the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God The water there is meant of Baptisme that laver of regeneration without this there is no entrance into heaven When Paul said Except these stay in the ship ye cannot be saved Acts 27.31 all will presently understand that their abode in the ship was of absolute necessity to safety and so also baptisme according to Christs words for eternity Answ Though it be not easy to determine what is the right meaning and genuine interpretation of those words yet it is of no great difficulty to vindicate them from them that would fasten this sense upon them and gather this consequence from them And before I come to a full answer I shall premise two things 1. That it is a wonder that Nicodemus coming to our Saviour in the night and as yet knowing nothing in the Mystery of Christ should hear that from him that others in the open light and farre more knowing in Christianity could never hear from his mouth 2. Bellarmine himself as Amesius doth observe confesses and if I do not much mistake Suarez somewhere that at that time of Christs conference with Nicodemus there was no such absolute necessity of Baptisme He puts the question when baptisme began to be necessary and determines it in four propositions Baptismus Châ—â—sti non fuit necessarius necessitate medii aut praecepti ante Christi mortem Baptismus Christi coepit esse necessarius necessitate medii praecepti a die pentecostes The third is That it was not necessary before the death of Christ neither necessitate praecepti or medii The fourth is that it was not necessary necessitate me dii praecepti before the day of Pentecost And let any judge whether it be probable instructing that novice in the faith Christ would in the first place inform him not what in present but what afterwards would be of necessity especially seeing that after that time by him set down when the absolute necessity should commence we hear of no such necessity of it For more full satisfaction I further answer First That text which names not Baptisme and cannot be concluded by an argument infallibly cogent to speak of Baptisme cannot enforce an absolute necessity of it This is cleare But this text names not Baptisme neither is there any argument to conclude infallibly that it speaks of baptisme probabilities are mentioned but no necessary concluding argument is by any produced Secondly A Scripture-text carrying like colour hath been urged for a like necessity for infants to receive the Lords Supper John 6.53 But this is agreed on all parties not to hold This then how eagerly soever it is prest may fail likewise Thirdly Either water there must be taken for Baptisme of water or else by way of Exegesis to hold out the same thing that was exprest before by the birth of the Spirit If the latter will hold as there are many parallel instances given and multitudes of Divines so interprete it Gerrard in his common places reckons up many more then I have to consult then this text comes to nothing in this particular And that this should be the meaning Chamier with fair probabilities argues seeing in this sense the words bear an absolute truth without any limitation All being of a corrupt birth there is a necessity of a new birth and that by the Spirit there being no more births then that of the flesh which is corrupt and that of the Spirit that comes to heal corruption If the former stand that water must of necessity hold out Baptisme of water as Papists and Lutherans generally contend and many Protestants yield then either the words must be taken in an absolute way without any limit at all or else with their just and due limitations If limits must be put then no absolute unlimitted necessity can be concluded and to understand it without any limit at all our adversaries themselves see to be lyable to dangerous absurdities Some therefore understand it of the Baptisme of water or some other that supplies the place and room of it and it is on all hands granted that Baptismus flaminis sanguinis the Spirit or blood in Martyrdome may supply the room of it for salvation And this Chamier saies is the limit that Arboreus puts Others understand it of Baptisme of water if it can be had and it be not contemned and despised and this Chamier saies is the limit that Lombard Bonaventure Gorran Carthusian and Villagadus put to it Others understand it of that regeneration that is ordinarily by baptisme of water though by other meanes it may be wrought And this limit Alexander of Hales puts to it as Amesius observes either of actual Baptisme or else of the desire of it and this Suarez sayes is the opinion of all Divines and charges it for an heresy to hold that none of years can be saved unlesse actually baptized notwithstanding their earnest desire of it and in his time he saies one a Michael Baius a Divine of Lovain held it But as he saies Pius 5. and Gregorius 13. in their letters published did condemne it And this text being subject to so many limitations our adversaries being judges I hope I may without any just exception adde one that it be understood of men of years such as Nicodemus was to whom it was spoken seeing so many helps are provided for men of yeares in the want of Baptisme it is altogether unreasonable to leave Infants in such exigents as to be irremedilesly under damnation for eternity when it is not in their power to make provision of it and so are holpen by Lombard and those of that party Any man may be their Compurgitor that they are not guilty of contempt of it Besides this Text there are many high speeches alledged out of some of the Ancient for the necessity of Baptisme and heavy doom of those that passe out of this world in the want of it But these are not onely under the dislike of Protestants but of those that these lay claim to be of their own party Bernard Epist 77. is large against them and Vossius hath a full quotation out of Petrus Blessensis who was Bernards contemporary c Sufficit Spiritus aqua Sufficit Spiritus sanguis si aquam non exclusit contemptus Religionis sed articulus necessitatis Sufficiet solus Spiritus quia testimonium ipsius pondus habet The Spirit and water sufficeth The Spirit and blood sufficeth if instant necessity and not contempt of Religion depriveth of Water The Spirit alone may suffice for his testimony hath weight in it And whereas Austin of all other is most frequently quoted for this rigid sentence as being in name most eminent my author sets Austine against Austin having in his 5th Book against Donatists these words d Etiam atque etiam considerans in venio non tantum passionem pro nomine Christi id quod ex Baptismo decrat posse supplere
another will by no means excuse neglect of it this were to sin because another sins to despise an Ordinance because another prophanes it when one came without a wedding garment no invited guest for his sake did keep from the wedding Fourthly No one Communicant is bound to examine what all are that are his fellow-Communicants there is neither expresse command for it nor yet reason to evince it each man is bound to see himself arrayed as he ought and not to find fault in others addresses Let a man examine himself and so let him eat though he be to admonish as his brothers visible sin gives him occasion Fifthly The penalty of him that comes unworthily reaches his own self that comes in his unworthinesse and extends no further Legal uncleannesse defiled the man that was personally unclean and not his neighbour so it is here He that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh judgment to himself c. Sixthly If one mans sin this way do defile another the sin of one Communicant doth defile all other Communicants then it must be either from the nature of sin thus to defile all in so near Communion or from the nature of the Ordinance thus to be defiled to all when one in defilement comes to it or from some positive precept forbidding all to come when any that is unclean is there I doubt not but this is a sufficient enumeration But 1. It is not of the nature of sin thus to defile all in such communion then it would every where thus defile wheresoever any have society or do accompany together Then the chief Priests had done well to keep out of the Judgment-Hall that they might be clean to keep the Passeover John 18.28 and the Pharisees to wash when they came from Market 2. It is not of the nature of the Ordinance to be thus defiled to all It is not so in other Ordinances Cain's offering defiled not Abels nor did Hophni and Phinehas in their offerings defile Elkanah and Hannah when they offered 3. Nor yet is there any positive precept forbidding a cleansed soul upon the account of the uncleannesse of another to come to this Table Seventhly If one mans presence in this way defile another then it is either his simple presence such a ones being there in his infection or else a willing and witting presence with such a one If simple presence do defile then there is no man that can be secure The closest hypocrite that creeps in unawares would be the undoing of all when Christ said Ye are clean but not all Joh 13.10 according to this opinion it had been a contradiction the uncleannesse of one had been the defilement of all Neither is it willing or witting presence that can in this way defile then it must be in every single mans power to determine him to be such and exclude him thence or else of necessity exclude himself When the Eldership hath judged and received according to the general way of Reformed Churches or the plurality of votes of believers as it is with men of the Congregational way he must make an after-search a further scrutiny he that one judges fit that most judge fit some will judge unworthy and upon that account must shut themselves out of Communion Men of such principles must everlastingly avoid all Church-fellowship or act against their principles and we need not to speak it it is too plainly visible what manner of persons men of such high pretences have in their Congregations There are multitudes of Arguments heaped to nourish this scruple but I shall not further trouble the Reader there is nothing I think can be said but that which here hath been spoke will afford a sufficient answer CHAP. IX The being of Sacraments depends upon their use Another Position yet followes from the words The being of Sacraments depends upon their use they are no Sacraments to those that do not partake of them This is grounded upon this act of Abraham appointed of God and accordingly done by him The being of Sacraments consists in their use He received the sign of Circumcision All that he did was in obedience of the Divine Commandment Gen. 