jerusalem 2. Concerning the males Tostatus thinketh that all the males after they were come to yeeres of discretion ascended as Christ being but a child according to the custome of other children went up with his parents But it is more like that none went up under 20. yeere old only those males qui iraâ—sibant sub censum which passed under the account Calvin Some thinke also none above 50. yeeres but that is not like the children might goe up with their parents also but that was not of any necessity And left it might have seemed a dangerous thing to the countrey if all the males together should have beene absent the Lord promiseth that their enemies should not desire their land in the meane time while they appeared before the Lord Exod. 34.24 3. Neither were the males of their owne children only bound to goe up but their servants also as is expresly mentioned Deut. 16.12 that their sonne daughter servant and maid should rejoyce with them before the Lord. Of their Hebrew servants there was no question because they were of the same profession and they were but their servants for a time And concerning other servants bought with their money they were to circumcise them and then they were to eat of the Passeover Exod. 12.44 Now if they were circumcised they were thereby bound to keepe the whole Law as the Apostle sheweth Galath 5.3 And seeing they also were to eat the Passeover which could not be offered but before the Lord Deut. 16.2 they were also necessarily to appeare before the Lord. 4. But if all their servants were bound to goe up with them thrice in the yeere and that from the furthest parts of the land this would seeme to have beene a great prejudice to their masters and an hindrance to their businesse to spare their servants so long Lyranus and Tostatus here answer that they which dwelt farre off were dispensed withall and it was sufficient for them to come up only once in the yeere at the Passeover But no such dispensation is extant in the Law I rather insist upon that other answer of Tostatus that damna animae plus vitanda sunt quà m damna corporis the detriment of the soule is more to be shunned than the detriment of the body Therefore seeing their appearing before the Lord concerned the health of their soules all worldly respects ought to give place unto it and the Commandement of God was to be preferred before all Tostat. quaest 26. QUEST XXXVI To what end the people were commanded to meet together THis generall meeting of all Israel thrice in a yeere before the Lord was profitable for divers ends 1. Ad concordiam religionis doctrinae conservandam c. To keepe and preserve concord and unity in doctrine and religion Simler for if they might have sacrificed where they would the people might soone have declined and fallen to strange worship 2. Ingenti multitudinis concursu alii alios incitabant c. By this concurse of the multitude one helped to stirre up and provoke another to the more cheerefull setting forth of the praise of God Gallas 3. It was effectuall also Ad coalitionem animorum c. For the knitting together of their hearts and mindes the maintaining of love and charity among them Marbach 4. Solemnia festa angustiora fieri tanto conventu The solemne feast dayes by this company of the people were thereby more adorned and set forth 5. And this was a figure also of Christ that as they had but one Sanctuary one Altar on high Priest so Christus est unicus servator Christ is our onely Saviour and high Priest Simler QUEST XXXVII Why the people were not to appeare empty before the Lord. Vers. 15. NOne shall appeare before me emptie 1. Though this precept be annexed here to the solemnity of the Passeover yet it is to be referred not only to that feast as Tostatus seemeth to take it but to all the rest of the three Cajetane Gallas 2. Some understand it thus that none should appeare empty or in vaine before the Lord but they should receive some blessing at his hand but it is plaine Deut. 16.17 that it is meant of such gifts and oblations as they should bring with them to offer before the Lord Simler 3. Which offerings and oblations served for the repairing of the Temple and the maintaining of the Levites and for other such uses belonging to the service of God Simler 4. This presenting of gifts unto the Lord was to testifie their thankfull minde Non enim satis erat verbis gratitudinem testificari For it was not sufficient in words only to testifie their thankfulnesse Gallas And to this end they did it ut personarum rerum fiat Deo oblatio qui dat personas res omnes that they might offer unto God as well their substance as their persons who giveth all both the persons and all things beside Cajetane 5. Though we are not bound unto this Law seeing it is abolished veritas tamen aâ—uos pertinet yet the truth thereof belongeth unto us Gallas that if wee have money or any other substance we should first releeve the poore tunc demum Deo preces fundamus and then offer our prayers unto God Saltem animam non à boâ—is operibus vacuam Deo offeramus c. At the least we should not present our soule unto God empty and void of good workes Theodoret. To the same purpose Chrysostome idcircò pauperes ante fores sunt ut nemo vacuus ingrediatur c. intras ut misericordiam consequaris prior ipse miserere c. Therefore the poore stand at the Church doore that none should goe in empty thou encrest to obtaine mercy first shew mercy thy selfe c. Gregorie applieth it to the appearing before the Judge at the latter day
