Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
themselves an Authority to make Laws which was never heard before Authority to make Laws What Laws a Law for an High Court of Justice a Law for lives to sentence mens lives And whose Life the Life of their Sovereign upon such a King who as to them had not only redressed long before at the beginning of the Parliament all Grievances that were and were imaginable taken away the Star-Chnmber High-Commission-Court and about Shipping such a King and after such Concessions that He had made in the Isle of Wight when He had granted so much that was more than the People would have desired When these few Commons not onely without but excluding the rest of the Commons not onely without but excluding the rest but rejecting the Lords too that then sat when these few Commons shall take upon them this Authority and by colour of this their King Soveraign Liege Lord shall be sentenced put to Death and that put to Death even as their King and sentenced as their King put to Death as their King and this before His own Door even before that Place where He used in Royal Majesty to hear Embassadors to have His Honourable Entertainments that this King shall be thus put to Death at Noon-day it is such an Aggravation of Villany that truly I cannot tell what to say No story that ever was I do not think any Romance any Fabulous Tragedy can produce the like Gentlemen If any Person shall now come and shroud himself under this pretended Authority or such a pretended Authority you must know that this is so far from an Excuse that it is an Height of Aggravation The Court of Common-Pleas is the Common Shop for Justice in that Court an appeal is brought for Murther which ought to have been in the King's Bench the Court gives Judgment the Party is condemned and executed in this Case it is Murther in them that executed because they had no lawful Authority I speak this to you to shew you that no man can shroud himself by colour of any such false or pretended Authority I have but one thing more to add to you upon this head and that is which I should have said at first If two or more do compass or Imagine the King's Death if some of them go on so far as to Consullation if others of them go further they sentence and execute put to Death in this Case they are all Guilty the first Consultation was Treason I have no more to add but one Particular a few Words As you will have Bills presented against those for Compassing Imagining Adjudging the King so possibly you may have Bils presented against some of those for Levying War against the King Levying of War which is another Branch of the State of 25th of Edward the Third It was but Declarative of the Common Law it was no new Law By that Law it was treason to Levy War against the King But to levy War against the Kings Authority you must know is Treason too If men will take up Armes upon any Publick pretence if it be to expulse Aliens if but to pull out Privy Councellours if it be but against any Particular Laws to reform Religion to pull down Enclosures in all these cases If Persons have assembled themselves in a Warlike manner to do any of these Acts this is Treason and within that Branch of Levying War against the King This was adjudged in the late Kings Time in Berstead's case Queen Elizabeth's Henry the Eighth's former Times King Jame's Time much more 〈◊〉 men will go not onely to Levy War against the King but against the Laws all the Laws subvert all the Laws to set up new Laws Models of their own If any of these cases come to be presented to you you know what the Laws are To conclude you are now to enquire of Blood of Royal Blood of Sacred Blood Blood like that of the Saints under the Altar crying Quousque Domine How long Lord c. This Blood crys for Vengeance and it will not be appeased without a Bloody Sacrifice Remember but this and I have done I shall not press you upon your Oaths you are Persons of Honour you all know the Obligation of an Oath This I will say that he that conceals or favours the guilt of Blood takes it upon himself wilfully knowingly takes it upon himself And we know that when the Jews said Let his blood be on us and our seed it continued to them and their Posterity to this day God save the King Amen Amen His Lordships Speech being ended Thomas Lee of the Middle-Temple London Gentleman was called to give in the Names of his Witnesses The names of the Witnesses then and there sworn follow William Clark Esq James Nutley Esq Mr. George Masterson Clerk George Farringdon Hercules Huncks Dr. William King Martin Foster John Baker Stephen Kirk Richard Nunnelly John Powel John Throckmorton John Blackwel Ralph Hardwick Thomas Walkley Gentleman Holland Simpson Benjamin Francis Colonel Matthew Thomlinson Griffith Bodurdo Esq Samuel Boardman Robert Carr Esq Richard Young Sir Purbock Temple John Rushworth Esq John Gerrard John Hearn Mr. Coitmore Mr. Cunningham Mr. Clench Willinm Jessop Esq Edward Austin Darnel Esq Mr. Brown Thomas Tongue John Bowler Mr. Sharp Mr. Lee. Robert Ewer John King Edward Folley Mr. Gouge Anthony Mildmay Esq The Grand Jury returned the Indictment Billa Vera. Court adjourned to the Old-Bailey 10th of October The 10. of October 1660. SIR John Robinson Knight Lieutenant of his Majesties Tower of London according to his Warrant received delivered to Mr. Sheriff the Prisoners hereafter named who were in several Coaches with a strong Guard of Horse and Foot conveyed to Newgate and about nine of the Clock in the Morning delivered to the Keepers of that Prison and thence brought to the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily London where the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer were in Court assembled and where their Indictment was publickly read by Edward Shelton Esq Clerk of the Crown Sessions-House in the Old-Baily 10. October 1660. THE Court being Assembled and Silence commanded the Commission of Oyer and Terminer was again read After which Sir Hardress Waller Collonel Thomas Harrison and Mr. William Heveningham were brought to the Bar and commanded to hold up their Hands which Sir Hardress Waller and Mr. Heveningham did but Harrison being commanded to hold up his Hand answered I am here and said My Lord if you please I will speak a Word Court Hold up your hand and you shall be heard in duetime Mr. Harrison the course is That you must hold up your hand first And then he held up his hand The Indictment was read purporting That He together with others not having the fear of God before his Eyes and being instigated by the Devil did Maliciously Treasonably and Feloniously contrary to his due Allegiance and bounden Duty sit upon and condemn our late Soveraign Lord King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory and also did upon
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
likewise would favour me sometimes with discourse and in that discourse I did many times take occasion to assert the laws in point of the King And discoursing about the King as being a capital instrument in the late Inconveniences as they call'd it in the times of the war Mr. Ireton would discourse this ordinarily I was bold to tell them that the person of the K. was solutus legibus this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar told me It was an unequal law I did observe Mr. Peters that he did bend his discourse not by way of argument only but in point of resolution of judgement fully against the Person and Government of the King I remember some of his expressions were these That he was a Tyrant that he was a Fool that he was not fit to be a K. or bear that office I have heard him say that for the Office it self in those very words which shortly after came into Print that it was a dangerous chargeable and useless Office My Lords the constant discourse of this Gentleman at that time was such as he did believe would never be called into question so that it was not a thing that a man was necessitated to observe by an accident but it was their full and whole discourse I will put you in mind of a particular passage When the news came to Windsor that the King was in Prison at the Isle of Wight my father whose house that was was very much troubled at it and being an ancient man was not able to controll his passions with reason told my mother that they meaning Mr. Ireton c. should have no entertainment there and took the key of the Celler and put it in his pocket his passions being lessened Mr. Ireton his wife and another Officer being at supper and afterwards my father said Grace and as he usually did though they were there he said that usual and honest expression praying for the King in these usual words God save the King Prince and Realm sometimes they did laugh at it but never did reflect upon him but this night he made this expression God save the Kings most excellent Majesty and preserve him out of the hands of all his enemies Peters who was then at the Table turns about to him and said Old Gentleman your Idol will not stand long I do conceive he meant it of the King For a matter of two months of the constant residence and being of the Army there I did observe that in the general Council there and in this private Cabal after the business was broke out and when the King was taken prisoner and carried to Windsor Mr. Peters was the constant man and when the business broke out I looke upon it in reason that Cromwel Ireton and this Gentleman at the Bar and Rich and that other Gentleman whose name I have forgot that they were the persons that did the business My Lords Mr. Peters he continued at Windsor I remember very well that after the body of the Army the General and the Officers of the Army were gone to London he continued in Windsor I remember a passage of one Bacon who was a Sectary Mr. Peters being in discourse of the King Mr. Bacon took great distaste at Mr. Peters for some affront put on the K. Mr. Peters falls upon him and rails at him and was ready to beat him we understood it so because he did tell him of his affronting the King Coun. Mr. Peters if you have any thing to ask this Witness you may Peters I have many things to ask him Did I ever lye there Starky No. Pet. Did you see me there at three of the clock in the morning Starky I have seen you go up at ten a clock at night to Mr. Ireton's chamber and sometimes I understood you did not go away till four a clock in the morning I went to bed it 's true but I understood it so Thomas Walkeley sworn Coun. Give your testimony