Lordships the things they took into their Consideration in respect of the matter and merits of the Cause They are comprehended within these six heads 1. That there is a treason within the Statute of 25. E. 3. by Levying of warre upon the matter of the fifteenth Article 2. If not by actuall levying of war yet by advising and declaring his intention of war and that by Savils warrant and the advice of bringing over the Irish army upon the matter in the 23 Article The intending of a Warre if not within the Clause of Levying Warre in the statute of 25. E. 3. yet within the first treason of compassing the death of the King 3. If neither of these two single Acts be within the Statute of 25. E. 3. yet upon putting all together which hath been proved against him That ther 's a Treason within the first clause of compassing the death of the King Et si non prosunt singula juncta juvant 4. That he hath sessed and laid Souldiers upon the Subjects of Ireland against their will and at their Charge within the Irish Statute of the eighteenth yeare of Henry the sixt That both person and thing are within the Statute That the statute remaines in force to this day That the Parliament here hath Cognizance of it And that even in the ordinary way of Judicature that if there be a Treason and a Traitor that the want of jurisdiction in the Judicall way may justly be supplied by Bill 5. That his endeavouring to subvert the fundamentall Lawes and Governement of the Realmes of England and Ireland and instead thereof to introduce a tyrannicall Government against Law is Treason by the Common law That Treasons at the Common Law are not taken away by the Statutes of 25. E. 3. 1. H. 4. c. 10. 1. Mar. c. 1. nor any of them 6. That as this Case stands It 's just and necessary to resort to the Supreame power in Parliament in case all the rest should faile Of these six five of them are Treason within the Compasse of the Lawes already established Three within the Statute of 25. E. 3. One within the Irish Statute the other by the Common Law of England If but any one of these six Considerations hold The Commons conceive that upon the whole matter they had good cause to passe the Bill My Lords for the first of levying Warre I shall make bold to read the Case to your Lordships before I speak to it it 's thus The Earle did by warrant under his hand and Seale give authority to Robert Savill a Serjeant at Arms and his Deputies to sesse such number of Souldiers horse and foot of the Army in Ireland together with an officer as the Serjeant should think fit upon his Majesties Subjects of Ireland against their will This warrant was granted by the Earle to the end to compell the Subjects of Ireland to submit to the unlawfull Summons and orders made by the Earle upon paper Petitions exhibited unto him in case of private Interest betweene party and party This warrant was executed by Savill and his Deputies by sessing of Souldiers both horse and foot upon divers of the Subjects of Ireland against their will in warlike manner and at divers times the Souldiers continued upon the parties upon whom they were sessed and wasted their goods until such time as they had submitted themselves unto those Summons and orders My Lords This is a levying of warre within the statute of 250. E. 3. The words of the Statute are If any man doe levy warre against our Lord the King in his Realm this is declared to be Treason I shall indeavour in this to make it appeare to your Lordships 1 What shall be a levying of Warre in respect of the motive or cause of it 2 What shall be said a levying of warre in respect of the Action orthing done 3 And in the third place I shall apply them to the present Case It will be granted in this of levying of warre That forces may be raised and likewise used in a war-like manner and yet no levying of warre within the Statute that is when the forces are raised and imployed upon private ends either of revenge or interest Before this Statute in E. 1. time The Title of a Castle was in difference between the Earles of Hereford and Gloster for the mainetaining of the possession on the one side and gayning of it on the other Forces were raised on either side of many hundred men they marched with Banners displayed one against the other In the Parliament in the 20. yeere of Edw. 1. this adjudged onely trespasse and either of the Earles fined 1000. markes a peece After the Statute in Hillary Terme the fiftieth yeere of Edward the third in the Kings Bench Rot. 3. Nicholas Huntercome in a war-like manner with 40 men armed amongst other weapons with Gunnes so ancient as appeares by that Record they were did much spoyle in the Mannour of the Abbee of Dorchester in the County of Oxford This no Treason So it hath beene held by the Judges that if one or more Townships upon pretence of saving their Commons doe in a forcible and war-like manner throw in Inclosures This is only a Riot no Treason The words of the Statute of 25. Edw. 3. cleare this Point that if any man ride armed openly or secretly with men at Armes against any other to kill and robbe or to detaine him untill he hath made fine and ransome for his deliverance this is declared not to be Treason but Fellony or Trespasse as the case shall require all the printed Statuts which have it covertly or secretly are mis printed for the words in the Parliament Roll as appeares n. 17. are Discovertment ou secreretment openly or secretly So that my Lords in this of levying warre the Act is not so much to be considered but as in all other Treasons and Fellonies quo animo with what intent and purpose Obj. My Lords If the end be considerable in levying warre it may be said that it cannot be a Treason warre unlesse against the King For the words of the statute are If any man levy warre against the King Ans That these words extend further then to the Person of the King appears by the words of the Statute which in the begining declares it to be Treason to compasse imagine the Kings death and after other Treasons this is to be declared to be Treason to levy war against the King If the levying of war extend no further then to the person of the King these words of the Statute are to no purpose for then the first Treason of compassing the Kings death had fully included it before because that he which levies war against the person of the King doth necessarily compasse his death It s a warre against the King when intended for alteration of the Lawes or Government in any part of them or to destroy any of the great Officers of the Kingdome This is a levying of War against