upward because they begin at twentie yeares to be fit for service in the Common-wealth at home and abroad in warre Tostat. qu. 9. 2. The children then and women are not counted but the one were reckoned with their fathers the other went under the account of their husbands Simler 3. It is not here expressed as they began at twentie so at what age they ended the account It is not like that the aged men were here reckoned but such only as were fit for warre Numb 1.3 which Iosephus saith was from twentie untill the age of fiftie Cajetan And this may be gathered by the like because the Levites after fiftie gave over their service in the Tabernacle Numb 8.25 as to beare burthens and to remove the Tabernacle much more at that age were they to be freed from the service of warre which was much more painfull and cumbersome 4. The Levites were accounted after another manner they were numbred from a moneth old Numb 3.39 Oleaster who here affirmeth that David offended God in numbring the people because hee would have all numbred and not onely from twentie and above But that was not the cause of the offence for it is evident out of the text that they onely were numbred which were strong men and able to draw swords 2 Sam. 24.9 See before quest 15. QUEST XXII Why the poore pay as much as the rich Vers. 15. THe rich shall not passe and the poore shall not diminish c. Divers reasons may bee yeelded hereof why the same portion was required as well of the poore as rich 1. It was done concordiae causa for concord and unitie for otherwise there might have growne contention the poore being unwilling to pay as much as the rich Tostat. qu. 10. 2. And by this meanes also the poore were not despised and ne divites se sanctiores reputarent pauperibus lest that the rich might have thought themselves holier than the poore in giving more unto the Tabernacle the Lord would have an equall rate set Lyran. 3. And this was prescribed ut numeri ratio constaret that the number of the people might bee certainly knowne which had beene uncertaine if they had not all paid alike 4. This was jus personale a personall right Calvin ad testandum obedientiam impositum and imposed to testifie their obedience that hereby everie one should acknowledge that they belonged unto God Simler 5. It was for the redemption of their soules quae unicuique aequalis fuit which was equall to all Gallas 6. And to shew that God is no accepter of persons but that the poore and rich if they bee faithfull are alike accepted before him Osiander 7. Hereby also is spiritually signified that the spirituall price of our redemption by the bloud of Christ doth belong equally unto all Simler QUEST XXIII Whether all these things were declared to Moses at once Vers. 17. ALso the Lord spake unto Moses 1. It appeareth by this that all these things before rehearsed from chap. 25. concerning the Tabernacle and things thereunto belonging were not delivered by one continued speech from the Lord unto Moses but that there were certaine breakings off as is evident in this place and likewise vers 11. afterward the Lord spake 2. It also may bee gathered that all these things were not delivered in one day unto Moses but in the space of fortie dayes as is shewed chap. 31.18 that after the Lord had made an end of communing with Moses hee delivered him the tables of stone which was in the end of fortie dayes as is declared Deut. 9.10 Tostat. qu. 11. The Lord could have delivered all these things at once unto Moses and have made him capable thereof to understand and remember But as the world was created in six dayes which the Lord in his great power could have finished all in one day yea in a moment yet it pleased him for our better understanding and for the establishing of a perpetuall order to be observed while the world endureth in giving six dayes for worke and one for rest to sort out all his workes into six dayes so likewise he divided the narration of these things unto Moses into the conference of many dayes QUEST XXIV Of the fashion of the brazen laver Vers. 18. THou shalt make a laver of brasse and his foot of brasse 1. By this description it may be gathered that this laver did not stand flat