17.11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin and it shall be a token of the Covenant betwixt me and you It was not the foreskin but the foreskin cut off that was the token of the Covenant So also in that of the Passeover Israel had a command from God to take every man a lamb and to eat the flesh rost with fire and unleavened bread and with bitter herbs ye shall eat it Exod. 12.3 8. It is not barely the Lamb but eaten in the way that God prescribed that made the Sacrament In Baptisme the command is Baptize them in the Name of the Father of the Son and of the Holy Ghost It is not water that makes up Baptisme but water applyed to the subject or the subject to the water In the Lords Supper there is bread and wine in their significancy held out not for bare sight but a Command is added Take eat drink ye all of this bread and wine makes not up the Sacrament without breaking giving taking and eating In those Sacraments extraordinary The Sea was no Sacrament but Israels passage through it The Cloud was no Sacrament but Israels guidance by it or the cloud guiding Israel and Israel following after it Neither was the Manna a Sacrament or the rock considered in themselves but the Manna eaten the water of the rock drunk by the Israelites Even the fictious Sacraments of the Church of Rome consist in their use Their Order is no Sacrament where there is none Ordained and Marriage is no Sacrament where none are married Their Chrisme in confirmation oyl in extream unction not applyed are of no use or efficacy This is plain in Reason Arguments to â—vince it First The being of Sacraments depends on their institution Take away their institution and they have no being at all But the institution leads us not barely to an element but prescribes the use not onely to a sign but the application of it not onely to water but to be baptized with water not onely to bread and wine but the eating of bread drinking of wine and the beholding of both Secondly the being of Sacraments depends upon the relation of the sign to the thing signified with the analogy and proportion that is held between them This is plain Take away such relation and the element is a common element and not a Sacrament set aside the consideration of the blood and Spirit of Christ and water is an element for common use to take away the filth of the flesh but for removal neither of the guilt nor filth of sin Take away the consideration of the body and blood of Christ and bread may strengthen nature but not nourish the soul But the relation is not barely in the signs or elements but in their applications to the subject water
with the washing of water by the Word that he might present it to himself a glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing but that it should be holy without blemish Ephe. 5.25 26 27. As the spot is taken off by his Spirit in working new principles in us and working us up to new obedience so the guilt is removed by his sufferings He blots out their transgressions for his Names sake He remembers them no more He hides his face from them He casts them into the bottom of the sea removes them as far as the East is from the West He doth not one of these to leave the other undone He vouchsafes purifying and he vouchsafes pacifying grace He delivers from the wrath to come and he makes meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the Saints in light He conferres habitual graces and he honours with relative priviledges Fifthly These may be distinguished Blood and Spirit may be distinguished but must not be divided but they must by no means be divided Christ doth not impart his merit where he doth deny his Spirit We account it a great presumption in men of years to talke of justification and want sanctification and we can say to such If any man have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his God writes his Law in the heart and puts it into the inward parts where he remembers sin no more Jer. 31.33 They are quickened together with Christ that have their trespasses forgiven them Col. 2.13 And it is an unwarrantable conceit to imagine that relative priviledges of adoption and pardon of sin are conferred on infants in Baptisme or otherwise when their natures remain still the same and unchanged who can think that God fits all of age for glory that he takes into glory and yet takes infants into glory their impurity and birth-defilement continuing Seeing that we have instances as of Gods love of infants Rom. 9.13 of Christs blessing of them Matth. 19.16 so also of the gift of his Spirit Jer. 1.5 Luk. 1.15 In case the former may be avoided yet certainly the later is above exception The reason given by Christ of that sentence of his holding forth an absolute necessity of regeneration Except a man be born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God is the pollution of the first birth as appears by his own words ver 6. inferred immediately upon the repetition of the former That which is born of the flesh is flesh and this is of equal concernment to infants and men of years uncleannesse of birth as well as uncleannesse of life stands as a barre to our entrance into heaven and no unclean person must enter there Sixthly The Sacraments especially those of initiation whether in the old or new Covenant about which concerning this in question there is most dispute The Sacraments especially those of initiation have respeâ—t to both of these havo respect to this whole work both of the change of our nature and the removal of our guilt As the have respect to the one so also to the other and that the whole of their work and the way how it is wrought may be better understood we are to consider that First Somewhat is hinted and implyed in those respective signs of Circumcision and Baptisme and that is our uncleannesse in nature and guilt contracted upon it Why should either infant or man of years have the foreskin of his flesh in that way by Divine appointment cut off but to let us understand the propagation of corruption and derivation of it from man to posterity Why should water be applyed which is of an abstersive cleansing faculty but to let us know that there is uncleannesse to be removed Cleansing for that which is clean is vain and needlesse As Sacrifices for atonement did imply wrath so this cleansing implyes filth and consequently guilt filth and guilt being inseparable Secondly Somewhat is signified and taught us in them somewhat the bare signs themselves are apt to signifie viz. That the taking off of the staine and the removal of our guilt is to be done by anothers power Why is this applyed by another hand but to let us know that it is above our strength Somewhat not the signes of themselves but the Word of the Covenant that is annext teaches and that is That the blood of Christ removes this guilt and that the Spirit of Christ takes away this stain This the signes of themselves could never shew but the words of the Covenant abundantly do demonstrate that remission of guilt is the work of the blood of Christ and Regeneration or Sanctification the work of the Spirit That the water in Baptisme holds out the Spirit unto us for Sanctification and change of our wayes is that I know denyed by none and in the Scripture it is plain I will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed Deut. 30.6 Circumcision is that of the heart Rom. 2.29 which by the Apostle Col. 2.11 is interpreted the putting off the body of the sins of the flesh Baptisme is the same as to the signification as we see in the same place from the Apostle Col. 2.11 12 13. In whom ye are also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ buried with him in Baptisme wherein ye are also risen with him through the faith of the operation of God who hath raised him from the dead and you being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh hath he quickned together with him having forgiven all your trespasses And this death to sin and life in grace are both from the Spirit Rom. 8.11 12 13. and both of these Baptisme holds out to us Rom. 6.4 We are buried with him by Baptisme into his death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father even so we also should walk in newnesse of life But whether the blood of Christ be at all signified by this element of water some have questioned Sticking so rigidly to that phrase of the Apostle Tit. 3.5 that they will not alone have it understood of Baptisme but they will have nothing else looked after in Baptisme but the work of regeneration But this doubtlesse is a clear mistake The blood that was shed in circumcision gave the circumcised to understand that the guilt propagated could not without blood be remitted And if any think that this is too dark and obscure a proof of a Mystery of this weight let them compare with it the text under hand and the Apostles scope and aime in it which as we have heard is to shew that Abrahams circumcision was not his justification seeing he was justified by faith in his state of uncircumcision and that he received circumcision as a sign and seal of it justification is by blood Rom. 3.25 Circumcision is a sign and seal of justification Righteousnesse of