the King 1 Because the King doth protect and maintaine the Laws in every part of them and the great Officers to whose care he hath in his own steed delegated the Execution of them 2 Because they are the Kings Lawes He is the Fountaine from whence in their severall Channels they are derived to the Subject all our inditements run thus Trespasses laied to be done Contra pacem Domini Regis the Kings peace for exorbitant offences though not intended against the Kings Person against the King his Crowne and Dignity My Lords this construction is made good by diverse Authorities of great weight ever since the statute of 25. E. 3. downwards In R. the 2 ds time Sir Thomas Talbot conspired the death of the Dukes of Glocester and Lancaster some other of the Peeres for the effecting of it he had caused diverse people in the County of Chester to be armed in warre-like manner in Assemblies In the Parliament held the seventeenth yeere of Richard the second number the 20. Sir Thomas Talbot accused of high Treason for this It s there declared that insomuch as one of them was Lord high Steward of England and the other high Constable of England that this was done in destruction of the estates of the Realme and of the Lawes of the Kingdome and therefore adjudged Treason and the judgement sent downe into the Kings Bench as appeares in Easter-Tearme in the seventh yeer of Richard the second in the Kings Bench Rott 16. These two Lords had appeared in the eleventh yeere of Richard the second in mainetenance of the Act of Parliament made the yeere before one of them was of the Commissioners appointed by Parliament and one of the Appellours of those that would have overthrowne it The Duke of Lancaster likewise was one of the Lords that was to have beene indicted of Treason for endeavouring the maintenance of it and therefore conspiring of their deaths is said to be in destruction of the lawes This there declared to be a Treson that concerned the Person of the King and the Common-wealth In that great insurrection of the Villains and meaner people in Richard the seconds time they tooke an oath Quod Regi Comunibus fidelitatem servarent to be true to the King and Commons that they would take nothing but what they paid for punished all theft with death here 's no intendment against the person of the King The intent was to abolish the Law of villainage and servitude to burne all the Records to kill the Judges this in the Parliament of the fifth yeere of Richard the second number the one and thirtieth and two and thirtieth the first part is declared to be Treason against the King and against the Law In the eleventh yeere of Richard the second in Parliament the raising of forces against the Commissioners appointed by act of Parliament the yeere before adjudged Treason by all the Judges The Statute of 1. Mar. cap. 12. enacts that if twelve or more shall indeavour by force to alter any of the Lawes or Statutes of the Kingdome hee shall from such a time there limited be adjudged onely as a fellon This act was to continue but to the next Parliament it is expired it shewes by the words onely that the offence was higher before the making of it My Lords In Queene Elizabeths time Grant and divers Prentices of London to the number of 200. rose and assembled at Tower-hill carried a Cloake upon a Pole instead of a banner their intent was to deliver divers Prentices out of prison that had beene committed upon a sentence in Star Chamber for ryots To kill the Lord Major of London and for setting prizes on victuals In Trinity Tearme 37. Eliz. divers of the Judges consulted withall and resolved that this was a levying of warre against the Queene being intended against the government and officers of the Queene and thereupon Grant and others executed as Traitors Afterwards in that Queenes time divers of the County of Oxford consulted together to goe from house to house in that County and thence to London other parts to excite them to take Armes for the throwing in of all inclosures throughout England nothing was done nor no Assembly The Statute of 13. Eliz. cap. 1. during the Queenes life made it Treason to intend or advise to levy war against the Queene In Easter Tearme 39. Eliz. All the Iudges of England met about the case it was resolved by them that this was a warre intended against the Queen they agreed that if it had beene of one Towneship or more upon private interest and claime of right of Common it had not bin Treason But this was to throw in all inclosures thorough the Kingdome wherto these parties could pretend no claime that it was against the Law in regard that the Statute of Merton gave power of Inclosures in many Cases Upon this Resolution Bradshaw and Burton were executed at Aynestowe hill in Oxford-shire the place where they intended their first meeting So that my Lords if the end of it be to overthrow any of the Statutes any part of the Law and setled Governement or any of the great Officers intrusted with the execution of them this is a warre against the King My Lords it will be further considerable what shall be accounted a leavying of warre in respect of the Actions things done There 's a designe to alter some part of the Lawes and present Governement for the effecting thereof people be provided of Armes gathered together into troopes but afterwards match not with Banners displayed nor doe Bellum percutere Whether the arming themselves and gathering together upon this Designe whether this be a warre or such prosecution of the Designe with force as makes it Treason within the Statute First If this be not a Warre in respect that it necessarily occasions hostile preparations on the otherside 2. From the words of the Statute shall levy warre be thereof probably attainted of open Deed by people of their Condition although the bare conspiring be not an open Deed yet whether the arming and drawing men together be not an open Declaration of Warre In Sir Thomas Talbots case before cited in the seventeenth yeere of Richard the second The Acts of force are expressed in the Parliament Roll That he caused divers of the people of the County of Chester to be armed in a war like manner in assemblies heere is no marching no banners displayed In the eighth yeer of Henry the 8th William Bell and Thomas Lacy in Com' Kanc. conspired with Thomas Cheney called the Hermite of the Queene of Fairies to overthrow the Lawes and customes of the Realme and for the effecting of it they with two hundred more met together and concluded upon a course of raising greater forces in the county of Kent and the adjacent Shires this adjudged Treason these were open Actes My Lords for the application of both these to the Case in question
twentieth yeare of Henry the sixt against the Acts of the Commissioners against Proclamations in pursuance of the Law against that himselfe took notice of Narrow hearted Commissioners 2 In this that here was an Army the Souldiers Souldiers by profession Acts of hostility from them of greater Terror than from free-holders of the same County My Lords I have now done with the first of levying warre 2 The second is the machination the advising of a warre The case in this rests upon the warrant to Savill and the advice in the 23 Article The Warrant shewes a resolution of employing the old Army of Ireland to the oppression of his Majesties Subjects and the Lawes In the 23 Article having told his Majesty that hee was loosed and absolved from rules of Government and might doe every thing which power might admit he proceeded further in speech to his Majesty in these words You have an Army in Ireland you may employ to reduce this Kingdome My Lords both being put together there 's a machination a practise an advise to levie warre and by force to oppresse and destroy his Majesties Subjects Obj. It hath beene said the Statute of 25. Edw. 3. is a penall Law and cannot bee taken by equity and construction there must be an actuall warre the Statute makes it Treason to counterfeit the Kings Coyne the conspiring the raising of furnaces is no Treason unlesse he doth nummum percutere actually coyne Answ My Lords this is onely said not proved the Law is otherwise â— 9. of Henry the sixt fol. 47. there adjudged that the conspiring and ayding to counterfeit coyne was Treason and Justice Stamford fol. 3. 