upon the ground but was reared upon his foot and consequently it being so lifted up upon the foot or base the Priests could not put their feet therein to wash them 2. R. Salomon therefore thinketh that this laver was made broad and large below and narrow above and that it had two spouts of each side for the water to issue forth and at the foot or bottome there was some place to receive the water which otherwise would have run along upon the ground This description followeth Lyranus Tostat. Montan. Genevens And Cajetan doth inferre thus much out of the text because it is said vers 19. Aaron and his sonnes shall wash their hands and feet mimmenu ex ipsa out of it not as the Latine whom Beda followeth in ea in it 3. This laver was set in the outward court betweene the Altar of burnt offering and the Tabernacle but not directly for then it would have somewhat hindred the â—ight of the Tabernacle but it was placed toward the South side which though it be not here expressed may be 〈…〉 sea which Salomon made in stead thereof which was so placed in the Temple 1 King 7.39 Simler QUEST XXV Of the use of this brazen laver Vers. 20. WHen they go into the Tabernacle 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth When they go into the Tabernacle c. and when they go vnto the altar to offer incense c. which Tostatus understandeth of the altar of incense but that was included in the former clause When they go into the Tabernacle and the word is ishah which signifieth a sacrifice made with fire he meaneth the altar of burnâ— offering that when they want in to doe my service in the Tabernacle or 〈…〉 without they should wash both their hands and feet 2. These parts above the rest must bee washed because they were apâ—est to gather soile the feet with dust and the hands with touching and handling of other things Tostat. 3. It is evident then that at the least twice everie day they washed their hands and feet at morning and even for then without in the Court they offered the morning and evening sacrifice and in the Tabernacle they burned incense and dressed the candlesticks Lippoman also thinketh that they ministred at the Altar barefoot as Moses was bid to put off his shooes when the Lord appeared unto him Exod. 3. But it is more like that they were shod with a kinde of light shooes called sandals as Tostatus inferreth out of Iosephus for as they washed their feet from soile when they began
to idols see likewise concerning other meats forbidden by Moses Law great question did arise betweene the converted Jewes and the beleeving Gentiles for the deciding of which controversie Saint Paul giveth two rules first That they should not judge one another Rom. 14.13 that he that did eat should not condemne him that would not eat secondly that they should not grieve or offend one another with their eating ibid vers 15. that they should abstaine from eating such things at the least in their brothers presence And after this the Church came together and decreed that for a time in regard of the weake they should abstaine from strangled and bloud Act. 15. Tostat. quâ—st 13. 4. But this further must be considered that Christians now have a greater liberty than the Israelites had for they are simply forbidden to goe unto the Gentiles feasts or to have any fellowship with them lest by little and little they might be drawne to partake with them in their idolatry But S. Paul allowed Christians to goe unto the feasts of the Gentiles and to eat of their sacrifices so it might be done without offence 1 Cor. 10.27 Gallas 5. And the reason hereof why the Israelites are forbidden to communicate with the Gentiles and to eat and drinke with them may thus further be declared For the communion of some is forbidden to the faithfull two wayes either in poenam illius cui communio fidelium subtrabitur for a punishment to him from whom the company of the faithfull is withdrawne as the incestuous young man was excommunicate among the Corinthians or ad cautelam eorum quibus interdicitur for their warning and heed-taking which are so forbidden others company And if so the faithfull be strong in faith and are more like to win the Infidels than to be corrupted by them they are not forbidden their company but if they be weake and such as easily may be drawne away the company of Infidels to such is dangerous Thomas And of this sort were the Hebrewes who were weake and prone to idolatry and therefore the Lord forbiddeth them all entercourse and communion with the Gentiles QUEST XXXIV Why marriages with the Idolatrous were forbidden and in what cases Vers. 16. LEst thou take of their daughters to thy sonnes 1. The Israelites were forbidden to take wives unto their sonnes from the idolatrous Heathen lest they might draw them also unto idolatry men must not deceive themselves in such marriages and thinke that