vnto them were not onely more secure of their own estate then was for their safety but also despised the Iewes as a people so reiected as if God vnmindfull of his promise would neuer be reconciled to them again Against al which the Apostle in this Epistle teacheth that al people that beleeue of whatsoeuer cuntry or nation are freely iustified by faith in Christ And first he proueth that neither Iew nor gentile vnder which two al are comprehended can be iustifyed by doing the works of the Law because none can fulfil the Law neither the gentiles by that light of nature the Law written in their heart neither the Iewes by that knowledge of the Law that they so much bragged of And this the Apostle performeth as the diligent Reader may obserue from the xvii verse of the first Chapter vnto the xxi of the third chapter So that he flatly concludeth Therfore by the works of the Law shal no flesh be iustified Now this place being so plaine as it is against iustification by works the doctrine of merits is quite ouerthrown if some color be not deuised to auoid the force of this testimony The Romish Catholiks therfore indeuor as much as they can to make vs beléeue that those wordes must haue another sence and vnderstanding then we take them to haue but what sence that is they are not yet resolued For some say that the Apostle by the workes of the Law meaneth the works of the Ceremonial Law and in déed many of the Papists do so expound it But Master Bellarmine liketh not of that answer confesseth in plain termes that not onely the obseruation of the Law of ceremonies but also the kéeping of the moral Law is excluded from iustification but yet he would haue vs to imagine that onely such workes as are done before we beléeue are denied to iustifie vs. As for the workes that we doe after they doe iustifie and merit as they teach vs. And this their absurd opinion procéedeth of their ignorance of the intent and meaning of the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romans For Master Bellarmine in the place before alledged doth affirme that the Apostle there as also in his Epistle to the Galathians goeth about to proue that none can be saued without faith or without Gods mercy which is in déed the trueth but it is not the whole trueth For he is also as carefull to take away the confidence that any had or might haue in their owne workes And because he writeth to them who had faith already for Their faith was published throughout the worlde and teacheth vs that all our reioycing by this iustification by faith in Christ is taken away but where is merit there is reioycing in our selues therfore it is plaine that the Apostle excludeth here from iustifying al works This also appeareth by the setting down the true cause of iustification By faith and remouing the wrong cause in so general termes Without the works of the Law that also the Apostle doth after in the example of Abraham All which may teach vs that S. Paule héere indeuoreth to take from all workes when soeuer we doe them all hope of being saued thereby to the end that our pryde in our owne workes being abated and our boasting taken away He that reioyceth may reioyce in the Lord. For this cause also the Apostle doth afterwards so set workes and merit against grace as if the one of them doth quite ouerthrow the other If by grace not now by workes for then grace is no more grace but if it be of workes then is it now no grace for then worke is no worke We sée then that S. Paule teaching that we cannot be iustified by workes to the end that our Iesus may be indeed a true onely and perfect Sauiour and fully saue vs from al our sins taketh away from all our doings the hope of meriting and deseruing the same And to this end the Apostle S. Peter also in the beginning of his first Epistle doth make mention of Gods aboundant mercy wherby we are not onely begotten to a liuely hope but also Kept by the power of GOD through faith vnto saluation Therefore I say hee teacheth vs that we obtaine this by Gods greate goodnesse because hee woulde not haue vs any thing to trust in our merites but in that God of all grace who will make vs perfect for our workes cannot do that that we may ascribe To him glory and dominion for euer and not to our selues or our goodnes But if any man replie that this doctrine séemeth contrarie to that which Saint Paule writeth to the Romans That God will reward euery man according to his deedes Or to that Saint Mark reporteth that our Sauiour Christ promised That he who in his name gaue a cup of cold water to drink to his seruants should not leese his reward thus I aunswere God in mercie promiseth reward to such as do his will and in mercie he likewise performeth the same not waighing the work but remembring his mercie So that herein wee may rather commend Gods faithfulnesse in kéeping his promise alwaies then estéeme of our works For who will think that a cup of cold water gyuing may be worthy of