what consultations you have had with the Prisoner at the Bar. Walkeley I came out of Essex in at Aldgate just as I came in a Proclamation was read for Tryal of his late Majesty I went down the next day to the Painted Chamber at Westminster where I saw Oliver Cromwel John Goodwin and Peters and others John Goodwin sate in the middle of the Table and he made a long speech or prayer I know not whether but Mr. Peters stood there after John Goodwin had done his prayer it was desired that strangers might avoid the room then came up Cook and Dorislaus and Humphreys and Ask and Dendy and several others and stood by Bradshaw at the upper end of the Table But Cromwel stood up and told them it was not necessary that the people should go out but that was overruled and so I went out and stayed their rising and saw this Gentleman Mr. Peters come out with them After that when the King was brought to Town a prisoner the Lord Carew a very honourable person meeting with me saith he Walkely if you will see your old Master go now or else it may be you will never see him Where is he my Lord said I saith he he is coming on this side Brainford I went to the farther end of St. James Corner and there I met some of the Army coming and then I saw his Majesty in his Coach with six horses and Peters like Bishop Almoner riding before the King triumphing then after that in St. James Park I saw Peters marshalling the Souldiers and I was forced to go about My Lord this is all I can say concerning that I remember one thing further of him I heard him in Westminster-Hall say within a year or two after the Army was raised If we can keep up our Army but seven years longer we need not care for the King and all his posterity Mr. Proctor sworn Pr. I having occasion to go from London to Windsor the day that the King was brought from thence a prisoner a little on this side Brainford I saw great Troops of horse I did conceive what the cause was having heard the King was to be brought up to his Tryal after I had passed some number of horses at last I espied the Prisoner at the Bar immediately before the Kings Coach singly riding before the Coach-horses and the King sitting alone in the Coach My Lord I did put off my hat and he was graciously pleased to put off his hat the Troopers seeing this they threw me into the ditch horse and all where I stayed till they passed by and was glad I escaped so Hardwick Sworn Coun. When the Proclamation was read in Westminster-hall for tryal of the King did you see Mr. Peters there Hard. I was in the Hall when that ugly Proclamation was Proclaimed where I saw Dendy King and that Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar in the hall After the Proclamation was proclaimed the prisoner at the Bar came out into the Palace-yard and told them
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
of the Lord and did weigh the things After that when the Bill was brought into the house my name was put in there with several others so I came to be in and what I did was upon these two Accounts First in obedience as I told you to the Lord which was the chief thing And in obedience to that which was then the Supreme Authority of this Nation and therefore I shall mention these grounds very briefly because indeed the things that are controverted here at this time they have been controverted in the Face of the whole world in several Nations and the Lord hath given an answer upon solemn Appeals to these things I shall therefore mention them very briefly because they have been so publique The Declarations and Remonstrances that have passed between the King and Parliament concerning the beginning of the Wars L. Chief Baron Mr. Ca. I would be very loth to interrupt you But I see what course is taken and the peoples eyes are upon you You seek delays and against the course of Prisoners you say you will confess but you do confess the Fact after you have spent the time And all the Witnesses are heard for this that you speak of now you go about to justifie as in the fear of the Lord or any thing of that nature that we cannot allow of but we do allow you to speak and give the heads of what you will say as to the matter of Fact but to hear you make discourses and debates which are a justification of a horrid and notorious Treason we cannot hear it we ought not to hear the maintaining of open Treason cannot hear you to speak that upon your opening which is Treason We are willing that you open the Heads what you have to say we are upon our consciences and to appear before God for what we do and so are you too but remember the Devil sometimes appears in the habit of an Angel of light If you will couch your matter in a few words the Court affords you liberty which is indeed beyond the strict Rules of Law Ca. You say you sit here by the Laws of the Land and are sworn to maintain the Laws We ought not that we should plead to this Indictment for what we did was by an Act of Parliament Court Pray Sir this must not be let fall without reproof or rather punishment Ca. I believe there is no Precedent for it Court Sir We know the act of Parliament as well as you and most of the standers by You go upon a false ground there was no such Act of the Supreme Authority as you pretend to these are but Phantasms of your own brain and must not be suffered these things have been controverted and decided many a time again and again Ca. I desire to have time to speak how it was begun and carried on or else how shall I be able to make my defence or to tell you what are the Heads I wil insist upon I shall declare the grounds upon which the Parliament did proceed L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew If that be your ground the Parliament did it the House of Commons did it I have something to offer not to interrupt you to the then Commons Ca. In my humble opinion for the maintaining of this It was by Authority the supreme Authority by which it was done L. Chief Baron Did you sign this Warrant for the summoning and warning of that Court And did you sign the Warrant for executing the late King Ca. I desire I may go on with my defence L. Chief Baron We would not have you be mistaken You seem to confess the act and now you justifie it you cannot speak any thing for your justification till you confess the fact Ca. I shall speak to that in its time L. Chief Baron You must speak to that first that is matter of Fact whereupon the Jury are to go Ca. There is matter of Law Court You must speak to matter of Fact first Ca. I say this is that I was about to say That the Supreme Authority Court You must speak to the Fact first Whether you did compass c. the Kings death or not that is the first ground if you did not there is an end of the business It is proved against you that you did it if you come to justifie it it must be when you have first agreed the matter of Fact Ca. I desire I may have liberty to proceed either for matter of Fact or Law as I list Court No no you must first speak to the Fact you may be after heard You know in all cases they must begin with the Fact either denying or extenuating For matter of Law in this case must arise from the fact Ca. But I humbly conceive there is a matter of Law in this case and it is matter of Law that is above the jurisdiction of this inferior Court Mr. Sol. Finch I pray that he may be held to the issue Guilty or Not Guilty If he deny the Fact let us relie upon our Evidence and he upon his he cannot come to Law till he hath confessed the Fact The question is Whether you did or not there is the Fact if you have any thing to justifie that follows Ca. I was upon that and going on to shew the reasons and grounds of it Court First you must confess it if you will shew the reasons why you did it Ca. I told you there was some things I did Coun. What are those some Ca. I do acknowledg that I was there at the Court. Coun. Did you sign the Warrants for summoning that Court and for Execution of the King Ca. Yes I did sign them both Coun. Then say what you will L. Chief Baron Now go on Ca. In the Year 1640. there was a Parliament called according to the Laws and constitutions of this Nation and after that there was some difference between the King and the Parliament the two Houses of Parliament Lords and Commons and thereupon the King did withdraw from the two Houses of Parliament as appears by their own Declaration The great Remonstrance printed in 1642. and thereupon the Lords and Commons did declare L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew The Court are of opinion not to suffer you to go on in this they say it tends not only to justifie your Act but you cast in Bones here to make some difference You talk of the Lords and Commons you have nothing to do with that business your authority that you pretend to was an Act of Parliament as they called themselves and that where there was but 46 Commons in the House and but 26 Voted it Ca. I say that the Lords and Commons by their Declaration Mr. J. Foster Hold your hand a while Sir not so fast you go to raise up those differences which I hope are asleep new Troubles to revive those things which by the grace of God are extinct you are not to be suffered in this it is not the singling