44. is of opinion That this or conspiring to counterfeit the great Seale is Treason The Statute is If any shall counterfeit the great Seale conspiring to doe it by the book is Treason if a man take the broad Seale from one Pattent and put it to another here is no counterfeiting it 's tuntamount and therefore Treason as is adjudged in 2. Henry 4. fo 25. and by the opinion of Stamford If machination or plotting a warre be not within that clause of the Statute of levying warre yet it 's within the first of compassing the death of the King as that which necessarily tends to the destruction both of the King and of the people upon whose safety and protection hee is to engage himselfe That this is Treason hath beene adjugded both after the Statutes of the first of Henry the fourth chapter the tenth and the first of Queene Mary the first chapter so much insisted upon on the other side In the third yeare of King Henry the fourth one Balshall comming from London found one Bernard at plough in the parish of Ofley in the Connty of Hertford Bernard asked Balshall what news hee told him the newes was That King Richard the second was alive in Scotland which was false for hee was then dead and that by Midsomer next he would come into England Bernard asked him what was best to be done Balshall answered get men and goe to King Richard In Michaelmas Terme in the third yeare of Henry the fourth in the Kings Bench rot 4. this advise of warre adjudged Treason In Queene Maries time Sir Nicholas Thrâ—gmorton conspired with Sir Thomas Wyat to levie warre within this Realme for alteration in Religion he joyned not with him in the execution This Conspiracy alone declared to bee Treason by the Judges This was after the Statute of the first of Queene Mary so much insisted upon That Parliament ended in October this opinion was delivered the Easter-Terme after and is reported by Justice Dyer fo 98. It 's true Sir Thomas Wyat afterwards did levie warre Sir Nicholas Throgmorton hee onely conspired this adjudged Treason Storie in Queene Elizabeths time practised with Forreiners to levy warre within the Kingdome nothing done in pursuance of the practise The intent without any adhering to Enemies of the Queene or other cause adjudged to bee Treason and hee executed thereupon It 's truemy Lords that yeare 13. Elizabeth by Act of Parliament it 's made Treason to intend the levying of warre this case was adjudged before the Parliament The case was adjudged in Hillary Terme the Parliament began not untill the April following This my Lords is a case adjudged in point That the practising to levy warre though nothing be done in execution of it is Treason Obj. It may be objected that in these Cases the conspiring being against the whole Kingdome included the Queene and was a compassing her destruction as well as of the Kingdomes here the advice was to the King Ans 1. The answer is first that the warrant was unknowne to his Majesty that was a machination of warre against the people and Laws wherein his Majesties person was engaged for protection 2. That the advice was to his Majesty aggravates the offence it was an Attempt not only upon the Kingdome but upon the Sacred person and his office too himselfe was hostes patriae hee would have made the Father of it so too nothing more unnaturall more dangerous To offer the King poyson to drink telling him that it is a Cordiall is a compassing of his death The poyson was repelled there was an antidote within the malice of the giver beyond expression The perswading of Forreiners to invade the kingdome holds no proportion with this Machination of warre against the Lawes or kingdome is against the King they cannot be severed My Lords if no actuall warre within the Statute if the counselling The third generall Head of a war if neither of these single Acts be Treason within the Statute The Commons in the next place have taken it into their consideration what the addition of his other words Counsells and Actions do operate in the case and have conceived That with this addition all being put together that he is brought within the Statute of 25. Edward 3. The words of the Statute are if any man shall compasse or imagine the death of the King the words are not if my man shall plot or consult the death of the King no my Lords they go further than to such things as are intended immediately directly and determinatively against the life and person of the King they are of a larger extent to compasse is to doe by circuit to consult or practice another thing directly which being done may necessarily produce this effect However it be in the other Treasons within this Statute yet in this by the very words there is roome left for constructions for necessary Inferences and Consequences What hath beene the judgement and practice of former times concerning these words of compassing the Kings death will appeare to your Lordships by some cases of attainders upon these words One Owen in King Iames his time in the 13. yeere of his raigne at Sandwich in Kent spake these words That King Iames being excommunicated by the Pope may bee killed by any man which killing is no murther
wherein this Statute was made So that my Lords immediately before and at the time of the making of this Statute there being Warre betweene those of the Shire grounds mentioned in this statute and the Irish the concluding of Warre and Acts offensive and invasive there mentioned can be intended against no others but the Irish enemies Againe the words of the statute are no captaine shall assemble the people of the Shire grounds to conclude of peace or warre Is it to bee presumed that those of the Shire grounds will conclude of Warre against themselves nor saith the statute shall carry those of the Shire grounds to doe any Acts invasive by the construction which is made on the other side they must be carried to fight against themselves Lastly the words are As captaine none shall assume the name or authority of a captaine or as a captaine shall gather the people together or as a captaine lead them The offence is not in the matter but in the manner If the acts offensive were against the Kings good Subjects those that went under command were punishable as well as the Commanders but in respect the Souldiers knew the service to bee good in it selfe being against the enemies and that it was not for them to dispute the authority of their commanders the penalty of a 100. pounds is laid onely upon him that as Captaine shall assume this power without warrant The people commanded are not within the Statute My Lords the logicke whereupon this argument hath been framed stands thus Because the statute of the eleventh yeere of Queene Elizabeth inflicts a penalty of a 100. pound and no more upon any man that as a captaine without warrant and upon his owne head shall conclude of or make Warre against the Kings enemies therefore the statute of the 18. yeere of Henry the sixth is repealed which makes it Treason to lay souldiers upon or to levie war against the Kings good people But my Lords observation hath been made upon other words of this statute that is that without licence of the Deputy these things cannot be done This shewes that the Deputy is within none of the statutes My Lords this Argument stands upon the same reason with the former because hee hath the ordering of the Army of Ireland for the defence of the people and may give warrant to the Officers of the Army upon eminent occasions of invasion to resist or prosecute the enimy because of the danger that else might ensue forthwith