Selected quad for the lemma: war_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
war_n	king_n	law_n	levy_v	3,963	5	11.2983	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91287	The subjection of all traytors, rebels, as well peers, as commons in Ireland, to the laws, statutes, and trials by juries of good and lawfull men of England, in the Kings Bench at Westminster, for treasons perpetuated by them in Ireland, or any foreign country out of the realm of England. Being an argument at law made in the Court of Kings Bench, Hil. 20 Caroli Regis, in the case of Connor Magwire, an Irish baron ... fully proving; that Irish peers, as well as commons may be lawfully tried in this court in England, by the statute of 35 H.8.c.2. for treasons committed by them in Ireland, by a Middlesex jury, and outed of a trial by Irish peers: which was accordingly adjudged, and he thereupon tried, condemned, executed as a traytor ... By William Prynne Esq; a bencher of Lincolnes Inne.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1658 (1658)	Wing P4090; Thomason E945_5; ESTC R203350	65,819	94

Tryal but such only who are excepted out of it by special Proviso Now Irish Peers are none of those Persons excepted as I shall prove anon That these words any person or persons extend to Peers as well as Commoners where there is no exception of Peers is undeniable First because a Peer is a Person though of a higher rank or degree than an ordinary Commoner or Freeman and one kind of person in Law therefore within these words any person or persons 2ly Because general Laws made for the common good safety of the Realm and punishment of the grand crime of High Treason are like to Go himself * No respectors of persons but bind and punish all alike Therefore any person or persons in such a publick Law as this made for the common good safety and punishment of the greatest Treasons Evils must necessarily include all persons subjects whatsoever and except none especially the greatest whole examples and offences are commonly most dangerous and pernicious Thirdly in all publick Acts whatsoever These words any person or persons extend to Peers as well as Commoners and I know no one President to the contrary To instance in some few Acts instead of many In the Statutes of 26 H. 8. c. 13. 5 6 E. 6. c. 11. concerning Treasons any person or persons or any of the Kings Subjects Denizen or others that shall commit or practise Treason out of the limits of this Realm in any outward parts extend to Peers as well as Commons Therefore in this Act of the same nature So in the Statutes of 1 Ed. 6. c. 1. 2 3 E. 6. c. 1. 5 6 E. 6. c. 1. 1 Eliz. c. 2. If any person or persons shall deprave or revile the most blessed Sacraments or the book of the Common prayer c. In the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. and also of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. If any person or persons c. shall extoll c. the power of the Bishop of Rome or of his See 13 Eliz. c. 1. If any person or persons shall bring in or put in ure any Bull from the Bishop of Rome Agnus Dei Pictures Crosses c. In the Statute of 23 Eliz. c. 2. If any person or persons shall with a malicious intent speak any false or seditious news of the Queen c. In 27 Eliz. c. 2. If any person or persons shall barbour or contribute any mony to the maintenance of any Jesuites Priests c. In all these Acts to pretermit * many others the words any person or persons extend to Peers as well as Commons as is resolved in the bodies and Provisoes of all these Acts Yea in the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. of Treasons though a most penal Law the words are only If a man do compass or imagine the deach of the King If a man do levy war against the King in his Realm c. If a man counterfeit the Kings Broad or Privy-seal or his mony c. Yet it hath been resolved without dispute in all times and so agreed by Sir Edward Cook Institutes 3. p. 4 5. That this word a man extends to both sexes alike including women as well as men Peers as well as Commoners Lords as well as Pesants yea all ranks callings conditions of men who are Subjects and that this word man in the singular number only extends to many men to any number of men committing any of these Treasons joyntly as well as to a single man or Traytor because it is a general Law made for the safety of the Kings person and the Realm Much more then must any person or persons in this Statute being both in the singular and plural number and in common acceptation a far more universal general and comprehensive expression than this of a man in 25 E. 3. c. 2. extend equally to all sorts sects and degrees of men as well as it and so to Peers as much as it and to Peers as well as to Commons as it doth in the Statutes of 25 H. 8. c. 22. 26 H. 8. c. 13. 