afterwards perish through unbelief and impenitence Therefore faith charity and other Spiritual qualities wrought by the Spirit in the regenerate are sometimes lost And having delivered himself thus in the negative that Baptisme works not these graces or habits in infants His first proposition in the affirmative tending to shew what Baptisme does work is w Omnes infantes baptizati ab Originalis peccati reatu absolvuntur That all baptized infants are acquitted from the guilt of original sin for which opinion many Fathers and Schoolmen are quoted by him as they were for the former So that I think the first part of my position is fully made good that the most eminent that ever have appeared for this power of Sacraments to conferre grace on the receivers either utterly deny or else doubtfully hold that Baptisme works any real change in infants but onely that which is relative and that it conferres not habits but onely priviledges on Infants baptized For the other part of the position that the Scriptures which these bring for proof of this power of Baptisme almost all speak of such a change that is real not relative of habits and not of priviledges The proof is easy What those Scriptures are which by them are produced in this Controversy may be seen in the former position and that almost all of them speak of a real change not barely that which is relative is evident The alone Old Testament text that I can find is Deut. 30.6 with Jer. 9.25 where circumcision of the heart is mentioned which texts as they can hardly be interpreted to speak at all of the Sacrament of Circumcision in the outward rite so it is certain that a real change is spoken to by Moses in Deuteronomy and by the Prophet also complained of to be wanting Reverend Dr. Ward yields that Spiritual Circumcision of the heart is there meant but he saith that by this Spiritual Circumcision the remission of original guilt is understood To which x Cordis circumcisione peccatorum remissionem denotari ut credam nihil adhuc quod suadeat video quod cogat multo minus Certe si quis verba illa Deut. 10.16 Circumcidite ergo praeputium cordis vestri aut illâ—d etiam Jer. 44. Circumcidimini sive circumcidite vos Jehovae exposuerit Remittite vobis peccata vestra 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pute 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mr. Gataker replies that he sees nothing that can perswade much lesse force him to believe any such thing Adding that If any should expound Deut. 10.16 Circumcise the forskin of your heart or Jer. 44. Circumcise your selves to the Lord to be as much as forgive your own sins it would be thought strange Disceptatio pag. 147. yea he makes the contrary plainly to appear As for those texts Titus 3.5 1 Corinthians 6.11 Ephesians 5.25 26. they speak all to the same thing In every one of them a real habitual change is mentioned Acts 2.38 Remission of sinnes is indeed mentioned and very probably Acts. 22.16 But in what sense to be understood I have shewed in the last place so that I think there is so much yielded and so little proved by the eminent advocates in this cause that according to Scripture there is any such causality in Baptisme for the pardon of sinne in every Infant that is presented to that ordinance and received that even upon this account it is justly to be susspected Besides that the blood of Christ and his Spirit are not onely distinguished by them but divided The vertue of his blood is ascribed to those that have no portion in his Spirit as though that Christ came both by water and blood unto some and by blood onely unto others SECT III. Objections against the former doctrine Obj. 1 HEre it is objected Where the blood of Christ on Gods part is offered and applyed for pardon of the guilt of sin and no impediment put on his part that receives it there the guilt of sin is remitted But in the Baptism of Infants the blood of Christ on Gods part is offered and applyed and no impediment put by him that receives it Ergo in the Baptisme of Infants the guilt of sin is remitted Answ 1 Answ 1. This Argument will hold with equal strength for proof of that which these deny as for that which they would assert Where the Spirit of Christ is offered on Gods part and applyed for regeneration and true sanctification and no impediment put by him that doth receive it there regeneration sanctification and all other gracious habits are wrought But in the Baptisme of Infants the Spirit of Christ is thus offered and applyed and no impediment is put Ergo. The Major in this syllogisme can be no more denyed then in the former The Spirit of Christ is as efficacious for regeneration as his blood for pardon It were over-much boldnesse to put any difference between them And for the Assumption none can deny but the Spirit is as well applyed in Baptisme as blood either then both must hold or both must be denyed 2. I utterly deny that the blood and Spirit of Christ that either Answ 2 blood or Spirit are thus applyed in Baptisme In case of such application they would produce their effects above and against all resistance there is no vain application of either of these to any person If the Spirit of Christ had been in Baptisme applyed to Simon Magus it would so have seazed upon him and wrought in him that Peter would not have addressed himself to him in that language which he heard from him and so I may say of the blood of Christ such an application of it to his soul would have had that effect that Peter would have said to him in the words of the Seraphim to Isaiah when he had applyed the coal from the Altar to his mouth Thine iniquity is taken away and thy sin is purged and not as he did that thou art in the gall of bitternesse and the bond of iniquity The blood of Christ upon the soul of an Infant or man of years must needs be as efficacious as a coal from the Altar on Isaiah's lips Universal redemption we know is asserted by these Authors though it be with such limits as not to close with Arminians but to remain their opposite If now there be not onely impetration of the merit of Christ but also application in that latitude as Baptisme is administred I know nothing that can stand in the way of salvation of all those that are baptized He that would see the consent of modern Writers of the most eminent note in the denyal of this proposition let him consult learned Mr. Gataker Discep pap 6 c. whereby his industrious pains after his manner many are multiplied Danaeus leads the way He is deceived saith he that thinks that Christ and his benefits are applyed by the sign of water which is onely the seal of such application 3. According to these principles laid by these
to do the duty that we owe. What the name of Christian or servant or people of God speaks the same these signs call for As the Altar set up Josh 22.24 did witness that those two Tribes and a half did belong with the other Tribes to the God of Israel so these Sacramental signes witness the same thing likewise 8. Remembrancing Eighthly They ace remonstrative and remembrancing signes sometimes of mercy conferred The Passeover was a sign of Israels freedom out of the land of Egypt Exod. 12.26 27. The Lords Supper shewes forth the Lords death untill he come 1 Cor. 11.26 being appointed to be done in remembrance of Christ Matth. 26.26 Mar. 14 20. Luk. 22.29 1 Cor. 11.24 of Christ dying giving his body and blood for us As those twelve stones taken out of Jordan by twelve men out of every Tribe a man were for a sign in ages following a memorial unto the children of Israel for ever that the waters of Jordan were cut off before the Arke of the Covenant of the Lord when it passed over Jordan Josh 4.6 7. So these Sacramental signs are memorials of the mercy mentioned They are alwayes memorials of the Covenant that we have entred the duty in which we stand engaged The Apostle having shewed that Baptisme doth signifie a death to sin and a life in righteousness Rom. 6.4 presently thence gives warning he that is dead is free from sin vers 6. Ninethly I might shew that they are ratifying and confirming signes but this is distinctly mentioned 9 Ratifying They are seals as well as signes which remaines to be handled SECT III. Corollaries from the former Doctrine SEveral consectaries follow from this observation which containes one part of the definition of a Sacrament First The sign and thing signified are analogically one That the sign and the thing signified in every Sacrament are one not properly and really one but in that manner one as all those things that remain distinct in nature one from other yet bear proportion and resemblance one with other are one One as Christ and a door Christ and a vine are one They are so one that one may be said to be the other when yet one distinct thing from other cannot be said to be the other in a sense that is proper my hand is not my writing my writing is not my hand but my hand is that which writes and writing is written with my hand and so my writing is usually called my hand and these speeches are in all mouthes vulgar common and are so far from being hard to understand that indeed they help the understanding A woman shewes a written peece of parchment and sayes Here is my Dower or Joynture when Dower or Joynture is in Lands not in Papers Every one knows that this speech means that it is that which vests her in it we shew a paper and say This is my will not meaning that faculty of the soul it self but a manifestation of what our desire is should be done with our estate after our decease such a man lives on my trencher that is on the meat which is laid on the trencher at my table so that men should blesse God for that he condescends to speak in such perspicuity and not complain in such speeches of difficulty Upon account of this oneness between the sign and the thing signified sometimes the sign is said to be the thing signified as that Bread is the body of Christ and the Cup the blood of Christ Matth. 26.26 27 So that that of Austin is famous that Christ said This is my body when he gave the sign of his body Circumcision is called the Covenant Gen. 17.9 10 11. Ast. 7.8 The Lambe is called the Passeover Exod. 12.11 21. Matth. 26.28 And the trees before spoken to are called the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil see Ezek. 5.5 1 Cor. 10.4 In all of these places the signe hath the name of the thing signified by reason of Analogy and representation and all by institution sometimes on the other hand the thing signified is called by the name of and is said to be the sign as 1 Cor. 5.7 Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for us so Joh. 6.55 My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed fitly resembled by meat and drink Joh. 15.1 I am the true vine fitly resembled by a vine see Joh. 10.10 11. Sometimes the effect which the thing signified doth produce is called by the name of the sign so in that speech of Ananias related by Paul Act. 22.16 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord when it was not the water that he was then to use but the blood of Christ that could take away sin 1 Joh. 1.7 so Baptisme saves 1 Pet. 3.21 when as the Apostle there as may be further shewen explains his own meaning so the putting off the sins of the flesh is called by the name of Circumcision and of Baptisme Colos 2.11 12. Sometimes that which is the proper work of the sign is attributed to the thing signified Deut. 10.16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart and be not stiffe necked These and such like speeches as these would be familiar with us and we should be able to give an account of them in case we understood Sacramental relations and other resemblances frequent in Scriptures Secondly Then it further followes There is no such things as transubstantiation that there can be no such thing as transubstantiation The sign and the thing signified remain distinct and cannot properly be the same in any Sacraments Of all Scripture-Sacraments and all those additional forged Sacraments of the Church of Rome one onely is by them thus honoured The Paschal Lambe was not turned into the body of Christ nor is water turned into the blood of Christ in Baptisme Nor do any other of their supposed signes lose their nature onely in the Lords Supper bread is not bread though it be still called bread but flesh wine is not wine though called the fruit of the vine but blood we see bread we taste bread we handle bread and yet we must not give credit either to our eyes ears taste or touch but we must believe it is no bread It hath the natural properties of bread and wine it gives natural nourishment as bread and wine the bread if eaten in excesse and the wine drunken will cause surfeit and intoxicate as bread and wine As the natural force so the natural defects of bread and wine still remain after consecration The bread breeds wormes and the wine turnes to vineger yet we must believe that God by miracle hath taken away bread and wine given blood and flesh turned bread into flesh wine into blood and yet still by miracles keeps up the natural shape properties and defects of these outward Elements When God in Scripture wrought miracles the miracles were seen and