they may draw their wives or the wives the husbands rather unto the true religion which they professe then to be corrupted by them For how knowest thou a man te uxorem lucrifacturum that thou shalt gaine thy wife to thy religion or thou woman that thou shalt perswade thy husband Gallasius Shall a man thinke himselfe more wise than Salomon whose heart was perverted by his wives and to please them he fell to most grosse idolatry Simlerus 2. Yet it was lawfull for the Israelites to take to wives such of the Gentiles as were converted to their religion as is evident Deut. 21.13 as Boaz married Ruth who had then imbraced the true religion and worship of the God of Israel as she said unto Naomi Thy people shall be my people and thy God my God Ruth 1.16 3. But the example of â—â—hlan and Chilian will be objected the sonnes of Elimeâ—ech who tooke unto them wives of the Moabites Orpah and Ruth who were not then converted to the faith of Israel for then Naomi would not have bid them returne into their country as shee did Ruth 1.12 for that had beene to give them occasion to commit idolatry Therefore this marriage is excused by the necessity of that place where Mahlan and Chilian sojourned namely in Moab for the space of ten yeeres where were no women of their religion and so they were faine to take them wives from the Moabites 4. Now further as it was unlawfull to take wives to their sonnes from the Gentiles so was it also forbidden that they should give their daughters to their sonnes Deut. 7.3 which of the two was the more dangerous 1. For the man is the head of the woman and so the Israelitish wife should come in subjection to a Pagan and by this meanes dishonour her nation 2. The man being of greater power might use more violent meanes to force the wife to Gentilisme than the wife could to draw the husband 3. The children also were more likely to be corrupted which are brought up according to the fathers minde Tostat. quaest 14. An example whereof we have in that blasphemer that was stoned to death who was the sonne of an Egyptian and of an Israelitish woman Levit. 24. QUEST XXXV Why the images are called molten gods Vers. 17. THou shalt make thee no molten gods 1. The Gentiles so called their idols communi populari errore by a common and popular errour as now among the Romanists the common people call their images their Saints But the wiser sort among the Heathen did not take the idols to be their gods but only representations of them yet that excused not their idolatry no more than the like pretense now among the Papists that they use images only to put them in minde of God Simler 2. But an idoll is farre from being God or having any divine thing in it that as the Apostle saith It is nothing in the world not in respect of the matter but of the signification for it neither representeth the true God who is a Spirit and hath no bodily shape nor yet the false gods which are nothing at all in the world Marbach 3. By one kinde of molten images all the rest are forbidden whether they be graven carved painted locutio est à parte totum significans it is a manner of speech taking a part for the whole Augustin Iunius But he giveth instance of molten images because of the molten calfe which they had lately made Lyranus 4. If it were unlawfull for them to suffer the Gentiles idols to stand but they were to breake them downe much more were they not to make them new Simler And so often is this Law repeated because of their pronenesse to idolatry Tostat. QUEST XXXVI Why the principall feasts of the Israelites are here rehearsed Vers. 18. THe feast of unleavened bread 1. The Lord renuing now his covenant with his people which was interrupted by their apostasie and falling away doth also againe prescribe unto them these festivall solemnities which they should observe unto him therefore renovato foedere repetuntur the covenant being renued they are also repeated Borrhaius 2. Another reason of this repetition is ne otiosus populus ceremonias Gentium aemuletur lest the idle people should have followed the ceremonies and superstitious festivals of the Gentiles the Lord prescribeth them certaine feasts wherein they should be occupied in setting forth of his praise Lippom. 3. Rupertus giveth this note Haec iteratiâ— praeceptorum Iudaeis carnalibus