Court being shewed Coun. Is that Mr. Jones's Hand the Prisoner at the Bar set to that Warrant Nut. I have been acquainted with his Hand I do believe it is The Warrant for Execution was also shewed Coun. Is that the same Hand-writing Nut. Yes I believe it is he hath written several Letters to me Mr. Hartlib Sworn Court Mr. Hartlib do you know Mr. Jones's Hand Har. I never did see him write but I have seen several Letters out of Ireland and other Papers which have been supposed to be his Hand-writing This seems to be like that which was reputed to be his Hand Coun. Mr. Clark do you know Mr. Jones's Hand-writing Cl. I have seen several Letters of Col. Jones and these are like his Hand-writing I do believe they are his Hand-writing Mr. Jones looks upon them both and confesses they are like his hand-writing Coun. We have given our Evidence What do you say for your self before Charge be given to the Jury Jones I have little to say your Lordships have already heard what is to be said in this Case I have nothing to say to the point I am not fit to plead any thing especially in matter of Law I must wholly put my self upon the Lord and this Honourable Court and Jury Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury here is this Prisoner John Jones stands Indicted for that he with others did Compass and Imagine the Kings death that is the substance of the Indictment The Indictment sets forth several Acts each proving the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death One of them is that he did consult and meet together and propound how the King should be put to death The second is they did assume a power to Judge the King The third is that they did actually sit upon him And the last of them is that they sentenced the King and afterwards the King was murthered The whole substance is whether he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death If any one of these particulars that are alledged for the overt acts be proved you are to find the Indictment He hath confessed very Ingenuously that he did sit upon the King that he did sit in that Court and so there is an overt act proved if nothing else you ought to find him guilty of this Treason There is further Evidence though not any Evidence of his sitting the last day of the Sentence you have had three comparing similitudes of hands to prove that he did sign that Sentence that horrid Instrument whereby the King was ordered to be put to death one of them having received Letters from Ireland and others acquainted with his hand say that it is like his hand he hath so confessed the likeness of his hand but he saith he doth not remember he signed it As to you of the Jury there is no more to be considered if any one of the acts do appear true to you that is sufficient to find him guilty though he were not guilty of all but that he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death is clear in sitting and signing the Warrant for the other whether you shall find that he did sentence the King that must be left to you Whatsoever it is still it is the same if any one be proved you ought to find him guilty of the Indictment which is the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death I think you need not stir from the Bar for he hath confessed it The Jury went together and after a little Consultation returned to their places Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our Foreman Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar. How say ye is he guilty c. Foreman Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner at the Bar is guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set all that have been tryed this day to the Bar. Lord Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot I must speak a word to you you made mention of the Kings Proclamation for pardon and you did desire the benefit of it As I told you before so now again That it was not proper for us upon that Proclamation to give any allowance by way of Plea because the Pardon ought to be under the Broad Seal but God forbid but just and due Consideration should be had of it with honour so far as you are comprehended within it Though Judgment shall pass no Warrant for Execution shall go out against you till consideration be had how far you are within the Compass of that Proclamation and the like to you Mr. Scroop Clerk Adrian Scroop Hold up thy hand Thou hast been Indicted of High Treason and hast thereof been found guilty What canst thou say for thy self why Judgement should not pass for thee to dye according to Law Scroop I do humbly submit to his Majesties mercy Cl. John Carew Hold up thy hand Thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Carew I commit my cause unto the Lord. Cl. Thomas Scot Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Scot. I shall only say I do only cast my self upon his Majesty and pray mercy Cl. John Jones Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what hast thou to say c. Jones I pray his Majesties Clemency Cl. Gregory Clement hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason and thereunto hast pleaded guilty What canst thou say c. Clem. I pray mercy from the King Lo. Ch. Bar. You that are Prisoners at the Bar Ye see the Sentence of death is now to pass against you and for ought you know or we know yet may be nearer than you are aware How soon it will be executed we know not when you have reflected upon your own consciences many of you could not chuse but look there and see as in a glass the foulness of this horrid Offence It is the Murther of our most gracious Soveraign King Charles the First of blessed memory a Prince whom we such of us as had the honour personally to attend him knew was of such parts and vertues if he had been a private man more could not have been desired truly what he did as a King his Clemency how it appeared at first in this Princes time If you look what Peace and Prosperity we enjoyned in his days we will not find it in other Kings times You had not a Noble-man put to death save one and that for an Offence which must not be named A Prince that had granted so much You may remember what was granted before the beginning of these Wars Grievances complained of Star-Chamber High Commission Court Ship money The Claim of Stannery c. All these were taken away What Concessions he made after in the Isle of Wight how much he wooed and courted the people for Peace I urge this unto
might be taken pro confesso Court By whom Nutly By the Prisoner at the Bar if so be that he would not answer This my Lord is the substance of what I have to say against him Council Mr. Nutly pray what discourse have you had at any time with the Prisoner at the Bar concerning this impeachment Nutly Truly my Lord I knew the Gentleman well I was well acquainted with him and for the satisfaction of my own conscience for I was very tender in the business and sorry he was ingaged in it I went to him and did desire him to desist I had discourse with him for I was then a young Student in the Temple and had a little knowledge in the Laws I desired him to consider the dangerous consequences of such a proceeding I may say I did it with tears in my eyes for I had a very good respect to the Gentleman for his profession sake being learned therein truly my Lord he did answer me thus I acknowlegde it is a very base business but they put it upon me I cannot avoid it you see they put it upon me I had some discourse with him concerning the oath of Allegiance truly he was satisfied that this oath was against the business in question I saw he was troubled at it Council Can ye speak of the manner of calling for Judgement against the King Nutly That I have already answered to it was several times done the King was brought several times to the Bar and at every time he was brought he was pressed to answer whether Guilty or Not guilty Court By whom Nutly By the Sollicitor then the Prisoner now at the Bar. My Lord I remember his Majesty was pleased when he saw he could not be heard to the discourse that he did intend to make of the whole business saith the King if you will needs press me to an answer I must demur to your Jurisdiction my Lord the answer that was given to that was this Mr. Bradshaw there then President did say Sir saith he if you demur to the Jurisdiction of this Court I must let you know that the Court doth over-rule your demurrer this was said my Lord and Judgement was pressed very often Court By whom Nutly By the prisoner at the Bar. Cook My Lord may I ask him a question Court Yes Cook The first question is whether the Parchment was delivered by me unto the Court or brought into the Court by Mr. Broughton the Clerk Mr. Nutly I do encline to believe my Lord That it was brought into the Court and delivered by some hand or other to the Prisoner at the Bar I do beleive it was for I do remember it was written by one Price I was told that was his name that may be true I believe it was brought into the Court and delivered to the Prisoner now at the Bar. Council But did he exhibit it Nutly Yes my Lords Cook Did you see me set my hand to that Parchment N. No my Lords but I believe it to be his hand Cook Another Question whether Mr. Nutly did hear me say concerning the opinions of those Gentlemen what they intended to do in that business Nut. My Lords I do remember that I had often conference with the Gentleman at the Bar. I desired him to desist from the business considering the dangerous consequences of it truly my Lord I do well remember that he did say he did hope they did not intend to take away the Kings life said I if they go about any such thing do you use your utmost endeavour to preserve his life saith he I did labour to that purpose but they tell me they only intend to bring him to submit to the Parliament Cook It is said that I demanded Judgement of his life Mr. Nutly I demand of you whether I used the words of Judgement against his life but only I demanded their Judgement Nut. My Lords for that I cannot remember possibly to a syllable but Judgement was demanded Court By whom N. By this person Cook I said the judgment of the Court not against him I meant judgement for his acquital Court Did you ever hear him desire the Court that the Charge might be taken pro confesso N. That I have said my Lord it was urged by the Prisoner at the Bar against his Majesty That if he would not plead to the Charge that then the matter charged in it might be taken pro confesso But my Lord if you please to give me leave to add this one word more my Lord I did hear him say at that time he shewed me a paper that contained an order of the Court that did direct the very words that he should use when he came to deliver the Charge whether those words were in the order I do not know Cook Whether was I not directed by those Gentlemen the very words I should speak Court We are satisfied in that he saith by an order that you shewed him you were so directed If you have any thing more ask it him Mr. Farrington sworn Mr. Sol. Gen. Pray tell my Lords and the Jury what was the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at Westminster at the place they called the High Court of Justice Farringt My Lord I was present about the 20th of Jan. 1648. at that which they called the High Court of Justice and Mr. Bradshaw sat then as President so much as I remember concerning the Prisoner at the Bar I shall acquaint your Lorship This Gentleman at the Bar after the reading of the Commission and directions by the President to bring his Majesty the prisoner they called him to the Bar the King being brought after silence made and some speeches made by the President this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar having then a Parchment in his hand the substance of it was for levying War against the Kingdom he prayed that it might be read and accepted as a Charge in behalf of the good people of England It was accordingly read and afterwards being demanded to answer after his Majesty having given several reasons as to the Jurisdiction of the Court four days every day the Prisoner at the Bar demanded the judgement of the Court. And if his Majesty would not answer to the charge it might be taken pro confesso Coun. Do you know his hand if you see it Farring I have not seen his hand a long time Then the Impeachment was shewn to the witness Far. Truly Sir this is like his hand Coun. Do you believe it Far. It is very like it I do not know positively Coun. Did you hear the words pro confesso Far. Yes my Lord several times after the first day Coun. Did he interrupt the King in his discourse as to say these words that the Charge might be taken pro confesso Far. I do remember one day there was some interruption between the King and him the King laying his Cane upon his shoulder desiring him to forbear Cock You cannot say that