by staying for a warrant from his Majesty out of England Therefore it is no Treason in the Deputy to imploy the Army in Ireland whensoever hee pleaseth for the subversion of the Kings good people and of the Lawes My Lords the statute of the tenth yeere of Henry the seventh the 17. Chapter touched upon for this purpose cleares the businesse in both points for there it is declared that none ought to make warre upon the Irish rebels and enimies without warrant from the Lieutenant the forfeiture a 100 pounds as here the statute is the same with this and might as well have beene cited for repealing the statute of the eighteenth yeere of Henry the 6. as this of the 11. yeere of Queene Elizabeth but if this had been insisted upon it would have expounded the other two cleare against him Object My Lords it hath been further said although the statute be in force and there be a Treason within it yet the Parliament hath no jurisdiction the Treasons are committed in Ireland therefore not triable here Answ My Lords Sir Iohn Perrot his predecessors in the 24. yeere of Queene Elizabeth was tried in the Kings bench for Treason done in Ireland when he was Deputy Orucke in the 33. yeere of Queene Elizabeth judged heere for Treason done Ireland Object But it will be said these trials were after the statute of the 34. yeere of Henry the eight which enacts that treasons beyond sea may be tried in England Answ My Lords his predecessor my Lord Gray was tried and adjudged here in the Kings bench that was in Trinity terme in the 33. yeere of Henry the eighth this was before the making of that statute Object To this againe will be said that it was for Treason by the Lawes and statutes of England but this is not for any thing that 's Treason by the Law of England but by an Irish statute So that the question is onely whether your Lordships in Parliament here have cognisance of an offence made treason by an Irish statute in the ordinary way of judicature without bill for so is the present question For the clearing of this I shall propound two things to your Lordships consideration 1. Whether the rule for expounding the Irish Statutes and customes bee one and the same in England as in Ireland 2. That being admitted whether the Parliaments in England have cognizance or jurisdiction of things there done in respect of the place because the Kings writ runnes not there For the first if in respect of the place the Parliament here hath cognizance there And secondly if the rules for expounding the Irish statutes and Customes bee the same here as there this exception as I humbly conceive must fall away In England there is the common law the statutes the acts of Parliament and customes peculiar to certaine places differing from the common Law if any question arise concerning either a custome or an act of Parliament the common Law of England the first the primitive and the generall Law that 's the rule and expositour of of them and of their severall extents it is so here it is so in Ireland the common Law of England is the common Law of Ireland likewise the same here and there in all the parts of it It was introduced into Ireland by King Iohn and afterwards by King Henry the third by act of Parliament held in England as appeares by the pattent Rolls of the 30 yeere of King Henry the third the first membranâ The words are Quia pro communi utilitate terrae Hiberaniae unitate terrarum Regis Rex vult de commune consilio Regis provisum est quòd omnes leges consuetudines quae in regno Angliae tenentur in Hibernia teneantur eadem terra eisdem legibus subjaceat per easdem regatur sicut Dominus Johannes Rex cum ultimò esset in Hibernia statuit fieri mandavit Quia c. Kex vult quod omnia brevia de communi Jure quae currunt in Angliae similitèr currant in Hibernia sub novo sigillo Regis mandatum est Archiepiscopis c. quod pro pace tranquillitate ejusdem terrae per easdem leges eos regi deduci permittant eas in omnibus sequantur In cujus c. Teste Rege apud Woodstock decimo nono die Septembris Here 's an union of both Kingdomes and that by act of Parliament and the same Lawes to be used heere as there in omnibus My
First in respect of the end of it here was a warre against the King It was to subvert the Lawes This being the designe for the effecting of it he assumed to his own person an arbitrary power over the lives liberties and estates of his Majesties Subjects and determined Causes upon paper petitions at his own will and pleasure obedience must be forced by the Army this declared by the Warrant 2 My Lords if it be said That the Warrant expresseth not any intent of subverting the Lawes It expresseth fully one of the principall meanes whereby this was to be done that is obedience to his arbitrary orders upon paper petitions this was done in reference to the maine designe In the Cases of the Towne of Cambridge and Sr. William Cogan that have formerly been cited to your Lordships upon other occasions the things in themselves were not Treason they were not a levying of Warre In that of Cambridge the Town met together and in a forcible manner broke up the University treasury and tooke out of it the Records and Evidence of the liberties of the Vniversity over the Town In the other they of Bridgewater marched to the Hospitall and compelled the Master of the Hospitall to deliver unto them certaine Evidences that concerned the Towne and forced him to enter into a bond of two hundred pound These if done upon these private ends alone had not been Treason as appeares by the very words of the Statute of 25. Edw. 3. before mentioned of marching openly or secretly But my Lords these of Cambridge and Bridgewater they were of the conspiracy with the villaines as appeares in the Parliament Roll of the first yeare of Richard the second number the one and thirtieth and two and thirtieth where the Towns of Cambridge and Bridgewater are expresly excepted out of the generall pardon made to the Villaines This being done in Reference to that designe of the villaines of altering the Lawes this was that which made it Treason If the designe went no further then the enforcing obedience to these paper orders made by himselfe It was sufficient it was to subvert one fundamentall part of the Lawes nay in effect the whole Law what use of Law if he might order and determine of mens estates at his own pleasure This was against the Law notoriously declared in Ireland In the close roll in the Tower in the five and twentieth yeere of Ed. 1. a Writ went to the Justices in Ireland that Kingdome at that time was governed by Justices declaring that upon petitions they were not to determine any titles betweene party and party upon any pretence of profit whatsoever to the King 6 In the eight and twentieth yeare of Henry the sixt the second Chapter Suites in equity not before the Deputy but in Chancery Suits at Common Law not before him but in Cases of life in the Kings Bench for title of land or goods in the proper Courts of the Common pleas or Kings Bench. This declared in the Instructions for Ireland in the latter end of King James his time and by the Proclamation in his Majesties time my Lord took notice of them called the Commissioners narrow-hearted Commissioners The Law said he should not thus proceed in subversion of it he saith he will and will enforce obedience by the Army This is as much in respect of the end as to endeavour the overthrow of the Statutes of Laborers of victuals or of Merton for Inclosures Here is a