Hereby also Christ and his Church was prefigured that in him there should be but one shepheard and one sheepfold he should be the only Priest and Mediatour and he should prescribe one Faith one Baptisme Simler See more hereof quest 36. chap. 23. QUEST XLIV Who were bound to goe up to the feasts NOw whereas the males only were to appeare before the Lord 1. The women are excepted because they were unfit both in respect of their domesticall businesse which was to be cared for in the absence of their husbands as also for that they might be often letted by giving sucke or being with child and they were not in regard of the tendernesse of their sex to take so long a journey And yet devout women specially when they dwelt not farre off from the place of the Sanctuary did use to goe up as Anna the mother of Samuel and the Virgin Marie Tostat. quaest 22. 2. As for their servants the men were bound to goe up as well as their masters there was one Law for both the maids also sometime went up with their masters but they were not bound as Deut. 12.18 and chap. 16.14 both they their sonne daughter servant maid were to rejoyce before the Lord in their solemne feasts 3. Neither were all the males bound to go up as the children which were not able to goe nor yet were of discretion to understand what they there heard or saw done Tostatus ibid. 4. Neither were the male children bound to goe up as soone as they began to be of discretion as Tostatus giveth instance of our blessed Saviour who at twelve yeeres old went up with his mother for both that example was extraordinary no childe at those yeeres was to be compared unto Christ and beside when such children went up with their parents it was voluntary not exacted by Law 5. Wherefore such males must be understood qui sub censum transibant which passed under the summe or account who were under twenty Calvin and exceeded not fifty as the Hebrewes thinke Simlerus QUEST XLV Whether all the males were bound every yeere to goe up thrice to the Sanctuarie Vers. 24. I Will cast out the nations before thee 1. Here the Lord prevenâ—â—th an objection the people being required thrice in a yeere to goe up to the Sanctuary might have doubted that their enemies might have taken advantage of their absence and so have invaded them the Lord therefore biddeth them to be secure for that matter for he would cast out their enemies before them and so worke that they should not desire their land and therefore they should not be afraid to goe up to appeare before the Lord Gallasius 2. Some thinke that this Law of appearing thrice in a yeere before the Lord did not binde but untill such time as their borders were enlarged quando secura universa regio futura erat when the whole land should be quiet Cajetane Which Calvin thinketh was not till God having subdued all his enemies Sanctuarium suum locavit in Sion had placed his Sanctuary in Sion c. But this is not like that the people kept not this Law till David and Salomons time for they were commanded to observe all the Lawes and ordinances when they were come into the land of rest Deut. 12.9 So that by inlarging of their coasts is not meant the making of them larger but the planting of them in the land of Canaan Tostat. qu. 22. 3. Some thinke that this never happened unto the Jewes according to the letter that all their enemies were subdued unto them and therefore in futura vitae complebitur it shall be fulfilled in the next life Gloss. interlin But if this had never beene performed how should the people have beene incouraged by this promise to goe up thrice in a yeere True it is that there were some Canaanites still dwelling among them yet were the nations of them destroyed though not every particular one of the nation 4. Some are of opinion that this promise was made with a condition if they did then endevour to keepe their bounds and set watchmen and garrisons in their borders that then the Lord would protect them that the rest of the males might safely goe up Ex Lippom. But when should those males which kept the garrisons have gone up they could not then observe this Law to goe up thrice in a yeere 5. Some thinke that every third yeere only they which dwelt farthest off came up to the Sanctuary and two yeeres they were free because mention is made of tithes to be laid up in the end of three yeeres Deut. 14.29 But that must be understood of another tenth part beside that which was to be paid yeerely vers 22. which they were yeerely to eat before the Lord vers 23. and therefore that cannot stand that every third yeere only they were bound to goe up 6. Tostatus his opinion is because it was both chargeable for them to goe thrice and come thrice that is six times in all in a yeere and they in that time lost their labour at home and beside in the space of six moneths betweene the sixth and seventh moneths wherein all these three principall feasts were observed these six journeyes fell out and within one moneth after their returne from the Passeover they were to come up againe to the feast of the Pentecost He thinketh therefore that they only which dwelt neere hand came up thrice in the yeere they which were further off only went up once in the feast of the Passeover and in the seventh yeere of remission twice in the said feast and at the feast of Tabernacles when they were to heare the Law read unto them Deut. 31.12 quast 21. Contra. 