I interrupted his Majesty Far. I remember that the King laid his Cane upon your shoulders Cook Whether did I the first or the last day demand judgement or that any thing might be taken pro confesso Far. The first day no but after the first day he did several days you did the last day Griffith Bodurdo Esq sworn Coun. Sir you have heard the question give an accompt to my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury of the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar towards his Majesty during the time of the Tryal Mr. Bod. My Lord I was all the time that the King was brought there before the Court as a Prisoner I was present all the day having a conveniency out of my house into a Gallery that was some part of it over that Court I do remember that the Prisoner at the Bar whom I never saw before that time did exhibit a charge the first day against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King in these very terms The Prisoner at the Bar the charge I heard it read then I have not seen it since the substance was this That for levying war against the Parliament and people of England and namely at such and such a place killing of the people of England I think Naseby and Keinton field was named in it and divers other places were named in the Charge and the Conclusion was that he had done those things as a Tyrant Traitor Murtherer and a publick and implacable enemy of the Commonwealth But this Prisoner at the Bar did exhibit the Charge and the King did then as you have heard he did plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court The King would fain have been heard but I think they did adjourn for that time The next day he pleaded the same thing I remember the answer that was several times given twice given by Bradshaw to the King thus that the Court did assert their own Jurisdiction The second and third day I do not remember any day after the first but that the prisoner at the Bar did demand judgement for the Kings not pleading and did several times make complaints to the Court of the Kings delays that he intended delays and nothing else Cook Pray my Lord one Question whether my Lord before he heard me speak of demanding judgement against the King whether he did not hear Mr. Bradshaw several times say that the Court owned their Authority and that the matter would be taken pro confesso Mr. Bodurdo I did hear the Prisoner at the Bar desire of the Court that it might be so and I heard the Prisoner tell the King that it must be so Joseph Herne sworn Coun. Mr. Herne tell my Lords what you know of the prisoners carriage at the High Court of Justice as they called it Mr. Herne Upon Saturday the 20th of Jan. 1648. it was the first day His Majesty was convened before them I could not come near the Court only I saw him at a distance I heard nothing but the acclamations of the people crying out God save your Majesty what was done in the Court I know nothing of On Munday I was there and had a conveniency to see and hear what was acted and so His Majesty being come to the Seat appointed for him the prisoner at the Bar being called upon by the then President Bra. he demanded of him what he had to ask of the Court He was then talking with Dorislaus and semeed not to mind the business of the Court His Majesty sitting near takes his stick and thrusts the Prisoner at the Bar upon his shoulder and the Prisoner looking back with a great deal of indignation turned about I did hear Bradshaw speaking to him in these words Mr. Sol. have you any thing to demand of the Court whereupon the prisoner at the Bar did use these or the like words May it please your Lordships I have formerly in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England exhibited a Charge of High Treason and other high crimes against Charles Stuart the prisoner at the Bar flinging his head back in this manner to him He had there further to require of the Court that he might be demanded to make positive answer by confession or denial if not that the Court would take it pro confesso and proceed according to Justice this was on the first day I was in the Court The President Bradshaw told His Majesty that he heard what was craved in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England against him by the now Prisoner at the Bar. The King stood up but Bradshaw prevented him in what he had to say telling of him that the Court had given him time to that day to know when he would plead to the Charge His Majesty proceeded to object against the Jurisdiction and said he did demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court upon which the President answered him If you demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court you must know that the Court hath over-ruled your demurrer and you must plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty upon that the King asked their authority and desired he might give reasons against it he was denyed it by the President the President at last was content to tell him that though he was not satisfied with their authority they were and he must but to satisfie him he told him in short they sat there by the supream authority of the Nation the Commons assembled in Parliament by whom his Anceston ever were and to whom he was accomptable then the King stood up by your favour shew me one President Bradshaw 〈◊〉 down in an angry manner Sir saith he we sit not here to answer your Questions plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty Clerk do your duty whereupon Broughton stood up and asked what he had to say whether guilty or not guilty and President Bradshaw said that if he would not plead they must record his contempt His Majesty turned about to the people and said then remember that the King of England suffers being not permitted to give his reasons for the liberty of the people with that a great shout came from the people crying God save the King but there was an awe upon them that they could not express themselves as they would have done I believe Coun. What did Cook say to the Judgement did you hear him press for Judgement Mr. H. Yes I heard these words from the Prisoner at the Bar That if the K. would not plead his Charge might be taken 〈◊〉 Conf. and that the Court might proceed according to Justice Cook One question more whether he often heard me speak those words that it might be taken pro Confesso and to proceed according to Justice Mr. Hern. You desired he might be held to his Plea confession or denial that he might not be suffered to use any words to the Jurisdiction of the Court. Cook Whether he
the Bar concerning the Trial of his late Majesty Mr. Starkey My Lords this Gentleman now Prisoner and my self have been acquainted a great while being of the same Society of Grayes-Inne and truly my Lord I confess I owe all my knowledge in the Laws to that Gentleman when 〈◊〉 came first he was accused for debt and was pleased to do me and several other Gentlemen now and then the favour to reason the Law with us and assist us in the beginning of the long Parliament that is to give you an accompt of his being indebted he did desire I would do my endeavour to get his Protection Near the time of the Kings Trial there was a Gentleman with my self one Samuel Palmer of Grays-Inne which frequented his Company had several nights the opportunity of understanding the affairs at Westmin and truly he himself did seem to us to count that a very ridiculous Council I remember what he said one night I think they are all mad which was within two or three days before the Kings tryal and instanced how a Fellow cryed out to the Lord Fairfax that if he did not consent to the proceedings he would kill Christ and him After that I did not think he did go to this Council for imployment but out of curiosity when the King came to Tryal we heard that Mr. Cook was the person that was Solicitor and Acted that part that you have heard of and that during that Tryal whether the second or third day I cannot say that certainly Mr. Cook came to Grays-Inne that evening about Ten or Eleven of the clock at might only upon some particular occasion as he said I being walking in the Court in the walk before my Chamber with another Gentleman I did see him pass out of a house to go back again I thought it was he called after him Mr. Cook said I upon that he turned back and met me I took him by the hand said I I hear you are up to the ears in this business no saith he I am serving the people truly said I I believe there is a thousand to one will not give you thanks said I I hear you charge the King for the levying war against the Parliament how can you rationally do this when you have pulled out the Parliament to make way to his Trial he answered me you will see strange things and you must wait upon God I did ask him but first he said this of himself said he he was as gracious and wise a Prince as any was in the world which made me reflect upon him again and asked how he could press those things as I have heard what answer he made to that I cannot tell I did by the way inquire what he thought concerning the King whether he must suffer or no he told me he must die and Monarchy must die with him Cook Whether was this after or before the Sentence Mr. Starkey It was before the Sentence for it was either the second or third Trial or rather in some interim of time before the Sentence for there was an adjournment for a day or two but I am sure it was before the Sentence Court Mr. Cook they have concluded