27 H. 8. c. 2. 33 H. 8. c. 12. 20. 5 E. 6. c. 11. 1 Mar. c. 6. 1. 2 Phil. Mar. c. 9 to 11. 5 Eliz. c. 1. 13 Eliz. c. 2. 18 Eliz. c. 1. 23 Eliz. c. 1. 27 Eliz. c. 2. 3 Jac. c. 4 concerning Treasons 2ly My second Argument to prove Irish Peers within this Statute is because Irish-Commons are within its Verge even for Treasons committed in Ireland as hath been adjudged in the forecited cases of Orourk Sir John Parrot and Mac-Mahone For Laws and Law givers being no respectors of persons where the offences be the same and there being no one clause word or syllable in this Statute extending to Irish-Commoners Treasons but which doth may and ought by the self same Justice reason equity to extend to the Treasons of Irish-Peers this Statute making no distinction between the one and other and the Commons of Ireland having as absolute a right and Inheritance in their native Privilege of being tryed by their Peers in Ireland which yet is taken away by this Act in case of Treason as the Peers in Ireland have in their Peerage to be tryed there by their Irish-Peers We must not yea we cannot in point of Justice distinguish between the one and other where the Law it self makes no distinction Therefore since the Irish Commoner is undoubtedly within the words and scope of this Act to be tryed at this Bar by a Middlesex-Jury the Irish-Peer unless we will judge with respect of persons and coyn a distinction not warranted by this Act must be also tryed in the self-same manner The Law is the same the crime is the same both in Magwires and in Mac-Mahones cases therefore the Tryal and Judgement too must in law reason be the same in both 3ly It will be granted me without dispute That if an Irish-Peer commit Treason in any forein parts out of England and Ireland as in Spain France Flanders Italy or Germany he shall be tryed in this Court by an ordinary Jury if Free-holders and not by his Peers in Ireland by vertue of this Act. Nay if he commit Treason in Ireland and flye into England he may and shall be tryed for that very Treason by an ordinary Jury at this Bar * because by flying his Country and a legal tryal there he hath outed himself of the benefit of his Peers Therefore it extends to Irish-Peers even for Treasons done in Ireland else they could not be tryable here in any of these Cases which are granted on all hands to be Law 4ly It is evident by the Proviso in this Act that English Peers committing any manner of Treasons out of this Realm are tryable for it in England by vertue of this Law as well as English Commons though they were not so by the Common-law Therefore Irish Peers committing Treason shall be within it likewise so tryable here as well as

The Subjection of all TRAYTORS REBELS as well PEERS as COMMONS in IRELAND TO THE Laws Statutes and Trials by Juries of good and lawfull men of ENGLAND in the Kings Bench at Westminster for Treasons perpetrated by them in IRELAND or any foreign Country out of the Realm of ENGLAND BEING An Argument at Law made in the Court of Kings Bench Hil. 20 Caroli Regis in the case of Connor Magwire an Irish Baron a principal Contriver of the last Irish Rebellion Fully proving That Irish Peers as well as Commons may be lawfully tried in this Court in England by the Statute of 35 H. 8. c. 2. for Treasons committed by them in Ireland by a Middlesex Jury and outed of a Trial by Irish Peers Which was accordingly adjudged and he there upon tried condemned executed as a Trayur Wherein are comprised many other particulars and notable Records relating to the Laws Peers Statutes affairs of Ireland not obvious in our Lawbooks and worthy publike knowledge By William Prynne Esq a Bencher of Lincolnes Inne Numb. 35. 31 33. Ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a Murderer which is guilty of death but he shall be surely put to death So ye shall not pollute the land wherein you are for bloud de fileth the land and the land cannot be cleansed of the bloud that is shed therein but by the bloud of him that shed it LONDON Printed by J. Leach for the Author 1658. TO THE Ingenuous Readers ESPECIALLY Professors Students of the Laws of England and Ireland HAving lately published a much enlarged Edition of my Plea for the Lords and House of Peers wherein the undoubted antient Birthright of all English Lords and Barons to sit vote and judge in all Parliaments of England and their tryal by their Peers is irrefragably vindicated by Histories and Records in all ages and larger Discoveries made of the Proceedings and Judicature in our Parliaments in Cases as well of Commoners as Peers than in all former Treatises whatsoever I apprehended it neither unseasonable nor unprofitable to publish this Argument at Law concerning the Trial of Irish Peers for forein Treasons acted by them made by me near 14 years past in the