1. The words of the precept are generall Three times in a yeere shall all the males appeare before the Lord Deut. 16.16 there are none excepted 2. Yea speciall order is taken for them which dwelt farre off that they might turne their offering into money Deut. 14.25 and every yeere they were to give the tithe of their increase and eat it before the Lord. 7. Wherefore the truer opinion is that all the males which were appointed to come up ascended thrice every yeere whereupon it is evident non tam longam vel latam fuisse promissionis terram c. that the land of Promise was not so long and large that in the space of foure moneths or at the most six they could come and go thrice to Jerusalem Lippom. For as Hierom writeth the land of Canaan was not above an hundred and sixty miles long and sixty miles broad allow then the furthest part of the land to be an hundred and twenty miles from the Sanctuary For wee must not imagine that it was placed in the utmost coasts it would aske them but a seven nights journey to the Tabernacle and as much homeward that is six weekes in the yeere somewhat above the tenth part which was no great matter for them to doe Oleaster
him 7. Iosephus is here deceived that Iosephs brethren refused to returne into Egypt with him but that hee gently intreated them for all this was done after that they were returned QUEST XI In what sense Ioseph saith am I God Vers. 19. AM I in Gods stead c. 1. Some doe read Am not I under God and make this sense if God be ready to forgive much more I. 2. Some I doe feare God or I am Gods S.C. therefore I will not seeke to revenge 3. But the best reading is Am I in Gods stead with an interrogation not without as Cajetane readeth I am in Gods stead that is I follow Gods will and sentence I looke not to your evill intent the word thacath signifieth both pro for and sometime it is a note of subjection but here it is taken in the first sense 4. The meaning then of these words Am I God is not 1. either that they should aske God forgivenesse and not him 2. or that he committed his revenge to God for hee thought of no revenge 3. or that he would not have them to worship him as God for he had divers times before received that reverence at their hands 4. neither doth he by this meanes excuse their fault because he referreth all to Gods will 5. But the meaning is that seeing God had turned their evill counsell against him to his good and theirs and of many beside he would not for his part be the man that should turne it to revenge Calvin Mercer and so the Latine Interpreter doth hit the sense though not the words can I resist Gods will Iacob after the same manner said to Rachel that said give me children am I God Gen. 30.2 that is it is not in my power to give thee children so here Ioseph saith am I God it is not in my power to hurt you whom the Lord intendeth by this meanes to blesse Iun. QUEST XII The computation of Iosephs age Vers. 22. IOseph lived an hundred and ten yeeres 1. Thus God recompenced Iosephs short affliction which endured 13. yeeres from the 17. yeere not from the 16. as Pererius saith following the corrupt Latine text of his age to the 30. when he stood before Pharaoh with a long time of prosperity for the space of 80. yeeres that is from the 30. yeere to the 110. yeares for so long he lived 2. Yet attained not Ioseph to the yeeres of his father which were 147. and some of his brethren overlived him as Levi who lived 137. yeares Exod. 6.16 nhether Ioseph dyed first of all his brethren as Pererius thinketh it is uncertaine the great affliction and hard imprisonment in his youth the cares and troubles of the government and administration of the kingdome might be some reason of the shortning of his dayes Perer. 3. This then was the age of Ioseph hee was 17. yeares old when he was sold into Egypt Gen. 37.2 at 30. yeares he stood before Pharaoh Gen. 41.46 he was 49. yeares old when Iacob came into Egypt for the seven yeares of plenty were then past and two of famine Gen. 45.6 at Iacobs death who lived 17. yeares in Egypt Gen. 47.28 he was 56. yeares old and 54. yeares he lived after which make 110. in all 4. By this age of Ioseph it may appeare how long hee dyed before Moses was borne namely 64. yeares and 144. yeares before the departure of Israel out of Egypt as may be thus gathered from the promise made to Abraham to the going out of Israel are 430. yeares Exod. 12.40 Galat. 