f Quo significat Dominum voluisse aptare suum sermonem ad captum auditorum ob id locutum in parabolis quod nudi sermonis nondum essent capaces at parabolas suas desumsiffe a rebus vulgaribus per quas idiotae utcunque induci parari possunt ad mysteriorum captum Hereby he signifies that Christ would fit his speech to the capacity of the hearers because they were not capable of naked truthes and he borrowed his speeches from vulgar things by which the most unlearned might be fitted for the mysteries of the kingdome of heaven Though some understand the words as they were worthy to hear and not to understand parables being above the common capacities and put for hard and difficult speeches As Matth. 13.10 Christ being demanded Why speakest thou in parables he answers ver 11 12 13 14 15. Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the Kingdome of heaven but to them it is not given for whosoever hath to him it shall be given and he shall have more abundance but whosoever hath not from him shall be taken away even that he hath Therefore speake I to them in parables because they seeing see not and hearing they hear not neither do they understand And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which saith By hearing ye shall hear and not understand and seeing ye shall see and not perceive For this peoples heart is waxed grosse and their ears are dull of hearing and their eyes they have closed lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their eares and should understand with their heart and should be converted and I should heal them But blessed are your eyes for they see and your eares for they heare But these texts may be reconciled A parable or Similitude when men stay in the outward bark of it is as a riddle nothing can be more obscure Some mystery men know is hid under it but they know not what Therefore Christ having uttered a parable to the multitude Matth. 15.11 and Peter requesting Declare unto us this parable ver 15. saith Are ye also yet without understanding Parables explained are the plainest way of teaching shewing the face of heavenly things in earthly glasses and therefore the Lord to set out his dealing with his own people faith I have also spoken by the Prophets and I have multiplyed visions and used similitudes by the Ministery of the Prophets Hos 12.10 But the scope be not discerned onely that which is said of earthly things and no more is known Now what words are to the eares in similitudes and comparisons that Sacramentall signes are to the eyes by both the understanding is holpen the memory refresht and as may God willing be unfolded faith strengthened The cleansing from sin we find in Scripture held forth under the metaphor of pouring out water Ezek. 36.25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you and ye shall be clean from all your filthinesse and from all your Idols will I cleanse you To which the Apostle alludes Ephes 5.26 where he saith Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it that he might sanctifie and cleanse it by the washing of water by the word Which was typified also in those divers washings mentioned by the Apostle Heb. 9.10 which the blood of Christ doth really work Purging our consciences from dead works to serve the living God cleansing us from all sin 1 John 1.7 and therefore it is called the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus 1 Pet. 1.2 In Baptisme in a standing Ordinance this is held out The party interessed in Covenant is dipped in or washed with water and the reason of it given Acts 22.16 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord. Christ promises to his Church living bread and water whereof whosoever drinketh shall never thirst He further explaines himself The bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world Joh. 6.51 My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed Joh. 6.55 Christ being to dye holds this out in outward signes and with his own Comment upon them Taking and breaking bread he saith This is my body Taking the cup he saith This is the cup in the New Testament in my blood shed for them and for many for the remission of sinnes In elements of frequent use ordinary easy to be compassed these high mysteries and singular mercies are shadowed SECT IV. A further Corollary drawn from the same Doctrine The necessity of explanation of Sacramental signes FOurthly Then there is a necessity that these Sacramental signes be opened explained the mystery cleared the thing signified held out and the Analogy and proportion made known otherwise the soul is still left in the dark and no benefit reaped either for the help of our faith or clearing of our understanding There is no Sacrament as Calvin well observes without a promise preceding The Sacrament is an appendant to the promise as a seal among men is to a Covenant an earnest to a bargain or a ring hath been to a marriage were there no promise there were nothing in those signes As where there is no Covenant there is nothing confirmed by a seal where there is no bargain nothing is ratified by earnest given where there is no matrimoniall consent the ring would be but an imposture the Word of promise gives being to the Sacrament according to that received speech g Accedit verbum ad elementum fit Sacramentum The Word to added to the Element and it is made a Sacrament And there can be no improvement of the Sacrament to any spirituall advantage without understanding of the promise Were the signes such as did proclaime their own signification as a footstep the foot that made the impression or a shadow the body then the signes might stand alone and speak their own intentions But being creatures for civill uses and having only an aptnesse in them to hold out the thing that they signifie and as hath been said equally apt to other significations a further explanation is necessary Signes among men must have their significations known as well as founds in musical and military instruments otherwise as none could know in the one what is piped or harped nor upon sound could prepare themselves to battell 1 Cor. 14.7 8. so in the other none can know what is shadowed out or resembled There was a custome to ratifie Covenants by killing a calfe and the Covenanters passage between the parts of it as you may see Jerem. 34. He that understood not the meaning of that ceremony could know nothing of a Covenant by that means between parties to be solemnized none understand any more then by sight then many of us do now by the reading of it A garland at the door if custome did not give us a reason of it would speak no more to a passenger without
the day that he was to dye he held a passeover In New Testament-times not onely through the Apostles times but to this time Baptisme and the Lords Supper have continued Reasons may also enforce this as to Sacraments in general so to Baptisme and the Lords Supper in particular 1. The Covenant is to be kept for ever there is no dispensation at any time for the breach of it The seals then which by Divine institution are appointed as appendants to it must be continued As reason it self may speak enough for the validity of this consequence so the Text of Scripture likewise confirms it Gen. 17.7 13. compared I will establish my Covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting Covenant to be a God unto thee and unto thy seed after thee He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must needs be circumcised and my Covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting Covenant 2. We have as much need as ever this generation as any other generation to have our weaknesses supported our faith strengthened there is not any benefit ever gained by a Sacrament but as primitive times did so we may reap spiritual advantage by it For reasons for the perpetuity of Baptisme Mr. Baxter pag. 341 342. of his Treatise of Infants Church-membership and Baptisme hath furnished the Reader with plenty of ten that he urges I judg nine at least to be unquestionable to which I shall adde onely one and that is such a one that with weaknesse enough hath been brought by some for warranty of the disuse of it If the gift of the Spirit be lasting and continuing in the Church then the use of Baptisme is lasting and continuing likewise But the gift of the Spirit is lasting and continuing Ergo. The assumption that the Spirit is a lasting gift I suppose none will question The major Proposition is grounded on the Apostles words Act. 10.47 Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we When others do reason from the having of the Spirit to the needlenesse of Baptisme the Apostle disputes in the direct opposite manner where the Spirit is there Baptisme is not to be denyed For the Sacrament of the Lords Supper we may likewise evince the constant standing necessity of it 1. The death of Christ is to be shewed forth constantly and every way preached This is a shewing forth of the death of Christ a means of declaring of him crucified 1 Cor. 11.26 2. The memorial of Christ is to be preserved and endeared This is for his memorial done in remembrance of him Matth 26. Luke 22. 