eternall life And the words of Saint Paule are plaine enough if we wrest them not out of their naturall sence For we denie not that GOD rewardeth men According to their workes And the place proueth not that GOD rewardeth them For their works and that sence onely can establish their doctrine of merites but thapostle saith there onely thus much that good workes shall haue a good reward of eternall lyfe glorie honor and peace Euill workes their due reward of wrath indignation tribulation and anguish So that according to the qualitie of their workes the qualitie I say and not the merite GOD in mercie according to his promise shall giue honour and immortalitie to them that séeke to serue him This therefore standeth still the vndoubted old faith of the Romans That by the workes of the Law there shall no flesh bee iustified in Gods sight For howsoeuer Abraham was iustified by workes before men as others also are Iustified that is declared and accompted before men iust by workes and not by Faith onely For euen Saint Bede expoundeth that place of Saint Iames for the approuing of Abrahams faith or making it to appeare yet I say Before God workes cannot iustifie And this is the auncient Roman faith receiued also and taught of the auncient Fathers both writing of this Epistle to the Romns and else where Chrisostome saith that this righteousnes is called Gods righteousnes because man cannot work it but God only And after That the Sonne hath perfected it wholie with his bloud And in another place verie notablie For thou shalt not obtaine this righteousnes by thy trauels and labours but thou
of the faithfull Romans because S. Paul teaching them to doe good workes seemeth to require nothing of them but loue which he saith is the fulfilling of the Law so that he would haue vs occupied in performing of loue to God and loue to man which God in the ten commandements requireth of vs and then we shall not faile but doe good works But this yet he teacheth more plainely in the shutting vp of that notable discourse in the fourtéenth Chapter Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne In which place Master Bellarmine wil haue vs by faith to vnderstand knowledge as also the Rhemistes teach vs or persuasion of conscience that the thing which we doe is good and lawfull But whatsoeuer we doe for the which we finde not our direction in Gods word what persuasion can we finde for the same in our conscience that God shall recken it among good workes Or rather why shoulde we not alwaies feare least God for such workes of ours should say Who hath required these thinges of your handes in which respect al the fathers in our good workes require faith And is not I pray you our good worke a flower of sweete sauour and a fruite of pleasant taste vnto the Lorde All men wil confesse it is so From what roote then must it come doubtlesse from no other but from that immortall seede that Saint Peter speaketh of The worde of God Whereby hee woulde also haue vs to growe And if S. Basil concerning the precepts of their monkish life doth think they must not be left vndone to take other workes in hand and that specially because that euery one knoweth not what is conuenient for them to doe but may as well choose that may be to his hurt and hinderance as to his helpe and furtherance then how much more should Gods lawes be in such accompt among vs who are by our profession regular hauing an expresse commaundement to doe that onely which God commaundeth that we would not for any thing adde vnto the same our owne inuentions or mingle with the same our owne traditions And if we suppose that one man may better see how to set downe rules of life then another how is it that we are so be sotted that wee giue not that glory to God that he knoweth better I say not then any but then all men what workes they are that please him best Or if we confesse him to haue that wisedom why doe we not follow then this his direction why do we not studie to keepe his commaundementes why doe wee weary our selues in our owne waies and wast our time in doing our owne workes Thirdly in euery good worke God also considereth to what ende it was done And principally we must respect Gods glorie Whether ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer ye doe doe all to the glorie of GOD. And therefore Saint Paule findeth greate fault with the Romans or rather writing to the Romans that neyther the Gentiles when they knewe God did glorifie him as God and the Iewes by their sinnes dishonored the name of God And for that cause giuing to the Romans a caueat he willeth them to take heede of such as made deuision And why For they serue not the Lorde Iesus Christ but their owne bellies They seeke not to glorifie the Lorde but to pamper themselues Yea both Saint Paul and S. Peter also teach vs this lesson by their owne example giuing to him prayse glory and dominion And this glorifying of GOD is especially performed by consecrating