3.17 of this time 215. yeares were run when Iacob came downe to Egypt for Abraham was 75. yeares old when the promise was first made Gen. 12.4 Isaack was borne when Abraham was 100. yeares old Gen. 17.17 Isaack at 60. had Esau and Iacob borne Gen. 25.26 Iacob at 130. came downe to Egypt Gen. 48.9 these yeares put together 25. of Abrahams age 60. of Isaacks 130. of Iacobs make 215. exactly there remaineth then the other halfe of 215. of the which time Ioseph lived 71. yeares for he was 49. when Iacob came downe to Egypt and lived 110. yeares there remaineth then 144. yeares take from this 80. yeares for so old was Moses when Israel went out of Egypt and the remnant is 64. from Iosephs death to Moses birth 5. Here appeareth Tostatus errour that would have 66. yeares from the death of Ioseph till Moses and 146. from thence to Israels departure wherein he faileth in 2. yeares But Iustinus the historiographer is in a greater error who would have Moses to be Iosephs son lib. 36. and in the same place he hath other untruths as that Ioseph was his fathers youngest sonne that his brethren sold him for the excellency of his wit whereas they did it of malice that he got his skill of interpreting dreames by art magicke whereas the Magitians and wise-men of Egypt could not do it but he by the spirit of God was enabled thereunto ex Perer. QUEST XIII How many generations Ioseph saw of Ephraim Vers. 23. IOseph saw Ephraims children to the third generation 1. Thus most doe read that Ioseph onely saw Ephraims childrens childrens children in the third descent from Ephraims proâ—epotes his grand-nephewes which were abâ—epotes to Ioseph nephewes in the fourth degree but of Manasseh he saw onely his childrens children so that Manasseh was only a grand-father Ephraim a great grand-father while Ioseph lived so that Ephraim was forwarder in his posterity than Manasseh by one descent 2. But I rather thinke that Ioseph saw Ephraims children in the fourth generation from Ephraim in the fift from himselfe 1. Because they are called in the originall the sonnes of the third namely from Ephraim the sons of the third are in the fourth generation and so Iunius translateth well abnepotes that is nephewes in the fourth descent 2. Because we finde that Ephraim though younger than Manasseh exceeded him by two descents for Iosuah was the seventh from Ephraim who was the sonne of Nun the son of Elishama of Ammihud of Hadan of Shutelah of Ephraim 1 Chron. 7.26 27. But Zelophehad who lived with Iosua and dyed in the wildernesse of Hepher of Gilead of Machir of Manasseh was but the fift from Manasseh Numb 29.1 Therefore when Ioseph saw the sonnes of Machir of Manasseh in the second degree from Manasseh he might see Elishama in the fourth descent from Ephraim and thus Iacobs prophecie more fully tooke effect even in Iacobs time that Ephraim should be greater in number than Manasseh QUEST XIV The meaning of this phrase to be brought up upon the knee Vers. 23. WEre brought up on Iosephs knees The Scripture useth three phrases of this kinde 1. As to come from betweene the feet which is taken for education and bringing up Genâ—s 49.10 though sometime it be specially applied to the birth of women Deuter. 28.57 2. They are said to beare upon his knees that is to receive the children newly borne and to
lay hand on them which properly belongeth to women as Rachel saith when she gave Bilha her maid to Iacob She shall beare upon my knees Gen. 30.3 3. The children are said to be brought up upon the fathers knees because they with joy imbrace their babes and dandle them on their knees Mercer Iunius QUEST XV. Why Ioseph would not presently be buried in Canaan Vers. 25. IOseph tooke an oath of the children of Israel 1. The Latine readeth only he tooke an oath of them but the Hebrewes well note that it is said of the children of Israel because not only the Patriarkes in person but all their posterity afterwards did take themselves bound to this oath and afterwards performed it 2. Ioseph did not presently charge them to bury him in Canaan but at their departure for these reasons 1. Because he would not prevent the time which God appointed for hee knew that God would visit them and deliver them Mercer 2. He did it to shew his faith as the Apostle sheweth that this motion proceeded of faith Hebr. 11.22 and that seeing they were to indure great affliction which Ioseph did foresee and therefore he saith God would visit them hee by this meanes would have them confirmed in the hope and expectation of their deliverance 3. Hee knew that the Egyptians would not suffer his body to be removed Perer. 