their Evidence plead for your self what you think fitting Cook My Lord I have been a Prisoner three months I humbly desire to acknowledge his Majesties and his Councils favour that I was not put into a Jeremy's Prison but in the Tower and not in Irons I give your Lordships humble thanks for that and truly considering the nature of the Charge had it been in some other Kingdom they would have served us as Iohn Baptist in prison I thank you that I have a fair Trial with the Judges of the Law who are upon their Oaths to do equal right and justice between our Soveraign Lord the King and every Prisoner concerning matters of life and death and likewise those Noble Lords that though they are not put upon their Oaths but upon their honour if they know any Law to preserve my life I trust they will rather save than destroy My Lords I do therefore say as Paul said my plea is much of that nature against the Law and against Caesar I hope I have not offended at all and so I have pleaded not guilty The learned Council have examined several witnesses against me and I humbly conceive that the matter will rest in a very narrow compass the substance of the Charge so far as my memory will serve doth rest in these three things the other being but matter of form That I with others should propound consult contrive and imagine the Death of the late King Secondly That to the perfecting and bringing about this wicked and horrid conspiracy that I with others did assume a Power and Authority as I remember power I am sure then to kill and murther the King thirdly That there was a person unknown that did cut off the Kings head and that we were abetting aiding assisting countenancing and procuring the person or words to that effect against the form of the Statutes and so forth I hâ—ve twelve poor words to offer for my self in this business wherein if I do not answer every thing that hath been particularly objected I hope you will give me leave afterwards to offer it First I humbly propound this that if it was not made appear to your Lordships that I did ever propound consult advise contrive attempt or any way plot or counsel the death of His Majestie then I hope I cannot be found guilty within the Statute of 25. Edward the third for the naked truth Mr. Nutly hath in a great part spoke to I was appointed upon the tenth of January 1648. for to give my advice concerning a Charge there having been upon the ninth a Proclamation for the Trial and upon the tenth Mr. Steel Dr. Dorislaus and Mr. Ask and my self were appointed and ordered to be of Council to draw up a Charge Here I have the order attested by Mr. Jessop and pray it may be read Court They do admit the thing that you were so assigned Cook Then I humbly conceive that that cannot be said to be done maliciously or advisedly or with any wicked intention in me which I was required and commanded to do Acting only within my Sphere and Element as a Counsellour no otherwise The next thing is this my L. that by Law words will not amount unto Treason we usually say that words may declare an Heretick but not a Traytor there were some Statutes formerly 1 Ed. 6. were words are made Treason but they are all repealed by 1 Mariae that nothing shall be Treason but what is expressed in 25 Ed. 3. this Objection will seem to lye that these were words put in writing and that I humbly conceive to be the greatest matter objected to which I answer 1. Whether there be any full certain clear proof that that is my hand to the Charge I must leave to you two or three
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
equitie of the Act. They had not all the Authority at that time they were a few of the people that did it they had some part of the Army with them the Lords were not dissolved then when they had adjourned some time they did sit afterwards so that all the particulars you alledge are against you The last thing was this you say that it having pleased God to restore the King Judgement should be given for example for terrour to others that this could not be drawn into example again why because by the blessing of God peace was restored no probability that if your life was spared that it would be drawn again into example this is the weakest thing you have urged you must know the reason there are two things there is the punishment and example punishment goes to the prisoner but example to the documents of all others God knows what such things may be in after ages if there should be impunity for them it would rather make men impudent and confident afterwards if you have any more to say I will hear you if not I must conclude to the Jury You hear the evidence is clear for compassing and imagining the Death of the King you have heard what he has said and what he hath done he has within and examined Witnesses against the King that he was by at the drawing of the charge where it was drawn you hear he exhibited this charge in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England and what this charge is it is high Treason and other high misdemeanors you find that he does complain of delays dosagain and again speak of this Charge desire it may be taken pro confesso in the close of all it was not so much he as innocent blood that demanded Justice this was more than was dictated to him You have heard the Witnesses he was perswaded to forbear acknowledged the King to be a gracious and wise King The Oaths alledged against him and you have heard his excuse I have nothing to say more I shall be very willing to hear you further I have not absolutely directed the Jury Cook I do humbly acknowledge your patience in hearing me and that your Lordships have truly and justly stated both proofs and my answer If your Lordships are pleased to lay aside these Acts or Orders or Authority whereby I did at that time truly conscientiously act and did think that it would bear me out if you lay aside that and look upon it as so many men got together without authority and aswell those that were instrumental though not sentencers or signers and that clause in the Act I confess I humbly make bold to say I have not received satisfaction in my judgment those very words of not so much I as the innocent blood cries for justice were dictated to me there was nothing at all left to me because his Majesty did not plead there was no Tryal that which I did was according to the best though it may be according to the weakest part of my judgment I have no new matter L. Ch. Bar. You have said no new matter unless it be worse than before for now you warrant that Authority Cook Do not mistake me my Lord I mean so far as to excuse me in the point of High Treason L. C. B. We delivered our opinions as to that formerly we were of opinion that the acting by colour of that pretended authority was so far from any extenuation that it was an aggravation of the thing the meeting by that authoty was Treason and in them that acted under them and approving of it the making of that trayterous pretended Act making the Proclamation sitting upon it they were all so many Treasons That was the reason why that was urged against you assuming upon you the power that was you approving of their power by acting under them so that there is nothing more to be said Gentlemen of the Jury you have heard the indictment was for compassing and imagining the death of the King you have heard the several Overt acts repeated and whether these are guilty of Treason to deliver in a charge against the K. such a one as that was in these words as against a Traytor Tyrant Murderer and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth in these very words to desire Judgement against the Prisoner then the King at the Bar angry at delayes to desire that the Charge might be taken pro confesso to have it expresly again again to demand Judgement if these be not Overt acts of compassing and imagining the Death of the King that which hath been said by the Witnesses it must be left to you I think you need not go from the Bar. Jury went together Silence is commanded Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall speak for you Jury The Fore-man Clerk John Cook hold up thy hand look upon the Prisoner at the Bar how say you is he guilty of the Treason in manner form as he stands indicted or not guilty Fore-man Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper Clerk What Goods and Chattells Jury None that we know of The Tryal of Hugh Peters the same 13. of October and at the same Bar. Clerk of the Crown SET Hugh Peters to the Bar he was brought accordingly H. P. Hold up thy hand thou standest indicted c. If you will challenge any of the Jury you must challenge them when they come to the book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Peters You may challenge to the number of 35 peremptiorily but beyond that you cannot without good cause shewn and you may have Pen Ink and Paper Peters My Lord I shall challenge none Jury sworn 12. Sir Jer. Whitch James Hally Christo Abdy Nich. Rainton Rich. Cheyney Jo. Smith Rich. Abell George Terry Charl. Pickern Jo. Nichol. Fran. Dorrington Anthony Hall Cler. Hugh Peters hold up thy hand Look on the Prisoner you that are sworn c. Sir Ed. Turner to the Jury You have often heard repeated to you that the substantial part of the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King and all the rest will be but evidence to prove that imagination against the Prisoner at the Bar whom we will prove to be a principal actor in this sad Tragedy and next to him whom God hath taken away and reserved to his own Judgment and we shall endeavour to prove That he was a chief Conspirator with Cromwell at serveral times and in several places and that it was designed by them We shall prove that he was the principal person to procure the Souldiery to cry out Justice Justice or assist or desire those for the taking away the life of the King He did make use of his profession wherein he should have been the Minister of peace to make himself a Trumpeter of war of Treason and Sedition in the Kingdom He preached many Sermons to the Souldiery in direct