vnto him the good grape of our holy obedience Euen by letting our light so shine before men that they may see our good workes and glorifie our Father which is in heauen Thus then we see that the auncient religion teacheth vs that no good worke can procéede from vs vnlesse the spring of our heart first be purged from the filth of sinne least our affections by that corruption shoulde be mingled like muddie water with sinfull cogitations and withdrawen from sinceritie in our action Then also that such onely are in déede good workes for doing whereof we haue warrant in Gods worde Lastly that in the said worke especially we must seeke Gods glory by seruing him in duetifull obedience for that the worke must be considered according to the ende whereunto it is directed and which we respected in doing the worke Augustine teacheth And if any of these be wanting either a sincere heart which cannot be without faith a direction out of the word or a godly ende the worke is not good whosoeuer worketh it or whatsoeuer shew of goodnes it seemeth to haue in the eies of men As on the contrary that which we doe according to Gods worde with a sincere heart desiring to walk on forward in all holy obedience that is in déede a good worke But it is almost a common receiued opinion of our new Romish Catholicks that the good intent maketh a good work Insomuch as many think it must needs be a good worke that a man or woman doth with a good purpose Neither yet do they measure this their intent or purpose with the true line of Gods worde but with the false measure of their owne imaginations And heereby it commeth to passe that the outward appearance of a good worke is taken of many to be an action acceptable to God although it be not either directed to the right end or commaunded in Gods word or done by him that hath the spirit of regeneration And this maketh them so grosly to teach concerning good workes because they would for the better credit of their workes commend the actions not only of the wicked but of the Infidels also that neuer knew God as if they might be perfect and void of sinne which is a thing as absurde to him that by the light of Gods spirit doth walk in the pathes of Gods word as if they would affirme that a wild vyne whilest it remayneth wild might bring forth a kindly grape a crab tree a good apple or from a foule and corrupt puddle might spring sweet and wholsome waters As for Gods Law because the waies therof are not roomy enough for such reelers and rouers to run in who according to their owne foolish phansies are alwaies hatching some new deuotions as not only the infinite swarues of their Religious orders as they falsly call those irreligious companies but also their innumerable toyes and superstitions whereby they would beare the world in hand that they please GOD and deserue his fauour doe plainley prooue they therefore now in the new Romish Religion commaund vnto vs many things whereof in the Scripture they can find no one commaundment no one example They quite forget the straight charge that GOD layeth vpon his people when he telleth them that They must not doe vvhat seemeth good in their owne eyes and concerning Gods Law That they must ad nothing therto nor
from performing their dutyfull obedience as he doth many times by his priuiledges As for indulgences and pardons any bodie that will pray and pay for them may haue them And they that dwell at Rome get yet another maner of blessing with his two fingers wherwith he blesseth the people that gaze at him when he is caried abroad To be short at certain times he blesseth those that are called blessed graines or Agnus dei or such like stuffe and causeth these to be sent into Countries far and neer deluding and deceiuing by such toyes the hearts of the simple therwithall filling their owne panches and purses as though they had gotten or those had giuen some great spirituall gift when they haue some such toy consecrated by the Pope These are his gifts such are his blessings If you would haue better he cannot afford them For he is not for the most part able to preach teach It is against honour and estimation to seek to comfort the afflicted conscience No neither the Pope nor his Colledge of Cardinals will busie themselues in the Ministerie of the word in the abundant blessing wherof Saint Paule reioyceth Is the darknesse more contrarie to the light then are these vain promises or shewes of spirituall comfort verie cloudes without water and trees without fruit of true consolation to that perfect peace of mind and ioy of conscience which the Apostle promiseth vnto them and purposed to work among them by the powerful preaching of the Gospell of peace This this is in deed a true consecrated sword which shall pierce euen to the heart and conscience of the sinner and make a deeper wound then all the hallowed swords that the Popes can sanctifie And thus to be short we see that where Paule commeth he bringeth