4. And this would bee an occasion that the Egyptians should have Ioseph in remembrance leaving his monument among them and deale the better with his nation Mercer QUEST XVI Why Ioseph was buried in Secheni Vers. 25. YE shall carry my bones hence 1. This was accordingly performed by Moses when the Israelites came out of Egypt Exod. 13.19 2. Besides it is evident also out of the Scripture that Ioseph was buried in Sechem not because Ioseph was there sold into Egypt as some Hebrewes thinke for that done in Dothan not in Sechem Genes 37.17 neither as Rab. Salomon thinketh because Iacob gave Sechem to Ioseph to that end to be a place of buriall or for that Ioseph gave charge to his brethren there to bury him Mercer for no such thing is mentioned in the story But I rather thinke that the Israelites in their discretion did there bury him because that place was given him in speciall words by Iacob and because it fell out to be in the inheritance of his sonnes for which cause also they buried Iosua in his inheritance in mount Ephraim Iosua 24.30 32. QUEST XVII Whether the rest of the Patriarkes were buried in Sechem NOw whereas a question may be moved whether the Israelites removed the bones of the rest of the Patriarkes when they came out of Egypt 1. It is not like that the Patriarkes as they died in Egypt were removed to Hebron where Iacob was buried as Iosephus thinketh libr. 2. antiquiâ—at cap. 4. for this had beene a great trouble to make so many severall journeyes and seeing Iosephs bones were kept in Egypt there was no reason to remove the rest 2. Much more unlike it is as some thinke that they were translated to Sechem as they died for Ioseph was the first that was there buried 3. And that they were translated from Sechem by the sonnes of Hemor as some expound that place Act. 7.16 it is not probable for the Israelites after their returne would not have suffered any other to meddle with their fathers bones and before they returned they would rather have buried them in Hebron than in Sechem 4. Wherefore it is most likely that the Patriarkes bones were carried out of Egypt together with Iosephs bones and there all buried together as Stephen sheweth Act. 7.16 Perer. Consent And seeing mention is made of that place Act. 7.16 where it is said That Iacob and the fathers were removed to Sichem and put in the sepulcher which Abraham bought of the sonnes of Hemor of Sichem which place hath moved much question I will adde somewhat here of this matter to that which is before handled qu. 13. in Gen. 23. QUEST XVIII How Abraham is said Act. 7.19 to have bought the sepulcher of the sonnes of Hemor whereas he indeed bought it of Ephron 1. THere I refused their opinion that thinke Stephen might faile in memory and name Abraham for Iacob 2. Theirs also I rejected which thinke that Zophar Ephraims father of whom Abraham bought the ground was also called Hemor whereunto Pererius subscribeth 3. Neither doe I consent to Cajetane which thinketh that the Patriarkes were removed from Sichem to the sepulcher which Abraham bought by the sonnes of Hemor and so referre the last words of the sonnes of Hemor not to the verbe òné sato bought but to the word ètethésan put but this is not likely that the Sichemites had any thing to doe with their bones 4. Nor yet can I altogether approve Beza his conjecture that thinketh by the negligence of the scribes Abraham to be put into the text for Iacob the reasons why I refused these foure conjectures I have set downe in that place whither I referre the Reader 5. The Syrian Translater readeth in the singular metetéthe he was translated and etéthe was put and so understandeth it only of Iacob that he was removed to Sichem and from thence by the Sichemites carried to Hebron But the Scripture overthroweth this conjecture which testifieth that his sonnes buried him in Abrahams place of sepulture which he bought of Ephron Gen. 50.13 beside the originall copy in the Greeke readeth in the plurall not in the singular 6. I resolved in that place upon the exposition of histor scholastic from the which Iunius seemeth not much to differ histor scholastic transporteth the words thus And were translated to Sichem bought of the sonnes of Hemor and from thence put in the sepulcher which Abraham bought for money but this transposing may seeme very hard therefore Iunius transposeth not the words but thinketh the article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be supplied that where it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the sonnes he would have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. beside that of the sonnes of Hemor that is bought of them and would have this to be the meaning that Iacob and the Patriarks were buried part of them in Abrahams sepulcher part in Sechem which Iacob bought To this interpretation that Stephen here abridgeth two histories of Abrahams and Iacobs purchase I gave liking before as the best of all the rest propounded 7. But since I have considered of another way to reconcile this place which doth satisfie my selfe best and this it is that by Abraham here is not understood the posterity of Abraham as Geâ—evens upon that place for that were an unproper kinde of speaking but I rather thinke according to the manner of the Hebrew tongue wherein Stephen then spake that there is here an eclipsis of a word of cognation as of sonne nephew or such like for it is usuall in the Scriptures to eclipse such termes and names of kindred as