terms for taking away the King comparing the K. to Barabbas He was instrumental when the Proclamation for the High Court of Justice as they called it was proclaimed directing where it should be proclaimed and in what place When the King was brought upon the stage that mock-work he was the person that stirred up the Souldiery below to cry for Justice we shall shew you as he preached at several times upon several occasions still he was in the Pulpit to promote this business the next day after he was brought to tryal he commends it you shall hear all out of the mouth of the Prisoner therefore I say no more call the witnesses Dr. William Young sworn Council Tell my Lords and Jury what the Prisoner at the Bar has declared to you concerning the contrivance of bringing the King to Tryal Dr. Young My L. and Gentlemen of the Jury It was near about and that the Prisoner may remember the moneth of July 1648. since we came first acquainted when he went over to Ireland it was about the Siege of Pembroke Castle but afterwards in the year 1649. we renewed our acquaintance he went over into Ireland with that Usurper the late Protector as he was called after the Town of Wexford was taken coming over he fell sick of the flux and said he received it by infection praying over Captain Horton Coming into Milford that Captain sends a summons to me to come on board that was to fetch this prisoner at the Bar who was sick I found him there groveling upon the deck and sick he was indeed with much difficulty we got him on shore within a very few dayes to the best of my remembrance five days I perfected his cure We became very familiar I observed in him that he had some secret thoughts that I could not well discover neither well understand whereupon I thought it might tend to my security that I should so much sympathize with him to get within him to know his intentions After some weeks for he continued with me ten weeks or near thereabouts some few days rather over than under we grew so familiar that at last I found he began to inlarge his heart to me Many times I should hear him rail most insufferably against the Blood Royal not only against our Martyred King but against his Royal off-spring still as we continued our acquaintance he became more and more open to me so we would sit up discoursing till about twelve or one of the clock at night very often about these unhappy wars late in England At last my Lord I found him that he began to tell me how he came into England and upon what account he came out of New England I shall desire that in regard his discourses were various that I may deliver them orderly they were delivered to me within the compass of ten weeks but the days and weeks I cannot remember First he told me discoursing of New England and the Clergy there and much of the Clergy here in England and of the business here of reformation he told me that for the driving on of this interest of this Reformation he was imployed out of New England for the stirring up of this war and driving of it on this I shall my Lord speak to in the first place and that upon the oath I have taken and secondly he was pleased at another time to acquaint me and that by way of complement complaining then against the Parliament saying that sometime after he was come into Engl. he was sent over into Ireland by the Parliament to receive further instructions to drive on the design to extirpate Monarchy saith he I did dispend a great deal of my own money yet never had that satisfaction from them which they promised me that was they promised me 2 or 3000 l. for my journey and yet they have given me no more but only a small pittance of land out of my Lord of Worcesters estate in Worcester-shire I have seen his letters directed to his kinsman here in London as I take it his name was Parker advising him for the settling of this land and selling it Thirdly my Lord I have observed that by way of vilification of the Monarchical Government I have found him jocundarily scoffing at it and would ordinarily quibble in this manner saying this Common-wealth will never be at peace till 150. be put down I asked him what this 150. was he told me three L's and afterwards interpreted the meaning to be the Lords the Levites and the Lawyers with that said I we shall be like Switzers Tinkers and Traytors Now my Lord we are come to the last particular we discoursing thus frequently and withal he was then a Colonel and had a Commission under that Usurper Oliver and brought over his Commission for raising of Souldiers to foment that War in Ireland that it was so I appeal to the dictates of his own Conscience and whether he did not press me very importunately to accept of a Commission of Major or a Captain he did issue forth two Commissions under his own hand one of them to bring over from Devon-shire two foot Companies unto Cork My Lord because we were militarily affected amongst the discourses of our unhappy wars I know not how it came from him it being near eleven years since and I have had many sufferings incumbent on me so that I may fail in some particulars but in general thus it was we were discoursing concerning our Martyr'd King as then we call'd him and of his Imprisonment in Holmeby-House which I wondered at thus we discourst he told me the story how they had used him at Holmeby and at last came up to this when he was taken away from Holmeby House the Parliament had then a design to have secured O. Cromwel and my self being then in London saith he we having intelligence of it escaped out of London and rode hard for it and as we rode to Ware we made a halt and advised how we should settle this Kingdome in peace and dispose of the King the result was this They should bring him to justice Try him for his life and cut off his Head whether this was the expression of Cromwel I cannot tell but to the utmost of my remembrance and I am mistaken if it was not the advice of Mr. Peters to Cromwel and I believe it because his former relations of his instructions out of Ireland did tend to that effect Mr. Soll. Gen. I will ask you this question we will not press you particularly upon your memory whether Cromwel or Peters said the words do you remember he confessed to you they were agreed upon that matter Young They did consult and agree upon it Peters My Lord I desire to speak a Word his voice being so low he was brought to the second Bar. I am the bolder to speak to your Lordships at this time a word and it is high time to satisfie my conscience if these things were true
it is very sad but if you will go you may I did go over the Park Coun. What time Glover About noon Coun. What hour Glover I do not know I did not stay there the soldiers and the people fill'd the place and I went back again to the chamber I came back again within a matter of an hours time Coun. Was the King dead before you came back again Glover They said he was not when I went home he asked me what was doing I told him there was a great croud I could not come near I staid there an hour and then went out again and still there was a croud and I came back again and M. Peters was in his chamber then Coun. Was he in bed or up Glover I do not remember Coun. How old were you then Glover I am not above 32. or 33. Coun. Was Mr. Peters sick Gl. Yes He was melancholy sick as he used to be L. Ch. Bar. How long have you been at the Post-office Gl. About five years L. Ch. Bar. M. Peters have you any more to ask him Peters I brought him to testifie that I was not out of my Chamber that day and that I was sick L. Ch. Bar. Did you desire to go or did he send you Gl. I did desire to go being newly come to London Lord Ch. Baron This Gentleman though not upon oath is examined and it is only to one particular nothing at all to the main proofs Peters I bring him only to vindicate my self from that aspersion of my being upon the Scaffold L. Ch. Bar. They do not lay the weight of their evidence upon that The Kings Councel have done with their evidence if you have any thing to say you have your liberty Peters May it please your Lordships I will give you an account of the business I lived fourteen years out of England when I came over I found the wars begun I began no war my Lord nor have been the Trumpeter when I came out of the West Indies I fled from the War into Ireland to the Western part there and it was after the Rebellion when some of the Irish had been stirring there I went and spent my time there I was neither at Edge-hill nor Naseby but my Lord after I came over there was War that the people were engaged in I was not here in the beginning of it but was a stranger to the carriage of it When I came into the Nations I looked after three things one was that there might be sound Religion The second was that learning and Laws might be maintained The third that the poor might be cared for and I must confess I have spent most of my time in these things to this end and purpose there was a noise in all parts of some miscarriages in matters of Religion after it was setled I lived in Ireland I must profess for my own part solemnly that my carriage hath been upon these heads For Religion I have through Gods mercies spoke the truths of the Protestant Church upon this account I did stay to see what God might do I was sent over to his Majesty that we might have a little help in point of Excise and Customes and encouragement in learning My Lord this is true that I being here in the Nation and being sent over upon the occasions of the Countrey and not upon any design but this I say I cannot deny it that after I came over and had seen the state of England in some measure I did stir but by strong importunities the Ministers of London deeper than I I am very sorry to hear of my carriage towards the King it is my great trouble I beg pardon for my own folly and weakness I thought God had a great controversie with the Nation and the Lord was displeased on all hands that which some people took to I did take unto I went into the Army I saw at the beginning of it that corruptions grew among them I suppose none can say I have gone aside from any Orthodox truth of the Lord And now to take off the scandal upon me and to the business let me beg of your Lordships to consider whatever prejudices or revenge may take up mens hearts there is a God that knows all God hath a regard to the people of England I look upon this Nation as the Cabinet of the world That that doth concern the business is this my Lord that after this time hither I came and did bear witness to all the world that there was amongst us something that was for better and some thing worse for the Nation I took advice of some great persons concerning the weightiness of it I had neither malice nor mischief in my heart against the King upon this I did engage so far as being invited I went into the Wars and there I found very strange and several kinds of providences as this day hath been seen I do not deny