warre against the King in respect of the end 2. In respect of the Actions whether there be either a levying of war or an open deed or both My Lords there was an Army in Ireland at that time of two thousand horse and foot by this Warrant there is a full designation of this whole Army and an Assignement of it over unto Savill for this purpose The Warrant gives him power from time to time to take as many souldiers horse and foot with an Officer throughout the whole Army as himselfe shall please heere is the terrour and awe of the whole Army to enforce obedience My Lords if the Earle had armed two thousand men horse and foot and formed them into companies to this end your Lordships would have conceived that this had been a war It 's as much as in the case of Sir Thomas Talbot who armed them in assemblies This is the same with a breach of trust added to it That Army was first raised and afterwards committed to his trust for defence of the people is now destined by him to their destruction This assignation of the Army by his Warrant under his hand seale is an open Act. 2. My Lords heer 's not onely an open act done but a levying of war souldiers both horse and foot with an Officer in warlike manner sessed upon the subject which killed their Cattell consumed and wasted their goods Ob. O but five or sixe were the most imployed at any time a mighty warre of six men scarce a Ryot Ans Your Lordships observe a great difference where six single men goe upon a designe alone and when sent from an Army of six hundred all engaged in the same service so many were sent as were sufficient to execute the command if upon a poore man fewer more upon a rich if the six had not beene able the whole Army must make it good the reason that the Sheriffe alone or but with one Bayliffe to doe execution is because he hath command of the Law the Kings Writ and the posse Comitatus in case of Resistance heer 's the warrant of the Generall of an Army heer 's the possâ— exercitus the power of the Army under this awe of the whole Army six may force more then sixty without it and although never above six in one place yet in the severall parts of the Kingdome at the same time might be above sixty for sessing of souldiers was frequent it was the ordinary course for execution of his orders The Lord Lievtenant of a County in England hath a designe to alter the Lawes and government nay admit the design goes not so high he onely declares thus much that he will order the freeholds and the estates of the Inhabitants of the County at his owne will and pleasure and doth accordingly proceed upon paper petitions foreseeing there will be disobedience he grants out warrants under his hand and seale to the deputy Lievtenants and Captaines of the traine bands that upon refusall they shall take such number of the traine bands thorow the County with Officers as they shall think good and lay them upon the lands and houses of the refusers Souldiers in a warlike manner are frequently sessed upon them accordingly Your Lordships doe conceive that this is a levying of Warre within the Statute The Case in question goes further in these two respects 1 That it is more against the declared Law in Ireland not only against the Common Law but likewise against the Statute of the eight and
being asked by those he spake to how he durst maintaine so bloody an assertion he answered that the matter was not so haynous as was supposed for the King who is the lesser is concluded by the Pope who is the greater and as a Malefactor being condemned before a Temporall Judge may bee delivered over to bee Executed so the King standing convicted by the Popes sentence of excommunication may justly be slaughtered without fault for the killing of the King is the execution of the Popes supreame sentence as the other is the execution of the Law for this judgement of High Treason was given against him and execution done My Lords here is no cleere intent appearing that Owen desired the thing should bee done only Arguments that it might be done This is a compassing there is a cleere Endeavour to corrupt the judgement to take off the bonds of conscience the greatest security of the Kings life God forbid saith one of better judgement than he That I should stretch out my hand against the Lords annointed no saith he the Lord doth not forbid it you may for these reasons lawfully kill the King Hee that denies the Title to the Crown and plots the meanes of setting it upon another head may doe this without any direct or immediate desiring the death of him that then weares it yet this is Treason as was adjudged in 10. Henry 7. in the case of Burton and in the Duke of Norfolks case 13. Elizabeth This is a compassing of his death for there can no more be two Kings in one Kingdome than two Suns in the Firmament he that conceives a title counts it worth ventring for though it cost him his life he that is in possession thinks it as well worth the keeping Iohn Sparhauke in King Henry the fourths time meeting two men upon the way amongst other talk said that the King was not rightfull King but the Earle of March and that the Pope would grant indulgencies to all that would assist the Earles title and that within halfe a yeree there would be no Liveries nor Conizances of the King that the King had not kept promise with the people but had layd taxes upon them In Easter Terme in the third yeere of Henry the fourth in the Kings Bench Rot. 12. this adjudged Treason This denying the title with motives though but implyedly of Action against it adjudged Treason this is a compassing the Kings death How this was a compassing the Kings death is declared in the reasons of the judgement That the words were spoken with an intent to withdraw the affections of the people from the King and to excite them against the King that in the end they might rise up against him in mortem destructionem of the King My Lords in this Judgement and others which I shall cite to your Lordships It appeares that it is a compassing the Kings death by words to indeavour to draw the peoples hearts from the King to set discord betweene the King and them whereby the people should leave the King should rise up against him to the death and destruction of the King The cases that I shall cite prove not onely that this is Treason but what is sufficient evidence to make this good Upon a Commission held the 18. yeere of Edw. 4. in Kent before the Marquesse of Dorset and others an Inditement was preferred against John Awater of High-Treason in the forme before mentioned for words which are entred in the enditement sub hac forma That he had beene servant to the Earle of Warwicke that though he were dead the Earle of Oxford was alive and should have the government of part of the Countrey That Edward whom you call King of England was a false man and had by art and subtlety slaine the Earle of Warwicke and the Duke of Clarence his brother without any cause who before had beene both of them attainted of High-Treason My Lords this Inditement was returned into the Kings Bench in Trinity Tearme in the eighteenth yeere of Edward the fourth and in Easter Tearme in the two and twentieth yeere of Edward the fourth he was outlawed by the stay of the outlawry so long it seemes the Judges had well advised before whether it were Treason or not At the same Session Thomas Hober was indited of Treason for these words That the last Parliament was the most simple and insufficient Parliament that ever had beene in