1 Cor. 11. If the deliverance from Egypt must be kept as a memorial for ever in that Ordinance of the Passeover then much more the remembrance of Christ in his Supper 3. Every way of Communion with Christ is to be preserved and upheld This is a way of Communion with Christ 1 Cor. 10.16 4. Union with the Members of Christ is to be studied This is the way of our union with the Members of Christ and therefore this is to be continued I shall not enlarge much for refutation of Objections of those that in our times are contrarily minded seeing I have read little of any thing that they have to say a noise is abroad of such with whom I have had small converse that cry down rebaptisme by the denyal of Baptisme as Lucian made it his businesse to confute Polytheisme by bringing in of Atheisme made himself merry with the Pagans rabble of gods by believing no God Opposition of errour ordinarily leads men into opposite errors but a better way may be found for the overthrow of a double Baptisme then by the nullifying of all baptisme One God asserted by the Apostle will overthrow Atheisme and Polytheisme and one Baptisme asserted by him in the same place will overthrow Anabaptisme But these are not the first founders of this opinion Austin speaking of the Manichees Heres 46. saith e Baptismum in aqua nihil cuiquam perhibent salutis adferre nec quenquam eorum baptizandum putant That they hold that Baptism with water not at all usefull for salvation neither do they think it meet to baptize any that they deceive and speaking of other Hereticks Heres 49. Seleuciani and Hermiani he saith f Baptismum in aquâ non accipiunt They do not hold any baptisme with water And Philastrius who as Bellarmine witnesses de Scriptor Ecclesiasticis pag. 93. wrote before Austin of Heresies and is quoted by Austin saith g Seleucus Hermius haeretici animas hominum de igne Spiritu esse existimantes isti baptismo non utuntur propter verbum hoc quod dixit Johannes Baptista ipse vos baptizabit in Spiritu igne Seleucus and Hermius the hereticks hold that the soul consists of fire and the Spirit These use not Baptisme by reason of John Baptists words He shall baptize you with the Spirit and fire Socinus in this last age hath revived this opinion and saith h Baptismum aquae habere praeceptum Christi aut saltem non perpetuum universale That Baptisme with water hath no command from Christ or at least no perpetual and universal command The Reader if he please may see the Scriptures by him wrested and Reasons by him brought Refert Vossius vindicated and answered by Vossius de necessitate Baptismi pag 381. to pag. 388. Rule 2 Secondly There appears a greater degree of necessity of the initiatory leading Sacrament Initiatory Sacraments are of greater necessity then those that follow which serves for our first admission whether in the dayes of the Old or New Testament into the Church of God then of the other that succeeds for our further strength and growth Both of them are necessary neither of them are arbitrary but in case we may enter comparison the greater weight lyes on the former as may several wayes appear unto us Arguments evincing this necessity First There was a leading Sacrament for initiation many years in the Church before any was ordained to follow after it Circumcision was given in charge 400 years before the Passeover that of Circumcision was not long after Abrahams call and the promise of the land of Canaan being before Isaac's birth which was onely 25 years distant from his first removal out of Haran for Canaan as appears Gen. 12.4 21.5 compared The Passeover was given in charge upon Israels departure out of Egypt Exod. 12. one year before the Law was given which was 430 yeares after the promise to Abraham Gal. 3.17 All this time the seed of Abraham entred into the Church by Circumcision and enjoyed no other Sacrament properly so called Secondly Gods displeasure never shewed it self so high upon the neglect of the Passeover as upon the neglect of Circumcision though the penalty threatned
of men of years may rather be defined by passion then action And passion may as well challenge the seat of Sacraments as action where he placeth it He concludes that ancient and modern Writers yea Calvins followers call them by the name of rites and Ceremonies which we know to consist in action Here is a manifest mistake rites and Ceremonies are not alwaies actions neither humane nor divine Ceremonies The high Priests Ephod with the rest of those holy garments prescribed were Ceremonies and so was the surplice while in use in England and yet these were in the predicament of Habitus and not of Actio It is true that the putting them on was an action but that was not the Ceremony but the wearing of them in the work of worship and the putting it on was no act of him that wore it but his that waited upon him And kneeling at the Sacrament was esteemed a Ceremony with us yet no action but a gesture or posture of the body and in the predicament of Situs Dr. Burges indeed in his rejoynder defines a Ceremony to be an action pag. 29. But presently he explaines himself and saies I call it an action because nothing is or can be a Ceremony in respect of existence or being but onely in respect of acting or usage thereof as a ceremony so that he takes action abusive for any manner of usage whatsoever upon the publishing of the book I spake with the author of this thing and he acknowledged action strictly taken was too narrow to be the Genus of a Ceremony and that it was holpen by the word usage So Dr. Sanderson that renouned Logician speaking of the execution done by Phinehas in the division of his text calls his standing up an action but presently addes Though I call it an action yet it is a gesture properly and not an action so that when rites and Ceremonies may be postures or habits it cannot be said that they consist in action so that it is clear that Sacraments consist in their use and though actions be seen in every Sacrament either done by the dispenser or receiver or both yet those actions being upon and about some visible element and the Elements themselves with the actions being all significant Sacraments are yet rightly defined to be signes and not actions Then it must necessarily follow by way of Corollary that there is no holinesse remaining in the elements There is no continued holinesse in Sacramental elements no relative holinesse abiding upon them further then according to the institution they are applyed and received The water in the vessel that containes it is no further as I may say consecrate then as it is applyed to the person baptized The river of Jordan nor yet the waters near Aenon in Salem had no more holinesse then other waters in Jury The reliques of bread and wine in the Lords Supper have no more of holinesse when they are taken from thence then they had when they were brought thither Tipling off of the wine in the place where it was immediately before received as a Sacrament of which I have heard is undecent and unsuitable to the work that they have been upon yet it is no other then common wine that then is taken Care should be taken not to defile the person who remaines consecrate to God and in participation of these elements makes profession of it no such fear of prophaning the elements themselves But for a great part these are well contented to be prophane provided that the elements may be esteemed and honoured as holy This high opinion of holinesse in the consecrated wine robbed the people of it Many of the Laity have beards that may lick some drops of it up and the number encreasing it must passe through so many hands or be put to so many mouthes that some may be spilt and those fears here so wrought that they may not meddle at all with it And how great disputes there have been what shall be done with it if a weak stomack vomit it up while the species of it doth remain unchanged they that are verst in Popish Casuists well know And all this from that monster of Transubstantiation But when a right use of the Sacraments is understood all these superstitious conceits will vanish and come to nothing when a sealed indenture hath done its office we no longer look much after the wax and parchment Secondly Their touch or abode upon any thing or utensil does not make it holy If their Sacramental nature remain no longer then their use so that themselves are no further holy then their touch or former abodes cannot make any place or utensil holy it cannot leave any such remaining holinesse as some conceit behind So it would follow that in case the words of consecration be pronounced over all the bread in the greatest pantry or to be sold in the market place which men of that opinion say may be done then not onely every bit of that bread is turned into Christ but all the binges or panniers that receive the bread in them must have an holinesse remaining and abiding upon them and so in like case all the Wine in the cellar yea all the earth of the Land of Canaan would remain holy by reason of the Manna falling upon it which was spiritual meat therefore a prophaning of it to tread with the foot upon it much more for beasts to dung and graze it As much is said to prove that the rock was Christ as there is to prove that the cup is Christs blood If that had such a sanctifying power then all the ground on which the water ran yea every beast that drank of it was made holy The thought of this might have silenced that talk of bowing to the place of Gods special residence by which they meant the place where the Sacrament hath been celebrated which of a Table they made an Altar which then according to our Saviour Christ must make holy the body and blood of Christ offered upon it and the body and blood of Christ must not make it holy Ye fooles and blind whether is greater the gift or the altar that sanctifieth the gift Matth. 23.19 But with us the gift did put the sanctification upon the Altar that from the time that the gift had been upon it men must upon sight still worship ad versus coram amazing those that were offended at it with their distinction of inhesive and abstractive holinesse CHAP. X. SECT I. Sacraments are seales HEre followes a second use and office of Sacraments which being added to the former makes up the whole for which they serve As they are signes so they are seales from whence a double Observation followes Sacraments are seales All that the Sacraments work on the soules of receivers is by way of sign and seal First Sacraments are seales Sacraments are seales Before this can be proved by reason of the ambiguity of the word it is to be