but that was active but not to stir in a way that was not honourable I challenge a great part of the Nations to manifest my carriage among them I shall make it good divers ways I had so much respect to his Majesty particularly at Windsor that I propounded to his Majesty my thoughts three ways to preserve himself from danger which were good as he was pleased to think though they did not succeed and the work died as for malice I had none in me It is true there was a difference amongst us an Army and an Army I never had a groat or penny from O. Cromwel since I knew this place I profess I have had no ends for honour or gain since I set foot upon this shore I challenge any man that belonged to that party whether they had not the same respect from me as my own party I have not persecuted any with malice I will only take off malice L. C. B. Your business is matter of fact Peters I am unskilful in Law this that I offer is to shew that I had no malice in me I was so far from malice that I have a Certificate if worth the reading from one of the Eminentest persons in the Nation to shew I had no malice It is concerning the Marques of Worcester under his Ladies hand beginning with these words I do here testifie that in all the sufferings of my husband Mr. Peters was my great friend c. I have here a seal and then produced it that the Earl of Norwich gave me to keep for his sake for saving his life which I will keep as long as I live L. C. Bar. I am not willing at all to interrupt you or hinder you that which you speak of doing good services is not at all to the point we do not question you for what good you have done but for the evil you have done I hope there is no malice in your heart nor upon the Court nor Jury we and they are upon our Oaths you hear the matter alledged against you pray
come to the matter Peters My Lord I cannot remember them Lord Ch. Baron Then I will remember you you are charged by this Indictment for compassing and imagining the death of the King and there is set forth sundry particulars to prove the overt act that you with other persons named in that Indictment did consult and meet together how to bring about the Kings death Then you are charged with several Acts of contriving and endeavouring the Kings death Overt acts that tend to the compassing or imagining the Kings death or any one of these to encourage the bringing on the King to his death the consulting or meeting together about it though you did not sit or sentence yet if you did any thing tending to that incouragement or otherwise abet it comfort or any wise ayd those trayterous persons that did it in the doing of it you are by law guilty of the whole fact the proposing and determining the King shall die though you were not he that actually put him to death yet notwithstanding if you did the other you are guilty of all if you shall speak any seditious speeches be they in the Pulpit or out of the Pulpit if you shall utter any thing that tends to sedition these are open acts which prove the imagination of the heart though imagination of the heart be Treason yet it cannot be proved but by open acts yet the imagination it self is Treason first you did conspire all the witnesses go along to prove this Dr. Young saith you came over from Ireland to his house and after five days that you were recovered of the Flux you staid there ten weeks you said your self there was enough if it were true to condemn you or any man I shall repeat it to you you told him a narrative that you came from New England from thence to Ireland and then you came to Holland with an intent to see how you might bring on the Kingdom to be a Commonwealth next he saith you spake very often against the King by way of disgrace against him and his family against the King and his off-spring this you said very often then you spake in vilification of Monarchical Government that this Commonwealth would never be at peace till 150. or three L's Lords Levites and Lawyers were taken away at which he replyed then they must be all Switzers Tinkers or Traytors he swears you were a Colonel and had a Commission that you would have had him accept of a Commission and that you had two Companies come from the West you told him the Parliament had an intent to secure Cromwel and your self but that you rid hard for it and then you confessed you agreed then upon his death to bring him to tryal and to cut off his head you did agree together and he believes it was your advice to Cromwel your answer was this that he was more violent than your self that he took upon him to be a spie and that he was no competent witness because he was under a temptation because you did not help him to his living and so conceived it to be malice you say he was used to take up such courses in his own Country the matter is not whether you had malice to the Kings life or Monarchy For the next one Gunter he swears that he was a Servant to Mr. Hildesly at the Star in Coleman-street and this was in 1648. he saith that many of the party of Cromwel did use to resort thither among the rest he saw you he said he came in to them and their discourse was about Charles Stewart and the Prisoner and did guess it was about the King that you were privy to it then he saih this was three daies before O. Cromwel went out of Town the effect of that is urged no further than this that you were so far of the Cabal that you were present with those persons Cromwel Ireton Rich and others you said I was there once with Mr. Nathaniel Fines Starkey he saith that at his Fathers house Ireton lay and was quartered there at Windsor before and when the King was Prisoner that you had your quarter there and Cromwel too in that Town The general meeting of the Councel of War was at his Fathers house there Ireton and his Wife lying there you came and resorted thither very often he saith then that it appeared that after the Councel of War had done many times Rich and you and Cromwel and Ireton were there together sometimes till two a clock in the morning he saith then that he did observe there was a fifth person he did not remember his name you sate up usually till two or three in the morning you had guards about you he saith further that Ireton being a Domestick he often discoursed with him and you came sometimes to be there too that there being some discourse concerning the King many times he did assert the Law concerning him that he was solutus legibus as to his person that you should say that it was an unequal law and that you did then discourse fully against the K. Government you said he was a Tyrant and not fit for that office that the office was useless chargeable and dangerous these very words he observed which afterwards were printed when they took away Monarchy He saith further that was their full and whole discourse he saith that his Father at Supper used to say that usual Grace God save the King Prince and Realm but afterwards that he heard the King was made a Prisoner that his Father altering the Grace he said God save his most Excellent Majesty and deliver him out of all his Enemies hands you rose up and said old Gentleman your Idol will not stand long That he did observe you often with them he saith further when Bacon was coming out and speaking some words concerning your frequent affronting the King you took up a staff and were ready to beat him and made an uproar it appears also of your being privy to Cromwels actions the next witness is Walkeley and he swears this against you that he was in the Painted Chamber the next day after the Proclamation was made and there he saw John Goodwin and You and there was an assembly and at the middle of the Table John Goodwin was and made a long speech or prayer that Cromwel would have had the people stay there but it was ordered they should be turned out at the end he saw you come out with the rest there it appeared you were in the consultation he saith he met the Army at St. James's and there when they were half past he saw the King in his Coach and there he saw Mr. Peters like Bishop Almoner riding immediately before the King and at St. James's Park he saw you marshalling the Souldiers that he was forced thereupon to go about he saith further that within a year or two after the Army was raised he heard you say these words If we can
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended
says he did it not Traiterously I humbly conceive he means it was Justifiable Sir P. Temple At another time I was in Town on a Friday and wanting Horses I went to Smithfield where I saw the Horses of State of his late Majesty to be sold in the Common Market at which I called to the Rider said I What makes these Horses here says he I am to sell them Why said I there 's the King's Brand upon them C. R. and he shew'd them me said I Will you sell these Horses What price he asked me three or fourscore pound a piece said I Who warrants the sale of these Horses says he Mr. Marten and Sir Wil. Brereton Afterwards I heard the Horses were taken into the Mews by the Prisoner at the Bar and Sir Wil. Brereton Counsel Was this before the Trial Sir P. Temple It was in 1642 or 1643. Counsel That 's nothing to this Business Marten My Lord the Commission went in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the Good People of England and what a matter is it for one of the Commissioners to say Let it be acted by the Good People of England Mr. Sol. Gen. You know all good People did abhor it I am sorry to see so little repentance Marten My Lord I hope that which is urged by the Learned Counsel will not have that impression upon the Court and Jury that it seems to have That I am so obstinate in a thing so apparently ill My Lord if it were possible for that Blood to be in the Body again and every drop that was shed in the late Wars I could wish it with all my heart But my Lord I hope it is lawful to offer in my own defence that which when I did it I thought I might do My Lord there was the House of Commons as I understood it perhaps your Lordships think it was not a House of Commons but then it was the Supream Authority of England it was so reputed both at home and abroad My Lord I suppose he that gives obedience to the Authority in being de facto whether de jure or no I think he is of a peaceable disposition and far from a Traitor My Lord I think there was a Statute made in Henry the Seventh's time whereby it was provided That whosoever was in Arms for the King de facto he should be indempnified though that King de facto was not so de