with him spirituall gifts euen abundance of blessing by the ministerie of the word But the Pope because he cannot skill of such blessings vseth other be blesseth fire water salt oyle swords roses books belles candles palmes ashes wax paper parchments lead pictures or payntings falsely perswading sillie soules that hee is able to put holinesse into them And thus it appeareth that if we consider the doctrine of the Church of Rome examining it with that that was taught in the dayes of Saint Paul and Saynt Peter they are nothing like If their practise they are cleane contrarie so that the new Romish Church hath no cause to brag of that old faith of the Romanes CHAP. XIX AND these are if I bee not deceaued all the points of religion in controuersie betweene vs and the Church of Rome at this day Whereof out of the Apostles epistle to the Romanes wee may gather any certayne doctrine Wherein if we dissent from the religion of the Romish Church that now is that we may iumpe and ioyne with the auncient faith of the Romanes commended by thapostle as spoken of and that worthilie in all the worlde I trust no indifferent Christian that in singlenesse of heart seeketh the trueth either will or can iustly reprooue vs. And as hitherto I haue shewed what consent there is in the groundes of their doctrines betweene S. Paul who wrote to Rome to confirme them in the faith S. Peter who they say wrote from Rome and S. Marke also who wrot his Gospell at Rome as in histories it is recorded so now in one point let vs see what Saint Peter thinketh in one poynt I say not touched by Saint Paule in that epistle although in other places plentifully enough by him deliuered Saint Peter therefore in handling the dueties betweene man and wife doth thereby commend the honourable estate of marriage as a state of life whereof God hath a care and therefore giueth lawes and rules in obseruing whereof husbands and wiues may serue and please God And if he had so verie well liked of single life as they who call themselues his successours doe hee woulde no doubte haue taken occasion to haue put in some caueat for the same But himselfe was maried as the Rhemistes themselues confesse and though out of Hierome they would proue that being called to be an Apostle he forsooke his wife yet how false that is Saint Peter himselfe doth plainely enough declare For he exhorteth Husbands to dwel with their wiues according to knowledge that is to kéepe and continue holily and kindly with them not vngodly and vncourteously to forsake them And shall we imagine that S. Peter would teach others and not himselfe or say one thing and doe another or that in wordes exhorting them not to depart from their wiues by his example he would moue them to leaue them That be farre from vs once to imagine And this we may be sure of that if he had forsaken his wife as our popish Catholickes now or some other in former times iniurious to that holy ordinance did surmise he woulde yet so haue tempered this his general commaundement that his example shoulde not haue béene manifestly repugnant to his doctrine Therefore that he was maried the scriptures report and it is by our aduersaries confessed but that he forsooke his wife it hath no shewe of proofe no colour of trueth Yea further the Apostle doth insinuate that the dwelling together of man and wife in knowledge is a furtheraunce to their prayers And therefore vnto that former exhortation he addeth these wordes That your prayers be not hindred Thereby declaring that the dwelling together of man and wife as they ought to doe is a furtheraunce to their prayers Whereas on the contrarie their separating of themselues in bodie may breede such an alienation of mindes with other great inconueniences as may interrupt their prayers And although S. Peter meane not héereby that they shoulde so continually dwel together as that they might neuer withdraw themselues the more fréely to consecrate as it were and wholly giue them selues to prayer and fasting yet woulde he doubtlesse according to S. Paules rules haue such their abstinence when anie is To be by consent for a time and againe to come together that Sathan shoulde not tempt them for their incontinencie For all men and women are in danger of his assaultes and therefore To auoyd fornication let euery man haue his wife and let euery woman haue her owne husband saith his fellow apostle And although men or women may for a time feele themselues voide of wanton and vnchast lustes yet because Not all men can receiue this thing saue they to whom it is giuen séeing I say it is not in their power but a rare gift of God which how long they shal haue it they are not certain yea to know who giueth it is a high point of wisdome the wiseman saith what madnes is it to promise that which thou canst not performe Or to séeke for that which is not necessarie for thee or to indeuor to please God with that which he requireth not of thée How much better is it