England That the King was gone to live in Kent because that for the present he had not the love of the Citizens of London nor should he have it for the future That if the Bishop of Bath and Wels were dead the Archbishop of Canterbury being Cardinall of England would immediately lose his head This inditement was returned into the Kings Bench in Trinity Tearme in the eighteenth yeere of Edward the fourth Afterwards there came a Privy Seale to the Judges to respit the proceedings which as it should seeme was to the intent the Judges might advise of the Case for afterwards he is outlawed of high-Treason upon this inditement These words were thought sufficient evidence to prove these severall Inditements That they were spoken to withdraw the peoples affection from the King to excite them against him to cause risings against him by the people in mortem destructionem of the King Your Lordships are pleased to consider that in all these Cases the Treason was for words onely words by private persons and in a more private manner but once spoken and no more onely amongst the people to excite them against the King My Lords here are words Counsels more than words and actions too not onely to dis-affect the people to the King but the King likewise towards the people not once but often not in private but in places most publique not by a private person but by a Counsellor of State a Lord Lieutenant a Lord President a Lord Deputy of Ireland 1 To his Majesty That the Parliament had denied to supply him a slander upon all the Commons of England in their affections to the King and Kingdome in refusing to yeeld timely supply for the necessities of King and Kingdome 2 From thence That the King was loose and absolved from rules of government and was to doe every thing that power would admit My Lords more cannot be said they cannot be aggravated whatever I should say would be in diminution 3 Thence You have an Army in Ireland you may imploy to reduce this Kingdome To counsell a King not to love his people is very unnaturall it goes higher to hate them to malice them in his heart the highest expressions of malice to destroy them by warre These coales they were cast upon his Majesty they were blowne they could not kindle in that brest Thence my Lords having done the utmost to the King hee goes to the people At York the Country being meâ— together for Justice at the open Assizes upon the Bench he tels them speaking of the
Subject shall assemble the people and conclude a warre and accordingly shall lead them to invade the Subject this is a levying of warre within the word of that statute and then the statutes of the five and twentieth yeere of Edward the third the first of Henry the fourth and the first of Queene Mary which the Earle of Strafford in his Answer desires to be tryed by are as well repealed in this point as the statute of the eighteenth yeere of Henry the sixth he might then without feare of Treason have done what he pleased with the Irish Army for all the statutes of levying war by this statute of the eleventh yeer of Queene Elizabeth were taken out of his way In Ireland a Subject gathers forces concludes a warre against the Kings people actually invades them bloodshed burning of houses Depredations ensue two of those that is murder and burning of houses are Treason and there the other felony by this construction the punishment of Treason and felony is turned onely into a fine of one hundred pounds from losse of life lands and all his goods onely to losse of part of his goods 3 The third absurdity a warre is concluded three severall Inrodes are made upon the Subject in the first a hundred pound dammage in the second five thousand pounds dammage in the third ten thousands pound dammage is done to the Subjects the penalty for the last inrode is no more than for the first onely one hundred pounds This statute by this construction tells any man how to get his living without long labour Two parts of the hundred pounds is given to the King a third part to the informer here 's no dammage to the Subject that is robbed and destroyed My Lords the Statute will free it selfe and the makers of it from these absurdities The meaning of this statute is That if any Captaine shall of his own head conclude of peace or war against the Kings Enimies or Rebels or shall upon his owne head invade them without warrant from the King or the Lord Deputie of Ireland that then he shall forfeit an hundred pounds The offence is not for laying of Souldiers upon the Kings people but making of warre against the Irish Rebells without warrant the offence â—s not in the matter but in the manner for doing a thing lawfull but without mission 1 This will appeare by the generall scope of the statute all the parts being put together 2 By particular clauses in the Statute 3 By the Condition of that Kingdome at the time of the making of that statute For the first The preamble recites that in time of Declination of Justice under pretext of defending the Countrey and themselves divers great men arrogated to themselves Regall authority under the names of Captaines that they acquired to themselves that government which belonged to the Crown for preventing this Its enacted that no man dwelling within the Shire grounds shall thenceforth assume or take upon himselfe the authority of name of a captaine within those Shire grounds without Letters Pattents from the Crowne nor shall under colour of his captaine-ship make any demand of the people of any exaction nor as a captaine assemble the people of the shire grounds nor as a captaine shall lead those people to doe any acts offensive or invasive without warrant under the great Seale of England or of the Lord Deputy upon penalty that if he do any thing contrary to that act then the Offender shall forfeit an hundred pounds My Lords the Rebels had been out the courts of justice scarce sate for defence of the countrey diverse usurped the place of Captaines concluded of warre against the Rebels and invaded them without warrant invading the Rebels without authority is the crime 2. This appeares further by the particular clauses in the statute None shall exercise any captaine-ship within the shire grounds nor assemble the men of the shire grounds to conclude of warre or lead them to any invasion That that had anciently beene so continued to this time that is the Irish and the English pale they within the shire grounds were within the English pale and ad fidem legem Angliae the Irish that were without the pale were enimies alwayes either in open act of hostility or upon leagues and hostages given for securing the peace And therefore as here in England we had our marches upon the frontiers in Scotland and Wales so were their Marches betweene the English and Irish pale where the inhabitants held their Lands by this tenure to defend the Countrey against the Irish as appeares in the close Rols of the Tower in the twentieth yeere of Edward the third membranâ 15. on the backside and in an Irish Parliament held the 42. yeere of Edward the 3. It s declared that the English pale was almost destroyed by the Irish enimies and that there was no way to prevent the danger but onely that the owners reside upon their Lands for defence and that absence should bee a forfeiture This act of Parliament in a great counsell here was affirmed as appeares in the close Roll the 22. yeere of Edward the third membra 20. dorse Afterwards as appeares in the Statute of the 28. yeere of Henry