jure And if the Supream Officers de facto can justifie a War the most pernicious Remedy that was ever adjudged by Mankind be the Cause what it will I presume the Supream Authority of England may justifie a Judicature though it be but an Authority de facto My Lord if it be said that it is but a third estate and a small parcel of that my Lord it was all that was extant I have heard Lawyers say That if there be Commons appurtenant to a Tenement and that Tenement be all burnt down except a small Stick the Commons belong to that one small piece as it did to the Tenement when all standing My Lord I shall humbly offer to consideration whether the King were the King indeed such a one whose Peace Crowns and Dignities were concerned in Publick Matters My Lord he was not in execution of his Offices he was a Prisoner My Lord I will not defer you long neither would I be offensive I had then and I have now a peaceable inclination a resolution to submit to the Government that God hath set over me I think his Majesty that now is is King upon the best Title under Heaven for he was called in by the Representative Body of England I shall during my life long or short pay obedience to him Besides my Lord I do owe my life to him if I am acquitted for this I do confess I did adhere to the Parliaments Army heartily my life is at his mercy if his Grace be pleased to grant it I have a double obligation to him Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar hath entred into a Discourse that I am afraid he must have an answer in Parliament for it He hath owned the King but thinks his best title is the acknowledgment of the People and he that hath that let him be who he will hath the best Title we have done with our Evidence Marten I have one word more my Lord I humbly desire that the Jury would take notice That though I am accused in the Name of the King that if I be acquitted the King is not Cast It doth not concern the King that the Prisoner be Condemned it concerns him that the Prisoner be Tried it is as much to his Interest Crown and Dignity that the Innocent be acquitted as that the Nocent be condemned Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this puts us now upon the reputation of our Evidence and you may see how necessary it is to distinguish between Confidence and Innocence for this very Person that desires you to have a care how you condemn the Innocent he doth seem to intimate to you that he is an innocent Person at the Bar and yet confesses he did sit upon the King did Sentence him to Death that he signed the Warrant for the Execution and yet here stands that Person that desires you to have a care of condemning Innocence What is this at the bottom of it but that my Fact is such as I dare not call it Innocence but would have you to believe it such Gentlemen of the Jury was it your intention the King should be so tried as this Prisoner moved It will concern you to declare That the People of England do abhor his Facts and Principles every Fact the Prisoner hath confessed himself the sitting in that Court which was Treason his Sentencing was Treason signing the Warrant for Execution was the highest of Treasons Gentlemen all that he hath to say for himself is there was an Authority of his own making whereby he becomes innocent But we hope out of his own Mouth you will find him guilty Gilbert Millington I desire you to hear me I come not hither to dispute but to acknowledg I will not trouble you with long Discourses My Lord it is not fit for wise Men to hear them I am not able to express them I will not justifie my self I will acknowledg my self Guilty My Lord The reason why I said the last day Not Guilty was in respect of being upon the Scaffold and murthering the King and those things but I will wave all things if your Lordship will give me leave and will go unto the lowest strain that possible can be I will confess my self Guilty every way I was awed by the present Power then in being This I leave with you and lay my self at your feet and have no more at all to say but a few words in a Petition which I desire you will please to accept and so I conclude Counsel We do accept this
a sentence that he did conjure them to withdraw once again and to consider of it if it were but half an hour or saith he if that be too much for you I will withdraw My Lord here I can make my appeal to him that must judg me when you have done with me I had not a murderous nor a trayterous thought against him but Sir I confess such deep passions did fall upon me that truly my self I was not I remember the persons betwen whom I sate as it fell out were one Mr. Cawly and Col. Walton these two I sate betwixt these were the very words I speak to them Have we hearts of stone are we men they laboured to appease me they told me I would ruine both my self and them said I if I die for it I must do it Cromwel sate just the seat below me the hearing of me make some stir whispering he looked up to me and asked me if I were my self what I meant to do that I could not be quiet Sir said I No I cannot be quiet upon that I started up in the very nick when the President commanded the Clerk to read the Sentence I stepping up and as loud as I could speak spoke to this effect these words or to the like purpose My Lord said I I am not satisfied to give my consent to this Sentence but have Reasons to offer to you against it and I desire the Court may adjourn to hear me presently he stept up and looked at me Nay saith he if any one of the Court be unsatisfied the Court must adjourn Sir accordingly they did adjourn into the inner Court of Wards when they came there I was called upon by Cromwel to give an account why I had put this trouble and disturbance upon the Court I did speak Sir to this effect it is long ago the very words I think I cannot speak but to this effect I did speak My Lord I should have been exceeding glad if the Court had been pleased to condescend to this gracious Expression but it is not too late for me I desire not his Death but his Life and that the Nations may be setled in Peace The King now is pleased to offer That if he might but speak with his Parliament he would offer to them such things as should be satisfactory to us all So said I what would you have Your pretence of bringing him to these Proceedings was That after such a long and bloody War his Majesty would not condescend to such Concessions as might secure the Parliaments Party but now you hear him that he will give every one of us satisfaction I told them sadly told them I think I may truly say more sadly then than at this time that if they should go precipitantly on and give Judgment upon him before they had acquainted the Parliament with what the King was pleased to offer we should never be able answer it the rather my Lord and that I did press with all the little understanding that I had if they did but consider the last concluded Order that the Parliament made after the passing of the Act for Trial that which was so called I say there was this Order that shut up all That upon any Emergency that could not at that time be thought on in the House the Court should immediately acquaint the House with it My Lord I did infer as strongly as I could to them That if this were not Emergent I could not tell what was The King denied the Jurisdiction of the Court and yet with all vehemency desired to speak with his Parliament were not these Emergencies if not I knew not what were Emergences My Lords Besides this there was another thing I did press that I thought was of greater consequence than this as to the satisfaction of every Man 's particular Conscience that admitting if it might be admitted that the King was liable to his Subjects that they might call him to an account and might condemn him I beg your pardon that I take the boldness to make such admissions but if such a thing might be admitted certainly it did exceedingly become those Judges that were to give such a Sentence not against a common Person but against the greatest to be very well satisfied in Matter of Fact to a full Evidence before them that such and such things that were said were true I do acknowledg this that to the best of my apprehension I wish it had been so to others there was a great shortness in this I do humbly affirm this That not one Member of the Court did hear one Witness Viva Voce I did press That if the Court did give Judgment against the King without a fair Examination I said it was such a thing as no Judg at any Assizes would do against a common Person what I had was from Peters and from some private Whispers from one of them that is gone and hath received his Sentence and Doom Cromwel did answer with a great deal of storm He told the President that now he saw what great reason the Gentleman had to put such a trouble and disturbance upon them saith he Sure he doth not know that he hath to do with the hardest hearted Man that lives upon the Earth however it is not fit that the Court should be hindred from their Duty by one peevish Man he said the bottom was known that he would fain save his old Master and desired the Court without any more ado would go and do their Duty Another that spoke to me in answer was one that hath been before you and hath rereived his Sentence but is not dead and I desire I may not name his Name his answer was to what I have said That some Men were either Scepticks or Infidels After this I did go into the Speaker's Chamber and there I did ease my mind and heart with tears God only knows I have an unhappy memory I have slipt many thinâ—s Lord Chief Baron Remember your self by Papers if you have any no man will hinder you Downes I have no papers but my Lord for the truth of this I have said there are some witnesses that will make the substance the effect of this appear Lord Chief Baron Mr. Downes there is one particular before you come to the witnesses that after all these Convictions you signed the Warrant you deny it the Council will prove it Downes I did never hope or think that any thing I can say should be so satisfactory to you but things might be retorted upon me and perhaps what I thought might be for extenuating my Crime my fall out to my disadvantage I understand you do proceed upon three particulars either signing the first Warrant for constituting the Court To my remembrance I know not of it if my hand was to it I have forgot Counsel Your hand is not to that but we mean your hand is to the Warrant for execution pray shew it him It was shewn him Downes My Lord