faith is not Sanctification Sanctification is inherent the righteousnesse of faith is imputed but circumcision is a sign and seal of the righteousnesse of faith And that Baptisme signifies and seals the same thing we find expressely in Peters words Ast. 2.38 Be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins Remission of sins is by blood Heb. 9.22 Without shedding of blood there is no remission Baptisme is for remission of sins and therefore the water in Baptisme holds out the blood of Christ And I doubt not but Ananias had respect to this in his speech to Paul Act. 22.16 Rise and be baptized and wash away thy sins Somewhat it is to which these signs engage and that is all unto which a Christian in duty as duty stands engaged whether for his change in heart or life or in order to the pardon of his sin Baptisme engages to the first work of regeneration and to the first work of making all new within To this circumcision did tye as it signified it so it engaged to it Deut. 10.16 Circumcise the foreskin of your hearts and be no more stiffenecked If by vertue of their circumcision in the flesh God did not require it why is the want of it charged on Judah as their sin or how could it lay them open with other Nations to punishment Jer. 9.25 26. Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will punish all them that are circumcised with the uncircumcised Egypt and Judah and Edom and the children of Ammon and Moab and all that are in the uttermost corners that dwell in the wildernesse for all these Nations are uncircumcised and all the house of Israel are uncicumcised in the heart And that the first work is required as well as a further degree and progresse both in circumcision and baptisme is clear In baptisme we are explicitly dedicated as the Jewes were implicitly in circumcision to Father Son and holy Ghost and therefore engaged to be sincerely his in Covenant But this cannot be till a change be wrought and we be born again from above To this therefore we are engaged We are engaged to love the Lord with all our heart with all our strength but this cannot be while our hearts are in an unchanged condition and therefore the circumcision of the heart Deut. 30.6 is mentioned in order to this of the love of the Lord The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart and the heart of thy seed to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul what is it but the first work that is called for in that of the Prophet Make ye a new heart and a new spirit Ezek. 10.31 And in those texts of the Apostle Awake thou that sleepest and stand up from the dead Ephes 5.14 Be ye transformed by the renewing of your minds Rom. 12.2 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man And be renewed in the spirit of your minds Ephes 4.22 23. Howsoever some of these Scriptures may be conceived to be directed to men in a state of Regeneration and therefore that they call not for the first work but for a further progresse in grace yet all of them cannot be so Interpreted And there is not any of them but implyes that where the first work is not done it must be done where the old man is not put off it must be put off and where the new man is not put on it must be put on where the spirit is not renewed it must be renewed Neither is it of force against this to say that the first work is out of our power and that in it we are wholly passive and therefore we do not in baptisme engage to it but God rather engages for it To which I answer Though it be out of our power yet it is within the command of God and is matter of our duty Gods command is no rule of our strength neither is it brought down to answer our weaknesse so a carnall man should be under no spiritual command but it is a rule of our duty what we once were and still ought to be it commands us for to be And though we be passive in the first work yet we are alwaies concerned to be active and assoon as we do receive power we are to act Dead Lazarus was commanded to rise and having power communicated from God he did actually rise and come out of the grave There is not any promise of God for inherent Grace nor any work of Grace but it comes within our duty and a command lies on us as instance might be given and consequently there is an obligation and engagement to it Gods command and his promises stand not in opposition but in subordination and to say that God is engaged and not man is dangerous then all that are baptized must be regenerate or else God fails in his engagement Somewhat it is that these signs seal and in sealing ratify and confirm and that is as the text shewes the righteousnesse of Faith and consequently all other priviledges whatsoever of like nature that are annexed to it Remission Justification Adoption Glorification Sacraments as seals have not as I conceive at least immediately and directly reference to graces or inherent habits but priviledges They are as Mr. Baxter hath well observed seales of the conditional Covenant and so they must seal whatsoever they do seal on Gods terms and conditions they ratifie mercies promised on those termes that the Covenant doth promise now graces are the conditions and termes of the Covenant and mercies are promised upon those termes and therefore the Covenant requires them but the Sacraments do not ratifie and seal them The Sacraments as signs shew us our wants of or wants in grace by the help of the Word and light received from it they point us out where supply may be found they engage us to this change to the whole of duty required from the people of God and upon answer of our conscience in this work they seal and confirm all promised priviledges to us The nature efficacy and operation of Sacraments would be better understood if that which is proper to each part or the particular office in each relation were better known The seal in a Lease as from the Lessor doth not ratifie the homage that is to be done by the Lessee or the service from him due but the inheritance or benefit whatsoever which upon condition of such homage or service is conveyed Graces are the homage and priviledges are the benefit or the inheritance the priviledges then and not the graces are directly in Sacraments sealed to us It is not sealed up to us either in Baptisme or the Lords Supper that we do believe or repent but that believing and repenting we have forgivenesse of sin and salvation But some say that the Sacraments seal all that the Covenant promises but the Covenant promises Grace and therefore the Sacraments
that this place should be interpreted of baptisme on which words of his Mr. Gataker pag. 123. very well comments l Quasi aliam potius quorundam expositionem probaturus ni aliorum importunitas aliò impelleret Verba sunt enim alii concedentis aliquid potius quam animi sui sensum enuntiantis As though he would rather saith he allow another interpretation if the importunity of others did not lead him that way They are words of one granting or rather yielding somewhat to another man then speaking his own mind as he further observes And Mr. Burges Spiritual Refining Part 1. pag. 214. speaking of Baptisme saith it is called the laver of regeneration Titus 3.5 as some expound it giving us to understand that it is no exposition universally agreed upon and sufficiently hinting that it is the more inconsiderable part that do interpret it this way Fifthly Though we should yield that these places were to be understood of the Sacrament of Baptisme as Calvin saith he could be content to do yet all this while nothing is gained seeing it still rests to be proved that this is meant any otherwise then by way of sign and seal they conclude no abolute work but onely as they have their influence upon the understanding and faith of the receivers And therefore Calvin when he was prevailed withall to yield so farre as we have heard presently addes m Non quod in externo aquae symbolo inclusa sit salus sed quia partam à Christo salutem Baptismus nobis obsignat Not that salvation is included in the outward symbole of water but because Baptisme seales it to us when Christ hath obtained it for us And Danaeus speaking to that Argument of Bellarmine that the Scripture witnesseth that the words of the Sacrament are active instruments of our justification and not seales of the promise giving instance in these and the like Scriptures for this purpose answers n Instrumenta signa etiam mere obsignantia testantia dicuntur per tropum metonymiam id facere quod obsignant nam annulus sponsalium qui solus est signum eorum dicitur conjun gere obligare sponsos contractus instrumentum quod solum consensus signum obstringere contrahentes Doctoratus sigillum literae creasse effecisse n. Doctoâ—em quaeenim nos juvant efficere ea ipsa dicuntur propter finem in quem spectant in quibus ab eis juvamur Verum vitanda est verborum hujusmodi quae ut causis vel signis vel instrumentis actionem tribuunt homonymia ne propterea censcamus ea signa vel instrumenta esse causas istâ—us actionis vel effecti vel fructus efficientes efficiunt enim aut efficere di cuntur illa effecta suo tantum modo nempe per modum duntaxat signi quatenus obsignant certificant eam actionem vel effectionem aut per modum instrumenti quoniam ad effectionem ad hibentur multum enim signa vera instrumenta inter se proprie differunt signa vero nihil plane ad effectio nem conferunt qualia sunt Sacramenta sed affectionem Sp. S. opus illius in nobis duntaxat vâ—rissime certissime testantur consignant Instruments and signs meerly testifying and sealing are said by a trope and metonymy to do that which they seal for even a ring used in espousals which onely is a sign is said to joyn and bind the espoused an instrument of contract which is onely a token of agreement is said to bind the contractors and the letters and seal of a Doctor to create a Doctor for those things that are helpful to us are said to effect those things as to such an end in which they are helpful But the homonymy of words of this nature is to be shunned which attributes actions to signes or instruments as to causes lest upon that account we may think that such signes or instruments are causes of such actions or efficients of such fruits and effects For they effect or are said to do such a work alone after their manner that is onely by way of sign as they seal or certify such an act or work or by way of instrument because they are used in the work For signes and instruments properly so called do very much differ For signes contribute nothing to the work of which sort are Sacraments but onely truely and certainly testifie and seal the work of the Spirit of God wrought Danaeus Contra Bellarmi Tom. Contro 2. Cap. 14. ad Arg. 2. Abundance more might be added to clear these Texts and take them out of their hands that urge them for this purpose though they were meant of the Sacraments which is not to be granted And what we have said of these Texts may be affirmed of that also Deut. 30.6 I will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed Circumcision which was a Sacrament is indeed there named but the speech is onely borrowed by way of metaphor from the circumcision of the flesh and applyed to the heart as is clear Deut. 10.16 where that work is given in command to the Jewes and they were not commanded to circumcise themselves but were already in Circumsion A second sort of