the 6. in Ireland this hostility continued betweene the English marches and the Irish enemies who by reason there was no difference betweene the English marches and them in their apparell did daily not being knowne to the English destroy the English within the pale Therefore it s enacted that every Englishman shall shave the haire of his upper lip for distinction sake This hostility continued till the 10. yeere of Henry the 7. as appeares by the Statute of the tenth of Henry the 7. the 17. Chapter and so successively downeward till the making of this very statute of the 11. yeere of Queene Elizabeth as appeares fully in the ninth chapter Nay immediately before and at the time of the making of this statute there was not onely enmity betweene those of the Shire grounds that is the English and Irish pale but open Warre and Acts of hostility as appeares by History of no lesse authority then that statute it selfe For in the first Chapter of this statute is the Attainder of Shane O Neale who had made open Warre was slaine in open Warre It 's there declared that he had gotten by force all the North of Ireland for an hundred and twenty miles in length and above a 100. in breadth that hee had mastered divers places within the English pale When the flame of this warre by his death immediately before this statute was spent yet the fire-brands were not all quenched for the rebellion was continued by Iohn Fitz Gerard called the white Knight and Thomas Queverford This appeares by the Statute of the 13. yeere of Queene Elizabeth in Ireland but two yeeres after this of the eleventh yeere of Queene Elizabeth where they are attainted of high treason for levying Warre this eleaventh yeere
away by the Statute of 25. E. 3. 1. H. 4. or 1. Q. M. or any of them My Lord to say they be taken away by the Stat. of 25. E. 3. is to speak against the direct words and scope of that Statute In it there 's this clause That because many other like cases of treason might fall out which are not there declared therefore it is enacted That if any such case come before the Judges they shall not proceed to Judgement till the case be declared in Parliament whether it ought to be adjudged treason or not These words and the whole scope of that Statute shewes that it was not the meaning to take away any treasons that were so before but only to regulate the jurisdiction and manner of triall Those that were single and certaine Acts as conspiring the Kings death levying war counterfeiting the money or great Seale killing a Judge these are left to the ordinary Courts of justice the others not depending upon single Acts but upon constructions and necessary inferences they thought it unfit to give inferiour Courts so great a latitude here as too dangerous to the subject those they strained to Parliaments This statute was the security of the subject made with such wisedome as all the succeeding ages have approved it It hath often passed through the furnace but like gold hath lost little or nothing The statute of 1. H. 4 cap. 10. is in these words Whereas in the Parliament held the 21 yeere of Richard the 2. divers pains of treasons were ordained insomuch that no man did know how to behave himselfe to doe say or speake It is accorded that in no time to come any treason be adjudged otherwise then it was ordained by the Statute of 25. E. 3. It hath been said to what end is this statute made if it takes not away the common Law treasons remaining after the statute of 25. Edward 3. There be two maine things which this statute doth First it takes away for the future all the treasons made by any statute since 25. E. 3. to 1. H. 4. even to that time For in respect that by another Act in that Parliament the statute of 21. R. 2. was repealed it will not be denied but that this statute repeals more treasons then these of 21. R. 2. it repeals all statute treasons but those in 25. E. 3. Secondly It not only takes away the statute treasons but likewise the declared treasons in Parliament after 25. E. 3. as to the future After declaration in Parliament the inferior Courts might judge these treasons for the declaration of a treason in Parliament after it was made was sent to the inferior Courts that toties quoties the like case fell out they might proceed therein the subject for the future was secured against these so that this statute was of great use By the very words of it it still refers all treasons to the provision of 25. E. 3. it leaves that entire and upon his old bottome The statute of 1. Q. M. cap. 1. saith That no offences made treason by any Act of Parliament shall thenceforth be taken or adjudged to be treason but onely as be declared and expressed to be treason by the statute of 25. E. 3. concerning treason or the declaration of treason and no others And further provides that no pains of death penalty or forfeiture in any wise shall ensue for committing any treason other then such as be in the statute of 25. E. 3. ordained and provided any Acts of Parliament or any declaration or matter to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the first part of this statute onely offences made treason by Act of Parliament are taken away the Common Law treasons are no way touched The words and no others referre still to offences made treason by Act of Parliament they restrain not to the treasons onely particularly mentioned in the statute of 25. E. 3. but leaue that statute entire as to the Common-law treason as appears by the words immediatly foregoing By the second part for the pains and forfeitures of treasons if it intend onely the punishment of treason or if it intend both treason and punishment yet all is referred to the provision and ordinance of 25. E. 3. any Act of Parliament or other declaration or thing notwithstanding It saith not other then such penalties or treasons as are expressed and declared in the statute of 25. E. 3. that might perhaps have restrained it to those that are particularly mentioned No it refers all treasons to the general ordination and provision of that statute wherein the Common law-treasons are expresly kept on foot If it be askt what good this statute doth if it take not away the the Common-law treasons 1. It takes away all the treasons made by Act of Parliament not only since the first of H. 4. which were many but all before 1. H. 4. even untill 25. E. 3. by expresse words 2. By expresse words it takes away all declared treasons if any such had been made in Parliament these for the future are likewise taken away so that whereas it might have been doubted whether the statute of 1. H. 4. took away any treasons but those of 21. and 22. R. 2. this clears it both for treasons made by Parliament or declared in Parliament even to the time of taking the statute This is of great use of great security to the subject so that as to to what shall be treason and what not the statute of 25. E. 3. remains entire and so by consequence the treasons at the Common Law Only my Lords it may be doubted whether the manner of the manner of the Parliamentary proteedings be not altered by the statute of 1. Hen. 4. the 17. cap. and more fully in the Parliament roll num 144. that is whether since that statute the Parliamentary power of declaration of treasons whereby the inferiour Courts received jurisdiction be not taken away and restrained only to Bill that so it might operate no further than to that particular contained in the Bill that so the Parliamentary declarations for after times should be kept within the Parliament it selfe and be extended no further Since 1. H. 4. we have not found any such declarations made but all Attainders of treason have been by Bill If this be so yet the common-Law-treasons still remaining there is one and the same ground of reason and equity since 1. H. 4. for passing of a Bill of treason as was before for declaring it without Bill Herein the Legislative power is not used against my Lord of Strafford in the Bill it is only the jurisdiction of the Parliament But my Lords because that either through my mistaking of the true grounds and reasons of the Commons or my not pressing of them with apt arguments and presidents of former times or that perchance your Lordships from some other reasons and authorities more swaying with your Lordships judgements then these from them may possible be