Kings bench Court at Westminster in the Case of Connor Magwire an Irish Baron there indicted for High Treason in having a principal hand in the late bloudy Rebellion in Ireland against whom I was by special Order assigned Counsel among others by the Parliament then sitting upon whose Plea and a Demurrer there unto I first argued this new point in Law never formerly disputed adjudged in open Court Whether an Irish Peer for Commoner committing Treason in Ireland sent over from thence into England against his will might be lawfully tryed for it in the Kings Bench at Westminster by a Middlesex Jury and outed of his tryal by Irish Peers of his condition by the Statute of 35 H. 8. c. 2 After two solemn Arguments at the Bar by my self and Serjeant Rolls against and Mr. Hales and Mr. Twisden for the Prisoner and Mr. Justice Bacons Argument on the Bench his Plea was over-ruled adjudged against him it being resolved he might and ought to be tried only by a Jury of Middlesex not by his Peers of Ireland Whereupon he pleading Not guilty to his Indictment was tried by a Substantial Jury to whom he took both his peremptory and legal challenges which the Court allowed him of right and after a very fair and full trial was found guilty by the Iury upon most pregnant evidence and then condemned executed as a Traytor at Tyburn as he well demerited The Reasons inducing me to publish this Argument were 1. The near affinity and cognation it hath with my Plea for the Lords 2ly The Novelty Rarity of the Subject and points debated in it not formerly discussed at large in our Law-books 3ly The generality and publike concernment thereof extending to all Irish Subjects whether Peers or Commons and so worthy their knowledge perusal and of all publike Officers in Ireland especially Lawyers 4ly The prevention of Misreports of this case and Argument in this age wherein many Arguments at Law and Reports of Cases have been lately published by In●udicious hands mistaking mangling or misreciting the Reasons Records Lawbooks cited both at Barr and Bench and sometimes the Cases Iudgements themselves to the prejudice seduction of young Students of the Law and scandal of the Law it self 5ly The importunitie of some Friends who formerly desired Copies thereof from me when I had no leisure to furnish them therewith 6ly The Vindication declaration both of the Parliaments and Kings Bench honorable resplendent equal untainted Justice against this Arch-Irish-Traytor and Rebel and that in these particulars 1. In trying this notorious Offendor guiltie of the horridest universallest Treason and Rebellion that ever brake forth in Ireland and that in a time of open War both in Ireland and England only by a Legal Indictment and indifferent sworn Jury of honest and lawful Freeholders according to the known Laws and Statutes of the Realm not in a Court Marshal or any other New-minted Judicature by an arbitrarie summarie illegal or martial proceeding without any lawful presentment indictment or Trial by a sworn impartial able Iury resolved to be diametrically contrary to the fundamental Laws Customs Great Charters Statutes of the Realm and inherent Liberty of the Subject especially in time of Peace when all other Courts of Justice are open and of very dangerous consequence and thereupon specially prohibited enacted against as you may read at leisure in the Statute of 5 R. 2. Parl. 1. ch. 5. Rot. Parl. n. 57. 2 R. 2. rot Parl. n. 57. 1 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 44. 2 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 89. The Votes of the House of Commons and Lords against it May 7. 1628. the Petition of Right 3 Caroli Mr. Cambdens Annals of Qu. Elizabeth p. 242 243. Cooks 3 Instit. p. 52. 124. and accordingly declared by the Commons House in their a Remonstrance of the State of the Kingdom 15 Decemb. 1641. and by the whole Parliament and most now in power in the case of the Lord Mount-Norris whose trial and capital condemnation in a Court Marshal in Ireland by Martial Law in time of peace without a lawful Indictment and Trial by his Peers in a summarie way by the Earl of Straffords power then Lord Deputy of Ireland was one of the principal b Charges evidences against him to make good his general impeachment of High Treason for which he was condemned and beheaded on Tower hill for a Traytor by judgement and Act of Parliament Namely That he had TRAYTEROUSLY endevoured TO SUBVERT THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS AND GOVERNMENT OF THE REALM and instead thereof TO INTRODUCE AN ARBITRARY TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT AGAINST LAW though this Lord was not executed or put to death by that Sentence against him Which if executed had been WILFULL MURDER both in his JUDGES EXECUTIONERS as Sir Edward Cook resolves