Scriptures are such in which baptisme is mentioned but faith evidently required to the attainment of the effects of it A second sort of Scriptures are such where Baptisme is indeed mentioned and the Sacrament of Baptisme intended but faith is evidently required for the attainment of the effect specified These especially are Acts 2.38 Repent and be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins Acts 22.16 Rise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the Name of the Lord. I shall referre the Reader for a full vindication of these Scriptures to Mr. Gatakers disceptation pag. 9 10 c. pag. 56 57. and shall onely adde that that phrase in the Name of the Lord utterly destroies all that they would build on these words seeing it implies faith in his Name as Acts 3.16 may be seen And howsoever Infants that are in Covenant upon their parents profession of faith are baptized into this Name yet those of yeares as these were to whom this speech is directed are in their own persons not onely to make profession of faith but in sincerity to believe in order to attainment to the pardon of their sins or any other spiritual priviledge of the Covenant whatsoever Yea that which these men would draw from these Texts stands not with their principles that urge them The Sacraments work grace say they as instruments I shall then desire to know whether positive infidelity be not such a barre that will hinder If it be a barre in men of yeares then the Sacrament works not without actual faith in the baptized It is the priviledge of faith to obtain forgivenesse of sin Act. 13.39 Rom. 3.25 It is the work then
a memorial of a temporal mercy It is the Lords Passeover Exod. 12.11 that is a memorial that the Lord passed over them when he smote the Land of Egypt v. 13. But this is no concluding Argument that it sealed not Christ or the righteousnesse of Christ by faith as may God willing be made to appear when we shall have occasion to speak of the Cloud that guided Israel out of Egypt the Sea that they passed through and Manna and the rock whereof they ate and drank This deliverance celebrated in the Passeover was in and through Christ as is gathered from the blood that was to be struck on the two side-posts and on the upper door-post of their houses Exod. 12.7 But most clearly from the Apostle 1 Cor. 10.9 He there sayes they tempted Christ but they tempted him from whom they had defence and present deliverance And therefore the Apostle expresly calls the Paschal Lamb by the Name of Christ 1 Cor. 5.7 For even Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for us And John Baptist had respect to it as well as to other Sacrifices of the Law when pointing out Christ he said Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world Joh. 1.29 This is so clear in the Sacraments of the New Testament Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord that proofs do not need By Reasons And the Reasons of it are clear Reason 1 First Sacraments are for power against sin and pardon of sin as appears by those frequent Texts produced for the working power of Sacraments which need not to be repeated But by Christ we have power against sin Without him we can do nothing Joh. 15.5 We can do all things through Christ that strengtheneth Phil. 4.13 In him we have the Circumcision made without hands which is the putting away the body of the sins of the flesh Col. 2.11 By Christ we have pardon of sin God hath set him forth a propitiation through faith in his blood Rom. 3.25 The blood of Christ cleanseth from all sin 1 Joh. 1.7 Christ then is signified and sealed in the Sacraments Reason 2 Secondly Sacraments are for salvation that is their end in common with all other Church-Ordinances whatsoever Baptisme saves 1 Pet. 3.21 But salvation is through Christ He is the Authour of eternal salvation Heb. 5.9 Neither is there salvation in any other for there is none other Name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved Reason 3 Thirdly Sacraments lead to the Covenant and confirm by way of seal all whatsoever that there in word is made over This is done in all seals which serve for ratification of grants When you see a seal you must find the use and latitude of it in the Covenant so it is in Sacramental seals God entering Covenant with Abraham to be his God and the God of his seed which was a Covenant for true blessednesse Matth. 22.31 32. Circumcision was instituted for confirmation of it and put as we see in the Text as a seal to it When Christ had promised his flesh for meat and his blood for drink being to leave the world he iustituted signs for memorial which are seals of it With this explanation or comment of his own upon them This is my body which is given for you this Cup is the New Testament in my blood And that Christ is the great Promise for blessednesse in the Covenant and that in him all Covenant-promises are made good needs not to be proved Christ therefore is sealed in the Sacraments 1. This we are so to understand The doctrine by rules explained that as all happinesse and true blessednesse is comprized under the righteousnesse of Faith even all that the Apostle looked after and made his ambition to compasse in lieu of all those priviledges which he once had Rule 1 made and false teachers his adversaries still did make matter of their glory Phil. 3.8 9. so every Sacrament that is a seal of this righteousnesse of faith seales all whatsoever is given of God in Covenant to his people If there be thousands of things made over in any grant one seal is the confirmation of all and though the seales be many as Amesius observes yet all that is passed in Covenant is made good in each Our Justification Adoption Perseverance Glorification and whatsoever else in order to these or any of these a people upright in Covenant may expect from the hand of God is under seal in every Sacrament confirm'd unto them So that whatsoever it is that the Word promiseth that the Sacraments by way of seal ratifie and confirm unto us Abraham had this righteousnesse of Faith revealed to him by promise the Gospel being preached to him Gal. 3.8 He had also the Land of Canaan given in promise as a special gift to his posteriry This was now confirm'd also to him in his Circumcision The righteousnesse of faith was as the marrow and substance of the gift and therefore the Apostle puts it into his definition yet the gift of the Land of Canaan which was onely an adjunct annexed as Chamier observes is confirmed with it Every baptized man hath the righteousnesse of Faith in Promise and ratified to him in Baptisme and whatsoever else is made over in promise by reason of any special calling or relation which is of God is confirm'd in Baptisme likewise When we are put of God into any way we have his promise Psal 91.11 to be kept in that way This promise is assured and confirmed in Baptisme Ministers are called of God and commissioned for their work in which we know they have many and large promises all of these in their Baptisme are confirmed to them Rule 2 2. Sacraments seal these blessings not onely universally and in the bulk but with particular application to every one that doth partake of them The Word holding this out indefinitely unto us that he that hath the Son hath life and that unto whom God gives his Son with him he gives all things that eating the flesh and drinking the blood of Christ believers have eternal life here a particular tender is made of his body and blood in these visible Elements of water and of bread and wine The water is passively received in Baptisme the bread and wine actually taken eaten and drunk in the Lords Supper In either whole Christ and the whole of all the benefits of Christ is tendred and to be received So that what miracles extraordinarily were to particular promises as we read in Scriptures for the confirmation of those that beheld them and for whose sake they were wrought that Sacraments ordinarily are and serve for as to true blisse and eternal happinesse This Bellarmine lib. 1. de Sacram. in gen cap. 24. charges on his adversaries quoting Melancton and Luther for it and we are content willingly to own it and among many others which he charges as errours he sayes this is the chief and diligently to be refuted therefore he
these that they cannot cast them out of themselves 2. Faith makes that resolute choyce of Christ that it suffers all manner of afflictions rather than to be driven and divided from him After ye were illuminated saith the Apostle to the believing Hebrewes ye suffered a great fight of afflictions Heb. 10.32 To save the labour of turning over large Volumes of Martyrologies read over that little book of Martyrs as some have called Heb. 11. especially ver 35 36 37 38. Faith kindles that flame that many waters cannot quench Christ upon earth was a man of sorrowes and acquainted with griefs yet he had those disciples that never left him till he came to the Crosse and then sollicitously enquired after him Where Christ dwells by faith there the Spirit strengthens for sufferings Ephes 3.16 17. If men now look into their hearts and see themselves willing to follow Christ in fair weather and to own his cause whilest it costs them nothing but in worldly respects rather gain by the bargain but when trouble ariseth they are gone These may look into the Parable of the sower whether this be not an evidence of a rocky and stony heart A strong wind is the tryal of the root of the tree of the foundation of the house an hot scorching fire of the truth of the mettal It is true that self-ends sometimes put a man upon sufferings But it is alwayes true that self-ends onely put a man upon profession when he will not stand out in sufferings They whose Religion is the States Religion the Times Religion will not lose an hair by any profession they make Self and not Faith carries on that profession 3. As faith carries the soul up to Christ to be one with him so also it carries it on in every affection and office of love to his brethren In Jesus Christ neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but faith which worketh by love Gal. 5.6 It is not to be of this opinion or of that which men call their faith nor of this Nation nor of that which too oft prescribes all that men in their way of faith believe But to be possest of that faith which works by love which commends us unto God A man may be of this or that faith according to pleasure and yet his faith utterly destitute of that grace Faith carries a man not any further at all towards Christ then his love carries him on towards his brethren An idle faith is a dead faith and a dead faith never reacheth righteousnesse to Justification and life James