Parliament binds untill it be repealed It hath been therefore said that this Statute is repealed by the Statutes of the eighth yeere of Edward the fourth the first Chapter and of the tenth yeere of Henry the seventh the two and twentieth Chapter because by these two Satutes the English Statutes are brought into Ireland The Argument if I mistook it not stood thus That the Statute of the first of Henry the fourth the 10. Chapter saith that in no time to come Treason shall be adjuged otherwise then it was ordained by the Statute of the 25. yeere of Edward the third That the Treason mentioned in the 18 yeere of Henry the sixth in the Irish Satute is not contained in the Statute of the 25 yeere of Edward the 3. and therefore being contrary to the statute of the first of Henry the fourth it must needs be void My Lords the difference of the times wherein the statute of the first yeere of Henry the fourth and that of the 18 yeere of Henry the sixth were made cleare the Point as is humbly conceived that of Henry the sixth was made fourty yeeres after the other The statute of the eighth yeere of Edward the fourth and the tenth of Henry the seventh bringing in the English statutes in order and series of time as they were made one after another as afterwards is proved they did it cannot be that the statute of the first yeere of Henry the fourth made fourty yeere before should repeale or make void the statute of the 18. Henry 6. made so long after The rule of Law is that Leges posteriores priores abrogant that latter lawes repeale former But by this construction a former Law should repeale and make void a Non ens a statute then was not If this were Law then all the statutes that made any new Treason after the first yeere of Henry the fourth were void in the very fabricke and at the time when they were made hence likewise it would follow that the Parliament now upon what occasion soever hath no power to make any thing Treason not declared to be so in the statute of the five and twentieth yeere of Edward the third This your Lordships easily see would make much for my Lord of Straffords advantage but why the Law should be so your Lordships as yet have onely heard an affirmation of it no reason But some touch was given that this statute of the tenth yeer of H. the seventh in words makes all the Irish statutes void which are contrary to the English The Answer to this is a deniall that there are any such words in the statute This statute declares that the English statutes shall be effectuall and confirmed in Ireland and that all statutes before time made to the contrary shall be revoked this repeales onely the Irish statutes of the tenth yeere of Henry the fourth and the nine and twentieth yeere of Honry the sixth which say that the English statutes shall not be in force in Ireland unlesse particularly received in Parliament It makes all the Irish statutes void which say that the English statutes shall not be in force there It is usuall when a Statute saith that such a thing shall be done or not done to adde further that all statutes to the contrary shall be voide No likeli-hood that this statute intended to take away any statute of Treason When but in the Chapter next before this Murder there is made Treason as if done upon the Kings Person That this statute of the eighteenth yeer of Henry the sixth remains on foot and not repealed either by the Statute of the eighth yeere of Edward the fourth or this of the tenth yeere of Henry the seventh appeares expressely by two severall Acts of Parliament made at the same Parliament of the tenth yeere of Henry the seventh By an Act of Parliament in H. the sixth's time in Ireland it was made Treason for any man to procure a privie Seale or any other Command whatsoever for apprehending any person in Ireland for Treason done without that Kingdome and to put any such Command in execution Divers had been attainted of Treason for executing such Commands Heere is a Treason so made by Act of Parliament in Henry the sixth's time In the third Chapter of this Parliament of the tenth of Henry the seventh an Act is passed for no other end then to repeale this statute of Henry the sixth of Treason If this statute of Henry the sixth of Treason had been formerly repealed by the statute of 8. Edward 4. or then by the two and twentieth Chapter of this Parliament of 10. Henry 7. by bringing in the English statutes the Law-makers were much mistaken now to make a particular Act of Parliament to repeale it it being likewise so unreasonable an Act as it was In the eighth Chapter of this Parliament of the tenth of Henry the seventh It is enacted That the statutes of Kilkenny and all other statutes made in Ireland two onely excepted whereof this of the eighteenth of Henry the sixth is none for the Common-weale shall be enquired off and executed My Lord of Strafford saith that the bringing in of the English statutes hath repealed this statute of the eighteenth yeere of Henry the sixth the Act of Parliament made the same time saith no it saith that all the Irish statutes excepting two whereof this is none shall still be in force Object Oh! But how ever it was in 10. H. 7. yet it appeares by Judgement in Parliament afterwards That this statute of the eighteenth yeere of Henry the sixth is repealed and that is by the Parliament of the eleventh yeere of Queene Elizabeth the seventh Chapter That by this Parliament it is enacted that if any man without license from the Lord Deputie lay any Souldiers upon the Kings Subjects if he be a Peere of the Realme he shall forfeit one hundred pounds if under the degree of a Peere 100 markes This statute as is alleadged declares the penalty of laying Souldiers upon the Subjects to bee onely a hundred pounds and therefore it s not Treason Answer My Lords if the offence for which this penalty of one hundred pounds is laid upon the offender be for laying Souldiers or leading them to doe any acts oftensive or invasive upon the Kings people The Argument hath some force but that the offence is not for laying Souldiers upon the true Subjects that this is not the offence intended in the statute will appeare to your Lordships Ex absurdo from the words of it The words are That if any man shall assemble the people of the County together to conclude of peace or warre or shall carry those people to doe any Acts offensive or invasive then he shall forfeit one hundred pounds If concluding of warre and carrying the people to Acts invasive be against the Kings Subjects this is high Treason within the words of the statute of the five and twentieth yeere of Edward the third For if any