never disputed against Paul's assertion of Justification by faith onely Writing after him as is generally confest he did not write to contradict any doctrine or correct any errours delivered by him When Paul concludes Justification by faith James concludes that it is by a working faith Where it works not it doth not then justifie and where it works to acceptation it works by love CHAP. XIII SECT I. Of the number of Sacraments AS a result from all that hath been said of the nature and use of Sacraments we may conclude the definite and distinct number of them So many Ordinances that we can find in Old or New Testament-Scriptures that are signs and seales of this nature as here hath been set out from the Apostles words so many Sacraments there are truly so called equally worthy of that honour of Sacraments with this of Circumcision being every way of the same nature and use they are deservedly to have the same esteem But falling short of such they are to have esteem as they are and their dignity may challenge but not to be put into this number The way to find out the number of Sacraments And I know no other way then this to find out the set and definite number of them Those trifling arguments made use of by some that the matter of New Testament-Sacraments viz. Water and Blood came out of the side of Christ and that blood and water as John affirms bear witnesse on earth are not worthy to be mentioned save onely that they are used by some of eminent name And upon diligent search we shall find onely two stated standing Ordinances in Old Testament-Scriptures and onely two in New Testament-Scriptures that are to be thus received We have not indeed any distinct Text in either of both Testaments expresly testifying that there are two and two onely Sacraments as we find it ordinarily in Catechismes Neither is there any distinct Text in the Law or Prophets that as we would that men should do to us so we should do to them Yet our Saviour Matth. 7.12 tells us that that rule is both in the Law and in the Prophets being a clear result from that which the Law and the Prophets have delivered The like may we say concerning the number of Sacraments It is as clear a result from that which is delivered to us both from Old and New Testament-Scriptures so that the conclusion is twofold drawn by way of deduction of this nature 1. Two onely standing Ordinances in the Old Testament of the nature of Sacraments Two onely Sacraments in the New Testament There were in Old Testament-times onely two standing Ordinances of the nature of Sacraments viz. Circumcision and the Passeover 2. There are in New Testament-times onely two Sacraments viz. Baptisme and the Lords Supper We shall begin with Old Testament-times and here our way of discovery is First To find out all those Signes or Ordinances that are set up in competition as Sacraments Secondly To enquire into the nature and use of them Thirdly To find out how nigh they come to the nature of Sacraments and what agreement they have with them Fourthly where it is that they are defective and fall short of Sacraments truly so called SECT II. Rainbowe no Sacrament THe first that offers it self is the Rainbowe of which we might speak First as it is in nature for discovery of the physical being of it Secondly as a sign appointed of God But the first consideration of it is not my businesse but the work of Philosophers who out of Aristotle have defined it to be A Bowe of many colours seated in an hollow and duskish cloud The definition of a Rainbow appearing upon the reflection of the Sun in opposition against it He that pleaseth may read further in Magirus physiol peripat lib. 4. cap. 5. Keckerman Syst Phys lib. 6. ad finem Zanch. de oper Dei lib. 3. cap. 3. Valesius de Sacrâ Philosoph cap. 9. So that the efficient cause is the Sun The subject in which it appeares is a cloud standing in Diametrical opposition The thing it self is the reflex of the Sun The form and shape is a bowe of variety of colours Whereupon it is generally concluded that there were bowes of this nature before the flood the Sun being then in equal vigour to produce it and clouds in which the reflex might be apparent And the cause being then as
the Leekes and the Onions and the Garlick but now our soul is dryed away there is nothing at all besides this Manna before our eyes They might according to this fancy have found flesh fish cucumbers melons leekes onions garlick and all things else in the Manna it self unlesse any will turn it into an Allegory that that which answers to all is found in Christ whom Manna did typifie Num. 20.9 opened The last of these providences is the Rock The history we may see Exod. 17. Num. 20.9 and observations made upon it by the Psalmist Psal 78.15 Psal 105.41 Psal 114.7 8. and the like by the Levites Nehem. 9.25 As the Manna was given upon Israels want of bread so this upon their complaint of want of water Go on before the people saith the Lord and take with thee of the Elders of Israel and thy rod wherewith thou smotest the river take in thine hand and go Behold I will stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb How the rock is said to follow Israel and thou shall smite the Rock and there shall come water out of it that the people may drink How it is said to follow the Israelites 1 Cor. 10.4 is the great difficulty Rocks being above all other things immovable The Jewish fable that it was carried those fourty years on Chariots in the wildernesse is not worthy to be named in order to our inquiry into it This must be taken for granted that the Rock it self is not here intended as a sign but the water flowing out of the rock As the cup is not the blood of Christ in the New Testament but the fruit of the vine that is in it and this of following the Israelites being referred to the water which flowed out of the rock That resolution which is generally received is most probable that many running streames were framed to draw the water along according to their several stations and removals to which River wil have that song Num. 21.17 18. to allude Spring up O well sing ye to it The Princes digged the well Nobles of the people digged it by the direction of the Law-giver with their staves But if we referre it to Christ the thing signified as Diodate on the words sayes it is very properly spoken for not onely his benefits are perpetual but he himself who is the spring of them is ever separated from his but resideth alwayes in and with them by his Spirit If now we look upon these respective signs with our Saviours and St. Pauls Comment upon them we shall not find for the time that they were in use any thing that serves to make up the proper nature of Sacraments that was wanting in them All that is essential in Sacraments was found in these providences during the time that they served the Israelites And the Apostles hope at which it appears he aimes when he speaks of these 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3. plainly doth evince it The Corinthians taking themselves to be high in the favour of God by reason of their priviledge of Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord the Apostle lets them know that the Jewes had that which answers to our Baptisme figuring out salvation by Christ to them as Baptisme to us They were all baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea As the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt was a figure of their redemption by Christ and their pilgrimage through the wildernesse an image of the Elects life in the world and the Land of Caanan a shadow of that Kingdom of heaven so their passage through the Red-Sea and their being under the Cloud were a sacred figure correspondent to Baptisme And Manna and the water coming out of the rock a sign which had its relation to the Lords Supper And our Saviour applyes that type of Manna to himself as we see Joh. 6. throughout When the Jewes said v. 31. Our Fathers did eat Manna in the wildernesse quoting the Psalmists words He gave them bread to eat Christ answers Verily verily I say unto you Moses gave you not that bread from heaven but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven and giveth life unto the world And upon their request Lord evermore give us of this bread v. 34. he answers v. 35. I am the bread of life he that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst So also v. 49 50 and 51. Your fathers did eat Manna in the wildernesse and are dead This is the bread that cometh down from heaven that a man may eat thereof and not dye I am the living bread which came down from heaven if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever and the bread that I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world Here is an outward visible sign given of God and received of his Covenant-people sealing Christ or righteousnesse by Christ unto them The whole therefore that is of the essence of a Sacrament is found in them Onely these were found with Israel but for a time namely the time of the pilgrimage in the wildernesse when Circumcision and the Passeover Baptisme and the Lords Supper are Ordinances stated and constant therefore the observation is that in Old-Testament-times there were onely two standing Ordinances of the nature of Sacraments Here some questions might be put necessary to be answered Object 1 1. Though we have the word Baptisme in this text of Scripture yet the addition seems to make it no Sacrament They were baptized into Moses saith the text and being baptized into Moses how could it be the same with Christian Baptisme We are baptized into Christ and not into Moses Answ Ans Into Moses is here no more then the Ministery of Moses or by the hand of Moses who was a Mediatour in type between God and that people And though some would overthrow our argument drawn from Baptisme into the Name of the Son and holy Ghost as into the Name of the Father to prove that the Son and the holy Ghost are God as is the Father seeing we are baptized as they object into Moses yet Moses is not God It will not yet serve their turn seeing the Name of the Son and of the holy Ghost are made equall in Baptisme to the Name of the Father and so is not the name of Moses We are Baptized into the Name of Christ and called by his Name so the Israelites never were into the name of Moses no more then the Corinthians into the name of Paul 1 Cor. 1.13 That is Christs peculiar with the Father and the holy Ghost not communicated to any creature 2. It is objected that these outward elements were given not Object 2 onely to the Israelites but also to their beasts for the water of the rock the text saies They drank of it and their cattel Num 20.11 And as